Expanding factors in threat to face

MyBook is a cheap paperback edition of the original book and will be sold at uniform, low price.

Buy this article

Price: £15.00+Taxes
Add to favourites

Assessing the toughness/equivocation connection in Japanese televised political interviews

The full text of this article is not currently available.

Data & Media loading...


Full text loading...


Bavelas, Janet Beavin , Alex Black , Nicole Chovil , and Jennifer Mullett
1990Equivocal Communication. Newbury Park: Sage.
Brown, Penelope and Stephen C. Levinson
1978 “Universals in Language Usage: Politeness Phenomena.” InQuestions and Politeness, ed. by Ester N. Goody , 56–311. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
1987Politeness: Some Universals in Language Use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bull, Peter
1994 “On Identifying Questions, Replies and Non-Replies in Political Interview.” Journal of Language and Social Psychology13: 115–131. doi: 10.1177/0261927X94132002
Bull, Peter and Ofer Feldman
2011 “Invitations to Affiliative Audience Responses in Japanese Political Speeches.” Journal of Language and Social Psychology30: 158–176. doi: 10.1177/0261927X10397151
Bull, Peter and Pam Wells
2012 “Adversarial Discourse in Prime Minister’s Questions.” Journal of Language and Social Psychology31: 30–48. doi: 10.1177/0261927X11425034
Bull, P. E. , Judy Elliott , Derrol Palmer , and Libby Walker
1996 “Why Politicians are Three-Faced: The Face Model of Political Interviews.” British Journal of Social Psychology35: 267–284. doi: 10.1111/j.2044‑8309.1996.tb01097.x
Cohen, Jacob
1960 “A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales.” Educational and Psychological Measurement20: 37–46. doi: 10.1177/001316446002000104
Feldman, Ofer
1998 “The Political Language of Japan: Decoding What Politicians Mean from What They Say.” InPolitically Speaking: A Worldwide Examination of Language Used in the Public Sphere, ed. by Ofer Feldman and Christ’l De Landtsheer , 43–55. Westport, Conn: Praeger.
2004Talking Politics in Japan Today. Brighton, UK: Sussex Academic Press.
Feldman, Ofer and Peter Bull
2012 “Understanding Audience Affiliation in Response to Political Speeches in Japan. Language and Dialogue3: 375–397. doi: 10.1075/ld.2.3.04fel
Feldman, Ofer and Ken Kinoshita
2017 “Do Important Questions Demand Respectful Replies? Analyzing Televised Political Interviews in Japan.” Journal of Asian Pacific Communication27: 121–157. doi: 10.1075/japc.27.1.07fel
Feldman, Ofer , Ken Kinoshita , and Peter Bull
2015 “Culture or Communicative Conflict? The Analysis of Equivocation in Broadcast Japanese Political Interviews.” Journal of Language & Social Psychology34: 65–89. doi: 10.1177/0261927X14557567
2016 “‘Ducking and Diving:’ How Political Issues Affect Equivocation in Japanese Political Interviews.” Japanese Journal of Political Science17: 141–167. doi:
Goffman, Erving
1955/1967 “On Face-Work: An Analysis of Ritual Elements in Social Interaction.” Psychiatry18: 213–231. doi: 10.1080/00332747.1955.11023008
1959/1990The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. London: Harmondsworth. (Reprinted, London: Penguin Books 1990).
1967 “Where the Action Is.” InInteraction Ritual: Essays on Face to Face Behaviour, ed. by Erving Goffman , 149–270. Garden City, New York: Anchor.
Haugh, Michael
2007 “Emic Conceptualizations of (Im)politeness and Face in Japanese: Implications for the Discursive Negotiation of Second Language Learner Identities.” Journal of Pragmatics39: 657–680. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2006.12.005
Hirokawa, Randy Y.
1987 “Communication Within the Japanese Business Organization.” InCommunication Theory From Eastern and Western Perspectives, ed. by D. Lawrence Kincaid , 137–149. New York: Academic Press.
Holtgraves, Thomas M.
2002Language as Social Action: Social Psychology and Language Use. Mahwah, N.J.: Erlbaum.
Jucker, Andreas
1986News Interviews: A Pragmalinguistic Analysis. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/pb.vii.4
Nakatsugawa, Satomi and Jiro Takai
2013 “Keeping Conflicts Latent: «Salient» versus «Non-Salient» Interpersonal Conflict Management Strategies of Japanese.” Intercultural Communication Studies22: 43–60.
Weigand, Edda
2010Dialogue: The Mixed Game. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/ds.10
2016 “How to Verify a Theory.” Language and Dialogue6: 349–369. doi: 10.1075/ld.6.3.01wei
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address