Lenguas de signos y educación en España

References

1. Alonso, P. , Martínez, F. , Nogueira, R. , Pinto, J. , Serna, Mª , Valdemoro, L. , y Vázquez A
   (2006) Signar (2ª edición). Madrid: Confederación Estatal de Sordos de España.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Batterbury, S.C.E
   (2012) Language justice for sign language peoples: The UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities”. Language Policy, 11, 253–272. doi: 10.1007/s10993‑012‑9245‑8
   https://doi.org/10.1007/s10993-012-9245-8 [Google Scholar]
3. Brentari, D
   (Ed.) (2010) Sign languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511712203
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511712203 [Google Scholar]
4. Cabeza-Pereiro, C. & Iglesias-Lago, S
   (2015) Spanish Sign Language (LSE). In J. Jepson Bakken , G. de Clerk , S. Lutalo-Kïngi and W. B. McGregor (eds.), Sign languages of the world (pp.729–769). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter / Ishara Press.
   [Google Scholar]
5. CNLSE
   (2014) La lengua de signos española hoy. Madrid: Real Patronato sobre Discapacidad.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Covington, V
   (1976) Problems for a sign language planning agency. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 11, 85–106.
   [Google Scholar]
7. De Meulder, M
   (2015) The legal recognition of sign languages. Sign Language Studies, 15(4), 498–506. doi: 10.1353/sls.2015.0018
   https://doi.org/10.1353/sls.2015.0018 [Google Scholar]
8. Deumert, A
   (2000) The sociolinguistics of sign language. R. Mesthrie , J. Swann , A. Deumert and W. Leap (Eds.), Introducing sociolinguistics (pp. 407–439). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Erting, C
   (1978) Language policy and deaf ethnicity in the United States. Sign Language Studies, 19, 139–152. doi: 10.1353/sls.1978.0000
   https://doi.org/10.1353/sls.1978.0000 [Google Scholar]
10. Esteban, Mª L
    . (Dir) (2003) Libro blanco de la lengua de signos española en el sistema educativo. Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia / Confederación Estatal de Sordos de España.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Ferreiro Lago, E. , & Aroca Fernández, E
    (2008) Cambio cultural, normalización lingüística de la lengua de signos española. Antonio Moreno Sandoval , ed.Actas del VIII Congreso de Lingüística General. 690–700.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Fishman, J.A
    (1991): Reversing language shift. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Fundación Confederación Estatal de Sordos de España
    (2008) DILSE: Diccionario normativo de la lengua de signos española. Madrid: Fundación Confederación Estatal de Sordos de España [DVD].
    [Google Scholar]
14. Gil Sabroso, M.ª E
    (2015) Presencia de la lengua de signos española en la televisión. Madrid: CNLSE.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Gras, V
    (2004) Language census of sign-language users in Spain: Attitudes in a changing language community. In M. Van Herreweghe and M. Vermeerbergen (Eds.), To the lexicon and beyond: Sociolinguistics in European deaf communities (pp. 211–247). Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Gras, V
    (2006)  La comunidad sorda como comunidad lingüística: panorama sociolingüístico de la/s lengua/s de signos de España . Ph.D. dissertation, Universidade da Coruña.
17. Herrero Blanco, Á
    (2009) Gramática didáctica de la lengua de signos española (LSE). Madrid: Fundación Confederación Estatal de Sordos de España / SM.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Hult, F. , & Compton, S
    (2012) Deaf education policy as language policy: A comparative analysis of Sweden and the United States. Sign Language Studies, 12, 602–620. doi: 10.1353/sls.2012.0014
    https://doi.org/10.1353/sls.2012.0014 [Google Scholar]
19. Jarque, M-J
    (2012) Las lenguas de signos: Su estudio científico y reconocimiento legal. Anuari de Filología. Estudis de lingüística, 2, 33–48.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Joquinen, M
    (2000) The linguistic human rights of sign language users. In R. Phillipson (Ed.), Rights to language: Equity, power and education (pp. 203–213). Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Kaplan, R. , & Baldauf, R
    (1997) Language planning: From practice to theory. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Krausneker, V
    (2015) Ideologies and attitudes toward sign languages: An approximation. Sign Language Studies, 15(4), 411–431. doi: 10.1353/sls.2015.0014
    https://doi.org/10.1353/sls.2015.0014 [Google Scholar]
23. Kusters, Annalies , De Meulder, Marrtje , Friedner, Michele and Emery, Steve
    (2015) On ‘diversity’ and ‘inclusion’: Exploring paradigms for achieving Sign Language Peoples rights. MMG Working Paper 15-02. Göttingen: Max-Planck-Institute for the Study of Religious and Ethnic Diversity.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Lane, H
    (1984) When the mind hears: A history of the Deaf. New York: Random House.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Matlosa, L
    (2010) Language policy and literacy among deaf people in Lesotho. South African Journal of African Languages, 30(1), 72–78.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Morales López, E. , Aliaga, D. , Alonso, J. , Boldú, R. , Garrusta, J. , & Gras, V
    (2002) Deaf people in bilingual speaking communities: The case of deaf people in Barcelona. In C. Lucas (Ed.), Turn-taking, fingerspelling, and contact in signed languages (pp. 107–155). Washington DC: Gallaudet University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Morales López, E
    (2008) Sign bilingualism in Spanish deaf education. In C. Plaza-Pust and E. Morales-López (Eds.), Sign bilingualism: Language development, interaction, and maintenance in sign language contact situations (pp. 223–276). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/sibil.38.11mor
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.38.11mor [Google Scholar]
28. Moreno Fernández, F. , & Ramallo, F
    (2013) Las lenguas de España a debate. Valencia: Uno y Cero Ediciones.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Murray, J.J
    (ed.) (2015) Language planning and sign language rights. Número monográfico de Sign Language Studies, 15(4).
    [Google Scholar]
30. Nosiphiwo Ganiso, M
    (2012)  Sign language in South Africa: Language planning and policy challenges . M.D. thesis, Rhodes University.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Padden, C. , & Rayman, J
    (2002) Concluding thoughts: The future of American Sign Language. In D. Armstrong , M. Karchmer , and J. Vickrey Van Cleve (Eds.), The study of signed languages (pp. 247–261). Washington DC: Gallaudet University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Pérez Martín, M. , Valmaseda Balanzategui, M. , & Morgan, G
    (2014) Sign bilingual and co-enrollment education for children with cochlear implants in Madrid. In M. Marschark , G. Tang and H. Knoors (Eds.), Bilingualism and bilingual deaf education (pp. 368–394). Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199371815.003.0015
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199371815.003.0015 [Google Scholar]
33. Pizer, G
    (2013) Bimodal bilingual families: The negotiation of communication practices between deaf parents and their hearing children. In M. Schwartz and A. Verschik (Eds.), Successful family language policy: Parents, children and educators in interaction (pp. 203–222). Dordrecht: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978‑94‑007‑7753‑8_9
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7753-8_9 [Google Scholar]
34. Plann, S
    (1997) A silent minority: Deaf education in Spain. Berkeley: University of California Press. [Traducción al español: Una minoría silenciosa. Madrid: Fundación Confederación Estatal de Sordos de España, 2004.]
    [Google Scholar]
35. Potowski, K
    (2013) Language maintenance and shift. In R. Bayley , R. Cameron , and C. Lucas (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of sociolinguistics (pp. 321–339). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Quer, J. , & de Quadros, R
    (Ed.) (2012) Language planning and policies for sign languages: Special issue of Sign Languages Studies, 12(4).
    [Google Scholar]
37. Ramsey, C
    (1989) Language planning in deaf education. In C. Lucas (Ed.), The sociolinguistic of the deaf community (pp. 123–146). San Diego: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Reagan, T
    (2001) Language planning and language policy. In C. Lucas (Ed.), The sociolinguistics of sign languages (pp. 145–180). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511612824.008
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511612824.008 [Google Scholar]
39. Reagan, T
    (2006) Language policy and sign languages. In T. Ricento (Ed.), An introduction to language policy: Theory and method (pp. 329–345). Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Reagan, T
    (2007) Language-in-education policy in South Africa: The challenge of sign language. Africa Education Review, 4(2), 26–41. doi: 10.1080/18146620701652663
    https://doi.org/10.1080/18146620701652663 [Google Scholar]
41. Reagan, T
    (2010) Language policy and planning for sign languages. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Reagan, T. , Penn, C. , & Ogilvy, D
    (2006) From policy to practice: Sign language development in post-apartheid South Africa. Language Policy, 5, 187–208. doi: 10.1007/s10993‑006‑9002‑y
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10993-006-9002-y [Google Scholar]
43. Schermer, T
    (2012) Language planning. In R. Pfau , M. Steinbach and B. Woll (Eds.), Sign language. An international handbook (pp. 889–908). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Schwartz, M. , & Verschik, A
    (Ed.) (2013) Successful family language policy: Parents, children and educators in interaction. Dordrecht: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978‑94‑007‑7753‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7753-8 [Google Scholar]
45. Skutnabb-Kangas, T
    (2000) Linguistic genocide in education – or worldwide diversity and human rights?Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Smith-Christmas, C
    (2016) Family language policy. Maintaining an endangered language in the home. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Spolsky, B
    (2004) Language policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Timmermans, N
    (2005) The status of sign languages in Europe. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.
    [Google Scholar]
49. UNESCO Ad Hoc Expert Group on Endangered Languages
    (2003) Language vitality and endangerment: by way of introduction. Paris: UNESCO.
    [Google Scholar]