@article{jbp:/content/journals/10.1075/ltba.39.1.01kon, author = "Konnerth, Linda", title = "The Proto-Tibeto-Burman *gV- nominalizing prefix", journal= "Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area", year = "2016", volume = "39", number = "1", pages = "3-32", doi = "https://doi.org/10.1075/ltba.39.1.01kon", url = "https://www.jbe-platform.com/content/journals/10.1075/ltba.39.1.01kon", publisher = "John Benjamins", issn = "0731-3500", type = "Journal Article", keywords = "morphological reconstruction", keywords = "Historical linguistics", keywords = "nominalization", keywords = "diachronic nominalization", keywords = "Proto-Tibeto-Burman", abstract = "Matisoff (2003) reconstructs an “adjectival prefix” *gV-, based on work by Wolfenden (1929). As a result of surveying grammatical descriptions of more than 90 Tibeto-Burman languages, the present study provides evidence to reconstruct Matisoff’s adjectival prefix as a nominalizer whose functional range includes (but is not limited to) the adjectival marking. Evidence for the prefix is found in three major genetic subdivisions. Within Bradley’s (2002) Western branch, Baram (Newaric) has a particularly versatile nominalizer ki-~gi-, and Eastern Kiranti languages have *gV-…-pa nominalizing circumfixes. In Bradley’s Eastern branch, rGyalrongic languages have velar prefixes that function as the main nominalizers. Further, in DeLancey’s (2015) Central branch of Trans-Himalayan (Sino-Tibetan), we find reflexes of *gV- in many languages, most notably the versatile nominalizer kV- in Lamkang (Northwest Kuki-Chin). Other languages of the India-Myanmar border with unresolved phylogenetic status within Tibeto-Burman also have reflexes of *gV-, most prominently Karbi and Tangkhul (Konnerth 2012).", }