The dual role of homophone dominance. Why homophone intrusions on regular verb forms so often go unnoticed

MyBook is a cheap paperback edition of the original book and will be sold at uniform, low price.

Buy this article

Price: £15.00+Taxes
Add to favourites

The full text of this article is not currently available.

Data & Media loading...


Full text loading...


Baayen, H. , Piepenbrock, R. , & Van Rijn, H
(1995) The CELEX lexical database(CD-ROM). Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania, Linguistic Data Consortium.
Chomsky, N
(1965) Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Daelemans, W. , & Van den Bosch, A
(2005) Memory-based language processing. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511486579
Dijkhuizen, E
(2016) Het effect van homofoondominantie op het leesgedrag van lexical en sublexicale homofoonintrusies. (The effect of homophone dominance on the reading of lexical and sublexical homophone intrusions) Unpublished Master’s thesis, Antwerp University.
Ernestus, M. , & Baayen, R.H.
(2004) Analogical effects in regular past tense production in Dutch. Linguistics, 42(5), 873–903. doi: 10.1515/ling.2004.031
Ernestus, M. , & Mak, W.M.
(2005) Analogical effects in reading Dutch verb forms. Memory and Cognition, 33(7), 1160–1173. doi: 10.3758/BF03193220
Keuleers, E. , Brysbaert, M. , & New, B
(2010) SUBTLEX-NL: A new frequency measure for Dutch words based on film subtitles. Behavior Research Methods, 42(3), 643–650. doi: 10.3758/BRM.42.3.643
Keuleers, E. , Sandra, D. , Daelemans, W. , Gillis, S. , Durieux, G. , & Martens, E
(2007) Dutch plural inflection: The exception that proves the analogy. Cognitive Psychology, 54(4), 283–318. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2006.07.002
Krott, A. , Baayen, R.H. , & Schreuder, R
(2001) Analogy in morphology: Modeling the choice of linking morphemes in Dutch. Linguistics, 39(1), 51–93. doi: 10.1515/ling.2001.008
Largy, P. , Fayol, M. , & Lemaire, P
(1996) The homophone effect in written French: The case of verb-noun inflection errors. Language and Cognitive Processes, 11, 217–255. doi: 10.1080/016909696387178
Longtin, C.-M. , Segui, J. , & Hallé, P.A
(2003) Morphological priming without morphological relationship. Language and Cognitive Processes, 18(3), 313–334. doi: 10.1080/01690960244000036
McClelland, J.L. , & Rumelhart, D.E
(1981) An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 1. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88(5), 375–407. doi: 10.1037/0033‑295X.88.5.375
McCormick, S.F. , Brysbaert, M. & Rastle, K
(2009) Is morphological decomposition limited to low-frequency words?The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62(9), 1706–1715. doi: 10.1080/17470210902849991
Pinker, S
(1999) Words and rules: The ingredients of language. New York: Harper Perennial.
Rastle, K. , Davis, M.H. , & New, B
(2004) The broth in my brother’s brothel: Morpho-orthographic segmentation in visual word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11(6), 1090–1098. doi: 10.3758/BF03196742
Sandra, D
(2010) Homophone dominance at the whole-word and sub-word levels: Spelling errors suggest full-form storage of regularly inflected verb forms. Language and speech, 53(3), 405–444. doi: 10.1177/0023830910371459
. (in preparation). Spellingfouten tegen de werkwoordvormen verklaard: de frequentieverdeling van Nederlandse werkwoordvormen over homofone en niet-homofone vormen. ( Explaining spelling errors on verb forms: the frequency distribution of Dutch verb forms over homophonous and non-homophonous forms ).
Sandra, D. , & Fayol, M
(2003) Spelling errors with a view on the mental lexicon: Frequency and proximity effects in misspelling homophonous regular verb forms in Dutch and French. In R.H. Baayen & R. Schreuder (Eds.), Morphological structure in language processing. Trends in Linguistics, Studies and Monographs 151. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Sandra, D. , Frisson, S. , & Daems, F
(1999) Why simple verb forms can be so difficult to spell: the influence of homophone frequency and distance in Dutch. Brain and language, 68, 277–283. doi: 10.1006/brln.1999.2108
(2004) Still errors after all those years… Limited attentional resources and homophone frequency account for spelling errors on silent verb suffixes in Dutch. Written Language and Literacy, 7, 61–77. doi: 10.1075/wll.7.1.07san
Sandra, D. , & van Abbenyen, L
(2009) Frequency and analogical effects in the spelling of full-form and sublexical homophonous patterns by 12 year-old children. Mental lexicon, 4(2), 239–274. doi: 10.1075/ml.4.2.04san
Schreuder, R. , & Baayen, R.H.
(1995) Modeling morphological processing. In L.B. Feldman (Ed.), Morphological aspects of language processing. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
Vandekerckhove, B. , Sandra, D. , & Daelemans, W
(2013) Selective impairment of adjective order constraints as overeager abstraction: An elaboration on Kemmerer et al. (2009). Journal of neurolinguistics, 26(1), 46–72. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2012.04.001
Vandekerckhove, R. , & Nobels, J
(2010) Code eclecticism: Linguistic variation and code alternation in the chat language of Flemish teenagers. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 14, 657–677. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑9841.2010.00458.x
Verhaert, N
(2016) Rules or regularities? The homophone dominance effect in spelling and reading regular Dutch verb forms. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Antwerp University.
Verhaert, N. , & Sandra, D
. (in preparation). The effect of homophone dominance plagues readers as well as spellers: Homophone intrusions on Dutch regular verb forms in speeded reading tasks.
Verhaert, N. , Vandekerckhove, B. , Daelemans, W. , & Sandra, D
. (submitted). Homophone Dominance and neighbor effects when spelling Dutch verb inflections.
White, K.K. , Abrams, L. , & Zoller, S.M.
(2013) Perception-production asymmetries in homophone spelling: the unique influence of aging. Journals of Gerontology, Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 68(5), 681–690. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbs099
White, K.K. , Abrams, L. , Zoller, S.M. , & Gibson, S.M.
(2008) Why did I right that? Factors that influence the production of homophonous substitution errors. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 977–985. doi: 10.1080/17470210801943978
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address