Visit www.benjamins.com

Propositional attitudes towards presuppositions

MyBook is a cheap paperback edition of the original book and will be sold at uniform, low price.

Buy this article

Price: £15.00+Taxes
Add to favourites

An experimental approach

The full text of this article is not currently available.
/content/journals/10.1075/pc.22.3.01dom
dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
6
3
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/pc.22.3.01dom
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Loading

Full text loading...

References

Camp, C.J. , Lachman, J.L. , & Lachman, R
(1980) Evidence for direct-access and inferential retrieval in question-answering. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 19(5), 583–596. doi: 10.1016/S0022‑5371(80)90639‑8
Chemla, E
(2009a) Universal implicatures and free choice effects: Experimental data. Semantics & Pragmatics, 2(2), 1–33. doi: 10.3765/sp.2.2
(2009b) Presuppositions of quantified sentences: Experimental data. Natural Language Semantics, 17(4), 299–340. doi: 10.1007/s11050‑009‑9043‑9
Chemla, E. , & Spector, B
(2011) Experimental evidence for embedded scalar implicatures. Journal of Semantics, 28(3), 359–400. doi: 10.1093/jos/ffq023
Chemla, E. , Homer, V. , & Rothschild, D
(2011) Modularity and intuitions in formal semantics: The case of polarity items. Linguistics and Philosophy (in press).
Collins, A.M. , & Loftus, E.F
(1975) A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing. Psychological Review, 82(6), 407–428. doi: 10.1037/0033‑295X.82.6.407
Domaneschi F
(2011) “Towards a normative epistemic account of presuppositions”. in Journal of Pragmatics, 43, 15, pp.3822–3831 2011 DOI: 10.1016/j.pragma.2011.09.011
(2016b), “Introduction: Presuppositions Philosophy, Linguistics and Psychology”, Topoi, 35:5–8. doi: 10.1007/s11245‑014‑9297‑91
Domaneschi F , Carrea E , Penco C and Greco A
(2016a) Selecting Presuppositions in Conditional Clauses. Results from a Psycholinguistic Experiment. Front. Psychol. 6:2026. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.02026
Domaneschi, F. , Carrea, E. , Penco, C. , & Greco, A
(2014) “The cognitive load of presupposition triggers. Mandatory and optional repairs in presupposition failure. Language and Cognitive Processes, 29(1). doi: 10.1080/01690965.2013.830185.
Gauker, C
(1998) What is a context of utterance?. Philosophical Studies, 91, 149–172. doi: 10.1023/A:1004247202476
(2002) Words Without Meaning. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Glanzberg, M
(2003) Felicity and presupposition triggers. Paper presented at the University of Michigan Workshop in Philosophy and Linguistics , Michigan, USA.
Kahneman, D
(2003) A perspective on judgment and choice: Mapping bounded rationality. American Psychologist58(9): 697–720. doi: 10.1037/0003‑066X.58.9.697
Johnson-Laird, P.N
(1983) Mental Models: Towards a Cognitive Science of Language, Inference, and Consciousness. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Levinson, S.C
(1983) Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Norman, D.A. , & Rumelhart, D.E
(1975) Explorations in Cognition. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman.
Russell, Bertrand
(1918), “The Philosophy of Logical Atomism”, The Monist, 1918. Reprinted, pp. 177–281 in Logic and Knowledge: Essays 1901–1950, Robert Charles Marsh (ed.), Unwin Hyman, London, UK, 1956. Reprinted, pp. 35–155 in The Philosophy of Logical Atomism, David Pears (ed.), Open Court, La Salle, IL, 1985.
Stalnaker, R
(2002) Common ground. Linguistics and Philosophy, 25(5-6), 701–721. doi: 10.1023/A:1020867916902
(2009) A response to Abbott on presupposition and common ground. Linguistics and Philosophy, 31, 539–544. doi: 10.1007/s10988‑008‑9047‑9
Schwarz, F
(2007) Processing presupposed content. Journal of Semantics, 24, 373–416. doi: 10.1093/jos/ffm011
Tiemann, S. , & Schmid, M . et al
(2011) Psycholinguistic evidence for presuppositions: On-line and off-line data. In I. Reich et al (Eds.), Proceedings of Sinn & Bedeutung15: 581–595.
http://jbenjamins.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/pc.22.3.01dom
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address