Visit www.benjamins.com

Beyond compare

MyBook is a cheap paperback edition of the original book and will be sold at uniform, low price.

Buy this article

Price: £15.00+Taxes
Add to favourites

Similes in interaction

The full text of this article is not currently available.
/content/journals/10.1075/rcl.13.1.06cue
dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
6
3
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/rcl.13.1.06cue
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Loading

Full text loading...

References

Addison, C
(1993) From literal to figurative: An introduction to the study of simile. College English, 55(4), 402–419. doi: 10.2307/378650
Aisenman, R.A
(1999) Structure mapping and simile-metaphor preference. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 14(1), 45–51. doi: 10.1207/s15327868ms1401_5
Bernárdez, E
(2009) Comparaciones explícitas con wie en Der Mann ohne Eigenschaften, de Robert Musil: Una aproximación cognitiva. Revista de Filología Alemana, anejo I, 57–72. Available at: revistas.ucm.es/index.php/RFAL/article/view/RFAL0909220057A. Access: 2. 7.2012.
Black, M
(1979) More about metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp. 19–43). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Bowdle, B.F. , & Gentner, D
(2005) The career of metaphor. Psychological Review,112(1), 193–216. doi: 10.1037/0033‑295X.112.1.193
Bredin, H
(1998) Comparisons and similes. Lingua, 105, 67–78. doi: 10.1016/S0024‑3841(97)00030‑2
Chiappe, D. , & Kennedy, J
(2000) Are metaphors elliptical similes?Journal of Pshycholinguistic Research,29(4), 371–398. doi: 10.1023/A:1005103211670
(2001) Literal bases for metaphor and simile. Metaphor and Symbol,16, 249–276. doi: 10.1080/10926488.2001.9678897
Chiappe, D. , Kennedy, J. , & Chiappe, P
(2003) Aptness is more important than comprehensibility in preference for metaphors and similes. Poetics,31, 51–68. doi: 10.1016/S0304‑422X(03)00003‑2
Coulson, S
(2001) Semantic leaps: Frame shifting and conceptual blending in meaning construction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511551352
Cuenca, M.J. , & Romano, M
(2013) Similes in interaction: Beyond (metaphor and) compare. Paper presented at the 12th International Cognitive Linguistics Conference , Edmonton (Canada), June, 23rd–28th, 2013.
Dancygier, B. , & Sweetser, E
(2014) Grammatical constructions and figurative meaning. InFigurative Language (pp. 127–161). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fillmore, C
(1988) Grammatical construction theory and the familiar dichotomies. In R. Dietrich & C.F. Graumann (Eds.), Language processing in social context (pp. 17–38). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Fromilhague, C
(1995) Les figures de style. Paris: Nathan.
Gentner, D
(1983) Structure-mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy. Cognitive Science, 7, 155– 170. doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog0702_3
(1989) The mechanisms of analogical learning. In S. Vosniadou & A. Ortony (Eds.), Similarity and analogical reasoning (pp. 199–241). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511529863.011
Gentner, D. , & Bowdle, B.F
(2001) Convention, form, and figurative language processing. Metaphor and Symbol, 16 (3/4), 223–247 doi: 10.1080/10926488.2001.9678896
Gentner, D. , & Markman, A.B
(1997) Structure mapping in analogy and similarity. American Psychologist, 52(1), 45–56. doi: 10.1037/0003‑066X.52.1.45
Glucksberg, S
(2001) Understanding figurative language: From metaphor to idioms. New York: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195111095.001.0001
Glucksberg, S. , & Haught, C
(2006) On the relation between metaphor and simile: When comparison fails. Mind & Language,21(3), 360–378. doi: 10.1111/j.1468‑0017.2006.00282.x
Glucksberg, S. , & Keysar, B
(1990) Understanding metaphorical comparisons: Beyond similarity. Psychological Review,97, 3–18. doi: 10.1037/0033‑295X.97.1.3
(1993) How metaphors work. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought, 2nd edition (pp. 401–424). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139173865.020
Israel, M. , Riddle Harding, J. , & Tobin, V
(2004) On simile. In M. Achard & S. Kemmer (Eds.)Language, culture, and mind (pp. 123–135). Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Moder, C.L
(2008) It’s like making a soup: metaphors and similes in spoken news discourse. In A. Tyler , Y. Kim , & A. Takada (Eds.). Language in the context of use: Discourse and cognitive approaches to language (pp. 301–320). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
(2010)  Two puzzle pieces: Fitting discourse context and constructions into cognitive metaphor theory. English Text Construction, 3(2), 294–320. doi: 10.1075/etc.3.2.09mod
(2012)  Two puzzle pieces: Fitting discourse context and constructions into cognitive metaphor theory. In B. Dancygier , J. Sanders , & L. Vandelanotte (Eds.)Textual choices in discourse: A view from Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 157–183). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/bct.40.09mod
Ortony, A
(Ed.) (1993) Metaphor and thought, 2nd edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139173865
Pierini, P
(2007) Simile in English: From description to translation. CÍRCULO de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación (clac), 29, 21–43. www.ucm.es/info/circulo/no29/pierini.pdf.
Romano, M
. (in progress). Are metaphor and similes interchangeable? A case study in opinion discourse.
Roncero, C. , Kennedy, J. , & Smyth, R
(2006) Similes on the Internet have Explanations. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,13(1), 74–77. Available at: www.utcs.utoronto.ca/~kennedy/Roncero-Kennedy-Smyth.pdf. doi: 10.3758/BF03193815
Sullivan, K
(2009) Grammatical constructions in metaphoric language. In B. Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk & K. Dziwirek (Eds.), Cognitive Corpus Linguistics (pp. 57–80). Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
(2013) Frames and constructions in metaphoric language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins doi: 10.1075/cal.14
Tversky, A
(1977) Features of similarity. Psychological Review, 84, 327–352. doi: 10.1037/0033‑295X.84.4.327
Utsumi, A
(2007) Interpretative diversity explains metaphor-simile distinction. Metaphor and Symbol, 22(4), 291–312. doi: 10.1080/10926480701528071
http://jbenjamins.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/rcl.13.1.06cue
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address