Visit www.benjamins.com

Visualization and conceptual metaphor as tools for the teaching of abstract motion in German

MyBook is a cheap paperback edition of the original book and will be sold at uniform, low price.

Buy this article

Price: £15.00+Taxes
Add to favourites

The full text of this article is not currently available.
/content/journals/10.1075/rcl.13.1.07kno
dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
6
3
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/rcl.13.1.07kno
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Loading

Full text loading...

References

Aldenhoff, J
(1994) Allemand: Grammaire progressive avec exercices. Bruxelles: De Boeck.
Bamberg, M
(2005) The role of language in the construction of emotions. Palmerston North, New Zealand: Dept of Psychology, Massey University, New Zealand.
Barcelona, A. , & Ruiz de Mendoza, F.J
(Eds.) (2011) Bibliography of metaphor and metonymy. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
(Eds.) (2014) Bibliography of metaphor and metonymy. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Bellavia, E
(1996) The German ‘über’. In M. Pütz & R. Dirven (Eds.), The construal of space in language and thought (pp. 73–107). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110821611.73
(2007) Erfahrung, Imagination und Sprache: Die Bedeutung der Metaphern der Alltagsprache für das Fremdsprachenlernen am Beispiel der deutschen Präpositionen. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.
Beréndi, M. , Csábi, S. , & Kövecses, Z
(2007) Using conceptual metaphors and metonymies in vocabulary teaching. In F. Boers & S. Lindstromberg (Eds.), Not so arbitrary: Cognitive linguistic approaches to teaching vocabulary and phraseology (pp. 65–100). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Boers, F
(2003) Applied linguistics perspectives on cross-cultural variation in conceptual metaphor. Metaphor and Symbol,18(4), 231–238. doi: 10.1207/S15327868MS1804_1
(2011) Cognitive semantic ways of teaching figurative phrases. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 9(1), 227–261. doi: 10.1075/rcl.9.1.11boe
(2013) Cognitive linguistic approaches to second language vocabulary: Assessment and integration. Language Teaching: Surveys and Studies, 46(2), 208–224. doi: 10.1017/S0261444811000450
Boers, F. , Deconinck, J. , & Lindstromberg, S
(2010) Choosing motivated chunks for teaching. In S. De Knop , F. Boers , & A. De Rycker (Eds.), Fostering language teaching efficiency through Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 239–256). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110245837
Boers, F. , & Demecheleer, M
(1998) A cognitive semantic approach to teaching prepositions. English Language Teaching Journal,53, 197–204. doi: 10.1093/elt/52.3.197
Boers, F. , & Lindstromberg, S
(Eds.) (2008) Cognitive approaches to teaching vocabulary. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Bouillon, H
(2001) Grammaire pratique de l’allemand. Brussels: De Boeck.
Brüning, L. , & Saum, T
(2007) Erfolgreich unterrichten durch Visualisieren. Grafisches Strukturieren mit Strategien des kooperativen Lernens. Essen, Germany: Neue Deutsche Schule Verlagsgesellschaft.
Buchowski, M
(1996) Metaphor, metonymy, and cross-cultural translation. Semiotica, 110(3–4), 301–310. doi: 10.1515/semi.1996.110.3‑4.301
Cameron, L
(Ed.) (2003) Metaphor in educational discourse. London: Continuum.
Carroll, M
(1997) Changing place in English and German: Language-specific preferences in the conceptualization of spatial relations. In J. Nuyts & E. Pederson (Eds.), Language and conceptualization (pp. 137–161). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139086677.006
Cienki, A. , & Müller, C
(Eds.) (2008) Metaphor and gesture. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/gs.3
Cortazzi M. , & Jin, L
(1999) Bridges to learning: Metaphors of teaching, learning and language. In L. Cameron & G. Low (Eds.), Researching and applying metaphor (pp. 149–176). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139524704.011
Danesi, M
(2007) A conceptual metaphor framework for the teaching of mathematics. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 26(3), 225–236. doi: 10.1007/s11217‑007‑9035‑5
(2008) Conceptual errors in second-language learning. In S. De Knop & T. De Rycker (Eds.), Cognitive approaches to pedagogical grammar: A volume in honour of René Dirven (pp. 223–248). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Deignan, A. , Gabrys, D. , & Solska, A
(1997) Teaching English metaphors using cross-linguistic awareness-raising activities. English Language Teaching Journal,51(4), 352–360. doi: 10.1093/elt/51.4.352
De Knop, S. , Dirven, R. , & Smieja, B
(Eds.) (2008) Bibliography of metaphor and metonymy (METBIB): The interdisciplinary resource on figurative language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
De Knop, S. , Boers, F. , & De Rycker, A
(Eds.) (2010) Fostering language teaching efficiency through Cognitive Linguistics. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110245837
Di Meola, C
(1998) Semantisch relevante und semantisch irrelevante Kasusalternation am Beispiel von ‘entlang.’Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft,26, 204–235.
Draye, L
(1996) The German dative. In W. Van Belle & W. Van Langendonck (Eds.), The dative: Descriptive studies (pp. 155–215). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/cagral.2.09dra
Evans, V. , & Tyler, A
(2005) Applying cognitive linguistics to pedagogical grammar: The English prepositions of verticality. Revista Brasileira de Lingüistica Aplicada,5(2), 11–42. doi: 10.1590/S1984‑63982005000200002
Gibbs, R.W
(1990) Psycholinguistic studies on the conceptual basis of idiomaticity. Cognitive Linguistics, 1, 417–451. doi: 10.1515/cogl.1990.1.4.417
(Ed.) (2008a) Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511816802
(2008b) Metaphor and gesture: Some implications for psychology. In A. Cienki & C. Müller (Eds.), Metaphor and gesture (pp. 291–301). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1558/lhs.v4i3.321
Gibbs, R.W. , & Perlman, M
(2006) The contested impact of cognitive linguistics research on the psycholinguistics of metaphor understanding. In G. Kristiansen , M. Achard , R. Dirven , & F.J. Ruiz de Mendoza (Eds.), Cognitive Linguistics: Current applications, future orientations (pp. 211–228). Berlin; New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Glucksberg, S
(1998) Understanding metaphors. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 7, 39–43. doi: 10.1111/1467‑8721.ep13175582
(2003) The psycholinguistics of metaphor. Trends in Cognitive Science,7, 92–96. doi: 10.1016/S1364‑6613(02)00040‑2
Godfroid, A. , Boers, F. , & Housen, A
(2013) An eye for words: Gauging the role of attention in L2 vocabulary acquisition by means of eye-tracking. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35(3), 483–517. doi: 10.1017/S0272263113000119
Holme, R
(2003) Mind, metaphor and language teaching. Basingstoke, U.K.: Palgrave Macmillan. doi: 10.1057/9780230503007
(2009) Cognitive Linguistics and language teaching. Basingstoke, U.K.: Palgrave Macmillan. doi: 10.1057/9780230233676
Huette, S. , Winter, B. , Matlock, T. , & Spivey, M
(2012) Processing motion implied in language: Eye-movement differences during aspect comprehension. Cognitive Processing, 13, 193–197. doi: 10.1007/s10339‑012‑0476‑6
Johnson, M
(2007) The meaning of the body: Aesthetics of human understanding. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. doi: 10.7208/chicago/9780226026992.001.0001
Juchem, C
(2006) Let’s save time: Raising metaphor awareness in German business English course. LAUD A663, 1–22. Essen: Universität Duisburg-Essen.
Jüttner, M
(2003) Visuelles Lernen. Oberhaching/Munich: Dustri.
Katz, A.N
(1996) Experimental psycholinguistics and figurative language: Circa 1995. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity,11(1), 17–37. doi: 10.1207/s15327868ms1101_2
Kopecka, A
(2006) The semantic structure of motion verbs in French: Typological perspectives. In M. Hickmann & S. Robert (Eds.), Space in languages: Linguistic systems and cognitive categories (pp. 83–101). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/tsl.66.06kop
Lakoff, G. , & Johnson, M
(1980) Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Langacker, R.W
(1987) Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Vol. 1. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Lemmens, M. , & Perrez, J
(2010) On the use of posture verbs by French-speaking learners of Dutch: A corpus-based study. Cognitive Linguistics,21(2), 315–347. doi: 10.1515/COGL.2010.012
Leys, O
(1989) Aspekt und Rektion räumlicher Präpositionen. Deutsche Sprache, 17, 97–113.
(1995) Dativ und Akkusativ in der deutschen Sprache der Gegenwart. Leuvense Bij-dragen,84: 39–62.
Littlemore, J
(2009) Applying Cognitive Linguistics to second language learning and teaching. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. doi: 10.1057/9780230245259
(2010) Metaphoric competence in the first and second language: Similarities and differences. In M. Pütz & L. Sicola (Eds.), Cognitive processing in second language acquisition (pp. 293–315). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/celcr.13.20lit
Littlemore, J. , & Low, G
(2006) Figurative thinking and foreign language learning. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. doi: 10.1057/9780230627567
Low, G
(2003) Validating metaphoric models in applied linguistics. Metaphor and Symbol,18(4), 239–254. doi: 10.1207/S15327868MS1804_2
MacArthur, F
(2010) Metaphorical competence in EFL: Where we are and where we should be going? A view from the classroom. AILA Review, 23, 155–173. doi: 10.1075/aila.23.09mac
MacLennan, C
(1994) Metaphors and prototypes in the learning and teaching of grammar and vocabulary. International Review of Applied Linguistics,32(1), 97–110. doi: 10.1515/iral.1994.32.2.97
Matlock, T
(2004a) The conceptual motivation of fictive motion. In G. Radden & K.-U. Panther (Eds.), Studies in linguistic motivation (pp. 221–248). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
(2004b) Fictive motion as cognitive simulation. Memory and Cognition, 32(8), 1389–1400. doi: 10.3758/BF03206329
Meex, B
(2002) Die Wegpräposition ‘über’. In H. Cuyckens & G. Radden (Eds.), Perspectives on prepositions (pp. 157–176). Tübingen: Max Niemeyer. doi: 10.1515/9783110924787.157
(2004) Motion, path, and aspect. The case of the German path adpositions über and durch . Belgian Journal of Linguistics, 18, 299–322. doi: 10.1075/bjl.18.15mee
Meex, B. , & Mortelmans, T
(2002) Grammatik und Kognition. Germanistische Mitteilungen,56, 48–66.
Newmark, P
(1985) The translation of metaphor. In W. Paprotté & R. Dirven (Eds.), The ubiquity of metaphor: Metaphor in language and thought (pp. 295–316). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/cilt.29.14new
Ortony, A
(Ed.) (1993) Metaphor and thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139173865
Özçaliskan, S
(2003) Metaphorical motion in crosslinguistic perspective: A comparison of English and Turkish. Metaphor and Symbol,18(3), 189–228. doi: 10.1207/S15327868MS1803_05
Paivio, A
(2001) Mental representations: A dual coding approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pourcel, S
(2004) What makes path of motion salient?Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of Berkeley Linguistics Society,30(1), 1–12. doi: 10.3765/bls.v30i1.963
(2005) Linguistic relativity in cognitive processes. Manuscript presented at 1st UK Cognitive Linguistics Conference: New Directions in Cognitive Linguistics , University of Sussex, October 2005.
Pourcel, S. , & Kopecka, A
(2005) Motion expression in French: Typological diversity. Durham and Newcastle Working Papers in Linguistics,11, 139–153.
Schäffner, C
(2004) Metaphor and translation: Some implications of a cognitive approach. Journal of Pragmatics, 36(7), 1253–1269. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2003.10.012
Schmitt, R
(2001) Metaphern in der Psychologie: Eine Skizze. Journal für Psychologie,9(4), 3–15.
Serra-Borneto, C
(1997) Two-way prepositions in German: Image and constraints. In M. Verspoor , K.D. Lee , & E. Sweetser (Eds.), Lexical and syntactical constructions and the construction of meaning (pp. 187–204). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/cilt.150.15ser
Shires Golon, A
(2008) Visual-spatial learners: Differentiation strategies for creating a successful classroom. Austin, Texas: Prufrock Press.
Slobin, D.I
(1996) Two ways to travel: Verbs of motion in English and Spanish. In M. Shibatani & S.A. Thompson (Eds.), Grammatical constructions: Their form and meaning (pp. 195–220). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
(2000) Verbalized events: A dynamic approach to linguistic relativity and determinism. In S. Niemeier & R. Dirven (Eds.), Evidence for linguistic relativity (pp. 107–138). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/cilt.198.10slo
Smith, M.B
(1987) The semantics of dative and accusative in German: An investigation in cognitive grammar. Ph.D. diss., Department of Linguistics, University of California at San Diego.
(1993) Cases as conceptual categories: Evidence from German. In R.A. Geiger & B. Rudzka-Ostyn (Eds.), Conceptualizations and mental processing in language: A selection of papers from the First International Cognitive Linguistics Conference in Duisburg, 1989 (pp. 531–565). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110857108.531
(1995) Semantic motivation vs. arbitrariness in grammar: Toward a more general account of the DAT/ACC contrast with two-way prepositions. In I. Rauch & G.F. Carr (Eds.), Insights in Germanic linguistics: Methodology and transition (pp. 293–323). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110810868.293
Talmy, L
(1985) Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms. In T. Shopen (Ed.), Language typology and syntactic description. Vol. 3: Grammatical categories and the lexicon (pp. 57–149). New York: Cambridge University Press.
(1991) Path to realization: A typology of event conflation. Proceedings of the Seventeenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 480–519. doi: 10.3765/bls.v17i0.1620
(2000) A typology of event integration. In L. Talmy (Ed.), Toward a cognitive semantics, Vol. 2 (pp. 213–288). Cambridge: MIT Press.
van Noppen, J.-P. , De Knop, S. , & Jongen, R
(1985) Metaphor: A bibliography of post-1970 publications. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/lisl.17
van Noppen, J.-P. , & Hols, E
(1990) Metaphor II. A classified bibliography of publications from 1985 to 1990. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/lisl.20
Verspoor, M. , & Boers, F
(2012) Cognitive linguistics of second language acquisition. In A. Chapelle (Ed.), The encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics. Chichester: Wiley Blackwell. doi: 10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal0148
Vester, F
(1978/1992) Denken, Lernen, Vergessen: Was geht in unserem Kopf vor, wie lernt das Gehirn, und wann lässt es uns im Stich?Stuttgart: Deutscher Taschenbuchverlag.
Woodward, T
(2001) Working with metaphors in teaching and teacher training. The Teacher Trainer,15(3), 10–11.
Zachara, E
(2004) Visualisieren im Englischunterricht: Effektiv und lebendig unterrichten. Buxtehude: Aol-Verlag.
Zelinsky-Wibbelt, C
(Ed.) (2003) Text transfer: Metonymy and metaphor, translation and expert-lay communication. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
http://jbenjamins.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/rcl.13.1.07kno
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address