The interpretation of metonymy by Japanese learners of English

MyBook is a cheap paperback edition of the original book and will be sold at uniform, low price.

Buy this article

Price: £15.00+Taxes
Add to favourites

The full text of this article is not currently available.

Data & Media loading...


Full text loading...


Barcelona, A
(2002) Clarifying and applying the notions of metaphor and metonymy within cognitive linguistics: An update. In R. Dirven & R. Pörings (Eds.), Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast (pp.207-277). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Barnden, J
(2010) Metaphor and metonymy: Making their connections more slippery. Cognitive Linguistics, 21(1), 1-34. doi: 10.1515/cogl.2010.001
Brdar, M. , & Brdar-Szabó, R
(2003) Metonymic coding of linguistic action in English, Croatian and Hungarian. In K.U. Panther & L. Thornburg (Eds.), Metonymy and pragmatic inferencing (pp.241-266). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/pbns.113.17brd
British national corpus at Brigham Young University (BYU-BNC)
, accessed
Chen, Y.C , & Lai, H.L
(2012) EFL learners’ awareness of the metonymy-metaphor continuum in figurative expressions. Language Awareness, 21(3), 235-248. doi: 10.1080/09658416.2011.598527
Deignan, A.H
(2005) Metaphor and corpus linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/celcr.6
Dirven, R
(2003) Metonymy and metaphor: Different mental strategies of conceptualisation [1993]. In R. Dirven & R. Pörings (Eds.), Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast (pp.75-112). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110219197
Goldberg, A
(2006) Constructions at work. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Goossens, L
(2002) Metaphtonymy: The interaction of metaphor and metonymy in expressions for linguistic action. In R. Dirven & R. Pörings (Eds.), Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast (pp.349-377). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Kövecses, Z
(2002) Metaphor: A practical introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kövecses, Z. , & Radden, G
(1998) Metonymy: Developing a cognitive linguistic view. Cognitive Linguistics, 9, 37-78. doi: 10.1515/cogl.1998.9.1.37
Lakoff, G
(1987) Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. doi: 10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001
Langacker, R.W
(2009) Investigations in cognitive grammar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110214369
Littlemore, J
(2001) The use of metaphor in university lectures and the problems that it causes for overseas students. Teaching in Higher Education, 6, 333–351. doi: 10.1080/13562510120061205
(2015) Metonymy: Hidden shortcuts in language, thought and communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781107338814
Littlemore, J. , Chen, P.T. , Koester, A. , & Barnden, J
(2011) Difficulties in metaphoric comprehension faced by international students whose first language is not English. Applied Linguistics, 23(1), 1-23.
Littlemore, J. , & Low, G
(2006) Figurative thinking and foreign language learning. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan. doi: 10.1057/9780230627567
Piquer-Piriz, A
(2008) Reasoning figuratively in early EFL: Some implications for the development of vocabulary. In F. Boers & S. Lindstromberg (Eds.), Cognitive linguistic approaches to teaching vocabulary and phraseology (pp.219-240). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Radden, G. , & Kövecses, Z
(1999) Towards and theory of metonymy. In K U. Panther & G. Radden (Eds.), Metonymy in language and thought (pp.17-59). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/hcp.4.03rad
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address