Subject preference in Ixcatec relative clauses (Otomanguean, Mexico)

MyBook is a cheap paperback edition of the original book and will be sold at uniform, low price.

Buy this article

Price: £15.00+Taxes
Add to favourites

The full text of this article is not currently available.

Data & Media loading...


Full text loading...


Adamou, Evangelia
2014 L’antipassif en ixcatèque. Bulletin de la Société de Linguistique de Paris109(1). 373–396.
2016A corpus-driven approach to language contact. Endangered languages in a comparative perspective. Berlin & Boston: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9781614516576
2017 Spatial language and cognition among the Ixcatec-Spanish bilinguals (Mexico). In Kate Bellamy , Mike Child , Antje Muntendam & M. Carmen Parafita Couto (eds.), Multidisciplinary approaches to bilingualism in the Hispanic and Lusophone world, 175–209. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/ihll.13.08ada
Adamou, Evangelia & Denis Costaouec
2013 El complementante la en ixcateco: marcador de clausula relativa, completiva y adverbial. Amerindia37(1). 193–210.
Aissen, Judith
1996 Pied-piping, abstract agreement, and functional projections in Tzotzil. Natural language and linguistic theory14(3). 447‒491. doi: 10.1007/BF00133596
Alexopoulou, Theodora
2006 Resumption in relative clauses. Natural language and linguistic theory24(1). 57‒111. doi: 10.1007/s11049‑005‑0898‑2
Anand, Pranav , Sandra Chung & Matthew Wagers
2011 Widening the net: Challenges for gathering linguistic data in the digital age. Submitted to the National Science Foundation SBE 2020 planning activity. (accessed16 January 2017).
Andrews, Avery D.
2007 Relative clauses. In Timothy Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, 206–236. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511619434.004
Asudeh, Ash
2012The logic of pronominal resumption. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199206421.001.0001
Bates, Douglas , Martin Maechler , Ben Bolker & Steve Walker
2015 Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software67(1). 1–48. doi: 10.18637/jss.v067.i01
Borer, Hagit
1984 Restrictive relatives in modern Hebrew. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory2(2). 219–260. doi: 10.1007/BF00133282
Borja, Manuel F. , Sandra Chung & Matthew Wagers
2016 Constituent order and parser control processes in Chamorro. In Amber Camp , Yuko Otsuka , Claire Stabile & Nozomi Tanaka (eds.), Proceedings of the 21st Annual Meeting of the Austronesian Formal Linguistics Association, 15–32. Canberra: Asia-Pacific Linguistics.
Caplan, David , Nathaniel Alpert & Gloria Waters
1999 PET studies of syntactic processing with auditory sentence presentation. NeuroImage9(3). 343–351. doi: 10.1006/nimg.1998.0412
Caplan, David , Nathaniel Alpert , Gloria Waters & Anthony Olivieri
2000 Activation of Broca’s area by syntactic processing under conditions of concurrent articulation. Human Brain Mapping9(2). 65–71. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097‑0193(200002)9:2<65::AID‑HBM1>3.0.CO;2‑4
Caplan, David , Sujith Vijayan , Gina Kuperberg , Caroline West , Gloria Waters , Doug Greve & Anders M. Dale
2001 Vascular responses to syntactic processing: Event related fMRI study of relative clauses. Human Brain Mapping15(1). 26–38. doi: 10.1002/hbm.1059
Carreiras, Manuel , Jon Andoni Duñabeitia , Marta Vergara , Irene de la Cruz-Pavía & Itziar Laka
2010 Subject relative clauses are not universally easier to process: Evidence from Basque. Cognition115(1). 79–92. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.11.012
Clemens, Lauren Eby , Jessica Coon , Pedro Mateo Pedro , Adam Milton Morgan , Maria Polinsky , Gabrielle Tandet & Matthew Wagers
2015 Ergativity and the complexity of extraction: A view from Mayan. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory33(2). 417–469. doi: 10.1007/s11049‑014‑9260‑x
Costaouec, Denis & Michael Swanton
2015 Classification nominale en ixcatèque. La linguistique51(2). 201–239. doi: 10.3917/ling.512.0201
Desmet, Timothy & Edward Gibson
2003 Disambiguation preferences and corpus frequencies in noun phrase conjunction. Journal of Memory and Language49(3). 353–374. doi: 10.1016/S0749‑596X(03)00025‑1
Dryer, Matthew
2011 Order of subject and verb. In Matthew Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), The World Atlas of Language Structures online. Munich, Max Planck Digital Library. (accessed6 July 2014).
Duffield, Cecily Jill & Laura A. Michaelis
2011 Why subject relatives prevail: Constraints versus constructional licensing. Language and Cognition3(2). 171–208. doi: 10.1515/LANGCOG.2011.007
Fernández de Miranda, María Teresa
1951 Reconstrucción del protopopoloca. Revista Mexicana de Estudios Antropológicos12. 61–93.
1953 Las formas posesivas del ixcateco. Memoria del Congreso Científico Mexicano12. 159–170.
1956Glotocronología de la familia popoloca. México, DF: Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia.
1959Fonémica del Ixcateco. México, DF: Instituto nacional de antropología e historia (INAH).
1961Diccionario ixcateco. México, DF: Instituto nacional de antropología e historia (INAH).
Frazier, Lyn
1987 Syntactic processing: Evidence from Dutch. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory5(4). 519–559. doi: 10.1007/BF00138988
Friedmann, Naama & Rama Novogrodsky
2004 The acquisition of relative clause comprehension in Hebrew: A study of SLI and normal development. Journal of Child Language31(3). 661–681. doi: 10.1017/S0305000904006269
Gibson, Edward
1998 Linguistic complexity: locality of syntactic dependencies. Cognition68(1). 1–76. doi: 10.1016/S0010‑0277(98)00034‑1
Gordon, Peter C. & Randall Hendrick
2005 Relativization, ergativity, and corpus frequency. Linguistic Inquiry36(3). 456–463. doi: 10.1162/0024389054396953
Grinevald, Colette
2000 A morphosyntactic typology of classifiers. In Gunter Senft (ed.), Systems of nominal classification, 50‒92. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press.
Gudschinsky, Sarah C.
1959Proto-Popotecan. A comparative study of Popolocan and Mixtecan. Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana University Publications.
Hamp, Eric P.
1958 Chocho-Popoloca innovations. International Journal of American Linguistics26(1). 62. doi: 10.1086/464554
Hawkins, John A.
1999 Processing complexity and filler-gap dependencies across grammars. Language75(2). 244‒285. doi: 10.2307/417261
Hironymous, Michael
2007Santa Maria Ixcatlan, Oaxaca: From colonial Cacicazgo to modern Municipio. Austin, TX: University of Texas PhD dissertation.
Hsiao, Franny & Edward Gibson
2003 Processing relative clauses in Chinese. Cognition90(1). 3–27. doi: 10.1016/S0010‑0277(03)00124‑0
Just, Marcel A. , Patricia A. Carpenter , Timothy A. Keller , William F. Eddy & Keith R. Thulborn
1996 Brain activation modulated by sentence comprehension. Science274(4). 114–116. doi: 10.1126/science.274.5284.114
Keenan, Edward L. & Bernard Comrie
1977 Noun phrase accessibility and universal grammar. Linguistic Inquiry8(1). 63–99.
King, Jonathan & Marcel A. Just
1991 Individual differences in syntactic processing: The role of working memory. Journal of Memory and Language30(5). 580–602. doi: 10.1016/0749‑596X(91)90027‑H
King, Jonathan & Marta Kutas
1995 Who did what and when? Using word- and clause-level ERPs to monitor working memory usage in reading. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience7(3). 376–395. doi: 10.1162/jocn.1995.7.3.376
Krauss, Michael
2006 Classification and terminology for degrees of languages endangerment. In Matthias Brenzinger (ed.), Language diversity endangered, 1–8. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Kwon, Nayoung , Yoonhyoung Lee , Peter C. Gordon , Robert Kluender & Maria Polinsky
2010 Cognitive and linguistic factors affecting subject/object asymmetry: An eye-tracking study of pre-nominal relative clauses in Korean. Language86(3). 546–582. doi: 10.1353/lan.2010.0006
Kwon, Nayoung , Robert Kluender , Marta Kutas & Maria Polinsky
2013 Subject/object processing asymmetries in Korean relative clauses: Evidence from ERP data. Language89(3). 537–585. doi: 10.1353/lan.2013.0044
Lehmann, Christian
1984 Der Relativsatz. Typologie seiner Strukturen, Theorie seiner Funktionen, Kompendium seiner Grammatik. Tübingen: G. Narr.
1986 On the typology of relative clauses. Linguistics24(4). 663–680. doi: 10.1515/ling.1986.24.4.663
MacDonald, Maryellen C.
2013 How language production shapes language form and comprehension. Frontiers in Psychology4. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00226
MacDonald, Maryellen C. & Morten Christiansen
2002 Reassessing working memory: Comment on Just and Carpenter (1992) and Waters and Caplan (1999). Psychological Review109(1). 35–54. doi: 10.1037/0033‑295X.109.1.35
MacWhinney, Brian & Csaba Pleh
1988 The processing of restrictive relative clauses in Hungarian. Cognition29(2). 95–141. doi: 10.1016/0010‑0277(88)90034‑0
Malchukov, Andrej , Martin Haspelmath & Bernard Comrie
(eds) 2010 Ditransitive constructions: a typological overview. In Andrej Malchukov , Martin Haspelmath & Bernard Comrie (eds.), Studies in ditransitive constructions: A comparative handbook, 1–64. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter.
McCloskey, James
1990 Resumptive pronouns, Aʹ-binding and levels of representation in Irish. In Randall Hendrick (ed.), The syntax of the modern Celtic languages, 199‒248. New York: Academic Press.
Mecklinger, Axel , Herbert Schriefers , Karsten Steinhauer & Angela Friederici
1995 Processing relative clauses varying on syntactic and semantic dimensions: An analysis with event-related potentials. Memory and Cognition23(4). 477–494. doi: 10.3758/BF03197249
Miyamoto, Edson T. & Michiko Nakamura
2003 Subject/object asymmetries in the processing of relative clauses in Japanese. In Gina Garding & Mimu Tsujimura (eds.), Proceedings of the 22nd West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, 342–355. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
Nichols, Johanna
1986 Head-marking and dependent-marking grammar. Language62(1). 56–119. doi: 10.1353/lan.1986.0014
Polinsky, Maria
2008 Relative clauses in heritage Russian: Fossilization or divergent grammar?In Andrei Antonenko , John F. Bailyn & Christina Y. Bethin (eds.), Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics (FASL) 16: The Stony Brook Meeting 2007, 333–357. University of Michigan: Michigan Slavic Publications.
Polinsky, Maria , Carlos Gomez-Gallo , Peter Graff & Ekaterina Kravtchenko
2012 Subject preference and ergativity. Lingua122(3). 267–277. doi: 10.1016/j.lingua.2011.11.004
R Core Team
R Core Team 2013 R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
Reali, Florencia & Morten H. Christiansen
2007 Processing of relative clauses is made easier by frequency of occurrence. Journal of Memory and Language57(1). 1–23. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2006.08.014
Schwartz, Florian
2007 Processing presupposed content. Journal of Semantics24(4). 373–416. doi: 10.1093/jos/ffm011
Shlonsky, Ur
1992 Resumptive pronouns as a last resort. Linguistic Inquiry23(3). 443‒448.
Skopeteas, Stavros , Ines Fiedler , Samantha Hellmuth , Anne Schwarz , Ruben Stoel & Gisbert Fanselow
2006Questionnaire on Information Structure. Potsdam: Audiovisuelles Zentrum der Universität Potsdam und sd:k Satz Druck GmbH Potsdam.
Suñer, Margarita
1998 Resumptive restrictive relatives: A cross-linguistic perspective. Language74(2). 335–364. doi: 10.1353/lan.1998.0194
Swadesh, Morris
1960 The Oto-Manguean hypothesis and macro Mixtecan. International Journal of American Linguistics26(2). 79–111. doi: 10.1086/464560
Traxler, Matthew J. , Robin K. Morris & Rachel E. Seely
2002 Processing subject and object relative clauses: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Memory and Language47(1). 69–90. doi: 10.1006/jmla.2001.2836
Ueno, Mieko & Susan M. Garnsey
2008 An ERP study of the processing of subject and object relative clauses in Japanese. Language and Cognitive Processes23(5). 646–688. doi: 10.1080/01690960701653501
Vasishth, Shravan , Zhong Chen , Qiang Li & Gueilan Guo
2013 Processing Chinese relative clauses: Evidence for the subject-relative advantage. PLoS ONE8(10). e77006. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0077006.
Veerman-Leichsenring, Annette
2000 Popolocan independent personal pronouns: Comparison and reconstruction. International Journal of American Linguistics66(3). 318–359. doi: 10.1086/466428
2001a Ixcateco: La frase nominal. Anales de Antropología35. 323–358.
2001b Changes in Popolocan word order and clause structure. In Jan T. Faarlund (ed.), Grammatical relations in change, 303–322. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/slcs.56.13vee
2001c Coreference in the Popolocan languages. In Laurel J. Brinton (ed.), Historical linguistics 1999: Selected papers from the 14th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Vancouver, 9–13August 1999, 337–350. doi: 10.1075/cilt.215.23vee
Warren, Tessa & Edward Gibson
2002 The influence of referential processing on sentence complexity. Cognition85(1). 79–112. doi: 10.1016/S0010‑0277(02)00087‑2
Wells, Justine , Morten Christiansen , David Race , Daniel Acheson & Maryellen C. MacDonald
2009 Experience and sentence comprehension: Statistical learning and relative clause comprehension. Cognitive Psychology58(2). 250–271. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2008.08.002
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address