- Home
- e-Journals
- Studies in Language. International Journal sponsored by the Foundation “Foundations of Language”
- Previous Issues
- Volume 34, Issue, 2010
Studies in Language. International Journal sponsored by the Foundation “Foundations of Language” - Volume 34, Issue 1, 2010
Volume 34, Issue 1, 2010
-
Intra-paradigmatic variation in Eleme verbal agreement
Author(s): Oliver Bondpp.: 1–35 (35)More LessMismatches in the morphosyntactic features of controllers and targets in the Eleme (Ogonoid, Niger-Congo) participant reference system allow for a subject agreement paradigm in which the person of the grammatical subject is indicated by a verbal prefix, while plural number is marked by a suffix on different targets — either lexical verbs or auxiliaries — based on the person value of the controller. I examine the distribution of Eleme ‘Default Subject’ agreement affixes and the intra-paradigmatic asymmetry found between second-person plural and third-person plural subjects in Auxiliary Verb Constructions (AVC) and Serial Verb Constructions (SVC). I argue that the criteria by which the various agreement affixes select an appropriate morphological host can be modelled in terms of agreement prerequisites even when distributional variation is paradigm internal.
-
Sentence-initial I think (that) and I believe (that): Prosodic evidence for uses as main clause, comment clause and discourse marker
Author(s): Nicole Dehé and Anne Wichmannpp.: 36–74 (39)More LessSentence-initial pronoun-verb combinations such as I think, I believe are ambiguous between main clause use on the one hand and adverbial or discourse use on the other hand. We approach the topic from a prosodic perspective. Based on corpus data from spoken British English the prosodic patterns of sentence-initial I think and I believe are analysed and related to their interpretation in context. We show that these expressions may function as main clause (MC), comment clause (CC) or discourse markers (DM) and that the speaker’s choice is reflected in the prosody. The key feature is prosodic prominence: MCs are reflected by accent placement on the pronoun, CCs by an accent on the verb, while DMs are unstressed.
-
Is there a ditransitive construction in Kokama-Kokamilla?
Author(s): Rosa Vallejos Yopánpp.: 75–107 (33)More LessIn Kokama-Kokamilla (KK), ditransitive constructions — i.e. syntactic units that profile three participants and contain two non-subject arguments — do not exist as a distinct type relative to transitives. KK shows both indirective and secundative alignment types (Haspelmath 2004, Dryer 1986, 2006), but no formal or behavioral evidence for a second object of any kind. In KK, typical three-participant events are syntactically encoded in at least three ways, none of which comprises two grammatical objects. Further, these findings suggest that no verb or construction profiles three participants in the sense of Goldberg (1995: 49). This paper adds to the literature on languages that code three-participant events by means of transitive clauses (Margetts & Austin 2007), which ultimately questions indirect object and secondary object as primitive notions as suggested by Dryer (1986).
-
‘Want’ is a lexical and conceptual universal: Reply to Khanina
Author(s): Cliff Goddard and Anna Wierzbickapp.: 108–123 (16)More LessThe question of whether or not all languages have a word for ‘want’ (as in ‘I know what you want, I want the same’) is far more important than many linguists appear to realize. Having studied and debated this question for many years, we welcome Olesya Khanina’s (2008) paper “How universal is ‘wanting’?”, which, we believe, addresses a question of fundamental importance. Our own view — which we have sought to substantiate in a large number of publications, over many years (cf. Wierzbicka 1972, 1996; Goddard 1991, 2001; Goddard and Wierzbicka eds. 1994, 2002; Peeters ed. 2006) — is that WANT is a universal semantic prime, i.e. an indivisible unit of meaning with a lexical exponent in all languages. In the present article, we argue that although Khanina has produced valuable results about cross-linguistic patterns in the polysemy of exponents of WANT, she has failed to demonstrate her concluding point, namely, “that ‘want’ is not a universal semantic prime in the sense of the Natural Semantic Metalanguage … [and] that the inclusion of WANT in this list [of semantic primes] is indeed false” (p. 848). Briefly, we will argue that Khanina’s conclusion depends, first, on an a priori decision not to recognise the existence of polysemy; and second, on a misunderstanding of the NSM position on what it means to be a lexical exponent of a semantic prime. We will also argue that ‘wanting’ constitutes an indispensable conceptual building block in human communication and cognition, and in linguistic and psychological theorizing about communication and cognition.
-
Syllable structure and extrametricality: A typological and phonetic study
Author(s): Matthew Gordon, Carmen Jany, Carlos Nash and Nobutaka Takarapp.: 131–166 (36)More LessThis paper proposes a functional basis for final consonant extrametricality, the asymmetric status of CVC syllables as stress-attracting in non-final position of a word but stress-rejecting in final position. A typological study of phonemic vowel length pattern in 10 languages with this final vs. non-final stress asymmetry and 30 languages in which CVC attracts stress in final position indicates a robust asymmetry between languages differing in their stress system’s treatment of final CVC. Languages that asymmetrically allow stress on non-final but not on final CVC all lack phonemic vowel length contrast in final position, whereas those lacking the stress asymmetry often have contrastive length in final vowels. It is claimed that the absence of phonemic length in languages that do not stress final CVC facilitates the nearly universal pattern of phonetic final lengthening, which threatens to obscure the perception of phonemic length. The enhanced lengthening of final vowels in languages with final phonemic vowel length reduces the duration ratio of CVC relative to CV, thereby reducing CVC’s perceptual prominence and thus its propensity to attract stress in keeping with Lunden’s (2006) proportional duration theory of weight. A phonetic study of two languages differing in the stress-attracting ability of final CVC offers support for the proposed account. Arabic, which displays consonant extrametricality and largely lacks phonemic vowel length in final position, has substantial final vowel lengthening, whereas Kabardian, which stresses final CVC and contrasts vowel length in final position, lacks substantial final lengthening.
-
Deixis, gesture, and cognition in spatial Frame of Reference typology
Author(s): Eve Danzigerpp.: 167–185 (19)More LessThe three Frames of Reference recognized in the current inventory of spatial-language types are differentiated by their placement of the Anchor from which the vector of search space from Ground to Figure is calculated (Levinson 1996). In certain well-recognized examples, Anchor merges with Ground. The existing analysis treats this merged component as analytically Ground rather than Anchor; its location in or out of the speech situation is therefore taken to be independent of the Frame of Reference typology. Instead, I treat this component as analytically Anchor, making its speech-situation status criterial to the typology. Four, not three, Frames of Reference now appear. The fourth, “Direct” frame, distinguishes binary locutions with a speech participant as Ground/Anchor (e.g. ‘in front of you’) from “Object-Centered” binary locutions in which Ground/Anchor is not a speech participant ( e.g. ‘in front of the kettle’). This four-frame analysis corresponds better than does the three-frame one to the logic of rotation sensitivity which has been used to show Whorfian parallels between language and conceptualization across cultures. I close by discussing the application of Frame of Reference typology to pointing gestures, and show how recognition of the fourth frame of reference allows us to bring discussion of these, and of the linguistic demonstratives and locatives with which they so frequently co-occur, fully within the Frame of Reference typology.
Volumes & issues
-
Volume 48 (2024)
-
Volume 47 (2023)
-
Volume 46 (2022)
-
Volume 45 (2021)
-
Volume 44 (2020)
-
Volume 43 (2019)
-
Volume 42 (2018)
-
Volume 41 (2017)
-
Volume 40 (2016)
-
Volume 39 (2015)
-
Volume 38 (2014)
-
Volume 37 (2013)
-
Volume 36 (2012)
-
Volume 35 (2011)
-
Volume 34 (2010)
-
Volume 33 (2009)
-
Volume 32 (2008)
-
Volume 31 (2007)
-
Volume 30 (2006)
-
Volume 29 (2005)
-
Volume 28 (2004)
-
Volume 27 (2003)
-
Volume 26 (2002)
-
Volume 25 (2001)
-
Volume 24 (2000)
-
Volume 23 (1999)
-
Volume 22 (1998)
-
Volume 21 (1997)
-
Volume 20 (1996)
-
Volume 19 (1995)
-
Volume 18 (1994)
-
Volume 17 (1993)
-
Volume 16 (1992)
-
Volume 15 (1991)
-
Volume 14 (1990)
-
Volume 13 (1989)
-
Volume 12 (1988)
-
Volume 11 (1987)
-
Volume 10 (1986)
-
Volume 9 (1985)
-
Volume 8 (1984)
-
Volume 7 (1983)
-
Volume 6 (1982)
-
Volume 5 (1981)
-
Volume 4 (1980)
-
Volume 3 (1979)
-
Volume 2 (1978)
-
Volume 1 (1977)
Most Read This Month
Article
content/journals/15699978
Journal
10
5
false
-
-
Where Have all the Adjectives Gone?
Author(s): R.M.W. Dixon
-
-
-
On thetical grammar
Author(s): Gunther Kaltenböck, Bernd Heine and Tania Kuteva
-
-
-
On contact-induced grammaticalization
Author(s): Bernd Heine and Tania Kuteva
-
- More Less