Visit www.benjamins.com

rss feed

AILA Review

image of AILA Review
ISSN 1461-0213
E-ISSN 1570-5595

<p>AILA Review is a refereed publication of the <em>Association Internationale de Linguistique Appliquée</em>, an international federation of national associations for applied linguistics. All volumes are guest edited.</p><p>As of Volume 16, 2003, AILA Review is published with John Benjamins.</p>


Show / Hide descriptions

Latest content:

Article
content/journals/15705595
Journal
5
3
Loading

Most cited this month

  • Beyond Repair: Conversation Analysis as an Approach to SLA
    • Author: Gabriele Kasper
    • Source: AILA Review, Volume 19, Issue 1, 2006, pages: 83 –99
    • + Show Description - Hide Description
    • As one of several approaches to SLA as social practice, Conversation Analysis (CA) has the capacity to examine in detail how opportunities for L2 learning arise in different interactional activities. Its particular strength, and one that distinguishes it from other social practice approaches, is its consistent focus on the orientations and relevancies that participants display to each other through their interactional conduct. CA thus affords a distinct perspective on L2 learning as object and process. It enables researchers to reconsider such established SLA topics as fluency, correction, or the benefits of tasks for L2 learning, but also offers an acquisitional perspective on interactional conduct whose potential for L2 learning has been largely unexplored.
  • Input, Interaction and Output: An Overview
    • Authors: Susan M. Gass, and Alison Mackey
    • Source: AILA Review, Volume 19, Issue 1, 2006, pages: 3 –17
    • + Show Description - Hide Description
    • This paper presents an overview of what has come to be known as the Interaction Hypothesis, the basic tenet of which is that through input and interaction with interlocutors, language learners have opportunities to notice differences between their own formulations of the target language and the language of their conversational partners. They also receive feedback which both modifies the linguistic input they receive and pushes them to modify their output during conversation. This paper focuses on the major constructs of this approach to SLA, namely, input, interaction, feedback and output, and discusses recent literature that addresses these issues.
  • Individual differences in second language acquisition
    • Author: Zoltán Dörnyei
    • Source: AILA Review, Volume 19, Issue 1, 2006, pages: 42 –68
    • + Show Description - Hide Description
    • Ever since the early days of its existence, the field of psychology has been trying to achieve two different and somewhat contradictory objectives: to understand the general principles of the human mind and to explore the uniqueness of the individual mind. The latter direction has formed an independent subdiscipline within the field, usually referred to as individual difference (ID) research. IDs are a prominent feature of SLA because a great deal of the variation in language learning outcomes is attributable, either directly or indirectly, to various learner characteristics. This paper first provides an overview of the five most important ID variables (personality, aptitude, motivation, learning styles and learning strategies) and then concludes by describing certain common themes in contemporary ID research.
  • Classroom code-switching in post-colonial contexts: Functions, attitudes and policies
    • Author: Gibson Ferguson
    • Source: AILA Review, Volume 16, Issue 1, 2003, pages: 38 –51
    • + Show Description - Hide Description
    • Code-Switching in the classroom across a range of curricular subjects is a widespread phenomenon in multilingual, language contact settings in Africa and, indeed, world-wide; yet it is not infrequently regarded unfavourably by educational policy-makers. This paper reviews the literature on classroom functions of code-switching in post-colonial contexts, commenting on the merits and limitations of recent research. It also examines some of the conceptions of language underlying official and lay attitudes. Finally, as befits a paper examining classroom codeþswitching from the somewhat unusual perspective of language planning in education, it evaluates a number of policy proposals addressing the issue of how code-switching might more effectively be exploited as a communicative and pedagogic resource in instruction. The paper overall is constructed so as to inform the attitudes, practices and policies of policy-makers, teacher educators and teachers.
  • Towards ‘biliteracy and trilingualism’ in Hong Kong (SAR): Problems, dilemmas and stakeholders’ views
    • Author: David C.S. Li
    • Source: AILA Review, Volume 22, Issue 1, 2009, pages: 72 –84
    • + Show Description - Hide Description
    • Despite the Hong Kong SAR (Special Administrative Region) government’s determination to implement the ‘mother tongue education’ policy amid strong social resistance one year after the handover, English remains a prestigious language in society. The need for Putonghua (Mandarin/Standard Chinese) is also increasing following ever-expanding trade and other activities with mainland China. The societal demand for both English and Putonghua in postcolonial Hong Kong is important for understanding the SAR government’s language-in-education policy called ‘biliteracy and trilingualism’. The learning of English is fraught with two main problems: (a) the absence of a conducive language-learning environment outside the classroom, which makes English in Hong Kong more like a foreign than a second language, and (b) tremendous typological difference between Chinese and English on one hand, and considerable linguistic differences between Cantonese and Putonghua on the other. Given the significant phonological differences and, to a lesser extent, lexico-grammatical divergence between the majority’s vernacular and modern written Chinese, the learning of Putonghua is no straightforward task either. The dilemmas of the medium-of-instruction (MoI) debate will be discussed by elucidating the main concerns as seen from the respective vantage points of the government and five key stakeholder groups: employers, parents, school principals, teachers and educationalists, and students.
More
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address