oa Organic Creativity and the Physics Within

References

1. Albert, R. S. , & Runco, M. A.
   (1999) A history of research on creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp.16–31). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Ambrose, D.
   (1996) Unifying theories of creativity: Metaphorical thought and the unification process. New Ideas in Psychology, 14(3), 257–267. doi: 10.1016/S0732‑118X(96)00019‑0
   https://doi.org/10.1016/S0732-118X(96)00019-0 [Google Scholar]
3. Arieti, S.
   (1976) Creativity: the magic synthesis. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Arnheim, R.
   (1954) Art and visual perception: A psychology of the creative eye. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Attridge, D.
   (2004) The singularity of literature. London: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9780203420447
   https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203420447 [Google Scholar]
6. Avital, M. , & Te'eni, D.
   (2009) From generative fit to generative capacity: Exploring an emerging dimension of information systems design and task performance. Information Systems Journal, 4(19), 345–367. doi: 10.1111/j.1365‑2575.2007.00291.x
   https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2575.2007.00291.x [Google Scholar]
7. Barron, F.
   (1988) Putting creativity to work. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity: contemporary psychological perspectives (pp.76–98). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Boden, M.
   (1990) The creative mind: Myths and mechanisms. London: Weidenfeld & Nicholson.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Bois, J. S.
   (1972) Epistemics: The science-art of innovating. San Francisco, CA: International Society for General Semantics.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Brown, T.
    (2008) Design thinking. Harvard Business Review, 86(6), 84–92.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Carter, B. , & Knight, D.
    (2008) Semiotic domains and non-textual technologies. Available at: sites.wiki.ubc.ca/etec510/Semiotic_Domains_and_Non-Textual_Technologies
12. Carter, R.
    (2004) Language and creativity. The art of common talk. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Casti, J. L.
    (1994) Complexification: Explaining a paradoxical world through the science of surprise. New York, NY: Harper Collins.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Chomsky, N.
    (1966) Cartesian linguistics. A chapter in the history of rationalist thought. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Clark, A.
    (2003) Natural-born cyborgs: Minds, technologies, and the future of human intelligence. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Csíkszentmihályi, M.
    (1988) Society, culture, and person: a systems view of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity: contemporary psychological perspectives (pp.325–339). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Csíkszentmihályi, M.
    (1996) Creativity: flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York, NY: Harper Perennial.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Dawkins, R.
    (1976/1989) The selfish gene. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
19. De Beaugrande, R.
    (1978) Linguistics and Creativity. Paper presented at theInterdisciplinary Conference on Linguistics (Louisville, Kentucky, April 1978).
    [Google Scholar]
20. Dewey, J.
    (1916) Democracy and education: An introduction to the philosophy of education. New York, NY: Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Elsom-Cook, M.
    (2001) Principles of interactive multimedia. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Fairbanks, M. S. , & Taylor, R. P.
    (2011) Measuring the scaling properties of temporal and spatial patterns: From the human eye to the foraging albatross. In S. Guastello & R. Gregson (Eds.), Nonlinear dynamical analysis for the behavioral sciences using real data. New York, NY: CRC Press.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Freud, S.
    (1986) On creativity and the unconscious. The psychology of art, literature, love, and religion. New York, NY: Harper Collins.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Gardner, H.
    (1988) Creative lives and creative works: A synthetic scientific approach. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity: Contemporary psychological perspectives (pp.288–321). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Gibson, J. J.
    (1966) The senses considered as perceptual systems. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Giedion, S.
    (1941) Space, time and architecture: The growth of a new tradition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Giedion, S.
    (1948) Mechanization takes command, a contribution to anonymous history. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Gladwell, M.
    (2002) The tipping point: How little things can make a big difference. Boston, MA: Little, Brown, and Company.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Goswami, A.
    (1996) Creativity and the quantum: A unified theory of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 9(1), 47–61. doi: 10.1207/s15326934crj0901_5
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj0901_5 [Google Scholar]
30. Greene, R. T.
    (2001) A model of 42 models of creativity, plus a new model derived from selecting 7 of them. Available at: independent.academia.edu/RichardTaborGreene/Papers/9086/A_Model_of_42_Models_of_Creativity
    [Google Scholar]
31. Greene, R. T.
    (2004) A model of 60 models of creativity for studying how particular repertoires of such models in creators affect their creativity. Available at: www.scribd.com/doc/2162318/A-Model-of-60-Models-of-Creativity
    [Google Scholar]
32. Gruber, H. E. , & Davis, S. N.
    (1988) Inching our way up Mount Olympus: The evolving-systems approach to creative thinking. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity: Contemporary psychological perspectives (pp.243–270). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Hahn, R.
    (1971) Anatomy of a scientific institution: The Paris Academy of Sciences, 1666-1803. Berkeley, CA: University of California.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Heilman, K. M. , Nadeau, S. E. , & Beversdorf, D. O.
    (2003) Creative innovation: Possible brain mechanisms. Neurocase, 9 (5), 369–379. doi: 10.1076/neur.9.5.369.16553
    https://doi.org/10.1076/neur.9.5.369.16553 [Google Scholar]
35. Heine, B.
    (1997) Cognitive foundations of grammar. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Heisenberg, W.
    (1952) Die Physik der Atomkerne [The physics of atomic nuclei]. London: Taylor & Francis.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Helmholtz, H. L. F.
    (1969) Treatise on physiological optics. New York, NY: Dover Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Hennessey, B. A. & Amabile, T. M.
    (1988) The conditions of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity: Contemporary psychological perspectives (pp.1–38). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Hoorn, J. F.
    (2012) Epistemics of the virtual. Linguistic approaches to literature 12. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/lal.12
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lal.12 [Google Scholar]
40. Johnson-Laird, P. N.
    (1988) Freedom and constraint in creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity: Contemporary psychological perspectives (pp.202–219). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Kahneman, D. , & Tversky, A.
    (1984) Choices, values and frames. American Psychologist, 39(4), 341–350. doi: 10.1037/0003‑066X.39.4.341
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.39.4.341 [Google Scholar]
42. Kirkham, R. L.
    (1984) Does the Gettier problem rest on a mistake?Mind, 93(372), 501–513. doi: 10.1093/mind/XCIII.372.501
    https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/XCIII.372.501 [Google Scholar]
43. Kelly, K.
    (2010) What technology wants. New York, NY: Viking.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Kuhn, T.
    (1962) The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Landy, M. S. , Maloney, L. T. , Johnston, E. B. , & Young, M.
    (1995) Measurement and modeling of depth cue combination: In defense of weak fusion. Vision Research, 35, 389–412. doi: 10.1016/0042‑6989(94)00176‑M
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0042-6989(94)00176-M [Google Scholar]
46. Langlotz, A.
    (2006) Idiomatic creativity. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/hcp.17
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.17 [Google Scholar]
47. Latour, B.
    (2007) Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Lowcre, M. M. M.
    (2011) Creativity: Meaning, Mechanisms, Models. Lorentz Workshop in collaboration with KNAW and NIAS (Sept. 12-16, 2011). Leiden, NL: Lorentz Center. Available at: www.lorentzcenter.nl/lc/web/2011/470/info.php3?wsid=470
    [Google Scholar]
49. Mandelbrot, B. B.
    (1982) The fractal geometry of nature. San Francisco, CA: Freeman.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Marr, D.
    (1982) Vision: A computational investigation into the human representation and processing of visual information. New York, NY: Freeman.
    [Google Scholar]
51. McKim, R. H.
    (1972) Experiences in visual thinking. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole.
    [Google Scholar]
52. Miller, A. I.
    (2000) Insights of genius. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
53. Molella, A. P.
    (2002) Classics revisited: science moderne, Sigfried Giedion. Technology and Culture, 43, 374–379. doi: 10.1353/tech.2002.0077
    https://doi.org/10.1353/tech.2002.0077 [Google Scholar]
54. Moran, S.
    (2010) The roles of creativity in society. In J. C. Kaufman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity (pp.74–90). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511763205.006
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511763205.006 [Google Scholar]
55. Mumford, L.
    (1934) Technics and civilization. New York, NY: Harcourt, Brace and Company.
    [Google Scholar]
56. Nickerson, R. S.
    (1999) Enhancing creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp.392–430). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University.
    [Google Scholar]
57. Paffen, C. L. E. , Verstraten, F. A. J. , & Vidnyanszky, Z.
    (2008) Attention-based perceptual learning increases binocular rivalry suppression of irrelevant visual features. Journal of Vision, 8(4):25, 1–11. doi: 10.1167/8.4.25
    https://doi.org/10.1167/8.4.25 [Google Scholar]
58. Park, G. , Lubinski, D. , & Benbow, C. P.
    (2007) Contrasting intellectual patterns predict creativity in the arts and sciences: Tracking intellectually precocious youth over 25 years. Psychological Science, 18, 948–952. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑9280.2007.02007.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.02007.x [Google Scholar]
59. Perkins, D. N.
    (1988) The possibility of invention. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity: Contemporary psychological perspectives (pp.362–385). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
60. Piaget, J.
    (1952) The child’s conception of number. Trans. C. Gattegno & F. M. Hodgson . London: Routledge and Paul.
    [Google Scholar]
61. Poelman, W.
    (2005) Design for living. International Conference on Doing, Thinking, Feeling Home: The Mental Geography of Residential Environments (Oct. 14-15, 2005, Technical University Delft). Available at: otb.tudelft.nl
    [Google Scholar]
62. Pope, R.
    (2005) Creativity: Theory, history, practice. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
63. Pope, R. , & Swann, J.
    (2011) Introduction: creativity, language, literature. In Swann, J. , Pope, R. , & Carter, R. (Eds.), Creativity in language and literature: The state of the art (pp.1–22). Basingstoke, Hants: Palgrave Macmillan. doi: 10.1007/978‑1‑349‑92482‑0_1
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-92482-0_1 [Google Scholar]
64. Ryland, S.
    (2011) Resisting metaphors: A metonymic approach to the study of creativity and cognition in art analysis and practice. Unpublished Doctoral dissertation, University of Brighton / University for the Creative Arts.
    [Google Scholar]
65. Schank, R. C.
    (1988) Creativity as a mechanical process. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity: Contemporary psychological perspectives (pp.220–238). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
66. Schaub, A. , Herst, D. , Surya, T. , & Agrivina, I.
    (2011) Intercontinental collaboration on prosthetic design. In B. van Abel , R. Klaassen , L. Evers , & P. Troxler (Eds.), Open design now. Amsterdam: BIS Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
67. Schrödinger, E.
    (1944/2010) What is life? Mind and matter. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
68. Simonton, D. K.
    (1988) Creativity, leadership, and chance. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity: Contemporary psychological perspectives (pp.386–426). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
69. Sennet, R.
    (2008) The craftsman. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
70. St. Clair, R. N.
    (2002) Metaphor and linguistic creativity. Keynote Address: Trinity University. Available at: epistemic-forms.com/R-creativity.html
    [Google Scholar]
71. Sternberg, R. J.
    (Ed.) (1988) The nature of creativity: Contemporary psychological perspectives. New York NY: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
72. Sternberg, R. J. & O’Hara, L. A.
    (1999) Creativity and intelligence. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp.251–272). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University.
    [Google Scholar]
73. Taylor, C. W.
    (1988) Approaches to and definitions of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity: Contemporary psychological perspectives (pp.118–119). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
74. Torrance, E. P.
    (1988) The nature of creativity as manifest in its testing. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity: Contemporary psychological perspectives (pp.43–75). New York NY: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
75. Van Abel, B. , Klaassen, R. , Evers, L. , & Troxler, P.
    (Eds.) (2011) Open design now. Amsterdam: BIS Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
76. Van Dijk, D. , Kresin, F. , Reitenbach, M. , & Rennen, E.
    (2011) Users as designers. Amsterdam: Waag Society.
    [Google Scholar]
77. Van Osch, W. , & Avital, M.
    (2010) Generative collectives. InProceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS), Saint Louis, Missouri.
    [Google Scholar]
78. Von Bertalanffy, L.
    (1968) General systems theory: Foundations, development, applications. New York, NY: George Braziller.
    [Google Scholar]
79. Von Graevenitz, A.
    (2009) Joseph Beuys’ letzte Leitern Scala Libera und Scala Napolitana (1985). In M. Vahler , M. Vöhler , & D. Linck (Eds.), Grenzen der Katharsis in den modernen Künsten: Transformationen des aristotelischen Modells seit Bernays, Nietzsche und Freud (pp.255–292) [Boundaries of catharsis in the modern arts: Transformations of the Aristotelian model since Bernays, Nietzsche and Freud]. Berlin, GE: Walter de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110216769.255
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110216769.255 [Google Scholar]
80. Wenger, W. , & Poe, R.
    (1996) The Einstein factor: A proven new method for increasing your intelligence. New York, NY: Random House.
    [Google Scholar]
81. Ward, T. B. , Smith, S. M. , & Finke, R. A.
    (1999) Creative cognition. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp.189–212). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
82. Wolpert, D. M. , Ghahramani, Z. , & Jordan, M. I.
    (1995) An internal model for sensorimotor integration. Science, 269, 1880–1882. doi: 10.1126/science.7569931
    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.7569931 [Google Scholar]
83. Zawada, B.
    (2006) Linguistic creativity from a cognitive perspective. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies, 24(2), 235–254. doi: 10.2989/16073610609486419
    https://doi.org/10.2989/16073610609486419 [Google Scholar]