1887
  1. Home
  2. Books
  3. Formulaic Humor and Humorous Formulae in Fictional Telecinematic Dialogue

Formulaic Humor and Humorous Formulae in Fictional Telecinematic Dialogue

image of Formulaic Humor and Humorous Formulae in Fictional Telecinematic Dialogue
USD
Buy:$189.00 + Taxes

This monograph presents the first book-length study to focus on formulaic humor and humorous formulae , situated at the crossroads of Pragmatics, Phraseology, and Conversational Humor Studies. Based upon a self-compiled corpus of 34 television series (4,214 episodes; 19.4 million words), it adopts a corpus-assisted, exploratory, mixed-method approach to analyze 13 types of humorous formulae across 146 samples. A conversation-analytical lens reveals how these formulaic patterns are systematically embedded in fictional dialogue and how they pragmatically shape scripted interaction.The study’s key contributions include a typology of humorous formulae, an account of their discursive functions, and new insights into their role in the stylistics of telecinematic discourse. Of special interest is its demonstration of how scripted talk employs formulaicity to generate humor efficiently and effectively. This book will appeal to scholars and advanced students in Linguistics, Pragmatics, Humor Studies, and media discourse, while extending existing knowledge on formulaicity in language use.

Related Topics: Discourse studies ; Pragmatics

References

  1. Aarons, Debra
    2017 Puns and Tacit Linguistic Knowledge. In Salvatore Attardo (ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Language and Humor (Routledge Handbooks in Linguistics). New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315731162‑7
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315731162-7 [Google Scholar]
  2. Abrahams, Roger D.
    1962 “Playing the Dozens”. The Journal of American Folklore75(297). 209–220. 10.2307/537723
     https://doi.org/10.2307/537723 [Google Scholar]
  3. Adams, Audrey
    2012 Humor Markers in Computer-Mediated Communication: Texas A & M Commerce Master’s Thesis.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Aijmer, Karin
    1996 Conversational Routines. Convention and Creativity. London: Longman.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Aijmer, Karin , and Anne-Marie Simon-Vandenbergen
    2004 “A Model and a Methodology for the Study of Pragmatic Markers: The Semantic Field of Expectation.” Journal of Pragmatics36 (10): 1781–1805. 10.1016/j.pragma.2004.05.005
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2004.05.005 [Google Scholar]
  6. Alba-Juez, Laura & Salvatore Attardo
    2014 The Evaluative Palette of Verbal Irony. In Geoff Thompson & Laura Alba-Juez (eds.), Evaluation in Context (Pragmatics & Beyond New Series), 93–116. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.242.05alb
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.242.05alb [Google Scholar]
  7. Alexander, Richard
    1997 Aspects of Verbal Humour in English (Language in Performance 13). Tübingen: Narr.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Alexander, Richard J.
    1984 Fixed Expressions in English: Reference Books and the Teacher. ELT Journal38(2). 127–134. 10.1093/elt/38.2.127
     https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/38.2.127 [Google Scholar]
  9. Allan, Keith , Alessandro Capone & Istvan Kecskés
    (eds.) 2016 Pragmemes and Theories of Language Use (Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology). Cham: Springer International Publishing. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑43491‑9
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43491-9 [Google Scholar]
  10. Allen, Graham
    2011 Intertextuality (The New Critical Idiom). London, New York: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group. 10.4324/9780203829455
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203829455 [Google Scholar]
  11. Altenberg, Bengt , and Mats Eeg-Olofsson
    1990 “Phraseology in Spoken English: Presentation of a Project.” InTheory and Practice in Corpus Linguistics, edited by Jan M. Aarts , 1–26. Language and Computers Studies in Practical Linguistics 4. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Alvarado Ortega, M. Belén
    2013 An Approach to Verbal Humor in Interaction. Procedia — Social and Behavioral Sciences95. 594–603. 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.687
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.687 [Google Scholar]
  13. Alvarez-Pereyre, Michael
    2011 Using Film as Linguistic Specimen: Theoretical and Practical Issues. In Roberta Piazza , Monika Bednarek & Fabio Rossi (eds.), Telecinematic Discourse: Approaches to the Language of Films and Television Series (Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 211), 47–67. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.211.05alv
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.211.05alv [Google Scholar]
  14. Ameka, Felix
    1992 Interjections: The Universal Yet Neglected Part of Speech. Journal of Pragmatics18(2–3). 101–118. 10.1016/0378‑2166(92)90048‑G
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(92)90048-G [Google Scholar]
  15. Ameka, Felix K. & David P. Wilkins
    1995 Interjections. In Jef Verschueren , Jan-Ola Östman , Jan Blommaert , Chris Bulcaen & Eline Versluys (eds.), Handbook of Pragmatics, 1–19. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/hop.10.int12
     https://doi.org/10.1075/hop.10.int12 [Google Scholar]
  16. Andersen, Gisle
    2001 Pragmatic Markers and Sociolinguistic Variation: A Relevance-Theoretic Approach to the Language of Adolescents (Pragmatics & Beyond New Series; 84). Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.84
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.84 [Google Scholar]
  17. Andersen, Gisle
    2019 Phraseology in a Cross-Linguistic Perspective: Introducing the Diachronic-Contrastive Corpus Method. In Hanna Parviainen , Mark Kaunisto & Päivi Pahta (eds.), Corpus Approaches into World Englishes and Language Contrasts (Studies in Variation, Contacts and Change in English 20), 365–389.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Antonopoulou, Eleni & Maria Sifianou
    2003 Conversational Dynamics of Humour: The Telephone Game in Greek. Journal of Pragmatics35(5). 741–769. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(02)00150‑9
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00150-9 [Google Scholar]
  19. Archakis, Argiris & Villy Tsakona
    2012 The Narrative Construction of Identities in Critical Education. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9781137264992
     https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137264992 [Google Scholar]
  20. Arendholz, Jenny & Monika Kirner-Ludwig
    2015 In-between Cognitively Isolated Quotes and References: Looking for Answers Lurking in Textual Margins. In Jenny Arendholz , Wolfram Bublitz & Monika Kirner-Ludwig (eds.), The Pragmatics of Quoting Now and Then (Topics in English Linguistics 89), 319–342. Berlin, Munich, Boston: de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110427561‑015
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110427561-015 [Google Scholar]
  21. Arseneault, Madeleine
    2014 “An Implicature Account of Idioms.” International Review of Pragmatics6 (1): 59–77. 10.1163/18773109‑00601004
     https://doi.org/10.1163/18773109-00601004 [Google Scholar]
  22. Attardo, Salvatore
    1990 The Violation of Grice’s Maxims in Jokes. In David J. Costa (ed.), Proceedings of the Sixteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 355–362. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society. 10.3765/bls.v16i0.1726
     https://doi.org/10.3765/bls.v16i0.1726 [Google Scholar]
  23. 1991 From Linguistics to Humor Research and Back: Applications of Linguistics to Humor and Their Implications for Linguistic Theory and Methodology: Purdue University Doctoral Dissertation.
  24. 1993 Violation of Conversational Maxims and Cooperation: The Case of Jokes. Journal of Pragmatics19. 537–558. 10.1016/0378‑2166(93)90111‑2
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(93)90111-2 [Google Scholar]
  25. 1994 Linguistic Theories of Humor. Berlin, New York: de Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. 1995 Humor. In Jef Verschueren , Jan-Ola Östman , Jan Blommaert , Chris Bulcaen & Eline Versluys (eds.), Handbook of Pragmatics, 1–25. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/hop.2.hum2
     https://doi.org/10.1075/hop.2.hum2 [Google Scholar]
  27. 1997 The Semantic Foundations of Cognitive Theories of Humor. HUMOR: International Journal of Humor Research, 395–421. 10.1515/humr.1997.10.4.395
     https://doi.org/10.1515/humr.1997.10.4.395 [Google Scholar]
  28. 2001a Humor and Irony in Interaction: From Mode Adoption to Failure of Detection. In Luigi Anolli , Rita Ciceri & Giuseppe Riva (eds.), Say not to Say: New Perspectives on Miscommunication, 166–186. Amsterdam: IOS Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. 2001b Humorous Texts: A Semantic and Pragmatic Analysis. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110887969
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110887969 [Google Scholar]
  30. (ed.) 2003 The Pragmatics of Humor (Journal of Pragmatics 35). Amsterdam: North-Holland. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(02)00178‑9
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00178-9 [Google Scholar]
  31. 2006 Cognitive Linguistics and Humor. HUMOR: International Journal of Humor Research19(3). 341–362. 10.1515/HUMOR.2006.017
     https://doi.org/10.1515/HUMOR.2006.017 [Google Scholar]
  32. 2008 A Primer for the Linguistics of Humor. In Victor Raskin (ed.), The Primer of Humor Research (Humor Research 8), 101–155. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110198492.101
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110198492.101 [Google Scholar]
  33. 2010 Humour. In Louise Cummings (ed.), The Pragmatics Encyclopedia, 199–201. London, New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203873069
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203873069 [Google Scholar]
  34. Attardo, Salvatore
    2013 Intentionality and Irony. In Leonor Ruiz Gurillo & M. B. Alvarado Ortega (eds.), Irony and Humor: From Pragmatics to Discourse (Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 231), 39–57. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.231.04att
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.231.04att [Google Scholar]
  35. Attardo, Salvatore
    2017a Humor and Pragmatics. In Salvatore Attardo (ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Language and Humor (Routledge Handbooks in Linguistics). New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315731162‑13
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315731162-13 [Google Scholar]
  36. 2017b Humor in Language. In Salvatore Attardo (ed.), Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.013.342
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.013.342 [Google Scholar]
  37. 2017c The General Theory of Verbal Humor. In Salvatore Attardo (ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Language and Humor (Routledge Handbooks in Linguistics), 126–142. New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315731162‑10
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315731162-10 [Google Scholar]
  38. (ed.) 2017d The Routledge Handbook of Language and Humor (Routledge Handbooks in Linguistics). New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315731162
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315731162 [Google Scholar]
  39. 2020 Humor. In Jan-Ola Östman & Jef Verschueren (eds.), Handbook of Pragmatics (Handbook of Pragmatics), 155–182. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/hop.23.hum2
     https://doi.org/10.1075/hop.23.hum2 [Google Scholar]
  40. Attardo, Salvatore , Donalee Attardo Hughes , Paul Baltes & Marnie J. Petray
    1994 The Linear Organization of Jokes: Analysis of Two Thousand Texts. HUMOR: International Journal of Humor Research7(1). 27–54. 10.1515/humr.1994.7.1.27
     https://doi.org/10.1515/humr.1994.7.1.27 [Google Scholar]
  41. Attardo, Salvatore & Jean C. Chabanne
    1992 Jokes as a Text Type. HUMOR: International Journal of Humor Research5(1–2). 165–176. 10.1515/humr.1992.5.1‑2.165
     https://doi.org/10.1515/humr.1992.5.1-2.165 [Google Scholar]
  42. Attardo, Salvatore , Jodi Eisterhold , Jennifer Hay & Isabella Poggi
    2003 Multimodal Markers of Irony and Sarcasm. HUMOR: International Journal of Humor Research16(2). 243–260. 10.1515/humr.2003.012
     https://doi.org/10.1515/humr.2003.012 [Google Scholar]
  43. Attardo, Salvatore & Lucy Pickering
    2011 Timing in the Performance of Jokes. HUMOR: International Journal of Humor Research24(2). 233–250. 10.1515/HUMR.2011.015
     https://doi.org/10.1515/HUMR.2011.015 [Google Scholar]
  44. Attardo, Salvatore , Lucy Pickering & Amanda Baker
    2011 Prosodic and Multimodal Markers of Humor in Conversation. Pragmatics & Cognition19(2). 224–247. 10.1075/pc.19.2.03att
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.19.2.03att [Google Scholar]
  45. Attardo, Salvatore & Victor Raskin
    1991 Script Theory Revis(it)ed: Joke Similarity and Joke Representation Model. HUMOR: International Journal of Humor Research4(3–4). 293–348. 10.1515/humr.1991.4.3‑4.293
     https://doi.org/10.1515/humr.1991.4.3-4.293 [Google Scholar]
  46. 2017 Linguistics and Humor Theory. In Salvatore Attardo (ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Language and Humor (Routledge Handbooks in Linguistics), 49–63. New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315731162‑5
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315731162-5 [Google Scholar]
  47. Bakhtin, Michael M.
    2014 Discourse in the Novel (1981[1934]). In: The Dialogic Imagination. Four Essays. In Johannes Angermuller , Dominique Maingueneau & Ruth Wodak (eds.), Discourse Studies Reader: Main Currents in Theory and Analysis, 28–35. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/z.184.15bak
     https://doi.org/10.1075/z.184.15bak [Google Scholar]
  48. Balirano, Giuseppe
    2013 The Strange Case of The Big Bang Theory and its Extra-Ordinary Italian Audiovisual Translation: A Multimodal Corpus-Based Analysis. Perspectives21(4). 563–576. 10.1080/0907676X.2013.831922
     https://doi.org/10.1080/0907676X.2013.831922 [Google Scholar]
  49. Balteiro, Isabel
    2018 Oh Wait: English Pragmatic Markers in Spanish Football Chatspeak. Journal of Pragmatics133. 123–133. 10.1016/j.pragma.2018.03.011
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.03.011 [Google Scholar]
  50. Bannard, Colin & Elena Lieven
    2012 Formulaic Language in L1 Acquisition. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics. 32. 3–16. 10.1017/S0267190512000062
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190512000062 [Google Scholar]
  51. Barbera, Joseph & William Hanna
    1960–1966 The Flintstones.
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Bardovi-Harlig, Kathleen
    2014 “On the Role of Formulas in the Acquisition of L2 Pragmatics.” InInterlanguage: Forty Years Later, edited by ZhaoHong Han and Elaine Tarone , 1–28. Language Learning & Language Teaching 39. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=5xd7z5kaaaaj&hl=de&oi=sra
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Bateson, Gregory
    1953a About Games and Being Serious. ETC: A Review of General Semantics10(3). 213–217.
     [Google Scholar]
  54. 1953b The Position of Humor in Human Communication. In Heinz von Foerster , Margaret Mead & Hans Teuber (eds.), Cybernetics: Circular Causal and Feedback Mechanisms in Biological and Social Systems: Transactions of the Ninth Conference, March 20–21, 1952 , 1–47. New York: Josiah Macy, Jr. Foundation.
     [Google Scholar]
  55. 1955 A Theory of Play and Fantasy: A Report on Theoretical Aspects of the Project of Study of the Role of Paradoxes of Abstraction in Communication. Approaches to the Study of Human Personality: Psychiatric Research Reports, 39–51.
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Beasley, Aaron L.
    2019 Using Sitcoms to Measure Humor Comprehension Between L1, L2, and Bilingual Users of English: Implications for Pragmatic ResearchDoctoral Dissertation.
  57. Beck, Stephenson , Sarah E. Clabaugh , Ruth A. Clark , Megan C. Kosovski , Rivka Daar , Veronica Hefner , Tracy Kmetz , Shelia McDaniel , Laura Miller , Cortney Moriarty , Zhilong Qian , Siddhartha Raja , Mary Ramey & Ratnadeep Suri
    2007 Teasing Among College Men and Women. Communication Studies58(2). 157–172. 10.1080/10510970701341105
     https://doi.org/10.1080/10510970701341105 [Google Scholar]
  58. Becker, Joseph D.
    1975 The Phrasal Lexicon. Theoretical Issues in Natural Language Processing, 60–63. 10.3115/980190.980212
     https://doi.org/10.3115/980190.980212 [Google Scholar]
  59. Beckmann, Susanne & Peter-Paul König
    2002 Pragmatische Phraseologismen. In D. A. Cruse , Franz Hundsnurscher , Michael Job & Peter R. Lutzeier (eds.), Lexikologie: Ein internationales Handbuch zur Natur und Struktur von Wörtern und Wortschätzen. 1. Halbband [= Lexicology: An international handbook on the nature and structure of words and vocabularies.] Volume 1 (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft / Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science (HSK) 21/1), 412–428. Berlin: de Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
  60. Bednarek, Monika
    2010 The Language of Fictional Television. London, New York: Continuum.
     [Google Scholar]
  61. 2011 The Stability of the Televisual Character: A Corpus-Stylistic Case Study. In Roberta Piazza , Monika Bednarek & Fabio Rossi (eds.), Telecinematic Discourse: Approaches to the Language of Films and Television Series (Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 211), 185–204. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.211.13bed
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.211.13bed [Google Scholar]
  62. 2012 Constructing ‘Nerdiness’: Characterisation in The Big Bang Theory. Multilingua31(2–3). 199–229. 10.1515/multi‑2012‑0010
     https://doi.org/10.1515/multi-2012-0010 [Google Scholar]
  63. 2017 The Role of Dialogue in Fiction. In Miriam A. Locher & Andreas H. Jucker (eds.), Pragmatics of Fiction (Handbooks of Pragmatics 12), 129–158. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110431094‑005
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110431094-005 [Google Scholar]
  64. 2018 Language and Television Series: A Linguistic Approach to TV Dialogue. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108559553
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108559553 [Google Scholar]
  65. 2020 The Sydney Corpus of Television Dialogue: Designing and Building a Corpus of Dialogue from US TV Series. Corpora15(1). 107–119. 10.3366/cor.2020.0187
     https://doi.org/10.3366/cor.2020.0187 [Google Scholar]
  66. Bednarek, Monika & Wolfram Bublitz
    2006a Enjoy! The (Phraseological) Culture of Having Fun. In Paul Skandera (ed.), Phraseology and Culture in English (Topics in English Linguistics 54), 109–135. Berlin: de Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
  67. Bednarek, Monika & Wolfram Bublitz
    2006b Reported Speech: Pragmatic Aspects. In Keith Brown (ed.), Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, 2nd edn.550–553. Amsterdam: Elsevier. 10.1016/B0‑08‑044854‑2/00369‑2
     https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/00369-2 [Google Scholar]
  68. Beers Fägersten, Kristy
    2016 Introduction: The Linguist’s View of Television. In Kristy Beers Fägersten (ed.), Watching TV with a Linguist (Television and Popular Culture), 13–17. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  69. Belica, Cyril & Kathrin Steyer
    2008 Korpusanalytische Zugänge zu sprachlichem Usus. [Corpus-analytical approaches to linguistic usage] In Marie Vachková (ed.), Beiträge zur bilingualen Lexikographie [Contributions to bilingual lexicography], 7–24. Prague: Univ. Karlova Filozifická Fak.
     [Google Scholar]
  70. Bell, Nancy D.
    2012 Formulaic Language, Creativity, and Language Play in a Second Language. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics32. 189–205. 10.1017/S0267190512000013
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190512000013 [Google Scholar]
  71. (ed.) 2016 Multiple Perspectives on Language Play. Berlin, Boston: de Gruyter. 10.1515/9781501503993
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501503993 [Google Scholar]
  72. 2018 Pragmatics, Humor Studies, and the Study of Interaction. In Cornelia Ilie & Neal R. Norrick (eds.), Pragmatics and its Interfaces (Pragmatics and Beyond New Series 294), 291–310. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.294.13bel
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.294.13bel [Google Scholar]
  73. Benshoff, Harry M.
    2016 Film and Television Analysis: An Introduction to Methods, Theories, and Approaches. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203129968
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203129968 [Google Scholar]
  74. Bertero, Dario & Pascale Fung
    2016 A Long Short-Term Memory Framework for Predicting Humor in Dialogues. In Kevin Knight , Ani Nenkova & Owen Rambow (eds.), Proceedings of the 2016 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, 130–135. Stroudsburg: Association for Computational Linguistics. 10.18653/v1/N16‑1016
     https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/N16-1016 [Google Scholar]
  75. Bezuidenhout, Anne
    2013 Perspective Taking in Conversation: A Defense of Speaker Non-Egocentricity. Journal of Pragmatics48(1). 4–16. 10.1016/j.pragma.2012.11.007
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.11.007 [Google Scholar]
  76. Biber, Douglas
    2009 A Corpus-Driven Approach to Formulaic Language in English. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics14(3). 275–311. 10.1075/ijcl.14.3.08bib
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.14.3.08bib [Google Scholar]
  77. Biber, Douglas , Susan Conrad & Viviana Cortes
    2004 ‘“If You Look at…”: Lexical Bundles in University Teaching and Textbooks. Applied Linguistics25. 371–405. 10.1093/applin/25.3.371
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/25.3.371 [Google Scholar]
  78. Biber, Douglas , Stig Johannson , Geoffrey Leech , Edward Finegan & Susan Conrad
    1999 The Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.
     [Google Scholar]
  79. Billig, Michael
    2001 Humour and Hatred: The Racist Jokes of the Ku Klux Klan. Discourse & Society12(3). 267–289. 10.1177/0957926501012003001
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926501012003001 [Google Scholar]
  80. 2005 Violent Racist Jokes: An Analysis of Extreme Racist Humour. In Sharon Lockyer & Michael Pickering (eds.), Beyond a Joke. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
     [Google Scholar]
  81. Bladas, Òscar
    2012 Conversational Routines, Formulaic Language and Subjectification. Journal of Pragmatics44(8). 929–957. 10.1016/j.pragma.2012.04.009
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.04.009 [Google Scholar]
  82. Blake, Barry J.
    2007 Playing with Words: Humour in the English Language. London, Oakville: Equinox.
     [Google Scholar]
  83. Blake, Marc
    2010 How to be a Comedy Writer: Secrets from the Inside (Creative Writing Skills, 1). Luton: Andrews UK Ltd.
     [Google Scholar]
  84. Blake, Mike
    2019 Humorous Quotations: Brilliant Wisecracks and One-Liners. London: Sirius.
     [Google Scholar]
  85. Blakemore, Diane
    2004 Discourse Markers. In Laurence R. Horn & Gregory Ward (eds.), The Handbook of Pragmatics (Blackwell Handbooks in Linguistics 16), 221–240. Malden: Blackwell. 10.1111/b.9780631225485.2005.00012.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/b.9780631225485.2005.00012.x [Google Scholar]
  86. Boersma, Paul , and David Weenink
    2026 Praat: doing phonetics by computer [Computer program]. Version 6.4.65, retrieved24 April 2026fromhttps://praat.org
  87. Boje, David , Michaela Driver & Yue Cai
    2005 Fiction and Humor in Transforming McDonald’s Narrative Strategies. Culture and Organization11(3). 195–208. 10.1080/14759550500203151
     https://doi.org/10.1080/14759550500203151 [Google Scholar]
  88. Bolinger, Dwight
    1979 Meaning and Memory. In George G. Haydu (ed.), Experience forms: Their Cultural and Individual Place and Function (World Anthropology), 95–112. The Hague: Mouton. 10.1515/9783110815733.95
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110815733.95 [Google Scholar]
  89. Bonsignori, Veronica & Silvia Bruti
    2014 Across Lingua-Cultures: Introductions and Wishes in Subtitled TV Series. In Beatrice Garzelli & Michela Baldo (eds.), Subtitling and Intercultural Communication: European Languages and Beyond (InterLinguistica 1), 77–100. Pisa: Edizioni ETS.
     [Google Scholar]
  90. Bousfield, Derek
    2014 Stylistics, Speech Acts and Im/politeness Theory. In Michael Burke (ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Stylistics (Routledge Handbooks in English Language Studies), 118–134. London, New York: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group. 10.4324/9781315795331
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315795331 [Google Scholar]
  91. Boxer, Diana & Florencia Cortes-Conde
    1997 From Bonding and Biting: Conversational Joking and Identity Display. Journal of Pragmatics27(3). 275–295. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(96)00031‑8
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(96)00031-8 [Google Scholar]
  92. Boxman-Shabtai, Lillian & Limor Shifman
    2014 Evasive Targets: Deciphering Polysemy in Mediated Humor. The Journal of Communication64(5). 977–998. 10.1111/jcom.12116
     https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12116 [Google Scholar]
  93. Brinton, Laurel J.
    2007 The Development of I Mean: Implications for the Study of Historical Pragmatics. In Susan M. Fitzmaurice & Irma Taavitsainen (eds.), Methods in Historical Pragmatics (Topics in English Linguistics 52), 37–80. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110197822.37
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197822.37 [Google Scholar]
  94. Brinton, Laurel J. & Elizabeth C. Traugott
    2006 Lexicalization and Language Change (Research Surveys in Linguistics). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511615962
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511615962 [Google Scholar]
  95. Britton, Douglas
    2009 That’s What She Said: Why Limiting the Use of Uncorroborated Eyewitness Identification Testimony Could Prevent Wrongful Convictions in Texas. Texas Tech Law Review41. 561–585.
     [Google Scholar]
  96. Brock, Alexander
    2011 Bumcivilian — Systemic Aspects of Humorous Communication in Comedies. In Roberta Piazza , Monika Bednarek & Fabio Rossi (eds.), Telecinematic Discourse: Approaches to the Language of Films and Television Series (Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 211), 263–280. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.211.17bro
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.211.17bro [Google Scholar]
  97. 2015 Participation Frameworks and Participation in Televised Sitcom, Candid Camera and Stand-Up Comedy. In Marta Dynel & Jan Chovanec (eds.), Participation in Public and Social Media Interactions (Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 256), 27–47. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.256.02bro
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.256.02bro [Google Scholar]
  98. Brône, Geert
    2008 Hyper- and Misunderstanding in Interactional Humor. Journal of Pragmatics40(12). 2027–2061. 10.1016/j.pragma.2008.04.011
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.04.011 [Google Scholar]
  99. 2012 Humour and Irony in Cognitive Pragmatics. In Hans-Jörg Schmid (ed.), Cognitive Pragmatics (Handbook of Pragmatics 4), 463–504. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110214215.463
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110214215.463 [Google Scholar]
  100. Brône, Geert & Kurt Feyaerts
    2003 The Cognitive Linguistics of Incongruity Resolution: Marked Reference-Point Structures in Humor. University of Leuven, Department of Linguistics preprint (205). [no pagination]. https://www.academia.edu/​5953936/The​_cognitive​_linguistics​_of​_incongruity​_resolution​_Marked​_reference​_point​_structures​_in​_humor
     [Google Scholar]
  101. Brône, Geert , Kurt Feyaerts & Tony Veale
    (eds.) 2015 Cognitive Linguistics and Humor Research (Applications of Cognitive Linguistics 26). Berlin et al.: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110346343
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110346343 [Google Scholar]
  102. Broth, Mathias & Lorenza Mondada
    2013 Walking Away: The Embodied Achievement of Activity Closings in Mobile Interaction. Journal of Pragmatics47(1). 41–58. 10.1016/j.pragma.2012.11.016
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.11.016 [Google Scholar]
  103. Brown, Penelope & Stephen C. Levinson
    2011[1987] Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage (Studies in Interactional Sociolinguistics 4), 21st edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  104. Bruti, Silvia & Gianmarco Vignozzi
    2016 Routines as Social Pleasantries in Period Dramas: A Corpus Linguistic Analysis. In Roberta Ferrari & Silvia Bruti (eds.), A Language of One’s Own: Idiolectal English, 207–239. Bologna: I libri di Emil.
     [Google Scholar]
  105. Bubel, Claudia
    2006 The Linguistic Construction of Character Relations in TV Drama: Doing Friendship in Sex and the City: Universität des Saarlandes Doctoral Dissertation.
  106. 2008 Film Audiences as Overhearers. Journal of Pragmatics40(1). 55–71. 10.1016/j.pragma.2007.10.001
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2007.10.001 [Google Scholar]
  107. 2011 Relationship Impression Formation: How Viewers Know People on the Screen are Friends. In Roberta Piazza , Monika Bednarek & Fabio Rossi (eds.), Telecinematic Discourse: Approaches to the Language of Films and Television Series (Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 211). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.211.15bub
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.211.15bub [Google Scholar]
  108. Bubel, Claudia & Alice Spitz
    2006 ‘One of the Last Vestiges of Gender Bias’: The Characterization of Women Through the Telling of Dirty Jokes in Ally McBeal. HUMOR: International Journal of Humor Research, 71–104. 10.1515/HUMOR.2006.004
     https://doi.org/10.1515/HUMOR.2006.004 [Google Scholar]
  109. Bublitz, Wolfram
    2015 Introducing Quoting as a Ubiquitous Meta-Communicative Act. In Jenny Arendholz , Wolfram Bublitz & Monika Kirner-Ludwig (eds.), The Pragmatics of Quoting Now and Then (Topics in English Linguistics 89), 1–26. Berlin, Munich, Boston: de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110427561‑002
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110427561-002 [Google Scholar]
  110. Bucholtz, Mary , Elena Skapoulli , Brendan Barnwell & Jung-Eun J. Lee
    2011 Entextualized Humor in the Formation of Scientist Identities among U.S. Undergraduates. Anthropology & Education Quarterly42(3). 177–192. 10.1111/j.1548‑1492.2011.01126.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1492.2011.01126.x [Google Scholar]
  111. Burger, Christoph , Dmitrij Dobrovol’skij , Peter Kühn & Neal R. Norrick
    2007a Phraseologie: Objektbereich, Terminologie und Forschungsschwerpunkte [Phraseology: Subject area, terminology and research topics]. In Harald Burger , Dmitrij Dobrovol’skij , Peter Kühn & Neal R. Norrick (eds.), Phraseology. An International Handbook of Contemporary Research (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft / Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science 28/1), 1–19. Berlin, New York: de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110171013.1
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110171013.1 [Google Scholar]
  112. Burger, Harald
    2004 Phraseologie — Kräuter und Rüben? Traditionen und Perspektiven der Forschung [Phraseology — herbs and turnips? Traditions and perspectives in research]. In Kathrin Steyer (ed.), Wortverbindungen — mehr oder weniger fest [word connections — more or less fixed] (Jahrbuch des Instituts für Deutsche Sprache 2003), 19–40. Berlin, New York: de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110622768‑003
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110622768-003 [Google Scholar]
  113. Burger, Harald
    2010 Phraseologie: Eine Einführung am Beispiel des Deutschen [Phraseology: An introduction using German as an example] (ESV basics 36), 4th edn. Berlin: Erich Schmidt.
     [Google Scholar]
  114. Burger, Harald
    2015 Phraseologie: Eine Einführung am Beispiel des Deutschen [Phraseology: An introduction using German as an example] (ESV basics 36), 5th edn. Berlin: Erich Schmidt.
     [Google Scholar]
  115. Burger, Harald , Annelies H. Buhofer , Ambros Sialm & Brigit Eriksson
    1982 Handbuch der Phraseologie [Handbook of phraseology]. Berlin, New York: Walter de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110849394
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110849394 [Google Scholar]
  116. Burger, Harald , Dmitrij Dobrovol’skij , Peter Kühn & Neal R. Norrick
    (eds.) 2007b Phraseology. An International Handbook of Contemporary Research (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft / Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science 28/1). Berlin, New York: de Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
  117. Burgers, Christian & Margot van Mulken
    2017 Humor Markers. In Salvatore Attardo (ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Language and Humor (Routledge Handbooks in Linguistics). New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315731162‑27
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315731162-27 [Google Scholar]
  118. Bushnell, Cade
    2014 On Developing a Systematic Methodology for Analyzing Categories in Talk-In-Interaction: Sequential Categorization Analysis. Pragmatics24(4). 735–756. 10.1075/prag.24.4.03bus
     https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.24.4.03bus [Google Scholar]
  119. Bybee, Joan
    2006 From Usage to Grammar: The Mind’s Response to Repetition. Language82(4). 711–733. 10.1353/lan.2006.0186
     https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2006.0186 [Google Scholar]
  120. Calude, Andreea S.
    2008 Demonstrative Clefts and Double Cleft Constructions in Spontaneous Spoken English. Studia Linguistica62(1). 78–118. 10.1111/j.1467‑9582.2007.00140.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9582.2007.00140.x [Google Scholar]
  121. 2009 Cleft Constructions in Spoken English. Saarbrücken: VDM.
     [Google Scholar]
  122. Cappelen, Herman & Ernie Lepore
    2015 Varieties of Quotation. In Herman Cappelen & Ernie Lepore (eds.), Liberating Content, 225–241: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199641338.003.0012
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199641338.003.0012 [Google Scholar]
  123. Carter, Ronald
    2004 Language and Creativity: The Art of Common Talk. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315658971
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315658971 [Google Scholar]
  124. 2012[1987] Vocabulary: Applied Linguistic Perspectives (Routledge Linguistics Classics). Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203124659
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203124659 [Google Scholar]
  125. Carter, Ronald & Michael McCarthy
    2006 Cambridge Grammar of English: A Comprehensive Guide; Spoken and Written English; Grammar and Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  126. Chafe, Wallace L.
    1968 Idiomaticity as an Anomaly in the Chomskyan Paradigm. Foundations of Language4. 109–125.
     [Google Scholar]
  127. Cheng, Winnie
    2007 The Use of Vague Language Across Spoken Genres in an Intercultural Hong Kong Corpus. In Joan Cutting (ed.), Vague Language Explored, 161–181. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230627420_9
     https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230627420_9 [Google Scholar]
  128. Chepinchikj, Neda & Celia Thompson
    2016 Analysing Cinematic Discourse Using Conversation Analysis. Discourse, Context & Media14. 40–53. 10.1016/j.dcm.2016.09.001
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2016.09.001 [Google Scholar]
  129. Chetwynd, Josh
    2017 Totally Scripted: Idioms, Words and Quotes from Hollywood to Broadway That Have Hhanged the English Language. Guilford: Lyons Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  130. Chiaro, Delia
    1992 Language of Jokes: Analyzing Verbal Play (The Interface Series). London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203327562
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203327562 [Google Scholar]
  131. Chimezie, Amuzie
    1976 The Dozens. Journal of Black Studies6(4). 401–420. 10.1177/002193477600600407
     https://doi.org/10.1177/002193477600600407 [Google Scholar]
  132. Chimsky, Mark E.
    2013 That’s What She Said!: More Than 150 Witty Sayings from Funny Women and Movie Legends. South Portland: Sellers.
     [Google Scholar]
  133. Chovanec, Jan
    2017 Interactional Humour and Spontaneity in TV Documentaries. Lingua197. 34–49. 10.1016/j.lingua.2017.04.007
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2017.04.007 [Google Scholar]
  134. Chovanec, Jan
    2018 Laughter and Non-Humorous Situations in TV Documentaries. In Villy Tsakona & Jan Chovanec (eds.), The Dynamics of Interactional Humor: Creating and Negotiating Humor in Everyday Encounters (Topics in Humor Research 7), 155–180. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/thr.7.07cho
     https://doi.org/10.1075/thr.7.07cho [Google Scholar]
  135. Chovanec, Jan , and Villy Tsakona
    2018 “Investigating the Dynamics of Humor.” InThe Dynamics of Interactional Humor: Creating and Negotiating Humor in Everyday Encounters. Vol.7, edited by Villy Tsakona and Jan Chovanec , 1–26. Topics in Humor Research 7. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
     [Google Scholar]
  136. Cieślicka, Anna
    2006 Literal Salience in On-Line Processing of Idiomatic Expressions by Second Language Learners. Second Language Research22(2). 115–144. 10.1191/0267658306sr263oa
     https://doi.org/10.1191/0267658306sr263oa [Google Scholar]
  137. Closs Traugott, Elizabeth
    2010 (Inter)Subjectivity and (Inter)Subjectification: A Reassessment. In Kristin Davidse , Lieven Vandelanotte & Hubert Cuyckens (eds.), Subjectification, Intersubjectification and Grammaticalization (Topics in English Linguistics 66), 29–74. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110226102.1.29
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110226102.1.29 [Google Scholar]
  138. Coates, Jennifer
    2007 Talk in a Play Frame: More on Laughter and Intimacy. Journal of Pragmatics39(1). 29–49. 10.1016/j.pragma.2006.05.003
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2006.05.003 [Google Scholar]
  139. 2014 Gender and Humor in Everyday Conversation. In Delia Chiaro & Raffaella Baccolini (eds.), Gender and Humor: Interdisciplinary and International Perspectives, 147–164. New York, London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  140. Conklin, Kathy & Norbert Schmitt
    2008 Formulaic Sequences: Are they Processed More Quickly than Non-Formulaic Language by Native and Non-Native Speakers?Applied Linguistics29(1). 72–89. 10.1093/applin/amm022
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amm022 [Google Scholar]
  141. Cook, Guy
    2000 Language Play, Language Learning (Oxford Applied Linguistics). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  142. Coulmas, Florian
    (ed.) 1981a Conversational Routine: Explorations in Standardized Communication Situations and Prepatterned Speech (Rasmus Rask Studies in Pragmatic Linguistics 2). The Hague: Mouton.
     [Google Scholar]
  143. 1981b Introduction: Conversational Routine. In Florian Coulmas (ed.), Conversational Routine: Explorations in Standardized Communication Situations and Prepatterned Speech (Rasmus Rask Studies in Pragmatic Linguistics 2), 1–17. The Hague: Mouton. 10.1515/9783110809145.1
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110809145.1 [Google Scholar]
  144. 1981c Routine im Gespräch: Zur pragmatischen Fundierung der Idiomatik [Routine in conversation:For the pragmatic foundation of idiomatics]. Wiesbaden: Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft Athenaion. 10.37307/j.2198‑2430.1982.02.16
     https://doi.org/10.37307/j.2198-2430.1982.02.16 [Google Scholar]
  145. Cowie, Anthony P.
    1981 “The Treatment of Collocations and Idioms in Learners’ Dictionaries.” Applied Linguistics2 (3): 223–35. 10.1093/applin/II.3.223
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/II.3.223 [Google Scholar]
  146. 1988 Stable and Creative Aspects of Vocabulary. In Ronald Carter & Michael McCarthy (eds.), Vocabulary and Language Teaching, 126–139. London, New York: Longman. 10.4324/9781315835860
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315835860 [Google Scholar]
  147. 1994 Phraseology. In Ronald E. Asher & J. M. Y. Simpson (eds.), The Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, 3168–3171. Oxford: Elsevier Science & Technology.
     [Google Scholar]
  148. Cowie, Anthony P.
    1998 Creativity and Formulaic Language. Linguistica e Philologia8. 159–170.
     [Google Scholar]
  149. Cowie, Anthony P.
    2001 Speech Formulae in English: Problems of Analysis and Dictionary Treatment. In G. van der Meer & A. G. B. ter Meulen (eds.), Making Senses: From Lexeme to Discourse. In Honor of Werner Abraham, 1–12. Groningen: Center for Language and Cognition.
     [Google Scholar]
  150. Crawford, Mary
    1995 Talking Difference: On Gender and Language. London, Thousand Oaks: Sage.
     [Google Scholar]
  151. Culpeper, Jonathan
    2014 Language and Characterisation: People in Plays and Other Texts (Textual Explorations). Hoboken: Taylor and Francis. 10.4324/9781315839349
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315839349 [Google Scholar]
  152. Curl, Traci S.
    2006 Offers of Assistance: Constraints on Syntactic Design. Journal of Pragmatics38(8). 1257–1280. 10.1016/j.pragma.2005.09.004
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2005.09.004 [Google Scholar]
  153. Dailey, Lige, JR.
    1986 Playing the Dozens: A Psycho-Historical Examination of an African American Ritual. Berkeley, California: The Wright Institute Doctoral Dissertation.
  154. Davies, Catherine E.
    2003 How English-Learners Joke with Native Speakers: An Interactional Sociolinguistic Perspective on Humor as Collaborative Discourse across Cultures. Journal of Pragmatics35(9). 1361–1385. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(02)00181‑9
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00181-9 [Google Scholar]
  155. Davies, Mark
    2008– The Corpus of Contemporary American English. Available online athttps://www.english-corpora.org/coca/
  156. 2016– Corpus of Online Registers of English [CORE]. Available online atcorpus.byu.edu/core/
  157. Davis, Allison & John Dollard
    1947 Children of Bondage: The Personality Development of Negro Youth in the Urban South. Washington: American Council on Education.
     [Google Scholar]
  158. DeBraccio, Steven V.
    2014 That’s (Not) What She Said: The Case for Expanding Admission of Prior Inconsistent Statements in New York Criminal Trials. Albany Law Review78(1). 269–298.
     [Google Scholar]
  159. Detweiler, Eric
    2012 “I Was Just Doing a Little Joke There”: Irony and the Paradoxes of the Sitcom in The Office. The Journal of Popular Culture45(4). 727–748. 10.1111/j.1540‑5931.2012.00955.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5931.2012.00955.x [Google Scholar]
  160. Dienhart, John M.
    1998 A Linguistic Look at Riddles. Journal of Pragmatics31. 95–125. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(98)00056‑3
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(98)00056-3 [Google Scholar]
  161. Dollard, John
    1939 The Dozens: Dialectic of Insult. American Imago1(1). 3–25.
     [Google Scholar]
  162. Du Bois, John
    2007 The Stance Triangle. In Robert Englebretson (ed.), Stancetaking in Discourse: Subjectivity, Evaluation, Interaction (Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 164), 139–182. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.164.07du
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.164.07du [Google Scholar]
  163. Du Bois, John W. , Wallace L. Chafe , Charles Meyer , Sandra A. Thompson , Robert Englebretson & Nii Martey
    2000–2005 Santa Barbara Corpus of Spoken American English.
     [Google Scholar]
  164. Dundes, Alan
    1995 Mother Wit from the Laughing Barrel: Readings in the Interpretation of Afro-American Folklore (Critical Studies on Black Life and Culture). Jackson: University Press of Mississippi.
     [Google Scholar]
  165. Dyer, Gillian
    1999[1982] Advertising as Communication (Studies in Culture and Communication). London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  166. Dynel, Marta
    2013c Review of Jokes and the Linguistic Mind and Meaning and Humour. Journal of Pragmatics47(1). 131–133. 10.1016/j.pragma.2012.12.004
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.12.004 [Google Scholar]
  167. Dynel, Marta
    2007 Joking aside: Sociopragmatic Functions of Conversational Humour in Interpersonal Communication. In Piotr Cap & Joanna Nijakowska (eds.), Current Trends in Pragmatics, 8th edn.246–267. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholar Publishing.
     [Google Scholar]
  168. Dynel, Marta
    2008 No Aggression, Only Teasing: The Pragmatics of Teasing and Banter. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics4(2). 241–261. 10.2478/v10016‑008‑0001‑7
     https://doi.org/10.2478/v10016-008-0001-7 [Google Scholar]
  169. 2009a Beyond a Joke: Types of Conversational Humour. Language and Linguistics Compass3(5). 1284–1299. 10.1111/j.1749‑818X.2009.00152.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818X.2009.00152.x [Google Scholar]
  170. 2009b Humorous Garden-Paths: A Pragmatic-Cognitive Study. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
     [Google Scholar]
  171. 2011a I’ll Be There for You: On Participation-Based Sitcom Humour. In Marta Dynel (ed.), The Pragmatics of Humour across Discourse Domains (Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 210), 311–333. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.210.20dyn
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.210.20dyn [Google Scholar]
  172. 2011b Joker in the pack: Towards Determining the Status of Humorous Framing in Conversations. In Marta Dynel (ed.), The Pragmatics of Humour across Discourse Domains (Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 210), 217–241. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.210.15dyn
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.210.15dyn [Google Scholar]
  173. 2011c Stranger than Fiction? A Few Methodological Notes on Linguistic Research in Film Discourse. Brno Studies in English37(1). 41–61. 10.5817/BSE2011‑1‑3
     https://doi.org/10.5817/BSE2011-1-3 [Google Scholar]
  174. (ed.) 2011d The Pragmatics of Humour across Discourse Domains (Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 210). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.210
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.210 [Google Scholar]
  175. 2012 Garden Paths, Red Lights and Crossroads: On Finding Our Way to Understanding the Cognitive Mechanisms Underlying Jokes. Israeli Journal of Humor Research1(1). 29–85.
     [Google Scholar]
  176. (ed.) 2013a Developments in Linguistic Humour Theory (Topics in Humor Research 1). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/thr.1
     https://doi.org/10.1075/thr.1 [Google Scholar]
  177. 2013b Humorous Phenomena in Dramatic Discourse. The European Journal of Humor Research1(1). 22–60. 10.7592/EJHR2013.1.1.dynel
     https://doi.org/10.7592/EJHR2013.1.1.dynel [Google Scholar]
  178. 2014 On the Part of Ratified Participants: Ratified Listeners in Multi-Party Interactions. Brno Studies in English40(1). 27–44. 10.5817/BSE2014‑1‑2
     https://doi.org/10.5817/BSE2014-1-2 [Google Scholar]
  179. 2015 Impoliteness in the Service of Verisimilitude in Film Interaction. In Marta Dynel & Jan Chovanec (eds.), Participation in Public and Social Media Interactions (Pragmatics & Beyond New Series), 157–182. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/pbns.256.07dyn
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.256.07dyn [Google Scholar]
  180. 2017 But Seriously: On Conversational Humour and (Un)Truthfulness. Lingua197. 83–102. 10.1016/j.lingua.2017.05.004
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2017.05.004 [Google Scholar]
  181. 2018a Irony, Deception and Humour: Seeking the Truth about Overt and Covert Untruthfulness (Mouton Series in Pragmatics [MSP] 21). Berlin, Boston: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9781501507922
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501507922 [Google Scholar]
  182. 2018b Taking Cognisance of Cognitive Linguistic Research on Humour. Review of Cognitive Linguistics16(1). 1–18. 10.1075/rcl.00001.dyn
     https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.00001.dyn [Google Scholar]
  183. 2021 COVID-19 Memes Going Viral: On the Multiple Multimodal Voices behind Face Masks. Discourse & Society32(2). 175–195. 10.1177/0957926520970385
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926520970385 [Google Scholar]
  184. Dynel, Marta & Valeria Sinkeviciute
    2017 Conversational Humour: Spotlight on Languages and Cultures. Language & Communication55.
     [Google Scholar]
  185. Eggins, Suzanne & Diana Slade
    2006[1997] Analysing Casual Conversation (Equinox Textbooks and Surveys in Linguistics). London: Equinox.
     [Google Scholar]
  186. Ehlich, Konrad
    1986 Interjektionen (Linguistische Arbeiten 111) [Interjections (Linguistic works 111)]. Berlin: de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783111357133
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783111357133 [Google Scholar]
  187. Eitelmann, Matthias & Ulrike Stange
    2016 The Pragmatics Explication: Making Sense of Nerds in The Big Bang Theory. In Kristy Beers Fägersten (ed.), Watching TV with a Linguist (Television and Popular Culture), 54–62. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  188. Elsaesser, Thomas & Malte Hagener
    2015 Film Theory: An Introduction Through the Senses, 2nd edn. New York, London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315740768
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315740768 [Google Scholar]
  189. Emmison, Michael
    1993 On the Analyzability of Conversational Fabrication. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics16(1). 83–108. 10.1075/aral.16.1.06emm
     https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.16.1.06emm [Google Scholar]
  190. Erman, Britt & Beatrice Warren
    2000 The Idiom Principle and the Open Choice Principle. Text20(1). 29–62. 10.1515/text.1.2000.20.1.29
     https://doi.org/10.1515/text.1.2000.20.1.29 [Google Scholar]
  191. Feilke, Helmuth
    1996 Sprache als soziale Gestalt: Ausdruck, Prägung und die Ordnung der sprachlichen Typik [Language as a social construct: expression, influence and the order of linguistic typicality]. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
     [Google Scholar]
  192. 2004 Kontext — Zeichen — Kompetenz. Wortverbindungen unter sprachtheoretischem Aspekt [Context — Signs — Competence. Word connections from a linguistic theory perspective]. In Kathrin Steyer (ed.), Wortverbindungen — mehr oder weniger fest [Word connections — more or less fixed] (Jahrbuch des Instituts für Deutsche Sprache 2003), 41–64. Berlin, New York: de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110622768‑004
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110622768-004 [Google Scholar]
  193. 2012 Was sind Textroutinen? Zur Theorie und Methodik des Forschungsfeldes [What are text routines? On the theory and methodology of the field of research]. In Helmuth Feilke & Katrin Lehnen (eds.), Schreib- und Textroutinen: Theorie, Erwerb und didaktisch-mediale Modellierung [Writing and text routines: theory, acquisition and didactic-media modelling] (Forum Angewandte Linguistik 52), 1–31. Frankfurt a.M.: Peter Lang. 10.3726/978‑3‑653‑01844‑8
     https://doi.org/10.3726/978-3-653-01844-8 [Google Scholar]
  194. Ferguson, Mark A. & Thomas E. Ford
    2008 Disparagement Humor: A Theoretical and Empirical Review of Psychoanalytic, Superiority, and Social Identity Theories. HUMOR: International Journal of Humor Research21(3). 283–312. 10.1515/HUMOR.2008.014
     https://doi.org/10.1515/HUMOR.2008.014 [Google Scholar]
  195. Fernando, Chitra
    1996 Idioms and Idiomaticity (Describing English Language). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  196. Fiedler, Sabine
    2007 English Phraseology: A Coursebook (Narr Studienbücher). Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag. 10.24053/9783823373384
     https://doi.org/10.24053/9783823373384 [Google Scholar]
  197. Filatkina, Natalia
    2007 Pragmatische Beschreibungsansätze [Pragmatic descriptive approaches]. In Harald Burger , Dmitrij Dobrovol’skij , Peter Kühn & Neal R. Norrick (eds.), Phraseology. An International Handbook of Contemporary Research (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft / Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science 28/1), 132–157. Berlin, New York: de Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
  198. 2009 Historische formelhafte Sprache als ‘harte Nuss’ der Korpus- und Computerlinguistik. Ihre Annotation und Analyse im HiFoS-Projekt. Linguistik online [Historical formulaic language as a “tough nut to crack” in corpus and computational linguistics. Its annotation and analysis in the HiFoS project. Linguistics online ] 39(3). 75–95. 10.13092/lo.39.478
     https://doi.org/10.13092/lo.39.478 [Google Scholar]
  199. Filatkina, Natalia
    2011 Variation im Bereich der formelhaften Wendungen am Beispiel der Luxemburger Rechnungsbücher [Variation in the area of formulaic expressions using the example of Luxembourg’s account books] (1388–1500). In Stephan Elspaß & Michaela Negele (eds.), Sprachvariation und Sprachwandel in der Stadt der Frühen Neuzeit: Beiträge zur 26. Tagung des Internationalen Arbeitskreises “Historische Sprachenforschung", der am 5. und 6. Oktober 2009 an der Universität Augsburg stattfand [Language variation and language change in the early modern city: Contributions to the 26th conference of the International Working Group on Historical Linguistics, held on 5 and 6 October 2009 at the University of Augsburg] (Sprache — Literatur und Geschichte. Studien zur Linguistik /Germanistik 38). Heidelberg: Winter.
     [Google Scholar]
  200. Fillmore, Charles J.
    1994 Humor in Academic Discourse. In Douglas Macbeth & Allen Grimshaw (eds.), What’s Going On Here? Complementary Studies of Professional Talk. (Advances in discourse processes 43), 271–310: Academic Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  201. Fillmore, Charles J. , Paul Kay , and Mary Catherine O’Connor
    1988 “Regularity and Idiomaticity in Grammatical Constructions: The Case of Let Alone.” Language64 (3): 501–38. 10.2307/414531
     https://doi.org/10.2307/414531 [Google Scholar]
  202. Firth, John R.
    1957 A Synopsis of Linguistic Theory 1930–1955. In John R. Firth (ed.), Studies in Linguistic Analysis. Special Volume of the Philological Society, 1–32. Oxford: Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  203. Fix, Ulla
    2007 Der Spruch — Slogans und andere Spruchtextsorten [The saying — slogans and other types of sayings]. In Harald Burger , Dmitrij Dobrovol’skij , Peter Kühn & Neal R. Norrick (eds.), Phraseology. An International Handbook of Contemporary Research (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft / Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science 28/1), 459–468. Berlin, New York: de Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
  204. Flamson, Thomas J. & Gregory A. Bryant
    2013 Signals of Humor: Encryption and Laughter in Social Interaction. In Marta Dynel (ed.), Developments in Linguistic Humour Theory (Topics in Humor Research 1), 49–74. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/thr.1.04fla
     https://doi.org/10.1075/thr.1.04fla [Google Scholar]
  205. Fleischer, Wolfgang
    1997 Phraseologie der deutschen Gegenwartssprache [Phraseology of contemporary German] (Niemeyer-Studienbuch), 2nd edn. Tübingen: Niemeyer. 10.1515/9783110947625
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110947625 [Google Scholar]
  206. Fónagy, Ivan
    2001 Languages Within Language: An Evolutive Approach (Foundations of Semiotics 13). Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/fos.13
     https://doi.org/10.1075/fos.13 [Google Scholar]
  207. Forabosco, Giovannantonio
    1992 Cognitive Aspects of the Humor Process: The Concept of Incongruity. HUMOR: International Journal of Humor Research5(1–2). 45–68. 10.1515/humr.1992.5.1‑2.45
     https://doi.org/10.1515/humr.1992.5.1-2.45 [Google Scholar]
  208. 2008 Is the Concept of Incongruity Still a Useful Construct for the Advancement of Humor Research?Lodz Papers in Pragmatics4. 45–62. 10.2478/v10016‑008‑0003‑5
     https://doi.org/10.2478/v10016-008-0003-5 [Google Scholar]
  209. Forceville, Charles
    1996 Pictorial Metaphor in Advertising. London, New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203272305
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203272305 [Google Scholar]
  210. Ford, Cecilia E. & Barbara A. Fox
    2010 Multiple Practices for Constructing Laughables. In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten , Elisabeth Reber & Margret Selting (eds.), Prosody in Interaction (Prosody in Interaction 23), 339–368. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/sidag.23.27for
     https://doi.org/10.1075/sidag.23.27for [Google Scholar]
  211. Ford, Thomas E. , Kyle Richardson , & Whitney E. Petit
    2015 Disparagement Humor and Prejudice: Contemporary Theory and Research. HUMOR: International Journal of Humor Research28(2). 171–186. 10.1515/humor‑2015‑0017
     https://doi.org/10.1515/humor-2015-0017 [Google Scholar]
  212. Franzke, Aline S. , Anja Bechmann , Michael Zimmer , Charles Ess , & Association of Internet Researchers
    2020 Internet Research: Ethical Guidelines 3.0. https://aoir.org/reports/ethics3.pdf
     [Google Scholar]
  213. Fraser, Bruce
    1996 Pragmatic Markers. Pragmatics6(2). 167–190. 10.1075/prag.6.2.03fra
     https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.6.2.03fra [Google Scholar]
  214. Fraser, Bruce
    2006 Towards a Theory of Discourse Markers. In Kerstin Fischer (ed.), Approaches to Discourse Particles, 189–204. Amsterdam: Brill. 10.1163/9780080461588_012
     https://doi.org/10.1163/9780080461588_012 [Google Scholar]
  215. Fry, William F.
    2017[1963] Sweet Madness: A Study of Humor, 2nd edn. London: Taylor and Francis.
     [Google Scholar]
  216. Fuertes-Olivera, Pedro A. Marisol Velasco-Sacristán , Ascensión Arribas-Baño & Eva Samaniego-Fernández
    2001 Persuasion and Advertising English: Metadiscourse in Slogans and Headlines. Journal of Pragmatics33(8). 1291–1307. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(01)80026‑6
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(01)80026-6 [Google Scholar]
  217. Georgakopoulou, Alexandra
    2007 Small Stories, Interaction and Identities. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/sin.8
     https://doi.org/10.1075/sin.8 [Google Scholar]
  218. Gibbs, John & Douglas Pye
    (eds.) 2005 Style and Meaning: Studies in the Detailed Analysis of Film, 1st edn. Manchester: Manchester Univ. Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  219. Gibbs, Raymond W.
    1985 Situational Conventions and Requests. In Joseph P. Forgas (ed.), Language and Social Situations, 97–110. New York: Springer New York. 10.1007/978‑1‑4612‑5074‑6_6
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-5074-6_6 [Google Scholar]
  220. 2002 A new Look at Literal Meaning in Understanding What is Said and Implicated. Journal of Pragmatics34(4). 457–486. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(01)00046‑7
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(01)00046-7 [Google Scholar]
  221. 2007 Idioms and Formulaic Language. In Dirk Geeraerts & Hubert Cuyckens (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, 697–725. New York: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  222. Giora, Rachel
    1991 On the Cognitive Aspects of the Joke. Journal of Pragmatics16(5). 465–485. 10.1016/0378‑2166(91)90137‑M
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(91)90137-M [Google Scholar]
  223. 1995 Irony. In Jef Verschueren , Jan-Ola Östman , Jan Blommaert , Chris Bulcaen & Eline Versluys (eds.), Handbook of Pragmatics, 1–20. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/hop.4.iro1
     https://doi.org/10.1075/hop.4.iro1 [Google Scholar]
  224. 1997 Understanding Figurative and Literal Language: The graded salience hypothesis. Cognitive Linguistics8(3). 183–206. 10.1515/cogl.1997.8.3.183
     https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1997.8.3.183 [Google Scholar]
  225. 2002 Optimal Innovation and Pleasure. In Oliviero Stock , Carlo Strapparava & Anton Nijholt (eds.), TWLT20 The April Fools’ Day Workshop on Computation Humour, 11–28. Trento: ITC-itst.
     [Google Scholar]
  226. 2003 On our Mind: Salience, Context, and Figurative Language. New York: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195136166.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195136166.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  227. 2004 On the Graded Salience Hypothesis. Intercultural Pragmatics1(1). 93–103. 10.1515/iprg.2004.001
     https://doi.org/10.1515/iprg.2004.001 [Google Scholar]
  228. Giora, Rachel & Ofer Fein
    1999 Irony: Context and Salience. Metaphor and Symbol14(4). 241–257. 10.1207/S15327868MS1404_1
     https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327868MS1404_1 [Google Scholar]
  229. Giora, Rachel , Ofer Fein , Dafna Laadan , Joe Wolfson , Michal Zeituny , Ran Kidron , Ronie Kaufman & Ronit Shaham
    2007 Expecting Irony: Context Versus Salience-Based Effects. Metaphor and Symbol22(2). 119–146. 10.1080/10926480701235346
     https://doi.org/10.1080/10926480701235346 [Google Scholar]
  230. Gläser, Rosemarie
    2011[1986] Phraseologie der englischen Sprache [Phraseology of the English language]. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
     [Google Scholar]
  231. Glenn, Phillip & Elizabeth Holt
    2017 Conversation Analysis of Humor. In Salvatore Attardo (ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Language and Humor (Routledge Handbooks in Linguistics). New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315731162‑21
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315731162-21 [Google Scholar]
  232. Glenn, Phillip J.
    2003 Laughter in Interaction (Studies in Interactional Sociolinguistics 18). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511519888
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511519888 [Google Scholar]
  233. Goatly, Andrew
    2012 Meaning and Humour (Key Topics in Semantics and Pragmatics). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511791536
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511791536 [Google Scholar]
  234. Goddard, Cliff
    2018 “Joking, Kidding, Teasing”: Slippery Categories for Cross-Cultural Comparison but Key Words for Understanding Anglo Conversational Humor. Intercultural Pragmatics15(4). 487–514. 10.1515/ip‑2018‑0017
     https://doi.org/10.1515/ip-2018-0017 [Google Scholar]
  235. Godioli, Alberto & Władysław Chłopicki
    2024 8 Humor and Figurative Language. In Thomas E. Ford , Władysław Chłopicki & Giselinde Kuipers (eds.), De Gruyter Handbook of Humor Studies, 145–162: de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110755770‑009
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110755770-009 [Google Scholar]
  236. Goffman, Erving
    1967 Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face Behavior. New York: Pantheon Books.
     [Google Scholar]
  237. 1978 Response Cries. Language54(4). 787–815. 10.2307/413235
     https://doi.org/10.2307/413235 [Google Scholar]
  238. (ed.) 1981 Forms of Talk. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  239. 1986[1974] Frame Analysis. An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  240. Golato, Andrea & Peter Golato
    2018 Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis. In Andreas H. Jucker , Klaus P. Schneider & Wolfram Bublitz (eds.), Methods in Pragmatics, 367–394. Berlin, Boston: de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110424928‑015
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110424928-015 [Google Scholar]
  241. Goldman, Robert
    1992 Reading Ads Socially. London, New York: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  242. Gramley, Stephan , Vivian Gramley & Kurt-Michael Pätzold
    2020 A Survey of Modern English, 3rd edn. London: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group. 10.4324/9780429300356
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429300356 [Google Scholar]
  243. Granger, Sylviane & Fanny Meunier
    (eds.) 2008 Phraseology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/z.139
     https://doi.org/10.1075/z.139 [Google Scholar]
  244. Granger, Sylviane & Magali Paquot
    2008 Disentangling the Phraseological Web. In Sylviane Granger & Fanny Meunier (eds.), Phraseology, 27–49. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/z.139.07gra
     https://doi.org/10.1075/z.139.07gra [Google Scholar]
  245. Grant, Lynn & Laurie Bauer
    2004 Criteria for Re-defining Idioms: Are we Barking up the Wrong Tree?Applied Linguistics25(1). 38–61. 10.1093/applin/25.1.38
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/25.1.38 [Google Scholar]
  246. Grice, Herbert P.
    1957 Meaning. The Philosophical Review66(3). 376–388. 10.2307/2182440
     https://doi.org/10.2307/2182440 [Google Scholar]
  247. 1969 Utterer’s Meaning and Intention. The Philosophical Review78. 86–116. 10.2307/2184179
     https://doi.org/10.2307/2184179 [Google Scholar]
  248. ed. 1989 Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  249. Gross, Gaston
    1996 Les expressions figées en français: Noms composés et autres locutions (Collection l’essentiel français) [Fixed expressions in French: Compound nouns and other idioms (The Essential French Collection)]. Gap: Ophrys.
     [Google Scholar]
  250. Gülich, Elisabeth
    1997 Routineformeln und Formulierungsroutinen. Ein Beitrag zur Beschreibung ‘formelhafter Texte’ [Routine formulas and formulation routines. A contribution to the description of ‘formulaic texts’]. In Rainer Wimmer & Franz-Josef Berens (eds.), Wortbildung und Phraseologie [Word formation and phraseology] (Studien zur deutschen Sprache 9), 131–175. Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag.
     [Google Scholar]
  251. Gumperz, John J.
    1982 Discourse Strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511611834
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511611834 [Google Scholar]
  252. 2005 Interactional Sociolinguistics: A Personal Perspective. In Deborah Schiffrin , Deborah Tannen & Heidi E. Hamilton (eds.), The Handbook of Discourse Analysis (Blackwell Handbooks in Linguistics), 215–228. Malden: Blackwell. 10.1002/9780470753460.ch12
     https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470753460.ch12 [Google Scholar]
  253. 2011 Contextualization Revisited. In Marta Dynel (ed.), The Pragmatics of Humour across Discourse Domains (Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 210), 39. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.22.04gum
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.22.04gum [Google Scholar]
  254. Günther, Ulrike
    2002 What’s in a Laugh? Humour, Jokes and Laughter in Conversational Corpus of the BNC. Freiburg: Albert-Ludwigs-University Doctoral Dissertation.
  255. Hale, Adrian
    2018 There is an After-Life (for Jokes, anyway): The Potential for, and Appeal of, ‘Immortality’ in Humor. HUMOR: International Journal of Humor Research31(3). 507–538. 10.1515/humor‑2017‑0105
     https://doi.org/10.1515/humor-2017-0105 [Google Scholar]
  256. Hall, Clark L.
    1943 Principles of Behavior: An Introduction to Behavior Theory. Oxford: Appleton-Century.
     [Google Scholar]
  257. Halliday, Michael A. K. & Ruqaiya Hasan
    1976 Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
     [Google Scholar]
  258. Haugh, Michael
    2010 Jocular Mockery, (Dis)Affiliation, and Face. Journal of Pragmatics42(8). 2106–2119. 10.1016/j.pragma.2009.12.018
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2009.12.018 [Google Scholar]
  259. 2011 Humour, Face and Im/Politeness in Getting Acquainted. In Bethan L. Davies , Michael Haugh & Andrew J. Merrison (eds.), Situated Politeness, 1st edn.165–184. London: Bloomsbury.
     [Google Scholar]
  260. 2016 Jocular Language Play, Social Action and (Dis)Affiliation in Conversational Interaction. In Nancy D. Bell (ed.), Multiple Perspectives on Language Play, 143–168. Berlin, Boston: de Gruyter. 10.1515/9781501503993‑007
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501503993-007 [Google Scholar]
  261. 2017 Teasing. In Salvatore Attardo (ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Language and Humor (Routledge Handbooks in Linguistics), 204–218. New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315731162‑15
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315731162-15 [Google Scholar]
  262. Hay, Jennifer
    2000 Functions of Humor in the Conversations of Men and Women. Journal of Pragmatics32(6). 709–742. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(99)00069‑7
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00069-7 [Google Scholar]
  263. 2001 The Pragmatics of Humor Support. HUMOR: International Journal of Humor Research14(1). 55–82. 10.1515/humr.14.1.55
     https://doi.org/10.1515/humr.14.1.55 [Google Scholar]
  264. He, Ali & Yang Zhang
    2018 Sexism in English Proverbs and Idioms. Journal of Language Teaching and Research9(2). 424–429. 10.17507/jltr.0902.27
     https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.0902.27 [Google Scholar]
  265. Hempelmann, Christian F.
    2014 Puns. In Salvatore Attardo (ed.), Encyclopedia of Humor Studies, 612–615. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
     [Google Scholar]
  266. Hempelmann, Christian F. & Tristan Miller
    2017 Puns. In Salvatore Attardo (ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Language and Humor (Routledge Handbooks in Linguistics). New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315731162‑8
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315731162-8 [Google Scholar]
  267. Hepburn, Alexa & Galina B. Bolden
    2013 The Conversation Analytic Approach to Transcription. In Jack Sidnell & Tanya Stivers (eds.), The Handbook of Conversation Analysis (Blackwell Handbooks in Linguistics), 57–76. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  268. Heritage, John
    1984a A Change-of-State Token and Aspects of its Sequential Placement. In J. M. Atkinson & John Heritage (eds.), Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis (Studies in Emotion and Social Interaction), 199–345. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511665868.020
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511665868.020 [Google Scholar]
  269. 1984b Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  270. Herring, Susan C.
    (ed.) 1996 Computer-Mediated Communication: Linguistic, Social and Cross-Cultural Perspectives (Pragmatics and Beyond 39). Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.39
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.39 [Google Scholar]
  271. 2007 A Faceted Classification Scheme for Computer-Mediated Discourse. language@internet4.
     [Google Scholar]
  272. Herring, Susan C. , Lois A. Scheidt , Sabrina Bonus , & Elijah Wright
    2004 Bridging the Gap: A Genre Analysis of Weblogs. In Sprague, Ralph H. Jr. (ed.), Proceedings of the 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences: (HICSS-37 2004) 5–8 January 2004, Big Island, Hawaii, abstracts and cd-rom of full papers, 40101b [sic]. Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society. 10.1109/HICSS.2004.1265271
     https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2004.1265271 [Google Scholar]
  273. Hetzron, Robert
    1991 On the Structure of Punchlines. HUMOR: International Journal of Humor Research4(1). 61–108. 10.1515/humr.1991.4.1.61
     https://doi.org/10.1515/humr.1991.4.1.61 [Google Scholar]
  274. Heyd, Theresa
    2010 How You Guys DOIN’? Staged Orality and Emerging Plural Address in the Television Series Friends. American Speech85(1). 33–66. 10.1215/00031283‑2010‑002
     https://doi.org/10.1215/00031283-2010-002 [Google Scholar]
  275. Hirsch, Eric D. , Joseph F. Kett , & James S. Trefil
    2002 The New Dictionary of Cultural Literacy, 3rd edn. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
     [Google Scholar]
  276. Hockett, Charles F.
    1977[1972] Jokes. In Charles F. Hockett (ed.), The View from Language: Selected Essays, 1948–1974, 257–289. Athens: University of Georgia Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  277. Hoffmann, Christian
    2023 The Art of Turn-Taking in Movie Phone Call Openings. In Christoph Schubert & Valentin Werner (eds.), Stylistic Approaches to Pop Culture (Routledge Studies in Rhetoric and Stylistics), 130–155. New York, London: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.
     [Google Scholar]
  278. Holmes, Janet
    2000 Politeness, Power and Provocation: How Humor Functions in the Workplace. Discourse Studies2(2). 159–185. 10.1177/1461445600002002002
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445600002002002 [Google Scholar]
  279. 2006 Sharing a Laugh: Pragmatic Aspects of Humor and Gender in the Workplace. Journal of Pragmatics38(1). 26–50. 10.1016/j.pragma.2005.06.007
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2005.06.007 [Google Scholar]
  280. Holmes, Janet , and Meredith Marra
    2002 “Having a Laugh at Work.” Journal of Pragmatics34 (12): 1683–1710. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(02)00032‑2
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00032-2 [Google Scholar]
  281. Holmes, Janet & Meredith Marra
    2002a Having a Laugh at Work. Journal of Pragmatics34(12). 1683–1710. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(02)00032‑2
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00032-2 [Google Scholar]
  282. 2002b Over the Edge? Subversive Humor between Colleagues and Friends. HUMOR: International Journal of Humor Research15(1). 65–87. 10.1515/humr.2002.006
     https://doi.org/10.1515/humr.2002.006 [Google Scholar]
  283. Holmes, Janet & Stephanie Schnurr
    2014 Funny, Feminine, and Flirtatious: Humor and Gendered Discourse Norms at Work. In Delia Chiaro & Raffaella Baccolini (eds.), Gender and Humor: Interdisciplinary and International Perspectives, 165–181. New York, London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  284. Holt, Elizabeth
    2011 On the Nature of “Laughables”. Pragmatics21(3). 393–410. 10.1075/prag.21.3.05hol
     https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.21.3.05hol [Google Scholar]
  285. Hopper, Robert
    1989 Speech in Telephone Openings: Emergent Interaction v. Routines. Western Journal of Speech Communication53(2). 178–194. 10.1080/10570318909374299
     https://doi.org/10.1080/10570318909374299 [Google Scholar]
  286. 1995 Episode Trajectory in Conversational Play. In Paul ten Have & George Psathas (eds.), Situated Order: Studies in the SocialOrganization of Talk and Embodied Activities (Studies in Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis 3), 57–71. Washington: International Institute for Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis.
     [Google Scholar]
  287. Horton, Andrew
    2000 Laughing out Loud: Writing the Comedy-Centered Screenplay. Berkeley: University of California Press. 10.1525/9780520923546
     https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520923546 [Google Scholar]
  288. Howarth, Peter
    1998 Phraseology and Second Language Proficiency. Applied Linguistics19(1). 24–44. 10.1093/applin/19.1.24
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/19.1.24 [Google Scholar]
  289. Hull, Rachel , Sümeyra Tosun & Jyotsna Vaid
    2017 What’s so Funny? Modelling Incongruity in Humour Production. Cognition & Emotion31(3). 484–499. 10.1080/02699931.2015.1129314
     https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2015.1129314 [Google Scholar]
  290. Hymes, Dell H.
    1962 The Ethnography of Speaking. In Thomas Gladwin & William C. Sturtevant (eds.), Anthropology and Human Behavior, 13–53. Washington: Anthropological Society of Washington.
     [Google Scholar]
  291. Ifantidou-Trouki, Elly
    1993 Sentential Adverbs and Relevance. Lingua90(1–2). 69–90. 10.1016/0024‑3841(93)90061‑Z
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3841(93)90061-Z [Google Scholar]
  292. Iloh, Constance
    2021 Do It for the Culture: The Case for Memes in Qualitative Research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods20. 160940692110258. 10.1177/16094069211025896
     https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069211025896 [Google Scholar]
  293. Jaki, Sylvia
    2014 Phraseological Substitutions in Newspaper Headlines: “More than Meats the Eye” (Human Cognitive Processing 46). Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/hcp.46
     https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.46 [Google Scholar]
  294. Jaszczolt, Kasia M. & Keith Allan
    (eds.) 2011 Salience and Defaults in Utterance Processing. Berlin, Boston: de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110270679
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110270679 [Google Scholar]
  295. Jefferson, Gail
    1979 A Technique for Inviting Laughter and its Subsequent Acceptance/​Declination. In George Psathas (ed.), Everyday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology, 79–96. New York, London: Irvington.
     [Google Scholar]
  296. 1985 An Exercise in the Transcription and Analysis of Laughter. In Teun A. van Dijk (ed.), Handbook of Discourse Analysis: Discourse and dialogue, 25–34. London: Academic Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  297. Jensen, Thomas W.
    2018 Humor as Interactional Affordances: An Ecological Perspective on Humor in Social Interaction. Psychology of Language and Communication22(1). 238–259. 10.2478/plc‑2018‑0010
     https://doi.org/10.2478/plc-2018-0010 [Google Scholar]
  298. Jhally, Sut
    1987 The Codes of Advertising: Fetishism and the Polit. Economy of Meaning in the Consumer Society. London: Pinter.
     [Google Scholar]
  299. Jones, Rodney
    2021 Data Collection and Transcription in Discourse Analysis: A Technological History. In Ken Hyland , Brian Paltridge & Lillian L. C. Wong (eds.), The Bloomsbury handbook of discourse analysis, 9–20. London: Bloomsbury Academic. 10.5040/9781350156111.ch‑001
     https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350156111.ch-001 [Google Scholar]
  300. Jongste, Henri de
    2016 Mental Models and Humorous Intent. Journal of Pragmatics95. 107–119. 10.1016/j.pragma.2016.01.006
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2016.01.006 [Google Scholar]
  301. 2020 Playing with Mental Models. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/thr.9
     https://doi.org/10.1075/thr.9 [Google Scholar]
  302. Jorgensen, Julia
    1996 The Functions of Sarcastic Irony in Speech. Journal of Pragmatics26(5). 613–634. 10.1016/0378‑2166(95)00067‑4
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(95)00067-4 [Google Scholar]
  303. Jucker, Andreas H.
    2021 Methodological Issues in Digital Conversation Analysis. Discourse, Context & Media42. 100520. 10.1016/j.dcm.2021.100520
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2021.100520 [Google Scholar]
  304. Jucker, Andreas H. & Sara W. Smith
    1998 And People Just you Know Like ‘wow’: Discourse Markers as Negotiating Strategies. In Andreas H. Jucker & Yael Ziv (eds.), Discourse Markers: Descriptions and Theory (Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 57), 171–201. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.57.10juc
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.57.10juc [Google Scholar]
  305. Jucker, Andreas H. , Sara W. Smith & Tanja Lüdge
    2003 Interactive Aspects of Vagueness in Conversation. Journal of Pragmatics35. 1737–1769. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(02)00188‑1
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00188-1 [Google Scholar]
  306. Jucker, Andreas H. & Yael Ziv
    1998 Discourse Markers: Introduction. In Andreas H. Jucker & Yael Ziv (eds.), Discourse Markers: Descriptions and Theory (Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 57), 1–12. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.57.03juc
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.57.03juc [Google Scholar]
  307. Jurafsky, Daniel
    1996 Universal Tendencies in the Semantics of the Diminutive. Language72(3). 533–578. 10.2307/416278
     https://doi.org/10.2307/416278 [Google Scholar]
  308. Kasper, Gabriele , Hanh thi Nguyen , Yoshimi Rudolph , Yoshioka Dina , and K. Jim
    eds. 2010 Pragmatics and Language Learning12. Honolulu: National Foreign Language Resource Center, University of Hawaii at Manoa.
     [Google Scholar]
  309. Katz, Jerrold J. & Paul M. Postal
    1963 Semantic Interpretation of Idioms and Semantic Interpretation of Idioms and Sentences Containing them. M.I.T Research Laboratory of Electronics, Quarterly Progress Report (70). 275–282.
     [Google Scholar]
  310. Kavka, Stanislav & Jerzy Zybert
    2004 Glimpses on the History of Idiomaticity Issues. SKAZE Journal of Theoretical Linguistics1. 54–66.
     [Google Scholar]
  311. Kecskés, István
    2004 The Role of Salience in Processing Pragmatic Units. Acta Linguistica Hungarica51(3–4). 309–324. 10.1556/ALing.51.2004.3‑4.4
     https://doi.org/10.1556/ALing.51.2004.3-4.4 [Google Scholar]
  312. 2006 On my Mind: Thoughts about Salience, Context and Figurative Language from a Second Language Perspective. Second Language Research22(2). 219–237. 10.1191/0267658306sr266ra
     https://doi.org/10.1191/0267658306sr266ra [Google Scholar]
  313. 2017 The Effect of Salience on Shaping Speaker’s Utterance. Reti, Saperi, Linguaggi6(11). 5–32. 10.12832/87352
     https://doi.org/10.12832/87352 [Google Scholar]
  314. 2013c Focus on the Speaker: An Introduction. Journal of Pragmatics48(1). 1–3. 10.1016/j.pragma.2012.11.006
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.11.006 [Google Scholar]
  315. 2013a Intercultural Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199892655.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199892655.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  316. 2010a Situation-Bound Utterances as Pragmatic Acts. Journal of Pragmatics42(11). 2889–2897. 10.1016/j.pragma.2010.06.008
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.06.008 [Google Scholar]
  317. 2010b “Dual and Multilanguage Systems.” International Journal of Multilingualism7 (2): 91–109. 10.1080/14790710903288313
     https://doi.org/10.1080/14790710903288313 [Google Scholar]
  318. 2010c The Paradox of Communication: Socio-Cognitive Approach to Pragmatics. Pragmatics and Society1(1). 50–73. www.jbe-platform.com/content/journals/10.​1075/ps.1.1.04kec. 10.1075/ps.1.1.04kec
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.1.1.04kec [Google Scholar]
  319. 2000 A Cognitive-Pragmatic Approach to Situation-Bound Utterances. Journal of Pragmatics32(5). 605–625. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(99)00063‑6
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00063-6 [Google Scholar]
  320. 2003 Situation-Bound Utterances in L1 and L2 (Studies on Language Acquisition 19). Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110894035
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110894035 [Google Scholar]
  321. 2007 Formulaic Language in English Lingua Franca. In István Kecskés & Laurence R. Horn (eds.), Explorations in Pragmatics: Linguistic, Cognitive and Intercultural Aspects, 191–219. Berlin, New York. 10.1515/9783110198843.3.191
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110198843.3.191 [Google Scholar]
  322. 2008 Dueling contexts: A Dynamic Model of Meaning. Journal of Pragmatics40(3). 385–406. 10.1016/j.pragma.2007.12.004
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2007.12.004 [Google Scholar]
  323. 2012 Is there Anyone out there Who is Interested in the Speaker?Language and Dialogue2(2). 285–299. 10.1075/ld.2.2.06kec
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.2.2.06kec [Google Scholar]
  324. 2014 The Evaluation Function of Situation-Bound Utterances in Intercultural Interaction. In Geoff Thompson & Laura Alba-Juez (eds.), Evaluation in Context, 137–152. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.242.07kec
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.242.07kec [Google Scholar]
  325. 2015 Is the Idiom Principle Blocked in Bilingual L2 Production?In Roberto Heredia & Anna Cieslicka (eds.), Bilingual Figurative Language Processing, 28–53. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139342100.005
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139342100.005 [Google Scholar]
  326. 2016 Deliberate Creativity and Formulaic Language Use. In Keith Allan , Alessandro Capone & Istvan Kecskés (eds.), Pragmemes and Theories of Language Use (Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology), 3–20. Cham: Springer International Publishing. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑43491‑9_1
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43491-9_1 [Google Scholar]
  327. Kecskés, Istvan , and Monika Kirner-Ludwig
    2019 ““Odd Structures” in English as a Lingua Franca Discourse.” Journal of Pragmatics151:76–90. 10.1016/j.pragma.2019.04.007
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.04.007 [Google Scholar]
  328. Keisanen, Tiina & Elise Kärkkäinen
    2014 Stance. In Klaus P. Schneider & Anne Barron (eds.), Pragmatics of Discourse (Handbooks of Pragmatics 3), 295–322. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110214406‑012
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110214406-012 [Google Scholar]
  329. Kendon, Adam
    2004 Gesture: Visible Action as Utterance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511807572
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511807572 [Google Scholar]
  330. Kepley, Kristyl
    2009 As the Call, so the Echo: Proverbs as Cues to Cultural Knowledge and Language Change. In Cynthia R. Dreyer (ed.), Language and Linguistics: Emerging Trends, 1–36. New York: Nova Science Publishers.
     [Google Scholar]
  331. Kidd, Stephen
    2011 Laughter Interjections in Greek Comedy. The Classical Quarterly61(2). 445–459. 10.1017/S0009838811000115
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0009838811000115 [Google Scholar]
  332. Kiddon, Chloe & Yuriy Brun
    2011 That’s What She Said: Double Entendre Identification. InAssociation for Computational Linguistics (ed.), Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 89–94.
     [Google Scholar]
  333. Kiefer, Ferenc
    1985 How to Account for Situational Meaning?Quaderni di Semantica2(85). 288–295.
     [Google Scholar]
  334. 1996 Bound Utterances. Language Sciences18(1–2). 575–587. 10.1016/0388‑0001(96)00035‑6
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0388-0001(96)00035-6 [Google Scholar]
  335. Kilgarriff, Adam , Pavel Rychlý , Pavel Smrz & David Tugwell
    ©2003– ”The Sketch Engine“. https://www.sketchengine.eu/
  336. Kirner-Ludwig, Monika
    2019 “‘Bridging the (Unbridgeable?) Gap: Formulaic Punchlines’ [Unpublished Key Note Lecture].” Tomsk, Russia 2019.
     [Google Scholar]
  337. 2020a Creation, Dissemination and Uptake of Fake-Quotes in Lay Political Discourse on Facebook and Twitter. Journal of Pragmatics, 101–118. 10.1016/j.pragma.2019.07.009
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.07.009 [Google Scholar]
  338. 2018 Trying to Make it Fit…That’s What She Said: An Argument for a New Category on the Formulaic Continuum. Journal of Pragmatics137. 76–91. 10.1016/j.pragma.2018.08.001
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.08.001 [Google Scholar]
  339. 2020 Adapting Medieval Stuff to Fit the Modern Screen: A Cognitive-Pragmatic Approach to Strategies of Evoking and Ridiculing Obsolete Frames to Entertain Today’s Recipient. In Christian Hoffmann & Monika Kirner-Ludwig (eds.), Telecinematic Stylistics, 223–262: Bloomsbury Academic. 10.5040/9781350042889.0016
     https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350042889.0016 [Google Scholar]
  340. 2022 ‘Rare but there’: On Subtleties and Saliencies of (Pseudo-)Archaisms in Game of Thrones Scripted Dialogues. In Anna Gamper & Thomas Müller (eds.), „Beyond the Wall”: Game of Thrones aus interdisziplinärer Perspektive [“Beyond the Wall”: Game of Thrones from an interdisciplinary perspective], 91–123. Wiesbaden: Springer VS. 10.1007/978‑3‑658‑36145‑7_6
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-36145-7_6 [Google Scholar]
  341. Kirner-Ludwig, Monika & Aleksandra Soboleva
    2022 An Intercultural Pragmatic Approach to English-Russian and English-German Renditions of the Formulaic That’s What She Said-Punchline in Telecinematic Discourse. The European Journal of Humour Research10(3). 113–137. 10.7592/EJHR.2022.10.3.686
     https://doi.org/10.7592/EJHR.2022.10.3.686 [Google Scholar]
  342. Kirner-Ludwig, Monika & Iris Zimmermann
    2015 Quoting and Plagiarising — Concepts of Both now and then?In Jenny Arendholz , Wolfram Bublitz & Monika Kirner-Ludwig (eds.), The Pragmatics of Quoting Now and Then (Topics in English Linguistics 89), 291–318. Berlin, Munich, Boston: de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110427561‑014
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110427561-014 [Google Scholar]
  343. Kleiber, Georges
    2006 Sémiotique de l’interjection [Semiotics of interjections]. Langages40(161). 10–23. 10.3406/lgge.2006.2701
     https://doi.org/10.3406/lgge.2006.2701 [Google Scholar]
  344. Knowles, Elizabeth
    2014 The Oxford Dictionary of Quotations: Over 20000 Quotations. [ODQ] (Oxford Reference), 8th edn.Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  345. Kockelman, Paul
    2003 The Meanings of Interjections in Q’eqchi’ Maya. Current Anthropology44(4). 467–490. 10.1086/375871
     https://doi.org/10.1086/375871 [Google Scholar]
  346. Korostenskiene, Julija & Aurelija Lieponyte
    2018 Funny as it May be: Humour in the American Sitcoms I Love Lucy and Modern Family. Kalbų Studijos / Studies about Languages33. 57–73. 10.5755/j01.sal.0.33.20097
     https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.sal.0.33.20097 [Google Scholar]
  347. 2019 Irony, Sarcasm and Parody in the American Sitcom “Modern Family”. Israeli Journal for Humor Research8(1). 51–85.
     [Google Scholar]
  348. Kotthoff, Helga
    1996 Impoliteness and Conversational Joking: On Relational Politics. Folia Linguistica30(3–4). 10.1515/flin.1996.30.3‑4.299
     https://doi.org/10.1515/flin.1996.30.3-4.299 [Google Scholar]
  349. 1998 Irony, Quotation, and Other Forms of Staged Intertextuality: Double or Contrastive Perspectivation in Conversation. Interaction and Linguistic Structures5. 1–25. 10.1075/hcp.9.13kot
     https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.9.13kot [Google Scholar]
  350. 1999 Coherent Keying in Conversational Humour: Contextualising Joint Fictionalisation. In Wolfram Bublitz , Uta Lenk & Eija Ventola (eds.), Coherence in Spoken and Written Discourse: How to Create it and How to Describe it; Selected Papers from the International Workshop on Coherence, Augsburg, 24 — 27 April 1997 (Pragmatics and Beyond 63), 125–150. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.63.10kot
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.63.10kot [Google Scholar]
  351. 2000 Gender and Joking: On the Complexities of Women’s Image Politics in Humorous Narratives. Journal of Pragmatics32(1). 55–80. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S​0378​2166​9900​0314. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(99)00031‑4
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00031-4 [Google Scholar]
  352. 2002 Irony, Quotation, and Other Forms of Staged Intertextuality. In Carl F. Graumann & Werner Kallmeyer (eds.), Perspective and Perspectivation in Discourse (Human Cognitive Processing), 201–229. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/hcp.9.13kot
     https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.9.13kot [Google Scholar]
  353. 2003 Responding to Irony in Different Contexts: On Cognition in Conversation. Journal of Pragmatics35(9). 1387–1411. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(02)00182‑0
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00182-0 [Google Scholar]
  354. 2006a Gender and Humor: The State of the Art. Journal of Pragmatics38(1). 4–25. 10.1016/j.pragma.2005.06.003
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2005.06.003 [Google Scholar]
  355. 2006b Pragmatics of Performance and the Analysis of Conversational Humor. HUMOR: International Journal of Humor Research19(3). 271–304. 10.1515/HUMOR.2006.015
     https://doi.org/10.1515/HUMOR.2006.015 [Google Scholar]
  356. 2007 Oral Genres of Humor: on the Dialectic of Genre Knowledge and Creative Authoring. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association(17). 263–296. 10.1075/prag.17.2.04kot
     https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.17.2.04kot [Google Scholar]
  357. Kozloff, Sarah
    2000 Overhearing Film Dialogue. Berkeley: University of California Press. 10.1525/9780520924024
     https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520924024 [Google Scholar]
  358. Krikmann, Arvo
    2006 Contemporary Linguistic Theories of Humour. Folklore: Electronic Journal of Folklore33. 27–58. 10.7592/FEJF2006.33.kriku
     https://doi.org/10.7592/FEJF2006.33.kriku [Google Scholar]
  359. Kuiper, Koenraad
    2007 Strukturelle Aspekte der Phraseme/Structural aspects of set phrases. In Harald Burger , Dmitrij Dobrovol’skij , Peter Kühn & Neal R. Norrick (eds.), Phraseology. An International Handbook of Contemporary Research (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft / Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science 28/1), 20–63. Berlin, New York: de Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
  360. 2009 Formulaic Genres. London, New York: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230241657
     https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230241657 [Google Scholar]
  361. Kuipers, Giselinde
    2008 The Sociology of Humor. In Victor Raskin (ed.), The Primer of Humor Research (Humor Research 8), 361–398. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110198492.361
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110198492.361 [Google Scholar]
  362. Kuiper, Koenraad , and Douglas Haggo
    1984 “Livestock Auctions, Oral Poetry, and Ordinary Language.” Language in Society13 (2): 205–34. 10.1017/s0047404500010381
     https://doi.org/10.1017/s0047404500010381 [Google Scholar]
  363. Lambrou, Marina
    2014 Stylistics, Conversation Analysis and the Cooperative Principle. In Michael Burke (ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Stylistics (Routledge Handbooks in English Language Studies), 136–156. London, New York: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group. 10.4324/9781315795331.CH8
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315795331.CH8 [Google Scholar]
  364. Lampert, Martin D. & Susan M. Ervin-Tripp
    2006 Risky Laughter: Teasing and Self-Directed Joking among Male and Female Friends. Journal of Pragmatics38(1). 51–72. 10.1016/j.pragma.2005.06.004
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2005.06.004 [Google Scholar]
  365. Landert, Daniela
    2017 Stance in Fiction. In Miriam A. Locher & Andreas H. Jucker (eds.), Pragmatics of Fiction (Handbooks of Pragmatics 12), 489–514. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110431094‑016
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110431094-016 [Google Scholar]
  366. Landragin, Frédéric , Nadia Bellalem & Laurent Romary
    2001 Visual Salience and Perceptual Grouping in Multimodal Interactivity. InHAL — archives ouvertes (ed.), First International Workshop on Information Presentation and Natural, 151–155. Verona.
     [Google Scholar]
  367. Laterza, Andrea
    2017 ‘That’s What She Said’: An Evaluation of Whether Hearsay Exceptions Should be Permitted in Accusatory Instruments. Touro Law Review33(3). 1217–1241.
     [Google Scholar]
  368. Leech, Geoffrey
    1983 Principles of Pragmatics. London, New York: Longman.
     [Google Scholar]
  369. Leech, Geoffrey N.
    1966 English in Advertising: A Linguistic Study of Advertising in Great Britain (English Language Series). London: Longman.
     [Google Scholar]
  370. Lee-Goldman, Russell
    2011 No as a Discourse Marker. Journal of Pragmatics43(10). 2627–2649. 10.1016/j.pragma.2011.03.011
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2011.03.011 [Google Scholar]
  371. Lefever, Harry
    1981 ‘Playing the Dozens’: A Mechanism for Social Control. Phylon42(1). 73–85. 10.2307/274886
     https://doi.org/10.2307/274886 [Google Scholar]
  372. Leiss, William , Stephen Kline , Sut Jhally , Jacqueline Botterill & Kyle Asquith
    2018[1988] Social Communication in Advertising, 4th edn. New York: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  373. Lems, Kristin
    2011 Pun Work Helps English Learners Get the Joke. The Reading Teacher65(3). 197–202. 10.1002/TRTR.01027
     https://doi.org/10.1002/TRTR.01027 [Google Scholar]
  374. Levinson, Stephen C.
    2013 Recursion in Pragmatics. Language89(1). 149–162. 10.1353/lan.2013.0005
     https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2013.0005 [Google Scholar]
  375. Levisen, Carsten
    2019 Laughter Interjections: Contributions to a Lexical Anthropology of Humour (With Special Reference to dANISH9). Scandinavian Studies in Language10(1). 110–130. 10.7146/sss.v10i1.114674
     https://doi.org/10.7146/sss.v10i1.114674 [Google Scholar]
  376. Lewis, Diana M.
    2011 Pragmatic Markers at the Periphery and Discourse Prominence. In Marta Dynel (ed.), The Pragmatics of Humour across Discourse Domains (Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 210), 351–381. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.325.13lew
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.325.13lew [Google Scholar]
  377. Lin, Phoebe M. S.
    2012 Sound Evidence: The Missing Piece of the Jigsaw in Formulaic Language Research. Applied Linguistics33(3). 342–347. 10.1093/applin/ams017
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/ams017 [Google Scholar]
  378. 2014 Investigating the Validity of Internet Television as a Resource for Acquiring L2 formulaic sequences. System42. 164–176. 10.1016/j.system.2013.11.010
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2013.11.010 [Google Scholar]
  379. 2020 Prosody of Formulaic Sequences: A Corpus and Discourse Approach. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
     [Google Scholar]
  380. Lipman, Joanne
    2018 That’s What She Said: What Men Need to Know (and Women Need to Tell them) About Working Together. New York: William Morrow.
     [Google Scholar]
  381. Litovkina, Anna T.
    2018 Women Through Anti-Proverbs. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
     [Google Scholar]
  382. Locher, Miriam A. & Andreas H. Jucker
    (eds.) 2017 Pragmatics of Fiction (Handbooks of Pragmatics 12). Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110431094
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110431094 [Google Scholar]
  383. Lüger, Heinz-Helmut
    1999 Satzwertige Phraseologismen: Eine pragmalinguistische Untersuchung [Sentence-level phraseologisms: A pragmalinguistic investigation]. Wien: Ed. Praesens.
     [Google Scholar]
  384. Lyons, John
    [1968]1995 Introduction to Theoretical Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  385. 1977 Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  386. Ma, Zejun & Man Jiang
    2013 Interpretation of Verbal Humor in the Sitcom The Big Bang Theory from the Perspective of Adaptation-Relevance Theory. Theory and Practice in Language Studies3(12). 2220–2226. 10.4304/tpls.3.12.2220‑2226
     https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.3.12.2220-2226 [Google Scholar]
  387. Margewitsch, Erika
    2006 Formelhafter Sprachgebrauch in Schülertexten [Formulaic language use in pupils’ texts]. Oldenburg, Univ. Diss. 2006 (Beiträge zur didaktischen Rekonstruktion 11). Oldenburg: Didaktisches Zentrum.
  388. Martin, Rod A. , Patricia Puhlik-Doris , Gwen Larsen , Jeanette Gray , & Kelly Weir
    2003 Individual Differences in Uses of Humor and their Relation to Psychological Well-Being: Development of the Humor Styles Questionnaire. Journal of Research in Personality37(1). 48–75. 10.1016/S0092‑6566(02)00534‑2
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-6566(02)00534-2 [Google Scholar]
  389. Martinière, Nathalie
    2004 Pseudo-Citations : présence/absence de l’hypotexte dans Possession de A.S. Byatt [presence/absence of the hypotext in Possession by A.S. Byatt]. E-rea (2.1). 10.4000/erea.487
     https://doi.org/10.4000/erea.487 [Google Scholar]
  390. Maybin, Janet & Joan Swann
    2007 Everyday Creativity in Language: Textuality, Contextuality, and Critique. Applied Linguistics28(4). 497–517. 10.1093/applin/amm036
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amm036 [Google Scholar]
  391. McArthur, Tom
    2018 Oxford Companion to the English Language, 2nd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acref/9780199661282.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acref/9780199661282.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  392. McConachy, Troy & Helen Spencer-Oatey
    2020 Developing Pragmatic Awareness. In Klaus P. Schneider & Elly Ifantidou (eds.), Developmental and Clinical Pragmatics (Handbooks of Pragmatics 13), 393–428. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110431056‑014
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110431056-014 [Google Scholar]
  393. McDonald, Scott A. & Richard C. Shillcock
    2003 Eye Movements Reveal the On-Line Computation of Lexical Probabilities During Reading. Psychological Science14(6). 648–652. 10.1046/j.0956‑7976.2003.psci_1480.x
     https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0956-7976.2003.psci_1480.x [Google Scholar]
  394. McEnery, Tony & Andrew Wilson
    1996 Corpus Linguistics (Edinburgh Textbooks in Empirical Linguistics). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  395. McIntyre, Dan
    2012 “Prototypical Characteristics of Blockbuster Movie Dialogue: A Corpus Stylistic Analysis.” Texas Studies in Literature and Language54 (3): 402–25. 10.1353/tsl.2012.0020
     https://doi.org/10.1353/tsl.2012.0020 [Google Scholar]
  396. Medlin, Mary M. , Mitch Brown , & Donald F. Sacco
    2018 That’s What She Said! Perceived Mate Value of Clean and Dirty Humor Displays. Personality and Individual Differences135. 192–200. 10.1016/j.paid.2018.07.017
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.07.017 [Google Scholar]
  397. Meier, Matthew R. & Christopher A. Medjesky
    2018 The Office was Asking for it: “That’s What She Said” as a Joke Cycle that Perpetuates Rape Culture. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies15(1). 2–17. 10.1080/14791420.2017.1394578
     https://doi.org/10.1080/14791420.2017.1394578 [Google Scholar]
  398. Meier, Simon , Bettina Bock , Konstanze Marx , Robert Mroczynski & Sven Staffeldt
    2019 Sprachliche Verfestigung und sprachlich Verfestigtes [Linguistic consolidation and linguistically consolidated]. Linguistik online [Liguistics online] 96(3). 1–8. 10.13092/lo.96.5527
     https://doi.org/10.13092/lo.96.5527 [Google Scholar]
  399. Mel'čuk, Igor
    1998 Collocations and Lexical Functions. In Anthony P. Cowie (ed.), Phraseology. Theory, Analysis, and Applications, 23–53. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780198294252.003.0002
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198294252.003.0002 [Google Scholar]
  400. Meredith, Joanne
    2016 Transcribing Screen-Capture Data: The Process of Developing a Transcription System for Multi-Modal Text-Based Data. International Journal of Social Research Methodology19(6). 663–676. 10.1080/13645579.2015.1082291
     https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2015.1082291 [Google Scholar]
  401. Meredith, Joanne
    2017 Analysing Technological Affordances of Online Interactions Using Conversation Analysis. Journal of Pragmatics115. 42–55. 10.1016/j.pragma.2017.03.001
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2017.03.001 [Google Scholar]
  402. 2019 Conversation Analysis and Online Interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction52(3). 241–256. 10.1080/08351813.2019.1631040
     https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2019.1631040 [Google Scholar]
  403. Meredith, Joanne & Jonathan Potter
    2014 Conversation Analysis and Electronic Interactions. In Hwee L. Lim & Fay Sudweeks (eds.), Innovative Methods and Technologies for Electronic Discourse Analysis (Advances in Human and Social Aspects of Technology Book Series), 370–393. Hershey: Information Science Reference. 10.4018/978‑1‑4666‑4426‑7.ch017
     https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-4426-7.ch017 [Google Scholar]
  404. Messerli, Thomas
    2021 Repetition in Telecinematic Humour: How US American Sitcoms Employ Formal and Semantic Repetition in the Construction of Multimodal Humour. Basel: University of Basel Doctoral dissertation.
  405. Messerli, Thomas C.
    2016 Extradiegetic and Character Laughter as Markers of Humorous Intentions in the Sitcom 2 Broke Girls. Journal of Pragmatics95. 79–92. 10.1016/j.pragma.2015.12.009
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2015.12.009 [Google Scholar]
  406. 2020 Repetition in Sitcom Humour. In Christian Hoffmann & Monika Kirner-Ludwig (eds.), Telecinematic Stylistics, 87–112: Bloomsbury Academic. 10.5040/9781350042889.0010
     https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350042889.0010 [Google Scholar]
  407. Mey, Jacob
    2001 Pragmatics: An Introduction. Malden: Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  408. Mey, Jacob L.
    2016 Why We Need the Pragmeme, or: Speech Acting and Its Peripeties. In Keith Allan , Alessandro Capone & István Kecskés (eds.), Pragmemes and Theories of Language Use (Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology), 133–140. Cham: Springer International Publishing. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑43491‑9_7
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43491-9_7 [Google Scholar]
  409. Mieder, Wolfgang
    1993 Proverbs Are Never out of Season: Popular Wisdom in the Modern Age. New York: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  410. 2004 Proverbs: A Handbook (Greenwood Folklore Handbooks). Westport, London: Greenwood.
     [Google Scholar]
  411. 2007 Proverbs as Cultural Units or Items of Folklore. In Harald Burger , Dmitrij Dobrovol’skij , Peter Kühn & Neal R. Norrick (eds.), Phraseology. An International Handbook of Contemporary Research (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft / Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science 28/1), 394–413. Berlin, New York: de Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
  412. 2008 « Proverbs Speak Louder Than Words »: Wisdom in Art, Culture, Folklore, History, Literature and Mass Media, 1st edn. New York: Peter Lang. 10.3726/978‑1‑4539‑0386‑5
     https://doi.org/10.3726/978-1-4539-0386-5 [Google Scholar]
  413. Mihalcea, Rada & Carlo Strapparava
    2005 Making Computers Laugh: Investigations in Automatic Humor Recognition. InAssociation for Computational Linguistics (ed.), Proceedings of the Conference on Human Language Technology and Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, 531–538: Association for Computational Linguistics. 10.3115/1220575.1220642
     https://doi.org/10.3115/1220575.1220642 [Google Scholar]
  414. Mikal, Jude P. , Ronald E. Rice , Robert G. Kent , & Bert N. Uchino
    2014 Common Voice: Analysis of Behavior Modification and Content Convergence in a Popular Online Community. Computers in Human Behavior35. 506–515. 10.1016/j.chb.2014.02.036
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.02.036 [Google Scholar]
  415. Mikos, Lothar
    2015 Film- und Fernsehanalyse [Film and TV analysis] (UTB Medien- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, Pädagogik 2415), 3rd edn. Konstanz, München: UVK-Verl.-Ges; UVK/Lucius. 10.36198/9783838544670
     https://doi.org/10.36198/9783838544670 [Google Scholar]
  416. Miller, Jim E. & Regina Weinert
    1998 Spontaneous Spoken Language: Syntax and Discourse. Oxford, New York: Clarendon Press. 10.1093/oso/9780198236566.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198236566.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  417. Mills, Brett
    2009 The Sitcom (TV genres). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  418. Mintzer, Richard
    1994 So You Wanna Write for TV Sitcoms?Back Stage35(43). [no pagination].
     [Google Scholar]
  419. Mondada, Lorenza
    2009 Emergent Focused Interactions in Public Places: A Systematic Analysis of the Multimodal Achievement of a Common Interactional Space. Journal of Pragmatics41(10). 1977–1997. 10.1016/j.pragma.2008.09.019
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.09.019 [Google Scholar]
  420. 2014a Bodies in action. Language and Dialogue4(3). 357–403. 10.1075/ld.4.3.02mon
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.4.3.02mon [Google Scholar]
  421. 2014b The Temporal Orders of Multiactivity: Operating and Demonstrating in the Surgical Theatre. In Pentti Haddington , Tiina Keisanen , Lorenza Mondada & Maurice Nevile (eds.), Multiactivity in Social Interaction: Beyond multitasking, 33–75. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/z.187.02mon
     https://doi.org/10.1075/z.187.02mon [Google Scholar]
  422. 2018 Multiple Temporalities of Language and Body in Interaction: Challenges for Transcribing Multimodality. Research on Language and Social Interaction51(1). 85–106. 10.1080/08351813.2018.1413878
     https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2018.1413878 [Google Scholar]
  423. Montoro del Arco, Esteban T.
    2006 Teoría fraseológica de las locuciones particulares: Las locuciones prepositivas, conjuntivas y marcadoras en español [Phraseological theory of particular expressions: Prepositional, conjunctive and marker expressions in Spanish] (Studien zur romanischen Sprachwissenschaft und interkulturellen Kommunikation 32). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
     [Google Scholar]
  424. Moon, Rosamund
    1998 Fixed Expressions and Idioms in English: A Corpus-Based Approach (Oxford Studies in Lexicography and Lexicology). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  425. Mukerji, Chandra & Michael Schudson
    1986 Popular Culture. Annual Review of Sociology(12). 47–66. 10.1146/annurev.so.12.080186.000403
     https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.12.080186.000403 [Google Scholar]
  426. Mullany, Louise
    2011 Im/Politeness, Rapport Management and Workplace Culture: Truckers Performing Masculinities on Canadian Ice-Roads. In Francesca Bargiela-Chiappini & Dániel Z. Kádár (eds.), Politeness Across Cultures, 61–84. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230305939_4
     https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230305939_4 [Google Scholar]
  427. Myers, Greg
    1997 Words in Ads. London: Arnold.
     [Google Scholar]
  428. Myers, Scott A. , Barbara L. Ropog , & R. P. Rodgers
    1997 Sex Differences in Humor. Psychological Reports81(1). 221–222. 10.2466/pr0.1997.81.1.221
     https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1997.81.1.221 [Google Scholar]
  429. Nattinger, James R. , and Jeanette S. DeCarrico
    1989 “Lexical Phrases, Speech Acts and Teaching Conversation.” InVocabulary Acquisition, edited by Paul Nation and Ron Carter , 118–39. Aila review-revue de l’aila 6.
     [Google Scholar]
  430. Nattinger, James R. & Jeanette S. DeCarrico
    1992 Lexical Phrases and Language Teaching (Oxford Applied Linguistics). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  431. Navon, David
    1988 The Seemingly Appropriate but Virtually Inappropriate. Poetics17. 207–219. 10.1016/0304‑422X(88)90031‑9
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-422X(88)90031-9 [Google Scholar]
  432. Nemesi, Attila L.
    2015 Levels and Types of Breaking the Maxims: A Neo-Gricean Account of Humor. Intercultural Pragmatics12(2). 249–276. 10.1515/ip‑2015‑0012
     https://doi.org/10.1515/ip-2015-0012 [Google Scholar]
  433. Németh, Enikő T.
    2014 Intentions and Perspectives in the Social Forms of Language Use. Argumentum10. 472–485.
     [Google Scholar]
  434. Nilep, Chad D.
    1997 Beyond the Waste Basket: An Investigation into the Formal Linguistic Aspects of Verbal Humor. Arizona, USA: Arizona State University Master’s thesis.
     [Google Scholar]
  435. Noonan, Will
    2014 Absurdist Humor. In Salvatore Attardo (ed.), Encyclopedia of Humor Studies. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
     [Google Scholar]
  436. Nørgaard, Nina
    2014 Multimodality and Stylistics. In Michael Burke (ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Stylistics (Routledge Handbooks in English Language Studies), 471–484. London, New York: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.
     [Google Scholar]
  437. Norrick, Neal R.
    2009a A Theory of Humour Interaction. Journal of Literary Theory3(2). 261–284. 10.1515/JLT.2009.015
     https://doi.org/10.1515/JLT.2009.015 [Google Scholar]
  438. 1993a Conversational Joking: Humor in Everyday Talk. Bloomington, Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  439. 2009b Interjections as Pragmatic Markers. Journal of Pragmatics41(5). 866–891. 10.1016/j.pragma.2008.08.005
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.08.005 [Google Scholar]
  440. 1993b Repetition in Canned Jokes and Spontaneous Conversational Joking. HUMOR: International Journal of Humor Research6(4). 385–402. 10.1515/humr.1993.6.4.385
     https://doi.org/10.1515/humr.1993.6.4.385 [Google Scholar]
  441. 1984 Stock Conversational Witticisms. Journal of Pragmatics8(2). 195–209. 10.1016/0378‑2166(84)90049‑3
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(84)90049-3 [Google Scholar]
  442. 1985 How Proverbs Mean: Semantic Studies in English Proverbs (Trends in Linguistics Studies and Monographs 27). Berlin, New York: Mouton. 10.1515/9783110881974
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110881974 [Google Scholar]
  443. 1987 Functions of Repetition in Conversation. Text — Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse7(3). 245–264. 10.1515/text.1.1987.7.3.245
     https://doi.org/10.1515/text.1.1987.7.3.245 [Google Scholar]
  444. 1989 Intertextuality in Humor. HUMOR: International Journal of Humor Research2(2). 10.1515/humr.1989.2.2.117
     https://doi.org/10.1515/humr.1989.2.2.117 [Google Scholar]
  445. 1994 Involvement and Joking in Conversation. Journal of Pragmatics22(3–4). 409–430. 10.1016/0378‑2166(94)90117‑1
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(94)90117-1 [Google Scholar]
  446. 1996 Conversational Joking: Humour in Everyday Talk. Human Studies19(1). 129–135.
     [Google Scholar]
  447. 2000 Conversational Narrative: Storytelling in Everyday Talk (Series IV, Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 203). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.203
     https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.203 [Google Scholar]
  448. 2001 On the Conversational Performance of Narrative Jokes: Toward an Account of Timing. HUMOR: International Journal of Humor Research14(3). 255–274. 10.1515/humr.2001.003
     https://doi.org/10.1515/humr.2001.003 [Google Scholar]
  449. 2003 Issues in Conversational Joking. Journal of Pragmatics35(9). 1333–1359. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(02)00180‑7
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00180-7 [Google Scholar]
  450. 2007a Proverbs and Set Phrases. In Harald Burger , Dmitrij Dobrovol’skij , Peter Kühn & Neal R. Norrick (eds.), Phraseology. An International Handbook of Contemporary Research (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft / Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science 28/1), 381–393. Berlin, New York: de Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
  451. 2007b Set Phrases and Humor. In Harald Burger , Dmitrij Dobrovol’skij , Peter Kühn & Neal R. Norrick (eds.), Phraseology. An International Handbook of Contemporary Research (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft / Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science 28/1), 302–308. Berlin, New York: de Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
  452. 2011 Interjections. In Gisle Andersen & Karin Aijmer (eds.), Pragmatics of Society (Handbooks of Pragmatics 5), 243–292. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110214420.243
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110214420.243 [Google Scholar]
  453. Norrick, Neal R.
    2014 Interjections. In Christoph Rühlemann & Karin Aijmer (eds.), Corpus Pragmatics: A Handbook, 249–275. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139057493.013
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139057493.013 [Google Scholar]
  454. Norrick, Neal R.
    2016 Language Play in Conversation. In Nancy D. Bell (ed.), Multiple Perspectives on Language Play, 11–45. Berlin, Boston: de Gruyter. 10.1515/9781501503993‑002
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501503993-002 [Google Scholar]
  455. Norrick, Neal R. & Delia Chiaro
    2009 Humor in Interaction (Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 182). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.182
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.182 [Google Scholar]
  456. Norrick, Neal R. & Alice Spitz
    2007 Conflict and Humor in Conversation. In Piotr Cap & Joanna Nijakowska (eds.), Current Trends in Pragmatics, 8th edn.224–245. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholar Publishing.
     [Google Scholar]
  457. O’Keeffe, Anne , Michael McCarthy & Ronald Carter
    2007 From Corpus to Classroom: Language use and Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511497650
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511497650 [Google Scholar]
  458. O’Shannon, Dan
    2012 What Are You Laughing At?: A Comprehensive Guide to the Comedic Event. New York: Bloomsbury Academic & Professional.
     [Google Scholar]
  459. Oaks, Dallin D.
    1994 Creating Structural Ambiguities in Humor: Getting English Grammar to Cooperate. HUMOR: International Journal of Humor Research7(4). 377–401. 10.1515/humr.1994.7.4.377
     https://doi.org/10.1515/humr.1994.7.4.377 [Google Scholar]
  460. Ochs, Elinor
    1996 Linguistic Resources for Socializing Humanity. In John J. Gumperz & Carsten Levinsen (eds.), Rethinking Linguistic Relativity (Studies in the Social and Cultural Foundations of Language 17), 407–437. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  461. Ochs, Elinor & Bambi Schieffelin
    1989 Language has a Heart. Text9(1). 7–25. 10.1515/text.1.1989.9.1.7
     https://doi.org/10.1515/text.1.1989.9.1.7 [Google Scholar]
  462. Oring, Elliott
    2003 Engaging Humor. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  463. Otsu, Takahiro
    2018 Multifunctionality of ‘After All’: A Unitary Account. Journal of Pragmatics134. 102–112. 10.1016/j.pragma.2018.04.007
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.04.007 [Google Scholar]
  464. Paczolay, Gyula
    1997 European Proverbs: In 55 Languages; With Equivalents in Arabic, Persian, Sanskrit, Chinese and Japanese = Európai közmondások. Veszprém: Veszprémi Nyomda.
     [Google Scholar]
  465. Padilla Cruz, Manuel
    2010a What Do Interjections Contribute to Communication and How are they Interpreted? A Cognitive Pragmatic Account. In Iwona Witczak-Plisiecka (ed.), Speech Actions in Theory and Applied Studies (Pragmatic Perspectives on Language and Linguistics 1), 39–68. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
     [Google Scholar]
  466. 2010b What Do Interjections Contribute to Communication and How Are They Interpreted? A Cognitive Pragmatic Account. In Iwona Witczak-Plisiecka (ed.), Speech Actions in Theory and Applied Studies (Pragmatic Perspectives on Language and Linguistics 1), 39–68. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
     [Google Scholar]
  467. Palmer, Jerry
    1987 The Logic of the Absurd: On Film and TV Comedy. London: British Film Institute.
     [Google Scholar]
  468. Paltridge, Brian , Angela Thomas & Jianxin Liu
    2011 Genre, Performance and Sex and the City. In Roberta Piazza , Monika Bednarek & Fabio Rossi (eds.), Telecinematic Discourse: Approaches to the Language of Films and Television Series (Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 211), 249–262. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.211.16pal
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.211.16pal [Google Scholar]
  469. Partington, Alan
    2006 The Linguistics of Laughter: A Corpus-Assisted Study of Laughter-Talk (Routledge Studies in Linguistics 5). London et al.: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203966570
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203966570 [Google Scholar]
  470. Patro, Badri N. , Mayank Lunayach , Deepankar Srivastava , Sarvesh Sarvesh , Hunar Singh , & Vinay P. Namboodiri
    2021 Multimodal Humor Dataset: Predicting Laughter Tracks for Sitcoms. In Lisa O’Conner (ed.), 2021 IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision, 576–585: The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. 10.1109/WACV48630.2021.00062
     https://doi.org/10.1109/WACV48630.2021.00062 [Google Scholar]
  471. Peterson, Robert R. & Curt Burgess
    1993 Syntactic and Semantic Processing During Idiom Comprehension: Neurolinguistic and Psycholinguistic Dissociations. In Cristina Cacciari & Patrizia Tabossi (eds.), Idioms: Processing, Structure, and Interpretation, 201–225. Hillsdale, London: Hove; Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
     [Google Scholar]
  472. Phillips, Patrick
    2003 Understanding Film Texts: Meaning and Experience. London: British Film Inst.
     [Google Scholar]
  473. Piazza, Roberta , Monika Bednarek & Fabio Rossi
    (eds.) 2011 Telecinematic Discourse: Approaches to the Language of Films and Television Series (Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 211). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.211
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.211 [Google Scholar]
  474. Pickering, Lucy , Marcella Corduas , Jodi Eisterhold , Brenna Seifried , Alyson Eggleston & Salvatore Attardo
    2009 Prosodic Markers of Saliency in Humorous Narratives. Discourse Processes46(6). 517–540. 10.1080/01638530902959604
     https://doi.org/10.1080/01638530902959604 [Google Scholar]
  475. Pillet-Shore, Danielle
    2012 Greeting: Displaying Stance Through Prosodic Recipient Design. Research on Language & Social Interaction45(4). 375–398. 10.1080/08351813.2012.724994
     https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2012.724994 [Google Scholar]
  476. Poggi, Isabella
    2009 The Language of Interjections. In Anna Esposito , Amir Hussain , Maria Marinaro & Raffaele Martone (eds.), Multimodal Signals: Cognitive and Algorithmic Issues (Lecture Notes in Computer Science), 170–186. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. 10.1007/978‑3‑642‑00525‑1_17
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-00525-1_17 [Google Scholar]
  477. Pollack, John
    2012 The Pun also Rises: How the Humble Pun Revolutionized Language, Changed History, and Made Wordplay more than Some Antics (49). New York: Gotham.
     [Google Scholar]
  478. Pons, Hernán & José L. Samaniego
    1998 Marcadores pragmáticos de apoyo discursivo en el habla culta de Santiago de Chile [Pragmatic markers of discursive support in the educated speech of Santiago, Chile]. Onomazein3. 11–25. 10.7764/onomazein.3.01
     https://doi.org/10.7764/onomazein.3.01 [Google Scholar]
  479. Priego-Valverde, Béatrice , Brigitte Bigi , Salvatore Attardo , Lucy Pickering & Elisa Gironzetti
    2018 Is Smiling During Humor so Obvious? A Cross-Cultural Comparison of Smiling Behavior in Humorous Sequences in American English and French Interactions. Intercultural Pragmatics15(4). 563–591. 10.1515/ip‑2018‑0020
     https://doi.org/10.1515/ip-2018-0020 [Google Scholar]
  480. Ptashnyk, Stefaniya
    2009 Phraseologische Modifikationen und ihre Funktionen im Text: Eine Studie am Beispiel der deutschsprachigen Presse [Phraseological modifications and their functions in text: A study based on examples from the German-language press] (Phraseologie und Parömiologie 249). Baltmannsweiler: Schneider Verlag Hohengehren.
     [Google Scholar]
  481. Quaglio, Paulo
    2009 Television Dialogue: The Sitcom “Friends” vs. Natural Conversation (Studies in Corpus Linguistics 36). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.36
     https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.36 [Google Scholar]
  482. Queen, Robin
    2017 Working with Performed Language — Movies, Television, and Music. In Christine Mallinson , Becky Childs & Gerard van Herk (eds.), Data Collection in Sociolinguistics: Methods and Applications, 2nd edn.218–232. New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315535258‑44
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315535258-44 [Google Scholar]
  483. Quirk, Randolph , Sidney Greenbaum , Geoffrey Leech & Jan Svartvik
    2012[1985] A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language, 24th edn. Harlow: Longman Pearson Education.
     [Google Scholar]
  484. Recanati, François
    2010 Pragmatic Enrichment. HAL open science: ijn_00503959https://hal.science/ijn_00503959v1
  485. Rappoport, Leon
    2005 Punchlines: The Case for Racial, Ethnic, and Gender Humor. Westport: Greenwood Publishing Group, Inc. 10.5040/9798216003335
     https://doi.org/10.5040/9798216003335 [Google Scholar]
  486. Raskin, Victor
    1979 Semantic Mechanisms of Humor. In Christine Chiarello (ed.), Proceedings of the Fifth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 325–335. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society. 10.3765/bls.v5i0.2164
     https://doi.org/10.3765/bls.v5i0.2164 [Google Scholar]
  487. Raskin, Victor
    1985 Semantic Mechanisms of Humor. Dordrecht, Boston: D. Reidel Pub. Co.
     [Google Scholar]
  488. 1992 Humor as a Non-Bona-Fide Mode of Communication. Psychology. [no pagination].
     [Google Scholar]
  489. (ed.) 2008 The Primer of Humor Research (Humor Research 8). Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110198492
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110198492 [Google Scholar]
  490. 2012 A Little Metatheory: Thoughts on What a Theory of Computational Humor Should Look Like. AAAI Technical Report12(2). 62–67.
     [Google Scholar]
  491. Raymond, Chase W.
    2013 Gender and Sexuality in Animated Television Sitcom Interaction. Discourse & Communication7(2). 199–220. 10.1177/1750481312472971
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481312472971 [Google Scholar]
  492. Récanati, François
    2001 Open Quotation. Mind110(439). 637–687. 10.1093/mind/110.439.637
     https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/110.439.637 [Google Scholar]
  493. Richardson, Kay
    2010 Television Dramatic Dialogue: A Sociolinguistic Study (Oxford Studies in Sociolinguistics). New York: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195374056.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195374056.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  494. Rieger, Caroline L.
    2017 “I Want a Real Apology”. A Discursive Pragmatics Perspective on Apologies. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association27(4). 553–590. 10.1075/prag.27.4.04rie
     https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.27.4.04rie [Google Scholar]
  495. Ritchie, Graeme
    2005 On Transformational Creativity. In Pablo Gervas , Tony Veale & Alison Pease (eds.), Proceedings of the IJCAI-05 Workshop on Computational Creativity, Edinburgh, 2005, 17–24. Madrid: Departamento de Sistemas Informaticos y Programacion, Universidad Complutense de Madrid.
     [Google Scholar]
  496. 2012 A Closer Look at Creativity as Search. InInternational Conference on Computational Creativity (ed.), Proceedings from the International Conference on Computational Creativity 2012 (Dublin, Ireland, May 30 — June 1), 41–48.
     [Google Scholar]
  497. Rossi, Fabio
    2011 Discourse Analysis of Film Dialogues. In Roberta Piazza , Monika Bednarek & Fabio Rossi (eds.), Telecinematic Discourse: Approaches to the Language of Films and Television Series (Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 211), 21–46. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.211.04ros
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.211.04ros [Google Scholar]
  498. Roth-Gordon, Jennifer
    2007 Youth, Slang, and Pragmatic Expressions: Examples from Brazilian Portuguese1. Journal of Sociolinguistics11(3). 322–345. 10.1111/j.1467‑9841.2007.00326.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2007.00326.x [Google Scholar]
  499. Rouchota, Villy
    2011 Procedural Meaning and Parenthetical Discourse Markers. In Marta Dynel (ed.), The Pragmatics of Humour across Discourse Domains (Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 210), 97. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.57.07rou
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.57.07rou [Google Scholar]
  500. Rush, Susan
    1998 The Noun Phrase in Advertising English. Journal of Pragmatics29(2). 155–171. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(97)00053‑2
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(97)00053-2 [Google Scholar]
  501. Ruzaitė, Jūratė
    2007 Vague Language in Educational Settings: Quantifiers and Approximators in British and American English (Anglo-Saxon Language and Literature 433). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
     [Google Scholar]
  502. Ryan, Jonathon & Scott Granville
    2020 The Suitability of Film for Modelling the Pragmatics of Interaction: Exploring authenticity. System89. 102186. 10.1016/j.system.2019.102186
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2019.102186 [Google Scholar]
  503. Ryan, Michael & Melissa Lenos
    2020 An Introduction to Film Analysis: Technique and Meaning in Narrative Film, 2nd edn. London, New York, Oxford, New Delhi, Sydney: Bloomsbury Academic.
     [Google Scholar]
  504. Sacks, Harvey , Emanuel A. Schegloff & Gail Jefferson
    1974 A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-Taking for Conversation. Language50(4). 696–735. 10.2307/412243
     https://doi.org/10.2307/412243 [Google Scholar]
  505. Sams, Jessie
    2007 Quoting the Unspoken: An Analysis of Quotations in Spoken Discourse: Department of Linguistics, University of Colorado Boulder.
     [Google Scholar]
  506. Sandig, Barbara
    2007 Stilistische Funktionen von Phrasemen [Stylistic functions of phraseologisms]. In Harald Burger , Dmitrij Dobrovol’skij , Peter Kühn & Neal R. Norrick (eds.), Phraseology. An International Handbook of Contemporary Research (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft / Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science 28/1), 158–175. Berlin, New York: de Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
  507. Sava, Doris
    2017 Modifizierte sprachliche Routinen. Zwischen Fakten und Deutung [Modified linguistic routines. Between facts and interpretation]. Germanistische Beiträge [German Studies Contributions] 40. 155–181.
     [Google Scholar]
  508. Schegloff, Emanuel A.
    1979 Identification and Recognition in Telephone Conversation Openings. In George Psathas (ed.), Everyday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology, 23–78. New York, London: Irvington.
     [Google Scholar]
  509. 1984 On Some Gestures’ Relation to Talk. In J. M. Atkinson & John Heritage (eds.), Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis (Studies in Emotion and Social Interaction), 266–296. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  510. 1986 The Routine as Achievement. Human Studies9(2–3). 111–151. 10.1007/BF00148124
     https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00148124 [Google Scholar]
  511. Schiffrin, Deborah
    1987 Discourse Markers (Studies in Interactional Sociolinguistics 5). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511611841
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511611841 [Google Scholar]
  512. 1993 ‘Speaking for Another’ in Sociolinguistic Interviews: Alignments, Identities, and Frames. In Deborah Tannen (ed.), Framing in Discourse, 231–263. New York: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  513. Schmitt, Norbert & Geoffrey Underwood
    2004 Exploring the Processing of Formulaic Sequences through a Self-Paced Reading Task. In Norbert Schmitt (ed.), Formulaic Sequences: Acquisition, Processing and Use (Language Learning and Language Teaching 9), 173–189. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/lllt.9.10sch
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.9.10sch [Google Scholar]
  514. Schnurr, Stephanie
    2010 Humour. In Miriam A. Locher (ed.), Interpersonal Pragmatics. The Handbooks of Pragmatics, Volume 6 (Handbooks of Pragmatics 6), 307–326. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110214338.2.307
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110214338.2.307 [Google Scholar]
  515. Schourup, Lawrence
    1999 Discourse Markers. Lingua107(3–4). 227–265. 10.1016/S0024‑3841(96)90026‑1
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-3841(96)90026-1 [Google Scholar]
  516. Schröter, Juliane
    2019 Gefühlte Wirklichkeit [Perceived reality]. Linguistik online96(3). 93–114. 10.13092/lo.96.5534
     https://doi.org/10.13092/lo.96.5534 [Google Scholar]
  517. Schubert, Christoph & Valentin Werner
    (eds.) 2023 Stylistic Approaches to Pop Culture (Routledge Studies in Rhetoric and Stylistics). New York, London: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.
     [Google Scholar]
  518. Schwentner, Ernst
    1924 Die primären Interjektionen in der indogermanischen Sprachen: mit besonderer Berücksichtigung des Griechischen, Lateinischen under Germanischen [The primary interjections in Indo-European languages: with special consideration of Greek, Latin and Germanic languages]. Heidelberg: Winter.
     [Google Scholar]
  519. Seidenberg, Mark S. & Maryellen C. MacDonald
    1999 A Probabilistic Constraints Approach to Language Acquisition and Processing. Cognitive Science23(4). 569–588. 10.1207/s15516709cog2304_8
     https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog2304_8 [Google Scholar]
  520. Sela, Tal , Meir-Simchah Panzer , & Michal Lavidor
    2017 Divergent and Convergent Hemispheric Processes in Idiom Comprehension: The Role of Idioms Predictability. Journal of Neurolinguistics44. 134–146. 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2017.05.002
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneuroling.2017.05.002 [Google Scholar]
  521. Selting, Margret , Peter Auer , Dagmar Barth-Weingarten , Jörg Bergmann , Pia Bergmann , Karin Birkner , Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen , Arnulf Deppermann , Peter Gilles , Susanne Günthner , Martin Hartung , Friederike Kern , Christine Mertzlufft , Christian Meyer , Miriam Morek , Frank Oberzaucher , Jörg Peters , Uta Quasthoff , Wilfried Schütte , Anja Stukenbrock & Susanne Uhmann
    2009 Gesprächsanalytisches Transkriptionssystem 2 [Conversation analysis transcription system 2] (GAT 2). Gesprächsforschung — Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion [Conversation Research — Online Journal on Verbal Interaction] 10. 353–402.
     [Google Scholar]
  522. Sherzer, Joel
    1985 Puns and Jokes. In Teun A. van Dijk (ed.), Handbook of Discourse Analysis: Discourse and Dialogue, 213–221. London: Academic Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  523. Shilikhina, Ksenia
    2017 Metapragmatic Markers of the Bona Fide and Non-Bona Fide Modes of Communication. In Wladyslaw Chlopicki & Dorota Brzozowska (eds.), Humorous Discourse (Humor Research vol. 11), 107–130. Boston: de Gruyter. 10.1515/9781501507106‑006
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501507106-006 [Google Scholar]
  524. 2018 Discourse Markers as Guides to Understanding Spontaneous Humor and Irony. In Villy Tsakona & Jan Chovanec (eds.), The Dynamics of Interactional Humor: Creating and Negotiating Humor in Everyday Encounters (Topics in Humor Research 7), 57–76. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/thr.7.03shi
     https://doi.org/10.1075/thr.7.03shi [Google Scholar]
  525. Simpson-Vlach, Rita & Nick C. Ellis
    2010 An Academic Formulas List: New Methods in Phraseology Research. Applied Linguistics31(4). 487–512. 10.1093/applin/amp058
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amp058 [Google Scholar]
  526. Sinclair, John M.
    1991 Corpus, Concordance, Collocation (Describing English Language). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  527. Sinclair, Melinda
    2012 The Effects of Context on Utterance Interpretation: Some Questions and Some Answers. Stellenbosch Papers in Linguistics25. 103–132. 10.5774/25‑0‑78
     https://doi.org/10.5774/25-0-78 [Google Scholar]
  528. Smith, Alvin L.
    2014 Not just Yo’ Mama but Rap’s Mama: The Dozens, African American Culture and the Origins of Battle Rap. RapGrid. [not provided].
     [Google Scholar]
  529. Sperber, Dan & Deirdre Wilson
    1986 Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  530. Spitz, Alice
    2005 Power Plays: the Representation of Mother-Daughter Disputes in Contemporary Plays by Women: A Study in Discourse Analysis. Saarbrücken: Universität des Saarlandes Doctoral dissertation.
  531. Stein, Stephan
    1995 Formelhafte Sprache: Untersuchungen zu ihren pragmatischen und kognitiven Funktionen im gegenwärtigen Deutsch [Formulaic language: Investigations into its pragmatic and cognitive functions in contemporary German] (Sprache in der Gesellschaft 22). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
     [Google Scholar]
  532. 2004 Formelhaftigkeit und Routinen in mündlicher Kommunikation [Formulaic language and routines in oral communication]. In Kathrin Steyer (ed.), Wortverbindungen — mehr oder weniger fest [Word-connections — more or less fixed] (Jahrbuch des Instituts für Deutsche Sprache 2003), 262–288. Berlin, New York: de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110622768‑013
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110622768-013 [Google Scholar]
  533. Steyer, Kathrin
    2013 Usuelle Wortverbindungen: Zentrale Muster des Sprachgebrauchs aus korpusanalytischer Sicht [Common word connections: Central patterns of language use from a corpus analysis perspective] (Studien zur deutschen Sprache Band 65). Tübingen: Narr.
     [Google Scholar]
  534. Stivers, Tanya
    2008 Stance, Alignment, and Affiliation During Storytelling: When Nodding Is a Token of Affiliation. Research on Language & Social Interaction41(1). 31–57. 10.1080/08351810701691123
     https://doi.org/10.1080/08351810701691123 [Google Scholar]
  535. Stokoe, Elizabeth
    2008 Dispreferred Actions and Other Interactional Breaches as Devices for Occasioning Audience Laughter in Television “Sitcoms”. Social Semiotics18(3). 289–307. 10.1080/10350330802217071
     https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330802217071 [Google Scholar]
  536. Strecker, Bruno
    2002 Ja doch, eigentlich schon noch. Alltagsroutinen des Kommunikationsmanagements [Yes, actually, it is. Everyday routines of communication management]. In Ulrike Haß-Zumkehr , Werner Kallmeyer & Gisela Zifonun (eds.), Ansichten der deutschen Sprache: Festschrift für Gerhard Stickel zum 65. Geburtstag [Views on the German Language: Festschrift for Gerhard Stickel on his 65th birthday], 555–577. Tübingen: Narr.
     [Google Scholar]
  537. Stubbs, Michael
    2009 Memorial Article: John Sinclair (1933–2007). Applied Linguistics30(1). 115–137. 10.1093/applin/amn052
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amn052 [Google Scholar]
  538. Stumpf, Sören
    2015 Formelhafte (Ir-)Regularitäten: Korpuslinguistische Befunde und sprachtheoretische Überlegungen [Formulaic (ir)regularities: corpus linguistic findings and linguistic theory considerations] (Sprache — System und Tätigkeit Band 67). Frankfurt am Main, New York: Peter Lang.
     [Google Scholar]
  539. Suls, Jerry M.
    1972 A Two-Stage Model for the Appreciation of Jokes and Cartoons: An Information-Processing Analysis. In Jeffrey H. Goldstein & Paul E. McGhee (eds.), The Psychology of Humor: Theoretical Perspectives and Empirical Issues, 81–100. New York, London: Academic Press. 10.1016/B978‑0‑12‑288950‑9.50010‑9
     https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-288950-9.50010-9 [Google Scholar]
  540. 1983 Cognitive Processes in Humor Appreciation. In Paul E. McGhee & Jeffrey H. Goldstein (eds.), Handbook of Humor Research: Volume 1: Basic Issues, 39–57. New York, Berlin: Springer. 10.1007/978‑1‑4612‑5572‑7_3
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-5572-7_3 [Google Scholar]
  541. Svensson, Maria
    2008 A Very Complex Criterion of Fixedness: Non-Compositionality. In Sylviane Granger & Fanny Meunier (eds.), Phraseology, 81–93. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/z.139.10sve
     https://doi.org/10.1075/z.139.10sve [Google Scholar]
  542. Tagliamonte, Sali & Chris Roberts
    2005 So Weird; so Cool; so Innovative: The Use of Intensifiers in the Television Series ‘Friends’. American Speech80(3). 280–300. 10.1215/00031283‑80‑3‑280
     https://doi.org/10.1215/00031283-80-3-280 [Google Scholar]
  543. Takanashi, Hiroko
    2018 Stance. In Jan-Ola Östman & Jef Verschueren (eds.), Handbook of Pragmatics, 173–200. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/hop.21.sta2
     https://doi.org/10.1075/hop.21.sta2 [Google Scholar]
  544. Tanaka, Keiko
    1999 Advertising Language: A Pragmatic Approach to Advertisements in Britain and Japan. London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  545. Tannen, Deborah
    2003 Power Maneuvers or Connection Maneuvers? Ventriloquizing in Family Interaction. In James E. Alatis & Deborah Tannen (eds.), Linguistics, Language, and the Real World: Discourse and Beyond (Georgetown University Round Table on Languages and Linguistics Ser), 50–62. Washington: Georgetown University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  546. 2005[1984] Conversational Style: Analyzing Talk among Friends. New York: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  547. 2010[1989] Talking Voices: Repetition, Dialogue, and Imagery in Conversational Discourse (Studies in Interactional Sociolinguistics 25), 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  548. Thielemann, Nadine
    2015 From Discourse Structure to Cognition (and Back) — Humorous Blends in Conversation. Wiener Slawistischer Almanach75. 189–228. 10.5282/cx9aq574
     https://doi.org/10.5282/cx9aq574 [Google Scholar]
  549. Thielemann, Nadine
    2020 Allusive Talk — Playing on Indirect Intertextual References in Russian Conversation. Journal of Pragmatics155. 123–134. 10.1016/j.pragma.2019.10.012
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.10.012 [Google Scholar]
  550. Toerien, Merran
    2013 Conversations and Conversation Analysis. In Uwe Flick (ed.), The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Data Analysis, 327–340. London: Sage Publications.
     [Google Scholar]
  551. Tomlinson, John M. , Nicole Gotzner , & Lewis Bott
    2017 Intonation and Pragmatic Enrichment: How Intonation Constrains Ad Hoc Scalar Inferences. Language and Speech60(2). 200–223. 10.1177/0023830917716101
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0023830917716101 [Google Scholar]
  552. Toolan, Michael
    2011 “I Don’t Know What they’re Saying Half the Time, but I’m Hooked on the Series”: Incomprehensible Dialogue and Integrated Multimodal Characterisation in The Wire. In Roberta Piazza , Monika Bednarek & Fabio Rossi (eds.), Telecinematic Discourse: Approaches to the Language of Films and Television Series (Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 211), 161–183. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.211.12too
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.211.12too [Google Scholar]
  553. Toolan, Michael J.
    2016 Making Sense of Narrative Text: Situation, Repetition, and Picturing in the Reading of Short Stories (Routledge Studies in Rhetoric and Stylistics 11). New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315622965
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315622965 [Google Scholar]
  554. Traugott, Elizabeth C.
    2004 Historical Pragmatics. In Laurence R. Horn & Gregory Ward (eds.), The Handbook of Pragmatics (Blackwell Handbooks in Linguistics 16), 538–561. Malden: Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  555. Traugott, Elizabeth C. & Richard Dasher
    2002 Regularity in Semantic Change (Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 97). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  556. Tsakona, Villy
    2003 Jab Lines in Narrative Jokes. HUMOR: International Journal of Humor Research16(3). 315–329. 10.1515/humr.2003.017
     https://doi.org/10.1515/humr.2003.017 [Google Scholar]
  557. 2013a Okras and the Metapragmatic Stereotypes of Humour. In Marta Dynel (ed.), Developments in Linguistic Humour Theory (Topics in Humor Research 1), 25–48. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/thr.1.03tsa
     https://doi.org/10.1075/thr.1.03tsa [Google Scholar]
  558. 2013b Online Joint Fictionalization. In Marta Dynel (ed.), Developments in Linguistic Humour Theory (Topics in Humor Research 1), 229–256. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/thr.7.10tsa
     https://doi.org/10.1075/thr.7.10tsa [Google Scholar]
  559. 2020 Recontextualizing Humor: Rethinking the Analysis and Teaching of Humor (Language Play and Creativity 4). Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9781501511929
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501511929 [Google Scholar]
  560. Tuzcu, Öznur
    2018 Anti-Proverb as a Type of Intertextual Joke. HUMANITAS — International Journal of Social Sciences, 34–48. 10.20304/humanitas.446326
     https://doi.org/10.20304/humanitas.446326 [Google Scholar]
  561. Urios-Aparisi, Eduardo & Manuela M. Wagner
    2011 Prosody of Humor in Sex and the City. Pragmatics & Cognition19(3). 507–529. 10.1075/pc.19.3.06uri
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.19.3.06uri [Google Scholar]
  562. Valdeva, Tatiana
    2003 Anti-Proverbs or New Proverbs: The Use of English Anti-Proverbs and their Stylistic Analysis. Proverbium20. 379–390.
     [Google Scholar]
  563. van Dale, Kim G. , Cheryl L. Somers , David H. Gregg , Jina S. Yoon , Stephen B. Hillman , & Marla G. Bartoi
    2014 The Roles of Teasing and Social Support in Adolescent Internalizing and Externalizing Behavioral Outcomes. Child Indicators Research7(3). 537–552. 10.1007/s12187‑013‑9227‑1
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-013-9227-1 [Google Scholar]
  564. van Lancker, Diana
    1988 Nonpropositional Speech: Neurolinguistic Studies. In Andrew Ellis (ed.), Progress in the Psychology of Language, 49–118. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
     [Google Scholar]
  565. Vasquez, Camilla
    2019 Language, Creativity and Humour Online (Language and digital media). New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315159027
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315159027 [Google Scholar]
  566. Vásquez, Camilla & Erhan Aslan
    2021 “Cats be Outside, How about Meow”: Multimodal Humor and Creativity in an Internet Meme. Journal of Pragmatics171. 101–117. 10.1016/j.pragma.2020.10.006
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2020.10.006 [Google Scholar]
  567. Veale, Tony
    2004 Incongruity in Humor: Root Cause or Epiphenomenon?Humor — International Journal of Humor Research17(4). 419–428. 10.1515/humr.2004.17.4.419
     https://doi.org/10.1515/humr.2004.17.4.419 [Google Scholar]
  568. Veale, Tony , Kurt Feyaerts & Geert Brône
    2006 The Cognitive Mechanisms of Adversarial Humor. HUMOR: International Journal of Humor Research19(3). 305–338. 10.1515/HUMOR.2006.016
     https://doi.org/10.1515/HUMOR.2006.016 [Google Scholar]
  569. Vega Moreno, Rosa E.
    2007 Idioms, Transparency and Pragmatic Inference. In Rosa E. Vega Moreno (ed.), Creativity and Convention: The Pragmatics of Everyday Figurative Speech (Pragmatics & Beyond New Series; 156), 389–426: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.156.c7
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.156.c7 [Google Scholar]
  570. Verstraten, Linda
    1992 Fixed Phrases in Monolingual Learners’ Dictionaries. In Pierre J. L. Arnaud & Henri Béjoint (eds.), Vocabulary and Applied Linguistics, 28–40. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑1‑349‑12396‑4_3
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-12396-4_3 [Google Scholar]
  571. Vestergaard, Torben , and Kim Schrøder
    1995 The Language of Advertising. Reprinted. Language in Society 9. Oxford: Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  572. Wald, Elijah
    2012 The Dozens. A History of Rap’s Mama. Oxford et al.: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  573. Wang, Yu
    2014 Humor in British Academic Lectures and Chinese students’ Perceptions of it. Journal of Pragmatics68. 80–93. 10.1016/j.pragma.2014.05.003
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.05.003 [Google Scholar]
  574. Watson, Rod
    1997 Some General Reflections on ‘Categorization’ and ‘Sequence’ in the Analysis of Conversation. In Stephen Hester & Peter Eglin (eds.), Culture in Action: Studies in Membership Categorization Analysis (Studies in Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis 4), 49–76. Washington: International Institute for Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis.
     [Google Scholar]
  575. Watts, Richard J.
    1989 Relevance and Relational Work: Linguistic Politeness as Politic Behavior. Multilingua8(2–3). 131–166. 10.1515/mult.1989.8.2‑3.131
     https://doi.org/10.1515/mult.1989.8.2-3.131 [Google Scholar]
  576. Weber, Tilo
    2019 Das Wechselspiel zwischen Lexikon und Diskurs: So genannte Antisprichwörter und die X ist das neue Y-Konstruktion [The interplay between lexicon and discourse: so-called anti-proverbs and the X is the new Y construction]. Linguistik online [Linguistics onine] 96(3 [special issue ‘Sprachliche Verfestigungen und sprachlich Verfestigtes’]). 133–155. 10.13092/lo.96.5535
     https://doi.org/10.13092/lo.96.5535 [Google Scholar]
  577. Wells, John C.
    2006 English Intonation: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  578. Werner, Valentin
    2022 Pop Cultural Linguistics. In Valentin Werner (ed.), Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Linguistics, 1–26: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.013.999
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.013.999 [Google Scholar]
  579. Wharton, David & Jeremy Grant
    2007 Teaching Analysis of Film Language (Teaching film and media studies). London: BFI Education.
     [Google Scholar]
  580. Wharton, Tim
    2003 Interjections, Language, and the ‘Showing/Saying’ Continuum. Pragmatics & Cognition11(1). 39–91. 10.1075/pc.11.1.04wha
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.11.1.04wha [Google Scholar]
  581. Wieczorek, Magdalena
    2018 Different Shades of Viewership: A Pragmatic Analysis of Humour in Sitcom Discourse. Forum for Contemporary Issues in Language and Literature3. 101–117.
     [Google Scholar]
  582. Wierzbicka, Anna
    1992 The Semantics of Interjection. Journal of Pragmatics18. 159–192. 10.1016/0378‑2166(92)90050‑L
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(92)90050-L [Google Scholar]
  583. Williamson, Judith
    1978 Decoding Advertisements: Ideology and Meaning in Advertising (Ideas in Progress). London, New York: Boyars.
     [Google Scholar]
  584. Wilson, Deirdre & Dan Sperber
    2004 Relevance Theory. In Laurence R. Horn & Gregory Ward (eds.), The Handbook of Pragmatics (Blackwell Handbooks in Linguistics 16), 607–632. Malden: Blackwell. 10.1002/9780470756959.ch27
     https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470756959.ch27 [Google Scholar]
  585. Wilson, Deirdre & Tim Wharton
    2006 Relevance and Prosody. Journal of Pragmatics38(10). 1559–1579. 10.1016/j.pragma.2005.04.012
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2005.04.012 [Google Scholar]
  586. Wilss, Wolfram
    1990 Verbal Stereotypes. Meta: Journal des traducteurs [Meta: Translators’ Journal] 35(2). 378–388. 10.7202/004612ar
     https://doi.org/10.7202/004612ar [Google Scholar]
  587. Wishne, Justin & Bryan Nicolas
    2011 That’s What She Said: The Most Versatile Joke on Earth. New York et al.: Penguin Publishing Group.
     [Google Scholar]
  588. Wodak, Ruth
    2009 The Discourse of Politics in Action. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
     [Google Scholar]
  589. Wooffitt, Robin
    2005 Conversation Analysis and Discourse Analysis: A Comparative and Critical Introduction. London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi: Sage Publications. 10.4135/9781849208765
     https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849208765 [Google Scholar]
  590. Wray, Alison
    1992 Focusing Hypothesis: The Theory of Left Hemisphere Lateralised Language Re-examined (Studies in speech pathology and clinical linguistics v.3). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/sspcl.3
     https://doi.org/10.1075/sspcl.3 [Google Scholar]
  591. 1999 Formulaic Language in Learners and Native Speakers. Language Teaching32(4). 213–231. 10.1017/S0261444800014154
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444800014154 [Google Scholar]
  592. 2002 Formulaic Language and the Lexicon. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  593. 2002a Formulaic Language and the Lexicon. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511519772
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511519772 [Google Scholar]
  594. 2002b Formulaic Language in Computer-Supported Communication: Theory Meets Reality. Language Awareness11(2). 114–131. 10.1080/09658410208667050
     https://doi.org/10.1080/09658410208667050 [Google Scholar]
  595. 2008 Formulaic Language: Pushing the Boundaries. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  596. 2013a Formulaic Language. Language Teaching46(3). 316–334. 10.1017/S0261444813000013
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444813000013 [Google Scholar]
  597. 2013b Future Directions in Formulaic Language Research. e-crini4. 1–17.
     [Google Scholar]
  598. 2017 Formulaic Sequences as a Regulatory Mechanism for Cognitive Perturbations During the Achievement of Social Goals. Topics in Cognitive Science9(3). 569–587. 10.1111/tops.12257
     https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12257 [Google Scholar]
  599. Wray, Alison & Michael R. Perkins
    2000 The Functions of Formulaic Language: An Integrated Model. Language & Communication20. 1–28. 10.1016/S0271‑5309(99)00015‑4
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0271-5309(99)00015-4 [Google Scholar]
  600. Xu, Qi
    2016 Formulaic Sequences and the Implications for Second Language Learning. English Language Teaching9(8). 39–45. 10.5539/elt.v9n8p39
     https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v9n8p39 [Google Scholar]
  601. Yankah, Kwesi
    1999 Proverb. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology9(1/2). 205–207. 10.1525/jlin.1999.9.1‑2.205
     https://doi.org/10.1525/jlin.1999.9.1-2.205 [Google Scholar]
  602. Young, Richard F.
    2019 Interactional Competence and L2 Pragmatics. In Naoko Taguchi (ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Second Language Acquisition and Pragmatics (Routledge Handbooks in Second Language Acquisition), 93–110. New York, London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781351164085‑7
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351164085-7 [Google Scholar]
  603. Yus, Francisco
    2003 Humor and the Search for Relevance. Journal of Pragmatics35(9). 1295–1331. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(02)00179‑0
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00179-0 [Google Scholar]
  604. Yus, Francisco
    2004 Pragmatics of Humorous Strategies in El Club de la Comedia. In Rosina Márquez Reiter & María E. Placencia (eds.), Current Trends in the Pragmatics of Spanish (Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 123), 319–346. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.123.25yus
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.123.25yus [Google Scholar]
  605. Yus, Francisco
    2012 Strategies and Effects in Humorous Discourse: The Case of Jokes. In Bárbara Eizaga-Rebollar (ed.), Studies in Linguistics and Cognition, 271–296. Berlin: Peter Lang.
     [Google Scholar]
  606. 2016 Humour and Relevance. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/thr.4
     https://doi.org/10.1075/thr.4 [Google Scholar]
  607. Zenner, Eline , Dirk Speelman & Dirk Geeraerts
    2013 What Makes a Catchphrase Catchy? Possible Determinants in the Borrowability of English Catchphrases in Dutch. In Eline Zenner & Gitte Kristiansen (eds.), New Perspectives on Lexical Borrowing, 41–64. Berlin, Boston: de Gruyter. 10.1515/9781614514305.41
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9781614514305.41 [Google Scholar]
  608. Zhang, Grace
    2011 Elasticity of Vague Language. Intercultural Pragmatics8(4). 10.1515/iprg.2011.026
     https://doi.org/10.1515/iprg.2011.026 [Google Scholar]
  609. Zhang, Qiao
    1998 Fuzziness — Vagueness — Generality — Ambiguity. Journal of Pragmatics29(1). 13–31. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(97)00014‑3
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(97)00014-3 [Google Scholar]
  610. Zillmann, Dolf
    1983 Disparagement Humor. In Paul E. McGhee & Jeffrey H. Goldstein (eds.), Handbook of Humor Research: Volume 1: Basic Issues, 85–107. New York, Berlin: Springer. 10.1007/978‑1‑4612‑5572‑7_5
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-5572-7_5 [Google Scholar]
  611. Zillmann, Dolf & S. H. Stocking
    1976 Putdown Humor. Journal of Communication26(3). 154–163. 10.1111/j.1460‑2466.1976.tb01919.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1976.tb01919.x [Google Scholar]
  612. Knowles, Elizabeth
    2014 Oxford Dictionary of Quotations (8th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acref/9780199668700.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acref/9780199668700.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  613. McArthur, Tom
    2018 The Oxford Companion to the English Language (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acref/9780199661282.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acref/9780199661282.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  614. Oxford English Dictionary
    Oxford English Dictionary , cf. https://www.oed.com/
  615. “bale, v.3.” OED Online. Oxford University Press, December 2022 Web. 15 February 2023.
     [Google Scholar]
  616. “mine, v.” OED Online. Oxford University Press, December 2022 Web. 15 February 2023.
     [Google Scholar]
  617. “sexism, n.2.” OED Online. Oxford University Press, December 2022 Web. 15 February 2023.
     [Google Scholar]
  618. “take, v.” OED Online. Oxford University Press, December 2022 Web. 15 February 2023. P7.c.
     [Google Scholar]
  619. Paczolay, Gyula
    1997 European proverbs: in 55 languages; with equivalents in Arabic, Persian, Sanskrit, Chinese and Japanese = Európai közmondások. Veszprém: Veszprémi Nyomda.
     [Google Scholar]
  620. Urban Dictionary
    Urban Dictionary . https://www.urbandictionary.com/
  621. Peckham, Aaron
    1999– “I hardly know her”: https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=I​​%20Hardly​​%20Know​​%20Her)i-hardly-know-her.urbanup.com/​1788​7324
     [Google Scholar]
  622. “Is that what they’re calling it these days”: https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Is​​%20that​​%20what​​%20they​​%27re​​%20calling​​%20it​​%20these​​%20days/”
  623. “how bout them Yankees/Dallas Cowboys”: https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=How​%20bout​%20them​%20yankees​%3F (last accessed16 Feb 2023)
  624. Fleming, Ian
    1953 Casino Royale. London: Jonathan Cape.
     [Google Scholar]
  625. Ovid
    Ovid. 12–17 AD. Epistulae ex Pontotext accessed viathelatinlibrary.com/ovid/ovid.ponto4.shtml (last accessed28 December 2022).
     [Google Scholar]
  626. Shaw, George Bernhard
    1903 Maxims for Revolutionists. InMan and Superman, 28–40. Westminster: Archibald Constable & Co., Ltd.
     [Google Scholar]
  627. Spencer, Herbert
    1864 The Principles of Biology. London: Williams and Norgate. Accessible via: https://archive.org/details/principlesbiolo05spengoog (last accessed12 August 2020).
     [Google Scholar]
  628. Wilde, Oscar
    2007 Epigrams of Oscar Wilde [Wordsworth Reference Series]. Ware: Wordsworth.
     [Google Scholar]
  629. 13 Reasons Why. [TV series]
    13 Reasons Why. [TV series] 2017–2018 Developed by Brian Yorkey . US: Paramount Television Studios et al. for Netflix.
  630. Bates Motel [TV series]
    Bates Motel [TV series] 2013–2017 Developed by Carlton Cuse , Kerry Ehrin & Anthony Cipriano . US: Universal Television et al. for A&E.
  631. Better call Saul [TV series]
    Better call Saul [TV series] 2015–2022 Created by Vince Gilligan & Peter Gould . US: High Bridge Productions et al. for AMC.
  632. Billions [TV series]
    Billions [TV series] 2016– Created by Brian Koppelman , David Levien & Andrew Ross Sorkin . US: Best Available! et al. for Showtime.
  633. Blackadder [TV series]
    Blackadder [TV series] 1983 Directed by Geoff Posner [pilot], Martin Shardlow [1], Mandie Fletcher [2–3], and Richard Boden [4]. UK: 7 Network/BBC/BBC Worldwide for BBC.
  634. Breaking Bad [TV series]
    Breaking Bad [TV series] 2008–2013 Created by Vince Gilligan . US: High Bridge Entertainment et al. for AMC.
  635. Brooklyn Nine–Nine [TV series]
    Brooklyn Nine–Nine [TV series]. Created by Dan Goor & Michael Schur . US: Fremulon et al. for Fox & NBC.
  636. Community [TV series]
    Community [TV series] 2009–2015 Created by Dan Harmon . US: Sony Pictures Television et al. for Netflix.
  637. Criminal Minds [TV series]
    Criminal Minds [TV series] 2005– Created by Jeff Davis US: Entertainment One et al. for CBS, Paramount+ & Disney+.
  638. Deadwood. [TV series]
    Deadwood. [TV series] 2004–2006 Created by David Milch . US: Paramount Network Television et al. for HBO.
  639. Friends [TV series]
    Friends [TV series] 1994–2004 Created by David Crane & Marta Kauffman . US: Warner Bros. Television et al. for NBC.
  640. Full House [TV series]
    Full House [TV series] 1987–1995 Created by Jeff Franklin . US: Jeff Franklin Productions et al. for ABC.
  641. Game of Thrones [TV series]
    Game of Thrones [TV series] 2011–2019 Created by David Benioff & Daniel B. Weiss . US: HBO Entertainment et al. for HBO.
  642. Gilmore Girls [TV series]
    Gilmore Girls [TV series] 2000–2007 Created by Amy Sherman-Palladino . US: Warner Bros. Television et al. for THE WB/The CW.
  643. Heroes [TV series]
    Heroes [TV series] 2006–2010 Created by Tim Kring . US: Tailwind Productions et al. for NBC.
  644. Homeland [TV series]
    Homeland [TV series] 2011–2020 Developed by Howard Gordon & Akex Gansa . US: Teakwood Lane Production et al. for Showtime.
  645. House M.D. [TV series]
    House M.D. [TV series] 2004–2012 Created by David Shore . US: Heel and Toe Films et al. for Fox.
  646. House of Cards [TV series]
    House of Cards [TV series] 2013 — 2018 Created by Beau Willimon . US: Trigger Street Productions et al. for Netflix.
  647. How I Met Your Mother [TV series]
    How I Met Your Mother [TV series] 2005–2014 Created by Carter Bays & Craig Thomas . US: 20th Century Fox Television et al. for CBS.
  648. John from Cincinatti [TV mini series]
    John from Cincinatti [TV mini series] 2007 Created by David Milch & Kem Nunn . US: David Milch for HBO.
  649. Joker [movie]
    Joker [movie] 2019 Directed by Todd Phillips . US: Warner Bros. Pictures et al. Script retrieved fromhttps://www.imsdb.com/scripts/Joker.html (last accessed8 January 2021).
  650. Late Night with Seth Myers [late-night news and political satire talk show]
    Late Night with Seth Myers [late-night news and political satire talk show] 2014– Created by David Letterman & Seth Myers . US: Universal Television et al. for NBC.
  651. Lost [TV series]
    Lost [TV series] 2004–2010 Created by Jeffrey Lieber , J. J. Abrams & Damon Lindelof . US: Bad Robot Productions et al for ABC.
  652. Mad Men [TV series]
    Mad Men [TV series] 2007–2015 Created by Matthew Weiner . US: Weiner Bros. Productions et al. for AMC.
  653. Marvel’s Jessica Jones [TV series]
    Marvel’s Jessica Jones [TV series] 2015–2019 Created by Melissa Rosenberg . US: Marvel television et al for Netflix.
  654. Modern Family [TV series]
    Modern Family [TV series] 2009–2020 Created by Christopher Lloyd & Steven Levitan . US: 20th Century Fox Television et al. for ABC.
  655. New Girl [TV series]
    New Girl [TV series] 2011–2018 Created by Elizabeth Meriwether . US: American Nitwits et al. for Fox.
  656. One Tree Hill [TV series]
    One Tree Hill [TV series] 2003–2012 Created by Mark Schwahn . US: Warner Bros. Television et al. for THE WB/The CW.
  657. Orange is the new black [TV series]
    Orange is the new black [TV series] 2013–2019 Created by jenji Kohan . US: Lionsgate Television & Tilted Productions for Netflix.
  658. Ozark [TV series]
    Ozark [TV series] 2017–2022 Created by Bill Dubuque & Mark Williams . US: MRC Television et al. for Netflix.
  659. Predator [movie]
    Predator [movie] 1987 Directed by John McTiernan . US: 20th Century Fox et al.
  660. Prison Break [TV series]
    Prison Break [TV series] 2005–2009 Created by Paul Scheuring . US: Original Film et al. for Fox.
  661. Russian Doll [TV series]
    Russian Doll [TV series] 2019– Created by Natasha Lyonne & Leslye Headland . US: Universal Television et al. for Netflix.
  662. Scrubs [TV series]
    Scrubs [TV series] 2001–2010 Created by Bill Lawrence . Doozer productions et al. for NBC.
  663. Seven Seconds [TV mini series]
    Seven Seconds [TV mini series] 2018 Created by Veena Sud . US: Fox 21 Television et al. for Netflix.
  664. Sex and the City [TV series]
    Sex and the City [TV series] 1998–2004 Created by Darren Star . US: HBO Entertainment et al. for HBO.
  665. Suits [TV series]
    Suits [TV series] 2011–2019 Created by Aaron Korsh . US: Universal Content Productions for USA Network.
  666. Superstore [TV series]
    Superstore [TV series] 2015–2021 Created by Justin Spitzer . US: Universal Television et al. for NBC.
  667. The Apprentice [reality competition TV show]
    The Apprentice [reality competition TV show] 2004–2015 Created by Mark Burnett . US: Trump Productions et al. for NBC.
  668. The Big Bang Theory [TV series]
    The Big Bang Theory [TV series] 2007–2019 Created by Chuck Lorre & Bill Prady . US: Warner Bros Productions et al. for CBS.
  669. The Blacklist [TV series]
    The Blacklist [TV series] 2013– Created by Jon Bokenkamp . US: Universal Television et al. for NBC.
  670. The Flintstones [animated TV series]
    The Flintstones [animated TV series] 1960–1966 Created by Joseph Barbera & William Hanna . US: Hanna-Barbera Productions for ABC.
  671. The Fresh Prince of Bel-Air [TV series]
    The Fresh Prince of Bel-Air [TV series] 1990–1996 Created by Andy Borowitz & Susan Borowitz . US: The Stuffed Dog Company et al for NBC.
  672. The Office [British TV series]
    The Office [British TV series] 2001–2003 Created and directed by Ricky Gervais and Stephen Merchant . UK: Capital United Nations Entertainment/The Identity Company for BBC.
  673. The Office [US TV series]
    The Office [US TV series] 2005–2013 Created by Greg Daniels , Ricky Gervais , and Stephen Merchant . Deedle-Dee Productions et al. for NBC. Transcript retrieved from: https://transcripts.foreverdreaming.org/viewforum.php?f=574 (last accessed15 February 2023).
  674. The Terminator [movie]
    The Terminator [movie] 1984 Directed by James Cameron . US: Hemdale.
  675. The Umbrella Academy [TV series]
    The Umbrella Academy [TV series] 2019– Created by Steve Blackman . US: Dark Horse Entertainment et al. for Netflix.
  676. Two and a Half Men [TV series]
    Two and a Half Men [TV series] 2003–2015 Created by Chuck Lorre & Lee Aronsohn . US: The Tannenbaum Cpmany et al. for CBS.
  677. Wayne’s World [movie]
    Wayne’s World [movie] 1992 Directed by Penelope Spheeris . US: Lorne Michaels.
  678. Witches of East End [TV series]
    Witches of East End [TV series] 2013–2014 Developed by Maggie Friedman . US: 3 Arts Entertainment et al. for Lifetime.
  679. Z Nation [TV series]
    Z Nation [TV series] 2014–2018 Created by Karl Schaefer & Craig Engler . US: The Asylum for Syfy.
/content/books/9789027243690
Loading

  • From This Site

    /content/books/9789027243690
    dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Chapter
    10
    5
/content/books/9789027243690
dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
-contentType:Journal -contentType:Chapter
10
5
Chapter
content/books/9789027243690
Book
false
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error