1887
  1. Home
  2. Books
  3. Speaking of Writing Romani

Speaking of Writing Romani

Language attitudes, text editing, and variability

image of Speaking of Writing Romani
USD
Buy:$182.00 + Taxes

As a traditionally oral language spoken in areas with a literacy-based culture, Romani provides a unique case for the study of orality and literacy. In a mixed-methods approach, this work investigates attitudes of Romani speakers towards the modalities, their communicative functions and use, and editing behaviour in writing texts. Importantly, it allows a direct comparison of spoken and written language use of individuals. Thus, while Romani writing has been studied before, this book adds unique data and aspects of metalinguistic knowledge to the discussion. Moreover, broadening the empirical coverage of smaller languages within experimental research, it comprises the first study on implicit attitudes towards the Romani language. This makes it possible for insights from minority languages to bear on theories of orality and literacy. Beyond Romani linguistics, the book will appeal to researchers interested in minority language research, variability, language attitudes, and frameworks of spoken and written language.

References

  1. Aarne, Antti & Stith Thompson
    1961 The Types of the Folktale. A Classification and Bibliography. (FF Communications LXXV.) Helsinki: Soumalainen Tiedeakatemia. Cited after Cech & Fennesz-Juhasz 2001.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Abercrombie, Amelia
    2018 “Language Purism and Social Hierarchies: Making a Romani Standard in Prizren.” Language in Society47. 741–761. 10.1017/S0047404518000969
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404518000969 [Google Scholar]
  3. Adamou, Evangelia
    2002 “De la stabilité de l’Imaginaire Linguistique.” Langage et société99. 77–95. 10.3917/ls.099.0077
     https://doi.org/10.3917/ls.099.0077 [Google Scholar]
  4. 2013 “Replicating Spanish estar in Mexican Romani.” Linguistics51(6). 1075–1105. 10.1515/ling‑2013‑0045
     https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2013-0045 [Google Scholar]
  5. 2021 The Adaptive Bilingual Mind. Insights from Endangered Languages. Cambridge et al.: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108884266
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108884266 [Google Scholar]
  6. 2024 Endangered Languages. Cambridge, MA/London: MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/15352.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/15352.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  7. Adamou, Evangelia & Kimmo Granqvist
    2015 “Unevenly Mixed Romani Languages.” International Journal of Bilingualism19(5). 525–547. 10.1177/1367006914524645
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006914524645 [Google Scholar]
  8. Adamou, Evangelia & Yair Haendler
    2020 “An Experimental Approach to Nominal Tense: Evidence from Pomak (Slavic).” Language96(3). 507–550. 10.1353/lan.2020.0040
     https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2020.0040 [Google Scholar]
  9. Adamou, Evangelia & Yaron Matras
    2020 “Romani Syntactic Typology.” In: Yaron Matras & Anton Tenser (eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of Romani Language and Linguistics. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. 187–227. 10.1007/978‑3‑030‑28105‑2_7
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28105-2_7 [Google Scholar]
  10. Adamou, Evangelia & Xingija R. Shen
    2019 “There are no Language Switching Costs When Codeswitching is Frequent.” International Journal of Bilingualism23(1). 53–70. 10.1177/1367006917709094
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006917709094 [Google Scholar]
  11. Adler, Astrid
    2019 “Language Discrimination in Germany: When Evaluation Influences Objective Counting.” Journal of Language and Discrimination3(2). 232–253. 10.1558/jld.39952
     https://doi.org/10.1558/jld.39952 [Google Scholar]
  12. Affolter, Michael
    2011 Mündlichkeit im literarischen Dialog epischer Texte. Einführung des Konzeptes der Mündlichkeitsintensität im Dienste der kontrastiven Linguistik und der literarischen Analyse. Stuttgart: ibidem.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Ágel, Vilmos & Mathilde Hennig
    2006 “Theorie des Nähe- und Distanzsprechens.” In: Vilmos Ágel & Mathilde Hennig (eds.), Grammatik aus Nähe und Distanz. Theorie und Praxis am Beispiel von Nähetexten 1650–2000. Tübingen: Niemeyer. 3–31. 10.1515/9783110944709.3
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110944709.3 [Google Scholar]
  14. Agheyisi, Rebecca & Joshua A. Fishman
    1970 “Language Attitude Studies: A Brief Survey of Methodological Approaches.” Anthropological Linguistics12(5). 137–157.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Agosta, Sara & Valentina Ghirardi & Cristina Zogmaister & Umberto Castiello & Giuseppe Sartori
    2011 “Detecting Fakers of the Autobiographical IAT.” Applied Cognitive Psychology25. 299–306. 10.1002/acp.1691
     https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1691 [Google Scholar]
  16. Akinnaso, F. Niyi
    1982 “On the Differences Between Spoken and Written Language.” Language and Speech25(2). 97–125. 10.1177/002383098202500201
     https://doi.org/10.1177/002383098202500201 [Google Scholar]
  17. 1985 “On the Similarities Between Spoken and Written Language.” Language and Speech28(4). 323–359. 10.1177/002383098502800401
     https://doi.org/10.1177/002383098502800401 [Google Scholar]
  18. Akkan, Başak & Mehmet Baki Deniz & Mehmet Ertan
    2017 “The Romanization of Poverty: Spatial Stigmatization of Roma Neighborhoods in Turkey.” Romani Studies27(1), 5th series. 73–93. 10.3828/rs.2017.4
     https://doi.org/10.3828/rs.2017.4 [Google Scholar]
  19. Albert, Gwendolyn & Marek Szilvasi
    2017 “Intersectional Discrimination of Romani Women Forcibly Sterilized in the Former Czechoslovakia and Czech Republic.” Health and Human Rights Journal19(2). 23–34.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Albury, Nathan J.
    2017 “The Power of Folk Linguistic Knowledge in Language Policy.” Language Policy16. 209–228. 10.1007/s10993‑016‑9404‑4
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s10993-016-9404-4 [Google Scholar]
  21. 2018 “‘If We Lose Their Language We Lose Our History’: Knowledge and Disposition in Māori Language Acquisition Policy.” Journal of Language, Identity & Education17(2). 69–84. 10.1080/15348458.2017.1389281
     https://doi.org/10.1080/15348458.2017.1389281 [Google Scholar]
  22. Álvarez-Mosquera, Pedro & Alejandro Marín-Gutiérrez
    2018 “Implicit Language Attitudes Toward Historically White Accents in the South African Context.” Journal of Language and Social Psychology37(2). 238–248. 10.1177/0261927X17718349
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X17718349 [Google Scholar]
  23. Ameka, Felix K.
    2015 “Unintended Consequences of Methodological and Practical Responses to Language Endangerment in Africa.” In: James Essegbey & Brent Henderson & Fiona McLaughlin (eds.), Language Documentation and Endangerment in Africa. (Culture and Language Use: Studies in Anthropological Linguistics 17.) Amsterdam et al.: John Benjamins. 15–35. 10.1075/clu.17.01ame
     https://doi.org/10.1075/clu.17.01ame [Google Scholar]
  24. Anand, Pranav & Sandra Chung & Matthew Wagers
    2011 “Widening the Net: Challenges for Gathering Linguistic Data in the Digital Age.” Submitted to theNational Science Foundation SBE 2020. Rebuilding the mosaic: Fostering Research in the Social, Behavioral and Economic Sciences at the National Science Foundation in the Next Decade, 1–5.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Anderson, John A. E. & Lorinda Mak & Aram Keyvani Chahi & Ellen Bialystok
    2018 “The Language and Social Background Questionnaire: Assessing Degree of Bilingualism in a Diverse Population.” Behaviour Research Methods50. 250–263. 10.3758/s13428‑017‑0867‑9
     https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-017-0867-9 [Google Scholar]
  26. Andreadis, Ioannis & Evangelia Kartsounidou
    2020 “The Impact of Splitting a Long Online Questionnaire on Data Quality.” Survey Research Methods14(1). 31–42.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Anwyl-Irvine, Alexander & Edwin S. Dalmaijer & Nick Hodges & Jo K. Evershed
    2021 “Realistic Precision and Accuracy of Online Experiment Platforms, Web Browsers, and Devices.” Behavior Research Methods53. 1407–1425. 10.3758/s13428‑020‑01501‑5
     https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-020-01501-5 [Google Scholar]
  28. Appadurai, Arjun
    1992 “Global Ethnoscapes: Notes and Queries for a Transnational Anthropology.” In: R. G. Fox (ed.), Interventions: Anthropologies of the Present. Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research. 191–210. Cited after Matras 2015.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Armitage, R. & Laura B. Nellums
    2020 “Letter to the Editor: COVID-19 and the Gypsy, Roma and Traveller Population.” Public Health185. 48. 10.1016/j.puhe.2020.06.003
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2020.06.003 [Google Scholar]
  30. Arnett, Jeffrey J.
    2008 “The Neglected 95%. Why American Psychology Needs to Become Less American.” American Psychologist63(7). 602–614. 10.1037/0003‑066X.63.7.602
     https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.63.7.602 [Google Scholar]
  31. Arvaniti, Amalia
    2016 “Analytical Decisions in Intonation Research and the Role of Representations: Lessons from Romani.” Laboratory Phonology: Journal of the Association for Laboratory Phonology7(1). Article6, 1–43. 10.5334/labphon.14
     https://doi.org/10.5334/labphon.14 [Google Scholar]
  32. Auer, Peter
    2014 “Enregistering Pluricentric German.” In: Augusto Soares da Silva (ed.), Pluricentricity: Language Variation and Sociocognitive Dimensions. Berlin, Boston, MA: De Gruyter Mouton. 19–48.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Averbeck-Lietz, Stefanie
    2019 „Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse und Diskursanalyse. Überlegungen zu Gemeinsamkeiten, Unterschieden und Grenzen.“ In: Thomas Wiedemann & Christine Lohmeier (eds.), Diskursanalyse für die Kommunikationswissenschaft. Theorie, Vorgehen, Erweiterungen. Wiesbaden: Springer VS. 83–111. 10.1007/978‑3‑658‑25186‑4_5
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-25186-4_5 [Google Scholar]
  34. Baayen, R. Harald
    2004 “Statistics in Psycholinguistics: A Critique of Some Current Gold Standards.” Mental Lexicon Working Papers1. 1–45. University of Edmonton. Available from URL: 〈languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/myl/ldc/Pitzer/BaayenStatistics.pdf〉 (07/02/2023).
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Babel, Molly
    2010 “Dialect Divergence and Convergence in New Zealand English.” Language in Society39(4). 437–456. 10.1017/S0047404510000400
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404510000400 [Google Scholar]
  36. Bakker, Peter
    1995 “Notes on the Genesis of Caló and other Iberian Para-Romani Varieties.” In: Yaron Matras (ed.), Romani in Contact. The History, Structure and Sociology of a Language. (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 126.) Amsterdam et al.: John Benjamins. 125–150. 10.1075/cilt.126.07bak
     https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.126.07bak [Google Scholar]
  37. Bakker, Peter & Yaron Matras
    1997 “Introduction.” In: Yaron Matras & Peter Bakker & Hristo Kyuchukov (eds.), The Typology and Dialectology of Romani. (Amsterdam Studies in the Theory and History of Linguistic Science. Series 4 — Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 156.) Amsterdam et al.: John Benjamins. vii–xxx. 10.1075/cilt.156.01bak
     https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.156.01bak [Google Scholar]
  38. Bakker, Peter & Marcia Rooker
    2001 “The Political Status of the Romani Language in Europe.” Mercator Working Papers2. 3–36.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Bakker, Peter & Hein van der Voort
    1991 “Para-Romani Languages: An Overview and Some Speculation on Their Genesis.” In: Peter Bakker & Marcel Cortiade (eds.), In the Margin of Romani. Gypsy Languages in Contact. (Studies in Language Contact 1.) Amsterdam: Instituut voor Algemene Taalwetenschap. 16–44.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Baldwin, Jessie R. & Jean-Baptiste Pingault & Tabea Schoeler & Hannah M. Sallis & Marcus R. Munafò
    2022 “Protecting Against Researcher Bias in Secondary Data Analysis: Challenges and Potential Solutions.” European Journal of Epidemiology37(1). 1–10. 10.1007/s10654‑021‑00839‑0
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-021-00839-0 [Google Scholar]
  41. Baló, Márton A.
    2020 “Romani Phonology.” In: Yaron Matras & Anton Tenser (eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of Romani Language and Linguistics. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. 119–153. 10.1007/978‑3‑030‑28105‑2_5
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28105-2_5 [Google Scholar]
  42. Barton, David & Mary Hamilton
    2000 “Literacy Practices.” In: Barton & Hamilton & Ivanič (eds.) 2000 7–15.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Barton, David & Mary Hamilton & Roz Ivanič
    (eds.) 2000 Situated Literacies. Reading and Writing in Context. (Literacies 1.) London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Barz, Hajdi
    2016 “Mimans Geschichte. Handreichung zum Thema Gadjé-Rassismus. Pädagogisches Begleitmaterial zu vier Video-Modulen aus dem Dokumentarfilm with wings and roots.” Available online, URL: 〈https://www.vielfalt-mediathek.de/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/Rassismus-gegen-Romnja-und-Sintizze_Mimans-Geschichte.pdf〉 (30/09/2022).
  45. Bates, Douglas & Martin Maechler & Ben Bolker & Steve Walker
    2015 “Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4.” Journal of Statistical Software67(1). 1–48. 10.18637/jss.v067.i01
     https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01 [Google Scholar]
  46. BDSG = “Bundesdatenschutzgesetz vom 30. Juni 2017 (BGBl. I S. 2097), das zuletzt durch Artikel 10 des Gesetzes vom 23. Juni 2021 (BGBl. I S. 1858; 2022 I 1045) geändert worden ist
    BDSG = “Bundesdatenschutzgesetz vom 30. Juni 2017 (BGBl. I S. 2097), das zuletzt durch Artikel 10 des Gesetzes vom 23. Juni 2021 (BGBl. I S. 1858; 2022 I 1045) geändert worden ist.” Available from URL: 〈www.bgbl.de/xaver/bgbl/start.xav?startbk=Bundesanzeiger_BGBl&jumpTo=bgbl117s2097.pdf〉 (27/09/2022).
  47. Becker, Judith & Franziska Moser & Maria Fleßner & Bettina Hannover
    2019 “Die Beobachter_innenübereinstimmung als Kompass bei der induktiven Kategorienbildung? Erfahrungen einer Forschungsgruppe mit der Auswertung von Interviewtranskripten.” Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung20(3). Article 28, 17 Paragraphs.
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Becker, Rolf & Sara Möser & David Glauser
    2019 “Cash vs. Vouchers vs. Gifts in Web Surveys of a Mature Panel Study — Main Effects in a Long-term Incentives Experiment Across Three Panel Waves.” Social Science Research81. 221–234. 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2019.02.008
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2019.02.008 [Google Scholar]
  49. Berger, Yvonne
    2020 Biographische Orientierungen im Bildungsverlauf. Eine rekonstruktive Studie im städtischen China. Wiesbaden: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑658‑30433‑1
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-30433-1 [Google Scholar]
  50. Berman, Ruth A. & Dan I. Slobin
    1994 Relating Events in Narrative: A Crosslinguistic Developmental Study. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Bernard, H. Russell
    2011 Research Methods in Anthropology. Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. 5th edition. Lanham, MD et al.: AltaMira Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Bialystok, Ellen
    2016 “The Signal and the Noise. Finding the Pattern in Human Behavior.” Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism6(5). 517–534. 10.1075/lab.15040.bia
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.15040.bia [Google Scholar]
  53. Biber, Douglas
    1988 Variation Across Speech and Writing. Cambridge et al.: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511621024
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511621024 [Google Scholar]
  54. Biber, Douglas & Susan Conrad
    2009 Register, Genre, and Style. Cambridge et al.: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511814358
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511814358 [Google Scholar]
  55. Bloomfield, Leonard
    1933 Language. New York, NY: Holt.
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Blum, Mirella
    2022 “Hearing Suprasegmentals over the Internet: Methodologies for Remote Fieldwork during and after COVID-19.” Talk online at LACITO (Langues et civilisations à tradition orale), CNRS, Paris, 23/02/2022.
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Blumenberg, Hans
    1981 Die Lesbarkeit der Welt. Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp.
     [Google Scholar]
  58. BMI = Bundesministerium des Innern, für Bau und Heimat
    BMI = Bundesministerium des Innern, für Bau und Heimat 2020 Nationale Minderheiten: Minderheitensprachen und die Regionalsprache Niederdeutsch in Deutschland. 4th edition. Frankfurt/Main: Druck- und Verlagshaus Zarbock. Available from URL: 〈https://www.bmi.bund.de/SharedDocs/downloads/DE/publikationen/themen/heimat-integration/nationale-minderheiten/minderheiten-und-regionalsprachen-vierte-auflage.pdf;jsessionid=009DAD8A8EEDF4B1CA952FFB6F3BA4FB.1_cid332?__blob=publicationFile&v=10〉 (08/03/2023).
     [Google Scholar]
  59. Boersma, Paul & David Weenink
    2018 Praat: Doing Phonetics by Computer [Computer Software]. Version 6.0.37. Available from URL: 〈www.praat.org/〉 (10/03/2018).
     [Google Scholar]
  60. Bogdal, Klaus-Michael
    2011 Europa erfindet die Zigeuner. Eine Geschichte von Faszination und Verachtung. Berlin: Suhrkamp.
     [Google Scholar]
  61. Bogdán, Mária
    2015 “Challenging Perspectives — The Role of Media Representation in Knowledge Production about Roma.” Roma Rights — Journal of the European Roma Rights Centre2. 71–74. Available from URL: 〈www.errc.org/uploads/upload_en/file/roma-rights-2-2015-nothing-about-us-without-us.pdf〉 (28/03/2023).
     [Google Scholar]
  62. Bogdán, Mária & Andrew Ryder & Marius Taba
    2015 “The Roma Spring: Knowledge Production and the Search for a New Humanity.” Roma Rights — Journal of the European Roma Rights Centre2. 33–37. Available from URL: 〈www.errc.org/uploads/upload_en/file/roma-rights-2-2015-nothing-about-us-without-us.pdf〉 (28/03/2023).
     [Google Scholar]
  63. Boneß, Anja & Helena Olfert
    2010 “Gegenüberstellung einer mündlichen und schriftlichen Textversion: Orate und literate Strukturen.” Grazer Linguistische Studien73. 169–181.
     [Google Scholar]
  64. Bonfiglio, Thomas Paul
    2010 Mother Tongues and Nations. The Invention of the Native Speaker. (Trends in Linguistics 226.) Berlin/New York, NY: De Gruyter Mouton. Cited after Hollington & Storch 2016 10.1515/9781934078266
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9781934078266 [Google Scholar]
  65. Boretzky, Norbert
    1996 “Arli. Materialien zu einem südbalkanischen Romani-Dialekt.” Grazer Linguistische Studien46. 1–30.
     [Google Scholar]
  66. Boretzky, Norbert & Birgit Igla
    1994a “Romani Mixed Dialects.” In: Peter Bakker & Maarten Mous (eds.), Mixed Languages, 15 Case Studies in Language Intertwining. (Studies in Language and Language Use 13.) Amsterdam: Institute for Functional Research into Language and Language Use. 35–68.
     [Google Scholar]
  67. 1994b Wörterbuch Romani-Deutsch-Englisch für den südosteuropäischen Raum. Mit einer Grammatik der Dialektvarianten. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.
     [Google Scholar]
  68. 1999 “Balkanische (südosteuropäische) Einflüsse im Romani.” In: Uwe Hinrichs (ed.), Handbuch der Südosteuropa-Linguistik. (Slavistische Studienbücher, Neue Folge 10.) Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz. 709–731.
     [Google Scholar]
  69. Bourdieu, Pierre
    1991 Language and Symbolic Power. Cambridge: Polity Press. Cited after Ó Riagáin 2008.
     [Google Scholar]
  70. Bowern, Claire & Natasha Warner
    2015 “‘Lone Wolves’ and Collaboration: A Reply to Crippen & Robinson (2013).” Language Documentation & Conservation9. 59–85.
     [Google Scholar]
  71. Bremner, Andrew J. & Serge Caparos & Jules Davidoff & Jan de Fockert & Karina J. Linnell & Charles Spence
    2013 “‘Bouba’ and ‘Kiki’ in Namibia? A Remote Culture Make Similar Shape–Sound Matches, but Different Shape–Taste Matches to Westerners.” Cognition126. 165–172. 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.09.007
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2012.09.007 [Google Scholar]
  72. Brooks, Ethel
    2015 “The Importance of Feminists and ‘Halfies’ in Romani Studies: New Epistemological Possibilities.” Roma Rights — Journal of the European Roma Rights Centre2. 57–61. Available from URL: 〈www.errc.org/uploads/upload_en/file/roma-rights-2-2015-nothing-about-us-without-us.pdf〉 (28/03/2023).
     [Google Scholar]
  73. Brooks, Ethel & Colin Clark & Iulius Rostas
    2022 “Engaging with Decolonisation, Tackling Antigypsyism: Lessons from Teaching Romani Studies at the Central European University in Hungary.” Social Policy & Society21(1). 68–79. 10.1017/S1474746421000452
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474746421000452 [Google Scholar]
  74. Bryman, Alan
    2012 Social Research Methods. 4th edition. Oxford et al.: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  75. Bugarski, Ranko
    2004 “Language Policies in the Successor States of Former Yugoslavia.” Journal of Language and Politics3(2). 189–207. 10.1075/jlp.3.2.04bug
     https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.3.2.04bug [Google Scholar]
  76. Bunčić, Daniel
    2008 “Die (Re-)Nationalisierung der serbokroatischen Standards.” In: Sebastian Kempgen (eds.), Deutsche Beiträge zum 14. Internationalen Slavistenkongress Ohrid 2008. (Die Welt der Slaven. Sammelbände/Sborniki 32.) München: Otto Sagner. 89–102.
     [Google Scholar]
  77. 2012 “Film-Untertitel als Quelle eines quasi-mündlichen Parallelkorpus?” In: Luka Szucsich & Natalia Gagarina & Elena Gorishneva & Joanna Leszkowicz (eds.), Linguistische Beiträge zur Slavistik: XIX. JungslavistInnen-Treffen in Berlin, 16.–18. Dezember 2010. (Specimina philologiae Slavicae 171.) München: Otto Sagner. 49–69.
     [Google Scholar]
  78. 2024 “Scripts.” In: Danko Šipka & Wayles Browne (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Slavic Linguistics. (Cambridge Handbooks in Language and Linguistics.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 675–696. 10.1017/9781108973021.033
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108973021.033 [Google Scholar]
  79. Busch, Brigitta
    2012 “The Linguistic Repertoire Revisited.” Applied Linguistics33(5). 503–523. 10.1093/applin/ams056
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/ams056 [Google Scholar]
  80. Busch, Dominic
    2009 “The Notion of Culture in Linguistic Research.” Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung10(1). Article 50, 60 Paragraphs.
     [Google Scholar]
  81. Callesano, Salvatore & Phillip M. Carter
    2023 “Unidirectional Language Bias: The Implicit Association Test with Spanish and English in Miami.” International Journal of Bilingualism27(6). 960–977. 10.1177/13670069221121159
     https://doi.org/10.1177/13670069221121159 [Google Scholar]
  82. Camerer, Colin F. & Anna Dreber & Felix Holzmeister & Teck-Hua Ho & Jürgen Huber & Magnus Johannesson & Michael Kirchler & Gideon Nave & Brian A. Nosek & Thomas Pfeiffer & Adam Altmejd & Nick Buttrick & Taizan Chan & Yiling Chen & Eskil Forsell & Anup Gampa & Emma Heikensten & Lily Hummer & Taisuke Imai & Siri Isaksson & Dylan Manfredi & Julia Rose & Eric-Jan Wagenmakers & Hang Wu
    2018 “Evaluating the Replicability of Social Science Experiments in Nature and Science between 2010 and 2015.” Nature Human Behaviour2. 637–644. 10.1038/s41562‑018‑0399‑z
     https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-018-0399-z [Google Scholar]
  83. Cameron, Deborah
    1995 Verbal Hygiene. (The Politics of Language.) London/New York, NY: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  84. Campbell-Kibler, Kathryn
    2012 “The Implicit Association Test and Sociolinguistic Meaning.” Lingua122. 753–763. 10.1016/j.lingua.2012.01.002
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2012.01.002 [Google Scholar]
  85. Canagarajah, Suresh
    2004 “Multilingual Writers and the Struggle for Voice in Academic Discourse.” In: Aneta Pavlenko & Adrian Blackledge (eds.), Negotiation of Identities in Multilingual Contexts. (Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 45.) Clevedon et al.: Multilingual Matters. 266–289.
     [Google Scholar]
  86. Cappai, Gabriele
    2003 “Einleitung: Übersetzung zwischen Kulturen als interdisziplinäre Aufgabe.” In: Arnold Zingerle (ed.), Sozialwissenschaftliches Übersetzen als interkulturelle Hermeneutik. (Contributi Associazione Italo-Tedesca di Sociologia 3.) Milan: Angeli. 11–29.
     [Google Scholar]
  87. Carifio, James & Ronald Biron
    1978 “Collecting Sensitive Data Anonymously: The CDRGP Technique.” Journal of Alcohol and Drug Education23. 47–66.
     [Google Scholar]
  88. Carini, Robert M. & John C. Hayek & George D. Kuh & John M. Kennedy & Judith A. Ouimet
    2003 “College Student Responses to Web and Paper Surveys: Does Mode Matter?” Research in Higher Education44(1). 1–19. 10.1023/A:1021363527731
     https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021363527731 [Google Scholar]
  89. Cech, Petra & Christiane Fennesz-Juhasz
    2001 “Märchen, Erzählungen und Lieder der Lovara.” In: Cech, Petra (eds.) 2001 397–424.
     [Google Scholar]
  90. Cech, Petra & Christiane Fennesz-Juhasz & Mozes F. Heinschink
    2012 “Märchen und Erzählungen der Kalderaš.” In: Fennesz-Juhasz (eds.) 2012 507–564.
     [Google Scholar]
  91. Cech, Petra & Christiane Fennesz-Juhasz & Dieter W. Halwachs & Mozes F. Heinschink
    (eds.) 2001 Fern von uns im Traum… Märchen, Erzählungen und Lieder der Lovara. / Te na dikhas sunende… Lovarenge paramiči, tertenetura taj gjila. Klagenfurt/Celovec: Drava.
     [Google Scholar]
  92. Cech, Petra & Mozes F. Heinschink & Dieter W. Halwachs
    (eds.) 2009 Kerzen und Limonen. Märchen der Arlije. / Momelja hem limonja. Arlijengere paramisja. Klagenfurt/Celovec: Drava.
     [Google Scholar]
  93. Chafe, Wallace L.
    (ed.) 1980 The Pear Stories. Cognitive, Cultural, and Linguistic Aspects of Narrative Production. (Advances in Discourse Processes 3.) Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
     [Google Scholar]
  94. 1984 “Integration and Involvement in Spoken and Written Language.” In: Tasso Borbé (ed.), Semiotics Unfolding. Proceedings of the Second Congress of the International Association for Semiotic Studies, Vienna, July 1979. (Approaches to Semiotics 68(2).) Berlin et al.: Mouton. 1095–1102. 10.1515/9783110869897‑131
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110869897-131 [Google Scholar]
  95. 1994 Discourse, Consciousness, and Time. The Flow and Displacement of Conscious Experience in Speaking and Writing. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  96. Chafe, Wallace L. & Deborah Tannen
    1987 “The Relation Between Written and Spoken Language.” Annual Review of Anthropology16. 383–407. 10.1146/annurev.an.16.100187.002123
     https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.an.16.100187.002123 [Google Scholar]
  97. Clifford, James & George E. Marcus
    (eds.) 1986 Writing Culture. The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography. Berkeley, CA et al.: University of California Press. 10.1525/9780520946286
     https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520946286 [Google Scholar]
  98. Cole, Jennifer & Stefanie Shattuck-Hufnagel
    2016 “New Methods for Prosodic Transcription: Capturing Variability as a Source of Information.” Laboratory Phonology7(1). Article8, 1–29. 10.5334/labphon.29
     https://doi.org/10.5334/labphon.29 [Google Scholar]
  99. Cortiade, Marcel
    1985 “Between Oral and Written Textuality: The Lila of the Young Romani Poets in Kosovia.” Lacio Drom6. 2–20.
     [Google Scholar]
  100. Coulmas, Florian
    2013 Writing and Society. An Introduction. Cambridge et al.: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139061063
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139061063 [Google Scholar]
  101. Council of Europe
    Council of Europe 2023 “European Charter for Regional or Minority Languages.” Available from URL: 〈https://www.coe.int/en/web/european-charter-regional-or-minority-languages〉 (17/03/2023).
  102. Crippen, James A. & Laura C. Robinson
    2013 “In Defense of the Lone Wolf: Collaboration in Language Documentation.” Language Documentation & Conservation7. 123–135.
     [Google Scholar]
  103. Cudak, Karin & Iulius Rostas
    2021 “Bildungssituation(en) von Sinti und Roma im deutschen Bildungssystem.” In: Strauß (ed.) 2021 13–44.
     [Google Scholar]
  104. Cummins, Jamie & Ian Hussey & Adriaan Spruyt
    2022 “The Role of Attitude Features in the Reliability of IAT Scores.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology101. Article104330, 1–8. 10.1016/j.jesp.2022.104330
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2022.104330 [Google Scholar]
  105. Cvencek, Dario
    2010 “Faking of the Implicit Association Test Is Statistically Detectable and Partly Correctable.” Basic and Applied Social Psychology32. 302–314. 10.1080/01973533.2010.519236
     https://doi.org/10.1080/01973533.2010.519236 [Google Scholar]
  106. Ćirković, Svetlana
    2023 “The Romani Language in the Linguistic Landscape of Serbia. A (non) visible Minority Language.” Balcanica54. 21–64. 10.2298/BALC2354021C
     https://doi.org/10.2298/BALC2354021C [Google Scholar]
  107. Dan-Glauser, Elise S. & Klaus R. Scherer
    2011 “The Geneva Affective Picture Database (GAPED): A New 730-Picture Database Focusing on Valence and Normative Significance.” Behaviour Research Methods43. 468–477. 10.3758/s13428‑011‑0064‑1
     https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-011-0064-1 [Google Scholar]
  108. De Houwer, Jan & Agnes Moors
    2010 “Implicit Measures: Similarities and Differences.” In: Bertram Gawronski & B. Keith Payne (eds.), Handbook of Implicit Social Cognition: Measurement, Theory and Applications. New York, NY: Guilford Press. 176–196. Cited after Rosseel & Grondelaers 2019.
     [Google Scholar]
  109. De Houwer, Jan & Sarah Teige-Mocigemba & Adriaan Spruyt & Agnes Moors
    2009 “Implicit Measures: A Normative Analysis and Review.” Psychological Bulletin135(3). 347–368. Cited after Rosseel & Grondelaers 2019 10.1037/a0014211
     https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014211 [Google Scholar]
  110. De Leeuw, Joshua R.
    2015 “jsPsych: A JavaScript Library for Creating Behavioral Experiments in a Web Browser.” Behaviour Research Methods47. 1–12. 10.3758/s13428‑014‑0458‑y
     https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-014-0458-y [Google Scholar]
  111. De Vogelaer, Gunther & Jean-Pierre Chevrot & Matthias Katerbow & Aurélie Nardy
    2017 “Bridging the Gap between Language Acquisition and Sociolinguistics. Introduction to an Interdisciplinary Topic.” In: Gunther De Vogelaer & Matthias Katerbow (eds.), Acquiring Sociolinguistic Variation. (Studies in Language Variation 20.) Amsterdam et al.: John Benjamins. 1–41. 10.1075/silv.20.01dev
     https://doi.org/10.1075/silv.20.01dev [Google Scholar]
  112. De Vogelaer, Gunther & Jolien Toye
    2017 “Acquiring Attitudes Towards Varieties of Dutch. A Quantitative Perspective.” In: Gunther De Vogelaer & Matthias Katerbow (eds.), Acquiring Sociolinguistic Variation. (Studies in Language Variation 20.) Amsterdam et al.: John Benjamins. 117–154. 10.1075/silv.20.05dev
     https://doi.org/10.1075/silv.20.05dev [Google Scholar]
  113. Denkler, Markus & Stephan Elspaß
    2007 “Nähesprachlichkeit und Regionalsprachlichkeit in historischer Perspektive.” Niederdeutsches Jahrbuch130. 79–108.
     [Google Scholar]
  114. Denscombe, Martyn
    2009 “Item Non-response Rates: A Comparison of Online and Paper Questionnaires.” International Journal of Social Research Methodology12(4). 281–291. 10.1080/13645570802054706
     https://doi.org/10.1080/13645570802054706 [Google Scholar]
  115. Detandt, Sandrine & Christophe Leys & Ariane Bazan
    2017 “A French Translation of the Pleasure Arousal Dominance (PAD) Semantic Differential Scale for the Measure of Affect and Drive.” Psychologica Belgica57(1). 17–31. 10.5334/pb.340
     https://doi.org/10.5334/pb.340 [Google Scholar]
  116. DeVito, Joseph A.
    1966 “Psychogrammatical Factors in Oral and Written Discourse by Skilled Communicators.” Speech Monographs33. 73–76. 10.1080/03637756609375483
     https://doi.org/10.1080/03637756609375483 [Google Scholar]
  117. Dick-Zatta, Jane
    1985 “The Metonymic Pole of Language and the Referential Function in Rom Sloveni Narration.” Lacio Drom, supplement to21(6). 32–41. Cited after Toninato 2014.
     [Google Scholar]
  118. Diepold, Alexander & Christoph Leucht
    2021 “Hildegard Lagrenne Stiftung: Perspektiven und Strategien für die gleichberechtigte Bildungsteilhabe von Roma und Sinti in Deutschland.” In: Strauß (ed.) 2021 83–88.
     [Google Scholar]
  119. Dittmar, Norbert & Peter Schlobinski & Inge Wachs
    1986 Berlinisch. Studien zum Lexikon, zur Spracheinstellung und zum Stilrepertoire. (Berlin Forschung 14.) Berlin: Berlin Verlag Arno Spitz.
     [Google Scholar]
  120. Doval Reixa, Irene
    2005 “Una cala en las olas germanizadoras de la historia de la lengua alemana. [A look at purist tendencies in the history of the German language.]” Revista de Filología Alemana13. 115–128.
     [Google Scholar]
  121. Dovidio, John F. & Kerry Kawakami & Kelly R. Beach
    2003 [2001] “Implicit and Explicit Attitudes: Examination of the Relationship between Measures of Intergroup Bias.” In: Rupert Brown & Samuel L. Gaertner (eds.), Blackwell Handbook of Social Psychology: Intergroup Processes. Malden, MA et al.: Blackwell. 175–197.
     [Google Scholar]
  122. Drače, Saša & Emir Efendić & Mirna Kusturica & Lamija Landžo
    2013 “Cross-cultural Validation of the ‘International Affective Picture System’ (IAPS) on a Sample from Bosnia and Herzegovina.” Psihologija46(1). 17–26. 10.2298/PSI1301017D
     https://doi.org/10.2298/PSI1301017D [Google Scholar]
  123. dROMa-Red
    dROMa-Red 2021 “Marcel Courthiade (1953–2021).” Available from URL: 〈www.roma-service.at/dromablog/?p=56962〉 (20/07/2021).
  124. Du Bois, John W.
    1980 “Introduction — The Search for a Cultural Niche: Showing the Pear Film in a Mayan Community.” In: Wallace L. Chafe (ed.), The Pear Stories. Cognitive, Cultural, and Linguistic Aspects of Narrative Production. (Advances in Discourse Processes 3.) Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation. 1–7.
     [Google Scholar]
  125. Duval, Laetitia & François-Charles Wolff & Martin McKee & Bayard Roberts
    2016 “The Roma Vaccination Gap: Evidence from Twelve Countries in Central and South-East Europe.” Vaccine34. 5524–5530. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2016.10.003
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2016.10.003 [Google Scholar]
  126. Dürscheid, Christa
    2016 “Nähe, Distanz und neue Medien.” In: Feilke & Hennig (eds.) 2016 357–385. 10.1515/9783110464061‑013
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110464061-013 [Google Scholar]
  127. Dürscheid, Christa & Carmen Frehner
    2013 “Email Communication.” In: Susan Herring & Dieter Stein & Tuija Virtanen (eds.), Pragmatics of Computer-Mediated Communication. (Handbooks of Pragmatics 9.). Berlin/Boston, MA: De Gruyter Mouton. 35–54. 10.1515/9783110214468.35
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110214468.35 [Google Scholar]
  128. Đuric, Rajko
    2012 Standardizacija romskog jezika. Sarajevo: Uduruženje “Kali Sara” I Romski informativni centar. Cited after Ćirković 2023.
     [Google Scholar]
  129. Eckert, Penelope
    2012 “Three Waves of Variation Study: The Emergence of Meaning in the Study of Sociolinguistic Variation.” Annual Review of Anthropology41. 87–100. 10.1146/annurev‑anthro‑092611‑145828
     https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-092611-145828 [Google Scholar]
  130. Eder-Jordan, Beate
    2015a “Literarische Orte der Roma.” In: Andrea Härle & Cornelia Kogoj , Werner Michael Schwarz & Michael Weese & Susanne Winkler (eds.), Romane Thana. Orte der Roma und Sinti. Katalog zur Ausstellung. Wien: Czernin Verlag. 194–200.
     [Google Scholar]
  131. 2015b “Oral and Written Šukar Laviben of the Roma. The Beginning of a Romani Literary Historiography.” In: J. Edward Chamberlin & Daniel Frank Chamberlain , Or Words to That Effect. Amsterdam et al.: John Benjamins. 194–205.10.1075/chlel.xxviii.14ede
     https://doi.org/10.1075/chlel.xxviii.14ede [Google Scholar]
  132. Ehrlich, Howard J.
    1969 “Attitudes, Behavior, and the Intervening Variables.” The American Sociologist4(1). 29–34.
     [Google Scholar]
  133. Eisenbeiß, Sonja & Birgit Hellwig
    2018 “Extending Psycholinguistics to Under-Researched Languages and Populations — The Principle of Justice and Ethical Challenges for New Types of Linguistic Fieldwork.” Unpublished Manuscript, 1–53.
     [Google Scholar]
  134. ELAN
    ELAN 2023 (Version 6.6) [Computer Software]. Nijmegen: Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, The Language Archive. Available from URL: 〈https://archive.mpi.nl/tla/elan〉 (13/10/2023).
     [Google Scholar]
  135. Elšík, Viktor & Yaron Matras
    2006 Markedness and Language Change. The Romani Sample. (Empirical Approaches to Language Typology 32.) Berlin/New York, NY: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110197594
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197594 [Google Scholar]
  136. Enzenhofer, Edith & Katharina Resch
    2013 “Unsichtbare Übersetzung? Die Bedeutung der Übersetzungsqualität für das Fremdverstehen in der qualitativen Sozialforschung.” In: Richard Bettmann & Michael Roslon (eds.), Going the Distance. Impulse für die interkulturelle Qualitative Sozialforschung. Wiesbaden: Springer VS. 203–229. 10.1007/978‑3‑658‑00871‑0_10
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-00871-0_10 [Google Scholar]
  137. Errington, J. Joseph
    2007 Linguistics in a Colonial World: A Story of Language, Meaning and Power. New York, NY: Blackwell. Cited after Hollington & Storch 2016 10.1002/9780470690765
     https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470690765 [Google Scholar]
  138. European Roma Rights Centre
    European Roma Rights Centre 2017 “Written Comments by the European Roma Rights Centre. ERRC Submission to the European Commission on the Enlargement Component of the EU Roma Framework (May 2017).” Available from URL: 〈www.errc.org/uploads/upload_en/file/submission-on-roma-inclusion-in-enlargement-countries-may-2017.pdf〉 (06/09/2023). 1–19.
  139. Feilke, Helmuth & Mathilde Hennig
    (eds.) 2016 Zur Karriere von ‚Nähe und Distanz‘. Rezeption und Diskussion des Koch-Oesterreicher-Modells. (Reihe Germanistische Linguistik 306.) Berlin/Boston, MA: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110464061
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110464061 [Google Scholar]
  140. Fennesz-Juhasz, Christiane & Petra Cech & Dieter W. Halwachs & Mozes F. Heinschink
    (eds.) 2003 Die schlaue Romni. Märchen und Lieder der Roma. / E bengali Romni. So Roma phenen taj gilaben. Klagenfurt/Celovec: Drava.
     [Google Scholar]
  141. Fennesz-Juhasz, Christiane & Petra Cech & Mozes F. Heinschink & Dieter W. Halwachs
    (eds.) 2012 Lang ist der Tag, kurz die Nacht. Märchen und Erzählungen der Kalderaš. / Baro o djes, cîni e rjat. Paramiča le Kaldêrašengê. Klagenfurt/Celovec: Drava.
     [Google Scholar]
  142. Fennesz-Juhasz, Christiane & Mozes F. Heinschink
    2015 “Selbstzeugnisse von Roma zu ihrer (Kultur-)Geschichte.” In: Erika Thurner & Elisabeth Hussl & Beate Eder-Jordan (eds.), Roma und Travellers. Identitäten im Wandel. Innsbruck: Innsbruck University Press. 135–158.
     [Google Scholar]
  143. Fiedler, Klaus & Matthias Bluemke
    2005 “Faking the IAT: Aided and Unaided Response Control on the Implicit Association Tests.” Basic and Applied Social Psychology27(4). 307–316. 10.1207/s15324834basp2704_3
     https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324834basp2704_3 [Google Scholar]
  144. Fiehler, Reinhard
    2000 “Über zwei Probleme bei der Untersuchung gesprochener Sprache.” Sprache und Literatur31(1). 23–42. 10.30965/25890859‑031‑01‑90000004
     https://doi.org/10.30965/25890859-031-01-90000004 [Google Scholar]
  145. 2015 “Die Vielfalt der Besonderheiten gesprochener Sprache — und zwei Beispiele, wie sie für den DaF-Unterricht geordnet werden kann: Gesprächspartikeln und Formulierungsverfahren.” In: Wolfgang Imo & Sandro M. Moraldo (eds.), Interaktionale Sprache und ihre Didaktisierung im DaF-Unterricht. (Stauffenburg Deutschdidaktik 4.) Tübingen: Stauffenburg. 23–43.
     [Google Scholar]
  146. Fings, Karola
    2016 Sinti und Roma. Geschichte einer Minderheit. München: C.H. Beck. 10.17104/9783406698491
     https://doi.org/10.17104/9783406698491 [Google Scholar]
  147. Fisher, Aaron J. & John D. Medaglia & Bertus F. Jeronimus
    2018 “Lack of Group-to-individual Generalizability is a Threat to Human Subjects Research.” PNAS — Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences115(27). E6106–E6115. 10.1073/pnas.1711978115
     https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1711978115 [Google Scholar]
  148. Fisher, Donald
    1988 “Boundary Work: A Model of the Relation Between Power and Knowledge.” Knowledge10(2). 156–176. 10.1177/0164025988010002004
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0164025988010002004 [Google Scholar]
  149. Foley, William A.
    2003 “Genre, Register, and Language Documentation in Literate and Preliterate Communities.” In: Peter K. Austin (ed.), Language Documentation and Description I. London: SOAS. 85–98.
     [Google Scholar]
  150. Fosztó, László
    2021 “Khangeri ando murro kher: Online Activism of Evangelical Roma and the New Discourse of Collective Immunity during the Global Spread of Coronavirus.” Talk at Séminaire “Mobilités et contacts dans les mondes romani”, École des hautes études en sciences sociales, Paris/online (26/03/2021).
     [Google Scholar]
  151. Fox, John & Sanford Weisberg
    2019 An R Companion to Applied Regression. 3rd Edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
     [Google Scholar]
  152. Frank-Job, Barbara
    2010 “Medienwandel und der Wandel von Diskurstraditionen.” In: Tilmann Sutter & Alexander Mehler (eds.), Medienwandel als Wandel von Interaktionsformen. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. 27–45. 10.1007/978‑3‑531‑92292‑8_3
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-92292-8_3 [Google Scholar]
  153. Franz, Romeo
    2020 “#SaveRomafromCorona: Protect Romani Communities from a Catastrophe.” Available from URL: 〈https://www.change.org/p/the-european-commission-and-its-president-ms-ursula-von-der-leyen-protect-romani-people-from-a-severe-corona-catastrophe?recruiter=1070397008&utm_source=share_petition&utm_medium=copylink&utm_campaign=share_petition〉 (19/07/2021).
  154. Friedman, Victor A.
    2001 “Romani Multilingualism in its Balkan Context.” STUF54. 148–161. 10.1524/stuf.2001.54.2.148
     https://doi.org/10.1524/stuf.2001.54.2.148 [Google Scholar]
  155. 2017 “Seven Varieties of Arli: Skopje as a Center of Convergence and Divergence of Romani Dialects.” Romani Studies27(1), 5th series. 29–45. 10.3828/rs.2017.2
     https://doi.org/10.3828/rs.2017.2 [Google Scholar]
  156. Galesic, Mirta & Michael Bosnjak
    2009 “Effects of Questionnaire Length on Participation and Indicators of Response Quality in a Web Survey.” Public Opinion Quarterly73(2). 349–360. 10.1093/poq/nfp031
     https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfp031 [Google Scholar]
  157. García, Ofelia & Li Wei
    2014 Translanguaging: Language, Bilingualism and Education. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan. Cited after Matras 2021 10.1057/9781137385765
     https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137385765 [Google Scholar]
  158. Garrett, Peter & Nikolas Coupland & Angie Williams
    2003 Investigating Language Attitudes. Social Meanings of Dialect, Ethnicity and Performance. Cardiff: University of Wales Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  159. Gawronski, Bertram & Jan De Houwer
    2014 “Implicit Measures in Social and Personality Psychology.” In: Harry T. Reis & Charles M. Judd (eds.), Handbook of Research Methods in Social and Personality Psychology. 2nd edition. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. 283–310. Cited after Rosseel & Grondelaers 2019 10.1017/CBO9780511996481.016
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511996481.016 [Google Scholar]
  160. GDPR = European Union
    GDPR = European Union 2016 “REGULATION (EU) 2016/679 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 27 April 2016 on the Protection of Natural Persons with Regard to the Processing of Personal Data and on the Free Movement of Such Data, and Repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation).” Official Journal of the European Union L119/1, 1–88. Available from URL: 〈https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2016/679/2016-05-04〉 (27/09/2022).
     [Google Scholar]
  161. Gee, Gilbert C. & Annie Ro & Salma Shariff-Marco & David Chae
    2009 “Racial Discrimination and Health Among Asian Americans: Evidence, Assessment, and Directions for Future Research.” Epidemiologic Reviews31(1). 130–151. 10.1093/epirev/mxp009
     https://doi.org/10.1093/epirev/mxp009 [Google Scholar]
  162. General Principles for Reducing Bias = American Psychological Association
    General Principles for Reducing Bias = American Psychological Association 2022 “General Principles for Reducing Bias.” Available from URL: 〈https://apastyle.apa.org/style-grammar-guidelines/bias-free-language/general-principles〉 (01/03/2024).
  163. Gieryn, Thomas F.
    1983 “Boundary-Work and the Demarcation of Science from Non-Science: Strains and Interests in Professional Ideologies of Scientists.” American Sociological Review48(6). 781–795. 10.2307/2095325
     https://doi.org/10.2307/2095325 [Google Scholar]
  164. Gil, David
    2001 “Escaping Eurocentrism: Fieldwork as a Process of Unlearning.” In: Paul Newman & Martha Ratliff (eds.), Linguistic Fieldwork. Cambridge et al.: Cambridge University Press. 102–32. 10.1017/CBO9780511810206.006
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511810206.006 [Google Scholar]
  165. Gluth, Sebastian & Nathalie C. Ebner & Florian Schmiedek
    2010 “Attitudes toward Younger and Older Adults: The German Aging Semantic Differential.” International Journal of Behavioral Development34(2). 147–158. 10.1177/0165025409350947
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025409350947 [Google Scholar]
  166. Godefroy, Olivier & Martine Roussel & Pascal Despretz & Véronique Quaglino & Muriel Boucart
    2010 “Age-related Slowing: Perceptuomotor, Decision, or Attention Decline?” Experimental Aging Research36(2). 169–189. 10.1080/03610731003613615
     https://doi.org/10.1080/03610731003613615 [Google Scholar]
  167. Godwin, Allison & Brianna Benedict & Jacqueline Rohde & Aaron Thielmeyer & Heather Perkins & Justin Major & Herman Clements & Zhihui Chen
    2021 “New Epistemological Perspectives on Quantitative Methods: An Example Using Topological Data Analysis.” Studies in Engineering Education2(1). 16–34. 10.21061/see.18
     https://doi.org/10.21061/see.18 [Google Scholar]
  168. Göbel, Christian
    2014 “Let’s Not Go There: Coping with (Pre-) Selection Bias in Collaborative Field Research.” Journal of Current Chinese Affairs43(2). 87–106. 10.1177/186810261404300207
     https://doi.org/10.1177/186810261404300207 [Google Scholar]
  169. Göritz, Anja. S.
    2006 “Incentives in Web Studies: Methodological Issues and a Review.” International Journal of Internet Science1(1). 58–70.
     [Google Scholar]
  170. Grabovac, Beata & Anita Deák
    2019 “Validation of the International Affective Picture System (IAPS) in Serbia: Comparison of a Serbian and a Hungarian Sample.” Primenjena Psihologija12(2). 117–137. 10.19090/pp.2019.2.117‑137
     https://doi.org/10.19090/pp.2019.2.117-137 [Google Scholar]
  171. Greene, Jennifer C.
    2007 Mixed Methods in Social Inquiry. San Francisco, CA: Wiley.
     [Google Scholar]
  172. Greene, Jennifer C. & Valerie J. Caracelli
    1997 “Defining and Describing the Paradigm Issue in Mixed-Method Evaluation.” In: Jennifer C. Greene & Valerie J. Caracelli (eds.), Advances in Mixed-Method Evaluation: The Challenges and Benefits of Integrating Diverse Paradigms. (New Directions for Evaluation 74.) San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. 5–17. Cited after Greene 2007 10.1002/ev.1068
     https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.1068 [Google Scholar]
  173. Greenwald, Anthony G. & Mahzarin R. Banaji
    1995 “Implicit Social Cognition: Attitudes, Self-Esteem, and Stereotypes.” Psychological Review102(1). 4–27. 10.1037/0033‑295X.102.1.4
     https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.102.1.4 [Google Scholar]
  174. Greenwald, Anthony G. & Steven J. Breckler
    1985 “To Whom Is the Self Presented?” In: Barry R. Schlenker (ed.), The Self and Social Life. New York, NY et al.: McGraw-Hill. 126–145.
     [Google Scholar]
  175. Greenwald, Anthony G. & Debbie E. McGhee & Jordan L. K. Schwartz
    1998 “Measuring Individual Differences in Implicit Cognition: The Implicit Association Test.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology74(6). 1464–1480. 10.1037/0022‑3514.74.6.1464
     https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1464 [Google Scholar]
  176. Greenwald, Anthony G. & Brian A. Nosek
    2001 “Health of the Implicit Association Test at Age 3.” Experimental Psychology48(2). 85–93. 10.1026//0949‑3946.48.2.85
     https://doi.org/10.1026//0949-3946.48.2.85 [Google Scholar]
  177. Greenwald, Anthony G. & Brian A. Nosek & Mahzarin R. Banaji
    2003 “Understanding and Using the Implicit Association Test: I. An Improved Scoring Algorithm.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology85(2). 197–216. 10.1037/0022‑3514.85.2.197
     https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.197 [Google Scholar]
  178. Grenoble, Lenore A. & Lindsay J. Whaley
    1998 “Toward a Typology of Language Endangerment.” In: Lenore A. Grenoble & Lindsay J. Whaley (eds.), Endangered Languages: Language Loss and Community Response. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 22–54. 10.1017/CBO9781139166959.003
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139166959.003 [Google Scholar]
  179. Grolemund, Garrett & Hadley Wickham
    2014 “A Cognitive Interpretation of Data Analysis.” International Statistical Review82(2). 184–204. 10.1111/insr.12028
     https://doi.org/10.1111/insr.12028 [Google Scholar]
  180. Gronek, Agnieszka M. & Anne Gorius & Heidrun Gerzymisch-Arbogast
    2012 “Culture and Coherence in the Pear Tree Project.” Perspectives20(1). 43–53. 10.1080/0907676X.2011.632685
     https://doi.org/10.1080/0907676X.2011.632685 [Google Scholar]
  181. Gröschel, Bernhard
    2009 Das Serbokroatische zwischen Linguistik und Politik. Mit einer Bibliographie zum postjugoslavischen Sprachenstreit. (LINCOM Studies in Slavic Linguistics 34.) München: LINCOM Europa.
     [Google Scholar]
  182. Gruber, Maria & Jakob-Moritz Eberl & Fabienne Lind & Hajo G. Boomgaarden
    2021 “Qualitative Interviews with Irregular Migrants in Times of COVID-19: Recourse to Remote Interview Techniques as a Possible Methodological Adjustment.” Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung22(1). Article 7, 30 Paragraphs.
     [Google Scholar]
  183. Grühn, Daniel & Susanne Scheibe
    2008 “Age-related Differences in Valence and Arousal Ratings of Pictures from the International Affective Picture System (IAPS): Do Ratings Become More Extreme with Age?” Behavior Research Methods40(2). 512–521. 10.3758/BRM.40.2.512
     https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.2.512 [Google Scholar]
  184. Gullberg, Marianne & Peter Indefrey & Pieter Muysken
    2009 “Research Techniques for the Study of Code-switching.” In: Barbara E. Bullock & Almeida Jacqueline Toribio (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Linguistic Code-switching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 21–39. 10.1017/CBO9780511576331.003
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511576331.003 [Google Scholar]
  185. Haarmann, Harald
    1988 “Allgemeine Strukturen europäischer Standardsprachentwicklung.” Sociolinguistica2(1). 10–51. 10.1515/9783110245073.10
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110245073.10 [Google Scholar]
  186. Habermalz, Christiane
    2018 “Europäisches Kulturerbejahr: Sinti und Roma sehen sich als wahre Europäer.” Available from URL: 〈https://www.deutschlandfunk.de/europaeisches-kulturerbejahr-sinti-und-roma-sehen-sich-als-100.html〉 (28/02/2022).
  187. Hagemann, Dirk & Frank M. Spinath & Erik M. Mueller
    2023 Differentielle Psychologie und Persönlichkeitsforschung. 9th edition. Stuttgart: W. Kohlhammer.
     [Google Scholar]
  188. Halwachs, Dieter W.
    2020 “Language Policy and Planning in Romani.” In: Yaron Matras & Anton Tenser (eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of Romani Language and Linguistics. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. 429–457. 10.1007/978‑3‑030‑28105‑2_14
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28105-2_14 [Google Scholar]
  189. Halwachs, Dieter W. & Emmerich Gärtner-Horvath & Michael Wogg
    (eds.) 2000 Der Rom und der Teufel. Märchen, Erzählungen und Lieder der Roma aus dem Burgenland. / O rom taj o beng. Romane pamaristscha, phukajiptscha taj gila andar o Burgenland. Klagenfurt/Celovec: Drava.
     [Google Scholar]
  190. Hancock, Ian
    1988 “The Development of Romani Linguistics.” In: Mohammad Ali Jazayery & Werner Winter (eds.), Languages and Cultures. Studies in Honor of Edgar C. Polomé. Berlin/New York, NY: De Gruyter Mouton. 183–223. 10.1515/9783110864359.183
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110864359.183 [Google Scholar]
  191. Harding, Sandra
    1991 Whose Science? Whose Knowledge? Thinking from Women’s Lives. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  192. Harkness, Janet & Beth-Ellen Pennell & Alisú Schoua-Glusberg
    2004 “Survey Questionnaire Translation and Assessment.” In: Stanley Presser & Jennifer M. Rothgeb & Mick P. Couper & Judith T. Lessler & Elizabeth Martin & Jean Martin & Eleanor Singer (eds.), Methods for Testing and Evaluating Survey Questionnaires. (Wiley Series in Survey Methodology.) Hoboken, NJ: Wiley & Sons. 453–473. 10.1002/0471654728.ch22
     https://doi.org/10.1002/0471654728.ch22 [Google Scholar]
  193. Haugen, Einar
    1966 “Dialect, Language, Nation.” American Anthropologist68(4). 922–935. 10.1525/aa.1966.68.4.02a00040
     https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1966.68.4.02a00040 [Google Scholar]
  194. Heerwegh, Dirk & Geert Loosveldt
    2008 “Face-to-Face Versus Web Surveying in a High-Internet-Coverage Population. Differences in Response Quality.” Public Opinion Quarterly72(5). 836–846. 10.1093/poq/nfn045
     https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfn045 [Google Scholar]
  195. Helfferich, Cornelia
    2011 Die Qualität qualitativer Daten. Manual für die Durchführung qualitativer Interviews. 4th edition. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. 10.1007/978‑3‑531‑92076‑4
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-92076-4 [Google Scholar]
  196. Heller, Monica
    2008 “Language and the Nation-state: Challenges to Sociolinguistic Theory and Practice.” Journal of Sociolinguistics12(4). 504–524. 10.1111/j.1467‑9841.2008.00373.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2008.00373.x [Google Scholar]
  197. Hellwig, Birgit
    2010 “Meaning and Translation in Linguistic Fieldwork.” Studies in Language34(4). 802–831. 10.1075/sl.34.4.02hel
     https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.34.4.02hel [Google Scholar]
  198. 2019 “Linguistic Diversity, Language Documentation and Psycholinguistics: The Role of Stimuli.” In: Aimée Lahaussois & Marine Vuillermet (eds.), Methodological Tools for Linguistic Description and Typology. (Language Documentation and Conservation Special Publication 16.) Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai’i Press. 5–30.
     [Google Scholar]
  199. Heltai, János I. & Eszter Tarsoly
    (eds.) 2023 Translanguaging for Equal Opportunities: Speaking Romani at School. Berlin/Boston, MA: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110769609
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110769609 [Google Scholar]
  200. Heltai, János I. , Eszter Tarsoly , Viktória Gergelyová , Bernadett Jani-Demetriou , Róza R. Lakatos-Balogh , Izabella Lőrincz-Kovács , Márk Attila Székely & Gergely Olexa
    2023 “Translanguaging and Written Nonstandard Language: Heterographic Literacy in and outside School.” In: Heltai & Tarsoly (eds.) 2023 245–264.
     [Google Scholar]
  201. Hennig, Mathilde
    2000 “Können gesprochene und geschriebene Sprache überhaupt verglichen werden?” Jahrbuch der ungarischen Germanistik 2000, 105–125.
     [Google Scholar]
  202. Hennig, Mathilde & Joachim Jacob
    2016 “Nähe, Distanz und Literatur.” In: Feilke & Hennig (eds.) 2016 187–211. 10.1515/9783110464061‑008
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110464061-008 [Google Scholar]
  203. Henrich, Joseph & Steven J. Heine & Ara Norenzayan
    2010 “The Weirdest People in the World?” Behavioral and Brain Sciences33. 61–135. 10.1017/S0140525X0999152X
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0999152X [Google Scholar]
  204. Henry, Alison
    2005 “Non-standard Dialects and Linguistic Data.” Lingua115. 1599–1617. 10.1016/j.lingua.2004.07.006
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2004.07.006 [Google Scholar]
  205. Hentschel, Elke & Harald Weydt
    2021 Handbuch der Deutschen Grammatik. 5th edition. Berlin/Boston, MA: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110629651
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110629651 [Google Scholar]
  206. Herzog, A. Regula & Jerald G. Bachman
    1981 “Effects of Questionnaire Length on Response Quality.” Public Opinion Quarterly45(4). 549–559. 10.1086/268687
     https://doi.org/10.1086/268687 [Google Scholar]
  207. Heuß, Herbert
    2020 “Zentralrat Deutscher Sinti und Roma warnt vor Rassismus in der Corona-Krise.” Available from URL: 〈https://zentralrat.sintiundroma.de/zentralrat-deutscher-sinti-und-roma-warnt-von-rassismus-in-der-corona-krise/〉 (21/07/2021).
  208. Hilbig, Benjamin E.
    2016 “Reaction Time Effects in Lab- versus Web-based Research: Experimental Evidence.” Behaviour Research Methods48(4). 1718–1724. 10.3758/s13428‑015‑0678‑9
     https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-015-0678-9 [Google Scholar]
  209. Himmelmann, Nikolaus P.
    1998 “Documentary and Descriptive Linguistics.” Linguistics36(1). 161–195. 10.1515/ling.1998.36.1.161
     https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1998.36.1.161 [Google Scholar]
  210. 2012 “Linguistic Data Types and the Interface between Language Documentation and Description.” Language Documentation & Conservation6. 187–207.
     [Google Scholar]
  211. 2014 “Asymmetries in the Prosodic Phrasing of Function Words: Another Look at the Suffixing Preference.” Language90(4). 927–960. 10.1353/lan.2014.0105
     https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2014.0105 [Google Scholar]
  212. 2018 “Meeting the Transcription Challenge.” In: Bradley McDonnell & Andrea L. Berez-Kroeker & Gary Holton (eds.), Reflections on Language Documentation. 20 Years after Himmelmann 1998. (Language Documentation and Conservation Special Publication 15.) Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai’i Press. 33–40.
     [Google Scholar]
  213. 2022 “Prosodic Phrasing and the Emergence of Phrase Structure.” Linguistics60(3). 715–743. 10.1515/ling‑2020‑0135
     https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2020-0135 [Google Scholar]
  214. Himmelmann, Nikolaus P. & Meytal Sandler & Jan Strunk & Volker Unterladstetter
    2018 “On the Universality of Intonational Phrases: A Cross-Linguistic Interrater Study.” Phonology35(2). 207–245. 10.1017/S0952675718000039
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0952675718000039 [Google Scholar]
  215. Hollington, Andrea & Anne Storch
    2016 “Tidying Up: A CMS Special Issue on Language Ideologies.” Critical Multilingualism Studies4(2). 1–9.
     [Google Scholar]
  216. Holt, Ed
    2020 “COVID-19 Lockdown of Roma Settlements in Slovakia.” The Lancet: Infectious Diseases20(6). 659.
     [Google Scholar]
  217. 2021 “COVID-19 Vaccination among Roma Populations in Europe.” The Lancet Microbe2(7). e289. 10.1016/S2666‑5247(21)00155‑5
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S2666-5247(21)00155-5 [Google Scholar]
  218. Hong, Yingying
    2010 “Literate und orate Strukturen im Mandarin Chinesischen. Eine korpusbasierte Untersuchung zum Bau komplexer Sätze.” Grazer Linguistische Studien73. 183–199.
     [Google Scholar]
  219. Houdebine-Gravaud, Anne-Marie
    2011 “Concept ou théorie: l’imaginaire linguistique, sa formation, son extension.” In: Musanji Nglasso-Mwatha (ed.), L’imaginaire linguistique dans les discours littéraires politiques et médiatiques en Afrique. (Études africaines et créoles 1.) Pessac: Presses Universitaires de Bordeaux. 29–50. 10.4000/books.pub.35593
     https://doi.org/10.4000/books.pub.35593 [Google Scholar]
  220. Hudley, Anne H. C. & Christine Mallinson & Mary Bucholtz
    2020 “Toward Racial Justice in Linguistics: Interdisciplinary Insights into Theorizing Race in the Discipline and Diversifying the Profession.” Language96(4). e200–e235. 10.1353/lan.2020.0074
     https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2020.0074 [Google Scholar]
  221. Hultsch, David F. & Stuart W. S. MacDonald & Roger A. Dixon
    2002 “Variability in Reaction Time Performance of Younger and Older Adults.” Journal of Gerontology: Series B57(2). 101–115. 10.1093/geronb/57.2.P101
     https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/57.2.P101 [Google Scholar]
  222. Hübschmannová, Milena
    2015 “Meine Begegnungen mit dem Šukar Laviben der Roma.” In: Erika Thurner & Elisabeth Hussl & Beate Eder-Jordan (eds.), Roma und Travellers. Identitäten im Wandel. Innsbruck: Innsbruck University Press. 325–366. [Translated into German by Susanne Costa . Original version: 2006 “Moje Setkání s Romano Šukar Laviben.” Romano džaniben (2006/1) 27–60.]
     [Google Scholar]
  223. Hyman, Larry M.
    2001 “Fieldwork as a State of Mind.” In: Paul Newman & Martha Ratliff (eds.), Linguistic Fieldwork. Cambridge et al.: Cambridge University Press. 15–33. 10.1017/CBO9780511810206.002
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511810206.002 [Google Scholar]
  224. Ianos, Maria Adelina & Andrei Rusu & Àngel Huguet & Cecilio Lapresta-Rey
    2023 “Implicit Language Attitudes in Catalonia (Spain): Investigating Preferences for Catalan or Spanish Using the Implicit Association Test.” Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development44(3). 214–229. 10.1080/01434632.2020.1806857
     https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2020.1806857 [Google Scholar]
  225. Ioannidis, John P. A.
    2005 “Why Most Published Research Findings Are False.” PLoS Med2(8). Article e124, 696–701.
     [Google Scholar]
  226. Ioannidou, Elena
    2009 “Using the ‘Improper’ Language in the Classroom: The Conflict Between Language Use and Legitimate Varieties in Education. Evidence from a Greek Cypriot Classroom.” Language and Education23(3). 263–278. 10.1080/09500780802691744
     https://doi.org/10.1080/09500780802691744 [Google Scholar]
  227. Jaeger, T. Florian & Neal E. Snider
    2013 “Alignment as a Consequence of Expectation Adaptation: Syntactic Priming is Affected by the Prime’s Prediction Error Given both Prior and Recent Experience.” Cognition127. 57–83. 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.10.013
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2012.10.013 [Google Scholar]
  228. Jaffe, Alexandra
    2009 “Introduction: The Sociolinguistics of Stance.” In: Alexandra Jaffe (ed.), Stance: Sociolinguistic Perspectives. Oxford et al.: Oxford University Press. 1–28. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331646.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331646.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  229. Janssen, Markus & Christoph Stamann & Yvonne Krug & Christina Negele
    2017 “Tagungsbericht: Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse — and beyond?” Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung18(2). Article 7, 23 Paragraphs.
     [Google Scholar]
  230. Jäger, Karl-Heinz & Ulrich Schiller
    1983 “Dialekt und Standardsprache im Urteil von Dialektsprechern. Untersuchungen der Einstellungen von alemannischen Dialektsprecherinnen zu ihrem Dialekt und zur Standardsprache.” Linguistische Berichte83. 63–95.
     [Google Scholar]
  231. Johns, Michael A. & Jorge R. Valdés Kroff & Paola E. Dussias
    2019 “Mixing Things Up: How Blocking and Mixing Affect the Processing of Codemixed Sentences.” International Journal of Bilingualism23(2). 584–611. 10.1177/1367006917752570
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006917752570 [Google Scholar]
  232. Joinson, Adam N.
    2001 “Self-disclosure in Computer-mediated Communication: The Role of Self-awareness and Visual Anonymity.” European Journal of Social Psychology31. 177–192. 10.1002/ejsp.36
     https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.36 [Google Scholar]
  233. Kaufman, Terrence
    1979 Review of Weer Rajendra Rishi, Multilingual Romani Dictionary (1974). International Journal of the Sociology of Language19. 131–144.
     [Google Scholar]
  234. Kehrein, Roland & Hanna Fischer
    2016 “Nähe, Distanz und Regionalsprache.” In: Feilke & Hennig (eds.) 2016 213–257. 10.1515/9783110464061‑009
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110464061-009 [Google Scholar]
  235. Kelle, Udo
    2017 “Die Integration qualitativer und quantitativer Forschung — theoretische Grundlagen von ‘Mixed Methods’.” Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie69. 39–61. 10.1007/s11577‑017‑0451‑4
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s11577-017-0451-4 [Google Scholar]
  236. Kerr, Norbert L.
    1998 “HARKing: Hypothesizing After the Results are Known.” Personality and Social Psychology Review2(3). 196–217. 10.1207/s15327957pspr0203_4
     https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0203_4 [Google Scholar]
  237. Kircher, Ruth & Lena Zipp
    2022 “An Introduction to Language Attitudes Research.” In: Ruth Kircher & Lena Zipp (eds.), Research Methods in Language Attitudes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1–16. 10.1017/9781108867788.002
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108867788.002 [Google Scholar]
  238. Klahn, Marett Katalin
    2015 “Knowing Differently: On Thinking and Doing ‘Roma’.” Roma Rights — Journal of the European Roma Rights Centre2. 63–69. Available from URL: 〈www.errc.org/uploads/upload_en/file/roma-rights-2-2015-nothing-about-us-without-us.pdf〉 (28/03/2023).
     [Google Scholar]
  239. Kleiber, Georges
    1993 Prototypensemantik. Eine Einführung. [Translated into German by Michael Schreiber . Original version: 1990. La sémantique du prototype. Catégories et sens lexical. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.] Tübingen: Narr.
     [Google Scholar]
  240. Kline, Rex B.
    2004 Beyond Significance Testing. Reforming Data Analysis Methods in Behavioral Research. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. 10.1037/10693‑000
     https://doi.org/10.1037/10693-000 [Google Scholar]
  241. Kloss, Heinz
    1976 “Abstandsprachen und Ausbausprachen.” In: Joachim Göschel & Norbert Nail & Gaston van der Elst (eds.), Zur Theorie des Dialekts. Aufsätze aus 100 Jahren Forschung mit biographischen Anmerkungen zu den Autoren. (Zeitschrift für Dialektologie und Linguistik 16.) Wiesbaden: Steiner. 301–322.
     [Google Scholar]
  242. Knobloch, Johann
    1953 Romāni-Texte aus dem Burgenland. Berichte, Erzählungen und Märchen der burgenländischen Zigeuner, aufgezeichnet, übersetzt und mit sprachlichen Bemerkungen versehen. (Burgenländische Forschungen 24.) Eisenstadt: Landesarchiv und Landesmuseum.
     [Google Scholar]
  243. 1977 “Berichte und Erzählungen württembergischer Zigeuner.” In: Johann Knobloch & Inge Sudbrack (eds.), Zigeunerkundliche Forschungen 1. (Innsbrucker Beiträge zur Kulturwissenschaft 42.) Innsbruck: Institut für Sprachwissenschaft der Universität Innsbruck. 43–57.
     [Google Scholar]
  244. Koch, Ute
    2005 Herstellung und Reproduktion sozialer Grenzen. Roma in einer west-deutschen Großstadt. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. 10.1007/978‑3‑322‑80751‑9
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-80751-9 [Google Scholar]
  245. Koch, Peter & Wulf Oesterreicher
    1985 “Sprache der Nähe — Sprache der Distanz. Mündlichkeit und Schriftlichkeit im Spannungsfeld von Sprachtheorie und Sprachgeschichte.” Romanistisches Jahrbuch36(1). 15–43. 10.1515/9783110244922.15
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110244922.15 [Google Scholar]
  246. Korunovska, Neda & Zeljko Jovanovic
    2020 “Roma in the COVID-19 crisis. An Early Warning from Six EU Member States.” PDF brief of the Roma Initiatives Office available from URL: 〈https://www.opensocietyfoundations.org/publications/roma-in-the-covid-19-crisis〉 (19/07/2021).
  247. Kraemer, Patrick
    2008 Vorüberlegungen, Aufbau und Analyse von Interviews mit Angehörigen der Deutschen Minderheit der Sinti und Roma. Eine Narrative, Biographische Interviewstudie. Hamburg: Diplomica Verlag.
     [Google Scholar]
  248. Krinková, Zuzana
    2015 From Iberian Romani to Iberian Para-Romani Varieties. Prague: Karolinum.
     [Google Scholar]
  249. Kristiansen, Tore
    2015 “The Primary Relevance of Subconsciously Offered Attitudes. Focusing the Language Ideological Aspect of Sociolinguistic Change.” In: Alexei Prikhodkine & Dennis R. Preston (eds.), Responses to Language Varieties. Variability, Processes and Outcomes. (IMPACT: Studies in Language and Society 39.) Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 87–116. 10.1075/impact.39.04kri
     https://doi.org/10.1075/impact.39.04kri [Google Scholar]
  250. Krosnick, Jon A.
    1991 “Response Strategies for Coping with the Cognitive Demands of Attitude Measures in Surveys.” Applied Cognitive Psychology5. 213–236. 10.1002/acp.2350050305
     https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.2350050305 [Google Scholar]
  251. Kuckartz, Udo
    2018 Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse. Methoden, Praxis, Computerunterstützung. 4th edition. Weinheim: Beltz Juventa.
     [Google Scholar]
  252. Kunin, Theodore
    1955 “The Construction of a New Type of Attitude Measure.” Personnel Psychology8(1). 65–77. 10.1111/j.1744‑6570.1955.tb01189.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1955.tb01189.x [Google Scholar]
  253. Kurdi, Benedek & Shayn Lozano & Mahzarin R. Banaji
    2017 “Introducing the Open Affective Standardized Image Set (OASIS).” Behaviour Research Methods49. 457–470. 10.3758/s13428‑016‑0715‑3
     https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-016-0715-3 [Google Scholar]
  254. Kuru, Ozan & Josh Pasek
    2016 “Improving Social Media Measurement in Surveys: Avoiding Acquiescence Bias in Facebook Research.” Computers in Human Behavior57. 82–92. 10.1016/j.chb.2015.12.008
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.12.008 [Google Scholar]
  255. Labov, William
    2013 The Language of Life and Death: The Transformation of Experience in Oral Narrative. Cambridge et al.: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139519632
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139519632 [Google Scholar]
  256. Lang, Peter J. & Margaret M. Bradley & Bruce N. Cuthbert
    2008 International Affective Picture System (IAPS): Instruction manual and affective ratings, Technical Report A-8. Gainesville, FL: The Center for Research in Psychophysiology, University of Florida.
     [Google Scholar]
  257. Lee, Ronald
    2005 Learn Romani. Das-dúma Rromanes. Hatfield: University of Hertfordshire Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  258. Leggio, D. Viktor
    2013 Lace Avilen ko Radio. Romani Language and Identity on the Internet. PhD thesis, University of Manchester.
     [Google Scholar]
  259. 2020 “Romani on the Internet.” In: Yaron Matras & Anton Tenser (eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of Romani Language and Linguistics. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. 515–537. 10.1007/978‑3‑030‑28105‑2_17
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28105-2_17 [Google Scholar]
  260. Leggio, D. Viktor & Yaron Matras
    2017 “Orthography Development on the Internet: Romani on YouTube.” In: Mari C. Jones & Damien Mooney (eds.), Creating Orthographies for Endangered Languages. Cambridge et al.: Cambridge University Press. 254–275. 10.1017/9781316562949.013
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316562949.013 [Google Scholar]
  261. Leigh, Kate
    1998 “Romani Elements in Present-Day Caló.” In: Yaron Matras (ed.), The Romani Element in Non-Standard Speech. (Sondersprachenforschung 3.) Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz. 243–282.
     [Google Scholar]
  262. Leiner, Dominik
    2019 “Too Fast, too Straight, too Weird: Non-Reactive Indicators for Meaningless Data in Internet Surveys.” Survey Research Methods13(3). 229–248.
     [Google Scholar]
  263. Leiner, Dominik
    2022 SoSci Survey (Version 3.3.17) [Computer Software]. Available from URL: 〈https://www.soscisurvey.de〉 (27/09/2022).
     [Google Scholar]
  264. Leipzig Glossing Rules = Bernard Comrie & Martin Haspelmath & Balthasar Bickel
    2015 “The Leipzig Glossing Rules: Conventions for Interlinear Morpheme-by-Morpheme glosses.” [Revised version ofFebruary 2008.] Available from URL: 〈https://www.eva.mpg.de/lingua/pdf/Glossing-Rules.pdf〉 (01/09/2019).
  265. Leonard, Wesley Y. & Erin Haynes
    2010 “Making ‘Collaboration’ Collaborative. An Examination of Perspectives that Frame Linguistic Field Research.” Language Documentation & Conservation4. 268–293.
     [Google Scholar]
  266. Lepenies, Wolf
    1997 “Die Übersetzbarkeit der Kulturen. Ein europäisches Problem, eine Chance für Europa.” In: Anselm Haverkamp (ed.), Die Sprache der Anderen. Übersetzungspolitik zwischen den Kulturen. Frankfurt/Main: Fischer. 95–117.
     [Google Scholar]
  267. Levinson, Martin P.
    2007 “Literacy in English Gypsy Communities: Cultural Capital Manifested as Negative Assets.” American Educational Research Journal44(1). 5–39. 10.3102/0002831206298174
     https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831206298174 [Google Scholar]
  268. Li, Ping & Sara Sepanski & Xiaowei Zhao
    2006 “Language History Questionnaire: A Web-based Interface for Bilingual Research.” Behaviour Research Methods38(2). 202–210. 10.3758/BF03192770
     https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03192770 [Google Scholar]
  269. Li, Ping & Fan Zhang & Erlfang Tsai & Brendan Puls
    2014 “Language History Questionnaire (LHQ 2.0): A New Dynamic Web-based Research Tool.” Bilingualism: Language and Cognition17(3). 673–680. 10.1017/S1366728913000606
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728913000606 [Google Scholar]
  270. Li, Ping & Fan Zhang & Anya Yu & Xiaowei Zhao
    2020 “Language History Questionnaire (LHQ3): An Enhanced Tool for Assessing Multilingual Experience.” Bilingualism: Language and Cognition23(5). 938–944. 10.1017/S1366728918001153
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728918001153 [Google Scholar]
  271. Likert, Rensis
    1932 A Technique for the Measurement of Attitudes. (Archives of Psychology 140.) New York, NY: [Columbia University/Unknown publisher].
     [Google Scholar]
  272. Linell, Per
    1982 The Written Language Bias in Linguistics. (Studies in Communication 2.) Linköping: Linköping University Electronic Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  273. LIP 2020 = Linguistics in the Pub
    LIP 2020 = Linguistics in the Pub 2020 “Fieldwork at a Distance.” [YouTube video of a panel discussion with Claire Bowern , Emiliana Cruz , Tom Ennever , Bryn Hauk , Stephen Morey , Anthony Woodbury .] Available from URL: 〈https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K89TKXaJNjU〉 (28/02/2022).
  274. Lorenz, Steffen
    2019 Living with Language: An Exploration of Linguistic Practices and Language Attitudes in Gulu, Northern Uganda. PhD thesis, University of Cologne.
     [Google Scholar]
  275. Lüdecke, Daniel
    2018 “sjmisc: Data and Variable Transformation Functions.” Journal of Open Source Software3(26). 754. 10.21105/joss.00754
     https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.00754 [Google Scholar]
  276. 2023 sjPlot: Data Visualization for Statistics in Social Science [R package version 2.8.15]. Available from URL: 〈https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=sjPlot〉 (07/12/2023).
     [Google Scholar]
  277. Maas, Utz
    2010a “Orat und Literat. Grundbegriffe der Analyse geschriebener und gesprochener Sprache.” Grazer Linguistische Studien73. 21–150.
     [Google Scholar]
  278. 2010b “Schriftkultur in der Migration — ein blinder Fleck in der Migrationsforschung.” Grazer Linguistische Studien73. 151–168.
     [Google Scholar]
  279. 2016 “Was wird bei der Modellierung mit Nähe und Distanz sichtbar und was wird von ihr verstellt?” In: Feilke & Hennig (eds.) 2016 89–111. 10.1515/9783110464061‑005
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110464061-005 [Google Scholar]
  280. 2021 Sprache und Sprachausbau. Die Dynamik von Sprache und sprachlichen Verhältnissen. PDF manuscript available from URL: 〈https://zentrum.virtuos.uni-osnabrueck.de/wikifarm/fields/utz.maas/uploads/Main/Sprachausbau.pdf〉, Version 21.11.21 (01/12/2021).
     [Google Scholar]
  281. Macht, Alexandra
    2018 “From Romanian ‘Soul’ to English ‘Heart’: Dilemmas of Cultural and Gender Representation in Translating Qualitative Data.” Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung19(2). Article 12, 33 Paragraphs.
     [Google Scholar]
  282. Maitz, Péter & Stephan Elspaß
    2011 “Zur sozialen und sprachpolitischen Verantwortung der Variationslinguistik.” In: Elvira Glaser & Jürgen E. Schmidt & Natascha Frey (eds.), Dynamik des Dialekts — Wandel und Variation. (Akten des 3. Kongresses der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Dialektologie des Deutschen (IGDD).) Stuttgart: Steiner. 221–240.
     [Google Scholar]
  283. Marian, Viorica & Henrike K. Blumenfeld & Margarita Kaushanskaya
    2007 “The Language Experience and Proficiency Questionnaire (LEAP-Q): Assessing Language Profiles in Bilinguals and Multilinguals.” Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research50(4). 940–967. 10.1044/1092‑4388(2007/067)
     https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2007/067) [Google Scholar]
  284. Marjanovič, Katarina & Christina Manouilidou & Tatjana Marvin
    2013 “Word-Formation Rules in Slovenian Agentive Deverbal Nominalization: A Psycholinguistic Study Based on Pseudo-Words.” Slovenski jezik — Slovene Linguistic Studies9. 93–109. 10.17161/SLS.1808.11432
     https://doi.org/10.17161/SLS.1808.11432 [Google Scholar]
  285. Matache, Margareta & Jacqueline Bhabha
    2020 “Anti-Roma Racism is Spiraling during COVID-19 Pandemic.” Health and Human Rights Journal22(1). 379–382.
     [Google Scholar]
  286. Matras, Yaron
    1994 Untersuchungen zu Grammatik und Diskurs des Romanes. Dialekt der Kelderaša/Lovara. (Balkanologische Veröffentlichungen 26.) Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.
     [Google Scholar]
  287. 1998 “Para-Romani revisited.” In: Yaron Matras (ed.), The Romani Element in Non-Standard Speech. (Sondersprachenforschung 3.) Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz. 1–27.
     [Google Scholar]
  288. 1999a “The Speech of the Polska Roma: Some Highlighted Features and Their Implications for Romani Dialectology.” Journal of the Gypsy Lore Society9(1). 1–28.
     [Google Scholar]
  289. 1999b “Writing Romani: The Pragmatics of Codification in a Stateless Language.” Applied Linguistics20(4). 481–502. 10.1093/applin/20.4.481
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/20.4.481 [Google Scholar]
  290. 2000 “Mixed Languages: A Functional-Communicative Approach.” Bilingualism: Language and Cognition3(2). 79–99. 10.1017/S1366728900000213
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728900000213 [Google Scholar]
  291. 2002 Romani. A Linguistic Introduction. Cambridge et al.: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511486791
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486791 [Google Scholar]
  292. 2004 “The Role of Language in Mystifying and De-mystifying Gypsy Identity.” In: Nicholas Saul & Susan Tebbutt (eds.), The Role of the Romanies. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press. 53–78. 10.5949/liverpool/9780853236795.003.0005
     https://doi.org/10.5949/liverpool/9780853236795.003.0005 [Google Scholar]
  293. 2005 “The Classification of Romani Dialects. A Geographic-Historical Perspective.” Offprint version. 7–32. [Published in: Barbara Schrammel & Dieter W. Halwachs & Gerd Ambrosch (eds.), General and Applied Romani Linguistics. Proceedings from the 6th International Conference on Romani Linguistics. Munich: Lincom Europa. 7–26.]
     [Google Scholar]
  294. 2010 Romani in Britain. The Afterlife of a Language. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  295. 2014 I Met Lucky People. The Story of the Romani Gypsies. London et al.: Allen Lane/Penguin Books.
     [Google Scholar]
  296. 2015 “Transnational Policy and ‘Authenticity’ Discourses on Romani Language and Identity.” Language in Society44(3). 295–316. 10.1017/S0047404515000202
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404515000202 [Google Scholar]
  297. Matras, Yaron
    2021 “The Standardization of a Stateless Language.” In: Wendy Ayres-Bennett & John Bellamy (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Language Standardization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 645–664. 10.1017/9781108559249.025
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108559249.025 [Google Scholar]
  298. Matras, Yaron
    2023 “Concluding Remarks.” Talk at 15th International Conference on Romani Linguistics , 13–14/09/2023, State University of Milan, Milan.
     [Google Scholar]
  299. Matras, Yaron & Christopher White & Viktor Elšík
    2009 “The Romani Morpho-Syntax (RMS) database.” In: Martin v. Everaert & Simon Musgrave & Alexis Dimitriadis (eds.), The Use of Databases in Cross-Linguistic Studies. (Empirical Approaches to Language Typology 41.) Berlin/New York, NY: De Gruyter Mouton. 329–362. 10.1515/9783110198744.329
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110198744.329 [Google Scholar]
  300. Matras, Yaron
    n.d. “Map of Dialect Samples.” Available from URL: 〈romani.humanities.manchester.ac.uk/interactive/samplermap.shtml〉 (25/08/2017).
  301. Mattheier, Klaus J.
    2000 “Die Herausbildung neuzeitlicher Schriftsprachen.” In: Werner Besch & Anne Betten & Oskar Reichmann & Stefan Sonderegger (eds.), Sprachgeschichte: Ein Handbuch zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache und ihrer Erforschung. (HSK 2.2.) 2nd edition. Berlin/Boston, MA: De Gruyter Mouton. 1085–1107.
     [Google Scholar]
  302. 2003 “German.” In: Ana Deumert (ed.), Germanic Standardizations: Past to Present. Amsterdam et al.: Benjamins. 211–244. 10.1075/impact.18.09mat
     https://doi.org/10.1075/impact.18.09mat [Google Scholar]
  303. Matuschek, Hannes & Reinhold Kliegl & Shravan Vasishth & R. Harald Baayen & Douglas Bates
    2017 “Balancing Type I Error and Power in Linear Mixed Models.” Journal of Memory and Language94. 305–315. 10.1016/j.jml.2017.01.001
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2017.01.001 [Google Scholar]
  304. Mayer, Mercer
    1969 Frog, Where Are You?New York, NY: Dial Books for Young Readers.
     [Google Scholar]
  305. Mayring, Philipp
    2000 “Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse.” Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung1(2). Article 20, 28 Paragraphs.
     [Google Scholar]
  306. McDaniel, Max J. & Margaret E. Beier & Andrew W. Perkins & Stephen Goggin & Brian Frankel
    2009 “An Assessment of the Fakeability of Self-report and Implicit Personality Measures.” Journal of Research in Personality43. 682–685. 10.1016/j.jrp.2009.01.011
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2009.01.011 [Google Scholar]
  307. McKenzie, Robert M. & Erin Carrie
    2018 “Implicit-Explicit Attitudinal Discrepancy and the Investigation of Language Attitude Change in Progress.” Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development39(9). 830–844. 10.1080/01434632.2018.1445744
     https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2018.1445744 [Google Scholar]
  308. McLuhan, Marshall
    1964 Understanding Media. The Extensions of Man. London/New York, NY: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  309. Melinger, Alissa & Andrea Weber
    2006 “Database of Noun Associations for German.” Available from URL: 〈www.psycholing.es.unituebingen.de/nag/index.php〉 (20/04/2021).
  310. Messing, Vera
    2019 “Conceptual and Methodological Considerations in Researching ‘Roma Migration’.” In: Tina Magazzini & Stefano Piemontese (eds.), Constructing Roma Migrants. European Narratives and Local Governance. (IMISCOE Research Series.) Cham: Springer. 17–30. 10.1007/978‑3‑030‑11373‑5_2
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11373-5_2 [Google Scholar]
  311. Meyer, Anna-Maria
    2019 “The Creation of Orthographies for Romani by Means of ‘Slavic’ Alphabets.” In: Sebastian Kempgen & Vittorio S. Tomelleri (eds.), Slavic Alphabets and Identities. (Bamberger Beiträge zur Linguistik 19.) Bamberg: University Press2017. 129–160. 10.20378/irb‑57844
     https://doi.org/10.20378/irb-57844 [Google Scholar]
  312. 2020 “The Impact of Slavic Languages on Romani.” In: Yaron Matras & Anton Tenser (eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of Romani Language and Linguistics. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. 261–301. 10.1007/978‑3‑030‑28105‑2_9
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28105-2_9 [Google Scholar]
  313. Michaels, Eli K. & Tracy Lam-Hine & Thu T. Nguyen & Gilbert C. Gee & Amani M. Allen
    2023 “The Water Surrounding the Iceberg: Cultural Racism and Health Inequities.” The Milbank Quarterly101(3). 768–814. 10.1111/1468‑0009.12662
     https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0009.12662 [Google Scholar]
  314. Milroy, James
    1992 “The Theoretical Status of Sociolinguistics.” In: Kingsley Bolton & Helen Kwok (eds.), Sociolinguistics Today. International Perspectives. London: Routledge. 356–360.
     [Google Scholar]
  315. 2001 “Language Ideologies and the Consequences of Standardization.” Journal of Sociolinguistics5(4). 530–555. 10.1111/1467‑9481.00163
     https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9481.00163 [Google Scholar]
  316. Mirga-Kruszelnicka, Anna
    2015 “Romani Studies and Emerging Romani Scholarship.” Roma Rights — Journal of the European Roma Rights Centre2. 39–46. Available from URL: 〈www.errc.org/uploads/upload_en/file/roma-rights-2-2015-nothing-about-us-without-us.pdf〉 (28/03/2023).
     [Google Scholar]
  317. 2022 Mobilizing Romani Ethnicity. Budapest et al.: Central European University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  318. Mirić, Mirjana
    2019 “Izazovi i značaj izvođenja nastave romskog jezika u Knjaževcu i okolini.” In: Mikica Sibinović & Vladana Stojadinović & Danijela Popović Nikolić (eds.) Knjaževački kraj — potencijali, stanje i perspektive razvoja. Zbornik radova naučne konferencije 19.-20. april 2019. Knjaževac: Narodna biblioteka “Njegoš”/Belgrade: Srpsko geografsko društvo. 158–178.
     [Google Scholar]
  319. 2021 “Promotion and Preservation of Gurbet Romani in Eastern Serbia: Actions Targeting Children and Youth.” Multiethnica41. 31–51. 10.33063/diva‑472012
     https://doi.org/10.33063/diva-472012 [Google Scholar]
  320. Morrow, Susan L.
    2005 “Quality and Trustworthiness in Qualitative Research in Counseling Psychology.” Journal of Counseling Psychology52(2). 250–260. 10.1037/0022‑0167.52.2.250
     https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.52.2.250 [Google Scholar]
  321. Mosel, Ulrike
    2015 “Putting Oral Narratives into Writing — Experiences from a Language Documentation Project in Bouganville, Papua New Guinea.” In: Bernard Comrie & Lucía Golluscio (eds.), Language Contact and Documentation — Contacto lingüístico y documentación. Berlin/Boston, MA: De Gruyter Mouton. 321–342. 10.1515/9783110317473.321
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110317473.321 [Google Scholar]
  322. Munafò, Marcus R. & Brian A. Nosek & Dorothy V. M. Bishop & Katherine S. Button & Christopher D. Chambers & Nathalie Percie du Sert & Uri Simonsohn & Eric-Jan Wagenmakers & Jennifer J. Ware & John P. A. Ioannidis
    2017 “A Manifesto for Reproducible Science.” Nature Human Behaviour1. Article21, 1–9. 10.1038/s41562‑016‑0021
     https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-016-0021 [Google Scholar]
  323. Newman, Paul
    1998 “We Has Seen the Enemy and It Is Us: The Endangered Languages Issue as a Hopeless Cause.” Studies in the Linguistic Sciences28(2). 11–20.
     [Google Scholar]
  324. Newmark, Leonard & Philip Hubbard & Peter Prifti
    1982 Standard Albanian. A Reference Grammar for Students. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  325. Nosek, Brian A. & Mahzarin R. Banaji & Anthony G. Greenwald
    2002 “Harvesting Implicit Group Attitudes and Beliefs from a Demonstration Web Site.” Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice6(1). 101–115. 10.1037/1089‑2699.6.1.101
     https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2699.6.1.101 [Google Scholar]
  326. Nosek, Brian A. & Anthony G. Greenwald & Mahzarin R. Banaji
    2005 “Understanding and Using the Implicit Association Test: II. Method Variables and Construct Validity.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin31(2). 166–180. 10.1177/0146167204271418
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167204271418 [Google Scholar]
  327. Nyamaa, Purevjargal
    2009 Orate und literate Strukturen im Mongolischen. MA thesis, University of Osnabrück. Cited after Maas 2010a.
     [Google Scholar]
  328. O’Donnell, Roy C.
    1974 “Syntactic Differences Between Speech and Writing.” American Speech49(1/2). 102–110. 10.2307/3087922
     https://doi.org/10.2307/3087922 [Google Scholar]
  329. Ó Riagáin, Pádraig
    2008 “Language Attitudes and Minority Languages.” In: Jasone Cenoz & Nancy H. Hornberger (eds.), Encyclopedia of Language and Education. Volume 6. Knowledge about Language. 2nd edition. Boston, MA: Springer. 329–341. 10.1007/978‑0‑387‑30424‑3_159
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-30424-3_159 [Google Scholar]
  330. Ochs, Elinor
    1979 “Planned and Unplanned Discourse.” In: Talmy Givón (ed.), Discourse and Syntax. (Syntax and Semantics 12.) New York, NY et al.: Academic Press. 51–80. 10.1163/9789004368897_004
     https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004368897_004 [Google Scholar]
  331. Oesterreicher, Wulf
    1997 “Types of Orality in Texts.” In: Egbert Bakker & Ahuvia Kahane (eds.), Written Voices, Spoken Signs. Tradition, Performance, and the Epic Text. (Center for Hellenic Studies Colloquia 1.) Cambridge, MA et al.: Harvard University Press. 190–214. 10.4159/9780674020467‑010
     https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674020467-010 [Google Scholar]
  332. Olawsky, Knut J.
    1998 “Psycholinguistic Experiments on Dagbani Novel Nouns.” Theorie des Lexikons, Arbeiten des Sonderforschungsbereichs 282 (108). Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf. 1–52.
     [Google Scholar]
  333. 2014 “Between Duty Statement and Reality — The ‘Linguist/Coordinator’ at an Australian Indigenous Language Centre.” Language Documentation and Conservation8. 361–383.
     [Google Scholar]
  334. Olive, Thierry
    2014 “Towards a Parallel and Cascading Model of the Writing System: A Review of Research on Writing Processes Coordination.” Journal of Writing Research6(2). 173–194. 10.17239/jowr‑2014.06.02.4
     https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2014.06.02.4 [Google Scholar]
  335. Olive, Thierry & Marie-Laure Barbier
    2017 “Processing Time and Cognitive Effort of Longhand Note Taking When Reading and Summarizing a Structured or Linear Text.” Written Communication34(2). 224–246. 10.1177/0741088317699898
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088317699898 [Google Scholar]
  336. Ong, Walter J.
    2002 [1982] Orality and Literacy. The Technologizing of the Word. London et al.: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  337. Open Science Collaboration
    Open Science Collaboration 2015 “Estimating the Reproducibility of Psychological Science.” Science349(6251). 943.
     [Google Scholar]
  338. Osgood, Charles E.
    1964 “Semantic Differential Technique in the Comparative Study of Cultures.” American Anthropologist66(3). 171–200. 10.1525/aa.1964.66.3.02a00880
     https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1964.66.3.02a00880 [Google Scholar]
  339. Osgood, Charles E. & George J. Suci & Percy H. Tannenbaum
    1957 The Measurement of Meaning. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  340. Outakoski, Hanna
    2015 Multilingual Literacy among Young Learners of North Sámi: Contexts, Complexity and Writing in Sápmi. PhD thesis, Umeå University.
     [Google Scholar]
  341. Padure, Cristian & Evangelia Adamou
    2021 “The Activity Spheres Framework Applied to Language Policy: Dispositions Towards Romani Revitalization in Romania.” Manuscript available from URL: 〈https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-03268416〉 (22/09/2022).
  342. Palmer, Jane E. & Samantha C. Winter & Sarah McMahon
    2020 “Matching Anonymous Participants in Longitudinal Research on Sensitive Topics: Challenges and Recommendations.” Evaluation and Program Planning80. Article101794, 1–10. 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2020.101794
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2020.101794 [Google Scholar]
  343. Pantos, Andrew J.
    2010 Measuring Implicit and Explicit Attitudes Toward Foreign-Accented Speech. PhD thesis, Rice University, Houston, TX.
     [Google Scholar]
  344. 2019 “Implicitness, Automaticity, and Consciousness in Language Attitudes Research.” Linguistics Vanguard5(S1). Article20180007, 1–9. 10.1515/lingvan‑2018‑0007
     https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2018-0007 [Google Scholar]
  345. Pantos, Andrew J. & Andrew W. Perkins
    2012 “Measuring Implicit and Explicit Attitudes Toward Foreign Accented Speech.” Journal of Language and Social Psychology32(1). 3–20. 10.1177/0261927X12463005
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X12463005 [Google Scholar]
  346. Pareek, Benu
    2017 Nominal Features in Hindi Language Acquisition. A Study of Agreement and Modification. PhD thesis, Jawaharlal Nehru University.
     [Google Scholar]
  347. Parise, Cesare V. & Charles Spence
    2012 “Audiovisual Crossmodal Correspondences and Sound Symbolism: A Study Using the Implicit Association Test.” Experimental Brain Research220. 319–333. 10.1007/s00221‑012‑3140‑6
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-012-3140-6 [Google Scholar]
  348. Pashler, Harold & Christine R. Harris
    2012 “Is the Replicability Crisis Overblown? Three Arguments Examined.” Perspectives on Psychological Science7(6). 531–536. 10.1177/1745691612463401
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612463401 [Google Scholar]
  349. Payne, B. Keith & Melissa A. Burkley & Mark B. Stokes
    2008 “Why Do Implicit and Explicit Attitude Tests Diverge? The Role of Structural Fit.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology94(1). 16–31. 10.1037/0022‑3514.94.1.16
     https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.94.1.16 [Google Scholar]
  350. Perugini, Marco
    2005 “Predictive Models of Implicit and Explicit Attitudes.” British Journal of Social Psychology44. 29–45. 10.1348/014466604X23491
     https://doi.org/10.1348/014466604X23491 [Google Scholar]
  351. Peterson, Jean S.
    2019 “Presenting a Qualitative Study: A Reviewer’s Perspective.” Gifted Child Quarterly63(3). 147–158. 10.1177/0016986219844789
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986219844789 [Google Scholar]
  352. Petter, Jan
    2021 “Die Mädchen trifft es als Erstes.” Available from URL: 〈https://www.spiegel.de/ausland/corona-in-bulgarien-die-pandemie-trifft-roma-gleich-doppelt-a-fafc2aa5-4069-4971-a62e-47835c90fea4〉 (21/07/2021).
  353. Phillips, Denis C.
    1990 “Postpositivistic Science: Myths and Realities.” In: Egon G. Guba (ed.), The Paradigm Dialog. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. 31–45. Cited after Greene 2007.
     [Google Scholar]
  354. Phillips, Denis C. & Nicholas C. Burbules
    2000 Postpositivism and Educational Research. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield. Cited after Greene 2007.
     [Google Scholar]
  355. Piasere, Leonardo
    1995 “I segni ‘segreti’ degli Zingari.” Ricerca Folklorica31. 83–105. Cited after Toninato 2014 10.2307/1480039
     https://doi.org/10.2307/1480039 [Google Scholar]
  356. Porciatti, Vittorio & Adriana Fiorentini & M. Concetta Morrone & David C. Burr
    1999 “The Effects of Ageing on Reaction Times to Motion Onset.” Vision Research39. 2157–2164. 10.1016/S0042‑6989(98)00288‑0
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0042-6989(98)00288-0 [Google Scholar]
  357. Poueyto, Jean Luc
    2000 Illettrisme, ‘Culture écrite’, et ‘Culture orale’. Une approche anthropologique et sémiotique de la question de l’écriture: l’exemple des Manouches de la région paloise. PhD thesis, Université de Pau et des pays de l’Adour. Cited after Trevisan 2009.
     [Google Scholar]
  358. Preston, Dennis R.
    2016 “Whaddayaknow now?” In: Anna M. Babel (ed.), Awareness and Control in Sociolinguistic Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 177–199. 10.1017/CBO9781139680448.010
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139680448.010 [Google Scholar]
  359. Prifti, Elton
    2015 “Das Italienische der italoalbanischen Migranten in den USA zwischen Schriftlichkeit und Mündlichkeit.” In: Thede Kahl & Johannes Kramer & Elton Prifti (eds.), Romanica et Balcanica: Wolfgang Dahmen zum 65. Geburtstag. (Jenaer Beiträge zur Romanistik 7.) München: Akademische Verlagsgemeinschaft. 347–366.
     [Google Scholar]
  360. R Core Team
    R Core Team 2022 R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing [Computer Software]. Vienna, Austria. Available from URL: 〈https://www.R-project.org〉 (17/09/2022).
     [Google Scholar]
  361. Rácová, Anna
    2018 “The Impact of Language Ideologies on the Language Practices of Roma in Slovakia.” Asian and African Studies27(2). 192–215.
     [Google Scholar]
  362. Ramos Pinto, Sara
    2018 “Film, Dialects and Subtitles: An Analytical Framework for the Study of Non-standard Varieties in Subtitling.” The Translator24(1). 17–34. 10.1080/13556509.2017.1338551
     https://doi.org/10.1080/13556509.2017.1338551 [Google Scholar]
  363. Randjelović, Isidora
    2019 “Rassismus gegen Rom*nja und Sinti*zze.” Available online, URL: 〈https://www.vielfalt-mediathek.de/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/expertise_randjelovic_rassismus_gegen_rom_nja_vielfalt_mediathek_1.pdf〉 (30/09/2022).
  364. Ratcliff, Graham & Mary Ganguli & Vijay Chandra & Sujatha Sharma & Steven Belle & Eric Seaberg & Rajesh Pandav
    1998 “Effects of Literacy and Education on Measures of Word Fluency.” Brain and Language61. 115–122. 10.1006/brln.1997.1858
     https://doi.org/10.1006/brln.1997.1858 [Google Scholar]
  365. Ratcliff, Roger & Daniel Spieler & Gail McKoon
    2000 “Explicitly Modeling the Effects of Aging on Response Time.” Psychonomic Bulletin & Review7(1). 1–25. 10.3758/BF03210723
     https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03210723 [Google Scholar]
  366. Redeker, Gisela
    1984 “On Differences Between Spoken and Written Language.” Discourse Processes7(1). 43–55. 10.1080/01638538409544580
     https://doi.org/10.1080/01638538409544580 [Google Scholar]
  367. Reetz, Steffen
    2021 Code-Switching among Qaqet-Speaking Adults in Kamanakam, East New Britain Province, Papua New Guinea. PhD thesis, University of Cologne. Available from URL: 〈https://kups.ub.uni-koeln.de/55141/〉 (27/09/2022).
     [Google Scholar]
  368. Reimers, Stian & Neil Stewart
    2015 “Presentation and Response Timing Accuracy in Adobe Flash and HTML5/JavaScript Web Experiments.” Behaviour Research Methods47. 309–327. 10.3758/s13428‑014‑0471‑1
     https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-014-0471-1 [Google Scholar]
  369. Reinke de Buitrago, Sybille
    2019 “Conducting Qualitative Content Analysis Across Languages and Cultures.” Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung20(3). Article 19, 14 Paragraphs.
     [Google Scholar]
  370. Reja, Urša & Katja Lozar Manfreda & Valentina Hlebec & Vasja Vehovar
    2003 “Open-ended vs. Close-ended Questions in Web Questionnaires.” Developments in Applied Statistics19. 159–177.
     [Google Scholar]
  371. Riesberg, Sonja & Janina Kalbertodt & Stefan Baumann & Nikolaus P. Himmelmann
    2020 “Using Rapid Prosody Transcription to Probe Little-Known Prosodic Systems: The Case of Papuan Malay.” Laboratory Phonology: Journal of the Association for Laboratory Phonology11(1). Article8, 1–35. 10.5334/labphon.192
     https://doi.org/10.5334/labphon.192 [Google Scholar]
  372. Rizova, Elena & Mira Bekar & Zoran Velkovski
    2020 “Educational Challenges of Roma Minorities: The Case of the Republic of North Macedonia.” International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education8(3). 113–122. 10.23947/2334‑8496‑2020‑8‑3‑113‑122
     https://doi.org/10.23947/2334-8496-2020-8-3-113-122 [Google Scholar]
  373. Roettger, Timo B.
    2021 “Preregistration in Experimental Linguistics: Applications, Challenges, and Limitations.” Linguistics59(5). 1227–1249. 10.1515/ling‑2019‑0048
     https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2019-0048 [Google Scholar]
  374. Rogers, Alan
    2001 “Afterword: Problematising Literacy and Development.” In: Street (ed.) 2001 205–222.
     [Google Scholar]
  375. Rogers, Susan K. & Abraham S. Ross
    1975 “A Cross-Cultural Test of the Maluma-Takete Phenomenon.” Perception4(1). 105–106. 10.1068/p040105
     https://doi.org/10.1068/p040105 [Google Scholar]
  376. Rosch, Eleanor H.
    1973 “Natural Categories.” Cognitive Psychology4(3). 328–350. 10.1016/0010‑0285(73)90017‑0
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(73)90017-0 [Google Scholar]
  377. Rom e.V.
    Rom e.V. 2020 “Spendenaufruf für den Stadtteil Zlokucani in Nordmazedonien.” Available from URL: 〈https://www.romev.de/?p=3425〉 (19/07/2021).
  378. Romani Morpho-Syntax database (RMS) = Elšík, Viktor & Yaron Matras
    2001–2018 “Romani Morpho-Syntax Database.” Available from URL: 〈romani.humanities.manchester.ac.uk/rms/〉 (14/06/2022).
  379. Romano, Simone & Davide Fucci & Giuseppe Scanniello & Maria Teresa Baldassarre & Burak Turhan & Natalia Juristo
    2021 “On Researcher Bias in Software Engineering Experiments.” Journal of Systems and Software182. Article111068, 1–18. 10.1016/j.jss.2021.111068
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2021.111068 [Google Scholar]
  380. RomBuK = Bildung und Kultur im Rom e.V.
    RomBuK = Bildung und Kultur im Rom e.V. 2019–2024 “Bibliothek, Archiv und Dokumentationszentrum.” Online catalogue available from URL: 〈romev.ifaust-online.de/〉 (22/02/2024).
  381. ROMLEX = Halwachs, Dieter W.
    1998–n.d. “ROMLEX Lexical Database.” Available from URL: 〈romani.uni-graz.at/romlex/lex.xml〉 (21/02/2024).
  382. RomnoKher gGmbH
    RomnoKher gGmbH 2021 “RomnoKher-Studie 2021: Ungleiche Teilhabe. Zur Lage von Sinti und Roma in Deutschland. Zentrale Ergebnisse der RomnoKher-Studie 2021.” URL: 〈https://sintiroma.org/images/sinti-roma/20210203_zentrale_ergebnisse_der_romnokher-studie_2021.pdf〉 (20/06/2023).
  383. Rosseel, Laura
    2017 New Approaches to Measuring the Social Meaning of Language Variation. Exploring the Personalized Implicit Association Test and the Relational Responding Task. PhD thesis, KU Leuven.
     [Google Scholar]
  384. Rosseel, Laura
    2022 “The Implicit Association Test Paradigm.” In: Ruth Kircher & Lena Zipp (eds.), Research Methods in Language Attitudes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 250–267. 10.1017/9781108867788.020
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108867788.020 [Google Scholar]
  385. Rosseel, Laura & Stefan Grondelaers
    2019 “Implicitness and Experimental Methods in Language Variation Research.” Linguistics Vanguard5(S1). Article20180005, 1–6. 10.1515/lingvan‑2018‑0005
     https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2018-0005 [Google Scholar]
  386. Rosseel, Laura & Dirk Speelman & Dirk Geeraerts
    2018 “Measuring Language Attitudes Using the Personalized Implicit Association Test: A Case Study on Regional Varieties of Dutch in Belgium.” Journal of Linguistic Geography6. 20–39. 10.1017/jlg.2018.3
     https://doi.org/10.1017/jlg.2018.3 [Google Scholar]
  387. 2019 “Measuring Language Attitudes in Context: Exploring the Potential of the Personalized Implicit Association Test.” Language in Society48. 429–461. 10.1017/S0047404519000198
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404519000198 [Google Scholar]
  388. Römer, Ruth
    1989 Sprachwissenschaft und Rassenideologie in Deutschland. 2nd edition. München: Wilhelm Fink.
     [Google Scholar]
  389. Ruigendijk, Esther
    2015 Contrastive Elicitation Task for Testing Case Marking. In: Sharon Armon-Lotem & Jan de Jong & Natalia Meir (eds.), Assessing Multilingual Children. Disentangling Bilingualism from Language Impairment. Bristol: Multilingual Matters. 38–54.
     [Google Scholar]
  390. Ruin, Sebastian
    2017 “Ansätze und Verfahren der Kategorienbildung in der qualitativen Inhaltsanalyse.” In: Heinz Aschebrock & Günter Stibbe (eds.), Schulsportforschung –wissenschaftstheoretische und methodologische Reflexionen. Münster: Waxmann. 119–134. Cited after Ruin 2019.
     [Google Scholar]
  391. 2019 “Kategorien als Ausdruck einer ausgewiesenen Beobachter_innenperspektive? Ein Vorschlag für eine qualitativere qualitative Inhaltsanalyse.” Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung20(3). Article 37, 60 Paragraphs.
     [Google Scholar]
  392. Sadanobu, Toshiyuki
    2013 “Structural Reversal Between Written and Spoken Languages in Japanese.” Studia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai Philologia58(1). 21–33.
     [Google Scholar]
  393. Said, Edward W.
    1978 Orientalism. New York, NY: Pantheon Books.
     [Google Scholar]
  394. Saikia, Pori
    2022 Children’s Acquisition of Assamese Split Ergativity. PhD thesis, University of Essex.
     [Google Scholar]
  395. Saikia, Pori & Maris Camilleri
    2019 “Assamese Case Alignment Shifts in Progress.” In: Miriam Butt & Tracy Holloway King & Ida Toivonen (eds.), Proceedings of the LFG’19 Conference, Australian National University. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications. 251–271.
     [Google Scholar]
  396. Sallabank, Julia
    2011 “Language Policy for Endangered Languages.” In: Peter Austin & Julia Sallabank (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Endangered Languages. (Cambridge Handbooks in Language and Linguistics.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 277–290.
     [Google Scholar]
  397. Santos, Boaventura de Sousa
    2014 Epistemologies of the South: Justice Against Epistemicide. London: Taylor and Francis. Cited after Hollington & Storch 2016.
     [Google Scholar]
  398. Sarnoff, Irving
    1970 “Social Attitudes and the Resolution of Motivational Conflict.” In: Marie Jahoda & Neil Warren (eds.), Attitudes. Selected Readings. Harmondsworth: Penguin. 279–284. [Excerpt from: Sarnoff, Irving 1962 Personality Dynamics and Development. New York, NY: Wiley.]
     [Google Scholar]
  399. Saussure, Ferdinand de
    1916 Cours de linguistique générale. Paris: Payot.
     [Google Scholar]
  400. Sauter, Marian & Dejan Draschkow & Wolfgang Mack
    2020 “Building, Hosting and Recruiting: A Brief Introduction to Running Behavioral Experiments Online.” Brain Sciences10(4). Article251, 1–11. 10.3390/brainsci10040251
     https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci10040251 [Google Scholar]
  401. Scala, Andrea
    2020 “Romani Lexicon.” In: Yaron Matras & Anton Tenser (eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of Romani Language and Linguistics. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. 85–117. 10.1007/978‑3‑030‑28105‑2_4
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28105-2_4 [Google Scholar]
  402. Schippling, Melanie
    . (in press). “From Spoken to Written Narratives in Romani: A Focus on Editing Processes.” In: Lisa Wolfson & Sidona Bauer eds. Entre son et sense. Interdisziplinäre Studien zur medialen Darstellung und Selbstermächtigung der Romn*ja, Gitan@s, Sinti*zze, Manouches und anderen Repräsentant*innen der heterogenen Minderheit. München: AVM.
     [Google Scholar]
  403. 2022 “Three-participant Events in Romani: A Study Based on the Romani Morpho-Syntax Database.” STUF — Language Typology and Universals75(3). 419–448. 10.1515/stuf‑2022‑1058
     https://doi.org/10.1515/stuf-2022-1058 [Google Scholar]
  404. Schmidt, William C.
    2001 “Presentation Accuracy of Web Animation Methods.” Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers33(2). 187–200. 10.3758/BF03195365
     https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195365 [Google Scholar]
  405. Schnell, Rainer & Tobias Bachteler & Jörg Reiher
    2010 “Improving the Use of Self-Generated Identification Codes.” Evaluation Review34(5). 391–418. 10.1177/0193841X10387576
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0193841X10387576 [Google Scholar]
  406. Schrammel, Barbara
    2008 Verb Derivational Morphology and Event Structure in Romani. PhD thesis, University of Manchester.
     [Google Scholar]
  407. Schreier, Margrit
    2014 “Varianten Qualitativer Inhaltsanalyse: Ein Wegweiser im Dickicht der Begrifflichkeiten.” Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung15(1). Article 18, 59 Paragraphs.
     [Google Scholar]
  408. Schroeder, Christoph
    2014 “Türkische Texte deutsch-türkisch bilingualer Schülerinnen und Schüler in Deutschland.” Zeitschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik44. 24–43. 10.1007/BF03379515
     https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03379515 [Google Scholar]
  409. Schumann, Elke & Elisabeth Gülich & Gabriele Lucius-Hoene & Stefan Pfänder
    (eds.) 2015 Wiedererzählen. Formen und Funktionen einer kulturellen Praxis. (Edition Kulturwissenschaft 50.) Bielefeld: transcript. 10.14361/9783839428511
     https://doi.org/10.14361/9783839428511 [Google Scholar]
  410. Sechidou, Irene
    2005 “Finikas Romika: A Greek Para-Romani Variety.” Romani Studies15(1), 5th series. 51–79. 10.3828/rs.2005.3
     https://doi.org/10.3828/rs.2005.3 [Google Scholar]
  411. Seitz, Maximilian & Jan Lenhart & Nina Rübsam
    2020 “The Effects of Gendered Information in Stories on Preschool Children’s Development of Gender Stereotypes.” British Journal of Developmental Psychology38. 363–390. 10.1111/bjdp.12323
     https://doi.org/10.1111/bjdp.12323 [Google Scholar]
  412. Semmelmann, Kilian & Sarah Weigelt
    2017 “Online Psychophysics: Reaction Time Effects in Cognitive Experiments.” Behaviour Research49. 1241–1260. 10.3758/s13428‑016‑0783‑4
     https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-016-0783-4 [Google Scholar]
  413. Sharwood Smith, Michael
    2021 “The Cognitive Status of Metalinguistic Knowledge in Speakers of One or More Languages.” Language and Cognition24. 185–196.
     [Google Scholar]
  414. Shor, Ira
    1999 “What Is Critical Literacy?” Journal of Pedagogy, Pluralism, and Practice1(4). Article 2, 2–32. Available from URL: 〈https://digitalcommons.lesley.edu/jppp/vol1/iss4/2〉 (27/01/2021).
     [Google Scholar]
  415. Siebenhaar, Beat
    2000 Sprachvariation, Sprachwandel und Einstellung. Der Dialekt der Stadt Aarau in der Labilitätszone zwischen Zürcher und Berner Mundartraum. (ZDL Beihefte 108.) Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag.
     [Google Scholar]
  416. Silva, Daniel Márcio Rodrigues & Samuel C. Bellini-Leite
    2020 “Cross-modal Correspondences in Sine Wave: Speech versus Non-Speech Modes.” Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics82. 944–953. 10.3758/s13414‑019‑01835‑z
     https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-019-01835-z [Google Scholar]
  417. Simmons, Joseph P. & Leif D. Nelson & Uri Simonsohn
    2011 “False-Positive Psychology: Undisclosed Flexibility in Data Collection and Analysis Allows Presenting Anything as Significant.” Psychological Science22(11). 1359–1366. 10.1177/0956797611417632
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611417632 [Google Scholar]
  418. Sophocleous, Andry & Clarissa Wilks
    2010 “Standard Modern Greek and Greek-Cypriot Dialect in Kindergarten Classroom Interaction: Teachers’ and Learners’ Language Attitudes and Language Use.” Language, Culture, and Curriculum23(1). 51–69. 10.1080/07908311003632519
     https://doi.org/10.1080/07908311003632519 [Google Scholar]
  419. Sorescu-Marinković, Annemarie
    2021 “‘What Language Do We Speak?’ The Bayash in the Balkans and Mother Tongue Education.” In: Annemarie Sorescu-Marinković & Mihai Dragnea & Thede Kahl & Blagovest Njagulov & Donald L. Dyer & Angelo Costanzo (eds.), The Romance-Speaking Balkans. Language and the Politics of Identity. (Brill’s Studies in Language, Cognition and Culture 29.) Leiden et al.: Brill. 207–232. 10.1163/9789004456174_010
     https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004456174_010 [Google Scholar]
  420. Söll, Ludwig
    1974 Gesprochenes und geschriebenes Französisch. (Grundlagen der Romanistik 6.) Berlin: Erich Schmidt Verlag.
     [Google Scholar]
  421. Speelman, Dirk & Adriaan Spruyt & Leen Impe & Dirk Geeraerts
    2013 “Language Attitudes Revisited: Auditory Affective Priming.” Journal of Pragmatics52. 83–92. 10.1016/j.pragma.2012.12.016
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.12.016 [Google Scholar]
  422. Starks, Helene & Susan Brown Trinidad
    2007 “Choose Your Method: A Comparison of Phenomenology, Discourse Analysis, and Grounded Theory.” Qualitative Health Research17(10). 1372–1380. 10.1177/1049732307307031
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732307307031 [Google Scholar]
  423. Stechow, Arnim von & Wolfgang Sternefeld
    1988 Bausteine syntaktischen Wissens: Ein Lehrbuch der generativen Grammatik. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag. 10.1007/978‑3‑322‑91923‑6
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-91923-6 [Google Scholar]
  424. Stewart, Michael
    2017 “Nothing About Us Without Us, or the Dangers of a Closed-society Research Paradigm.” Romani Studies27(2). 125–146. 10.3828/rs.2017.8
     https://doi.org/10.3828/rs.2017.8 [Google Scholar]
  425. Strauß, Daniel
    2021 “Einleitung.” In: Strauß (ed.) 2021 9–11.
     [Google Scholar]
  426. (ed.) 2021 RomnoKher-Studie 2021: Ungleiche Teilhabe. Zur Lage der Sinti und Roma in Deutschland. Mannheim: RomnoKher. Available from URL: 〈https://mediendienst-integration.de/fileadmin/Dateien/2021_RomnoKher_Ungleiche_Teilhabe.pdf〉 (20/06/2023).
     [Google Scholar]
  427. Street, Brian V.
    (ed.) 2001 Literacy and Development. Ethnographic Perspectives. (Literacies 5.) London/New York, NY: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  428. Stroop, J. R.
    1935 “Studies of Interference in Serial Verbal Reactions.” Journal of Experimental Psychology18(6). 643–662. 10.1037/h0054651
     https://doi.org/10.1037/h0054651 [Google Scholar]
  429. Styles, Suzy J. & Lauren Gawne
    2017 “When Does Maluma/Takete Fail? Two Key Failures and a Meta-Analysis Suggest That Phonology and Phonotactics Matter.” i-Perception8(4). 1–17. Available from URL: 〈 10.1177/2041669517724807〉 (11/08/2021).
     https://doi.org/10.1177/2041669517724807 [Google Scholar]
  430. Sudbrack, Inge
    1977 “Zur heutigen soziologischen Situation der Zigeuner in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland.” In: Johann Knobloch & Inge Sudbrack (eds.), Zigeunerkundliche Forschungen 1. (Innsbrucker Beiträge zur Kulturwissenschaft 42.) Innsbruck: Institut für Sprachwissenschaft der Universität Innsbruck. 9–42.
     [Google Scholar]
  431. Sunun, Monica & Rafael Luangi & Henrike Frye
    2023 The Garden Film. Unpublished stimulus material.
     [Google Scholar]
  432. Surdu, Mihai
    2016 Those Who Count. Expert Practices of Roma Classification. Budapest/New York, NY: Central European University Press. 10.1515/9789633861158
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9789633861158 [Google Scholar]
  433. Tannen, Deborah
    2013 “The Medium Is the Metamessage. Conversational Style in New Media Interaction.” In: Deborah Tannen & Anna Marie Trester (eds.), Discourse 2.0: Language and New Media. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press. 99–117.
     [Google Scholar]
  434. Tarozzi, Massimiliano
    2013 “Translating and Doing Grounded Theory Methodology, Intercultural Mediation as an Analytic Resource.” Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung14(2). Article 6, 47 Paragraphs.
     [Google Scholar]
  435. Teddiman, Laura
    2007 “The Roles of Metalinguistic Awareness and Semantic Interpretability in the Processing of Novel Pseudowords in English.” Proceedings of the 2007 annual conference of the Canadian Linguistic Association. Article32, 1–9.
     [Google Scholar]
  436. Tenser, Anton
    2008 Northeastern Group of Romani Dialects. PhD thesis, University of Manchester.
     [Google Scholar]
  437. 2016 “Semantic Map Borrowing — Case Representation in Northeastern Romani Dialects.” Journal of Language Contact9. 211–245. 10.1163/19552629‑00902001
     https://doi.org/10.1163/19552629-00902001 [Google Scholar]
  438. Toninato, Paola
    2014 Romani Writing. Literacy, Literature and Identity Politics. (Routledge Research in Literacy 4.) New York, NY et al.: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  439. Tremlett, Annabel
    2009 “Bringing Hybridity to Heterogeneity in Romani Studies.” Romani Studies19(2). 147–168. 10.3828/rs.2009.8
     https://doi.org/10.3828/rs.2009.8 [Google Scholar]
  440. 2014 “Making a Difference Without Creating a Difference: Super-diversity as a New Direction for Research on Roma Minorities.” Ethnicities14(6). 830–848. 10.1177/1468796814542183
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1468796814542183 [Google Scholar]
  441. Trevisan, Paola
    2009 “Écrire pour qui? Auteurs, public et registres linguistiques dans les autobiographies des sinti italiens.” Études Tsiganes37. 90–109. 10.3917/tsig.037.0090
     https://doi.org/10.3917/tsig.037.0090 [Google Scholar]
  442. Tribulato, Chiara & Bianca Pastori
    2019 “‘Per racontare tutta una vita non bastano poche pagine’. Il diaro di Jucki tra ricerca e presentazione di sé.” La Ricerca Folklorica74. 43–59.
     [Google Scholar]
  443. Ugur Rizzi, Canan
    2021 “Antiziganism as a Barrier for the Roma to Access Policies: The Case of Romani Access to Education in Turkey.” Ethnopolitics20(3). 305–316. 10.1080/17449057.2020.1839220
     https://doi.org/10.1080/17449057.2020.1839220 [Google Scholar]
  444. Uhlmann, Eric Luis & T. Andrew Poehlman & Brian A. Nosek
    2012 “Automatic Associations: Personal Attitudes or Cultural Knowledge?” In: Jon Hanson & John Jost (eds.), Ideology, Psychology, and Law. (Series in Political Psychology.) New York, NY: Oxford University Press. 228–260. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199737512.003.0009
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199737512.003.0009 [Google Scholar]
  445. Urbanek, Simon & Jeffrey Horner
    2022 Cairo: R Graphics Device Using Cairo Graphics Library for Creating High-Quality Bitmap (PNG, JPEG, TIFF), Vector (PDF, SVG, PostScript) and Display (X11 and Win32) Output [R package version 1.6–0]. Available from URL: 〈https://cran.r-project.org/package=Cairo〉 (08/06/2023).
     [Google Scholar]
  446. Uro, Justine Leon A.
    2021 sdRplot [R function]. Available from URL: 〈https://github.com/justineuro/sdRplot〉 (08/06/2023).
     [Google Scholar]
  447. Vachek, Josef
    1973 Written Language. General Problems and Problems of English. The Hague et al.: Mouton. 10.1515/9783110803860
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110803860 [Google Scholar]
  448. Vaismoradi, Mojtaba & Jacqueline Jones & Hannele Turunen & Sherill Snelgrove
    2016 “Theme Development in Qualitative Content Analysis and Thematic Analysis.” Journal of Nursing Education and Practice6(5). 100–110. 10.5430/jnep.v6n5p100
     https://doi.org/10.5430/jnep.v6n5p100 [Google Scholar]
  449. Van Dijk, Teun A.
    2003 “The Discourse-Knowledge Interface.” In: Gilbert Weiss & Ruth Wodak (eds.), Critical Discourse Analysis. Theory and Interdisciplinarity. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 85–109.
     [Google Scholar]
  450. Vari, Judit
    2021 Influence of Standardisation on Language Endangerment. A Study of Language Attitudes in Luxembourg and Belgium. PhD thesis, Bangor University.
     [Google Scholar]
  451. Vari, Judit & Marco Tamburelli
    2021 “Accepting a ‘New’ Standard Variety: Comparing Explicit Attitudes in Luxembourg and Belgium.” Languages6. Article134, 1–29. 10.3390/languages6030134
     https://doi.org/10.3390/languages6030134 [Google Scholar]
  452. 2023 “Standardisation: Bolstering Positive Attitudes Towards Endangered Language Varieties? Evidence from Implicit Attitudes.” Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development44(6). 447–466. 10.1080/01434632.2020.1829632
     https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2020.1829632 [Google Scholar]
  453. Von Plato, Alexander
    2011 “Methodische Herausforderungen des Projektes ‘Bildungssituation von deutschen Sinti und Roma’.” In: Daniel Strauß (ed.), Studie zur aktuellen Bildungssituation deutscher Sinti und Roma, Dokumentation und Forschungsbericht. Marburg: I-Verb.de. 5–16.
     [Google Scholar]
  454. Wadams, Morgan & Tanya Park
    2018 “Qualitative Research in Correctional Settings: Researcher Bias, Western Ideological Influences, and Social Justice.” Journal of Forensic Nursing14(2). 72–79. 10.1097/JFN.0000000000000199
     https://doi.org/10.1097/JFN.0000000000000199 [Google Scholar]
  455. Walsh, Olivia
    2021 “Introduction: In the Shadow of the Standard. Standard Language Ideology and Attitudes Towards ‘Non-Standard’ Varieties and Usages.” Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development42(9). 773–782. 10.1080/01434632.2020.1813146
     https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2020.1813146 [Google Scholar]
  456. Werlen, Erika
    1984 Studien zur Datenerhebung in der Dialektologie. (Zeitschrift für Dialektologie und Linguistik — Beihefte 46.) Wiesbaden: Steiner.
     [Google Scholar]
  457. Whitfield, Mervyn & Christian H. Jordan
    2009 “Mutual Influence of Implicit and Explicit Attitudes.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology45(4). 748–759. 10.1016/j.jesp.2009.04.006
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2009.04.006 [Google Scholar]
  458. Wickham, Hadley
    2016 ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. New York, NY: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑24277‑4
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24277-4 [Google Scholar]
  459. Williams, Patrick
    1986 “Storia del Manuš, del Pirdo e del porcospino.” Lacio Drom22(1). 2–22. Cited after Toninato 2014.
     [Google Scholar]
  460. 1997 “L’écriture entre l’oral et l’écrit. Six scènes de la vie tsigane en France.” In: Daniel Fabre (ed.), Par écrit: Ethnologie des écritures quotidiennes. (Ethnologie de la France 11.) Paris: Éditions de la Maison des sciences de l’homme. 59–78. 10.4000/books.editionsmsh.3956
     https://doi.org/10.4000/books.editionsmsh.3956 [Google Scholar]
  461. Winter, Bodo
    2020 Statistics for Linguists: An Introduction Using R. New York, NY et al.: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  462. 2022 “Mapping the Landscape of Exploratory and Confirmatory Data Analysis in Linguistics.” In: Dennis Tay & Molly Xie Pan (eds.), Data Analytics in Cognitive Linguistics. (Applications of Cognitive Linguistics 41.) Berlin/Boston, MA: De Gruyter Mouton. 13–48. 10.1515/9783110687279‑002
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110687279-002 [Google Scholar]
  463. Witt, Roxanna-Lorraine
    2021 “Gadjé-Rassismus. Ein analytischer Perspektivwechsel auf Kontinuitäten menschenfeindlicher Ideologien in weißer Kultur und Identität.” In: Onur Suzan Nobrega & Matthias Quent & Jonas Zipf (eds.), Rassismus. Macht. Vergessen. Von München über den NSU bis Hanau: Symbolische und materielle Kämpfe entlang rechten Terrors. Bielefeld: transcript. 125–144. 10.1515/9783839458631‑009
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783839458631-009 [Google Scholar]
  464. Wogg, Michael
    2000 “Märchen, Erzählungen und Lieder der Burgendland-Roma.” In: Halwachs & Gärtner-Horvath & Wogg (eds.) 2000 237–249.
     [Google Scholar]
  465. Wolsiefer, Katie & Jacob Westfall & Charles M. Judd
    2017 “Modeling Stimulus Variation in Three Common Implicit Attitude Tasks.” Behavior Research Methods49. 1193–1209. 10.3758/s13428‑016‑0779‑0
     https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-016-0779-0 [Google Scholar]
  466. Woods, David L. & John M. Wyma & E. William Yund & Timothy J. Herron & Bruce Reed
    2015 “Age-related Slowing of Response Selection and Production in a Visual Choice Reaction Time Task.” Frontiers in Human Neuroscience9. Article193, 1–12.
     [Google Scholar]
  467. Woolard, Kathryn A.
    1998 “Introduction: Language Ideology as a Field of Inquiry.” In: Bambi B. Schieffelin & Kathryn A. Woolard & Paul V. Kroskrity (eds.), Language Ideologies: Practice and Theory. New York, NY et al.: Oxford University Press. 3–47. 10.1093/oso/9780195105612.003.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195105612.003.0001 [Google Scholar]
  468. YouTube = YouTube LLC
    YouTube = YouTube LLC 2005–2024 “YouTube.” Video platform available from URL: 〈https://www.youtube.com/〉 (03/03/2024).
  469. Yurek, Leo A. & Joseph Vasey & Donna Sullivan Havens
    2008 “The Use of Self-Generated Identification Codes in Longitudinal Research.” Evaluation Review32(5). 435–452. 10.1177/0193841X08316676
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0193841X08316676 [Google Scholar]
  470. Zahova, Sofiya
    2020 “Romani Language Literature.” In: Yaron Matras & Anton Tenser (eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of Romani Language and Linguistics. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. 539–569. 10.1007/978‑3‑030‑28105‑2_18
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28105-2_18 [Google Scholar]
  471. Zhao, Hui & Hong Liu
    2021 “(Standard) Language Ideology and Regional Putonghua in Chinese Social Media: A View from Weibo.” Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development42(9). 882–896. 10.1080/01434632.2020.1814310
     https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2020.1814310 [Google Scholar]
/content/books/9789027244215
Loading

  • From This Site

    /content/books/9789027244215
    dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Chapter
    10
    5
/content/books/9789027244215
dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
-contentType:Journal -contentType:Chapter
10
5
Chapter
content/books/9789027244215
Book
false
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error