1887
  1. Home
  2. Books
  3. The Person in Politics

The Person in Politics

Pronouns and political personalization in U.S. presidential campaigns

image of The Person in Politics
USD
Buy:$163.00 + Taxes

Personalization has become a central feature of political communication. Politicians appear on late-night talk shows, smile from billboards, and post family photos on social media – placing themselves at the heart of public discourse. As individual personalities take center stage, abstract political ideologies and political collectives fade into the background. The Person in Politics explores the linguistic dimension of this shift through the cognitive semantic analysis of pronominal references. Drawing on a thorough account of how pronouns are used in American presidential nomination acceptance speeches and with what purpose, this work investigates how politicians emphasize individual leadership and craft collective identities with personal pronouns. Offering valuable insights into the intersection of language and political campaign rhetoric, this book is relevant for scholars of cognitive linguistics and political communication, as well as practicioners seeking to navigate the evolving field of political discourse.

Related Topics: Discourse studies ; Pragmatics

References

  1. Aarts, Bas , Chalker, Sylvia , and Weiner, Edmund
    2014 The Oxford dictionary of English grammar (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acref/9780199658237.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acref/9780199658237.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  2. Aczél Petra
    Aczél Petra 2009 Új retorika: Közélet, kommunikáció, kampány. Budapest: Kalligram.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Adam, Silke , and Michaela Maier
    2010 “Personalization of Politics A Critical Review and Agenda for Research.” Annals of the International Communication Association34 (1): 213–257. 10.1080/23808985.2010.11679101
     https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2010.11679101 [Google Scholar]
  4. Algeo, John
    2006 British or American English?Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511607240
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511607240 [Google Scholar]
  5. Allen, Wendy
    2007 “Australian Political Discourse: Pronominal Choice in Campaign Speeches.” InSelected Papers from the 2006 Annual Meeting of the Australian Linguistic Society, edited by Ilana Mushin and Mary Laughren , 1–13. University of Queensland. espace.library.uq.edu.au/eserv/UQ:12794/ALLEN_W_ALS2006.pdf. AccessedJanuary 13, 2021.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Anthony, Lawrence
    2020 AntConc (Version 3.5.9) [Computer Software]. Tokyo, Japan: Waseda University. Available fromhttps://www.laurenceanthony.net/software
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Arbour, Brian
    2014 Candidate-Centered Campaigns. New York: Palgrave Macmillan US. 10.1057/9781137387370
     https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137387370 [Google Scholar]
  8. Atia, Renana , and Meital Balmas
    2023 “Between ‘Me, Myself, and I’ and the ‘Royal We’: Gender Differences in Personalized Political Discourse on Facebook and User Involvement.” International Journal of Communication17: 24.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Austin, John L.
    1962 How to do things with words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Balmas, Meital , Gideon Rahat , Tamir Sheafer , and Shaul R. Shenhav
    2012 “Two Routes to Personalized Politics: Centralized and Decentralized Personalization.” Party Politics20 (1): 37–51. 10.1177/1354068811436037
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068811436037 [Google Scholar]
  11. Balmas, Michal , and Tamir Sheafer
    2013 “Leaders First, Countries After: Mediated Political Personalization in the International Arena.” Journal of Communication63, no.3: 454–475. 10.1111/jcom.12027
     https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12027 [Google Scholar]
  12. 2016 “Personalization of Politics.” InThe International Encyclopedia of Political Communication, edited by Gianpietro Mazzoleni , 1–9. John Wiley & Sons. 10.1002/9781118541555.wbiepc021
     https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118541555.wbiepc021 [Google Scholar]
  13. Barcelona, Antonio
    2011 “Reviewing the Properties and Prototype Structure of Metonymy.” InDefining Metonymy in Cognitive Linguistics: Towards a Consensus View, edited by Réka Benczes , Antonio Barcelona , and Francisco José Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez , 7–58. John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/hcp.28.02bar
     https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.28.02bar [Google Scholar]
  14. Barcelona Sánchez, Antonio
    2023 “Metonymy-Guided Discourse Inferencing: A Qualitative Study.” Lublin Studies in Modern Languages and Literature47 (2): 11–29.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Barret, John Q.
    2008 Political conventions. The Jackson List. https://thejacksonlist.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/20080904-Jackson-List-Political-Conventions.pdf. Accessed: 12 March 2021.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Bazzanella, Carla
    2002 “The Significance of Context in Comprehension: The `WeCase’.” Foundations of Science7 (3): 239–254. 10.1023/A:1019657025835
     https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019657025835 [Google Scholar]
  17. Beard, Adrian
    2000 The language of politics. London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Bell, Peter
    2024 “Public Trust in Government: 1958–2024.” Pew Research Center. Pew Research Center. June24. https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2024/06/24/public-trust-in-government-1958-2024/
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Bene, Márton
    2016 “Go Viral on the Facebook! Interactions between Candidates and Followers on Facebook during the Hungarian General Election Campaign of 2014.” Information, Communication & Society20 (4): 513–529. 10.1080/1369118X.2016.1198411
     https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1198411 [Google Scholar]
  20. Bene, Márton , and Fruzsina Nábelek
    2019 “A Politikai Kommunikáció Története a Külföldi Szakirodalomban [The History of Political Communication in the Foreign Literature].” InA Szavakon Túl: Politikai Kommunikáció Magyarországon, 1990–2015, edited by Balázs Kiss , 19–42. Budapest: L’Harmattan Kiadó.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Billig, Michael
    1995 Banal Nationalism. London: SAGE Publications.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Bimes, Terri
    2009 “Understanding the Rhetorical Presidency.” InThe Oxford Handbook of the American Presidency, edited by George C. Edwards III and William G. Howell . Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199238859.003.0010
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199238859.003.0010 [Google Scholar]
  23. Blumler, Jay G.
    2016 “The Fourth Age of Political Communication.” Politiques de Communication6 (1): 19–30. 10.3917/pdc.006.0019
     https://doi.org/10.3917/pdc.006.0019 [Google Scholar]
  24. Blumler, Jay G. , and Dennis Kavanagh
    1999 “The Third Age of Political Communication: Influences and Features.” Political Communication16 (3): 209–230. 10.1080/105846099198596
     https://doi.org/10.1080/105846099198596 [Google Scholar]
  25. Blumler, Jay G. , David Kavanagh , and Timothy J. Nossiter
    1996 “Modern Communications vs. Traditional Politics in Britain: Unstable Marriage of Convenience.” InPolitics, Media, and Modern Democracy: An International Study of Innovations in Electoral Campaigning and Their Consequences, edited by David L. Swanson and Paolo Mancini , 49–72. Praeger. 10.5040/9798400698873.ch‑003
     https://doi.org/10.5040/9798400698873.ch-003 [Google Scholar]
  26. Bøggild, Troels , Rosie Campbell , Marie Kaldahl Nielsen , Helene Helboe Pedersen , and Jennifer Anne van Heerde-Hudson
    2019 “Which Personality Fits Personalized Representation?” Party Politics27 (2): 269–281. 10.1177/1354068819855703
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068819855703 [Google Scholar]
  27. Borah, Porismita
    2016 “Political Facebook Use: Campaign Strategies Used in 2008 and 2012 Presidential Elections.” Journal of Information Technology & Politics13 (4): 326–338. 10.1080/19331681.2016.1163519
     https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2016.1163519 [Google Scholar]
  28. Branham, A. J. , and C. Wlezien
    2020 “Do Election Campaigns Matter? A Comparative Perspective and Overview.” InThe Oxford Handbook of Electoral Persuasion, edited by E. Suhay , B. Grofman , and A. H. Trechsel , 184–200. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190860806.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190860806.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  29. Brdar, Mario , and Rita Brdar-Szabó
    2009 “The (Non-)Metonymic Use of Place Names in English, German, Hungarian, and Croatian.” InMetonymy and Metaphor in Grammar, edited by Klaus-Uwe Panther , Linda L. Thornburg , and Antonio Barcelona , 229–257. 10.1075/hcp.25.14brd
     https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.25.14brd [Google Scholar]
  30. 2011 “Metonymy, Metaphor and the ‘Weekend Frame of Mind’: Towards Motivating the Micro-Variation in the Use of One Type of Metonymy.” InMotivation in Grammar and the Lexicon, edited by Klaus-Uwe Panther and Günter Radden , 233–250. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/hcp.27.15brd
     https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.27.15brd [Google Scholar]
  31. Brdar-Szabó, Rita , and Mario Brdar
    2021 “Metonymic Indeterminacy and Metalepsis: Getting Two (or More) Targets for the Price of One Vehicle.” InFigurative Language — Intersubjectivity and Usage, edited by Augusto Soares da Silva , 175–212. John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/ftl.11.06brd
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ftl.11.06brd [Google Scholar]
  32. Brdar, Mario , and Rita Brdar-Szabó
    2022 “Targetting Metonymic Targets.” InFigurative Thought and Language in Action, edited by Mario Brdar and Rita Brdar-Szabó , 16:59–86. John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/ftl.16.03brd
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ftl.16.03brd [Google Scholar]
  33. Brown, Roger , and Albert Gilman
    1960 “The Pronouns of Power and Solidarity.” InStyle in Language, edited by Thomas A. Sebeok , 253–276. MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Bull, Peter , and Anita Fetzer
    2006 “Who Are We and Who Are You? The Strategic Use of Forms of Address in Political Interviews,” Text & Talk, 26 (1): 3–37. 10.1515/TEXT.2006.002
     https://doi.org/10.1515/TEXT.2006.002 [Google Scholar]
  35. Burden, Barry C. and David C. Kimball
    2009 Why Americans split their tickets: Campaigns, competition, and divided government. University of Michigan Press. 10.3998/mpub.22995
     https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.22995 [Google Scholar]
  36. Busse, Beatrix
    2014 “Genre.” InThe Cambridge Handbook of Stylistics, edited by Peter Stockwell and Sara Whiteley , 103–116. Cambridge Handbooks in Language and Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139237031.010
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139237031.010 [Google Scholar]
  37. Campbell, Angus , and Warren E. Miller
    1957 “The Motivational Basis of Straight and Split Ticket Voting.” American Political Science Review51 (2): 293–312. 10.2307/1952193
     https://doi.org/10.2307/1952193 [Google Scholar]
  38. Campus, Donatella
    2013 Women Political Leaders and the Media. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK. 10.1057/9781137295545
     https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137295545 [Google Scholar]
  39. Cap, Piotr
    2013 Proximization: The Pragmatics of Symbolic Distance Crossing. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.232
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.232 [Google Scholar]
  40. 2014 “Applying cognitive pragmatics to Critical Discourse Studies: A proximization analysis of three public space discourses.” Journal of Pragmatics70: 16–30. 10.1016/j.pragma.2014.05.008
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.05.008 [Google Scholar]
  41. 2018 “‘We don’t want any immigrants or terrorists here’: The linguistic manufacturing of xenophobia in the post-2015 Poland.” Discourse & Society, 29 (4): 380–398. 10.1177/0957926518754416
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926518754416 [Google Scholar]
  42. Caprara, Gian Vittorio
    2007 “The Personalization of Modern Politics.” European Review15 (2): 151–164. 10.1017/S1062798707000178
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S1062798707000178 [Google Scholar]
  43. Caspi, Daniel
    1996 “American-Style Electioneering in Israel: Americanisation versus Modernization.” InPolitics, Media, and Modern Democracy: An International Study of Innovations in Electoral Campaigning and Their Consequences, edited by David L. Swanson and Paolo Mancini , 173–192. Praeger. 10.5040/9798400698873.ch‑009
     https://doi.org/10.5040/9798400698873.ch-009 [Google Scholar]
  44. CAWP
    CAWP. “Share of women in the United States Congress from 1971 to 2023.” Chart. December 28, 2022. Statista. AccessedAugust 02, 2024. https://www.statista.com/statistics/952906/us-congress-share-women-congress/
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Ceaser, James W. , Glen E. Thurow , Jeffrey K. Tulis , and Joseph M. Bessette
    1981 “The Rise of the Rhetorical Presidency.” Presidential Studies Quarterly11, no.2: 158–171.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Chadwick, Andrew
    2017 The Hybrid Media System: Politics and Power. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780190696726.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190696726.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  47. Chandler, Daniel , and Rod Munday
    2020 A Dictionary of Media and Communication. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acref/9780198841838.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acref/9780198841838.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  48. Chantrill, Peter A. , and John S. Mio
    1996 “Metonymy in Political Discourse.” InMetaphor: Implications and Applications, edited by John S. Mio and Anthony N. Katz , 171–184. Psychology Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Charteris-Black, Jonathan
    2011 Politicians and rhetoric: The persuasive power of metaphor. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230319899
     https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230319899 [Google Scholar]
  50. 2017 “Competition Metaphors and Ideology: Life as a Race.” InThe Routledge Handbook of Language and Politics, edited by Ruth Wodak and Bernhard Forchtner , 202–217. Routledge. 10.4324/9781315183718‑16
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315183718-16 [Google Scholar]
  51. 2018 Analysing political speeches: Rhetoric, discourse and metaphor. London: Palgrave.
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Chilton, Paul
    2003 “Deixis and distance: President Clinton’s justification of intervention in Kosovo.” InAt War with Words, edited by Mirjana N. Dedaic and Daniel N. Nelson , 95–126. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110897715.95
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110897715.95 [Google Scholar]
  53. 2005 “Vectors, viewpoint and viewpoint shift: Toward a Discourse Space Theory.” InAnnual Review of Cognitive Linguistics: Volume 3, edited by Francisco José Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez , 78–116. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/arcl.3.06chi
     https://doi.org/10.1075/arcl.3.06chi [Google Scholar]
  54. 2017 ““The people” in populist discourse: Using neuro-cognitive linguistics to understand political meanings.” Journal of Language and Politics16(4): 582–594. 10.1075/jlp.17031.chi
     https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.17031.chi [Google Scholar]
  55. Cienki, Alan
    1997 “Some Properties and Groupings of Image Schemas.” InAmsterdam Studies in the Theory and History of Linguistic Science. Series 4, Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, edited by Marjolijn H. Verspoor , Kee Dong Lee , and Eve Sweetser , 3–15. John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/cilt.150.04cie
     https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.150.04cie [Google Scholar]
  56. Clausner, Timothy C.
    2005 “Image Schema Paradoxes: Implications for Cognitive Semantics.” InImage Schemas in Cognitive Linguistics, edited by Beate Hampe , 93–112. De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110197532.1.93
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197532.1.93 [Google Scholar]
  57. Coe, Kevin
    2017 “Presidential Address.” InThe Oxford Handbook of Political Communication, edited by Kate Kenski and Kathleen Hall Jamieson . Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199793471.013.001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199793471.013.001 [Google Scholar]
  58. Cosgrove, Ken , and Nathan R. Shrader
    2022 “Political Branding in the USA Election of 2020.” InPolitical Branding in Turbulent Times, edited by Mona Moufahim , 33–50. Cham: Springer International Publishing. 10.1007/978‑3‑030‑83229‑2_3
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-83229-2_3 [Google Scholar]
  59. Crisp, Brian F. , Santiago Olivella , Michael Malecki , and Mindy Sher
    2013 “Vote-Earning Strategies in Flexible List Systems: Seats at the Price of Unity.” Electoral Studies32 (4): 658–669. 10.1016/j.electstud.2013.02.007
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2013.02.007 [Google Scholar]
  60. Crystal, David
    1989 Why did he say it?English Today5(1): 41–42. 10.1017/S0266078400003734
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266078400003734 [Google Scholar]
  61. 2008 A dictionary of linguistics and phonetics. London: Blackwell. 10.1002/9781444302776
     https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444302776 [Google Scholar]
  62. De Fina, Anna
    1995 “Pronominal Choice, Identity, and Solidarity in Political Discourse,” Text & Talk, 15 (3): 379–410. 10.1515/text.1.1995.15.3.379
     https://doi.org/10.1515/text.1.1995.15.3.379 [Google Scholar]
  63. Dickinson, Matthew J.
    2014 “The 2012 Presidential Election: Taking the ‘Fun’ Out of Fundamentals?” PS: Political Science & Politics 47 (2): 309–12.
     [Google Scholar]
  64. Domonkosi, Ágnes , and Zsófia Ludányi
    2018 “A Társas Deixis Szocializációs Mintái Az Óvodai Bábjátékban: Egy Óvodapedagógus-Képzésben Zajló Kísérlet Tanulságai.” InKutatás és Innováció a Kárpát-Medencei Oktatási Térben, edited by Péter Tóth , Enikő Maior , Kinga Horváth , András Kautnik , Jenő Duchon , and Bálint Sass , 488–505. Budapest: Óbudai Egyetem Trefort Ágoston Mérnökpedagógiai Központ.
     [Google Scholar]
  65. Druckman, James N. , Matthew J. Kifer , and Michael Parkin
    2009 “The Technological Development of Candidate Web Sites: How and Why Candidates Use Web Innovations.” InPoliticking Online: The Transformation of Election Campaign Communications, edited by Costas Panagopoulos , 21–47. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  66. Eagly, Alice H. and Steven J. Karau
    . “Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders.” Psychological review1093 (2002): 573–598. 10.1037/0033‑295X.109.3.573
     https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.109.3.573 [Google Scholar]
  67. Ellis, Richard
    1998 “Accepting the Nomination from Martin Van Buren to Franklin Delano Roosevelt.” InSpeaking to the People: The Rhetorical Presidency in Historical Perspective, edited by Richard Ellis , 113–133. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  68. Enli, Gunn Sara , and Eli Skogerbø
    2013 “Personalized Campaigns In Party-Centred Politics: Twitter and Facebook as Arenas for Political Communication.” Information, Communication & Society16 (5): 757–774. 10.1080/1369118X.2013.782330
     https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2013.782330 [Google Scholar]
  69. Erichsen, Kristen , Douglas Schrock , Benjamin Dowd-Arrow , and Pierce Dignam
    2020 “Bitchifying Hillary: Trump Supporters’ Vilification of Clinton during the 2016 Presidential Election.” Social Currents7 (6): 526–542. 10.1177/2329496520941022
     https://doi.org/10.1177/2329496520941022 [Google Scholar]
  70. Esser, Frank , and Jörg Matthes
    2013 “Mediatization Effects on Political News, Political Actors, Political Decisions, and Political Audiences.” InDemocracy in the Age of Globalization and Mediatization, edited by Hanspeter Kriesi , Sandra Lavenex , Frank Esser , Jörg Matthes , Marc Bühlmann , and Daniel Bochsler , 177–201. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK. 10.1057/9781137299871_8
     https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137299871_8 [Google Scholar]
  71. Evans, Vyvyan , and Melanie Green
    2006 Cognitive linguistics: An introduction. London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  72. Fairclough, Norman , and Anna Mauranen
    1997 “The Conversationalisation of Political Discourse.” Belgian Journal of Linguistics11 (December): 89–119. 10.1075/bjl.11.06fai
     https://doi.org/10.1075/bjl.11.06fai [Google Scholar]
  73. Farkas, Xénia , and Márton Bene
    2020 “Images, Politicians, and Social Media: Patterns and Effects of Politicians’ Image-Based Political Communication Strategies on Social Media.” The International Journal of Press/Politics26 (1): 119–142. 10.1177/1940161220959553
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161220959553 [Google Scholar]
  74. Farrell, David M. , and Paul Webb
    2002 “Political Parties as Campaign Organizations.” InParties Without Partisans, 102–128. Oxford University PressOxford. 10.1093/0199253099.003.0006
     https://doi.org/10.1093/0199253099.003.0006 [Google Scholar]
  75. Fauconnier, Gilles
    1994 Mental spaces: aspects of meaning construction in natural language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511624582
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511624582 [Google Scholar]
  76. 2012 “Mental Spaces.” InThe Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, edited by Dirk Geeraerts and Hubert Cuyckens , Oxford Handbooks. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199738632.013.0014
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199738632.013.0014 [Google Scholar]
  77. Fetzer, Anita
    2008 “‘And I Think That Is a Very Straightforward Way of Dealing With It’: The Communicative Function of Cognitive Verbs in Political Discourse.” Journal of Language and Social Psychology27 (4): 384–396. 10.1177/0261927X08322481
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X08322481 [Google Scholar]
  78. 2014 “I Think, I Mean and I Believe in Political Discourse.” Functions of Language21 (1): 67–94. 10.1075/fol.21.1.05fet
     https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.21.1.05fet [Google Scholar]
  79. Fetzer, Anita , and Peter Bull
    2008 “‘Well, I Answer It by Simply Inviting You to Look at the Evidence.’” Journal of Language and Politics7 (2): 271–289. 10.1075/jlp.7.2.05fet
     https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.7.2.05fet [Google Scholar]
  80. Filardo-Llamas, Laura
    2013 “‘Committed to the ideals of 1916’. The language of paramilitary groups: the case of the Irish Republican Army.” Critical Discourse Studies10 (1): 1–17. 10.1080/17405904.2012.736396
     https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2012.736396 [Google Scholar]
  81. Filardo-Llamas, Laura , Christopher Hart , and Bertie Kaal
    2015 “Introduction for the special issue on space, time and evaluation in ideological discourse.” Critical Discourse Studies12 (3): 235–237. 10.1080/17405904.2015.1013480
     https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2015.1013480 [Google Scholar]
  82. Fillmore, Charles J.
    1971 “Toward a Theory of Deixis.” The PCCLLU Papers3/4: 219–241.
     [Google Scholar]
  83. 1975 Santa Cruz Lectures on Deixis. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Linguistics Club.
     [Google Scholar]
  84. 1997 Lectures on Deixis. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
     [Google Scholar]
  85. Fludernik, Monika
    2003 The Fictions of Language and the Languages of Fiction. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203451007
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203451007 [Google Scholar]
  86. Frank, Roslyn M.
    2008 “Introduction: Sociocultural Situatedness.” In, edited by Roslyn M. Frank , René Dirven , Tom Ziemke , and Enrique Bernárdez , 1–20. De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110199116
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110199116 [Google Scholar]
  87. Frantz, Erica , Andrea Kendall-Taylor , Carisa Nietsche , and Joseph Wright
    2021 “How Personalist Politics Is Changing Democracies.” Journal of Democracy32 (3): 94–108. 10.1353/jod.2021.0036
     https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2021.0036 [Google Scholar]
  88. Gaddini, Katie , and Lucia Figueras-Pont
    2024 “Last Word: Why Kamala Harris Lost.” Political Insight15 (4): 32. 10.1177/20419058241305494
     https://doi.org/10.1177/20419058241305494 [Google Scholar]
  89. Garzia, Diego
    2014 Personalization of politics and electoral change. Palgrave Macmillan.
     [Google Scholar]
  90. 2017 “Personalization of Politics Between Television and the Internet: Leader Effects in the 2013 Italian Parliamentary Election.” Journal of Information Technology & Politics14 (4): 403–416. 10.1080/19331681.2017.1365265
     https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2017.1365265 [Google Scholar]
  91. Garzia, Diego , and Frederico Ferreira da Silva
    2021 “Negative Personalization and Voting Behavior in 14 Parliamentary Democracies, 1961–2018.” Electoral Studies71 (June): 102300. 10.1016/j.electstud.2021.102300
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2021.102300 [Google Scholar]
  92. Garzia, Diego , Frederico Ferreira da Silva , and Andrea de Angelis
    2021 Leaders without Partisans : Dealignment, Media Change, and the Personalization of Politics. ECPR Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  93. Garzia, Diego , and Frederico Ferreira da Silva
    2022 “The Electoral Consequences of Affective Polarization? Negative Voting in the 2020 US Presidential Election.” American Politics Research50(3): 303–311. 10.1177/1532673X221074633
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X221074633 [Google Scholar]
  94. Geise, Stephanie , Katharina Maubach , and Alena Boettcher Eli
    2024 “Picture Me in Person: Personalization and Emotionalization as Political Campaign Strategies on Social Media in the German Federal Election Period 2021.” New Media & Society, March, 14614448231224032. 10.1177/14614448231224031
     https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448231224031 [Google Scholar]
  95. Gibbs, Raymond W., Jr.
    2005 Embodiment and Cognitive Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511805844
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511805844 [Google Scholar]
  96. Gibbs Jr., Raymond W. , Dinara A. Beitel , Michael Harrington , and Paul E. Sanders
    1994 “Taking a Stand on the Meanings of Stand: Bodily Experience as Motivation for Polysemy.” Journal of Semantics11 (4): 231–251. 10.1093/jos/11.4.231
     https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/11.4.231 [Google Scholar]
  97. Gibbs, Raymond W. , and Herbert L. Colston
    1995 “The Cognitive Psychological Reality of Image Schemas and Their Transformations,” Cognitive Linguistics, 6 (4): 347–378. 10.1515/cogl.1995.6.4.347
     https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1995.6.4.347 [Google Scholar]
  98. Giles, David C.
    2002 “Parasocial Interaction: A Review of the Literature and a Model for Future Research.” Media Psychology4 (3): 279–305. 10.1207/S1532785XMEP0403_04
     https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532785XMEP0403_04 [Google Scholar]
  99. Goddard, Cliff , and Anna Wierzbicka
    2021 “‘We’: Conceptual Semantics, Linguistic Typology and Social Cognition.” Language Sciences83 (January): 101327. 10.1016/j.langsci.2020.101327
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2020.101327 [Google Scholar]
  100. Goffman, Erving
    1976 “Replies and Responses.” Language in Society5 (3): 257–313. 10.1017/S0047404500007156
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500007156 [Google Scholar]
  101. Golway, Terry
    2012 American Political Speeches. London: Penguin Books.
     [Google Scholar]
  102. Goodwin, Doris Kearns
    1994 No Ordinary Time: Franklin and Eleanor Roosevelt: The Home Front in World War II. New York: Simon & Schuster.
     [Google Scholar]
  103. Graham, Todd , Daniel Jackson , and Marcel Broersma
    2018 “The Personal in the Political on Twitter: Towards a Typology of Politicians’ Personalized Tweeting Behaviours.” InManaging Democracy in the Digital Age: Internet Regulation, Social Media Use, and Online Civic Engagement, edited by Julia Schwanholz , Todd Graham , and Peter-Tobias Stoll , 137–157. Cham: Springer International Publishing. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑61708‑4_8
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61708-4_8 [Google Scholar]
  104. Grady, Joseph
    1997 Foundations of Meaning: Primary Metaphors and Primary Scenes. PhD diss., University of California, Berkeley.
  105. Gries, Stefan Th
    2010 “Useful Statistics for Corpus Linguistics.” InA Mosaic of Corpus Linguistics: Selected Approaches, edited by Aquilino Sánchez Pérez and Moisés Almela Sánchez , 269–291. Bern: Peter Lang.
     [Google Scholar]
  106. Haßler, Jörg , Anna-Katharina Wurst , and Katharina Pohl
    2024 “Politicians over Issues? Visual Personalization in Three Instagram Election Campaigns.” Information, Communication & Society27 (5): 815–35. 10.1080/1369118X.2023.2227684
     https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2023.2227684 [Google Scholar]
  107. Hahn, Dan
    1970 “The Effect of Television on Presidential Campaigns.” Today’s Speech18 (2): 4–17. 10.1080/01463377009368930
     https://doi.org/10.1080/01463377009368930 [Google Scholar]
  108. Hall, Louise
    2020 “One Quarter Kamala Harris Nomination Coverage Included Racist or Sexist Stereotypes, Report Says.” The Independent, October 6, 2020. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-election/kamala-harris-sexism-racism-vp-debate-2020-election-b837342.html
     [Google Scholar]
  109. Halliday, M. A. K. , and Ruqaiya Hasan
    1976 Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
     [Google Scholar]
  110. Halmari, Helena
    2008 “On the Language of the Clinton-Dole Presidential Campaign Debates.” Journal of Language and Politics7 (2): 247–270. 10.1075/jlp.7.2.04hal
     https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.7.2.04hal [Google Scholar]
  111. Hampe, Beate
    2005 “Image Schemas in Cognitive Linguistics: Introduction.” InImage Schemas in Cognitive Linguistics, edited by Beate Hampe , 1–14. De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110197532.0.1
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197532.0.1 [Google Scholar]
  112. Hamřík, Lukáš
    2020 “Is There Any ‘Price’ for Making Individual EU Politicians More Important? The Personalization of Politics in the European Commission.” Journal of European Integration43 (4): 403–420. 10.1080/07036337.2020.1784154
     https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2020.1784154 [Google Scholar]
  113. Hart, Christopher
    2014 Discourse, Grammar and Ideology: Functional and Cognitive Perspectives. London: Bloomsbury.
     [Google Scholar]
  114. Hart, Roderick P.
    1999 Seducing America: How television charms the modern voter. SAGE. 10.4135/9781452243375
     https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452243375 [Google Scholar]
  115. Holbrook, Thomas
    1996 Do campaigns matter?SAGE. 10.4135/9781452243825
     https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452243825 [Google Scholar]
  116. Holloway, Richard
    2008 “Conventions, Political.” InEncyclopedia of Political Communication, vol.1, edited by Lynda Lee Kaid and Christina Holtz-Bacha , 135–138. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications. 10.4135/9781412953993.n122
     https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412953993.n122 [Google Scholar]
  117. Holtz-Bacha, Christina
    2004 “Germany: How the Private Life of Politicians Got into the Media.” Parliamentary Affairs57 (1): 41–52.
     [Google Scholar]
  118. 2008a “Americanization.” InEncyclopedia of Political Communication, vol.1, edited by Lynda Lee Kaid and Christina Holtz-Bacha , 32–33. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications. 10.4135/9781412953993.n542
     https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412953993.n542 [Google Scholar]
  119. 2008b “Professionalization.” InEncyclopedia of Political Communication, vol.1, edited by Lynda Lee Kaid and Christina Holtz-Bacha , 657–658. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications. 10.4135/9781412953993.n542
     https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412953993.n542 [Google Scholar]
  120. Holtz-Bacha, Christina , Ana Ines Langer , and Susanne Merkle
    2014 “The Personalization of Politics in Comparative Perspective: Campaign Coverage in Germany and the United Kingdom.” European Journal of Communication29 (2): 153–170. 10.1177/0267323113516727
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323113516727 [Google Scholar]
  121. Horváth, Balázs
    2024 “Retúrjegy a „miénktől” az „enyémig”. A politikai perszonalizáció vizsgálata Orbán Viktor televíziós interjúiban a személyes névmások elemzésén keresztül.” InUtak a nyelvhasználat kutatásában I., edited by Emese Borissza , Zsófia Gömbös , Kata Heller , Anett Osztroluczki , Orsolya Ruzsits , and Sára Török , 35–50. Utak a nyelvhasználat kutatásában ; 1. Budapest: ELTE BTK Alkalmazott nyelvészeti diákműhely.
     [Google Scholar]
  122. Horváth, Péter , Gábor Simon , and Szilárd Tátrai
    2021 “A Lírai Személyjelölés Konstrukcióinak Annotálási Elveiről.” InLíra, Poétika, Diskurzus, edited by Krisztina Laczkó and Szilárd Tátrai , 133–164. Budapest: ELTE Eötvös József Collegium.
     [Google Scholar]
  123. Horton, Donald , and R. Richard Wohl
    1956 “Mass Communication and Para-Social Interaction: Observations on Intimacy at a Distance.” Psychiatry19 (3): 215–229. 10.1080/00332747.1956.11023049
     https://doi.org/10.1080/00332747.1956.11023049 [Google Scholar]
  124. Howard, Anthony
    2008 “State of the Union Address.” InEncyclopedia of Political Communication, vol.1, edited by Lynda Lee Kaid and Christine Holtz-Bacha , 762–763. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications. 10.4135/9781412953993.n644
     https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412953993.n644 [Google Scholar]
  125. Huang, Yan
    2014 Pragmatics (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  126. H Varga, Márta
    2017 “Kic és mic vogmuc? A többes számú első személyű nyelvi formák funkcionális vizsgálata.” THL2 (1–2): 133–144.
     [Google Scholar]
  127. Íñigo-Mora, Isabel
    2004 “On the Use of the Personal Pronoun We in Communities.” Journal of Language and Politics3 (1): 27–52. 10.1075/jlp.3.1.05ini
     https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.3.1.05ini [Google Scholar]
  128. Jamieson, Kathleen Hall
    1995 Beyond the double bind: Women and leadership. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780195089400.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195089400.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  129. Janney, Richard W.
    2002 “Cotext as Context: Vague Answers in Court.” Language & Communication22 (4): 457–475. 10.1016/S0271‑5309(02)00020‑4
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0271-5309(02)00020-4 [Google Scholar]
  130. Jobst, Ágnes
    2007 A mi mint a hatalom és a szolidaritás névmása. Magyar Nyelvőr131(1): 29–47.
     [Google Scholar]
  131. 2010 A nyelv kisajátítása. A második világháború utáni média elemzése szótárral és szövegmutatványokkal. Budapest: Tinta Könyvkiadó.
     [Google Scholar]
  132. Johnson, Mark
    1987 The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226177847.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226177847.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  133. 2005 “The Philosophical Significance of Image Schemas.” InImage Schemas in Cognitive Linguistics, edited by Beate Hampe , 15–34. De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110197532.1.15
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197532.1.15 [Google Scholar]
  134. 2017 Embodied mind, meaning, and reason: How our bodies give rise to understanding. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226500393.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226500393.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  135. Jost, John T. , and Joanna Sterling
    2020 “The Language of Politics: Ideological Differences in Congressional Communication on Social Media and the Floor of Congress.” Social Influence15 (2–4): 80–103. 10.1080/15534510.2020.1871403
     https://doi.org/10.1080/15534510.2020.1871403 [Google Scholar]
  136. Jost, Pablo
    2022 “How Politicians Adapt to New Media Logic. A Longitudinal Perspective on Accommodation to User-Engagement on Facebook.” Journal of Information Technology & Politics20 (2): 184–197. 10.1080/19331681.2022.2076271
     https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2022.2076271 [Google Scholar]
  137. Jurkowitz, Mark , Amy Mitchell , Elisa Shearer , and Mason Walker
    2020 “U.S. Media Polarization and the 2020 Election: A Nation Divided.” Pew Research Center. Pew Research Center. January24. https://www.pewresearch.org/journalism/2020/01/24/u-s-media-polarization-and-the-2020-election-a-nation-divided/
     [Google Scholar]
  138. Kalinauskas, Ava
    2024 “Trump Is Plain “Weird”: How Kamala Harris’ Meme-Fied Campaign Is Leveraging Social Media and Gen Z Culture.” The Conversation, August 1, 2024. https://theconversation.com/trump-is-plain-weird-how-kamala-harris-meme-fied-campaign-is-leveraging-social-media-and-gen-z-culture-235779
     [Google Scholar]
  139. Karapetjana, Indra
    2011 Pronominal choice in political interviews. Baltic Journal of English Language, Literature and Culture1(1): 36–45. 10.22364/BJELLC.01.2011.05
     https://doi.org/10.22364/BJELLC.01.2011.05 [Google Scholar]
  140. Karvonen, Laurie
    2010 The personalisation of politics: a study of parliamentary democracies. ECPR Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  141. Keeter, Scott
    1987 “The Illusion of Intimacy Television and The Role of Candidate Personal Qualities in Voter Choice.” Public Opinion Quarterly51 (3): 344–358. 10.1086/269040
     https://doi.org/10.1086/269040 [Google Scholar]
  142. Kernell, Samuel
    2007 Going public: new strategies of presidential leadership. CQ Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  143. Kimmel, Michael
    2005 “Culture Regained: Situated and Compound Image Schemas.” InImage Schemas in Cognitive Linguistics, edited by Beate Hampe , 285–312. De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110197532.4.285
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197532.4.285 [Google Scholar]
  144. Kirkpatrick, Samuel A. , William Lyons , and Michael R. Fitzgerald
    1975 “Candidates, Parties, and Issues in The American Electorate Two Decades of Change.” American Politics Quarterly3 (3): 247–283. 10.1177/1532673X7500300303
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X7500300303 [Google Scholar]
  145. Kiss, Balázs
    2003 “Kampány és Tabloidizáció — A Perszonalizáció Jelensége.” InKampánykommunikáció, edited by Erika Sárközy and Nóra Schleicher , 9–41. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.
     [Google Scholar]
  146. Kitagawa, Chisato , and Adrienne Lehrer
    1990 “Impersonal Uses of Personal Pronouns.” Journal of Pragmatics14 (5): 739–759. 10.1016/0378‑2166(90)90004‑W
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(90)90004-W [Google Scholar]
  147. Klinger, Ulrike , and Jakob Svensson
    2015 “The Emergence of Network Media Logic in Political Communication: A Theoretical Approach.” New Media and Society17 (8): 1241–57. 10.1177/1461444814522952
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814522952 [Google Scholar]
  148. Knuckey, Jonathan , and Adrienne Mathews
    2024 “Racial Resentment, Sexism, and Evaluations of Kamala Harris in the 2020 U.S. Presidential Election.” Social Science Quarterly105 (4): 1266–79. 10.1111/ssqu.13405
     https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.13405 [Google Scholar]
  149. Kövecses, Zoltán
    1995 “American Friendship and the Scope of Metaphor,” Cognitive Linguistics, 6 (4): 315–346. 10.1515/cogl.1995.6.4.315
     https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1995.6.4.315 [Google Scholar]
  150. 2000 American English: An introduction. Broadview Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  151. Kövecses, Zoltán
    2006 Language, mind, and culture: A practical introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  152. Kövecses, Zoltán
    2010 Metaphor: A practical introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  153. 2015 Where metaphors come from: Reconsidering context in metaphor. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190224868.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190224868.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  154. Kövecses, Zoltán and Réka Benczes
    2010 Kognitív nyelvészet. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.
     [Google Scholar]
  155. Kövecses, Zoltán , and Günter Radden
    1998 “Metonymy: Developing a Cognitive Linguistic View,” Cognitive Linguistics, 9 (1): 37–78. 10.1515/cogl.1998.9.1.37
     https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1998.9.1.37 [Google Scholar]
  156. Kreis, Ramona
    2017 “The ‘Tweet Politics’ of President Trump.” Journal of Language and Politics16 (4): 607–618. 10.1075/jlp.17032.kre
     https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.17032.kre [Google Scholar]
  157. Kriesi, Hanspeter
    2011 “Personalization of National Election Campaigns.” Party Politics18 (6): 825–844. 10.1177/1354068810389643
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068810389643 [Google Scholar]
  158. Kruikemeier, Sanne , Guda van Noort , Rens Vliegenthart , and Claes H de Vreese
    2013 “Getting Closer: The Effects of Personalized and Interactive Online Political Communication.” European Journal of Communication28 (1): 53–66. 10.1177/0267323112464837
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323112464837 [Google Scholar]
  159. Krzeszowski, Tomasz
    2011 “The Axiological Parameter in Preconceptional Image Schemata.” InConceptualizations and Mental Processing in Language, edited by René Geiger and Brygida Rudzka-Ostyn , 307–330. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110857108.307
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110857108.307 [Google Scholar]
  160. Kuna, Ágnes
    2016 Személydeixis és önreprezentáció az orvos-beteg találkozáson. Magyar Nyelvőr140(3): 316–332.
     [Google Scholar]
  161. Laczkó, Krisztina
    2001 Névmás és referencia. Magyar Nyelvőr125(1): 102–107.
     [Google Scholar]
  162. Laczkó, Krisztina , and Szilárd Tátrai
    2012 “Személyek és/vagy Dolgok: A Harmadik Személyű és a Mutató Névmási Deixis a Magyarban.” InKonstrukció és Jelentés: Tanulmányok a Magyar Nyelv Funkcionális Kognitív Leírására, edited by Szilárd Tátrai and Gábor Tolcsvai Nagy , 231–257. Budapest: ELTE.
     [Google Scholar]
  163. 2015 “„Évek óta mást se csinálunk.” A Többes Szám Első Személyű Deiktikus Elemek Működésének Vizsgálatához.” InA Nyelv Dimenziói: Tanulmányok Juhász Dezső Tiszteletére, edited by János Bárth , Csaba Bodó , and Zsófia Kocsis , 501–514. Budapest: ELTE BTK Magyar Nyelvtudományi és Finnugor Intézet.
     [Google Scholar]
  164. Lakoff, George
    1987 Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Tell Us About the Nature of Thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  165. Lakoff, George , and Mark Johnson
    1980/2003 Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  166. 1999 Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western Thought. New York: Basic Books.
     [Google Scholar]
  167. Lakoff, George , and Rafael E. Núñez
    2000 Where Mathematics Comes From: How the Embodied Mind Brings Mathematics into Being. New York: Basic Books.
     [Google Scholar]
  168. Lakoff, Robin
    1974 “Remarks on ‘This’ and ‘That’.” Papers from the Regional Meeting, Chicago Linguistic Society10: 345–356.
     [Google Scholar]
  169. 1990 Talking Power: The Politics of Language in Our Lives. New York: Basic Books.
     [Google Scholar]
  170. Lang, Kurt , and Gladys E. Lang
    1957 “Television and the Intimate View of Politics.” Journal of Broadcasting1, no.1: 47–55. 10.1207/s15506878jobem0101_8
     https://doi.org/10.1207/s15506878jobem0101_8 [Google Scholar]
  171. Langacker, Ronald W.
    2007 “Constructing the Meanings of Personal Pronouns.” InAspects of Meaning Construction, edited by Günter Radden , Klaus-Michael Köpcke , Thomas Berg , and Peter Siemund , 171–187. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/z.136.12lan
     https://doi.org/10.1075/z.136.12lan [Google Scholar]
  172. Langer, Ana Inés
    2007 “A Historical Exploration of the Personalisation of Politics in the Print Media: The British Prime Ministers (1945–1999).” Parliamentary Affairs60 (3): 371–387. 10.1093/pa/gsm028
     https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsm028 [Google Scholar]
  173. 2009 “The Politicization of Private Persona: Exceptional Leaders or the New Rule? The Case of the United Kingdom and the Blair Effect.” The International Journal of Press/Politics15 (1): 60–76. 10.1177/1940161209351003
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161209351003 [Google Scholar]
  174. Langer, John
    1981 “Television’s ‘Personality System.’” Media, Culture & Society3 (4): 351–365. 10.1177/016344378100300405
     https://doi.org/10.1177/016344378100300405 [Google Scholar]
  175. Lee, Jayeon , and Young-shin Lim
    2016 “Gendered Campaign Tweets: The Cases of Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump.” Public Relations Review42 (5): 849–855. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2016.07.004
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2016.07.004 [Google Scholar]
  176. Levinson, Stephen C.
    1983 Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511813313
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813313 [Google Scholar]
  177. 2004 “Deixis.” InThe Handbook of Pragmatics, edited by Laurence R. Horn and Gregory L. Ward , 97–121. London: Blackwell. 10.1002/9780470756959.ch5
     https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470756959.ch5 [Google Scholar]
  178. Lindsay, James M.
    2024 “Election 2024: Kamala Harris Makes Her Case to the Nation.” Council on Foreign Relations. AccessedAugust 24, 2024. https://www.cfr.org/blog/election-2024-kamala-harris-makes-her-case-nation
     [Google Scholar]
  179. Littlemore, Jeannette
    2019 Metaphors in the Mind: Sources of Variation in Embodied Metaphor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108241441
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108241441 [Google Scholar]
  180. Liu, Amy H.
    2022 “Pronoun Usage as a Measure of Power Personalization: A General Theory with Evidence from the Chinese-Speaking World.” British Journal of Political Science52 (3): 1258–75. 10.1017/S0007123421000181
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123421000181 [Google Scholar]
  181. Louden, Andrew
    2008 “Presidential Communication.” InEncyclopedia of Political Communication, edited by Lynda Lee Kaid and Christina Holtz-Bacha , vol.1, 632–639. SAGE Publications. 10.4135/9781412953993.n531
     https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412953993.n531 [Google Scholar]
  182. Lukács, Ákos , and V. Zoltán Szamarasz
    2014 “Téri Nyelv.” InPszicholingvisztika [Psycholinguistics], edited by Csaba Pléh and Ákos Lukács , vol.2, 877–917. Akadémiai Kiadó. 10.1556/9789630594998
     https://doi.org/10.1556/9789630594998 [Google Scholar]
  183. Lyons, John
    1977 Semantics (Vol.2). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  184. Mair, Peter , Wolfgang C. Müller , and Fritz Plasser
    2004 “Conclusion: Political Parties in Changing Electoral Markets.” InPolitical Parties and Electoral Change Party Responses to Electoral Markets, edited by Peter Mair , Wolfgang C. Müller , and Fritz Plasser , 264–274. SAGE. ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/monash/detail.action?docID=254613. 10.4135/9781446216224.n10
     https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446216224.n10 [Google Scholar]
  185. Maitland, Karen , and John Wilson
    1987 “Pronominal Selection and Ideological Conflict.” Journal of Pragmatics11 (4): 495–512. 10.1016/0378‑2166(87)90092‑0
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(87)90092-0 [Google Scholar]
  186. Mancini, Paolo , and David L. Swanson
    1996 “Politics, Media, and Modern Democracy: Introduction.” InPolitics, Media, and Modern Democracy: An International Study of Innovations in Electoral Campaigning and Their Consequences, edited by David L. Swanson and Paolo Mancini , 1–28. Westport, CT: Praeger. 10.5040/9798400698873.ch‑001
     https://doi.org/10.5040/9798400698873.ch-001 [Google Scholar]
  187. Marino, Bruno , Nicola Martocchia Diodati , and Luca Verzichelli
    2022 “The Personalization of Party Politics in Western Europe (1985–2016): Evidence from an Expert Survey.” Acta Politica57 (3): 571–596. 10.1057/s41269‑021‑00210‑x
     https://doi.org/10.1057/s41269-021-00210-x [Google Scholar]
  188. Marmaridou, Sophia
    2000 Pragmatic Meaning and Cognition. Amsterdam/New York: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.72
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.72 [Google Scholar]
  189. Matthews, Justin L. , and Teenie Matlock
    2011 “Understanding the Link Between Spatial Distance and Social Distance.” Social Psychology42 (3): 185–192. 10.1027/1864‑9335/a000062
     https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000062 [Google Scholar]
  190. Mazzoleni, Gianpietro
    2000 “A Return to Civic and Political Engagement Prompted by Personalized Political Leadership?” Political Communication17 (4): 325–328. 10.1080/10584600050178915
     https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600050178915 [Google Scholar]
  191. Mazzoleni, Gianpietro , and Winfried Schulz
    1999 “‘Mediatization’ of Politics: A Challenge for Democracy?” Political Communication16 (3): 247–261. 10.1080/105846099198613
     https://doi.org/10.1080/105846099198613 [Google Scholar]
  192. Mayer, William G.
    2013 “How the Romney Campaign Blew It,” The Forum, 10 (4): 40–50. 10.1515/forum‑2013‑0005
     https://doi.org/10.1515/forum-2013-0005 [Google Scholar]
  193. Mayobre, José A.
    1996 “Politics, Media, and Modern Democracy: The Case of Venezuela.” InPolitics, Media, and Modern Democracy: An International Study of Innovations in Electoral Campaigning and Their Consequences, edited by David L. Swanson and Paolo Mancini , 227–245. Westport: Praeger. 10.5040/9798400698873.ch‑012
     https://doi.org/10.5040/9798400698873.ch-012 [Google Scholar]
  194. McAllister, Ian
    2007 “The Personalization of Politics.” InThe Oxford Handbook of Political Behavior, edited by J. Dalton Russell and Hans-Dieter Klingemann , 571–588. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199270125.003.0030
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199270125.003.0030 [Google Scholar]
  195. 2015a “Political Leaders in Westminster Systems.” InPolitical Leaders and Democratic Elections, edited by Kees Aarts , André Blais , and Hermann Schmitt , 52–75. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199259007.003.0004
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199259007.003.0004 [Google Scholar]
  196. 2015b “The Personalization of Politics in Australia.” Party Politics21, no.3: 337–345. 10.1177/1354068813487111
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068813487111 [Google Scholar]
  197. McGregor, Shannon C.
    2017 “Personalization, Social Media, and Voting: Effects of Candidate Self-Personalization on Vote Intention.” New Media & Society20 (3): 1139–60. 10.1177/1461444816686103
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816686103 [Google Scholar]
  198. McGregor, Shannon C. , Regina G. Lawrence , and Arielle Cardona
    2016 “Personalization, Gender, and Social Media: Gubernatorial Candidates’ Social Media Strategies.” Information Communication and Society20 (2): 264–283. 10.1080/1369118X.2016.1167228
     https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1167228 [Google Scholar]
  199. Meeks, Lindsey
    2017 “Getting Personal: Effects of Twitter Personalization on Candidate Evaluations.” Politics and Gender. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/S1743923X16000696
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X16000696 [Google Scholar]
  200. Metcalf, Allan
    2004 Presidential Voices: Speaking Styles from George Washington to George W. Bush. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
     [Google Scholar]
  201. Metz, Manon , Sanne Kruikemeier , and Sophie Lecheler
    2019 “Personalization of Politics on Facebook: Examining the Content and Effects of Professional, Emotional and Private Self-Personalization.” Information, Communication & Society23 (10): 1481–98. 10.1080/1369118X.2019.1581244
     https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2019.1581244 [Google Scholar]
  202. Mochmann, Ines C. , and Wolfgang Zenk-Möltgen
    2005 “Appendix 2: The European Voter Data Base.” InThe European Voter: A Comparative Study of Modern Democracies, edited by Jacques Thomassen , 309–312. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/0199273219.005.0003
     https://doi.org/10.1093/0199273219.005.0003 [Google Scholar]
  203. Moufahim, Mona
    2022 “Introduction: Political Branding in Turbulent Times.” InPolitical Branding in Turbulent Times, 1–7. Cham: Springer International Publishing. 10.1007/978‑3‑030‑83229‑2_1
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-83229-2_1 [Google Scholar]
  204. Moy, Patricia , Gianpietro Mazzoleni , and Hernán Rojas
    2012 “On the Dichotomies of Political Communication.” International Journal of Communication6: 241–246.
     [Google Scholar]
  205. Nave, Nir Noon , Limor Shifman , and Keren Tenenboim-Weinblatt
    2018 “Talking It Personally: Features of Successful Political Posts on Facebook.” Social Media and Society4 (3). 10.1177/2056305118784771
     https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305118784771 [Google Scholar]
  206. Norris, Pippa
    2000 A Virtuous Circle. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511609343
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511609343 [Google Scholar]
  207. Negrine, Ralph
    2016 “Americanization.” InThe International Encyclopedia of Political Communication, edited by Gianpietro Mazzoleni , 1–5. John Wiley & Sons. 10.1002/9781118541555.wbiepc005
     https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118541555.wbiepc005 [Google Scholar]
  208. Oakley, Todd
    2010 “Image Schemas.” InThe Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, edited by Dirk Geeraerts and Hubert Cuyckens . Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199738632.013.0009
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199738632.013.0009 [Google Scholar]
  209. Ohr, David
    2015 “Changing patterns in political communication.” InPolitical Leaders and Democratic Elections, edited by Kees Aarts , André Blais , and Hermann Schmitt , 11–34. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199259007.003.0002
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199259007.003.0002 [Google Scholar]
  210. Ohr, David , and Henrik Oscarsson
    2015 “Leader Traits, Leader Image and Vote Choice.” InPolitical Leaders and Democratic Elections, edited by Kees Aarts , André Blais , and Hermann Schmitt , 187–219. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199259007.003.0011
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199259007.003.0011 [Google Scholar]
  211. O’Keeffe, Anne , Brian Clancy , and Susan Adolphs
    2011 Introducing Pragmatics in Use. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203830949
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203830949 [Google Scholar]
  212. O’Kruk, Amy , and Curt Merrill
    2023 “Tracking Donald Trump’s Indictments.” CNN. AccessedAugust 24, 2024. https://edition.cnn.com/interactive/2023/07/politics/trump-indictments-criminal-cases/
     [Google Scholar]
  213. Olsson, Eva-Karin
    2017 “How Journalists Portray Political Leaders: The Personalization of Prime Ministers and the Connection to Party Affiliation in Swedish News Coverage.” InPutting a Face on It: Individual Exposure and Subjectivity in Journalism, edited by Birgitte Kjos Fonn , Harald Hornmoen , Nathalie Hyde-Clark , and Yngve Benestad Hågvar , 99–119. Cappelen Damm Akademisk/NOASP (Nordic Open Access Scholarly Publishing). 10.23865/noasp.28
     https://doi.org/10.23865/noasp.28 [Google Scholar]
  214. Otto, Lukas , and Michaela Maier
    2016 “Mediated and Moderated Effects of Personalized Political Communication on Political Trust,” Communications, 41 (1): 21–45. 10.1515/commun‑2015‑0028
     https://doi.org/10.1515/commun-2015-0028 [Google Scholar]
  215. Pakulski, Jacek , and András Körösényi
    2012 Toward Leader Democracy. London: Anthem Press. 10.7135/UPO9781843317715
     https://doi.org/10.7135/UPO9781843317715 [Google Scholar]
  216. Papp, Zsófia
    2013 Kampány-perszonalizáció Magyarországon a képviselők szemével: Személy-és választókerület-központúság pártközpontú választási rendszerekben. Politikatudományi Szemle22(4): 37–56.
     [Google Scholar]
  217. Papp, Zsófia , and Burtejin Zorigt
    2016 “Party-Directed Personalisation: The Role of Candidate Selection in Campaign Personalisation in Hungary.” East European Politics32 (4): 466–486. 10.1080/21599165.2016.1215303
     https://doi.org/10.1080/21599165.2016.1215303 [Google Scholar]
  218. Parmelee, John H. , Stephynie C. Perkins , and Berrin Beasley
    2022 “Personalization of Politicians on Instagram: What Generation Z Wants to See in Political Posts.” Information, Communication & Society26 (9): 1773–88. 10.1080/1369118X.2022.2027500
     https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2022.2027500 [Google Scholar]
  219. Passarelli, Gianluca
    2015 “Parties’ Genetic Features: The Missing Link in the Presidentialization of Parties.” InThe Presidentialization of Political Parties: Organizations, Institutions and Leaders, edited by Gianluca Passarelli , 1–25. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK. 10.1057/9781137482464_1
     https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137482464_1 [Google Scholar]
  220. Pavlidou, Theodossia-Soula
    2014 “Constructing Collectivity with ‘We’: An Introduction.” InPragmatics & beyond. New Series, edited by Theodossia-Soula Pavlidou , 1–20. 10.1075/pbns.239.03pav
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.239.03pav [Google Scholar]
  221. Pedersen, Helene Helboe , and Gideon Rahat
    2019 “Political Personalization and Personalized Politics within and beyond the Behavioural Arena.” Party Politics27 (2): 211–219. 10.1177/1354068819855712
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068819855712 [Google Scholar]
  222. Peña-Cervel, María Sandra , and Francisco José Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez
    2022 Figuring out Figuration: A Cognitive Linguistic Account. Vol.14. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/ftl.14
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ftl.14 [Google Scholar]
  223. Pennycook, Alastair
    1994 “The Politics of Pronouns.” ELT Journal48 (2): 173–178. 10.1093/elt/48.2.173
     https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/48.2.173 [Google Scholar]
  224. Perloff, Richard M.
    1998 Political Communication: Politics, Press, and Public in America. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 10.4324/9780203811832
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203811832 [Google Scholar]
  225. 1999 “Elite, Popular, and Merchandised Politics: Historical Origins of Presidential Campaign Marketing.” InHandbook of Political Marketing, edited by Bruce I. Newman , 19–40. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
     [Google Scholar]
  226. 2014 The Dynamics of Political Communication: Media and Politics in a Digital Age. 1st ed.London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203115312
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203115312 [Google Scholar]
  227. 2021 The Dynamics of Political Communication: Media and Politics in a Digital Age. 3rd ed.London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780429298851
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429298851 [Google Scholar]
  228. Petersoo, Pille
    2007 “What Does ‘We’ Mean?” Journal of Language and Politics6 (3): 419–436. 10.1075/jlp.6.3.08pet
     https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.6.3.08pet [Google Scholar]
  229. Pinkleton, Bruce
    2008 “Negative Campaigning.” InEncyclopedia of Political Communication, edited by Lynda Lee Kaid and Christina Holtz-Bacha , vol.1, 489–489. SAGE Publications. 10.4135/9781412953993.n432
     https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412953993.n432 [Google Scholar]
  230. Plasser, Fritz
    2008 “Political Consulting Worldwide.” InRoutledge Handbook of Political Management, edited by David W. Johnson , 40–57. Routledge. 10.4324/9780203892138
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203892138 [Google Scholar]
  231. Plasser, Fritz , and Gerald Lengauer
    2008 “Television Campaigning Worldwide.” InRoutledge Handbook of Political Management, edited by David W. Johnson , 253–271. Routledge. 10.4324/9780203892138
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203892138 [Google Scholar]
  232. Polsby, Nelson , Aaron Wildavsky , Steven Schier , and David Hopkins
    2016 Presidential Elections: Strategies and Structures of American Politics. Rowman & Littlefield.
     [Google Scholar]
  233. Encyclopædia Britannica
    Encyclopædia Britannica 2024 “Primary Election.” Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc.AccessedSeptember 1, 2024. https://www.britannica.com/topic/primary-election
     [Google Scholar]
  234. Proctor, Katarzyna , and Lily I.Wen Su
    2011 “The 1st Person Plural in Political Discourse — American Politicians in Interviews and in a Debate.” Journal of Pragmatics43 (13): 3251–66. 10.1016/j.pragma.2011.06.010
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2011.06.010 [Google Scholar]
  235. Pruysers, Scott , and William Cross
    2016 “Research Note: ‘Negative’ Personalization: Party Leaders and Party Strategy.” Canadian Journal of Political Science49 (3): 539–558. 10.1017/S0008423916000779
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008423916000779 [Google Scholar]
  236. Quinlan, Stephen , and Ian McAllister
    2021 “Leader or Party? Quantifying and Exploring Behavioral Personalization 1996–2019.” Party Politics28 (1): 24–37. 10.1177/13540688211019239
     https://doi.org/10.1177/13540688211019239 [Google Scholar]
  237. Quirk, Randolph , Sidney Greenbaum , Geoffrey Leech , and Jan Svartvik
    1985 A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. Longman.
     [Google Scholar]
  238. Rahat, Gideon , and Reuven Y. Hazan
    2001 “Candidate Selection Methods: An Analytical Framework.” Party Politics7 (3): 297–322. 10.1177/1354068801007003003
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068801007003003 [Google Scholar]
  239. Rahat, Gideon and Ofer Kenig
    2018 From Party Politics to Personalized Politics?: Party Change and Political Personalization in Democracies. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780198808008.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198808008.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  240. Rahat, Gideon , and Tamir Sheafer
    2007 “The Personalization(s) of Politics: Israel, 1949–2003.” Political Communication24 (1): 65–80. 10.1080/10584600601128739
     https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600601128739 [Google Scholar]
  241. Reisigl, Martin
    2008 “Rhetoric of Political Speeches.” InHandbook of Communication in the Public Sphere, edited by Ruth Wodak and Veronika Koller , 243–269. Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110198980.3.243
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110198980.3.243 [Google Scholar]
  242. Reitan, Earl A.
    2003 The Thatcher revolution: Margaret Thatcher, John Major, Tony Blair, and the transformation of modern Britain, 1979–2001. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
     [Google Scholar]
  243. Ritter, Kurt W.
    1980 “American Political Rhetoric and the Jeremiad Tradition: Presidential Nomination Acceptance Addresses, 1960–1976.” Central States Speech Journal31 (3): 153–171. 10.1080/10510978009368054
     https://doi.org/10.1080/10510978009368054 [Google Scholar]
  244. Roberts, Robert North , & Hammond, Scott John
    2004 Encyclopedia of presidential campaigns, slogans, issues, and platforms. Greenwood Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  245. Robertson, Nick
    2024 “These Major Media Outlets Have Called for Biden to Drop Out.” The Hill, June 30, 2024. https://thehill.com/homenews/media/4748637-biden-debate-step-aside-newspapers/
     [Google Scholar]
  246. Römmele, Andrea , and Dirk von Schneidmesser
    2016 “Election Campaigning Enters a Fourth Phase: The Mediatized Campaign.” Zeitschrift Für Politikwissenschaft26 (4): 425–442. 10.1007/s41358‑016‑0070‑z
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s41358-016-0070-z [Google Scholar]
  247. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, Francisco , and Olga Isabel Díez Velasco
    2004 “Motivation in Anaphoric Reference.” InStudies in Linguistic Motivation, edited by Günter Radden and Klaus-Uwe Panther , 293–320. Mouton de Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
  248. Russmann, Uta , Ulrike Klinger , and Karolina Koc-Michalska
    2024 “Personal, Private, Emotional? How Political Parties Use Personalization Strategies on Facebook in the 2014 and 2019 EP Election Campaigns.” Social Science Computer Review. SAGE Publications Inc. 10.1177/08944393241254807
     https://doi.org/10.1177/08944393241254807 [Google Scholar]
  249. Salamurović, Aleksandra
    2020 “Metonymy and the Conceptualisation of Nation in Political Discourse,” Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association8 (1): 181–196. 10.1515/gcla‑2020‑0011
     https://doi.org/10.1515/gcla-2020-0011 [Google Scholar]
  250. Salek, Thomas A.
    2014 “Faith Turns Political on the 2012 Campaign Trail: Mitt Romney, Franklin Graham, and the Stigma of Nontraditional Religions in American Politics.” Communication Studies65 (2): 174–188. 10.1080/10510974.2013.851097
     https://doi.org/10.1080/10510974.2013.851097 [Google Scholar]
  251. Schröter, Melani
    2014 “Addressee Orientation in Political Speeches.” Journal of Language and Politics13 (2): 289–312. 10.1075/jlp.13.2.05sch
     https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.13.2.05sch [Google Scholar]
  252. Semino, Elena
    2008 Metaphor in discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  253. Sidnell, Jack
    2009 “Deixis.” InKey Notions for Pragmatics, vol.1ofHandbook of Pragmatics Highlights, edited by Jef Verschueren and Jan-Ola Östman , 114–138. John Benjamins. 10.1075/hoph.1.07sid
     https://doi.org/10.1075/hoph.1.07sid [Google Scholar]
  254. Siewierska, Anna
    2013 “Gender Distinctions in Independent Personal Pronouns.” InWALS Online (v2020.3), edited by Matthew S. Dryer and Martin Haspelmath . Zenodo. 10.5281/zenodo.7385533. Available online atwals.info/chapter/44. AccessedSeptember 1, 2024.
     https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7385533 [Google Scholar]
  255. Simon, Gábor
    2017 Áttekintés a műfajkutatás tendenciáiról és lehetőségeiről. Útban egy kognitív szemléletű műfajelmélet felé. Magyar Nyelv113(2): 146–166. 10.18349/MagyarNyelv.2017.2.146
     https://doi.org/10.18349/MagyarNyelv.2017.2.146 [Google Scholar]
  256. Smith, Aaron
    2009 “The Internet’s Role in Campaign 2008.” Pew Research Center. Pew Research Center. April 15. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2009/04/15/the-internets-role-in-campaign-2008/
     [Google Scholar]
  257. Sorrentino, Jasmin , Martha Augoustinos , and Amanda LeCouteur
    2021 “‘Deal Me in’: Hillary Clinton and Gender in the 2016 US Presidential Election.” Feminism & Psychology32 (1): 23–43. 10.1177/09593535211030746
     https://doi.org/10.1177/09593535211030746 [Google Scholar]
  258. Stanyer, James
    2007 Modern Political Communication. Cambridge: Polity.
     [Google Scholar]
  259. 2008 “Candidate-Centered Communication.” InEncyclopedia of Political Communication, edited by Lynda Lee Kaid and Christina Holtz-Bacha , vol.1, 81–83. SAGE Publications. 10.4135/9781412953993.n70
     https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412953993.n70 [Google Scholar]
  260. Steen, Gerard
    1999 “Genres of Discourse and the Definition of Literature.” Discourse Processes28 (2): 109–120. 10.1080/01638539909545075
     https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539909545075 [Google Scholar]
  261. Sterling, Christopher H.
    2002 “The fireside chats” — President Franklin D. Roosevelt (1933–1944). Library of Congress. https://www.loc.gov/static/programs/national-recording-preservation-board/documents/FiresideChats.pdf. Accessed18 December 2020.
  262. Suleiman, Camelia , Daniel C. O’Connell , and Sabine Kowal
    2002 “‘If You and I, If We, in This Later Day, Lose That Sacred Fire…’: Perspective in Political Interviews.” Journal of Psycholinguistic Research31 (3): 269–287. 10.1023/A:1015592129296
     https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015592129296 [Google Scholar]
  263. Szabó, Lilla Petronella
    2020 “Én és a pártom: A Politikai Kommunikáció Perszonalizációja a Személyes Névmások Tükrében.” InDoktoranduszok Tanulmányai az Alkalmazott Nyelvészet Köréből 2020. XIV. Alkalmazott Nyelvészeti Doktoranduszkonferencia, edited by Tamás Váradi , Zsófia Ludányi , and Tekla Etelka Gráczi , 106–115. Nyelvtudományi Intézet. 10.18135/Alknyelvdok.2020.14.8
     https://doi.org/10.18135/Alknyelvdok.2020.14.8 [Google Scholar]
  264. 2021a “Félelem És Rettegés a Fehér Házban. Metaforák Donald Trump 2020-as Kampánybeszédeiben.” ARGUMENTUM17: 726–746. 10.34103/ARGUMENTUM/2021/37
     https://doi.org/10.34103/ARGUMENTUM/2021/37 [Google Scholar]
  265. 2021b We the people? A perszonalizáció nyelvészeti vizsgálata az Amerikai Egyesült Államok politikai kommunikációjában. JEL-KÉP2021(2): 93–102. 10.20520/JEL‑KEP.2021.2.93
     https://doi.org/10.20520/JEL-KEP.2021.2.93 [Google Scholar]
  266. 2022 Personalization is in the details. Studia Linguistica Hungarica 34 (1): 102–117. 10.54888/slh.2022.34.102.117
     https://doi.org/10.54888/slh.2022.34.102.117 [Google Scholar]
  267. Szabó, Lilla Petronella
    2024 “Is This Us? The Cultural Conceptualization of Individualization in American Political Speeches.” InCultural Linguistics and the Social World, edited by Judit Baranyiné Kóczy , Diana Prodanović Stankić , and Olga Panić Kavgić , 93–111. Springer. 10.1007/978‑981‑97‑6192‑0_6
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-6192-0_6 [Google Scholar]
  268. 2025 “Making a Cardinal Point: The Conceptualization of EAST and WEST in Hungarian Public Discourse.” Metaphor and Symbol40 (2): 140–52. 10.1080/10926488.2024.2431620
     https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2024.2431620 [Google Scholar]
  269. Talmy, Leonard
    1988 Force dynamics in language and cognition. Cognitive Science12(1): 49–100. 10.1207/s15516709cog1201_2
     https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1201_2 [Google Scholar]
  270. 2018 The Targeting System of Language. The MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/9780262036979.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262036979.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  271. 2020 Targeting in Language: Unifying Deixis and Anaphora. Frontiers in Psychology11. 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02016
     https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02016 [Google Scholar]
  272. Tan, Kevin Y. L.
    2017 “Presidential Systems.” InMax Planck Encyclopedia of Comparative Constitutional Law, edited by Rüdiger Wolfrum , Frauke Lachenmann , and Rainer Grote . Oxford University Press. AccessedJanuary 25, 2021. https://oxcon.ouplaw.com/view/10.1093/law-mpeccol/law-mpeccol-e430#
     [Google Scholar]
  273. Tanabe, Karin
    2011 “Patti Davis on Rebelling against Reagan — Politico.” Patti Davis on Rebelling against Reagan. POLITICO. December 12. https://www.politico.com/blogs/click/2011/12/patti-davis-on-rebelling-against-reagan-107143
     [Google Scholar]
  274. Tátrai, Szilárd
    2010 Áttekintés a deixisről (funkcionális kognitív kiindulópontból). Magyar Nyelvőr134(2): 211–233.
     [Google Scholar]
  275. 2011 Bevezetés a pragmatikába: Funkcionális kognitív megközelítés. Budapest: Tinta Könyvkiadó.
     [Google Scholar]
  276. 2013 Attitude, comparison, and relation in style. Remarks on the socio-cultural factors of style. Studia Linguistica Hungarica28: 21–36.
     [Google Scholar]
  277. 2017a “Esti Kornél És a Beégés. Megjegyzések a Műfajiság Pragmatikai Vonatkozásaihoz.” Magyar Nyelv113 (3): 290–301. 10.18349/MagyarNyelv.2017.3.290
     https://doi.org/10.18349/MagyarNyelv.2017.3.290 [Google Scholar]
  278. 2017b Pragmatika. InNyelvtan, 857–1058. Edited by András Imrényi , Nóra Kugler , Mária Ladányi , Alexandra Markó , Szilárd Tátrai , and Gábor Tolcsvai Nagy . Budapest: Osiris Kiadó.
     [Google Scholar]
  279. 2020 “On the Perspectival Nature and the Metapragmatic Reflectiveness of Contextualization.” Studia Linguistica Hungarica32: 109–120.
     [Google Scholar]
  280. Tátrai, Szilárd , and Júlia Ballagó
    2020 “On Socio-Cultural Situatedness in Style Attribution: A Study of Style in Hungarian.” New Horizons in English Studies2020 (5): 3–23. 10.17951/nh.2020.5.3‑23
     https://doi.org/10.17951/nh.2020.5.3-23 [Google Scholar]
  281. Teten, Ryan L.
    2003 “Evolution of the Modern Rhetorical Presidency: Presidential Presentation and Development of the State of the Union Address.” Presidential Studies Quarterly33 (2): 333–346. 10.1111/j.1741‑5705.2003.tb00033.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-5705.2003.tb00033.x [Google Scholar]
  282. Thompson, John B.
    1995 The media and modernity: A social theory of the media. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  283. Thurber, James
    2000 “Introduction to the Study of Campaign Consultants.” InCampaign Warriors: Political Consultants in Elections, edited by James Thurber and Candice Nelson , 1–9. Brookings Institution Press. 10.7864/j.ctv7xbrn2.3
     https://doi.org/10.7864/j.ctv7xbrn2.3 [Google Scholar]
  284. Tracy, Karen
    2017 “Facework and (Im)Politeness in Political Exchanges.” InThe Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)Politeness, edited by Jonathan Culpeper , Michael Haugh , and Dániel Z. Kádár , 739–758. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK. 10.1057/978‑1‑137‑37508‑7_28
     https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-37508-7_28 [Google Scholar]
  285. Trent, J. S. , C. Short-Thompson , P. A. Mongeau , and M. S. Metzler
    2017 “The Consistent Attributes of the Ideal Presidential Candidate in an Increasingly Divided Electorate.” American Behavioral Scientist61 (3): 278–97. 10.1177/0002764217693278
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764217693278 [Google Scholar]
  286. Troy, Gil
    1996 See How They Ran: The Changing Role of the Presidential Candidate. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  287. Tulis, Jeffrey
    2017 The rhetorical presidency. Princeton: Princeton University Press. 10.2307/j.ctvc77bq6
     https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvc77bq6 [Google Scholar]
  288. Turner, Mark
    1991 Reading minds: The study of English in the age of cognitive science. Princeton: Princeton University Press. 10.1515/9780691227788
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691227788 [Google Scholar]
  289. Twiplomacy
    Twiplomacy. (July20 2020) World leaders with the most Twitter followers as of June 2020 [Graph]. InStatista. RetrievedJuly 24, 2024, fromhttps://www.statista.com/statistics/281375/heads-of-state-with-the-most-twitter-followers/
     [Google Scholar]
  290. Unger, Peter
    1971 “A Defense of Skepticism.” The Philosophical Review80 (2): 198–219. 10.2307/2184030
     https://doi.org/10.2307/2184030 [Google Scholar]
  291. Urban, Greg
    1986 “Rhetoric of a War Chief.” Working Papers and Proceedings of the Center for Psychosocial Studies5: 1–21.
     [Google Scholar]
  292. Van Aelst, Peter , Tamir Sheafer , and James Stanyer
    2011 “The Personalization of Mediated Political Communication: A Review of Concepts, Operationalizations and Key Findings.” Journalism13 (2): 203–220. 10.1177/1464884911427802
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884911427802 [Google Scholar]
  293. Van Aelst, Peter , Tamir Sheafer , Nicolas Hubé , and Stylianos Papathanassopoulos
    2016 “Personalization.” InComparing Political Journalism, edited by Claes de Vreese , Frank Esser , and David Nicolas Hopmann , 112–130. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315622286
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315622286 [Google Scholar]
  294. van Erkel, Patrick F. , Peter Thijssen , and Peter Van Aelst
    2016 “One for All or All for One: The Electoral Effects of Personalized Campaign Strategies.” Acta Politica52 (3): 384–405. 10.1057/s41269‑016‑0034‑9
     https://doi.org/10.1057/s41269-016-0034-9 [Google Scholar]
  295. Van Santen, Rosa , and Liesbet Van Zoonen
    2010 “The Personal in Political Television Biographies.” Biography33 (1): 46–67. 10.1353/bio.0.0157
     https://doi.org/10.1353/bio.0.0157 [Google Scholar]
  296. Van Zoonen, Liesbet
    1998 “‘Finally, I Have My Mother Back’: Politicians and Their Families in Popular Culture.” Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics3 (1): 48–64. 10.1177/1081180X98003001005
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1081180X98003001005 [Google Scholar]
  297. Van Zoonen, Liesbet , and Christina Holtz-Bacha
    2000 “Personalisation in Dutch and German Politics: The Case of Talk Show.” Javnost — The Public7 (2): 45–56. 10.1080/13183222.2000.11008743
     https://doi.org/10.1080/13183222.2000.11008743 [Google Scholar]
  298. Verdegem, Pieter , and Evelien D’heer
    2017 “Social Media Logic and Its Impact on Political Communication during Election Times.” InManaging Democracy in the Digital Age: Internet Regulation, Social Media Use, and Online Civic Engagement, 119–135. Springer International Publishing. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑61708‑4_7
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61708-4_7 [Google Scholar]
  299. Verschueren, Jef
    1999 Understanding pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  300. Vile, M. J. C.
    2008 Politics in the USA. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203437049
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203437049 [Google Scholar]
  301. Vuckovic, Milica
    2023 Politicizing, Personalizing, and Mobilizing in Online Political Communication: Drivers and Killers of Users’ Engagement. International Journal of Communicationno.17: 3033–3053. ijoc.org
     [Google Scholar]
  302. Wales, Katie
    1996 Personal pronouns in present-day English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  303. 2014 A Dictionary of Stylistics. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315833507
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315833507 [Google Scholar]
  304. Ward, Myah
    2024 “For Years She Was Vice President Harris. Now She’s Kamala.” Politico. AccessedAugust 23, 2024. https://www.politico.com/news/2024/08/16/kamala-harris-campaign-branding-00173064
     [Google Scholar]
  305. Ware, Alan
    2002 The American Direct Primary: Party Institutionalization and Transformation in the North. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  306. Wattenberg, Martin P.
    1991 The Rise of Candidate-Centered Politics. Harvard University Press. 10.4159/harvard.9780674865723
     https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674865723 [Google Scholar]
  307. 2004 “Elections: Personal Popularity in U.S. Presidential Elections.” Presidential Studies Quarterly34 (1): 143–155. 10.1111/j.1741‑5705.2004.00040.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-5705.2004.00040.x [Google Scholar]
  308. 2015 “US Party Leaders: Exploring the Meaning of Candidate-Centred Politics.” InPolitical Leaders and Democratic Elections, edited by Kees Aarts , André Blais , and Hermann Schmitt , 76–90. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199259007.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199259007.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  309. Wei, J. M.
    (2023) Politicians’ pronouns: Who is “we”? Negotiating national collectivities in Taiwan’s authoritarian period. In L. L. Paterson (Ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Pronouns (pp.365–377). Taylor and Francis. 10.4324/9781003349891‑30
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003349891-30 [Google Scholar]
  310. Weimann, Gabriel
    2008 “American-Style Campaigning.” InEncyclopedia of Political Communication, edited by L. L. Kaid and C. Holtz-Bacha , vol.1, 34–35. SAGE Publications. 10.4135/9781412953993.n25
     https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412953993.n25 [Google Scholar]
  311. Wilson, John
    1990 Politically Speaking: The Pragmatic Analysis of Political Language. Oxford: Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  312. Winter, Bodo and Teenie Matlock
    2017 “Primary Metaphors Are Both Cultural and Embodied.” InMetaphor: Embodied Cognition and Discourse, edited by Beate Hampe , 99–116. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108182324.007
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108182324.007 [Google Scholar]
  313. Wlezien, Christopher
    2014 “Election Campaigns.” InComparing Democracies: Elections and Voting in a Changing World, edited by Lawrence LeDuc , Richard G. Niemi , and Pippa Norris , vol.4, 76–95. London: SAGE. 10.4135/9781473921108.n5
     https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473921108.n5 [Google Scholar]
  314. Wodak, Ruth , Rudolf de Cillia , Martin Reisigl , and Karin Liebhart
    2009 The Discursive Construction of National Identity. Translated by Angelika Hirsch , Richard Mitten , and J. W. Unger . Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  315. Wolfsfeld, Gadi
    2004 Media and the Path to Peace. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press10.1017/CBO9780511489105
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511489105 [Google Scholar]
  316. Zittel, Thomas , and Dominic Nyhuis
    2021 “The Legislative Effects of Campaign Personalization: An Analysis on the Legislative Behavior of Successful German Constituency Candidates.” Comparative Political Studies54 (2): 312–38. 10.1177/0010414020938103
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414020938103 [Google Scholar]
  317. Zupnik, Yael-Janette
    1994 “A Pragmatic Analysis of the Use of Person Deixis in Political Discourse.” Journal of Pragmatics21 (4): 339–383. 10.1016/0378‑2166(94)90010‑8
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(94)90010-8 [Google Scholar]
  318. Yaniv, Naama Weiss , and Keren Tenenboim-Weinblatt
    2016 “Politically Relevant Intimacy: A Conceptual and Empirical Investigation.” International Journal of Communication10: 5186–5205.
     [Google Scholar]
  319. Biden, Joseph R.
    2020 Address Accepting the Democratic Presidential Nomination in Wilmington, Delaware. https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/address-accepting-the-democratic-presidential-nomination-wilmington-delawareAccessed: 16 February 2022.
  320. Bush, George H. W.
    1988 Address Accepting the Presidential Nomination at the Republican National Convention in New Orleans. https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/address-accepting-the-presidential-nomination-the-republican-national-convention-newAccessed: 16 February 2022.
  321. 1992 Remarks Accepting the Presidential Nomination at the Republican National Convention in Houston. https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/remarks-accepting-the-presidential-nomination-the-republican-national-convention-houstonAccessed: 16 February 2022.
  322. Bush, George W.
    2000 Address Accepting the Presidential Nomination at the Republican National Convention in Philadelphia. https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/address-accepting-the-presidential-nomination-the-republican-national-convention-0Accessed: 16 February 2022.
  323. 2004 Remarks Accepting the Presidential Nomination at the Republican National Convention in New York City. https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/remarks-accepting-the-presidential-nomination-the-republican-national-convention-new-yorkAccessed: 16 February 2022.
  324. Carter, James
    1976 “Our Nation’s Past and Future”: Address Accepting the Presidential Nomination at the Democratic National Convention in New York City. https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/our-nations-past-and-future-address-accepting-the-presidential-nomination-the-democraticAccessed: 16 February 2022.
  325. 1980 Remarks Accepting the Presidential Nomination at the 1980 Democratic National Convention in New York. https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/remarks-accepting-the-presidential-nomination-the-1980-democratic-national-convention-newAccessed: 16 February 2022.
  326. Clinton, Hillary R.
    2016 Address Accepting the Presidential Nomination at the Democratic National Convention in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/address-accepting-the-presidential-nomination-the-democratic-national-conventionAccessed: 16 February 2022.
  327. Clinton, William J.
    1992 Address Accepting the Presidential Nomination at the Democratic National Convention in New York. https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/address-accepting-the-presidential-nomination-the-democratic-national-convention-new-yorkAccessed: 16 February 2022.
  328. 1996 Remarks Accepting the Presidential Nomination at the Democratic National Convention in Chicago. https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/remarks-accepting-the-presidential-nomination-the-democratic-national-convention-chicagoAccessed: 16 February 2022.
  329. Dewey, Thomas
    1944 Address Accepting the Presidential Nomination at the Republican National Convention in Chicago, Illinois. https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/address-accepting-the-presidential-nomination-the-republican-national-convention-chicago-1Accessed: 16 February 2022.
  330. 1948 Address Accepting the Presidential Nomination at the Republican National Convention in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/address-accepting-the-presidential-nomination-the-republican-national-conventionAccessed: 16 February 2022.
  331. Dole, Robert
    1996 Address Accepting the Presidential Nomination at the Republican National Convention in San Diego. https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/address-accepting-the-presidential-nomination-the-republican-national-convention-san-diegoAccessed: 16 February 2022.
  332. Dukakis, Michael F.
    1988 Address Accepting the Presidential Nomination at the Democratic National Convention in Atlanta. https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/address-accepting-the-presidential-nomination-the-democratic-national-convention-atlantaAccessed: 16 February 2022.
  333. Eisenhower, Dwight D.
    1952 Address Accepting the Presidential Nomination at the Republican National Convention in Chicago. https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/address-accepting-the-presidential-nomination-the-republican-national-convention-chicago-0Accessed: 16 February 2022.
  334. 1956 Address at the Cow Palace on Accepting the Nomination of the Republican National Convention. https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/address-the-cow-palace-accepting-the-nomination-the-republican-national-conventionAccessed: 16 February 2022.
  335. Ford, Gerald R.
    1976 Remarks in Kansas City Upon Accepting the 1976 Republican Presidential Nomination. https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/remarks-kansas-city-upon-accepting-the-1976-republican-presidential-nominationAccessed: 16 February 2022.
  336. Goldwater, Barry
    1964 Address Accepting the Presidential Nomination at the Republican National Convention in San Francisco. https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/address-accepting-the-presidential-nomination-the-republican-national-convention-sanAccessed: 16 February 2022.
  337. Gore, Albert
    2000 Address Accepting the Presidential Nomination at the Democratic National Convention in Los Angeles. https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/address-accepting-the-presidential-nomination-the-democratic-national-convention-losAccessed: 16 February 2022.
  338. Harris, Kamala
    2024 Address Accepting the Democratic Presidential Nomination in Chicago, Illinois. https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/address-accepting-the-democratic-presidential-nomination-chicago-illinoisAccessed31 August 2024.
  339. Hoover, Herbert
    1932 Address Accepting the Republican Presidential Nomination. https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/address-accepting-the-republican-presidential-nominationAccessed: 16 February 2022.
  340. Humphrey, Hubert H.
    1968 Address Accepting the Presidential Nomination at the Democratic National Convention in Chicago. https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/address-accepting-the-presidential-nomination-the-democratic-national-convention-chicago-2Accessed: 16 February 2022.
  341. Johnson, Lyndon B.
    1964 Remarks Before the National Convention Upon Accepting the Nomination. https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/remarks-before-the-national-convention-upon-accepting-the-nominationAccessed: 16 February 2022.
  342. Kennedy, John F.
    1960 Address Accepting the Democratic Nomination for President at the Memorial Coliseum in Los Angeles, California. https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/address-accepting-the-democratic-nomination-for-president-the-memorial-coliseum-losAccessed: 16 February 2022.
  343. Kerry, John F.
    2004 Address Accepting the Presidential Nomination at the Democratic National Convention in Boston. https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/address-accepting-the-presidential-nomination-the-democratic-national-convention-bostonAccessed: 16 February 2022.
  344. Landon, Alf
    1936 Address Accepting the Republican Presidential Nomination in Topeka, Kansas. https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/address-accepting-the-republican-presidential-nomination-topeka-kansasAccessed: 16 February 2022.
  345. McCain, John
    2008 Address Accepting the Presidential Nomination at the Republican National Convention in Saint Paul. https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/address-accepting-the-presidential-nomination-the-republican-national-convention-saintAccessed: 16 February 2022.
  346. McGovern, Grover
    1972 Address Accepting the Presidential Nomination at the Democratic National Convention in Miami Beach, Florida. https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/address-accepting-the-presidential-nomination-the-democratic-national-convention-miamiAccessed: 16 February 2022.
  347. Mondale, Walter. F.
    1984 Address Accepting the Presidential Nomination at the Democratic National Convention in San Francisco. https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/address-accepting-the-presidential-nomination-the-democratic-national-convention-sanAccessed: 16 February 2022.
  348. Nixon, Richard
    1960 Address Accepting the Presidential Nomination at the Republican National Convention in Chicago. https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/address-accepting-the-presidential-nomination-the-republican-national-convention-chicagoAccessed: 16 February 2022.
  349. 1968 Address Accepting the Presidential Nomination at the Republican National Convention in Miami Beach, Florida. https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/address-accepting-the-presidential-nomination-the-republican-national-convention-miamiAccessed: 16 February 2022.
  350. 1972 Remarks on Accepting the Presidential Nomination of the Republican National Convention. https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/remarks-accepting-the-presidential-nomination-the-republican-national-conventionAccessed: 16 February 2022.
  351. Obama, Barack
    2008 Address Accepting the Presidential Nomination at the Democratic National Convention in Denver: “The American Promise”. https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/address-accepting-the-presidential-nomination-the-democratic-national-convention-denverAccessed: 16 February 2022.
  352. 2012 Remarks Accepting the Presidential Nomination at the Democratic National Convention in Charlotte, North Carolina. https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/remarks-accepting-the-presidential-nomination-the-democratic-national-convention-charlotteAccessed: 16 February 2022.
  353. Reagan, Ronald
    1980 Address Accepting the Presidential Nomination at the Republican National Convention in Detroit. https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/address-accepting-the-presidential-nomination-the-republican-national-convention-detroitAccessed: 16 February 2022.
  354. 1984 Remarks Accepting the Presidential Nomination at the Republican National Convention in Dallas, Texas. https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/remarks-accepting-the-presidential-nomination-the-republican-national-convention-dallasAccessed: 16 February 2022.
  355. Romney, Mitt
    2012 Address Accepting the Presidential Nomination at the Republican National Convention in Tampa, Florida. https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/address-accepting-the-presidential-nomination-the-republican-national-convention-tampaAccessed: 16 February 2022.
  356. Roosevelt, Franklin D.
    1932 Address Accepting the Presidential Nomination at the Democratic National Convention in Chicago. https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/address-accepting-the-presidential-nomination-the-democratic-national-convention-chicago-1Accessed: 16 February 2022.
  357. 1936 Acceptance Speech for the Renomination for the Presidency, Philadelphia, Pa. https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/acceptance-speech-for-the-renomination-for-the-presidency-philadelphia-paAccessed: 16 February 2022.
  358. Roosevelt, Franklkin D.
    1940 Radio Address to the Democratic National Convention Accepting the Nomination. https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/radio-address-the-democratic-national-convention-accepting-the-nominationAccessed: 16 February 2022.
  359. Roosevelt, Franklin D.
    1944 Address to the Democratic National Convention in Chicago. https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/address-the-democratic-national-convention-chicagoAccessed: 16 February 2022.
  360. Stevenson, Adlai
    1952 Address Accepting the Presidential Nomination at the Democratic National Convention in Chicago. https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/address-accepting-the-presidential-nomination-the-democratic-national-convention-chicago-0Accessed: 16 February 2022.
  361. 1956 Address Accepting the Presidential Nomination at the Democratic National Convention in Chicago. https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/address-accepting-the-presidential-nomination-the-democratic-national-convention-chicagoAccessed: 16 February 2022.
  362. Truman, Harry S.
    1948 Address in Philadelphia Upon Accepting the Nomination of the Democratic National Convention. https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/address-philadelphia-upon-accepting-the-nomination-the-democratic-national-conventionAccessed: 16 February 2022.
  363. Trump, Donald J.
    2016 Address Accepting the Presidential Nomination at the Republican National Convention in Cleveland, Ohio. https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/address-accepting-the-presidential-nomination-the-republican-national-convention-clevelandAccessed: 16 February 2022.
  364. 2020 Address Accepting the Republican Presidential Nomination. https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/address-accepting-the-republican-presidential-nomination-4Accessed: 16 February 2022.
  365. 2024 Address Accepting the Presidential Nomination at the Republican National Convention in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/address-accepting-the-presidential-nomination-the-republican-national-convention-milwaukeeAccessed31 August 2024
  366. Willkie, Wendell
    1940 Address Accepting the Presidential Nomination in Elwood, Indiana. https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/address-accepting-the-presidential-nomination-elwood-indianaAccessed: 16 February 2022.
/content/books/9789027244604
Loading

  • From This Site

    /content/books/9789027244604
    dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Chapter
    10
    5
/content/books/9789027244604
dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
-contentType:Journal -contentType:Chapter
10
5
Chapter
content/books/9789027244604
Book
false
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error