1887
  1. Home
  2. Books
  3. The Second Language Acquisition of English Tense, Aspect and Modality

The Second Language Acquisition of English Tense, Aspect and Modality

image of The Second Language Acquisition of English Tense, Aspect and Modality
USD
Buy:$163.00 + Taxes

After a comprehensive description of the French and English tense, aspect, mood/modality (TAM) systems in Chapter 1, an overview of key theoretical perspective and applied perspectives from the morpheme-order studies to examples of internal and external interfaces in monolingual child acquisition is presented in Chapter 2. The literature review of L2 studies illustrates the subtleties of TAM properties in Chapter 3. It is followed by the rigorous methodology of a cross-sectional empirical study designed to test the L2 acquisition of the English TAM system along with pretest results in Chapter 4. The quantitative and qualitative analyses of data obtained from written production tasks, cloze tests and completion tasks completed by French EFL and ESL learners and a NS comparison group appear in Chapters 5, 6 and 7. The results discussed in Chapter 8 address the explanatory power of the Interface and Feature Reassembly hypotheses while directions for future research are offered in Chapter 9. Scholars will appreciate how new data carefully analyzed in its nuances and complexities bring us closer to better understanding the challenges L2 learners face.

References

  1. Aarts, B. , McMahon, A. & Hinrichs, L.
    (eds) (2021) The Handbook of English Linguistics. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley & Sons.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Achard, M.
    (1998) Representation of Cognitive Structures: Syntax and semantics of French sentential complements. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110805956
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110805956 [Google Scholar]
  3. Adloo, M. & Rohani, G.
    (2019) The impact of proactive and reactive focus on form in multimodal setting on EFL learners’ comprehension and production of modal auxiliaries. Journal of Teaching Language Skills37(4): 1–46.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Aikhenvald, A.
    (2004) Evidentiality. Oxford: OUP. 10.1093/oso/9780199263882.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199263882.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  5. (ed.) (2018) The Oxford Handbook of Evidentiality. Oxford: OUP. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198759515.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198759515.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  6. Aksu-Koç, A.
    (1988) The Acquisition of Aspect and Modality: The case of past reference in Turkish. Cambridge: CUP. 10.1017/CBO9780511554353
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511554353 [Google Scholar]
  7. Alshehry, A.
    (2019) Extending the morpheme order studies: Acquisition of modal and non-modal verbal morphemes by ESL learners. MA thesis, Central Washington University.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Andersen, R. W.
    (1986) El desarrollo de la morfología verbal en el español como segundo idioma. InAdquisición del Lenguaje — Acquisição da Linguagem, J. Meisel (ed.), pp.115–138. Frankfurt: Klaus-Dieter Vervuert. 10.31819/9783964562081‑011
     https://doi.org/10.31819/9783964562081-011 [Google Scholar]
  9. (1989) La adquisicion de la morfologia verbal. Linguistica1: 89–141.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. (1991) Developmental sequences: The emergence of aspect marking in second language acquisition. InCrosscurrents in Second Language Acquisition and Linguistic Theories, T. Huebner & C. A. Ferguson (eds), pp.305–324. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/lald.2.17and
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.2.17and [Google Scholar]
  11. Andersen, R. W.
    (1993) Four operating principles and input distribution as explanations for underdeveloped and mature morphological systems. InProgression and Regression in Language, K. Hyltenstam & A. Viborg (eds), pp.309–339. Cambridge: CUP.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Andersen, R. W. & Shirai, Y.
    (1994) Discourse motivations for some cognitive acquisition principles. Studies in Second Language Acquisition16: 133–156. 10.1017/S0272263100012845
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100012845 [Google Scholar]
  13. (1996) The primacy of aspect in first and second language acquisition: The pidgin-creole connection. InHandbook of Second Language Acquisition, W. C. Ritchie & T. K. Bhatia (eds), pp.527–570. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Aston, G. & L. Burnard
    (1998) The BNC Handbook: Exploring the British National Corpus with SARA. Edinburgh: EUP.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Authier-Revuz, J.
    (2004) La représentation du discours autre: Un champ multiplement hétérogène. InLe discours rapporté dans tous ses états, J. M. Lopez-Muñoz , S. Marnette & L. Rosier (eds), pp.35–53. Paris: L’Harmattan.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Avrutin, S.
    (1994) Psycholinguistic investigations in the theory of reference. Doctoral dissertation, MIT.
  17. (1999) Development of the Syntax-Discourse Interface. Dordrecht: Kluwer. 10.1007/978‑94‑017‑1239‑2
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1239-2 [Google Scholar]
  18. Avrutin, S. & Wexler, K.
    (1992) Development of principle B in Russian: Coindexation at LF and coreference. Language Acquisition4: 259–262. 10.1207/s15327817la0204_2
     https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327817la0204_2 [Google Scholar]
  19. Avrutin, S. & Wexler, K.
    (1999/2000) Children’s knowledge of subjunctive clauses: Obviation, binding and reference. Language Attrition8(1): 69–102.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Ayoun, D.
    (1999) Verb movement in French L2 acquisition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition2(2): 103–125. 10.1017/S136672899900022X
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S136672899900022X [Google Scholar]
  21. (2004) The effectiveness of written recasts in the second language acquisition of aspectual distinctions in French: A follow-up study. Modern Language Journal88: 31–55. 10.1111/j.0026‑7902.2004.00217.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0026-7902.2004.00217.x [Google Scholar]
  22. (2005) The acquisition of tense and aspect in L2 French from a Universal Grammar perspective. InTense and Aspect in Romance Languages: Theoretical and Applied Perspectives, D. Ayoun & R. Salaberry (eds), pp.79–127. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/sibil.29.05ayo
     https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.29.05ayo [Google Scholar]
  23. (2013) The Second Language Acquisition of French Tense, Aspect and Mood and Modality. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/aals.10
     https://doi.org/10.1075/aals.10 [Google Scholar]
  24. (2014) The acquisition of future temporality by L2 French learners. Journal of French Language Studies24: 181–202. 10.1017/S0959269513000185
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959269513000185 [Google Scholar]
  25. (2015a) There is no time like the present: A longitudinal case study in L2 French acquisition. InThe Acquisition of the Present, D. Ayoun (ed.), pp.87–113. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/z.196.04ayo
     https://doi.org/10.1075/z.196.04ayo [Google Scholar]
  26. (ed.) (2015b) The Acquisition of the Present. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/z.196
     https://doi.org/10.1075/z.196 [Google Scholar]
  27. (2019) The L2 acquisition of French tense, aspect and modality: Refocusing on the input. InGrammatical Representations and Processing in L2 Acquisition, D. Arteaga (ed.), pp.47–67. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. (2020) A longitudinal study in the L2 acquisition of the French TAM system. Languages5(4): 42. Special issue. 10.3390/languages5040042
     https://doi.org/10.3390/languages5040042 [Google Scholar]
  29. (2022) Indeterminacy in L2 French grammars: The case of gender and number agreement. Journal of French Language Studies32: 327–359.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. (in progress). The instructed second language acquisition of English modality. Comparing a CL-based pedagogical approach to a traditional PPP pedagogical approach.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Ayoun, D. & Gilbert, C.
    (2017) The acquisition of modal auxiliaries in English by advanced Francophone learners. InTense-Aspect-Modality in a Second Language. Contemporary perspectives, M. Howard & P. Leclercq (eds), pp.183–212. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/sibil.50.07ayo
     https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.50.07ayo [Google Scholar]
  32. Ayoun, D. & Rothman, J.
    (2013) Generative approaches to the L2 acquisition of temporal-aspectual-mood system. InResearch Design and Methodology in Studies on L2 Tense and Aspect, R. Salaberry & L. Comajoan (eds), pp.119–156. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9781934078167.119
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9781934078167.119 [Google Scholar]
  33. Ayoun, D. & Salaberry, R.
    (eds) (2005) Tense and Aspect in Romance Languages: Theoretical and applied perspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/sibil.29
     https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.29 [Google Scholar]
  34. (2008) Acquisition of English tense-aspect morphology by advanced French learners. Language Learning58(3): 555–595. 10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2008.00450.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2008.00450.x [Google Scholar]
  35. Baauw, S.
    (2000) Grammatical features and the acquisition of reference. A comparative study of Dutch and Spanish. Doctoral dissertation, Utrecht University.
  36. (2018) The interpretation of pronouns across Spanish-speaking populations. Languages3(2): 1–17. 10.3390/languages3020011
     https://doi.org/10.3390/languages3020011 [Google Scholar]
  37. Baaw, S. & Cuetos, F.
    (2003) The interpretation of pronouns in Spanish language acquisition and breakdown: Evidence for the “principle B delay” as a non-unitary phenomenon. Language Acquisition11(4): 219–275. 10.1207/s15327817la1104_2
     https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327817la1104_2 [Google Scholar]
  38. Baayen, R. H. & Moscoso del Prado Martín, F.
    (2005) Semantic density and past tense formation in three German languages. Language81(3): 666–698. 10.1353/lan.2005.0112
     https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2005.0112 [Google Scholar]
  39. Bae, S. H.
    (2015) The syntax-phonology interface in native and near-native Korean. Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University.
  40. Bailey, N. , Madden, C. & Krashen, S.
    (1974) Is there a “natural sequence” in adult second language learning?Language Learning24: 235–243. 10.1111/j.1467‑1770.1974.tb00505.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1974.tb00505.x [Google Scholar]
  41. Baker, F.
    (2006) Corpora and language assessment: Trends and prospects. Research Notes26(1): 2–4.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Baker, M. C.
    (1991) Morphological classes and grammatical organization. Yearbook of Morphology 1991: 89–106. Dordrecht: Springer.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Bardovi-Harlig, K.
    (1992a) The use of adverbials and natural order in the development of temporal expression. International Review of Applied Linguistics30: 299–320. 10.1515/iral.1992.30.4.299
     https://doi.org/10.1515/iral.1992.30.4.299 [Google Scholar]
  44. (1992b) The telling of a tale: Discourse structure and tense use in learner’s narratives. InPragmatics and Language Learning (Vol.3), L. Bouton & Y. Krachu (eds), pp.144–161. Urbana-Champaign, IL: DEIL.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. (1994) Anecdote or evidence? Evaluating support for hypotheses concerning the development of tense and aspect. InResearch Methodology in Second Language Acquisition, E. Tarone , S. Gass & A. Cohen (eds), pp.41–60. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. (1995) A narrative perspective on the development of the tense/aspect system in second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition17: 263–291. 10.1017/S0272263100014182
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100014182 [Google Scholar]
  47. (1998) Narrative structure and lexical aspect. Conspiring factors in second language acquisition of tense-aspect morphology. Studies in Second Language Acquisition20(4): 471–508. 10.1017/S0272263198004021
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263198004021 [Google Scholar]
  48. (1999) From morpheme studies to temporal semantics. Tense-aspect research in SLA. Studies in Second Language Acquisition21: 341–382. 10.1017/S0272263199003010
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263199003010 [Google Scholar]
  49. (2000) Tense and Aspect in Second Language Acquisition: Form, meaning, and use. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. (2000) Tense and Aspect in Second Language Acquisition: Form, meaning, and use. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  51. (2005) The future of desire: Lexical futures and modality in L2 English future expression. InProceedings of the 7th Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition Conference, L. Dekydtspotter , R. A. Sprouse & A. Liljestrand (eds), pp.1–12. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  52. (2012) After process, then what? A longitudinal investigation of the progressive prototype in L2 English. Cahiers Chronos24: 131–151. 10.1163/9789401207188_008
     https://doi.org/10.1163/9789401207188_008 [Google Scholar]
  53. (2024) Future tense and future expressions. InThe Routledge Handbook of Second Language Acquisition, Morphosyntax, and Semantics, T. Ionin , S. Montrul & R. Slabakova (eds), pp.297–310. New York, NY: Routledge. 10.4324/9781003412373‑26
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003412373-26 [Google Scholar]
  54. Bardovi-Harlig, K. & Comajoan-Colomé, L.
    (2020) The Aspect hypothesis and the acquisition of L2 past morphology in the last 20 years: A state-of-the-scholarship review. Studies in Second Language Acquisition42(5): 1137–1167. 10.1017/S0272263120000194
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263120000194 [Google Scholar]
  55. Bardovi-Harlig, K. & Comajoan-Colomé, L.
    (2020) The Aspect hypothesis and the acquisition of L2 past morphology in the last 20 years. Studies in Second Language Acquisition22: 1–31. 10.1017/S0272263120000194
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263120000194 [Google Scholar]
  56. (2022) The relation of second language acquisition, instructed second language acquisition, and language teaching from the lens of second language tense-aspect. Language Teaching55: 289–345. 10.1017/S026144482200009X
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S026144482200009X [Google Scholar]
  57. Bardovi-Harlig, K. & Reynolds, D.
    (1995) The role of lexical aspect in the acquisition of tense and aspect. TESOL Quarterly29: 107–131. 10.2307/3587807
     https://doi.org/10.2307/3587807 [Google Scholar]
  58. Bassano, D.
    (2008) Acquisition du langage et grammaticalisation: Le développement pour les noms et les verbes en français. InAspects du développement conceptuel et langagier, F. Labrell & G. Chasseigne (eds), pp.17–50. Paris: Publibook Université.
     [Google Scholar]
  59. Battye, A. & Roberts, I.
    (1995) Introduction. InClause Structure and Language Change, A. Battye & I. Roberts (eds), pp.3–28. Oxford: OUP. 10.1093/oso/9780195086324.003.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195086324.003.0001 [Google Scholar]
  60. Bauer, L. , Lieber, R. & Plag, I.
    (2013) The Oxford Reference Guide to English Morphology. Oxford: OUP. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198747062.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198747062.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  61. Beck, M.-L.
    (ed.) (1998) Morphology and its Interfaces in Second Language Knowledge. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/lald.19
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.19 [Google Scholar]
  62. Becker, K. & Feng, H-H.
    (2020) Stance in unpublished student writing: An exploratory study of modal verbs in MICUSP’s physical science papers. InAdvances in Corpus-Based Research on Academic Writing: Effects of Discipline, Register, and Writer Expertise, U. Römer , V. Cortes & E. Friginal (eds), pp. pp.255–278. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.95.11bec
     https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.95.11bec [Google Scholar]
  63. Belli, S. A.
    (2018) An analysis of stative verbs with the progressive aspect in corpus-informed textbooks. English Language Teaching11(1): 120–135. 10.5539/elt.v11n1p120
     https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v11n1p120 [Google Scholar]
  64. Bensaid, M.
    (2015) Arab ESL learners and modals. Arab World English Journal6(4): 90–97.
     [Google Scholar]
  65. Benveniste, E.
    (1974) Problèmes de linguistique générale. Paris: NRF.
     [Google Scholar]
  66. Bergs, A. & Heine, L.
    (2010) Mood in English. InMood in the Languages of Europe, B. Rothstein & R. Thieroff (eds), pp.103–116. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.120.06ber
     https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.120.06ber [Google Scholar]
  67. Biber, D. , Johansson, S. , Leech, G. , Conrad, S. & Finegan, E.
    (1999) The Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman. Republished as: Biber, D. , Johansson, S. , Leech, G. , Conrad, S. & Finegan, E. (2021) The Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/z232
     https://doi.org/10.1075/z232 [Google Scholar]
  68. Bickerton, D.
    (1981) Roots of Language. Ann Arbor, MI: Karoma.
     [Google Scholar]
  69. Binnick, R.
    (1991) Time and the Verb. Oxford: Blackwell. 10.1093/oso/9780195062069.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195062069.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  70. (2021) Aspect and aspectuality. InThe Handbook of English Linguistics, B. Aarts , A. McMahon & L. Hinrichs, L. (eds), pp.183–205. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley & Sons.
     [Google Scholar]
  71. Bley-Vroman, R.
    (1990) The logical problem of foreign language learning. Linguistic Analysis20: 3–49.
     [Google Scholar]
  72. (2009) The evolving context of the Fundamental Difference hypothesis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition31: 175–198. 10.1017/S0272263109090275
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263109090275 [Google Scholar]
  73. Borgonovo, C. , Bruhn de Garavito, J. & Prévost, P.
    (2006) Is the semantics/syntax interface vulnerable in L2 acquisition? Focus on mood distinction clauses in L2 Spanish. InAcquisition of Syntax in Romance Languages, V. Torrens & L. Escobar (eds), pp.353–369. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/lald.41.17bor
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.41.17bor [Google Scholar]
  74. Borgonovo, C. , Bruhn de Garavito, J. & Prévost, P.
    (2015) Mood selection in relative clauses. Interfaces and variability. Studies in Second Language Acquisition37: 33–69. 10.1017/S0272263114000321
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263114000321 [Google Scholar]
  75. Boynes
    Boynes (2011) Navigating the spoken–written interface: The stylistics of linguistic creativity in Riddley Walke . InInterfaces in Language 2 , D. Hornsby & E. Partridge (eds), pp.103–116. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.
     [Google Scholar]
  76. Bres, J.
    (2020) Le conditionnel. Encyclopédie grammaticale du français. https://encyclogram.fr
     [Google Scholar]
  77. Brookes, G. & McEnery, T.
    (2020) Corpus linguistics. InThe Routledge Handbook of English Language and Digital Humanities, S. Adolphs & D. Knight (eds), pp.378–404. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781003031758‑20
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003031758-20 [Google Scholar]
  78. Brown, R.
    (1973) A First Language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. 10.4159/harvard.9780674732469
     https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674732469 [Google Scholar]
  79. Bryant, P. , Nunes, T. & Aidinis, A.
    (1999) Different morphemes, same spelling problems: Crosslinguistic developmental studies. InLearning to Read and Write: A crosslinguistic perspective, M. Harris & G. Hatano (eds), pp.112–133. Cambridge: CUP.
     [Google Scholar]
  80. Bybee, J.
    (1995) Diachronic and typological properties of morphology and their implications for representation. InMorphological Aspects of Language Processing, L. Feldman (ed.), pp. 225–246. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
     [Google Scholar]
  81. Bybee, J. , Revere, P. & Pagliuca, W.
    (1994) The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, aspect and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  82. Calinescu, L.
    (2018) The online processing of intensional modal verbs in Norwegian: An ERP study. MA thesis, Norwegian University of Science and Technology.
     [Google Scholar]
  83. Celce-Murcia, M. & Larsen-Freeman, D.
    (1999) The Grammar Book. An ESL/EFL teacher’s course, 2nd ed.Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle.
     [Google Scholar]
  84. Cervoni, J.
    (1987) L’énonciation. FeniXX.
     [Google Scholar]
  85. Chamorro, G. & Sorace, A.
    (2019) The Interface Hypothesis as a framework for studying L1 attrition. InOxford Handbook of Language Attrition, M. S. Schmid & B. Köpke (eds), pp. 25–35. Oxford: OUP.
     [Google Scholar]
  86. Chen, Z.
    (2012) Expression of epistemic stance in EFL Chinese university students’ writing. English Language Teaching 5 (10): 173–179. 10.5539/elt.v5n10p173
     https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v5n10p173 [Google Scholar]
  87. Chen, W-H.
    (2016) Second language perception and production of English regular past tense: L1 influence in phonology and morphosyntax. Doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University.
  88. Chen, C-Y.
    (2020) The acquisition of Mandarin by heritage speakers and second language learners. Doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
  89. Chien, Y. & Wexler, K.
    (1990) Children’s knowledge of locality conditions in binding as evidence for the modularity of syntax and pragmatics. Language Acquisition1: 225–295. 10.1207/s15327817la0103_2
     https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327817la0103_2 [Google Scholar]
  90. Chiercha, G. , Guasti, M. T. & Gualmini, A.
    (2001) Nouns and articles in child grammar and the syntax/semantics map. Unpublished manuscript, University of Milan/University of Siena/University of Maryland, College Park.
     [Google Scholar]
  91. Chomsky, N.
    (1957) Syntactic Structures. The Hague: Mouton. 10.1515/9783112316009
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783112316009 [Google Scholar]
  92. (1981) Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.
     [Google Scholar]
  93. (1991) Some notes on economy of derivation and representation. InPrinciples and Parameters in Comparative Grammar, R. Freiden (ed.), pp.417–454. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  94. (1993) A Minimalist Program for linguistic theory. InThe View from Building 20: Essays in Linguistics in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger, K. Hale & S. J. Keyser (eds), pp.1–52. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  95. Chomsky, N.
    (1995) The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  96. Chomsky, N.
    (1998) Minimalist inquiries: The framework. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics15: 1–56.
     [Google Scholar]
  97. (2001) Derivation by phase. In M. Kenstowicz (Ed.), Ken Hale: A life in language (pp.1–52). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/4056.003.0004
     https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/4056.003.0004 [Google Scholar]
  98. (2005) Three factors in language design. Linguistic Inquiry36: 1–22. 10.1162/0024389052993655
     https://doi.org/10.1162/0024389052993655 [Google Scholar]
  99. (2007) Approaching UG from below. InInterfaces + Recursion = Language?, U. Sauerland & H.-M. Gärtner (eds), pp.1–30. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110207552.1
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110207552.1 [Google Scholar]
  100. Chu, X.
    (2008) Les verbes modaux du français. Paris: Editions OPHRYS.
     [Google Scholar]
  101. Clackson, K. , Felser, C. & Clahsen, H.
    (2011) Children’s processing of reflexives and pronouns in English: Evidence from eye-movements during listening. Journal of Memory and Language65: 128–144. 10.1016/j.jml.2011.04.007
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2011.04.007 [Google Scholar]
  102. Clark, E. V.
    (1996) Early verbs, event-types, and inflections. Children’s Language9: 61–73.
     [Google Scholar]
  103. Collentine, J.
    (2003) The development of the subjunctive and complex syntactic abilities among FL Spanish learners. InStudies in Spanish Second Language Acquisition: The state of the science, B. Lafford & R. Salaberry (eds), pp.74–97. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  104. Collins, L.
    (2002) The roles of L1 influence and lexical aspect in the acquisition of temporal morphology. Language Learning52(1): 43–94. 10.1111/1467‑9922.00177
     https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9922.00177 [Google Scholar]
  105. (2004) The particulars on universals: A comparison of the acquisition of tense-aspect morphology among Japanese- and French-speaking learners of English. The Canadian Modern Language Review61(2): 251–274. 10.3138/cmlr.61.2.251
     https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.61.2.251 [Google Scholar]
  106. Collins, P.
    (2009) Modals and Quasi-Modals in English. Amsterdam: Rodopi. 10.1163/9789042029095
     https://doi.org/10.1163/9789042029095 [Google Scholar]
  107. Comrie, B.
    (1976) Aspect. An introduction to the study of verbal aspect and related problems. Cambridge: CUP.
     [Google Scholar]
  108. (1985) Tense. Cambridge: CUP. 10.1017/CBO9781139165815
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139165815 [Google Scholar]
  109. Cournane, A.
    (2020) Learning modals: A grammatical perspective. Language and Linguistics Compass14(10): 1–22. 10.1111/lnc3.12399
     https://doi.org/10.1111/lnc3.12399 [Google Scholar]
  110. Cournane, A. , Hirzel, M. & Hacquard, V.
    (2024) Mapping modal verbs to meanings: An elicited production study on “force” and “flavor” with young preschoolers. Language Acquisition31(1): 57–80. 10.1080/10489223.2023.2173074
     https://doi.org/10.1080/10489223.2023.2173074 [Google Scholar]
  111. Crystal, D.
    (1977) The Cambridge Encyclopedic of Language. Cambridge: CUP.
     [Google Scholar]
  112. Davies, M.
    (2009) The 385+ million word Corpus of Contemporary American English (1990–2008): Design, architecture and linguistic insight. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics14(2): 159–190. 10.1075/ijcl.14.2.02dav
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.14.2.02dav [Google Scholar]
  113. (2010) The Corpus of Contemporary American English as the first reliable monitor corpus of English. Literary and Linguistic Computing25(4): 447–464. 10.1093/llc/fqq018
     https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqq018 [Google Scholar]
  114. (2012) The 400 million word corpus of historical American English (1810–2009). InEnglish Historical Linguistics 2010, I. Hegedus & A. Fodor (eds), pp.217–250. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.325.11dav
     https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.325.11dav [Google Scholar]
  115. Davies, M. & Fuchs, R.
    (2015) Expanding horizons in the study of world Englishes with the 1.9 billion word Global Web-based English Corpus (GloWbE). English World-Wide36(1): 1–28. 10.1075/eww.36.1.01dav
     https://doi.org/10.1075/eww.36.1.01dav [Google Scholar]
  116. Davydova, J.
    (2011) The Present Perfect in Non-Native Englishes: A corpus-based study in variation. Boston: Walter de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110255027
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110255027 [Google Scholar]
  117. Declerck, R.
    (1991) Tense in English: Its structure and use in discourse. London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  118. Declerck, R. , Reed, S. & Cappelle, B.
    (2006) The Grammar of the English Verb Phrase. Volume 1: The grammar of the English tense system. A comprehensive analysis. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
  119. Deen, K. U.
    (2015) The morphosyntax interface. InThe Cambridge Handbook of Child Language, E. L. Bavin & L. R. Naigles (eds), pp.324–347. Cambridge: CUP. 10.1017/CBO9781316095829.015
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316095829.015 [Google Scholar]
  120. De Houwer, A. & Gillis, S.
    (1998) Dutch child language: An overview. InThe Acquisition of Dutch, S. Gillis & A. De Houwer (eds), pp.1–100. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.52.04deh
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.52.04deh [Google Scholar]
  121. Dekydtspotter, L. , Sprouse, R. A. & Anderson, B.
    (1997) The interpretive interface in L2 acquisition: The process-result distinction in English-French interlanguage grammars. Language Acquisition4: 297–332. 10.1207/s15327817la0604_2
     https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327817la0604_2 [Google Scholar]
  122. (1998) Interlanguage A-bar dependencies: binding construals, null prepositions and Universal Grammar. Second Language Research14: 341–358. 10.1191/026765898677792795
     https://doi.org/10.1191/026765898677792795 [Google Scholar]
  123. Dendale, P. & Van Bogaert, J.
    (2007) A semantic description of French lexical evidential markers and the classification of evidentials. Rivista di Linguistica19(1): 65–89.
     [Google Scholar]
  124. Depraetere, I. & Reed, S.
    (2021) Mood and modality in English. InThe Handbook of English Linguistics, 2nd ed., B. Aarts , A. McMahon & L. Hinrichs (eds), pp.207–227. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley & Sons.
     [Google Scholar]
  125. Depraetere, I. , Cappelle, B. , Hilpert, M. , De Cuypere, L. , Dehouck, M. , Denis, P. , Flach, S. , Grabar, N. , Grandin, C. , Hamon, T. , Hufeld, C. , Leclercq, B. & Schmid, H-J.
    (eds) (2023) Models of Modals. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
  126. Destruel, E.
    (2022) Processing pragmatic inferences in L2 French speakers. Second Language Research39(4): 969–995. 10.1177/02676583221110236
     https://doi.org/10.1177/02676583221110236 [Google Scholar]
  127. Dietrich, R.
    (1995) The acquisition of German. InThe Acquisition of Temporality in a Second Language, R. Dietrich , C. Noyau & K. Wolfgang (eds), pp.71–115. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/sibil.7.05die
     https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.7.05die [Google Scholar]
  128. Dietrich, R. , Noyau, C. & Wolfgang, K.
    (eds) (1995) The Acquisition of Temporality in a Second Language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/sibil.7
     https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.7 [Google Scholar]
  129. Díez-Bedmar, M B.
    (2021) The use of the progressive in light of the Aspect hypothesis in EFL-instructed Spanish learners at university level: A longitudinal learner corpus-based SLA study. InTense, Aspect and Modality in L2. Recent applied studies, L. Quintana Hernández & B. Rodríguez Arrizabalaga (eds), Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación32(3): 53–69
     [Google Scholar]
  130. Dowty, D.
    (1979) Word Meaning and Montague Grammar. Dordrecht: Reidel. 10.1007/978‑94‑009‑9473‑7
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9473-7 [Google Scholar]
  131. Dry, H.
    (1981) Sentence aspect and the movement of narrative time. Text1: 233–240
     [Google Scholar]
  132. (1983) The movement of narrative time. Journal of Literary Semantics12: 19–53. 10.1515/jlse.1983.12.2.19
     https://doi.org/10.1515/jlse.1983.12.2.19 [Google Scholar]
  133. Ducrot, O.
    (1975) Je trouve que. Semantikos1(1): 63–88.
     [Google Scholar]
  134. Dudley, A.
    (2020) An investigation into the acquisition and processing of the subjunctive by English-speaking second language learners of French. Doctoral dissertation, University of Southampton.
  135. Dudley, A. & Slabakova, R.
    (2020) Aspectual contrasts in the English present tense revisited. Exploring the role of input and L1 influence. Pedagogical Linguistics1(1): 66–93. 10.1075/pl.19010.dud
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pl.19010.dud [Google Scholar]
  136. (2021) L2 knowledge of the obligatory French subjunctive: Offline measures and eye tracking compared. Languages6(1): 31. 10.3390/languages6010031
     https://doi.org/10.3390/languages6010031 [Google Scholar]
  137. Dulay, H. & Burt, M.
    (1974) Natural sequence in child second language acquisition. Language Learning24: 37–53. 10.1111/j.1467‑1770.1974.tb00234.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1974.tb00234.x [Google Scholar]
  138. Eibensteiner, L.
    (2019) Transfer in L3 acquisition: How does L2 aspectual knowledge in English influence the acquisition of perfective and imperfective aspect in L3 Spanish among German-speaking learners?Dutch Journal of Applied Linguistics8(1): 67–83. 10.1075/dujal.19003.eib
     https://doi.org/10.1075/dujal.19003.eib [Google Scholar]
  139. (2023) L3 acquisition of aspect: The influence of structural similarity, analytic L2 and general L3 proficiency. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching61(4): 1827–1858. 10.1515/iral‑2021‑0220
     https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2021-0220 [Google Scholar]
  140. Ellis, R.
    (2003) Task-Based Language Learning and Teaching. Cambridge: CUP.
     [Google Scholar]
  141. (2005) Measuring implicit and explicit knowledge of a second language: A psychometric study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition27: 141–172. 10.1017/S0272263105050096
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263105050096 [Google Scholar]
  142. (2006) Current issues in the teaching of grammar: An SLA perspective. TESOL Quarterly40(1): 83–107. 10.2307/40264512
     https://doi.org/10.2307/40264512 [Google Scholar]
  143. Elturki, E. & Salsbury, T.
    (2016) A cross-sectional investigation of the development of modality in English language learners’ written narratives: A corpus-driven study. Issues in Applied Linguistics20(1): 51–72. 10.5070/L4200016202
     https://doi.org/10.5070/L4200016202 [Google Scholar]
  144. Emonds, J.
    (1978) The verbal complex V’-V in French. Linguistic Inquiry9: 151–171.
     [Google Scholar]
  145. (1985) A Unified Theory of Syntactic Categories. Dordrecht: Foris. 10.1515/9783110808513
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110808513 [Google Scholar]
  146. Engel, D.
    (2001) Absolutely perfect? What is the status of futur antérieur?Journal of French Language Studies11: 201–220. 10.1017/S0959269501000230
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959269501000230 [Google Scholar]
  147. Eubank, L. & Thépaut Grace, S.
    (1998) V-to-I and inflection in non-native grammars. InMorphology and its Interfaces in Second Language Knowledge, M.-L. Beck (ed.), pp. 69–88. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/lald.19.05eub
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.19.05eub [Google Scholar]
  148. Ewert, D.
    (2006) The expression of temporality in the written discourse of L2 learners of English: Distinguishing text-types and text-passages. Doctoral dissertation, Indiana University.
  149. Farina, C.
    (2017) Adult L2 processing and acquisition of the English present perfect. Doctoral dissertation, University of South Carolina.
  150. Fernández Cuenca, S.
    (2019) The effects of language instruction on L2 learners’ input processing and learning outcomes. Doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
  151. Fernández-Dobao, A. & Herschensohn, J.
    (2020) Present tense verb morphology of Spanish L2 and L2 children in dual immersion. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism10(6): 775–804. 10.1075/lab.18026.fer
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.18026.fer [Google Scholar]
  152. Filip, H.
    (2012) Lexical aspect. InThe Oxford Handbook of Tense and Aspect, R. Binnick (ed.), pp.721–751. Oxford: OUP.
     [Google Scholar]
  153. Filipović, L. , Brown, M. & Engelhardt, P. E.
    (2023) Evidential meanings in native and learner Japanese and English. Implications for the assessment of speaker certainty. Pragmatics and Society14(3): 484–508. 10.1075/ps.20089.fil
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.20089.fil [Google Scholar]
  154. Fryd, M.
    (2020) Puzzling out the English present perfect puzzle. Études Anglaises73(4): 452–471. 10.3917/etan.734.0452
     https://doi.org/10.3917/etan.734.0452 [Google Scholar]
  155. Fuchs, R. & Werner, V.
    (2020) Tense and aspect in second language acquisition and learner corpus research. InTense and Aspect in Second Language Acquisition and Learner Corpus Research, R. Fuchs & V. Werner (eds), pp.1–21. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/bct.108.ijlcr.00004.int
     https://doi.org/10.1075/bct.108.ijlcr.00004.int [Google Scholar]
  156. Gablasova, D. , Brezina, V. , McEnery, T. & Boyd, E.
    (2017) Epistemic stance in spoken L2 English: The effect of task and speaker style. Applied Linguistics38: 613–637. 10.1093/applin/amv055
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amv055 [Google Scholar]
  157. Gabrielatos, C. & McEnery, T.
    (2005) Epistemic modality in MA dissertation. InLengua y Sociedad: Investigaciones recientes en lingüística aplicada, pp.311–331. Valladolid: Universidad de Valladolid.
     [Google Scholar]
  158. Gardner, S. & Moreton, E.
    (2020) Written corpora. InThe Routledge Handbook of English Language and Digital Humanities, S. Adolph & D. Knight (eds), pp.26–48. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781003031758‑3
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003031758-3 [Google Scholar]
  159. Geeraert, K. & Newman, J.
    (2011)  I haven’t drank in weeks: The use of past tense forms as participles in English corpora. InCorpus-based Studies in Language Use, Language Learning, and Language Documentation, J. Newman , H. Baayen & S. Rice (eds), pp. 13–33. Amsterdam: Rodopi Press. 10.1163/9789401206884_003
     https://doi.org/10.1163/9789401206884_003 [Google Scholar]
  160. Giacalone Ramat, A.
    (1995) Tense and aspect in learner Italian. InTemporal Reference, Aspect and Actionality: Typological perspectives (Vol.2), P. Bertinetto , V. Bianchi , O. Dahl & M. Squartini (eds), pp.289–309. Turin: Rosenberg & Sellier.
     [Google Scholar]
  161. Giacalone Ramat, A. & Banfi, E.
    (1990) The acquisition of temporality: A second language perspective. Folia LinguisticaXXIV(3–4): 405–428. 10.1515/flin.1990.24.3‑4.405
     https://doi.org/10.1515/flin.1990.24.3-4.405 [Google Scholar]
  162. Gillis, S. & Ravid, R.
    (2006) Typological effects on spelling development: A crosslinguistic study of Hebrew and Dutch. Journal of Child Language33: 621–659. 10.1017/S0305000906007434
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000906007434 [Google Scholar]
  163. Giorgi, A. & Pianesi, F.
    (1997) Tense and Aspect: From semantics to morphosyntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780195091922.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195091922.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  164. Giskes, A.
    (2018) The online processing of epistemic modal verbs during language comprehension. An ERP study. MA thesis, Norwegian University of Science and Technology.
     [Google Scholar]
  165. Gobert, D. L. & Maisier, V.
    (1995) Valeurs modales du futur et du conditionnel et leurs emplois en français contemporain. The French Review68: 1003–1014.
     [Google Scholar]
  166. Godfrey, F.
    (1980) A discourse analysis of tense in adult ESL monologues. InDiscourse Analysis in Second Language Research, D. Larsen-Freeman (ed.), pp.92–100. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
     [Google Scholar]
  167. Goldberg, A.
    (1995) Constructions: A Construction Grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  168. (2003) Constructions: A new theoretical approach. Trends in Cognitive Sciences7(5): 219–224. 10.1016/S1364‑6613(03)00080‑9
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00080-9 [Google Scholar]
  169. Goldschneider, J. & DeKeyser, R.
    (2005) Explaining the “natural order of L2 morpheme acquisition” in English: A meta-analysis of multiple determinants. Language Learning55: 27–77. 10.1111/j.0023‑8333.2005.00295.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0023-8333.2005.00295.x [Google Scholar]
  170. Gondra, A.
    (2022) Testing the Interface hypothesis: Heritage speakers’ perception and production of Spanish subject position with unergative and unaccusative verbs. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism25(5): 1730–1764. 10.1080/13670050.2020.1799322
     https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2020.1799322 [Google Scholar]
  171. Goo, J. , Granena, G. , Yilmaz, Y. & Novella, M.
    (2015) Implicit and explicit instruction in L2 learning: Norris & Ortega (2000) revisited and updated. InImplicit and Explicit Learning of Languages, P. Rebuschat (ed.), pp.443–482. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/sibil.48.18goo
     https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.48.18goo [Google Scholar]
  172. Granath, S. & Wherrity, M.
    (2014) I’m loving you — and knowing it too: Aspect and so-called stative verbs. Rhesis: Linguistics and Philology4(1): 2–22.
     [Google Scholar]
  173. Granger, S.
    (1998) The computer learner corpus: A versatile new source of data for SLA research. InLearner English on Computer, S. Granger (ed.), pp.3–18. London: Addison Wesley Longman.
     [Google Scholar]
  174. (2003) The International Corpus of Learner English: A new resource for foreign language learning and teaching and second language acquisition research. TESOL Quarterly37(3): 538–546. 10.2307/3588404
     https://doi.org/10.2307/3588404 [Google Scholar]
  175. Greenbaum, S.
    (1991) The development of the International Corpus of English. InEnglish Corpus Linguistics: Studies in honour of Jan Svartvik, K. Aijmer , B. Altenberg & J. Svartvik (eds.), pp.83–91. London: Longman.
     [Google Scholar]
  176. Grevisse, D. , Watorek, M. , Heidlmayr, K. & Isel, F.
    (2023) Processing of complex morpho-syntactic structures in French: ERP evidence from native speakers. Brain and Cognition171: 1–12. 10.1016/j.bandc.2023.106062
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2023.106062 [Google Scholar]
  177. Grimshaw, J. & Rosen, T.
    (1990) Knowledge and obedience: The development status of the Binding theory. Linguistic Inquiry21: 187–222.
     [Google Scholar]
  178. Grinstead, J.
    (2004) Subjects and Interface Delay in child Spanish and Catalan. Language80(1): 40–72. 10.1353/lan.2004.0024
     https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2004.0024 [Google Scholar]
  179. (2021) Interface Delay. Journal of Child Language48: 888–906. 10.1017/S0305000921000477
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000921000477 [Google Scholar]
  180. Grodzinsky, Y. & Reinhart, T.
    (1993) The innateness of Binding and the development of coreference. Linguistic Inquiry24: 69–103.
     [Google Scholar]
  181. Hakuta, K.
    (1974) A preliminary report on the development of grammatical morphemes in a Japanese girl learning English as a second language. Working Papers on Bilingualism3.
     [Google Scholar]
  182. Halliday, M. A. K. & Hasan, R.
    (1989) Language, Context, and Text: Aspects of language in a social-semiotic perspective. Oxford: OUP.
     [Google Scholar]
  183. Hauser, M. D. , Chomsky, N. & Fitch, T.
    (2002) The faculty of language: What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve?Science298: 1569–1579. 10.1126/science.298.5598.1569
     https://doi.org/10.1126/science.298.5598.1569 [Google Scholar]
  184. Hawkins, R. & Chan, C.
    (1997) Partial availability of Universal Grammar in second language acquisition: The failed formal features hypothesis. Second Language Research13: 187–226. 10.1191/026765897671476153
     https://doi.org/10.1191/026765897671476153 [Google Scholar]
  185. Hawkins, R. & Liszka, S.
    (2003) Locating the source of defective past tense marking in advanced L2 English speakers. InThe Lexicon-Syntax Interface in Second Language Acquisition, R. van Hout , A. Hulk , F. Kuiken & R. Towell (eds), pp.21–44. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/lald.30.03haw
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.30.03haw [Google Scholar]
  186. Hicks, G. & Domínguez, L.
    (2020) A model of grammatical attrition. Second Language Research36(2): 143–165. 10.1177/0267658319862011
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658319862011 [Google Scholar]
  187. Hinkel, E.
    (2002) Second Language Writers’ Texts. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 10.4324/9781410602848
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410602848 [Google Scholar]
  188. Holmes, J.
    (1988) Doubt and certainty in ESL textbooks. Applied Linguistics9(1): 21–44. 10.1093/applin/9.1.21
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/9.1.21 [Google Scholar]
  189. Hondo, J.
    (2012) Unveiling learners’ attention during language processing: The case of epistemic meanings of a modal verb. Language Awareness21(3): 249–265. 10.1080/09658416.2011.598529
     https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2011.598529 [Google Scholar]
  190. Hoot, B. , Leal, T. & Destruel, E.
    (2020) Object focus marking in Spanish: An investigation using three tasks. Glossa5(1): 1–32.
     [Google Scholar]
  191. Hopper, P.
    (1979) Aspect and foregrounding in discourse. InSyntax and Semantics: Discourse and syntax, T. Givón (ed.), pp.213–241. New York, NY: Academic Press. 10.1163/9789004368897_010
     https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004368897_010 [Google Scholar]
  192. Hornsby, D.
    (2011) Variable liaison and the speech/writing interface in French. InInterfaces in Language 2 , D. Hornsby & E. Partridge (eds), pp.117–136. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.
     [Google Scholar]
  193. Hornsby, D. & Partridge, J.
    (eds) (2011) Interfaces in Language 2 . Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.
     [Google Scholar]
  194. Housen, A.
    (2002) The development of tense-aspect in English as a second language and the variable influence of inherent aspect. InThe L2 Acquisition of Tense-Aspect Morphology, R. Salaberry & Y. Shirai (eds), pp.155–197. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/lald.27.09hou
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.27.09hou [Google Scholar]
  195. Hu, C. & Li, X.
    (2015) Epistemic modality in the argumentative essays of Chinese EFL learners. English Language Teaching8(6): 20–31. 10.5539/elt.v8n6p20
     https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v8n6p20 [Google Scholar]
  196. Huddleston, R.
    (1976) Some theoretical issues in the description of the English verb. Lingua40(4): 331–383. 10.1016/0024‑3841(76)90084‑X
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3841(76)90084-X [Google Scholar]
  197. (1995) The case against a future tense in English. Studies in Language19: 399–446. 10.1075/sl.19.2.04hud
     https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.19.2.04hud [Google Scholar]
  198. Huette, S. , Matlock, T. , & Spivey, M. J.
    (2010) The online processing of modal verbs: Parallel activation of competing mental models. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society32(32): 1154–1159.
     [Google Scholar]
  199. Hundt, M. & Smith, N.
    (2009) The present perfect in British and American English: Has there been any change, recently?ICAME33: 45–63.
     [Google Scholar]
  200. Hwang, S. H. & Lardiere, D.
    (2013) Plural-marking in L2 Korean: A feature-based approach. Second Language Research29(1): 57–86. 10.1177/0267658312461496
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658312461496 [Google Scholar]
  201. Hyland, K. & Milton, J.
    (1997) Qualification and certainty in L1 and L2 students’ writing. Journal of Second Language Writing6(2): 183–205. 10.1016/S1060‑3743(97)90033‑3
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(97)90033-3 [Google Scholar]
  202. Iatridou, S.
    (1990) About AgrP. Linguistic Inquiry21(4): 551–577.
     [Google Scholar]
  203. Ishikawa, S.
    (2023) The ICNALE Guide. An introduction to a learner corpus study on Asian learner’s L2 English. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781003252528
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003252528 [Google Scholar]
  204. Iverson, M. , Kempchinsky, P. & Rothman, J.
    (2008) Interface vulnerability and knowledge of the subjunctive/indicative distinction with negated epistemic predicates in L2 Spanish. Eurosla Yearbook8: 135–163. 10.1075/eurosla.8.09ive
     https://doi.org/10.1075/eurosla.8.09ive [Google Scholar]
  205. Jackendoff, R.
    (2002) Foundations of Language. Brain, meaning, evolution. Oxford: OUP.
     [Google Scholar]
  206. (2007) Language, Consciousness, Culture: Essays on mental structure. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/4111.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/4111.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  207. (2011) What is the human language faculty? Two views. Language87(3): 586–624. 10.1353/lan.2011.0063
     https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2011.0063 [Google Scholar]
  208. (2023) The parallel architecture in language. InTopics in Cognitive Science, G. Baggio , N. Cohn & E. Wittenberg (eds), pp.1–10. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley & Sons.
     [Google Scholar]
  209. Janke, V.
    (2013) The distribution of non-obligatory control and its + human interpretation. InInterfaces in Language 3 , M. Kolokonte & V. Janke (eds), pp.121–158. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.
     [Google Scholar]
  210. Jespersen, O.
    (1924) The Philosophy of Grammar. London: Allen & Unwin.
     [Google Scholar]
  211. Kaplan, M.
    (1987) Developmental patterns of past tense acquisition among foreign language learners of French. InForeign Language Learning: A research perspective, B. VanPatten (ed.), 52–60. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
     [Google Scholar]
  212. Kenny, A.
    (1963) Action, Emotion and Will. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
     [Google Scholar]
  213. Khojasteh, L. & Reinders, H.
    (2013) How textbooks (and learners) get it wrong: A corpus study of modal verbs. Applied Research on English Language2(1): 33–44.
     [Google Scholar]
  214. Khojasteh, L. , Shokrpour, N. & Torabiardakani, N.
    (2017) EFL advanced adult learners’ use of English modals in narrative composition. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities25(4): 1803–1820.
     [Google Scholar]
  215. Killgariff, A.
    (2006) BNC database and word frequency lists. https://www.kilgarriff.co.uk/bnc-readme.html
  216. Kim, C. & Suh, H.
    (2014) Epistemic rhetorical stance: hedges and boosters in L1 and L2 students’ English writing. The Linguistic Association of Korea Journal22(2): 61–93. 10.24303/lakdoi.2014.22.2.61
     https://doi.org/10.24303/lakdoi.2014.22.2.61 [Google Scholar]
  217. Kizu, M. , Gyogi, E. , & Dougherty, P.
    (2022) Epistemic stance in L2 English discourse: The development of pragmatic strategies in study abroad. Applied Pragmatics4(1): 33–62. 10.1075/ap.20007.kiz
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ap.20007.kiz [Google Scholar]
  218. Klein, W.
    (1992) The present perfect puzzle. Language68(3): 525–52. 10.2307/415793
     https://doi.org/10.2307/415793 [Google Scholar]
  219. (1994) Time in Language. London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  220. (1995) The acquisition of English. InThe Acquisition of Temporality in a Second Language, R. Dietrich , C. Noyau & K. Wolfgang (eds), pp.31–70. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/sibil.7.04kle
     https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.7.04kle [Google Scholar]
  221. Klein, W. & Perdue, C.
    (1997) The basic variety (or: Couldn’t natural languages be much simpler?). Second Language Research14: 301–347. 10.1191/026765897666879396
     https://doi.org/10.1191/026765897666879396 [Google Scholar]
  222. Knight, D. , Adolphs, S. & Carter, R.
    (2014) CANELC — constructing an e-language corpus. Corpora9(1): 29–56. 10.3366/cor.2014.0050
     https://doi.org/10.3366/cor.2014.0050 [Google Scholar]
  223. Kolokonte, M. & Janke, V.
    (eds) (2013) Interfaces in Language 3 . Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.
     [Google Scholar]
  224. Kronning, H.
    (1996) Modality, cognition et polysémie: sémantique du verbe modal ‘devoir’. Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis.
     [Google Scholar]
  225. (2001) Pour une tripartition des emplois du modal devoir . InLes verbes modaux, P. Dendale & J. Van der Auwera (eds), 67–84. Amsterdam: Rodopi. 10.1163/9789004488021_007
     https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004488021_007 [Google Scholar]
  226. (2024) Les verbes modaux devoir et pouvoir. InEncyclopédie Grammaticale du Français. encyclogram.fr
     [Google Scholar]
  227. Krug, M.
    (2000) Emerging English Modals. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110820980
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110820980 [Google Scholar]
  228. Kupisch, T.
    (2004) On the relation between input frequency and acquisition patterns from a cross-linguistic perspective. InProceedings of GALA, J. van Kampen & S. Baauw (eds), pp. 281–92. Utrecht: LOT.
     [Google Scholar]
  229. Kurtyka, A.
    (2001) Teaching English phrasal verbs: A cognitive approach. InApplied Cognitive Linguistics I: Language pedagogy, M. Pütz , S. Niemeier & R. Dirven (eds), 29–54. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110866254.29
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110866254.29 [Google Scholar]
  230. Lakoff, G.
    (1987) Women, Fire and Dangerous Things. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  231. Langacker, R. W.
    (1987) Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Vol. 1: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  232. Langacker, R. W.
    (1991) Foundations of cognitive grammar, Vol. 2: Descriptive application. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  233. Langacker, R. W.
    (2008) Cognitive grammar as a basis for language instruction. InHandbook of Cognitive Linguistics and Second Language Acquisition, P. Robinson & N. Ellis (eds), pp.66–88. New York, NY: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  234. Lardiere, D.
    (2007) Ultimate Attainment in Second Language Acquisition: A case study. New York, NY: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  235. (2008) Feature assembly in second language acquisition. InThe Role of Formal Features in Second Language Acquisition, J. M. Liceras , H. Zobl & H. Goodluck (eds), pp. 106–140. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
     [Google Scholar]
  236. (2009) Some thoughts on the contrastic analysis of features in second language acquisition. Second Language Research25(2): 173–227. 10.1177/0267658308100283
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658308100283 [Google Scholar]
  237. Larreya, P.
    (1996) Le temps grammatical: Une question de mode?InDynamique du Temps, A. Suberchicot (ed.), pp.139–153. Clermont-Ferrand: CRLMC, Université Blaise Pascal.
     [Google Scholar]
  238. (2000) Modal verbs and the expression of futurity in English, French and Italian. Belgian Journal of Linguistics14: 115–129. 10.1075/bjl.14.07lar
     https://doi.org/10.1075/bjl.14.07lar [Google Scholar]
  239. (2003) Irrealis, past time reference and modality. InModality in Contemporary English, R. Facchinelli , F. Palmer & M. Krug (eds), pp.21–45. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110895339.21
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110895339.21 [Google Scholar]
  240. Larsen-Freeman, D.
    (1975) The acquisition of grammatical morphemes by adult learners of English as a second language. Doctoral dissertation, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
  241. Lass, R.
    (1994) Proliferation and option-cutting: The strong verb in the fifteenth to eighteenth centuries. InTowards a Standard English: 1600–1800, D. Stein & I. Tieken-Boon van Ostade (eds), pp.81–113. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
  242. (2008) Phonology and morphology. InThe Cambridge History of the English Language, Vol. 3: 1476–1776, R. Lass (ed.), pp.56–186. Cambridge: CUP.
     [Google Scholar]
  243. Leal, T. , Rothman, J. & Slabakova, R.
    (2014) A rare structure at the syntax-discourse interface: Heritage and Spanish-dominant native speakers weigh in. Language Acquisition21(4): 411–429. 10.1080/10489223.2014.892946
     https://doi.org/10.1080/10489223.2014.892946 [Google Scholar]
  244. Leclercq, B.
    (2021) The acquisition of verbal epistemic stance marking during study abroad: The case of je pense in L2 French. Languages6: 196. 10.3390/languages6040196
     https://doi.org/10.3390/languages6040196 [Google Scholar]
  245. (2023) Modality revisited: Combining insights from Construction Grammar and Relevance Theory. InModels of Modals, I. Depraetere , B. Cappelle , M. Hilpert , L. De Cuypere , M. Dehouck , P. Denis , S. Flach , N. Grabar , C. Grandin , T. Hamon , C. Hufeld , B. Leclercq & H-J. Schmid (eds), pp.60–92. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110734157‑003
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110734157-003 [Google Scholar]
  246. Leclercq, P. & Edmonds, A.
    (2017) How L2 learners of French and English express modality using verbal means: A crosslinguistic and developmental study. International Review of Applied Linguistics55(3): 265–282. 10.1515/iral‑2017‑0108
     https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2017-0108 [Google Scholar]
  247. Leclercq, P. & Mélac, E.
    (2021) Second language acquisition of evidentiality in French and English in a narrative task. Language, Interaction and Acquisition122: 251–283. 10.1075/lia.20025.lec
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lia.20025.lec [Google Scholar]
  248. Lee, E-J.
    (2001) The acquisition of personal and temporal reference in English interlanguage: A longitudinal study. Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.
  249. Lee, E. & Lardiere, D.
    (2019) Feature reassembly in the acquisition of plural marking by Korean and Indonesian bilinguals. A bidirectional study. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism9(1): 73–119. 10.1075/lab.16018.lee
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.16018.lee [Google Scholar]
  250. Lee, E. & Park, S.
    (2008) A study of epistemic modality in college writing. Korean Journal of English Language and Linguistics14(1): 45–58.
     [Google Scholar]
  251. Leech, G.
    (1983) Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.
     [Google Scholar]
  252. Leech, G. , Hundt, M. , Mair, C. & Smith, N.
    (2009) Change in Contemporary English. A grammatical study. Cambridge: CUP. 10.1017/CBO9780511642210
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511642210 [Google Scholar]
  253. Le Goffic, P. & Lab, F.
    (2001) The present “pro futuro”. Cahiers Chronos7: 77–98. 10.1163/9789042013247_007
     https://doi.org/10.1163/9789042013247_007 [Google Scholar]
  254. Leow, R.
    (2022) The influence of learning contexts on the psycholinguistics of language learning. InThe Routledge Handbook of Second Language Acquisition and Psycholinguistics, A. Godfroid & H. Hopp (eds), pp.373–386. New York, NY: Routledge. 10.4324/9781003018872‑35
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003018872-35 [Google Scholar]
  255. Levin, B. & Rappaport Hovav, M.
    (1995) Unaccusativity: At the syntax-semantics interface. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  256. Lewis, M.
    (1986) The English Verb. Hove: Language Teaching Publications.
     [Google Scholar]
  257. Lewis, L. M.
    (2024) The role of linguistic input in adult grammars: Modelling L1 morphosyntactic attrition. Doctoral dissertation, University of Southampton.
  258. L’Huillier, M.
    (1999) Advanced French Grammar. Cambridge: CUP. 10.1017/CBO9780511800221
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511800221 [Google Scholar]
  259. Li, L. X.
    (2020) Modal verb treatment in EFL textbooks: A quantitative and qualitative approach. Doctoral dissertation, The Chinese University of Hong Kong.
  260. (2022) Developmental patterns of English modal verbs in the writings of Chinese learners of English: A corpus-based approach. Cogent Education9(1): 1–23. 10.1080/2331186X.2022.2050457
     https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2022.2050457 [Google Scholar]
  261. Li, Q.
    (2017) A corpus-based study of modal verbs use in English writing by ESL learners. Canadian Social Science13(11): 31–35.
     [Google Scholar]
  262. Li, P. & Shirai, Y.
    (2000) The Acquisition of Lexical and Grammatical Aspect. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110800715
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110800715 [Google Scholar]
  263. Liang, L. , Chondrogianni, V. & Chen, B.
    (2024) Online processing of the grammatical aspect marker by L2 Chinese learners. Second Language Research38(4): 765–786. 10.1177/0267658321996423
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658321996423 [Google Scholar]
  264. Liceras, J.
    (1988) Syntax and stylistics: More on the pro-drop parameter. InLearnability and Second Languages: A book of readings, J. Pankhurst , M. Sharwood Smith & P. Van Buren (eds), pp.71–93. Dordrecht: Foris. 10.1515/9783110874150‑005
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110874150-005 [Google Scholar]
  265. Lidz, G. & Gagliardi, A.
    (2015) How nature meets nurture: Universal Grammar and statistical learning. Annual Review of Linguistics1: 333–352. 10.1146/annurev‑linguist‑030514‑125236
     https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-linguist-030514-125236 [Google Scholar]
  266. Lightfoot, D. & Hornstein, N.
    (Eds) (1994) Verb Movement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511627705
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511627705 [Google Scholar]
  267. Lillo-Martin, D. & Müller de Quadros, R.
    (2011) Acquisition of the syntax-discourse interface: The expression of point of view. Lingua121: 623–636. 10.1016/j.lingua.2010.07.001
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2010.07.001 [Google Scholar]
  268. Liszka, S. A.
    (2006) Advanced grammars and pragmatic processes. Exploring the interface. Eurosla Yearbook6: 79–99. 10.1075/eurosla.6.07lis
     https://doi.org/10.1075/eurosla.6.07lis [Google Scholar]
  269. (2009) Associating meaning to form in advanced L2 speakers. An investigation of the English present simple and present progressive. InRepresentational Deficits in SLA: Studies in honor of Roger Hawkins, N. Snape , Y-k.I. Leung & M. Sharwood Smith (eds), pp.229–246. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/lald.47.12lis
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.47.12lis [Google Scholar]
  270. (2015) The L2 acquisition of the English present simple — present progressive distinction. Verb-raising revisited. InThe Acquisition of the Present, D. Ayoun (ed.), pp. 57–86. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/z.196.03lis
     https://doi.org/10.1075/z.196.03lis [Google Scholar]
  271. Littlemore, J.
    (2009) Applying Cognitive Linguistics to Second Language Learning and Teaching. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230245259
     https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230245259 [Google Scholar]
  272. Llopis-García, R.
    (2010) Why cognitive grammar works in the L2 classroom. A case study of mood selection in Spanish. AILA Review23: 72–94. 10.1075/aila.23.05llo
     https://doi.org/10.1075/aila.23.05llo [Google Scholar]
  273. Lombardi, A.
    (2022) Moral outrage or mere possibility? An exploration of epistemic versus deontic stance in reading-to-write argumentation. Journal of Second Language Writing58(3): 1–13. 10.1016/j.jslw.2022.100912
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2022.100912 [Google Scholar]
  274. Long, M. H.
    (1991) Focus on form: A design feature in language teaching methodology. InForeign Language Research in Cross-Cultural Perspective, K. de Bot , R. Ginsberg & C. Kramsch (eds), pp.39–52. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/sibil.2.07lon
     https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.2.07lon [Google Scholar]
  275. (2000) Focus on form in task-based language teaching. InLanguage Policy and Pedagogy. Essays in honor of A. Ronald Walton, R. D. Lambert & E. Shohamy (eds), pp. 179–192. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/z.96.11lon
     https://doi.org/10.1075/z.96.11lon [Google Scholar]
  276. Long, M. H. & Robinson, P.
    (1998) Focus on form: theory, research, and practice. InFocus on Form in Classroom Second Language Acquisition, C. Doughty & J. Williams (eds), pp. 15–41. Cambridge: CUP.
     [Google Scholar]
  277. Long, M. H. & Sato, C. J.
    (1984) Methodological issues in interlanguage studies: An interactionist perspective. InInterlanguage, A. Davies , C. Criper & A. P. R. Howatt (eds), pp.253–279. Edinburgh: EUP.
     [Google Scholar]
  278. Love, R.
    (2017) The Spoken British National Corpus 2014. Design, compilation and analysis. Doctoral dissertation, Lancaster University.
  279. Lyons, C.
    (1999) Definiteness. Cambridge: CUP. 10.1017/CBO9780511605789
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511605789 [Google Scholar]
  280. Lyons, J.
    (1977) Semantics (Vol. 2). Cambridge: CUP.
     [Google Scholar]
  281. Mackey, A. & Gass, S. M.
    (2005) Second Language Research: Methodology and design. New York, NY: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  282. MacWhinney, B.
    (2000) The CHILDES Project: Tools for analyzing talk. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
     [Google Scholar]
  283. Mahdi, A. A.
    (2021) Saudi EFL learners’ use of English modal verbs: A study of challenges and solutions. International Journal of Language and Literary Studies3(2): 301–311. 10.36892/ijlls.v3i2.991
     https://doi.org/10.36892/ijlls.v3i2.991 [Google Scholar]
  284. Martin, G. , Demirdache, H. , García del Real, I. , van Hout, A. & Kazanina, N.
    (2020) Children’s non-adultlike interpretations of telic predicates across languages. Linguistics58(5): 1447–1500. 10.1515/ling‑2020‑0182
     https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2020-0182 [Google Scholar]
  285. Massery, L. & Fuentes, C.
    (2017) Testing the Interface hypothesis: Acquisition of complex syntax and modality in L2 Spanish. Journal of Second and Multiple Language Acquisition5(4): 99–126.
     [Google Scholar]
  286. Massini-Cagliari, G.
    (2013) Changing attitudes: Ways of phonologically adapting proper names in archaic Brazilian and European Portuguese. InInterfaces in Language 3 , M. Kolokonte & V. Janke (eds), pp.159–178. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.
     [Google Scholar]
  287. McCoy, L.
    (2022) The acquisition of the subjunctive mood by L2 French learners. Doctoral dissertation, University of Arizona.
  288. McEnery, T. & Kifle, N.
    (2002) Epistemic modality in argumentative essays of second language writers. InAcademic Discourse, J. Flowerdew (ed.), pp.182–195. London: Longman.
     [Google Scholar]
  289. McManus, K. & Mitchell, R.
    (2015) Subjunctive use and development in L2 French. A longitudinal study. Language, Interaction and Acquisition6(1): 42–73. 10.1075/lia.6.1.02mcm
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lia.6.1.02mcm [Google Scholar]
  290. Mélac, E.
    (2022) The grammaticalization of evidentiality in English. English Language and Linguistics26(2): 331–359. 10.1017/S1360674321000101
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S1360674321000101 [Google Scholar]
  291. Mélac, E. & Leclercq, P.
    (2024) Introduction: The functions of evidentiality. Functions of Language31(1): 1–15. (Special issue) 10.1075/fol.24038.mel
     https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.24038.mel [Google Scholar]
  292. Meng, Y.
    (2012) Epistemic modality in written English of Chinese English majors: An interlanguage pragmatic study. Doctoral dissertation, Northeast Normal University, Jilin, China.
  293. Michaelis, L. A.
    (2021) Tense in English. InThe Handbook of English Linguistics, B. Aarts , A. McMahon & L. Hinrichs (eds), pp.163–181. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley & Sons.
     [Google Scholar]
  294. Mifka-Profozic, N.
    (2017) Processing epistemic modality in a second language: A self-paced reading study. IRAL55(3): 245–264. 10.1515/iral‑2017‑0107
     https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2017-0107 [Google Scholar]
  295. Mifka-Profozic, N. , O’Reilly, D. & Lovrovic, L.
    (2024) Unpacking L2 explicit linguistic knowledge and online processing of the English modals may and can: A comparison of acceptability judgments and self-paced reading. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 46(3):741–768. 10.1017/S0272263123000475
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263123000475 [Google Scholar]
  296. Moessner, L.
    (2020) The History of the Present English Subjunctive. A corpus-based study of mood and modality. Edinburgh: EUP.
     [Google Scholar]
  297. Mourelatos, A.
    (1978) Events, processes and states. Language and Philosophy2: 415–434. 10.1007/BF00149015
     https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00149015 [Google Scholar]
  298. (1981) Events, processes, and states. InSyntax and Semantics, Vol. 14: Tense and Aspect, P. Tedeschi & A. Zaenen (eds), pp.191–212. New York, NY: Academic Press. 10.1163/9789004373112_012
     https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004373112_012 [Google Scholar]
  299. Mulder, G. , Schoenmakers, G-J. & de Hoop, H.
    (2022) The influence of first and second language on the acquisition of pragmatic markers in Spanish: Evidence from an experimental study. Isogloss8(1): 1–23. 10.5565/rev/isogloss.212
     https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/isogloss.212 [Google Scholar]
  300. Mustanoja, T. F.
    (1960) A Middle English Grammar, Part 1: Parts of speech. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.
     [Google Scholar]
  301. Nakayama, S.
    (2020) Contrastive interlanguage analysis of modal auxiliary verb usage by Japanese learners of English in argumentative essays. Conference Proceedings of the IAFOR International Conference on Education: 507–522. 10.22492/issn.2189‑1036.2020.41
     https://doi.org/10.22492/issn.2189-1036.2020.41 [Google Scholar]
  302. (2021) Modal auxiliary verbs in Japanese EFL learners’ conversation: A corpus-based study. Asia Pacific Journal of Corpus Research2(1): 23–34.
     [Google Scholar]
  303. Nesi, H.
    (2013) BAWE: An introduction to a new resource. InNew Trends in Corpora and Language Learning, A. Frankenberg-Garcia , G. Aston & L. Flowerdew (eds), pp.213–228. London: Bloomsbury.
     [Google Scholar]
  304. Otzurk, O. & Papafragou, A.
    (2015) The acquisition of epistemic modality: Meaning to pragmatic interpretation. Language Learning & Development11: 191–214. 10.1080/15475441.2014.905169
     https://doi.org/10.1080/15475441.2014.905169 [Google Scholar]
  305. Norris, J. & Ortega, L.
    (2001) Does type of instruction make a difference? Substantive findings from a meta-analytic review. Language Learning51: 157–213. 10.1111/j.1467‑1770.2001.tb00017.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.2001.tb00017.x [Google Scholar]
  306. Palmer, F. R.
    (1986) Mood and Modality. Cambridge: CUP.
     [Google Scholar]
  307. (1990) Modality and the English Modals, 2nd ed. Cambridge: CUP.
     [Google Scholar]
  308. (2001) Mood and Modality. Cambridge: CUP. 10.1017/CBO9781139167178
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139167178 [Google Scholar]
  309. Papafragou, A.
    (1998) Inference and word meaning: The case of modal auxiliaries. Lingua105: 1–47. 10.1016/S0024‑3841(97)00029‑6
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-3841(97)00029-6 [Google Scholar]
  310. Papafragou, A.
    (2000) Modality: Issues in the semantics-pragmatics interface. Amsterdam: Elsevier. 10.1163/9780585474199
     https://doi.org/10.1163/9780585474199 [Google Scholar]
  311. Parisse, C. , de Pontox, S. & Morgenstern, A.
    (2017) L’émergence de la temporalité dans le langage de l’enfant. InLe langage de l’enfant: De l’éclosion à l’explosion, A. Morgenstern & C. Parisse (eds), pp.134–147. Paris: Presses de la Sorbonne Nouvelle. 10.4000/books.psn.10644
     https://doi.org/10.4000/books.psn.10644 [Google Scholar]
  312. Parkinson, J.
    (2020) Stance and modals of obligation and necessity in academic writing. Register Studies 2 (1): 102–131. 10.1075/rs.18012.par
     https://doi.org/10.1075/rs.18012.par [Google Scholar]
  313. Partridge, J.
    (ed.) (2010) Interfaces in Language. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.
     [Google Scholar]
  314. Perdue, C.
    (ed.) (1982) Second Language Acquisition by Adult Immigrants: A field manual. Strasbourg: European Science Foundation.
     [Google Scholar]
  315. (ed.) (1993) Adult Language Acquisition, Vol. 1: Field Methods. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
     [Google Scholar]
  316. Philip, W. & Coopmans, P.
    (1996) The role of lexical feature acquisition in the development of pronominal anaphora. InAmsterdam Series on Child Language Development (Vol.5), W. Philip & F. Wijnen (eds), pp.241–257. Amsterdam: Instituut Algemene Taalwetenschap.
     [Google Scholar]
  317. Pollock, J-Y.
    (1989) Verb movement, Universal Grammar, and the structure of IP. Linguistic Inquiry20(3): 365–424
     [Google Scholar]
  318. Pölvedere, N. , Johansson, V. & Paradis, C.
    (2021) On the London-Lund Corpus 2: Design, challenges and innovations. English Language & Linguistics25(3): 459–483. 10.1017/S1360674321000186
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S1360674321000186 [Google Scholar]
  319. Pütz, M. , Dirven, R. & Niemeier, S.
    (eds) (2001a) Applied Cognitive Linguistics I: Theory and language acquisition. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110866247
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110866247 [Google Scholar]
  320. Pütz, M. , Niemeier, S. & Dirven, R.
    (eds) (2001b) Applied Cognitive Linguistics I: Language pedagogy. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
  321. Quer, J.
    (2001) Interpreting mood. Probus13: 81–111. 10.1515/prbs.13.1.81
     https://doi.org/10.1515/prbs.13.1.81 [Google Scholar]
  322. (2009) Twists of mood: The distribution and interpretation of the indicative and the subjunctive. Lingua119: 1779–1787. 10.1016/j.lingua.2008.12.003
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2008.12.003 [Google Scholar]
  323. Qiu, X.
    (2020) Functions of oral monologic tasks: Effects of topic familiarity on L2 speaking performance. Language Teaching Research24(6): 745–764. 10.1177/1362168819829021
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168819829021 [Google Scholar]
  324. Quirk, R. , Greenbaum, S. , Leech, G. & Svartvik, J.
    (1972) A Grammar of Contemporary English. Longman.
     [Google Scholar]
  325. Quirk, R. , Greenbaun, S. , Leech, G. & Svartvik, J.
    (1985) A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.
     [Google Scholar]
  326. Radden, G. & Dirven, R.
    (2007) Cognitive English Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/clip.2
     https://doi.org/10.1075/clip.2 [Google Scholar]
  327. Ramchand, G. & Reiss, C.
    (2012) (Eds). The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Interfaces. Oxford: OUP.
     [Google Scholar]
  328. Rastelli, S.
    (2020) The Acquisition of Aspect in a Second Language. Cambridge: CUP. 10.1017/9781108903455
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108903455 [Google Scholar]
  329. (2023) Telic for whom? The lexical underspecification hypothesis. Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique68 (2): 191–228. 10.1017/cnj.2023.3
     https://doi.org/10.1017/cnj.2023.3 [Google Scholar]
  330. Rautionaho, P. , Deshors, S. & Meiläinen, L.
    (2018) Revisiting the ENL-ESL-EFL continuum: A multifactorial approach to grammatical aspect in spoken Englishes. ICAME Journal42: 41–78. 10.1515/icame‑2018‑0004
     https://doi.org/10.1515/icame-2018-0004 [Google Scholar]
  331. Ravid, D.
    (2002) A developmental perspective on root perception in Hebrew and Palestinian Arabic. InLanguage Processing and Acquisition in Languages of Semitic, Root-based Morphology, Y. Shimron (ed.), pp.293–319. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/lald.28
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.28 [Google Scholar]
  332. Ravid, D. & Zilberbuch, S.
    (2003) Morphosyntactic constructs in the development of spoken and written Hebrew text production. Journal of Child Language30: 395–418. 10.1017/S0305000903005555
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000903005555 [Google Scholar]
  333. Reichenbach, H.
    (1947) Elements of Symbolic Logic. New York, NY: Macmillan.
     [Google Scholar]
  334. Reinhart, T.
    (2006) Interface Strategies: Optimal and costly computations. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/3846.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/3846.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  335. Roberts, I.
    (1998) Have/Be raising, Move F, and Procrastinate. Linguistic Inquiry29: 113–125. 10.1162/002438998553671
     https://doi.org/10.1162/002438998553671 [Google Scholar]
  336. Roberts, L. & Liszka, S. A.
    (2013) Processing tense/aspect-agreement violations on-line in the second language: A self-paced reading study with French and German L2 learners of English. Second Language Research29(4): 413–439. 10.1177/0267658313503171
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658313503171 [Google Scholar]
  337. (2019) Grammatical aspect and L2 learners’ online processing of temporarily ambiguous sentences in English: A self-paced reading study with German, Dutch and French L2 learners. Second Language Research37(4): 619–647. 10.1177/0267658319895551
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658319895551 [Google Scholar]
  338. Robinson, P.
    (1995) Task complexity and second language narrative discourse. Language Learning45(1): 99–140. 10.1111/j.1467‑1770.1995.tb00964.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1995.tb00964.x [Google Scholar]
  339. Robison, R. E.
    (1990) The primacy of aspect: Aspectual marking in English interlanguage. Studies in Second Language Acquisition12: 315–330. 10.1017/S0272263100009190
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100009190 [Google Scholar]
  340. (1995) Verb inflections in native speaker speech: Do they mean what we think?InThe Development of Morphological Systematicity. A cross-linguistic perspective, H. Pishwa & K. Maroldt (eds), pp.199–224. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.
     [Google Scholar]
  341. Rocca, S.
    (2002) Lexical aspect in child second language acquisition of temporality: A bidirectional study. InThe L2 Acquisition of Tense-Aspect Morphology, R. Salaberry & Y. Shirai (eds), pp.249–284. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/lald.27.12roc
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.27.12roc [Google Scholar]
  342. Rohde, A.
    (1996) The Aspect hypothesis and emergence of tense distinction in naturalistic L2 acquisition. Linguistics34: 1115–1138. 10.1515/ling.1996.34.5.1115
     https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1996.34.5.1115 [Google Scholar]
  343. Rohrbacher, B. W.
    (1999) Morphology-Driven Syntax: A theory of V to I raising and pro-drop. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.15
     https://doi.org/10.1075/la.15 [Google Scholar]
  344. Römer, U. & O’Donnell, M. B.
    (2011) From student hard drive to web corpus (part 1): The design, compilation and genre classification of the Michigan Corpus of Upper-level Student Papers (MICUSP). Corpora6(2): 159–177. 10.3366/cor.2011.0011
     https://doi.org/10.3366/cor.2011.0011 [Google Scholar]
  345. Rozendaal, M. I. & Baker, A. E.
    (2008) A cross-linguistic investigation of the pragmatics of indefinite and definite reference in two-year-olds. Journal Child Language35: 773–807. 10.1017/S0305000908008702
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000908008702 [Google Scholar]
  346. Rudzka-Ostyn, B.
    (1988) Semantic extensions into the domain of verbal communication. InTopics in Cognitive Linguistics, B. Rudzka-Ostyn (ed.), pp.507–553. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.50.19rud
     https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.50.19rud [Google Scholar]
  347. Rutherford, W. & Sharwood Smith, M.
    (1985) Consciousness-raising and universal grammar. Applied Linguistics6: 274–282. 10.1093/applin/6.3.274
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/6.3.274 [Google Scholar]
  348. Ryle, G.
    (1949) The Concept of Mind. London: Hutchinson’s University Library.
     [Google Scholar]
  349. Ryu, J.-Y. & Shirai, Y.
    (2023) L1 acquisition of tense-aspect markers ‑ess (past-perfective) and ‑ko iss (imperfective) in Korean. Journal of Child Language50(3): 736–756. 10.1017/S0305000922000113
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000922000113 [Google Scholar]
  350. Salaberry, M. R.
    (2008) Marking Past Tense in Second Language Acquisition. London: Continuum.
     [Google Scholar]
  351. Salaberry, M. R.
    (2000) The Development of Past Tense Morphology in L2 Spanish. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/sibil.22
     https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.22 [Google Scholar]
  352. Salaberry, R.
    (2024) Thirty years in studying lexical aspect in L2 acquisition: Moving towards an expansive research agenda. Ampersand13. 10.1016/j.amper.2024.100185
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amper.2024.100185 [Google Scholar]
  353. Salaberry, R. & Shirai, Y.
    (eds) (2002) The L2 Acquisition of Tense-Aspect Morphology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/lald.27
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.27 [Google Scholar]
  354. Salkie, R.
    (2010) Will: Tense or modal or both?English Language and Linguistics14(2):187–215. 10.1017/S1360674310000055
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S1360674310000055 [Google Scholar]
  355. Salsbury, T.
    (1997) The grammaticalization of hypotheticals. Unpublished manuscript for the Seminar in Second Language Acquisition at Indiana University, Bloomington.
     [Google Scholar]
  356. (2000) The acquisitional grammaticalization of unreal conditionals and modality in L2 English: A longitudinal perspective. Doctoral dissertation, Indiana University.
  357. Salsbury, T. & Bardovi-Harlig, K.
    (2000) Oppositional talk and the acquisition of modality in L2 English. InSocial and Cognitive Factors in Second Language Acquisition: Selected Proceedings of the 1999 Second Language Research Forum, B. Swierzbin , F. Morris , M. E. Anderson , C. A. Klee , & E. Tarone (eds), pp.57–76. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  358. (2001) “I know your mean, but I don’t think so”. Disagreements in L2 English. InPragmatics and Language Learning, L. Bouton (ed.), pp. 131–151. Urbana-Champaign, IL: University of Illinois.
     [Google Scholar]
  359. Sato, C. J.
    (1990) The Syntax of Conversation in Interlanguage Development. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.
     [Google Scholar]
  360. Schachter, J. & Yip, V.
    (1990) Grammaticality judgments: Why does anyone object to subject extraction?Studies in Second Language Acquisition12(4): 379–392. 10.1017/S0272263100009487
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100009487 [Google Scholar]
  361. Schmidt, R.
    (1983) Interaction, acculturation and the acquisition of communicative competence: a case study of an adult. Sociolinguistics and Language Acquisition137: 137–174.
     [Google Scholar]
  362. (1995) Attention and Awareness in Foreign Language Learning. Honolulu, HI: Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center, University of Hawai’i.
     [Google Scholar]
  363. Schwartz, B. D. & Sprouse, R. A.
    (1994) Word order and nominative case in normative language acquisition: A longitudinal study of (L1 Turkish) German Interlanguage. InLanguage Acquisition Studies in Generative, T. Hoekstra & B. D. Schwartz (eds), pp.317–368. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/lald.8.14sch
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.8.14sch [Google Scholar]
  364. (1996) L2 cognitive states and the Full Transfer/Full Access Model. Second Language Research12: 40–72. 10.1177/026765839601200103
     https://doi.org/10.1177/026765839601200103 [Google Scholar]
  365. Sénéchal, M.
    (2000) Morphological effects in children’s spelling of French words. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology54: 76–85. 10.1037/h0087331
     https://doi.org/10.1037/h0087331 [Google Scholar]
  366. Serratrice, L. , Sorace, A. & Paoli, S.
    (2004) Crosslinguistic influence at the syntax-pragmatics interface: Subjects and objects in English-Italian bilingual and monolingual acquisition. Bilingualism: Language & Cognition7: 183–205. 10.1017/S1366728904001610
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728904001610 [Google Scholar]
  367. Skehan, P.
    (1998) Task-based instruction. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics18: 268–286. 10.1017/S0267190500003585
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190500003585 [Google Scholar]
  368. Slobin, D.
    (1985) Cross-linguistic evidence for the language-making capacity. InThe Crosslinguistic Study of Language Acquisition: Theoretical Issues (Vol.2), D. Slobin (ed.), pp.1157–1249. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
     [Google Scholar]
  369. Smith, C. S.
    (1991/1997) The Parameter of Aspect. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
     [Google Scholar]
  370. Sočanać, T.
    (2017) Subjunctive complements in Slavic languages: A syntax-semantics interface approach. Doctoral dissertation, University of Geneva.
  371. Solt, S. , Pugach, Y. , Klein, E. C. , Adams, K. , Stoyneshka, I. & Rose, T.
    (2004) L2 perception and production of the English regular past: Evidence of phonological effects. InProceedings of the 28th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, A. Brugos , L. Micciulla & C. Smith (eds), pp.553–564. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  372. Sorace, A.
    (1993) Incomplete vs. divergent representations of unaccusativity in non-native grammars of Italian. Second Language Research9(1): 22–47. 10.1177/026765839300900102
     https://doi.org/10.1177/026765839300900102 [Google Scholar]
  373. (2011) Pinning down the concept of “interfaces” in bilingualism. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism1(1): 1–33. 10.1075/lab.1.1.01sor
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.1.1.01sor [Google Scholar]
  374. (2020) L1 attrition in a wider perspective. Second Language Research36(2): 203–206. 10.1177/0267658319895571
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658319895571 [Google Scholar]
  375. Sorace, A. , & Filiaci, F.
    (2006) Anaphora resolution in near-native speakers of Italian. Second Language Research22: 339–368. 10.1191/0267658306sr271oa
     https://doi.org/10.1191/0267658306sr271oa [Google Scholar]
  376. Sorace, A. & Serratrice, L.
    (2009) Internal and external interfaces in bilingual language development: Beyond structural overlap. International Journal of Bilingualism13: 195–210. 10.1177/1367006909339810
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006909339810 [Google Scholar]
  377. Sprouse, R. A.
    (1998) Some notes on the relationship between inflectional morphology and parameter setting in first and second language acquisition. InMorphology and its Interfaces in Second Language Knowledge, M.-L. Beck (ed.), pp.41–68. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/lald.19.04spr
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.19.04spr [Google Scholar]
  378. Stewart, A. J. , Haigh, M. & Kidd, E.
    (2009) An investigation into the online processing of counterfactual and indicative conditionals. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology62(11): 2113–2125. 10.1080/17470210902973106
     https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210902973106 [Google Scholar]
  379. Stewart, A. J. , Kidd, E. & Haigh, M.
    (2009) Early sensitivity to discourse-level anomalies: Evidence from self-paced reading. Discourse Processes46(1), 46–69. 10.1080/01638530802629091
     https://doi.org/10.1080/01638530802629091 [Google Scholar]
  380. Suzuki, D.
    (2024) The use of epistemic stance markers by Japanese learners of English: A corpus-based approach. Doctoral dissertation, University College London.
  381. Suzuki, Y.
    (2017) Validity of new measures of implicit knowledge: Distinguishing implicit knowledge from automatized explicit knowledge. Applied Psycholinguistics38: 1229–1261. 10.1017/S014271641700011X
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S014271641700011X [Google Scholar]
  382. Sweetser, E.
    (1990) From Etymology to Pragmatics. Cambridge: CUP. 10.1017/CBO9780511620904
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620904 [Google Scholar]
  383. Teixeira, J.
    (2021) The impact of explicit instruction on different types of linguistic properties. Syntactic vs. syntax-discourse properties. International Journal of Applied Linguistics172(1): 26–57. 10.1075/itl.18022.tei
     https://doi.org/10.1075/itl.18022.tei [Google Scholar]
  384. Tenny, C. L.
    (1987) Grammaticalizing aspect and affectedness. Doctoral dissertation, MIT.
  385. (1994) Aspectual Roles and the Syntax-Semantics Interface. Dordrecht: Kluwer. 10.1007/978‑94‑011‑1150‑8
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-1150-8 [Google Scholar]
  386. Thornton, R. & Wexler, K.
    (1999) VP Ellipsis and the Binding Theory in Early Child Grammar. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  387. Tong, X. & Shirai, Y.
    (2016) L2 acquisition of Mandarin zai and ‑le . Chinese Second Language Research5(1): 1–25. 10.1515/caslar‑2016‑0001
     https://doi.org/10.1515/caslar-2016-0001 [Google Scholar]
  388. Torabiardakani, N. , Khojasteh, L. & Shokrpour, N.
    (2015) Modal auxiliaries and their semantic functions used by advanced EFL learners. Acta Didactica Napocensia8(2): 51–60.
     [Google Scholar]
  389. Tosun, S. & Filipović, L.
    (2022) Lost in translation, apparently: Bilingual language processing of evidentiality in a Turkish–English translation and judgment task. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition25: 739–754. 10.1017/S1366728922000141
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728922000141 [Google Scholar]
  390. Tsimpli, I. & Sorace, A.
    (2006) Differentiating interfaces: L2 performance in syntax-semantics and syntax-discourse phenomena. InProceedings of the Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, D. Bamman , T. Magnitskaia & C. Zaller (eds), pp. 653–664. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  391. Tyler, A. , Mueller, C. M. & Ho, V.
    (2010) Applying cognitive linguistics to instructed L2 learning. The English modals. AILA Review23: 30–40. 10.1075/aila.23.03tyl
     https://doi.org/10.1075/aila.23.03tyl [Google Scholar]
  392. Thuillier, F.
    (2004) Le verbe paraître: Surgissement, manifestation, impression, ouï-dire. Linx50: 15–32. 10.4000/linx.131
     https://doi.org/10.4000/linx.131 [Google Scholar]
  393. Tomasello, M.
    (2009) Constructing a Language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  394. Tsimpli, T. , Sorace, A. , Heycock, C. & Filiaci, F.
    (2004) First language attrition and syntactic subjects: A study of Greek and Italian near-native speakers of English. International Journal of Bilingualism8: 257–277. 10.1177/13670069040080030601
     https://doi.org/10.1177/13670069040080030601 [Google Scholar]
  395. Tyler, A.
    (2017) Second language acquisition. InThe Cambridge Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, B. Dancygier (ed.), pp.74–90. Cambridge: CUP. 10.1017/9781316339732.006
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316339732.006 [Google Scholar]
  396. Tyler, A. & Evans, V.
    (2001) The relation between experience, conceptual structure and meaning: Non-temporal uses of tense and language teaching. InApplied Cognitive Linguistics I: Theory and language acquisition, M. Putz , R. Dirven & S. Niemeier (eds), pp.63–105. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110866247.63
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110866247.63 [Google Scholar]
  397. Tyler, A. , Mueller, C. A. & Ho, V.
    (2010) Applying cognitive linguistics to instructed L2 learning. The English modals. AILA Review23: 30–49. 10.1075/aila.23.03tyl
     https://doi.org/10.1075/aila.23.03tyl [Google Scholar]
  398. van Osch, B. A.
    (2019) Vulnerability in heritage speakers of Spanish in the Netherlands. An interplay between language-internal and language-external factors. Doctoral dissertation, Universiteit van Amsterdam.
  399. Vainikka, A. & Young-Scholten, M.
    (1998) Morphosyntactic triggers in adult SLA. InMorphology and its Interfaces in Second Language Knowledge, M.-L. Beck (ed.), pp. 89–113. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/lald.19.06vai
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.19.06vai [Google Scholar]
  400. van Hout, A.
    (2016) Lexical and grammatical aspect. InThe Oxford Handbook of Developmental Linguistics, J. Lidz , W. Snyder & J. Pater (eds), pp.587–610. Oxford: OUP.
     [Google Scholar]
  401. Vendler, Z.
    (1967) Verbs and times. InLinguistics and Philosophy, Z. Vendler (ed.), 97–121. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. (Reprinted from Philosophical Review 1957, 66: 143–160). 10.7591/9781501743726
     https://doi.org/10.7591/9781501743726 [Google Scholar]
  402. Vikner, S.
    (1997) Vo-to-Io movement and inflection for person in all tenses. InThe New Comparative Syntax, L. Haegeman (ed.), pp.189–213. London: Longman.
     [Google Scholar]
  403. de Villiers, J. G. & de Villiers, P. A.
    (1973) A cross-sectional study of the acquisition of grammatical morphemes in child speech. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research2(3): 267–278. 10.1007/BF01067106
     https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01067106 [Google Scholar]
  404. von Stutterheim, C. & Klein, W.
    (1987) Referential movement in descriptive and narrative discourse. InLanguage Processing in Social Context, R. Dietrich & C. F. Graumann (eds), pp.39–76. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
     [Google Scholar]
  405. von Wright, G. H.
    (1951) An Essay in Modal Logic. Amsterdam: North Holland.
     [Google Scholar]
  406. Vraciu, A.
    (2013) Exploring the upper limits of the Aspect hypothesis. Tense-aspect morphology in the advanced English L2 variety. Language, Interaction and Acquisition4(2): 256–290. 10.1075/lia.4.2.06vra
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lia.4.2.06vra [Google Scholar]
  407. Wallington, A.
    (2022) Investigating the roles of feature reassembly and linguistic input in later-stage second language acquisition: a case study of aspectual development in university learners of French. Doctoral dissertation, University of Southampton.
  408. Wärnsby, A.
    (2006) (De)coding Modality. The case of must, may, måste, and kan. Lund: Lund University.
     [Google Scholar]
  409. Watorek, M.
    (2004) Construction du discours par des enfants et des apprenants adultes. Langages155: 1–128.
     [Google Scholar]
  410. Weist, R. M.
    (2002) Temporal and spatial concepts in child language: Conventional and configurational. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research31(3): 195–210. 10.1023/A:1015522711549
     https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015522711549 [Google Scholar]
  411. Wen, X. & Taylor, J. R.
    (2021) Cognitive linguistics: Retrospect and Prospect. InThe Routledge Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, X. Wen & J. R. Taylor (eds), pp.1–15. New York, NY: Routledge. 10.4324/9781351034708‑1
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351034708-1 [Google Scholar]
  412. Westney, P.
    (1994) Rules and pedagogical grammar. InPerspectives on Pedagogical Grammar, T. Odlin (eds.), pp.72–96. Cambridge: CUP. 10.1017/CBO9781139524605.006
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524605.006 [Google Scholar]
  413. Wijnen, F. & Verrips, M.
    (1998) The acquisition of Dutch syntax. InThe Acquisition of Dutch, S. Gillis & A. De Houwer (eds), pp.223–299. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.52.07wij
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.52.07wij [Google Scholar]
  414. Wirag, A. , Li, Y. & Zhang, B.
    (2022) Applying cognitive linguistics to foreign language teaching and learning. Addressing current challenges. Cognitive Linguistic Studies9(2): 185–201. 10.1075/cogls.21010.wir
     https://doi.org/10.1075/cogls.21010.wir [Google Scholar]
  415. Yang, S. & Huang, Y. Y.
    (2004) The impact of the absence of grammatical tense in L1 on the acquisition of the tense-aspect system in L2. International Review of Applied Linguistics42: 49–70. 10.1515/iral.2004.002
     https://doi.org/10.1515/iral.2004.002 [Google Scholar]
  416. Yang, W. & Kim, Y.
    (2020) The effect of topic familiarity on the complexity, accuracy, and fluency of second language writing. Applied Linguistics Review11(1): 79–108. 10.1515/applirev‑2017‑0017
     https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2017-0017 [Google Scholar]
  417. Yang, X.
    (2018) A corpus-based study of modal verbs in Chinese learners’ academic writing. English Language Teaching11(2): 122–130. 10.5539/elt.v11n2p122
     https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v11n2p122 [Google Scholar]
  418. Yarrington, K. M.
    (2022) The reassembly of verbal and nominal morphosyntatic features by novice L1 English-L2 Spanish learners. Doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign.
  419. Zesiger, P. , Chillier Zesiger, L. , Arabatzi, M. , Baranzini, L. , Cronel-Ohayon, S. , Franck, J. , Fraudenfelder, U. H. , Hamann, C. & Rizzi, L.
    (2010) The acquisition of pronouns by French children: A parallel study of production and comprehension. Applied Psycholinguistics31(4): 571–603. 10.1017/S0142716410000147
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716410000147 [Google Scholar]
  420. Zhao, H. & Shirai, Y.
    (2020) Arabic learners’ acquisition of English past tense morphology: Lexical aspect and phonological saliency. InTense and Aspect in Second Language Acquisition and Learner Corpus Research, R. Fuchs & V. Verner (eds), pp.111–134. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/bct.108.ijlcr.17006.zha
     https://doi.org/10.1075/bct.108.ijlcr.17006.zha [Google Scholar]
  421. Zhou, P.
    (2010) Interface conditions in child language: A view from Mandarin Chinese. Doctoral dissertation, Macquarie University.
/content/books/9789027244680
Loading

  • From This Site

    /content/books/9789027244680
    dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Chapter
    10
    5
/content/books/9789027244680
dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
-contentType:Journal -contentType:Chapter
10
5
Chapter
content/books/9789027244680
Book
false
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error