1887
  1. Home
  2. Books
  3. Our People’s Language

Our People’s Language

Variation and change in the Lánnang-uè of the Manila Lannangs

image of Our People’s Language
USD
Buy:$215.00 + Taxes
USD
Buy:$215.00 + Taxes

This book pioneers the study of Lánnang-uè, deeply embedded in Manila’s Lannang community’s culture. It approaches Lánnang-uè not just as a language but as a vibrant social practice, highlighting its variability and complex social meanings (e.g., identity-marking). Over six years and with more than 150 participants, the monograph integrates contemporary, community-focused, and critical sociolinguistic frameworks to explore and document linguistic variation as well as change signaling attrition, challenging reductive academic views. Employing diverse methodologies—surveys, elicitation, interviews, computational modeling, and ethnography— the work offers a nuanced depiction of Lánnang-uè’s diversity. A decolonial stance is advocated, emphasizing the complex practices that define the language and its speakers’ identity. It critiques the idea of a uniform linguistic standard, presenting Lánnang-uè as shaped by local, diverse, and inclusive practices, urging a reevaluation of language ownership and authenticity. This monograph is crucial for scholars in sociolinguistics, language variation, and contact linguistics, informing language revitalization efforts and enriching global discussions on linguistic diversity and discrimination.

References

  1. Agha, Asif
    2003 The social life of cultural value. Language & Communication23(3–4): 231–73, 10.1016/S0271‑5309(03)00012‑0
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0271-5309(03)00012-0 [Google Scholar]
  2. 2007 Language and Social Relations. Language and social relations [Studies in the Social and Cultural Foundations of Language ; No. 24.]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Alberca, Wilfredo L.
    1978 The distinctive features of Philippine English in the mass media. Ph.D. dissertation, Manila: University of Santo Tomas.
  4. Aldridge, Edith
    2002 Nominalization and wh-movement in Seediq and Tagalog. Language and Linguistics3(2): 393–426.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Anderson, Victoria
    2006 Lexical stress without postlexical head-marking: Evidence from Tagalog. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America120(5): 3092. 10.1121/1.4787497
     https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4787497 [Google Scholar]
  6. Ang See, Teresita
    1990 The Chinese in the Philippines: Problems and Perspectives. Vol.1. Manila: Kaisa Para Sa Kaunlaran.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. 1997 The Chinese in the Philippines: Problems and Perspectives. Vol.2. Manila: Kaisa Para Sa Kaunlaran.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Antoniou, Mark , Best, Catherine T. , Tyler, Michael D. & Kroos, Christian
    2011 Inter-language interference in VOT production by L2-dominant bilinguals: Asymmetries in phonetic code-switching. Journal of Phonetics39(4): 558–70, 10.1016/j.wocn.2011.03.001
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2011.03.001 [Google Scholar]
  9. Atkinson, Emily , Apple, Aaron , Rawlins, Kyle & Omaki, Akira
    2016 Similarity of wh-phrases and acceptability variation in wh-islands. Frontiers in Psychology6: 2048. 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.02048
     https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.02048 [Google Scholar]
  10. Bakker, Peter
    2003 Mixed languages as autonomous systems. InThe mixed language debate: theoretical and empirical advances, Yaron Matras (ed), 107–50. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110197242.107
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197242.107 [Google Scholar]
  11. Bamgboṣe, Ayọ
    1991 Language and the nation : the language question in Sub-Saharan Africa.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Baptista, Marlyse
    2020 Competition, selection, and the role of congruence in creole genesis and development. Language96(1): 160–99. 10.1353/lan.2020.0005
     https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2020.0005 [Google Scholar]
  13. Bates, Douglas , Mächler, Martin , Bolker, Ben & Walker, Steve
    2015 Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software67(1). 10.18637/jss.v067.i01
     https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01 [Google Scholar]
  14. Batibo, Herman
    2005 Language decline and death in Africa : causes, consequences, and challenges, Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781853598104
     https://doi.org/10.21832/9781853598104 [Google Scholar]
  15. Bautista, Ma. Lourdes S.
    2000 Defining Standard Philippine English: Its Status and Grammatical Features. Manila, the Philippines: De La Salle University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Bautista, Maria Lourdes S.
    2004 Tagalog-english code switching as a mode of discourse. Asia Pacific Education Review5(2): 226–33, 10.1007/BF03024960
     https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03024960 [Google Scholar]
  17. Bell, Allan
    1984 Language Style as Audience Design.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Benor, Sarah Bunin
    2010 Ethnolinguistic repertoire: Shifting the analytic focus in language and ethnicity. Journal of Sociolinguistics14(2): 159–83. 10.1111/j.1467‑9841.2010.00440.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2010.00440.x [Google Scholar]
  19. Biblical Seminary of the Philippines
    Biblical Seminary of the Philippines 2011 The Amoy Audio Bible Project. Biblical Seminary of the Philippines 2011, 〈https://bsop.edu.ph/the-amoy-bible-project/〉 (16 August 2020).
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Bodman, Nicholas C.
    1987 Spoken Amoy Hokkien. New York: Language Services.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Boersma, Paul & Weenink, David
    2021 Praat: doing phonetics by computer, 〈www.praat.org/〉
  22. Bohmann, Axel & Ahlers, Wiebke
    2022 Stance in narration: Finding structure in complex sociolinguistic variation. Journal of Sociolinguistics26(1): 65–83, 10.1111/josl.12533
     https://doi.org/10.1111/josl.12533 [Google Scholar]
  23. Bosma, Evelyn & Blom, Elma
    2019 A code-switching asymmetry in bilingual children: Code-switching from Dutch to Frisian requires more cognitive control than code-switching from Frisian to Dutch. International Journal of Bilingualism23(6): 1431–47. 10.1177/1367006918798972
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006918798972 [Google Scholar]
  24. Bouchard, Marie-Eve
    2019 Ongoing change in post-independence São Tomé: The use of rhotics as a marker of national identity among young speakers of Santomean Portuguese. Language Variation and Change31(1): 21–42, 10.1017/S0954394518000182
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394518000182 [Google Scholar]
  25. Bourdieu, Pierre
    1977 Outline of a Theory of Practice [Cambridge Studies in Social and Cultural Anthropology]. 1st ed.Vol.16. New York: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511812507
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511812507 [Google Scholar]
  26. Bürkner, Paul-Christian
    2017  brms : An R Package for Bayesian Multilevel Models Using Stan . Journal of Statistical Software80(1), 10.18637/jss.v080.i01
     https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v080.i01 [Google Scholar]
  27. Bussmann, Hadumod
    2006 Routlege Dictionary of Language and Linguistics. 2nd ed.London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203980057
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203980057 [Google Scholar]
  28. Calder, Jeremy
    2019 The fierceness of fronted /s/: Linguistic rhematization through visual transformation. Language in Society48(1): 31–64, 10.1017/S004740451800115X
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S004740451800115X [Google Scholar]
  29. Calude, Andreea Simona , Miller, Steven & Pagel, Mark
    2020 Modelling loanword success — a sociolinguistic quantitative study of Māori loanwords in New Zealand English. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory16(1): 29–66. 10.1515/cllt‑2017‑0010
     https://doi.org/10.1515/cllt-2017-0010 [Google Scholar]
  30. Chan-Yap, Gloria
    1977 Hokkien loanwords in Tagalog. Studies in Philippine Linguistics1(1): 17–49.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Chao, Yuan Ren
    1968 A Grammar of Spoken Chinese. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Chappell, Hilary
    2019 Southern Min. InThe Mainland Southeast Asia linguistic area, A. Vittrant & J. Watkins (eds), 176–233. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110401981‑005
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110401981-005 [Google Scholar]
  33. Charity Hudley, Anne H. , Mallinson, Christine & Bucholtz, Mary
    (eds) 2024 Decolonizing Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780197755259.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197755259.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  34. Chen, Hongjuan
    2006 Utterance final lengthening and focus induced lengthening in standard Chinese bi-syllabic words. Master’s Thesis, Edinburgh, United Kingdom: The University of Edinburgh.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Cheng, Chin-chuan
    1973 A quantitative study of tone in Chinese. Journal of Chinese Linguistics1: 93–110.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Cheng, Lauretta S. P. , Babel, Molly & Yao, Yao
    2022 Production and perception across three Hong Kong Cantonese consonant mergers: Community- and individual-level perspectives. Laboratory Phonology13(1), 10.16995/labphon.6461
     https://doi.org/10.16995/labphon.6461 [Google Scholar]
  37. Cheng, Lauretta S. P. , Burgess, Danielle , Vernooij, Natasha , Solís-Barroso, Cecilia , McDermott, Ashley & Namboodiripad, Savithry
    2021 The problematic concept of Native Speaker in psycholinguistics: Replacing vague and harmful terminology With inclusive and accurate measures. Frontiers in Psychology12: 715843, 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.715843
     https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.715843 [Google Scholar]
  38. Cheung, Candice Chi-Hang
    2014 Wh-fronting and the left periphery in Mandarin. Journal of East Asian Linguistics23: 393–431. 10.1007/s10831‑013‑9112‑4
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s10831-013-9112-4 [Google Scholar]
  39. Chow, Una Y.
    2016 L2 transfer of stress, tones, and intonation from Mandarin: A case study. Calgary Working Papers in Linguistics29: 19–40.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Chu, Richard
    2006 The “Chinaman” Question: A Conundrum in US Imperial Policy in the Pacific. Kritika Kultura.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. 2010 Chinese and Chinese Mestizos of Manila: Family, Identity, and Culture, 1860s–1930s. Leiden: Brill. 10.1163/ej.9789004173392.i‑452
     https://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004173392.i-452 [Google Scholar]
  42. 2021 From “sangley” to “Chinaman”, “Chinese Mestizo” to “Tsinoy”: Unpacking “Chinese” identities in the Philippines at the turn of the Twentieth-Century. Asian Ethnicity, 10.1080/14631369.2021.1941755
     https://doi.org/10.1080/14631369.2021.1941755 [Google Scholar]
  43. Chuaunsu, Rebecca
    1989 A speech communication profile of three generations of Filipino-Chinese in Metro Manila: Their use of English, Pilipino and Chinese languages in different domains, role-relationships, speech situations and functions. Master’s Thesis, Manila: University of the Philippines.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Comrie, Bernard
    1976 Aspect: An Introduction to the Study of Verbal Aspect and Related Problems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Coupland, Nikolas
    2003 Sociolinguistic authenticities. Journal of Sociolinguistics7(3): 417–31, 10.1111/1467‑9481.00233
     https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9481.00233 [Google Scholar]
  46. (2014) Language, society and authenticity: Themes and perspectives. In Véronique Lacoste , Jakob Leimgruber , & Thiemo Breyer (Eds.), Indexing authenticity: Sociolinguistic Perspectives. Berlin, München, Boston: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110347012
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110347012 [Google Scholar]
  47. 2016 Sociolinguistics: Theoretical Debates. Sociolinguistics : theoretical debates. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781107449787
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107449787 [Google Scholar]
  48. Crystal, David
    2008 A Dictionary of Linguistics and Phonetics. 6th ed.Malden, MA: Blackwell. 10.1002/9781444302776
     https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444302776 [Google Scholar]
  49. Daganzo, Carlos F. , Gayah, Vikash V. & Gonzales, Eric J.
    2012 The potential of parsimonious models for understanding large scale transportation systems and answering big picture questions. EURO Journal on Transportation and Logistics1: 47–65. 10.1007/s13676‑012‑0003‑z
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s13676-012-0003-z [Google Scholar]
  50. Defior, Sylvia & Alegria, Jésus
    2005 Morphosyntax and spelling connection: When phonology is (almost) enough to spell. Revista de Logopedia, Foniatria y Audiologia25(2): 51–61.
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Dodsworth, Robin M.
    2005 Linguistic variation and sociological consciousness. Ph.D. dissertation, Columbus, Ohio: The Ohio State University.
  52. Doeppers, Daniel
    1986 Destination, selection and turnover among Chinese migrants to Philippine cities in the nineteenth century. Journal of Historical Geography12(4): 235–60. 10.1016/S0305‑7488(86)80176‑1
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-7488(86)80176-1 [Google Scholar]
  53. D’Onofrio, Annette
    2015 Persona-based information shapes linguistic perception: Valley Girls and California vowels. Journal of Sociolinguistics19(2): 241–56, 10.1111/josl.12115
     https://doi.org/10.1111/josl.12115 [Google Scholar]
  54. 2020 Personae in sociolinguistic variation. WIREs Cognitive Science11(6), 10.1002/wcs.1543
     https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1543 [Google Scholar]
  55. Duanmu, San
    2007 The Phonology of Standard Chinese. 2nd ed.Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780199215782.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199215782.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  56. Dy, Carmen J.
    1972 The syntactic structures of Amoy as used in the Philippines. Philippine Journal of Linguistics3(2): 75–94.
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Eberhard, David M. , Simons, Gary F. & Fennig, Charles D.
    2020 Ethnologue: Languages of the World. 23rd ed.Dallas, Texas: SIL International.
     [Google Scholar]
  58. Eckert, Penelope
    1989 The whole woman: Sex and gender differences in variation. Language Variation and Change1: 245–67. 10.1017/S095439450000017X
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S095439450000017X [Google Scholar]
  59. 2005 Variation, convention, and social meaning. presented at theAnnual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, Oakland, CA.
     [Google Scholar]
  60. 2008 Variation and the indexical field. Journal of Sociolinguistics12: 453–76. 10.1111/j.1467‑9841.2008.00374.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2008.00374.x [Google Scholar]
  61. 2012 Three waves of variation study: The emergence of meaning in the study of sociolinguistic variation. Annual Review of Anthropology41: 87–100. 10.1146/annurev‑anthro‑092611‑145828
     https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-092611-145828 [Google Scholar]
  62. 2019 The individual in the semiotic landscape. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics4(1), 10.5334/gjgl.640
     https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.640 [Google Scholar]
  63. Eckert, Penelope & McConnell-Ginet, Sally
    2003 Language and Gender. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511791147
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511791147 [Google Scholar]
  64. Englebretson, Robert
    (ed) 2007 Stancetaking in Discourse: Subjectivity, Evaluation, Interaction [Pragmatics & beyond New Series, v. 164]. Amsterdam ; Philadelphia: John Benjamins Pub. 10.1075/pbns.164
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.164 [Google Scholar]
  65. Ferguson, Charles A.
    1959 Diglossia. WORD15(2): 325–40, 10.1080/00437956.1959.11659702
     https://doi.org/10.1080/00437956.1959.11659702 [Google Scholar]
  66. Fisher, Cynthia , Hall, D. Geoffrey , Rakowitz, Susan & Gleitman, Lila
    1994 When it is better to receive than to give: Syntactic and conceptual constraints on vocabulary growth. Lingua92: 333–75. 10.1016/0024‑3841(94)90346‑8
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3841(94)90346-8 [Google Scholar]
  67. Fishman, Joshua A.
    1967 Bilingualism With and Without Diglossia; Diglossia With and Without Bilingualism. Journal of Social Issues23(2): 29–38, 10.1111/j.1540‑4560.1967.tb00573.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1967.tb00573.x [Google Scholar]
  68. Franke, Michael & Roettger, Timo Benjamin
    2019 Bayesian regression modeling (for factorial designs): A tutorial. Preprint. PsyArXiv, 10.31234/osf.io/cdxv3
     https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/cdxv3 [Google Scholar]
  69. Ghyselen, Anne-Sophie & De Vogelaer, Gunther
    2018 Seeking Systematicity in Variation: Theoretical and Methodological Considerations on the “Variety” Concept. Frontiers in Psychology9: 385, 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00385
     https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00385 [Google Scholar]
  70. Giles, Howard
    2016 Communication Accommodation Theory: Negotiating Personal Relationships and Social Identities across Contexts. Cambridge University Press, 10.1017/CBO9781316226537
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316226537 [Google Scholar]
  71. Glaser, Barney G. & Strauss, Anselm L.
    2017 The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. 1st ed.Routledge, 10.4324/9780203793206
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203793206 [Google Scholar]
  72. Goldberg, Yoav
    2017 Neural Network Methods for Natural Language Processing. Edited by Graeme Hirst . California, USA: Morgan and Claypool. 10.1007/978‑3‑031‑02165‑7
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-02165-7 [Google Scholar]
  73. Gonzales, Wilkinson Daniel Wong
    2016 Trilingual code-switching using quantitative lenses: An exploratory study on Hokaglish. Philippine Journal of Linguistics47: 106–28.
     [Google Scholar]
  74. 2017a Language contact in the Philippines: The history and ecology from a Chinese Filipino perspective: The history and ecology from a Chinese Filipino perspective. Language Ecology1(2): 185–212, 10.1075/le.1.2.04gon
     https://doi.org/10.1075/le.1.2.04gon [Google Scholar]
  75. 2017b Language contact in the Philippines: The history and ecology from a Chinese Filipino perspective. Language Ecology1(2): 185–212, 10.1075/le.1.2.04gon
     https://doi.org/10.1075/le.1.2.04gon [Google Scholar]
  76. 2018 Philippine Hybrid Hokkien as a postcolonial mixed language: Evidence from nominal derivational affixation mixing. Master’s Thesis, Singapore: National University of Singapore.
     [Google Scholar]
  77. 2021 Filipino, Chinese, neither, or both? The Lannang identity and its relationship with language. Language & Communication77: 5–16. 10.1016/j.langcom.2020.11.002
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2020.11.002 [Google Scholar]
  78. Gonzales, Wilkinson Daniel Wong
    (2022) Interactions of Sinitic Languages in the Philippines: Sinicization, Filipinization, and Sino-Philippine Language Creation. In Zhengdao Ye (Ed.), The Palgrave Handbook of Chinese Language Studies (pp.369–408). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore. 10.1007/978‑981‑16‑0924‑4_31
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-0924-4_31 [Google Scholar]
  79. Gonzales, Wilkinson Daniel Wong
    2022a Hybridization. InPhilippine English: Development, Structure, and Sociology of English in the Philippines, Ariane Macalinga Borlongan (ed), 170–83. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780429427824‑17
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429427824-17 [Google Scholar]
  80. 2022b Interactions of Sinitic Languages in the Philippines: Sinicization, Filipinization, and Sino-Philippine Language Creation. InThe Palgrave Handbook of Chinese Language Studies, Zhengdao Ye (ed), 369–408. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore, 10.1007/978‑981‑16‑0924‑4_31
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-0924-4_31 [Google Scholar]
  81. 2022c The Lannang Corpus (LanCorp): A POS-tagged, sociolinguistic corpus containing recordings and transcriptions of Lannang speech collected from the metropolitan Manila Lannangs between 2016 and 2020. Deep Blue Data, Deep Blue Repositories, 10.7302/66g9‑e028
     https://doi.org/10.7302/66g9-e028 [Google Scholar]
  82. 2022d “Truly a Language of Our Own” A Corpus-Based, Experimental, and Variationist Account of Lánnang‑uè in Manila, 409.
     [Google Scholar]
  83. 2023a Spread, stability, and sociolinguistic variation in multilingual practices: the case of Lánnang‑uè. International Journal of Multilingualism, 10.1080/14790718.2023.2199998
     https://doi.org/10.1080/14790718.2023.2199998 [Google Scholar]
  84. 2023b Spread, stability, and sociolinguistic variation in multilingual practices: the case of Lánnang‑uè. International Journal of Multilingualism, 10.1080/14790718.2023.2199998
     https://doi.org/10.1080/14790718.2023.2199998 [Google Scholar]
  85. 2023c Variability in clusters and continuums: The sociolinguistic situation of the Manila Lannangs in the 2010s. Asia-Pacific Language Variation9(1): 83–124, 10.1075/aplv.22009.gon
     https://doi.org/10.1075/aplv.22009.gon [Google Scholar]
  86. 2024a Mixed language in flux? The various impacts of multilingual contact on Lánnang‑uè’s wh-question system. International Journal of Bilingualism0(0): 13670069231201865, 10.1177/13670069231201865
     https://doi.org/10.1177/13670069231201865 [Google Scholar]
  87. 2024b Sociolinguistic Analysis with Missing Metadata? Leveraging Linguistic and Semiotic Resources Through Deep Learning to Investigate English Variation and Change on Twitter. Applied Linguistics, amad086, 10.1093/applin/amad086
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amad086 [Google Scholar]
  88. 2024c Advancing Sino-Philippine linguistics and sociolinguistics using the Lannang Corpus (LanCorp): A multilingual, POS-tagged, and audio-textual databank. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics29(2): 213–57, 10.1075/ijcl.22096.gon
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.22096.gon [Google Scholar]
  89. Gonzales, Wilkinson Daniel Wong & Hiramoto, Mie
    2020 Two Englishes diverged in the Philippines? A substratist account of Manila Chinese English: A substratist account of Manila Chinese English. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages35: 125–59, 10.1075/jpcl.00057.gon
     https://doi.org/10.1075/jpcl.00057.gon [Google Scholar]
  90. Gonzales, Wilkinson Daniel Wong & Starr, Rebecca Lurie
    2020 Vowel system or vowel systems? Variation in the monophthongs of Philippine Hybrid Hokkien in Manila. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages35(2): 253–92. 10.1075/jpcl.00061.won
     https://doi.org/10.1075/jpcl.00061.won [Google Scholar]
  91. Gonzalez, Andrew
    1970 Acoustic correlates of accent, rhythm, and intonation in Tagalog. Phonetica22: 11–44. 10.1159/000259307
     https://doi.org/10.1159/000259307 [Google Scholar]
  92. Gordon, Elizabeth , Campbell, Lyle , Hay, Jennifer , Maclagan, Margaret , Sudbury, Andrea & Trudgill, Peter
    2004 New Zealand English: Its Origins and Evolution. Cambridge, the United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511486678
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486678 [Google Scholar]
  93. Gordon, Matthew
    2001 A typology of contour tone restrictions. Studies in Language25(3): 423–62. 10.1075/sl.25.3.03gor
     https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.25.3.03gor [Google Scholar]
  94. Gordon, Matthew & Roettger, Timo
    2017 Acoustic correlates of word stress: A cross-linguistic survey. Linguistics Vanguard3(1), 10.1515/lingvan‑2017‑0007
     https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2017-0007 [Google Scholar]
  95. Grafmiller, Jason , Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt & Hinrichs, Lars
    2018 Restricting the restrictive relativizer. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory14(2): 309–55, 10.1515/cllt‑2016‑0015
     https://doi.org/10.1515/cllt-2016-0015 [Google Scholar]
  96. Green, David D.
    1998 Mental control of the bilingual lexico-semantic system. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition1: 67–81. 10.1017/S1366728998000133
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728998000133 [Google Scholar]
  97. Hall-Lew, Lauren , Cardoso, Amanda & Davies, Emma
    2021 Social Meaning and Sound Change. InSocial Meaning and Linguistic Variation: Theorizing the Third Wave, Emma Moore , Lauren Hall-Lew & Robert J. Podesva (eds), 27–53. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 10.1017/9781108578684.002
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108578684.002 [Google Scholar]
  98. Hau, Caroline S.
    2000 Necessary Fictions: Philippine Literature and the Nation, 1946–1980. Honolulu, Hawai’i, USA: University of Hawai’i Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  99. Haugen, Einar
    1971 The ecology of language. Linguist Report13(25): 19–26.
     [Google Scholar]
  100. Hebdige, Dick
    1979 Subculture: The Meaning of Style. London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  101. Hermans, Daan , Bongaerts, Theo , de Bot, Kees & Schreuder, Robert
    2003 Producing words in a foreign language: Can speakers prevent interference from their first language?Bilingualism: Language and Cognition1(3): 213–29. 10.1017/S1366728998000364
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728998000364 [Google Scholar]
  102. Hing, Jia Wen
    2019 A descriptive grammar of Penang Hokkien. Master’s Thesis, Singapore: National University of Singapore.
     [Google Scholar]
  103. Hoffman, Michol F. & Walker, James A.
    2010 Ethnolects and the city: Ethnic orientation and linguistic variation in Toronto English. Language Variation and Change22(1): 37–67. 10.1017/S0954394509990238
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394509990238 [Google Scholar]
  104. Hurst, Ellen
    2009 Tsotsitaal, global culture and local style: identity and recontextualisation in twenty-first century South African townships. Social Dynamics35(2): 244–57, 10.1080/02533950903076196
     https://doi.org/10.1080/02533950903076196 [Google Scholar]
  105. Hwang, Hyun Kyun , Nagaya, Naonori & Villegas, Julián
    2019 Cue weighting in the perception of Tagalog stress. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America146: 3052. 10.1121/1.5137583
     https://doi.org/10.1121/1.5137583 [Google Scholar]
  106. Irvine, Judith T. & Gal, Susan
    2000 Language ideology and linguistic differentiation. InRegimes of language, P. Kroskrity (ed), 35–83. Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  107. Jaffe, Alexandra
    2009 Stance: Sociolinguistic Perspectives. Oxford University Press, 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331646.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331646.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  108. Jin, Dawei
    2014 Contradiction, why-questions and complex islands in Chinese. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics21(1): 1–8.
     [Google Scholar]
  109. Johnstone, Barbara , Andrus, Jennifer & Danielson, Andrew E.
    2006 Mobility, Indexicality, and the Enregisterment of “Pittsburghese”. Journal of English Linguistics34(2): 77–104, 10.1177/0075424206290692
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0075424206290692 [Google Scholar]
  110. Johnstone, Barbara & Kiesling, Scott F.
    2008 Indexicality and experience: Exploring the meanings of /aw/-monophthongization in Pittsburgh 1 . Journal of Sociolinguistics12(1): 5–33, 10.1111/j.1467‑9841.2008.00351.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2008.00351.x [Google Scholar]
  111. Jun, Sun-Ah
    2007 Prosodic typology. InProsodic typology: The phonology of intonation and phrasing. Oxford: Oxford Univeristy Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  112. Kahn, Juliette , Audibert, Nicolas , Bonastre, Jean-François & Rossato, Solange
    2011 Inter and intra-speaker variability in French: An analysis of oral vowels and its implication for automatic speaker verification. presented at theICPhS XVII, Hong Kong, SAR, People’s Republic of China.
     [Google Scholar]
  113. Kang, M. Agnes & Chen, Katherine Hoi Ying
    2017 Gender stereotype as a vehicle for social change?: The case of the Kong Girl. Gender and Language11(4): 460–81, 10.1558/genl.31607
     https://doi.org/10.1558/genl.31607 [Google Scholar]
  114. Kidd, Evan , Kemp, Nenagh , Kashima, Emiko S. & Quinn, Sara
    2016 Language, Culture, and Group Membership: An Investigation Into the Social Effects of Colloquial Australian English. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology47(5): 713–33, 10.1177/0022022116638175
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022116638175 [Google Scholar]
  115. Kiesling, Scott F.
    2018 Masculine stances and the linguistics of affect: on masculine ease. NORMA13(3–4): 191–212, 10.1080/18902138.2018.1431756
     https://doi.org/10.1080/18902138.2018.1431756 [Google Scholar]
  116. 2022 Stance and Stancetaking. Annual Review of Linguistics8(1): 409–26, 10.1146/annurev‑linguistics‑031120‑121256
     https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-linguistics-031120-121256 [Google Scholar]
  117. Kingston, John
    2011 Tonogenesis. InThe Blackwell companion to phonology, Marc van Oostendorp , Colin J. Ewen , Elizabeth Hume & Keren Rice (eds). New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons. 10.1002/9781444335262.wbctp0097
     https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444335262.wbctp0097 [Google Scholar]
  118. Klaus, Jana , Lemhöfer, Kristin & Schriefers, Herbert
    2018 The second language interferes with picture naming in the first language: evidence for L2 activation during L1 production. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience33(7): 867–77, 10.1080/23273798.2018.1430837
     https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2018.1430837 [Google Scholar]
  119. Klöter, Henning
    2011 The Language of the Sangleys: A Chinese Vernacular in Missionary Sources of the Seventeenth Century. Leiden/Boston: Brill. 10.1163/9789004195929
     https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004195929 [Google Scholar]
  120. Koban, Didem
    2013 Intra-sentential and Inter-sentential Code-switching in Turkish-English Bilinguals in New York City, U.S. Procedia — Social and Behavioral Sciences70: 1174–79, 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.01.173
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.01.173 [Google Scholar]
  121. Konstantopoulos, Spyros & Hedges, Larry
    2019 Statistically analyzing effect sizes: Fixed- and random-effects models. InThe handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis, Harris Cooper , Larry V. Hedges & Jeffrey C. Valentine (eds), 3rd ed., 246–78. New York: Russell Sage Foundation. 10.7758/9781610448864.15
     https://doi.org/10.7758/9781610448864.15 [Google Scholar]
  122. Kuo, Yu-Ching , Rosen, Stuart & Faulkner, Andrew
    2008 Acoustic cues to tonal contrasts in Mandarin: Implications for cochlear implants. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America123: 2824. 10.1121/1.2896755
     https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2896755 [Google Scholar]
  123. Kuznetsova, Alexandra , Brockhoff, Per Bruun & Christhensen, Rune Haubo Bojesen
    2019 Tests in linear mixed effects models: Package “lmerTest”.
     [Google Scholar]
  124. Labov, William
    1972a Sociolinguistic Patterns. Pennsylvania: University of Pennsylvania Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  125. 1972b The social motivation of a sound change. InSociolinguistic patterns, 251–65. New York: Academic.
     [Google Scholar]
  126. Lafferty, John , McCallum, Andrew & Pereira, Fernando C. N.
    2001 Conditional Random Fields: Probabilistic models for segmenting and labeling sequence data. Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Machine Learning, 282–89.
     [Google Scholar]
  127. Lagrou, Evelyne , Hartsuiker, Robert J. & Duyck, Wouter
    2011 Knowledge of a second language influences auditory word recognition in the native language. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition37(4): 952–65.
     [Google Scholar]
  128. Le Page, R. B. (Robert Brock) & Tabouret-Keller, Andrée
    1985 Acts of Identity : Creole-Based Approaches to Language and Ethnicity. Acts of identity : Creole-based approaches to language and ethnicity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  129. Lee, Nala Huiying
    2014 A grammar of Baba Malay with sociophonetics considerations. Ph.D. dissertation, Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai’i at Mānoa.
  130. Lesho, Marivic
    2013 The sociophonetics and phonology of the Cavite Chabacano vowel system. Ph.D. dissertation, Columbus, Ohio: The Ohio State University.
  131. 2018 Philippine English (Metro Manila acrolect). Journal of the International Phonetic Association48(3): 357–70. 10.1017/S0025100317000548
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025100317000548 [Google Scholar]
  132. Levshina, Natalia
    2016 When variables align: A Bayesian multinomial mixed-effects model of English permissive constructions. Cognitive Linguistics27(2): 235–68, 10.1515/cog‑2015‑0054
     https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2015-0054 [Google Scholar]
  133. Li, Charles N. & Thompson, Sandra A.
    1981 Mandarin Chinese: A Functional Reference Grammar. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. 10.1525/9780520352858
     https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520352858 [Google Scholar]
  134. Lin, Yuhan & Wang, Tianxiao
    2023 Rhyming style, persona, and the contested landscape of authentic Chinese hip hop. Journal of Sociolinguistics, josl.12635, 10.1111/josl.12635
     https://doi.org/10.1111/josl.12635 [Google Scholar]
  135. Lipski, John
    2020 Reconstructing the life-cycle of a mixed language: An exploration of Ecuadoran Media Lengua. International Journal of Bilingualism24(2): 410–36. 10.1177/1367006919842668
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006919842668 [Google Scholar]
  136. Lüdecke, Daniel
    2018a ggeffects — Estimated Marginal Means and Adjusted Predictions from Regression Models. Ggeffects 2018, 〈https://strengejacke.github.io/ggeffects/〉 (26 October 2021).
     [Google Scholar]
  137. 2018b ggeffects: Tidy Data Frames of Marginal Effects from Regression Models. Journal of Open Source Software3(26): 772, 10.21105/joss.00772
     https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.00772 [Google Scholar]
  138. Maclagan, Margaret , Gordon, Elizabeth & Lewis, Gillian
    1999 Women and sound change: Conservative and innovative behavior by the same speakers. Language Variation and Change11: 19–41. 10.1017/S0954394599111025
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394599111025 [Google Scholar]
  139. Maegaard, Marie & Pharao, Nicolai
    2021 Features, Meanings, and Indexical Fields. InSocial Meaning and Linguistic Variation: Theorizing the Third Wave, Lauren Hall-Lew , Emma Moore & Robert J. Podesva (eds). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108578684.009
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108578684.009 [Google Scholar]
  140. Makowski, Dominique , Ben-Shachar, Mattan S. , Chen, S. H. Annabel & Lüdecke, Daniel
    2019 Indices of Effect Existence and Significance in the Bayesian Framework. Frontiers in Psychology10: 2767, 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02767
     https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02767 [Google Scholar]
  141. Matras, Yaron & Bakker, Peter
    (eds) 2003 The Mixed Language Debate: Theoretical and Empirical Advances [Trends in Linguistics 145]. Berlin ; New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110197242
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197242 [Google Scholar]
  142. Matras, Yaron & Sakel, Jeanette
    2007 Investigating the mechanism of pattern replication in language convergence. Studies in Language31(4): 825–65. 10.1075/sl.31.4.05mat
     https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.31.4.05mat [Google Scholar]
  143. Matthews, P. H.
    2007 The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Linguistics. 2nd ed.Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  144. McElreath, Richard
    2020 Statistical Rethinking: A Bayesian Course with Examples in R and Stan [CRC Texts in Statistical Science]. 2nd ed.Boca Raton: Taylor and Francis, CRC Press. 10.1201/9780429029608
     https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429029608 [Google Scholar]
  145. Meakins, Felicity & O’Shannessy, Carmel
    2010 Ordering arguments about: Word order and discourse motivations in the development and use of the ergative marker in two Australian mixed languages. Lingua120(7): 1693–1713, 10.1016/j.lingua.2009.05.013
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2009.05.013 [Google Scholar]
  146. Mena, Mike
    2021 The Language-Elsewhere. InThe Spanish Language in the United States, by JA Cobas , B Urciuoli , JR Feagin , & DJ Delgado , 1st ed., 80–95. New York: Routledge, 10.4324/9781003257509‑9
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003257509-9 [Google Scholar]
  147. Meyerhoff, Miriam
    2018 Introducing Sociolinguistics. 3rd ed.Taylor and Francis. 10.4324/9780429507922
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429507922 [Google Scholar]
  148. Meyerhoff, Miriam & Birchfield, Alexandra
    2019 Gender and language contact: how gender is/isn’t marked in language contact. InHandbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft / Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science (HSK), Jeroen Darquennes , Joseph C. Salmons & Wim Vandenbussche (eds), 246–56. De Gruyter, 10.1515/9783110435351‑021
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110435351-021 [Google Scholar]
  149. Miller, John E. , Tresoldi, Tiago , Zariquiey, Roberto , Beltrán Castañon, César A. , Morozova, Natalia & List, Johann-Mattis
    2020 Using lexical language models to detect borrowings in monolingual wordlists. PLOS ONE15(2): e0242709. 10.1371/journal.pone.0242709
     https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0242709 [Google Scholar]
  150. Milroy, James & Milroy, Lesley
    1985 Linguistic Change, social network and speaker innovation. Journal of Linguistics21: 339–84. 10.1017/S0022226700010306
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226700010306 [Google Scholar]
  151. Mintz, Toben H. & Byrd, Dani
    2010 Discovering Speech, Words, and Mind. 1st ed.Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  152. Monaghan, Padraic & Roberts, Seán G.
    2019 Cognitive influences in language evolution: Psycholinguistic predictors of loan word borrowing. Cognition186: 147–58. 10.1016/j.cognition.2019.02.007
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2019.02.007 [Google Scholar]
  153. Moore, Emma & Podesva, Robert
    2009 Style, indexicality, and the social meaning of tag questions. Language in Society38(4): 447–85, 10.1017/S0047404509990224
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404509990224 [Google Scholar]
  154. Mufwene, Salikoko S.
    2001 The ecology of language evolution, Cambridge approaches to language contact.
     [Google Scholar]
  155. Obeidat, Hussein & Hammoudi, Khadidja
    2019 Men as leaders of linguistic change: Case of Tlemcen speech community. Jordan Journal of Modern Languages and Literature11(3): 371–84.
     [Google Scholar]
  156. Oberauer, Klaus
    2009 Interference between storage and processing in working memory: Feature overwriting, not similarity-based competition. Memory & Cognition37(3): 346–57. 10.3758/MC.37.3.346
     https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.37.3.346 [Google Scholar]
  157. Ochs, Elinor
    1992 Indexing gender. InRethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon, Alessandro Duranti & Charles Goodwin (eds), 335–58. Cambridge, the United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  158. Ohala, John
    1978 Production of tone. InTone: A linguistic survey, V. A. Fromkin (ed), 3–39. New York: Academic Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  159. Otheguy, Ricardo , García, Ofelia & Reid, Wallis
    2015 Clarifying translanguaging and deconstructing named languages: A perspective from linguistics. Applied Linguistics Review6(3): 281–307, 10.1515/applirev‑2015‑0014
     https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2015-0014 [Google Scholar]
  160. Palacios-Martínez, Ignacio M.
    2018 Lexical innovation in the language of teenagers: A cross-linguistic perspective. InJugendsprachen/Youth languages. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110472226‑017
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110472226-017 [Google Scholar]
  161. Pélabon, Christophe , Hilde, Christoffer H. , Einum, Sigurd & Gamelon, Marlène
    2020 On the use of the coefficient of variation to quantify and compare trait variation. Evolution Letters4(3): 180–88. 10.1002/evl3.171
     https://doi.org/10.1002/evl3.171 [Google Scholar]
  162. Pham, Giang , Donovan, Danaee , Dam, Quynh & Contant, Amy
    2018 Learning Words and Definitions in Two Languages: What Promotes Cross-Language Transfer?Language Learning68(1): 206–33, 10.1111/lang.12274
     https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12274 [Google Scholar]
  163. Phyak, Prem
    2023 Producing the disciplined English-speaking subjects: Language policing, development ideology, and English medium of instruction policy. Language in Society, 1–23, 10.1017/S0047404523000052
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404523000052 [Google Scholar]
  164. Plass, Jan L. , Chun, Dorothy M. , Mayer, Richard E. & Leutner, Detlev
    2003 Cognitive load in reading a foreign language text with multimedia aids and the influence of verbal and spatial abilities. Computers in Human Behavior19: 221–43. 10.1016/S0747‑5632(02)00015‑8
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0747-5632(02)00015-8 [Google Scholar]
  165. Platt, John Talbot & Weber, Heidi
    1984 Speech convergence miscarried: an investigation into inappropriate accommodation strategies. International Journal of the Sociology of Language46: 131–46. 10.1515/ijsl.1984.46.131
     https://doi.org/10.1515/ijsl.1984.46.131 [Google Scholar]
  166. Poa, Dory
    2004 From Quadrilingual to Bilingual: On the Multilingual Teaching in the Chinese Schools in the Philippines). InBilingual Studies, 2:96–107. Beijing: Minzu Chubanshe.
     [Google Scholar]
  167. Prince, Alan & Smolensky, Paul
    2008 Optimality Theory: Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar. New Jersey: Wiley-Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  168. Prior, Anat & MacWhinney, Brian
    2009 A bilingual advantage in task switching. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition13(2): 253–62. 10.1017/S1366728909990526
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728909990526 [Google Scholar]
  169. Tan, Susan Villanueva
    (1993) The education of Chinese in the Philippines and Koreans in Japan. University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, SAR, People’s Republic of China.
     [Google Scholar]
  170. R Core Team
    R Core Team 2015 R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing 2015, 〈www.R-project.org〉
     [Google Scholar]
  171. Remijsen, Bert
    2014 The study of tone in languages with a quantity contrast. Language Documentation & Conservation8: 672–89.
     [Google Scholar]
  172. Reyes, Angela
    2017 Inventing Postcolonial Elites: Race, Language, Mix, Excess. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology27(2): 210–31. 10.1111/jola.12156
     https://doi.org/10.1111/jola.12156 [Google Scholar]
  173. Rothman, J. & Treffers-Daller, J.
    2014 A Prolegomenon to the Construct of the Native Speaker: Heritage Speaker Bilinguals are Natives Too!Applied Linguistics35(1): 93–98, 10.1093/applin/amt049
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amt049 [Google Scholar]
  174. Sande, Hannah
    2015 Nouchi as a Distinct Language: The Morphological Evidence. Selected Proceedings of the 44th Annual Conference on African Linguistics, 243–53.
     [Google Scholar]
  175. Sankoff, Gillian
    2006 Age: Apparent time and real time. InThe encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics, Keith Brown (ed), 2nd ed., 110–16. Oxford: Elsevier. 10.1016/B0‑08‑044854‑2/01479‑6
     https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/01479-6 [Google Scholar]
  176. Sato, Yosuke
    2013 Wh-Questions in Colloquial Singapore English: Adaptive traits from vernacular Malay and typological congruence. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages28(2): 299–322. 10.1075/jpcl.28.2.02sat
     https://doi.org/10.1075/jpcl.28.2.02sat [Google Scholar]
  177. Satyanath, Shobha
    2022 Standard-ness, national ideologies and their embedding in “sociolinguistic theory”. Asia-Pacific Language Variation8(2): 174–205, 10.1075/aplv.22007.sat
     https://doi.org/10.1075/aplv.22007.sat [Google Scholar]
  178. Schachter, Paul & Otanes, Fe T.
    1972 Tagalog Reference Grammar. Berkeley, CA: Univeristy of California Press. 10.1525/9780520321205
     https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520321205 [Google Scholar]
  179. Schachter, Paul & Shopen, Timothy
    2007 Parts-of-speech systems. InLanguage typology and syntactic description, Timothy Shopen (ed), I:1–60. Cambridge, the United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511619427.001
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511619427.001 [Google Scholar]
  180. Schuchardt, Hugo
    1882 Kreolische Studien I: Über Das Negerportugiesiesche von S. Thomé. Vienna: Buchhändler der Kais, Akademie der Wissenschaften.
     [Google Scholar]
  181. Sebba, Mark
    1998 A Congruence Approach to the Syntax of Codeswitching. International Journal of Bilingualism2(1): 1–19, 10.1177/136700699800200101
     https://doi.org/10.1177/136700699800200101 [Google Scholar]
  182. Shetewi, Ourooba
    2018 Acquisition of Sociolinguistic Variation in a Dialect Contact Situation: The Case of Palestinian Children and Adolescents in Syria. Ph.D. dissertation, Tyne, England: Newcastle University.
  183. Shin, Naomi Lapidus
    2013 Women as leaders of language change: A qualification from the bilingual perspective. Selected Proceedings of the 6th Workshop on Spanish Sociolinguistics, 135–47.
     [Google Scholar]
  184. Shopen, Timothy
    2007 Language Typology and Syntactic Description: Clause Structure. Vol.I. Cambridge, the United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  185. Siegel, Jeff
    2012 Two Types of Functional Transfer in Language Contact. Journal of Language Contact5(2): 187–215, 10.1163/187740912X639247
     https://doi.org/10.1163/187740912X639247 [Google Scholar]
  186. Silverstein, Michael
    2003 Indexical order and the dialectics of sociolinguistic life. Language & Communication23(3–4): 193–229, 10.1016/S0271‑5309(03)00013‑2
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0271-5309(03)00013-2 [Google Scholar]
  187. Sim, Jasper Hong
    2022 Negotiating social meanings in a plural society: Social perceptions of variants of /l/ in Singapore English. Language in Society, 1–28, 10.1017/S0047404522000173
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404522000173 [Google Scholar]
  188. Sippola, Eeva
    2021 Ilokano-Spanish: Borrowing, code-switching or a mixed language?InNew Perspectives on Mixed Languages, Maria Mazzoli & Eeva Sippola (eds), 253–76. De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9781501511257‑009
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501511257-009 [Google Scholar]
  189. Sonderegger, Morgan
    2022 Regression Modeling for Linguistic Data. 1st ed.Open Science Framework, 〈https://osf.io/pnumg/〉 (31 January 2022).
     [Google Scholar]
  190. Starr, Rebecca Lurie & Balasubramaniam, Brinda
    2019 Variation and change in English /r/ among Tamil Indian Singaporeans. World Englishes38(4): 630–43, 10.1111/weng.12357
     https://doi.org/10.1111/weng.12357 [Google Scholar]
  191. Stewart, Jesse
    2024 Mixed languages. InThe Wiley Blackwell Companion to Diachronic Linguistics, A. Ledgeway , E. Aldridge , A. Breitbarth , K.É. Kiss , J. Salmons , A. Simonenko , M. Everaert & H. C. Van Riemsdijk (eds). John Wiley & Sons, Limited, 〈https://books.google.com.hk/books?id=-EbgzgEACAAJ〉
     [Google Scholar]
  192. Styler, Will
    2011 Using Praat for linguistic research, 〈https://wstyler.ucsd.edu/praat/〉
  193. Tan, Cheryl Xue Er
    2014 The aspectual system in Singapore Hokkien. Unpublished Bachelor’s Thesis, Singapore: Nanyang Technological University.
     [Google Scholar]
  194. Tan, Susan Villanueva
    1993 The education of Chinese in the Philippines and Koreans in Japan. Hong Kong, SAR, People’s Republic of China: University of Hong Kong. 10.5353/th_b3195041
     https://doi.org/10.5353/th_b3195041 [Google Scholar]
  195. Tang, C.-C. Jane
    1988 Wh-Topicalization in Chinese. (Manuscript). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University.
     [Google Scholar]
  196. Tay, Li Chia , Chan, Mei Yuit , Yap, Ngee Thai & Wong, Bee Eng
    2016 Discourse particles in Malaysian English What do they mean?Bidragen Tot De Taal172: 479–509.
     [Google Scholar]
  197. The Lannang Archives
    The Lannang Archives 2020 Lannang Orthography. The Lannang Archives. The Lannang Archives 2020, 〈https://www.lannangarchives.org〉 (3 August 2020).
     [Google Scholar]
  198. Thomason, Sarah
    2001 Language Contact: An Introduction. Washington, D. C.: Georgetown University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  199. 2007 Language contact and deliberate change. Journal of Language Contact1(1): 41–62. 10.1163/000000007792548387
     https://doi.org/10.1163/000000007792548387 [Google Scholar]
  200. 2008 Social and linguistic factors as predictors of contact-induced change. Journal of Language Contact2: 42–56. 10.1163/000000008792525381
     https://doi.org/10.1163/000000008792525381 [Google Scholar]
  201. Thomason, Sarah & Kaufman, Terrence
    1988 Language Contact, Creolization, and Genetic Linguistics. Berkeley, CA: Univeristy of California Press. 10.1525/9780520912793
     https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520912793 [Google Scholar]
  202. Thompson, Roger Mark
    2003 Filipino English and Taglish: Language Switching from Multiple Perspectives [Varieties of English around the World General Series, G 31]. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/veaw.g31
     https://doi.org/10.1075/veaw.g31 [Google Scholar]
  203. Thompson, Sandra A. , Longacre, Robert E. & Hwang, Shin Ja J.
    2007 Adverbial clauses. InLanguage typology and syntactic description: Complex constructions, Timothy Shopen (ed), II:237–300. Cambridge, the United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511619434.005
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511619434.005 [Google Scholar]
  204. Tsai, Hui-Ming
    2017 A study of Philippine Hokkien language. PhD dissertation, Taipei, Taiwan: National Taiwan Normal University.
  205. Tupas, Ruanni & Salonga, Aileen
    2016 Unequal Englishes in the Philippines. Journal of Sociolinguistics20(3): 367–81, 10.1111/josl.12185
     https://doi.org/10.1111/josl.12185 [Google Scholar]
  206. Tyler, Joseph C.
    2015 Expanding and Mapping the Indexical Field: Rising Pitch, the Uptalk Stereotype, and Perceptual Variation. Journal of English Linguistics43(4): 284–310, 10.1177/0075424215607061
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0075424215607061 [Google Scholar]
  207. Uytanlet, Juliet Lee
    2014 The Hybrid Tsinoys: Challenges of hybridity and homogeneity as sociocultural constructs among the Chinese in the Philippines. Ph.D. dissertation, Wilmore, KY: Ashbury Theological Seminary.
  208. Van der Loon, Piet
    1966 The Manila incunabula and early Hokkien studies (part 1). Asia Major12: 1–43.
     [Google Scholar]
  209. Vejdemo, Susanne & Hörberg, Thomas
    2016 Semantic factors predict the rate of lexical replacement in content words. PLOS ONE11(1). 10.1371/journal.pone.0147924
     https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0147924 [Google Scholar]
  210. Verhagen, Véronique , Mos, Maria , Schilperoord, Joost & Backus, Ad
    2020 Variation is information: Analyses of variation across items, participants, time, and methods in metalinguistic judgment data. Linguistics58(1): 37–81, 10.1515/ling‑2018‑0036
     https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2018-0036 [Google Scholar]
  211. Verreyt, Nele , Woumans, Evy , Vandelanotte, Davy , Szmalec, Arnaud & Duyck, Wouter
    2016 The influence of language-switching experience on the bilingual executive control advantage. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition19(1): 181–90. 10.1017/S1366728914000352
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728914000352 [Google Scholar]
  212. Walker, Abby , García, Christina , Cortés, Yomi & Campbell-Kibler, Kathryn
    2014 Comparing social meanings across listener and speaker groups: The indexical field of Spanish /s/. Language Variation and Change26(2): 169–89, 10.1017/S0954394514000088
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394514000088 [Google Scholar]
  213. Wan, Tsung-Lun Alan
    2022 Islands, geopolitics and language ideologies: Sociolinguistic differentiation between Taiwanese and Kinmenese Hokkien. Language & Communication83: 36–48, 10.1016/j.langcom.2022.01.001
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2022.01.001 [Google Scholar]
  214. Wang, Ping
    2015 Phonological prominence and its interaction with tone in Chinese dialects. Ph.D. dissertation, Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh.
  215. Wang, Tianxiao
    2023 The code of the streets in Beijing: Style-shifting and changing personae in the performance of Beijing male rappers. Language in Society. 10.1017/S0047404523000799
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404523000799 [Google Scholar]
  216. Weinreich, Uriel , Labov, William & Herzog, Marvin I.
    1968 Empirical foundations for a theory of language change. InDirections for historical linguistics, Winfred P. Lehmann & Yakov Malkiel (eds), 100. Austin: University of Texas Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  217. Wickberg, Edgar
    1965 The Chinese in Philippine Life, 1850–1898. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  218. Wu, Jianxin
    1999 Syntax and Semantics of Quantification in Chinese. Manuscript. College Park: MD: The University of Maryland, College Park.
     [Google Scholar]
  219. Yip, Moira
    2002 Tone. Cambridge, the United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139164559
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139164559 [Google Scholar]
  220. Yuan, Boping & Dugarova, Esuna
    2012 Wh-topicalization at the syntax-discourse interface in English speakers’ L2 Chinese grammars. Studies in Second Language Acquisition34(4): 533–60, 10.1017/S0272263112000332
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263112000332 [Google Scholar]
  221. Zhang, Hang
    2016 Dissimilation in the second language acquisition of Mandarin Chinese tones. Second Language Research32(3): 427–51. 10.1177/0267658316644293
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658316644293 [Google Scholar]
  222. Zhang, Hui , Seilhamer, Mark Fifer & Cheung, Yin Ling
    2023 Identity construction on shop signs in Singapore ’s Chinatown: a study of linguistic choices by Chinese Singaporeans and New Chinese immigrants. International Multilingual Research Journal17(1): 15–32, 10.1080/19313152.2022.2080445
     https://doi.org/10.1080/19313152.2022.2080445 [Google Scholar]
  223. Zhang, Jie
    2002 The Effects of Duration and Sonority on Contour Tone Distribution: Typological Survey and Formal Analysis. New York: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  224. Zhang, Qing
    2005 A Chinese yuppie in Beijing: Phonological variation and the construction of a new professional identity. Language in Society34: 431–66. 10.1017/S0047404505050153
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404505050153 [Google Scholar]
  225. Zhang, Yin , Jin, Rong & Zhou, Zhi-Hua
    2010 Understanding bag-of-words model: A statistical framework. International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics1: 43–52. 10.1007/s13042‑010‑0001‑0
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s13042-010-0001-0 [Google Scholar]
  226. Zulueta, Johanna
    2007 I speak Chinese but… : Code-switching and identity construction among Chinese-Filipino youth. Caligrama3(2): 1–11. 10.11606/issn.1808‑0820.cali.2007.65395
     https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1808-0820.cali.2007.65395 [Google Scholar]
  227. Zwicky, Arnold M.
    1985 Clitics and particles. Language61(2): 283–305. 10.2307/414146
     https://doi.org/10.2307/414146 [Google Scholar]
  228. Zwicky, Arnold M. & Pullum, Geoffrey K.
    1983 Cliticization vs. inflection: English N’T. Language59(3): 502–13. 10.2307/413900
     https://doi.org/10.2307/413900 [Google Scholar]
/content/books/9789027246189
Loading

  • From This Site

    /content/books/9789027246189
    dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Chapter
    10
    5
/content/books/9789027246189
dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
-contentType:Journal -contentType:Chapter
10
5
Chapter
content/books/9789027246189
Book
false
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error