1887

The Boundary between Grammar and Lexicon

Evidence from Japanese verb morphology

image of The Boundary between Grammar and Lexicon

All linguists recognize that competence in a natural language involves knowledge of a lexicon or dictionary; most assume that it also involves knowledge of a grammatical system. Just where the boundary between the lexicon and the grammar lies, however, is a question on which there is little consensus. This problem arises in particular with regard to the field of morphology, with many morphologists taking all morpheme combinations to result from the operation of the syntactic computational system and many others assuming that morphological units like stems and words are either lexically listed or created by nonsyntactic means. The present study, using Japanese and Ryukyuan verbal morphology as its primary database, argues that evidence from the syntactic branch of the grammar and evidence from the phonological branch of the grammar converge on the conclusion that, while inflectional morphology is fully syntactic, derivational morphology has properties that militate against a syntactic treatment. The boundary between grammar and lexicon, then, falls at the boundary between inflection and derivation, rendering morphology “split” between syntactic and nonsyntactic subparts. The book should be of interest not only to morphologists, but to all concerned with the distinction between grammatical and lexical competence.

References

  1. Adger, David
    2003Core syntax. A minimalist approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780199243709.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199243709.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  2. Akiyama, Shoji
    1961 Kumamoto. In Misao Tojo , Yoshimoto Endo , Teruo Hirayama , Tadatoshi Okubo , and Takeshi Shibata (eds.), Kyūshū/Ryūkyū hōgen [Kyushu and Ryukyu dialects] ( Hōgengaku kōza [Dialectology course] 4), 208–238. Tokyo: Tokyodo Shuppan.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Albright, Adam
    2002 The identification of bases in morphological paradigms. Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.
  4. 2008 Explaining universal tendencies and language particulars in analogical change. In Jeff Good (ed.), Linguistic universals and language change, 144–181. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199298495.003.0007
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199298495.003.0007 [Google Scholar]
  5. 2011 Paradigms. In Marc van Oostendorp , Colin J. Ewen , Elizabeth Hume , and Keren Rice (eds.), The Blackwell companion to phonology, 1972–2001. Oxford: Blackwell. 10.1002/9781444335262.wbctp0083
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444335262.wbctp0083 [Google Scholar]
  6. Albright, Adam , Argelia Andrade , and Bruce Hayes
    2000 Segmental environments of Spanish diphthongization. MS, UCLA. Published in Albright, Adam , and Taehong Cho (eds.) 2001 UCLA working papers in linguistics7 ( Papers in phonology 5), 117–151. Los Angeles: UCLA Department of Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Alexiadou, Artemis , and Elena Anagnostopoulou
    2005 On the syntax and morphology of Greek participles. Talk presented at theWorkshop on the Morphosyntax of Modern Greek, LSA Institute, Cambridge, MA.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Alkire, Ti , and Carol Rosen
    2010Romance languages. A historical introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511845192
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511845192 [Google Scholar]
  9. Anagnostopoulou, Elena
    2016 Inner and outer morphology in Greek adjectival participles. In Daniel Siddiqi and Heidi Harley (eds.), Morphological metatheory, 431–460. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/la.229.14ana
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.229.14ana [Google Scholar]
  10. Anagnostopoulou, Elena , and Yota Samioti
    2011 Idiomatic meaning and the structure of participles. Selected Papers on Theoretical and Applied Linguistics (Aristotle University of Thessaloniki) 19: 101–110.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. 2013 Allosemy, idioms, and their domains: Evidence from adjectival participles. In Raffaella Folli , Christina Sevdali , and Robert Truswell (eds.), Syntax and its limits, 218–250. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199683239.003.0012
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199683239.003.0012 [Google Scholar]
  12. 2014 Domains within words and their meanings: A case study. In Artemis Alexiadou , Hagit Borer , and Florian Schäfer (eds.), The syntax of roots and the roots of syntax, 81–111. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199665266.003.0005
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199665266.003.0005 [Google Scholar]
  13. Andersen, Henning
    1969 A study in diachronic morphophonemics: The Ukrainian prefixes. Language45. 807–830. 10.2307/412336
    https://doi.org/10.2307/412336 [Google Scholar]
  14. Anderson, Stephen R.
    1982 Where’s morphology?Linguistic Inquiry13. 571–612.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. 1992A-morphous morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511586262
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511586262 [Google Scholar]
  16. 2005Aspects of the theory of clitics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199279906.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199279906.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  17. Andriotis, Nikolaos
    1961To idíoma tou Livisíou tis Lykías [The dialect of Livisi in Lycia]. Athens: Center of Asia Minor Studies.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Aoki, Hirofumi
    2010Gokeisei kara mita Nihongobunpōshi [Japanese grammatical history viewed from word-formation]. Tokyo: Hituzi Syobo.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Arakaki, Tomoko
    2003 A grammatical study of Luchuan — Focusing upon the verb forms in Shuri dialect. In Atsuko Izuyama (ed.), Studies on Luchuan Grammar, 163–216. Osaka: Osaka Gakuin Daigaku Joho Gakubu.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Arimoto, Mitsuhiko
    2001a Ryūkyū Yonaguni Sonai hōgen no dōshi katsuyōkei no goi on’inron [Lexical phonology of the verbal inflected forms of the Ryukyu dialect of Sonai, Yonaguni] (1). Yasuda Joshi Daigaku Kiyō [Bulletin of Yasuda Women’s University] 29. 1–11.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. 2001b Ryūkyū Yonaguni Sonai hōgen no dōshi katsuyōkei no goi on’inron [Lexical phonology of the verbal inflected forms of the Ryukyu dialect of Sonai, Yonaguni] (2). Kokugo Kokubun Ronshū (Yasuda Joshi Daigaku) [Papers on Japanese Language and Literature (Yasuda Women’s University) ] 31. 11–19.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. 2002a Ryūkyū Yonaguni Sonai hōgen no dōshi katsuyōkei no goi on’inron [Lexical phonology of the verbal inflected forms of the Ryukyu dialect of Sonai, Yonaguni] (3). Yasuda Joshi Daigaku Kiyō [Bulletin of Yasuda Women’s University] 30. 1–10.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. 2002b Ryūkyū Yonaguni Sonai hōgen no dōshi katsuyōkei no goi on’inron [Lexical phonology of the verbal inflected forms of the Ryukyu dialect of Sonai, Yonaguni] (4). Kokugo Kokubun Ronshū (Yasuda Joshi Daigaku) [Papers on Japanese Language and Literature (Yasuda Women’s University) ] 32. 11–15.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Aronoff, Mark
    1976Word formation in generative grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. 1994Morphology by itself. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Ashworth, David
    1973 A generative study of the inflectional morphophonemics of the Shuri dialect of Ryukyuan. Doctoral dissertation, Cornell University.
  27. Aso, Reiko
    2015 Hateruma Yaeyama grammar. In Patrick Heinrich , Shinsho Miyara , and Michinori Shimoji (eds.), Handbook of the Ryukyuan languages, 423–447. Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9781614511151.423
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781614511151.423 [Google Scholar]
  28. Audring, Jenny , and Francesca Masini
    (eds.) 2019The Oxford handbook of morphological theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Azevedo, Milton M.
    2005Portuguese. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511755057
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511755057 [Google Scholar]
  30. Baker, Mark C.
    1988Incorporation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. 1996The polysynthesis parameter. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780195093070.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195093070.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  32. Balanced Corpus of Contemporary Written Japanese
    Balanced Corpus of Contemporary Written Japanese: https://clrd.ninjal.ac.jp/bccwj/
  33. Bauer, Laurie
    1983English word-formation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139165846
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139165846 [Google Scholar]
  34. Becker, Michael
    2009 Phonological trends in the lexicon: The role of constraints. Doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
  35. Beekes, Robert S. P.
    1995Comparative Indo-European linguistics. An introduction. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/z.72
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.72 [Google Scholar]
  36. Bermúdez-Otero, Ricardo
    2007 Diachronic phonology. In Paul de Lacy (ed.), The Cambridge handbook of phonology, 497–517. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511486371.022
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486371.022 [Google Scholar]
  37. 2011 Cyclicity. In Marc van Oostendorp , Colin J. Ewen , Elizabeth Hume , and Keren Rice (eds.), The Blackwell companion to phonology, 2019–2048. Oxford: Blackwell. 10.1002/9781444335262.wbctp0085
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444335262.wbctp0085 [Google Scholar]
  38. 2013 The Spanish lexicon stores stems with theme vowels, not roots with inflectional class features. Probus25. 3–103. 10.1515/probus‑2013‑0009
    https://doi.org/10.1515/probus-2013-0009 [Google Scholar]
  39. 2015 Amphichronic explanation and the life cycle of phonological processes. In Patrick Honeybone and Joseph Salmons (eds.), The Oxford handbook of historical phonology, 374–399. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Bermúdez-Otero, Ricardo , and Ana R. Luís
    2016 A view of the morphome debate. In Ricardo Bermúdez-Otero and Ana R. Luís (eds.), The morphome debate, 309–340. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198702108.003.0012
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198702108.003.0012 [Google Scholar]
  41. Bermúdez-Otero, Ricardo , and Graeme Trousdale
    2012 Cycles and continua: On unidirectionality and gradualness in language change. In Terttu Nevalainen and Elizabeth Closs Traugott (eds.), The Oxford handbook of the history of English, 691–720. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199922765.013.0059
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199922765.013.0059 [Google Scholar]
  42. Blevins, James P.
    2016Word and paradigm morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199593545.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199593545.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  43. Blevins, Juliette
    2008 Consonant epenthesis: Natural and unnatural histories. In Jeff Good (ed.), Linguistic universals and language change, 79–107. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199298495.003.0004
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199298495.003.0004 [Google Scholar]
  44. Bloch, Bernard
    1946 Studies in colloquial Japanese I. Inflection. Journal of the American Oriental Society66. 97–109. Reprinted in Bloch, Bernard 1970 Bernard Bloch on Japanese, edited with an introduction by Roy Andrew Miller , 1–24. New Haven: Yale University Press. 10.2307/596327
    https://doi.org/10.2307/596327 [Google Scholar]
  45. Bloomfield, Leonard
    1933Language. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. 1946 Algonquian. In Harry Hoijer (ed.), Linguistic structures of native America (Viking Fund Publications in Anthropology 6), 85–129. New York.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Bonami, Olivier , and Gregory Stump
    2016 Paradigm function morphology. In Andrew Hippisley and Gregory Stump (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of morphology, 449–481. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781139814720.017
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781139814720.017 [Google Scholar]
  48. Booij, Geert
    1992 Compounding in Dutch. Rivista di Linguistica4. 37–59.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. 1993 Against split morphology. In Geert Booij and Jaap van Marle (eds.), Yearbook of morphology 1993, 27–49. Dordrecht: Kluwer. 10.1007/978‑94‑017‑3712‑8_2
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3712-8_2 [Google Scholar]
  50. 1996 Inherent versus contextual inflection and the split morphology hypothesis. In Geert Booij and Jaap van Marle (eds.), Yearbook of morphology 1995, 1–16. Dordrecht: Kluwer. 10.1007/978‑94‑017‑3716‑6_1
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3716-6_1 [Google Scholar]
  51. Bresnan, Joan , Ash Asudeh , Ida Toivonen , and Stephen Wechsler
    2016Lexical-functional syntax, 2nd ed. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Brown, Dunstan , and Andrew Hippisley
    2012Network morphology: A defaults-based theory of word structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511794346
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511794346 [Google Scholar]
  53. Buck, Carl Darling
    1933Comparative grammar of Greek and Latin. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Burzio, Luigi
    2001 Zero derivations. Linguistic Inquiry32. 658–677. 10.1162/002438901753373032
    https://doi.org/10.1162/002438901753373032 [Google Scholar]
  55. 2002 Surface-to-surface morphology: When your representations turn into constraints. In Paul Boucher (ed.), Many morphologies, 142–177. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Bybee, Joan
    1985Morphology. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.9
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.9 [Google Scholar]
  57. 1995 Regular morphology and the lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes10. 425–455. Reprinted in Bybee, Joan 2007 Frequency of use and the organization of language, 167–193. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1080/01690969508407111
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01690969508407111 [Google Scholar]
  58. 2001Phonology and language use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511612886
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511612886 [Google Scholar]
  59. Campbell, A.
    1961Old English grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Casali, Roderic F.
    1997 Vowel elision in hiatus contexts: Which vowel goes?Language73. 493–533. 10.2307/415882
    https://doi.org/10.2307/415882 [Google Scholar]
  61. 1998Resolving hiatus. New York: Garland.
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Chen, Victoria , and Bradley McDonnell
    2019 Western Austronesian voice. Annual Review of Linguistics5. 173–195. 10.1146/annurev‑linguistics‑011718‑011731
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-linguistics-011718-011731 [Google Scholar]
  63. Chew, John J.
    1973A transformational analysis of modern colloquial Japanese. The Hague: Mouton. 10.1515/9783111713441
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783111713441 [Google Scholar]
  64. Chitoran, Ioana
    2002The phonology of Romanian. A constraint-based approach. Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110889185
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110889185 [Google Scholar]
  65. Chomsky, Noam
    1955The logical structure of linguistic theory. MS, Harvard University. Partially revised version published as Chomsky, Noam 1975 The logical structure of linguistic theory. New York: Plenum.
    [Google Scholar]
  66. 1957Syntactic structures. The Hague: Mouton. 10.1515/9783112316009
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783112316009 [Google Scholar]
  67. 1964aCurrent issues in linguistic theory. The Hague: Mouton. Reprinted in Fodor, Jerry A. , and Jerrold J. Katz (eds.) 1964 The structure of language, 50–118. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
    [Google Scholar]
  68. 1964b The logical basis of linguistic theory. In Horace Lunt (ed.), Proceedings of the ninth international congress of linguists, 914–978. The Hague: Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
  69. 1965Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  70. 1970 Remarks on nominalization. In Roderick A. Jacobs and Peter S. Rosenbaum (eds.), Readings in English transformational grammar, 184–221. Waltham, MA: Ginn.
    [Google Scholar]
  71. 1981Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.
    [Google Scholar]
  72. 1994 Bare phrase structure (MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics 5). Cambridge, MA: MITWPL. Reprinted in Campos, Héctor , and Paula Kempchinsky (eds.) 1995 Evolution and revolution in linguistic theory, 51–109. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press. Reprinted in Webelhuth, Gert (ed.) 1995 Government and binding theory and the minimalist program, 383–439. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  73. 1995The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  74. 2000 Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In Roger Martin , David Michaels , and Juan Uriagereka (eds.), Step by step. Essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik, 89–155. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  75. 2008 On phases. In Robert Freidin , Carlos P. Otero , and Maria Luisa Zubizarreta (eds.), Foundational issues in linguistic theory. Essays in honor of Jean-Roger Vergnaud, 133–166. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/7713.003.0009
    https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/7713.003.0009 [Google Scholar]
  76. Chomsky, Noam , and Morris Halle
    1968The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper and Row.
    [Google Scholar]
  77. Chung, Sung-Yeo , and Masayoshi Shibatani
    2018 Causative constructions in Japanese and Korean. In Prashant Pardeshi and Taro Kageyama (eds.), Handbook of Japanese contrastive linguistics, 137–172. Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9781614514077‑005
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781614514077-005 [Google Scholar]
  78. Cinque, Guglielmo
    1999Adverbs and functional heads. A cross-linguistic perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780195115260.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195115260.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  79. Clements, George N. , and Samuel Jay Keyser
    1983CV phonology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  80. Davis, Stuart , and Hyunsook Kang
    2006 English loanwords and the word-final [t] problem in Korean. Eohak Yeonku (Seoul Taehakkyo) [Language Research (Seoul National University) ] 42. 253–274.
    [Google Scholar]
  81. Dawkins, Richard M.
    1916Modern Greek in Asia Minor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  82. Deal, Amy Rose
    2017 External possession and possessor raising. In Martin Everaert and Henk van Riemsdijk (eds.), The Wiley-Blackwell companion to syntax, 2nd ed., 1509–1540. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell. 10.1002/9781118358733.wbsyncom047
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118358733.wbsyncom047 [Google Scholar]
  83. de Chene, Brent
    1983 Morphological n-epenthesis in Sanskrit. In Shiro Hattori and Kazuko Inoue (eds.), Proceedings of the XIIIth international congress of linguists, 689–692. Tokyo: Comité International Permanent des Linguistes.
    [Google Scholar]
  84. 1985r-Epenthesis and the Japanese verb. Papers in Japanese Linguistics10. 172–207. 10.1515/jjl‑1985‑1‑211
    https://doi.org/10.1515/jjl-1985-1-211 [Google Scholar]
  85. 1987 Keitai on’inron ni okeru shinriteki jitsuzaisei: Nihongo no dōshi no baai [Psychological reality in morphophonology: The case of the Japanese verb]. In Yukio Otsu (ed.), Kotoba kara mita kokoro [Mind viewed from language], 145–180. Tokyo: Tokyo Daigaku Shuppankai.
    [Google Scholar]
  86. 2014 Probability matching versus probability maximization in morphophonology: The case of Korean noun inflection. Theoretical and Applied Linguistics at Kobe Shoin17. 1–13.
    [Google Scholar]
  87. 2016 Description and explanation in morphophonology: The case of Japanese verb inflection. Journal of East Asian Linguistics25. 37–80. 10.1007/s10831‑015‑9137‑y
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10831-015-9137-y [Google Scholar]
  88. 2017 Root-based syntax and Japanese derivational morphology. In Claire Bowen , Laurence Horn , and Raffaella Zanuttini (eds.), On looking into words (and beyond), 117–135. Berlin: Language Science Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  89. 2019r-Epenthesis and Ryukyuan. Gengo Kenkyu155. 101–130.
    [Google Scholar]
  90. 2020a On the (ir)regularity of Dunan verbal morphophonology. Journal of Japanese Linguistics36. 253–289. 10.1515/jjl‑2020‑2026
    https://doi.org/10.1515/jjl-2020-2026 [Google Scholar]
  91. 2020br-Epenthesis and the bigrade alternation: The role of phonological distance in the regularization of Japanese verbal inflection. Diachronica37. 178–214. 10.1075/dia.18038.dec
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.18038.dec [Google Scholar]
  92. 2022a Sanskrit nominal stem gradation without morphomes. Word Structure15. 28–54. 10.3366/word.2022.0198
    https://doi.org/10.3366/word.2022.0198 [Google Scholar]
  93. 2022b Syntactic and lexical -ase- are distinct suffixes. Journal of Japanese Linguistics38. 193–230. 10.1515/jjl‑2022‑2058
    https://doi.org/10.1515/jjl-2022-2058 [Google Scholar]
  94. . to appear. Stem inalterability in Japonic. Journal of Japanese Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  95. de Lacy, Paul
    2006Markedness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511486388
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486388 [Google Scholar]
  96. Di Sciullo, Anna Maria , and Edwin Williams
    1987On the definition of word. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  97. Dixon, R. M. W. , and Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald
    2002 Word: A typological framework. In R. M. W. Dixon and Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald (eds.), Word. A cross-linguistic typology, 1–41. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  98. Dressler, Wolfgang U.
    1989 Prototypical differences between inflection and derivation. Zeitschrift für Phonetik, Sprachwissenschaft und Kommunikationsforschung42. 3–10. 10.1515/stuf‑1989‑0102
    https://doi.org/10.1515/stuf-1989-0102 [Google Scholar]
  99. Embick, David
    2021 The motivation for roots in distributed morphology. Annual Review of Linguistics7. 69–88. 10.1146/annurev‑linguistics‑040620‑061341
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-linguistics-040620-061341 [Google Scholar]
  100. Embick, David , and Alec Marantz
    2008 Architecture and blocking. Linguistic Inquiry39. 1–53. 10.1162/ling.2008.39.1.1
    https://doi.org/10.1162/ling.2008.39.1.1 [Google Scholar]
  101. Fertig, David
    2016 Mechanisms of paradigm leveling and the role of universal preferences in morphophonological change. Diachronica33. 423–460. 10.1075/dia.33.4.01fer
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.33.4.01fer [Google Scholar]
  102. Frellesvig, Bjarke
    2008 On reconstruction of proto-Japanese and pre-Old Japanese verb inflection. In Bjarke Frellesvig and John Whitman (eds.), Proto-Japanese, 175–192. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.294.14fre
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.294.14fre [Google Scholar]
  103. 2010A history of the Japanese language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511778322
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511778322 [Google Scholar]
  104. Frellesvig, Bjarke , and John Whitman
    2008 Introduction. In Bjarke Frellesvig and John Whitman (eds.), Proto-Japanese, 1–9. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.294.01fre
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.294.01fre [Google Scholar]
  105. Fujii, Nozomi
    2019 Kodomo no jikokenkōkanrinōryoku no kōjō o mezashite [Towards an increase in childrens’ health self-management abilities]. Kyōiku Kenkyū Ronbun [Papers in Educational Research] (Funabashi-shi Sogo Kyoiku Sentaa [Funabashi City Integrated Educational Center]) 54. 14–20.
    [Google Scholar]
  106. Fukushima, Kazuhiko
    2004 Conspiracy of form and function for optimization of language change. Journal of East Asian Linguistics13. 181–196. 10.1023/B:JEAL.0000019116.81203.cd
    https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JEAL.0000019116.81203.cd [Google Scholar]
  107. Fukushima, Kunimichi
    1969 “myū” to “myō” no kōtai [Variation between “myū” and “myō”]. In Masayoshi Oki , Yasuo Kitahara , Hideo Komatsu , Norio Nakada , Kazuo Mabuchi , and Muneaki Morino (eds.), Saeki Umetomo hakase koki kinen kokugogaku ronshū [Papers in Japanese linguistics offered to Dr. Umetomo Saeki on his 70th birthday], 533–551. Tokyo: Hyogensha.
    [Google Scholar]
  108. Garrett, Andrew
    2008 Paradigmatic uniformity and markedness. In Jeff Good (ed.), Linguistic universals and language change, 125–143. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199298495.003.0006
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199298495.003.0006 [Google Scholar]
  109. Goddard, Ives
    2013 Algonquian linguistic change and reconstruction. In Philip Baldi (ed.), Patterns of change — change of patterns. Linguistic change and reconstruction methodology, 55–70. Berlin: De Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  110. Goldberg, Adele E.
    1995Constructions. A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  111. Goto, Kazuhiko
    1961 Kagoshima/Miyazaki nanbu [Kagoshima and southern Miyazaki]. In Misao Tojo , Yoshimoto Endo , Teruo Hirayama , Tadatoshi Okubo , and Takeshi Shibata (eds.), Kyūshū/Ryūkyū hōgen [Kyushu/Ryukyu dialects] ( Hōgengaku kōza [Dialectology course] 4), 268–293. Tokyo: Tokyodo Shuppan.
    [Google Scholar]
  112. Hagège, Claude
    1990 Do the classical morphological types have clear-cut limits?In Wolfgang U. Dressler , Hans C. Luschützky , Oskar E. Pfeiffer and John R. Rennison (eds.), Contemporary morphology, 297–308. Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110874082.297
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110874082.297 [Google Scholar]
  113. Hale, Kenneth
    1973 Deep-surface canonical disparities in relation to analysis and change: An Australian example. In Thomas A. Sebeok (ed.), Diachronic, areal, and typological linguistics (Current Trends in Linguistics 11), 401–458. The Hague: Mouton. 10.1515/9783111418797‑018
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783111418797-018 [Google Scholar]
  114. Hall, T. A.
    2011 Coronals. In Marc van Oostendorp , Colin J. Ewen , Elizabeth Hume , and Keren Rice (eds.), The Blackwell companion to phonology, 267–287. Oxford: Blackwell. 10.1002/9781444335262.wbctp0012
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444335262.wbctp0012 [Google Scholar]
  115. Halle, Morris
    1962 Phonology in generative grammar. Word18. 54–72. Reprinted in Fodor, Jerry A. , and Jerrold J. Katz (eds.) 1964 The structure of language, 334–352. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
    [Google Scholar]
  116. 1973 Prolegomena to a theory of word formation. Linguistic Inquiry4. 3–16.
    [Google Scholar]
  117. 1997 Distributed morphology: Impoverishment and fission. In Benjamin Bruening , Yoonjung Kang , and Martha McGinnis (eds.), PF: Papers at the interface (MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 30), 425–449. Cambridge, MA: MITWPL.
    [Google Scholar]
  118. Halle, Morris , and Alec Marantz
    1993 Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. In Kenneth Hale and Samuel J. Keyser (eds.), The view from building 20. Essays in linguistics in honor of Sylvain Bromberger, 111–176. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  119. 1994 Some key features of distributed morphology. In Andrew Carnie and Heidi Harley (eds.), Papers on phonology and morphology (MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 21), 275–288. Cambridge, MA: MITWPL.
    [Google Scholar]
  120. Harley, Heidi
    1995 Subjects, events and licensing. Doctoral dissertation, MIT.
  121. 2008 On the causative construction. In Shigeru Miyagawa and Mamoru Saito (eds.), The Oxford handbook of Japanese linguistics, 20–53. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  122. 2009 The morphology of nominalizations and the syntax of vP*. In Anastasia Giannakidou and Monika Rathert (eds.), Quantification, definiteness, and nominalization, 321–343. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  123. 2012 Lexical decomposition in modern syntactic theory. In Markus Werning , Wolfram Hinzen , and Edouard Machery (eds.), The Oxford handbook of compositionality, 328–350. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  124. 2015 The syntax-morphology interface. In Tibor Kiss and Artemis Alexiadou (eds.), Syntax — theory and analysis, vol.2, 1128–1154. Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110363708‑010
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110363708-010 [Google Scholar]
  125. Harley, Heidi , and Rolf Noyer
    1999 Distributed morphology. Glot International4.4. 3–9.
    [Google Scholar]
  126. Harley, Heidi and Rolf Noyer
    2000 Formal versus encyclopedic properties of vocabulary: Evidence from nominalisations. In Bert Peeters (ed.), The lexicon-encyclopedia interface, 349–374. Leiden: Brill. 10.1163/9780585474465_014
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9780585474465_014 [Google Scholar]
  127. Harris, James W.
    1974 Evidence from Portuguese for the “Elsewhere Condition” in phonology. Linguistic Inquiry5. 61–80.
    [Google Scholar]
  128. Hasegawa, Nobuko
    1999Seisei nihongogaku nyūmon [Introduction to the generative grammar of Japanese]. Tokyo: Taishukan Shoten.
    [Google Scholar]
  129. 2007 The possessor raising construction and the interpretation of the subject. In Simin Karimi , Vida Samiian , and Wendy K. Wilkins (eds.), Phrasal and clausal architecture: Syntactic derivation and interpretation, 66–92. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/la.101.05has
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.101.05has [Google Scholar]
  130. Haspelmath, Martin
    1996 Word-class-changing inflection and morphological theory. In Geert Booij and Jaap van Marle (eds.), Yearbook of morphology 1995, 43–66. Dordrecht: Kluwer. 10.1007/978‑94‑017‑3716‑6_3
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3716-6_3 [Google Scholar]
  131. 2011 The indeterminacy of word segmentation and the nature of morphology and syntax. Folia Linguistica45. 31–80. 10.1515/flin.2011.002
    https://doi.org/10.1515/flin.2011.002 [Google Scholar]
  132. Hattori, Shiro
    1955 Ryūkyūgo V: Bunpō. [Ryukyuan V: Grammar]. In Sanki Ichikawa and Shiro Hattori (eds.), Sekai gengo gaisetsu [An introduction to the languages of the world], vol.2, 328–353. Tokyo: Kenkyusha.
    [Google Scholar]
  133. Hayes, Bruce , and James White
    2015 Saltation and the P-map. Phonology32. 267–302. 10.1017/S0952675715000159
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0952675715000159 [Google Scholar]
  134. Heinrich, Patrick , Shinsho Miyara , and Michinori Shimoji
    2015 Introduction: Ryukyuan languages and Ryukyuan linguistics. In Patrick Heinrich , Shinsho Miyara , and Michinori Shimoji (eds.), Handbook of the Ryukyuan languages, 1–10. Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9781614511151.1
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781614511151.1 [Google Scholar]
  135. Hensey, Fritz G.
    1972 Portuguese vowel alternation. In Jean Casagrande and Bohdan Saciuk (eds.), Generative studies in Romance languages, 285–292. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
    [Google Scholar]
  136. Hikosaka, Yoshinobu
    1999 Kyūshū ni okeru ichi/nidan katsuyō no godanka — “Kōgohō” kara GAJ e [The assimilation of unigrade and bigrade inflection to consonant-stem inflection in Kyushu — from the Spoken usage survey report to the GAJ]. In Takeyoshi Sato (ed.), Goi/gohō no shinkenkyū [New research on lexicon and grammar], 277–292. Tokyo: Meiji Shoin.
    [Google Scholar]
  137. Hippisley, Andrew , and Gregory Stump
    (eds.) 2016The Cambridge handbook of morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781139814720
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781139814720 [Google Scholar]
  138. Hirayama, Teruo
    1988Minami Ryūkyū no hōgen kiso goi [Basic vocabulary of southern Ryukyu dialects]. Tokyo: Ofusha.
    [Google Scholar]
  139. Hirayama, Teruo , and Masachie Nakamoto
    1964Ryūkyū Yonaguni hōgen no kenkyū [Research on the Ryukyu dialect of Yonaguni]. Tokyo: Tokyodo Shuppan.
    [Google Scholar]
  140. Hirayama, Teruo , and Ichiro Oshima
    1969Gotō rettō no hōgen [The dialects of the Goto archipelago]. Tokyo: Tokyo Toritsu Daigaku Toshi Kenkyu Iinkai [Tokyo Metropolitan University Urban Research Committee].
    [Google Scholar]
  141. Hirayama, Teruo , Ichiro Oshima , and Masachie Nakamoto
    1966Ryūkyū hōgen no sōgōteki kenkyū [Comprehensive research on Ryukyu dialects]. Tokyo: Meiji Shoin.
    [Google Scholar]
  142. 1967Ryūkyū Sakishima hōgen no sōgōteki kenkyū [Comprehensive research on Ryukyu Sakishima dialects]. Tokyo: Meiji Shoin.
    [Google Scholar]
  143. Hirayama, Teruo , Ichiro Oshima , Makio Ono , Makoto Kuno , Mariko Kuno , and Takao Sugimura
    (eds.) 1992–1994Gendai Nihongo hōgen daijiten [Great dictionary of modern Japanese dialects], 9vols. Tokyo: Meiji Shoin.
    [Google Scholar]
  144. Hokama, Shuzen
    1960 Chūsei bunken ni arawareta Ryūkyū hōgen no dōshi [Ryukyu dialect verbs appearing in medieval documents]. Kokugogaku41. 106–114. Reprinted in Inoue, Fumio , Koichi Shinozaki , Takashi Kobayashi , and Takuichiro Onishi (eds.) 2001 Ryūkyū hōgen kō [Studies on Ryukyu dialects] 2 (Nihon Rettō Hōgen Sōsho [Japanese Dialect Series] 29), 43–51. Tokyo: Yumani Shobo.
    [Google Scholar]
  145. Hokama, Shuzen , and Masami Tamaki
    1980Nantō kayō taisei I: Okinawahen jō [Compilation of songs of the southern islands I: Okinawa book 1]. Tokyo: Kadokawa Shoten.
    [Google Scholar]
  146. Hokama, Shuzen
    (eds.) 2011Okinawa kogo daijiten [Great historical dictionary of Okinawan], on-demand edition. Tokyo: Kadokawa Gakugei Shuppan.
    [Google Scholar]
  147. Holton, David , Geoffrey Horrocks , Marjolijne Janssen , Tina Lendari , Io Manolessou , and Notis Toufexis
    2019The Cambridge grammar of medieval and early modern Greek, 4vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781316632840
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316632840 [Google Scholar]
  148. Hooper, Joan B.
    1979 Substantive principles in natural generative phonology. In Daniel A. Dinnsen (ed.), Current approaches to phonological theory, 106–125. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  149. Hopper, Paul J. , and Sandra A. Thompson
    1980 Transitivity in grammar and discourse. Language56. 251–299. 10.1353/lan.1980.0017
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1980.0017 [Google Scholar]
  150. Horrocks, Geoffrey
    1997Greek: A history of the language and its speakers. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  151. Householder, Fred W. , Kostas Kazazis , and Andreas Koutsoudas
    1964Reference grammar of literary dhimotiki. Bloomington: Indiana University.
    [Google Scholar]
  152. Hyman, Larry
    2003 Suffix ordering in Bantu: A morphocentric approach. In Geert Booij and Jaap van Marle (eds.), Yearbook of morphology 2002, 245–281. Dordrecht: Kluwer. 10.1007/0‑306‑48223‑1_8
    https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-48223-1_8 [Google Scholar]
  153. Igartua, Iván
    2015 From cumulative to separative exponence in inflection: Reversing the morphological cycle. Language91. 676–722. 10.1353/lan.2015.0032
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2015.0032 [Google Scholar]
  154. Iha, Fuyu
    1933 Ryūkyū no hōgen [Ryukyu dialects]. InHōgengaku [Dialectology] ( Kokugo kagaku kōza [Course in Japanese linguistics] VII). Tokyo: Meiji Shoin. Reprinted in Hattori, Shiro , Seizen Nakasone , and Shuzen Hokama (eds.) 1975 Iha Fuyū Zenshū [Collected writings of Iha Fuyu], vol.8, 508–549. Tokyo: Heibonsha.
    [Google Scholar]
  155. Iitoyo, Kiichi , Sukezumi Hino , and Ryoichi Sato
    (eds.) 1982–1986Kōza hōgengaku [Course in dialectology], 10vols. Tokyo: Kokusho Kankokai.
    [Google Scholar]
  156. Institute of Modern Greek Studies, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
    Institute of Modern Greek Studies, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki 1998Lexikó tis koinís Neoellenikís [Dictionary of Standard Modern Greek]. https://www.greek-language.gr/greekLang/modern_greek/tools/lexica/triantafyllides/index.html
    [Google Scholar]
  157. Ito, Chiyuki
    2010 Analogy and lexical restructuring in the development of nominal stem inflection from Middle to Contemporary Korean. Journal of East Asian Linguistics19. 357–383. 10.1007/s10831‑010‑9066‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10831-010-9066-8 [Google Scholar]
  158. Ito, Junko , and Armin Mester
    2004 Morphological contrast and merger: ranuki in Japanese. Journal of Japanese Linguistics20. 1–18. Also in the Rutgers Optimality Archive, ROA-711. 10.1515/jjl‑2004‑0103
    https://doi.org/10.1515/jjl-2004-0103 [Google Scholar]
  159. Itoi, Kan’ichi
    1961 Ōita/Miyazaki hokubu [Oita and northern Miyazaki]. In Misao Tojo , Yoshimoto Endo , Teruo Hirayama , Tadatoshi Okubo , and Takeshi Shibata (eds.), Kyūshū/Ryūkyū hōgen [Kyushu/Ryukyu dialects] ( Hōgengaku kōza [ Dialectology course] 4), 239–267. Tokyo: Tokyodo Shuppan.
    [Google Scholar]
  160. 1983 Ōita-ken no hōgen [The dialects of Oita Prefecture]. In Kiichi Iitoyo , Sukezumi Hino , and Ryoichi Sato (eds.), Kyūshū chihō no hōgen [The dialects of the Kyushu region] ( Kōza hōgengaku [Course in dialectology] 9), 237–266. Tokyo: Kokusho Kankokai.
    [Google Scholar]
  161. Iwai, Ryusei
    1959 Ishikawa-ken Kanazawa-shi Hikozō ichibanchō. [(The dialect of) Hikozo ichibancho in Kanazawa, Ishikawa Prefecture]. InNihon hōgen no kijutsuteki kenkyū [Descriptive studies on Japanese dialects], 87–110. Tokyo: Kokuritsu Kokugo Kenkyujo.
    [Google Scholar]
  162. 1961 Toyama/Ishikawa. In Misao Tojo , Yoshimoto Endo , Teruo Hirayama , Tadatoshi Okubo , and Takeshi Shibata (eds.), Seibu hōgen [Western dialects] ( Hōgengaku kōza [Dialectology course] 3), 84–110. Tokyo: Tokyodo Shuppan.
    [Google Scholar]
  163. Iwasaki, Shoichi
    2013Japanese, 2nd ed. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/loall.17
    https://doi.org/10.1075/loall.17 [Google Scholar]
  164. Izuyama, Atsuko
    2012 Yonaguni. In Nicolas Tranter (ed.), The languages of Japan and Korea, 412–457. Abingdon: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  165. Jackendoff, Ray
    1975 Morphological and semantic regularities in the lexicon. Language51. 639–671. 10.2307/412891
    https://doi.org/10.2307/412891 [Google Scholar]
  166. 1997The architecture of the language faculty. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  167. 2002Foundations of language. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198270126.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198270126.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  168. Jacobsen, Wesley M.
    1982 Transitivity in the Japanese verbal system (Doctoral dissertation, University of Chicago). Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.
  169. 1992The transitive structure of events in Japanese. Tokyo: Kurosio Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  170. 2017 Transitivity. In Masayoshi Shibatani , Shigeru Miyagawa , and Hisashi Noda (eds.), Handbook of Japanese syntax, 55–95. Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9781614516613‑003
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781614516613-003 [Google Scholar]
  171. Jinnouchi, Masataka
    1989 Hokubu kyūshū no shin-hōgen [New dialects of northern Kyushu]. In Mitsuo Okumura (ed.), Kyūshū hōgen no shiteki kenkyū [Historical research on Kyushu dialects], 331–347. Tokyo: Ofusha.
    [Google Scholar]
  172. Jun, Jongho
    2010 Stem-final obstruent variation in Korean. Journal of East Asian Linguistics19. 137–179. 10.1007/s10831‑010‑9058‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10831-010-9058-8 [Google Scholar]
  173. Kageyama, Taro
    1999 Word formation. In Natsuko Tsujimura (ed.), The handbook of Japanese linguistics, 297–325. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  174. Kageyama, Taro , and Wesley M. Jacobsen
    (eds.) 2016Transitivity and valency alternations: Studies on Japanese and beyond. Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110477153
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110477153 [Google Scholar]
  175. Kaisse, Ellen M. , and Patricia A. Shaw
    1985 On the theory of lexical phonology. Phonology2. 1–30. 10.1017/S0952675700000361
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0952675700000361 [Google Scholar]
  176. Kamimura, Takaji
    1983 Kyūshū hōgen no gaisetsu [An outline of Kyushu dialects]. In Kiichi Iitoyo , Sukezumi Hino , and Ryoichi Sato (eds.), Kyūshū chihō no hōgen [The dialects of the Kyushu region] ( Kōza hōgengaku [Course in dialectology] 9), 1–28. Tokyo: Kokusho Kankokai.
    [Google Scholar]
  177. Karatsareas, Petros
    2011 A study of Cappadocian Greek nominal morphology from a diachronic and dialectological perspective. Doctoral dissertation, University of Cambridge.
  178. Karimata, Shigehisa
    1997a Miyako hōgen [Miyako dialects]. In Takashi Kamei , Rokuro Kono , and Eiichi Chino (eds.), Nihon rettō no gengo (Gengogaku daijiten serekushon) [The languages of the Japanese archipelago (Selection from the Great dictionary of linguistics)], 388–403. Tokyo: Sanseido.
    [Google Scholar]
  179. 1997b Yaeyama hōgen [Yaeyama dialects]. In Takashi Kamei , Rokuro Kono , and Eiichi Chino (eds.), Nihon rettō no gengo (Gengogaku daijiten serekushon) [The languages of the Japanese archipelago (Selection from the Great dictionary of linguistics)], 403–413. Tokyo: Sanseido.
    [Google Scholar]
  180. 1999 Miyako shohōgen no dōshi “shūshikei” no seiritsu ni tsuite [On the formation of the verbal conclusive form in the dialects of Miyako]. Nihon Tōyō Bunka Ronshū (Ryūkyū Daigaku Hōbungakubu Kiyō) [Japanese Papers on Eastern Culture (Bulletin of the Faculty of Law and Letters, University of the Ryukyus) ] 5. 27–51.
    [Google Scholar]
  181. 2005 Okinawa-ken Miyakojima Hirara hōgen no foneemu [The phonemes of the dialect of Hirara, Miyakojima, Okinawa Prefecture]. Nihon Tōyō Bunka Ronshū (Ryūkyū Daigaku Hōbungakubu Kiyō) [Japanese Papers on Eastern Culture (Bulletin of the Faculty of Law and Letters, University of the Ryukyus) ] 11. 67–113.
    [Google Scholar]
  182. 2015 Ryukyuan languages: A grammar overview. In Patrick Heinrich , Shinsho Miyara , and Michinori Shimoji (eds.), Handbook of the Ryukyuan languages, 113–140. Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9781614511151.113
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781614511151.113 [Google Scholar]
  183. Keino, Masaji
    1972Dōshi no kenkyū [Studies on verbs]. Tokyo: Kasama Shoin.
    [Google Scholar]
  184. Kenstowicz, Michael , and Charles Kisseberth
    1977Topics in phonological theory. New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  185. 1979Generative phonology. New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  186. Kim, Heung-gyu , and Beom-mo Kang
    2000Frequency analysis of Korean morpheme and word usage1. Seoul: Institute of Korean Culture, Korea University.
    [Google Scholar]
  187. Kiparsky, Paul
    1971 Historical linguistics. Lecture, University of Maryland. Published in Kiparsky, Paul. 1982. Explanation in phonology, 57–80. Dordrecht: Foris.
    [Google Scholar]
  188. 1972 Review of Geschichte der indogermanischen Verbalflexion, by Calvert Watkins. Foundations of Language9. 277–286.
    [Google Scholar]
  189. 1973 Productivity in phonology. In Michael J. Kenstowicz and Charles W. Kisseberth (eds.), Issues in phonological theory, 169–176. The Hague: Mouton. Reprinted in Kiparsky, Paul 1982 Explanation in phonology, 165–173. Dordrecht: Foris. 10.1515/9783110905137.169
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110905137.169 [Google Scholar]
  190. 1982 Lexical morphology and phonology. InThe Linguistic Society of Korea (ed.), Linguistics in the morning calm, 3–91. Seoul: Hanshin.
    [Google Scholar]
  191. 1996 Allomorphy or morphophonology?In Rajendra Singh (ed.), Trubetzkoy’s orphan, 13–31. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.144.06kip
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.144.06kip [Google Scholar]
  192. 2003 The phonological basis of sound change. In Brian D. Joseph and Richard D. Janda (eds.), The handbook of historical linguistics, 313–342. Oxford: Blackwell. 10.1002/9780470756393.ch6
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470756393.ch6 [Google Scholar]
  193. 2015 Stratal OT: A synopsis and FAQs. In Yuchau E. Hsiao and Lian-Hee Wee (eds.), Capturing phonological shades within and across languages, 2–44. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  194. 2020 Morphological units: Stems. In Rochelle Lieber (ed.), The Oxford encyclopedia of morphology, 33–52. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  195. Ko, Kwang-Mo
    1989 Cheeon kkeuth ui pyeonhwa t > s e taehan saeroun haeseok [A new interpretation of the noun-final change t > s ]. Eoneohak [Linguistics] 11. 3–22.
    [Google Scholar]
  196. Kobayashi, Takashi
    2004Hōgengakuteki Nihongoshi no hōhō [A dialectological approach to the history of the Japanese language]. Tokyo: Hituzi Syobo.
    [Google Scholar]
  197. Kokugo Chosa Iinkai [Japanese Language Survey Committee]
    Kokugo Chosa Iinkai [Japanese Language Survey Committee] 1906Kōgohō chōsa hōkokusho [Report on the survey of spoken usage], 2vols. Tokyo: Monbusho.
    [Google Scholar]
  198. Kokugo Gakkai [Society for Japanese Linguistics]
    Kokugo Gakkai [Society for Japanese Linguistics] 1980Kokugogaku daijiten [Great dictionary of Japanese linguistics]. Tokyo: Tokyodo Shuppan.
    [Google Scholar]
  199. Kokuritsu Kokugo Kenkyujo [National Language Research Institute]
    Kokuritsu Kokugo Kenkyujo [National Language Research Institute] 1953Chiiki shakai no gengo seikatsu. Tsuruoka ni okeru jittai chōsa. [The linguistic life of regional society. A survey of Tsuruoka]. Tokyo: Shuei Shuppan.
    [Google Scholar]
  200. Kokuritsu Kokugo Kenkyujo [National Language Research Institute]
    Kokuritsu Kokugo Kenkyujo [National Language Research Institute] 1963Okinawa-go jiten [Dictionary of the Okinawan language]. Tokyo: Okurasho Insatsukyoku.
    [Google Scholar]
  201. Kokuritsu Kokugo Kenkyujo [National Language Research Institute]
    Kokuritsu Kokugo Kenkyujo [National Language Research Institute] 1966–1974Nihon gengo chizu [Linguistic atlas of Japan], 6vols. Tokyo: Okurasho Insatsukyoku.
    [Google Scholar]
  202. Kokuritsu Kokugo Kenkyujo [National Language Research Institute]
    Kokuritsu Kokugo Kenkyujo [National Language Research Institute] 1989–2006Hōgen bunpō zenkoku chizu [Grammar atlas of Japanese dialects], 6vols. Tokyo: Kokuritsu Kokugo Kenkyujo. https://www2.ninjal.ac.jp/past-publications/publication/catalogue/gaj_map/
    [Google Scholar]
  203. Komatsushiro, Yuichi
    1961 Iwate. In Misao Tojo , Yoshimoto Endo , Teruo Hirayama , Tadatoshi Okubo , and Takeshi Shibata (eds.), Tōbu hōgen [Eastern dialects] ( Hōgengaku kōza [Dialectology course] 2), 177–203. Tokyo: Tokyodo Shuppan.
    [Google Scholar]
  204. Konishi, Izumi
    2011 Izumo hōgen ni okeru “ichidan katsuyō no ra-gyō godanka” ni kansuru oboegaki [A note concerning “assimilation of vowel-stem to r-stem inflection” in the Izumo dialect]. Ronsō Kokugo Kyōikugaku Fukkan [Papers on Japanese Language Education New Series] 2. 49–60.
    [Google Scholar]
  205. Konoshima, Masatoshi
    1961 Aomori. In Misao Tojo , Yoshimoto Endo , Teruo Hirayama , Tadatoshi Okubo , and Takeshi Shibata (eds.), Tōbu hōgen [Eastern dialects] ( Hōgengaku kōza [Dialectology course] 2), 127–148. Tokyo: Tokyodo Shuppan.
    [Google Scholar]
  206. Kubo, Miori
    1992 Japanese passives. Hokkaidō Daigaku Gengobunkabu Kiyō [Bulletin of the Institute of Languages and Cultures, Hokkaido University] 23. 231–302.
    [Google Scholar]
  207. Kurisu, Kazutaka
    2001 The phonology of morpheme realization. Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Santa Cruz.
  208. Kuroda, S.-Y.
    1960Gengo no kijutsu [The description of language]. Tokyo: Kenkyusha.
    [Google Scholar]
  209. 1993 Lexical and productive causatives in Japanese: An examination of the theory of paradigmatic structure. Journal of Japanese Linguistics15. 1–81. 10.1515/jjl‑1993‑0102
    https://doi.org/10.1515/jjl-1993-0102 [Google Scholar]
  210. Kuryłowicz, Jerzy
    1945–49 La nature des procès dits « analogiques ». Acta LinguisticaV. 15–37. Reprinted in Hamp, Eric P. , Fred W. Householder , and Robert Austerlitz (eds.) 1966 Readings in linguistics II, 158–174. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  211. Kyushu Hogen Gakkai [Kyushu Dialect Society]
    Kyushu Hogen Gakkai [Kyushu Dialect Society] 1991Kyūshū hōgen no kisoteki kenkyū [Basic research on Kyushu dialects], revised edition. Tokyo: Kazama Shobo.
    [Google Scholar]
  212. Labov, William
    2001Principles of linguistic change, vol. 2: Social factors. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  213. Labrune, Laurence
    2014 The phonology of Japanese /r/: A panchronic account. Journal of East Asian Linguistics23. 1–25. 10.1007/s10831‑013‑9117‑z
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10831-013-9117-z [Google Scholar]
  214. Lawrence, Wayne P.
    2004 High vowels, glides, and Japanese phonology. Gengo Kenkyu125. 1–30.
    [Google Scholar]
  215. Lichtenberk, Frantisek , Jyotsna Vaid , and Hsin-Chin Chen
    2011 On the interpretation of alienable vs. inalienable possession: A psycholinguistic investigation. Cognitive Linguistics22. 659–689. 10.1515/cogl.2011.025
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.2011.025 [Google Scholar]
  216. Lieber, Rochelle
    1980 On the organization of the lexicon. Doctoral dissertation, MIT.
  217. 1992Deconstructing morphology. Word formation in syntactic theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  218. 2004Morphology and lexical semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  219. (ed.) 2020The Oxford encyclopedia of morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acref/9780190682361.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acref/9780190682361.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  220. Lightner, Theodore
    1968 On the use of minor rules in Russian phonology. Journal of Linguistics4. 69–72. 10.1017/S0022226700001651
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226700001651 [Google Scholar]
  221. 1975 The role of derivational morphology in generative grammar. Language51. 617–638. 10.2307/412890
    https://doi.org/10.2307/412890 [Google Scholar]
  222. Lombard, Alf
    1954Le verbe Roumain: Étude morphologique, TomeI. Lund: C.W.K. Gleerup.
    [Google Scholar]
  223. Lombardi, Linda
    2002 Coronal epenthesis and markedness. Phonology19. 219–251. 10.1017/S0952675702004323
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0952675702004323 [Google Scholar]
  224. Mackridge, Peter
    1985The modern Greek language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  225. Maiden, Martin
    2018The Romance verb. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780199660216.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199660216.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  226. Marantz, Alec
    1997 No escape from syntax: Don’t try morphological analysis in the privacy of your own lexicon. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics4. 201–225.
    [Google Scholar]
  227. 2005 Generative linguistics within the cognitive neuroscience of language. The Linguistic Review22. 429–445. 10.1515/tlir.2005.22.2‑4.429
    https://doi.org/10.1515/tlir.2005.22.2-4.429 [Google Scholar]
  228. 2007 Phases and words. In Sook-Hee Choe (ed.), Phases in the theory of grammar, 191–222. Seoul: Dong In.
    [Google Scholar]
  229. 2013 Locality domains for contextual allomorphy across the interfaces. In Ora Matushansky and Alec Marantz (eds.), Distributed morphology today, 95–115. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/9701.003.0008
    https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9701.003.0008 [Google Scholar]
  230. Marcus, Gary , Ursula Brinkmann , Harald Clahsen , Richard Wiese , and Steven Pinker
    1995 German inflection: The exception that proves the rule. Cognitive Psychology29. 189–256. 10.1006/cogp.1995.1015
    https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1995.1015 [Google Scholar]
  231. Marcus, Gary , Steven Pinker , Michael Ullman , Michelle Hollander , T. John Rosen , Fei Xu and Harald Clahsen
    1992 Overregularization in language acquisition. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development57.4. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 10.2307/1166115
    https://doi.org/10.2307/1166115 [Google Scholar]
  232. Martin, Samuel E.
    1966 Lexical evidence relating Korean to Japanese. Language42. 185–251. 10.2307/411687
    https://doi.org/10.2307/411687 [Google Scholar]
  233. 1975A reference grammar of Japanese. New Haven: Yale University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  234. Mateus, Maria Helena , and Ernesto d’Andrade
    2000The phonology of Portuguese. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780198235811.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198235811.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  235. Matsumaru, Michio
    2006 minai, miro [does not look, look!]. Gengo35.12. 40–43.
    [Google Scholar]
  236. Matsumoto, Yo
    2016 Phonological and semantic subregularities in noncausative-causative verb pairs in Japanese. In Taro Kageyama and Wesley M. Jacobsen (eds.), Transitivity and valency alternations: Studies on Japanese and beyond, 51–88. Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110477153‑003
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110477153-003 [Google Scholar]
  237. Matsumura, Akira
    (ed.) 1971Nihon bunpō daijiten [Great dictionary of Japanese grammar]. Tokyo: Meiji Shoin.
    [Google Scholar]
  238. (ed.) 1988Daijirin. Tokyo: Sanseido.
    [Google Scholar]
  239. (ed.) 1995Daijirin, 2nd ed.Tokyo: Sanseido.
    [Google Scholar]
  240. Matthews, P. H.
    1972Inflectional morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  241. McCarthy, John J.
    2002A thematic guide to optimality theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  242. McCarthy, John J. , and Alan Prince
    1993 Generalized alignment. In Geert Booij and Jaap van Marle (eds.), Yearbook of morphology 1993, 79–153. Dordrecht: Kluwer. 10.1007/978‑94‑017‑3712‑8_4
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3712-8_4 [Google Scholar]
  243. McCawley, James D.
    1968The phonological component of a grammar of Japanese. The Hague: Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
  244. Melissaropoulou, Dimitra
    2013 Gradualness in analogical change as a complexification stage in a language simplification process: A case study from Modern Greek dialects. In Anna Giacalone Ramat , Caterina Mauri , and Piera Molinelli (eds.), Synchrony and diachrony: A dynamic interface, 125–150. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.133.06mel
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.133.06mel [Google Scholar]
  245. Mester, Armin , and Junko Ito
    1989 Feature predictability and underspecification: Palatal prosody in Japanese mimetics. Language65. 258–293. 10.2307/415333
    https://doi.org/10.2307/415333 [Google Scholar]
  246. Miyagawa, Shigeru
    1984 Blocking and Japanese causatives. Lingua64. 177–207. Reprinted in Miyagawa, Shigeru 2012 Case, argument structure, and word order, 169–194, 292 (notes). New York: Routledge. 10.1016/0024‑3841(84)90016‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3841(84)90016-0 [Google Scholar]
  247. 1989Structure and case marking in Japanese. San Diego: Academic Press. 10.1163/9789004373259
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004373259 [Google Scholar]
  248. 1998(s)ase as an elsewhere causative and the syntactic nature of words. Journal of Japanese Linguistics16. 67–110. 10.1515/jjl‑1998‑0105
    https://doi.org/10.1515/jjl-1998-0105 [Google Scholar]
  249. 1999 Causatives. In Natsuko Tsujimura (ed.), The handbook of Japanese linguistics, 236–268. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  250. 2012 Blocking and causatives revisited. In Shigeru Miyagawa , Case, argument structure, and word order, 195–216. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  251. Miyaji, Yutaka
    1969seru/saseru (gendaigo) [ seru/saseru (modern language)]. In Akira Matsumoto (ed.), Kotengo/gendaigo joshi jodōshi shōsetsu [Detailed exposition of the particles and auxiliary verbs of the classical and modern language], 89–96. Tokyo: Gakutosha.
    [Google Scholar]
  252. Miyara, Shinsho
    1995Minami Ryūkyū Yaeyama Ishigaki hōgen no bunpō [The grammar of the Ishigaki dialect of Yaeyama, southern Ryukyus]. Tokyo: Kurosio Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  253. 2015 Shuri Okinawan grammar. In Patrick Heinrich , Shinsho Miyara , and Michinori Shimoji (eds.), Handbook of the Ryukyuan languages, 379–404. Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9781614511151.379
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781614511151.379 [Google Scholar]
  254. Moreton, Elliott , and Joe Pater
    2012a Structure and substance in artificial-phonology learning, part I: Structure. Language and Linguistics Compass6. 686–701. 10.1002/lnc3.363
    https://doi.org/10.1002/lnc3.363 [Google Scholar]
  255. 2012b Structure and substance in artificial-phonology learning, part II: Substance. Language and Linguistics Compass6. 702–718. 10.1002/lnc3.366
    https://doi.org/10.1002/lnc3.366 [Google Scholar]
  256. Morley, Rebecca L.
    2018 Is phonological consonant epenthesis possible? A series of artificial grammar learning experiments. Phonology35. 649–688. 10.1017/S0952675718000234
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0952675718000234 [Google Scholar]
  257. Nakajima, Nobutaro
    (ed.) 1972Harima Kako-gun hokubu hōgen kiroku. [Records of the dialect of northern Kako county, Harima]. Tokyo: Musashino Shoin.
    [Google Scholar]
  258. Nakamoto, Masachie
    1990Nihon rettō gengoshi no kenkyū [Research on the linguistic history of the Japanese archipelago]. Tokyo: Taishukan Shoten.
    [Google Scholar]
  259. Nasukawa, Kuniya
    2010 No consonant-final stems in Japanese verb morphology. Lingua120. 2336–2352. 10.1016/j.lingua.2010.03.026
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2010.03.026 [Google Scholar]
  260. Nevins, Andrew , and Bert Vaux
    2007 Underlying representations that do not minimize grammatical violations. In Sylvia Blaho , Patrik Bye , and Martin Krämer (eds.), Freedom of analysis?, 35–61. Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110198591.35
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110198591.35 [Google Scholar]
  261. Nguyễn, Ðình-hoà
    1987Vietnamese. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
  262. Nihon kokugo daijiten dainihan henshu iinkai/Shogakukan kokugo jiten henshubu [Great dictionary of the Japanese language second edition editorial committee/Shogakukan Japanese dictionary editorial division] (eds.) 2000–2002Nihon kokugo daijiten [Great dictionary of the Japanese language], 2nd ed. Tokyo: Shogakukan.
    [Google Scholar]
  263. Nishio, Minoru , Etsutaro Iwabuchi , and Shizuo Mizutani
    (eds.) 2000Iwanami kokugo jiten [Iwanami dictionary of the Japanese language], 6th ed. Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten.
    [Google Scholar]
  264. Nishioka, Satoshi
    1993 Ryūka/Kumiodori-go ni okeru “nai” no katsuyō [The conjugation of “nai” in the language of the Ryuka and Kumiodori]. Okinawa Bunka28.2. 27–39.
    [Google Scholar]
  265. Nyrop, Kr
    1908Grammaire historique de la langue Française, vol.3. Copenhagen: Gyldendal.
    [Google Scholar]
  266. Oehrle, Richard , and Hiroko Nishio
    1981 Adversity. In Ann Farmer and Chisato Kitagawa (eds.), Proceedings of the Arizona conference on Japanese linguistics ( Coyote Papers 2), 163–187. Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona Linguistics Circle.
    [Google Scholar]
  267. Ojeda, Almerindo E.
    1982 Some constraints on deletion. Doctoral dissertation, University of Chicago.
  268. Omodaka, Hisataka
    (eds.) 1967Jidaibetsu kokugo daijiten, jōdaihen [Great historical dictionary of Japanese, Nara period]. Tokyo: Sanseido.
    [Google Scholar]
  269. Onishi, Takuichiro
    2006 Gengo chirigaku no saikidō [A new start for linguistic geography]. In Seiichi Nakai , Daniel Long , and Kenjiro Matsuda (eds.), Nihon no fiirudo gengogaku [Field linguistics in Japan], 80–93. Toyama: Katsura Shobo.
    [Google Scholar]
  270. (ed.) 2016aShin Nihon gengo chizu [New linguistic atlas of Japan]. Tokyo: Asakura Shoten.
    [Google Scholar]
  271. 2016b okiru [get up]. In Takuichiro Onishi (ed.), Shin Nihon gengo chizu [New linguistic atlas of Japan], 150–151. Tokyo: Asakura Shoten.
    [Google Scholar]
  272. 2016c okiro [get up!]. In Takuichiro Onishi (ed.), Shin Nihon gengo chizu [New linguistic atlas of Japan], 152–153. Tokyo: Asakura Shoten.
    [Google Scholar]
  273. Ono, Susumu
    1953 Nihongo no dōshi no katsuyōkei no kigen ni tsuite [On the origin of the verbal inflectional forms of Japanese]. Kokugo to Kokubungaku350. 47–56.
    [Google Scholar]
  274. Ono, Susumu , Akihiro Satake , and Kingoro Maeda
    (eds.) 1974Iwanami kogo jiten [Iwanami historical dictionary of Japanese]. Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten.
    [Google Scholar]
  275. Ortmann, Albert
    1999 Affix repetition and non-redundancy in inflectional morphology. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft18. 76–120. 10.1515/zfsw.1999.18.1.76
    https://doi.org/10.1515/zfsw.1999.18.1.76 [Google Scholar]
  276. Oseki, Yohei
    2017 Voice morphology in Japanese argument structures. MS, New York University. https://ling.auf.net/lingbuzz/003374
  277. 2021 Bunsan keitairon to Nihongo no tadōsei kōtai [Distributed morphology and Japanese transitivity alternations]. In Hideki Kishimoto (ed.), Rekishikon kenkyū no gendaiteki kadai [Current issues in lexicon research], 1–23. Tokyo: Kurosio Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  278. Oshima, David Y.
    2014 On the morphological status of -te, -ta, and related forms in Japanese: Evidence from accent placement. Journal of East Asian Linguistics23. 233–265. 10.1007/s10831‑014‑9120‑z
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10831-014-9120-z [Google Scholar]
  279. Panagiotidis, Phoevos , Vassilios Spyropoulos , and Anthi Revithiadou
    2017 Little v as a categorizing verbal head: Evidence from Greek. In Roberta D’Alessandro , Irene Franco , and Ángel J. Gallego (eds.), The verbal domain, 29–48. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  280. Parsons, Terence
    1990Events in the semantics of English: A study in subatomic semantics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  281. Paul, Hermann
    1920Prinzipien der sprachgeschichte, 5th ed. Halle: Niemeyer.
    [Google Scholar]
  282. Payne, David L.
    1981The phonology and morphology of Axininca Campa. University of Texas, Arlington, and Summer Institute of Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  283. Payne, Doris , and Immanuel Barshi
    (eds.) 1999External possession. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.39
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.39 [Google Scholar]
  284. Pellard, Thomas
    2009 Ōgami: Éléments de description d’un parler du Sud des Ryūkyū. Doctoral dissertation, École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales, Paris.
  285. 2016 Nichiryū sogo no bunki nendai [The period of separation of Proto-Japanese-Ryukyuan]. In Yukinori Takubo , John Whitman , and Tatsuya Hirako (eds.), Ryūkyū shogo to kodai Nihongo: Nichiryū sogo no saiken ni mukete [Ryukyuan and premodern Japanese: Toward the reconstruction of Proto-Japanese-Ryukyuan], 99–124. Tokyo: Kurosio Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  286. Pellard, Thomas , and Masahiro Yamada
    2017 Verb morphology and conjugation classes in Dunan (Yonaguni). In Ferenc Kiefer , James P. Blevins , and Huba Bartos (eds.), Perspectives on morphological organization: Data and analyses, 31–49. Leiden: Brill. 10.1163/9789004342934_004
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004342934_004 [Google Scholar]
  287. Penny, Ralph
    2002A history of the Spanish language, 2nd ed.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511992827
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511992827 [Google Scholar]
  288. Perlmutter, David M.
    1988 The split morphology hypothesis: Evidence from Yiddish. In Michael Hammond and Michael Noonan (eds.), Theoretical morphology. Approaches in modern linguistics, 79–100. San Diego: Academic Press. 10.1163/9789004454101_008
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004454101_008 [Google Scholar]
  289. Pinker, Steven
    2002The blank slate: The modern denial of human nature. New York: Viking.
    [Google Scholar]
  290. Pollard, Carl , and Ivan A. Sag
    1987Information-based syntax and semantics, vol.1. Fundamentals. Stanford: Center for the Study of Language and Information.
    [Google Scholar]
  291. 1994Head-driven phrase structure grammar. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  292. Pross, Tillmann
    2019 What about lexical semantics if syntax is the only generative component of the grammar? A case study on word meaning in German. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory37. 215–261. 10.1007/s11049‑018‑9410‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-018-9410-7 [Google Scholar]
  293. Pylkkänen, Liina
    2002 Introducing arguments. Doctoral dissertation, MIT.
  294. 2008Introducing arguments. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/9780262162548.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262162548.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  295. Ralli, Angela
    2000 A feature-based analysis of Greek nominal inflection. Glossologia11–12. 201–227.
    [Google Scholar]
  296. Ringe, Don
    2006From Proto-Indo-European to Proto-Germanic ( A linguistic history of English, vol. 1 ). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  297. Rizzi, Luigi
    2016 The concept of explanatory adequacy. In Ian Roberts (ed.), The Oxford handbook of universal grammar, 97–113. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  298. Rodriguez, Ioão
    1604–1608Arte da lingoa de Japam. Nagasaki: Collegio de Iapão. Japanese translation by Doi Tadao published as Rodriguez, Ioão 1955 Nihon daibunten [Great Japanese grammar]. Tokyo: Sanseido.
    [Google Scholar]
  299. Sadakane, Kumi , and Masatoshi Koizumi
    1995 On the nature of the “dative” particle ni in Japanese. Linguistics33. 5–33. 10.1515/ling.1995.33.1.5
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1995.33.1.5 [Google Scholar]
  300. Sadock, Jerrold M.
    1991Autolexical syntax. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  301. 1995 Review of A-morphous morphology, by Stephen R. Anderson. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory13. 326–341.
    [Google Scholar]
  302. Sakakura, Atsuyoshi
    1975Bunshō to hyōgen [Text and expression]. Tokyo: Kadokawa Shoten.
    [Google Scholar]
  303. Sakanashi, Ryuzo
    1982 Kindai no bunpō II (Kamigata-hen) [Grammar of the early modern period II (Kyoto-Osaka)]. In Hiroshi Tsukishima (ed.), Bunpōshi [Grammatical history] ( Kōza kokugoshi [Course in the history of Japanese] 4), 467–536. Tokyo: Taishukan Shoten.
    [Google Scholar]
  304. Sasaki, Kan
    2018 Hokkaidō hōgen ni okeru jihatsu gokei no yure [Variation in the spontaneous form in the Hokkaido dialect]. KLS38 ( Proceedings of the 42nd annual meeting of the Kansai Linguistic Society ). 205–216.
    [Google Scholar]
  305. 2019ra-gyō godanka no tayōsei [The diversity of assimilation to r-stem conjugation]. In Taro Kageyama and Hideki Kishimoto (eds.), Rekishikon kenkyū no arata na apuroochi [New approaches to lexicon research], 201–228. Tokyo: Kurosio Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  306. Sasaki, Kan , and Akie Yamazaki
    2006 Two types of detransitive constructions in the Hokkaido dialect of Japanese. In Werner Abraham and Larisa Leisiö (eds.), Passivization and typology, 352–372. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.68.21sas
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.68.21sas [Google Scholar]
  307. Scalise, Sergio
    1984Generative morphology. Dordrecht: Foris.
    [Google Scholar]
  308. Schachter, Paul
    1987 Tagalog. In Bernard Comrie (ed.), The world’s major languages, 936–958. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  309. Schachter, Paul , and Fe T. Otanes
    1972Tagalog reference grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press. 10.1525/9780520321205
    https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520321205 [Google Scholar]
  310. Serafim, Leon A. , and Rumiko Shinzato
    2021The language of the Old-Okinawan Omoro Sōshi . Leiden: Brill.
    [Google Scholar]
  311. Shibatani, Masayoshi
    1973 Semantics of Japanese causativization. Foundations of Language9. 317–373.
    [Google Scholar]
  312. 1976 The grammar of causative constructions: A conspectus. In Masayoshi Shibatani (ed.), The grammar of causative constructions, 1–40. San Diego: Academic Press. 10.1163/9789004368842_002
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004368842_002 [Google Scholar]
  313. 1977 Grammatical relations and surface cases. Language53. 789–809. 10.2307/412912
    https://doi.org/10.2307/412912 [Google Scholar]
  314. Shimabukuro, Moriyo
    2007The accentual history of the Japanese and Ryukyuan languages: A reconstruction. Folkestone: Global Oriental. 10.1163/ej.9781901903638.i‑376
    https://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9781901903638.i-376 [Google Scholar]
  315. Shimabukuro, Yukiko
    1997 Okinawa hokubu hōgen [Dialects of northern Okinawa]. In Takashi Kamei , Rokuro Kono , and Eiichi Chino (eds.), Nihon rettō no gengo (Gengogaku daijiten serekushon) [The languages of the Japanese archipelago (Selection from the Great dictionary of linguistics)], 354–369. Tokyo: Sanseido.
    [Google Scholar]
  316. Shinmura, Izuru
    (ed.) 1991Kōjien, 4th ed. Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten.
    [Google Scholar]
  317. (ed.) 1998Kōjien, 5th ed. Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten.
    [Google Scholar]
  318. Siddiqi, Daniel
    2014 The morphology–syntax interface. In Andrew Carnie , Yosuke Sato , and Daniel Siddiqi (eds.), The Routledge handbook of syntax, 345–364. Abingdon: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  319. Sihler, Andrew L.
    1995New comparative grammar of Greek and Latin. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780195083453.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195083453.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  320. Siloni, Tal
    2019 Event structure and syntax. In Robert Truswell (ed.), The Oxford handbook of event structure, 456–489. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  321. Skoruppa, Katrin , Anna Lambrechts , and Sharon Peperkamp
    2011 The role of phonetic distance in the acquisition of phonological alternations. North Eastern Linguistic Society (NELS) 39. 717–729.
    [Google Scholar]
  322. Sorace, Antonella
    2000 Gradients in auxiliary selection with intransitive verbs. Language76. 859–890. 10.2307/417202
    https://doi.org/10.2307/417202 [Google Scholar]
  323. Sotiropoulos, Dimitri
    1972Noun morphology of modern demotic Greek. The Hague: Mouton. 10.1515/9783111355450
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783111355450 [Google Scholar]
  324. Sowell, Thomas
    1987A conflict of visions: Ideological origins of political struggles. New York: Quill.
    [Google Scholar]
  325. Stephany, Ursula
    1982 Inflectional and lexical morphology — A linguistic continuum. Glossologia1. 27–55.
    [Google Scholar]
  326. Steriade, Donca
    2016 The morphome vs similarity-based syncretism: Latin t-stem derivatives. In Ricardo Bermúdez-Otero and Ana R. Luís (eds.), The morphome debate, 112–171. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198702108.003.0006
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198702108.003.0006 [Google Scholar]
  327. Stump, Gregory T.
    2001Inflectional morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511486333
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486333 [Google Scholar]
  328. Suzuki, Kazuhiko
    1977 Bunpō no utsurikawari [Grammatical change]. In Atsuyoshi Sakakura (ed.), Nihongo no rekishi [ The history of Japanese ] ( Nihongo kōza [Course in Japanese] 6), 197–242. Tokyo: Taishukan Shoten.
    [Google Scholar]
  329. Takahashi, Toshizo
    1987aRyūkyū no hōgen [Ryukyu dialects] 11 ( Yaeyama: Yonaguni-jima ). Tokyo: Hosei Daigaku Okinawa Bunka Kenkyujo.
    [Google Scholar]
  330. 1987bRyūkyū no hōgen [Ryukyu dialects] 12 ( Yaeyama: Yonaguni-jima ). Tokyo: Hosei Daigaku Okinawa Bunka Kenkyujo.
    [Google Scholar]
  331. 1991aOmoro Saushi no dōshi no kenkyū [Research on the verbs of the Omoro Soshi]. Tokyo: Musashino Shoin.
    [Google Scholar]
  332. 1991bOmoro Saushi no kokugogakuteki kenkyū [Linguistic research on the Omoro Soshi]. Tokyo: Musashino Shoin.
    [Google Scholar]
  333. 1997a Koten Ryūkyūgo [Classical Ryukyuan]. In Takashi Kamei , Rokuro Kono , and Eiichi Chino (eds.) Nihon rettō no gengo (Gengogaku daijiten serekushon) [The languages of the Japanese archipelago (Selection from the Great dictionary of linguistics)], 422–431. Tokyo: Sanseido.
    [Google Scholar]
  334. 1997b Yonaguni hōgen [The Yonaguni dialect]. In Takashi Kamei , Rokuro Kono , and Eiichi Chino (eds.) Nihon rettō no gengo (Gengogaku daijiten serekushon) [The languages of the Japanese archipelago (Selection from the Great dictionary of linguistics)], 413–422. Tokyo: Sanseido.
    [Google Scholar]
  335. Thorpe, Maner L.
    1983 Ryūkūan language history. Doctoral dissertation, University of Southern California.
  336. Thumb, Albert
    1910Handbuch der neugriechischen Volkssprache, 2nd ed.Strassburg: Trübner. English translation by S. Angus published as Thumb, Albert 1912 Handbook of the modern Greek vernacular. Edinburgh: Clark. 10.1515/9783111550084
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783111550084 [Google Scholar]
  337. Tiersma, Peter
    1978 Bidirectional leveling as evidence for relational rules. Lingua45. 67–77. 10.1016/0024‑3841(78)90021‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3841(78)90021-9 [Google Scholar]
  338. 1982 Local and general markedness. Language58. 832–849. 10.2307/413959
    https://doi.org/10.2307/413959 [Google Scholar]
  339. Tojo, Misao
    (ed.) 1951Zenkoku hōgen jiten [Nationwide dialect dictionary]. Tokyo: Tokyodo Shuppan.
    [Google Scholar]
  340. Tojo, Misao , Yoshimoto Endo , Teruo Hirayama , Tadatoshi Okubo , and Takeshi Shibata
    (eds.) 1961Hōgengaku kōza [Dialectology course], 4vols. Tokyo: Tokyodo Shuppan.
    [Google Scholar]
  341. Toyama, Nana
    2013a Okinawa-ken Shuri hōgen ni okeru shiekibun no imikōzō [The semantic structure of causative sentences in the Shuri dialect of Okinawa Prefecture]. Nihongo Bunpō13. 105–121.
    [Google Scholar]
  342. 2013b Okinawa Shuri hōgen no shieki dōshi to tadōsei [Causative verbs and transitivity in the Shuri dialect of Okinawa]. Ryūkyū-Ajia Shakaibunka Kenkyū [Ryukyu/Asia Sociocultural Research] 16. 113–130.
    [Google Scholar]
  343. 2015 Okinawa Shuri hōgen ni okeru voisu to riekisei no kijutsu bunpō kenkyū [Descriptive grammatical study of voice and benefactivity in the Shuri dialect of Okinawa]. Doctoral dissertation, University of the Ryukyus.
  344. Triandaphyllidis, Manolis A.
    1949Mikrí Neoellinikí grammatikí. Athens. English translation by John B. Burke published as Triandaphyllidis, Manolis A. 2004 Concise Modern Greek grammar. Aristotle University of Thessaloniki.
    [Google Scholar]
  345. Tsuda, Katsumi
    2000 Ōitaben ni okeru hukanō hyōgen ni tsuite [On expressions of impossibility in the Oita dialect]. Nippon Bunri Daigaku Kiyō [Bulletin of Nippon Bunri University] 28. 116–126.
    [Google Scholar]
  346. Tsuhako, Toshiko
    1997 Okinawa chūnanbu hōgen [Dialects of central and southern Okinawa]. In Takashi Kamei , Rokuro Kono , and Eiichi Chino (eds.) Nihon rettō no gengo (Gengogaku daijiten serekushon) [The languages of the Japanese archipelago (Selection from the Great dictionary of linguistics)], 369–388. Tokyo: Sanseido.
    [Google Scholar]
  347. Uchima, Chokujin
    1980 Yonaguni hōgen no katsuyō to sono seiritsu [Conjugation of the Yonaguni dialect and its formation]. InKuroshio Bunka no Kai [Kuroshio Cultural Association] (ed.), Kuroshio no minzoku, bunka, gengo [The peoples, cultures, and languages of the Kuroshio current], 447–490. Tokyo: Kadokawa Shoten.
    [Google Scholar]
  348. 1982 Ha-gyō yodankei dōshi no katsuyō no tsūjiteki kōsatsu [Diachronic observations on the conjugation of w-stems]. InKyugakkai Rengo Amami Chosa Iinkai [Union of Nine Learned Societies Amami Survey Committee] (ed.), Amami: Shizen, bunka, shakai [Amami: Nature, culture, society], 300–308. Tokyo: Kobundo.
    [Google Scholar]
  349. 1984a Miyako shotō no hōgen [The dialects of the Miyako island group]. In Kiichi Iitoyo , Sukezumi Hino , and Ryoichi Sato (eds.), Okinawa/Amami chihō no hōgen [The dialects of the Okinawa/Amami region] ( Kōza hōgengaku [Course in dialectology] 10), 251–287. Tokyo: Kokusho Kankokai.
    [Google Scholar]
  350. 1984bRyūkyū hōgen bunpō no kenkyū [Research on the grammar of Ryukyu dialects]. Tokyo: Kasama Shoin.
    [Google Scholar]
  351. Uchima, Chokujin , and Mitsuyoshi Nohara
    2006Okinawa-go jiten [Okinawan dictionary]. Tokyo: Kenkyusha.
    [Google Scholar]
  352. Uemura, Yukio
    1961 Okinawa hontō [The main island of Okinawa]. In Misao Tojo , Yoshimoto Endo , Teruo Hirayama , Tadatoshi Okubo , and Takeshi Shibata (eds.), Kyūshū/Ryūkyū hōgen [Kyushu and Ryukyu dialects] ( Hōgengaku kōza [Dialectology course] 4), 334–357. Tokyo: Tokyodo Shuppan.
    [Google Scholar]
  353. 1963 Shuri hōgen no bunpō [A grammar of the Shuri dialect]. InKokuritsu Kokugo Kenkyujo [National Language Research Institute], Okinawa-go jiten [Dictionary of the Okinawan language], 58–86. Tokyo: Okurasho Insatsukyoku. English translation by Wayne P. Lawrence in Uemura, Yukio 2003 The Ryukyuan language, 124–161. Osaka: Osaka Gakuin Daigaku Joho Gakubu.
    [Google Scholar]
  354. 1997 Sōsetsu [Introduction]. In Takashi Kamei , Rokuro Kono , and Eiichi Chino (eds.), Nihon rettō no gengo (Gengogaku daijiten serekushon) [The languages of the Japanese archipelago (Selection from the Great dictionary of linguistics)], 311–354. Tokyo: Sanseido. English translation by Wayne P. Lawrence in Uemura, Yukio 2003 The Ryukyuan language, 1–110. Osaka: Osaka Gakuin Daigaku Joho Gakubu.
    [Google Scholar]
  355. Umegaki, Minoru
    1962 Mie-ken hōgen [The dialects of Mie Prefecture]. In Minoru Umegaki (ed.), Kinki hōgen no sōgōteki kenkyū [A comprehensive study of the Kinki dialects], 91–157. Tokyo: Sanseido.
    [Google Scholar]
  356. Unger, J. Marshall
    1977 Studies in early Japanese morphophonemics (Doctoral dissertation, Yale University). Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.
  357. 2000 Reconciling comparative and internal reconstruction: The case of Old Japanese /ti, ri, ni/. Language76: 655–681. 10.2307/417138
    https://doi.org/10.2307/417138 [Google Scholar]
  358. Vance, Timothy J.
    1987An introduction to Japanese phonology. Albany: State University of New York Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  359. 2008The sounds of Japanese. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  360. Vaux, Bert
    2001 Consonant insertion and hypercorrection. Paper presented at theLSA Annual Meeting, Washington, DC. https://www.academia.edu/300593/Consonant_Epenthesis_and_Hypercorrection
    [Google Scholar]
  361. 2008 Why the phonological component must be serial and rule-based. In Bert Vaux and Andrew Nevins (eds.), Rules, constraints, and phonological phenomena, 20–60. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199226511.003.0002
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199226511.003.0002 [Google Scholar]
  362. Vazou, Elli , and George J. Xydopoulos
    2007 Towards an account of acronyms/initialisms in Greek. Selected Papers on Theoretical and Applied Linguistics (Aristotle University of Thessaloniki) 17. 233–243.
    [Google Scholar]
  363. Vennemann, Theo
    1972 Rule inversion. Lingua29. 209–242. 10.1016/0024‑3841(72)90025‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3841(72)90025-3 [Google Scholar]
  364. 1974 Words and syllables in natural generative grammar. In Anthony Bruck , Robert A. Fox , and Michael W. LaGaly (eds.), Papers from the parasession on natural phonology, 346–374. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
    [Google Scholar]
  365. Volpe, Mark
    2005 Japanese morphology and its theoretical consequences: Derivational morphology in distributed morphology. Doctoral dissertation, Stony Brook University.
  366. Vovin, Alexander
    2010Koreo-Japonica. Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  367. Whitman, John
    1985 The phonological basis for the comparison of Japanese and Korean. Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University.
  368. 2008 The source of the bigrade conjugation and stem-shape in pre-Old Japanese. In Bjarke Frellesvig and John Whitman (eds.), Proto-Japanese, 159–173. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.294.13whi
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.294.13whi [Google Scholar]
  369. 2012 The relationship between Japanese and Korean. In Nicolas Tranter (ed.), The languages of Japan and Korea, 24–38. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  370. 2016 Nichiryū sogo no on’in taikei to rentaikei/izenkei no kigen [The vowel system of Proto-Japanese-Ryukyuan and the origin of the adnominal/realis forms]. In Yukinori Takubo , John Whitman , and Tatsuya Hirako (eds.), Ryūkyū shogo to kodai Nihongo: Nichiryū sogo no saiken ni mukete [Ryukyuan and premodern Japanese: Toward the reconstruction of Proto-Japanese-Ryukyuan], 21–38. Tokyo: Kurosio Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  371. Whitney, William Dwight
    1889Sanskrit grammar, 2nd ed. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  372. Williams, Edwin B.
    1938From Latin to Portuguese. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  373. Yamada, Masahiro
    2016 Dunan(Yonaguni)go no dōshi keitairon [The verbal morphology of Dunan (Yonaguni)]. In Yukinori Takubo , John Whitman , and Tatsuya Hirako (eds.), Ryūkyū shogo to kodai Nihongo: Nichiryū sogo no saiken ni mukete [Ryukyuan and premodern Japanese: Toward the reconstruction of Proto-Japanese-Ryukyuan], 259–289. Tokyo: Kurosio Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  374. Yamada, Masahiro , Thomas Pellard and Michinori Shimoji
    2015 Dunan grammar (Yonaguni Ryukyuan). In Patrick Heinrich , Shinsho Miyara , and Michinori Shimoji (eds.), Handbook of the Ryukyuan languages, 449–478. Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9781614511151.449
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781614511151.449 [Google Scholar]
  375. Yamaguchi, Akiho , and Morihide Akimoto
    (eds.) 2001Nihongo bunpō daijiten [Great dictionary of Japanese grammar]. Tokyo: Meiji Shoin.
    [Google Scholar]
  376. Yoshikawa, Toshiaki
    1972 Toyohashi chihō no hōgen [The dialect of the Toyohashi region]. In Toshiaki Yoshikawa and Yukihiro Yamaguchi , Toyohashi chihō no hōgen [The dialect of the Toyohashi region], 15–283. Toyohashi: Toyohashi Bunka Kyokai.
    [Google Scholar]
  377. Zuraw, Kie
    2000 Patterned exceptions in phonology. Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.
/content/books/9789027246264
Loading
/content/books/9789027246264
dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
-contentType:Journal -contentType:Chapter
10
5
Chapter
content/books/9789027246264
Book
false
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error