1887
  1. Home
  2. Books
  3. English Prosody in First and Second Language Speakers

English Prosody in First and Second Language Speakers

A contrastive interlanguage analysis across intonational dimensions

image of English Prosody in First and Second Language Speakers
USD
Buy:$163.00 + Taxes

Discover the intricate dynamics of L2 prosody with this pioneering study, which examines how advanced learners from Czech, German, and Spanish backgrounds engage with British and American English intonation. By employing a multidimensional approach - spanning phonetic, phonological, discourse-pragmatic, and sociolinguistic perspectives - this book provides a comprehensive overview of L2 prosodic features, highlighting patterns of intonational phrasing, f0 range, and the use of tones and uptalk. Building on foundational works by Pierrehumbert, Mennen, and Gut, this work bridges significant gaps in the field by comparing different L1 and L2 varieties, integrating diverse linguistic variables, and proposing a multifactorial model of L2 prosody. Relevant for linguists, language educators, and researchers in SLA, the findings offer valuable insights for reducing foreign accents and enhancing intelligibility, making it an essential resource for improving language teaching methodologies and learner outcomes. Dive into this essential guide and elevate your understanding of L2 prosody and its impact on effective communication.

References

  1. Abrahamsson, Niclas & Hyltenstam, Kenneth
    2008 The robustness of aptitude effects in near-native second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition30(4): 481–509. 10.1017/S027226310808073X
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S027226310808073X [Google Scholar]
  2. 2009 Age of L2 acquisition and native-likeness: Listener perception versus linguistic scrutiny. Language Learning59(2): 249–306. 10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2009.00507.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00507.x [Google Scholar]
  3. Abu-Al-Makarem, Ali & Petrosino, Linda
    2007 Reading and spontaneous speaking fundamental frequency of young Arabic men for Arabic and English languages: A comparative study. Perceptual and Motor Skills105(2): 572–580. 10.2466/pms.105.2.572‑580
     https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.105.2.572-580 [Google Scholar]
  4. Aguilar, Lauren , Downey, Geraldine , Krauss, Robert , Pardo, Jennifer , Lane, Sean & Bolger, Niall
    2016 A dyadic perspective on speech accommodation and social connection: Both partners’ rejection sensitivity matters. Journal of Personality84(2): 165–177. 10.1111/jopy.12149
     https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12149 [Google Scholar]
  5. Alcoba, Santiago & Murillo, Julio
    1998 Intonation in Spanish. InIntonation Systems. A Survey of Twenty Languages, Daniel Hirst & Albert Di Cristo (eds), 152–166. Cambridge: CUP.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Allan, Scott
    1990 The rise of New Zealand intonation. InNew Zealand Ways of Speaking English, Allan Bell & Janet Holmes (eds), 115–128. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Altenberg, Bengt
    1987 Prosodic Patterns in Spoken English: Studies in the Correlation between Prosody and Grammar for Text-to-speech Conversation. Lund: Lund University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Anderson-Hsieh, Janet , Johnson, Ruth & Koehler, Kenneth
    1992 The relationship between native speaker judgments of non-native pronunciation and deviance in segmentals, prosody, and syllable structure. Language Learning42(4): 529–555. 10.1111/j.1467‑1770.1992.tb01043.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1992.tb01043.x [Google Scholar]
  9. Andreeva, Bistra & Barry, William J.
    2012 Fine phonetic detail in prosody. Cross-language differences need not inhibit communication. InUnderstanding Prosody: The Role of Context, Function and Communication, Oliver Niebuhr & Anita Steube (eds), 259–288. Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110301465.259
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110301465.259 [Google Scholar]
  10. Andreeva, Bistra & Dimitrova, Snezhina
    2022a Prosodic characteristics of Bulgarian-accented German. InElektronische Sprachsignalverarbeitung, Tagungsband der 33. Konferenz Sønderborg, 220–227. Dresden, Germany.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. 2022b The influence of L1 prosody on Bulgarian-accented German and English. InProceedings of Speech Prosody 2022, 764–768. Lisbon, Portugal. 10.21437/SpeechProsody.2022‑155
     https://doi.org/10.21437/SpeechProsody.2022-155 [Google Scholar]
  12. Andreeva, Bistra , & Snezhina Dimitrova
    2022c L1 influences on Bulgarian-accented German: Prosodic units and prenuclear pitch accents. Languages7(4): 1–18. 10.3390/languages7040263
     https://doi.org/10.3390/languages7040263 [Google Scholar]
  13. Andreeva, Bistra , Demenko, Grazyna , Wolska, Magdalena , Möbius, Bernd , Zimmerer, Frank , Jügler, Jeanin , Oleskowicz-Popiel, Magdalena & Trouvain, Jürgen
    2014a Comparison of pitch range and pitch variation in Slavic and Germanic languages. InProceedings of Speech Prosody 2014, 776–780. Dublin, Ireland. 10.21437/SpeechProsody.2014‑144
     https://doi.org/10.21437/SpeechProsody.2014-144 [Google Scholar]
  14. Andreeva, Bistra , Demenko, Grazyna , Möbius, Bernd , Zimmerer, Frank , Jügler, Jeanin & Oleskowicz-Popiel, Magdalena
    2014b Differences of pitch profiles in Germanic and Slavic languages. InProceedings of the 15th International Speech Communication Association, Interspeech 2014, 1307–1311. Singapore. 10.21437/Interspeech.2014‑325
     https://doi.org/10.21437/Interspeech.2014-325 [Google Scholar]
  15. Andrew, Martin
    2011 ‘The real world’: Lived literacy practices and cultural learning from community placement. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy34(2): 219–235. 10.1007/BF03651857
     https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03651857 [Google Scholar]
  16. Anufryk, Volha
    2008 Effects of language ability on phonetic and phonological variation of English intonation by German speakers. InProceedings of the 8th International Seminar on Speech Production, ISSP 2008, 233–235. Strasbourg, France.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. 2012 Intonational Variation and Pronunciation Aptitude. PhD dissertation,Stuttgart University.
  18. Anufryk, Volha & Dogil, Grzegorz
    2009 On prosodic variation and pronunciation aptitude: A case study of German speakers of English. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America125(4): 2757. 10.1121/1.4784641
     https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4784641 [Google Scholar]
  19. Anufryk, Volha , Jilka, Matthias & Dogil, Grzegorz
    2008 Prosodic variation in L2: A case study of Germans speaking English. InProceedings of the 2nd ISCA Tutorial and Research Workshop on Experimental Linguistics, ISCA 2008, 21–24. Athens, Greece.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Aoyama, Katsura & Guion, Susan G.
    2007 Prosody in second language acquisition. Acoustic analyses of duration and F0 range. InLanguage Experience in Second Language Speech Learning. In Honour of James Emil Flege [Language Learning & Language Teaching 17], Ocke-Schwen Bohn & Murray J. Munro (eds), 281–297. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/lllt.17.24aoy
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.17.24aoy [Google Scholar]
  21. Archibald, John
    1993a The learnability of English metrical parameters by Spanish speakers. International Review of Applied Linguistics31(2): 129–142.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. 1993b Metrical phonology and the acquisition of L2 stress. InConfluence: The Interaction of Linguistics, Second Language Acquisition, and Speech Pathology [Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 4], Fred R. Eckman (ed.), 37–48. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/lald.4.05arc
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.4.05arc [Google Scholar]
  23. 1994 A formal model of learning L2 prosodic phonology. Second Language Research10(3): 215–240. 10.1177/026765839401000303
     https://doi.org/10.1177/026765839401000303 [Google Scholar]
  24. 1997 The acquisition of second language phrasal stress: A pilot study. InFocus on Phonological Acquisition [Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 16], Stephen J. Hannahs & Martha Young-Scholten (eds), 263–281. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/lald.16
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.16 [Google Scholar]
  25. 2018 Advanced-level L2 phonology. InThe Handbook of Advanced Proficiency in Second Language Acquisition, Paul A. Malovrh & Alessandro G. Benati (eds), 241–263. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley & Sons. 10.1002/9781119261650.ch13
     https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119261650.ch13 [Google Scholar]
  26. Armstrong, Meghan E ., Piccinini, Page E . & Ritchart, Amanda
    2015 The phonetics and distribution of non-question rises in two varieties of American English. InProceedings of the 18th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, ICPhS 2015, Maria Wolters , Judy Livingstone , Bernie Beattie , Rachel Smith , Mike MacMahon , Jane Stuart-Smith & Jim Scobbie (eds), 1–5. Glasgow, Scotland, UK.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Arvaniti, Amalia
    2011 The representation of intonation. InThe Blackwell Companion to Phonology, Marc van Oostendorp , Colin J. Ewen , Elizabeth Hume & Keren Rice (eds), 757–780. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. 10.1002/9781444335262.wbctp0032
     https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444335262.wbctp0032 [Google Scholar]
  28. Arvaniti, Amalia
    2017 The autosegmental-metrical model of intonational phonology. InProsodic Theory and Practice, Stefanie Shattuck-Hufnagel & Jonathan Barnes (eds), 1–45. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Arvaniti, Amalia & Atkins, Madeleine
    2016 Uptalk in Southern British English. InProceedings of Speech Prosody 8, 153–157. Boston, MA. 10.21437/SpeechProsody.2016‑32
     https://doi.org/10.21437/SpeechProsody.2016-32 [Google Scholar]
  30. Arvaniti, Amalia & Baltazani, Mary
    2005 Intonational analysis and prosodic annotation of Greek spoken corpora. InProsodic Typology: The Phonology of Intonation and Phrasing, Sun-Ah Jun (ed.), 84–117. Oxford: OUP. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199249633.003.0004
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199249633.003.0004 [Google Scholar]
  31. Arvaniti, Amalia & Fletcher, Janet
    2021 The autosegmental-metrical theory of intonational phonology. InThe Oxford Handbook of Language Prosody, Carlos Gussenhoven & Aoju Chen (eds), 78–95. Oxford: OUP.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Arvaniti, Amalia & Garding, Gina
    2007 Dialectal variation in the rising accents of American English. InLaboratory Phonology 9, Jennifer Cole & José Ignacio Hualde (eds), 547–576. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Asch, Madeline & Brogan, Franny D.
    2022 Uptalk in Chicano Southern California English. American Speech98(3): 264–295. 10.1215/00031283‑9940687
     https://doi.org/10.1215/00031283-9940687 [Google Scholar]
  34. Asher, J. James & Garcia, Ramiro
    1969 The optimal age to learn a foreign language. Modern Language Journal53(5): 334–341. 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.1969.tb04603.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1969.tb04603.x [Google Scholar]
  35. Astruc, Lluïsa & del Mar Vanrell, Maria
    2016 Intonational phonology and politeness in L1 and L2 Spanish. Probus28(1): 91–118. 10.1515/probus‑2016‑0005
     https://doi.org/10.1515/probus-2016-0005 [Google Scholar]
  36. Atterer, Michaela & Ladd, D. Robert
    2004 On the phonetics and phonology of “segmental anchoring” of f0: Evidence from German. Journal of Phonetics32(2): 177–197. 10.1016/S0095‑4470(03)00039‑1
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0095-4470(03)00039-1 [Google Scholar]
  37. Auran, Cyril & Hirst, Daniel
    2004 Anaphora, connectives and resetting: Prosodic and pragmatic parameters interactions in the marking of discourse structure. InProceedings of Speech Prosody 2004, 259–262. Nara, Japan. 10.21437/SpeechProsody.2004‑60
     https://doi.org/10.21437/SpeechProsody.2004-60 [Google Scholar]
  38. Austin, John Langshaw
    1975 How to do Things with Words, 2nd edn.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198245537.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198245537.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  39. Ayers, Gayle M.
    1994 Discourse functions of pitch range in spontaneous and read speech. OSU Working Papers in Linguistics44(1): 1–49.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Babel, Molly
    2010 Dialect divergence and convergence in New Zealand English. Language in Society39(4): 437–456. 10.1017/S0047404510000400
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404510000400 [Google Scholar]
  41. 2012 Evidence for phonetic and social selectivity in spontaneous phonetic imitation. Journal of Phonetics40(1): 177–189. 10.1016/j.wocn.2011.09.001
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2011.09.001 [Google Scholar]
  42. Babel, Molly & Bulatov, Dasha
    2012 The role of fundamental frequency in phonetic accommodation. Language and Speech55(2): 231–248. 10.1177/0023830911417695
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0023830911417695 [Google Scholar]
  43. Babel, Molly , McGuire, Grant , Walters, Sophia & Nicholls, Alice
    2014 Novelty and social preference in phonetic accommodation. Laboratory Phonology5(1): 123–150. 10.1515/lp‑2014‑0006
     https://doi.org/10.1515/lp-2014-0006 [Google Scholar]
  44. Backman, Nancy
    1979 Intonation errors in second-language pronunciation of eight Spanish-speaking adults learning English. Interlanguage Studies Bulletin Utrecht4(2): 239–265.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Bacon, Susan M.C
    1992 The relationship between gender, comprehension, processing strategies, and cognitive and affective response in second-language listening. Modern Language Journal76(2): 160–178. 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.1992.tb01096.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1992.tb01096.x [Google Scholar]
  46. Bacon, Susan M.C . & Finnemann, Michael D.
    1992 Sex differences in self-reported beliefs about foreign-language learning and authentic oral and written input. Language Learning42(4): 471–495. 10.1111/j.1467‑1770.1992.tb01041.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1992.tb01041.x [Google Scholar]
  47. Baese-Berk, Melissa M . & Morrill, Tuuli H.
    2015 Speaking rate consistency in native and non-native speakers of English. Journal of the Acoustic Society of America138(3): 223–228. 10.1121/1.4929622
     https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4929622 [Google Scholar]
  48. Baills, Florence , Alazard-Guiu, Charlotte & Prieto, Pilar
    2022 Embodied prosodic training helps improve accentedness and suprasegmental accuracy. Applied Linguistics43(4): 776–804. 10.1093/applin/amac010
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amac010 [Google Scholar]
  49. Baker, Ann
    2006 Ship or Sheep? Student’s Book. An Intermediate Pronunciation Course, 3rd edn.Cambridge: CUP.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Bardovi-Harlig, Kathleen
    2000 Tense and Aspect in Second Language Acquisition: Form, Meaning and Use. Oxford: Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Barnes, Jonathan & Shattuck-Hufnagel, Stefanie
    (eds) 2022 Prosody Theory and Practice. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/10413.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/10413.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  52. Barry, Angela
    2008 The Form, Function and Distribution of High Rising Intonation: A Comparative Study of HRT in Southern California and Southern British English. Saarbrücken: Verlag Dr. Müller.
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Barry, William & Andreeva, Bistra
    2001 Cross-language similarities and differences in spontaneous speech patterns. Journal of the International Phonetic Association31(1): 51–66. 10.1017/S0025100301001050
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025100301001050 [Google Scholar]
  54. Bates, Douglas , Mächler, Martin , Bolker, Ben & Walker, Steve
    2015 Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software67(1): 1–48. 10.18637/jss.v067.i01
     https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01 [Google Scholar]
  55. Batliner, Anton , Buckow, Jan , Huber, Richard , Warnke, Volker , Nöth, Elmar & Niemann, Heinrich
    2001 Boiling down prosody for the classification of boundaries and accents in German and English. InProceedings of the European Conference on Speech Communication and Technology 2001, 2781–2784. Aalborg, Denmark. 10.21437/Eurospeech.2001‑651
     https://doi.org/10.21437/Eurospeech.2001-651 [Google Scholar]
  56. Baugh, Albert C . & Cable, Thomas
    2013 A History of the English Language, 6th edn.London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Baumann, Stefan , Grice, Martine & Benzmüller, Ralf
    2001 GToBI – A phonological system for the transcription of German intonation. InProceedings of Speech Prosody 2000, 21–28. Poznan, Poland.
     [Google Scholar]
  58. Baumann, Stefan , Mertens, Jane & Kalbertodt, Janina
    2021 The influence of informativeness on the prosody of sentence topics. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics6(1): 1–28.
     [Google Scholar]
  59. Beckman, Mary E. & Pierrehumbert, Janet B.
    1986 Intonational structure in Japanese and English. Phonology Yearbook3(1): 255–309. 10.1017/S095267570000066X
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S095267570000066X [Google Scholar]
  60. Beckman, Mary E . & Venditti, Jennifer J.
    2011 Intonation. InThe Handbook of Phonological Theory, John A. Goldsmith , Jason Riggle & Alan C.L. Yu (eds), 485–532. Malden, MA: Blackwell. 10.1002/9781444343069.ch15
     https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444343069.ch15 [Google Scholar]
  61. Beckman, Mary E ., Hirschberg, Julia & Shattuck-Hufnagel, Stefanie
    2005 The original ToBI system and the evolution of the ToBI framework. InProsodic Typology: The Phonology of Intonation and Phrasing, Sun-Ah Jun (ed.), 9–54. Oxford: OUP. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199249633.003.0002
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199249633.003.0002 [Google Scholar]
  62. Beckman, Mary E . & Ayers Elam, Gayle
    1997 Guidelines for ToBI labeling, version 3.0. Columbus, OH: Linguistics Department, Ohio State University.
     [Google Scholar]
  63. Bell, Allan & Johnson, Gary
    1997 Towards a sociolinguistics of style. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics4(2): 1–21.
     [Google Scholar]
  64. Beňuš, Štefan
    2014 Social aspects of entrainment in spoken interaction. Cognitive Computation6(4): 802–813. 10.1007/s12559‑014‑9261‑4
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s12559-014-9261-4 [Google Scholar]
  65. Beňuš, Štefan , Reichel, Uwe D . & Mády, Katalin
    2014 Modeling accentual phrase intonation in Slovak and Hungarian. InComplex Visibles Out There [Olomouc Modern Language Series 4], Ludmila Veselovská & Markéta Janebová (eds), 677–689. Olomouc, Czech Republic: Palacký University.
     [Google Scholar]
  66. Best, Catherine T.
    1995 A direct realist view of cross-language speech perception. InSpeech Perception and Linguistic Experience: Issues in Cross-Language Research, Winifred Strange (ed.), 171–204. Timonium, MD: York Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  67. Best, Catherine T . & Tyler, Michael D.
    2007 Nonnative and second-language speech perception: Commonalities and complementarities. InLanguage Experience in Second Language Speech Learning. In Honour of James Emil Flege [Language Learning & Language Teaching 17], Ocke-Schwen Bohn & Murray J. Munro (eds), 13–34. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/lllt.17.07bes
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.17.07bes [Google Scholar]
  68. Bever, Thomas G.
    1981 Normal acquisition processes explain the critical period for language learning. InIndividual Differences and Universals in Language Learning Aptitude, Karl C. Diller (ed.), 176–198. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
     [Google Scholar]
  69. Biber, Douglas , Johansson, Stig , Leech, Geoffrey N ., Conrad, Susan & Finegan, Edward
    2002 Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Pearson Education ESL. Also published as: Biber, Douglas , Johansson, Stig , Leech, Geoffrey N ., Conrad, Susan & Finegan, Edward 2021 Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/z.232
     https://doi.org/10.1075/z.232 [Google Scholar]
  70. Bielska, Joanna
    2009 Gender differences in strategy use and classroom task preferences of Polish EFL learners. InPractical Approaches to Foreign Language Teaching and Learning, Marta Navarro Coy (ed.), 113–127. Bern: Peter Lang.
     [Google Scholar]
  71. Biersack, Sonja
    2002 Systematische Aussprachefehler deutscher Muttersprachler im Englischen: Eine phonetisch-phonologische Bestandaufnahme. Forschungsberichte des Instituts für Phonetik und Sprachliche Kommunikation der Universität München39: 37–130.
     [Google Scholar]
  72. Biersack, Sonja , Kempe, Vera & Knapton, Lorna
    2005 Fine-tuning speech registers: A comparison of the prosodic features of child-directed and foreigner directed speech. InProceedings of the European Conference on Speech Communication and Technology 2005, 2401–2404. Lisbon, Portugal. 10.21437/Interspeech.2005‑46
     https://doi.org/10.21437/Interspeech.2005-46 [Google Scholar]
  73. Bigi, Brigitte
    2015 SPPAS – Multilingual approaches to the automatic annotation of speech. The Phonetician, International Society of Phonetic Sciences111–112: 55–69.
     [Google Scholar]
  74. Bilious, Frances R . & Krauss, Robert. M
    1988 Dominance and accommodation in the conversational behaviours of same- and mixed-gender dyads. Language and Communication8(3–4): 183–194. 10.1016/0271‑5309(88)90016‑X
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0271-5309(88)90016-X [Google Scholar]
  75. Bird, Elizabeth & Garellek, Marc
    2019 Dynamics of voice quality over the course of the English utterance. InProceedings of the International Congress of Phonetic Sciences 2019, 2406–2410. Canberra, Australia.
     [Google Scholar]
  76. Birdsong, David
    1999 Introduction: Whys and why nots of the Critical Period Hypothesis for second language acquisition. InSecond Language Acquisition and the Critical Period Hypothesis, David Birdsong (ed.), 1–22. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Association. 10.4324/9781410601667
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410601667 [Google Scholar]
  77. 2014 Dominance and age in bilingualism. Applied Linguistics35(4): 374–392. 10.1093/applin/amu031
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amu031 [Google Scholar]
  78. Bissiri, Maria Paola
    2013 Glottalization in German-accented English in relationship to phrase boundaries. InSystemtheorie Signalverarbeitung Sprachtechnologie. Rüdiger Hoffman zum 65. Geburtstag [Studientexte zur Sprachkommunikation Band 68], Dieter Mehnert , Ulrich Kordon & Matthias Wolff (eds), 234–240. Dresden: TUD press.
     [Google Scholar]
  79. Bissiri, Maria Paola & Volín, Jan
    2010 Prosodic structure as a predictor of glottal stops before word-initial vowels in Czech English. InProceedings of Czech-German Workshop on Speech Processing 2010, 23–28. Prague, Czech Republic.
     [Google Scholar]
  80. Bissiri, Maria Paola , Lecumberri, Maria Luisa , Cooke, Martin & Volín, Jan
    2011 The role of word-initial glottal stops in recognizing English words. InProceedings of the International Speech Communication Association 2011, 165–168. Firenze, Italy. 10.21437/Interspeech.2011‑73
     https://doi.org/10.21437/Interspeech.2011-73 [Google Scholar]
  81. Blaauw, Eleonora
    1994 The contribution of prosodic boundary markers to the perceptual difference between read and spontaneous speech. Speech Communication14(4): 359–375. 10.1016/0167‑6393(94)90028‑0
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6393(94)90028-0 [Google Scholar]
  82. Boersma, Paul & Weenink, David
    2019 Praat: Doing Phonetics by Computer, version 6.1.03 [Computer program]. University of Amsterdam. <www.praat.org/> (1September 2019).
     [Google Scholar]
  83. Bolinger, Dwight
    1946 The intonation of quoted questions. Quarterly Journal of Speech32(2): 197–202. 10.1080/00335634609381188
     https://doi.org/10.1080/00335634609381188 [Google Scholar]
  84. 1958 A theory of pitch accent in English. Word14(2–3): 109–149. 10.1080/00437956.1958.11659660
     https://doi.org/10.1080/00437956.1958.11659660 [Google Scholar]
  85. 1972 Around the edge of language: Intonation. InIntonation, Dwight Bolinger (ed.), 19–29. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
     [Google Scholar]
  86. 1986 Intonation and its Parts: Melody in Spoken English. London: Arnold.
     [Google Scholar]
  87. 1989 Intonation and its Uses. London: Arnold. 10.1515/9781503623125
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9781503623125 [Google Scholar]
  88. Bongaerts, Theo
    1999 Ultimate attainment in L2 pronunciation: The case of very advanced late L2 learners. InSecond Language Acquisition and the Critical Period Hypothesis, David Birdsong (ed.), 133–159. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
     [Google Scholar]
  89. Bongaerts, Theo , Mennen, Susan & van der Slik, Frans
    2000 Authenticity of pronunciation in naturalistic second language acquisition: The case of very advanced late learners of Dutch as a second language. Studia Linguistica54(2): 298–308. 10.1111/1467‑9582.00069
     https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9582.00069 [Google Scholar]
  90. Bongaerts, Theo , Planken Brigitte & Schils, Erik
    1995 Can late learners attain a native accent in a foreign language? A test of the critical period hypothesis. InThe Age Factor in Second Language Acquisition, David Michael Singleton & Zsolt Lengyel (eds), 30–50. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781800418240‑003
     https://doi.org/10.21832/9781800418240-003 [Google Scholar]
  91. Bongaerts, Theo , van Summeren, Chantal , Planken, Brigitte & Schils, Erik
    1997 Age and ultimate attainment in the pronunciation of a foreign language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition19(4): 447–465. 10.1017/S0272263197004026
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263197004026 [Google Scholar]
  92. Bourhis Richard Y . & Giles, Howard
    1977 The language of intergroup distinctiveness. InLanguage, Ethnicity and Intergroup Relations, Howard Giles (ed.), 119–135. New York, NY: European Association of Experimental Social Psychology.
     [Google Scholar]
  93. Bowden, Harriet Wood , Sanz, Cristina & Stafford, Catherine A.
    2005 Individual differences: Age, sex, working memory, and prior knowledge. InMind and Context in Adult Second Language Acquisition: Methods, Theory, and Practice, Cristina Sanz (ed.), 105–140. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  94. Bowen, Donald J.
    1956 A comparison of the intonation patterns of English and Spanish. Hispania39(1): 30–35. 10.2307/335189
     https://doi.org/10.2307/335189 [Google Scholar]
  95. Boyle, Joseph P.
    1987 Sex differences in listening vocabulary. Language Learning37(2): 273–284. 10.1111/j.1467‑1770.1987.tb00568.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1987.tb00568.x [Google Scholar]
  96. Brabcová, Katerina & Skarnitzl, Radek
    2018 Foreign or native-like? The attitudes of Czech EFL learners towards accents of English and their use as pronunciation models. Studie z aplikované lingvistiky – Studies in Applied Linguistics9(1): 38–50.
     [Google Scholar]
  97. Bradford, Barbara
    1997 Upspeak in British English. English Today13(3): 29–36. 10.1017/S0266078400009810
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266078400009810 [Google Scholar]
  98. Bradlow, Ann R . & Bent, Tessa
    2008 Perceptual adaptation to non-native speech. Cognition106(2): 707–729. 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.04.005
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2007.04.005 [Google Scholar]
  99. Brand, Christiane & Kämmerer, Susanne
    2006 The Louvain International Database of Spoken English Interlanguage (LINDSEI): Compiling the German component. InCorpus Technology and Language Pedagogy: New Resources, New Tools, New Methods, Sabine Braun , Kurt Kohn & Joybrato Mukherjee (eds), 127–140. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
     [Google Scholar]
  100. Braun, Angelika
    1995 Fundamental frequency – How speaker-specific is it?Studies in Forensic Phonetics, BEIPHOL64: 9–23.
     [Google Scholar]
  101. Brazil, David
    1997 The Communicative Value of Intonation in English. Cambridge: CUP.
     [Google Scholar]
  102. Brazil, David , Coulthard, Malcolm & Johns, Catherine
    1980 Discourse Intonation and Language Teaching. Harlow: Longman.
     [Google Scholar]
  103. Bresnahan, Mary Jiang , Ohashi, Rie , Nebashi, Reiko , Liu, Wen Ying & Shearman, Sachiyo Morinaga
    2002 Attitudinal and affective response toward accented English. Language and Communication22(2): 171–185. 10.1016/S0271‑5309(01)00025‑8
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0271-5309(01)00025-8 [Google Scholar]
  104. Britain, David
    1992 Linguistic change in intonation: The use of high rising terminals in New Zealand English. Language Variation and Change4(1): 77–104. 10.1017/S0954394500000661
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394500000661 [Google Scholar]
  105. 1998 Linguistic change in intonation: The use of high-rising terminals in New Zealand English. InThe Sociolinguistics Reader, 1: Variation and Multilingualism, Peter Trudgill & Jenny Cheshire (eds), 213–239. London: Arnold.
     [Google Scholar]
  106. Britain, David & Newman John
    1992 High rising terminals in New Zealand English. Journal of the International Phonetic Association22(1–2): 1–11. 10.1017/S0025100300004540
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025100300004540 [Google Scholar]
  107. Brown, Penelope & Levinson, Stephen C.
    1987 Politeness. Some Universals in Language Usage. [Studies in Interactional Sociolinguistics 4]. Cambridge: CUP. 10.1017/CBO9780511813085
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813085 [Google Scholar]
  108. Brugos, Alejna , Breen, Mara , Veilleux, Nanette , Barnes, Jonathan & Shattuck-Hufnagel, Stefanie
    2018 Cue-based annotation and analysis of prosodic boundary events. InProceedings of the International Speech Communication Association 2018, 245–249. Poznań, Poland. 10.21437/SpeechProsody.2018‑50
     https://doi.org/10.21437/SpeechProsody.2018-50 [Google Scholar]
  109. Bryant, Gregory A . & Fox Tree, Jean E.
    2005 Is there an ironic tone of voice?Language and Speech48(3): 257–277. 10.1177/00238309050480030101
     https://doi.org/10.1177/00238309050480030101 [Google Scholar]
  110. Bryant, Pauline
    1980 Australian Questioning Intonation: An Addition to Speakers’ Response-seeking Repertoire. BA thesis, Australian National University.
     [Google Scholar]
  111. Buck, Gavin
    2016 Systematic Transfer of ‘Uptalk’ from English (L1) to Spanish (L2) for Native English Speakers: A Developmental Study. BA thesis, University of Michigan.
     [Google Scholar]
  112. Bundgaard-Nielsen, Rikke L ., Best, Catherine T . & Tyler, Michael D.
    2011 Vocabulary size is associated with L2 vowel perception performance in adult L2 learners. Studies in Second Language Acquisition33(3): 433–461. 10.1017/S0272263111000040
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263111000040 [Google Scholar]
  113. Bundgaard-Nielsen, Rikke L ., Best, Catherine T ., Kroos, Christian & Tyler, Michael D.
    2012 Second language learners’ vocabulary expansion is associated with improved second language vowel intelligibility. Applied Psycholinguistics33(3): 643–664. 10.1017/S0142716411000518
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716411000518 [Google Scholar]
  114. Burdin, Rachel Steindel & Tyler, Joseph
    2018 Rises inform, and plateaus remind: Exploring the epistemic meanings of “list intonation” in American English. Journal of Pragmatics136: 97–114. 10.1016/j.pragma.2018.08.013
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.08.013 [Google Scholar]
  115. Busà, Maria Grazia & Urbani, Martina
    2011 A cross linguistic analysis of pitch range in English L1 and L2. InProceedings of the 17th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, ICPhS 2011, 380–383. Hong Kong.
     [Google Scholar]
  116. Buysse, Lieven
    2017 The pragmatic marker you know in learner Englishes. Journal of Pragmatics121: 40–57. 10.1016/j.pragma.2017.09.010
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2017.09.010 [Google Scholar]
  117. Bylund, Emanuel , Abrahamsson, Niclas & Hyltenstam, Kenneth
    2012 Does first language maintenance hamper native-likeness in a second language?Studies in Second Language Acquisition34(2): 215–241. 10.1017/S0272263112000034
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263112000034 [Google Scholar]
  118. Byrd, Dani
    1994 Relations of sex and dialect to reduction. Speech Communication15(1–2): 39–54. 10.1016/0167‑6393(94)90039‑6
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6393(94)90039-6 [Google Scholar]
  119. Cacioppo, John T . & Petty, Richard E.
    1980 Sex differences in influenceability: Towards specifying the underlying processes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin6(4): 651–656. 10.1177/014616728064016
     https://doi.org/10.1177/014616728064016 [Google Scholar]
  120. Callies, Marcus
    2008 Easy to understand but difficult to use? Raising constructions and information packaging in the advanced learner variety. InLinking Contrastive and Learner Corpus Research, Gaëtanelle Gilquin , María Belén Diez Bedmar & Szilvia Papp (eds), 201–226. Amsterdam: Rodopi. 10.1163/9789401206204_009
     https://doi.org/10.1163/9789401206204_009 [Google Scholar]
  121. 2009 Information Highlighting in Advanced Learner English: The Syntax- pragmatics Interface in Second Language Acquisition [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 186]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.186
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.186 [Google Scholar]
  122. Calhoun, Sasha & Schweitzer, Antje
    2012 Can intonation contours be lexicalised? Implications for discourse meanings. InProsody and Meaning [Interface Explorations 25], Gorka Elordieta & Pilar Prieto (eds.), 271–327. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
     [Google Scholar]
  123. Cameron, Deborah
    2011 Sociophonetics and sexuality: Discussion. American Speech86(1): 98–103. 10.1215/00031283‑1277537
     https://doi.org/10.1215/00031283-1277537 [Google Scholar]
  124. Canellada, María Josefa & Madsen Kuhlmann, John
    1987 Pronunciación del español: Lengua hablada y literaria. Madrid: Castalia.
     [Google Scholar]
  125. Cangemi, Francesco , Albert, Aviad & Grice, Martine
    2019 Modelling intonation: Beyond segments and tonal targets. InProceedings of the 19th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, ICPhS 2019, Sasha Calhoun , Paola Escudero , Marija Tabain & Paul Warren (eds). 572–576. Melbourne, Australia: Australasian Speech Science and Technology Association.
     [Google Scholar]
  126. Carrie, Erin
    2017 British is professional, American is urban: Attitudes towards English reference accents in Spain. International Journal of Applied Linguistics27(2): 427–447. 10.1111/ijal.12139
     https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.12139 [Google Scholar]
  127. Cauvin, Évelyne
    2013 Intonational phrasing as a potential indicator for establishing prosodic learner profiles. InTwenty Years of Learner Corpus Research: Looking Back, Moving Ahead [Corpora and Language in Use – Proceedings 1], Sylviane Granger , Gaëtanelle Gilquin & Fanny Meunier (eds), 75–88. Louvain-la-Neuve: Presses universitaires de Louvain.
     [Google Scholar]
  128. Cavé, Christian , Guaïtella, Isabelle , Bertrand, Roxane , Santi, Serge , Harlay, Francoise & Espesser, Robert
    1996 About the relationship between eyebrow movements and F0 variations. InProceedings of the 4th International Conference on Spoken Language Processing, ICSLP 1996, 2175–2179. Philadelphia, PA. 10.21437/ICSLP.1996‑551
     https://doi.org/10.21437/ICSLP.1996-551 [Google Scholar]
  129. Celce-Murcia, Marianne , Brinton, Donna M . & Goodwin, Janet. M
    2010 Teaching Pronunciation: A Course Book and Reference Guide. Cambridge: CUP.
     [Google Scholar]
  130. Cenoz, Jasone & García Lecumberri , Maria Luisa
    1999 The acquisition of English pronunciation: Learners’ views. International Journal of Applied Linguistics9(1): 3–15. 10.1111/j.1473‑4192.1999.tb00157.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1473-4192.1999.tb00157.x [Google Scholar]
  131. Chafe, Wallace L.
    1980 The Pear Stories. Cognitive, Cultural, and Linguistic Aspects of Narrative Production. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
     [Google Scholar]
  132. 1988 Linking intonation units in spoken English. InClause Combining in Grammar and Discourse [Typological Studies in Language 18], John Haiman & Sandra A. Thompson (eds), 1–27. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.18.03cha
     https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.18.03cha [Google Scholar]
  133. 1994 Discourse, Consciousness and Time. The Flow and Displacement of Conscious Experience in Speaking and Writing. Chicago, IL: The Chicago University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  134. Chambers, Francine & Richards, Brian J.
    1995 The free conversation and the assessment of oral proficiency. The Language Learning Journal11(1): 6–10. 10.1080/09571739585200031
     https://doi.org/10.1080/09571739585200031 [Google Scholar]
  135. Chamonikolasová, Jana
    2017 Intonation in English and Czech Dialogues. Brno: Masarykova Univerzita.
     [Google Scholar]
  136. Chartrand, Tanya L . & Bargh, John A.
    1999 The chameleon effect: The perception-behavior link and social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology76(6): 893–910. 10.1037/0022‑3514.76.6.893
     https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.76.6.893 [Google Scholar]
  137. Chen, Aoju
    2003 Language dependence in continuation intonation. InProceedings of the 15th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, ICPhS 2003, 1069–1072. Barcelona, Spain.
     [Google Scholar]
  138. 2007 Language-specificity in the perception of continuation intonation. InTones and Tunes, II: Phonetic and Behavioural Studies in Word and Sentence Prosody, Carlos Gussenhoven & Tomas Riad (eds), 107–142. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110207576.1.107
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110207576.1.107 [Google Scholar]
  139. 2009 Perception of paralinguistic intonational meaning in a second language. Language Learning59(2): 367–409. 10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2009.00510.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00510.x [Google Scholar]
  140. 2010 Is there really an asymmetry in the acquisition of the focus-to-accentuation mapping?Lingua120(8): 1926–1939. 10.1016/j.lingua.2010.02.012
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2010.02.012 [Google Scholar]
  141. Chen, Sally & Fon, Janice
    2008 The peak alignment of prenuclear and nuclear accents among advanced L2 English learners. InProceedings of the Speech Prosody 2008 Conference, 643–646. Campinas, Brazil. 10.21437/SpeechProsody.2008‑143
     https://doi.org/10.21437/SpeechProsody.2008-143 [Google Scholar]
  142. Ching, Marvin K L
    1982 The question intonation in assertions. American Speech57(2): 95–107. 10.2307/454443
     https://doi.org/10.2307/454443 [Google Scholar]
  143. Chipere, Ngoni
    2013 Sex differences in phonological awareness and reading ability. Language Awareness23(3): 1–15.
     [Google Scholar]
  144. Chun, Dorothy M.
    1998 Signal analysis software for teaching discourse intonation. Language Learning and Technology2(1): 74–93.
     [Google Scholar]
  145. 2002 Discourse Intonation in L2: From Theory and Research to Practice [Language Learning & Language Teaching 1]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/lllt.1
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.1 [Google Scholar]
  146. Chun, Dorothy M ., Hardison, Debra M . & Pennington, Martha C.
    2008 Technologies for prosody in context. Past and future of L2 research and practice. InPhonology and Second Language Acquisition [Studies in Bilingualism 36], Jette G. Hansen Edwards & Mary L. Zampini (eds), 323–346. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/sibil.36.16chu
     https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.36.16chu [Google Scholar]
  147. Cid Uribe, Miriam & Roach, Peter
    1990 Spanish intonation: Design and implementation of a machine-readable corpus. Journal of the International Phonetic Association20(2): 1–8. 10.1017/S0025100300004163
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025100300004163 [Google Scholar]
  148. Clark, Herbert H.
    1994 Discourse in production. InHandbook of Psycholinguistics, Morton A. Gernsbacher (ed.), 985–1021. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  149. Clark, Herbert H . & Fox Tree, Jean E.
    2002 Using uh and um in spontaneous speaking. Cognition84(1): 73–111. 10.1016/S0010‑0277(02)00017‑3
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(02)00017-3 [Google Scholar]
  150. Clopper, Cynthia G . & Pisoni, David B.
    2006 The Nationwide Speech Project: A new corpus of American English dialects. Speech Communication48(6): 633–644. 10.1016/j.specom.2005.09.010
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.specom.2005.09.010 [Google Scholar]
  151. Clopper, Cynthia G . & Smiljanic, Rajka
    2011 Effects of gender and regional dialect on prosodic patterns in American English. Journal Phonetics39(2): 237–245. 10.1016/j.wocn.2011.02.006
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2011.02.006 [Google Scholar]
  152. 2015 Regional variation in temporal organization in American English. Journal of Phonetics49: 1–15. 10.1016/j.wocn.2014.10.002
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2014.10.002 [Google Scholar]
  153. Coates, Jennifer
    2004 Women, Men, and Language: A Sociolinguistic Account of Gender Differences in Language. Harlow: Pearson Education.
     [Google Scholar]
  154. Cogo, Alessia & Dewey, Martin
    2006 Efficiency in ELF communication: From pragmatic motives to lexico-grammatical innovation. InNordic Journal of English Studies [Special Issue on ELF], Anna Mauranen & Maria Metsä-Ketelä (eds), 59–93. Göteborg: University of Göteborg. 10.35360/njes.12
     https://doi.org/10.35360/njes.12 [Google Scholar]
  155. Cohen, Antonie & ’t Hart, Johan
    1967 On the anatomy of intonation. Lingua19(1–2): 177–192. 10.1016/0024‑3841(69)90118‑1
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3841(69)90118-1 [Google Scholar]
  156. Cohen, Jacob
    1960 A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement20(1): 37–46. 10.1177/001316446002000104
     https://doi.org/10.1177/001316446002000104 [Google Scholar]
  157. Colantoni, Laura , Cuza, Alejandro & Mazzaro, Natalia
    2016a Task-related effects in the prosody of Spanish heritage speakers and long-term immigrants. InIntonational Grammar in Ibero-Romance: Approaches across Linguistic Subfields [Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 6], Meghan E. Armstrong , Nicholas Henrikesen & Maria del Mar Vanrell (eds), 1–24. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/ihll.6.01col
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ihll.6.01col [Google Scholar]
  158. Colantoni, Laura , Klassen, Gabrielle , Patience, Matthew , Radu, Malina & Tararova, Olga
    2015 Increasing context: L2 production of English intonation by L1 Spanish and L1 Mandarin speakers. InProceedings of the 18th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, ICPhS 2015, 1–4. Glasgow, Scotland, UK.
     [Google Scholar]
  159. 2016b Task-effects in the L2 perception and production of English sentence-types by L1 Spanish speakers. InProceedings of the Speech Prosody 8 Conference, 1–5. Boston, MA. 10.21437/SpeechProsody.2016‑3
     https://doi.org/10.21437/SpeechProsody.2016-3 [Google Scholar]
  160. Colantoni, Laura , Gabrielle Klassen , Matthew Patience , Malina Radu , & Tararova, Olga
    2022 Perception and production of sentence types by Inuktitut-English bilinguals. Languages7(3): 1–26. 10.3390/languages7030193
     https://doi.org/10.3390/languages7030193 [Google Scholar]
  161. Conley, John M ., O’Barr, William M . & Lind, Allan E.
    1978 The power of language: Presentational style in the courtroom. Duke Law Journal6: 1375–1399.
     [Google Scholar]
  162. Cook, Vivian
    (ed.) 2002 Portraits of the L2 User. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781853595851
     https://doi.org/10.21832/9781853595851 [Google Scholar]
  163. Corder, Stephen Pit
    1967 The significance of learners’ errors. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching5(4): 161–170. 10.1515/iral.1967.5.1‑4.161
     https://doi.org/10.1515/iral.1967.5.1-4.161 [Google Scholar]
  164. Costa, Albert , Pickering, Martin J . & Sorace, Antonella
    2008 Alignment in second language dialogue. Language and Cognitive Processes23(4): 528–556. 10.1080/01690960801920545
     https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960801920545 [Google Scholar]
  165. Council of Europe 2001
    Council of Europe 2001. Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment. Strasbourg.
     [Google Scholar]
  166. Council of Europe 2020
    Council of Europe 2020. Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment. Companion Volume with New Descriptors. Strasbourg.
     [Google Scholar]
  167. Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth
    1986 An Introduction to English Prosody. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
     [Google Scholar]
  168. Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth & Selting, Margret
    1996 Towards an interactional perspective on prosody and a prosodic perspective on interaction. InProsody in Conversation: Interactional Studies, Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen & Margret Selting (eds), 11–56. Cambridge: CUP. 10.1017/CBO9780511597862.003
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511597862.003 [Google Scholar]
  169. Courtney, Neil
    1996 The nature of Australian. English Today12(2): 23-29.
     [Google Scholar]
  170. Cruttenden, Alan
    1994 Rises in English. InStudies in General and English Phonetics. Essays in honour of Professor J. D. O’Connor, Jack Windsor Lewis (ed.), 155–73. London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  171. 1997 Intonation, 2nd edn.Cambridge: CUP. 10.1017/CBO9781139166973
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139166973 [Google Scholar]
  172. Crystal, David
    1969 Prosodic Systems and Intonation in English. Cambridge: CUP.
     [Google Scholar]
  173. 1986 Prosodic development. InStudies in First Language Development, Paul J. Fletcher & Michael Garman (eds), 174–197. Cambridge: CUP. 10.1017/CBO9780511620683.011
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620683.011 [Google Scholar]
  174. 1995 The Cambridge Encyclopedia of the English Language. Cambridge: CUP.
     [Google Scholar]
  175. 2003 A Dictionary of Linguistics and Phonetics, 6th edn.Oxford: Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  176. Cucchiarini, Catia , Strik Helmer & Boves, Lou
    2000 Quantitative assessment of second language learners’ fluency by means of automatic speech recognition technology. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America107(2): 989–999. 10.1121/1.428279
     https://doi.org/10.1121/1.428279 [Google Scholar]
  177. Culpeper, Jonathan , Mackey, Alison & Taguchi, Naoko
    2018 Second Language Pragmatics. From Theory to Research. New York, NY: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315692388
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315692388 [Google Scholar]
  178. Cutler, Anne & Swinney, David A.
    1987 Prosody and the development of comprehension. Journal of Child Language14(1): 145–167. 10.1017/S0305000900012782
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000900012782 [Google Scholar]
  179. Cutler, Anne , Dahan, Delphine & van Donselaar, Wilma
    1997 Prosody in the comprehension of spoken language: A literature review. Language and Speech40(2): 141–201. 10.1177/002383099704000203
     https://doi.org/10.1177/002383099704000203 [Google Scholar]
  180. Dagut, Menachem & Laufer, Batia
    1985 Avoidance of phrasal verbs: A case for contrastive analysis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition7(1): 73–79. 10.1017/S0272263100005167
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100005167 [Google Scholar]
  181. Dahmen, Silvia
    2013 Prosodie oder Segmente? Phonetische Untersuchungen zu Trainingseffekten bei Italienischen Deutschlernenden. PhD dissertation, University of Cologne.
  182. Dahmen, Silvia , Grice, Martine & Roessig, Simon
    2023 Prosodic and segmental aspects of pronunciation training and their effects on L2. Languages8(1): 74. 10.3390/languages8010074
     https://doi.org/10.3390/languages8010074 [Google Scholar]
  183. Dallaston, Katherine & Docherty, Gerard
    2020 The quantitative prevalence of creaky voice (vocal fry) in varieties of English: A systematic review of the literature. PLoS ONE15(3): 1–18. 10.1371/journal.pone.0229960
     https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0229960 [Google Scholar]
  184. Dalton-Puffer, Christiane , Kaltenboeck, Gunther & Smit, Ute
    1997 Learner attitudes and L2 pronunciation in Austria. World Englishes16(1): 115–128. 10.1111/1467‑971X.00052
     https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-971X.00052 [Google Scholar]
  185. Daly, Nicola & Warren, Paul
    2001 Pitching it differently in New Zealand English: Speaker sex and intonation patterns. Journal of Sociolinguistics5(1): 85–96. 10.1111/1467‑9481.00139
     https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9481.00139 [Google Scholar]
  186. Daneš, František
    1957 Intonace a věta ve spisovné čeŝtině [Intonation and the sentence in standard Czech]. Praha: Academia.
     [Google Scholar]
  187. Dankovičová, Jana
    1998 The Linguistic Basis of Articulation Rate Variation in Czech. PhD dissertation, Oxford University.
  188. Dankovičová, Jana & Dellwo, Volker
    2007 Czech speech rhythm and the rhythm class hypothesis. InProceedings of the 16th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, ICPhS 2007, 1241–1244. Saarbrücken, Germany.
     [Google Scholar]
  189. Dauer, R. M
    1983 Stress-timing and syllable-timing reanalyzed. Journal of Phonetics11(1): 51–62. 10.1016/S0095‑4470(19)30776‑4
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0095-4470(19)30776-4 [Google Scholar]
  190. Davidson, Lisa
    2019 The effects of pitch, gender, and prosodic context on the identification of creaky voice. Phonetica76(4): 235–262. 10.1159/000490948
     https://doi.org/10.1159/000490948 [Google Scholar]
  191. de Bot, Kees
    1983 Visual feedback of intonation, I: Effectiveness and induced practice behavior. Language and Speech26(4): 331–350. 10.1177/002383098302600402
     https://doi.org/10.1177/002383098302600402 [Google Scholar]
  192. de Bot, Kees & Mailfert, Kate
    1982 The teaching of intonation: Fundamental research and classroom applications. TESOL Quarterly16(1): 71–77. 10.2307/3586564
     https://doi.org/10.2307/3586564 [Google Scholar]
  193. de Cock, Sylvie
    2004 Preferred sequences of words in NS and NNS speech. Belgian Journal of English Language and Literatures (BELL) New Series2: 225–246.
     [Google Scholar]
  194. de Jong, Kenneth J.
    2001 Rate-induced resyllabification revisited. Language and Speech44(2): 197– 216. 10.1177/00238309010440020401
     https://doi.org/10.1177/00238309010440020401 [Google Scholar]
  195. de Jong, Nivja H
    2016 Predicting pauses in L1 and L2 speech: The ffects of utterance boundaries and word frequency. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching.
     [Google Scholar]
  196. de Jong, Nivja H ., Pacilly, Jos & Heeren, Willemijn
    2021 PRAAT scripts to measure speed fluency and breakdown fluency in speech automatically. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice28(4): 456–476. 10.1080/0969594X.2021.1951162
     https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2021.1951162 [Google Scholar]
  197. de Leeuw, Esther
    2019 Native speech plasticity in the German-English late bilingual Stefanie Graf: A longitudinal study over four decades. Journal of Phonetics73: 24–39. 10.1016/j.wocn.2018.12.002
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2018.12.002 [Google Scholar]
  198. de Leeuw, Esther , Mennen, Ineke & Scobbie, James M.
    2012 Singing a different tune in your native language: First language attrition of prosody. International Journal of Bilingualism16(1): 101–116. 10.1177/1367006911405576
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006911405576 [Google Scholar]
  199. de Looze, Céline , Scherer, Stefan , Vaughan, Brian & Campbell, Nick
    2014 Investigating automatic measurements of prosodic accommodation and its dynamics in social interaction. Speech Communication58: 11–34. 10.1016/j.specom.2013.10.002
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.specom.2013.10.002 [Google Scholar]
  200. DeKeyser, Robert M ., Alf-Shabtay, Iris & Ravid, Dorit
    2010 Cross-linguistic evidence for the nature of age effects in second language acquisition. Applied Psycholinguistics31(3): 413–438. 10.1017/S0142716410000056
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716410000056 [Google Scholar]
  201. Delais-Roussarie, Elizabeth , Avanzi, Mathieu & Herment, Sophie
    (eds) 2015 Prosody and Languages in Contact: L2 Acquisition, Attrition, Languages in Multilingual Situations. Berlin: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑662‑45168‑7
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-45168-7 [Google Scholar]
  202. Delattre, Pierre
    1963 Comparing the prosodic features of English, German, Spanish and French. International Review of Applied Linguistics1(3): 193–210. 10.1515/iral.1963.1.1.193
     https://doi.org/10.1515/iral.1963.1.1.193 [Google Scholar]
  203. 1966 A comparison of syllable length conditioning among languages. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching4(3): 183–198. 10.1515/iral.1966.4.1‑4.183
     https://doi.org/10.1515/iral.1966.4.1-4.183 [Google Scholar]
  204. Delattre, Pierre , Poenack, Elmer & Olsen, Carroll
    1965 Some characteristics of German intonation for the expression of continuation and finality. Phonetica13: 134–161. 10.1159/000258484
     https://doi.org/10.1159/000258484 [Google Scholar]
  205. Dellwo, Volker
    2010 Influences of Speech rate on the Acoustic Correlates of Speech Rhythm: An Experimental Phonetic Study on Acoustic and Perceptual Evidence. PhD dissertation, University of Bonn.
  206. Derwing, Tracey M & Munro, Murray J.
    1997 Accent, intelligibility and comprehensibility. Evidence from four L1s. Studies in Second Language Acquisition19(1): 1–16. 10.1017/S0272263197001010
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263197001010 [Google Scholar]
  207. Derwing, Tracey M . & Munro, Murray J.
    2013 The development of L2 oral language skills in two L1 groups: A 7-year study. Language Learning63(2): 163–185. 10.1111/lang.12000
     https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12000 [Google Scholar]
  208. 2015 Pronunciation Fundamentals. Evidence-based Perspectives for L2 Teaching and Research [Language Learning & Language Teaching 42]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/lllt.42
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.42 [Google Scholar]
  209. Derwing, Tracey M . & Rossiter, Marian J.
    2003 The effects of pronunciation instruction on the accuracy, fluency and complexity of L2 accented speech. Applied Language Learning13(1): 1–17.
     [Google Scholar]
  210. Derwing, Tracey M ., Diepenbroek, Lori G . & Foote, Jennifer A.
    2013 How well do general-skills ESL textbooks address pronunciation?TESL Canada Journal30(1): 22–44. 10.18806/tesl.v30i1.1124
     https://doi.org/10.18806/tesl.v30i1.1124 [Google Scholar]
  211. Derwing, Tracey M ., Munro, Murray J . & Wiebe, Grace
    1998 Evidence in favor of a broad framework for pronunciation instruction. Language Learning48(3): 393–410. 10.1111/0023‑8333.00047
     https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.00047 [Google Scholar]
  212. Derwing, Tracey M ., Munro, Murray J ., Thomson, Ronald I . & Rossiter, Marian J.
    2009 The relationship between L1 fluency and L2 fluency development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition31(4): 533–557. 10.1017/S0272263109990015
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263109990015 [Google Scholar]
  213. Dewaele, Jean-Marc , Macintyre, Peter , Boudreau, Carmen & Dewaele, Livia
    2016 Do girls have all the fun? Anxiety and enjoyment in the foreign language classroom. Theory and Practice of Second Language Acquisition2(1): 41–63.
     [Google Scholar]
  214. Di Gioacchino, Martina & Crook Jessop, Lorena
    2011 Uptalk – Towards a quantitative analysis. Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics33: 1–16.
     [Google Scholar]
  215. Diehl, Randy L ., Lindblom Björn , Hoemeke Kathryn A . & Fahey, Richard P.
    1996 On explaining certain male-female differences in the phonetic realization of vowel categories. Journal of Phonetics24(2): 187–208. 10.1006/jpho.1996.0011
     https://doi.org/10.1006/jpho.1996.0011 [Google Scholar]
  216. Dietrich, Rainer , Klein, Wolfgang & Noyau, Colette
    1995 The Acquisition of Temporality in a Second Language [Studies in Bilingualism 7]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/sibil.7
     https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.7 [Google Scholar]
  217. Dijkstra, Christel , Krahmer, Emiel & Swerts, Marc
    2006 Manipulating uncertainty – The contribution of different audiovisual prosodic cues to the perception of confidence. InProceedings of the 3rd International Conference of Speech Prosody, 1–5. Dresden, Germany. 10.21437/SpeechProsody.2006‑209
     https://doi.org/10.21437/SpeechProsody.2006-209 [Google Scholar]
  218. Dilley, Laura & Shattuck-Hufnagel, Stefanie
    1995 Variability in glottalization of word onset vowels in American English. InProceedings of the 13th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, ICPhS 1995, 586–589. Stockholm, Sweden.
     [Google Scholar]
  219. Dilley, Laura , Shattuck-Hufnagel, Stefanie , & Ostendorf, Mari
    1996 Glottalization of word-initial vowels as a function of prosodic structure. Journal of Phonetics24(4): 423–444. 10.1006/jpho.1996.0023
     https://doi.org/10.1006/jpho.1996.0023 [Google Scholar]
  220. Dombrowski, Ernst & Niebuhr, Oliver
    2005 Acoustic patterns and communicative functions of phrase-final rises in German: Activating and restricting contours. Phonetica62(2–4): 176–195. 10.1159/000090097
     https://doi.org/10.1159/000090097 [Google Scholar]
  221. 2010 Shaping phrase-final rising intonation in German. InProceedings of the 5th International Conference of Speech Prosody, 1–4. Chicago, IL. 10.21437/SpeechProsody.2010‑152
     https://doi.org/10.21437/SpeechProsody.2010-152 [Google Scholar]
  222. Dörnyei, Zoltan & Clément, Richard
    2001 Motivational characteristics of learning different target languages: Results of a nationwide survey. InMotivation and Second Language Acquisition, Zoltan Dornyei & Richard Schmidt (eds), 399–432. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai’i, Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center.
     [Google Scholar]
  223. Douglas, Nick
    2017 Uptalk actually serves a powerful purpose. 31May2017 <https://lifehacker.com/uptalk-actually-serves-a-powerful-purpose-1795688458> (10August 2023).
     [Google Scholar]
  224. Dragojevic, Marko & Giles, Howard
    2016 I don’t like you because you’re hard to understand: The role of processing fluency in the language attitudes process. Human Communication Research42(3): 396–420. 10.1111/hcre.12079
     https://doi.org/10.1111/hcre.12079 [Google Scholar]
  225. Du Bois, John W ., Cummings, Susanna , Schuetze-Coburn, Stephan & Paolino, Danae
    1992 Discourse Transcription [Santa Barbara Papers in Linguistics 4]. Santa Barbara, CA: Department of Linguistics, UCSB.
     [Google Scholar]
  226. Duběda, Tomáš
    2006 Prosodic boundaries in Czech: An experiment based on delexicalized speech. InProceedings of the 9th International Speech Communication Association, Interspeech 2006, 309–312. Pittsburg, PA. 10.21437/Interspeech.2006‑109
     https://doi.org/10.21437/Interspeech.2006-109 [Google Scholar]
  227. 2014 Czech intonation: A tonal approach. Slovo a Slovesnost75(2): 83–98.
     [Google Scholar]
  228. Duběda, Tomáš & Mády, Katalin
    2010 Nucleus position within the intonation phrase: A typological study of English, Czech and Hungarian. InProceedings of the 11th International Speech Communication Association, Interspeech 2010, 4 Vols., 126–129. Makuhari, Chiba, Japan.
     [Google Scholar]
  229. Dumont, Amandine
    2017 The contribution of learner corpora to the substantiation of fluency levels. InLanguage, Learners and Levels: Progression and Variation, Pieter de Haan , Rina de Vries & Sanne van Vuuren (eds), 281–308. Louvain-la-Neuve: Presses universitaires de Louvain.
     [Google Scholar]
  230. Dziubalska-Kołaczyk, Katarzyna & Przedlacka, Joanna
    (eds) 2008 English Pronunciation Models: A Changing Scene, 2nd edn.Hamburg: Peter Lang.
     [Google Scholar]
  231. Eagly, Alice H.
    1978 Sex differences in influenceability. Psychological Bulletin85(1): 86–116. 10.1037/0033‑2909.85.1.86
     https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.85.1.86 [Google Scholar]
  232. Eckert, Penelope & Podesva, Robert J.
    2011 Sociophonetics and sexuality: Toward a symbiosis of sociolinguistics and laboratory phonology. American Speech86(1): 6–13. 10.1215/00031283‑1277465
     https://doi.org/10.1215/00031283-1277465 [Google Scholar]
  233. Eckert, Hartwig & Barry, William
    2002 The Phonetics and Phonology of English and Pronunciation: A Coursebook. Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Trier.
     [Google Scholar]
  234. Eckman, Fred R.
    1977 Markedness and the contrastive analysis hypothesis. Language Learning, 27(2): 315–330. 10.1111/j.1467‑1770.1977.tb00124.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1977.tb00124.x [Google Scholar]
  235. 1996 A functional-typological approach to second language acquisition theory. InHandbook of Second Language Acquisition, William C. Ritchie & Tej K. Bhatia (eds), 195–211. New York, NY: Academic Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  236. Edelsky, Carole
    1979 Question intonation and sex roles. Language in Society8(1): 15–32. 10.1017/S0047404500005923
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500005923 [Google Scholar]
  237. Edlund, Jens , Heldner, Mattias & Hirschberg, Julia
    2009 Pause and gap length in face-to-face interaction. InProceedings of the 10th International Speech Communication Association, Interspeech 2009, 2779–2782. Brighton, UK. 10.21437/Interspeech.2009‑710
     https://doi.org/10.21437/Interspeech.2009-710 [Google Scholar]
  238. Education First
    Education First 2011–2015 EF EPI: EF English Proficiency Index (five editions). <www.ef.co.uk/epi/downloads/> (1September 2019).
     [Google Scholar]
  239. Edwards, Alison & Fuchs, Robert
    2018 A cluster analysis of attitudes to English in Germany and the Netherlands. World Englishes37(4): 653–667. 10.1111/weng.12348
     https://doi.org/10.1111/weng.12348 [Google Scholar]
  240. Ehrman, Madeline & Oxford, Rebecca
    1989 Effects of sex differences, career choice, and psychological type on adult language learning strategies. Modern Language Journal72(3): 253–265. 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.1988.tb04185.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1988.tb04185.x [Google Scholar]
  241. Elliott, Raymond A.
    1995 Field independence/dependence, hemispheric specialization, and attitude in relation to pronunciation accuracy in Spanish as a foreign language. The Modern Language Journal79(3): 356–371. 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.1995.tb01112.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1995.tb01112.x [Google Scholar]
  242. Ellis, Rod
    1994 The Study of Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: OUP.
     [Google Scholar]
  243. Elvira-García, Wendy
    2016 La entonación en el aula de ELE. InDossier del XXV Encuentro Práctico de Profesores de ELE, Neus Sans Baulenas & Begoña Montmany (eds), 41–47. Barcelona: Difusión Publishing Company and International House.
     [Google Scholar]
  244. Eriksson, Anders & Heldner, Mattias
    2015 The acoustics of word stress in English as a function of stress level and speaking style. InProceedings of the 16th International Speech Communication Association, Interspeech 2015, 41–45. Dresden, Germany. 10.21437/Interspeech.2015‑9
     https://doi.org/10.21437/Interspeech.2015-9 [Google Scholar]
  245. Eskenazi, Maxine
    1999 Using automatic speech processing for foreign language pronunciation tutoring: Some issues and a prototype. Language Learning & Technology2(2): 62–76.
     [Google Scholar]
  246. Esser, Jürgen
    1978 Contrastive intonation of German and English. Phonetica35(1): 41–55. 10.1159/000259921
     https://doi.org/10.1159/000259921 [Google Scholar]
  247. Estebas-Vilaplana, Eva & Prieto, Pilar
    2010 Castilian Spanish Intonation. InTranscription of Intonation of the Spanish Language, Pilar Prieto & Paolo Roseano (eds), 17–48. Munich: Lincom.
     [Google Scholar]
  248. Estebas-Vilaplana, Eva
    2008 Modelling final declarative intonation in English and Spanish. InEstudios de FilologíaInglesa. Homenaje a la Dra. Asunción Alba Pelayo, María Teresa Gibert & Laura Alba-Juez (eds), 109–127. Madrid: UNED.
     [Google Scholar]
  249. 2014 The evaluation of intonation: Pitch range differences in English and Spanish. InEvaluation in Context [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series242], Geoff Thompson & Laura Alba-Juez (eds), 179–194. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.242.09est
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.242.09est [Google Scholar]
  250. Estebas-Vilaplana, Eva & Prieto, Pilar
    2008 La notación prosódica del español: Una revisión del Sp_ToBI. Estudios de Fonética Experimental17: 265–283.
     [Google Scholar]
  251. Euler, Sasha
    2014 Approaches to pronunciation teaching: History and recent developments. InRecent Developments in Applied Phonetics [Studies in Linguistics and Methodology 6], Jolanta Szpyra-Kozłowska , Ewa Guz , Piotr Steinbrich & Radosław Święciński (eds), 35–78. Wydawnictwo: KUL.
     [Google Scholar]
  252. Face, Timothy L.
    2001 Focus and early peak alignment in Spanish intonation. Probus: International Journal of Latin and Romance Linguistics13(2): 223–246. 10.1515/prbs.2001.004
     https://doi.org/10.1515/prbs.2001.004 [Google Scholar]
  253. Face, Timothy L
    2002 Intonational marking of contrastive focus in Madrid Spanish. Munich: Lincom Europa.
     [Google Scholar]
  254. Face, Timothy L.
    2003 Intonation in Spanish declaratives: Differences between lab speech and spontaneous speech. Catalan Journal of Linguistics2: 115–131. 10.5565/rev/catjl.46
     https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/catjl.46 [Google Scholar]
  255. 2005 F0 peak height and the perception of sentence type in Castilian Spanish. Revista Internacional de Lingüística Iberoamericana2(6): 49–65.
     [Google Scholar]
  256. Feagin, Crawford
    1997 The African contribution to southern states English. InLanguage Variety in the South Revisited, Cynthia Bernstein , Thomas E. Nunally & Robin Sabino (eds), 123–139. Tuscaloosa, AL: University of Alabama Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  257. Ferguson, Charles A.
    1971 Absence of copula and the notion of simplicity: A study of normal speech, baby talk, foreigner talk and pidgins. InPidginization and Creolization of Languages, Dell H. Hymes (ed.), 141–150. Cambridge: CUP.
     [Google Scholar]
  258. Fernández, Julieta & Staples, Shelley
    2021 Pragmatic approaches. InRoutledge Handbook of Second Language Acquisition and Corpora, Nicole Tracy-Ventura & Magali Paquot (eds), 240–251. London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  259. Féry, Caroline , Hörnig, Robin & Pahaut, Serge
    2011 Correlates of phrasing in French and German from an experiment with semi-spontaneous speech. InIntonational Phrasing in Romance and Germanic: Cross-linguistic and Bilingual Studies [Hamburg Studies in Multilingualism 10], Christoph Gabriel & Conxita Lleó (eds), 11–41. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/hsm.10.03fer
     https://doi.org/10.1075/hsm.10.03fer [Google Scholar]
  260. Fey, Fabian & Lewandowski, Natalie
    2020 Uptalk in German: Investigation on the GECO database. InProceedings of the Phonetics and Phonology in the German Language Area, P & P 14, 54–57. Vienna, Austria.
     [Google Scholar]
  261. Flaig, Stefanie & Zerbian, Sabine
    2016 Rising intonation in statements of German speakers of English as a foreign language. Poster presented at the 7th conference on Tone and Intonation in Europe 2016 in Canterbury, UK.
     [Google Scholar]
  262. Flege, James E.
    1988 Factors affecting degree of perceived foreign accent in English sentences. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America84: 70–79. 10.1121/1.396876
     https://doi.org/10.1121/1.396876 [Google Scholar]
  263. 1995 Second language speech learning theory, findings and problems. InSpeech Perception and Linguistic Experience: Issues in Cross-linguistic Research, Winifred Strange (ed.), 233–277. Timonium, MD: York Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  264. 2009 Give input a chance!InInput matters in SLA, Thorsten Piske & Martha Young-Scholten (eds), 175–190. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
     [Google Scholar]
  265. 2016 The role of phonetic category formation in second language speech acquisition. InProceedings of the International Conference on Second Language Speech 2016, 1–121. Aarhus, Denmark.
     [Google Scholar]
  266. 2018 How the revised Speech Learning Model (SLM-r) works for stop consonants. InProceedings of Research Frontiers of Second Language Speech 2018, 1–114. Nanjing, China.
     [Google Scholar]
  267. 2019 A non-critical period for second-language learning. InA Sound Approach to Language Matters. In Honor of Ocke-Schwen Bohn, Anne Mette Nyvad , Míša Hejná , Anders Højen , Anna B. Jespersen & Mette Hjortshøj Sørensen (eds), 501–541. Aarhus: Department of English, Aarhus University. <https://pure.au.dk/ws/files/153251381/Bohn_FINAL.pdf> (19April 2024).
     [Google Scholar]
  268. Flege, James. E . & Bohn, Ocke-Schwen
    2021 The Revised Speech Learning Model (SLM-r). InSecond Language Speech Learning: Theoretical and Empirical Progress, Ratree Wayland (ed.), 3–83. Cambridge: CUP. 10.1017/9781108886901.002
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108886901.002 [Google Scholar]
  269. Flege, James E . & Fletcher, Kathryn L.
    1992 Talker and listener effects on degree of perceived accent. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America91(1): 370–389. 10.1121/1.402780
     https://doi.org/10.1121/1.402780 [Google Scholar]
  270. Flege, James E . & MacKay, Ian R.
    2004 Perceiving vowels in a second language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition26(1): 1–34. 10.1017/S0272263104261010
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263104261010 [Google Scholar]
  271. Flege, James E ., Bohn, Ocke-Schwen & Jang, Sunyoung
    1997a Effects of experience on non-native speakers’ production and perception of English vowels. Journal of Phonetics25(4): 437–470. 10.1006/jpho.1997.0052
     https://doi.org/10.1006/jpho.1997.0052 [Google Scholar]
  272. Flege, James E ., Frieda, Elaina M . & Nozawa, Takeshe
    1997b Amount of native-language (L1) use affects the pronunciation of an L2. Journal of Phonetics25(2): 169–186. 10.1006/jpho.1996.0040
     https://doi.org/10.1006/jpho.1996.0040 [Google Scholar]
  273. Flege, James E ., MacKay, Ian R.A . & Piske, Thorsten
    2002 Assessing bilingual dominance. Applied Psycholinguistics23(4): 567–598. 10.1017/S0142716402004046
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716402004046 [Google Scholar]
  274. Flege, James E ., Munro, Murray & MacKay, Ian
    1995 Factors affecting strength of perceived foreign accent in a second language. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America97(5): 3125–3134. 10.1121/1.413041
     https://doi.org/10.1121/1.413041 [Google Scholar]
  275. Fletcher, Janet
    2005 Compound rises and “uptalk” in spoken English dialogues. InProceedings of the International Speech Communication Association, Interspeech 2005, 1381–1384. Lisbon, Portugal.
     [Google Scholar]
  276. Fletcher, Janet & Loakes, Debbie
    2006 Patterns of rising and falling in Australian English. InProceedings of the 11th Australian Conference on Speech Science and Technology, Paul Warren & Catherine I. Watson (eds), 42–47. Auckland, New Zealand.
     [Google Scholar]
  277. Fletcher, Janet , Grabe, Esther & Warren, Paul
    2005 Intonational variation in four dialects of English: the high rising tone. InProsodic Typology: The Phonology of Intonation and Phrasing, Sun-Ah Jun (ed.), 390–409. Oxford: OUP. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199249633.003.0014
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199249633.003.0014 [Google Scholar]
  278. Flynn, Suzanne & Manuel, Sharon
    1991 Age-dependent effects in language acquisition: An evaluation of “Critical Period” hypotheses. InPoint Counterpoint: Universal Grammar in the Second Language, [Language Acquisition & Language Disorders 3], Lynn Eubank (ed.), 117–145. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/lald.3.06fly
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.3.06fly [Google Scholar]
  279. Ford, Cecilia E.
    1993 Grammar and Interaction: Adverbial Clauses in American English Conversations. Cambridge: CUP. 10.1017/CBO9780511554278
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511554278 [Google Scholar]
  280. Ford, Cecilia E . & Thompson, Sandra A.
    1996 Interactional units in conversation: Syntactic, intonational and pragmatic resources for the management of turns. InInteraction and Grammar, Elinor Ochs , Emanuel A. Schegloff & Sandra A. Thompson (eds), 134–184. Cambridge: CUP. 10.1017/CBO9780511620874.003
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620874.003 [Google Scholar]
  281. Foster, Pauline & Tavakoli, Parvaneh
    2009 Native speakers and task performance: Comparing effects on complexity, fluency, and lexical diversity. Language Learning59(4): 866–896. 10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2009.00528.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00528.x [Google Scholar]
  282. Foster, Pauline & Snyder Ohta, Amy
    2005 Negotiation for meaning and peer assistance in second language classrooms. Applied Linguistics26(3): 402–430. 10.1093/applin/ami014
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/ami014 [Google Scholar]
  283. Fougeron, Cécile & Jun, Sun-Ah
    1998 Rate effects on French intonation: Prosodic organization and phonetic realization. Journal of Phonetics26(1): 45–69. 10.1006/jpho.1997.0062
     https://doi.org/10.1006/jpho.1997.0062 [Google Scholar]
  284. Fought, Carmen
    2003 Chicano English in Context. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230510012
     https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230510012 [Google Scholar]
  285. Fox, Anthony
    1981 Fall-rise intonations in German and English. InContrastive Aspects of English and German, Charles V.J. Russ (ed.), 55–72. Heidelberg: Julius Groos.
     [Google Scholar]
  286. 1984 German Intonation: An Outline. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  287. 2000 Prosodic Features and Prosodic Structure. The Phonology of Suprasegmentals. Oxford: OUP. 10.1093/oso/9780198237853.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198237853.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  288. Fox, John
    2003 Effect Displays in R for Generalised Linear Models. Journal of Statistical Software8 (15): 1-27. 10.18637/jss.v008.i15
     https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v008.i15 [Google Scholar]
  289. Fox, Robert Allen , Jacewicz, Ewa & Hart, Jessica
    2013 Pitch pattern variations in three regional varieties of American English. InProceedings of the International Speech Communication Association, Interspeech 2013, 123–127. Lyon, France. 10.21437/Interspeech.2013‑51
     https://doi.org/10.21437/Interspeech.2013-51 [Google Scholar]
  290. Freed, Barbara F ., Segalowitz, Norman & Dewey, Dan P.
    2004 Context of learning and second language fluency in French: Comparing regular classroom, study abroad, and intensive domestic immersion programs. Studies in Second Language Acquisition26(2): 275–301. 10.1017/S0272263104262064
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263104262064 [Google Scholar]
  291. Friedberg, Heather , Litman, Diane & Paletz, Susannah
    2012 Lexical entrainment and success in student engineering groups. InProceedings of theIEEE Workshop onSpoken Language Technology 2012, 404–409. Miami, FL. 10.1109/SLT.2012.6424258
     https://doi.org/10.1109/SLT.2012.6424258 [Google Scholar]
  292. Friginal, Eric , Lee, Joseph , Polat, Brittany & Roberson, Audrey
    2017 Exploring Spoken English Learner Language from Corpora: Learner Talk. London: Palgrave McMillan.
     [Google Scholar]
  293. Frota, Sonia , D’Imperio, Mariapaola , Elordieta, Gorka , Prieto, Pilar & Vigário, Marina
    2007 The phonetics and phonology of intonational phrasing in Romance. InSegmental and Prosodic Issues in Romance Phonology [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 282], Pilar Prieto , Joan Mascaró & Maria-Josep Solé (eds), 131–154. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.282.10fro
     https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.282.10fro [Google Scholar]
  294. Fuchs, Robert
    2018 Pitch range, dynamism and level in postcolonial varieties of English: A comparison of educated Indian English and British English. InProceedings of the 9th International Conference on Speech Prosody, 893–897. Poznań, Poland.
     [Google Scholar]
  295. Fujisaki, Hiroya
    1983 Dynamic characteristics of voice fundamental frequency in speech and singing. InThe Production of Speech, Peter F. MacNeilage (ed.), 39–55. New York, NY: Springer. 10.1007/978‑1‑4613‑8202‑7_3
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-8202-7_3 [Google Scholar]
  296. Gabriel, Christoph & Lleó, Conxita
    2011 Intonational Phrasing in Romance and Germanic: Cross-linguistic and Bilingual Studies [Hamburg Sudies in Multilinguialism 10]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/hsm.10
     https://doi.org/10.1075/hsm.10 [Google Scholar]
  297. García Lecumberri , Maria Luisa , Cooke, Martin & Wester, Mirjam
    2017 A bi-directional task-based corpus of learners’ conversational speech. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research4(2): 175–195. 10.1075/ijlcr.3.2.04gar
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ijlcr.3.2.04gar [Google Scholar]
  298. Garellek, Marc & Keating, Patricia
    2015 Phrase-final creak: Articulation, acoustics, and distribution. Tutotialat the 2015 annual meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, 1–35. Portland, OR.
     [Google Scholar]
  299. Gass, Susan M ., Behney, Jennifer & Plonsky, Luke
    2013 Second Language Acquisition: An Introductory Course. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203137093
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203137093 [Google Scholar]
  300. Gibbon, Dafydd
    1998 Intonation in German. InIntonation Systems. A Survey of Twenty Languages, Daniel Hirst & Albert di Cristo (eds), 78–95. Cambridge: CUP.
     [Google Scholar]
  301. Gilbert, Judy B.
    2008 Teaching Pronunciation: Using the Prosody Pyramid. Cambridge: CUP.
     [Google Scholar]
  302. Giles, Howard & Powesland, Peter
    1997 Accommodation Theory. InSociolinguistics: A Reader and Coursebook, Nikolas Coupland & Adam Jaworsky (eds), 232–239. New York, NY: Palgrave. 10.1007/978‑1‑349‑25582‑5_19
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-25582-5_19 [Google Scholar]
  303. Giles, Howard , Coupland, Justine & Coupland, Nikolas
    1991 Accommodation Theory: Communication, context, and consequence. InContexts of Accommodation, Howard Giles , Justine Coupland & Nikolas Coupland (eds), 1–68. Cambridge:CUP. 10.1017/CBO9780511663673.001
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511663673.001 [Google Scholar]
  304. Gilles, Peter
    2005 Regionale Prosodie im Deutschen. Varibilität in der Intonation von Abschluss und Weiterweisung. InLinguistik – Impulse & Tendenzen6, Peter Gilles (ed.). Berlin: De Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
  305. Gilquin, Gaëtanelle , De Cock, Sylvie & Granger, Sylviane
    (eds) 2010 LINDSEI: Louvain International Database of Spoken English Interlanguage. Handbook and CD-ROM. Louvain-la-Neuve: Presses universitaires de Louvain.
     [Google Scholar]
  306. Goldman, Jean-Philippe
    2011 EasyAlign: An automatic phonetic alignment tool under Praat. Proceedings of the International Speech Communication Association, Interspeech 2011, 3233–3236. Firenze, Italy.
     [Google Scholar]
  307. Goldman-Eisler, Frieda
    1968 Psycholinguistics: Experiments in Spontaneous Speech. London: Academic Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  308. González Ardeo , Joseba Mikel
    2003 Attitude towards English and ESP acquisition as an L2 or L3 at university. Ibérica6: 109–133.
     [Google Scholar]
  309. Gordon, Joshua & Darcy, Isabelle
    2016 The development of comprehensible speech in L2 learners: A classroom study on the effects of short-term pronunciation instruction. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation2(1): 56–92. 10.1075/jslp.2.1.03gor
     https://doi.org/10.1075/jslp.2.1.03gor [Google Scholar]
  310. Götz, Sandra
    2013 Fluency in Native and Nonnative English Speech [Studies in Corpus Linguistcs 53]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.53
     https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.53 [Google Scholar]
  311. 2019 Filled pauses across proficiency levels, L1s and learning context variables – A multivariate exploration of the Trinity Lancaster Corpus Sample. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research5(2): 159–180. 10.1075/ijlcr.17018.got
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ijlcr.17018.got [Google Scholar]
  312. Götz, Sandra , Wolk, Christoph & Jäschke, Katja
    2022 Contextualizing fluency in advanced spoken learner language. A contrastive interlanguage analysis across L1s, task types and learning context variables. InComplexity, Accuracy and Fluency in Learner Corpus Research, Agnieszka Leńko-Szymańska & Sandra Götz (eds), 273-298. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
     [Google Scholar]
  313. Götz, Sandra & Mukherjee, Joybrato
    2018 Investigating the effect of the study abroad variable on learner output: A pseudo-longitudinal study on spoken German learner English. InLearner Corpus Research: New Perspectives and Applications, Vaclav Brezina & Lynne Flowerdew (eds), 47–65. London: Bloomsbury.
     [Google Scholar]
  314. Grabe, Esther
    1997 Comparative intonational phonology: English and German. InIntonation: Theory, Models, and Applications. Proceedings of the ESCA Worshop, September 18–20, Athens, Greece, Antonis Botinis (ed.), 157–160. ESCA.
     [Google Scholar]
  315. 1998 Comparative Intonational Phonology: English and German. PhD dissertation, Max-Planck-Institut for Psycholinguistics and University of Nijmegen.
  316. 1998b Pitch accent realization in English and German. Journal of Phonetics26(21): 129–143. 10.1006/jpho.1997.0072
     https://doi.org/10.1006/jpho.1997.0072 [Google Scholar]
  317. 2002 Variation adds to prosodic typology. InProceedings of Speech Prosody 2002, 127–132. Aix-en-Provence, France. 10.21437/SpeechProsody.2002‑18
     https://doi.org/10.21437/SpeechProsody.2002-18 [Google Scholar]
  318. 2004 Intonational variation in urban dialects of English spoken in the British Isles. InRegional Variation in Intonation [Linguistische Arbeiten 492], Peter Gilles & Jörg Peters (eds), 9–31. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
     [Google Scholar]
  319. Grabe, Esther & Low, Ee Ling
    2002 Durational variability in speech and the rhythm class hypothesis. InLaboratory Phonology7, Carlos Gussenhoven & Natasha Warner (eds), 515–546. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
  320. Grabe, Esther & Post, Brechtje
    2002 Intonational variation in English. InProceedings of Speech Prosody 2002, 343–346. Aix-en-Provence, France.
     [Google Scholar]
  321. Grabe, Esther , Kochansky, Greg & Coleman, John
    2005 The intonation of native accent varieties in the British Isles: Potential for miscommunication?InEnglish Pronunciation Models: AChanging Scene [Linguistics Insights: Studies in Language and Communication], Katarzyna Dziubalska-Kolaczyk & Joanna Przedlacka (eds), 311–338. Bern: Peter Lang.
     [Google Scholar]
  322. Grabe, Esther , Post, Brechtje & Nolan, Francis
    2001 The IViE Corpus. Cambridge: University of Cambridge.
     [Google Scholar]
  323. Grabe, Esther , Post, Brechtje , Nolan, Francis & Farrar, Kimberley
    2000 Pitch accent realization in four varieties of British English. Journal of Phonetics28(2): 161–185. 10.1006/jpho.2000.0111
     https://doi.org/10.1006/jpho.2000.0111 [Google Scholar]
  324. Grabe, Esther , Rosner, Burton S ., García-Albea, José E . & Zhou, Xiaolin
    2003 Perception of English intonation by English, Spanish, and Chinese listeners. Language and Speech46(4): 375–401. 10.1177/00238309030460040201
     https://doi.org/10.1177/00238309030460040201 [Google Scholar]
  325. Grabe, Esther , Nolan, Francis & Farrar, Kimberley
    1998 IViE – A comparative transcription system for intonational variation in English. InProceedings of the 5th International Conference on Spoken Language Processing, 1–4. Sydney, Australia. 10.21437/ICSLP.1998‑583
     https://doi.org/10.21437/ICSLP.1998-583 [Google Scholar]
  326. Gráf, Tomáš
    2015 Accuracy and Fluency in the Speech of the Advanced Learner of English. PhD dissertation, Charles University Prague.
  327. 2017 Corpus LINDSEI_CZ. Praha: FF UK.
     [Google Scholar]
  328. 2019 Speech rate revisited: The effect of task design on speech rate. InLearner Corpora and Language Teaching [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 92], Sandra Götz & Joybrato Mukherjee (eds), 175–189. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.92.09gra
     https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.92.09gra [Google Scholar]
  329. Gráf, Tomáš & Huang, Lan-Fen
    2019 Repeats in native and learner English. InFluency and Disfluency across Languages and Language Varieties [Corpora and Language in Use – Proceedings 4], Liesbeth Degand , Gaëtanelle Gilquin , Laurence Meurant & Anne Catherine Simon (eds), 219–241. Louvain-la-Neuve: Presses universitaires de Louvain.
     [Google Scholar]
  330. Graham, Calbert
    2013 Revisiting f0 range production in Japanese-English simultaneous bilinguals. UC Berkeley Phonology Lab Annual Report, 110-125.
     [Google Scholar]
  331. Graham, Calbert & Post, Brechtje
    2018 Second language acquisition of intonation: Peak alignment in American English. Journal of Phonetics66: 1–14. 10.1016/j.wocn.2017.08.002
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2017.08.002 [Google Scholar]
  332. Granena, Gisela & Long, Michael H.
    2012 Age of onset, length of residence, language aptitude, and ultimate L2 attainment in three linguistic domains. Second Language Research29(3): 311–343. 10.1177/0267658312461497
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658312461497 [Google Scholar]
  333. Granger, Sylviane
    1996 From CA to CIA and back: An integrated approach to computerized bilingual and learner corpora. InLanguages in Contrast. Text-based Cross-linguistic Studies, Karin Aijmer (ed.), 37–51. Lund: Lund University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  334. 1998 The computer learner corpus: A versatile new source of data for SLA research. InLearner English on Computer, Sylviane Granger (ed.), 3–18. London: Longman.
     [Google Scholar]
  335. 2004 Computer learner corpus research: Current status and future prospects. InApplied Corpus Linguistics: A Multidimensional Perspective, Ulla Connor & Thomas A. Upton (eds), 123–145. Amsterdam: Rodopi. 10.1163/9789004333772_008
     https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004333772_008 [Google Scholar]
  336. 2015 Contrastive interlanguage analysis: A reappraisal. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research1(1): 7–24. 10.1075/ijlcr.1.1.01gra
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ijlcr.1.1.01gra [Google Scholar]
  337. 2021 Have learner corpus research and second language acquisition finally met?InLearner Corpus Research Meets Second Language Acquisition, Le Bruyn, Bert & Paquot, Magali (eds), 243–257. Cambridge: CUP.
     [Google Scholar]
  338. Granger, Sylviane , Gilquin, Gaëtanelle & Meunier, Fanny
    2016 The Cambridge Handbook of Learner Corpus Research. Cambridge: CUP.
     [Google Scholar]
  339. Granger, Sylviane , Hung, Joseph & Petch-Tyson, Stephanie
    (eds) 2002 Computer Learner Corpora, Second Language Acquisition and Foreign Language Teaching [Language Learning & Language Teaching 6]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/lllt.6
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.6 [Google Scholar]
  340. Granget, Cyrille & Delais-Roussarie, Elisabeth
    2022 Does Japanese/German L1 metrical and tonal structure constrain the acquisition of French L2 morphology?Languages7(4): 1–22. 10.3390/languages7040305
     https://doi.org/10.3390/languages7040305 [Google Scholar]
  341. Gravano, Agustín & Hirschberg, Julia
    2009 Backchannel-inviting cues in task-oriented dialogue. InProceedings of the 10th International Speech Communication Association, 1019–1022. Brighton, UK. 10.21437/Interspeech.2009‑301
     https://doi.org/10.21437/Interspeech.2009-301 [Google Scholar]
  342. Grice, H. Paul
    1975 Logic and conversation. InSyntax and Semantics, 3: Speech Acts, Peter Cole & Jerry L. Morgan (eds), 41–58. New York, NY: Academic Press. 10.1163/9789004368811_003
     https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004368811_003 [Google Scholar]
  343. Grice, Martine & Baumann, Stefan
    2002 Deutsche Intonation und GToBI. LinguistischeBerichte191: 267–298.
     [Google Scholar]
  344. Grice, Martine & Baumann, Stefan
    2007 An introduction to intonation – Functions and models. InNon-Native Prosody – Phonetic Description and Teaching Practice, Jürgen Trouvain & Ulrike Gut (eds), 25–51. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110198751.1.25
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110198751.1.25 [Google Scholar]
  345. Grice, Martine , Baumann, Stefan & Benzmüller, Ralf
    2005 German intonation in autosegmental -Metrical phonology. InProsodic Typology, Sun-Ah Jun (ed.), 55–83. Oxford: OUP. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199249633.003.0003
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199249633.003.0003 [Google Scholar]
  346. Grice, Martine , Reyelt, Matthias , Benzmüller, Ralf , Mayer, Jörg & Batliner, Anton
    1996 Consistency in transcription and labelling of German intonation with GToBI. InProceedings of the 4th International Conference on Spoken Language Processing, ICSLP 1996, 1716–1719. Philadelphia, PA.
     [Google Scholar]
  347. Grice, Martine , Ritter, Simon , Niemann, Henrik & Roettger, Timo B.
    2017 Integrating the discreteness and continuity of intonational categories. Journal of Phonetics64: 90–107. 10.1016/j.wocn.2017.03.003
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2017.03.003 [Google Scholar]
  348. Grice, Martine , Sneed German, James & Warren, Paul
    2020 Intonation systems across varieties of English. InThe Oxford Handbook of Language Prosody, Carlos Gussenhoven & Aoju Chen (eds), 285–302. Oxford: OUP.
     [Google Scholar]
  349. Gries, Stefan Th
    2013 Statistics for Linguistics with R. A Practical Introduction. Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110307474
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110307474 [Google Scholar]
  350. Grieve, Averil
    2010 ‘Aber ganz ehrlich‘: Differences in episodic structure, apologies and truth-orientation in German and Australian workplace telephone discourse. Journal of Pragmatics42(1): 190–219. 10.1016/j.pragma.2009.05.009
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2009.05.009 [Google Scholar]
  351. Grosser, Wolfgang
    1982 Intonatorische Inteferenzerscheinungen Deutsch – English. Wien: Verband der Wissenschaftlichen Gesellschaften Österreichs.
     [Google Scholar]
  352. 1989 Akzentuierung und Intonation im englischen L2-Erwerb österreichischer Lerner [Salzburger Studien zur Anglistik und Amerikanistik 9]. Salzburg: University of Salzburg.
     [Google Scholar]
  353. 1993 Aspectsofintonational L2 acquisition. InCurrent Issues in European Second Language Acquisition Research, Bernhard Kettemann & Wilfried Wieden (eds), 81–94. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.
     [Google Scholar]
  354. 1997 On the acquisition of tonal and accentual features of English by Austrian learners. InSecond Language Speech: Structure and Process, Allan James & Jonathan Leather (eds), 207–224. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110882933.211
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110882933.211 [Google Scholar]
  355. Grosvald, Michael
    2009 Inter-speaker variation in the extent and perception of long-distance vowel-to-vowel coarticulation. Journal of Phonetics37(2): 173–188. 10.1016/j.wocn.2009.01.002
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2009.01.002 [Google Scholar]
  356. Grover, Cynthia , Jamieson, Donald G . & Dobrovolsky, Michael B.
    1987 Intonation in English, French, and German: Perception and production. Language and Speech30(3): 277–295. 10.1177/002383098703000307
     https://doi.org/10.1177/002383098703000307 [Google Scholar]
  357. Gumperz, John J.
    1982 Discourse Strategies [Studies in Interactional Sociolinguistics 1]. Cambridge: CUP. 10.1017/CBO9780511611834
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511611834 [Google Scholar]
  358. Gunlogson, Christine A.
    2001 True to Form: Rising and Falling Declaratives as Questions in English. PhD dissertation, University of California at Santa Cruz.
  359. Gussenhoven, Carlos
    1984 On the Grammar and Semantics of Sentence Accents. Dordrecht: Foris. 10.1515/9783110859263
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110859263 [Google Scholar]
  360. 2002 Intonation and interpretation: Phonetics and phonology. InProceedings of Speech Prosody 2002, 47–57. Aix-en-Provence, France.
     [Google Scholar]
  361. Gussenhoven, Carlos
    2004 The Phonology of Tone and Intonation. Cambridge: CUP. 10.1017/CBO9780511616983
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511616983 [Google Scholar]
  362. Gut, Ulrike
    2000 On the acquisition of rhythmic structure. InNew Sounds 2000. Proceedings of the 4th Internation Symposium on the Acquisition of Second Language Speech, Allan James & Jonatan Leather (eds),148–154. Klagenfurt: University of Klagenfurt.
     [Google Scholar]
  363. 2007 Sprachkorpora im Phonetikunterricht. Zeitschrift für Interkulturellen Fremdsprachenunterricht12(2): 1–21.
     [Google Scholar]
  364. 2009 Non-Native Speech: A Corpus-Based Analysis of Phonological and Phonetic Properties of L2 English and German. Frankfurt: Peter Lang. 10.3726/978‑3‑653‑01155‑5
     https://doi.org/10.3726/978-3-653-01155-5 [Google Scholar]
  365. 2010 The LeaP corpus. A phonetically annotated corpus of non-native speech. wwwhomes.uni-bielefeld.de/gibbon/Docs/LeapCorpus_Manual.pdf (30March 2015).
     [Google Scholar]
  366. 2012 The LeaP corpus: A multilingual corpus of spoken learner German and learner English. InMultilingual Corpora and Multilingual Corpus Analysis [Hamburg Studies on Multilingualism 14], Thomas Schmidt & Kai Wörner (eds), 3–23. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/hsm.14.03gut
     https://doi.org/10.1075/hsm.14.03gut [Google Scholar]
  367. 2014 Corpus phonology and second language acquisition. InThe Oxford Handbook of Corpus Phonology, Jacques Durand , Ulrike Gut & Gjert Kristoffersen (eds), 286–301. Oxford: OUP.
     [Google Scholar]
  368. 2017 Phonological development in different learning contexts – A corpus-based study. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research3(2): 196–222. 10.1075/ijlcr.3.2.05gut
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ijlcr.3.2.05gut [Google Scholar]
  369. Gut, Ulrike , Trouvain, Jürgen & Barry, William J.
    2007 Bridging research on phonetic descriptions with knowledge from teaching practice – The case of prosody in non-native speech. InNon-Native Prosody: Phonetic Description and Teaching Practice [Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs 186], Jürgen Trouvain & Ulrike Gut (eds), 3–24. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110198751.0.3
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110198751.0.3 [Google Scholar]
  370. Gutiérrez Díez, Francisco
    1982 Bases para una comparación de la prosodia del catalán, el castellano y el ingles. PhD dissertation, University of Barcelona.
  371. 1983 Aspectos lingüísticos de la segmentación del tone en ingles, castellano y catalán. InActas del primer Congreso Nacional de Lingüística Aplicada, 179–181. Murcia, Spain.
     [Google Scholar]
  372. 1995 La function demarcative de la entonaciónen ingles castellano y catalán. Murcia: Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Murcia.
     [Google Scholar]
  373. 2005 Intonation focus in the interlanguage of a group of Spanish learners of English. Revista Alicantina de Estudios Ingleses18(1): 127–147. 10.14198/raei.2005.18.06
     https://doi.org/10.14198/raei.2005.18.06 [Google Scholar]
  374. 2008 Contrastive intonation and error analysis. Tonality and tonicity in the interlanguage of a group of Spanish learners of English. InLanguages and Cultures in Contrast and Comparison [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series175], María de los Ángeles Gómez González , John Lachlan Mackenzie & Elsa M. González Álvarez (eds), 327–354. Amsterdam: Johnson Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.175.17die
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.175.17die [Google Scholar]
  375. 2012 Trouble spots in the learning of English intonation by Spanish speakers. Tonality and tonicity. InPragmatics and Prosody in English Language Teaching, Jesús Romero-Trillo (ed.), 219–230. Dodrecht: Springer. 10.1007/978‑94‑007‑3883‑6_13
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-3883-6_13 [Google Scholar]
  376. Guy, Gregory & Vonwiller, Julia
    1989 The high rising tone in Australian English. InAustralian English, Peter Collins & David Blair (eds),21–34. St. Lucia: University of Queensland Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  377. Guy, Gregory , Horvath, Barbara , Vonwiller, Julia , Daisley, Elaine & Rogers, Inge
    1986 An intonational change in Australian English. Language in Society15(1): 23–51. 10.1017/S0047404500011635
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500011635 [Google Scholar]
  378. Hála, Bohuslav
    1967 Výslovnost spisovné čeŝtiny: Zásady a pravidla. Výslovnost slov českých Díl I. Praha: Academia.
     [Google Scholar]
  379. Halliday, Michael Alexander Kirkwood
    1963 Intonation in English grammar. Transactions of the Philological Society62(1): 143–169. 10.1111/j.1467‑968X.1963.tb01003.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-968X.1963.tb01003.x [Google Scholar]
  380. 1967 Intonation and Grammar in British English. The Hague: Mouton. 10.1515/9783111357447
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783111357447 [Google Scholar]
  381. 1970 A Course in Spoken English: Intonation. London: OUP.
     [Google Scholar]
  382. Han, Zhao Hong
    2009 Interlanguage and fossilization: Towards an analytic model. InContemporary Applied Linguistics, 1: Language Teaching and Learning, Vivian Cook & Li Wei (eds), 137–162. London: Continuum.
     [Google Scholar]
  383. 2013 Forty years later: Updating the Fossilization Hypothesis. Language Teaching46(2): 133–171. 10.1017/S0261444812000511
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444812000511 [Google Scholar]
  384. Hardison, Debra M.
    2004 Generalization of computer-assisted prosody training: Quantitative and qualitative findings. Language Learning and Technology8(1): 34–52.
     [Google Scholar]
  385. 2005 Contextualized computer-based L2 prosody training: Evaluating the effects of discourse context and video input. CALICO Journal22(2): 175–190. 10.1558/cj.v22i2.175‑190
     https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.v22i2.175-190 [Google Scholar]
  386. Hartshorne, Joshua K ., Tenenbaum, Joshua B . & Pinker, Steven
    2018 A critical period for second language acquisition: Evidence from 2/3 million English speakers. Cognition177: 263–277. 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.04.007
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2018.04.007 [Google Scholar]
  387. Havlík, Martin
    2020 Jak čeští mluvčí ’uptalkují’?Presentation, 23March 2020 <https://ufal.mff.cuni.cz/events/jak-cesti-mluvci-uptalkuji> (24January 2022).
     [Google Scholar]
  388. Headlandová Kalischová, Irena
    2009 Intonation Centre Placement in English Utterances of Czech Speakers. PhD dissertation, Masaryk University Brno.
  389. Henderson, Alice , Frost, Dan , Tergujeff, Elina , Kautzsch, Alexander , Murphy, Deirdre J ., Kirkova-Naskova, Anastazija , Waniek-Klimczak, Ewa , Levey, David , Cunningham, Una & Curnick, Lesley
    2012 The English pronunciation teaching in Europe survey: Selected results. Research in Language10(1): 5–27. 10.2478/v10015‑011‑0047‑4
     https://doi.org/10.2478/v10015-011-0047-4 [Google Scholar]
  390. Henriksen, Nicholas C ., Geeslin, Kimberly L . & Willis, Erik W.
    2010 The development of L2 Spanish intonation during a study abroad immersion program in León, Spain. Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics3(1): 113–162. 10.1515/shll‑2010‑1067
     https://doi.org/10.1515/shll-2010-1067 [Google Scholar]
  391. Henton, Caroline G.
    1989 Fact and fiction in the description of female and male speech. Language and Communication9(4): 299–311. 10.1016/0271‑5309(89)90026‑8
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0271-5309(89)90026-8 [Google Scholar]
  392. 1995 Pitch dynamism in female and male speech. Language and Communication15(1): 43–61. 10.1016/0271‑5309(94)00011‑Z
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0271-5309(94)00011-Z [Google Scholar]
  393. Hewings, Martin
    1995 Tone choice in the English intonation of non-native speakers. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching33(3): 251–265.
     [Google Scholar]
  394. Hilton, Heather
    2014 Oral fluency and spoken proficiency: Considerations for research and testing. InMeasuring L2 Proficiency: Perspectives from SLA, Amanda Edmonds , Heather Hilton & Pascale Leclercq (eds), 27–53. Bristol: Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781783092291‑005
     https://doi.org/10.21832/9781783092291-005 [Google Scholar]
  395. Hincks, Rebecca
    2004 Processing the prosody of oral presentations. InProceedings of InSTIL/ICALL NLP and Speech Technologies in Advanced Language Learning Systems2004, 63–66. Venice, Italy.
     [Google Scholar]
  396. Hincks, Rebecca & Edlund, Jens
    2009 Promoting increased pitch variation in oral presentations with transient visual feedback. Language Learning & Technology13(3): 32–50.
     [Google Scholar]
  397. Hirschberg, Julia
    2000 A corpus-based approach to the study of speaking style. InProsody: Theory and Experiment. Studies Presented to Gösta Bruce, Merle Horne (ed.),335–350. Dordrecht: Kluwer. 10.1007/978‑94‑015‑9413‑4_12
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9413-4_12 [Google Scholar]
  398. Hirschfeld, Ulla & Trouvain, Jürgen
    2007 Teaching prosody in German as foreign language. InNon-Native Prosody – Phonetic Description and Teaching Practice, Jürgen Trouvain & Ulrike Gut (eds),171–187. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110198751.2.171
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110198751.2.171 [Google Scholar]
  399. Hirson, Allen , French, Peter & Howard, David M.
    1995 Speech fundamental frequency over the telephone and face-to-face: Some implications for forensic phonetics. InStudies in General and English Phonetics.Essays in Honour of Professor J.D. O’Connor, Jack Windsor Lewis (ed.), 230–240. London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  400. Hirst, Daniel , Auran, Cyril & Bouzon, Caroline
    2009 The Aix-MARSEC Database, 2002–2004. Tech. Report, Equipe Prosodie et Représentation Formelle du Langage, Laboratoire CNRS UMR 6057 Parole et Langage, Université de Provence, Aix-en-Provence.
     [Google Scholar]
  401. Hirst, Daniel & di Cristo, Albert
    1998 A survey of intonation systems. InIntonation Systems. A Survey of Twenty Languages, Daniel Hirst & Albert di Cristo (eds), 1–44. Cambridge: CUP.
     [Google Scholar]
  402. Hoff, Meagan A.
    2014 Ethnic Identity and Accent: Exploring Phonological Acquisition for International Students from China. MA thesis, Bowling Green State University.
     [Google Scholar]
  403. Holguín Mendoza, Claudia
    2011 Language, Gender, and Identity Construction: Sociolinguistic Dynamics in the Borderlands. PhD dissertation, University of Illinois.
  404. Hollien, Harry
    1990 Acoustics of Crime: The New Science of Forensic Phonetics. New York, NY: Springer. 10.1007/978‑1‑4899‑0673‑1
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-0673-1 [Google Scholar]
  405. Hollien, Harry & Paul, Patricia
    1969 A second evaluation of the speaking fundamental frequency characteristics of post-adolescent girls. Language and Speech12(2): 119–124. 10.1177/002383096901200204
     https://doi.org/10.1177/002383096901200204 [Google Scholar]
  406. Hollien, Harry & Shipp, Thomas
    1972 Speaking fundamental frequency and chronological age in males. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research15(1): 155–159. 10.1044/jshr.1501.155
     https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.1501.155 [Google Scholar]
  407. Hollien, Harry , Hollien, Patricia A . & de Jong, Gea
    1997 Effects of three parameters on speaking fundamental frequency. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America102(5–1): 2984–2992. 10.1121/1.420353
     https://doi.org/10.1121/1.420353 [Google Scholar]
  408. Holmes, Janet
    1995 Women, Men and Politeness. London: Longman.
     [Google Scholar]
  409. Horgues, Celine
    2013 French learners of L2 English: Intonation boundaries and the marking of lexical stress. Research in Language11(1): 41–56. 10.2478/v10015‑012‑0006‑8
     https://doi.org/10.2478/v10015-012-0006-8 [Google Scholar]
  410. Horvath, Barbara M.
    1985 Variation in Australian English: The Sociolects of Sydney. Cambridge:CUP.
     [Google Scholar]
  411. Hosmer, David W . & Lemeshow, Stanley
    2000 Applied Logistic Regression, 2nd edn.New York, NY: Wiley & Sons. 10.1002/0471722146
     https://doi.org/10.1002/0471722146 [Google Scholar]
  412. House, Jill
    2006 Constructing a context with intonation. Journal of Pragmatics38(10): 1542–1558. 10.1016/j.pragma.2005.07.005
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2005.07.005 [Google Scholar]
  413. Housen, Alex & Kuiken, Folkert
    2009 Complexity, accuracy, and fluency in second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics30(4): 461–473. 10.1093/applin/amp048
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amp048 [Google Scholar]
  414. Howell, David. C
    2013 Statistical Methods for Psychology. 8th edn.Andover, Hampshire: Cengage Learning.
     [Google Scholar]
  415. Howell, Peter & Kadi-Hanifi, Karima
    1991 Comparison of prosodic properties between read and spontaneous speech. Speech Communication10(2): 163–169. 10.1016/0167‑6393(91)90039‑V
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6393(91)90039-V [Google Scholar]
  416. Hualde, José Ignacio
    2002 Intonation in Spanish and the other Ibero-Romance languages: Overview and status quaestionis. InRomance Phonology and Variation.Selected Papers from the 30th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 217], Caroline R. Wiltshire & Joaquim Camps (eds), 101–115. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.217.10hua
     https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.217.10hua [Google Scholar]
  417. 2005 The Sounds of Spanish. Cambridge: CUP.
     [Google Scholar]
  418. Hualde, José I . & Prieto, Pilar
    2016 Towards an International Prosodic Alphabet (IPrA). Laboratory Phonology: Journal of the Association for Laboratory Phonology7(1): 1–25. 10.5334/labphon.11
     https://doi.org/10.5334/labphon.11 [Google Scholar]
  419. Huang, Lan-Fen & Gráf, Tomáš
    2021 Expanding LINDSEI to spoken learner English from several L1s across CEFR levels. Corpora16(2): 271–285. 10.3366/cor.2021.0220
     https://doi.org/10.3366/cor.2021.0220 [Google Scholar]
  420. Huang, Lan-Fen
    2019 The construction of spoken English learner corpus from several L1s across CEFR levels. The Ministry of Science and Technology, Republic of China. Grant number: MOST 107–2410-H-012-001. Grant amount: USD 23000, Republic of China Naval Academy, Duration: 1 Aug 2018–30 September 2019.
     [Google Scholar]
  421. Huang, Lan-Fen , Kubelec, Simon , Keng, Nicole & Hsu, Lung-Hsun
    2018 Evaluating CEFR rater performance through the analysis of spoken learner corpora. Language Testing in Asia8(14): 1–17. 10.1186/s40468‑018‑0069‑0
     https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-018-0069-0 [Google Scholar]
  422. Hudson, Toby , de Jong, Gea , McDougall, Kirsty , Harrison, Philip & Nolan, Francis
    2007 F0 statistics for 100 young male speakers of standard southern British English. InProceedings of the 16th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, ICPhS 2007, 1809–1812. Saarbrücken, Germany.
     [Google Scholar]
  423. Hulstijn, Jan H . & Marchena, Elaine
    1989 Avoidance: Grammatical or semantic causes?Studies in Second Language Acquisition11(3): 241–255. 10.1017/S0272263100008123
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100008123 [Google Scholar]
  424. Hunter, Ann-Marie
    2017 Fluency Development in the ESL Classroom: The Impact of Immediate Task Repetition and Procedural Repetition on Learners’ Oral Fluency. PhD dissertation, University of Surrey.
  425. Hurford, James R.
    1991 The evolution of the critical period for language acquisition. Cognition40(3): 159–201. 10.1016/0010‑0277(91)90024‑X
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(91)90024-X [Google Scholar]
  426. Hyltenstam, Kenneth & Abrahamsson, Niclas
    2000 Who can become native-like in a second language? All, some, or none? On the maturational constraints controversy in second language acquisition. Studia Linguistica54(2): 150–166. 10.1111/1467‑9582.00056
     https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9582.00056 [Google Scholar]
  427. 2003 Maturational constraints in SLA. InThe Handbook of Second Language Acquisition, Catherine Doughty & Michael H. Long (eds), 539–588. Malden, MA: Blackwell. 10.1002/9780470756492.ch17
     https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470756492.ch17 [Google Scholar]
  428. Ibarraran, Amaia , Lasagabaster, David & Sierra, Juan Manuel
    2008 Multilingualism and language attitudes: Local versus immigrant students’ perceptions. Language Awareness17(4): 326–341. 10.1080/09658410802147311
     https://doi.org/10.1080/09658410802147311 [Google Scholar]
  429. Idsardi, William James
    1992 The Computation of Prosody. PhD dissertation, University of Toronto.
  430. Ioup, Georgette , Boustagui, Elizabeth , El Tigi, Manal & Moselle, Martha
    1994 Reexamining the Critical Period Hypothesis: A case study of successful adult SLA in a naturalistic environment. Studies in Second Language Acquisition16(1): 73–98. 10.1017/S0272263100012596
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100012596 [Google Scholar]
  431. Ishikawa, Shin’ichiro
    2015 Lexical development in L2 English learners’ speeches and writings. Procedia198: 202–210. 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.437
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.437 [Google Scholar]
  432. J. Murrey Atkins Library
    2019 New South Voices Collection. The University of North Carolina at Charlotte.
     [Google Scholar]
  433. Jacewicz, Ewa , Fox, Robert A . & O’Neill, Caitlin
    2009 Articulation rate across dialect, age, and gender. Language Variation and Change21(2): 233–256. 10.1017/S0954394509990093
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394509990093 [Google Scholar]
  434. Jacewicz, Ewa , Fox, Robert Allen & Wei, Lai
    2010 Between-speaker and within-speaker variation in speech tempo of American English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America128(2): 839–850. 10.1121/1.3459842
     https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3459842 [Google Scholar]
  435. Jakšič, Jan & Šturm, Pavel
    2017 Accents of English at Czech schools: Students’ attitudes and recognition skills. Research in Language15(4): 353–369. 10.1515/rela‑2017‑0020
     https://doi.org/10.1515/rela-2017-0020 [Google Scholar]
  436. James, Eric , Mahut, Christopher & Latkiewitcz, George
    1989 The investigation of an apparently new intonation pattern in Toronto English. Information Communication10: 11–17.
     [Google Scholar]
  437. Jansen, Wouter , Gregory, Michelle L . & Brenier, Jason M.
    2001 Prosodic correlates of directly reported speech: Evidence from conversational speech. InITRW on Prosody in Speech Recognition and Understanding, paper 14. Red Bank, NJ.
     [Google Scholar]
  438. Järvinen, Kati , Laukkanen, Anna-Maria & Aaltonen, Olli
    2013 Speaking a foreign language and its effect on F0 . Logopedics Phoniatrics Vocology38(2): 47–51. 10.3109/14015439.2012.687764
     https://doi.org/10.3109/14015439.2012.687764 [Google Scholar]
  439. Jarvis, Scott & Pavlenko, Aneta
    2009 Crosslinguistic Influence in Language and Cognition. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  440. Jenkins, Jennifer
    2002 A sociolinguistically based, empirically researched pronunciation syllabus for English as an International Language. Applied Linguistics23(1): 83–103. 10.1093/applin/23.1.83
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/23.1.83 [Google Scholar]
  441. Jessen, Michael , Köster, Olaf & Gfroerer, Stefan
    2005 Influence of vocal effort on average and variability of fundamental frequency. International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law12(2): 174–213. 10.1558/sll.2005.12.2.174
     https://doi.org/10.1558/sll.2005.12.2.174 [Google Scholar]
  442. Jiang, Mei , Green, Raymond J ., Henley, Tracy B . & Masten, William G.
    2009 Acculturation in relation to the acquisition of a second language. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development30(6): 481–492. 10.1080/01434630903147898
     https://doi.org/10.1080/01434630903147898 [Google Scholar]
  443. Jiang, Xiaoming , & Pell, Marc D.
    2017 The sound of confidence and doubt. Speech Communication88: 106–126. 10.1016/j.specom.2017.01.011
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.specom.2017.01.011 [Google Scholar]
  444. Jilka, Matthias
    2000 The Contribution of Intonation to the Perception of Foreign Accent. PhD dissertation, Stuttgart University.
  445. 2007 Different manifestations and perceptions of foreign accent in intonation. InNon-Native Prosody – Phonetic Description and Teaching Practice [Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs 186], Jürgen Trouvain & Ulrike Gut (eds), 77–96. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110198751.1.77
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110198751.1.77 [Google Scholar]
  446. Jiménez Vilches, Raúl
    2017 Analysing four prosodic forms to convey the pragmatic function of dominance and control in L2 monologic discourse. EPiC Series in Language and Linguistics2: 199–213. 10.29007/rs8q
     https://doi.org/10.29007/rs8q [Google Scholar]
  447. Jiránková, Lucie , Gráf, Tomáš & Kvítková, Alena
    2019 On the relation between L1 and L2 speech rate. InWidening the Scope of Learner Corpus Research.Selected Papers from the Fourth Learner Corpus Research Conference. Corpora and Language in Use – Proceedings 5, Andrea Abel , Alvars Glaznieks , Verena Lyding & Lionel Nicolas (eds), (pp.19–41). Louvain-la-Neuve: Presses universitaires de Louvain.
     [Google Scholar]
  448. Jiřelová, Karolina
    2018 Language Transfer and Fluency. Diploma thesis, Charles University Prague.
     [Google Scholar]
  449. Johnson, Jacqueline S . & Newport, Elissa L.
    1989 Critical period effects in second language learning: The influence of maturational state on the acquisition of English as a second language. Cognitive Psycho1ogy21(1): 60–99. 10.1016/0010‑0285(89)90003‑0
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(89)90003-0 [Google Scholar]
  450. Jun, Sun-Ah
    2005 Prosodic typology: The phonology of intonation and phrasing. Oxford: OUP.
     [Google Scholar]
  451. 2014 Prosodic typology: By prominence type, word prosody, and macro-rhythm. InProsodic Typology II, Sun-Ah Jun (ed.), 520–539. Oxford: OUP. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199567300.003.0017
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199567300.003.0017 [Google Scholar]
  452. 2022 The ToBI transcription system: Conventions, strengths, and challenges. InProsodic Theory and Practice, Jonathan Barnes & Stefanie Shattuck-Hufnagel (eds), 151–211. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/10413.003.0007
     https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/10413.003.0007 [Google Scholar]
  453. Jun, Sun-Ah & Fletcher, Janet
    2014 Methodology of studying intonation: From data collection to data analysis. InProsodic Typology, II: The New Development in the Phonology of Intonation and Phrasing, Sun-Ah Jun (ed.), 493–519. Oxford: OUP. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199567300.003.0016
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199567300.003.0016 [Google Scholar]
  454. Jun, Sun-Ah & Oh, Mira
    2000 Acquisition of second language intonation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America107(5): 2802–2803. 10.1121/1.429024
     https://doi.org/10.1121/1.429024 [Google Scholar]
  455. Kachru, Braj B.
    1996 World Englishes: Agony and ecstasy. Journal of Aesthetic Education30(2): 135–155. 10.2307/3333196
     https://doi.org/10.2307/3333196 [Google Scholar]
  456. Kang, Okim
    2010 Relative salience of suprasegmental features on judgments of L2 comprehensibility and accentedness. System38(2): 301–315. 10.1016/j.system.2010.01.005
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2010.01.005 [Google Scholar]
  457. 2013 Linguistic analysis of speaking features distinguishing general English exams at CEFR levels B1 to C2 and examinee L1 backgrounds. Research Notes52: 40–48.
     [Google Scholar]
  458. Kang, Okim , Rubin, Don O.N . & Pickering, Lucy
    2010 Suprasegmental measures of accentedness and judgements of language learner proficiency in oral English. The Modern Language Journal94(4): 554–566. 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.2010.01091.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2010.01091.x [Google Scholar]
  459. Kartushina, Natalia & Frauenfelder, Ulrich H.
    2014 On the effects of L2 perception and of individual differences in L1 production on L2 pronunciation. Frontiers in Psychology5: 1–17. 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01246
     https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01246 [Google Scholar]
  460. Kasper, Gabriele
    1981 Pragmatische Aspekte in der Interimsprache. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.
     [Google Scholar]
  461. Kehrein, Roland
    2002 Prosodie und Emotionen [Germanistische Linguistik 231]. Berlin:De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110940763
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110940763 [Google Scholar]
  462. Kelly, Niamh
    2022 Change across time in L2 intonation vs. segments: A longitudinal study of the English of Ole Gunnar Solskjaer. Languages7(3): 1–17. 10.3390/languages7030210
     https://doi.org/10.3390/languages7030210 [Google Scholar]
  463. Kelm, Orlando R.
    1995 Acoustic measurements of Spanish and English pitch contours: Native and non-native speakers. Hispanic Linguistics6(7): 435–448.
     [Google Scholar]
  464. Kennedy, Sara & Trofimovich, Pavel
    2008 Intelligibility, comprehensibility, and accentedness of L2 speech: The role of listener experience and semantic context. The Canadian Modern Language Review64(3): 459–489. 10.3138/cmlr.64.3.459
     https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.64.3.459 [Google Scholar]
  465. Kim, Midam
    2012 Phonetic Accommodation after Auditory Exposure to Native and Nonnative Speech. PhD dissertation, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.
  466. Kim, Midam , Horton, William S . & Bradlow, Ann R.
    2011 Phonetic convergence in spontaneous conversations as a function of interlocutor language distance. Laboratory Phonology2(1): 125–156. 10.1515/labphon.2011.004
     https://doi.org/10.1515/labphon.2011.004 [Google Scholar]
  467. Kim, Ji Young
    2023 Spanish-English cross-linguistic influence on heritage bilinguals’ production of uptalk. Languages8(22): 165–189. 10.3390/languages8010022
     https://doi.org/10.3390/languages8010022 [Google Scholar]
  468. Kim, Ji Young & Repiso-Puigdelliura, Gemma
    2021 Keeping a critical eye on majority language influence: The case of uptalk inheritage Spanish. Languages6(1): 1–27. 10.3390/languages6010013
     https://doi.org/10.3390/languages6010013 [Google Scholar]
  469. Kingdon, Roger
    1958 The Groundwork of English Intonation. London: Longman.
     [Google Scholar]
  470. Kjellmer, Göran
    2003 Hesitation. In defence of er and erm . English Studies84(2): 171–198. 10.1076/enst.84.2.170.14903
     https://doi.org/10.1076/enst.84.2.170.14903 [Google Scholar]
  471. Klein, Wolfgang & Perdue, Clive
    1997 The basic variety (or: Couldn’t natural languages be much simpler?). Second Language Research13(4): 301–347. 10.1191/026765897666879396
     https://doi.org/10.1191/026765897666879396 [Google Scholar]
  472. Klewitz, Gabriele & Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth
    1999 Quote-unquote. The role of prosody in the contextualization of reported speech sequences. Pragmatics9(4): 459–485.
     [Google Scholar]
  473. Knoll, Monja A . & Costall, Alan
    2015 Characterising F(0) contour shape in infant-and foreigner-directed speech. Speech Communication66: 231–243. 10.1016/j.specom.2014.10.007
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.specom.2014.10.007 [Google Scholar]
  474. Knoll, Monja A . & Uther, Maria
    2004 Motherese and Chinese: Evidence for acoustic changes in speech directed at infants and foreigners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America116(4): 2522. 10.1121/1.4785064
     https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4785064 [Google Scholar]
  475. Knoll, Monja A ., Uther, Maria , MacLeod, Norman , O’Neill, Mark & Walsh, Stig
    2006 Emotional, linguistic or just cute? The function of pitch contours in infant- and foreigner-directed speech. InProceedings of Speech Prosody 2006, 165–168. Dresden, Germany. 10.21437/SpeechProsody.2006‑54
     https://doi.org/10.21437/SpeechProsody.2006-54 [Google Scholar]
  476. Knowles, Gerald
    1973 Scouse: The Urban Dialect of Liverpool. PhD dissertation, University of Leeds.
  477. Kohler, Klaus J.
    1983 Stress-timing and speech rate in German: A productionmodel. Arbeitsberichte Institut für Phonetik und digitale Sprachverarbeitung Kiel20: 7–53. Kiel: Kiel University.
     [Google Scholar]
  478. 1986 Parameters of speech rate perception in German words and sentences: Duration, F0 movement and F0 level. Lang Speech29(2): 115–139. 10.1177/002383098602900202
     https://doi.org/10.1177/002383098602900202 [Google Scholar]
  479. 1994 Glottal stops and glottalization in German: Data and theory of connected speech processes. Phonetica51(1–3): 38–51. 10.1159/000261957
     https://doi.org/10.1159/000261957 [Google Scholar]
  480. Kornder, Lisa & Mennen, Ineke
    2021 Longitudinal developments in bilingual second language acquisition and first language attrition of speech: The case of Arnold Schwarzenegger. Languages6(2): 1–25. 10.3390/languages6020061
     https://doi.org/10.3390/languages6020061 [Google Scholar]
  481. Kreidel, Charles W.
    2004 The Pronunciation of English: A Course Book, 2nd edn.Oxford: Blackwell. 10.1002/9780470759264
     https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470759264 [Google Scholar]
  482. Krippendorff, Klaus
    2004 Content Analysis: An Introduction to its Methodology, 2nd edn.Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
     [Google Scholar]
  483. Künzel, Hermann J.
    1989 How well does average fundamental frequency correlate with speaker height and weight?Phonetica46(1–3): 117–125. 10.1159/000261832
     https://doi.org/10.1159/000261832 [Google Scholar]
  484. 1997 Some general phonetic and forensic aspects of speaking tempo. Forensic Linguistics4(1): 48–83. 10.1558/ijsll.v4i1.48
     https://doi.org/10.1558/ijsll.v4i1.48 [Google Scholar]
  485. Kyle, Kristopher & Crossley, Scott A.
    2015 Automatically assessing lexical sophistication: Indices, tools, findings, and application. TESOL Quarterly49(4): 757–786. 10.1002/tesq.194
     https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.194 [Google Scholar]
  486. Laan, Gitta P.M
    1997 The contribution of intonation, segmental durations, and spectral features to the perception of a spontaneous and a read speaking style. Speech Communication22(1): 43–65. 10.1016/S0167‑6393(97)00012‑5
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6393(97)00012-5 [Google Scholar]
  487. Labov, William , Ash, Sharon & Boberg, Charles
    2006 Atlas of North American English: Phonetics, Phonology, and Sound Change. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110167467
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110167467 [Google Scholar]
  488. Ladd, D. Robert
    1983 Phonological features of intonational peaks. Language59(4): 721–759. 10.2307/413371
     https://doi.org/10.2307/413371 [Google Scholar]
  489. 1986 Intonational phrasing: The case for recursive prosodic structure. Phonology Yearbook3: 311-340.
     [Google Scholar]
  490. 1988 Declination ‘reset’ and the hierarchical organization of utterances. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America84(2): 530–544. 10.1121/1.396830
     https://doi.org/10.1121/1.396830 [Google Scholar]
  491. 1996 Intonational Phonology. Cambridge: CUP.
     [Google Scholar]
  492. Ladd, D. Robert
    2000 Bruce, Pierrehumbert, and the Elements of Intonational Phonology. InProsody: Theory and Experiment [Text, Speech and Language Technology], Merle Horne (ed.), 37–50. Dordrecht: Springer. 10.1007/978‑94‑015‑9413‑4_3
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9413-4_3 [Google Scholar]
  493. Ladd, D. Robert
    2008 Intonational Phonology, 2nd edn.Cambridge: CUP. 10.1017/CBO9780511808814
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511808814 [Google Scholar]
  494. Ladd, D. Robert , Faulkner, Dan , Faulkner, Hanneke & Schepman, Astrid
    1999 Constant “segmental anchoring” of F0 movements under changes in speech rate. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America106(3–1): 1543–1554. 10.1121/1.427151
     https://doi.org/10.1121/1.427151 [Google Scholar]
  495. Ladd, D. Robert , Silverman, Kim E.A ., Tolkmitt, Frank , Bergmann, Günther & Scherer, Klaus R.
    1985 Evidence for the independent function of intonation contour type, voice quality, and f0 range in signaling speaker affect. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America78: 435–444. 10.1121/1.392466
     https://doi.org/10.1121/1.392466 [Google Scholar]
  496. Lado, Robert
    1957 Linguistics across Cultures: Applied Linguistics for Language Teachers. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  497. Lakoff, Robin
    1975 Language and Women’s Place. New York, NJ: Harper & Row.
     [Google Scholar]
  498. Laméris, Tim
    2022 Non-native Perception, Production, and Lexical Processing of Tone. PhD dissertation, University of Cambridge.
  499. Landis, J. R . & Koch, G. G
    1977 The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics33(1): 159-174.
     [Google Scholar]
  500. Lasagabaster, David
    2005 Attitudes towards Basque, Spanish and English: An analysis of the most influential variables. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development26(4): 296–316. 10.1080/01434630508669084
     https://doi.org/10.1080/01434630508669084 [Google Scholar]
  501. Lasagabaster, David & Sierra, Juan Manuel
    2005 The nativeness factor: An analysis of students’ preferences. ITL International Journal of Applied Linguistics148: 21–43. 10.2143/ITL.148.0.2002063
     https://doi.org/10.2143/ITL.148.0.2002063 [Google Scholar]
  502. Laures, Jacqueline S . & Weismer, Gary
    1999 The effects of a flattened fundamental frequency on intelligibility at the sentence level. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research42(5): 1148–1156. 10.1044/jslhr.4205.1148
     https://doi.org/10.1044/jslhr.4205.1148 [Google Scholar]
  503. Le Bruyn, Bert & Paquot, Magali
    (eds) 2021a Learner Corpus Research Meets Second Language Acquisition. Cambridge: CUP.
     [Google Scholar]
  504. 2021b Learner corpus research and second language acquisition: An attempt at bridging the gap. InLearner Corpus Research Meets Second Language Acquisition, Bert Le Bruyn & Magali Paquot (eds), 1–9. Cambridge: CUP.
     [Google Scholar]
  505. Lee, Jin-Kyong
    2007 The Inside of the L2 Lexicon and Semantic Overgeneralization. Ms., Michigan State University.
     [Google Scholar]
  506. Lee, William R.
    1958 English Intonation: A New Approach. Amsterdam: North Holland.
     [Google Scholar]
  507. Leeman, Adrian
    2009 Intonational variation in Swiss German. InLanguage Variation – European Perspectives II: Selected Papers from the fourth International Conference on Language Variation in Europe (ICLaVE 4) Nicosia, June 2007 [Studies in Language Variation 5], Stavroula Tsiplakou , Marilena Karyolemou & Pavlos Pavlou (eds), 135–143. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/silv.5.11lee
     https://doi.org/10.1075/silv.5.11lee [Google Scholar]
  508. Lengeris, Angelos
    2012 Teaching and learning English prosody: Lessons from L2 speech perception and production research. InPragmatics and Prosody in English Language Teaching, Jesús Romero-Trillo (ed.), 25–40. Dordrecht: Springer. 10.1007/978‑94‑007‑3883‑6_3
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-3883-6_3 [Google Scholar]
  509. Lenneberg, Eric H.
    1967 Biological Foundations of Language. New York, NY: John Wiley.
     [Google Scholar]
  510. Lennon, Paul
    1990 Investigating fluency in EFL: A quantitative approach. Language Learning40(3): 387–417. 10.1111/j.1467‑1770.1990.tb00669.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1990.tb00669.x [Google Scholar]
  511. Lentz, Tomas O . & Chen, Aoju
    2015 Unbalanced adult production and perception of prosody. InProceedings of the 18th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, ICPhS 2015, 1–4. Glasgow, Scotland, UK.
     [Google Scholar]
  512. Lepetit, Daniel
    1989 Cross-linguistic influence in intonation: French/Japanese and French/English. Language Learning39(3): 397–413. 10.1111/j.1467‑1770.1989.tb00598.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1989.tb00598.x [Google Scholar]
  513. Levelt, Willem J.M
    1993 Speaking: From Intention to Articulation. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  514. J. Murrey Atkins Library
    J. Murrey Atkins Library 2019 New South Voices Collection. The University of North Carolina at Charlotte.
     [Google Scholar]
  515. Levis, John M.
    1999 Intonation in theory and practice, revisited. TESOL Quarterly33(1): 37–64. 10.2307/3588190
     https://doi.org/10.2307/3588190 [Google Scholar]
  516. 2005 Comparing apples and oranges? Pedagogical approaches to intonation in British and American English. InEnglish Pronunciation Models: A Changing Scene, Katarzyna Dziubalska-Kolaczyk & Joanna Przedlacka (eds), 339–366. Bern: Peter Lang.
     [Google Scholar]
  517. 2018 Intelligibility, Oral Communication, and the Teaching of Pronunciation. Cambridge: CUP. 10.1017/9781108241564
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108241564 [Google Scholar]
  518. 2019 Cinderella no more: Leaving victimhood behind. Speak Out60(1): 1–7.
     [Google Scholar]
  519. Levis, John M. & Pickering, Lucy
    2004 Teaching intonation in discourse using speech visualization technology. System32(4): 505–524. 10.1016/j.system.2004.09.009
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2004.09.009 [Google Scholar]
  520. Levitan, Rivka
    2014 Acoustic-prosodic Entrainment in Human-human and Human-computer Dialogue. PhD dissertation, Columbia University.
  521. Levitan, Rivka & Hirschberg, Julia
    2011 Measuring acoustic prosodic entrainment with respect to multiple levels and dimensions. InProceedings of the 12th Annual International Conference of the Speech Communication Association, Interspeech 2011, 3081–3084. Firenze, Italy. 10.21437/Interspeech.2011‑771
     https://doi.org/10.21437/Interspeech.2011-771 [Google Scholar]
  522. Levon, Erez
    2016 Gender, interaction and intonational variation: The discourse functions of high rising terminals in London. Journal of Sociolinguistics20(2): 133–163. 10.1111/josl.12182
     https://doi.org/10.1111/josl.12182 [Google Scholar]
  523. 2018 Same difference: The phonetic shape of high rising terminals in London. English Language and Linguistics24(1): 1–25.
     [Google Scholar]
  524. Levon, Erez & Ye, Yang
    2020 Language, indexicality and gender ideologies: Contextual effects on the perceived credibility of women. Gender and Language14(2): 123–151. 10.1558/genl.39235
     https://doi.org/10.1558/genl.39235 [Google Scholar]
  525. Lewandowski, Eva M . & Nygaard, Lynne C.
    2018 Vocal alignment to native and non-native speakers of English. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America144(2): 620–633. 10.1121/1.5038567
     https://doi.org/10.1121/1.5038567 [Google Scholar]
  526. Lewandowski, Natalie
    2012 Talent in Nonnative Phonetic Convergence. PhD dissertation, Stuttgart University.
  527. Lewandowski, Natalie & Jilka, Matthias
    2019 Phonetic convergence, language talent, personality and attention. Frontiers in Communication4(18): 1–19. 10.3389/fcomm.2019.00018
     https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2019.00018 [Google Scholar]
  528. Li, Peng , Florence Baills , Lorraine Baqué & Prieto, Pilar
    2022 The effectiveness of embodied prosodic training in L2 accentedness and vowel accuracy. Second Language Research39(4): 1077–1105. 10.1177/02676583221124075
     https://doi.org/10.1177/02676583221124075 [Google Scholar]
  529. Li, A . & Post, B.
    2014 L2 acquisition of prosodic properties of speech rhythm. Studies in Second Language Acquisition36(2): 223–255. 10.1017/S0272263113000752
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263113000752 [Google Scholar]
  530. Liao, Yan & Fukuya, Yoshinori J.
    2004 Avoidance of phrasal verbs: The case of Chinese learners of English. Language Learning54(2): 193–226. 10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2004.00254.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2004.00254.x [Google Scholar]
  531. Liberman, Mark & Prince, Alan
    1977 On stress and linguistics rhythm. Linguistic Inquiry8(2): 249–336.
     [Google Scholar]
  532. Lightbown, Patsy M . & Spada, Nina
    2013 How Languages are Learned. Oxford: OUP.
     [Google Scholar]
  533. Lin, Phoebe M.S
    2011 Perception and Production of Prosodically Varying Inter-gestural Timing in American English Laterals. PhD dissertation, University of Michigan.
  534. 2012a Sound evidence: The missing piece of the jigsaw in formulaic language research. Applied Linguistics33(3): 342–347. 10.1093/applin/ams017
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/ams017 [Google Scholar]
  535. 2012b More than music to our ears: The value of the phonological interface in a comprehensive understanding of vocabulary acquisition and knowledge. InMultilingual Theory and Practice in Applied Linguistics: Proceedings of the 45th Annual Meeting of the British Association for Applied Linguistics, 6–8 September2012, University of Southampton, Alisdair N. Archibald (ed.), 155–158. London: BAAL.
     [Google Scholar]
  536. 2013 The prosody of formulaic expressions in the IBM/Lancaster Spoken English Corpus. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics18(4): 561–588. 10.1075/ijcl.18.4.05lin
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.18.4.05lin [Google Scholar]
  537. 2020 The Prosody of Formulaic Sequences: A Corpus and Discourse Approach. London: Bloomsbury.
     [Google Scholar]
  538. Lindsey, Geoff
    2019 English after RP: Standard British Pronunciation Today. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑3‑030‑04357‑5
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04357-5 [Google Scholar]
  539. Linneman, Thomas J.
    2013 Gender in Jeopardy! Intonation variation on a television game show. Gender & Society27(1): 82–105. 10.1177/0891243212464905
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243212464905 [Google Scholar]
  540. Lintunen, Pekka , Peltonen, Pauliina & Webb, Joshua
    2015 Tone units as indicators of L2 fluency development: Evidence from native and learner English. InInvestigating English Pronunciation: Trends and Directions, Jose A. Mompean & Jonás Fouz-González (eds), 196–218. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9781137509437_9
     https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137509437_9 [Google Scholar]
  541. Liscombe, Jackson , Hirschberg, Julia & Venditti, Jennifer J.
    2005 Detecting certainness in spoken tutorial dialogues. InProceedings of the 9th International Speech Communication Association, 1837–1840. Lisbon, Portugal. 10.21437/Interspeech.2005‑581
     https://doi.org/10.21437/Interspeech.2005-581 [Google Scholar]
  542. Litman, Diane , Rotaru, Mihai & Nicholas, Greg
    2009 Classifying turn-level uncertainty using word-level prosody. InProceedings of the 10th International Speech Communication Association, 2003–2006. Brighton, UK. 10.21437/Interspeech.2009‑577
     https://doi.org/10.21437/Interspeech.2009-577 [Google Scholar]
  543. Lleó, Conxita & Vogel, Irene
    2004 Learning new segments and reducing domains in German L2 phonology: The role of the prosodic hierarchy. International Journal of Bilingualism8(1): 79–104. 10.1177/13670069040080010601
     https://doi.org/10.1177/13670069040080010601 [Google Scholar]
  544. Long, Michael H.
    1990 Maturational constraints on language development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition12(3): 251–285. 10.1017/S0272263100009165
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100009165 [Google Scholar]
  545. Long, Michael H.
    2003 Stabilization and fossilization in second language interlanguage development. InThe Handbook of Second Language Acquisition, Catherine J. Doughty & Michael H. Long (eds), 487–529. Oxford: Blackwell. 10.1002/9780470756492.ch16
     https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470756492.ch16 [Google Scholar]
  546. López Rúa, Paula
    2006 The sex variable in foreign language learning: An integrative approach. Porta Linguarum6: 99–114. 10.30827/Digibug.30663
     https://doi.org/10.30827/Digibug.30663 [Google Scholar]
  547. Loveday, Leo
    1981 Pitch, politeness and sexual role: An exploratory investigation into the pitch correlates of English and Japanese politeness formulae. Language and Speech24(1): 71–89. 10.1177/002383098102400105
     https://doi.org/10.1177/002383098102400105 [Google Scholar]
  548. 1982 The Sociolinguistics of Learning and Using a Non-Native Language. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  549. Lowry, Orla
    2002 The stylistic variation of nuclear patterns in Belfast English. Journal of the International Phonetic Association32(1): 33–42. 10.1017/S0025100302000130
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025100302000130 [Google Scholar]
  550. Ludusan, Bogdan & Schuppler, Barbara
    2022 An analysis of prosodic boundaries across speaking styles in two varieties of German. Speech Communication141: 93–106. 10.1016/j.specom.2022.05.002
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.specom.2022.05.002 [Google Scholar]
  551. Mackey, William F.
    2000 The description of bilingualism. InThe Bilingualism Reader, Li Wei (ed.), 26–54. London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  552. Markham, Duncan
    1997 Phonetic Imitation, Accent, and the Learner. Lund: Lund University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  553. Martínez-Gómez, Rebeca
    2018 Fresa Style in Mexico: Sociolinguistic Stereotypes and the Variability of Social Meanings. PhD dissertation, University of New Mexico.
  554. Marzec-Stawiarska, Małgorzata
    2014 Gender differences in foreign language speaking-in-class anxiety. LinguisticaSilesiana35: 417–434.
     [Google Scholar]
  555. Matsuda, Sae & Gobel, Peter
    2004 Anxiety and predictors of performance in the foreign language classroom. System32(1): 21–36. 10.1016/j.system.2003.08.002
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2003.08.002 [Google Scholar]
  556. Mauranen, Anna
    2006 Signaling and preventing misunderstanding in English as a lingua franca communication. International Journal of the Sociology of Language177: 123–150. 10.1515/IJSL.2006.008
     https://doi.org/10.1515/IJSL.2006.008 [Google Scholar]
  557. Mayer, Jörg
    1995 Transcription of German intonation – The Stuttgart system. Technical report, University of Stuttgart.
     [Google Scholar]
  558. McDougall, Kirsty & Duckworth, Martin
    2017 Profiling fluency: An analysis of individual variation in disfluencies in adult males. Speech Communication95: 16–27. 10.1016/j.specom.2017.10.001
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.specom.2017.10.001 [Google Scholar]
  559. McKirnan, David J . & Hamayan, Else V.
    1984 Speech norms and attitudes toward outgroup members: A test of a model in a bicultural context. Journal of Language and Social Psychology3(1): 21–38. 10.1177/0261927X8431002
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X8431002 [Google Scholar]
  560. McLemore, Cynthia Ann
    1991 The Pragmatic Interpretation of English Intonation: Sorority Speech. PhD dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.
  561. Meer, Philipp & Fuchs, Robert
    2021 The Trini Sing-Song: Sociophonetic variation in Trinidadian English prosody and differences to other varieties. Language and Speech65(4): 923–957. 10.1177/0023830921998404
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0023830921998404 [Google Scholar]
  562. Méndez Seijas, Jorge
    2018 L2 Spanish intonation in a short-term study abroad program. InThe Routledge Handbook of Study Abroad Research and Practice, Cristina Sanz & Alfonso Morales-Front (eds), 86–100. London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  563. Mennen, Ineke
    1998 Can language learners ever acquire the intonation of a second language?InProceedings ETRW on Speech Technology in Language Learning 1998, 17–20. Marholmen, Sweden.
     [Google Scholar]
  564. Mennen, Ineke
    2004 Bi-directional interference in the intonation of Dutch speakers of Greek. Journal of Phonetics32(4): 543–563. 10.1016/j.wocn.2004.02.002
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2004.02.002 [Google Scholar]
  565. Mennen, Ineke
    2007 Phonological and phonetic influences in non-native intonation. InNon-Native Prosody – Phonetic Description and Teaching Practice, Jürgen Trouvain & Ulrike Gut (eds), 53–76. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110198751.1.53
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110198751.1.53 [Google Scholar]
  566. 2015 Beyond segments: Towards an L2 intonation learning theory (LILt). InProsody and Language in Contact: L2 Acquisition, Attrition and Languages in Multilingual Situations, Elisabeth Delais-Roussarie , Mathieu Avanzi & Sophie Herment (eds), 171–188. Berlin: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑662‑45168‑7_9
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-45168-7_9 [Google Scholar]
  567. Mennen, Ineke , Chen, Aoju & Karlsson, Fredrik
    2010 Characterising the internal structure of learner intonation and its development over time. InProceedings of the 6th International Symposium on the Acquisition of Second Language Speech, New Sounds 2010, Katarzyna Dziubalska-Kołaczyk , Magdalena Wrembel & Małgorzata Kul (eds), 319–324. Poznań, Poland.
     [Google Scholar]
  568. Mennen, Ineke & Colantoni, Laura
    (eds) 2023  The Effects of Cross-Language Differences on Bilingual Production and/or Perception of Sentence-Level Intonation . Special issue ofLanguages8(2): 108. 10.3390/languages8020108
     https://doi.org/10.3390/languages8020108 [Google Scholar]
  569. Mennen, Ineke & de Leeuw, Esther
    2014 Beyond segments. Prosody in SLA. Studies in Second Language Acquisition36(2): 183–194. 10.1017/S0272263114000138
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263114000138 [Google Scholar]
  570. Mennen, Ineke , Schaeffler, Felix & Dickie, Catherine
    2014 Second language acquisition of pitch range in German learners of English. Studies in Second Language Acquisition36(2): 303–329. 10.1017/S0272263114000023
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263114000023 [Google Scholar]
  571. Mennen, Ineke , Schaeffler, Felix & Docherty, Gerard
    2007 Pitching it differently: A comparison of the pitch ranges of German and English speakers. InProceedings of the International Congress of Phonetic Sciences 2007, ICPhS XVI, 1769–1972. Saarbrücken, Germany.
     [Google Scholar]
  572. 2012 Cross-language differences in fundamental frequency range: A comparison of English and German. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America131(3): 2249–2260. 10.1121/1.3681950
     https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3681950 [Google Scholar]
  573. Mennen, Ineke , Reubold, Ulrich , Endes, Kerstin & Mayr, Robert
    2022 Plasticity of native intonation in the L1 of English migrants to Austria. Languages7(3): 1–27. 10.3390/languages7030241
     https://doi.org/10.3390/languages7030241 [Google Scholar]
  574. Michalsky, Jan & Schoormann, Heike
    2017 Pitch convergence as an effect of perceived attractiveness and likability. InProceedings of the 18th International Speech Communication Association, Interspeech 2017, 2253–2256. Stockholm, Sweden. 10.21437/Interspeech.2017‑1520
     https://doi.org/10.21437/Interspeech.2017-1520 [Google Scholar]
  575. Michas, Irene C . & Berry, Dianne C.
    1994 Implicit and explicit processes in a second language learning task. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology6(4): 357–381. 10.1080/09541449408406520
     https://doi.org/10.1080/09541449408406520 [Google Scholar]
  576. Milde, Jan-Torsten & Gut, Ulrike
    2002 A prosodic corpus of non-native speech. InProceedings of Speech Prosody 2002, 503–506. Aix-en-Provence, France. 10.21437/SpeechProsody.2002‑111
     https://doi.org/10.21437/SpeechProsody.2002-111 [Google Scholar]
  577. Miles, Scott A ., Miranda, Robbin A . & Ullman, Michael T.
    2016 Sex differences in music: A female advantage at recognizing familiar melodies. Frontiers in Psychology7: 1–12. 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00278
     https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00278 [Google Scholar]
  578. Miller, Jim E . & Weinert, Regina
    2009 Spontaneous Spoken Language: Syntax and Discourse. Oxford: OUP.
     [Google Scholar]
  579. Missaglia, Federica
    1999 Contrastive prosody in SLA – An empirical study with adult Italian learners of German. InProceedings of the XIVthInternational Congress of Phonetic Sciences, ICPhS 1999, John J. Ohala , Yoko Hasegawa , Manjari Ohala , Daniel Granville & Ashlee C. Bailey (eds),551–554. San Francisco, CA.
     [Google Scholar]
  580. Möbius, Bernd
    1993 Ein quantitatives Modell der deutschen Intonation. Analyse und Synthese von Grundfrequenzverläufen. Tübingen: Niemeyer. 10.1515/9783111355870
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783111355870 [Google Scholar]
  581. Mok, Peggy , Yin, Yanjun , Setter, Jane & Nayan, Noor Mat
    2016 Assessing knowledge of English intonation patterns by L2 speakers. InProceedings of Speech Prosody 8, 1–5. Boston, MA. 10.21437/SpeechProsody.2016‑111
     https://doi.org/10.21437/SpeechProsody.2016-111 [Google Scholar]
  582. Mompeán González, Jose A.
    2004 Options and criteria for the choice of an English pronunciation model in Spain. InLinguistic Perspectives from the Classroom: Language Teaching in a Multicultural Europe, JoDee Anderson , Jose Manuel Oro Cabanas & Jesús Varela Zapata (eds), 1043–1059. Santiago de Compostela: Universityof Santiago de Compostela.
     [Google Scholar]
  583. Monroy, Rafael & Hernández-Campoy, Juan Manuel
    2015 Murcian Spanish. Journal of the International Phonetic Association45(2): 229–240. 10.1017/S0025100314000231
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025100314000231 [Google Scholar]
  584. Moyer, Alene
    1999 Ultimate attainment in L2 phonology: The critical factors of age, motivation, and instruction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition21(1): 81–108. 10.1017/S0272263199001035
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263199001035 [Google Scholar]
  585. 2004 Age, Accent, and Experience in Second Language Acquisition: An Integrated Approach to Critical Period Inquiry. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781853597190
     https://doi.org/10.21832/9781853597190 [Google Scholar]
  586. 2007 Do language attitudes determine accent? A study of bilinguals in the USA. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development28(6): 1–17. 10.2167/jmmd514.0
     https://doi.org/10.2167/jmmd514.0 [Google Scholar]
  587. 2011 An investigation of experience in L2 phonology: Does quality matter more than quantity?Canadian Modern Language Review67(2): 191–216. 10.3138/cmlr.67.2.191
     https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.67.2.191 [Google Scholar]
  588. 2013 Foreign Accent: The Phonology of Non-native Speech. Cambridge: CUP. 10.1017/CBO9780511794407
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511794407 [Google Scholar]
  589. 2016 The puzzle of gender effects in L2 phonology. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation2(1): 8–28. 10.1075/jslp.2.1.01moy
     https://doi.org/10.1075/jslp.2.1.01moy [Google Scholar]
  590. 2017 Autonomy in second language phonology: Choice vs. limits. Language Teaching50(3): 395–411. 10.1017/S0261444815000191
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444815000191 [Google Scholar]
  591. 2018 An advantage for age? Self-concept and self-regulation as teachable foundations in second language accent. The CATESOL Journal30(1): 1–18.
     [Google Scholar]
  592. Mukherjee, Joybrato
    2001 Form and Function of Parasyntactic Presentation Structures: A Corpus-based Study of Talk Units in Spoken English. Amsterdam: Rodopi. 10.1163/9789004488908
     https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004488908 [Google Scholar]
  593. 2005 The native speaker is alive and kicking: Linguistic and language-pedagogical perspectives. Anglistik16(2): 7–23.
     [Google Scholar]
  594. Müller, Simone
    2005 Discourse Markers in Native and Non-Native English Discourse [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 138]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.138
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.138 [Google Scholar]
  595. Munro, Murray J . & Derwing, Tracey M.
    1995 Foreign accent, comprehensibility, and intelligibility in the speech of second language learners. Language Learning45(1): 73–97. 10.1111/j.1467‑1770.1995.tb00963.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1995.tb00963.x [Google Scholar]
  596. 1999 Foreign accent, comprehensibility, and intelligibility in the speech of second language learners, Language Learning49(1): 285–310. 10.1111/0023‑8333.49.s1.8
     https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.49.s1.8 [Google Scholar]
  597. Myles, Florence
    2005 Interlanguage corpora and second language acquisition research. Second Language Research21(4): 373–391. 10.1191/0267658305sr252oa
     https://doi.org/10.1191/0267658305sr252oa [Google Scholar]
  598. Nagano-Madsen, Yasuko
    2015a Acquisition process of L2 Japanese intonation by Swedish learners – Interlanguage or prosodic transfer?InProceedings of the 18th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, ICPhS 2015, 1–4. Glasgow, UK.
     [Google Scholar]
  599. Nagano-Madsen, Yasuko
    2015b Prosodic phrasing unique to the acquisition of L2 intonation – An analysis of L2 Japanese intonation by L1 Swedish learners. InProceedings of the International Speech Communication Association, Interspeech 2015, 820–823. Dresden, Germany. 10.21437/Interspeech.2015‑258
     https://doi.org/10.21437/Interspeech.2015-258 [Google Scholar]
  600. Nakajima, Shin’ya & Allen, James F.
    1993 A study on prosody and discourse structure in cooperative dialogues. Phonetica50(3): 197–210. 10.1159/000261940
     https://doi.org/10.1159/000261940 [Google Scholar]
  601. Namy, Laura L ., Nygaard Lynne C . & Sauerteig, Denise
    2002 Gender differences in vocal accommodation: The role of perception. Journal of Language and Social Psychology21(4): 422–432. 10.1177/026192702237958
     https://doi.org/10.1177/026192702237958 [Google Scholar]
  602. Nance, Claire , Kirkham, Sam & Groarke, Eve
    2015 Intonational variation in Liverpool English. InProceedings of the 18th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, ICPhS 2015, 1–4. Glasgow, UK.
     [Google Scholar]
  603. 2018 Studying intonation in varieties of English: Gender and individual variation in Liverpool. InSociolinguistics in England, Natalie Braber & Sandra Jansen (eds), 275–295. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/978‑1‑137‑56288‑3_11
     https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-56288-3_11 [Google Scholar]
  604. National Institute for Education
    National Institute for Education 2017 Rámcový vzdělávací program pro základní vzdělávání. www.nuv.cz/uploads/RVP_ZV_2017_verze_cerven.pdf (15November 2019).
     [Google Scholar]
  605. Nava, Emily & Zubizarreta, Maria Luisa E
    2009 Order of L2 acquisition of prosodic prominence patterns: Evidence from L1 Spanish/L2 English speech. InProceedings of the 3rd Conference on Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition North America, GALANA 2008, Jean Lenore Crawford , Koichi Otaki & Masahiko Takashi (eds), 175–187. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
     [Google Scholar]
  606. Navarro Tomás, Tomás
    1974 Métrica española : reseña histórica y descriptiva. Madrid: Guadarrama.
     [Google Scholar]
  607. Neff, JoAnne , Dafouz, Emma , Rica, Juan P.
    Díez, Mercedes & Prieto, Rosa 2009 The status of English in Spain. InInternational Corpus of Learner English, Version 2, Gaëtanelle Gilquin , Sylvie De Cock & Sylviane Granger (eds), 168–174. Louvain-la-Neuve: Presses universitaires de Louvain.
     [Google Scholar]
  608. Nevalainen, Terttu
    1992 Intonation and discourse type. Text12(3): 397–427.
     [Google Scholar]
  609. Nibert, Holly Joy
    2000 Phonetic and Phonological Evidence for Intermediate Phrasing in Spanish Intonation. PhD dissertation, University of Illinois.
  610. 2005 The acquisition of the phrase accent by intermediate and advanced adult learners of Spanish as a second language. InSelected Proceedings of the 6th Conference on the Acquisition of Spanish and Portuguese as First and Second Languages, David Eddington (ed.), 108–122. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
     [Google Scholar]
  611. 2006 The acquisition of the phrase accent by beginning adult learners of Spanish as a second language. InSelected Proceedings of the2nd Laboratory Approaches to Spanish Phonetics and Phonology, Manuel Díaz-Campos (ed.), 131–148. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
     [Google Scholar]
  612. Niebuhr, Oliver
    2015 Gender differences in the prosody of German questions. InProceedings of the 18th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, ICPhS 2015, 1–6. Glasgow, Scotland.
     [Google Scholar]
  613. Niebuhr, Oliver & Ward, Nigel G.
    2018 Challenges in studying prosody and its pragmatic functions: Introduction to JIPA special issue. Journal of the International Phonetic Association48(1): 1–8. 10.1017/S0025100318000014
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025100318000014 [Google Scholar]
  614. Nilsenová, Marie
    2006 Rises and Falls: Studies in the Semantics and Pragmatics of Intonation. PhD dissertation, University of Amsterdam.
  615. Nolan, Francis
    2003 Intonational equivalence: An experimental evaluation of pitch scales. InProceedings of the 15th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, ICPhS 2003, 771–774. Barcelona, Spain.
     [Google Scholar]
  616. Nooteboom, Sieb & Terken, Jacques
    1982 What makes speakers omit pitch accents? An experiment. Phonetica39(4–5): 317–336. 10.1159/000261670
     https://doi.org/10.1159/000261670 [Google Scholar]
  617. Nowacka, Marta
    2012 Questionnaire-based pronunciation studies: Italian, Spanish and Polish students’ views on their English pronunciation. Research in Language10(1): 43–61. 10.2478/v10015‑011‑0048‑3
     https://doi.org/10.2478/v10015-011-0048-3 [Google Scholar]
  618. O’Barr, William M . & Atkins, Bowman K.
    1998[1980] ‘Women’s language’ or ‘powerless language’?InLanguage: A Reader for Writers, Gita DasBender (ed.), 401–407. Oxford:OUP.
     [Google Scholar]
  619. O’Brien, Mary & Gut, Ulrike
    2010 Phonological and phonetic realisation of different types of focus in L2 speech. InAchievements and Perspectives in the Acquisition of Second Language Speech. New Sounds 2010, Katarzyna Dziubalska-Kołaczyk , Magdalena Wrembel & Malgorzata Kul (eds), 205–215. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
     [Google Scholar]
  620. O’Connor, Joseph Desmond & Arnold, Gordon F.
    1973 Intonation of Colloquial English: APractical Handbook. London: Longmans.
     [Google Scholar]
  621. O’Grady, Gerard Nigel
    2010 A Grammar of Spoken English Discourse: The Intonation of Increments. London: Continuum.
     [Google Scholar]
  622. Oakhill, Jane & Kyle, Fiona E.
    2000 The relation between phonological awareness and working memory. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology75(2): 152–164. 10.1006/jecp.1999.2529
     https://doi.org/10.1006/jecp.1999.2529 [Google Scholar]
  623. Ochs, Elinor
    1992 Indexing gender. InRethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon, Alessandro Duranti & Charles Goodwin (eds), 335–58. Cambridge: CUP.
     [Google Scholar]
  624. Ogden, Richard
    2006 Phonetics and social action in agreements and disagreements. Journal of Pragmatics38(10): 1752–1775. 10.1016/j.pragma.2005.04.011
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2005.04.011 [Google Scholar]
  625. Ogden, Richard & Routarinne, Sara
    2005 The communicative functions of final rises in Finnish intonation. Phonetica62(2–4): 160–175. 10.1159/000090096
     https://doi.org/10.1159/000090096 [Google Scholar]
  626. Ohala, John & Ewan, William
    1973 Speed of pitch change. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America53: 345. 10.1121/1.1982441
     https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1982441 [Google Scholar]
  627. Ohara, Yumiko
    1999 Performing gender through voice pitch: A cross-cultural analysis of Japanese and American English. InWahrnehmung und Herstellung von Geschlecht: Perceiving and Performing Gender, Ursula Pasero & Friederike Braun (eds), 105–116. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. 10.1007/978‑3‑322‑89014‑6_8
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-89014-6_8 [Google Scholar]
  628. Öhman, Sven
    1967 Word and sentence intonation: A quantitative model. STL-QPSR8: 2–3.
     [Google Scholar]
  629. Ordin, Mikhail , Polyanskaya, Leona & Ulbrich, Christiane
    2011 Acquisition of timing patterns in second language. InProceedings of the International Speech Communication Association, Interspeech 2011, 1129–1132. Florence, Italy. 10.21437/Interspeech.2011‑336
     https://doi.org/10.21437/Interspeech.2011-336 [Google Scholar]
  630. Ordin, Mikhail & Mennen, Ineke
    2017 Cross-linguistic differences in bilinguals’ fundamental frequency ranges. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research60(6): 1493–1506. 10.1044/2016_JSLHR‑S‑16‑0315
     https://doi.org/10.1044/2016_JSLHR-S-16-0315 [Google Scholar]
  631. Orrico, Riccardo , Cataldo, Violetta , Savy, Renata & Barone, Linda
    2016 Transfer, fossilization and prosodic drift in foreign language learning. InAtti del XII Convegno Nazionale AISV, La fonetica sperimentale nell’ insegnamento e nell’ apprendimento delle lingue straniere, 117–132. Salerno, Italy.
     [Google Scholar]
  632. Ortega, Lourdes
    2009 Understanding Second Language Acquisition. New York, NY: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  633. Ortega, Lourdes & Byrnes, Heidi
    (eds) 2008 The Longitudinal Study of Advanced L2 Capacities. London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  634. Ortega-Llebaria, Marta & Colantoni, Laura
    2014 L2 English intonation: Relations between form-meaning associations, access to meaning and L1-transfer. Studies in Second Language Acquisition36(2): 331–353. 10.1017/S0272263114000011
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263114000011 [Google Scholar]
  635. Oxford, Rebecca L . & Ehrman, Madeline
    1993 Second language research on individual differences. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics13:188–205. 10.1017/S0267190500002464
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190500002464 [Google Scholar]
  636. Oxford, Rebecca L ., Nyikos, Martha & Ehrman, Madeline
    1988 Vive la différence? Reflections on sex differences in use of language learning strategies. Foreign Language Annals21(4): 321–329. 10.1111/j.1944‑9720.1988.tb01076.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.1988.tb01076.x [Google Scholar]
  637. Oyama, Susan
    1976 A sensitive period for the acquisition of a nonnative phonological system. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research5(3): 261–283. 10.1007/BF01067377
     https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01067377 [Google Scholar]
  638. Palková, Zdena
    1994 Fonetika a fonologieče ŝtiny. Praha: Karolinum.
     [Google Scholar]
  639. 1997 Fonetika a fonologie čeŝtiny, 2nd edn.Praha: Karolinum.
     [Google Scholar]
  640. Palková, Zdena & Volín, Jan
    2003 The role of F0 contours in determining foot boundaries in Czech. InProceedings of the 15th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, ICPhS 2003, 1783–1786. Barcelona, Spain.
     [Google Scholar]
  641. Palmer, Harold E.
    1922 English Intonation, With Systematic Exercises. Cambridge: Heffer.
     [Google Scholar]
  642. Papoušek, Mechthild & Hwang, Shu-Fen C
    1991 Tone and intonation in Mandarin baby talk to presyllabic infants: Comparison with registers of adult conversation and foreign language instruction. Applied Psycholinguistics12(4): 481–504. 10.1017/S0142716400005889
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716400005889 [Google Scholar]
  643. Pardo, Jennifer S.
    2006 On phonetic convergence during conversational interaction. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America119(4): 2382–2393. 10.1121/1.2178720
     https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2178720 [Google Scholar]
  644. 2010 Expressing oneself in conversational interaction. InExpressing Oneself/Expressing One’s Self: Communication, Cognition, Language, and Identity, Ezequiel Morsella (ed.), 183–196. London: Psychology Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  645. Pardo, Jennifer S ., Jordan, Kelly , Mallari, Rolliene , Scanlon, Caitlin & Lewandowski, Eva
    2013 Phonetic convergence in shadowed speech: The relation between acoustic and perceptual measures. Journal of Memory and Language69(3): 183–195. 10.1016/j.jml.2013.06.002
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2013.06.002 [Google Scholar]
  646. Park, Micah William
    2011 Teaching Intonation Patterns through Reading Aloud. MA thesis, Portland State University.
     [Google Scholar]
  647. Pascoe, Graham
    1996 Pronunciation analysis and teaching. PHONUS2: 109–122.
     [Google Scholar]
  648. Passoni, Elisa , de Leeuw, Esther & Levon, Erez
    2022 Bilinguals produce pitch range differently in their two languages to convey social meaning. Language and Speech65(4): 1071–1095. 10.1177/00238309221105210
     https://doi.org/10.1177/00238309221105210 [Google Scholar]
  649. Paterson, Ken
    2011 A Handbook of Spoken Grammar: Strategies for Speaking Natural English. Peaslake: Delta Publishing.
     [Google Scholar]
  650. Patkowski, Mark S.
    1980 The sensitive period for the acquisition of syntax in a second language. Language Learning30(2): 449–472. 10.1111/j.1467‑1770.1980.tb00328.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1980.tb00328.x [Google Scholar]
  651. Patterson, David
    2000 A Linguistic Approach to Pitch Range Modelling. PhD dissertation, University of Edinburgh.
  652. Paunović, Tatjana
    2022 Uptalk in L2 English: The phonetic identity and perception of final declarative rises in Seriban EFL. Phonetica79(6): 551–589. 10.1515/phon‑2022‑0028
     https://doi.org/10.1515/phon-2022-0028 [Google Scholar]
  653. Pawley, Andrew & Syder, Frances Hodgetts
    1983 Two puzzles for linguistic theory: Native-like selection and native-like fluency. InLanguage and Communication, Jack C. Richards & Richard W. Schmidt (eds), 191–226. London: Longman.
     [Google Scholar]
  654. 2000 The one-clause-at-a-time hypothesis. InPerspectives on Fluency, Heidi Riggenbach (ed.), 163–199. Ann Arbor MI: The University of Michigan Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  655. Peltonen, Paulina
    2018 Exploring connections between first and second language fluency: A mixed methods approach. The Modern Language Journal102(4): 676–692. 10.1111/modl.12516
     https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12516 [Google Scholar]
  656. Pépiot, Erwan
    2014 Male and female speech: A study of mean f0, f0 range, phonation type and speech rate in Parisian French and American English speakers. InProceedings of Speech Prosody 7, 305-309. Dublin, Ireland.
     [Google Scholar]
  657. Pérez-Paredes, Pascual
    2010 The death of the adverb revisited: Attested uses of adverbs in native and non-native comparable corpora of spoken English. InExploring New Paths in Language Pedagogy. Lexis and Corpus-based Language Teaching, María Moreno Jaén , Fernando Serrano Valverde & María Calzada Pérez (eds), 157–172. London: Equinox.
     [Google Scholar]
  658. Pešková, Andrea
    2017 Czech ToBI. Phonetics and Phonology in Europe, June 12–15, 2017. Cologne, Germany. 10.13140/RG.2.2.36577.92007
     https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.36577.92007 [Google Scholar]
  659. 2022 Intonation patterns used innon-neutral statements by Czechlearners of Italian and Spanish: Across-linguistic comparison. Languages7(4): 1–26. 10.3390/languages7040282
     https://doi.org/10.3390/languages7040282 [Google Scholar]
  660. Pešková, Andrea , Colantoni, Laura & Meisenburg, Trudel
    2018 Initial and final intonation cues of Czech yes-no questions. InProceedings of Speech Prosody 2018, 50–54. Poznań, Poland. 10.21437/SpeechProsody.2018‑10
     https://doi.org/10.21437/SpeechProsody.2018-10 [Google Scholar]
  661. Peters, Benno
    2003 Multiple cues for phonetic phrase boundaries in German spontaneous speech. InProceedings of 15th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, ICPhS 2003, 1795–1798. Barcelona, Spain.
     [Google Scholar]
  662. 2006 Form und Funktion prosodischer Grenzen im Gespräch . PhD dissertation, Kiel University.
  663. Peters, Benno , Kohler, Klaus & Wesener, Thomas
    2005a Phonetische Merkmale prosodischer Phrasierung in deutscher Spontansprache. InProsodic Structures in German Spontaneous Speech [Arbeitsberichte des Instituts für Phonetik und digitale Sprachverarbeitung der Universität Kiel 35a], Klaus J. Kohler , Felicitas Kleber & Benno Peters (eds), 143–184. Kiel: Kiel University.
     [Google Scholar]
  664. 2005b Melodische Satzakzentmuster in prosodischen Phrasen deutscher Spontansprache: Statistische Verteilung und sprachliche Funktion. InProsodic Structures in German Spontaneous Speech [Arbeitsberichte des Instituts für Phonetik und digitale Sprachverarbeitung der Universität Kiel 35a], Klaus J. Kohler , Felicitas Kleber & Benno Peters (eds), 7–54. Kiel: Kiel University.
     [Google Scholar]
  665. Peters, Jörg , Auer, Peter , Gilles, Peter & Selting, Margret
    2015 Untersuchungen zur Struktur und Funktion regionalspezifischer Intonationsverläufe im Deutschen. Rückblick auf ein Forschungsprojekt. InRegionale Variation des Deutschen. Projekte und Perspektiven, Roland Kehrein , Alfred Lameli & Stefan Rabanus (eds), 53–80. Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110363449‑004
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110363449-004 [Google Scholar]
  666. Petrone, Caterina & Niebuhr, Oliver
    2014 On the intonation of German intonation questions: The role of the prenuclear region. Language and Speech57(1): 108–146. 10.1177/0023830913495651
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0023830913495651 [Google Scholar]
  667. Petrone, Caterina , Truckenbrodt, Hubert , Wellmann, Caroline , Holzgrefe-Lang, Julia , Wartenburger, Isbaell & Höhle, Barbara
    2017 Prosodic boundary cues in German: Evidence from the production and perception of bracketed lists. Journal of Phonetics61: 71–92. 10.1016/j.wocn.2017.01.002
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2017.01.002 [Google Scholar]
  668. Pickering, Lucy
    2001 The role of tone choice in improving ITA communication in the classroom. TESOL Quarterly35(2): 233–255. 10.2307/3587647
     https://doi.org/10.2307/3587647 [Google Scholar]
  669. 2004 The structure and function of intonational paragraphs in native and non-native speaker instructional discourse. English for Specific Purposes23(1): 19–43. 10.1016/S0889‑4906(03)00020‑6
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(03)00020-6 [Google Scholar]
  670. 2009 Intonation as a pragmatic resource in ELF interaction. Intercultural Pragmatics6(2): 235–255. 10.1515/IPRG.2009.013
     https://doi.org/10.1515/IPRG.2009.013 [Google Scholar]
  671. 2010 Intonation. InThe Linguistics Encyclopedia, Kirsten Malmkjær (ed.),3rd edn, 283–289. London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  672. Pickering, Lucy & Litzenberg, Jason J.
    2011 Intonation as a pragmatic resource in ELF interaction, revisited. InLatest Trends in ELF, Alasdair Archibald , Alessia Cogo & Jennifer Jenkins (eds), 77–92. Newcastle upon Tyne:Cambridge Scholars.
     [Google Scholar]
  673. Pickering, Lucy , Hu, Guiling & Baker, Amanda
    2012 The pragmatic function of intonation: Cueing agreement and disagreement in spoken English discourse and implications for ELT. InPragmatics, Prosody in ELT, Jesús Romero-Trillo (ed.), 199–218. Dordrecht: Springer. 10.1007/978‑94‑007‑3883‑6_12
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-3883-6_12 [Google Scholar]
  674. Pickering, Martin J . & Garrod, Simon
    2004 Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue. Behavioral and Brain Sciences27(2): 169–226. 10.1017/S0140525X04000056
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X04000056 [Google Scholar]
  675. 2006 Alignment as the basis for successful communication. Research on Language and Computation4(2): 203–228. 10.1007/s11168‑006‑9004‑0
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s11168-006-9004-0 [Google Scholar]
  676. Pierrehumbert, Janet B.
    1980 The Phonology and Phonetics of English Intonation. PhD dissertation, MIT.
  677. 1981 Synthesizing intonation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America70(4): 985–995. 10.1121/1.387033
     https://doi.org/10.1121/1.387033 [Google Scholar]
  678. Pierrehumbert, Janet B
    1987 The Phonology and Phonetics of English Intonation. Indiana University Linguistics Club.
     [Google Scholar]
  679. Pierrehumbert, Janet B.
    2003 Phonetic diversity, statistical learning and acquisition of phonology. Language and Speech46(2–3): 115–154. 10.1177/00238309030460020501
     https://doi.org/10.1177/00238309030460020501 [Google Scholar]
  680. Pierrehumbert, Janet B . & Hirschberg, Julia
    1990 The meaning of intonational contours in the interpretation of discourse. InIntentions in Communication, Philip R. Cohen , Jerry Morgan & Martha E. Pollack (eds), 271–311. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/3839.003.0016
     https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/3839.003.0016 [Google Scholar]
  681. Pierrehumbert, Janet B ., & Talkin, David
    1992 Lenition of /h/ and glottal stop. InPapers in Laboratory Phonology II: Gesture, Segment, Prosody, Gerard J. Docherty & D. Robert Ladd (eds), 90–117. Cambridge: CUP. 10.1017/CBO9780511519918.005
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511519918.005 [Google Scholar]
  682. Pike, Kenneth Lee
    1945 The Intonation of American English. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  683. Pincus, Nadya
    2014 Teaching intonation with explicit instruction and audio-visual techniques. InProceedings of the 7th International Technology, Education and Development Conference, INTED 2013, 3428–3435. Valencia, Spain.
     [Google Scholar]
  684. Pirt, G.
    1990 Discourse intonation problems for non-native speakers. InPapers in Discourse Intonation, Martin Hewings (ed.), 145–156. Birmingham: English Language Research.
     [Google Scholar]
  685. Piske, Thorsten
    2012 Factors affecting the perception and production of L2 prosody: Research results and their implications for the teaching of foreign languages. InPragmatics and Prosody in English Language Teaching, Jesús Romero-Trillo (ed.), 41–49. Dordrecht: Springer. 10.1007/978‑94‑007‑3883‑6_4
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-3883-6_4 [Google Scholar]
  686. Piske, Thorsten , MacKay, Ian R. A . & Flege, James E.
    2001 Factors affecting degree of foreign accent in an L2: A review. Journal of Phonetics29(2): 191–215. 10.1006/jpho.2001.0134
     https://doi.org/10.1006/jpho.2001.0134 [Google Scholar]
  687. Pitzl, Marie-Luise
    2005 Non-understanding in English as a Lingua Franca: Examples from a business context. Vienna English Working Papers14(2): 50–71.
     [Google Scholar]
  688. Podesva, Robert J.
    2011 Salience and the social meaning of declarative contours: Three case studies of gay professionals. Journal of English Linguistics39(3): 233–264. 10.1177/0075424211405161
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0075424211405161 [Google Scholar]
  689. Pon-Barry, Heather
    2008 Prosodic manifestations of confidence and uncertainty in spoken language. InProceedings of the 9th International Conference on Speech Communication and Technology, Interspeech 2008, 74–77. Brisbane, Australia. 10.21437/Interspeech.2008‑16
     https://doi.org/10.21437/Interspeech.2008-16 [Google Scholar]
  690. Pon-Barry, Heather & Shieber, Stuart
    2009 Identifying uncertain words within an utterance via prosodic features. InProceedings of the 10th International Speech Communication Association, Interspeech 2009, 1579–1582. Brighton, UK. 10.21437/Interspeech.2009‑470
     https://doi.org/10.21437/Interspeech.2009-470 [Google Scholar]
  691. Pravec, Norma A.
    2002 Survey of learner corpora. ICAME Journal26: 81–114.
     [Google Scholar]
  692. Prechtel, Christine & Clopper, Cynthia G.
    2016 Uptalk in Midwestern American English. InProceedings of Speech Prosody 8, 133–137. Boston, MA. 10.21437/SpeechProsody.2016‑28
     https://doi.org/10.21437/SpeechProsody.2016-28 [Google Scholar]
  693. Preston, Dennis R.
    1998 They speak really bad English down South and in New York City. InLanguage Myths, Laurie Bauer & Peter Trudgill (eds), 139–149. Penguin: London.
     [Google Scholar]
  694. Prieto, Pilar & Roseano, Paolo
    (eds) 2009–2013 Atlas interactivo de la entonación del español. <prosodia.upf.edu/atlasentonacion/> (14October 2018).
     [Google Scholar]
  695. (eds) 2010 Transcription of Intonation of the Spanish Language. Munich: Lincom.
     [Google Scholar]
  696. Prieto, Pilar & Shih, Chilin
    1996 Pitch downtrend in Spanish. Journal of Phonetics24(4): 445–473. 10.1006/jpho.1996.0024
     https://doi.org/10.1006/jpho.1996.0024 [Google Scholar]
  697. Puga, Karin
    2019 English intonation of advanced learners: A contrastive interlanguage analysis. InLearner Corpora and Language Teaching [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 92], Sandra Götz & Joybrato Mukherjee (eds), 191–217. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.92.10pug
     https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.92.10pug [Google Scholar]
  698. Puga, Karin , Fuchs, Robert ., Hudson, Toby , Setter, Jane & Mok, Peggy
    2018 The perception-production link in intonation: Evidence from German learners of English. InProceedings of Speech Prosody 2018, 685–689. Poznań, Poland.
     [Google Scholar]
  699. Puga, Karin , Fuchs, Robert ., Setter, Jane & Mok, Peggy
    2017 The perception of English intonation patterns by German L2 speakers of English. InProceedings of the 18th International Speech Communication Association, Interspeech 2017, 3241–3245. Stockholm, Sweden. 10.21437/Interspeech.2017‑1279
     https://doi.org/10.21437/Interspeech.2017-1279 [Google Scholar]
  700. Purcell, Edward T . & Suter, Richard W.
    1980 Predictors of pronunciation accuracy: A reexamination. Language Learning30(2): 271–287. 10.1111/j.1467‑1770.1980.tb00319.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1980.tb00319.x [Google Scholar]
  701. Queen, Robin M.
    2006 Phrase-final intonation in narratives told by Turkish-German bilinguals. International Journal of Bilingualism10(2): 153–178. 10.1177/13670069060100020301
     https://doi.org/10.1177/13670069060100020301 [Google Scholar]
  702. 2012 Turkish-German bilinguals and their intonation: Triangulating evidence about contact-induced language change. Language88(4): 791–816. 10.1353/lan.2012.0078
     https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2012.0078 [Google Scholar]
  703. Quilis, Antonio
    1993 Tratado de fonología y fonética españolas, 2nd edn.Madrid: Gredos.
     [Google Scholar]
  704. R Development Core Team
    R Development Core Team 2022  R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: Foundation for Statistical Computing. <https://www.R-project.org/> (24April 2024).
     [Google Scholar]
  705. Rakow, Martin & Lleó, Conxita
    2011 Comparing cues of phrasing in German and Spanish child monolingual and bilingual acquisition. InIntonational Phrasing in Romance and Germanic: Cross-linguistic and Bilingual Studies [Hamburg Studies on Multilingualism 10], Christoph Gabriel & Conxita Lleó (eds), 213–234. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/hsm.10.11rak
     https://doi.org/10.1075/hsm.10.11rak [Google Scholar]
  706. Ramírez Verdugo, M. Dolores
    2002 Non-native interlanguage intonation systems: A study based on a computerized corpus of Spanish learners of English. ICAME Journal26: 115–132.
     [Google Scholar]
  707. 2003 A Contrastive Analysis of Non-native Interlanguage English Intonation Systems and their Implication in the Organization of Information from a Functional Perspective. A Study based on a Computerized Corpus of Spanish Learners of English. PhD dissertation, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid.
  708. 2005 The nature and patterning of native and non-native intonation in the expression of certainty and uncertainty: Pragmatic effects. Journal of Pragmatics37(12): 2086–2115. 10.1016/j.pragma.2005.02.012
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2005.02.012 [Google Scholar]
  709. 2006a Prosodic realization of focus in the discourse of Spanish learners and English native speakers. EstudiosIngleses de la Universidad Complutense14: 9–32.
     [Google Scholar]
  710. 2006b Non-native intonation: What information does it transmit?InCorpus Linguistics. Applications for the Study of English [Linguistic Insights 25], Ana María Hornero , María José Luzón & Silvia Murillo (eds), 507–526. Bern: Peter Lang.
     [Google Scholar]
  711. 2008 A cross-linguistic study on the pragmatics of intonation in directives. InPragmatics and Corpus Linguistics: A Mutualistic Entente, Jesús Romero-Trillo (ed.), 205–234. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110199024.205
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110199024.205 [Google Scholar]
  712. 2022 Intonation in L2 Discourse: Research Insights. New York, NJ: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  713. Ramírez Verdugo, M. Dolores & Romero-Trillo, Jesús
    2005 The pragmatic function of intonation in L2 discourse: English tag questions used by Spanish speakers. Intercultural Pragmatics2(2): 151–168.
     [Google Scholar]
  714. Rampton, Ben
    2009 Interaction ritual and not just artful performance in crossing and stylization, Language in Society38(2): 149–176. 10.1017/S0047404509090319
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404509090319 [Google Scholar]
  715. Rasier, Laurent & Hiligsmann, Philippe
    2007 Prosodic transfer from L1 to L2. Theoretical and methodological issues. Nouveaux Cahiers de Linguistique Française28:41–66.
     [Google Scholar]
  716. Raupach, Manfred
    1980 Temporal variables in first and second language speech production. InTemporal Variables in Speech Studies in Honour of Frieda Goldman-Eisler, Hans W. Dechert & Manfred Raupach (eds), 263–270. The Hague: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110816570.263
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110816570.263 [Google Scholar]
  717. Ray, George B . & Zahn, Christopher J.
    1990 Regional speech rates in the United States: A preliminary analysis. Communication Research Reports7(1): 34–37. 10.1080/08824099009359851
     https://doi.org/10.1080/08824099009359851 [Google Scholar]
  718. Reitter, David & Moore, Johanna D.
    2007 Predicting success in dialogue. InProceedings of the 45th Annual Meeting – Association for Computational Linguistics, Annie Zaenen & Antal van den Bosch (eds), 808–815. Prague, Czech Republic: Association for Computational Linguistics.
     [Google Scholar]
  719. Reyelt, Matthias , Grice, Martine , Benzmüller, Ralf , Mayer, Jörg & Batliner, Anton
    1996 Prosodische Etikettierung des Deutschen mit ToBI. InNatural Language and Speech Technology. Results of the Third KONVENS Conference, Dafydd Gibbon (ed.), 144–155. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110821895‑016
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110821895-016 [Google Scholar]
  720. Riesco-Bernier, Silvia
    2012 Same but different: The pragmatic potential of native vs. non-native teachers’ intonation in the EFL classroom. InPragmatics and Prosody in English Language Teaching, Jesús Romero-Trillo (ed.), 171–198. Dordrecht: Springer. 10.1007/978‑94‑007‑3883‑6_11
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-3883-6_11 [Google Scholar]
  721. Riesco-Bernier, Silvia & Romero-Trillo, Jesús
    2008 The acoustics of ‘newness’ and its pragmatic implications in classroom discourse. Journal of Pragmatics40(6): 1103–1116. 10.1016/j.pragma.2008.02.002
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.02.002 [Google Scholar]
  722. Ritchart, Amanda & Arvaniti, Amalia
    2014 The form and use of uptalk in Southern California English. InProceedings of the 7th International Conference on Speech Prosody, 331–335. Dublin, Ireland.
     [Google Scholar]
  723. Roach, Peter
    2009[1991] English Phonetics and Phonology: A Practical Course. Cambridge: CUP.
     [Google Scholar]
  724. Robb, Michael P ., Maclagan, Margaret A . & Chen, Yang
    2004 Speaking rates of American and New Zealand varieties of English. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics18(1): 1–15. 10.1080/0269920031000105336
     https://doi.org/10.1080/0269920031000105336 [Google Scholar]
  725. Robles-Puente, Sergio
    2019 Transferencia y erosión de patrones melódicos en bilingües de español e inglésen California. Boletín de Filología54(1): 283–306. 10.4067/S0718‑93032019000100283
     https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-93032019000100283 [Google Scholar]
  726. Rodgers, Jonathan
    1999 Tree influences on glottalization. InPhrase-Level Phonetics and Phonology of German, Klaus. J. Kohler (ed.), 173–280. Kiel: Institut für Phonetik und Digitale Sprachverarbeitung, Universität Kiel.
     [Google Scholar]
  727. 2000 The phonatory correlates of juncture in German. InProceedings of the 5th Seminar on Speech Production: Models and Data, 289–292. Kloster Seeon, Bavaria, Germany.
     [Google Scholar]
  728. Rodríguez, Luis J . & Torres, M. Inés
    2006 Spontaneous speech events in two speech databases of human-computer and human-human dialogs in Spanish. Language and Speech49(3): 333–366. 10.1177/00238309060490030201
     https://doi.org/10.1177/00238309060490030201 [Google Scholar]
  729. Rogerson-Revell, Pamela
    2011 English Phonology and Pronunciation Teaching. London: Bloomsbury. 10.5040/9781350934177
     https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350934177 [Google Scholar]
  730. Romero-Trillo, Jesús
    2002 The pragmatic fossilization of discourse markers in non-native speakers of English. Journal of Pragmatics34(6): 769–784. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(02)00022‑X
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00022-X [Google Scholar]
  731. 2007 Adaptive management in discourse: The case of involvement discourse markers in English and Spanish conversations. Catalan Journal of Linguistics6: 81–94. 10.5565/rev/catjl.125
     https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/catjl.125 [Google Scholar]
  732. (ed.) 2012 Pragmatics and Prosody in English Language Teaching. Dordrecht: Springer. 10.1007/978‑94‑007‑3883‑6
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-3883-6 [Google Scholar]
  733. 2014 ‘Pragmatic punting’ and prosody: Evidence from corpora. InThe Functional Perspective on Language and Discourse: Applications and Implications [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 247], María A. Gómez González , Francisco José Ruíz de Mendoza Ibáñez , Francisco Gonzálvez García & Angela Downing (eds), 209–221. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.247.11rom
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.247.11rom [Google Scholar]
  734. 2019 Prosodic pragmatics and feedback in intercultural communication. Journal of Pragmatics151: 91–102. 10.1016/j.pragma.2019.02.018
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.02.018 [Google Scholar]
  735. Romero-Trillo, Jesús & Lenn, Elizabeth
    2011 Do you “(mis)understand” what I mean? Pragmatic strategies to avoid cognitive maladjustment. Journal of English Studies9: 223–241. 10.18172/jes.173
     https://doi.org/10.18172/jes.173 [Google Scholar]
  736. Romero-Trillo, Jesús & Llinares-García, Ana
    2004 Prosodic competence in reading aloud: An acoustic corpus-based study of native and non-native (Spanish) speakers of English. Estudios Ingleses de la Universidad Complutense12: 63–77.
     [Google Scholar]
  737. Romero-Trillo, Jesús & Maguire, Laura
    2011 Adaptive context, the fourth element of meaning. International Review of Pragmatics3(2): 226–239.
     [Google Scholar]
  738. Romero-Trillo, Jesús & Newell, Jessica
    2012 Prosody and feedback in native and non-native speakers of English. InPragmatics and Prosody in English Language Teaching, Jesús Romero-Trillo (ed.),117–132. Dordrecht: Springer. 10.1007/978‑94‑007‑3883‑6_8
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-3883-6_8 [Google Scholar]
  739. Rosen, Anna
    2019 The use of smallwords in the speech of German learners of English. InLearner Corpora and Language Teaching. A Corpus-based Study of the Factors of Instruction and Natural Exposure [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 92], Sandra Götz & Joybrato Mukherjee (eds), 220–241. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.92.11ros
     https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.92.11ros [Google Scholar]
  740. Rüdiger, Sofia
    2016 Cuppa coffee? Challenges and opportunities of compiling a conversational English corpus in an expanding circle setting. InA Blend of MaLT. Selected Contributions from the Methods and Linguistic Theories Symposium 2015, Hanna Christ , Daniel Klenovšak , Lukas Sönning & Valentin Werner (eds), 49–71. Bamberg: University of Bamberg Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  741. Sacks, Harvey & Schegloff, Emanuel A.
    1979 Two preferences in the organization of reference to persons in conversation and their interaction. InEveryday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology, George Psathas (ed.), 15–21. New York, NY: Irvington Publishers.
     [Google Scholar]
  742. Sacks, Harvey , Schegloff, Emanuel A . & Jefferson, Gail
    1974 A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language50(4–1): 696–735. 10.1353/lan.1974.0010
     https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1974.0010 [Google Scholar]
  743. Sagisaka, Yoshinori , Campbell, Nick & Higuchi, Norio
    (eds) 1997 Computing Prosody: Computational Models for Processing Spontaneous Speech. New York, NY: Springer. 10.1007/978‑1‑4612‑2258‑3
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-2258-3 [Google Scholar]
  744. Saito, Kazuya
    2013 Age effects on late bilingualism: The production development of /r/ by high-proficiency Japanese learners of English. Journal of Memory and Language69(4): 546–562. 10.1016/j.jml.2013.07.003
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2013.07.003 [Google Scholar]
  745. 2015 Experience effects on the development of late second language learners’ oral proficiency. Language Learning65(3): 563–595. 10.1111/lang.12120
     https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12120 [Google Scholar]
  746. 2018 Advanced second language segmental and suprasegmental acquisition. InThe Handbook of Advanced Proficiency in Second Language Acquisition, Paul A. Malovrh & Alessandro G. Benati (eds), 282–303. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley & Sons. 10.1002/9781119261650.ch15
     https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119261650.ch15 [Google Scholar]
  747. Saito, Kazuya & Hanzawa, Keiko
    2016 The role of input in second language oral ability development in foreign language classrooms: A longitudinal study. Language Teaching Research22(4): 1–20.
     [Google Scholar]
  748. Saito, Yukie & Saito, Kazuya
    2016 Differential effects of instruction on the development of second language comprehensibility, word stress, rhythm, and intonation: The case of inexperienced Japanese EFL learners. Language Teaching Research21(5): 1–20.
     [Google Scholar]
  749. Sánchez-Alvarado, Covadonga
    2020 Syntactic and prosodic marking of subject focus in American English and Peninsular Spanish. InHispanic Linguistics: Current Issues and New Directions [Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 26], Alfonso Morales-Front , Michael J. Ferreira , Ronald P. Leow & Cristina Sanz (eds), 184–203. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/ihll.26.09san
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ihll.26.09san [Google Scholar]
  750. Saville-Troike, Muriel & Barto, Karen
    2017 Introduction Second Language Acquisition, 3rd edn. Cambridge: CUP.
     [Google Scholar]
  751. Scarborough, Rebecca A ., Keating, Patricia , Mattys, Sven L ., Taehong Cho & Alwan, Abeer
    2009 Optical phonetics and visual perception of lexical and phrasal stress in English. Language and Speech52(2–3): 135–175. 10.1177/0023830909103165
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0023830909103165 [Google Scholar]
  752. Scharff-Rethfeldt, Wiebke , Miller, Nick & Mennen, Ineke
    2008 Unterschiede in der mittleren Sprechtonhöhe bei Deutsch/Englisch bilingualen Sprechern. Sprache, Stimme, Gehör32(3): 123–128. 10.1055/s‑0028‑1083799
     https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0028-1083799 [Google Scholar]
  753. Schauffler, Nadja
    2021 Alternation Preferences and Focus Marking. PhD dissertation, University of Stuttgart.
  754. Scherer, Klaus R.
    2003 Vocal communication of emotion: A review of research paradigms. Speech Communication40(1–2): 227–256. 10.1016/S0167‑6393(02)00084‑5
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6393(02)00084-5 [Google Scholar]
  755. Schilling, Natalie
    2013 Sociolinguistic Fieldwork. Cambridge: CUP. 10.1017/CBO9780511980541
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511980541 [Google Scholar]
  756. Schütze, Ulf
    2016 Language Learning and the Brain. Lexical Processing in Second Language Acquisition. Cambridge: CUP. 10.1017/CBO9781316665619
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316665619 [Google Scholar]
  757. Schweitzer, Antje & Lewandowski, Natalie
    2013 Convergence of articulation rate in spontaneous speech. InProceedings of the 14th International Speech Communication Association, Interspeech 2013, 525–529. Lyon, France. 10.21437/Interspeech.2013‑148
     https://doi.org/10.21437/Interspeech.2013-148 [Google Scholar]
  758. Schweitzer, Katrin , Walsh, Michael & Schweitzer, Antje
    2017 To see or not to see: Interlocutor visibility and likeability influence convergence in intonation. InProceedings of the 18th International Speech Communication Association, Interspeech 2017, 919–923. Stockholm, Sweden.
     [Google Scholar]
  759. Scovel, Thomas
    1988 A Time to Speak. A Psycholinguistic Inquiry to the Critical Period for Human Speech. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
     [Google Scholar]
  760. 2000 A critical review of the critical period research. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics20: 213–223. 10.1017/S0267190500200135
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190500200135 [Google Scholar]
  761. Scuffil, Michael
    1982 Experiments in Comparative Intonation. Tübingen: Niemeyer. 10.1515/9783111595290
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783111595290 [Google Scholar]
  762. Seliger, Herbert W.
    1978 Implications of a multiple critical periods hypothesis for second language learning. InSLA Research: Issues and Implications, William C. Ritchie (ed.), 11–19. New York, NY: Academic Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  763. Selinker, Larry
    1972 Interlanguage. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching10(3): 209–231. 10.1515/iral.1972.10.1‑4.209
     https://doi.org/10.1515/iral.1972.10.1-4.209 [Google Scholar]
  764. 1992 Rediscovering Interlanguage. London: Longman.
     [Google Scholar]
  765. Selinker, Larry & Lamendella, John T.
    1978 Two perspectives on fossilization in interlanguage learning. Interlanguage Studies Bulletin3(2): 143–191.
     [Google Scholar]
  766. Selkirk, Elisabeth O.
    1980 The role of prosodic categories in English word stress. Linguistic Inquiry11(3): 563–605.
     [Google Scholar]
  767. Selting, Margret
    2000 The construction of units in conversational talk. Language in Society29(4): 477–517. 10.1017/S0047404500004012
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500004012 [Google Scholar]
  768. Selting, Margret
    2005 Syntax and prosody as methods for the construction and identification of turn-constructional units in conversation. InSyntax and Lexis in Conversation. Studies on the Use of Linguistic Resources in Talk-in-interaction [Studies in Discourse and Grammar 17], Auli Hakulinen & Margret Selting (eds), 17–44. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/sidag.17.04sel
     https://doi.org/10.1075/sidag.17.04sel [Google Scholar]
  769. Selting, Margret
    2010 Prosody in interaction: State of the art. InProsody in Interaction [Studies in Discourse and Grammar 23], Dagmar Barth-Weingarten , Elisabeth Reber & Margret Selting (eds), 3–40. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/sidag.23.05sel
     https://doi.org/10.1075/sidag.23.05sel [Google Scholar]
  770. Setter, Jane , Wong, Cathy S. P . & Chan, Brian H. S
    2010 Hong Kong English. Edinburgh: EUP. 10.1515/9780748635979
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9780748635979 [Google Scholar]
  771. Sheldon Amy & Strange, Winifred
    1982 The acquisition of /r/ and /l/ by Japanese learners of English: Evidence that speech production can precede speech perception. Applied Psycholinguistics19(3): 243–261. 10.1017/S0142716400001417
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716400001417 [Google Scholar]
  772. Shevchenko, Tatiana I . & Skopintseva, Tatiana S.
    2004 Prosody variation in English: Geographical, social, situational. InProceedings of Speech Prosody 2004, 139–142. Nara, Japan.
     [Google Scholar]
  773. Shobbrook, Katherine & House, Jill
    2003 High rising tones in Southern British English. InProceedings of the 15th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, ICPhS 2003, 1273–1276. Barcelona, Spain.
     [Google Scholar]
  774. Shokeir, Vanessa
    2008 Evidence for the stable use of uptalk in South Ontario English. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics14(2): 16–24.
     [Google Scholar]
  775. Shriberg, Lawrence D ., Kwiatkowski, Joan & Hoffman, Kit
    1984 A procedure for phonetic transcription by consensus. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research27(3): 456–465. 10.1044/jshr.2703.456
     https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.2703.456 [Google Scholar]
  776. Sidaras, Sabrina K ., Alexander, Jessica E . & Nygaard, Lynne C.
    2009 Perceptual learning of systematic variation in Spanish-accented speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America125(5): 3306–3316. 10.1121/1.3101452
     https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3101452 [Google Scholar]
  777. Silverman, Kim , Beckman, Mary Esther , Pitrelli, John F ., Ostendorf, Mari , Wightman, Colin , Price, Patti , Pierrehumbert, Janet B . & Hirschberg, Julia
    1992 ToBI: A standard scheme for labeling prosody. InProceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Spoken Language Processing, ICSLP 1992, 867–870. Banff, Alberta, Canada.
     [Google Scholar]
  778. Šimáčková, Šárka , Kolářová, Katerina & Podlipský, Václav Jonáš
    2014 Tempo and connectedness of Czech-accented English speech. Concordia Working Papers in Applied Linguistics5: 667–677.
     [Google Scholar]
  779. Simpson, Adrian P
    2009 Phonetic differences between male and female speech. Language and Linguistics Compas3(2): 621-640.
     [Google Scholar]
  780. Skarnitzl, Radek & Hledíková, Hana
    2022 Prosodic phrasing of good speakers in English and Czech. Frontiers in Psychology13: 1–13. 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.857647
     https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.857647 [Google Scholar]
  781. Skarnitzl, Radek & Rumlová, Jana
    2019 Phonetic aspects of strongly-accented Czech speakers of English. Acta Universitatis Carolinae – Philologica2( Phonetica Pragensia ): 109–128. 10.14712/24646830.2019.21
     https://doi.org/10.14712/24646830.2019.21 [Google Scholar]
  782. Skarnitzl, Radek & Vaňková, Jitka
    2017 Fundamental frequency statistics for male speakers of common Czech. Acta Universitatis Carolinae – Philologica3( Phonetica Pragensia ): 7–17. 10.14712/24646830.2017.29
     https://doi.org/10.14712/24646830.2017.29 [Google Scholar]
  783. Skehan, Peter & Foster, Pauline
    1997 Task type and task processing conditions as influences on foreign language performance. Language Teaching Research1(3): 185–211. 10.1177/136216889700100302
     https://doi.org/10.1177/136216889700100302 [Google Scholar]
  784. Smith, Caroline Laws
    2007 Prosodic accommodation by French speakers to a nonnative interlocutor. InProceedings of the 16th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, ICPhS 2007, 1081–1084. Saarbrücken, Germany.
     [Google Scholar]
  785. Smith, Vicki L . & Clark, Herbert H.
    1993 On the course of answering questions. Journal of Memory and Language32(1): 25–38. 10.1006/jmla.1993.1002
     https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1993.1002 [Google Scholar]
  786. Smorenburg, Laura , Rodd, Joe & Chen, Aoju
    2015 The effect of explicit training on the prosodic production of L2 sarcasm by Dutch learners of English. InProceedings of the 18th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, ICPhS 2015, 1–5. Glasgow, Scotland, UK.
     [Google Scholar]
  787. Snow, Catherine E . & Hoefnagel-Höhle, Marian
    1977 Age differences in the pronunciation of foreign sounds. Language & Speech20(4): 357–365. 10.1177/002383097702000407
     https://doi.org/10.1177/002383097702000407 [Google Scholar]
  788. Snow, David & Balog, Heather L.
    2002 Do children produce the melody before the words? A review of developmental intonation research. Lingua112(12): 1025–1058. 10.1016/S0024‑3841(02)00060‑8
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-3841(02)00060-8 [Google Scholar]
  789. Sonsaat, Sinem
    2017 The Influence of an Online Pronunciation Teacher’s Manual on Teachers’ Cognitions. PhD dissertation, Iowa State University. 10.31274/etd‑180810‑5849
     https://doi.org/10.31274/etd-180810-5849
  790. Sosa, Juan Manuel
    1999 La entonación del español: Su estructura fónica, variabilidad y dialectología. Madrid: Cátedra.
     [Google Scholar]
  791. Speer, Shari R ., Warren, Paul & Schafer, Amy J.
    2011 Situationally independent prosodic phrasing. Laboratory Phonology2(1): 35–98. 10.1515/labphon.2011.002
     https://doi.org/10.1515/labphon.2011.002 [Google Scholar]
  792. Speeter Beddor, Patrice
    2015 The relationship between language users’ perception and production repertoires. InProceedings of the 18th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, ICPhS 2015, 1–9. Glasgow, Scotland, UK.
     [Google Scholar]
  793. Spezzini, Susan
    2004 English immersion in Paraguay: Individual and sociocultural dimensions of language learning and use. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism7(5): 412–431. 10.1080/13670050408667823
     https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050408667823 [Google Scholar]
  794. Spolsky, Bernard
    1989 Conditions for Second Language Learning: Introduction to a General Theory. Oxford: OUP.
     [Google Scholar]
  795. Staples, Shelley
    2015 The Discourse of Nurse-patient Interactions: Contrasting the Communicative Styles of U.S. and International Nurses [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 72].Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.72
     https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.72 [Google Scholar]
  796. Staples, Shelley & Puga, Karin
    2022 Integrating fluency and prosody into multidimensional analysis. Exploring the multidimensional nature of spoken learner language. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research8(2): 190–236. 10.1075/ijlcr.21012.sta
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ijlcr.21012.sta [Google Scholar]
  797. Staples, Shelley & Reppen, Randi
    2016 Understanding first-year L2 writing: A lexico-grammatical analysis across L1s, genre, and language ratings. Journal of Second Language Writing32: 17–35. 10.1016/j.jslw.2016.02.002
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2016.02.002 [Google Scholar]
  798. Steinberg, Danny D & Sciarini, Natalia
    2006 Introduction to Psycholinguistics, 2nd edn.London: Longman.
     [Google Scholar]
  799. Stirling, Lesley , Fletcher, Janet , Mushin, Ilana & Wales, Roger
    2001 Representational issues in annotation: Using the Australian map task corpus to relate to prosody and discourse structure. Speech Communication33(1–2): 113–134. 10.1016/S0167‑6393(00)00072‑8
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6393(00)00072-8 [Google Scholar]
  800. Stockwell, Robert P ., Bowen, J. Donald & Martin, John W
    1965 The Grammatical Structures of English and Spanish. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  801. Streeter, Lynn A ., Macdonald, Nina H ., Apple, William , Krauss, Robert M . & Galotti, Kathleen M.
    1983 Acoustic and perceptual indicators of emotional stress. Journal of the Acoustic Society of America73(4): 1354–1360. 10.1121/1.389239
     https://doi.org/10.1121/1.389239 [Google Scholar]
  802. Šturm, Pavel & Lukeš, David
    2017 Fonotaktická analýza obsahu slabik na okrajích českých slov v mluvené a psanéřeči. Slovo a Slovesnost78(2): 99–118.
     [Google Scholar]
  803. Šturm, Pavel & Volín, Jan
    2023 Occurrence and duration of pauses in relation to speech tempo and structural organization in two speech genres. Languages8: 1–18. 10.3390/languages8010023
     https://doi.org/10.3390/languages8010023 [Google Scholar]
  804. Suter, Richard W.
    1976 Predictors of pronunciation accuracy in second language learning. LanguageLearning26(2): 233–253.
     [Google Scholar]
  805. Svartvik, Jan
    (ed) 1990 The London-Lund Corpus of Spoken English: Description and Research [Lund Studies in English82], Lund: Lund University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  806. Svartvik, Jan
    1991 What can real spoken data teach teachers of English?InGeorgetown University Round Table of Languages and Linguistics. Linguistics and Language Pedagogy: The State of the Art, James E. Alatis (ed.), 555–566. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  807. Swerts, Marc & Geluykens, Ronald
    1994 Prosody as a marker of information flow in spoken discourse. Language & Speech37(1): 21–43. 10.1177/002383099403700102
     https://doi.org/10.1177/002383099403700102 [Google Scholar]
  808. Swerts, Marc & Hirschberg, Julia
    2010 Prosodic predictors of upcoming positive or negative content in spoken messages. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America128(3): 1337–1345. 10.1121/1.3466875
     https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3466875 [Google Scholar]
  809. Swerts, Marc & Krahmer, Emiel
    2004 Congruent and incongruent audiovisual cues to prominence. InProceedings of Speech Prosody 2004, 69–72. Nara, Japan. 10.21437/SpeechProsody.2004‑16
     https://doi.org/10.21437/SpeechProsody.2004-16 [Google Scholar]
  810. 2005 Audiovisual prosody and feeling of knowing. Journal of Memory and Language53(1): 81–94. 10.1016/j.jml.2005.02.003
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2005.02.003 [Google Scholar]
  811. Szczepek Reed, Beatrice
    2010 Intonation phrases in natural conversation. InProsody in Interaction [Studies in Discourse & Grammar 23], Dagmar Barth-Weingarten , Elisabeth Reber & Margret Selting (eds), 191–212. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/sidag.23.16ree
     https://doi.org/10.1075/sidag.23.16ree [Google Scholar]
  812. ’t Hart, Johan & Collier, René
    1975 Integrating different levels of intonation analysis. Journal of Phonetics3(4): 235–55. 10.1016/S0095‑4470(19)31432‑9
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0095-4470(19)31432-9 [Google Scholar]
  813. ’t Hart, Johan , Collier, René & Cohen, Antonie
    1990 A perceptual study of intonation. An experimental-phonetic approach to speech melody [Cambridge Studies in Speech Science and Communication]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  814. Tahta, Sonia , Wood, Margaret & Loewenthal, Kate
    1981a Foreign accents: Factors relating to transfer of accent from the first language to a second language. Language and Speech24(3): 265–272. 10.1177/002383098102400306
     https://doi.org/10.1177/002383098102400306 [Google Scholar]
  815. 1981b Age changes in the ability to replicate foreign pronunciation and intonation. Language and Speech24(4): 363–372. 10.1177/002383098102400405
     https://doi.org/10.1177/002383098102400405 [Google Scholar]
  816. Tannen, Deborah
    1986 Cross-cultural Communication. InHandbook of Discourse Analysis, Vol. 4: Discourse Analysis in Society, Teun Adrianus van Dijk (ed.), 203–215. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  817. Tauroza, Steve & Allison, Desmond
    1990 Speech rates in British English. Applied Linguistics11(1): 90–105. 10.1093/applin/11.1.90
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/11.1.90 [Google Scholar]
  818. Tavakoli, Parvaneh & Skehan, Peter
    2005 Strategic planning, task structure, and performance testing. InPlanning and Task Performance in a Second Language [Language Learning & Language Teaching 11], Rod Ellis (ed.), 239–273. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/lllt.11.15tav
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.11.15tav [Google Scholar]
  819. Taylor, David S.
    1993 Intonation and accent in English: What teachers need to know. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching31(1): l–22. 10.1515/iral.1993.31.1.1
     https://doi.org/10.1515/iral.1993.31.1.1 [Google Scholar]
  820. Taylor, Paul
    2000 Analysis and synthesis of intonation using the Tilt Model. Technical report, Centre for Speech Technology Research, University of Edinburgh.
     [Google Scholar]
  821. Tench, Paul
    1996 The Intonation Systems of English. London: Cassell.
     [Google Scholar]
  822. 2003 Processes of semogenesis in English intonation. Functions of Language10(2): 209–234. 10.1075/fol.10.2.04ten
     https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.10.2.04ten [Google Scholar]
  823. 2015 The Intonation Systems of English. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
     [Google Scholar]
  824. Terraschke, Agnes & Holmes, Janet
    2007 Und tralala: Vagueness and general extenders in German and New Zealand English. InVague Language Explored, Joan Cutting (ed.), 198–220. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230627420_11
     https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230627420_11 [Google Scholar]
  825. Thomas, Erik R . & Kendall, Tyler S.
    2019 Prosody. InMexican American English: Substrate Influence and the Birth of an Ethnolect, Erik R. Thomas (ed.), 215–242. Cambridge: CUP. 10.1017/9781316162316.009
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316162316.009 [Google Scholar]
  826. Thomason, Jesse , Nguyen, Huy V . & Litman, Diane
    2013 Prosodic entrainment and tutoring dialogue success. InArtificial Intelligence in Education, H. Chad Lane , Kalina Yacef , Jack Mostow & Philip Pavlik (eds), 750–753. Berlin: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑642‑39112‑5_104
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39112-5_104 [Google Scholar]
  827. Thompson, Irene
    1991 Foreign accents revisited: The English pronunciation of Russian immigrants. Language Learning41(2): 177–204. 10.1111/j.1467‑1770.1991.tb00683.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1991.tb00683.x [Google Scholar]
  828. Tian, Ye , Maruyama, Takehiko & Ginzburg, Jonathan
    2017 Self-addressed questions and filled pauses: A cross-linguistic investigation. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research46(4): 905–922. 10.1007/s10936‑016‑9468‑5
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-016-9468-5 [Google Scholar]
  829. Tillmann, Hans. G . & Pfitzinger, Hartmut R.
    2003 Local speech rate: Relationships between articulation and speech acoustics. InProceedings of the 15th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, ICPhS 2003, 3177–3180. Barcelona, Spain.
     [Google Scholar]
  830. Toivanen, Juhani
    2003 Tone choice in the English intonation of proficient non-native speakers. InPHONUM9: Proceedings from Fonetik 2003, 1–4. Umeå, Sweden.
     [Google Scholar]
  831. Toledo, Guillermo Andres
    1988 El ritmo en elespañol. Madrid: Gredos.
     [Google Scholar]
  832. Tomlinson Jr., John M . & Fox Tree , Jean E.
    2009 Talking it up: How the function of rising declaratives depends on prolongations and listeners’ expectations. InProceedings of the 31st Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, CogSci 2009, 1234–1239. Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
     [Google Scholar]
  833. 2011 Listeners’ comprehension of uptalk in spontaneous speech. Cognition119(1): 58–69. 10.1016/j.cognition.2010.12.005
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2010.12.005 [Google Scholar]
  834. Tortel, Anne
    2013 Prosody in a contrastive learner corpus. InAutomatic Treatment and Analysis of Learner Corpora [Studies in Corpus Linguistics Series 59], Ana Díaz-Negrillo , Nicolas Ballier & Paul Thompson (eds), 227–248. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.59.14tor
     https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.59.14tor [Google Scholar]
  835. Tortel, Anne & Hirst, Daniel
    2010 Rhythm metrics and the production of English L1/L2. InProceedings of Speech Prosody 2010, 1–4. Chicago, IL. 10.21437/SpeechProsody.2010‑49
     https://doi.org/10.21437/SpeechProsody.2010-49 [Google Scholar]
  836. Tottie, Gunnel
    2002 An Introduction to American English. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  837. Tottie, Gunnel & Hoffmann, Sebastian
    2006 Tag questions in British and American English. Journal of English Linguistics34(4): 283–311. 10.1177/0075424206294369
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0075424206294369 [Google Scholar]
  838. Towell, Richard , Hawkins, Roger & Bazergui, Nives
    1996 The development of fluency in advanced learners of French. Applied Linguistics17(1): 84–119. 10.1093/applin/17.1.84
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/17.1.84 [Google Scholar]
  839. Towell, Richard
    2002 Relative degrees of fluency. A comparative case study of advanced learners of French. International Review of Applied Linguistic in Language40(2): 117–150. 10.1515/iral.2002.005
     https://doi.org/10.1515/iral.2002.005 [Google Scholar]
  840. Tracy-Ventura, Nicole & Paquot, Magali
    (eds) 2021 Routledge Handbook of Second Language Acquisition and Corpora. London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  841. Trafton, Anne
    2018 Cognitive scientists define critical period for learning language: Study shows children remain adept learners until the age of 17 or 18. MIT NEWS Office, 1May 2018 <news.mit.edu/2018/cognitive-scientists-define-critical-period-learning-language-0501> (15July 2018).
     [Google Scholar]
  842. Trager, George L . & Smith Jr., Henry Lee
    1951 An Outline of English Structure. Washington, DC: American Council of Learned Societies.
     [Google Scholar]
  843. Trim, John L. M
    1964 Tonetic stress marks for German. InIn Honour of Daniel Jones, David Abercrombie , Dennis Butler Fry , Peter MacCarthy , Norman Carson Scott & John L. M. Trim (eds), 374–383. London: Longman.
     [Google Scholar]
  844. Trim, John L. M
    1988 Some contrastive intonated features of British English and German. InEssays on the English Language and Applied Linguistics on the Occasion of Gerhard Nickel’s 60th Birthday, Josef Klegraf & Dietrich Nehls (eds), 235–249. Heidelberg: Julius Groos.
     [Google Scholar]
  845. Trofimovich, Pavel & Baker, Wendy
    2006 Learning second language suprasegmentals: Effect if L2 experience on prosody and fluency characteristics of L2 speech. Studies in Second Language Acquisition28(1): 1–30. 10.1017/S0272263106060013
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263106060013 [Google Scholar]
  846. 2007 Learning prosody and fluency characteristics of L2 speech: The effect of experience on child learners’ acquisition of five suprasegmentals. Applied Psycholinguistics28(2): 251–276. 10.1017/S0142716407070130
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716407070130 [Google Scholar]
  847. Trouvain, Jürgen
    2001 Phonetic aspects of “speech-laughs”. InProceedings of the Conference on Orality & Gestuality2001, 634–639. Aix-en-Provence, France.
     [Google Scholar]
  848. . Laughing, Breathing, Clicking – The Prosody of Nonverbal Vocalisations. InProceedings of Speech Prosody 7, 598-602. Dublin, Ireland.
     [Google Scholar]
  849. Trouvain, Jürgen & Braun, Bettina
    2020 Sentence prosody in a second language. InThe Oxford Handbook of Language Prosody, Carlos Gussenhoven & Aoju Chen (eds), 605–618. Oxford: OUP.
     [Google Scholar]
  850. Trouvain, Jürgen & Grice, Martine
    1999 The effect of tempo on prosodic structure. InProceedings of the 14th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, ICPhS 1999, 1067–1070. San Francisco, CA.
     [Google Scholar]
  851. Trouvain, Jürgen , Zimmerer, Frank , Möbius, Bernd , Gósy, Mária & Bonneau, Anne
    (eds) 2017  Segmental, Prosodic and Fluency Features in Phonetic Learner Corpora . Special issue ofInternational Journal of Learner Corpus Research3(2). 10.1075/ijlcr.3.2.01tro
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ijlcr.3.2.01tro [Google Scholar]
  852. Truckenbrodt, Hubert
    2007 Upstep on edge tones and on nuclear accents. InTones and Tunes, Vol. 2: Experimental Studies in Word and Sentence Prosody, Carlos Gussenhoven & Tomas Riad (eds), 349–386. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110207576.2.349
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110207576.2.349 [Google Scholar]
  853. Tyler, Joseph C.
    2012 Discourse Prosody in Production and Perception. PhD dissertation, University of Michigan.
  854. Tyler, Joseph
    2014 Rising pitch and quoted speech in everyday American English. InProceedings to the 7th Speech Prosody Conference 2014, 548–552. Dublin, Ireland. 10.21437/SpeechProsody.2014‑98
     https://doi.org/10.21437/SpeechProsody.2014-98 [Google Scholar]
  855. 2015 Expanding and mapping the indexical field: Rising pitch, the uptalk stereotype, and perceptual variation. Journal of English Linguistics43(4): 284–310. 10.1177/0075424215607061
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0075424215607061 [Google Scholar]
  856. 2019 Gender, questions and phonetic variation in uptalk: A corpus analysis of terminal rising pitch in the Santa Barbara Corpus of Spoken American English. Unpublished manuscript, Morehead State University.
     [Google Scholar]
  857. Uhlírová, Ludmila
    1997 Length vs. Order: Word length and clause length from the perspective of word order. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics4(1–3): 266–275. 10.1080/09296179708590103
     https://doi.org/10.1080/09296179708590103 [Google Scholar]
  858. Ulbrich, Christiane
    2004 A comparative study of declarative utterances in Swiss and German standards. InRegional Variation in Intonation, Peter Gilles & Jörg Peters (eds), 99–122. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
     [Google Scholar]
  859. 2006a Pitch range is not pitch range. InProceedings of Speech Prosody 2006, 1–4. Dresden, Germany. 10.21437/SpeechProsody.2006‑179
     https://doi.org/10.21437/SpeechProsody.2006-179 [Google Scholar]
  860. 2006b Prosodic phrasing in three German standard varieties. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics12(1): 361–373.
     [Google Scholar]
  861. Ulbrich, Christiane
    2008 Acquisition of regional pitch patterns in L2. InProceedings of Speech Prosody 2008, 575–578. Campinas, Brazil. 10.21437/SpeechProsody.2008‑130
     https://doi.org/10.21437/SpeechProsody.2008-130 [Google Scholar]
  862. Ulbrich, Christiane
    2010 Belfast intonation in L2 speech. InProceedings of Speech Prosody 2010, 1–4. Chicago, IL. 10.21437/SpeechProsody.2010‑50
     https://doi.org/10.21437/SpeechProsody.2010-50 [Google Scholar]
  863. 2012 German pitches in English: Production and perception of cross-varietal differences in L2. Computational Modeling of Bilingualism16(2): 397–419.
     [Google Scholar]
  864. 2015 Developmental stages and variability in the acquisition of second language segments and prosody. InProceedings of the 18th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, ICPhS 2015, 1–5. Glasgow, Scotland, UK.
     [Google Scholar]
  865. Ulbrich, Christiane & Mennen, Ineke
    2016 When prosody kicks in: The intricate interplay between segments and prosody in perceptions of foreign accent. International Journal of Bilingualism20(5): 522–549. 10.1177/1367006915572383
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006915572383 [Google Scholar]
  866. Ullakonoja, Riikka
    2007 Comparison of pitch range in Finnish (L1) and Russian (L2). InProceedings of the 16th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, ICPhS 2007, 1701–1704. Saarbrücken, Germany.
     [Google Scholar]
  867. Urbani, Martina
    2012 Pitch range in L1/L2 English. An analysis of f0 using LTD and linguistic measures. InMethodological Perspectives on Second Language Prosody. Papers from ML2P 2012, 79–83. Padova, Italy.
     [Google Scholar]
  868. Uther, Maria , Knoll, Monja & Burnham, Denis
    2007 Do you speak E-N-G-L-I-S-H? A comparison of foreigner- and infant-directed speech. Speech Communication49(1): 2–7. 10.1016/j.specom.2006.10.003
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.specom.2006.10.003 [Google Scholar]
  869. Uzal, Melike , Peltonen, Teemu , Huotilainen, Minna & Aaltonen, Olli
    2015 Degree of perceived accent in Finnish as a second language for Turkish children born in Finland. Language Learning65(3): 477–503. 10.1111/lang.12126
     https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12126 [Google Scholar]
  870. van Bezooijen, Reneé
    1995 Sociocultural aspects of Pitch differences between Japanese and Dutch women. Lang Speech38(3): 253–265. 10.1177/002383099503800303
     https://doi.org/10.1177/002383099503800303 [Google Scholar]
  871. van Els, Theo & de Bot, Kees
    1987 The role of intonation in foreign accent. The Modern Language Journal71(2): 147–155. 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.1987.tb01597.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1987.tb01597.x [Google Scholar]
  872. van Maastricht, Lieke , Zee, Tim , Krahmer, Emiel & Swerts, Marc
    2021 The interplay of prosodic cues in the L2: How intonation, rhythm, and speech rate in speech by Spanish learners of Dutch contribute to L1 Dutch perceptions of accentedness and comprehensibility. Speech Communication133: 81–90. 10.1016/j.specom.2020.04.003
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.specom.2020.04.003 [Google Scholar]
  873. Vergara, Daniel
    2015 Uptalk in Spanish dating shows?University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics21: 187–196.
     [Google Scholar]
  874. Veroňková, Jitka & Tolkunova, Yana
    2016 Vowel-related glottalization in Czech read speech: Russian vs. native speakers. Studie z Aplikované Lingvistiky1: 93–108.
     [Google Scholar]
  875. Vogel, Irene
    1991 Prosodic phonology: Second language acquisition data as evidence in theoretical phonology. InCrosscurrents in Second Language Acquisition and Linguistic Theories [Language Acquisition & Language Disorders 2], Thom Huebner & Charles A. Ferguson (eds),47–65. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/lald.2.07vog
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.2.07vog [Google Scholar]
  876. Voigt, Stefanie & Schüppert, Anja
    2013 Articulation rate and syllable reduction in Spanish and Portuguese. InPhonetics in Europe: Perception and Production, Charlotte S. Gooskens & Renee van Bezooijen (eds), 317–332. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
     [Google Scholar]
  877. Volín, Jan
    2008 Z intonace čtených zpravodajství: Výška první slabiky v taktu. Čeština doma a ve světě1–2: 89–96.
     [Google Scholar]
  878. Volín, Jan
    2019 The size of prosodic phrases in native and foreign-accented read-out monologues. Acta Universitatis Carolinae – Philologica 2 (PhoneticaPragensia XV): 145–158. 10.14712/24646830.2019.23
     https://doi.org/10.14712/24646830.2019.23 [Google Scholar]
  879. Volín, Jan & Galeone, Damien
    2017 Prosodic phrases in native and foreign-accented speech. Accents 2017. Accents in use. Łódź, Poland.
     [Google Scholar]
  880. 2018 Prosodic breaks in foreign-accented speech. Accents 2018. Accents go to School. Łódź, Poland.
     [Google Scholar]
  881. Volín, Jan & Johaníková, Terezie
    2018 Weak structural words in British and Czech English. InThe Pronunciation of English by Speakers of Other Languages, Jan Volín & Radek Skarnitzl (eds), 181–195. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.
     [Google Scholar]
  882. Volín, Jan & Skarnitzl, Radek
    2007 Temporal downtrends in Czech read speech. InProceedings of the 8th International Speech Communication Association, Interspeech 2007, 442–445. Antwerp, Belgium. 10.21437/Interspeech.2007‑214
     https://doi.org/10.21437/Interspeech.2007-214 [Google Scholar]
  883. 2010a Suprasegmental acoustic cues of foreigness in Czech English. InProceedings of Odyssey 2010: The Speaker and Language Recognition Workshop, 271–278. Brno, Czech Republic.
     [Google Scholar]
  884. 2010b The strength of foreign accent under adverse listening conditions. Speech Communication52(11–12): 1010–1021. 10.1016/j.specom.2010.06.009
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.specom.2010.06.009 [Google Scholar]
  885. Volín, Jan , Galeone, Damien & Johnson, Wesley
    2017 Pitch range of intonation contours in English Czech. Philologica3: 55–64. 10.14712/24646830.2017.33
     https://doi.org/10.14712/24646830.2017.33 [Google Scholar]
  886. Volín, Jan , Poesová, Kristyna & Weingartová, Lenka
    2015 Speech melody properties in English, Czech and Czech English: Reference and interference. Research in Language13(1): 107–123. 10.1515/rela‑2015‑0018
     https://doi.org/10.1515/rela-2015-0018 [Google Scholar]
  887. Volín, Jan , Skarnitzl, Radek & Henderson, Alice
    2018 Perceptual impact of foreign-accented speech. InThe Pronunciation of English by Speakers of Other Languages, Jan Volín & Radek Skarnitzl (eds), 73–94. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.
     [Google Scholar]
  888. Vykouková, Martina
    2014 The Approach of Czech Upper-secondary English Teachers to Pronunciation Teaching. MA thesis, Charles University Prague.
     [Google Scholar]
  889. Walker, Abby & Campbell-Kibler, Kathryn
    2015 Repeat what after whom? Exploring variable selectivity in a cross-dialectal shadowing task. Frontiers in Psychology6: 1–18. 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00546
     https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00546 [Google Scholar]
  890. Walker, Robin
    1999 Proclaimed and perceived wants and needs among Spanish teachers of English. Speak Out!24(1): 25–32.
     [Google Scholar]
  891. Ward, Gregory & Hirschberg, Julia
    1985 Implicating uncertainty: The pragmatics of fall-rise intonation. Language61(4): 747–776. 10.2307/414489
     https://doi.org/10.2307/414489 [Google Scholar]
  892. Ward, Nigel G . & Gallardo, Paola
    2015 A corpus for investigating English-language learners’ dialog behaviors. UTEP Technical Report, 1–8.
     [Google Scholar]
  893. 2017 Non-native differences in prosodic-construction use. Dialogue & Discourse8(1): 1–30. 10.5087/dad.2017.101
     https://doi.org/10.5087/dad.2017.101 [Google Scholar]
  894. Ward, Nigel G.
    2015 Midlevel prosodic features toolkit. <https://github.com/nigelgward/midlevel> (28April 2024).
     [Google Scholar]
  895. Warren, Paul
    2005 Patterns of late rising in New Zealand English. Language Variation and Change17(2): 209–230. 10.1017/S095439450505009X
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S095439450505009X [Google Scholar]
  896. 2016 Uptalk. The Phenomenon of Rising Intonation. Cambridge: CUP.
     [Google Scholar]
  897. Warren, Paul & Britain, David
    2000 Intonation and prosody in New Zealand English. InNew Zealand English [Varieties of English Around the World G25], Allan Bell & Koenraad Kuiper (eds), 146–172. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/veaw.g25.10war
     https://doi.org/10.1075/veaw.g25.10war [Google Scholar]
  898. Warren, Paul & Daly, Nicola
    2005 Characterizing New Zealand English intonation: Broad and narrow analysis. InLanguages of New Zealand, Allan Bell , Ray Harlow & Donna Starks (eds), 217–237. Wellington: Victoria University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  899. Weingartová, Lenka , Churaňová, Eliška & Šturm, Pavel
    2014b Transitions, pauses and overlaps: Temporal characteristics of turn-taking in Czech. InProceedings of Speech Prosody 2014, 502–506. Dublin, Ireland.
     [Google Scholar]
  900. Weingartová, Lenka , Poesová, Kristyna & Volín, Jan
    2014a Prominence contrasts in Czech English as a predictor of learner’s proficiency. InProceedings of Speech Prosody 2014, 236–240. Dublin, Ireland. 10.21437/SpeechProsody.2014‑35
     https://doi.org/10.21437/SpeechProsody.2014-35 [Google Scholar]
  901. Wells, John Christopher
    2006 English Intonation: An Introduction. Cambridge: CUP.
     [Google Scholar]
  902. 2014 Sounds Interesting: Observations on English and General Phonetics. Cambridge: CUP. 10.1017/CBO9781139871327
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139871327 [Google Scholar]
  903. Wennerstrom, Ann
    1994 Intonational meaning in English discourse: A study of non-native speakers. Applied Linguistics15(4): 399–420. 10.1093/applin/15.4.399
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/15.4.399 [Google Scholar]
  904. 1998 Intonation as cohesion in academic discourse. Studies of Second Language Acquisition20(1): 1–25. 10.1017/S0272263198001016
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263198001016 [Google Scholar]
  905. 2001 The Music of Everyday Speech: Prosody and Discourse Analysis. Oxford: OUP. 10.1093/oso/9780195143218.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195143218.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  906. Wennerstrom, Ann & Siegel, Andrew F.
    2003 Keeping the floor in multiparty conversations:Intonation, syntax, and pause. Discourse Processes36(2): 77–107. 10.1207/S15326950DP3602_1
     https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326950DP3602_1 [Google Scholar]
  907. Werner, Valentin , Fuchs, Robert & Götz, Sandra
    2021 L1 influence vs. universal mechanisms: An SLA-driven corpus study on temporal expression. InLearner Corpus Research Meets Second Language Acquisition, Bert Le Bruyn & Magali Paquot (eds), 39–66. Cambridge: CUP.
     [Google Scholar]
  908. Wichmann, Anne
    2000 Intonation in Text and Discourse: Beginnings, Middles, and Ends. Harlow: Longman.
     [Google Scholar]
  909. Wichmann, Anne & Caspers, Johanneke
    2001 Melodic cues to turn-taking in English: Evidence from perception. InProceedings of the 2nd SIG dial Workshop on Discourse and Dialogue, 180–185. Aalborg, Denmark. 10.3115/1118078.1118103
     https://doi.org/10.3115/1118078.1118103 [Google Scholar]
  910. Wickham, Hadley
    2016 ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. New York, NY: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑24277‑4
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24277-4 [Google Scholar]
  911. Wiese, Richard
    1983 Psycholinguistische Aspekte der Sprachproduktion: Sprachverhalten und Verbalisierungsprozesse. Hamburg: Buske.
     [Google Scholar]
  912. Willems, Nico
    1982 English Intonation from a Dutch Point of View. Ambach: Intercontinental Graphics. 10.1515/9783110853469
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110853469 [Google Scholar]
  913. Willis, Erik W.
    2010 Dominican Spanish intonation. InTranscription of Intonation of the Spanish Language, Pilar Prieto & Paolo Roseano (eds), 123–153. Munich: Lincom.
     [Google Scholar]
  914. Wolfson, Nessa
    1986a Research methodology and the question of validity. TESOL Quarterly20(4): 689–699. 10.2307/3586519
     https://doi.org/10.2307/3586519 [Google Scholar]
  915. 1986b The bulge: A theory of speech behavior and social distance. Working Papers in Educational Linguistics2(1): 55–83.
     [Google Scholar]
  916. Wolk, Christoph , Götz, Sandra & Jäschke, Katja
    2021 Possibilities and Drawbacks of Using an Online Application for Semi-automatic Corpus Analysis to Investigate Discourse Markers and Alternative Fluency Variables. Corpus Pragmatics5: 7–36.
     [Google Scholar]
  917. Wollermann, Charlotte
    2012 Prosodie, nonverbal Signale, Unsicherheit und Kontext – Studien zur pragmatischen Fokusinterpretation. PhD dissertation, University of Duisburg-Essen.
  918. Wray, Alison
    2008 Formulaic Language: Pushing the Boundaries. Oxford: OUP.
     [Google Scholar]
  919. Yang, Li-Chiung
    2004 Duration and pauses as cues to discourse boundaries in speech. InProceedings of Speech Prosody 2004, 267–270. Nara, Japan. 10.21437/SpeechProsody.2004‑62
     https://doi.org/10.21437/SpeechProsody.2004-62 [Google Scholar]
  920. Yngve, Victor H.
    1970 On getting a word in edgewise. InPapers from the Sixth Regional Meeting Chicago Linguistic Society, 567–577. Chicago, IL.
     [Google Scholar]
  921. Yu, Alan C. L ., Abrego-Collier, Carissa & Sonderegger, Morgan
    2013 Phonetic imitation from an individual-difference perspective: Subjective attitude, personality and ‘autistic’ traits. PloS One8(9): e74746. 10.1371/journal.pone.0074746
     https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0074746 [Google Scholar]
  922. Yu, Jenny & Zahner, Katharina
    2018 Truncation and compression in Southern German and Australian English. InProceedings of the 19th International Speech Communication Association, Interspeech 2018, 1833–1837. Hyderabad, India. 10.21437/Interspeech.2018‑2513
     https://doi.org/10.21437/Interspeech.2018-2513 [Google Scholar]
  923. Yu, Guoxing
    2009 Lexical diversity in writing and speaking task performances. Applied Linguistics31(2): 236–259. 10.1093/applin/amp024
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amp024 [Google Scholar]
  924. Yule, George
    1980 Speakers’ topics and major paratones. Lingua52(1–2): 33–47. 10.1016/0024‑3841(80)90016‑9
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3841(80)90016-9 [Google Scholar]
  925. Zahner, Katharina & Yu, Jenny
    2019 Compensation strategies in non-native English and German. InProceedings of the 19th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, ICPhS 2019, 1670–1674. Melbourne, Australia.
     [Google Scholar]
  926. Zárate-Sández, Germán
    2015 Perception and Production of Intonation among English-Spanish Bilingual Speakers at Different Proficiency Levels. PhD dissertation, Georgetown University.
  927. 2016 Categorical perception and prenuclear pitch peak alignment in Spanish. InProceedings of Speech Prosody 8, 663–667. Boston, MA. 10.21437/SpeechProsody.2016‑136
     https://doi.org/10.21437/SpeechProsody.2016-136 [Google Scholar]
  928. 2017 Reexamining foreign accent: How much can personality explain?Ilha do Desterro70(3): 227–243. 10.5007/2175‑8026.2017v70n3p227
     https://doi.org/10.5007/2175-8026.2017v70n3p227 [Google Scholar]
  929. 2018 Production of final boundary tones in declarative utterances by English speaking learners of Spanish. InProceedings of Speech Prosody 2018, 927–931. Poznań, Poland. 10.21437/SpeechProsody.2018‑187
     https://doi.org/10.21437/SpeechProsody.2018-187 [Google Scholar]
  930. Zerbian, Sabine , Zuban, Yulia & Klotz, Martin
    2024 Intonational Features of Spontaneous Narrations in Monolingual and Heritage Russian in the U.S. - An Exploration of the RUEG Corpus. Languages9(2).10.3390/languages9010002
     https://doi.org/10.3390/languages9010002 [Google Scholar]
  931. Zellers, Margaret & Schweitzer, Antje
    2017 An investigation of pitch matching across adjacent turns in a corpus of spontaneous German. InProceedings of the 18th International Speech Communication Association, Interspeech 2017, 2336–2340. Stockholm, Sweden. 10.21437/Interspeech.2017‑811
     https://doi.org/10.21437/Interspeech.2017-811 [Google Scholar]
  932. Zellner, Brigitte
    1994 Pauses and the temporal structure of speech. InFundamentals of Speech Synthesis and Speech Recognition, Eric Keller (ed.), 41–62. Chichester: John Wiley.
     [Google Scholar]
  933. Zimmerer, Frank , Andreeva, Bistra , Jügler, Jeanin & Möbius, Bernd
    2015 Comparison of pitch profiles of German and French speakers speaking French and German. InProceedings of the 18th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, ICPhS 2015, 1–5. Glasgow, Scotland, UK.
     [Google Scholar]
  934. Zimmerer, Frank , Jügler, Jeanin , Andreeva, Bistra , Möbius, Bernd & Trouvain, Jürgen
    2014 Too cautious to vary more? A comparison of pitch variation in native and non-native productions of French and German speakers. InProceedings of Speech Prosody 7, 1037–1041. Dublin, Ireland. 10.21437/SpeechProsody.2014‑197
     https://doi.org/10.21437/SpeechProsody.2014-197 [Google Scholar]
  935. Zubizarreta, Maria Luisa & Nava, Emily
    2011 Encoding discourse-based meaning: Prosody vs. syntax. Implications for second language acquisition. Lingua121(4): 652–669. 10.1016/j.lingua.2010.06.013
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2010.06.013 [Google Scholar]
  936. Zvonik, Elena & Cummins, Fred
    2003 The effect of surrounding phrase lengths on pause duration. InProceedings of the 8th European Conference on Speech Communication and Technology, Eurospeech 2003, 777–780. Geneva, Switzerland. 10.21437/Eurospeech.2003‑65
     https://doi.org/10.21437/Eurospeech.2003-65 [Google Scholar]
/content/books/9789027246479
Loading

  • From This Site

    /content/books/9789027246479
    dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Chapter
    10
    5
/content/books/9789027246479
dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
-contentType:Journal -contentType:Chapter
10
5
Chapter
content/books/9789027246479
Book
false
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error