1887
  1. Home
  2. Books
  3. Metaphor, Metonymy and Lexicogenesis

Metaphor, Metonymy and Lexicogenesis

image of Metaphor, Metonymy and Lexicogenesis
USD
Buy:$156.00 + Taxes

This book investigates the interaction between new English lexis and metaphor/metonymy – figures meticulously defined and contrasted in terms of similarity/contiguity. It advances three main hypotheses: (i) derived lexis is more likely to be figurative in meaning and usage than the bases from which it is derived; (ii) derivation obscures the figurative origins of this lexis to varying degrees depending on differing processing strategies; (iii) lexicalisation is determined by Relevance (in Sperber and Wilson’s sense) to the needs of a culture or its powerful interest groups, where culture, following Norman Fairclough, is characterised as an ensemble of recognised action/discourse genres. This volume is distinctive in exploring the relations between grammar and metonymy and providing numerous examples of metaphorical and metonymic lexis as it reflects society's changing needs and (contested) ideologies.

References

  1. Adams, V.
    1973 An introduction to modern English word-formation. London: Longman.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Ahrens, K. , Liu, H. L. , Lee, C. Y. , Gong, S. P. , Fang, S. Y. and Hsu, Y. Y.
    2006 Functional MRI of conventional and anomalous metaphors in Mandarin Chinese. Brain and Language. 100 ( 2 ), 163–171. 10.1016/j.bandl.2005.10.004
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2005.10.004 [Google Scholar]
  3. Aitchison, J.
    1994 Words in the mind. 3rd edition. Oxford: Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Allan, K.
    2008 Metaphor and metonymy: a diachronic Approach. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Allan, K. and Burridge, K.
    2004 Euphemism and dysphemism. Oxford: OUP.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Al-Sharafi, A.
    2004 Textual metonymy: a semiotic approach. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9781403938909
     https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403938909 [Google Scholar]
  7. Arbib, M. A. , Bonaiuto, J. , and Rosta, E.
    2006 The mirror system hypothesis: from a macaque-like mirror system to imitation. In A. Cangelosi , A. D. M. Smith , and K. Smith , (Eds.), Proceedings of the 6th International Conference (EVOLANG6), Rome, Italy, 12 – 15 April 2006, (476–485). 10.1142/9789812774262_0001
     https://doi.org/10.1142/9789812774262_0001 [Google Scholar]
  8. Ardila, A.
    2010 A proposed re-interpretation and re-classification of aphasic syndromes. Aphasiology, 24 (3), 363–39410.1080/02687030802553704
     https://doi.org/10.1080/02687030802553704 [Google Scholar]
  9. 2021 Grammar in the brain: two grammar subsystems and two agrammatic types of aphasia. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 58 , 1–9. 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2020.100960
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneuroling.2020.100960 [Google Scholar]
  10. Aronoff, M.
    1976 Word formation in generative grammar. Massachussetts: MIT Press
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Attardo, S.
    2001 Humorous texts: a semantic and pragmatic analysis. Berlin, New York: Mouton. 10.1515/9783110887969
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110887969 [Google Scholar]
  12. Attardo, S. and Raskin, V.
    1991 Script theory revisited: joke similarity and joke representation model. Humor 4–3/4, 293–347. 10.1515/humr.1991.4.3‑4.293
     https://doi.org/10.1515/humr.1991.4.3-4.293 [Google Scholar]
  13. Ayto, J.
    1989 The Longman register of new words. Harlow: Longman.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. 1996 Lexical life expectancy – a prognostic guide. In J. Svartvik (Ed.), Words: proceedings of an international symposium (181–88). Lund, 25–26 August 1995. Stockholm: Kungl. Vitterhets Historie och Antikvitets Akademien. Konferenser 36.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Baayen, H.
    1992 Quantitative aspects of morphological productivity. In G. Booij , and J. van Marle (Eds.), Yearbook of morphology 1991 (109–49). Dordrecht: Kluwer. 10.1007/978‑94‑011‑2516‑1_8
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-2516-1_8 [Google Scholar]
  16. Baker, M.
    1992 In other words: a coursebook on translation. London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Bakhtin, M.
    1981 The dialogic imagination, M. Holquist and C. Emerson (Eds.). Austin: University of Texas Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Ballantyne, R. M.
    1915 A Coral Island, London: Nisbet.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Barcelona, A.
    2000 Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads: a cognitive perspective. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. 2002 Clarifying and applying the notions of metaphor and metonymy within cognitive linguistics: an update. In R. Dirven and R. Pörings (Eds.), Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast, (207–278). New York: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110219197.207
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110219197.207 [Google Scholar]
  21. Barcelona, A.
    2009 Motivation of construction meaning and form: the roles of metonymy and inference. In K-U. Panther , L. Thornburg , and A. Barcelona (Eds.), Metonymy and metaphor in grammar (363–401). Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/hcp.25.22bar
     https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.25.22bar [Google Scholar]
  22. Barcelona, A.
    2016 Salience in metonymy-motivated constructional abbreviated form with particular attention to English clippings. Cognitive Semantics2 (2016) 30–58. 10.1163/23526416‑00201003
     https://doi.org/10.1163/23526416-00201003 [Google Scholar]
  23. 2011 Reviewing the properties and prototype structure of metonymy. In R. Benczes , A. Barcelona , and F. J. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez (Eds.), Defining metonymy in cognitive linguistics: towards a consensus view (7–58). Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/hcp.28.02bar
     https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.28.02bar [Google Scholar]
  24. Barfield, O.
    1970 The meaning of literal. In G. Watson (Ed.), Literary English since Shakespeare (22–34). Oxford: OUP.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Barnbrook, G. , Mason, O. and Krishnamurti, R.
    2013 Collocation: applications and implications. Basingstoke: Macmillan. 10.1057/9781137297242
     https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137297242 [Google Scholar]
  26. Barnden, J.
    2010 Metaphor and metonymy: making their connections more slippery. Cognitive Linguistics, 21 ( 1 ), 1–34. 10.1515/cogl.2010.001
     https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.2010.001 [Google Scholar]
  27. Bartsch, R.
    1987 Norms of language. Theoretical and practical aspects. London and New York: Longman.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. ‘Basic level category’ 2019 https://psychologydictionary.org/basic-level-category/retrieved25/10/2019.
  29. Basilio, M.
    2006 Metaphor and metonymy in word-formation. D.E.L.T.A, Vol. 22, 67–80. 10.1590/S0102‑44502006000300006
     https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-44502006000300006 [Google Scholar]
  30. Bauer, L.
    1983 English word-formation. Cambridge: CUP. 10.1017/CBO9781139165846
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139165846 [Google Scholar]
  31. 2001 Morphological productivity [Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 95]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511486210
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486210 [Google Scholar]
  32. 2005 Productivity: theories. In P. Stekauer , and R. Lieber, R. (Eds.), Handbook of word-formation (315–334). Dordrecht: Springer. 10.1007/1‑4020‑3596‑9_13
     https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3596-9_13 [Google Scholar]
  33. 2006 Competition in English word-formation. In A. van Kemenade and B. Los (Eds.), The handbook of the history of English (177–198). Oxford: Blackwell. 10.1002/9780470757048.ch8
     https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470757048.ch8 [Google Scholar]
  34. 2008 Compounds and minor word-formation processes. In B. Aarts , and M. McMahon (Eds.), The handbook of English linguistics (483–506). Malden MA, Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. 2018 Conversion as metonymy. WORD Structure, 11 (2),175–184. 10.3366/word.2018.0123
     https://doi.org/10.3366/word.2018.0123 [Google Scholar]
  36. Bauer, L. , Lieber, R. , and Plag, I.
    2013 The Oxford reference guide to English morphology. Oxford: OUP. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198747062.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198747062.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  37. ‘Behavioursim’ 2022 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Behaviorism. retrieved10/10/2022
  38. Benczes, R.
    2013 The role of alliteration and rhyme in novel metaphorical and metonymical compounds. Metaphor and Symbol, 28 , 167–84. 10.1080/10926488.2013.797728
     https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2013.797728 [Google Scholar]
  39. Biernacka, E.
    2013 A discourse dynamics investigation of metonymy in talk. Ph.D thesisThe Open University. oro.open.ac.uk/54728/1/607623.pdf/retrieved08/01/2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Black, M.
    1962 Models and metaphors. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. 10.7591/9781501741326
     https://doi.org/10.7591/9781501741326 [Google Scholar]
  41. Blake, W.
    1969 The little vagabond. In G. Keynes (Ed.), Complete writings (216). London: OUP.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Blank, A.
    2001 Pathways of lexicalization. In M. Haspelmath , E. Konig , W. Oesterreicher , and W. Raible (Eds.), Language typology and language universals. Vol. 2 (1596–1608). Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Bloomfield, L.
    1926 A set of postulates for the science of language. Language 2 : 3 , 153–164. 10.2307/408741
     https://doi.org/10.2307/408741 [Google Scholar]
  44. Bloomfield, L.
    1933 Language. London: Allen and Unwin.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Blumberg, M.
    2002 Body heat. Cambridge Mass.: Harvard University Press. 10.4159/9780674023765
     https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674023765 [Google Scholar]
  46. Bonyadi, A. , and Samuel, M.
    2013 Headlines in newspaper editorials: a contrastive study. SAGE Open, 3 (2),1–10. 10.1177/2158244013494863.sgo.sagepub.com
     https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244013494863.sgo.sagepub.com [Google Scholar]
  47. Boroditsky, L. , and Ramscar, M.
    2002 The roles of body and mind in abstract thought. Psychological Science, 13 (2), 185–189. 10.1111/1467‑9280.00434
     https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00434 [Google Scholar]
  48. Bourdieu, P.
    1991 Language and symbolic power, ( John B. Thompson Ed., Gino Raymond and Matthew Adamson , trans.). Cambridge UK: Polity Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Boyd, R.
    1979 Metaphor and theory change: what is “metaphor” a metaphor for?In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (356–408). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Brdar, M.
    2009 Metonymies we live without. In K-U. Panther , L. Thornburg , and A. Barcelona (Eds.), Metonymy and metaphor in grammar (259–276). Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/hcp.25.15brd
     https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.25.15brd [Google Scholar]
  51. Brdar, M. and Brdar-Szabo, R.
    2009 The (non-) metonymic use of place names in English, German, Hungarian, and Croatian. In K-U. Panther , L. Thornburg , and A. Barcelona (Eds.), Metonymy and metaphor in grammar (229–257). Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/hcp.25.14brd
     https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.25.14brd [Google Scholar]
  52. Brdar-Szabó, R. and Brdar, M.
    2012 The problem of data in the cognitive linguistic research on metonymy: a cross-linguistic perspective Language Sciences 34 (6), 728–745.
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Bronte, C.
    1967 (f.p. 1853) Villette. London: Collins.
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Bruner, J.
    1983 Childs talk: learning to use language. New York: Norton.
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Butterfield, J.
    2008 Damp squid: the English language laid bare. Oxford: OUP.
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Caballero, R.
    2003 Metaphor and genre: the presence and role of metaphor in the Building Review. Applied Linguistics, 24 (2), 145–167, 10.1093/applin/24.2.145
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/24.2.145 [Google Scholar]
  57. ‘CallHome – English Corpus’ 2020 https://ca.talkbank.org/access/CallHome/eng.htmlretrieved1/07/2020.
  58. Cameron, L.
    2003 Metaphor in educational discourse. London: Continuum.
     [Google Scholar]
  59. 2008 Metaphor and talk. In R. W. Gibbs (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (197–211). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511816802.013
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816802.013 [Google Scholar]
  60. ‘Capitalism’ 2022 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capitalismretrieved10/10/2022.
  61. Carr, J. and Greeves, L.
    2006 The naked jape: uncovering the hidden world of jokes. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
     [Google Scholar]
  62. Carter, R.
    2004 Language and creativity: the art of common talk. Abingdon: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  63. Causley, C.
    1973 Death of a Poet. In P. Larkin (Ed.), The Oxford book of twentieth-century English verse (495). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  64. Chafe, W.
    1982 Integration and involvement in speaking, writing and oral literature. In D. Tannen (Ed.), Spoken and written language (35–53). Norwood, New Jersey: Ablex.
     [Google Scholar]
  65. Clark, H.
    1987 Relevance to what?Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 10 . (4), 714–5. 10.1017/S0140525X00055394
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00055394 [Google Scholar]
  66. Clark, H. H. and Clark, E. V.
    1977 Psychology and language. An introduction to psycholinguistics. New York: Harcourt.
     [Google Scholar]
  67. ‘Class conflict’ 2023 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Class_conflictretrieved23/06/2023.
  68. Clear, J.
    1993 From Firth principles – computational tools for the study of collocation. In M. Baker , G. Francis and E. Tognini-Bonelli (Eds.), Text and technology: in honour of John Sinclair (271–291). Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/z.64.18cle
     https://doi.org/10.1075/z.64.18cle [Google Scholar]
  69. Clear, J.
    1996 “Grammar and nonsense”: or syntax and word senses. In J. Svartvik (Ed.), Words: Proceedings of an international symposium, Lund, 25–6 August 1995 (213–42). Stockholm: Kungl. Vitterhets Historie och Antikvitets Akademien. Konferenser 36.
     [Google Scholar]
  70. COCA
    COCAhttps://www.english-corpora.org/coca/retrieved09/12/2021.
  71. Code, C.
    1987 Language, aphasia, and the right hemisphere. Chichester: John Wiley.
     [Google Scholar]
  72. Cohen, J. M. , and Cohen, M. J.
    1971 The Penguin dictionary of modern quotationsLondon: Allen Lane.
     [Google Scholar]
  73. Coleridge, S. T.
    1962 Select poetry, prose and letters. S. Potter (Ed.). London: Nonesuch Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  74. Cook, G.
    2001 The Discourse of Advertising. Abingdon: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203978153
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203978153 [Google Scholar]
  75. Coseriu, E.
    1977 Content-based word formation theory using the example of the type coupe-papier. In Brekle, Herbert E. and Kastovky, Dieter (Eds.), Perspectives of word formation research. Contributions to the Wuppertal word formation colloquium from 9 to 10 July 1976. (48–61). Bonn: Grundmann.
     [Google Scholar]
  76. Coulmas, F.
    1979 On the sociolinguistic relevance of routine formulae. Journal of Pragmatics 3 , 239–266. 10.1016/0378‑2166(79)90033‑X
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(79)90033-X [Google Scholar]
  77. Coupland, D.
    1991 Generation X: tales for an accelerated culture. London: St Martin’s Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  78. Crespo-Fernández, E.
    2014 Euphemism and political discourse in the British regional press. Brno Studies in English 40 (1),5–26. 10.5817/BSE2014‑1‑1
     https://doi.org/10.5817/BSE2014-1-1 [Google Scholar]
  79. Crisp, P.
    1996 Imagism’s metaphors: a test case. Language and Literature 5 , 79–92. 10.1177/096394709600500201
     https://doi.org/10.1177/096394709600500201 [Google Scholar]
  80. Critser, G.
    2003 Fat Land: How Americans became the fattest people in the world. New York: Houghton Mifflin.
     [Google Scholar]
  81. Croft, W.
    1993 The role of domains in the interpretation of metaphors and metonymies. Cognitive Linguistics4, (4), 335–370. 10.1515/cogl.1993.4.4.335
     https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1993.4.4.335 [Google Scholar]
  82. 2002 The role of domains in the interpretation of metaphors and metonymies. In R. Dirven and R. Porings (Eds.), Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast (161–204). The Hague: Mouton. 10.1515/9783110219197.161
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110219197.161 [Google Scholar]
  83. Croft, W. and Cruse, A.
    2004 Cognitive linguistics. Cambridge: CUP. 10.1017/CBO9780511803864
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511803864 [Google Scholar]
  84. Crossley-Holland, K. and Mitchell, B.
    1965 The Battle of Maldon and other Old English poems. London: Macmillan.
     [Google Scholar]
  85. Crystal, D.
    2001 Language and the Internet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139164771
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139164771 [Google Scholar]
  86. 2008 Txtng the gr8 db8. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  87. Crystal, D. and Davy, D.
    1969 Investigating English Style. Harlow: Longman.
     [Google Scholar]
  88. Cummings, E. E.
    1960 She being Brand. InSelected poems 1923–1958 (15–16). London: Faber.
     [Google Scholar]
  89. Damasio, A.
    2003 Looking for Spinoza. London and New York: Heinemann/Harcourt.
     [Google Scholar]
  90. Dawkins, R.
    2006 The god delusion. London: Transworld Publishers.
     [Google Scholar]
  91. De Palma, P. and Weiner, E. J.
    1992 Riddles: accessibility and knowledge representation. COLING '92: Proceedings of the 14th conference on Computational linguistics – 4, 1121–1125. 10.3115/992424.992441
     https://doi.org/10.3115/992424.992441 [Google Scholar]
  92. Debord, G.
    1994 (1967). The society of the spectacle, D. Nicholson-Smith (Trans.). Princeton N.J : Princeton University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  93. Deignan, A.
    2005 Metaphor and corpus linguistics. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/celcr.6
     https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.6 [Google Scholar]
  94. 1995 Collins Cobuild English Guides vol.7: Metaphor. London: HarperCollins.
     [Google Scholar]
  95. Deignan, A. , Littlemore, J. , and Semino, E.
    2013 Figurative language, genre and register. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  96. De Jong, N. H. de , Schreuder, R. , and Baayen, H.
    2003 Morphological resonance in the mental lexicon. In H. Baayen and R. Schreuder (Eds.), Morphological Structure in Language Processing (65–88). Berlin, New York: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110910186.65
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110910186.65 [Google Scholar]
  97. ‘Dementia UK Report’ 2023 https://www.alzheimers.org.uk/about-us/policy-and-influencing/dementia-uk-reportretrieved24/7/2023.
  98. Dickens, C.
    2004 The Pickwick Papers. London: Penguin Classics.
     [Google Scholar]
  99. 2021 (f.p. 1846). Dombey and son. InThe complete novels. London: The Classics.
     [Google Scholar]
  100. Ding, E.
    2010 Parallels, interactions and illuminations. Toronto: University of Toronto Press. 10.3138/9781442685703
     https://doi.org/10.3138/9781442685703 [Google Scholar]
  101. Dirven, R.
    1999 Conversion as a conceptual metonymy of an event structure. In R. Dirven , and R. Pörings (Eds.), Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast (275–287). The Hague: Mouton.
     [Google Scholar]
  102. 2002 Metonymy and metaphor: different mental strategies of conceptualization. In R. Dirven , and R. Pörings (Eds.), Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast (75–112). The Hague: Mouton. 10.1515/9783110219197.75
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110219197.75 [Google Scholar]
  103. Dirven, R. and Porings, R.
    2002 The interaction of metaphor and metonymy in composite expressions. In R. Dirven , and R. Pörings (Eds.), Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast (435–468). The Hague: Mouton.
     [Google Scholar]
  104. Dorst, A. G. , Mulder, G. and Steen, G. J.
    2011 Recognition of personifications in fiction by non-expert readers. Metaphor and the Social World, 1 (2), 174–200. 10.1075/msw.1.2.04dor
     https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.1.2.04dor [Google Scholar]
  105. Dressler, W.
    2005 Word-formation in natural morphology. In P. Stekauer , and R. Lieber, R. (Eds.), Handbook of word-formation (267–284). Dordrecht: Springer. 10.1007/1‑4020‑3596‑9_11
     https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3596-9_11 [Google Scholar]
  106. Durán Escribano, P. , and Roldan Riejos, A.
    2008 The role of context in the interpretation of academic and professional communication. In T. Gibert Maceda and L. Alba Juez (Eds.), Estudios de filología Inglesa: homenaje a la Dra Asunción Alba Pelayo (81–94). Madrid: Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia.
     [Google Scholar]
  107. Earles, J. L. , and Kersten, A. W.
    2000 Adult age differences in memory for verbs and nouns. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 7 (2), 130–9. 10.1076/1382‑5585(200006)7:2;1‑U;FT130
     https://doi.org/10.1076/1382-5585(200006)7:2;1-U;FT130 [Google Scholar]
  108. Edwards, R. and Clevenger, T. Jr.
    1990 The effects of schematic and affective processes on metaphorical invention. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 19 , (2), 91–102. 10.1007/BF01068092
     https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01068092 [Google Scholar]
  109. Ekman, P.
    2000 Emotions revealed. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.
     [Google Scholar]
  110. Eliot, T. S.
    1951 The metaphysical poets. Selected essays (3rd edition) (281–91). London: Faber and Faber.
     [Google Scholar]
  111. Fainsilber, L. and Ortony, A.
    1987 Metaphorical uses of language in the expression of emotions. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 2 (4), 239–250. 10.1207/s15327868ms0204_2
     https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327868ms0204_2 [Google Scholar]
  112. Fairclough, N.
    2001 Language and power (2nd edition). Harlow: Longman.
     [Google Scholar]
  113. Ferris, C.
    1993 The meaning of syntax: a study in the adjectives of English. Harlow: Longman.
     [Google Scholar]
  114. Fillmore, C. J.
    1982 Frame semantics. InLinguistic Society of Korea (Ed.), Linguistics in the Morning Calm (111–138). Seoul: Hanshin.
     [Google Scholar]
  115. Fillmore, C. J. and Atkins, B. T.
    1992 Towards a frame-based organization of the lexicon: the semantics of RISK and its neighbors. In A. Lehrer and E. Kittay (Eds.), Frames, fields, and contrast: new essays in semantics and lexical organization (75–102). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
     [Google Scholar]
  116. Fillmore, C. , and Atkins, B. T. S.
    1994 Starting where the dictionaries stop: the challenge of corpus lexicography. In B. T. S. Atkins and A. Zampolli (Eds.), Computational approaches to the lexicon (349–393). Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780198239796.003.0013
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198239796.003.0013 [Google Scholar]
  117. Fillmore, C. , and Atkins, B. T. S.
    2000 Describing polysemy: the case of “crawl”. In Y. Ravin and C. Leacock (Eds.), Polysemy: theoretical and computational approaches (91–110). Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780198238423.003.0005
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198238423.003.0005 [Google Scholar]
  118. Firbas, J.
    1992 Functional sentence perspective in written and spoken communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511597817
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511597817 [Google Scholar]
  119. Firth, J. R.
    1964 The Tongues of Men and Speech. London: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  120. Forceville, C.
    2008 Metaphor in pictures and multimodal representations. In R. W. Gibbs (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (462–482). Cambridge: CUP. 10.1017/CBO9780511816802.028
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816802.028 [Google Scholar]
  121. Foucualt, M.
    1977 Discipline and punish. London: Tavistock Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  122. Fries, P. H.
    1992 The structuring of information in written English text. Language Sciences14 (4), 461–488. 10.1016/0388‑0001(92)90026‑B
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0388-0001(92)90026-B [Google Scholar]
  123. Frisson, S. and Pickering, M. J.
    1999 The processing of metonymy: evidence from eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 25 (6), 1366–1383.
     [Google Scholar]
  124. Gallese, V. and Lakoff, G.
    2005 The brain’s concepts: the role of the sensory-motor system in conceptual knowledge. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 22 (3/4), 455–79. 10.1080/02643290442000310
     https://doi.org/10.1080/02643290442000310 [Google Scholar]
  125. Galtung, J. and Ruge, M.
    1973 Structuring and selecting news. In S. Cohen and J. Young (Eds.), The manufacture of news: social problems, deviance and the mass media. London: Constable.
     [Google Scholar]
  126. Garton, A. and Pratt, U.
    1998 Learning to be literate (2nd edition). Oxford: Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  127. Gazzaniga, M. S.
    1977 Consistency and diversity in brain organization. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 299 , 415–423. 10.1111/j.1749‑6632.1977.tb41926.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1977.tb41926.x [Google Scholar]
  128. Geeraerts, D.
    1985 Cognitive restrictions on the structure of semantic change. In J. Fisiak (Ed.), Historical linguistics: historical word-formation (127–153). Berlin, New York, Amsterdam: Mouton. 10.1515/9783110850178.127
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110850178.127 [Google Scholar]
  129. 2002 The interaction of metaphor and metonymy in composite expressions. In R. Dirven , and R. Pörings (Eds.), Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast (435–468). The Hague: Mouton. 10.1515/9783110219197.435
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110219197.435 [Google Scholar]
  130. 2009 Theories of lexical semantics. Oxford: OUP. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198700302.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198700302.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  131. Geeraerts, D. and Peirsman, Y.
    2011 Zones facets and prototype-based metonymy. In R. Benczes , A. Barcelona , and F. J. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez (Eds.), Defining metonymy in cognitive linguistics: towards a consensus view (89–102). Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/hcp.28.05gee
     https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.28.05gee [Google Scholar]
  132. Geis, M. L. and Zwicky, A. M.
    1971 On invited inferences. Linguistic Inquiry. 2 , 561–566.
     [Google Scholar]
  133. Gentner, D.
    1982 Are scientific analogies metaphors?In D. S. Miall (Ed.), Metaphor: problems and perspectives (106–132). Brighton: Harvester.
     [Google Scholar]
  134. Gentner, D. and Bowdle, B. F.
    2001 Convention, form and figurative language processing. Metaphor and Symbol 16 , 223–248. 10.1080/10926488.2001.9678896
     https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2001.9678896 [Google Scholar]
  135. Ghosh, A.
    2016 The great derangement: climate change and the unthinkable. Chicago: Chicago University Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226323176.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226323176.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  136. Gibbs, R.
    2006 Metaphor interpretation as embodied simulation. Mind and Language, 21 (3), 434–458. 10.1111/j.1468‑0017.2006.00285.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0017.2006.00285.x [Google Scholar]
  137. Gibbs, R. W. and Gerrig, R. J.
    1989 How context makes metaphor comprehension seem “special”. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 4: 154–8. 10.1207/s15327868ms0403_3
     https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327868ms0403_3 [Google Scholar]
  138. Gildea, P. and Glucksberg, S.
    1983 On understanding metaphor: the role of context. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior22 (5), 577–590. 10.1016/S0022‑5371(83)90355‑9
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(83)90355-9 [Google Scholar]
  139. Giora, R. , and Fein, O.
    1999 On understanding familiar and less-familiar figurative language. Journal of Pragmatics, 31 (12), 1601–18. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(99)00006‑5
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00006-5 [Google Scholar]
  140. Givón, T.
    1979 On understanding grammar. New York: Academic Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  141. 1984 Syntax: a functional-typological introduction 1 . Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/z.17
     https://doi.org/10.1075/z.17 [Google Scholar]
  142. Glucksberg, S.
    2001 Understanding figurative language: from metaphors to idioms. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195111095.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195111095.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  143. Glucksberg, S. and Keysar, B.
    1993 How metaphors work. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (401–24). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139173865.020
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173865.020 [Google Scholar]
  144. Glucksberg, S. and McGlone, M.
    1999 When love is not a journey: what metaphors mean. Journal of Pragmatics, 31 , 1541–1558. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(99)00003‑X
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00003-X [Google Scholar]
  145. Goatly, A. P.
    1983 Metaphor in the novels of William Golding. Unpublished Ph. D thesis, University College, London University.
     [Google Scholar]
  146. 1994 Register and the redemption of relevance theory. Pragmatics, 3 (2), 39–82.
     [Google Scholar]
  147. 2002 The representation of nature on the BBC World Service. Text, 22 (1), 1–27. 10.1515/text.2002.003
     https://doi.org/10.1515/text.2002.003 [Google Scholar]
  148. 2007 Washing the brain: metaphor and hidden ideology. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/dapsac.23
     https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.23 [Google Scholar]
  149. 2008 Explorations in stylistics. London: Equinox.
     [Google Scholar]
  150. Goatly, A.
    2011 The Language of metaphors. London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  151. Goatly, A. P.
    2012 Meaning and humour. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511791536
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511791536 [Google Scholar]
  152. 2017 The poems of Edward Thomas: a case study in ecostylistics. In J. Douthwaite , D. F. Virdis , E. Zurru (Eds.), The stylistics of landscapes, the landscapes of stylistics (95–122). Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/lal.28.07goa
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lal.28.07goa [Google Scholar]
  153. 2022 Two dimensions of meaning: similarity and contiguity in metaphor, metonymy, language, culture and ecology. Abingdon: Routledge. 10.4324/9781003285977
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003285977 [Google Scholar]
  154. Goatly, A. P. and Hiradhar, P.
    2016 Critical reading and writing in the digital age. Abingdon: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315616728
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315616728 [Google Scholar]
  155. Golding, W.
    1954 Lord of the flies. London: Faber.
     [Google Scholar]
  156. 1956 Pincher Martin. London: Faber.
     [Google Scholar]
  157. 1961 Free fall. London: Faber.
     [Google Scholar]
  158. 1965 The spire. London: Faber.
     [Google Scholar]
  159. 1979 Darkness visible. London: Faber.
     [Google Scholar]
  160. Gomez, M.
    2019 The presence of Action ICM metonymies in English and Spanish football reports: a contrastive analysis. InProceedings of 11th International Conference of the Spanish Cognitive Linguistics Association (AELCO), 17th-19th October 2018. https://www.uco.es/aelco2018/wp-content/assets/the-presence-of-action-icm-metonymies-in-english-and-spanish-football-reports-a-contrastive-analysis.pdfretrieved21/01/21.
     [Google Scholar]
  161. Gonzalez, E. R. and Clivilles, B. S.
    2017 Novel metonymy and novel metaphor as primary pragmatic processes. In M. E. Jurado , and P. G. Medina (Eds.), Where grammar meets discourse: functional and cognitive perspectives (21–35). Cordoba: Publicaciones Universidad de Córdoba.
     [Google Scholar]
  162. Goodman, N.
    1968 Languages of art: an approach to a theory of symbols. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.
     [Google Scholar]
  163. Goossens, L.
    1990 Metaphtonomy: the interaction of metaphor and metonymy in expressions for linguistic action. Cognitive Linguistics 1 : 323–340. 10.1515/cogl.1990.1.3.323
     https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1990.1.3.323 [Google Scholar]
  164. Gradečak-Erdeljić, T.
    2004 Euphemisms in the language of politics or how metonymy opens one door but closes the other. In P. Cap (Ed.), New developments in linguistic pragmatics (27). Department of English Language, University of Łódź.
     [Google Scholar]
  165. Grady, J. E.
    1997 Foundations of meaning; primary metaphors and primary scenes. University of California, Berkeley, unpublished Ph. D dissertation.
  166. 1999 A typology of motivation for conceptual metaphor: correlation vs. resemblance. In R. Gibbs , and G. Steen (Eds.) Metaphor in cognitive linguistics (79–100). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
     [Google Scholar]
  167. Grady, Joseph E. , Todd Oakley , and Seana Coulson
    1999 Blending and metaphor. In R. W. Gibbs, Jr. and G J. Steen (Eds.), Metaphor in cognitive linguistics [Current issues in linguistic theory 175] (101–24). Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.175.07gra
     https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.175.07gra [Google Scholar]
  168. Granger, S.
    2009 Learner corpora: a window onto the phrasicon. In A. Barfield and H. Gyllstad (Eds.), Researching collocations in another language (60–5). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230245327_5
     https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230245327_5 [Google Scholar]
  169. Grice, P.
    1975 Logic and conversation. In P. Cole , and J. Morgan (Eds.). Syntax and semantics 3: speech scts (41–58). New York: Academic Press. 10.1163/9789004368811_003
     https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004368811_003 [Google Scholar]
  170. Gries, S. Th
    2011 Phonological similarity in multi-word units. Cognitive Linguistics, 22 (3), 491–511. 10.1515/cogl.2011.019
     https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.2011.019 [Google Scholar]
  171. Halliday, M. A. K. and Hasan, R.
    1985 Language, context and text; aspects of language in a social-semiotic perspective. Victoria: Deakin University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  172. Halliday, M. A. K. and Matthiessen
    2004 An introduction to functional grammar (3rd revised edition). London: Hodder.
     [Google Scholar]
  173. Hanauer, D.
    1998 The genre-specific hypothesis of reading: reading poetry and encyclopaedic items. Poetics, 26 , 63–80. 10.1016/S0304‑422X(98)00011‑4
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-422X(98)00011-4 [Google Scholar]
  174. Handl, S.
    2011 The conventionality of figurative language: a usage-based study. Tubingen: Narr Verlag.
     [Google Scholar]
  175. Haspelmath, M. and Sims, A. D.
    2013 Understanding morphology. Abingdon: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203776506
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203776506 [Google Scholar]
  176. Hay, J. and Baayen, H.
    2002 Parsing and productivity. In G. Booij and J. van Marle (Eds.), Yearbook of morphology (203–35). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
     [Google Scholar]
  177. Hayek, F. A.
    1944 The road to serfdom. London: Routledge
     [Google Scholar]
  178. Heaney, S.
    1966a Death of a naturalist. InDeath of a Naturalist (15–16). London: Faber.
     [Google Scholar]
  179. 1966b An advancement of learning. InDeath of a Naturalist (18–19). London: Faber.
     [Google Scholar]
  180. 1966c Poor Women in a City Church. InDeath of a Naturalist (42). London: Faber.
     [Google Scholar]
  181. Heine, B.
    1997 Possession: cognitive sources, forces, and grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511581908
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511581908 [Google Scholar]
  182. Hickey, F. and Kuiper, K.
    2000 A deep depression covers the South Tasman Sea: New Zealand meteorological office weather forecasts. In A. Bell and K. Kuiper (Eds.), New Zealand English (279–296). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/veaw.g25.15hic
     https://doi.org/10.1075/veaw.g25.15hic [Google Scholar]
  183. Hoey, M.
    2005 Lexical priming: A new theory of words and language. London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  184. Hohenhaus, P.
    2005 Lexicalisation and institutionalisation. In P. Stekauer , and R. Lieber (Eds.), Handbook of word-formation (353–374). Dordrecht: Springer. 10.1007/1‑4020‑3596‑9_15
     https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3596-9_15 [Google Scholar]
  185. Honeck, R. P. , Reichman, P. , and Hoffman, R.
    1975 Semantic memory for metaphor: the conceptual base hypothesis. Memory and Cognition, 3 , 409–15. 10.3758/BF03212934
     https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03212934 [Google Scholar]
  186. Hudson, R. A.
    1980 Sociolinguistics. Cambridge: CUP.
     [Google Scholar]
  187. Hughes, T.
    1972 Pike. InSelected Poems 1957–1967 (55). London: Faber.
     [Google Scholar]
  188. ‘Humanism’ 2022 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Humanismretrieved10/10/2022.
  189. Hunston, S. and Francis, G.
    2000 Pattern grammar: a corpus-driven approach to the lexical grammar of English. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.4
     https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.4 [Google Scholar]
  190. Isačenko, A. V.
    1974 On have and be languages. In M. S. Flier (Ed.), Slavic forum: essays in linguistics and literature. New York, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110888386‑006
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110888386-006 [Google Scholar]
  191. Ishiguro, K.
    1989 The remains of the day. London: Faber.
     [Google Scholar]
  192. Jakel, O.
    1995 The metaphorical concept of mind. In, J. R. Taylor , and R. E. MacLaury (Eds.), Language and the cognitive construal of the World (197–229). New York, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110809305.197
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110809305.197 [Google Scholar]
  193. Jakobson, R.
    1987 Two aspects of language and two types of aphasic disturbances. www.ieeff.org/jakobsonaphasiafull.pdffrom Jakobson, R. 1987 ( K. Pomorska and S. Rudy (Eds.)), Language in literature (1–12). Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  194. Janda, L.
    2011 Metonymy in word-formation. Cognitive Linguistics, 22 (2), 359–392. 10.1515/cogl.2011.014
     https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.2011.014 [Google Scholar]
  195. Joanette, Y. , Goulet, I. and I Iannequin, D.
    1990 Right hemisphere and verbal communication. New York: Springer-Verlag. 10.1007/978‑1‑4612‑4460‑8
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-4460-8 [Google Scholar]
  196. Johnson, C.
    1999 Constructional grounding: the role of interpretational overlap in lexical and constructional acquisition. Ph. D thesis. University of California.
     [Google Scholar]
  197. Kastovsky, D.
    2005 Hans Marchand and the Marchandeans. In P. Stekauer , and R. Lieber (Eds.), Handbook of word-formation (99–124). Dordrecht: Springer. 10.1007/1‑4020‑3596‑9_5
     https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3596-9_5 [Google Scholar]
  198. Katz, J. and Fodor, J. A.
    1963 The structure of a semantic theory. Language, 39 , 170–210. 10.2307/411200
     https://doi.org/10.2307/411200 [Google Scholar]
  199. Kauschke, C. , and Stenneken, P.
    2008 Differences in noun and verb processing in lexical decision cannot be due to word form and morphological complexity alone. Journal of Psychological Research, 37 , 443–52.
     [Google Scholar]
  200. Kövecses, Z.
    1986 Metaphors of anger, pride and love: a lexical approach to the structure of concepts. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/pb.vii.8
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pb.vii.8 [Google Scholar]
  201. 1990 Emotion concepts. New York: Springer-Verlag. 10.1007/978‑1‑4612‑3312‑1
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-3312-1 [Google Scholar]
  202. 2000 Metaphor and emotion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  203. 2005 Metaphor in culture: universality and variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511614408
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511614408 [Google Scholar]
  204. Kövecses, Z. and Radden, G.
    1998 Metonymy: developing a cognitive linguistic view. Cognitive Linguistics, 9 (1), 37–77. 10.1515/cogl.1998.9.1.37
     https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1998.9.1.37 [Google Scholar]
  205. Kress, G.
    1989 History and language: towards a social account of linguistic change. Journal of Pragmatics, 13 , 445–466. 10.1016/0378‑2166(89)90065‑9
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(89)90065-9 [Google Scholar]
  206. Kristiansen, G.
    2008 Style-shifting and shifting styles: a socio-cognitive approach to lectal variation. In G. Kristiansen and R. Dirven (Eds.), Cognitive sociolinguistics: language variation, cultural models, social systems (45–88). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110199154.1.45
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110199154.1.45 [Google Scholar]
  207. Kuhn, T.
    1979 Metaphor in science. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (409–419). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  208. Kuiper, K.
    1991 The evolution of an oral tradition: race-calling in Canterbury, New Zealand. Oral Tradition, 6 (1), 19–34.
     [Google Scholar]
  209. Kuiper, K.
    1996 Smooth talkers: the linguistic performance of auctioneers and sportscasters. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
     [Google Scholar]
  210. Kuiper, K. and Austin, P.
    1990 They’re off and racing now: the speech of the New Zealand race caller. In A. Bell and J. Holmes (Eds.), New Zealand ways of speaking English. (195–220). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
     [Google Scholar]
  211. Kuiper, K. and Haggo, D.
    1984 Livestock auctions, oral poetry, and ordinary language. Language in Society, 13 , 205–234. 10.1017/S0047404500010381
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500010381 [Google Scholar]
  212. Lakoff, G.
    1972 Hedges: a study in meaning criteria and the logic of fuzzy concepts. Papers from the eghth regional meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society (183–217). Department of Linguistics, University of Chicago.
     [Google Scholar]
  213. 1987 Women, fire and dangerous things. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  214. 1993 The contemporary theory of metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (202–252). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139173865.013
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173865.013 [Google Scholar]
  215. Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M.
    1980 Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  216. Lakoff, G. and Turner, M.
    1989 More than cool reason: a field guide to poetic Metaphor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226470986.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226470986.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  217. Lamb, S. M.
    1998 Pathways of the brain. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
     [Google Scholar]
  218. Lancker, van D. , Canter, J. , and Terbeek, D.
    1981 Disambiguation of ditropic sentences: acoustic and phonetic cues. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 24 . 330–35. 10.1044/jshr.2403.330
     https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.2403.330 [Google Scholar]
  219. Langacker, R. W.
    1991 Foundations of cognitive grammar, vol. 2: descriptive applications. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  220. 1993 Reference-Point Constructions. Cognitive Linguistics, 4 , 1–38. 10.1515/cogl.1993.4.1.1
     https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1993.4.1.1 [Google Scholar]
  221. 1999 Grammar and conceptualization. The Hague: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110800524
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110800524 [Google Scholar]
  222. 2009 Metonymic grammar. In K-U. Panther , L. Thornburg , and A. Barcelona, A. (Eds.), Metonymy and metaphor in grammar (45–74). Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/hcp.25.04lan
     https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.25.04lan [Google Scholar]
  223. Lawrence, D. H.
    Aaron’s Rodhttps://www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/4520/pg4520-images.htmlretrieved14/03/2024.
     [Google Scholar]
  224. Leach, E.
    1964 Anthropological aspects of language: animal categories and verbal abuse. In E. H. Lenneberg (Ed.), New directions in the study of language (23–63). Cambridge Mass. MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  225. Leech, G. N.
    1981 Semantics, 2nd edition. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
     [Google Scholar]
  226. 1983 Principles of pragmatics. Harlow: Longman.
     [Google Scholar]
  227. 2008 Language and literature: style and foregrounding. Abingdon: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  228. Lehmann, C.
    1995 Thoughts on grammaticalisation. Munich: Lincom Europa
     [Google Scholar]
  229. Levin, S. R.
    1977 The Semantics of metaphor. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. 10.1353/book.71828
     https://doi.org/10.1353/book.71828 [Google Scholar]
  230. Lieber, R.
    2005 English word-formation processes. In P. Stekauer, P. and R. Lieber (Eds.), Handbook of word-formation (375–428). Dordrecht: Springer. 10.1007/1‑4020‑3596‑9_16
     https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3596-9_16 [Google Scholar]
  231. Lipka, L.
    1985 Inferential features in historical semantics. In J. Fisiak (Ed.), Historical linguistics: historical word-formation (339–353). Berlin, New York, Amsterdam: Mouton. 10.1515/9783110850178.339
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110850178.339 [Google Scholar]
  232. Lipka, L.
    1996 Words, metaphors and cognition: a bridge between domains. In J. Svartvik (Ed.), Words: proceedings of an international symposium, Lund, 25–6 August 1995 (49–70). Stockholm: Kungl. Vitterhets Historie och Antikvitets Akademien. Konferenser 36.
     [Google Scholar]
  233. Lipka, L.
    1998 Word-formation, metaphor and metonymy – processes, results and their description. In C. Rodriguez (Ed.), Functional approaches to the lexicon. [ Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses, 36], 97–112.
     [Google Scholar]
  234. 2002 English lexicology. Tubingen: Gunter Narr Verlag.
     [Google Scholar]
  235. Littlemore, J.
    2015 Metonymy: hidden shortcuts in language, thought and communication [Cambridge Studies in Cognitive Linguistics]. Cambridge University Press. Kindle Edition. 10.1017/CBO9781107338814
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107338814 [Google Scholar]
  236. ‘Living Death’ 2024 https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/living-deathretrieved10/03/2024.
  237. Lovejoy, A. O.
    1960 The great chain of being: a study of the history of an idea. New York: Harper and Row.
     [Google Scholar]
  238. Low, G.
    1999 “This paper thinks”. Investigating the acceptability of the metaphor ESSAY IS A PERSON. In L. Cameron, L. and G. Low (Eds.), Researching and applying metaphor (221–248). Cambridge: CUP. 10.1017/CBO9781139524704.014
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524704.014 [Google Scholar]
  239. Lyons, J.
    1977 Semantics. Cambridge: CUP.
     [Google Scholar]
  240. Mack, D.
    1975 Metaphoring as speech act: some happiness conditions for implicit similes and simple metaphors. Poetics, 4 : 221–256. 10.1016/0304‑422X(75)90083‑2
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-422X(75)90083-2 [Google Scholar]
  241. MacCormac, E. R.
    1990 A cognitive theory of metaphor. Cambridge Mass. and London: MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  242. Macmillan English dictionary 2002 London: Bloomsbury.
     [Google Scholar]
  243. Mahdawi, A.
    2017 We need new words to explain these curious times. How about coffused or procrastinetflix?Guardian, 26 November 2017. retrieved02/01/2018
     [Google Scholar]
  244. Manning, C. D. and Schutze, H.
    1999 Foundations of statistical natural language processing. Cambridge Mass.: MIT Presshttps://nlp.stanford.edu › fsnlp › promo
     [Google Scholar]
  245. Marchand, H.
    1969 [1962]. The categories and types of present-day English word-formation, 2nd edition. Munich: Beck.
     [Google Scholar]
  246. Marks, J.
    2002 What it means to be 98% chimpanzee. Berkeley, Los Angeles, and London: University of California Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  247. Martin, J. , Cummings, A. L. , and Hallberg, E. T.
    1992 Therapists’ intentional use of metaphor: memorability, clinical impact and possible epistemic/motivational functions. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 60 , 143–145. 10.1037/0022‑006X.60.1.143
     https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.60.1.143 [Google Scholar]
  248. Martin, J. R.
    1992 English text: system and structure. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/z.59
     https://doi.org/10.1075/z.59 [Google Scholar]
  249. Martin, J. R. and White, P. R. R.
    2005 The language of evaluation: appraisal in English. London and New York: Palgrave-Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230511910
     https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230511910 [Google Scholar]
  250. Matlock, T. , Ramscar, M. , and Boroditsky, L.
    2005 On the experiential link between spatial and temporal language. Cognitive Science 8;29 (4), 655–64. 10.1207/s15516709cog0000_17. PMID: 21702788.
     https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog0000_17 [Google Scholar]
  251. May, A.
    2013 To what extent and why are the following conceptual metonymies exploited across thirteen typologically varied languages? PRODUCER FOR PRODUCT; AGENT FOR ACTION; PART FOR WHOLE; WHOLE FOR PART; ACTION FOR COMPLEX EVENT; CATEGORY FOR MEMBER; MEMBER FOR CATEGORY; OBJECT FOR ACTION. Unpublished MA project, University of Birmingham, UK.
     [Google Scholar]
  252. McArthur, T.
    1992 The Oxford companion to the English language. New York: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  253. McGilchrist, I.
    2018 The master and his emissary. London and New Haven: Yale University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  254. McKinney, F.
    2020 Opinion: Racism is America’s virushttps://www.ctpost.com/opinion/article/Opinion-Racism-is-America-s-virus-15303048.phpretrieved12/04/2024
  255. 2020 Racism is America’s virus. https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/opinion-racism-is-america-s-virus/ar-BB14MLdl29/06/2020
  256. ‘Mcjobs’ 2022 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McJobretrieved10/10/2022
  257. Meadows, B.
    2006 Distancing and showing solidarity via metaphor and metonymy in political discourse: a critical study of American statements on Iraq during the years 2004–2005. Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis across Disciplines, 1 (2), 1–17.
     [Google Scholar]
  258. Metanet
    Metanethttps://metanet.icsi.berkeley.edu/metanet/
  259. Metcalf, A.
    2016 From skeddadle to selfie: words of the generations. Oxford: OUP
     [Google Scholar]
  260. Mihatsch, W.
    2009 Nouns are THINGS: Evidence for a grammatical metaphor. In K-U. Panther , L. Thornburg , and A. Barcelona (Eds.), Metonymy and metaphor in grammar (75–98). Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/hcp.25.06mih
     https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.25.06mih [Google Scholar]
  261. Miller, D. G.
    2014 English lexicogenesis. Oxford: OUP. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199689880.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199689880.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  262. Monbiot, G.
    2014 Cleansing the stock. www.monbiot.com/2014/10/21/cleansing-the-stock/retrieved26/07/2014.
  263. Moll, H. , and Tomasello, M.
    2007a Co-operation and human cognition: the Vygotskian intelligence hypothesis. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 362 , 639–648. 10.1098/rstb.2006.2000
     https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2006.2000 [Google Scholar]
  264. 2007b How 14- and 18- month-olds know what others have experienced. Developmental Psychology, 43 , 309–317. 10.1037/0012‑1649.43.2.309
     https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.43.2.309 [Google Scholar]
  265. Moore, M.
    2004 Fahrenheit 9/11. Dog Eat Dog Films.
     [Google Scholar]
  266. Murphy, M. L.
    2010 Lexical meaning. Cambridge: CUP. 10.1017/CBO9780511780684
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511780684 [Google Scholar]
  267. Nascione, A.
    2001 Phraseological units in discourse. Riga: Latvian Academy of Culture.
     [Google Scholar]
  268. Nash, W.
    1980 Designs in prose, Harlow: Longman.
     [Google Scholar]
  269. Nerlich, B. and Clarke, D.
    2001 Elements for an integral theory of semantic change and semantic development. In R. Eckardt and K. von Heusinger (Eds.), Meaning change – meaning variation. Workshop held at Konstanz, Feb. 1999, Vol. I, (123–134). Konstanz: Fachbereich Sprachwissenschaft Universitat Konstanz.
     [Google Scholar]
  270. Norrick, N. R.
    1993 Conversational joking: Humor in everyday talk. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  271. Ong, W.
    2002 Orality and literacy: the technologizing of the Word. London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  272. Opie, I. and Opie, P.
    1967 The lore and language of schoolchildren. Oxford: OUP.
     [Google Scholar]
  273. Orr, R. A.
    1992 Slavo-Celtica. Canadian Slavonic Papers. 34 .(3), 245–268. 10.1080/00085006.1992.11091989
     https://doi.org/10.1080/00085006.1992.11091989 [Google Scholar]
  274. Orwell, G.
    1945 Politics and the English language. Available fromhttps://files.libcom.org/files/Politics%20and%20the%20English%20Language%20-%20George%20Orwell.pdf, ( 1–9 ).
     [Google Scholar]
  275. Panther, K-U.
    2006 Metonymy as a usage event. In G. Kristiansen , M. Achard , R. Dirven and F. J. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez (Eds.), Cognitive Linguistics (147–186). Berlin, New York: De Gruyter Mouton 2006, 10.1515/9783110197761.2.147
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197761.2.147 [Google Scholar]
  276. Panther, K-U. and Thornburg, L.
    2002 The roles of metaphor and metonymy in English -er nominals. In R. Dirven , and R. Pӧrings (Eds.), Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast (279–316). The Hague: Mouton. 10.1515/9783110219197.279
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110219197.279 [Google Scholar]
  277. 2003 Metonymies as natural inference and activation schemas: the case of dependent clauses as independent speech acts. In K-U. Panther and L. Thornburg (Eds), Metonymy and pragmatic inferencing (127–147) Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.113.10pan
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.113.10pan [Google Scholar]
  278. 2009 On figuration in grammar. In K-U. Panther , L. Thornburg , and A. Barcelona (Eds.), Metonymy and metaphor in grammar (1–44). Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/hcp.25.03pan
     https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.25.03pan [Google Scholar]
  279. 2012 Conceptualising human as animals in English verb particle constructions. Language Value, 4 (1), 63–83.
     [Google Scholar]
  280. Panther, K-U. , Thornburg, L. and Barcelona, A.
    (Eds.) 2009 Metonymy and metaphor in grammar. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/hcp.25
     https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.25 [Google Scholar]
  281. Papafragou, A.
    1996 On metonymy. Lingua, 99 , 169–95. 10.1016/0024‑3841(96)00016‑2
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3841(96)00016-2 [Google Scholar]
  282. Paprotte, W. and Dirven, R.
    (Eds.) 1985 The ubiquity of metaphor. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.29
     https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.29 [Google Scholar]
  283. Paradis, C.
    2004 Where does metonymy stop? Senses, facets, and active zones. Metaphor and Symbol, 19 (4), 245–264, 10.1207/s15327868ms1904_1
     https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327868ms1904_1 [Google Scholar]
  284. 2011 Metonymization: a key mechanism in semantic change. In R. Benczes , A. Barcelona , and F. J. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez (Eds.), Defining metonymy in cognitive linguistics: towards a consensus view (61–88). Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/hcp.28.04par
     https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.28.04par [Google Scholar]
  285. Paul, H.
    1981/1896 Über die Aufgaben der Wortbildungslehre. InSitzungsberichte der philosophisch-philologischen Classe der k.b. Akademie zu München, Jahrgang 1896, 692–713. Reprinted in: L. Lipka and H. Günther (Eds.) 1981, Wortbildung (17–35). Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.
     [Google Scholar]
  286. Pawley, A.
    1991 How to talk cricket: on linguistic competence in a subject matter. In R. Blust (Ed.), Currents in Pacific linguistics: papers on Austronesian languages and ethnolinguistics in honour of George W. Grace. (339–368). Canberra: Pacific Linguistics C-1 17.
     [Google Scholar]
  287. Pawley, A. and Syder, F. H.
    1983 Two puzzles for linguistic theory: native-like selection and native-like fluency. In J. C. Richards and R. W. Schmidt (Eds.), Language and communication (191–226). London: Longman.
     [Google Scholar]
  288. Pearson, H.
    2003 Pollutocrats christened. Nature Online10.1038/news030421‑9
     https://doi.org/10.1038/news030421-9 [Google Scholar]
  289. Peirce, C. S.
    1867 On a new list of categories. Proceedings of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences 7 (1868) (287–298), presented, 14 May 1867. Reprinted in E. C. Moore (Ed.) 1984 Writings of Charles S. Peirce: A chronological edition, 2 , (49–59). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  290. Peirsman, Yves and Geeraerts, D.
    2006 Metonymy as a prototypical category. Cognitive Linguistics, 17 (3), 269–316. 10.1515/COG.2006.007
     https://doi.org/10.1515/COG.2006.007 [Google Scholar]
  291. Peña Cervel, M. S. and Ruiz de Mendoza Ibanez, J.
    2009 The metonymic and metaphoric grounding of two image-schema transformations. In K-U. Panther , L. Thornburg , and A. Barcelona , (Eds.), Metonymy and metaphor in grammar (339–362). Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/hcp.25.21pen
     https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.25.21pen [Google Scholar]
  292. Peters, A. M.
    1983 Units of language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  293. Piesman, M. and Hartley, M.
    1984 The yuppie handbook: The state-of-the-art manual for young urban professionals. Horsham Sussex UK: Ravette Publishing.
     [Google Scholar]
  294. Pound, E.
    1957 In a Station of the Metro. InSelected Poems (35), New York: New Directions.
     [Google Scholar]
  295. Plag, I.
    2003 Word-formation in English. Cambridge: CUP. 10.1017/CBO9780511841323
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511841323 [Google Scholar]
  296. 2008 Productivity. In B. Aarts , and M. McMahon (Eds.), The handbook of English linguistics (537–556). Malden MA, Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  297. Plath, S.
    1981 The rabbit catcher. In T. Hughes (Ed.), Collected Poems (193). London, New York: Harper Perennial.
     [Google Scholar]
  298. Popper, K.
    1959 The logic of scientific discovery. London: Hutchinson.
     [Google Scholar]
  299. Pustejovsky, J.
    1995 The generative lexicon. Cambridge Mass.: MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  300. Rabagliati, H. , Marcus, G. F. , and Pylkkänen, L.
    2011 Rules, radical pragmatics and restrictions on regular polysemy. Journal of Semantics, 28, (4), 485–512. 10.1093/jos/ffr005
     https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/ffr005 [Google Scholar]
  301. Radden, G.
    2000 How metonymic are metaphors. In A. Barcelona (Ed.), Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads (93–105). New York, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
  302. 2005 The ubiquity of metonymy. In J.-L. Otal Campo , I. Ferrando and B. Belles Fortuno (Eds.), Cognitive and discourse approaches to metaphor and metonymy (11–28). Castellón de la Plana: Universitat Jaume I.
     [Google Scholar]
  303. Radden, G. , Köpcke, K.-M. , Berg, T. , and Siemund, P.
    2007 The construction of meaning in language. In G. Radden , K.-M. Köpcke , T. Berg and P. Siemund (Eds.), Aspects of meaning construction (1–15). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/z.136.02rad
     https://doi.org/10.1075/z.136.02rad [Google Scholar]
  304. Radden, G. , and Kövecses, Z.
    1999 Towards a theory of metonymy. In K.-U. Panther and G. Radden (Eds.) Metonymy in language and thought (17–59) Amsterdam: Benjamins. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/284894262_Towards_a_Theory_of_Metonymyretrieved25/3/2021. 10.1075/hcp.4.03rad
     https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.4.03rad [Google Scholar]
  305. Rainer, F.
    2003 Semantic change in word-formation. Linguistics, 43 (2), 415–441.
     [Google Scholar]
  306. 2005 Constraints on productivity. In P. Stekauer , and R. Lieber (Eds.), Handbook of word-formation (335–352). Dordrecht: Springer.pp. 10.1007/1‑4020‑3596‑9_14
     https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3596-9_14 [Google Scholar]
  307. Rapp, A. M. , Mutschler, D. E. , and Erb, M.
    2012 Where in the brain is non-literal language? A coordinate-based meta-analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging studies. Neuroimage, 63 , 600–10. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.06.022
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.06.022 [Google Scholar]
  308. Reijinierse, G. , Burgers, C. , Krennmayr, T. and Steen, G.
    2019 Metaphor in communication: the distribution of potentially deliberate metaphor across register and word class. Corpora, 14 (3), 301–326. 10.3366/cor.2019.0176
     https://doi.org/10.3366/cor.2019.0176 [Google Scholar]
  309. Rhodes, R. A. and Lawler, J. M.
    1981 Athematic metaphors’, Papers from the Seventeenth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society(CLS 17) Chicago Illinois, 318–42.
     [Google Scholar]
  310. Rifkin, J.
    1987 Time wars. New York: Touchstone/Simon and Schuster.
     [Google Scholar]
  311. Ritchie, G.
    2004 The Linguistic analysis of jokes. London and New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203406953
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203406953 [Google Scholar]
  312. Rizzolatti, G. , and Arbib, M. A.
    1998 Language within our grasp. Trends in Neurosciences, 21 , 188–194. 10.1016/S0166‑2236(98)01260‑0
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-2236(98)01260-0 [Google Scholar]
  313. Rosch, E.
    1975 Cognitive representations of semantic categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104 , 192–233. 10.1037/0096‑3445.104.3.192
     https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.104.3.192 [Google Scholar]
  314. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibanez, F. J. and Diez Velasco, O. I.
    2000 The role of mappings and domains in understanding metonymy. In A. Barcelona (Ed.), Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads (109–132). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
  315. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, F. and Pérez Hernández, L.
    2003 Cognitive operations and pragmatic implication. In K.-U. Panther and L. Thornburg (Eds.), Metonymy and pragmatic inferencing (23–50). Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.113.05rui
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.113.05rui [Google Scholar]
  316. Rundblad, G. , and Annaz, D.
    2010 Metaphor and metonymy comprehension: receptive vocabulary and conceptual knowledge. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 28 , 547–63. 10.1348/026151009X454373
     https://doi.org/10.1348/026151009X454373 [Google Scholar]
  317. Rushdie, S.
    2008 The enchantress of Florence. London: Cape.
     [Google Scholar]
  318. Sampson, G.
    2005 The ‘language instinct’ debate. New York: Continuum.
     [Google Scholar]
  319. Santa Ana, O.
    1999 “Like an animal I was treated”; Anti-immigrant metaphor in US public discourse. Discourse and Society, 10 (2), 191–224. 10.1177/0957926599010002004
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926599010002004 [Google Scholar]
  320. Saussure, F. de
    1960 Course in general linguistics, C. Bally, C. and A. Sechehaye (Eds.) W. Baskin (Trans.). London: Peter Owen.
     [Google Scholar]
  321. Schank, R. , and Abelson, R.
    1977 Scripts, plans, goals and understanding. Hillsdale N.J.: Erlbaum.
     [Google Scholar]
  322. Scheppegrell, M. J.
    1996 Abstraction and agency in middle school environmental education. In J. C. Bang , J. Door , R. J. Alexander , A. Fill , A. and F. Verhagen (Eds.), Language and ecology: proceedings of the symposium on ecolinguistics of AILA 96 Jyvaskyla (27–42). Odense, Odense University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  323. Schumacher, E. F.
    1973/1999 Small is beautiful: Economics as if people mattered. Point Roberts WA and Vancouver: Hartley and Marks.
     [Google Scholar]
  324. Semino, E.
    2002 A sturdy baby or a derailing train? Metaphorical representation of the euro in British and Italian newspapers. Text, 22 , 107–139.
     [Google Scholar]
  325. 2008 Metaphor in discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  326. Semino, E. and Steen, G.
    2008 Metaphor in literature. In R. W. Gibbs (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (232–246). Cambridge: CUP. 10.1017/CBO9780511816802.015
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816802.015 [Google Scholar]
  327. Semino, E. , Deignan, A. , and Littlemore, J.
    2013 Metaphor, genre and re-contextualisation. Metaphor and Symbol, 28 , 41–59. 10.1080/10926488.2013.742842
     https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2013.742842 [Google Scholar]
  328. Seto, K.
    1999 Distinguishing metonymy from synecdoche. In K.-U. Panther , and G. Radden (Eds.), Metonymy in language and thought (91–120). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: Benjamins. 10.1075/hcp.4.06set
     https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.4.06set [Google Scholar]
  329. Shaw, P.
    1981 Logic and its limits. London: Pan.
     [Google Scholar]
  330. Shklovsky, V.
    2017 Viktor Shklovsky: A reader. A. Berlina (Ed. and Trans.), London: Bloomsbury.
     [Google Scholar]
  331. Siegelman, E. Y.
    1990 Metaphor and meaning in psychotherapy. London, New York: Guilford Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  332. Sinclair, J. M.
    1991 Corpus, concordance, collocation. Oxford: Oxford U.P.
     [Google Scholar]
  333. Sinclair, J. M. and Renouf, A.
    1988 A lexical syllabus for language learning. In R. Carter and M. McCarthy (Eds.), Vocabulary and language teaching (140–160). London, New York: Longman.
     [Google Scholar]
  334. Slabakova, R. , Amaro, J. C. and Kang, S. K.
    2013 Regular and novel metonymy in native Korean, Spanish, and English: experimental evidence for various acceptability. Metaphor and Symbol, 28 (4), 275–293. 10.1080/10926488.2013.826556
     https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2013.826556 [Google Scholar]
  335. Spenney, M. J. , and Haynes, O. H.
    1989 Semantic and phonological performance in adults learning novel object and action words. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 18 , 341–52. 10.1007/BF01067182
     https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01067182 [Google Scholar]
  336. Sperber, D. and Wilson, D.
    1986/1995 Relevance: communication and cognition (2nd edition). Oxford: Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  337. 2008 A deflationary account of metaphors. In R. Gibbs (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (84–105). Cambridge: CUP. 10.1017/CBO9780511816802.007
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816802.007 [Google Scholar]
  338. Steen, G.
    1994 Understanding metaphor in literature. Harlow: Longman.
     [Google Scholar]
  339. 2007 Finding metaphor in grammar and usage. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/celcr.10
     https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.10 [Google Scholar]
  340. Stekauer, P. , Valera, S. and Kortvelyessy, L.
    2012 Word-formation in the world’s languages. Cambridge: CUP. 10.1017/CBO9780511895005
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511895005 [Google Scholar]
  341. Stekauer, P.
    2005 Onomasiological approach to word-formation. In P. Stekauer and R. Lieber (Eds.), Handbook of word-formation (207–232). Dordrecht: Springer. 10.1007/1‑4020‑3596‑9_9
     https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3596-9_9 [Google Scholar]
  342. Stubbs, M.
    1995 Collocations and cultural connotations of common words. Linguistics and Education, 7 (4), 379–390. 10.1016/0898‑5898(95)90011‑X
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0898-5898(95)90011-X [Google Scholar]
  343. Swales, J.
    1990 Genre analysis; English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  344. Sweetser, E.
    1990 From etymology to pragmatics: metaphorical and cultural aspects of semantic structure. Cambridge: CUP. 10.1017/CBO9780511620904
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620904 [Google Scholar]
  345. Szymanek, B.
    2005 The latest trends in English word-formation. In P. Stekauer and R. Lieber (Eds.), Handbook of word-formation (429–448). Dordrecht: Springer. 10.1007/1‑4020‑3596‑9_17
     https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3596-9_17 [Google Scholar]
  346. Tabossi, P.
    1989 What’s in a context?In D. S. Gorfein (Ed.), Resolving semantic ambiguity (25–39). Berlin: Springer Verlag. 10.1007/978‑1‑4612‑3596‑5_3
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-3596-5_3 [Google Scholar]
  347. Talmy, L.
    2005 The fundamental system of spatial schemas in language. In B. Hampe (Ed.), From perception to meaning: image schemas in cognitive linguistics (199–234) Berlin, New York: De Gruyter Mouton, 10.1515/9783110197532.3.199
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197532.3.199 [Google Scholar]
  348. Taylor, J. R.
    1995 Linguistic categorization. (2nd edition). Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780199266647.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199266647.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  349. ‘Ten years on: Bangladesh Rana Plaza Disaster’ 2023′ https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/apr/24/10-years-on-bangladesh-rana-plaza-disaster-safety-garment-workers-rights-pay
  350. Tennyson, A.
    1969 In memoriam. In C. Ricks (Ed.), The poems of Tennyson (853–988). Harlow: Longman.
     [Google Scholar]
  351. Thomas, E.
    1949 A Cat. In W. De la Mare (Ed.), Collected poems of Edward Thomas (117). London: Faber.
     [Google Scholar]
  352. Thomas, J.
    1995 Meaning in interaction. Harlow: Longman.
     [Google Scholar]
  353. Thomas, R. S.
    1973 On The Farm. In P. Larkin (Ed.), The Oxford book of twentieth-century English verse (465). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  354. Thompson, J. B.
    1984 Studies in the theory of ideology. London: Polity Press. 10.1525/9780520312234
     https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520312234 [Google Scholar]
  355. Thornburg, L. and Panther, K-U.
    2000 Why we incorporate (in English): a post-Whorfian view. In M. Putz , and M. Verspoor, M. (Eds.), Explorations in linguistic relativity (319–343). Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.199.16tho
     https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.199.16tho [Google Scholar]
  356. Tibballs, G.
    2006 The mammoth book of jokes. London: Robinson.
     [Google Scholar]
  357. Tillyard, E. M. W.
    1943 The Elizabethan world picture. London: Chatto and Windus.
     [Google Scholar]
  358. Tomasello, M.
    2008 Origins of human communication. Cambridge, Mass. MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/7551.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/7551.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  359. Tournier, J.
    1985 Introduction descriptive à la lexicogénétique de l’Anglais contemporain. Paris-Genève: Champion-Slatkine.
     [Google Scholar]
  360. Traugott, E. C.
    1982 From propositional to textual and expressive meanings: some semantic-pragmatic aspects of grammaticalization. In W. P. Lehmann , and Y. Malkiel (Eds.), Perspectives on historical linguistics (245–271). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.24.09clo
     https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.24.09clo [Google Scholar]
  361. 1999 The role of pragmatics in a theory of semantic change. In J. Verschueren (Ed.), Pragmatics in 1998: Selected papers from the 6th International Pragmatics conference, 2 , 93–102. Antwerp: International Pragmatics Association.
     [Google Scholar]
  362. Traugott, E. C. and Dasher, R.
    2002 Regularity in semantic change. Cambridge: CUP.
     [Google Scholar]
  363. Tremblay, P. and Dick, A. S.
    2016 Broca and Wernicke are dead, or moving past the classical model of language neurobiology. Brain and Language, 162 , 60–71. 10.1016/j.bandl.2016.08.004
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2016.08.004 [Google Scholar]
  364. Tsur, R.
    1987 On metaphorising. Jerusalem: Israel Science Publishers.
     [Google Scholar]
  365. Tuggy, D.
    2005 Cognitive approach to word-formation. In P. Stekauer, P. and R. Lieber, R. (Eds.), Handbook of word-formation (233–266). Dordrecht: Springer.pp. 10.1007/1‑4020‑3596‑9_10
     https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3596-9_10 [Google Scholar]
  366. Tversky, A.
    1977 Features of similarity. Psychological Review, 84 , 327–52. 10.1037/0033‑295X.84.4.327
     https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.4.327 [Google Scholar]
  367. Ullmann, S.
    1952 Précis de sémantique française 3rd edition. Bern: A Francke AG Verlag.
     [Google Scholar]
  368. 1962 Semantics: an introduction to the science of meaning. Oxford: Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  369. Urban Dictionary
    Urban Dictionary. https://www.urbandictionary.com/
  370. Vendler, Z.
    1968 Adjectives and nominalization. The Hague: Mouton.
     [Google Scholar]
  371. Waldron, R. A.
    1967 Sense and sense development. London: Deutsch.
     [Google Scholar]
  372. Warren, B.
    1992 What euphemisms tell us about the interpretation of words. Studia Linguistica, 46 , 128–172. 10.1111/j.1467‑9582.1992.tb00833.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9582.1992.tb00833.x [Google Scholar]
  373. 1999 Aspects of referential metonymy. In K.-U. Panther and G. Radden (Eds.), Metonymy in language and thought (121–37). Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/hcp.4.07war
     https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.4.07war [Google Scholar]
  374. 2002 An alternative account of referential metonymy and metaphor. In R. Dirven , and R. Pӧrings (Eds.), Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast (113–132). The Hague: Mouton. 10.1515/9783110219197.113
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110219197.113 [Google Scholar]
  375. Watts, R. J.
    2003 Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 10.1017/CBO9780511615184
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511615184 [Google Scholar]
  376. Weizenbaum, J.
    1976 Computer power and human reason. New York San Fransisco: W.H. Freeman.
     [Google Scholar]
  377. Werth, P.
    1994 Extended metaphor: a text world account. Language and Literature, 3 (2), 79–103. 10.1177/096394709400300201
     https://doi.org/10.1177/096394709400300201 [Google Scholar]
  378. Whorf, B. J.
    1956 Language, thought and reality, J. B. Carroll (Ed.). Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  379. Wierzbicka, A.
    1997 Understanding cultures through their keywords. Oxford: OUP. 10.1093/oso/9780195088359.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195088359.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  380. Williams, R.
    1983 Keywords: a vocabulary of culture and society. London: Flamingo.
     [Google Scholar]
  381. Winner, E. and Gardner, H.
    1977 The comprehension of metaphor in brain-damaged patients. Brain, 100 , 717–729. 10.1093/brain/100.4.717
     https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/100.4.717 [Google Scholar]
  382. Wittgenstein, L.
    1953/2001 Philosophical investigations. Oxford: Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  383. Wolfson, N.
    1989 Perspectives: sociolinguistics and TESOL. Rowley Mass.: Newbury House.
     [Google Scholar]
  384. Wordnet
    Wordnethttps://wordnet.princeton.edu/
  385. Wordsworth, W.
    1950 My heart leaps up. In E. De Selincourt (Ed.), Poetical Works (62). London OUP.
     [Google Scholar]
  386. Wray, A.
    2002 Formulaic language and the lexicon. Cambridge: CUP. 10.1017/CBO9780511519772
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511519772 [Google Scholar]
  387. Yarowsky, D.
    1993 One sense per collocation. Proceedings, ARPA Human Language Technology Workshop, (266–271). Princeton, New Jersey: Advanced Research Project Agency. 10.3115/1075671.1075731
     https://doi.org/10.3115/1075671.1075731 [Google Scholar]
  388. Zamma, H.
    2013 Patterns and categories in English suffixation and stress placement: a theoretical and quantitative study. Tokyo: Kaitakusha.
     [Google Scholar]
  389. Zarcone, A. , Padó, S. and Lenci, A.
    2014 Inferring covert events in logical metonymies: a probe recognition experiment. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:5253181 retrieved23/10/2023.
  390. Ziegler, D.
    2007 A word of caution on coercion. Journal of Pragmatics, 39 (5), 990–1028. 10.1016/j.pragma.2006.07.014
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2006.07.014 [Google Scholar]
  391. Zwaan, R. A.
    1993 Aspects of literary comprehension: a cognitive approach. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/upal.29
     https://doi.org/10.1075/upal.29 [Google Scholar]
/content/books/9789027246523
Loading

  • From This Site

    /content/books/9789027246523
    dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Chapter
    10
    5
/content/books/9789027246523
dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
-contentType:Journal -contentType:Chapter
10
5
Chapter
content/books/9789027246523
Book
false
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error