1887
  1. Home
  2. Books
  3. The Frequency–Grammar Interface

The Frequency–Grammar Interface

Rules and regularities in first and second languages

image of The Frequency–Grammar Interface
USD
Buy:$156.00 + Taxes

Speakers and learners, based on memory and experience, implicitly know that certain language elements naturally pair together. However, they also understand, through abstract and frequency-independent categories, why some combinations are possible and others are not. The frequency-grammar interface (FGI) bridges these two types of information in human cognition. Due to this interface, the sediment of statistical calculations over the order, distribution, and associations of items (the regularities) and the computation over the abstract principles that allow these items to join together (the rules) are brought together in a speaker’s competence, feeding into one another and eventually becoming superposed. In this volume, it is argued that a specific subset of both first and second language grammar (termed ‘combinatorial grammar’) is both innate and learned. While not derived from language usage, combinatorial grammar is continuously recalibrated by usage throughout a speaker’s life. In the domain of combinatorial grammar, both generative and usage-based theories are correct, each shedding light on just one component of the two that are necessary for any language to function: rules and regularities.

References

  1. Abbot-Smith, K. & Tomasello, M.
    (2006) Exemplar-learning and schematization in a usage-based account of syntactic acquisition. The Linguistic Review, 23 (3), 275–290. 10.1515/TLR.2006.011
     https://doi.org/10.1515/TLR.2006.011 [Google Scholar]
  2. Abney, S. P.
    (1991) Parsing by chunks. In R. C. Berwick , S. P. Abney , & C. Tenny (Eds.), Principle-based parsing: Computation and psycholinguistics (pp.257–278). Springer. 10.1007/978‑94‑011‑3474‑3_10
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3474-3_10 [Google Scholar]
  3. Adelman, J. S. , Brown, G. D. , & Quesada, J. F.
    (2006) Contextual diversity, not word frequency, determines word-naming and lexical decision times. Psychological Science, 17 (9), 814–823. 10.1111/j.1467‑9280.2006.01787.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01787.x [Google Scholar]
  4. Adger, D.
    (2003) Core syntax: A minimalist approach. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780199243709.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199243709.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  5. Ajemian, R. , D’Ausilio, A. , Moorman, H. , & Bizzi, E.
    (2010) Why professional athletes need a prolonged period of warm-up and other peculiarities of human motor learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 42 (6), 381–388. 10.1080/00222895.2010.528262
     https://doi.org/10.1080/00222895.2010.528262 [Google Scholar]
  6. (2013) A theory for how sensorimotor skills are learned and retained in noisy and nonstationary neural circuits. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 110 (52), E5078–E5087. 10.1073/pnas.1320116110
     https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1320116110 [Google Scholar]
  7. Alexiadou, A. , Agnastopoulou, E. , & Everaert, M.
    (2004) The unaccusativity puzzle: Explorations of the syntax-lexicon interface. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199257652.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199257652.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  8. Alonqueo, P. , & Soto, P.
    (2012) ¿Ser o estar? Desarrollo de la comprensión y efectos en la categorización [“Ser” or “Estar”? Development of its comprehension and categorisation effects]. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 35 (3), 279–297. 10.1174/021037012802238948
     https://doi.org/10.1174/021037012802238948 [Google Scholar]
  9. Ambridge, B. , Kidd, E. , Rowland, C. F. , & Theakston, A. L.
    (2015) The ubiquity of frequency effects in first language acquisition. Journal of child language, 42 (2), 239–273. 10.1017/S030500091400049X
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S030500091400049X [Google Scholar]
  10. Ambridge, B. , Pine, J. M. , & Lieven, E. V. M.
    (2014) Child language acquisition: Why universal grammar doesn’t help. Language, 90 (3), e53–e90. 10.1353/lan.2014.0051
     https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2014.0051 [Google Scholar]
  11. Amso, D. , Davidson, M. C. , Johnson, S. P. , Glover, G. , & Casey, B. J.
    (2005) Contributions of the hippocampus and the striatum to simple association and frequency-based learning. NeuroImage, 27 (2), 291–298. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.02.035
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.02.035 [Google Scholar]
  12. Anderson, B.
    (2007a) Pedagogical rules and their relationship to frequency in the input: Observational and empirical data from L2 French. Applied Linguistics, 28 (2), 286–308. 10.1093/applin/amm015
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amm015 [Google Scholar]
  13. (2007b) Learnability and parametric change in the nominal system of L2 French. Language Acquisition, 14 (2), 165–214. 10.1080/10489220701353842
     https://doi.org/10.1080/10489220701353842 [Google Scholar]
  14. Arche, M. J.
    (2006) Individuals in time: Tense, aspect and the individual/stage distinction. John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.94
     https://doi.org/10.1075/la.94 [Google Scholar]
  15. Arciuli, J.
    (2017) The multi-component nature of statistical learning. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 372 (1711), Article 20160058. 10.1098/rstb.2016.0058
     https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2016.0058 [Google Scholar]
  16. Arnon, I.
    (2021) The Starting Big approach to language learning. Journal of Child Language, 48 (5), 937–958. 10.1017/S0305000921000386
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000921000386 [Google Scholar]
  17. Arnon, I. , McCauley, S. M. , & Christiansen, M. H.
    (2017) Digging up the building blocks of language: Age-of-acquisition effects for multiword phrases. Journal of Memory and Language, 92 , 265–280. 10.1016/j.jml.2016.07.004
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2016.07.004 [Google Scholar]
  18. Arnon, I. , & Snider, N.
    (2010) More than words: Frequency effects for multi-word phrases. Journal of Memory and Language, 62 (1), 67–82. 10.1016/j.jml.2009.09.005
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2009.09.005 [Google Scholar]
  19. Aronoff, M.
    (1976) Word formation in generative grammar. The MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Baayen, R. H.
    (2010) Demythologizing the word frequency effect: A discriminative learning perspective. The Mental Lexicon, 5 (3), 436–461. 10.1075/ml.5.3.10baa
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ml.5.3.10baa [Google Scholar]
  21. Baayen, R. H. , Davidson, D. J. , & Bates, D. M.
    (2008) Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59 (4), 390–412. 10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005 [Google Scholar]
  22. Baayen, R. H. , Dijkstra, T. , & Schreuder, R.
    (1997) Singulars and plurals in Dutch: Evidence for a parallel dual-route model. Journal of Memory and Language, 37 (1), 94–117. 10.1006/jmla.1997.2509
     https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1997.2509 [Google Scholar]
  23. Baggio, G. , Choma, T. , van Lambalgen, M. , & Hagoort, P.
    (2010) Coercion and compositionality. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22 (9), 2131–2140. 10.1162/jocn.2009.21303
     https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2009.21303 [Google Scholar]
  24. Baggio, G. , van Lambalgen, M. , & Hagoort, P.
    (2008) Computing and recomputing discourse models: An ERP study. Journal of Memory and Language, 59 (1), 36–53. 10.1016/j.jml.2008.02.005
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2008.02.005 [Google Scholar]
  25. Bakker, I. , Macgregor, L. J. , Pulvermüller, F. , & Shtyrov, Y.
    (2013) Past tense in the brain’s time: Neurophysiological evidence for dual-route processing of past-tense verbs. NeuroImage, 71 , 187–195. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.12.065
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.12.065 [Google Scholar]
  26. Bannard, C. , & Lieven, E.
    (2009) Repetition and reuse in child language learning. In R. Corrigan , E. Moravcsik , H. Ouali , & K. Wheatley (Eds.), Formulaic language: Vol. 2, Acquisition, loss, psychological reality, functional explanations (pp.299–321). John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.83.04ban
     https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.83.04ban [Google Scholar]
  27. Bates, D. , Mächler, M. , Bolker, B. , & Walker, S.
    (2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67 (1), 1–48. 10.18637/jss.v067.i01
     https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01 [Google Scholar]
  28. Batterink, L. J. , Oudiette, D. , Reber, P. J. , & Paller, K. A.
    (2014) Sleep facilitates learning a new linguistic rule. Neuropsychologia, 65 , 169–179. 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.10.024
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.10.024 [Google Scholar]
  29. Batterink, L. J. , Paller, K. A. , & Reber, P. J.
    (2019) Understanding the neural bases of implicit and statistical learning. Topics in Cognitive Science, 11 (3), 482–503. 10.1111/tops.12420
     https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12420 [Google Scholar]
  30. Batterink, L. J. , Reber, P. J. , Neville, H. J. , & Paller, K. A.
    (2015) Implicit and explicit contributions to statistical learning. Journal of Memory and Language, 83 , 62–78. 10.1016/j.jml.2015.04.004
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2015.04.004 [Google Scholar]
  31. Batterink, L. J. , Westerberg, C. E. , & Paller, K. A.
    (2017) Vocabulary learning benefits from REM after slow-wave sleep. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, 144 , 102–113. 10.1016/j.nlm.2017.07.001
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nlm.2017.07.001 [Google Scholar]
  32. Batterink, L. J. , & Zhang, S.
    (2022) Simple statistical regularities presented during sleep are detected but not retained. Neuropsychologia, 164 , Article 108106. 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2021.108106
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2021.108106 [Google Scholar]
  33. Bauke, L. , & Blümel, A.
    (Eds.) (2017) Labels and roots. De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9781501502118
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501502118 [Google Scholar]
  34. Bavelier, D. , Green, C. S. , & Dye, M. W. G.
    (2009) Exercising your brain: Training-related brain plasticity. In M. S. Gazzaniga , E. Bizzi , L. M. Chalupa , S. T. Grafton , T. F. Heatherton , C. Koch , J. E. LeDoux , S. J. Luck , G. R. Mangan , J. A. Movshon , H. Neville , E. A. Phelps , P. Rakic , D. L. Schacter , M. Sur , & B. A. Wandell (Eds.), The Cognitive Neurosciences (pp.153–164). The MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/8029.003.0016
     https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/8029.003.0016 [Google Scholar]
  35. Becerra-Bonache, L. , Bel-Enguix, G. , Jiménez-López, M. D. , & Martín-Vide, C.
    (2014) Mathematical foundations: Formal grammars and languages. In R. Mitkov (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of computational linguistics (2nd ed., pp.207–229). Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199573691.013.021
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199573691.013.021 [Google Scholar]
  36. Beckers, T. , De Houwer, J. , & Matute, H.
    (2007) Editorial: Human contingency learning. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60 (3), 289–290. 10.1080/17470210601000532
     https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210601000532 [Google Scholar]
  37. Benítez-Burraco, A. , & Boeckx, C.
    (2014) Universal grammar and biological variation: An EvoDevo agenda for comparative biolinguistics. Biological Theory, 9 (2), 122–134. 10.1007/s13752‑014‑0164‑0
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s13752-014-0164-0 [Google Scholar]
  38. Bennett, M. , & Partee, B. H.
    (2004) Toward the logic of tense and aspect in English. In B. H. Partee (Ed.), Compositionality in formal semantics (pp.59–109). Blackwell. 10.1002/9780470751305.ch4
     https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470751305.ch4 [Google Scholar]
  39. Bentley, D.
    (2006) Split intransitivity in Italian. De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110896053
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110896053 [Google Scholar]
  40. Berwick, R. C.
    (1997) Syntax facit saltum: Computation and the genotype and phenotype of language. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 10 (2–3), 231–249. 10.1016/S0911‑6044(97)00007‑9
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0911-6044(97)00007-9 [Google Scholar]
  41. (2011) Syntax facit saltum redux: Biolinguistics and the leap to syntax. In A. M. Di Sciullo , & C. Boeckx (Eds.), The biolinguistic enterprise: New perspectives on the evolution and nature of the human language faculty (pp.65–99). Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Berwick, R. C. , & Chomsky, N.
    (2017) Why only us: Language and evolution. The MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Bever, T. G. , & Poeppel, D.
    (2010) Analysis by synthesis: A (re-)emerging program of research for language and vision. Biolinguistics, 4 (2–3), 174–200. 10.5964/bioling.8783
     https://doi.org/10.5964/bioling.8783 [Google Scholar]
  44. Biberauer, T. , Holmberg, A. , & Roberts, I.
    (2009) Linearization and the architecture of grammar: A view from the Final-over-Final constraint. In V. Moscati , & E. Servidio (Eds.), Proceedings XXXV Incontro di Grammatica Generativa, CICL working papers (pp.77–89). Universit`a degli Studi di Siena
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Bickerton, D.
    (2003) Symbol and structure: A comprehensive framework for language evolution. In M. H. Christiansen & S. Kirby , (Eds.), Language evolution (pp.77–93). Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199244843.003.0005
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199244843.003.0005 [Google Scholar]
  46. (2009a) Recursion: Core of complexity or artifact of analysis?In T. Givón & M. Shibatani (Eds.), Syntactic complexity: Diachrony, acquisition, neuro-cognition, evolution (pp.531–544). John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.85.20rec
     https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.85.20rec [Google Scholar]
  47. (2009b) Syntax for non-syntacticians. A brief primer. In D. Bickerton & E. Szathmáry (Eds.), Biological foundations and origin of syntax (pp.3–13). The MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/8468.003.0005
     https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/8468.003.0005 [Google Scholar]
  48. Bizzi, E. , & Ajemian, R.
    (2015) A hard scientific quest: Understanding voluntary movements. Daedalus, 144 (1), 83–95. 10.1162/DAED_a_00324
     https://doi.org/10.1162/DAED_a_00324 [Google Scholar]
  49. Bley-Vroman, R.
    (1983) The comparative fallacy in interlanguage studies: The case of systematicity. Language Learning, 33 (1), 1–17. 10.1111/j.1467‑1770.1983.tb00983.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1983.tb00983.x [Google Scholar]
  50. (2002) Frequency in production, comprehension and acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24 (2), 209–213. 10.1017/S027226310200205X
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S027226310200205X [Google Scholar]
  51. (2009) The evolving context of the fundamental difference hypothesis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 31 (2), 175–198. 10.1017/S0272263109090275
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263109090275 [Google Scholar]
  52. Blumenthal-Dramé, A.
    (2017) Entrenchment from a psycholinguistic and neurolinguistic perspective. In H.-J. Schmid (Ed.), Entrenchment and the psychology of language learning: How we reorganize and adapt linguistic knowledge (pp.129–152). De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1037/15969‑007
     https://doi.org/10.1037/15969-007 [Google Scholar]
  53. Bod, R.
    (2009) From exemplar to grammar: A probabilistic analogy-based model of language learning. Cognitive Science, 33 (5), 752–793. 10.1111/j.1551‑6709.2009.01031.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-6709.2009.01031.x [Google Scholar]
  54. Boeckx, C.
    (2008) Bare syntax. Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Boeckx, C. , Fodor, J. D. , Gleitman, L. , & Rizzi, L.
    (2009) Language universals: Yesterday, today and tomorrow. In M. Piattelli-Palmarini , J. Uriagereka , & P. Salaburu (Eds.). Of minds and language: A dialogue with Noam Chomsky in the Basque Country (pp.194–220). Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780199544660.003.0016
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199544660.003.0016 [Google Scholar]
  56. Boeckx, C. , & Theofanopoulou, C.
    (2018) (Neural) syntax. In R. Martin , & A. Gallego (Eds), Language, syntax, and the natural sciences (pp.295–315). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781316591529.016
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316591529.016 [Google Scholar]
  57. Bogaerts, L. , Siegelman, N. , & Frost, R.
    (2021) Statistical learning and language impairments: Toward more precise theoretical accounts. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 16 (2), 319–337. 10.1177/1745691620953082
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620953082 [Google Scholar]
  58. Borer, H. , & Wexler, K.
    (1992) Bi-unique relations and the maturation of grammatical principles. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 10 (2), 147–189. 10.1007/BF00133811
     https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00133811 [Google Scholar]
  59. Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, I. , & Schlesewsky, M.
    (2019) Toward a neurobiologically plausible model of language-related, negative event-related potentials. Frontiers in Psychology, 10 , Article 298. 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00298
     https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00298 [Google Scholar]
  60. Bovolenta, G. , & Husband, E. M.
    (2023) Structural prediction during language comprehension revealed by electrophysiology: Evidence from Italian auxiliaries. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 49 (1), 116–129. 10.1037/xlm0001115
     https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0001115 [Google Scholar]
  61. Boxell, O.
    (2016) The place of universal grammar in the study of language and mind: A response to Dabrowska (2015). Open Linguistics, 2 (1), 352–372. 10.1515/opli‑2016‑0017
     https://doi.org/10.1515/opli-2016-0017 [Google Scholar]
  62. Brauer, J. , Anwander, A. , & Friederici, A. D.
    (2011) Neuroanatomical prerequisites for language functions in the maturing brain. Cerebral Cortex, 21 (2), 459–466. 10.1093/cercor/bhq108
     https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhq108 [Google Scholar]
  63. Bresnan, J.
    (2007) Is syntactic knowledge probabilistic? Experiments with the English dative alternation. In S. Featherston & W. Sternefeld (Eds.), Roots: Linguistics in search of its evidential base (pp.75–96). De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110198621.75
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110198621.75 [Google Scholar]
  64. Bresnan, J. , & Ford, M.
    (2010) Predicting syntax: Processing dative constructions in American and Australian varieties of English. Language, 86 (1), 168–213. 10.1353/lan.0.0189
     https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.0.0189 [Google Scholar]
  65. Brouwer, H. , Crocker, M. W. , Venhuizen, N. J. , & Hoeks, J. C. J.
    (2017) A neurocomputational model of the N400 and the P600 in language processing. Cognitive Science, 41 (56), 1318–1352. 10.1111/cogs.12461
     https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12461 [Google Scholar]
  66. Buffington, J. , Demos, A. , & Morgan-Short, K.
    (2021) The reliability and validity of procedural memory assessments used in second language acquisition research. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 43 (3), 635–662. 10.1017/S0272263121000127
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263121000127 [Google Scholar]
  67. Busemeyer, J. R. , & Wang, Z.
    (2015) What is quantum cognition, and how is it applied to psychology?Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24 (3), 163–169. 10.1177/0963721414568663
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721414568663 [Google Scholar]
  68. Bybee, J.
    (1995) Regular morphology and the lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes, 10 (5), 425–455. 10.1080/01690969508407111
     https://doi.org/10.1080/01690969508407111 [Google Scholar]
  69. (2002) Sequentiality as the basis of constituent structure. In T. Givón & B. F. Malle (Eds.), The evolution of language out of pre-language (pp.107–134). John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.53.07byb
     https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.53.07byb [Google Scholar]
  70. (2006) From usage to grammar: The mind’s response to repetition. Language, 82 (4), 711–733. 10.1353/lan.2006.0186
     https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2006.0186 [Google Scholar]
  71. (2007) Frequency of use and the organization of language. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195301571.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195301571.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  72. Bybee, J.
    (2008) Usage-based grammar and second language acquisition. In P. Robinson & N. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition (pp.226–246). Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  73. Bybee, J.
    (2010) Language, usage and cognition. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511750526
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511750526 [Google Scholar]
  74. (2011) Domain-general processes as the basis for grammar. In K. R. Gibson & M. Tallerman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of language evolution (pp.528–536). Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199541119.013.0055
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199541119.013.0055 [Google Scholar]
  75. Cardinaletti, A. , & Giusti, G.
    (2011) The acquisition of adjectival ordering in Italian. In M. Anderssen , K. Bentzen , & M. Westergaard (Eds.), Variation in the input (pp.65–93). Springer. 10.1007/978‑90‑481‑9207‑6_4
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9207-6_4 [Google Scholar]
  76. Carminati, M. N.
    (2002) The processing of Italian subject pronouns. Doctoral dissertations, University of Massachusetts at Amherst. https://scholarworks.umass.edu/dissertations/AAI3039345
  77. Carnie, A.
    (2002) Syntax: A generative introduction. Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  78. Carreiras, M. , & Clifton, C.
    (Eds.) (2004) The on-line study of sentence comprehension: Eye-tracking, ERPs and beyond. Psychology Press. 10.4324/9780203509050
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203509050 [Google Scholar]
  79. Carroll, S. E.
    (2006) Shallow processing: A consequence of bilingualism or second language learning?Applied Psycholinguistics, 27 (1), 53–56. 10.1017/S0142716406240037
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716406240037 [Google Scholar]
  80. Cattaneo, Z. , Devlin, J. T. , Vecchi, T. , & Silvanto, J.
    (2009) Dissociable neural representations of grammatical gender in Broca’s area investigated by the combination of satiation and TMS. NeuroImage, 47 (2), 700–704. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.04.097
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.04.097 [Google Scholar]
  81. Cecchetto, C. , & Donati, C.
    (2010) On labeling: Principle C and head movement. Syntax, 13 (3), 241–278. 10.1111/j.1467‑9612.2010.00140.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9612.2010.00140.x [Google Scholar]
  82. Chater, N. , & Christiansen, M. H.
    (2010) Language acquisition meets language evolution. Cognitive Science, 34 (7), 1131–1157. 10.1111/j.1551‑6709.2009.01049.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-6709.2009.01049.x [Google Scholar]
  83. Cheng, L. S. , Burgess, D. , Vernooij, N. , Solís-Barroso, C. , McDermott, A. , & Namboodiripad, S.
    (2021) The problematic concept of native speaker in psycholinguistics: Replacing vague and harmful terminology with inclusive and accurate measures. Frontiers in Psychology, 12 , Article 715843. 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.715843
     https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.715843 [Google Scholar]
  84. Chomsky, N.
    (1995) The minimalist program. The MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  85. (2000a) The architecture of language. Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  86. (2000b) New horizons in the study of language and mind. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511811937
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511811937 [Google Scholar]
  87. (2002) On nature and language. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511613876
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511613876 [Google Scholar]
  88. (2005) Three factors in language design. Linguistic Inquiry, 36 (1), 1–22. 10.1162/0024389052993655
     https://doi.org/10.1162/0024389052993655 [Google Scholar]
  89. (2007) Approaching UG from below. In U. Sauerland & H. M. Gärtner (Eds.), Interfaces + recursion = language? Chomsky’s minimalism and the view from syntax-semantics (pp.1–30). De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110207552.1
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110207552.1 [Google Scholar]
  90. (2009) Opening remarks. In M. Piattelli-Palmarini , J. Uriagereka , & P. Salaburu (Eds.). Of minds and language: A dialogue with Noam Chomsky in the Basque Country (pp.13–43). Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780199544660.003.0003
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199544660.003.0003 [Google Scholar]
  91. (2011) Language and the cognitive science revolution(s). Lecture given at Carlton University, April 8, 2011 [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XbjVMq0k3uc
     [Google Scholar]
  92. Chomsky, N.
    (2012) The science of language: Interviews with James McGilvray. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139061018
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139061018 [Google Scholar]
  93. Chomsky, N.
    (2013) Problems of projection. Lingua, 130 , 33–49. 10.1016/j.lingua.2012.12.003
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2012.12.003 [Google Scholar]
  94. (2015a) Problems of projections: Extensions. In E. Di Domenico , C. Hamann , & S. Matteini (Eds.), Structures, strategies and beyond: Studies in honour of Adriana Belletti (pp.1–16). John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.223.01cho
     https://doi.org/10.1075/la.223.01cho [Google Scholar]
  95. (2015b) Some core contested concepts. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 44 (1), 91–104. 10.1007/s10936‑014‑9331‑5
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-014-9331-5 [Google Scholar]
  96. (2015c) The minimalist program: 20th anniversary edition. The MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/9780262527347.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262527347.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  97. (2016) Minimal computation and the architecture of language. Chinese Semiotic Studies, 12 (1), 13–24. 10.1515/css‑2016‑0003
     https://doi.org/10.1515/css-2016-0003 [Google Scholar]
  98. (2017) Language architecture and its import for evolution. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 81 (Pt B), 295–300. 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.01.053
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.01.053 [Google Scholar]
  99. Christiansen, M. H. , Conway, C. M. , & Onnis, L.
    (2012) Similar neural correlates for language and sequential learning: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Language and Cognitive Processes, 27 (2), 231–256. 10.1080/01690965.2011.606666
     https://doi.org/10.1080/01690965.2011.606666 [Google Scholar]
  100. Cinque, G.
    (1994) On the evidence for partial N-movement in the romance DP. In G. Cinque , J. Koster , J.-Y. Pollock , L. Rizzi , & R. Zanuttini , (Eds.), Paths towards universal grammar: Studies in honor of Richard S. Kayne (pp.85–110). Georgetown University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  101. (2010) The syntax of adjectives: A comparative study. The MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/9780262014168.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262014168.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  102. Citko, B.
    (2011) Symmetry in syntax: Merge, move and labels. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511794278
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511794278 [Google Scholar]
  103. Clahsen, H. , & Felser, C.
    (2006a) How native-like is non-native language processing?Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10 (12), 564–570. 10.1016/j.tics.2006.10.002
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2006.10.002 [Google Scholar]
  104. (2006b) Grammatical processing in language learners. Applied Psycholinguistics, 27 (1), 3–42. 10.1017/S0142716406060024
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716406060024 [Google Scholar]
  105. (2006c) Authors’ response: Continuity and shallow structures in language processing. Applied Psycholinguistics, 27 (1), 107–126. 10.1017/S0142716406060206
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716406060206 [Google Scholar]
  106. (2018) Some notes on the Shallow Structure Hypothesis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 40 (3), 693–706. 10.1017/S0272263117000250
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263117000250 [Google Scholar]
  107. Clahsen, H. , Felser, C. , Neubauer, K. , Sato, M. , & Silva, R.
    (2010) Morphological structure in native and nonnative language processing. Language Learning, 60 (1), 21–43. 10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2009.00550.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00550.x [Google Scholar]
  108. Clair, M. C. S. , Monaghan, P. , & Christiansen, M. H.
    (2010) Learning grammatical categories from distributional cues: Flexible frames for language acquisition. Cognition, 116 (3), 341–360. 10.1016/j.cognition.2010.05.012
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2010.05.012 [Google Scholar]
  109. Clark, A.
    (2013) Are we predictive engines? Perils, prospects, and the puzzle of the porous perceiver. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36 (3), 233–253. 10.1017/S0140525X12002440
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X12002440 [Google Scholar]
  110. Clear, J.
    (1993) From Firth principles: Computational tools for the study of collocations. In M. Baker , G. Francis , & E. Tognini-Bonelli (Eds.), Text and technology: In honour of John Sinclair (pp.271–292). John Benjamins. 10.1075/z.64.18cle
     https://doi.org/10.1075/z.64.18cle [Google Scholar]
  111. Clifton Jr., C. , Staub, A. , & Rayner, K.
    (2007) Eye movements in reading words and sentences. In R. P. G. van Gompel , M. H. Fischer , W. S. Murray , & R. L. Hill (Eds.), Eye movements: A window on mind and brain (pp.341–371). Elsevier. 10.1016/B978‑008044980‑7/50017‑3
     https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-008044980-7/50017-3 [Google Scholar]
  112. Coltheart, M. , Rastle, K. , Perry, C. , Langdon, R. , & Ziegler, J.
    (2001) DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108 (1), 204–256. 10.1037/0033‑295X.108.1.204
     https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.108.1.204 [Google Scholar]
  113. Compton, B. J. , & Logan, G. D.
    (1991) The transition from algorithm to retrieval in memory-based theories of automaticity. Memory & cognition, 19 (2), 151–158. 10.3758/BF03197111
     https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197111 [Google Scholar]
  114. Conklin, K. , & Pellicer-Sánchez, A.
    (2016) Using eye-tracking in applied linguistics and second language research. Second Language Research, 32 (3), 453–468. 10.1177/0267658316637401
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658316637401 [Google Scholar]
  115. Cruschina, S.
    (2015) The expression of evidentiality and epistemicity: Cases of grammaticalization in Italian and Sicilian. Probus, 27 (1), 1–31. 10.1515/probus‑2013‑0006
     https://doi.org/10.1515/probus-2013-0006 [Google Scholar]
  116. Cruz Heredia, A. A. L. , Dickerson, B. , & Lau, E.
    (2022) Towards understanding sustained neural activity across syntactic dependencies. Neurobiology of Language, 3 (1), 87–108. 10.1162/nol_a_00050
     https://doi.org/10.1162/nol_a_00050 [Google Scholar]
  117. Cunnings, I.
    (2017) Parsing and working memory in bilingual sentence processing. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 20 (4), 659–678. 10.1017/S1366728916000675
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728916000675 [Google Scholar]
  118. Dąbrowska, E.
    (2014) Words that go together: Measuring individual differences in native speakers’ knowledge of collocations. The Mental Lexicon, 9 (3), 401–418. 10.1075/ml.9.3.02dab
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ml.9.3.02dab [Google Scholar]
  119. Dąbrowska, E. , & Lieven, E.
    (2005) Towards a lexically specific grammar of children’s question constructions. Cognitive Linguistics, 16 (3), 437–474. 10.1515/cogl.2005.16.3.437
     https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.2005.16.3.437 [Google Scholar]
  120. De Bot, K. , Lowie, W. , & Verspoor, M.
    (2007) A Dynamic Systems Theory approach to second language acquisition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 10 (1), 7–21. 10.1017/S1366728906002732
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728906002732 [Google Scholar]
  121. De Diego-Balaguer, R. , Fuentemilla, L. , & Rodriguez-Fornells, A.
    (2011) Brain dynamics sustaining rapid rule extraction from speech. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23 (10), 3105–3120. 10.1162/jocn.2011.21636
     https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2011.21636 [Google Scholar]
  122. De Diego-Balaguer, R. , & Lopez-Barroso, D.
    (2010) Cognitive and neural mechanisms sustaining rule learning from speech. Language Learning, 60 , 151–187. 10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2010.00605.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00605.x [Google Scholar]
  123. Dehaene, S.
    (2009) Reading in the brain: The new science of how we read. Penguin Books.
     [Google Scholar]
  124. Dehé, N. , & Samek-Lodovici, V.
    (2009) On the prosody and syntax of DPs: evidence from Italian noun adjective sequences. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 27 , 45–75. 10.1007/s11049‑009‑9063‑7
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-009-9063-7 [Google Scholar]
  125. DeKeyser, R. M.
    (2000) The robustness of critical period effects in second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22 (4), 499–533. 10.1017/S0272263100004022
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100004022 [Google Scholar]
  126. DeKeyser, R.
    (2007) Skill Acquisition Theory. In B. VanPatten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction (pp.97–113). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
     [Google Scholar]
  127. (2009) Cognitive-psychological processes in second language learning. In C. Doughty & M. Long (Eds.) The handbook of language teaching (pp.119–137). Blackwell. 10.1002/9781444315783.ch8
     https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444315783.ch8 [Google Scholar]
  128. Dekydspotter, L.
    (2009) Second language epistemology: Take two. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 31 (2), 291–321. 10.1017/S0272263109090317
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263109090317 [Google Scholar]
  129. DeLong, K. A. , Troyer, M. , & Kutas, M.
    (2014) Pre-processing in sentence comprehension: Sensitivity to likely upcoming meaning and structure. Language and Linguistics Compass, 8 (12), 631–645. 10.1111/lnc3.12093
     https://doi.org/10.1111/lnc3.12093 [Google Scholar]
  130. DeLong, K. A. , Urbach, T. P. , & Kutas, M.
    (2005) Probabilistic word pre-activation during language comprehension inferred from electrical brain activity. Nature Neuroscience, 8 (8), 1117–1121. 10.1038/nn1504
     https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1504 [Google Scholar]
  131. De Martino, M. , Bracco, G. , & Laudanna, A.
    (2011) The activation of grammatical gender information in processing Italian nouns. Language and Cognitive Processes, 26 (4–6), 745–776. 10.1080/01690965.2010.491977
     https://doi.org/10.1080/01690965.2010.491977 [Google Scholar]
  132. De Martino, M. , Bracco, G. , Postiglione, F. , & Laudanna, A.
    (2017) The influence of grammatical gender and suffix transparency in processing Italian written nouns. The Mental Lexicon, 12 (1), 107–128. 10.1075/ml.12.1.05dem
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ml.12.1.05dem [Google Scholar]
  133. De Saussure , F.
    (1922) Course de linguistique générale ( F. Sechehaye , Trans.). Editions Payot.
     [Google Scholar]
  134. De Swart, H.
    (1998) Aspect shift and coercion. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 16 , 347–385. 10.1023/A:1005916004600
     https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005916004600 [Google Scholar]
  135. Dimroth, C. , & Starren, M.
    (Eds.) (2003) Information structure and the dynamics of language acquisition. John Benjamins. 10.1075/sibil.26
     https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.26 [Google Scholar]
  136. Divjak, D.
    (2019) Frequency in language: Memory, attention and learning. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781316084410
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316084410 [Google Scholar]
  137. Doumas, L. A. , Hummel, J. E. , & Sandhofer, C. M.
    (2008) A theory of the discovery and predication of relational concepts. Psychological Review, 115 (1), 1–43. 10.1037/0033‑295X.115.1.1
     https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.115.1.1 [Google Scholar]
  138. Drozd, K. F.
    (2001) Children’s weak interpretations of universally quantified questions. In M. Bowerman & S. Levinson (Eds.), Conceptual development and language acquisition (pp.340–376). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511620669.014
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620669.014 [Google Scholar]
  139. Dulay, H. , Burt, M. , & Krashen, S.
    (1982) Language two. Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  140. Dussias, P. E.
    (2003) Syntactic ambiguity resolution in L2 learners: Some effects of bilinguality on LI and L2 processing strategies. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25 (4), 529–557. 10.1017/S0272263103000238
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263103000238 [Google Scholar]
  141. Eichenbaum, H.
    (2012) The cognitive neuroscience of memory: An introduction (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199778614.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199778614.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  142. Ellis, N. C.
    (2001) Memory for language. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp.33–68). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139524780.004
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524780.004 [Google Scholar]
  143. (2002) Frequency effects in language processing: A review with implications for theories of implicit and explicit language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24 (2), 143–188. 10.1017/S0272263102002024
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263102002024 [Google Scholar]
  144. (2012) Formulaic language and second language acquisition: Zipf and the phrasal teddy bear. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 32 , 17–44. 10.1017/S0267190512000025
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190512000025 [Google Scholar]
  145. (2016) Cognition, corpora, and computing: Triangulating research in usage-based language learning. Language Learning, 67 (51), 40–65. 10.1111/lang.12215
     https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12215 [Google Scholar]
  146. Ellis, N. C. , & Cadierno, T.
    (2009) Constructing a second language: Introduction to the special section. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 7 (1), 111–139. 10.1075/arcl.7.05ell
     https://doi.org/10.1075/arcl.7.05ell [Google Scholar]
  147. Ellis, N. C. , & Collins, L.
    (2009) Input and second language acquisition: The roles of frequency, form, and function introduction to the special issue. The Modern Language Journal, 93 (3), 329–335. 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.2009.00893.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00893.x [Google Scholar]
  148. Ellis, N. C. , & Ogden, D. C.
    (2017) Thinking about multiword constructions: Usage-based approaches to acquisition and processing. Topics in Cognitive Science, 9 (3), 604–620. 10.1111/tops.12256
     https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12256 [Google Scholar]
  149. Ellis, N. C. , & Wulff, S.
    (2020) Usage-based approaches to L2 acquisition. In B. VanPatten , G. Keating , & S. Wulff (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction, (pp.63–82). Routledge. 10.4324/9780429503986‑4
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429503986-4 [Google Scholar]
  150. Epstein, S. , Kitahara, H. , & Seely, T.
    (2017) Merge, labeling and their interactions. In L. Bauke & A. Blümel (Eds.), Labels and roots (pp.17–46). De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9781501502118‑002
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501502118-002 [Google Scholar]
  151. Fernández-Leborans, M. J.
    (1999) La predicación: Las oraciones copulativas. In V. Demonte Barreto & I. Bosque (Eds.), Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española (Vol.2, pp.2357–2460). Espasa Calpe.
     [Google Scholar]
  152. Ferreira, F.
    (2003) The misinterpretation of noncanonical sentences. Cognitive Psychology, 47 (2), 164–203. 10.1016/S0010‑0285(03)00005‑7
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0285(03)00005-7 [Google Scholar]
  153. Ferreira, F. , Bailey, K. G. D. , & Ferraro, V.
    (2002) Good-enough representations in language comprehension. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11 (1), 11–15. 10.1111/1467‑8721.00158
     https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.00158 [Google Scholar]
  154. Ferreira, F. , & Patson, N. D.
    (2007) The ‘good enough’ approach to language comprehension. Language and Linguistics Compass, 1 (1-2), 71–83. 10.1111/j.1749‑818X.2007.00007.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818X.2007.00007.x [Google Scholar]
  155. Ferreira, F. , & Qiu, Z.
    (2021) Predicting syntactic structure. Brain Research, 1770 , Article 147632. 10.1016/j.brainres.2021.147632
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2021.147632 [Google Scholar]
  156. Fisher, C. , Gertner, Y. , Scott, R. M. , & Yuan, S.
    (2010) Syntactic bootstrapping. WIREs Cognitive Science, 1 (2), 143–149. 10.1002/wcs.17
     https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.17 [Google Scholar]
  157. Fodor, J. D.
    (1989) Empty categories in sentence processing. Language and Cognitive Processes, 4 (3–4), SI155–SI209. 10.1080/01690968908406367
     https://doi.org/10.1080/01690968908406367 [Google Scholar]
  158. Fodor, J. D. , & Inoue, A.
    (2010) Attach anyway. In J. D. Fodor & F. Ferreira (Eds.), Reanalysis in sentence processing (pp.101–141). Kluwer.
     [Google Scholar]
  159. Fodor, J. A. , & Pylyshyn, Z. W.
    (1988) Connectionism and cognitive architecture: A critical analysis. Cognition, 28 (1–2), 3–71. 10.1016/0010‑0277(88)90031‑5
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(88)90031-5 [Google Scholar]
  160. Frank, M. C. , & Tenenbaum, J. B.
    (2011) Three ideal observer models for rule learning in simple languages. Cognition, 120 (3), 360–371. 10.1016/j.cognition.2010.10.005
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2010.10.005 [Google Scholar]
  161. Franzon, F. , & Zanini, C.
    (2023) The entropy of morphological systems in natural languages is modulated by functional and semantic properties. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, 30 (1), 42–66. 10.1080/09296174.2022.2063501
     https://doi.org/10.1080/09296174.2022.2063501 [Google Scholar]
  162. Frazier, L.
    (1999) On sentence interpretation. Springer. 10.1007/978‑94‑011‑4599‑2
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4599-2 [Google Scholar]
  163. Frenck-Mestre, C.
    (2002) An on-line look at sentence processing in the second language. In R. R. Heredia & J. Altarriba (Eds.), Bilingual sentence processing (pp.217–236). Elsevier. 10.1016/S0166‑4115(02)80012‑7
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4115(02)80012-7 [Google Scholar]
  164. (2005) Eye-movement recording as a tool for studying syntactic processing in a second language: A review of methodologies and experimental findings. Second Language Research, 21 (2), 175–198. 10.1191/0267658305sr257oa
     https://doi.org/10.1191/0267658305sr257oa [Google Scholar]
  165. Friederici, A. D. , Brauer, J. , & Lohmann, G.
    (2011) Maturation of the language network: from inter- to intrahemispheric connectivities. PloS one, 6 (6), Article e20726. 10.1371/journal.pone.0020726
     https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0020726 [Google Scholar]
  166. Friederici, A. D. , Oberecker, R. , & Brauer, J.
    (2012) Neurophysiological preconditions of syntax acquisition. Psychological Research, 76 (2), 204–211. 10.1007/s00426‑011‑0357‑0
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-011-0357-0 [Google Scholar]
  167. Friston, K.
    (2018) Does predictive coding have a future?Nature Neuroscience, 21 (8), 1019–1021. 10.1038/s41593‑018‑0200‑7
     https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-018-0200-7 [Google Scholar]
  168. Frost, R. , Armstrong, B. C. , Siegelman, N. , & Christiansen, M. H.
    (2015) Domain generality versus modality specificity: The paradox of statistical learning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19 (3), 117–125. 10.1016/j.tics.2014.12.010
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2014.12.010 [Google Scholar]
  169. Gallego, A.J. & Martin, R.
    (2018) Language, Syntax, and the Natural Sciences. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  170. Gabay, Y. , Thiessen, E. D. , & Holt, L. L.
    (2015) Impaired statistical learning in developmental dyslexia. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research: JSLHR, 58 (3), 934–945. 10.1044/2015_JSLHR‑L‑14‑0324
     https://doi.org/10.1044/2015_JSLHR-L-14-0324 [Google Scholar]
  171. García-Pardo, A. , & Menon, M.
    (2020) The aspectual structure of the adjective: Spanish ser and estar . In A. Morales-Front , M. J. Ferreira , R. P. Leow , & C. Sanz (Eds.), Hispanic linguistics: Current issues and new directions (pp.138–159). John Benjamins. 10.1075/ihll.26.07gar
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ihll.26.07gar [Google Scholar]
  172. Geeraerts, D. , & Cuyckens, H.
    (2012) Introducing cognitive linguistics. In D. Geeraerts , H. Cuyckens (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of cognitive linguistics (pp.3–22). Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  173. Giacalone-Ramat, A.
    (1998) Testing the boundaries of grammaticalization. In A. Giacalone-Ramat & P. J. Hopper (Eds.), The limits of grammaticalization (pp.107–128). John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.37.05gia
     https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.37.05gia [Google Scholar]
  174. (2000) On some grammaticalization patterns for auxiliaries. In J. C. Smith & D. Bentley (Eds.), Historical linguistics 1995: Vol. 1, General issues and non-Germanic Languages (pp.125–154). John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.161.10gia
     https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.161.10gia [Google Scholar]
  175. Giacalone Ramat, A.
    (Ed.) (2003) Verso l’italiano: Percorsi e strategie di acquisizione. Carocci.
     [Google Scholar]
  176. Gluck, M. A. , & Bower, G. H.
    (1988) From conditioning to category learning: An adaptive network model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117 (3), 227–247. 10.1037/0096‑3445.117.3.227
     https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.117.3.227 [Google Scholar]
  177. Goldberg, A. E.
    (2006) Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  178. Goldberg, A.
    (2008) Universal Grammar? Or prerequisites for natural language?Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 31 (5), 522–523. 10.1017/S0140525X0800513X
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0800513X [Google Scholar]
  179. Goldstein, M. H. , Waterfall, H. R. , Lotem, A. , Halpern, J. Y. , Schwade, J. A. , Onnis, L. , & Edelman, S.
    (2010) General cognitive principles for learning structure in time and space. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14 (6), 249–258. 10.1016/j.tics.2010.02.004
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2010.02.004 [Google Scholar]
  180. Gómez, R.
    (2007) Statistical learning in infant language development. In M. G. Gaskell (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of psycholinguistics, pp.601–616. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198568971.013.0036
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198568971.013.0036 [Google Scholar]
  181. Granena, G. , & Long, M.
    (Eds.) (2013a) Sensitive periods, language aptitude, and ultimate L2 attainment. John Benjamins. 10.1075/lllt.35
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.35 [Google Scholar]
  182. Granena, G. , & Long, M. H.
    (2013b) Age of onset, length of residence, language aptitude, and ultimate L2 attainment in three linguistic domains. Second Language Research, 29 (3), 311–343. 10.1177/0267658312461497
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658312461497 [Google Scholar]
  183. Gries, S. T.
    (2008) Dispersions and adjusted frequencies in corpora. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 13 (4), 403–437. 10.1075/ijcl.13.4.02gri
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.13.4.02gri [Google Scholar]
  184. (2015) Statistics for learner corpus research. In S. Granger , G. Gilquin , & F. Meunier (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of learner corpus research (pp.159–182). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139649414.008
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139649414.008 [Google Scholar]
  185. (2018) Mechanistic formal approaches to language acquisition: Yes, but at the right level(s) of resolution. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 8 (6), 733–737. 10.1075/lab.18050.gri
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.18050.gri [Google Scholar]
  186. (2022) On, or against?, (just) frequency. In H. Boas (Ed.), Directions for pedagogical construction grammar: Learning and teaching (with) constructions (pp.47–72). De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110746723‑002
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110746723-002 [Google Scholar]
  187. Gries, S. T. , & Ellis, N. C.
    (2015) Statistical measures for usage-based linguistics . Language Learning, 65 (S1), 228–255. 10.1111/lang.12119
     https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12119 [Google Scholar]
  188. Hagiwara, H. , Soshi, T. , Ishihara, M. , & Imanaka, K.
    (2007) A topographical study on the event-related potential correlates of scrambled word order in Japanese complex sentences. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19 (2), 175–193. 10.1162/jocn.2007.19.2.175
     https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2007.19.2.175 [Google Scholar]
  189. Hall, T.
    (2010) L2 learner-made formulaic expressions and constructions. Columbia University Working Papers in TESOL and Applied Linguistics, 10 (2), 1–18. 10.7916/salt.v10i2.1427
     https://doi.org/10.7916/salt.v10i2.1427 [Google Scholar]
  190. Hamrick, P.
    (2015) Declarative and procedural memory abilities as individual differences in incidental language learning. Learning and Individual Differences, 44 , 9–15. 10.1016/j.lindif.2015.10.003
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2015.10.003 [Google Scholar]
  191. Han, Z. , & Tarone, E.
    (Eds.) (2014) Interlanguage: Forty years later. John Benjamins. 10.1075/lllt.39
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.39 [Google Scholar]
  192. Hare, M. , & Elman, J. L.
    (1993) From weared to wore: A connectionist account of language change. Proceedings of the Fifteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 528–533. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
     [Google Scholar]
  193. Haselow, A. , & Kaltenböck, G.
    (Eds.) (2020) Grammar and cognition: Dualistic models of language structure and language processing. John Benjamins. 10.1075/hcp.70
     https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.70 [Google Scholar]
  194. Haspelmath, M.
    (2021) Explaining grammatical coding asymmetries: Form–frequency correspondences and predictability. Journal of Linguistics, 57 (3), 605–633. 10.1017/S0022226720000535
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226720000535 [Google Scholar]
  195. Hastie, T. , Tibshirani, R. , & Friedman, J.
    (2009) The elements of statistical learning: Data mining, inference, and prediction. Springer. 10.1007/978‑0‑387‑84858‑7
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-84858-7 [Google Scholar]
  196. Hauptmann, B. , & Karni, A.
    (2002) From primed to learn: The saturation of repetition priming and the induction of long-term memory. Cognitive Brain Research, 13 (3), 313–322. 10.1016/S0926‑6410(01)00124‑0
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0926-6410(01)00124-0 [Google Scholar]
  197. Hauser, M. D. , Yang, C. , Berwick, R. C. , Tattersall, I. , Ryan, M. J. , Watumull, J. , Chomsky, N. , & Lewontin, R. C.
    (2014) The mystery of language evolution. Frontiers in Psychology, 5 , Article 401. 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00401
     https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00401 [Google Scholar]
  198. Hawkins, J. A.
    (2003) Efficiency and complexity in grammars: Three general principles. In J. Moore & M. Polinsky (Eds.), The nature of explanation in linguistic theory (pp.121–152). CSLI Publications.
     [Google Scholar]
  199. (2004) Efficiency and complexity in grammars. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199252695.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199252695.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  200. (2022) Have grammars been shaped by working memory and if so, how?In J. Schwieter & Z. Wen (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of working memory and language (pp.275–303). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108955638.017
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108955638.017 [Google Scholar]
  201. Hawkins, R.
    (2001) Second language syntax: A generative introduction. Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  202. Heine, B. , Kaltenböck, G. , Kuteva, T. , & Long, H.
    (2013) An outline of discourse grammar. In S. Bischoff & C. Jany (Eds.), Functional approaches to language (pp.155–206). De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110285321.155
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110285321.155 [Google Scholar]
  203. Heine, B. , Kuteva, T. , & Kaltenböck, G.
    (2014) Discourse Grammar, the dual process model, and brain lateralization: Some correlations. Language and Cognition: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Language and Cognitive Science, 6 (1), 146–180. 10.1017/langcog.2013.3
     https://doi.org/10.1017/langcog.2013.3 [Google Scholar]
  204. Hendriks, H.
    (2003) How to acquire anaphoric linkage in European languages: a look at evidence from Chinese learner data. In E. Banfi (Ed.), Italiano di cinesi: Percorsi acquisizionali (pp.57–66). Franco Angeli.
     [Google Scholar]
  205. Hilpert, M. , & Diessel, H.
    (2017) Entrenchment in construction grammar. In H.-J. Schmid (Ed.), Entrenchment and the psychology of language learning: How we reorganize and adapt linguistic knowledge (pp.57–74). De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1037/15969‑004
     https://doi.org/10.1037/15969-004 [Google Scholar]
  206. Hjelmslev, L.
    (1938) Essai d’une théorie des morphèmes. InActes du IV Congrès International des Linguistes (pp.140–151). Munksgaard.
     [Google Scholar]
  207. Hohwy, J.
    (2013) The predictive mind. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199682737.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199682737.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  208. Hommel, B. , Müsseler, J. , Aschersleben, G. , & Prinz, W.
    (2001) The Theory of Event Coding (TEC): A framework for perception and action planning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24 (5), 849–937. 10.1017/S0140525X01000103
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X01000103 [Google Scholar]
  209. Hommel, B. , & Prinz, W.
    (Eds.) (1996) Theoretical issues in stimulus-response compatibility. North-Holland.
     [Google Scholar]
  210. Hornstein, N.
    (2009) A theory of syntax: Minimal operations and universal grammar. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511575129
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511575129 [Google Scholar]
  211. Hornstein, N. , & Pietroski, P.
    (2009) Basic operations: Minimal syntax-semantics. Catalan Journal of Linguistics, 8 , 113–139. https://raco.cat/index.php/CatalanJournal/article/view/168907. 10.5565/rev/catjl.148
     https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/catjl.148 [Google Scholar]
  212. Hulme, C. , & Snowling, M. J.
    (2013) Learning to read: What we know and what we need to understand better. Child Development Perspectives, 7 (1), 1–5. 10.1111/cdep.12005
     https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12005 [Google Scholar]
  213. Hulstijn, J. H.
    (2002) What does the impact of frequency tell us about the language acquisition device?Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24 (2), 269–273. 10.1017/S0272263102002115
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263102002115 [Google Scholar]
  214. Hummel, J. E.
    (2010) Symbolic versus associative learning. Cognitive science, 34 (6), 958–965. 10.1111/j.1551‑6709.2010.01096.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-6709.2010.01096.x [Google Scholar]
  215. Irwin, D. E.
    (2004) Fixation location and fixation duration as indices of cognitive processing. In J. M. Henderson & F. Ferreira (Eds.), The interface of language, vision, and action: Eye movements and the visual world (pp.105–133). Psychology Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  216. Jackendoff, R.
    (1997) The architecture of the language faculty. The MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  217. (2002a) Foundations of language: Brain, meaning, grammar, evolution. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198270126.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198270126.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  218. (2002b) What’s in the lexicon?In S. Nooteboom , F. Weerman , & F. Wijnen (Eds.), Storage and computation in the language faculty (pp.23–58). Kluwer. 10.1007/978‑94‑010‑0355‑1_2
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0355-1_2 [Google Scholar]
  219. Jackendoff, R. , & Audring, J.
    (2020) Relational morphology: A cousin of construction grammar. Frontiers in Psychology, 11 , Article 2241. 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02241
     https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02241 [Google Scholar]
  220. Jackendoff, R. , & Pinker, S.
    (2005) The nature of the language faculty and its implications for evolution of language (reply to Fitch, Hauser, and Chomsky). Cognition, 97 (2), 211–225. 10.1016/j.cognition.2005.04.006
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2005.04.006 [Google Scholar]
  221. Jaén, M. M.
    (2007) A corpus-driven design of a test for assessing the ESL collocational competence of university students. International Journal of English Studies, 7 (2), 127–147.
     [Google Scholar]
  222. Jakubíček, M. , Kilgarriff, A. , Kovář, V. , Rychlý, P. , & Suchomel, V.
    (2013, July). The TenTen corpus family. 7th International Corpus Linguistics Conference CL, 125–127.
     [Google Scholar]
  223. Jared, D.
    (1997) Spelling-sound consistency affects the naming of high-frequency words. Journal of Memory and Language, 36 (4), 505–529. 10.1006/jmla.1997.2496
     https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1997.2496 [Google Scholar]
  224. Joanisse, M. F. , & Seidenberg, M. S.
    (1999) Impairments in verb morphology after brain injury: A connectionist model. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 96 (13), 7592–7597. 10.1073/pnas.96.13.7592
     https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.96.13.7592 [Google Scholar]
  225. Jordens, P.
    (1997) Introducing the Basic Variety. Second Language Research, 13 (4), 289–300. 10.1191/026765897672176425
     https://doi.org/10.1191/026765897672176425 [Google Scholar]
  226. Juffs, A.
    (2005) The influence of first language on the processing of wh-movement in English as a second language. Second Language Research, 21 (2), 121–151. 10.1191/0267658305sr255oa
     https://doi.org/10.1191/0267658305sr255oa [Google Scholar]
  227. Juliano, C. , & Tanenhaus, M. K.
    (1994) A constraint-based lexicalist account of the subject/object attachment preference. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 23 (6), 459–471. 10.1007/BF02146685
     https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02146685 [Google Scholar]
  228. Kafri, R. , Springer, M. , & Pilpel, Y.
    (2009) Genetic redundancy: New tricks for old genes. Cell, 136 (3), 389–392. 10.1016/j.cell.2009.01.027
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2009.01.027 [Google Scholar]
  229. Kaltenböck, G. , Heine, B. , & Kuteva, T.
    (2011) On thetical grammar. Studies in Language, 35 (4), 852–897. 10.1075/sl.35.4.03kal
     https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.35.4.03kal [Google Scholar]
  230. Kam, C. L. H. , & Newport, E. L.
    (2005) Regularizing unpredictable variation: The roles of adult and child learners in language formation and change. Language Learning and Development, 1 (2), 151–195. 10.1207/s15473341lld0102_3
     https://doi.org/10.1207/s15473341lld0102_3 [Google Scholar]
  231. (2009) Getting it right by getting it wrong: When learners change languages. Cognitive Psychology, 59 (1), 30–66. 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2009.01.001
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2009.01.001 [Google Scholar]
  232. Kaplan, R. M.
    (2014) Syntax. In R. Mitkov (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of computational linguistics (2nd ed., pp.74–93). Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199573691.013.31
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199573691.013.31 [Google Scholar]
  233. Karttunen, L. , Chanod, J. P. , Grefenstette, G. , & Schille, A.
    (1996) Regular expressions for language engineering. Natural Language Engineering, 2 (4), 305–328. 10.1017/S1351324997001563
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S1351324997001563 [Google Scholar]
  234. Keating, G. D.
    (2014) Eye tracking with text. In J. Jegerski & B. VanPatten (Eds.), Research methods in second language psycholinguistics (pp.69–92). Routledge. 10.4324/9780203123430
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203123430 [Google Scholar]
  235. Keen, E. & Grüter, T.
    (Eds.) (2021) Prediction in second language processing and learning. John Benjamins. 10.1075/bpa.12
     https://doi.org/10.1075/bpa.12 [Google Scholar]
  236. Keller, F. , & Sorace, A.
    (2003) Gradient auxiliary selection and impersonal passivization in German: An experimental investigation. Journal of Linguistics, 39 (1), 57–108. 10.1017/S0022226702001676
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226702001676 [Google Scholar]
  237. Kilgarriff, A. , & Renau, I.
    (2013) esTenTen, a vast web corpus of Peninsular and American Spanish. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 95 , 12–19. 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.617
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.617 [Google Scholar]
  238. Kimppa, L. , Kujala, T. , Leminen, A. , Vainio, M. , & Shtyrov, Y.
    (2015) Rapid and automatic speech-specific learning mechanism in human neocortex. NeuroImage, 118 , 282–291. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.05.098
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.05.098 [Google Scholar]
  239. King, J. W. , & Kutas, M.
    (1995) Who did what and when? Using word- and clause-level ERPs to monitor working memory usage in reading. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 7 (3), 376–395. 10.1162/jocn.1995.7.3.376
     https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.1995.7.3.376 [Google Scholar]
  240. Klein, W. , & Perdue, C.
    (1992) Utterance structure: Developing grammars again. John Benjamins. 10.1075/sibil.5
     https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.5 [Google Scholar]
  241. (1997) The Basic Variety (or: Couldn’t natural languages be much simpler?). Second Language Research, 13 (4), 301–347. 10.1191/026765897666879396
     https://doi.org/10.1191/026765897666879396 [Google Scholar]
  242. Kóbor, A. , Takács, Á. , Kardos, Z. , Janacsek, K. , Horváth, K. , Csépe, V. , & Nemeth, D.
    (2018) ERPs differentiate the sensitivity to statistical probabilities and the learning of sequential structures during procedural learning. Biological Psychology, 135 , 180–193. 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2018.04.001
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2018.04.001 [Google Scholar]
  243. Koeneman, O. , & Zeijlstra, H.
    (2017) Introducing syntax. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781316156391
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316156391 [Google Scholar]
  244. Koopman, H. , & Sportiche, D.
    (1991) The position of subjects. Lingua, 85 (2–3), 211–258. 10.1016/0024‑3841(91)90022‑W
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3841(91)90022-W [Google Scholar]
  245. Kraš, T.
    (2009) Native-like attainment of the lexicon-syntax interface in the L2: Converging evidence from different methodologies, In J. Chandlee , M. Franchini , S. Lord & G.-M. Rheiner (Eds.), Proceedings of the 33th annual Boston University conference on language development (pp.278–289). Cascadilla Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  246. (2010) Unaccusativity in L2 Italian at the lexico-syntax interface. In M. Iverson , I. Ivanov , T. Judy , J. Rothman , R. Slabakova , & M. Tryzna (Eds.), Proceedings of the mind/context divide workshop on linguistic interfaces and acquisition (pp.60–71). Cascadilla Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  247. Kutas, M. , & Federmeier, K. D.
    (2011) Thirty years and counting: finding meaning in the N400 component of the event-related brain potential (ERP). Annual Review of Psychology, 62 , 621–647. 10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.131123
     https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.131123 [Google Scholar]
  248. Landau, B. , & Gleitman, L. R.
    (1985) Language and experience: Evidence from the blind child. Harvard University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  249. Langacker, R. W.
    (1987) Foundations of Cognitive Grammar: Vol. I, Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  250. (2017) Entrenchment in cognitive grammar. In H.-J. Schmid (Ed.), Entrenchment and the psychology of language learning: How we reorganize and adapt linguistic knowledge (pp.39–56). De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1037/15969‑003
     https://doi.org/10.1037/15969-003 [Google Scholar]
  251. Lau, E. , & Liao, C.-H.
    (2018) Linguistic structure across time: ERP responses to coordinated and uncoordinated noun phrases. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 33 (5), 633–647. 10.1080/23273798.2017.1400081
     https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2017.1400081 [Google Scholar]
  252. Lehecka, T.
    (2015) Collocations and colligations. In J.-O. Östman & J. Verschueren (Eds.), Handbook of pragmatics (pp.1–20). John Benjamins. 10.1075/hop.19.col2
     https://doi.org/10.1075/hop.19.col2 [Google Scholar]
  253. Lester, N. A. , Moran, S. , Küntay, A. C. , Allen, S. E. M. , Pfeiler, B. , & Stoll, S.
    (2022) Detecting structured repetition in child-surrounding speech: Evidence from maximally diverse languages. Cognition, 221 , Article 104986. 10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104986
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104986 [Google Scholar]
  254. Levin, B. , & Rappaport-Hovav, M.
    (1995) Unaccusativity: At the syntax-lexical semantics interface. The MIT Press. https://hdl.handle.net/2027/heb08443.0001.001
     [Google Scholar]
  255. Levshina, N.
    (2015) How to do linguistics with R: Data exploration and statistical analysis. John Benjamins. 10.1075/z.195
     https://doi.org/10.1075/z.195 [Google Scholar]
  256. Li, P. , Jeong, H. and Xu, Y.
    (2017) A consequence of an internal generative process by which the human brain draws upon given information to construct hypothesized candidate representations of the forthcoming information. Neuropsychologia, 106, pp.64–75.
     [Google Scholar]
  257. Lidz, J. , & Gagliardi, A.
    (2015) How nature meets nurture: Universal grammar and statistical learning. Annual Review of Linguistics, 1 , 333–353. 10.1146/annurev‑linguist‑030514‑125236
     https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-linguist-030514-125236 [Google Scholar]
  258. Liu, H. , Forest, T. A. , Duncan, K. , & Finn, A. S.
    (2023) What sticks after statistical learning: The persistence of implicit versus explicit memory traces. Cognition, 236 , Article 105439. 10.1016/j.cognition.2023.105439
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2023.105439 [Google Scholar]
  259. Logan, G. D.
    (1988) Toward an instance theory of automatization. Psychological Review, 95 (4), 492–527. 10.1037/0033‑295X.95.4.492
     https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.95.4.492 [Google Scholar]
  260. (1997) Automaticity and reading: Perspectives from the instance theory of automatization. Reading & Writing Quarterly: Overcoming Learning Difficulties, 13 (2), 123–146. 10.1080/1057356970130203
     https://doi.org/10.1080/1057356970130203 [Google Scholar]
  261. (2002) An instance theory of attention and memory. Psychological Review, 109 (2), 376–400. 10.1037/0033‑295X.109.2.376
     https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.109.2.376 [Google Scholar]
  262. Logan, G. D. , & Klapp, S. T.
    (1991) Automatizing alphabet arithmetic: I. Is extended practice necessary to produce automaticity?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17 (2), 179–195. 10.1037/0278‑7393.17.2.179
     https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.17.2.179 [Google Scholar]
  263. Lohndal, T. & Uriagereka, J.
    (2017) Third-Factor Explanations and Universal Grammar. In I. Roberts (ed). The Oxford Handbook of Generative Grammar, Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp.114–128
     [Google Scholar]
  264. Lovibond, P. F. , & Shanks, D. R.
    (2002) The role of awareness in Pavlovian conditioning: Empirical evidence and theoretical implications. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 28 (1), 3–26. 10.1037/0097‑7403.28.1.3
     https://doi.org/10.1037/0097-7403.28.1.3 [Google Scholar]
  265. Luck, S. J. , & Kappenman, E. S.
    (Eds.) (2012) The Oxford handbook of event-related potentials components. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195374148.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195374148.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  266. Lum, J. A. , Conti-Ramsden, G. , Page, D. , & Ullman, M. T.
    (2012) Working, declarative and procedural memory in specific language impairment. Cortex, 48 (9), 1138–1154. 10.1016/j.cortex.2011.06.001
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2011.06.001 [Google Scholar]
  267. MacKenzie, I.
    (2006) Unaccusative verbs in Romance languages. Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230627550
     https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230627550 [Google Scholar]
  268. MacWhinney, B.
    (2001) The competition model: The input, the context, and the brain. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp.69–90). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139524780.005
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524780.005 [Google Scholar]
  269. (2005) A unified model of language acquisition. In J. F. Kroll & A. M. B. de Groot (Eds.), Handbook of bilingualism: Psycholinguistic approaches (pp.49–67). Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  270. Malec, W.
    (2009) On the asymmetry of verb–noun collocations. In J. Arabski & A. Wojtaszek (Eds.), Neurolinguistic and psycholinguistic perspectives on SLA (pp.126–144). Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781847692429‑011
     https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847692429-011 [Google Scholar]
  271. Mani, N. , & Huettig, F.
    (2012) Prediction during language processing is a piece of cake – But only for skilled producers. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38 (4), 843–847. 10.1037/a0029284
     https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029284 [Google Scholar]
  272. Manning, C. D.
    (2003) Probabilistic syntax. In R. Bod , J. Hay & S. Jannedy (Eds.), Probabilistic linguistics (pp.289–341). The MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/5582.003.0011
     https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/5582.003.0011 [Google Scholar]
  273. Marcus, G. F.
    (2003) The algebraic mind: Integrating connectionism and cognitive science. The MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  274. Marcus, G. F. , Pinker, S. , Ullman, M. , Hollander, M. , Rosen, T. J. , & Xu, F.
    (1992) Overregularization in language acquisition. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 57 (4), 1–182. 10.2307/1166115
     https://doi.org/10.2307/1166115 [Google Scholar]
  275. Martin, C. D. , Thierry, G. , Kuipers, J.-R. , Boutonnet, B. , Foucart, A. , & Costa, A.
    (2013) Bilinguals reading in their second language do not predict upcoming words as native readers do. Journal of Memory and Language, 69 (4), 574–588. 10.1016/j.jml.2013.08.001
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2013.08.001 [Google Scholar]
  276. McClelland, J. L. , & Patterson, K.
    (2002) Rules or connections in past-tense inflections: What does the evidence rule out?Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6 (11), 465–472. 10.1016/S1364‑6613(02)01993‑9
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(02)01993-9 [Google Scholar]
  277. McLaughlin, B.
    (1990) Restructuring. Applied Linguistics, 11 (2), 113–128. 10.1093/applin/11.2.113
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/11.2.113 [Google Scholar]
  278. McLaughlin, B. , & Heredia, R.
    (1996) Information processing approaches to research on second language acquisition and use. In W. Ritchie & T. Bathia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp.213–228). Academic Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  279. McLaughlin, J. , Osterhout, L. , & Kim, A.
    (2004) Neural correlates of second-language word learning: Minimal instruction produces rapid change. Nature Neuroscience, 7 (7), 703–704. 10.1038/nn1264
     https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1264 [Google Scholar]
  280. McLaughlin, J. , Tanner, D. , Pitkänen, I. , Frenck-Mestre, C. , Inoue, K. , Valentine, G. , & Osterhout, L.
    (2010) Brain potentials reveal discrete stages of L2 grammatical learning. Language Learning, 60 (Suppl 2), 123–150. 10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2010.00604.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00604.x [Google Scholar]
  281. McNealy, K. , Mazziotta, J. C. , & Dapretto, M.
    (2010) The neural basis of speech parsing in children and adults. Developmental Science, 13 (2), 385–406. 10.1111/j.1467‑7687.2009.00895.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2009.00895.x [Google Scholar]
  282. (2011) Age and experience shape developmental changes in the neural basis of language-related learning. Developmental Science, 14 (6), 1261–1282. 10.1111/j.1467‑7687.2011.01075.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2011.01075.x [Google Scholar]
  283. Mehler, J. , Peña, M. , Nespor, M. , & Bonatti, L.
    (2006) The “soul” of language does not use statistics: Reflections on vowels and consonants. Cortex, 42 (6), 846–854. 10.1016/S0010‑9452(08)70427‑1
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70427-1 [Google Scholar]
  284. Michaelis, L. A.
    (2004) Type shifting in construction grammar: An integrated approach to aspectual coercion. Cognitive Linguistics, 15 (1), 1–67. 10.1515/cogl.2004.001
     https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.2004.001 [Google Scholar]
  285. Millan, J. , Lesarri, A. , Fernández, J. A. , & Martínez, R.
    (2021) Exploring epigenetic marks by analysis of noncovalent interactions. ChemBioChem, 22 (2), 408–415. 10.1002/cbic.202000380
     https://doi.org/10.1002/cbic.202000380 [Google Scholar]
  286. Mintz, T. H.
    (2002) Category induction from distributional cues in an artificial language. Memory & Cognition, 30 (5), 678–686. 10.3758/BF03196424
     https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196424 [Google Scholar]
  287. (2003) Frequent frames as a cue for grammatical categories in child directed speech. Cognition, 90 (1), 91–117. 10.1016/S0010‑0277(03)00140‑9
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(03)00140-9 [Google Scholar]
  288. Misyak, J. B. , & Christiansen, M. H.
    (2012) Statistical learning and language: An individual differences study. Language Learning, 62 (1), 302–331. 10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2010.00626.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00626.x [Google Scholar]
  289. Mitchell, D. C.
    (1994) Sentence parsing. In M. A. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp.375–409). Academic Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  290. Mitchell, R. , & Myles, F.
    (2004) Second language learning theories (2nd ed.). Hodder Arnold.
     [Google Scholar]
  291. Mizuguchi, M.
    (2019) Ambiguous labeling and full interpretation. Studia Linguistica, 73 (3), 563–603. 10.1111/stul.12109
     https://doi.org/10.1111/stul.12109 [Google Scholar]
  292. Moens, M. , & Steedman, M.
    (2005) Temporal ontology and temporal reference. In I. Mani , J. Pusteiovskj , & R. Gaizauskas (Eds.), The language of time: A reader (pp.93–114). Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780199268535.003.0007
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199268535.003.0007 [Google Scholar]
  293. Molinaro, N. , Giannelli, F. , Caffarra, S. , & Martin, C.
    (2017) Hierarchical levels of representation in language prediction: The influence of first language acquisition in highly proficient bilinguals. Cognition, 164 , 61–73. 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.03.012
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2017.03.012 [Google Scholar]
  294. Montrul, S. & Slabakova, R.
    (2003) Competence similarities between native and near-NS: An investigation of the preterite-imperfect contrast in Spanish. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25 (3), 351–398. 10.1017/S0272263103000159
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263103000159 [Google Scholar]
  295. Morgan, E. , & Levy, R.
    (2016) Abstract knowledge versus direct experience in processing of binomial expressions. Cognition, 157 , 384–402. 10.1016/j.cognition.2016.09.011
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2016.09.011 [Google Scholar]
  296. Mueller, J. L. , Oberecker, R. , & Friederici, A. D.
    (2009) Syntactic learning by mere exposure: An ERP study in adult learners. BMC Neuroscience, 10 , Article 89. 10.1186/1471‑2202‑10‑89
     https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2202-10-89 [Google Scholar]
  297. Munn, A. , Karen, M. , & Cristina, S.
    (2006) Maximality and plurality in children’s interpretation of definites. In D. Bamman , T. Magnitskaia , & C. Zaller (Eds.), Proceedings of the 30th annual Boston University conference on language development (pp.377–387). Cascadilla Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  298. Myles, F.
    (2004) From data to theory: The over-representation of linguistic knowledge in SLA. Transactions of the philological Society, 102 (2), 139–168. 10.1111/j.0079‑1636.2004.00133.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0079-1636.2004.00133.x [Google Scholar]
  299. (2016) Formulaic Sequences (FS) cannot be an umbrella term in SLA: Focusing on psycholinguistic FSs and their identification. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 39 (1), 3–28. 10.1017/S027226311600036X
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S027226311600036X [Google Scholar]
  300. Myles, F. , Hooper, J. , & Mitchell, R.
    (1998) Rote or rule? Exploring the role of formulaic language in classroom second language learning. Language Learning, 48 (3), 323–363. 10.1111/0023‑8333.00045
     https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.00045 [Google Scholar]
  301. Namy, L. L.
    (2012) Getting specific: Early general mechanisms give rise to domain-specific expertise in word learning. Language Learning and Development, 8 (1), 47–60. 10.1080/15475441.2011.617235
     https://doi.org/10.1080/15475441.2011.617235 [Google Scholar]
  302. Nemeth, D. , Janacsek, K. , & Fiser, J.
    (2013) Age-dependent and coordinated shift in performance between implicit and explicit skill learning. Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, 7 , 147. 10.3389/fncom.2013.00147
     https://doi.org/10.3389/fncom.2013.00147 [Google Scholar]
  303. Newmeyer, F. J.
    (2005) Possible and probable languages: A generative perspective on linguistic typology. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199274338.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199274338.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  304. Newport, E. L.
    (2011) The modularity issue in language acquisition: A rapprochement? Comments on Gallistel and Chomsky. Language Learning and Development, 7 (4), 279–286. 10.1080/15475441.2011.605309
     https://doi.org/10.1080/15475441.2011.605309 [Google Scholar]
  305. Newport, E. L. , & Aslin, R. N.
    (2004) Learning at a distance I. Statistical learning of non-adjacent dependencies. Cognitive Psychology, 48 (2), 127–162. 10.1016/S0010‑0285(03)00128‑2
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0285(03)00128-2 [Google Scholar]
  306. Nooteboom, C. , Weerman, F. , & Wijnen, F.
    (Eds.) (2002) Storage and computation in the language faculty. Dordrecht: Kluwer. 10.1007/978‑94‑010‑0355‑1
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0355-1 [Google Scholar]
  307. Norde, M.
    (2009) Degrammaticalization. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199207923.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199207923.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  308. Norris, J. , & Ortega, L.
    (2003) Defining and measuring SLA. In C. Doughty & M. Long (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp.716–761). Wiley-Blackwell. 10.1002/9780470756492.ch21
     https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470756492.ch21 [Google Scholar]
  309. Nosofsky, R. M.
    (2014) The generalized context model: An exemplar model of classification. In M. Pothos & A. Wills (Eds.), Formal approaches in categorization (pp.18–39). Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  310. Nowak, M. A. , Boerlijst, M. C. , Cooke, J. , & Smith, J. M.
    (1997) Evolution of genetic redundancy. Nature, 388 (6638), 167–171. 10.1038/40618
     https://doi.org/10.1038/40618 [Google Scholar]
  311. O’Donnell , T. J.
    (2015) Productivity and reuse in language: A theory of linguistic computation and storage. The MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/9780262028844.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262028844.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  312. O’Donnell, T. J. , Goodman, N. D. , & Tenenbaum, J. B.
    (2009) Fragment grammars: Exploring computation and reuse in language. MIT Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory Technical Report Series, MIT-CSAIL-TR-2009-013.
     [Google Scholar]
  313. O’Donnell, T. , Snedeker, J. , Tenenbaum, J. , & Goodman, N.
    (2011) Productivity and reuse in language: A developmental study. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, 33/33, 1613–1618. https://escholarship.org/uc/cognitivesciencesociety/33/33
     [Google Scholar]
  314. O’Grady, W.
    (2008) Language without grammar. In P. Robinson & N. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition (pp.139–167). Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  315. (2011) Interfaces and processing. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 1 (1), 63–66. 10.1075/lab.1.1.08ogr
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.1.1.08ogr [Google Scholar]
  316. (2012) Three factors in the design and acquisition of language. WIREs Cognitive Science, 3 (5), 493–499. 10.1002/wcs.1188
     https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1188 [Google Scholar]
  317. Onnis, L.
    (2012) The potential contribution of statistical learning to second language acquisition. In J. Williams & P. Rebuschat (Eds), Statistical learning and second language acquisition (pp.203–236). De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9781934078242.203
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9781934078242.203 [Google Scholar]
  318. Onnis, L. , Waterfall, H. R. , & Edelman, S.
    (2008a) Learn locally, act globally: Learning language from variation set cues. Cognition, 109 (3), 423–430. 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.10.004
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2008.10.004 [Google Scholar]
  319. Onnis, L. , Waterfall, H. , & Edelman, S.
    (2008b) Variation sets facilitate artificial language learning. Proceedings of the 30th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, 30 . https://escholarship.org/uc/item/321985fw
     [Google Scholar]
  320. Ortega, L.
    (2011) Sequences and processes in language learning. In C. Doughty & M. Long (Eds.), The handbook of language teaching. Wiley-Blackwell. 10.1002/9781444315783.ch6
     https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444315783.ch6 [Google Scholar]
  321. (2014) Trying out theories on interlanguage: Description and explanation over 40 years of L2 negation research. In Z. Han & E. Tarone (Eds.), Interlanguage: Forty years later (pp.173–201). John Benjamins. 10.1075/lllt.39.10ch8
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.39.10ch8 [Google Scholar]
  322. Oshita, H.
    (2001) The unaccusative trap in second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 23 (2), 279–304. 10.1017/S0272263101002078
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263101002078 [Google Scholar]
  323. Osterhout, L. , Kim, A. , & Kuperberg, G. R.
    (2012) The neurobiology of sentence comprehension. In M. J. Spivey , K. McRae , & M. F. Joanisse (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of psycholinguistics (pp.365–389). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139029377.019
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139029377.019 [Google Scholar]
  324. Osterhout, L. , McLaughlin, J. , Kim, A. , Greenwald, R. , & Inoue, K.
    (2004) Sentences in the brain: Event-related potentials as real-time reflections of sentence comprehension and language learning. In M. Carreiras & C. Clifton (Eds.), The on-line study of sentence comprehension: Eye-tracking, ERPs and beyond (pp.271–308). Psychology Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  325. Osterhout, L. , McLaughlin, J. , Pitkanen, I. , Frenck-Mestre, C. , & Molinaro, N.
    (2006) Novice learners, longitudinal designs and event-related potentials: A means for exploring the neurocognition of second language processing. In P. Indefrey & M. Gullberg (Eds.), The cognitive neuroscience of second language acquisition (pp.199–230). Blackwell. 10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2006.00361.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2006.00361.x [Google Scholar]
  326. Osterhout, L. , Poliakov, A. , Inoue, K. , McLaughlin, J. , Valentine, G. , Pitkanen, I. , Frenck-Mestre, C. , & Hirschensohn, J.
    (2008) Second-language learning and changes in the brain. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 21 (6), 509–521. 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2008.01.001
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneuroling.2008.01.001 [Google Scholar]
  327. Packard, M. G. , & Goodman, J.
    (2013) Factors that influence the relative use of multiple memory systems. Hippocampus, 23 (11), 1044–1052. 10.1002/hipo.22178
     https://doi.org/10.1002/hipo.22178 [Google Scholar]
  328. Paczynski, M. , Jackendoff, R. , & Kuperberg, G.
    (2014) When events change their nature: The neurocognitive mechanisms underlying aspectual coercion. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 26 (9), 1905–1917. 10.1162/jocn_a_00638
     https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00638 [Google Scholar]
  329. Pallotti, G.
    (2007) An operational definition of the emergence criterion. Applied Linguistics, 28 (3), 361–382. 10.1093/applin/amm018
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amm018 [Google Scholar]
  330. Paolieri, D. , Cubelli, R. , Macizo, P. , Bajo, T. , Lotto, L. , & Job, R.
    (2010) Grammatical gender processing in Italian and Spanish bilinguals. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63 (8), 1631–1645. 10.1080/17470210903511210
     https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210903511210 [Google Scholar]
  331. Paradis, M.
    (2004) A neurolinguistic theory of bilingualism. John Benjamins. 10.1075/sibil.18
     https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.18 [Google Scholar]
  332. (2009) Declarative and procedural determinants of second languages. John Benjamins. 10.1075/sibil.40
     https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.40 [Google Scholar]
  333. (2013) Late-L2 increased reliance on L1 neurocognitive substrates: A comment on Babcock, Stowe, Maloof, Brovetto & Ullman (2012). Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 16 , 704–07. 10.1017/S1366728913000011
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728913000011 [Google Scholar]
  334. (2019) Special foreword. In J. Schwieter & M. Paradis (Eds.), The handbook of the neuroscience of multilingualism (pp.xxxiii–xxxviii). Wiley-Blackwell. 10.1002/9781119387725
     https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119387725 [Google Scholar]
  335. Patel, A. D.
    (2012) Language, music, and the brain: A resource-sharing framework. In P. Rebuschat , M. Rohrmeier , J. A. Hawkins , & I. Cross (Eds.), Language and music as cognitive systems (pp.204–223). Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  336. Pearce, D.
    (2002) A comparative evaluation of collocation extraction techniques. InProceedings of the Third International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation. European Language Resources Association (ELRA). www.lrec-conf.org/proceedings/lrec2002/pdf/169.pdf
     [Google Scholar]
  337. Pearlmutter, N. J. , & MacDonald, M. C.
    (1995) Individual differences and probabilistic constraints in syntactic ambiguity resolution. Journal of Memory and Language, 34 (4), 521–542. 10.1006/jmla.1995.1024
     https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1995.1024 [Google Scholar]
  338. Peña, M. , Bonatti, L. L. , Nespor, M. , & Mehler, J.
    (2002) Signal-driven computations in speech processing. Science, 298 (5593), 604–607. 10.1126/science.1072901
     https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1072901 [Google Scholar]
  339. Pérez-Leroux, A. T.
    (2011) What I don’t understand about interfaces. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 1 (1), 71–73. 10.1075/lab.1.1.10per
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.1.1.10per [Google Scholar]
  340. Perfetti, C. & Helder, A.
    (2022) Progress in reading science: Word identification, comprehension, and universal perspectives. In M. J. Snowling , C. Hulme , & K. Nation (Eds.), The science of reading: A handbook (2nd ed) (pp.5–35). Wiley Blackwell. 10.1002/9781119705116.ch1
     https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119705116.ch1 [Google Scholar]
  341. Perpiñán, S. , & Cardinaletti, A.
    (2022) Null-Prep as a systematic interlanguage phenomenon: Evidence from relative clauses, interrogatives, and sluicing constructions. Second Language Research, 0 (0). 10.1177/02676583221132198
     https://doi.org/10.1177/02676583221132198 [Google Scholar]
  342. Perruchet, P. , & Pacton, S.
    (2006) Implicit learning and statistical learning: One phenomenon, two approaches. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10 (5), 233–238. 10.1016/j.tics.2006.03.006
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2006.03.006 [Google Scholar]
  343. Phillips, C.
    (2013) Parser-grammar relations: We don’t understand everything twice. In M. Sanz , I. Laka , & M. K. Tanenhaus (Eds.), Language down the garden path: The cognitive and biological basis for linguistic structure (pp.294–315). Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199677139.003.0017
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199677139.003.0017 [Google Scholar]
  344. Phillips, C. , Kazanina, N. , & Abada, S. H.
    (2005) ERP effects of the processing of syntactic long-distance dependencies. Cognitive Brain Research, 22 (3), 407–428. 10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2004.09.012
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2004.09.012 [Google Scholar]
  345. Piattelli-Palmarini, M. , Uriagereka, J. & Saladuru, P.
    (eds) (2009) Of Minds & Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  346. Pickering, M. J. , & Gambi, C.
    (2018) Predicting while comprehending language: A theory and review. Psychological Bulletin, 144 (10), 1002–1044. 10.1037/bul0000158
     https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000158 [Google Scholar]
  347. Pienemann, M.
    (1998) Language processing and second language development: Processability theory. John Benjamins. 10.1075/sibil.15
     https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.15 [Google Scholar]
  348. (2007) Processability theory. In B. VanPatten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition (pp.137–154). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
     [Google Scholar]
  349. (2015) An outline of processability theory and its relationship to other approaches to SLA. Language Learning, 65 (1), 123–151. 10.1111/lang.12095
     https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12095 [Google Scholar]
  350. Pienemann, M. , Di Biase, B. , & Kawaguchi, S.
    (2005) Extending processability theory. In M. Pienemann (Ed.), Cross-linguistic aspects of processability theory (pp.199–251). John Benjamins. 10.1075/sibil.30.09pie
     https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.30.09pie [Google Scholar]
  351. Pinker, S.
    (1991) Rules of language. Science, 253 (5019), 530–535. 10.1126/science.1857983
     https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1857983 [Google Scholar]
  352. (1997) Words and rules in the human brain. Nature, 387 (6633), 547–548. 10.1038/42347
     https://doi.org/10.1038/42347 [Google Scholar]
  353. (1998) Words and rules. Lingua, 106 (1–4), 219–242. 10.1016/S0024‑3841(98)00035‑7
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-3841(98)00035-7 [Google Scholar]
  354. (1999) Words and rules: The ingredients of language. Basic Books.
     [Google Scholar]
  355. (2002) Preface. In S. Nootebom , F. Weerman , & F. Wijnen (Eds.), Storage and computation in the language faculty (pp.ix–xii). Kluwer.
     [Google Scholar]
  356. Pinker, S. , & Prince, A.
    (1994) Regular and irregular morphology and the psychological status of rules of grammar. In S. D. Lima , R. L. Corrigan , & G. K. Iverson (Eds.), The reality of linguistic rules (pp.321–351). John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.26.21pin
     https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.26.21pin [Google Scholar]
  357. Pinker, S. , & Ullman, M. T.
    (2002) Combination and structure, not gradedness, is the issue. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6(11), 472–474.
     [Google Scholar]
  358. Plebanek, D. J. , & James, K. H.
    (2021) The effects of frequency, variability, and co-occurrence on category formation in neural systems. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 33 (8), 1397–1412. 10.1162/jocn_a_01738
     https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_01738 [Google Scholar]
  359. Plunkett, K. , & Marchman, V.
    (1991) U-shaped learning and frequency effects in a multi-layered perceptron: Implications for child language acquisition. Cognition, 38 (1), 43–102. 10.1016/0010‑0277(91)90022‑V
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(91)90022-V [Google Scholar]
  360. Poeppel, D. , & Monahan, P. J.
    (2011) Feedforward and feedback in speech perception: Revisiting analysis by synthesis. Language and Cognitive Processes, 26 (7), 935–951. 10.1080/01690965.2010.493301
     https://doi.org/10.1080/01690965.2010.493301 [Google Scholar]
  361. Poldrack, R. A.
    (2006) Can cognitive processes be inferred from neuroimaging data?Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10 (2), 59–63. 10.1016/j.tics.2005.12.004
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2005.12.004 [Google Scholar]
  362. Poldrack, R. A. , Clark, J. , Paré-Blagoev, E. J. , Shohamy, D. , Creso Moyano, J. , Myers, C. , & Gluck, M. A.
    (2001) Interactive memory systems in the human brain. Nature, 414 (6863), 546–550. 10.1038/35107080
     https://doi.org/10.1038/35107080 [Google Scholar]
  363. Poldrack, R. A. , & Packard, M. G.
    (2003) Competition among multiple memory systems: Converging evidence from animal and human brain studies. Neuropsychologia, 41 (3), 245–251. 10.1016/S0028‑3932(02)00157‑4
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0028-3932(02)00157-4 [Google Scholar]
  364. Prinz, W.
    (2018) Contingency and similarity in response selection. Consciousness and Cognition, 64 , 146–153. 10.1016/j.concog.2018.04.014
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2018.04.014 [Google Scholar]
  365. Pulvermüller, F. , Cappelle, B. , & Shtyrov, Y.
    (2013) Brain basis of meaning, words, constructions, and grammar. In T. Hoffmann & G. Trousdale (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of construction grammar (pp.397–416). Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195396683.013.0022
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195396683.013.0022 [Google Scholar]
  366. Pustejovsky, J.
    (1995) The generative lexicon. The MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  367. Rabovsky, M. , Hansen, S. S. , & McClelland, J. L.
    (2018) Modelling the N400 brain potential as change in a probabilistic representation of meaning. Nature Human Behaviour, 2 (9), 693–705. 10.1038/s41562‑018‑0406‑4
     https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-018-0406-4 [Google Scholar]
  368. Rah, A. , & Adone, D.
    (2010) Processing of the reduced relative clause versus main verb ambiguity in L2 learners at difference proficiency levels. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32 (1), 79–109. 10.1017/S027226310999026X
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S027226310999026X [Google Scholar]
  369. Ramscar, M. , Hendrix, P. , Shaoul, C. , Milin, P. , & Baayen, H.
    (2014) The myth of cognitive decline: Non-linear dynamics of lifelong learning. Topics in Cognitive Science, 6 (1), 5–42. 10.1111/tops.12078
     https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12078 [Google Scholar]
  370. Ramscar, M. , Yarlett, D. , Dye, M. , Denny, K. , & Thorpe, K.
    (2010) The effects of feature-label-order and their implications for symbolic learning. Cognitive Science, 34 (6), 909–957. 10.1111/j.1551‑6709.2009.01092.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-6709.2009.01092.x [Google Scholar]
  371. Randall, J.
    (2007) Parameterized auxiliary selection: A fine-grained interaction of features and linking rules. In R. Aranovich (Ed.), Split auxiliary systems (pp.207–235). John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.69.10ran
     https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.69.10ran [Google Scholar]
  372. Rastelli, S.
    (2007) Lexical aspect and auxiliary selection in Italian learner corpora. Linguistica e Filologia, XXV , 67–97.
     [Google Scholar]
  373. (2014) Discontinuity in second language acquisition: The switch between statistical and grammatical learning. Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781783092475
     https://doi.org/10.21832/9781783092475 [Google Scholar]
  374. (2016) A quantum-cognition approach to the study of second language acquisition. Journal of Cognitive Science, 17 (2), 229–262. 10.17791/jcs.2016.17.2.229
     https://doi.org/10.17791/jcs.2016.17.2.229 [Google Scholar]
  375. (2019) The discontinuity model: Statistical and grammatical learning in adult second-language acquisition. Language Acquisition: A Journal of Developmental Linguistics, 26 (4), 387–415. 10.1080/10489223.2019.1571594
     https://doi.org/10.1080/10489223.2019.1571594 [Google Scholar]
  376. Rastelli, S.
    (2022) The uncertainty principle in second language acquisition. In A. G. Benati & J. W. Schwieter (Eds.), Second language acquisition theory: The legacy of Mike Long (pp.101–112). John Benjamins. 10.1075/bpa.14.05ras
     https://doi.org/10.1075/bpa.14.05ras [Google Scholar]
  377. Rayner, K. , & Liversedge, S. P.
    (2004) Visual and linguistic processing during eye fixations in reading. In J. M. Henderson & F. Ferreira (Eds.), The interface of language, vision, and action: Eye movements and the visual world (pp.59–104). Psychology Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  378. Rayner, K. , & Sereno, S. C.
    (1994) Eye movements in reading: Psycholinguistic studies. In M. A. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp.57–81). Academic Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  379. R Core Team
    R Core Team (2021) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/
     [Google Scholar]
  380. Reeder, P. , Newport, E. , & Aslin, R.
    (2010) Novel words in novel contexts: The role of distributional information in form-class category learning. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, 32 , 2063–2068. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/23m494t4
     [Google Scholar]
  381. Requena, P. E. , Román-Hernández, A. I. , & Miller, K.
    (2015) Children’s knowledge of the Spanish copulas ser and estar with novel adjectives. Language Acquisition: A Journal of Developmental Linguistics, 22 (2), 193–207. 10.1080/10489223.2014.928299
     https://doi.org/10.1080/10489223.2014.928299 [Google Scholar]
  382. Rizzi, L.
    (2009) Movements and concepts of locality. In M. Piattelli-Palmarini , J. Uriagereka , & P. Salaburu (Eds.), Of minds and language: A dialogue with Noam Chomsky in the Basque Country (pp.154–168). Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780199544660.003.0013
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199544660.003.0013 [Google Scholar]
  383. (2016) Labeling, maximality and the head – phrase distinction. The Linguistic Review, 33 (1), 103–127. 10.1515/tlr‑2015‑0016
     https://doi.org/10.1515/tlr-2015-0016 [Google Scholar]
  384. Roberts, L. , Gullberg, M. , & Indefrey, P.
    (2008) Online pronoun resolution in L2 discourse: L1 influence and general learner effects. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 30 (3), 333–357. 10.1017/S0272263108080480
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263108080480 [Google Scholar]
  385. Roberts, L. , & Siyanova-Chanturia, A.
    (2013) Using eye-tracking to investigate topics in L2 acquisition and L2 processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35 (2), 213–235. 10.1017/S0272263112000861
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263112000861 [Google Scholar]
  386. Roeper, T.
    (2007) What frequency can do and what it can’t. In I. Gülzow & N. Gagarina (Ed.), Frequency effects in language acquisition: Defining the limits of frequency as an explanatory concept (pp.23–48). De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110977905.23
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110977905.23 [Google Scholar]
  387. Romberg, A. R. , & Saffran, J. R.
    (2010) Statistical learning and language acquisition. WIREs Cognitive Science, 1 (6), 906–914. 10.1002/wcs.78
     https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.78 [Google Scholar]
  388. Rossini Favretti, R.
    (2000) Progettazione e costruzione di un corpus di italiano scritto: CORIS/CODIS. In R. Rossini Favretti (Ed.), Linguistica e informatica. Multimedialità, corpora e percorsi di apprendimento (pp.39–56). Bulzoni.
     [Google Scholar]
  389. Rossini Favrettii, R. , Tamburini, F. & De Santis, C.
    (2002) A corpus of written Italian: A defined and a dynamic model. In A. Wilson , P. Rayson , & T. McEnery (Eds.), A rainbow of corpora: Corpus linguistics and the languages of the world (pp.27–38). Lincom.
     [Google Scholar]
  390. Saffran, J. R.
    (2002) Constraints on statistical language learning. Journal of Memory and Language, 47 (1), 172–196. 10.1006/jmla.2001.2839
     https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.2001.2839 [Google Scholar]
  391. Saffran, J. R. , & Wilson, D. P.
    (2003) From syllables to syntax: Multilevel statistical learning by 12-month-old infants. Infancy, 4 (2), 273–284. 10.1207/S15327078IN0402_07
     https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327078IN0402_07 [Google Scholar]
  392. Schlund, M. W. & Ortu, D.
    (2010) Experience-dependent changes in human brain activation during contingency learning. Neuroscience, 165 (1), 151–158. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2009.10.014
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2009.10.014 [Google Scholar]
  393. Schmid, H.-J.
    (Ed.) (2017) Entrenchment and the psychology of language learning: How we reorganize and adapt linguistic knowledge. De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1037/15969‑000
     https://doi.org/10.1037/15969-000 [Google Scholar]
  394. Schmidt, J. R. , & De Houwer, J.
    (2016) Time course of colour-word contingency learning: Practice curves, pre-exposure benefits, unlearning, and relearning. Learning and Motivation, 56 , 15–30. 10.1016/j.lmot.2016.09.002
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lmot.2016.09.002 [Google Scholar]
  395. Schmitt, C. J.
    (1996) Aspect and the syntax of noun phrases (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Maryland, College Park.
  396. Schmitt, C. , & Miller, K.
    (2007) Making discourse-dependent decisions: The case of the copulas ser and estar in Spanish. Lingua, 117 (11), 1907–1929. 10.1016/j.lingua.2006.11.007
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2006.11.007 [Google Scholar]
  397. Schmitt, N. , & Underwood, G.
    (2004) Exploring the processing of formulaic sequences through a self-paced reading task. In N. Schmitt (Ed.), Formulaic sequences (pp.173–189). John Benjamins. 10.1075/lllt.9.10sch
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.9.10sch [Google Scholar]
  398. Schreiweis, C. , Bornschein, U. , Burguière, E. , Kerimoglu, C. , Schreiter, S. , Dannemann, M. , Goyal, S. , Rea, E. , French, C. A. , Puliyadi, R. , Groszer, M. , Fisher, S. E. , Mundry, R. , Winter, C. , Hevers, W. , Pääbo, S. , Enard, W. , & Graybiel, A. M.
    (2014) Humanized Foxp2 accelerates learning by enhancing transitions from declarative to procedural performance. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111 (39), 14253–14258. 10.1073/pnas.1414542111
     https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1414542111 [Google Scholar]
  399. Schuler, K. D. , Reeder, P. A. , Newport, E. L. , & Aslin, R. N.
    (2017) The effect of Zipfian frequency variations on category formation in adult artificial language learning. Language Learning and Development, 13 (4), 357–374. 10.1080/15475441.2016.1263571
     https://doi.org/10.1080/15475441.2016.1263571 [Google Scholar]
  400. Schuler, K. , Yang, C. , & Newport, E.
    (2016) Testing the Tolerance Principle: Children form productive rules when it is more computationally efficient to do so. InProceedings of the 38th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp.2321–2326).
     [Google Scholar]
  401. Shillcock, R.
    (2007) Eye movements and visual world recognition. In M. G. Gaskell (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of psycholinguistics (pp.89–105). Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  402. Segalowitz, N.
    (2003) Automaticity and second languages. In C. Doughty & M. Long (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp.382–408). Blackwell. 10.1002/9780470756492.ch13
     https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470756492.ch13 [Google Scholar]
  403. Segalowitz, N. , & Hulstijn, J.
    (2005) Automaticity in bilingualism and second language learning. In J. F. Kroll & A. M. B. de Groot (Eds.), Handbook of bilingualism: Psycholinguistic approaches (pp.371–388). Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  404. Segalowitz, N. S. , & Segalowitz, S. J.
    (1993) Skilled performance, practice, and the differentiation of speed-up from automatization effects: Evidence from second language word recognition. Applied Psycholinguistics, 14 (3), 369–385. 10.1017/S0142716400010845
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716400010845 [Google Scholar]
  405. Seidenberg, M. S.
    (1985) The time course of phonological code activation in two writing systems. Cognition, 19 (1), 1–30. 10.1016/0010‑0277(85)90029‑0
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(85)90029-0 [Google Scholar]
  406. Seidenberg, M. S. , Farry-Thorn, M. , & Zevin, J. D.
    (2022) Models of word reading: What have we learned?In M. J. Snowling , C. Hulme , & K. Nation (Eds.), The science of reading: A handbook (pp.36–59). Wiley-Blackwell. 10.1002/9781119705116.ch2
     https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119705116.ch2 [Google Scholar]
  407. Seidenberg, M. S. , MacDonald, M. C. , & Saffran, J. R.
    (2002) Does grammar start where statistics stop?Science, 298 (5593), 553–554. 10.1126/science.1078094
     https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1078094 [Google Scholar]
  408. Seidenberg, M. S. , Waters, G. S. , Barnes, M. A. , & Tanenhaus, M. K.
    (1984) When does irregular spelling or pronunciation influence word recognition?Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 23 (3), 383–404. 10.1016/S0022‑5371(84)90270‑6
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(84)90270-6 [Google Scholar]
  409. Selinker, L.
    (1972) Interlanguage. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching IRAL, 10 (3), 209–231. 10.1515/iral.1972.10.1‑4.209
     https://doi.org/10.1515/iral.1972.10.1-4.209 [Google Scholar]
  410. Shanks, D. R.
    (2007) Associationism and cognition: Human contingency learning at 25. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60 (3), 291–309. 10.1080/17470210601000581
     https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210601000581 [Google Scholar]
  411. Sharwood Smith, M. , & Truscott, J.
    (2014) The multilingual mind: A modular processing perspective. Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  412. Shtyrov, Y.
    (2012) Neural bases of rapid word learning. The Neuroscientist, 18 (4), 312–319. 10.1177/1073858411420299
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1073858411420299 [Google Scholar]
  413. Shtyrov, Y. , Nikulin, V. V. , & Pulvermüller, F.
    (2010) Rapid cortical plasticity underlying novel word learning. The Journal of Neuroscience, 30 (50), 16864–16867. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1376‑10.2010
     https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1376-10.2010 [Google Scholar]
  414. Sidtis, J. J. , Van Lancker Sidtis, D. , Dhawan, V. , & Eidelberg, D.
    (2018) Switching language modes: Complementary brain patterns for formulaic and propositional language. Brain Connectivity, 8 (3), 189–196. 10.1089/brain.2017.0573
     https://doi.org/10.1089/brain.2017.0573 [Google Scholar]
  415. Siegelman, N. , & Arnon, I.
    (2015) The advantage of starting big: Learning from unsegmented input facilitates mastery of grammatical gender in an artificial language. Journal of Memory and Language, 85 , 60–75. 10.1016/j.jml.2015.07.003
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2015.07.003 [Google Scholar]
  416. Siegelman, N. , & Frost, R.
    (2015) Statistical learning as an individual ability: Theoretical perspectives and empirical evidence. Journal of Memory and Language, 81 , 105–120. 10.1016/j.jml.2015.02.001
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2015.02.001 [Google Scholar]
  417. Simor, P. , Zavecz, Z. , Horváth, K. , Éltető, N. , Török, C. , Pesthy, O. , Gombos, F. , Janacsek, K. , & Nemeth, D.
    (2019) Deconstructing procedural memory: Different learning trajectories and consolidation of sequence and statistical learning. Frontiers in Psychology, 9 , Article 2708. 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02708
     https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02708 [Google Scholar]
  418. Sinclair, J.
    (1998) The lexical item. In E. Weigand (Ed.), Contrastive lexical semantics (pp.1–24). John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.171.02sin
     https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.171.02sin [Google Scholar]
  419. Slabakova, R.
    (2016) Second language acquisition. Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  420. Smith, C.
    (1991) The parameter of aspect. Springer. 10.1007/978‑94‑015‑7911‑7
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-7911-7 [Google Scholar]
  421. Smolensky, P.
    (2012) Symbolic functions from neural computation. Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences, 370 (1971), 3543–3569. 10.1098/rsta.2011.0334
     https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2011.0334 [Google Scholar]
  422. Solstad, T. , Daskalaki, E. , & Järvikivi, J.
    (2021) Expectations in language processing and production: An introduction to the special issue. Linguistics 59 (2), 319–331. 10.1515/ling‑2021‑0021
     https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2021-0021 [Google Scholar]
  423. Sonbul, S. , El-Dakhs, D. , Conklin, K. , & Carrol, G.
    (2022) “Bread and butter” or “butter and bread”? Nonnatives’ processing of novel lexical patterns in context. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 45 (2), 370–392. 10.1017/S0272263122000237
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263122000237 [Google Scholar]
  424. Sorace, A.
    (1993) Incomplete vs. divergent representations of unaccusativity in non native grammars of Italian. Second Language Research, 9 (1), 22–47. 10.1177/026765839300900102
     https://doi.org/10.1177/026765839300900102 [Google Scholar]
  425. (1996) The use of acceptability judgements in second language acquisition research. In W. C. Ritchie & T. K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp.375–409). Academic Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  426. (2000) Gradients in auxiliary selection with intransitive verbs. Language, 76 (4), 859–890. 10.2307/417202
     https://doi.org/10.2307/417202 [Google Scholar]
  427. (2004) Gradience at the lexicon-syntax: Evidence from auxiliary selection. In A. Alexiadou , E. Anagnostopoulou , & M. Everaert (Eds.), The unaccusativity puzzle: Explorations of the Syntax-Lexicon Interface (pp.243–268). Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199257652.003.0010
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199257652.003.0010 [Google Scholar]
  428. (2012) Pinning down the concept of ‘interface’ in bilingual development. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 1 (1), 1–33. 10.1075/lab.1.1.01sor
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.1.1.01sor [Google Scholar]
  429. Sorace, A. , & Filiaci, F.
    (2006) Anaphora resolution in near-native speakers of Italian. Second Language Research, 22 (3), 339–368. 10.1191/0267658306sr271oa
     https://doi.org/10.1191/0267658306sr271oa [Google Scholar]
  430. Sorace, A. , & Serratrice, L.
    (2009) Internal and external interfaces in bilingual language development: Beyond structural overlap. International Journal of Bilingualism, 13 (2), 195–210. 10.1177/1367006909339810
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006909339810 [Google Scholar]
  431. Spina, S.
    (2010) The dictionary of Italian collocations: Design and integration in an online learning environment. In N. Calzolari , K. Choukri , B. Maegaard , J. Mariani , J. Odjik , S. Piperidis , M. Rosner & D. Tapias (Eds.), Proceedings of the seventh conference on international language resources and evaluation (LREC’10) (pp.3202–3208). European Language Resources Association.
     [Google Scholar]
  432. Spinner, P. , Gass, S. M. , & Behney, J.
    (2013) Ecological validity in eye-tracking: An empirical study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35 (2), 389–415. 10.1017/S0272263112000927
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263112000927 [Google Scholar]
  433. Spivey, M. J. , Tanenhaus, M. K. , Eberhard, K. M. , & Sedivy, J. C.
    (2002) Eye movements and spoken language comprehension: Effects of visual context on syntactic ambiguity resolution. Cognitive Psychology, 45 (4), 447–481. 10.1016/S0010‑0285(02)00503‑0
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0285(02)00503-0 [Google Scholar]
  434. Squire, L. R. , & Wixted, J. T.
    (2011) The cognitive neuroscience of human memory since H.M. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 34 , 259–288. 10.1146/annurev‑neuro‑061010‑113720
     https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-neuro-061010-113720 [Google Scholar]
  435. Starling, S. J. , Reeder, P. A. , & Aslin, R. N.
    (2018) Probability learning in an uncertain world: How children adjust to changing contingencies. Cognitive Development, 48 , 105–116. 10.1016/j.cogdev.2018.06.008
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2018.06.008 [Google Scholar]
  436. Staub, A. , & Rayner, K.
    (2007) Eye movements and on-line comprehension processes. In M. G. Gaskell (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of psycholinguistics (pp.327–342). Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198568971.013.0019
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198568971.013.0019 [Google Scholar]
  437. Stefaniak, N. , Baltazart, V. , & Declercq, C.
    (2021) Processing verb meanings and the Declarative/Procedural Model: A developmental study. Frontiers in Psychology, 12 , Article 714523. 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.714523
     https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.714523 [Google Scholar]
  438. Stefanowitsch, A. , & Gries, S. T.
    (2005) Covarying collexems. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 1 (1), 1–43. 10.1515/cllt.2005.1.1.1
     https://doi.org/10.1515/cllt.2005.1.1.1 [Google Scholar]
  439. Steinhauer, K.
    (2014) Event-related potentials (ERPs) in second language research: A brief introduction to the technique, a selected review, and an invitation to reconsider critical periods in L2. Applied Linguistics, 35 (4), 393–417. 10.1093/applin/amu028
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amu028 [Google Scholar]
  440. Stemberger, J. P. , & MacWhinney, B.
    (1988) Are inflected forms stored in the lexicon?In M. Hammond & M. Noonan (Eds.), Theoretical morphology: Approaches in modern linguistics (pp.101–116). Academic Press. 10.1163/9789004454101_009
     https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004454101_009 [Google Scholar]
  441. Swaab, T. Y. , Ledoux, K. , Camblin, C. C. & Boudewyn, M. A.
    (2012) Language-Related ERP Components. In S. Luck & E. Kappenman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of event-related potential components (pp.397–439). 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195374148.013.0197
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195374148.013.0197 [Google Scholar]
  442. Tal, S. , & Arnon, I.
    (2018) SES effects on the use of variation sets in child-directed speech. Journal of Child Language, 45 (6), 1423–1438. 10.1017/S0305000918000223
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000918000223 [Google Scholar]
  443. Tanner, D.
    (2011) Agreement mechanisms in native and nonnative language processing: Electrophysiological correlates of complexity and interference (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Washington.
  444. (2013) Individual differences and stream of processing. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 3 (3), 350–356. 10.1075/lab.3.3.14tan
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.3.3.14tan [Google Scholar]
  445. Tanner, D. , Inoue, K. , & Osterhout, L.
    (2014) Brain-based individual differences in online L2 grammatical comprehension. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 17 (2), 277–293. 10.1017/S1366728913000370
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728913000370 [Google Scholar]
  446. Tanner, D. , McLaughlin, J. , Herschensohn, J. , & Osterhout, L.
    (2013) Individual differences reveal stages of L2 grammatical acquisition: ERP evidence. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 16 (2), 367–382. 10.1017/S1366728912000302
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728912000302 [Google Scholar]
  447. Tanner, D. , Osterhout, L. , & Herschensohn, J.
    (2009) Snapshots of grammaticalization: Differential electrophysiological responses to grammatical anomalies with increasing L2 exposure. In J. Chandlee , M. Franchini , S. Lord , & G.-M. Rheiner (Eds.), Proceedings of the 33rd annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp.528–539). Cascadilla Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  448. Tanner, D. , & Van Hell, J. G.
    (2012) ERPs reveal individual differences in syntactic processing strategies. Poster presented at thePsychonomics Society Conference, Minneapolis, MN. 10.1037/e502412013‑429
     https://doi.org/10.1037/e502412013-429 [Google Scholar]
  449. Taraban, R. , & McClelland, J. L.
    (1987) Conspiracy effects in word pronunciation. Journal of Memory and Language, 26 (6), 608–631. 10.1016/0749‑596X(87)90105‑7
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(87)90105-7 [Google Scholar]
  450. Tettamanti, M. , Rotondi, I. , Perani, D. , Scotti, G. , Fazio, F. , Cappa, S. F. , & Moro, A.
    (2009) Syntax without language: neurobiological evidence for cross-domain syntactic computations. Cortex, 45 (7), 825–838. 10.1016/j.cortex.2008.11.014
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2008.11.014 [Google Scholar]
  451. Thompson, S. P. , & Newport, E. L.
    (2007) Statistical learning of syntax: The role of transitional probability. Language Learning and Development, 3 (1), 1–42. 10.1080/15475440709336999
     https://doi.org/10.1080/15475440709336999 [Google Scholar]
  452. Toledo, A. , & Sassoon, G. W.
    (2011) Absolute vs. relative adjectives – Variance within vs. between individuals. Semantics and Linguistic Theory, 21 , 135–154. 10.3765/salt.v21i0.2587
     https://doi.org/10.3765/salt.v21i0.2587 [Google Scholar]
  453. Tomasello, M.
    (2003) Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Harvard University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  454. Townsend, D. J. , & Bever, T. G.
    (2001) Sentence comprehension: The integration of habits and rules. The MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/6184.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/6184.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  455. Townsend, P.
    (2006) The autonomy of Grammar. Oxford Philosophical Society. https://www.oxfordphilsoc.org/Weekend/2006.html
     [Google Scholar]
  456. Travis, L.
    (2010a) The role of features in syntactic theory and language variation. In J. M. Liceras , H. Zobl , & H. Goodluck (Eds.), The role of formal features in second language acquisition (pp.22–47). Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  457. (2010b) Inner aspect: The Articulation of VP. Springer. 10.1007/978‑90‑481‑8550‑4
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-8550-4 [Google Scholar]
  458. Tversky, A. , & Gati, I.
    (1978) Studies of similarity. In E. Rosch & B. Lloyd (Eds.), Cognition and categorization (pp.79–98). Lawrence Elbaum Associates.
     [Google Scholar]
  459. Uddén, J. , & Bahlmann, J.
    (2012) A rostro-caudal gradient of structured sequence processing in the left inferior frontal gyrus . Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 367 (1598), 2023–2032. 10.1098/rstb.2012.0009
     https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2012.0009 [Google Scholar]
  460. Uddén, J. , Ingvar, M. , Hagoort, P. , & Petersson, K. M.
    (2012) Implicit acquisition of grammars with crossed and nested non-adjacent dependencies: investigating the push-down stack model. Cognitive Science, 36 (6), 1078–1101. 10.1111/j.1551‑6709.2012.01235.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-6709.2012.01235.x [Google Scholar]
  461. Ullman, M. T.
    (1999a) Acceptability ratings of regular and irregular past-tense forms: Evidence for a dual-system model of language from word frequency and phonological neighbourhood effects. Language and Cognitive Processes, 14 (1), 47–67. 10.1080/016909699386374
     https://doi.org/10.1080/016909699386374 [Google Scholar]
  462. (1999b) Naming tools and using rules: Evidence that a frontal/basal-ganglia system underlies both motor skill knowledge and grammatical rule use. Brain and Language, 69 (3), 316–318.
     [Google Scholar]
  463. (2004) Contributions of memory circuits to language: The Declarative/​Procedural Model. Cognition, 92 (1–2), 231–270. 10.1016/j.cognition.2003.10.008
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2003.10.008 [Google Scholar]
  464. Ullman, M. T.
    (2005) A cognitive neuroscience perspective on second language acquisition: The Declarative/Procedural Model. In C. Sanz (Ed.), Mind and context in second language acquisition (pp.141–178). Georgetown University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  465. Ullman, M. T.
    (2008) The role of memory systems in disorders of language. In B. Stemmer & H. A. Whitaler (Eds.), Handbook of the neuroscience of language (pp.189–198). Academic Press. 10.1016/B978‑0‑08‑045352‑1.00018‑5
     https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-045352-1.00018-5 [Google Scholar]
  466. (2016) The Declarative/Procedural Model: A neurobiological model of language learning, knowledge and use. In G. Hickok & S. L. Small (Eds.), The neurobiology of language (pp.953–968). Elsevier. 10.1016/B978‑0‑12‑407794‑2.00076‑6
     https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-407794-2.00076-6 [Google Scholar]
  467. (2020) The Declarative-Procedural Model . In B. VanPatten , G. D. Keating , & S. Wullf (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction (3rd ed., pp.128–161). Routledge. 10.4324/9780429503986‑7
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429503986-7 [Google Scholar]
  468. Ullman, M. T. , Corkin, S. , Coppola, M. , Hickok, G. , Growdon, J. H. , Koroshetz, W. J. , & Pinker, S.
    (1997) A neural dissociation within language: Evidence that the mental dictionary is part of declarative memory, and that grammatical rules are processed by the procedural system. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 9 (2), 266–276. 10.1162/jocn.1997.9.2.266
     https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.1997.9.2.266 [Google Scholar]
  469. Ullman, M. T. , Earle, F. S. , Walenski, M. , & Janacsek, K.
    (2020) The neurocognition of developmental disorders of language. Annual Review of Psychology, 71 , 389–417. 10.1146/annurev‑psych‑122216‑011555
     https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-122216-011555 [Google Scholar]
  470. Ullman, M. T. , & Lovelett, J. T.
    (2018) Implications of the Declarative/Procedural Model for improving second language learning: The role of memory enhancement techniques. Second Language Research, 34 (1), 39–65. 10.1177/0267658316675195
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658316675195 [Google Scholar]
  471. Ullman, M. T. , & Pullman, M. Y.
    (2015) A compensatory role for declarative memory in neurodevelopmental disorders. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 51 , 205–222. 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2015.01.008
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2015.01.008 [Google Scholar]
  472. Valois, D.
    (1991) The internal structure of DP (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of California.
  473. Van Berkum, J. J. , Zwitserlood, P. , Hagoort, P. , & Brown, C. M.
    (2003) When and how do listeners relate a sentence to the wider discourse? Evidence from the N400 effect. Cognitive Brain Research, 17 (3), 701–718. 10.1016/S0926‑6410(03)00196‑4
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0926-6410(03)00196-4 [Google Scholar]
  474. Van den Brink, D. , Brown, C. M. , & Hagoort, P.
    (2006) The cascaded nature of lexical selection and integration in auditory sentence processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32 (2), 364–372. 10.1037/0278‑7393.32.3.364
     https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.32.3.364 [Google Scholar]
  475. Van Gompel, R. P. G. , & Pickering, M. J.
    (2007) Syntactic Parsing. In M. G. Gaskell (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of psycholinguistics (pp.289–308). Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198568971.013.0017
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198568971.013.0017 [Google Scholar]
  476. Van Hout, A.
    (2004) Unaccusativity as telicity checking. In A. Alexiadou , E. Anagnostopoulou , & M. Everaert (Eds.), The unaccusativity puzzle: Explorations of the syntax-lexicon interface (pp.60–83). Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199257652.003.0003
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199257652.003.0003 [Google Scholar]
  477. Van Lancker Sidtis, D.
    (2004) When novel sentences spoken or heard for the first time in the history of the universe are not enough: Toward a dual-process model of language. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 39 (1), 1–44. 10.1080/13682820310001601080
     https://doi.org/10.1080/13682820310001601080 [Google Scholar]
  478. (2008) Formulaic and novel language in a ‘dual process’ model of language competence: Evidence from surveys, speech samples, and schemata. In R. L. Corrigan , E. A. Moravcsik , H. Ouali , & K. M. Wheatley (Eds.), Formulaic language: Vol. 2, Acquisition, loss, psychological reality, functional applications (pp.151–176). John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.83
     https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.83 [Google Scholar]
  479. Van Lancker Sidtis, D.
    (2012) Two-track mind: Formulaic and novel language support a dual-process model. In M. Faust (Ed.), The handbook of the neuropsychology of language: Vol. 1, Language processing in the brain: Basic science, Vol. 2. Language processing in the brain: Clinical populations (pp.342–367). Wiley Blackwell. 10.1002/9781118432501.ch17
     https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118432501.ch17 [Google Scholar]
  480. Van Lancker Sidtis, D. , Kougentakis, K. , Cameron, K. , Falconer, C. , & Sidtis, J.
    (2012) “Down with ___”: The linguistic schema as intermediary between formulaic and novel expressions. Yearbook of Phraseology, 3 (1), 87–108. 10.1515/phras‑2012‑0005
     https://doi.org/10.1515/phras-2012-0005 [Google Scholar]
  481. Van Lancker Sidtis, D. , & Postman, W. A.
    (2006) Formulaic expressions in spontaneous speech of left- and right-hemisphere-damaged subjects. Aphasiology, 20 (5), 411–426. 10.1080/02687030500538148
     https://doi.org/10.1080/02687030500538148 [Google Scholar]
  482. VanPatten, B.
    (2007) Input processing in adult second language acquisition. In B. VanPatten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction (pp.115–135). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
     [Google Scholar]
  483. VanPatten, B. , & Jegerski, J.
    (Eds.) (2010) Research in second language processing and parsing. John Benjamins. 10.1075/lald.53
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.53 [Google Scholar]
  484. VanPatten, B. , Smith, M. , & Benati, A.
    (2019) Key questions in second language acquisition. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108761529
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108761529 [Google Scholar]
  485. Van Petten, C. , Coulson, S. , Rubin, S. , Plante, E. , & Parks, M.
    (1999) Time course of word identification and semantic integration in spoken language. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25 (2), 394–417. 10.1037/0278‑7393.25.2.394
     https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.25.2.394 [Google Scholar]
  486. Van Petten, C. , & Luka, B. J.
    (2012) Prediction during language comprehension: Benefits, costs, and ERP components. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 83 (2), 176–190. 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2011.09.015
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2011.09.015 [Google Scholar]
  487. Van Valin Jr., R. D. , & LaPolla, R. J.
    (1997) Syntax: Structure, meaning, and function. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139166799
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139166799 [Google Scholar]
  488. Vegas, R. A. M.
    (2022) Impacto del factor frecuencia en la didáctica de estructuras verbales preposicionales en español para sinohablantes. Porta Linguarum, 38 , 1–26.
     [Google Scholar]
  489. Verkuyl, H. J.
    (2005) Aspectual composition: Surveying the ingredients. In H. Verkuyl , H. de Swart & A. van Hout (Eds.), Perspectives on aspect (pp.19–39). Springer. 10.1007/1‑4020‑3232‑3_2
     https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3232-3_2 [Google Scholar]
  490. Verneau, M. , van der Kamp, J. , Savelsbergh, G. J. , & de Looze, M. P.
    (2014) Age and time effects on implicit and explicit learning. Experimental aging research, 40 (4), 477–511. 10.1080/0361073X.2014.926778
     https://doi.org/10.1080/0361073X.2014.926778 [Google Scholar]
  491. Vogt, P. , & Lieven, E.
    (2010) Verifying theories of language acquisition using computer models of language evolution. Adaptive Behavior, 18 (1), 21–35. 10.1177/1059712309350970
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1059712309350970 [Google Scholar]
  492. Waterfall, H. R. , Sandbank, B. , Onnis, L. , & Edelman, S.
    (2010) An empirical generative framework for computational modeling of language acquisition. Journal of Child Language, 37 (3), 671–703. 10.1017/S0305000910000024
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000910000024 [Google Scholar]
  493. White, L.
    (2003) On the nature of interlanguage representation: Universal grammar in the second language. In C. Doughty & M. Long (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp.18–42). Wiley-Blackwell. 10.1002/9780470756492.ch2
     https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470756492.ch2 [Google Scholar]
  494. Wilmut, I. , Sullivan, G. , & Chambers, I.
    (2011) The evolving biology of cell reprogramming. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 366 (1575), 2183–2197. 10.1098/rstb.2011.0051
     https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2011.0051 [Google Scholar]
  495. Wittenberg, E. , Paczynski, M. , Wiese, H. , Jackendoff, R. , & Kuperberg, G.
    (2014) The difference between “giving a rose“ and “giving a kiss“: Sustained neural activity to the light verb construction. Journal of Memory and Language, 73 , 31–42. 10.1016/j.jml.2014.02.002
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2014.02.002 [Google Scholar]
  496. Wlotko, E. W. , & Federmeier, K. D.
    (2012) So that’s what you meant! Event-related potentials reveal multiple aspects of context use during construction of message-level meaning. NeuroImage, 62 (1), 356–366. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.04.054
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.04.054 [Google Scholar]
  497. Wolter, B. , & Yamashita, J.
    (2018) Word frequency, collocational frequency, L1 congruency, and proficiency in l2 collocational processing: What accounts for L2 performance?Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 40 (2), 395–416. 10.1017/S0272263117000237
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263117000237 [Google Scholar]
  498. Wong, P. C. , Ettlinger, M. , & Zheng, J.
    (2013) Linguistic grammar learning and DRD2-TAQ-IA polymorphism. PloS one, 8 (5), Article e64983. 10.1371/journal.pone.0064983
     https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0064983 [Google Scholar]
  499. Wood, C. , & Connelly, V.
    (Eds.) (2009) Contemporary perspectives on reading and spelling. Routledge. 10.4324/9780203877838
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203877838 [Google Scholar]
  500. Wray, A.
    (2000) Formulaic sequences in second language teaching: Principle and practice. Applied Linguistics, 21 , (4), 463–489, 10.1093/applin/21.4.463
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/21.4.463 [Google Scholar]
  501. Wulff, S. , Ellis, N. C. , Römer, U. , Bardovi–Harlig, K. , & Leblanc, C. J.
    (2009) The acquisition of tense–aspect: Converging evidence from corpora and telicity ratings. The Modern Language Journal, 93 (3), 354–369. 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.2009.00895.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00895.x [Google Scholar]
  502. Xiang, M. , & Kuperberg, G.
    (2015) Reversing expectations during discourse comprehension. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 30 (6), 648–672. 10.1080/23273798.2014.995679
     https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2014.995679 [Google Scholar]
  503. Yang, C.
    (2002) Knowledge and learning in natural language. Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  504. (2004) Universal Grammar, statistics or both?Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8 (10), 451–456. 10.1016/j.tics.2004.08.006
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2004.08.006 [Google Scholar]
  505. (2005) On productivity. Linguistic Variation Yearbook, 5 , 333–370. 10.1075/livy.5.09yan
     https://doi.org/10.1075/livy.5.09yan [Google Scholar]
  506. (2008) The great number crunch. Journal of Linguistics 44 , 205–228. 10.1017/S0022226707004999
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226707004999 [Google Scholar]
  507. (2011a) Computational models of syntactic acquisition. WIREs Cognitive Science, 3 (2), 205–213. 10.1002/wcs.1154
     https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1154 [Google Scholar]
  508. (2011b) A statistical test for grammar. Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Cognitive Modeling and Computational Linguistics (pp.30–38). https://aclanthology.org/W11-0604
     [Google Scholar]
  509. (2013) Who’s afraid of George Kingsley Zipf? Or: Do children and chimps have language?Significance, 10 (6), 29–34. 10.1111/j.1740‑9713.2013.00708.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-9713.2013.00708.x [Google Scholar]
  510. (2016) The price of linguistic productivity: How children learn to break the rules of language. The MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/9780262035323.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262035323.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  511. Yang, C. , Crain, S. , Berwick, R. C. , Chomsky, N. , & Bolhuis, J. J.
    (2017) The growth of language: Universal Grammar, experience, and principles of computation. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 81 (Pt B), 103–119. 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.12.023
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.12.023 [Google Scholar]
  512. Yang, C. , & Roeper, T.
    (2011) Minimalism and language acquisition. In C. Boeckx (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic minimalism (pp.551–573). Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199549368.013.0024
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199549368.013.0024 [Google Scholar]
  513. Yano, M. , & Koizumi, M.
    (2021) The role of discourse in long-distance dependency formation. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 36 (6), 711–729. 10.1080/23273798.2021.1883694
     https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2021.1883694 [Google Scholar]
/content/books/9789027246578
Loading

  • From This Site

    /content/books/9789027246578
    dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Chapter
    10
    5
/content/books/9789027246578
dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
-contentType:Journal -contentType:Chapter
10
5
Chapter
content/books/9789027246578
Book
false
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error