1887
  1. Home
  2. Books
  3. Variation in University Student Writing

Variation in University Student Writing

A communicative text type approach

image of Variation in University Student Writing
USD
Buy:$149.00 + Taxes

This book provides a comprehensive description of the situational and linguistic characteristics of undergraduate student writing, considering both assignment type and discipline. Drawing on a corpus of more than 900 undergraduate student assignments from four disciplinary groups (Arts and Humanities, Social Sciences, Physical Sciences, and Life Sciences), the book combines corpus-based analyses of linguistic features with analyses of communicative purposes and text characteristics. Variation in University Writing takes a new approach to register variation by grouping assignments by their communicative purpose (to argue, to explain, to compare, to describe, to narrate a personal event, to give a procedural recount, to give personal advice, and to propose), rather than register categories. A multidimensional analysis provides a detailed description of the linguistic patterns of undergraduate writing. The findings presented in this book will be of interest to teachers of writing, instructors of English for Academic Purposes (EAP), and researchers of university writing.

References

  1. Aull, L.
    (2015) First-year university writing: A corpus-based study with implications for pedagogy. Springer. 10.1057/9781137350466
     https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137350466 [Google Scholar]
  2. Barbieri, F. , & Wizner, S.
    (2019) Appendix A: Annotation of major register and genre studies. In D. Biber & S. Conrad (Eds.), Register, genre, and style (pp.318–364). Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Benitez-Castro, M. A.
    (2021) Shell-noun use in disciplinary student writing: A multifaceted analysis of problem and way in third-year undergraduate writing across three disciplines. English for Specific Purposes, 61 , 132–149. 10.1016/j.esp.2020.10.004
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2020.10.004 [Google Scholar]
  4. Berber-Sardinha, T. , Pinto, M. V. , Mayer, C. , Zuppardi, M. C. , & Kauffmann, C. H.
    (2019) Adding registers to a previous multi-dimensional analysis. In T. Berber-Sardinha & M. Pinto (Eds.), Multi-dimensional analysis: Research methods and current issues (pp.165–186). Bloomsbury.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Biber, D.
    (1988) Variation across speech and writing. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511621024
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511621024 [Google Scholar]
  6. (1994) An analytical framework for register studies. In D. Biber & E. Finegan (Eds.), Sociolinguistic perspectives on register (pp.31–56). Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780195083644.003.0003
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195083644.003.0003 [Google Scholar]
  7. (2006) University language: A corpus-based study of spoken and written registers. John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.23
     https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.23 [Google Scholar]
  8. (2019) Text-linguistic approaches to register variation. Register Studies, 1 (1), 42–75. 10.1075/rs.18007.bib
     https://doi.org/10.1075/rs.18007.bib [Google Scholar]
  9. Biber, D. , & Conrad, S.
    (2019) Register, genre, and style (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108686136
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108686136 [Google Scholar]
  10. Biber, D. , & Egbert, J.
    (2018) Register variation online. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781316388228
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316388228 [Google Scholar]
  11. (2023) What is a register? Accounting for linguistic and situational variation within–and outside of–textual varieties. Register Studies, 5 (1), 1–22. 10.1075/rs.00004.bib
     https://doi.org/10.1075/rs.00004.bib [Google Scholar]
  12. Biber, D. , Egbert, J. , & Keller, D.
    (2019) Reconceptualizing register in a continuous situational space. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 16 (3), 581–616.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. (2020) Reconceptualizing register in a continuous situational space. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 16 (3), 581–616. 10.1515/cllt‑2018‑0086
     https://doi.org/10.1515/cllt-2018-0086 [Google Scholar]
  14. Biber, D. , Egbert, J. , Keller, D. R. , & Wizner, S.
    (2021a) Describing registers in a continuous situational space: Case studies from the web and natural conversation. In E. Seoane & D. Biber (Eds.), Corpus-based approaches to register variation (pp.19–50). John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.103.02bib
     https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.103.02bib [Google Scholar]
  15. Biber, D. , Egbert, J. , Keller, D. , & Wizner, S.
    (2021b) Towards a taxonomy of conversational discourse types: An empirical corpus-based analysis. Journal of Pragmatics, 171 , 20–35. 10.1016/j.pragma.2020.09.018
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2020.09.018 [Google Scholar]
  16. Biber, D. , & Gray, B.
    (2010) Challenging stereotypes about academic writing: Complexity, elaboration, explicitness. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 9 (1), 2–20. 10.1016/j.jeap.2010.01.001
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2010.01.001 [Google Scholar]
  17. (2016) Grammatical complexity in academic English: Linguistic change in writing. Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Biber, D. , Gray, B. , & Poonpon, K.
    (2011) Should we use characteristics of conversation to measure grammatical complexity in L2 writing development?TESOL Quarterly, 45 (1), 5–35. 10.5054/tq.2011.244483
     https://doi.org/10.5054/tq.2011.244483 [Google Scholar]
  19. Biber, B. , Johansson, S. , Leech, G. , Conrad, S. , & Finegan, E.
    (1999) Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Pearson Education. Also published as Biber, B. , Johansson, S. , Leech, G. , Conrad, S. , & Finegan, E. (2021) Grammar of spoken and written English. John Benjamins. 10.1075/z.232
     https://doi.org/10.1075/z.232 [Google Scholar]
  20. Biber, D. , Reppen, R. , & Staples, S.
    (2017) Exploring the relationship between TOEFL iBT scores and disciplinary writing performance. TESOL Quarterly, 51 (4), 948–960. 10.1002/tesq.359
     https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.359 [Google Scholar]
  21. Black, A. , Dixon, T. , Goulart, L. & Wizner, S.
    (2021) Register and register variation. Oxford bibliographies online research guide. Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Bridgeman, B. , & Carlson, S. B.
    (1984) Survey of academic writing tasks. Written Communication, 1 (2), 247–280. 10.1177/0741088384001002004
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088384001002004 [Google Scholar]
  23. Britton, J.
    (1975) The development of writing abilities (pp.11–18). Macmillan Education.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Bruce, I.
    (2010) Textual and discoursal resources used in the essay genre in sociology and English. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 9 (3), 153–166. 10.1016/j.jeap.2010.02.011
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2010.02.011 [Google Scholar]
  25. Çandarlı, D.
    (2022) Linguistic characteristics of online academic forum posts across subregisters, L1 backgrounds, and grades. Lingua, 267 , 103190. 10.1016/j.lingua.2021.103190
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2021.103190 [Google Scholar]
  26. Charles, M.
    (2006) Phraseological patterns in reporting clauses used in citation: A corpus-based study of theses in two disciplines. English for Specific Purposes, 25 (3), 310–331. 10.1016/j.esp.2005.05.003
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2005.05.003 [Google Scholar]
  27. Chen, M.
    (2013) Overuse or underuse: A corpus study of English phrasal verb use by Chinese, British and American students. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 18 (1), 418–422. 10.1075/ijcl.18.3.07che
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.18.3.07che [Google Scholar]
  28. Chen, Y.-H. , & Baker, P.
    (2010) Lexical bundles in L1 and L2 academic writing. Language Learning and Technology, 14 (2), 30–49.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Comrey, A. L. , Lee, H. B.
    (1992) A first course in factor analysis. (2nd ed.) Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Conrad, S. M.
    (1996) Academic discourse in two disciplines: Professional writing and student development in biology and history (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Northern Arizona University.
  31. Cortes, V.
    (2004) Lexical bundles in published and student disciplinary writing: Examples from history and biology. English for Specific Purposes, 23 (4), 397–423. 10.1016/j.esp.2003.12.001
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2003.12.001 [Google Scholar]
  32. Couture, B.
    (1986) Effective ideation in written text: A functional approach to clarity and exigence. DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska, Lincoln. Retrieved on27 April 2024fromhttps://digitalcommons.unl.edu/englishfacpubs/68/
  33. Crosthwaite, P. , & Cheung, L.
    (2019) Learning the language of dentistry: Disciplinary corpora in the teaching of English for specific academic purposes. John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.93
     https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.93 [Google Scholar]
  34. Eblen, C.
    (1983) Writing across-the-curriculum: A survey of a university faculty’s views and classroom practices. Research in the Teaching of English, 17 (4), 343–348. 10.58680/rte198315696
     https://doi.org/10.58680/rte198315696 [Google Scholar]
  35. Egbert, J.
    (2014) Reader perceptions of linguistic variation in published academic writing (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Northern Arizona University.
  36. Egbert, J. , & Staples, S.
    (2019) Doing multi-dimensional analysis in SPSS, SAS, and R. In T. Berber Sardinha & M. Veirano Pinto (Eds.), Multi-dimensional analysis: Research methods and current issues (pp.125–144). Bloomsbury Academic. 10.5040/9781350023857.0015
     https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350023857.0015 [Google Scholar]
  37. Gardner, S. , & Holmes, J.
    (2009) Can I use headings in my essay? Section headings, macrostructures and genre families in the BAWE corpus of student writing. In M. Charles , S. Hunston , & D. Pecorari (Eds.), Academic writing: At the interface of corpus and discourse (pp.252–271). Bloomsbury Academic.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Gardner, S. , & Nesi, H.
    (2013) A classification of genre families in university student writing. Applied linguistics, 34 (1), 25–52. 10.1093/applin/ams024
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/ams024 [Google Scholar]
  39. Gardner, S. , Nesi, H. , & Biber, D.
    (2019) Discipline, level, genre: Integrating situational perspectives in a new MD analysis of university student writing. Applied Linguistics, 40 (4), 646–674. 10.1093/applin/amy005
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amy005 [Google Scholar]
  40. Gardner, S. , & Powell, L.
    (2006) An investigation of genres of assessed writing in British higher education: A Warwick-Reading-Oxford Brookes project. InResearch, scholarship and practice in the area of academic literacies. University of Westminster.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Gil, L. , Bråten, I. , Vidal-Abarca, E. , & Strömsö, H. I.
    (2010) Understanding and integrating multiple science texts: Summary tasks are sometimes better than argument tasks. Reading Psychology, 31 (1), 30–68. 10.1080/02702710902733600
     https://doi.org/10.1080/02702710902733600 [Google Scholar]
  42. Gorsuch, R. L.
    (2015) Factor analysis. Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Goulart, L.
    (2016) Compilation of a Brazilian academic written English corpus. Revista e-scrita: Revista do Curso de Letras da UNIABEU, 8 (2), 32–47.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. (2021) Register variation in L1 and L2 student writing: A multidimensional analysis. Register Studies, 3 (1), 115–143. 10.1075/rs.20012.gou
     https://doi.org/10.1075/rs.20012.gou [Google Scholar]
  45. Goulart, L. , Biber, D. , & Reppen, R.
    (2022) In this essay, I will…: Examining variation of communicative purpose in university writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 59 , 101159. 10.1016/j.jeap.2022.101159
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2022.101159 [Google Scholar]
  46. Goulart, L. , & Staples, S.
    (2023) Multidimensional analysis. In M. Kessler & C. Polio (Eds.), Conducting genre-based research in applied linguistics (pp.127–148). Routledge. 10.4324/9781003300847‑9
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003300847-9 [Google Scholar]
  47. Goulart, L. , & Wood, M.
    (2021) Methodological synthesis of research using multi-dimensional analysis. Journal of Research Design and Statistics in Linguistics and Communication Science, 6 (2), 107–13. 10.1558/jrds.18454
     https://doi.org/10.1558/jrds.18454 [Google Scholar]
  48. Gray, B.
    (2015) Linguistic variation in research articles. When discipline tells one part of the story. John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.71
     https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.71 [Google Scholar]
  49. (2019) Tagging and counting linguistic features for multi-dimensional analysis. In T. Berber Sardinha & M. Veirano Pinto (Eds.), Multi-dimensional analysis: Research methods and current issues (pp.43–66). Bloomsbury Academic. 10.5040/9781350023857.0011
     https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350023857.0011 [Google Scholar]
  50. Hale, G. , Taylor, C. , Bridgeman, B. , Carson, J. , Kroll, B. , & Kantor, R.
    (1994) A study of writing tasks assigned in academic degree program. TOEFL Research Reports (Vol.44).
     [Google Scholar]
  51. (1996) A study of writing tasks assigned in academic degree program. TOEFL Research Reports, 44 .
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Hardy, J. A. , & Römer, U.
    (2013) Revealing disciplinary variation in student writing: A multi-dimensional analysis of the Michigan Corpus of Upper-level Student Papers (MICUSP). Corpora, 8 (2), 183–207. 10.3366/cor.2013.0040
     https://doi.org/10.3366/cor.2013.0040 [Google Scholar]
  53. Hardy, J. A. , & Friginal, E.
    (2016) Genre variation in student writing: A multi-dimensional analysis. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 22 , 119–131. 10.1016/j.jeap.2016.03.002
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2016.03.002 [Google Scholar]
  54. Heuboeck, A. , Holmes, J. , & Nesi, H.
    (2010) The BAWE corpus manual, Version III.
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Hewings, M. , & Hewings, A.
    (2002) “It is interesting to note that…”: A comparative study of anticipatory ‘it’ in student and published writing. English for Specific Purposes, 21 (4), 367–383. 10.1016/S0889‑4906(01)00016‑3
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(01)00016-3 [Google Scholar]
  56. Horowitz, D. M.
    (1986) What professors actually require: Academic tasks for the ESL classroom. TESOL quarterly, 20 (3), 445–462. 10.2307/3586294
     https://doi.org/10.2307/3586294 [Google Scholar]
  57. Hyland, K.
    (1999) Academic attribution: Citation and the construction of disciplinary knowledge. Applied Linguistics, 20 (3), 341–367. 10.1093/applin/20.3.341
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/20.3.341 [Google Scholar]
  58. (1998) Boosting, hedging and the negotiation of academic knowledge. Text & Talk, 18 (3), 349–382. 10.1515/text.1.1998.18.3.349
     https://doi.org/10.1515/text.1.1998.18.3.349 [Google Scholar]
  59. (2008a) Academic clusters: Text patterning in published and postgraduate writing. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 18 (1), 41–62. 10.1111/j.1473‑4192.2008.00178.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1473-4192.2008.00178.x [Google Scholar]
  60. (2008b) As can be seen: Lexical bundles and disciplinary variation. English for Specific Purposes, 27 (1), 4–21. 10.1016/j.esp.2007.06.001
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2007.06.001 [Google Scholar]
  61. Hyland, K. , & Jiang, F. K.
    (2021) A bibliometric study of EAP research: Who is doing what, where and when?Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 49 , 100929. 10.1016/j.jeap.2020.100929
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2020.100929 [Google Scholar]
  62. Hyland, K. , & Tsé, P.
    (2007) Is there an “academic vocabulary”?TESOL Quarterly, 41 (2), 235–253. 10.1002/j.1545‑7249.2007.tb00058.x
     https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1545-7249.2007.tb00058.x [Google Scholar]
  63. Hymes, D.
    (1974) Foundations in sociolinguistics: An ethnographic approach. University of Pennsylvania Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  64. Kellogg, R. T. , & Raulerson, B. A.
    (2007) Improving the writing skills of college students. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14 (2), 237–242. 10.3758/BF03194058
     https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194058 [Google Scholar]
  65. Larsson, T.
    (2016) The introductory it pattern: Variability explored in learner and expert writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 22 , 64–79. 10.1016/j.jeap.2016.01.007
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2016.01.007 [Google Scholar]
  66. Larsson, T. , Paquot, M. , & Biber, D.
    (2021) On the importance of register in learner writing. In E. Seoane & D. Biber (Eds.), Corpus-based approaches to register variation (pp.235–258). John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.103.09lar
     https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.103.09lar [Google Scholar]
  67. Leki, I. , & Carson, J.
    (1997) “Completely different worlds”: EAP and the writing experiences of ESL students in university courses. TESOL Quarterly, 31 (1), 39–69. 10.2307/3587974
     https://doi.org/10.2307/3587974 [Google Scholar]
  68. Lin, L. , & Evans, S.
    (2012) Structural patterns in empirical research articles: A cross-disciplinary study. English for Specific Purposes, 31 (3), 150–160. 10.1016/j.esp.2011.10.002
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2011.10.002 [Google Scholar]
  69. Martin, J. R. , & Rothery, J.
    (1986) What a functional approach to the writing task can show teachers about ‘good writing’. In B. Couture (Ed.), Functional approaches to writing: Research perspectives (pp.241–265). Ablex.
     [Google Scholar]
  70. Melzer, D.
    (2009) Writing assignments across the curriculum: A national study of college writing. College Composition and Communication, 61 (2), 240–261. 10.58680/ccc20099487
     https://doi.org/10.58680/ccc20099487 [Google Scholar]
  71. Moran, K. E.
    (2013) Exploring undergraduate disciplinary writing: Expectations and evidence in psychology and chemistry (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Georgia State University.
  72. Nesi, H. , & Gardner, S.
    (2006) Variation in disciplinary culture: University tutors’ views on assessed writing tasks. In R. Kiely , P. Rae-Dickins , H. Woodfield , & G. Clibbon (Eds.), Language, culture and identity in applied linguistics (pp.99–117). Equinox.
     [Google Scholar]
  73. (2012) Genres across the disciplines: Student writing in higher education. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781009030199
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009030199 [Google Scholar]
  74. O’Donnell, M. B. , & Römer, U.
    (2012) From student hard drive to web corpus, (part 2): The annotation and online distribution of the Michigan Corpus of Upper-level Student Papers (MICUSP). Corpora, 7 (1), 1–18. 10.3366/cor.2012.0015
     https://doi.org/10.3366/cor.2012.0015 [Google Scholar]
  75. Rashid, A. , & Mahmood, M. A.
    (2019) Linguistic variations across disciplines: A multidimensional analysis of Pakistani research articles. Global Social Sciences Review, IV , 34–48. 10.31703/gssr.2019(IV‑I).04
     https://doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2019(IV-I).04 [Google Scholar]
  76. Revelle, W.
    (2021) How to use the psych package for mediation/moderation/regression analysis. The Personality Project. Retrieved on27 April 2024frompersonality-project.org/r/psych/HowTo/mediation
  77. Römer, U. , & O’Donnell, M. B.
    (2011) From student hard drive to web corpus, (part 1): The design, compilation and genre classification of the Michigan Corpus of Upper-level Student Papers (MICUSP). Corpora, 6 (2), 159–177. 10.3366/cor.2011.0011
     https://doi.org/10.3366/cor.2011.0011 [Google Scholar]
  78. Saville-Troike, M.
    (2003) The ethnography of communication: An introduction. John Wiley & Sons. 10.1002/9780470758373
     https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470758373 [Google Scholar]
  79. Staples, S. , Biber, D. , & Reppen, R.
    (2018) Using corpus-based register analysis to explore the authenticity of high-stakes language exams: A register comparison of TOEFL iBT and disciplinary writing tasks. The Modern Language Journal, 102 (2), 310–332. 10.1111/modl.12465
     https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12465 [Google Scholar]
  80. Staples, S. , Egbert, J. , Biber, D. , & Gray, B.
    (2016) Academic writing development at the university level: Phrasal and clausal complexity across level of study, discipline, and genre. Written Communication, 33 (2), 149–183. 10.1177/0741088316631527
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088316631527 [Google Scholar]
  81. Staples, S. , & Reppen, R.
    (2016) Understanding first-year L2 writing: A lexico-grammatical analysis across L1s, genres, and language ratings. Journal of Second Language Writing, 32 , 17–35. 10.1016/j.jslw.2016.02.002
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2016.02.002 [Google Scholar]
  82. Tabachnick, B. G. , & Fidell, L. S.
    (2007) Using multivariate statistics. Pearson Education.
     [Google Scholar]
  83. Tasker, D. G.
    (2019) Situational and linguistic variation in undergraduate English-department student writing (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Northern Arizona University.
  84. (2022) A case study of the variety of writing assignments in an undergraduate English department. English for Specific Purposes, 66 , 33–62. 10.1016/j.esp.2021.12.001
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2021.12.001 [Google Scholar]
  85. Van Rooy, B.
    (2008) A multidimensional analysis of student writing in Black South African English. English World-Wide, 29 (3), 268–305. 10.1075/eww.29.3.03van
     https://doi.org/10.1075/eww.29.3.03van [Google Scholar]
  86. Wolfe, C. R.
    (2011) Argumentation across the curriculum. Written Communication, 28 (2), 193–219. 10.1177/0741088311399236
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088311399236 [Google Scholar]
  87. Wright, H. R.
    (2020) Stand-alone literature reviews. In U. Römer-Barron , V. Cortes , & E. Friginal (Eds.), Advances in corpus-based research on academic writing: Effects of discipline, register, and writer expertise (pp.307–322). John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.95.13wri
     https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.95.13wri [Google Scholar]
  88. Wu, B. , & Paltridge, B.
    (2021) Stance expressions in academic writing: A corpus-based comparison of Chinese students’ MA dissertations and PhD theses. Lingua, 253 , 103071. 10.1016/j.lingua.2021.103071
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2021.103071 [Google Scholar]
  89. Zhu, W.
    (2004) Writing in business courses: An analysis of assignment types, their characteristics, and required skills. English for Specific purposes, 23 (2), 111–135. 10.1016/S0889‑4906(02)00046‑7
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(02)00046-7 [Google Scholar]
/content/books/9789027246615
Loading

  • From This Site

    /content/books/9789027246615
    dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Chapter
    10
    5
/content/books/9789027246615
dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
-contentType:Journal -contentType:Chapter
10
5
Chapter
content/books/9789027246615
Book
false
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error