1887

Elementary Predicates and Related Categories

image of Elementary Predicates and Related Categories

This book offers a fresh perspective on how natural languages encode grammatical relations, by delving into the interplay between oblique cases, adpositions, serial verbs, and applicatives. This book reveals, through a series of case studies, the pervasive role of the 'inclusion' relator across diverse linguistic contexts. Departing from traditional views that obliques lack interpretive content, this work presents a unified conceptual framework of relations in grammar. Drawing on minimalist principles, the book posits a preeminence of the lexicon in syntactic projection, shedding light on the underlying ontology of language. By exploring cross-categorial variation and syncretism, it outlines an inventory of primitives shaping morpho-syntactic derivations.

References

  1. Aboh, E. O.
    (2009) Clause structure and verb series. Linguistic Inquiry, 40(1), 1–33. 10.1162/ling.2009.40.1.1
    https://doi.org/10.1162/ling.2009.40.1.1 [Google Scholar]
  2. Adger, D.
    (2013) A Syntax of Substance. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Aikhenvald, A. Y.
    (2006) Serial Verb Constructions in a Typological Perspective. In A. Y. Aikhenvald & R. M. W. Dixon (Eds.), Serial verb constructions: a cross-linguistic typology (pp. 1–87). Oxford, Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. (2008) Versatile cases. Journal of Linguistics, 44, 565–603. 10.1017/S002222670800532X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S002222670800532X [Google Scholar]
  5. Aissen, J.
    (2003) Differential Object Marking: Iconicity vs. economy. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 21(3), 435–483. 10.1023/A:1024109008573
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024109008573 [Google Scholar]
  6. Alexiadou, A.
    (2001) Functional structure in nominals. Amsterdam, John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.42
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.42 [Google Scholar]
  7. Alexiadou, A. , Haegeman, L. , & Stavrou, M.
    (2007) Noun Phrase in the Generative Perspective. Berlin, Mouton De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110207491
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110207491 [Google Scholar]
  8. Alexiadou, A. , Anagnostopoulou, E. & Schäfer, F.
    (2009) PP licensing in nominalizations. In A. Schardl , M. Walkow , & M. Abdurrahman (Eds.), Proceedings of NELS38 (pp. 39–52). Ottawa, GLSA.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Alexiadou, A. , & Stavrou M.
    (2011) Ethnic adjectives as pseudo-adjectives. Studia Linguistica, 65, 1–30. 10.1111/j.1467‑9582.2011.01179.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9582.2011.01179.x [Google Scholar]
  10. Alexiadou, A. , Anagnostopoulou, E. & Schäfer, F.
    (2015) External arguments in transitivity alternations. Oxford, Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199571949.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199571949.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  11. Aristar, A. A.
    (1996) The relationship between dative and locative: Kuryłowicz’s argument from a typological perspective. Diachronica, XIII(2): 207–224. 10.1075/dia.13.2.02ari
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.13.2.02ari [Google Scholar]
  12. Ariste, P.
    (1997) A grammar of the Votic language. Bloomington and The Hague, Indiana University Press and Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Arkhangelskiy T. , & Usacheva, M.
    (2015) Syntactic and Morphosyntactic Properties of Postpositional Phrases in Beserman Udmurt as Part-of-Speech Criteria. SKY Journal of Linguistics, 28, 103–137.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Arsenijevic, B. , Boleda, G. , Gehrke, B. , & McNally, L.
    (2014) Ethnic adjectives are proper adjectives. In R. Baglini , T. Grinsell , J. Keane , A. Roth Singerman , & J. Thomas (Eds.), CLS-46-I the main session: 46th annual meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society (pp. 17–30). Chicago, IL, Chicago Linguistic Society.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Asbury, A.
    (2008) The Morphosyntax of Case and Adpositions. PhD dissertation, Universiteit Utrecht.
  16. Avril, Y.
    (2006) Parlons Komi. Paris, L’Harmattan.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Bach, E.
    (1986) The algebra of events. Linguistics and Philosophy, 9, 5–16. 10.1007/BF00627432
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00627432 [Google Scholar]
  18. Baerman, M. , Brown, D. & Corbett, G.
    (2005) The syntax-morphology interface: A study of syncretism. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511486234
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486234 [Google Scholar]
  19. Baggio, P. & Caircross, A.
    (2020) The syntax of Puss in Boots and Sleeping Beauty. Proper names between productivity and atomicity, Proceedings of ConSOLEXXVIII.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Bahrami-Khorshid, S. , & Golfam, A.
    (2013) Encoding the Agent in Persian Passive Construction: A Cognitive Approach. International Journal of Humanities, 20(4), 79–97.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Baker, M.
    (1988) Incorporation: A theory of grammatical function changing. Chicago, IL, University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. (1989) Object sharing and projection in serial verb constructions. Linguistic Inquiry, 20(4), 513–553.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. (1991) On the Relation of Serialization to Verb Extensions. In C. Lefebvre (Ed.), Serial verbs: Grammatical, comparative and cognitive approaches (pp. 79–102). Amsterdam, John Benjamins. 10.1075/ssls.8.04bak
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ssls.8.04bak [Google Scholar]
  24. (1992) Thematic conditions on syntactic structures: Evidence from locative applicatives. In I. M. Roca (Ed.), Thematic structure: Its role in grammar (pp. 23–46). Dordrecht: Foris. 10.1515/9783110872613.23
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110872613.23 [Google Scholar]
  25. (2003) Lexical Categories. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511615047
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511615047 [Google Scholar]
  26. Baker, P. , & Kriegel, S.
    (2013) Mauritian Creole structure dataset. In S. M. Michaelis , P. Maurer , M. Haspelmath & M. Huber (Eds.), Atlas of Pidgin and Creole Language Structures Online, Leipzig, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. (Available online atapics-online.info/).
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Bakker, P.
    (2003) Pidgin inflectional morphology and its implications for creole morphology. In G. Booij & J. van Marle (Eds.), Yearbook of morphology 2002 (pp. 3–33), Dordrecht, Kluwer. 10.1007/0‑306‑48223‑1_2
    https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-48223-1_2 [Google Scholar]
  28. Baldi, B. , & Savoia, L. M.
    (2019) Possessives in North-Calabrian dialects. QULSO -Quaderni del Dipartimento di Linguistica, 7, 19–40.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. (2021) Possessives, from Franco-Provencal and Occitan systems to contact dialects in Apulia and Calabria. Languages, 6(2), 63. 10.3390/languages6020063
    https://doi.org/10.3390/languages6020063 [Google Scholar]
  30. Barat, C. , Carayol, M. , & Vogel, C.
    (1977) Kriké kraké: recueil de contes créoles réunionnais. Paris, CNRS.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Barker, C.
    (1995) Possessive Descriptions. Stanford, CSLI Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Bartning, I.
    (1980) Remarkes sur la syntaxe et la semantique des pseudo adjectif de nominaux en francais. Stockholm, Almvist & Wiksell International.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Barwise, J. , & Cooper, R.
    (1981) Generalized quantifiers and natural language. Linguistics and Philosophy, 4, 159–219. 10.1007/BF00350139
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00350139 [Google Scholar]
  34. Bassaganyas-Bars T.
    (2015) The rise of haver as the existential predicate and the perfect auxiliary: the case of Old Catalan. Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung19, 107–124.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Baxter, A. N.
    (1988) A grammar of Kristang (Malacca Creole Portuguese). Canberra, Pacific Linguistics, Australian National University.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. (2013) Papiá Kristang structure dataset. In S. M. Michaelis , P. Maurer , M. Haspelmath & M. Huber (Eds.), Atlas of Pidgin and Creole Language Structures Online, Leipzig, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. (Available online atapics-online.info/).
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Beavers, J.
    (2011) On affectedness. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 29(2), 335–370. 10.1007/s11049‑011‑9124‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-011-9124-6 [Google Scholar]
  38. Beck, S. , & K. Johnson
    . (2004) Double objects again. Linguistic Inquiry, 35, 97–124. 10.1162/002438904322793356
    https://doi.org/10.1162/002438904322793356 [Google Scholar]
  39. Belletti, A.
    (2004) Aspects of the low IP area. In L. Rizzi (Ed.), The Structure of IP and CP (pp. 16–51). Oxford, Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780195159486.003.0002
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195159486.003.0002 [Google Scholar]
  40. (2005) Extended doubling and the VP periphery. Probus, 17, 1–35. 10.1515/prbs.2005.17.1.1
    https://doi.org/10.1515/prbs.2005.17.1.1 [Google Scholar]
  41. Belletti, A.
    (2017) Labeling (Romance) causatives. Manuscript. Universities of Geneva & Siena. 10.1515/9781501504037‑002
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501504037-002 [Google Scholar]
  42. Bellucci, G.
    (2017) Oblique subjects: theoretical and experimental perspectives. Ph.D. Dissertation, Università di Firenze.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Belvin, R. S.
    (1996) Inside Events: The Non-Possessive Meanings of Possession Predicates and the Semantic Conceptualization of Events. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Southern California.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Belvin, R. S. , & den Dikken, M.
    (1997)  There, happens, to, be, have . Lingua, 101, 151–183. 10.1016/S0024‑3841(96)00049‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-3841(96)00049-6 [Google Scholar]
  45. Bentley, D.
    (2013) Subject canonicality and definiteness effects in Romance “there” sentences. Language, 89, 675–712. 10.1353/lan.2013.0062
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2013.0062 [Google Scholar]
  46. (2017) Copular and existential constructions. In A. Dufter , & E. Stark (Eds.), Manual of Romance Morphosyntax and Syntax (pp. 332–366). Berlin, De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110377088‑009
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110377088-009 [Google Scholar]
  47. Bentley, D. , Ciconte, F. M. , & Cruschina, S.
    (2015) Existential and Locatives in Romance Dialects of Italy. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198745266.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198745266.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  48. Benveniste, É.
    (1966) Problèmes de linguistique générale1. Paris, Gallimard.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Berwick, R. , & Chomsky, N.
    (2011) The biolinguistic program: The current state of its evolution and development. In A. M. DiSciullo , & C. Boeckx (Eds.), The Biolinguistic Enterprise (pp. 19–41). Oxford, Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Biagui, N. B. , & Quint, N.
    (2013) Casamancese Creole structure dataset. In S. M. Michaelis , P. Maurer , M. Haspelmath & M. Huber (Eds.), Atlas of Pidgin and Creole Language Structures Online, Leipzig, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. (Available online atapics-online.info/).
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Bickerton, D.
    (1981) Roots of Language. Ann Arbor, Karoma.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. (1984) The language bioprogram hypothesis. Behaviour and brain sciences, 7(2), 173–221. 10.1017/S0140525X00044149
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00044149 [Google Scholar]
  53. (1989) Seselwa serialization and its significance. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages, 4, 155–183. 10.1075/jpcl.4.2.02bic
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jpcl.4.2.02bic [Google Scholar]
  54. Bisang, W.
    (1992) Das Verb im Chinesischen, Hmong, Vietnamesischen, Thai und Khmer. Vergleichende Grammatik im Rahmen der Verb­serialisierung, der Grammatikalisierung und der Attraktor­positionen. Tübingen, Gunter Narr.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. (1996) Areal typology and grammaticalization: Processes of grammaticalization based on nouns and verbs in East and Mainland South East Asian languages. Studies in Language, 20, 519–597. 10.1075/sl.20.3.03bis
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.20.3.03bis [Google Scholar]
  56. (1998) Adverbials: The view from the Far East. In J. van der Auwera & D. P. O´Baoill (Eds.), Adverbial constructions in the languages of Europe (pp. 641–812). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Blake, B.
    (2001) Case. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139164894
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139164894 [Google Scholar]
  58. Bobaljik, J.
    (2012) Universals in Comparative Morphology: Suppletion, Superlatives, and the Structure of Words. Cambridge, MA, The MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/9069.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9069.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  59. Boeckx, C.
    (2009) The nature of merge. Consequences for language, mind and biology. In M. Piatelli Palmarini (Ed.), Of minds and language (pp. 44–57). Oxford, Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780199544660.003.0004
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199544660.003.0004 [Google Scholar]
  60. Boleda, G. , Evert, S. , Gehrke, B. , & McNally, L.
    (2012) Adjectives as saturators vs. modifiers: Statistical evidence. In M. Aloni , V. Kimmelman , F. Roelofsen , G. Weidman Sassoon , K. Schulz , & M. Westera (Eds.), Logic, language and meaning – 18th Amsterdam Colloquium, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, December 19–21, 2011, Revised Selected Papers (pp. 112–121). Dordrecht, Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑642‑31482‑7_12
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31482-7_12 [Google Scholar]
  61. Bollée, A. & Marcel, R.
    (1994) Parol ek memwar. Récits de vie des Seychelles. Hamburg, Buske.
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Boneh, N. , & Sichel, I.
    (2010) Deconstructing possession. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 28, 1–40. 10.1007/s11049‑009‑9087‑z
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-009-9087-z [Google Scholar]
  63. Boneh, N. , & Nash, L.
    (2012) Core and non-core datives in French. In B. Fernández & R. Etxepare (Eds.), Variation in datives: A Microcomparative Perspective (pp. 22–49). Oxford, Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199937363.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199937363.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  64. Borer, H.
    (2003) Exo-Skeletal vs. Endo-Skeletal Explanations: Syntactic Projections and the Lexicon. In J. Moore & M. Polinsky (Eds.), The Nature of Explanation in Linguistics Theory (pp. 31–67). Stanford, CLSI Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  65. (2005) In name only, Structuring sense, vol I. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199263905.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199263905.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  66. (2014) Derived Nominals and the Domain of Content. Lingua, 141, 71–96. 10.1016/j.lingua.2013.10.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2013.10.007 [Google Scholar]
  67. Borschev, V. & Partee, B.
    (2001) The Russian genitive of negation in existentials sentences: The role of Theme-Rheme structure reconsidered. Prague Linguistic Circle Papers / Travaux du cercle linguistique de Prague, 4, 185–250. 10.1075/plcp.4.11bor
    https://doi.org/10.1075/plcp.4.11bor [Google Scholar]
  68. Bosque, I. & Picallo, C.
    (1996) Postnominal adjectives in Spanish DPs. Journal of Linguistics, 32, 349–385. 10.1017/S0022226700015929
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226700015929 [Google Scholar]
  69. Bossong, G.
    (1985) Differentielle Objektmarkierung in den Neuiranischen Sprachen. Tübingen, Gunter Narr.
    [Google Scholar]
  70. Bowden, J.
    (2001) Taba: description of a South Halmahera language. Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies, The Australian National University, Pacific Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  71. Bresnan, J. , & Moshi, L.
    (1990) Object asymmetries in comparative Bantu syntax. Linguistic Inquiry, 21, 147–185.
    [Google Scholar]
  72. Bruening, B.
    (2012) By phrases in passives and nominals. Syntax, 16, 1–41. 10.1111/j.1467‑9612.2012.00171.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9612.2012.00171.x [Google Scholar]
  73. Bruyn, A. , Muysken, P. , & Verrips, M.
    (1999) Double-object constructions in the creole languages: development and acquisition. In Michel DeGraff (Ed.), Language creation and language change: Creolization, diachrony and development (pp. 329–373). Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  74. Buell, L. , & Sy, M.
    (2006) Affix orderingInWolof applicatives and causatives. In  J. Mugane , J. P. Hutchison , & D. A. Worman (Eds.), Selected Proceedings of the 35th Annual Conference on African Linguistics (pp. 214–224). Somerville, Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
    [Google Scholar]
  75. Bunting, J.
    (2009) ‘Give’ and ‘take’: How dative gi contributed to the decline of ditransitive taki . Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages, 24, 199–217. 10.1075/jpcl.24.2.01bun
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jpcl.24.2.01bun [Google Scholar]
  76. Caha, P.
    (2009) The nanosyntax of case. PhD dissertation, CASTL & University of Tromsø.
    [Google Scholar]
  77. (2016)  gen.sg = nom.pl: A mystery solved?Linguistica Brunensia, 64, 25–40.
    [Google Scholar]
  78. (2017) How (not) to derive a *ABA: the case of Blansitt’s generalisation. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics, 2(1), 84–115. 10.5334/gjgl.348
    https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.348 [Google Scholar]
  79. Calabrese, A.
    (1998) Some remarks on the Latin case system and its development in Romance. In J. Lema , & E. Treviño (Eds.), Theoretical advances on Romance Languages (pp. 71–126). Amsterdam, John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.157.06cal
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.157.06cal [Google Scholar]
  80. Calabrese, A.
    (2008) On absolute and contextual syncretism. In A. Nevins & A. Bachrach (Eds.), The bases of inflectional identity (pp. 156–205). Oxford, Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780199219254.003.0006
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199219254.003.0006 [Google Scholar]
  81. Capistrán Garza, A.
    (2015) Multiple object constructions in P’orhépecha: Argument realization and valence-affecting morphology. Leiden, Brill. 10.1163/9789004288874
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004288874 [Google Scholar]
  82. Cardinaletti, A.
    (1998) On the deficient/strong opposition in possessive systems. In  A. Alexiadou , & C. Wilder (Eds.), Possessors, Predicates and Movement in the Determiner Phrase (pp. 17–53). Amsterdam, John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.22.03car
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.22.03car [Google Scholar]
  83. Cardinaletti, A. & Starke, M.
    (1999) The typology of structural deficiency. A case study of the three classes of pronouns. In H. van Riemsdijk (Ed.), Clitics in the Languages of Europe (pp. 145–233). Berlin, Mouton-De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110804010.145
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110804010.145 [Google Scholar]
  84. Cardinaletti, A. , & Giusti, G.
    (2016) The syntax of the Italian indefinite determiner dei . Lingua, 181, 58–80. 10.1016/j.lingua.2016.05.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2016.05.001 [Google Scholar]
  85. (2018) Micro-variation in the Possessive Systems of Italian Dialects. In J. Emonds , M. Janebová , & L, Veselovská (Eds.), Language Use and Linguistic Structure. Proceedings of the Olomouc Linguistics Colloquium (pp. 137–154). Olomouc, Palacký University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  86. Cardoso, H. C.
    (2009) The Indo-Portuguese language of Diu. Utrecht, LOT.
    [Google Scholar]
  87. Carlson, G.
    (1977) Reference to Kinds in English. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
  88. Carlson, R.
    (1991) Grammaticalisation of postpositions and word order in Senufo languages. In E. C. Traugott & B. Heine (Eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization. Vol. 2: Focus on types of grammatical markers (pp. 201–223). Amsterdam, John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.19.2.11car
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.19.2.11car [Google Scholar]
  89. Carstens, V.
    (2002) Antisymmetry and word order in serial constructions. Language, 78(1), 3–50. 10.1353/lan.2002.0004
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2002.0004 [Google Scholar]
  90. Champollion L. , & Krifka, M.
    (2016) Mereology. In M. Aloni , & P. Dekker (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Formal Semantics (pp. 369–388). Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139236157.014
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139236157.014 [Google Scholar]
  91. Chappell, H. M.
    (2015) Diversity in Sinitic languages. Oxford, Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198723790.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198723790.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  92. Chierchia, G.
    (1998a) Plurality of mass nouns and the notion of ‘semantic parameter. In S. Rothstein (Ed.), Events in Grammar (pp. 53–104). Kluwer, Dordrecht. 10.1007/978‑94‑011‑3969‑4_4
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3969-4_4 [Google Scholar]
  93. (1998b) Partitives, reference to kinds and semantic variation. In A. Lawson (Ed.), Proceedings from Semantics and Linguistic Theory(SALT 7) (pp.73–98).
    [Google Scholar]
  94. (2010) Mass nouns, vagueness and semantic variation. Synthese, 174: 99–149. 10.1007/s11229‑009‑9686‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-009-9686-6 [Google Scholar]
  95. Chomsky, N.
    (1981) Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht, Foris.
    [Google Scholar]
  96. (1995) The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  97. (2000) Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In R. Martin , D. Michaels , & J. Uriagereka (Eds.), Step by step, essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik (pp. 89–155). Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  98. (2001a) Derivation by Phase. In M. Kenstowicz (Ed.), Ken Hale: A Life in Language, (pp. 1–54). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/4056.003.0004
    https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/4056.003.0004 [Google Scholar]
  99. Chomsky, N.
    (2001b) Beyond explanatory adequacy. MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics20. Cambridge, MA: MIT, Department of Linguistics and Philosophy, MITWPL.
    [Google Scholar]
  100. Chomsky, N.
    (2013) Problems of projection. Lingua, 130, 33–49. 10.1016/j.lingua.2012.12.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2012.12.003 [Google Scholar]
  101. (2015) Problems of projection: Extensions. In E. Di Domenico , C. Hamann , & S. Matteini (Eds.), Structures, strategies and beyond -studies in honour of Adriana Belletti, (pp. 3–16). Amsterdam, John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.223.01cho
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.223.01cho [Google Scholar]
  102. (2020) The UCLA Lectures (April 29 – May 2, 2019). https://ling.auf.net/lingbuzz/005485
    [Google Scholar]
  103. Chomsky, N. , Gallego, Á, J. , & Ott, D.
    (2019) Generative Grammar and the Faculty of Language: Insights, Questions and Challenges. Catalan Journal of Linguistics, Special Issue, 229–261. 10.5565/rev/catjl.288
    https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/catjl.288 [Google Scholar]
  104. Chumakina, M.
    (2011) Nominal periphrasis. A canonical approach. Studies in Language, 35, 247–274. 10.1075/sl.35.2.01chu
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.35.2.01chu [Google Scholar]
  105. Cinque, G.
    (1994) On the Evidence for Partial N-Movement in the Romance DP. In G. Cinque , J. Koster , J-Y. Pollock , L. Rizzi , & R. Zanuttini (Eds.), Paths Towards Universal Grammar. Studies in Honor of Richard S. Kayne, 85–110. Washington, DC, Georgetown University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  106. (2007) La natura grammaticale del diminutivo e del vezzeggiativo. In R. Maschi , N. Penello , & P. Rizzolatti (Eds.), Miscellanea di studi liguistici offerti a Laura Vanelli da amici e allievi padovani (pp. 229–236). Udine, Forum.
    [Google Scholar]
  107. (2010a) Mapping Spatial PPs: an Introduction. In G. Cinque & L. Rizzi (Eds.), Mapping Spatial PPs, The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Vol. 6 (pp. 3–25). New York, Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195393675.003.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195393675.003.0001 [Google Scholar]
  108. (2010b) The Syntax of Adjectives: A Comparative Study. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/9780262014168.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262014168.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  109. (2015) Augmentative, pejorative, diminutive and endearing heads in the extended nominal projection. In E. Di Domenico , C. Hamann , & S. Matteini (Eds.), Structures, strategies and beyond -studies in honour of Adriana Belletti (pp. 67–81). Amsterdam, John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.223.04cin
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.223.04cin [Google Scholar]
  110. Cinque, G. , & Rizzi, L.
    (2010) The cartography of syntactic structures. In B. Heine , & H. Narrog (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic analysis (pp. 51–65). Oxford, Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  111. Clements, J. C.
    (2013) Korlai structure dataset. In S. M. Michaelis , P. Maurer , M. Haspelmath & M. Huber (Eds.), Atlas of Pidgin and Creole Language Structures Online, Leipzig, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. (Available online atapics-online.info/).
    [Google Scholar]
  112. Cole, P.
    (1983) The grammatical role of the causee in Universal Grammar. International Journal of American Linguistics, 49, 115–133. 10.1086/465778
    https://doi.org/10.1086/465778 [Google Scholar]
  113. Collins, C.
    (1997) Argument sharing in serial verb constructions. Linguistic Inquiry, 28(3), 461–497.
    [Google Scholar]
  114. (2005) A smuggling approach to the passive in English. Syntax, 8, 81–120. 10.1111/j.1467‑9612.2005.00076.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9612.2005.00076.x [Google Scholar]
  115. Colot S , & Ludwig, R.
    (2013a) Guadeloupean Creole structure dataset. In S. M. Michaelis , P. Maurer , M. Haspelmath & M. Huber (Eds.), Atlas of Pidgin and Creole Language Structures Online, Leipzig, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. (Available online atapics-online.info/).
    [Google Scholar]
  116. Colot S , & Ludwig, R.
    (2013b) Martinican Creole structure dataset. In S. M. Michaelis , P. Maurer , M. Haspelmath & M. Huber (Eds.), Atlas of Pidgin and Creole Language Structures Online, Leipzig, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. (Available online atapics-online.info/).
    [Google Scholar]
  117. Comrie, B.
    (1976) Aspect. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  118. (1999) Spatial cases in Daghestanian languages. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung, 52, 108–117.
    [Google Scholar]
  119. Comrie, B. & Polinsky, M.
    (1998) The great Daghestanian case hoax. In A. Siewierska & J. J. Song (Eds.), Case, Typology and Grammar: In Honor of Barry J. Blake (pp. 95–114). Amsterdam, John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.38.09com
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.38.09com [Google Scholar]
  120. Corbett, G.
    (2011) Number. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  121. Corne, C , Coleman D. , & Curnow, S.
    (1996) Clause reduction in asyndetic coordination in Isle de France creole: The ‘serial verbs’ problem. In P. Baker & A. Syea (Eds.), Changing meanings, changing functions (pp. 129–154). London, University of Westminster Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  122. Coupe, A.
    (2008) A Grammar of Mongsen Ao. Berlin, Mouton De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110198522
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110198522 [Google Scholar]
  123. Craig, C. , & Hale, K.
    (1988) Relational Preverbs in Some Languages of the Americas: Typological and Historical Perspectives. Language, 64, 312–344. 10.2307/415436
    https://doi.org/10.2307/415436 [Google Scholar]
  124. Creissels, Denis
    (2006) Encoding the distinction between location, source, and destination. In M. Hickmann & S. Robert (Eds.), Space in Languages: Linguistic Systems and Cognitive Categories (pp. 19–28). Amsterdam, John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.66.03cre
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.66.03cre [Google Scholar]
  125. Creissels, D.
    (2010) Benefactive applicative periphrases: a typological approach. In F. Zúñiga & S. Kittilä (Eds.), Benefactives and malefactives: Typological perspectives and case studies (pp. 29–69). Amsterdam, John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.92.02cre
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.92.02cre [Google Scholar]
  126. Creissels D.
    (2014) Existential predication in typological perspective. Ms., Université Lyon.
    [Google Scholar]
  127. Crocco Galèas, G.
    (1991) Gli etnici italiani: studio di morfologia naturale. Padova, Unipress.
    [Google Scholar]
  128. Cruschina, S.
    (2015) Patterns of variation in existential constructions. Isogloss. A journal on variation of Romance and Iberian languages, 1(1), 33–65. 10.5565/rev/isogloss.5
    https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/isogloss.5 [Google Scholar]
  129. Cuervo, M. C.
    (2003) Datives at large. Ph.D. dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
    [Google Scholar]
  130. (2010) Two types of (apparently) ditransitive light verbs constructions. In K. Arregi , Z. Fagyal , S. A. Montrul , & A. Tremblay (Eds.), Romance Linguistics 2008. Interaction in Romance. Selected Papers from the 38th. Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages. Urbana-Champaign, April 2008 (pp. 139–154). Amsterdam, John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.313.14cue
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.313.14cue [Google Scholar]
  131. Dahl Ö. , & Koptjevskaja-Tamm, M.
    (2001) Kinship in grammar. In I. Baron , M. Herslund & F. Sørensen (Eds.), Dimensions of Possession, (pp. 201–243). Amsterdam, John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.47.12dah
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.47.12dah [Google Scholar]
  132. Dardano, M.
    (2008) Costruire parole. Bologna, Il Mulino.
    [Google Scholar]
  133. David, A.
    (2014) Descriptive Grammar of Pashto and its Dialects. Berlin, Mouton De Gruyter. 10.1515/9781614512318
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781614512318 [Google Scholar]
  134. De Belder, M.
    (2011) A morphosyntactic decomposition of countability in Germanic. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics, 14 (3), 173-202. 10.1007/s10828‑011‑9045‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10828-011-9045-0 [Google Scholar]
  135. De Belder, M. , Faust, N. & Lampitelli, N.
    (2014) On a low and a high diminutive. In A. Alexiadou , H. Borer , & F. Schäfer (Eds.), The syntax of roots and the roots of syntax (pp. 149–163). Oxford, Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199665266.003.0007
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199665266.003.0007 [Google Scholar]
  136. Déchaine, R-M. , Girard, R. , Mudzingwa, C. , & Wiltschko, M.
    (2014) The internal syntax of Shona class prefixes. Language Sciences, 43, 18–46. 10.1016/j.langsci.2013.10.008
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2013.10.008 [Google Scholar]
  137. DeGraff, M.
    (2001) On the Origin of Creoles: A Cartesian Critique of Neo-Darwinian Linguistics. Linguistic Typology, 5(2–3), 213–310.
    [Google Scholar]
  138. DeGraff, M.
    (2003) Against Creole Exceptionalism. Language, 79(2), 391–410. 10.1353/lan.2003.0114
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2003.0114 [Google Scholar]
  139. (2007) Kreyòl Ayisyen or Haitian Creole. In J. Holm , & P. Patrick (Eds.), Comparative creole syntax. Parallel outlines of 18 creole grammars (pp. 101–126). London/Colombo: Battlebridge.
    [Google Scholar]
  140. Demirdache, H. , & Uribe-Etxebarria, M.
    (2000) The primitives of temporal relations. In R. Martin , D. Michaels , & J. Uriagereka (Eds.), Step by step, essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik, 157–186. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  141. Den Dikken, M.
    (1991) Serial Verbs, ‘Object Sharing’, and the Analysis of Dative Shift. Linguistics in the Netherlands, 8, 31–40. 10.1075/avt.8.06dik
    https://doi.org/10.1075/avt.8.06dik [Google Scholar]
  142. (1995) Particles. New York, Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780195091342.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195091342.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  143. (2006) Relators and linkers: A study of predication, predicate inversion and copulas. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/5873.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/5873.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  144. (2010) On the functional structure of locative and directional PPs. In G. Cinque & L. Rizzi (Eds.), Mapping Spatial PPs, The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Vol.6 (pp. 74–126). New York, Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195393675.003.0003
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195393675.003.0003 [Google Scholar]
  145. Den Dikken, M. , & Dékány, É.
    (2018) Adpositions and case: Alternative realisation and concord. Finno-Ugric Languages and Linguistics7(2).
    [Google Scholar]
  146. Devonish, H. , & Thompson, D.
    (2013) “Creolese”. In S. M. Michaelis , P. Maurer , M. Haspelmath & M. Huber (Eds.), The survey of pidgin and creole languages. Vol. I: English-based and Dutch-based languages (pp. 49–60). Oxford, Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  147. Di Garbo, F.
    (2014) Gender and its interaction with number and evaluative morphology: An intra- and intergeneralogical typological survey of Africa. PhD Dissertation. Stockholm University.
    [Google Scholar]
  148. Durie, M.
    (1988) Verb Serialization and ‘Verbal Prepositions’ in Oceanic Languages. Oceanic Linguistics, 27(1–2), 1–23. 10.2307/3623147
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3623147 [Google Scholar]
  149. (1997) Grammatical structures in verb serialization. In A. Alsina , J. Bresnan , & P. Sells (Eds.), Complex predicates (pp. 289–354). Stanford, CSLI Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  150. Ehrhart S. , & Revis, M.
    (2013) Tayo structure dataset. In S. M. Michaelis , P. Maurer , M. Haspelmath & M. Huber (Eds.), Atlas of Pidgin and Creole Language Structures Online, Leipzig, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. (Available online atapics-online.info/).
    [Google Scholar]
  151. Ehrhart, S.
    (1993) Le créole français de St-Louis (le tayo) en Nouvelle-Calédonie. Hamburg, Helmut Buske.
    [Google Scholar]
  152. Emonds, J.
    (1985) A Unified Theory of Syntactic Categories. Dordrecht, Foris. 10.1515/9783110808513
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110808513 [Google Scholar]
  153. Fábregas, A.
    (2007a) (Axial) parts and wholes. Nordlyd, 34, 1–32. 10.7557/12.109
    https://doi.org/10.7557/12.109 [Google Scholar]
  154. (2007b) The internal syntactic structure of Relational adjectives. Probus, 19(1), 1–36. 10.1515/PROBUS.2007.001
    https://doi.org/10.1515/PROBUS.2007.001 [Google Scholar]
  155. (2015a) Una nota sobre locativos y acusativos.”Archivum, LXV, 57–74. 10.17811/arc.65.2015.57‑74
    https://doi.org/10.17811/arc.65.2015.57-74 [Google Scholar]
  156. (2015b) Direccionales con con y Marcado Diferencial de Objeto. Revue Romane50, 163–190. 10.1075/rro.50.2.01fab
    https://doi.org/10.1075/rro.50.2.01fab [Google Scholar]
  157. (2020) Morphologically Derived Adjectives in Spanish. Amsterdam, John Benjamins. 10.1075/ihll.30
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ihll.30 [Google Scholar]
  158. Faraclas, N.
    (1996) Nigerian Pidgin. London, Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  159. Farquharson, J. T.
    (2013) Jamaican structure dataset. In S. M. Michaelis , P. Maurer , M. Haspelmath & M. Huber (Eds.), Atlas of Pidgin and Creole Language Structures Online, Leipzig, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. (Available online atapics-online.info/).
    [Google Scholar]
  160. Feist, T. R.
    (2010) A Grammar of Skolt Saami. Ph.D dissertation, University of Manchester.
    [Google Scholar]
  161. Filbeck, D.
    (1975) A grammar of verb serialization in Thai. In J. G. Harris , & J. R. Chamberlain (Eds.), Studies in Tai linguistics in honor of William J. Gedney (pp. 112–129). Bangkok, Central Institute of English Language.
    [Google Scholar]
  162. Filchenko, A. Y.
    (2007) A Grammar of Eastern Khanty. PhD dissertation, Rice University.
  163. Filip, H.
    (1999) Aspect, situation types and noun phrase semantics. New York, Garland.
    [Google Scholar]
  164. Fillmore, C. J.
    (1968) The case for case. In E. Bach & R. T. Harms (Eds.), Universals in linguistic theory (pp. 1–88). New York, Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
    [Google Scholar]
  165. (1986) Pragmatically controlled zero anaphora. InProceedings of the Twelfth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 95–107. Berkeley, CA, BLS. 10.3765/bls.v12i0.1866
    https://doi.org/10.3765/bls.v12i0.1866 [Google Scholar]
  166. Finney, M. A.
    (2013) Krio structure dataset. In S. M. Michaelis , P. Maurer , M. Haspelmath & M. Huber (Eds.), Atlas of Pidgin and Creole Language Structures Online, Leipzig, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. (Available online atapics-online.info/).
    [Google Scholar]
  167. Folli, R. , & Harley, H.
    (2007) Causation, obligation, and argument structure: on the nature of little v. Linguistic Inquiry, 38(2), 197–238. 10.1162/ling.2007.38.2.197
    https://doi.org/10.1162/ling.2007.38.2.197 [Google Scholar]
  168. Folli, R.
    (2008) Complex PPs in Italian. In A. Asbury , J. Dotlačil , B. Gehrke , & R. Nouwen (Eds.), Syntax and Semantics of Spatial P (pp. 197–220). Amsterdam, John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.120.10fol
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.120.10fol [Google Scholar]
  169. Folli, R. , Harley, H. , & Karimi, S.
    (2005) Determinants of event structure in Persian complex predicates. Lingua, 115, 1365–1401. 10.1016/j.lingua.2004.06.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2004.06.002 [Google Scholar]
  170. Forman, M. L.
    (1972) Zamboangueño texts with grammatical analysis. A Study of Philippine Creole Spanish. Ph.D. dissertation, Cornell University.
    [Google Scholar]
  171. Frajzyngier, Z.
    (2012) A Grammar of Wandala. Berlin, De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110218411
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110218411 [Google Scholar]
  172. Francez, I.
    (2007) Existential propositions. Ph.D. dissertation, Stanford University.
    [Google Scholar]
  173. (2009) Existentials, predication, and modification. Linguistics and Philosophy, 32: 1–50. 10.1007/s10988‑009‑9055‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-009-9055-4 [Google Scholar]
  174. Francez, I. , & Koontz-Garboden, A.
    (2016) A note on possession and mereology in Ulwa property concept constructions. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 34, 93–106. 10.1007/s11049‑015‑9299‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-015-9299-3 [Google Scholar]
  175. (2017) Semantics and morphosyntactic variation: Qualities and the grammar of property concepts. Oxford, Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198744580.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198744580.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  176. Franco, L.
    (2013) Before strikes back: An *ABA constraint on temporal expressions. Acta Linguistica Hungarica, 60(3), 265–301. 10.1556/ALing.60.2013.3.2
    https://doi.org/10.1556/ALing.60.2013.3.2 [Google Scholar]
  177. (2015a) The morphosyntax of adverbs of thecarpone/i type in (Old and Modern) Italian. Probus, 27(2), 271–306. 10.1515/probus‑2014‑0005
    https://doi.org/10.1515/probus-2014-0005 [Google Scholar]
  178. (2016) Axial Parts, phi-features and degrammaticalization. Transactions of the Philological Society, 114, 149–170. 10.1111/1467‑968X.12067
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-968X.12067 [Google Scholar]
  179. (2018) On Nominalization: Genitives, Datives, and Elementary Predicates in Italian. In A. Bloch-Rozmej , & A. Bondaruk (Eds.), Studies in Formal Linguistics Universal Patterns and Language Specific Parameters (pp. 73–90). Frankfurt, Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  180. Franco, L.
    (2020) (Im)proper prepositions in (Old and Modern) Italian. In L. Franco & P. Lorusso (Eds.), Linguistic Variation: Structure and Interpretation (pp. 249–272). Berlin, De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9781501505201‑015
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501505201-015 [Google Scholar]
  181. Franco, L. , Baldi, B. & Savoia, L. M.
    (2020) Collectivizers in Italian (and beyond). The interplay between collectivizing and evaluating morphology (and the Div paradox). Studia Linguistica, 74, 2–41. 10.1111/stul.12112
    https://doi.org/10.1111/stul.12112 [Google Scholar]
  182. Franco, L. , Bellucci, G. , Dal Pozzo, L. , & Manzini, M. R.
    (2017) Locatives, Part and Whole in Uralic. In J. Emonds & M. Janebovà (Eds.), Language Use and Linguistic Structure – selected proceedings of OLINCO 2016 (pp. 283–304). Olomouc, Palacky University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  183. Franco, L. , & Lorusso, P.
    (2019) The expression of proper location and beyond: motion-to and state-in in Italian spatial adpositions. In M. Baird & J. Pesetsky (Eds), NELS 49: Proceedings of the Forty-Ninth Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society: Volume 1 (pp. 279–290). GLSA, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
    [Google Scholar]
  184. (2020) Aspectual datives (and instrumentals). In A. Pineda & J. Mateu (Eds.), Dative constructions in Romance and beyond (pp. 175–194). Berlin, Language Science Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  185. (2022) Derivational Relators in Italian. Languages, 7(2): 130. 10.3390/languages7020130
    https://doi.org/10.3390/languages7020130 [Google Scholar]
  186. Franco, L. , Manzini M. R. , & Savoia, L. M.
    (2015a) N Class and Its Interpretation: The Neuter in Central Italian Varieties and Its Implications. Isogloss. A Journal on Variation of Romance and Iberian Languages, 1, 41–68. 10.5565/rev/isogloss.14
    https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/isogloss.14 [Google Scholar]
  187. (2015b) Linkers and agreement. The Linguistic Review, 32(2), 277–332. 10.1515/tlr‑2014‑0024
    https://doi.org/10.1515/tlr-2014-0024 [Google Scholar]
  188. (2021) Locative PS as general relators. Location, direction, DOM in Romance. Linguistic Variation, 21, 135–73. 10.1075/lv.00035.fra
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lv.00035.fra [Google Scholar]
  189. Franco, L. , & Manzini, M. R.
    (2017a) Genitive/‘of’ Arguments in DOM Contexts. Revue Roumaine De Linguistique, LXII, 427–444.
    [Google Scholar]
  190. (2017b) Instrumental prepositions and case: Contexts of occurrence and alternations with datives. Glossa, 2(1), 8. 10.5334/gjgl.111
    https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.111 [Google Scholar]
  191. Freeze, R.
    (1992) Existentials and other locatives. Language, 68(3), 553–595. 10.2307/415794
    https://doi.org/10.2307/415794 [Google Scholar]
  192. Gallego, Á.
    (2010) Phase Theory. Amsterdam, John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.152
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.152 [Google Scholar]
  193. Ganfi, V. , & Piunno, V.
    (2017) Preposizioni complesse in italiano antico e contemporaneo. Grammaticalizzazione, schematismo e produttività. Archivio Glottologico Italiano, CII(2), 184–204.
    [Google Scholar]
  194. Garzonio, J. , & Rossi, S.
    (2016) Case in Italian Complex PPs. In E. Carrilho , A. Fiéis , M. Lobo & S. Pereira (Eds.), Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 10: Selected papers from ‘Going Romance’ 28, Lisbon (pp. 121–138). Amsterdam, John Benjamins. 10.1075/rllt.10.07gar
    https://doi.org/10.1075/rllt.10.07gar [Google Scholar]
  195. Gavarro, A. & Heshmati, Y.
    (2014) An investigation on the comprehension of Persian passives in typical development and autism. Catalan Journal of Linguistics, 13, 79–98.
    [Google Scholar]
  196. George, I.
    (1975) Typology of verb serialization. Journal of West African Languages, 10(1), 78–97.
    [Google Scholar]
  197. Gerdts, D. , & Hinkson, M.
    (2004) The grammaticalization of Halkomelem ‘face’ into a dative applicative suffix. International Journal of American Linguistics, 70(3), 227–250. 10.1086/425600
    https://doi.org/10.1086/425600 [Google Scholar]
  198. Ghomeshi, J.
    (1997) Non-Projecting Nouns and the Ezafe: Construction in Persian. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 15, 729–788. 10.1023/A:1005886709040
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005886709040 [Google Scholar]
  199. Giusti, G.
    (2015) Nominal Syntax at the Interfaces. A Comparative Study of Languages with Articles. Newcastle upon Tyne, Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  200. Givón, T.
    (1975) Serial verbs and syntactic change. In C. N. Li (Ed.), Word order and word order change (pp. 47–112). Austin, University of Texas Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  201. Goury, L. & Migge, B.
    (2003) Grammaire du nengee: Introduction aux langues aluku, ndyuka et pamaka. Paris, Editions IRD.
    [Google Scholar]
  202. Grandi, N.
    (2001) Su alcune presunte anomalie della morfologia valutativa. Archivio Glottologico, 86, 25–56.
    [Google Scholar]
  203. (2003) Mutamenti innovativi e conservativi nella morfologia valutativa dell’italiano. Origine, sviluppo e diffusione del suffisso accrescitivo –one . In N. Maraschio , & T. Poggi Salani (Eds.), Italia linguistica anno Mille – Italia linguistica anno Duemila. Atti del XXXIV Congresso Internazionale di Studi della Società di Linguistica Italiana (pp. 243–258). Roma, Bulzoni.
    [Google Scholar]
  204. Grimm, S.
    (2011) Semantics of Case. Morphology, 21, 515–544. 10.1007/s11525‑010‑9176‑z
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11525-010-9176-z [Google Scholar]
  205. (2012) Inverse Number Marking and Individuation in Dagaare. In D. Massam (Ed.), Count and Mass Across Languages (pp. 75–98). Oxford, Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199654277.003.0005
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199654277.003.0005 [Google Scholar]
  206. Grimshaw, J.
    (1990a) Extended projection. Ms., Brandeis University.
    [Google Scholar]
  207. (1990b) Argument structure. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  208. Hagège, C.
    (2010) Adpositions. Oxford, Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199575008.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199575008.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  209. Hagemeijer, T.
    (2000) Serial verb constructions in São-Tomense. MA thesis, University of Lisbon.
    [Google Scholar]
  210. (2011) The Gulf of Guinea creoles. Genetic and typological relations. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages, 26(1), 111–154. 10.1075/jpcl.26.1.05hag
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jpcl.26.1.05hag [Google Scholar]
  211. (2013) Santome structure dataset. In S. M. Michaelis , P. Maurer , M. Haspelmath & M. Huber (Eds.), Atlas of Pidgin and Creole Language Structures Online, Leipzig, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. (Available online atapics-online.info/).
    [Google Scholar]
  212. Hagemeijer, T. & Ogie, O.
    (2011) Edo influence on Santome: evidence from verb serialization and beyond. In C. Lefebvre (Eds.), Creoles, their substrates, and language typology (pp. 37–60). Amsterdam, John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.95.05hag
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.95.05hag [Google Scholar]
  213. Haig, G.
    (2008) Alignment Change in Iranian Languages: A Construction Grammar Approach. Berlin and New York, Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110198614
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110198614 [Google Scholar]
  214. Hajek, J.
    (2006) Serial verbs in Tetun Dili. In A. Y. Aikhenvald & R. M. W. Dixon (Eds.), Serial Verb Constructions: a Cross-Linguistic Typology (pp. 239–253). Oxford, Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  215. Häkkinen, K.
    (1996) Suomalaisten esihistoria kielitieteen valossa. Tietolipas147. Helsinki, SKS.
    [Google Scholar]
  216. Hakulinen, L.
    (1979) Suomen kielen rakenne ja kehitys. (4th revised ed.). Otavan korkeakoulukirjasto. Helsinki, Otava.
    [Google Scholar]
  217. Hale, K. & Keyser, S. J.
    (1993) On argument structure and the lexical expression of grammatical relations. In K. Hale & S. J. Keyser (Eds.), The view from building20 (pp. 53–109). Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  218. (2002) Prolegomenon to a Theory of Argument Structure. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/5634.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/5634.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  219. Halle, M.
    (1997) Distributed Morphology: Impoverishment and Fission. In B. Bruening , Y. Kang , & M. McGinnis (Eds.), PF: Papers at the Interface, MIT Working Papers in Linguistics30, (pp. 425–449). Cambridge, MA, MITWPL.
    [Google Scholar]
  220. Halle, M. & Marantz, A.
    (1993) Distributed Morphology and the Pieces of Inflection. In K. Hale & S. J. Keyser (Eds.), The view from building20 (pp. 111–176). Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  221. Hanske, T.
    (2007) Ditransitive constructions in Vietnamese: How to integrate serial verb constructions and systemic zero-anaphora in a typology of alignment patterns. Paper Presented at theConference on Ditransitive Constructions, 23–25November 2007 Leipzig, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology.
    [Google Scholar]
  222. Harley, H.
    (2002) Possession and the Double Object Construction. Linguistic Variation Yearbook, 2, 29–68. 10.1075/livy.2.04har
    https://doi.org/10.1075/livy.2.04har [Google Scholar]
  223. (2008) When is a Syncretism more than a Syncretism?In D. Harbour , D. Adger & S. Béjar (Eds.), Phi-Theory: Phi-features across Interfaces and Modules (pp. 251–294). Oxford, Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780199213764.003.0009
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199213764.003.0009 [Google Scholar]
  224. (2009) The morphology of nominalizations and the syntax of vP. In A. Giannakidou & M. Rathert (Eds.), Quantification, Definiteness and Nominalization (pp. 321–343). Oxford, Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  225. (2013) External arguments and the Mirror Principle: On the distinctness of Voice and v. Lingua, 125, 34-57. 10.1016/j.lingua.2012.09.010
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2012.09.010 [Google Scholar]
  226. Haspelmath, M.
    (1993) A Grammar of Lezgian. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110884210
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110884210 [Google Scholar]
  227. (2013) Expletive subject of existential verb. In S. M. Michaelis , P. Maurer , M. Haspelmath & M. Huber (Eds.), Atlas of Pidgin and Creole Language Structures Online, Leipzig, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. (Available online atapics-online.info/).
    [Google Scholar]
  228. (2019) Differential place marking and differential object marking. STUF - Language Typology and Universals, 72(3), 313-334. 10.1515/stuf‑2019‑0013
    https://doi.org/10.1515/stuf-2019-0013 [Google Scholar]
  229. Haspelmath, M. , & Michaelis, S.
    (2008) Leipzig fourmille de typologues: Genitive objects in comparison. In G. Corbett , & M. Noonan (Eds.), Case and grammatical relations: Studies in honor of Bernard Comrie (pp. 149–166). Amsterdam, John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.81.08has
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.81.08has [Google Scholar]
  230. Heine, B.
    (1997) Possession. Cognitive sources, forces, and grammaticalization. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511581908
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511581908 [Google Scholar]
  231. Heine, B. & König, C.
    (2010) On the linear order of ditransitive objects. Language Sciences, 32, 87–131. 10.1016/j.langsci.2008.07.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2008.07.002 [Google Scholar]
  232. Heine, B. , & Kuteva, T.
    (2002) World lexicon of grammaticalization. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511613463
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511613463 [Google Scholar]
  233. Hemmings, C.
    (2013) Causatives and applicatives: The case for polysemy in Javanese. SOAS Working Papers in Linguistics, 16, 167–194.
    [Google Scholar]
  234. Higginbotham, J.
    (1985) On Semantics. Linguistic Inquiry, 16, 547–621.
    [Google Scholar]
  235. (2009) Tense, Aspect, and Indexicality. Oxford, Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199239313.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199239313.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  236. Hoekstra, T.
    (1999) Parallels between nominal and verbal projections. In D. Adger , S. Pintzuk , B. Plunkett , & G. Tsoulas (Eds.), Specifiers: Minimalist approaches (pp. 163–187). Oxford, Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780198238133.003.0009
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198238133.003.0009 [Google Scholar]
  237. Hohnerlein-Buchinger, T.
    (1996) Per un sublessico vitivinicolo. La storia materiale e linguistica di alcuni nomi di viti e vini italiani. Tübingen, Niemeyer. 10.1515/9783110930993
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110930993 [Google Scholar]
  238. Holm, J. , & Patrick P. L.
    (2007) Comparative Creole Syntax (Eds.). London/Colombo, Battlebridge.
    [Google Scholar]
  239. Holmberg, A.
    (2002) Prepositions and PPs in Zina Kotoko. In B. Kappel Schmidt , D. Odden , & A. Holmberg (Eds.), Some Aspects of the Grammar of Zina Kotoko (pp. 162–174). Munich, Lincom Europa.
    [Google Scholar]
  240. Hualde, J. I.
    (1992) Catalan (Descriptive Grammars). London, Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  241. Huang, C.-T. J. , Li, Y.-H. A. , & Li, Y.
    (2009) The Syntax of Chinese. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139166935
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139166935 [Google Scholar]
  242. Huumo, T. , & Ojutkangas, K.
    (2006) An introduction to Finnish spatial relations: Local cases and adpositions. In M-L. Helasvuo & L. Campbell (Eds.), Grammar from the human perspective: Case, space and person in Finnish (pp. 11–20). Amsterdam, John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.277.04huu
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.277.04huu [Google Scholar]
  243. Intumbo, I. , Inverno, L. & Holm, J.
    (2013) Guinea-Bissau Kriyol structure dataset. In S. M. Michaelis , P. Maurer , M. Haspelmath & M. Huber (Eds.), Atlas of Pidgin and Creole Language Structures Online, Leipzig, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. (Available online atapics-online.info/).
    [Google Scholar]
  244. Itkonen, T.
    (1997) Reflections on PreUralic and the Saami-Finnic protolanguage. Finnisch-Ugrische Forschungen, 54, 229–266.
    [Google Scholar]
  245. Jackendoff, R.
    (1983) Semantics and Cognition. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  246. Jacob, J. , & Grimes, C.
    (2011) Aspect and directionality in Kupang Malay serial verb constructions: Calquing on the grammars of substrate languages. In C. Lefebvre (Ed.), Creoles, their substrates, and language typology (pp. 337–366). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.95.20jac
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.95.20jac [Google Scholar]
  247. Jakobson, R.
    (1936) Contribution to the General Theory of Case: General Meanings of the Russian Cases. In L. Waugh & M. Halle (Eds.), Roman Jakobson. Russian and Slavic Grammar: Studies 1931–1981 (pp. 59–103). Berlin, Mouton De Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  248. Jansen, B , Koopman, H. , & Muysken, P.
    (1978) Serial verbs in the creole languages. Amsterdam Creole Studies, 2, 125–159.
    [Google Scholar]
  249. Jeong, Y.
    (2007) Applicatives: Structure and interpretation from a minimalist perspective. Amsterdam, John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.104
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.104 [Google Scholar]
  250. Jerro, K.
    (2017) The causative–instrumental syncretism. Journal of Linguistics, 53, 751–788. 10.1017/S0022226717000044
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226717000044 [Google Scholar]
  251. Jóhannsdóttir, K.
    (2012) Aspects of the progressive in English and Icelandic. PhD Dissertation, University of British Columbia.
    [Google Scholar]
  252. Johns, A.
    (1992) Deriving ergativity. Linguistic Inquiry, 23, 57–87.
    [Google Scholar]
  253. Johns, A. & Thurgood, B.
    (2011) Axial Parts in Inuktitut and Uzbeki. Proceedings of the 2011 annual conference of the Canadian Linguistic Association.
    [Google Scholar]
  254. Josselin de Jong, J.P.B. de
    . (1926) Het huidige Negerhollandsch (teksten en woordenlijst). Amsterdam, Koninklijke Academie van Wetenschappen te Amsterdam.
    [Google Scholar]
  255. Jurafsky, D.
    (1996) Universal tendencies in the semantics of the diminutive. Language, 72(3), 533–578. 10.2307/416278
    https://doi.org/10.2307/416278 [Google Scholar]
  256. Karimi, S.
    (1997) Persian complex predicates and LF incorporation. Proceedings of the Chicago Linguistic Society(CLS), 33, 215–229.
    [Google Scholar]
  257. Karimi, S , & Brame, M.
    (1986) A generalization concerning the Ezafe construction in Persian. West Coast Conference in Linguistics(WECOL 86), Vancouver, Canada
    [Google Scholar]
  258. Kayne, R.
    (1975) French syntax: the transformational cycle. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  259. (1984) Connectedness and binary branching. Dordrecht, Foris. 10.1515/9783111682228
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783111682228 [Google Scholar]
  260. (1994) The Antisymmetry of Syntax. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  261. (2004a) ‘Here and There’. In C. Leclère , É. Laporte , M. Piot , & M. Silberztein (Eds.), Lexique, syntaxe, et lexique-grammaire (Syntax, Lexis, and Lexicon-Grammar): Papers in Honour of Maurice Gross (Lingvisticæ Investigationes Supplementa, 24) (pp. 275–285). Amsterdam, John Benjamins. 10.1075/lis.24.23kay
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lis.24.23kay [Google Scholar]
  262. (2004b) Prepositions as Probes. In A. Belletti (Ed.), Structures and Beyond: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, vol. 3 (pp. 192–212). New York, Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780195171976.003.0006
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195171976.003.0006 [Google Scholar]
  263. (2005) Movement and Silence. Oxford, Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195179163.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195179163.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  264. (2007) A Short Note on Where vs. Place. In R. Maschi , N. Penello , & P. Rizzolatti (Eds.), Miscellanea di studi liguistici offerti a Laura Vanelli da amici e allievi padovani (245–257). Udine, Forum.
    [Google Scholar]
  265. (2010) Comparisons and contrasts. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  266. Keenan, E.
    (1987) A semantic definition of indefinite NP. In E. Reuland & A. ter Meulen (Eds.), The representation of (in)definiteness (pp. 286–317). Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  267. Kenesei , István , Vago, R. M. , & Fenyvesi, A.
    (1998) Hungarian. London, Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  268. Kim, K.
    (2012) Argument Structure Licensing and English have. Journal of Linguistics, 48(1), 71–105. 10.1017/S0022226711000168
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226711000168 [Google Scholar]
  269. Kimenyi, A.
    (1980) A Relational Grammar of Kinyarwanda. University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  270. Kiparsky, P.
    (2001) Structural Case in Finnish. Lingua, 111, 315–376. 10.1016/S0024‑3841(00)00035‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-3841(00)00035-8 [Google Scholar]
  271. Kittilä, S. & Ylikoski, J.
    (2011) Remarks on the coding of Goal, Recipient, and Vicinal Goal in European Uralic. In S. Kittilä , K. Västi , & J. Ylikoski (Eds.), Case, Animacy and Semantic Rolespp. (29–64). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.99.02kit
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.99.02kit [Google Scholar]
  272. Klingler, T. A.
    (2003) ‘If I could turn my tongue like that’: The Creole Language of Pointe Coupee Parish, Louisiana. Baton Rouge/London, Louisiana State University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  273. Koopman, H.
    (1984) The syntax of Verbs: from Verb movement rules in the Kru languages to Universal Grammar. Dordrecht, Foris.
    [Google Scholar]
  274. (2000) Prepositions, postpositions, circumpositions, and particles. In Hilda Koopman (Ed.), The Syntax of Specifiers and Heads (pp. 204–260). London, Routledge. 10.4324/9780203171608
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203171608 [Google Scholar]
  275. Kouwenberg, S.
    (2013) Papiamentu structure dataset. In S. M. Michaelis , P. Maurer , M. Haspelmath & M. Huber (Eds.), Atlas of Pidgin and Creole Language Structures Online, Leipzig, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. (Available online atapics-online.info/).
    [Google Scholar]
  276. Kracht, M.
    (2002) On the semantics of locatives. Linguistics and Philosophy, 25, 157–232. 10.1023/A:1014646826099
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014646826099 [Google Scholar]
  277. Kripke, S.
    (1980) Naming and Necessity. Cambridge, Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  278. Kulikov, L.
    (2009) Evolution of Case Systems. In A. Malchukov & A. Spencer (Eds), The Oxford Handbook of Case (pp. 439–457). Oxford, Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  279. Künnap, A.
    (1999) Enets. München, Lincom Europa.
    [Google Scholar]
  280. Kuo, P-J.
    (2010) Transitivity and the ba construction. Taiwan Journal of Linguistics, 8(1), 95–128.
    [Google Scholar]
  281. La Fauci, N. & Loporcaro, M.
    (1993) Grammatical relations and syntactic levels in Bonorvese morphosyntax. In A. Belletti (Ed.), Syntactic Theory and the Dialects of Italy (pp. 155–203). Torino, Rosenberg & Sellier.
    [Google Scholar]
  282. Laalo, K.
    (2009) Acquisition of Case and Plural in Finnish. In U. Stephany & M. Voeikova (Eds.), Development of Nominal Inflection in first Language Acquisition: a Cross-Linguistic Perspective (pp49–90). Berlin, Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110217117.49
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110217117.49 [Google Scholar]
  283. Landman, F.
    (1992) The progressive. Natural Language Semantics, 1, 1–32. 10.1007/BF02342615
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02342615 [Google Scholar]
  284. Larson, R. , & Yamakido, H.
    (2008) Ezafe and the deep position of nominal modifiers. In L. McNally & C. Kennedy (Eds.), Adjectives and adverbs: Syntax, semantics and discourse (pp. 43–70). Oxford, Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780199211616.003.0003
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199211616.003.0003 [Google Scholar]
  285. Larson, R. , & V. Samiian
    (2020) The Ezafe construction revisited. In R. Larson , S. Moradi & V. Samiian (Eds.), Advances in Iranian Linguistics (pp. 173–236). Amsterdam, John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.351.10lar
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.351.10lar [Google Scholar]
  286. Larson, R.
    (1988) On the double object construction. Linguistic Inquiry, 19(3), 335–392.
    [Google Scholar]
  287. Laury, R.
    (1997) Demonstratives in interaction: The emergence of a definite article in Finnish. Amsterdam, John Benjamins. 10.1075/sidag.7
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sidag.7 [Google Scholar]
  288. Lazard, G.
    (1957) Grammaire du persan contemporain. Parigi, Klincksieck.
    [Google Scholar]
  289. Ledgeway, A.
    (2020) The causative construction in the dialects of southern Italy and the phonology syntax interface. In L. Franco , & P. Lorusso (Eds.), Linguistic Variation: Structure and Interpretation (pp. 371–400). Berlin, Mouton De Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  290. Lefebvre, C.
    (1991) Take serial verb constructions in Fon. In C. Lefebvre (Ed.), Serial verbs: Grammatical, comparative and cognitive approaches (pp. 37–78). Amsterdam, John Benjamins. 10.1075/ssls.8.03lef
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ssls.8.03lef [Google Scholar]
  291. (1998) Creole genesis and the acquisition of grammar: The case of Haitian Creole. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  292. Legate, J. A.
    (2014) Voice and v: Lessons from Acehnese. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/9780262028141.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262028141.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  293. Lehmann, C.
    (2018) Foundations of Body-PartGrammar, manuscript, University of Erfort.
    [Google Scholar]
  294. Lehtinen, T.
    (2007) Kielen vuosituhannet. Helsinki, SKS.
    [Google Scholar]
  295. Lekakou, M. & Szendrői, K.
    (2012) Polydefinites in Greek: Ellipsis, close apposition and expletive determiners. Journal of Linguistics, 48, 107–149. 10.1017/S0022226711000326
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226711000326 [Google Scholar]
  296. Leonetti, M.
    (2008) Definiteness Effects and the Role of the Coda in Existential Constructions. In H. Hoeg-Müller & A. Klinge (Eds.), Essays on Nominal Determination (pp. 131–162). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.99.09leo
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.99.09leo [Google Scholar]
  297. Levi, J. N.
    (1978) The Syntax and Semantics of Complex Nominals. New York, Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  298. Levinson, L.
    (2011) Possessive WITH in Germanic: HAVE and the role of P. Syntax, 14(4), 355–393. 10.1111/j.1467‑9612.2011.00159.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9612.2011.00159.x [Google Scholar]
  299. Li, C. N. , & Thompson, S, A.
    (1976) Subject and topic: a new typology of language. In C. N. Li (Ed.), Subject and Topic (pp. 457–461). Austin, University of Texas Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  300. (1981) Mandarin Chinese: a Functional Reference Grammar. Berkeley, University of California Press. 10.1525/9780520352858
    https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520352858 [Google Scholar]
  301. Li, Y.
    (1993) Structural head and aspectuality. Language, 69(3), 480–504. 10.2307/416696
    https://doi.org/10.2307/416696 [Google Scholar]
  302. Lim, L. & Ansaldo, U.
    (2013) Singlish structure dataset. In S. M. Michaelis , P. Maurer , M. Haspelmath & M. Huber (Eds.), Atlas of Pidgin and Creole Language Structures Online, Leipzig, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. (Available online atapics-online.info/).
    [Google Scholar]
  303. Link, G.
    (1983) The Logical Analysis of Plurals and Mass Terms: A Lattice-theoretical Approach. In R. Bäuerle , C. Schwarze & A. von Stechow (Eds.), Meaning, Use, and Interpretation of Language, (pp. 302–323). Berlin, De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110852820.302
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110852820.302 [Google Scholar]
  304. Longobardi, G.
    (1994) Reference and Proper Names: A Theory of N-Movement in Syntax and Logical Form. Linguistic Inquiry, 25, 609–665.
    [Google Scholar]
  305. (1996). The Syntax of N-Raising: A Minimalist Theory. OTS Working Papers. Utrecht, Utrecht University.
    [Google Scholar]
  306. (2001) Formal syntax, diachronic minimalism, and etymology: The history of French chez . Linguistic Inquiry, 32, 275–302. 10.1162/00243890152001771
    https://doi.org/10.1162/00243890152001771 [Google Scholar]
  307. (2005) Toward a Unified Grammar of Reference. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft, 24, 5–44. 10.1515/zfsw.2005.24.1.5
    https://doi.org/10.1515/zfsw.2005.24.1.5 [Google Scholar]
  308. (2008) Reference to individuals, person, and the variety of mapping parameters. In A. Klinge & H. Høeg Müller (Eds.), Essays on Nominal Determination: from morphology to discourse (pp. 189–211). Amsterdam, John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.99.11lon
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.99.11lon [Google Scholar]
  309. Lord, C.
    (1989) Syntactic reanalysis in the historical development of serial verb constructions in languages of West Africa, PhD dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.
    [Google Scholar]
  310. (1993) Historical Change in Serial Verb Constructions. Amsterdam, John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.26
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.26 [Google Scholar]
  311. Lorusso, P. , & Franco, L.
    (2017) Patterns of syntactic agreement with embedded NPs. Lingua, 195, 39–56. 10.1016/j.lingua.2017.06.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2017.06.001 [Google Scholar]
  312. Lovestrand, J.
    (2017) Temporal iconicity and verb order in instrumental SVCs. Hand-out of a talk given at SLE, 10 September 2017.
    [Google Scholar]
  313. (2018) Serial verb constructions in Barayin: Typology, description and Lexical­Functional Grammar. PhD dissertation, University of Oxford.
  314. Ludwig, R.
    (1996) Kreolsprachen zwischen Mündlichkeit und Schriftlichkeit. Zur Syntax und Pragmatik atlantischer Kreolsprachen auf französischer Basis. Tübingen, Gunter Narr.
    [Google Scholar]
  315. Luraghi S.
    (2003) On the Meaning of Prepositions and Cases. A Study of the Expression of Semantic Roles in Ancient Greek. Amsterdam, John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.67
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.67 [Google Scholar]
  316. (2011) The coding of spatial relations with human landmarks: From Latin to Romance. In S. Kittilä , K. Västi , & J. Ylikoski (Eds.), Case, Animacy and Semantic Roles (pp. 209–234). Amsterdam, John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.99.08lur
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.99.08lur [Google Scholar]
  317. Lyons, J.
    (1967) A note on possessive, existential and locative sentences. Foundations of Language, 3, 390–396.
    [Google Scholar]
  318. McGinnis, M.
    (1998) Locality in A-movement. PhD dissertation, MIT.
  319. Malchukov, A.
    (2008) Animacy and asymmetries in differential case marking. Lingua, 118(2), 203–221. 10.1016/j.lingua.2007.02.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2007.02.005 [Google Scholar]
  320. Manzini, M. R. , & Wexler, K.
    (1987) Parameters, Binding Theory, and Learnability. Linguistic Inquiry, 18, 413–444.
    [Google Scholar]
  321. Manzini, M. R. , & Savoia L. M.
    (2002) Parameters of subject inflection in Italian dialects. In P. Svenonius (Eds.), Subjects, Expletives and the EPP (pp. 157–199). New York, Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780195142242.003.0007
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195142242.003.0007 [Google Scholar]
  322. Manzini, M. R. , & Savoia L. M.
    (2005) I dialetti italiani e romanci. Morfosintassi generativa (3volumes) Alessandria, Edizioni dell’Orso.
    [Google Scholar]
  323. Manzini, M. R. , & Savoia L. M.
    (2007) A unification of morphology and syntax. Studies in Romance and Albanian varieties. London, Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  324. (2011a) Grammatical categories. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511974489
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511974489 [Google Scholar]
  325. (2011b) Reducing ‘case’ to denotational primitives: Nominal inflections in Albanian. Linguistic Variation, 11(1), 76–120. 10.1075/lv.11.1.03man
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lv.11.1.03man [Google Scholar]
  326. Manzini, M. R.
    (2014) Grammatical categories: Strong and weak pronouns in Romance. Lingua, 150, 171–201. 10.1016/j.lingua.2014.07.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2014.07.001 [Google Scholar]
  327. Manzini, M. R. & Savoia, L. M.
    (2014) From Latin to Romance: case loss and preservation in pronominal systems. Probus, 26(2), 217-248. 10.1515/probus‑2014‑0008
    https://doi.org/10.1515/probus-2014-0008 [Google Scholar]
  328. Manzini, M. R. , Savoia, L. M. , & Franco, L.
    (2015) Ergative case, Aspect and Person splits: Two case studies. Acta Linguistica Hungarica, 62(3), 297–351. 10.1556/064.2015.62.3.3
    https://doi.org/10.1556/064.2015.62.3.3 [Google Scholar]
  329. Manzini, M. R. , & Franco, L.
    (2016) Goal and DOM datives. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 34, 197–240. 10.1007/s11049‑015‑9303‑y
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-015-9303-y [Google Scholar]
  330. Manzini, M. R.
    (2017) Passive, smuggling and the by-phrase. In N. LaCara , K. Moulton & A-M. Tessier (Eds.), A Schrift to Fest Kyle Johnson (pp. 233–244). University of Massachusets – Amherst.
    [Google Scholar]
  331. Manzini, M. R. , & Savoia L. M.
    (2017a) N morphology and its interpretation: The neuter in Italian and Albanian varieties. In A. Bloch-Rozmej & A. Bondaruk (Eds.), Constraints on Structure and Derivation in Syntax, Phonology and Morphology (pp. 213–236). Frankfurt am Main, Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  332. (2017b) Gender, number and inflectional class in Romance: Feminine/plural –a . In  J. Emonds & M. Janebova (Eds.), Language Use and Linguistic Structure (pp. 263–282). Olomouc, Palacky University Olomouc.
    [Google Scholar]
  333. (2018) The Morphosyntax of Albanian and Aromanian Varieties. Berlin, Mouton De Gruyter. 10.1515/9781501505140
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501505140 [Google Scholar]
  334. Manzini, M. R. , & Franco, L.
    (2019) ‘Agreement of structural obliques’ parameter. Lingvisticae Investigationes, 42(1), 82–101. 10.1075/li.00030.man
    https://doi.org/10.1075/li.00030.man [Google Scholar]
  335. Manzini, M. R. , Franco, L. , & Savoia, L. M.
    (2019) Suffixaufnahme, Oblique Case and Agree. In L. Franco , M. Marchis Moreno , & M. Reeve (Eds.), Agreement, Case and Locality in the Nominal and Verbal Domains (pp. 211–255). Berlin, Language Science Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  336. Manzini, M. R. , Savoia, L. M. , & Franco, L.
    (2020) DOM and Dative in Italo-Romance. In A. Bárány & L. Kalin (Eds.), Case, agreement, and their interactions: New perspectives on Differential Object Marking, Berlin, De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110666137‑006
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110666137-006 [Google Scholar]
  337. Manzini, M. R.
    (2020) The morphosyntactic structure of number in Italian and Albanian. High and low plurals. Catalan Journal of Linguistics, 19, 127–157. 10.5565/rev/catjl.319
    https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/catjl.319 [Google Scholar]
  338. Marantz, A.
    (1984) On the nature of grammatical relations. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  339. (1993) Implications of asymmetries in double object constructions. In S. Mchombo (Ed.), Theoretical aspects of Bantu grammar (pp. 113–150). Stanford, CA, CSLI.
    [Google Scholar]
  340. Marantz, A.
    (1997) No escape from syntax: Don’t try morphological analysis in the privacy of your own lexicon. In A. Dimitriadis (Ed.), UPenn working papers in linguistics, vol. 4.2 (pp. 201–225). Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania.
    [Google Scholar]
  341. Marantz, A.
    (2007) Phases and words. In S. H. Choe (Ed.), Phases in the Theory of Grammar (pp. 191–222). Seul, Dong-In Publishing Company.
    [Google Scholar]
  342. Marchis Moreno, M.
    (2010) Relational adjectives at the Syntax/Morphology Interface in Romanian and Spanish. PhD Dissertation, Stuttgart University.
    [Google Scholar]
  343. (2015) Relational adjectives at interfaces. Studia Linguistica, 69(3), 304–332. 10.1111/stul.12038
    https://doi.org/10.1111/stul.12038 [Google Scholar]
  344. 2018Relational Adjectives in Romance and English Mismatches at Interfaces. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108290401
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108290401 [Google Scholar]
  345. Marchis Moreno, M. , & Franco, L.
    (2020) Intervention in agreement and case assignment: the role of doubling. Quaderni di Linguistica e Studi Orientali – QULSO6, 125–159.
    [Google Scholar]
  346. Markey, T. L.
    (1982) Afrikaans: Creole or Non-Creole?Zeitschrift für Dialektologie und Linguistik, 49(2), 169–207.
    [Google Scholar]
  347. Marten, L.
    (2002) At the Syntax-Pragmatics Interface. Oxford, Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199250639.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199250639.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  348. Masi, S.
    (2020) Variation in the Possession of kinship terms in the Dialects of Italy. Proceedings of the 2020 CLA – Canadian Linguistic Association meeting.
    [Google Scholar]
  349. Mathieu, E.
    (2012) Flavors of division. Linguistic Inquiry, 43, 650–679. 10.1162/ling_a_00110
    https://doi.org/10.1162/ling_a_00110 [Google Scholar]
  350. Matisoff, J. A.
    (1991) Areal and universal dimensions of grammatization in Lahu. In E. C. Traugott & B. Heine (Eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization, Vol. 2 (pp. 383–453). Amsterdam & Philadelphia, John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.19.2.19mat
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.19.2.19mat [Google Scholar]
  351. Matushansky, O.
    (2009) On the linguistic complexity of proper names. Linguistics and Philosophy, 31, 573–627. 10.1007/s10988‑008‑9050‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-008-9050-1 [Google Scholar]
  352. Maurer, P.
    (1995) L’angolar. Un créole afro-portugais parlé à São Tomé. Notes de grammaire, textes, vocabulaire. Hamburg, Buske.
    [Google Scholar]
  353. (2009) Principense. Grammar, texts, and vocabulary of the Afro-Portuguese Creole of the Island of Príncipe, Gulf of Guinea. London/Colombo, Battlebridge.
    [Google Scholar]
  354. (2011) The former Portuguese Creole of Batavia and Tugu (Indonesia). London/Colombo, Battlebridge.
    [Google Scholar]
  355. (2013) Angolar structure dataset. In S. M. Michaelis , P. Maurer , M. Haspelmath & M. Huber (Eds.), Atlas of Pidgin and Creole Language Structures Online, Leipzig, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. (Available online atapics-online.info/).
    [Google Scholar]
  356. Mazzoli, M.
    (2015) Complexity in gradience: the serial verb take in Nigerian Pidgin. In A. D. M. Smith , G. Trousdale & R. Waltereit (Eds.), New Directions in Grammaticalization Research (pp. 231–260). Amsterdam, John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.166.11maz
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.166.11maz [Google Scholar]
  357. McDonnell, B. J.
    (2013) Toward an integrated typology of causative/applicative syncretism. Hand-out of a talk given at Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany, October 9, 2013.
    [Google Scholar]
  358. McNally, L.
    (1992) An interpretation for the English existential construction. New York, Garland.
    [Google Scholar]
  359. McNally, L. , & Boleda, G.
    (2004) Relational adjectives as properties of kinds. In O. Bonami & P. Cabredo Hofherr (Eds.), Empirical Issues in Syntax and Semantics vol. 5 (pp. 179–196). www.cssp.cnrs.fr/eiss5
    [Google Scholar]
  360. McNally, L.
    (2011) Existential sentences. In C. Maienborn , K. von Heusinger & P. Portner (Eds.), Semantics: An International Handbook of Natural Language Meaning, vol. 2 (pp. 1829–1848). Berlin, De Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  361. McWhorter, John H.
    (2005) Defining Creole. New York, Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780195166699.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195166699.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  362. McWhorter, J. H.
    (2011) Tying up Loose Ends: The Creole Prototype after all. Diachronica, 28(1), 82–117. 10.1075/dia.28.1.04mcw
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.28.1.04mcw [Google Scholar]
  363. Merlini Barbaresi, L.
    (2004) Alterazione. In M. Grossmann & F. Rainer (Eds.), La formazione delle parole in italiano (pp. 264–292). Tübingen: Niemeyer.
    [Google Scholar]
  364. Meyer-Lübke, W.
    (1911) Romanisches etymologisches Wörterbuch. Heidelberg, C. Winter.Available online at: www.archive.org.
    [Google Scholar]
  365. Michaelis, S. M. , & Haspelmath, M.
    (2003) Ditransitive constructions: Creole languages in a cross-linguistic perspective. Creolica www.creolica.net/Ditransitive-constructions-Creole
    [Google Scholar]
  366. Michaelis, S. M. , & Marcel, R.
    (2013) Seychelles Creole. In S. M. Michaelis , P. Maurer , M. Haspelmath & M. Huber (Eds.), The survey of pidgin and creole languages. Vol. II: Portuguese-based, Spanish-based and French-based languages (pp. 261–270). Oxford, Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  367. Michaelis, S. M. , Maurer, P. , Haspelmath, M. & Huber M.
    (Eds.) (2013) Atlas of Pidgin and Creole Language Structures Online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. apics-online.info
    [Google Scholar]
  368. Milsark, G. L.
    (1974) Existential Sentences in English. PhD Dissertation. MIT.
    [Google Scholar]
  369. Montaut, A.
    (2004) Oblique main arguments in Hindi as localizing predications. Questioning the category of subject. In P. Bhaskararao & K. V. Subbarao (Eds.), Non nominative subjects (pp. 33–56). Amsterdam, John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.61.04mon
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.61.04mon [Google Scholar]
  370. Moro, A.
    (1997) The Raising of Predicates. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511519956
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511519956 [Google Scholar]
  371. (2017) Existential Sentences and Expletive There. In M. Everaert & H. C. van Riemsdijk (Eds.), The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Syntax, Second Edition (pp. 1483-1508). Hoboken, NJ, John Wiley & Sons. 10.1002/9781118358733.wbsyncom044.
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118358733.wbsyncom044 [Google Scholar]
  372. Moyne, J.
    (1974) The so-called Passive in Persian. Foundation of Language, 12, 249–267.
    [Google Scholar]
  373. Müller, G.
    (2007) Notes on Paradigm Economy. Morphology, 17(1), 1–38. 10.1007/s11525‑007‑9114‑x
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11525-007-9114-x [Google Scholar]
  374. Munro, P.
    (2000) The Leaky Grammar of the Chickasaw Applicatives. Chicago Linguistic Society, 36, 285–310.
    [Google Scholar]
  375. Muysken, P.
    (1981) Halfway between Quechua and Spanish: The case for relexification. In A. Highfield & A. Valdman (Eds.), Historicity and variation in creole studies (pp. 52–78). Ann Arbor, Karoma.
    [Google Scholar]
  376. (1988) Parameters for serial verbs. In V. Manfredi (Ed.), Niger-Congo Syntax and Semantics, 1, 65–75. Boston, Boston University African Studies Center.
    [Google Scholar]
  377. Muysken, P. , & Veenstra, T.
    (1995) Serial verb constructions. In J. Arends , P. Muysken & N. Smith (Eds.), Pidgins and creoles: an introduction (pp. 289–301). Amsterdam, John Benjamins. 10.1075/cll.15.30muy
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cll.15.30muy [Google Scholar]
  378. Muysken, P.
    (1999) Three processes of borrowing: Borrowability revisited. In G. Extra & L. Verhoeven (Eds.), Bilingualism and Migration (pp. 229–246). Berlin, Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110807820.229
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110807820.229 [Google Scholar]
  379. Muysken, P. , & Veenstra, T.
    (2006) Serial verbs. In M. Everaert & H. C. van Riemsdijk (Eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Syntax, Vol. IV (pp. 234–270). Malden, Blackwell. 10.1002/9780470996591.ch59
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470996591.ch59 [Google Scholar]
  380. Myler, N.
    (2014) Building and Interpreting Possession Sentences. PhD Dissertation, New York University.
    [Google Scholar]
  381. (2016) Building and Interpreting Possession Sentences. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/9780262034913.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262034913.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  382. Naderi, N.
    (2010) Semantic and Pragmatics of Grammatical Voice in Farsi. MA Thesis, Leiden, Leiden University Center for Linguistics (LUCL).
    [Google Scholar]
  383. Næss, Å.
    (2008) Prototypical transitivity. Amsterdam, John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.72
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.72 [Google Scholar]
  384. Nemati, F.
    (2013) On the syntax-semantics of passives in Persian. In A. Alexiadou , & F. Schäfer , (Eds.), Non-Canonical Passives (pp. 261–280). Amsterdam, John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.205.12nem
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.205.12nem [Google Scholar]
  385. Nichols, J.
    (1986) Head-marking and dependent-marking grammar. Language, 62, 56–119. 10.1353/lan.1986.0014
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1986.0014 [Google Scholar]
  386. Nikolaeva, I.
    (1999) Ostyak. München, Lincom Europa.
    [Google Scholar]
  387. (2014) A Grammar of Tundra Nenets. Berlin, De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110320640
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110320640 [Google Scholar]
  388. Nikolaeva, I. , & Spencer, A.
    (2013) Possession and modification: A perspective from Canonical Typology. In D. Brown , M. Chumakina , & G. Corbett (Eds.), Canonical morphology and syntax (pp. 207–238). Oxford, Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  389. Nishina, Y.
    (2001) Comitative and Instrumental in Japanese. STUF-Language Typology and Universals, 54, 346–364. 10.1524/stuf.2001.54.4.346
    https://doi.org/10.1524/stuf.2001.54.4.346 [Google Scholar]
  390. Nordlinger, R.
    (2019) From body part to applicative: Encoding ‘source’ in Murrinhpatha. Linguistic Typology, 23(3), 401–433. 10.1515/lingty‑2019‑0023
    https://doi.org/10.1515/lingty-2019-0023 [Google Scholar]
  391. Noyer, R.
    (1992) Features, Positions and Affixes in Autonomous Morphological Structure. PhD Dissertation, MIT.
    [Google Scholar]
  392. Ott, D.
    (2011) Diminutive-formation in German. Spelling out the Classifier Analysis. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics, 14, 1–46. 10.1007/s10828‑010‑9040‑x
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10828-010-9040-x [Google Scholar]
  393. Oyelaran, O.
    (1982) On the scope of the serial verb construction in Yoruba. Studies in African Linguistics, 13(2), 109-146.
    [Google Scholar]
  394. Palancar, E.
    (2002) The Origin of Agent Markers. Berlin, Akademie Verlag. 10.1524/9783050081410
    https://doi.org/10.1524/9783050081410 [Google Scholar]
  395. Paul, D.
    (2004) The passive in Persian. SOAS Working Papers in Linguistics, 13, 221–235.
    [Google Scholar]
  396. Pantcheva, M.
    (2006) Persian Preposition Classes. Nordlyd, 33, 1–25.
    [Google Scholar]
  397. (2010) The syntactic structure of Locations, Goals, and Sources. Linguistics, 48, 1043–1081. 10.1515/ling.2010.034
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.2010.034 [Google Scholar]
  398. (2011) Decomposing Path: The Nanosyntax of Directional Expressions. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Tromsø.
    [Google Scholar]
  399. Parsons, T.
    1979 An Analysis of Mass Terms and Amount Terms. In F. J. Pelletier (Ed.), Mass terms: some philosophical problems (pp. 137–166). Dordrecht, Springer.
    [Google Scholar]
  400. Partee, B. H.
    (2007) Compositionality and Coercion in Semantics: The Dynamics of Adjective Meaning. In G. Bouma , I. Kramer , & J. Zwarts (Eds.), Cognitive Foundations of Interpretation (pp. 145–161). Amsterdam, Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences.
    [Google Scholar]
  401. Peck, S. M. Jr.
    (1988) Tense, aspect and mood in Guinea-Casamance Portuguese Creole. Ph. D. Dissertation, University of California.
    [Google Scholar]
  402. Percus, O.
    (2011) Gender features and interpretation: a case study. Morphology, 21, 167–196. 10.1007/s11525‑010‑9157‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11525-010-9157-2 [Google Scholar]
  403. Pesetsky, D.
    (1995) Zero syntax. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  404. Peterson, D.
    (2007) Applicative constructions. Oxford, Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780199270927.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199270927.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  405. Pfänder, S.
    (2013) Guyanais structure dataset. In S. M. Michaelis , P. Maurer , M. Haspelmath & M. Huber (Eds.), Atlas of Pidgin and Creole Language Structures Online, Leipzig, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. (Available online atapics-online.info/).
    [Google Scholar]
  406. Pham, M.
    (2011) Are Vietnamese kinship terms pronouns?Ms.University of Chicago.
    [Google Scholar]
  407. Pineda, A.
    (2014) (In)transitivity borders. A study of applicatives in Romance languages and Basque. PhD Dissertation, UAB.
    [Google Scholar]
  408. Plank, Frans
    . (1995) (Re-)Introducing Suffixaufnahme. In F. Plank (Ed.), Double Case. Agreement by Suffixaufnahme (pp. 3–112). Oxford, Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780195087758.003.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195087758.003.0001 [Google Scholar]
  409. Post, M.
    (1995) Fa d’Ambu. In J. Arends , P. Muysken , & N. Smith (Eds.), Pidgins and creoles: an introduction (pp. 191–204). Amsterdam, John Benjamins. 10.1075/cll.15.22pos
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cll.15.22pos [Google Scholar]
  410. (1999) Crioulos de Base Portuguesa. Lisboa, Associação Portuguesa de Linguística, FLUL.
    [Google Scholar]
  411. (2013) Fa d’Ambô structure dataset. In S. M. Michaelis , P. Maurer , M. Haspelmath & M. Huber (Eds.), Atlas of Pidgin and Creole Language Structures Online, Leipzig, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. (Available online atapics-online.info/).
    [Google Scholar]
  412. Pylkkänen, L.
    (2002) Introducing arguments. PhD Dissertation, MIT.
    [Google Scholar]
  413. (2008) Introducing arguments. Cambridge, MA, MIT press. 10.7551/mitpress/9780262162548.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262162548.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  414. Rainer, F.
    (1996) Copernicano e luterano: sul ruolo del latino nella derivazione deantroponimica italiana. Lingua Nostra, 57, 48–49.
    [Google Scholar]
  415. Quine, W.
    (1960). Word and object: An inquiry into the linguistic mechanisms of objective reference. John Wiley.
    [Google Scholar]
  416. Rainer, F.
    (2004) Etnici. In M. Grossmann & F. Rainer (Eds.), La formazione delle parole in italiano (pp. 402–408). Tübingen, Niemeyer.
    [Google Scholar]
  417. (2013) Can relational adjectives really express any relation? An onomasiological perspective. SKASE Journal of Theoretical Linguistics, 101, 12–40.
    [Google Scholar]
  418. Ramchand, G.
    (2011) Licensing of Instrumental Case in Hindi/Urdu Causatives. Nordlyd, 36, 1–38. 10.7557/12.2230
    https://doi.org/10.7557/12.2230 [Google Scholar]
  419. Reinhart, T.
    (2003) The theta-system – an overview. Theoretical Linguistics, 28, 229–290. 10.1515/thli.28.3.229
    https://doi.org/10.1515/thli.28.3.229 [Google Scholar]
  420. Ricca, D.
    (2004) Conversione in avverbi. In M. Grossmann & F. Rainer (Eds.), La formazione delle parole in italiano (pp. 550–553). Tübingen, Niemeyer.
    [Google Scholar]
  421. Richards, N.
    (2013) Lardil ‘‘Case Stacking’’ and the Timing of Case Assignment. Syntax, 16, 42–76. 10.1111/j.1467‑9612.2012.00169.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9612.2012.00169.x [Google Scholar]
  422. (2010) Uttering trees. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/9780262013765.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262013765.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  423. Rickford, J. R.
    (1987) Dimensions of a creole continuum: History, texts, and linguistic analysis of Guyanese Creole. Stanford, CA, Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  424. Riese, T.
    (2001) Vogul. München, Lincom Europa.
    [Google Scholar]
  425. Rigau, G.
    (1997) Locative sentences and related constructions in Catalan: “ésser/haver” alternation. In A. Mendikoetxea & M. Uribe-Etxebarría (Eds.), Theoretical Issues at the Morphology- Syntax Interface (pp. 395–421). Bilbao, Universidad del País Vasco.
    [Google Scholar]
  426. Rizzi, L.
    (1978) A Restructuring Rule in Italian Syntax. In S. J. Keyser (Ed.), Recent Transformational Studies in European Languages (pp. 113–158). Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  427. Rizzi, L.
    (1988) Il sintagma preposizionale. In L. Renzi , G. P. Salvi , & A. Cardinaletti (Eds.), Grande grammatica italiana di consultazione (pp. 507–531). Bologna, Il Mulino.
    [Google Scholar]
  428. Rizzi, L. , & Cinque, G.
    (2016) Functional Categories and Syntactic Theory. The Annual Review of Linguistics, 2, 139–163. 10.1146/annurev‑linguistics‑011415‑040827
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-linguistics-011415-040827 [Google Scholar]
  429. Roberts, S. J. , & Bresnan, J.
    (2008) Retained inflectional morphology in pidgins: A typological study. Linguistic Typology, 12(2), 269–302. 10.1515/LITY.2008.039
    https://doi.org/10.1515/LITY.2008.039 [Google Scholar]
  430. Rohlfs, G.
    (1969) Grammatica storica della lingua italiana e dei suoi dialetti, III. Sintassi e formazione delle parole. Torino, Einaudi.
    [Google Scholar]
  431. (1968). Grammatica Storica Della Lingua Italiana e dei Suoi Dialetti. Morfologia. Torino, Einaudi.
    [Google Scholar]
  432. Romaine, S.
    (1988) Pidgin and creole languages. London & New York, Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  433. Romeu, J.
    (2013) The nanosyntax of Path. Ms.Madrid.
    [Google Scholar]
  434. Ross, J.
    (1967) Constraints on variables in syntax. PhD. dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
    [Google Scholar]
  435. Roy, I.
    (2006) Body part nouns in expressions of location in French. Nordlyd, 33, 98–119.
    [Google Scholar]
  436. Roy, I. , & Svenonius, P.
    (2009) Complex prepositions. In F. Jacques , E. Gilbert , C. Guimier , & M. Krause (Eds.), Autour de la préposition, Actes du Colloque International de Caen (20–22 septembre 2007) (pp105–116). Caen, Presses Universitaires de Caen.
    [Google Scholar]
  437. Rugna, G. , & Franco, L.
    (2022) Prepositions as relators in Italian Prepositional Compounds. In M. Bril , M. Coene , T. Ihsane , P. Sleeman & T. Westveer (Eds.), RLLT 19, Special Issue of Isogloss. Open Journal of Romance Linguistics , 8(5), 11, 1–21. 10.5565/rev/isogloss.215
    https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/isogloss.215 [Google Scholar]
  438. Safir, K.
    (1983) Small clauses as constituents. Linguistic Inquiry, 14(4), 730–735.
    [Google Scholar]
  439. Samiian, V.
    (1983) Structure of phrasal categories in Persian: An X-bar analysis. Los Angeles, CA: UCLA dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  440. (1994) The Ezafe construction: Some implications for the theory of X-bar syntax. In M. Marashi (Ed.), Persian Studies in North America (pp. 17–41). Bethesda, MD, Iranbooks.
    [Google Scholar]
  441. Savoia, L. M. , Manzini, M. R. , Franco, L. , & Baldi, B.
    (2017) Nominal evaluative suffixes in Italian. In R. D’Alessandro , G. Iannàccaro , D. Passino , & A. M. Thornton (Eds.), Di tutti i colori. Studi linguistici per Maria Grossmann,. avalable atLeiden University Repository: https://openaccess.leidenuniv.nl/
    [Google Scholar]
  442. Savoia, L. M. , Manzini, M. R. , Baldi, B. , & Franco, L.
    (2018) A Morphosyntactic Analysis of Evaluatives in Italian. SILTA – Studi Italiani di Linguistica Teorica e Applicata, XLVI, 413–440.
    [Google Scholar]
  443. Scalise, S.
    (1990) Constraints on the Italian suffix –mente . In W. U. Dressler , H. C. Luschützky , O. E. Pfeiffer , & J. R. Rennison (Eds.), Contemporary morphology (pp. 87–98). Mouton De Gruyter, Berlin. 10.1515/9783110874082.87
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110874082.87 [Google Scholar]
  444. Schäfer, F.
    (2012) Two types of external argument licensing – the case of causers. Studia Linguistica, 66, 128–180. 10.1111/j.1467‑9582.2012.01192.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9582.2012.01192.x [Google Scholar]
  445. Schlücker, B. & Ackermann, T.
    (2017) The morphosyntax of proper names: an overview. Folia Linguistica, 51, 309–333. 10.1515/flin‑2017‑0011
    https://doi.org/10.1515/flin-2017-0011 [Google Scholar]
  446. Schumann, C. L.
    (1783)  Neger-Englisches Wörterbuch. Ms. Early creole lexicography: A study of C.L. Schumann’s manuscript dictionary of Sranan, ed. by A. Kamp , 44–305.
    [Google Scholar]
  447. Schwegler, A.
    (2013) Palenquero structure dataset. In S. M. Michaelis , P. Maurer , M. Haspelmath & M. Huber (Eds.), Atlas of Pidgin and Creole Language Structures Online, Leipzig, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. (Available online atapics-online.info/).
    [Google Scholar]
  448. Sebba, M.
    (1987) The Syntax of Serial Verbs: An Investigation into Serialisation in Sranan and Other Languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cll.2
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cll.2 [Google Scholar]
  449. Seidl, C.
    (2004) Deantroponimici. In M. Grossmann & F. Rainer (Eds.), La formazione delle parole in italiano (pp. 411–419). Tübingen, Niemeyer.
    [Google Scholar]
  450. Serianni, L.
    (1988) Grammatica italiana. Italiano comune e lingua letteraria. Suoni, forme, costrutti. Torino, Utet.
    [Google Scholar]
  451. Seuren, P.
    (1990) Still no serials in Seselwa: a reply to “Seselwa serialization and its significance.”Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages, 5, 271–292. 10.1075/jpcl.5.2.08seu
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jpcl.5.2.08seu [Google Scholar]
  452. Shibatani, M. & Pardeshi, P.
    (2002) The causative continuum. In M. Shibatani (Ed.), The Grammar of Causation and Interpersonal Manipulation (pp. 85–126). Amsterdam, John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.48.07shi
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.48.07shi [Google Scholar]
  453. Siewierska, A.
    (1984) The Passive: a comparative linguistic analysis. London, Croon Helm.
    [Google Scholar]
  454. Siloni, T.
    (1997) Noun Phrases and Nominalizations: The Syntax of DPs. Kluwer, Dordrecht. 10.1007/978‑94‑015‑8863‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8863-8 [Google Scholar]
  455. Simoncsics, P.
    (1998) Kamassian. In D. Abondolo (Ed.), The Uralic Languages (pp. 580–601). London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  456. Siro, P.
    (1964) Suomen kielen lauseoppi. Helsinki, Tietosanakirja.
    [Google Scholar]
  457. Sneddon, J. N.
    (1996) Indonesian Reference Grammar. St Leonards, NSW, Allen and Unwin.
    [Google Scholar]
  458. Snyder, William , & Stromswold, K.
    (1997) The Structure and Acquisition of English Dative Constructions. Linguistic Inquiry, 28(2), 281–317.
    [Google Scholar]
  459. Spencer, A. , & Nikolaeva, I.
    (2017) Denominal adjectives as mixed categories. Word Structure, 10, 79–99. 10.3366/word.2017.0101
    https://doi.org/10.3366/word.2017.0101 [Google Scholar]
  460. Sperber, D. , & Wilson, D.
    (1995) Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Oxford, Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  461. Starke, M.
    (2009) Nanosyntax: A short primer to a new approach to language. Nordlyd, 36, 2–6.
    [Google Scholar]
  462. (2017) Resolving (dat = acc) ≠ gen . Glossa: a journal of general linguistics, 2(1), 104. 10.5334/gjgl.408
    https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.408 [Google Scholar]
  463. Stassen, L.
    (2009) Predicative possession. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780199211654.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199211654.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  464. Steinkrüger, P. O.
    (2013) Zamboanga Chabacano structure dataset. In S. M. Michaelis , P. Maurer , M. Haspelmath & M. Huber (Eds.), Atlas of Pidgin and Creole Language Structures Online, Leipzig, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. (Available online atapics-online.info/).
    [Google Scholar]
  465. Stewart, J. M.
    (1963) Some restrictions on objects in Twi. Journal of African Languages, 2(2), 145–149.
    [Google Scholar]
  466. Stolz, T.
    (2001) To be with X is to have X: Comitatives, instrumentals, locative, and predicative possession. Linguistics, 39(2), 321–350. 10.1515/ling.2001.013
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.2001.013 [Google Scholar]
  467. Stolz, T. , Levkovych, N. , & Urdze, A.
    (2017) Die Grammatik der Toponyme als typologisches Forschungsfeld: eine Pilotstudie. In J. Helmbrecht , D. Nübling & B. Schlücker (Eds.), Namengrammatik, 121–146. Hamburg, Buske.
    [Google Scholar]
  468. Stolz, T. , Stroh C. , & Urdze, A.
    (2006) On comitatives and related categories. Berlin, De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110197648
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197648 [Google Scholar]
  469. Stowell, T.
    (1978) What Was There Before There Was There. Proceedings of CLS, 14, 458–471.
    [Google Scholar]
  470. Stump, G.
    (2001) Inflectional morphology: A theory of paradigm structure. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511486333
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486333 [Google Scholar]
  471. (2002) Morphological and syntactic paradigms: Arguments for a theory of paradigm linkage. In G. Booij & J. van Marle (Eds.), Yearbook of Morphology2001, 147–180. Dordrecht, Kluwer. 10.1007/978‑94‑017‑3726‑5_5
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3726-5_5 [Google Scholar]
  472. Sulkala, H. , & Karjalainen, M.
    (1992) Finnish. London, Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  473. Sun, C.
    (1996) Word order change and grammaticalization in the history of Chinese. Stanford, CA, Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  474. Suñer M.
    (1982) Syntax and Semantics of Spanish Presentational Sentence-Types. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  475. Suutari, T.
    (2006) Body part names and grammaticalization. In M-L. Helasvuo & L. Campbell (Eds.), Grammar from the human perspective: Case, space and person in Finnish (pp. 101–128). Amsterdam, John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.277.10suu
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.277.10suu [Google Scholar]
  476. Svenonius, P.
    (2002) Icelandic case and the structure of events. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics, 5(1–3), 197–225. 10.1023/A:1021252206904
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021252206904 [Google Scholar]
  477. (2003) Limits on p: filling in holes vs. falling in holes. Nordlyd, 31, 431–445.
    [Google Scholar]
  478. (2006) The emergence of axial parts. Nordlyd, 33, 1–22.
    [Google Scholar]
  479. (2007) Adpositions, particles and the arguments they introduce. In E. Reuland , T, Bhattacharya , & G. Spathas (Eds.), Argument Structure (pp. 63–103). Amsterdam, John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.108.08sve
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.108.08sve [Google Scholar]
  480. (2008) Projections of P. In A. Asbury , J. Dotlačil , B. Gehrke & R. Nouwen (Eds.), Syntax and Semantics of Spatial P (pp. 63–84). Amsterdam, John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.120.04sve
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.120.04sve [Google Scholar]
  481. (2010) Spatial P in English. In G. Cinque & L. Rizzi (Eds.), Mapping Spatial PPs, The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Vol. 6 (pp. 127–160). New York, Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195393675.003.0004
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195393675.003.0004 [Google Scholar]
  482. (2012) Structural decomposition of spatial adpositions. Presented at The Meaning of P, Universität Bochum. ling.auf.net/lingbuzz/001776.
    [Google Scholar]
  483. Swolkien de Sousa, D.
    (2012) The Cape Verdean Creole of São Vicente: its genesis and structure. Ph.D Dissertation, University of Coimbra.
    [Google Scholar]
  484. Sybesma, R.
    (1999) The Mandarin VP. Dordrecht, Kluwer. 10.1007/978‑94‑015‑9163‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9163-8 [Google Scholar]
  485. Syea, A.
    (2013) Serial verb constructions in Indian Ocean French Creoles (IOCs) Substrate, universal, or an independent diachronic development?Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages, 28(1), 13–64. 10.1075/jpcl.28.1.02sye
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jpcl.28.1.02sye [Google Scholar]
  486. (2014) The Syntax of Mauritian Creole. London, Bloomsbury.
    [Google Scholar]
  487. (2017) French Creoles: A Comprehensive and Comparative Grammar. London, Routledge. 10.4324/9781315388588
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315388588 [Google Scholar]
  488. Tai, J. H.-Y.
    (1985) Temporal sequence and Chinese word order. In J. Haiman (Ed.), Iconicity in Syntax (pp. 49–72). Amsterdam, John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.6.04tai
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.6.04tai [Google Scholar]
  489. Takamine, K.
    (2017) Putting Adpositions in Place. Amsterdam, John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.240
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.240 [Google Scholar]
  490. Talmy, L.
    (1985) Lexicalization patterns: semantic structure in lexical forms. In T. Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description. Vol. 3: grammatical categories and the lexicon, (pp. 57-149) Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  491. Talmy, L.
    (1988) The relation of grammar to cognition. In B. Rudzka-Ostyn (Ed.), Topics in cognitive linguistics (pp. 165–205). Amsterdam, John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.50.08tal
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.50.08tal [Google Scholar]
  492. (2000) Toward a cognitive semantics. Concept structuring systems, Vol. 1. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/6847.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/6847.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  493. Thomas, F.
    (1940) Le suffixe Latin -aster/ -astrum. Revue des Études Anciennes, 48, 520–528. 10.3406/rea.1940.3135
    https://doi.org/10.3406/rea.1940.3135 [Google Scholar]
  494. Todd, L.
    (1982) Cameroon. Heidelberg, Julius Groos Verlag. 10.1075/veaw.t1
    https://doi.org/10.1075/veaw.t1 [Google Scholar]
  495. Topping, D.
    (1973) Chamorro reference grammar. Honolulu, University of Hawaii Press. 10.1515/9780824841263
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9780824841263 [Google Scholar]
  496. Torrego, E.
    (2010) Variability in the Case Patterns of Causative Formation in Romance and Its Implications. Linguistic Inquiry, 41, 445–470. 10.1162/LING_a_00004
    https://doi.org/10.1162/LING_a_00004 [Google Scholar]
  497. Tortora, C.
    (2005) The Preposition’s Preposition in Italian: Evidence for Boundedness of Space. In R. Gess , & E. Rubin (Eds), Theoretical and Experimental Approaches to Romance Linguistics (pp. 307–327). Amsterdam, John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.272.19tor
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.272.19tor [Google Scholar]
  498. Ursini, F-A. , & Long, H.
    (2018) On spatial nouns and adpositions in Mandarin. Language and Linguistics, 81, 193–226. 10.20865/20188109
    https://doi.org/10.20865/20188109 [Google Scholar]
  499. Vainikka, A.
    (1989) Deriving Syntactic Representations in Finnish. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts/Amherst.
  500. van der Voort, Hein
    . (2004) A grammar of Kwaza. Berlin, Mouton De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110197280
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197280 [Google Scholar]
  501. van Hout, A. , & Roeper, T.
    (1998) Events and aspectual structure in derivational morphology. In H. Harley (Ed.), Papers from the UPenn/MIT roundtable on argument structure and aspect (pp. 175–200). MITWPL32.
    [Google Scholar]
  502. van Pareren, R.
    (2013) Body part terms as a semantic basis for grammaticalization: a Mordvin case study into spatial reference and beyond. Language Sciences, 36, 90–102. 10.1016/j.langsci.2012.03.022
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2012.03.022 [Google Scholar]
  503. van Riemsdijk, H.
    (1978) A case study in syntactic markedness: The binding nature of prepositional phrases. Lisse, The Peter de Ridder Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  504. Veenstra, T. & den Besten, H.
    (1994) Fronting. In J. Arends , P. Muysken & N. Smith (Eds.), Pidgins and creoles: an introduction (pp. 303–315). Amsterdam, John Benjamins. 10.1075/cll.15.31vee
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cll.15.31vee [Google Scholar]
  505. Veland, R.
    (2012) Le locuzioni preposizionali a(d) opera di, per opera di, per mano di in italiano contemporaneo: funzionamento sintattico e proprietà semantiche. Zeitschrift für romanische Philologie, 128, 537–552. 10.1515/zrp‑2012‑0046
    https://doi.org/10.1515/zrp-2012-0046 [Google Scholar]
  506. Viitso, T-R.
    (1998) Estonian. In D. Abondolo (Ed.), The Uralic Languages (pp. 115–148). London, Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  507. Villalba, X.
    (2013) Eventive existentials in Catalan and the topic-focus articulation. Italian Journal of Linguistics/Rivista di Linguistica, 25(1), 147–173.
    [Google Scholar]
  508. Von Fintel, K.
    (1994) Restrictions on quantifier domains. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachussets.
    [Google Scholar]
  509. von Heusinger, K. , & Kaiser, G. A.
    (2011) Affectedness and differential object marking in Spanish. Morphology, 21(3–4), 593–617. 10.1007/s11525‑010‑9177‑y
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11525-010-9177-y [Google Scholar]
  510. Wälchli, B. , & Zúñiga, F.
    (2006) Source-Goal (in)difference and the typology of motion events in the clause. Sprachtypologie & Universalienforschung, 59, 284–303. 10.1524/stuf.2006.59.3.284
    https://doi.org/10.1524/stuf.2006.59.3.284 [Google Scholar]
  511. Wandruszka, U.
    (2004) Aggettivi di relazione. In M. Grossmann & F. Rainer (Eds.), La formazione delle parole in italiano (pp. 382–394). Tübingen, Niemeyer.
    [Google Scholar]
  512. Williams, E.
    (1983) Against small clauses.Linguistic Inquiry, 14(2), 287–308.
    [Google Scholar]
  513. Williams, E.
    (1984) There-insertion. Linguistic Inquiry, 15, 131–153.
    [Google Scholar]
  514. (1994) Thematic Structure in Syntax. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  515. Wiltschko, M.
    (2006) Why should diminutives count?In H. Broekhuis , N. Corver , Norbert, R. Huijbregts , U. Kleinhenz , & J. Koster (Eds.), Organizing Grammar. Linguistic Studies in Honor of Henk van Riemsdijk (pp. 669–679). Berlin, Walter de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  516. Windfuhr, G. , & Perry, J. J.
    (2009) Persian and Tajik. In G. Windfuhr (Ed.), The Iranian Languages (pp. 416–444). London, Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  517. Winford, D. & Migge, B.
    (2008) Surinamese Creole: Morphology and syntax. In Edgar W. Schneider (Ed.), Varieties of English, Vol. 2: The Americas and the Caribbean (pp. 693–731). Berlin, Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110208405.2.693
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110208405.2.693 [Google Scholar]
  518. Winkler, E.
    2001Udmurt. München, Lincom Europa.
    [Google Scholar]
  519. Wood, J.
    (2015) Icelandic Morphosyntax and Argument Structure. Dordrecht, Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑09138‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09138-9 [Google Scholar]
  520. Wood, J. & Marantz, A.
    (2018) The Interpretation of External Arguments. psych.nyu.edu/morphlab/publications/Wood%20&%20Marantz%20
    [Google Scholar]
  521. Woolford, E.
    (1997) Four-way Case systems: Ergative, nominative, objective, and accusative. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 15, 181–227. 10.1023/A:1005796113097
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005796113097 [Google Scholar]
  522. (2006) Lexical Case, Inherent Case, and Argument Structure. Linguistic Inquiry, 37, 111–130. 10.1162/002438906775321175
    https://doi.org/10.1162/002438906775321175 [Google Scholar]
  523. Yamada, M.
    (2010) Plurality, reciprocity, and plurality of reciprocity. PhD Dissertation, University of Delaware.
    [Google Scholar]
  524. Ylikoski J.
    (2011) A Survey of the Origins of Directional Case Suffixes in European Uralic. In S. Kittilä , K. Västi , & J. Ylikoski (Eds.), Case, Animacy and Semantic Roles (pp. 235–280). Amsterdam, John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.99.09yli
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.99.09yli [Google Scholar]
  525. Zamparelli, R.
    (2000) Layers in the Determiner Phrase. New York, Garland.
    [Google Scholar]
  526. Ziegeler, D. P.
    (2000) A Possession-Based Analysis of the Ba-construction in Mandarin Chinese. Lingua, 110, 807–842. 10.1016/S0024‑3841(00)00018‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-3841(00)00018-8 [Google Scholar]
  527. Zwarts, J.
    (1995) Lexical and Functional Direction in Dutch. In M. den Dikken , & Kees Hengeveld (Eds.), Linguistics in the Netherlands, 12 (pp. 227–238). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/avt.12.21zwa
    https://doi.org/10.1075/avt.12.21zwa [Google Scholar]
  528. Zwicky, A.
    (1990) What are we talking about when we talk about serial verb constructions?In B. D. Joseph & A. M. Zwicky (Eds.), When Verbs Collide: Papers from the (1990) Ohio State Mini-Conference on Serial verb constructions, The Ohio State University Working Papers in Linguistics39, 1–13.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/books/9789027246622
Loading
/content/books/9789027246622
dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
-contentType:Journal -contentType:Chapter
10
5
Chapter
content/books/9789027246622
Book
false
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error