1887
  1. Home
  2. Books
  3. A Construction Grammar of the English Language

A Construction Grammar of the English Language

CASA – a constructionist approach to syntactic analysis

image of A Construction Grammar of the English Language
USD
Buy:$47.00 + Taxes
(Purchase for institutional use at $149.00 + taxes by logging in as an institutional administrator)

The present book provides an introduction to the linguistic model of Construction Grammar, offering a full analysis of the grammar of the English language. It covers all levels of morpho-syntactic form-meaning units: including sentence types, tense and aspect, argument structure, phrases, idioms, word and morphological constructions.

In line with its usage-based approach, all constructions are discussed using authentic corpus examples. In order to illustrate how constructions can be learnt, the book draws on authentic data from child language. Furthermore, corpus analysis is used to show which lexical items typically occur in the slots of constructions and make up their ‘collo-profile’.

A key feature of the book is that it develops a systematic method for showing how constructions combine to form actual utterances. For this purpose, so-called ‘construction grids’ are developed which contain all the constructions that make up even the most complex sentences and show points of overlap between them.

References

  1. Aarts, Bas
    2007 Syntactic Gradience: The Nature of Grammatical Indeterminacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. 2011 Oxford Modern English Grammar. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Aarts, Jan & Flor Aarts
    1988 English Syntactic Structures (2nd edition). New York & Leyden: Prentice Hall & Martinus Nijhoff. (1st edition 1982 Pergamon Press)
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Allerton, David
    1990 Language as form and patterns: Grammar and its categories. In N. E. Collinge (ed.), An Encyclopaedia of Language, 68–111. London & New York: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Altenberg, Bengt
    1998 On the phraseology of Spoken English: The evidence of recurrent word-combinations. In Anthony P. Cowie (ed.), Phraseology: Theory, Analysis, and Applications, 101–121. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 10.1093/oso/9780198294252.003.0005
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198294252.003.0005 [Google Scholar]
  6. Ambridge, Ben & Elena V. M. Lieven
    2011 Child Language Acquisition: Contrasting Theoretical Approaches. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511975073
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511975073 [Google Scholar]
  7. Bauer, Eva-Maria & Thomas Hoffmann
    2020  Turns out is not Ellipsis: A Usage-based Construction Grammar view on reduced constructions. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia52(2), 240–259. 10.1080/03740463.2020.1777036
     https://doi.org/10.1080/03740463.2020.1777036 [Google Scholar]
  8. Bauer, Laurie
    1983 English Word-formation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139165846
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139165846 [Google Scholar]
  9. Behrens, Heike
    1999 Was macht Verben zu einer besonderen Kategorie im Spracherwerb?In Jörg Meibauer & Monika Rothweiler (eds.), Das Lexikon im Spracherwerb, 32–50. Tübingen/Basel: Francke.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. 2007 The acquisition of argument structure. In Thomas Herbst & Katrin Götz-Votteler (eds.), Valency: Theoretical, Descriptive and Cognitive Issues, 193–214. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110198775.2.193
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110198775.2.193 [Google Scholar]
  11. 2009a Usage-based and emergentist approaches to language acquisition. Linguistics47(2), 383–411. 10.1515/LING.2009.014
     https://doi.org/10.1515/LING.2009.014 [Google Scholar]
  12. 2009b Konstruktionen im Spracherwerb. Zeitschrift für Germanistische Linguistik37, 427–444. 10.1515/ZGL.2009.030
     https://doi.org/10.1515/ZGL.2009.030 [Google Scholar]
  13. 2011 Grammatik und Lexikon im Spracherwerb: Konstruktionsprozesse. In Stefan Engelberg , Anke Holler & Kristel Proost (eds.), Sprachliches Wissen zwischen Lexikon und Grammatik, 375–396. Berlin/Boston: de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110262339.375
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110262339.375 [Google Scholar]
  14. Bierwiaczonek, Boguslaw
    2016 An Introductory English Grammar in Constructions. Częstochowa: Academia.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Boas, Hans C.
    2003 A Constructional Approach to Resultatives. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. 2011 Zum Abstraktionsgrad von Resultativkonstruktionen. In Stefan Engelberg , Kristel Proost & Anke Holler (eds.), Sprachliches Wissen zwischen Lexikon und Grammatik, 37–69. Berlin/Boston: de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110262339.37
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110262339.37 [Google Scholar]
  17. 2013 Cognitive Construction Grammar. In Thomas Hoffmann & Graeme Trousdale (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar, 233–252. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. 2022 From Construction Grammar(s) to Pedagogical Construction Grammar. In Hans. C. Boas (ed.), Directions for Pedagogical Construction Grammar. Learning and Teaching (with) Constructions, 3–43. Berlin/Boston: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110746723‑001
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110746723-001 [Google Scholar]
  19. Boas, Hans C. , Benjamin Lyngfelt & Tiago Timponi Torrent
    2019 Framing constructicography. Lexicographica35, 15–59. 10.1515/lex‑2019‑0002
     https://doi.org/10.1515/lex-2019-0002 [Google Scholar]
  20. Boas, Hans C. , Joseph Ruppenhofer & Collin Baker
    2024 FrameNet at 25. International Journal of LexicographyXX, 1–22.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Booij, Geert
    2013 Morphology in Construction Grammar. In Thomas Hoffmann & Graeme Trousdale (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar, 255–273. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Boyd, Jeremy K. & Adele E. Goldberg
    2011 Learning what not to say: The role of statistical preemption and categorization in ‘a’-adjective production. Language81(1), 1–29. 10.1353/lan.2011.0012
     https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2011.0012 [Google Scholar]
  23. Bresnan, J. & M. Ford
    2010 Predicting syntax: Processing dative constructions in American and Australian varieties of English. Language86, 168–213. 10.1353/lan.0.0189
     https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.0.0189 [Google Scholar]
  24. Brown, Gillian & George Yule
    1983 Discourse Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511805226
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511805226 [Google Scholar]
  25. Burgschmidt, Ernst
    1977 Strukturierung, Norm und Produktivität in der Wortbildung. In Herbert Ernst Brekle & Dieter Kastovsky (eds.), Perspektiven der Wortbildungsforschung, 39–47. Bonn: Bouvier Verlag.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Buysschaert, Joost
    1982 Criteria for the Classification of English Adverbials, Brussel: Paleis der Academiën.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Bybee, Joan
    1995 Regular Morphology and the Lexicon. Language and Cognition Processes10(5), 425–455. 10.1080/01690969508407111
     https://doi.org/10.1080/01690969508407111 [Google Scholar]
  28. 2010 Language, Usage and Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511750526
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511750526 [Google Scholar]
  29. 2013 Usage-based theory and exemplar representations of constructions. In Thomas Hoffmann & Graeme Trousdale (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar, 49–69. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. 2015 Language Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139096768
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139096768 [Google Scholar]
  31. Bybee, Joan & Joanne Scheibman
    1999 The effect of usage on degrees of constituency: The reduction of don’t in English. Linguistics: An Interdisciplinary Journal of the Language Sciences37(4), 575–596. 10.1515/ling.37.4.575
     https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.37.4.575 [Google Scholar]
  32. Cantos-Gomez, Pascual & Moises Almela Sánchez
    2001 Lexical constellations: What collocations fail to tell. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics6(2), 199–228. 10.1075/ijcl.6.2.02can
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.6.2.02can [Google Scholar]
  33. Cappelle, Bert
    2006 Particle placement and the case for ‘allostructions’. ConstructionsSV1–7: 1–28. www.constructions-journal.com
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Cappelle, Bert , Edwige Dugas & Vera Tobin
    2015 An afterthought on let alone . Journal of Pragmatics80, 70–85. 10.1016/j.pragma.2015.02.005
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2015.02.005 [Google Scholar]
  35. Casenhiser, Devin & Adele E. Goldberg
    2005 Fast mapping between a phrasal form and meaning. Developmental Science8(6), 500–508. 10.1111/j.1467‑7687.2005.00441.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2005.00441.x [Google Scholar]
  36. Chomsky, Noam
    1957 Syntactic Structures. The Hague: Mouton. 10.1515/9783112316009
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783112316009 [Google Scholar]
  37. 1964 Current Issues in Linguistic Theory. The Hague: Mouton.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. 1965 Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge/Mass: MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. 1970 Remarks on nominalization. In R. A. Jacobs & P. S. Rosenbaum (eds.), Readings in English Transformational Grammar, 184–221. Blaisdell.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. 1986 Knowledge of Language. New York: Praeger.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. 1995 The Minimalist Program. Cambridge/MA/London: MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Clark, Herbert E. & Eve V. Clark
    1979 Psychology and Language. San Diego: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Colleman, Timothy
    2011 Ditransitive verbs and the ditransitive construction: A diachronic perspective. Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik59(4), 380–410. 10.1515/zaa‑2011‑0408
     https://doi.org/10.1515/zaa-2011-0408 [Google Scholar]
  44. Cowan, Nelson
    2008 What are the differences between long-term, short-term, and working memory?Progress in Brain Research169, 323–333. 10.1016/S0079‑6123(07)00020‑9
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-6123(07)00020-9 [Google Scholar]
  45. Cowie, Anthony P. , Ronald Mackin & Isabel R. McCaig
    1983 Oxford Dictionary of Current Idiomatic English. Vol 2: Phrase, Clause and Sentence Idioms. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Cowie, Anthony P. & R. Mackin
    1975 Oxford Dictionary of Current Idiomatic English. Vol. 1: Verbs with Prepositions and Particles. London: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Croft, William
    2001 Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic Theory in Typological Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198299554.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198299554.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  48. Croft, William
    2012 Verbs: Aspect and Causal Structure. Oxford. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199248582.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199248582.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  49. Croft, William
    2013 Radical Construction Grammar. In Thomas Hoffmann & Graeme Trousdale (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar, 211–232. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. 2016 Comparative concepts and language-specific categories: Theory and practice. Linguistic Typology20, 377–393.
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Croft, William & Alan. D. Cruse
    2004 Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511803864
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511803864 [Google Scholar]
  52. Cruse, David A.
    1986 Lexical Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Crystal, David A.
    1967 English. Lingua17, 24–56. 10.1016/0024‑3841(66)90003‑9
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3841(66)90003-9 [Google Scholar]
  54. Culicover, Peter W. & Ray Jackendoff
    1999 The view from the periphery: The English comparative correlative. Linguistic Inquiry30, 543–571. 10.1162/002438999554200
     https://doi.org/10.1162/002438999554200 [Google Scholar]
  55. Dąbrowska, Ewa
    2014a Recycling utterances: A speaker’s guide to sentence processing. Cognitive Linguistics25(4), 617–653. 10.1515/cog‑2014‑0057
     https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2014-0057 [Google Scholar]
  56. 2014b ‘Words that go together’: Measuring individual differences in native speakers’ knowledge of collocations. Mental Lexicon9, 401–418. 10.1075/ml.9.3.02dab
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ml.9.3.02dab [Google Scholar]
  57. Dąbrowska, Ewa & Elena Lieven
    2005 Towards a lexically specific grammar of children’s question constructions. Cognitive Linguistics16(3), 437–474. 10.1515/cogl.2005.16.3.437
     https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.2005.16.3.437 [Google Scholar]
  58. Dąbrowska, Ewa & Marcin Szczerbinski
    2006 Polish children’s productivity with case marking: The role of regularity, type frequency, and phonological diversity. Journal of Child Language33(3), 559–597. 10.1017/S0305000906007471
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000906007471 [Google Scholar]
  59. Deacon, Terrance
    1997 The Symbolic Species: The Co-evolution of Language and the Human Brain. London: Penguin.
     [Google Scholar]
  60. Diamond, Adele
    2013 Executive functions. Annual Review of Psychology64, 135–68. 10.1146/annurev‑psych‑113011‑143750
     https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143750 [Google Scholar]
  61. Diessel, Holger
    2013 Construction Grammar and first language acquisition. In Thomas Hoffmann & Graeme Trousdale (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar, 347–364. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  62. 2019 The Grammar Network: How Linguistic Structure Is Shaped by Language Use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108671040
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108671040 [Google Scholar]
  63. Dirven, René & Günter Radden
    1977 Semantische Syntax des Englischen. Wiesbaden: Athenaion.
     [Google Scholar]
  64. Ellis, Nick C.
    2003 Constructions, chunking & connectionism: The emergence of second language structure. In Catherine J. Doughty & Michael H. Long (eds.), The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition, 63–103. Malden: Blackwell. 10.1002/9780470756492.ch4
     https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470756492.ch4 [Google Scholar]
  65. 2006 Selective attention and transfer phenomena in L2 acquisition: Contingency, cue competition, salience, interference, overshadowing, blocking, and perceptual learning. Applied Linguistics27(2), 164–194, 10.1093/applin/aml015
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/aml015 [Google Scholar]
  66. Ellis, Nick C. & Stefanie Wulff
    2015 Usage-based approaches to SLA. In Bill Van Patten & Jessica Williams (eds.), Theories in Language Acquisition: An Introduction, 75–93. Florence: Taylor and Francis.
     [Google Scholar]
  67. Elman, Jeffrey L.
    2004 An alternative view of the lexicon. Trends in Cognitive Science8(7), 301–306. 10.1016/j.tics.2004.05.003
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2004.05.003 [Google Scholar]
  68. Emonds, Joseph
    1976 A Transformational Approach to English Syntax. New York: Academic Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  69. Esser, Jürgen
    1992 Neuere Tendenzen in der Grammatikschreibung des Englischen. Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik40(2), 112–123.
     [Google Scholar]
  70. Evert, Stefan
    2005 The Statistics of Word Co-occurrences: Word Pairs and Collocations. Stuttgart: University of Stuttgart Dissertation.
     [Google Scholar]
  71. Evert, Stefan , Peter Uhrig , Sabine Bartsch , Thomas Proisl
    2017 E-VIEW-alation – A large-scale evaluation study of association measures for collocation identification. InElectronic lexicography in the 21st century. Proceedings of the eLex 2017 conference, Leiden, The Netherlands.
     [Google Scholar]
  72. Fauconnier, Gilles & Mark Turner
    1996 Blending as a central process of grammar. In Adele E. Goldberg (ed.), Conceptual Structure, Discourse and Language, 113–130. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
     [Google Scholar]
  73. Fauconnier, Gilles & Mark Turner
    2002 The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind’s Hidden Complexities. New York: Basic Books.
     [Google Scholar]
  74. Felfe, Marc , Dagobert Höllein & Klaus Welke
    (eds.) Regelbasierte Konstruktionsgrammatik: Musterbasiertheit vs. Idiomatizität. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter 2024 10.1515/9783111334042
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783111334042 [Google Scholar]
  75. Fillmore, Charles J.
    1968 The case for case. In Emmon Bach & Robert T. Harms (eds.), Universals in Linguistic Theory, 0–88. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
     [Google Scholar]
  76. 1985 Syntactic intrusions and the notion of grammatical construction. Berkeley Linguistic Society11, 73–86.
     [Google Scholar]
  77. 1988 The Mechanisms of “Construction Grammar.” In Shelley Axmaker , Annie Jassier & Helen Singmaster (eds.), General Session and Parasession on Grammaticalization, 35–55. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society. 10.3765/bls.v14i0.1794
     https://doi.org/10.3765/bls.v14i0.1794 [Google Scholar]
  78. 2007 Valency issues in FrameNet. In Thomas Herbst & Katrin Götz-Votteler (eds.), Valency. Theoretical, Descriptive and Cognitive Issues, 129–160. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110198775.1.129
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110198775.1.129 [Google Scholar]
  79. 2014 Frames, constructions and FrameNet. In Thomas Herbst , Hans-Jörg Schmid & Susen Faulhaber (eds.), Constructions – Collocations – Patterns, 121–166. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110356854.121
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110356854.121 [Google Scholar]
  80. Fillmore, Charles J. , Christopher R. Johnson & Miriam R. L. Petruck
    2003 Background to FrameNet. International Journal of Lexicography16(3), 236–250. 10.1093/ijl/16.3.235
     https://doi.org/10.1093/ijl/16.3.235 [Google Scholar]
  81. Fillmore, Charles J. , Russell R. Lee-Goldman & Russell Rhomieux
    2012 The FrameNet constructicon. In Ivan A. Sag & Hans C. Boas (eds.), Sign-Based Construction Grammar, 309–372. Stanford: CSLI.
     [Google Scholar]
  82. Fillmore, Charles J. , Paul Kay & Mary Catherine O’Connor
    1988 Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: The case of let alone . Language64(3), 501–538. 10.2307/414531
     https://doi.org/10.2307/414531 [Google Scholar]
  83. Fischer, Kerstin & Anatol Stefanowitsch
    2006 Konstruktionsgrammatik: Ein Überblick. In Kerstin Fischer & Anatol Stefanowitsch (eds.), Konstruktionsgrammatik: Von der Anwendung zur Theorie, 3–17. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.
     [Google Scholar]
  84. Gilquin, Gaëtanelle
    2007 To err is not all: What corpus and elicitation can reveal about the use of collocation by learners. Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik55(3), 273–291. 10.1515/zaa.2007.55.3.273
     https://doi.org/10.1515/zaa.2007.55.3.273 [Google Scholar]
  85. 2022 Constructing learner speech: On the use of spoken data in Applied Construction Grammar. In Hans. C. Boas (ed.), Directions for Pedagogical Construction Grammar: Learning and teaching (with) constructions, 73–96. Berlin/Boston: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110746723‑003
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110746723-003 [Google Scholar]
  86. 2023 Causative constructions in process: How do they come into existence in learner writing?Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association11, 105–120. 10.1515/gcla‑2023‑0006
     https://doi.org/10.1515/gcla-2023-0006 [Google Scholar]
  87. Givón, Thomas
    1979 On Understanding Grammar. New York: Academic Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  88. Gläser, Rosemarie
    1990 Phraseologie der englischen Sprache. Leipzig: Enzyklopädie.
     [Google Scholar]
  89. Goldberg, Adele E.
    1995 Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  90. 2006 Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  91. 2019 Explain Me This: Creativity, Competition, and the Partial Productivity of Constructions. Princeton/Oxford: Princeton University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  92. Goldberg, Adele E. & Thomas Herbst
    2021 The nice-of-you construction and its fragments. Linguistics59(1), 285–318. 10.1515/ling‑2020‑0274
     https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2020-0274 [Google Scholar]
  93. Goldberg, Adele E. & Ray Jackendoff
    2004 The English resultative as a family of constructions. Language80(3), 532–568. 10.1353/lan.2004.0129
     https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2004.0129 [Google Scholar]
  94. Granger, Sylviane & Magali Paquot
    2008 Disentangling the phraseological web. In Sylviane Granger & Fanny Meunier (eds.), Phraseology: An Interdisciplinary Perspective, 27–49. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins. 10.1075/z.139.07gra
     https://doi.org/10.1075/z.139.07gra [Google Scholar]
  95. Greenbaum, Sidney
    1969 Studies in English Adverbial Usage. London: Longman.
     [Google Scholar]
  96. 1974 Some verb-intensifier collocations in American and British English. American Speech49(1/2), 79–89. 10.2307/3087920
     https://doi.org/10.2307/3087920 [Google Scholar]
  97. Greenbaum, Sidney & Randolph Quirk
    1970 Elicitation Experiments in English: Linguistic Studies in Use and Attitude. London: Longman.
     [Google Scholar]
  98. Gregory, Michelle L. and Laura A. Michaelis
    2001 Topicalization and left-dislocation: A functional opposition revisited. Journal of Pragmatics33: 1665–1706. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(00)00063‑1
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(00)00063-1 [Google Scholar]
  99. Gries, Stefan Th
    2005 Syntactic priming: A corpus-based approachJournal of Psycholinguistic Research34: 365–399. 10.1007/s10936‑005‑6139‑3
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-005-6139-3 [Google Scholar]
  100. 2008 Phraseology and linguistic theory: A brief survey. In Sylviane Granger & Fanny Meunier (eds.), Phraseology: An interdisciplinary perspective, 3–25. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins. 10.1075/z.139.06gri
     https://doi.org/10.1075/z.139.06gri [Google Scholar]
  101. Gries, Stefan Th. & Anatol Stefanowitsch
    2004 Extending collostructional analysis: A corpus-based perspective on ‘alternations.’International Journal of Corpus Linguistics9(1), 97–129. 10.1075/ijcl.9.1.06gri
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.9.1.06gri [Google Scholar]
  102. Gries, Stefan Th. & Stefanie Wulff
    2005 Do foreign learners have constructions? Evidence from priming, sorting, and corpora. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics3, 182–200. 10.1075/arcl.3.10gri
     https://doi.org/10.1075/arcl.3.10gri [Google Scholar]
  103. Habermann, Mechthild
    2023 The German geschweige denn construction. Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association11, 151–174. 10.1515/gcla‑2023‑0008
     https://doi.org/10.1515/gcla-2023-0008 [Google Scholar]
  104. Haegeman, Liliane
    1991 Introduction to Government and Binding Theory. Oxford/UK/Cambridge/US: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  105. Halliday, Michael A. K.
    1967–8 Notes on transitivity and theme in English. Journal of Linguistics. 3 (1) Part1: 37–81, 3(2) Part2: 199–244, 4(2) Part3: 179–215. 10.1017/S0022226700012949
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226700012949 [Google Scholar]
  106. 1970 Language structure and language function. In John Lyons (ed.), New Horizons in Linguistics, 140–165. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
     [Google Scholar]
  107. 1994 An Introduction to Functional Grammar. 2nd edition. London: Arnold.
     [Google Scholar]
  108. Halliday, Michael A. K. & Ruquaya Hasan
    1976 Cohesion in English (Longman Linguistics Library). London: Longman.
     [Google Scholar]
  109. Hampe, Beate & Doris Schönefeld
    2003 Creative syntax: Iconic principles within the symbolic. In Wolfgang G. Müller & Olga Fischer (eds.), From Sign to Signing, 243–261. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins. 10.1075/ill.3.18ham
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ill.3.18ham [Google Scholar]
  110. Hanks, Patrick
    2000 Do word meanings exist?Computers and the Humanities34 (1/2), 205–215. 10.1023/A:1002471322828
     https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1002471322828 [Google Scholar]
  111. Hausmann, Franz Josef
    1984 Wortschatzlernen ist Kollokationslernen. Praxis des neusprachlichen Unterrichts, 31, 394–406.
     [Google Scholar]
  112. 1985 Kollokationen im deutschen Wörterbuch: Ein Beitrag zur Theorie des lexikographischen Beispiels. In Henning Bergenholtz & Joachim Mugdan (eds.), Lexikographie und Grammatik, 118–129. Tübingen: Niemeyer. 10.1515/9783111635637‑004
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783111635637-004 [Google Scholar]
  113. 2007 Die Kollokationen im Rahmen der Phraseologie: Systematische und historische Darstellung. Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik55(3), 217–235. 10.1515/zaa.2007.55.3.217
     https://doi.org/10.1515/zaa.2007.55.3.217 [Google Scholar]
  114. Helbig, Gerhard & Wolfgang Schenkel
    1973 Wörterbuch zur Valenz und Distribution deutscher Verben. (2nd edition). Leipzig: Verlag Enzyklopädie.
     [Google Scholar]
  115. Herbst, Thomas
    1983 Untersuchungen zur Valenz englischer Adjektive und ihrer Nominalisierungen. Tübingen: Narr.
     [Google Scholar]
  116. Herbst, Thomas
    1984 Adjective complementation: A valency approach to making EFL dictionaries. Applied LinguisticsV(1), 1–11. 10.1093/applin/5.1.1
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/5.1.1 [Google Scholar]
  117. 1996 What are collocations: Sandy beaches or false teeth? English Studies77(4), 379–393. 10.1080/00138389608599038
     https://doi.org/10.1080/00138389608599038 [Google Scholar]
  118. 2005 Englische Grammatik ist nicht so kompliziert: Pro Minimalismus, Lücke und Polysemie – Kontra Prototypik und Semantik in grammatischer Terminologie. In Thomas Herbst (ed.), Linguistische Dimensionen des Fremdsprachenunterrichts, 11–28. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann.
     [Google Scholar]
  119. 2010 English Linguistics: A Coursebook for Students of English. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110215489
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110215489 [Google Scholar]
  120. 2011a The status of generalizations: Valency and argument structure constructions. Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik59(4): 347–367. 10.1515/zaa‑2011‑0406
     https://doi.org/10.1515/zaa-2011-0406 [Google Scholar]
  121. 2011b Choosing sandy beaches – collocations, probabemes and the idiom principle. In Thomas Herbst , Susen Faulhaber & Peter Uhrig (eds.), The Phraseological View of Language: A Tribute to John Sinclair, 27–57, Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110257014.27
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110257014.27 [Google Scholar]
  122. 2013 Von Fledermäusen, die auch Schläger sind, und von Gerundien, die es besser nicht gäbe. In Christoph Bürgel & Dirk Siepmann (eds), Sprachwissenschaft – Fremdsprachendidaktik: Neue Impulse, 57–76. Baltmansweiler: Schneider Verlag Hohengehren.
     [Google Scholar]
  123. 2014a Idiosyncrasies and generalizations: Argument structure, semantic roles and the valency realization principle. Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association2, 253–289. 10.1515/gcla‑2014‑0015
     https://doi.org/10.1515/gcla-2014-0015 [Google Scholar]
  124. 2014b The valency approach to argument structure constructions. In Thomas Herbst , Hans-Jörg Schmid & Susen Faulhaber (eds.), Constructions – Collocations – Patterns, 167–216. Berlin, Boston: de Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110356854.167
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110356854.167 [Google Scholar]
  125. 2015 Why Construction Grammar catches the worm and corpus data can drive you crazy: Accounting for idiomatic and non-idiomatic idiomaticity. Journal of Social Sciences11(3), 91–110. 10.3844/jssp.2015.91.110
     https://doi.org/10.3844/jssp.2015.91.110 [Google Scholar]
  126. 2016 Foreign language learning is construction learning: Principles of Pedagogic Construction Grammar. In Sabine De Knop & Gaëtanelle Gilquin (eds.), Applied Construction Grammar, 21–51. Berlin/Boston: de Gruyter Mouton.
     [Google Scholar]
  127. 2016a Foreign language learning is construction learning – what else? Moving towards Pedagogical Construction Grammar. In Sabine de Knop & Gaêtanelle Gilquin (eds.), Applied Construction Grammar, 21–51. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110458268‑003
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110458268-003 [Google Scholar]
  128. 2016b Wörterbuch war gestern. Programm für ein unifiziertes Konstruktikon. In Stefan Schierholz , Rufus Hjalmar Gouws , Zita Hollós & Werner Wolski (eds.), Wörterbuchforschung und Lexikographie, 169–206. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110474251‑011
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110474251-011 [Google Scholar]
  129. 2018a Menschliche Sprache: Ein Netzwerk aus Mustern genannt Konstruktionen. In Rudolf Freiburg (ed.), Sprachwelten, 105–127. Erlangen: FAU University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  130. 2018b Is language a collostructicon? A proposal for looking at valency, argument structure and other constructions. In Pascual Cantos-Gomez & Moises Almela Sanchez (eds.). Lexical Collocation Analysis: Advances and Applications, 1–22. Cham: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑92582‑0_1
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92582-0_1 [Google Scholar]
  131. 2019 Constructicons – A new type of reference work?Lexicographica35(1), 3–14. 10.1515/lex‑2019‑0001
     https://doi.org/10.1515/lex-2019-0001 [Google Scholar]
  132. 2020a Constructions, generalizations, and the unpredictability of language. Constructions and Frames12(1): 56–96. [reprinted in Tiago Timponi Torrent , Ely Edison da Silva Matos & Natália Sathler Sigiliano (eds) 2022 Construction Grammar across Borders. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins, 55–94.] 10.1075/cf.00035.her
     https://doi.org/10.1075/cf.00035.her [Google Scholar]
  133. Herbst, Thomas
    2020b Dependency and valency approaches. In Bas Aarts , Jill Bowie , & Gergana Popova (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of English Grammar (Oxford Handbooks in Linguistics), 124–152. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198755104.013.12
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198755104.013.12 [Google Scholar]
  134. Herbst, Thomas
    2022 Frame elements, argument roles and word meaning – three sides of the same coin?In Kristian Blensenius (ed.), Valency and Constructions, 59–99. Göteborg: Meijerbergs institut for svensk etymologisk forskning.
     [Google Scholar]
  135. Herbst, Thomas , David Heath , Ian F. Roe & Dieter Götz
    2004 A Valency Dictionary of English: A Corpus-Based Analysis of the Complementation Patterns of English Verbs, Nouns and Adjectives. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110892581
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110892581 [Google Scholar]
  136. Herbst, Thomas & Thomas Hoffmann
    2018 Construction Grammar for students: A Constructionist Approach to Syntactic Analysis (CASA). Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association6, 197–218. 10.1515/gcla‑2018‑0010
     https://doi.org/10.1515/gcla-2018-0010 [Google Scholar]
  137. Herbst, Thomas & Peter Uhrig
    2009– Erlangen Valency Patternbank. A corpus-based research tool for work on valency and argument structure constructions 2009 www.patternbank.fau.de
     [Google Scholar]
  138. 2020 The issue of specifying slots in argument structure constructions in terms of form and meaning. Belgian Journal of Linguistics34, 135–147. 10.1075/bjl.00041.her
     https://doi.org/10.1075/bjl.00041.her [Google Scholar]
  139. Herbst, Thomas & Susen Schüller
    2008 Introduction to Syntactic Analysis: A Valency Approach. Tübingen: Narr.
     [Google Scholar]
  140. Hilpert, Martin
    2008 Germanic Future Constructions: A Usage-Based Approach to Language Change. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins. 10.1075/cal.7
     https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.7 [Google Scholar]
  141. Hilpert
    Hilpert 2019 Construction Grammar and its Application to English. Second edition. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  142. Hilpert, Martin
    2020 Constructional Approaches. In Bas Aarts , Jill Bowie & Gergana Popova (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of English Grammar, 106–123. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198755104.013.13
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198755104.013.13 [Google Scholar]
  143. Hoffmann, Thomas
    2017 Multimodal constructs – multimodal constructions? The role of constructions in the working memory. Linguistics Vanguard3,1. 10.1515/lingvan‑2016‑0042
     https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2016-0042 [Google Scholar]
  144. 2018 Creativity and construction grammar: Cognitive and psychological issues. Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik66(3), 259–276. 10.1515/zaa‑2018‑0024
     https://doi.org/10.1515/zaa-2018-0024 [Google Scholar]
  145. 2019a English Comparative Correlatives: Diachronic and Synchronic Variation at the Lexicon-Syntax Interface. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108569859
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108569859 [Google Scholar]
  146. 2019b Language and creativity: A construction grammar approach to linguistic creativity. Linguistics Vanguard 5 (1), 1–8. 10.1515/lingvan‑2019‑0019
     https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2019-0019 [Google Scholar]
  147. Hoffmann, Thomas
    2020 Construction Grammar and creativity: Evolution, psychology and cognitive science. Cognitive Semiotics13(1), 1–11. 10.1515/cogsem‑2020‑2018
     https://doi.org/10.1515/cogsem-2020-2018 [Google Scholar]
  148. Hoffmann, Thomas
    2021a Multimodal Construction Grammar: From multimodal constructs to multimodal constructions. In Xu Wen & John R. Taylor (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. New York: Routledge, 78–92. 10.4324/9781351034708‑6
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351034708-6 [Google Scholar]
  149. 2021b The Cognitive Foundation of Post-colonial Englishes: Construction Grammar as the Cognitive Theory for the Dynamic Model. (Cambridge Elements in World Englishes). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108909730
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108909730 [Google Scholar]
  150. 2022a Constructionist approaches to creativity. Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association10, 259–284.
     [Google Scholar]
  151. 2022b Construction Grammar: The Structure of English. (Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781139004213
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9781139004213 [Google Scholar]
  152. 2023 Constructicon in Progress: A short introduction to the constructionist approach to syntactic analysis (CASA). Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association11, 7–22. 10.1515/gcla‑2023‑0002
     https://doi.org/10.1515/gcla-2023-0002 [Google Scholar]
  153. Hoffmann, Thomas , Thomas Brunner & Jakob Horsch
    2020 English comparative correlative constructions: A usage-based account. Open Linguistics6, 196–215. 10.1515/opli‑2020‑0012
     https://doi.org/10.1515/opli-2020-0012 [Google Scholar]
  154. Hoffmann, Thomas & Thomas Herbst
    . Forthc. Identifying and combining English constructions – some challenges facing a Construction Grammar approach to syntactic analysis.
     [Google Scholar]
  155. Hoffmann, Thomas , Jakob Horsch & Thomas Brunner
    2019 The More Data, The Better: A Usage-based Account of the English Comparative Correlative Construction. Cognitive Linguistics30(1), 1–36. 10.1515/cog‑2018‑0036
     https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2018-0036 [Google Scholar]
  156. Hoffmann, Thomas & Graeme Trousdale
    (eds) 2013 The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195396683.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195396683.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  157. Hollmann, Willem
    2014 Word classes: Towards a more comprehensive usage-based account. In Nikolas Gisborne & Willem B. Hollmann (eds.), Theory and Data in Cognitive Linguistics. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 211–238. 10.1075/bct.67.08hol
     https://doi.org/10.1075/bct.67.08hol [Google Scholar]
  158. Huddleston, Rodney & Geoffrey K. Pullum
    2002 The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781316423530
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316423530 [Google Scholar]
  159. Hudson, Richard
    1984 Word Grammar. Oxford: Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  160. Imo, Wolfgang
    2015 Interactional construction grammar. Linguistics Vanguard 2015 1(1), 69–77.
     [Google Scholar]
  161. Jackendoff, Ray
    2002 Foundations of Language: Brain, Meaning, Grammar, Evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198270126.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198270126.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  162. Jurafsky, Dan
    2003 Probabilistic modeling in psycholinguistics: Linguistic comprehension and production. In Rens Bod , Jennifer Hay & Stefanie Jannedy , (eds.), Probabilistic Linguistics, 39–95/96. Cambridge & MA & London: MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/5582.003.0006
     https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/5582.003.0006 [Google Scholar]
  163. Jurafsky, Daniel & James H. Martin
    2023 Vector Semantics and Embeddings. Speech and Language Processing (draft). https://web.stanford.edu/~jurafsky/slp3/6.pdf
     [Google Scholar]
  164. Kaltenböck, Günther
    2020 Information structuring. In Bas Aarts , Jill Bowie & Gergana Popova (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of English Grammar, 461–482. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198755104.013.18
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198755104.013.18 [Google Scholar]
  165. Keizer, Evelien
    2007 The English Noun Phrase. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511627699
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511627699 [Google Scholar]
  166. 2020 Noun Phrases. In Bas Aarts , Jill Bowie & Gergana Popova (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of English Grammar, 335–357. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198755104.013.19
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198755104.013.19 [Google Scholar]
  167. Kibrik, Andrej A.
    2019 Rethinking agreement: Cognition-to-form mapping. Cognitive Linguistics30(1), 37–83. 10.1515/cog‑2017‑0035
     https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2017-0035 [Google Scholar]
  168. Kim, Jong-Bok & Laura Michaelis
    2020 Syntactic Constructions in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  169. Kiparsky, Paul & Carol Kiparsky
    1971 Fact. In Danny D. Steinberg & Leon A. Jakobovits (eds.), Semantics: An Interdisciplinary Reader in Philosophy, Linguistics and Psychology, 345–369. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  170. Klotz, Michael & Thomas Herbst
    2016 English Dictionaries: A Linguistic Introduction. Berlin: Erich Schmidt Verlag.
     [Google Scholar]
  171. Knop, Sabine de & Gaëtanelle Gilquin
    2016 Applied Construction Grammar. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110458268
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110458268 [Google Scholar]
  172. Krug, Manfred
    2000 Emerging English Modals: A Corpus-Based Study of Grammaticalization. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110820980
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110820980 [Google Scholar]
  173. Lakoff, George
    1987 Women, Fire and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago: Chicago University Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  174. Lambrecht, Knut
    1994 Information Structure and Sentence Form: Topic, Focus, and the Mental Representations of Discourse Referents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511620607
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620607 [Google Scholar]
  175. Lambrecht, Knud
    2001 Dislocation. In Martin Haspelmath , Ekkehard König , Wulf Oesterreicher & Wolfgang Raible (eds.), Language Typology and Language Universals: An International Handbook, Vol.2, 1050–1078. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
  176. Langacker, Ronald W.
    1987 Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Vol. 1 Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  177. 1991 Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Vol. 2 Descriptive Application. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  178. 2003/2009 Constructions in Cognitive Grammar. In Ronald W. Langacker (ed.), Investigations in Cognitive Grammar, 1–39, Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. (originally in English Linguistics 20, 41–83)
     [Google Scholar]
  179. 2008a Cognitive Grammar: A Basic Introduction. Oxford / New York: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331967.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331967.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  180. 2008b The relevance of Cognitive Grammar for language pedagogy. In Sabine de Knop & Teun Rycker (eds.), Cognitive Approaches to Pedagogical Grammar, 7–35. Berlin: de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110205381.1.7
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110205381.1.7 [Google Scholar]
  181. 2020 Trees, assemblies, chains and windows. Constructions and Frames12(1), 8–55. 10.1075/cf.00034.lan
     https://doi.org/10.1075/cf.00034.lan [Google Scholar]
  182. Lapesa, Gabriella & Stefan Evert
    2014 A large scale evaluation of distributional semantic models: Parameters, interactions and model selection. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics2, 531–545. 10.1162/tacl_a_00201
     https://doi.org/10.1162/tacl_a_00201 [Google Scholar]
  183. Lea, Diana
    2007 Making a collocations dictionary. Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik55(3), 261–271. 10.1515/zaa.2007.55.3.261
     https://doi.org/10.1515/zaa.2007.55.3.261 [Google Scholar]
  184. Leech, Geoffrey N.
    1971 Meaning and the English Verb. London: Longman.
     [Google Scholar]
  185. 1981 Semantics. Second edition. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
     [Google Scholar]
  186. 1983 Principles of Pragmatics. London/New York: Longman.
     [Google Scholar]
  187. Leech, Geoffrey N. & Jan Svartvik
    1975 A Communicative Grammar of English. London: Longman.
     [Google Scholar]
  188. Leino, Jakko
    2013 Information structure. In Thomas Hoffmann & Graeme Trousdale , (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar, 329–344. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  189. Lieven, Elena
    2014 First-language learning from a usage-based approach. In Thomas Herbst , Hans-Jörg Schmid , & Susen Faulhaber (eds.), Constructions – Collocations – Patterns, 9–32. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110356854.9
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110356854.9 [Google Scholar]
  190. Lohndahl, Terje & Liliane Haegeman
    2020 Generative approaches. In Bas Aarts , Jill Bowie & Gergana Popova (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of English Grammar, 153–179. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198755104.013.11
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198755104.013.11 [Google Scholar]
  191. Lyngfelt, Benjamin , Lars Borin , Kyoko Ohara & Tiago Timponi Torrent
    (eds.) 2018 Constructicography: Constructicon Development across Languages. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins. 10.1075/cal.22
     https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.22 [Google Scholar]
  192. MacWhinney, Brian
    2000 The CHILDES Project: Tools for Analyzing Talk. 3rd edn. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
     [Google Scholar]
  193. Makkai, Adam
    1972 Idiom Structure in English. The Hague: Mouton. 10.1515/9783110812671
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110812671 [Google Scholar]
  194. Matthews, Peter
    1981 Syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  195. 2007 The scope of valency in grammar. In Thomas Herbst & Katrin Götz-Votteler (eds.), Valency. Theoretical, Descriptive and Cognitive Issues, 3–14. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110198775.1.3
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110198775.1.3 [Google Scholar]
  196. Michaelis, Laura A.
    2013 Sign-Based Construction Grammar. In Thomas Hoffmann and Graeme Trousdale (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar, 133–152. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  197. Minsky, Marvin
    1975 A framework for representing knowledge. In P. Winston (ed.), The Psychology of Computer Vision, 211–277. New York: McGraw-Hill.
     [Google Scholar]
  198. Müller, Stefan
    2023 Grammatical Theory: From Transformational Grammar to Constraint-based Approaches. (Textbooks in Language Sciences 1). Berlin: Language Science Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  199. Nesselhauf, Nadja
    2005 Collocations in a Learner Corpus. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.14
     https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.14 [Google Scholar]
  200. OED online
    OED online . https://www.oed.com
  201. Palmer, Frank R.
    1971 Grammar. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
     [Google Scholar]
  202. 1981 Semantics. Second edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  203. Patel, Malin , Armine Garibyan , Elodie Winckel & Stephanie Evert
    2023 A reference constructicon as a database. Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association11, 175–202. 10.1515/gcla‑2023‑0009
     https://doi.org/10.1515/gcla-2023-0009 [Google Scholar]
  204. Patten, Amanda & Florent Perek
    2019 Towards an English constructicon using patterns and frames. International Journal of Corpus Lingustics24, 356–386.
     [Google Scholar]
  205. Perek, Florent
    2015 Argument Structure in Usage-Based Construction Grammar. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins. 10.1075/cal.17
     https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.17 [Google Scholar]
  206. Petruck, Miriam R. L.
    1996 Frame semantics. In Jef Verschueren , Jan-Ola Östman , Jan Blommaert & Chris Bulcaen (eds.), Handbook of Pragmatics, 1–11. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins.
     [Google Scholar]
  207. Quirk, Randolph , Sidney Greenbaum , Geoffrey Leech & Jan Svartvik
    1985 A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.
     [Google Scholar]
  208. Radden, Günter & René Dirven
    2007 Cognitive English Grammar. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins. 10.1075/clip.2
     https://doi.org/10.1075/clip.2 [Google Scholar]
  209. Radford, Andrew
    1988 Transformational Grammar: A First Course. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511840425
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511840425 [Google Scholar]
  210. 1993 Head-hunting: On the trail of the nominal Janus. In Greville B. Corbett , Norman M. Fraser & Scott McClashen (eds.), Heads in Grammatical Theory, 73–113. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511659454.005
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511659454.005 [Google Scholar]
  211. Rezac, Milan
    2006 On tough-movement. In Cedric Boeckx (ed.), Minimalist Essays, 288–325. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins. 10.1075/la.91.19rez
     https://doi.org/10.1075/la.91.19rez [Google Scholar]
  212. Rothweiler, Monika & Jörg Meibauer
    1999 Das Lexikon im Spracherwerb – Ein Überblick. In Jörg Meibauer & Monika Rothweiler (eds.), Das Lexikon im Spracherwerb, 9–31. Tübingen/Basel: Francke.
     [Google Scholar]
  213. Sag, Ivan A.
    2010 English filler-gap constructions. Language86(3), 486–545. 10.1353/lan.2010.0002
     https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2010.0002 [Google Scholar]
  214. Sanchez-Stockhammer, Christina
    2018 English Compounds and their Spelling. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  215. Sanchez-Stockhammer, Christina & Peter Uhrig
    2023 “I’m gonna get totally and utterly X-ed.” Constructing drunkenness. Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association11, 121–150. 10.1515/gcla‑2023‑0007
     https://doi.org/10.1515/gcla-2023-0007 [Google Scholar]
  216. Schank, Roger C. & Robert P. Abelson
    1977 Scripts, Plans, Goals, and Understanding: An Inquiry Into Human Knowledge Structures. Hillsdale/NJ: Erlbaum.
     [Google Scholar]
  217. Schmid, Hans-Jörg
    2000 English Abstract Nouns as Conceptual Shells. From Corpus to Cognition: Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110808704
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110808704 [Google Scholar]
  218. 2003 Collocation: hard to pin down, but bloody useful. Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik51(3), 235–258.
     [Google Scholar]
  219. 2005 Englische Morphologie und Wortbildung. Eine Einführung. Berlin: Schmidt.
     [Google Scholar]
  220. 2011 English Morphology and Word-formation. An Introduction. Berlin: Schmidt.
     [Google Scholar]
  221. 2017 A framework for understanding entrenchment and its psychological foundations. In Hans-Jörg Schmid (ed.), Entrenchment and the Psychology of Language Learning: How We Reorganize and Adapt Linguistic Knowledge, 9–36. Boston: APA & Walter de Gruyter. 10.1037/15969‑002
     https://doi.org/10.1037/15969-002 [Google Scholar]
  222. Schmid, Hans-Jörg
    2020 The Dynamics of the Linguistic System: Usage, Conventionalization and Entrenchment. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780198814771.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198814771.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  223. Schönefeld, Doris
    2006 From conceptualization to linguistic expression: Where languages diversify. In Stefan Th. Gries & Anatol Stefanowitsch (eds.), Corpora in Cognitive Linguistics: The Syntax-Lexis Interface, 297–344. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110197709.297
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197709.297 [Google Scholar]
  224. Schumacher, Helmut , Jacqueline Kubczak , Renate Schmidt & Vera de Ruiter
    2004 VALBU – Valenzwörterbuch deutscher Verben. Tübingen: Narr.
     [Google Scholar]
  225. Siepmann, Dirk
    2007 Wortschatz und Grammatik: Zusammenbringen, was zusammengehört. Beiträge zur Fremdsprachenvermittlung46, 59–80.
     [Google Scholar]
  226. Sinclair, John McH.
    2004 Trust the Text. London/New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203594070
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203594070 [Google Scholar]
  227. Sinclair, John McH
    2008 The phrase, the whole phrase and nothing but the phrase. In Sylviane Granger & Fanny Meunier (eds.), Phraseology: An Interdisciplinary Perspective, 407–410. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins.
     [Google Scholar]
  228. Sinclair, John McH.
    1991 Corpus, Concordance, Collocation. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  229. Sinclair, John McH. & Anna Mauranen
    2006 Linear Unit Grammar: Integrating Speech and Writing. Amsterdam/Philadelphia. 10.1075/scl.25
     https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.25 [Google Scholar]
  230. Sommerer, Lotte
    2018 Article Emergence in Old English: A Constructionist Perspective. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
  231. Steels, Luc
    2013 Fluid Construction Grammar. In Thomas Hoffmann & Graeme Trousdale (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar, 153–167. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  232. Steen, Francis & Mark Turner
    2013 Multimodal construction grammar. In Mike Borkent , Barbara Dancygier & Jennifer Hinnell (eds.), Language and the Creative Mind, 255–274. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
     [Google Scholar]
  233. Stefanowitsch, Anatol
    2003 The English imperative: A construction-based approach. Unpublished manuscript, Universität Bremen.
  234. 2011a Argument structure: Item-based or distributed?Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 59 (4): 369–386. 10.1515/zaa‑2011‑0407
     https://doi.org/10.1515/zaa-2011-0407 [Google Scholar]
  235. 2011b Keine Grammatik ohne Konstruktionen: Ein logisch-ökonomisches Argument für die Konstruktionsgrammatik. In Stefan Engelberg , Anke Holler & Kristel Proost (eds.), Sprachliches Wissen zwischen Lexikon und Grammatik, 181–210. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110262339.181
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110262339.181 [Google Scholar]
  236. 2014 Collostructional analysis: A case study of the English into-causative. In Thomas Herbst , Hans-Jörg Schmid & Susen Faulhaber (eds.), Constructions, Colocations, Patterns, 216–238. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110356854.217
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110356854.217 [Google Scholar]
  237. 2018 The goal-bias revisited: a collostructional approach. Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association6, 143–166. 10.1515/gcla‑2018‑0007
     https://doi.org/10.1515/gcla-2018-0007 [Google Scholar]
  238. Stefanowitsch, Anatol & Stefan Th. Gries
    2003 Collostructions: Investigating the interaction of words and constructions. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics8(2), 209–243. 10.1075/ijcl.8.2.03ste
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.8.2.03ste [Google Scholar]
  239. Stefanowitsch, Anatol & Ada Rohde
    2004 The goal bias in the encoding of motion events. In Günter Radden & Klaus-Uwe Panther (eds.), Studies in Linguistic Motivation, 249–268. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
  240. Street, James & Ewa Dąbrowska
    2014 Lexically specific knowledge and individual differences in adult native speakers’ processing of the English passive. Applied Psycholinguistics35, 97–118. 10.1017/S0142716412000367
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716412000367 [Google Scholar]
  241. Taylor, John R.
    1989 Linguistic Categorization. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  242. Tesnière, Lucien
    1959/2015 Elements of Structural Syntax. (Trans.) Timothy Osborne & Sylvain Kahane . Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins.
     [Google Scholar]
  243. Tomasello, Michael
    1992 First Verbs. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511527678
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511527678 [Google Scholar]
  244. 2003 Constructing a Language. Cambridge/MA/London: Harvard University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  245. Traugott, Elisabeth Closs
    2008 Grammaticalization, constructions and the incremental development of language: Suggestions from the development of degree modifiers in English. In Regine Eckardt , Gerhard Jäger & Tonjes Veenstra (eds.), Variation, Selection, Development: Probing the Evolutionary Model of Language Change, 219–250. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110205398.3.219
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110205398.3.219 [Google Scholar]
  246. Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
    2015 Toward a coherent account of grammatical constructionalization. In Jóhanna Barðdal , Elena Smirnova , Lotte Sommerer & Spike Gildea (eds.), Diachronic Construction Grammar, 51–79. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cal.18.02tra
     https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.18.02tra [Google Scholar]
  247. Turner, Mark
    2018 The role of creativity in multimodal Construction Grammar. Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik66(3), 357–370. 10.1515/zaa‑2018‑0030
     https://doi.org/10.1515/zaa-2018-0030 [Google Scholar]
  248. Turner, Mark & Gilles Fauconnier
    1999 A mechanism of creativity. Poetics Today20(3), 397–418.
     [Google Scholar]
  249. Tyler, Andrea E.
    2012 Cognitive Linguistics and Second Language Learning: Theoretical Basics and Experimental Evidence. New York/London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203876039
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203876039 [Google Scholar]
  250. Tyler, Andrea E. , Lourdes Ortega , Mariko Uno & Hae In Park
    (eds.) 2018 Usage-inspired L2 Instruction. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins. 10.1075/lllt.49
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.49 [Google Scholar]
  251. Uhrig, Peter
    2015 Why the Principle of No Synonymy is overrated. Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 66 (3), 323–337. 10.1515/zaa‑2015‑0030
     https://doi.org/10.1515/zaa-2015-0030 [Google Scholar]
  252. 2018 Subjects in English: From Valency Grammar to a Constructionist Treatment of Non-Canonical Subjects. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110589801
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110589801 [Google Scholar]
  253. 2020 Multimodal research in linguistics. Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik68(4), 345–349. 10.1515/zaa‑2020‑2019
     https://doi.org/10.1515/zaa-2020-2019 [Google Scholar]
  254. 2021 Large-Scale Multimodal Corpus Linguistics – The Big Data Turn. Habilitationsschrift Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (unpublished ms.).
     [Google Scholar]
  255. Uhrig, Peter , Susen Faulhaber , Ewa Dąbrowska & Thomas Herbst
    2022 L2-words that go together – more on collocation and learner language. In Hans C. Boas (ed.), Directions for Pedagogical Construction Grammar, 97–119, Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110746723‑004
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110746723-004 [Google Scholar]
  256. Ungerer, Friedrich and Hans-Jörg Schmid
    2006 An Introduction to Cognitive Linguistics. Second edition. London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  257. Van Trijp, Remi
    2014 Cognitive vs. generative Construction Grammar: The case of coercion and argument structure. Cognitive Linguistics26(4), 613–632. 10.1515/cog‑2014‑0074
     https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2014-0074 [Google Scholar]
  258. Welke, Klaus
    2011 Valenzgrammatik des Deutschen: Eine Einführung. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110254198
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110254198 [Google Scholar]
  259. 2019 Konstruktionsgrammatik des Deutschen: Ein sprachgebrauchsbezogener Ansatz. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110614077
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110614077 [Google Scholar]
  260. Wells, John C.
    2006 English Intonation: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  261. Wittgenstein, Ludwig
    1953 Philosophical Investigations. Oxford: Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  262. Ziem, Alexander
    2008 Frame-Semantik und Diskursanalyse: Skizze einer kognitionswissenschaftlich inspirierten Methode zur Analyse gesellschaftlichen Wissens. In Ingo H. Warnke & Jürgen Spitzmüller (eds.), Methoden der Diskurslinguistik: Sprachwissenschaftliche Zugänge zur transtextuellen Ebene. Methoden, 89–116. Berlin /New York: De Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
  263. Ziem, Alexander & Alexander Lasch
    2013 Konstruktionsgrammatik: Konzepte und Grundlagen gebrauchsorientierter Ansätze. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110295641
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110295641 [Google Scholar]
  264. Ziem, Alexander & Tim Feldmüller
    2023 Dimensions of constructional meanings in the German Constructicon: Why collo-profiles matter. Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association11, 203–226. 10.1515/gcla‑2023‑0010
     https://doi.org/10.1515/gcla-2023-0010 [Google Scholar]
  265. www.con​​struct​​icon.de: The CASA-ConstruCtiCon of the English Language.
     [Google Scholar]
  266. BNC British National Corpus. Distributed by Oxford University Computing Service on behalf of the BNC Consortium.
     [Google Scholar]
  267. Childes Elena Lieven & Jeannette Goh
    : CHILDES English Thomas Corpushttps://childes.talkbank.org/access/Eng-UK/Thomas.html
     [Google Scholar]
  268. MacWhinney, Brian
    2000 The CHILDES Project: Tools for analyzing talk. 3rd edn. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
     [Google Scholar]
  269. COCA Corpus of Contemporary English , Mark Davies
    https://www.english-corpora.org/coca/
  270. MOVIES Movies 1930s–2018
    MOVIES Movies 1930s–2018 (200 million words) https://www.english-corpora.org
  271. NOW News on the Web
    NOW News on the Web (over 15 billion words) https://www.english-corpora.org
  272. TV TV corpus
    TV TV corpus (over 325 million words) https://www.english-corpora.org
  273. NYT New York Times
    NYT New York Times https://www.nytimes.com
/content/books/9789027246769
Loading

  • From This Site

    /content/books/9789027246769
    dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Chapter
    10
    5
/content/books/9789027246769
dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
-contentType:Journal -contentType:Chapter
10
5
Chapter
content/books/9789027246769
Book
false
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error