1887
  1. Home
  2. Books
  3. Textbook English

Textbook English

A multi-dimensional approach

image of Textbook English
USD
Buy:$149.00 + Taxes

This book provides a systematic, empirical account of the language typically presented in English as a Foreign Language (EFL) textbooks, based on a large corpus of EFL textbooks used in secondary schools. A modified version of the Multi-Dimensional Analysis (MDA) framework serves to examine linguistic variation both within textbooks and compared to corpora representing ‘real-life’ English as used outside the EFL classroom. The results highlight the characteristics of Textbook English that define it as a distinct variety of English. In light of the study's pedagogical implications, this book proposes a range of corpus-based approaches to improve the naturalness of textbook texts. It also contributes to advancing quantitative corpus linguistics methodology: its detailed online supplements aim for methodological transparency and reproducibility in line with the principles of Open Science. This book will be of interest to linguistics and language education students and researchers, as well as EFL teachers, textbook authors and editors, and those involved in curriculum development and teacher training.

References

  1. Abello-Contesse, Christián & López-Jiménez, María Dolores
    2010 The treatment of lexical collocations in EFL textbooks. InExploring New Paths in Language Pedagogy: Lexis and Corpus-based Language Teaching [Equinox English Linguistics and ELT], María Moreno Jaén , Fernando Serrano & María Calzada Pérez (eds), 95–109. London: Equinox.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Achard, Michel & Niemeier, Susanne
    (eds) 2004 Cognitive Linguistics, Second Language Acquisition, and Foreign Language Teaching [Studies on Language Acquisition 18]. Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110199857
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110199857 [Google Scholar]
  3. Ahmad, Hamdi & Millar, Robert McColl
    2020 Review of Text Authenticity Relationship with Language Learner Motivation and Communicative Competence. International Journal of English Linguistics10(5): 89. 10.5539/ijel.v10n5p89
     https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v10n5p89 [Google Scholar]
  4. Alejo González, Rafael , Piquer Píriz, Ana & Reveriego Sierra, Guadalupe
    2010 Phrasal verbs in EFL course books. InFostering Language Teaching Efficiency through Cognitive Linguistics [Applications of Cognitive Linguistics 17], Sabine De Knop , Frank Boers & Antoon De Rycker (eds), 59–78. Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110245837.59
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110245837.59 [Google Scholar]
  5. Alemi, Minoo & Isavi, Ebrahim
    2012 Evaluation of interactional metadiscourse in EFL textbooks. Advances in Asian Social Science2(1): 422–430.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Al-Hoorie, Ali H. & Marsden, Emma
    2024 Open scholarship and transparency in applied linguistics research. OSF. 10.31219/osf.io/7ntq2
     https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/7ntq2 [Google Scholar]
  7. Altenberg, Bengt
    1989 Review of Douglas Biber (1988) Variation across speech and writing. Studia Linguistica43(2). 167–174. 10.1111/j.1467‑9582.1989.tb00800.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9582.1989.tb00800.x [Google Scholar]
  8. Altenberg, Bengt & Granger, Sylviane
    2001 The grammatical and lexical patterning of MAKE in native and non-native student writing. Applied Linguistics22(2): 173–195. 10.1093/applin/22.2.173
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/22.2.173 [Google Scholar]
  9. Anthony, Laurence
    2020 Programming for corpus linguistics. InA Practical Handbook of Corpus Linguistics, Magali Paquot & Stefan Th. Gries (eds), 181–207. Cham: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑030‑46216‑1_9
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-46216-1_9 [Google Scholar]
  10. Anton, Daniela
    2017 Inter- und transkulturelles Lernen im Englischunterricht: Eine didaktische Analyse einschlägiger Lehrbücher [Anglistische Forschungen 456]. Heidelberg: Universitätsverlag Winter.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Argamon, Shlomo
    2019 Register in computational language research. Register Studies1(1): 100–135. 10.1075/rs.18015.arg
     https://doi.org/10.1075/rs.18015.arg [Google Scholar]
  12. Atkins, Sue , Clear, Jeremy & Ostler, Nicholas
    1992 Corpus design criteria. Literary and Linguistic Computing7(1): 1–16. 10.1093/llc/7.1.1
     https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/7.1.1 [Google Scholar]
  13. Ballier, Nicolas , Díaz Negrillo, Ana & Thompson, Paul
    (eds) 2013 Automatic Treatment and Analysis of Learner Corpus Data [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 59]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Barbieri, Federica
    2005 Quotative use in American English: A corpus-based, cross-register comparison. Journal of English Linguistics33(3): 222–256. 10.1177/0075424205282667
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0075424205282667 [Google Scholar]
  15. Barbieri, Federica & Eckhardt, Suzanne E. B.
    2007 Applying corpus-based findings to form-focused instruction: The case of reported speech. Language Teaching Research11(3): 319–346. 10.1177/1362168807077563
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168807077563 [Google Scholar]
  16. Barlow, Michael
    2003 Corpora and language teaching. KATE Forum27(1): 6–9.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Barlow, Michael & Kemmer, Suzanne
    (eds) 2000 Usage-Based Models of Language. Stanford, CA: CSLI.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Baroni, Marco & Bernardini, Silvia
    2005 A new approach to the study of translationese: Machine-learning the difference between original and translated text. Literary and Linguistic Computing21(3): 259–274. 10.1093/llc/fqi039
     https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqi039 [Google Scholar]
  19. Baroni, Marco & Evert, Stephanie
    2009 Statistical methods for corpus exploitation. InCorpus Linguistics: An International Handbook, Merja Kytö & Anke Lüdeling (eds), Ch. 36, 777–803. Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110213881.2.777
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110213881.2.777 [Google Scholar]
  20. Baroni, Marco , Kilgarriff, Adam , Pomikálek, Jan & Rychlý, Pavel
    2006 WebBootCaT: A web tool for instant corpora. In Elisa Corino , Carla Marello & Onesti Cristina (eds), Proceedings of the 12th Euralex International Congress, 123–132. Torino: European Association for Lexicography.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Bates, Douglas , Mächler, Martin , Bolker, Ben & Walker, Steve
    2015 Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software67(1): 1–48. 10.18637/jss.v067.i01
     https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01 [Google Scholar]
  22. Bausch, Karl-Richard
    (ed.) 2005 Bildungsstandards für den Fremdsprachenunterricht auf dem Prüfstand: Arbeitspapiere der 25. Frühjahrskonferenz zur Erforschung des Fremdsprachenunterrichts [Giessener Beiträge Zur Fremdsprachendidaktik]. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Behrens, Heike
    2006 The input–output relationship in first language acquisition. Language and Cognitive Processes21(1–3): 2–24. 10.1080/01690960400001721
     https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960400001721 [Google Scholar]
  24. Bell, Jan & Gower, Roger
    2011 Writing course materials for the world: A great compromise. InMaterials Development in Language Teaching, Brian Tomlinson (ed.), 135–150. Cambridge: CUP. 10.1017/9781139042789.008
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9781139042789.008 [Google Scholar]
  25. Belz, Anya , Agarwal, Shubham , Shimorina, Anastasia & Reiter, Ehud
    2021 A systematic review of reproducibility research in natural language processing. arXiv:2103.07929 [cs]. 〈arxiv.org/abs/2103.07929〉 (26 July 2021). 10.18653/v1/2021.eacl‑main.29
     https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2021.eacl-main.29 [Google Scholar]
  26. Bendix, Regina
    1997 In Search of Authenticity: The Formation of Folklore Studies. Madison WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Benhamou, Émile & Dominique, Philippe
    . Speak English : 6e série verte. Paris: Fernand Nathan.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Bennett, Gena
    2010 Using Corpora in the Language Learning Classroom: Corpus Linguistics for Teachers. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press. 10.3998/mpub.371534
     https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.371534 [Google Scholar]
  29. Berber Sardinha, Tony & Veirano Pinto, Marcia
    (eds) 2014 Multi-Dimensional Analysis, 25 Years on: A Tribute to Douglas Biber [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 60]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.60
     https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.60 [Google Scholar]
  30. (eds) 2019 Multi-Dimensional Analysis: Research Methods and Current Issues. London: Bloomsbury Academic. 10.5040/9781350023857
     https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350023857 [Google Scholar]
  31. Berber Sardinha, Tony , Veirano Pinto, Marcia , Mayer, Cristina , Zuppardi, Maria Carolina & Kauffmann, Carlos Henrique
    2019 Adding registers to a previous multi-dimensional analysis. InMulti-Dimensional Analysis: Research Methods and Current Issues, Tony Berber Sardinha & Marcia Veirano Pinto (eds), 165–188. London: Bloomsbury. 10.5040/9781350023857.0017
     https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350023857.0017 [Google Scholar]
  32. Berez-Kroeker, Andrea L. , Gawne, Lauren , Kung, Susan Smythe , Kelly, Barbara F. , Heston, Tyler , Holton, Gary , Pulsifer, Peter ,
    2018 Reproducible research in linguistics: A position statement on data citation and attribution in our field. Linguistics56(1): 1–18. 10.1515/ling‑2017‑0032
     https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2017-0032 [Google Scholar]
  33. Berns, Margie S. , de Bot, Kees & Hasebrink, Uwe
    (eds) 2007 In the Presence of English: Media and European Youth [Language Policy 7]. New York, NY: Springer. 10.1007/978‑0‑387‑36894‑8
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-36894-8 [Google Scholar]
  34. Bezemer, Jeff & Kress, Gunther
    2016 The textbook in a changing multimodal landscape. InHandbuch Sprache im multimodalen Kontext, Nina-Maria Klug & Hartmut Stöckl (eds), 476–498. Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110296099‑022
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110296099-022 [Google Scholar]
  35. Biber, Douglas
    1984 A Model of Textual Relations within the Written and Spoken Modes. PhD dissertation, University of Southern California.
  36. 1988 Variation across Speech and Writing. Cambridge: CUP. 10.1017/CBO9780511621024
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511621024 [Google Scholar]
  37. 1990 Methodological issues regarding corpus-based analyses of linguistic variation. Literary and Linguistic Computing5(4): 257–269. 10.1093/llc/5.4.257
     https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/5.4.257 [Google Scholar]
  38. 1995 Dimensions of Register Variation. Cambridge: CUP. 10.1017/CBO9780511519871
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511519871 [Google Scholar]
  39. 2006 University Language: A Corpus-Based Study of Spoken and Written Registers [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 23]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.23
     https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.23 [Google Scholar]
  40. 2012 Register as a predictor of linguistic variation. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory8(1): 9–37. 10.1515/cllt‑2012‑0002
     https://doi.org/10.1515/cllt-2012-0002 [Google Scholar]
  41. 2014 Using multi-dimensional analysis to explore cross-linguistic universals of register variation. Languages in Contrast14(1): 7–34. 10.1075/lic.14.1.02bib
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lic.14.1.02bib [Google Scholar]
  42. 2019 Multi-dimensional analysis: A historical synopsis. InMulti-Dimensional Analysis: Research Methods and Current Issues, Tony Berber Sardinha & Marcia Veirano Pinto (eds), 11–26. London: Bloomsbury Academic. 10.5040/9781350023857.0009
     https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350023857.0009 [Google Scholar]
  43. 2021 Corpus linguistics is for text-lovers. Linguistics with a Corpus (blog), 22 December 2021. 〈https://linguisticswithacorpus.wordpress.com/2021/12/22/corpus-linguistics-is-for-text-lovers%EF%BF%BC/〉 (28 December 2021).
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Biber, Douglas & Barbieri, Federica
    2007 Lexical bundles in university spoken and written registers. English for Specific Purposes26(3): 263–286. 10.1016/j.esp.2006.08.003
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2006.08.003 [Google Scholar]
  45. Biber, Douglas & Conrad, Susan
    2001 Quantitative corpus-based research: Much more than bean counting. TESOL Quarterly35(2): 331–336. 10.2307/3587653
     https://doi.org/10.2307/3587653 [Google Scholar]
  46. 2010 Corpus Linguistics and Grammar Teaching. Pearson Longman Education. longmanhomeusa.com/content/pl_biber_conrad_monograph5_lo.pdf. (7 March, 2017).
     [Google Scholar]
  47. 2019 Register, Genre, and Style, 2nd edn. Cambridge: CUP. 10.1017/9781108686136
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108686136 [Google Scholar]
  48. Biber, Douglas , Conrad, Susan , Reppen, Randi , Byrd, Pat & Helt, Marie
    2002 Speaking and writing in the university: A multidimensional comparison. TESOL Quarterly36(1): 9. 10.2307/3588359
     https://doi.org/10.2307/3588359 [Google Scholar]
  49. Biber, Douglas , Conrad, Susan , Reppen, Randi , Byrd, Pat , Helt, Marie , Clark, Victoria , Cortes, Viviana , Csomay, Eniko & Urzua, Alfredo
    2004 Representing Language Use in the University: Analysis of the TOEFFL 2000 Spoken and Written Academic Language Corpus [TOEFL Monograph Series]. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Biber, Douglas & Egbert, Jesse
    2016 Register variation on the searchable web: A multi-dimensional analysis. Journal of English Linguistics44(2): 95–137. 10.1177/0075424216628955
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0075424216628955 [Google Scholar]
  51. 2018 Register Variation Online. Cambridge: CUP. 10.1017/9781316388228
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316388228 [Google Scholar]
  52. Biber, Douglas , Egbert, Jesse , Gray, Bethany , Oppliger, Rahel & Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt
    2016 Variationist versus text-linguistic approaches to grammatical change in English: Nominal modifiers of head nouns. InThe Cambridge Handbook of English Historical Linguistics, Merja Kyto & Paivi Pahta (eds), 351–375. Cambridge: CUP. 10.1017/CBO9781139600231.022
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139600231.022 [Google Scholar]
  53. Biber, Douglas & Finegan, Edward
    1994 Sociolinguistic Perspectives on Register. Oxford: OUP. 10.1093/oso/9780195083644.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195083644.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  54. Biber, Douglas & Gray, Bethany
    2013 Discourse characteristics of writing and speaking task types on the TOEFL IBT test: A lexico-grammatical analysis. ETS Research Report Series 2013(1). 10.1002/j.2333‑8504.2013.tb02311.x
     https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2333-8504.2013.tb02311.x [Google Scholar]
  55. 2015 Grammatical Complexity in Academic English: Linguistic Change in Writing [Studies in English Language]. Cambridge: CUP. 10.1017/CBO9780511920776
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511920776 [Google Scholar]
  56. Biber, Douglas , Johansson, Stig , Leech, Geoffrey , Conrad, Susan & Finegan, Edward
    1999 Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Longman.
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Biber, Douglas , Johansson, Stig , Leech, Geoffrey N. , Conrad, Susan & Finegan, Edward
    2021 Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/z.232
     https://doi.org/10.1075/z.232 [Google Scholar]
  58. Biber, Douglas & Quirk, Randolph
    (eds) 2012 Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English, 10th edn. Harlow: Longman.
     [Google Scholar]
  59. Biber, Douglas & Reppen, Randi
    2002 What does frequency have to do with grammar teaching?Studies in Second Language Acquisition24(2): 199–208. 10.1017/S0272263102002048
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263102002048 [Google Scholar]
  60. Biebighäuser, Katrin , Zibelius, Marja & Schmidt, Torben
    2012 Aufgaben 2.0: Konzepte, Materialien und Methoden für das Fremdsprachenlehren und -lernen mit digitalen Medien. BoD – Books on Demand.
     [Google Scholar]
  61. Bieswanger, Markus
    2008 Varieties of English in current English language teaching. Stellenbosch Papers in Linguistics38: 22–47. 10.5774/38‑0‑21
     https://doi.org/10.5774/38-0-21 [Google Scholar]
  62. Birkland, Annie , Block, Adeli , Craft, Justin , Sedarous, Yourdanis , Wang, Sky , Gou, Wu & Namboodiripad, Savithry
    2022 Problematizing the “native speaker” in linguistic research: History of the term and ways forward. Presented at theLinguistic Society of America, January 8, 〈https://osf.io/jufmg/〉 (16 January 2022).
     [Google Scholar]
  63. Blau, Eileen K.
    1990 The effect of syntax, speed, and pauses on listening comprehension. TESOL Quarterly24(4): 746. 10.2307/3587129
     https://doi.org/10.2307/3587129 [Google Scholar]
  64. Blighe, Kevin & Lun, Aaron
    2020 PCAtools: Everything principal components analysis, 〈https://github.com/kevinblighe/PCAtools〉 (22 April 2021).
  65. Blume, Carolyn
    2020 German teachers’ digital habitus and their pandemic pedagogy. Postdigital Science and Education2(3): 879–905. 10.1007/s42438‑020‑00174‑9
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-020-00174-9 [Google Scholar]
  66. Blumenthal-Dramé, Alice
    2012 Entrenchment in Usage-based Theories: What Corpus Eata do and do not Reveal about the Mind [Topics in English Linguistics 83]. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110294002
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110294002 [Google Scholar]
  67. Blyth, Carl
    2003 Playing games with literacy: The poetic function in the age of communicative language teaching. InReading between the Lines: Perspectives on Foreign Language Literacy [Yale Language Series], Peter Charles Patrikis (ed.), 60–73. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  68. 2009 From textbook to online materials: The changing ecology of foreign language publishing in the era of ICT. InForeign Language Learning with Digital Technology, Michael J. Evans (ed.), 174–202. London: Continuum.
     [Google Scholar]
  69. BNC Consortium
    BNC Consortium 2007 The British National Corpus. Oxford Text Archive, 〈www.natcorp.ox.ac.uk/corpus/〉 (28 August 2023).
     [Google Scholar]
  70. Bochynska, Agata , Keeble, Liam , Halfacre, Caitlin , Casillas, Joseph V. , Champagne, Irys-Amélie , Chen, Kaidi , Röthlisberger, Melanie , Buchanan, Erin M. & Roettger, Timo B.
    2023 Reproducible research practices and transparency across linguistics. Glossa Psycholinguistics2(1). 10.5070/G6011239
     https://doi.org/10.5070/G6011239 [Google Scholar]
  71. Bohmann, Axel
    2017 Variation in English World-wide: Varieties and Genres in a Quantitative Perspective. PhD dissertation, University of Texas, Austin.
  72. 2019 Variation in English Worldwide: Registers and Global Varieties. Cambridge: CUP. 10.1017/9781108751339
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108751339 [Google Scholar]
  73. 2021 Register in World Englishes research. InBloomsbury World Englishes, Vol. 1: Paradigms, Britta Schneider , Theresa Heyd & Mario Saraceni (eds), 80–96. London: Bloomsbury Academic. 10.5040/9781350065833.0011
     https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350065833.0011 [Google Scholar]
  74. Boulton, Alex & Cobb, Tom
    2017 Corpus use in language learning: A meta-analysis. Language Learning67(2): 348–393. 10.1111/lang.12224
     https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12224 [Google Scholar]
  75. Boulton, Alex & Tyne, Henry
    2015 Corpus-based study of language and teacher education. InThe Routledge Handbook of Educational Linguistics, Martha Bigelow & Johanna Ennser-Kananen (eds), 301–312. New York, NY: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  76. Boulton, Alex & Vyatkina, Nina
    2021 Thirty years of data-driven learning: Taking stock and charting new directions over time. Language Learning25(3): 66–89.
     [Google Scholar]
  77. Bragger, Jeannette D. & Rice, Donald B.
    2000 Foreign language materials: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow. InAgents of Change in a Changing Age, Robert M. Terry (ed.), 107–40. Lincolnwood, IL: National Textbook Company.
     [Google Scholar]
  78. Brezina, Vaclav
    2018 Statistics in Corpus Linguistics: A Practical Guide. Cambridge: CUP. 10.1017/9781316410899
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316410899 [Google Scholar]
  79. Brezina, Vaclav & Gablasova, Dona
    2015 Is there a core general vocabulary? Introducing the new general service list. Applied Linguistics36(1): 1–22. 10.1093/applin/amt018
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amt018 [Google Scholar]
  80. Brezina, Vaclav , Hawtin, Abi & McEnery, Tony
    2021 The Written British National Corpus 2014 – Design and comparability. Text & Talk41(5–6): 595–615. 10.1515/text‑2020‑0052
     https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2020-0052 [Google Scholar]
  81. Brown, Dale
    2014 The power and authority of materials in the classroom ecology. The Modern Language Journal98(2): 658–661.
     [Google Scholar]
  82. Bruyn, Bert Le & Paquot, Magali
    2021 Learner Corpus Research Meets Second Language Acquisition. Cambridge: CUP.
     [Google Scholar]
  83. Burnard, Lou
    (ed.) 2007 Reference Guide for the British National Corpus, XML edn. 〈www.natcorp.ox.ac.uk/XMLedition/URG/〉 (17 September 2021).
     [Google Scholar]
  84. Burnard, Lou & Bauman, Syd
    2021 TEI P5: Guidelines for electronic text encoding and interchange v. 4.3.0. TEI consortium. 〈https://tei-c.org/Guidelines/P5/〉 (2 January 2022).
     [Google Scholar]
  85. Burton, Graham
    2012 Corpora and coursebooks: Destined to be strangers forever?Corpora7(1). 10.3366/cor.2012.0019
     https://doi.org/10.3366/cor.2012.0019 [Google Scholar]
  86. 2019 The Canon of Pedagogical Grammar for ELT: A Mixed Methods Study of its Evolution, Development and Comparison with Evidence on Learner Output. PhD dissertation, University of Limerick.
  87. 2020 Grammar. ELT Journal74(2): 198–201. 10.1093/elt/ccaa004
     https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccaa004 [Google Scholar]
  88. 2023 Grammar in ELT and ELT Materials. Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/BURTON5270
     https://doi.org/10.21832/BURTON5270 [Google Scholar]
  89. Bybee, Joan
    2007 Frequency of Use and the Organization of Language. Oxford: OUP. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195301571.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195301571.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  90. Bybee, Joan & Hopper, Paul
    (eds) 2001 Frequency and the Emergence of Linguistic Structure [Typological Studies in Language 45]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.45
     https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.45 [Google Scholar]
  91. Callies, Marcus
    2019 Integrating corpus literacy into language teacher education: The case of learner corpora. InLearner Corpora and Language Teaching [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 92], Sandra Götz & Joybrato Mukherjee (eds), 245–63. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.92.12cal
     https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.92.12cal [Google Scholar]
  92. Canale, Germán
    2021 The language textbook: Representation, interaction & learning: Conclusions. Language, Culture and Curriculum34(2): 199–206. 10.1080/07908318.2020.1797081
     https://doi.org/10.1080/07908318.2020.1797081 [Google Scholar]
  93. Carrie, Erin
    2017 “British is professional, American is urban”: Attitudes towards English reference accents in Spain. International Journal of Applied Linguistics27(2): 427–447. 10.1111/ijal.12139
     https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.12139 [Google Scholar]
  94. Carter, Ronald & McCarthy, Michael
    1996 Correspondence. ELT Journal50(4): 369–371. 10.1093/elt/50.4.369‑b
     https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/50.4.369-b [Google Scholar]
  95. Carter, Ronald
    2014 Grammar and spoken English. InApplying English Grammar: Corpus and Functional Approaches, Caroline Coffin , Ann Hewings & Kieran O’Halloran (eds), 25–39. Oxon: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  96. Carter, Ronald , Hughes, Rebecca & McCarthy, Michael
    1998 Telling tails: Grammar, the spoken language and materials development. InMaterials Development in Language Teaching, Brian Tomlinson (ed.), 67–86. Cambridge: CUP.
     [Google Scholar]
  97. Carter, Ronald & McCarthy, Michael
    1995 Grammar and the spoken language. Applied linguistics16(2): 141–158. 10.1093/applin/16.2.141
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/16.2.141 [Google Scholar]
  98. 2006a Cambridge Grammar of English: A Comprehensive Guide: Spoken and Written English Grammar and Usage. Cambridge: CUP.
     [Google Scholar]
  99. 2006b Cambridge Grammar of English: A Comprehensive Guide: Spoken and Written English Grammar and Usage. Cambridge: CUP.
     [Google Scholar]
  100. 2017 Spoken grammar: Where are we and where are we going?Applied Linguistics38(1): 1–20. 10.1093/applin/amu080
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amu080 [Google Scholar]
  101. Catalán, Rosa Maria Jiménez & Mancebo Francisco, Rocío
    2008 Vocabulary input in EFL textbooks. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada (RESLA)21: 147–166.
     [Google Scholar]
  102. Chafe, Wallace
    1982 Integration and involvement in speaking, writing, and oral literature. InSpoken and Written Language: Exploring Orality and Literacy [Advances in Discourse Processes 9], Deborah Tannen (ed.), 35–54. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
     [Google Scholar]
  103. Chambers, Angela
    2019 Towards the corpus revolution? Bridging the research–practice gap. Language Teaching52(4): 460–475. 10.1017/S0261444819000089
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444819000089 [Google Scholar]
  104. Chapelle, Carol A.
    2010 The spread of computer-assisted language learning. Language Teaching43(1): 66–74. 10.1017/S0261444809005850
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444809005850 [Google Scholar]
  105. Chen, Alvin Cheng-Hsien
    2016 A critical evaluation of text difficulty development in ELT textbook series: A corpus-based approach using variability neighbor clustering. System58: 64–81. 10.1016/j.system.2016.03.011
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2016.03.011 [Google Scholar]
  106. 2017 Assessing text difficulty development in ELT textbooks series using n-gram language models based on BNC. Presented atthe Corpus Linguistics Conference2017, Birmingham. 〈https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/Documents/college-artslaw/corpus/conference-archives/2017/general/paper137.pdf〉 (21 January 2019).
     [Google Scholar]
  107. Chen, Lin
    2010 An investigation of lexical bundles in ESP textbooks and electrical engineering introductory textbooks. InPerspectives on Formulaic Language: Acquisition and Communication, David Wood (ed.), 107–125. London: Continuum.
     [Google Scholar]
  108. Cheng, Winnie
    2007 Sorry to interrupt, but…: Pedagogical implications of a spoken corpus. InSpoken Corpora in Applied Linguistics [Linguistic Insights 51], Mari Carmen Campoy & María José Luzón (eds), 199–216. Bern: Peter Lang.
     [Google Scholar]
  109. Cheng, Winnie , Greaves, Christopher & Warren, Martin
    2005 The creation of a prosodically transcribed intercultural corpus: The Hong Kong Corpus of Spoken English (prosodic). ICAME journal29: 47–68.
     [Google Scholar]
  110. Cheng, Winnie & Warren, Martin
    2005 // → Well I Have a DIFferent // ↘ THINking You Know //: A corpus-driven study of disagreement in Hong Kong business discourse. InAsian Business Discourse(s), Francesca Bargiela-Chiappini & Maurizio Gotti (eds), 241–70. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
     [Google Scholar]
  111. 2006 I would say be very careful of…: Opine markers in an intercultural business corpus of spoken English. InManaging Interaction in Professional Discourse: Intercultural and Interdiscoursal Perspectives, Julia Bamford & Marina Bondi (eds), 46–57. Rome: Officina Edizioni.
     [Google Scholar]
  112. 2007 Checking understandings: Comparing textbooks and a corpus of spoken English in Hong Kong. Language Awareness16(3): 190–207. 10.2167/la455.0
     https://doi.org/10.2167/la455.0 [Google Scholar]
  113. Chien, Chu Ying & Young, Kathie
    2007 The centrality of textbooks in teachers’ work: Perceptions and use of textbooks in a Hong Kong primary school. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher16(2): 155–163.
     [Google Scholar]
  114. Chomsky, Noam
    1995 Language and nature. Mind104(413): 1–61. 10.1093/mind/104.413.1
     https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/104.413.1 [Google Scholar]
  115. 2002 On Nature and Language, ed. by Adriana Belletti & Luigi Rizzi . Cambridge: CUP. 10.1017/CBO9780511613876
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511613876 [Google Scholar]
  116. Chong, Chia Suan
    2012 The teach-off – My reaction to coursebooks & uncount nouns. chiasuanchong.com (blog), 26 April 2012, 〈https://chiasuanchong.com/2012/04/26/the-teach-off-my-reaction-to-coursebooks-uncountable-nouns/〉 (17 September 2020).
     [Google Scholar]
  117. Clark, Eve V. & Casillas, Marisa
    2016 First language acquisition. InThe Routledge Handbook of Linguistics, Keith Allan (ed.), 311–28. New York, NY: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  118. Clarke, Isobelle
    2019 Functional linguistic variation in Twitter trolling. International Journal of Speech Language and the Law26(1): 57–84. 10.1558/ijsll.34803
     https://doi.org/10.1558/ijsll.34803 [Google Scholar]
  119. 2020 Linguistic Variation across Twitter and Twitter Trolling. PhD dissertation, University of Birmingham. 〈etheses.bham.ac.uk/id/eprint/10009〉
  120. 2022 A multi-dimensional analysis of English tweets. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics31(2): 124–149. 10.1177/09639470221090369
     https://doi.org/10.1177/09639470221090369 [Google Scholar]
  121. Clarke, Isobelle & Grieve, Jack
    2017 Dimensions of abusive language on Twitter. InProceedings of the First Workshop on Abusive Language Online, 1–10, 〈https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/W17-3001.pdf〉 (11 February 2021). 10.18653/v1/W17‑3001
     https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/W17-3001 [Google Scholar]
  122. Coats, Steven
    2016 Grammatical feature frequencies of English on Twitter in Finland. InEnglish in Computer-Mediated Communication, Lauren Squires (ed.), 179–210. Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110490817‑009
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110490817-009 [Google Scholar]
  123. Cohen, Henri & Lefebvre, Claire
    2017 Handbook of Categorization in Cognitive Science, 2nd edn. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
     [Google Scholar]
  124. Condon, Nora
    2008 How cognitive linguistic motivations influence the learning of phrasal verbs. InCognitive Linguistic Approaches to Teaching Vocabulary and Phraseology, Frank Boers & Seth Lindstromberg (eds), 133–58. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110199161.2.133
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110199161.2.133 [Google Scholar]
  125. Conrad, Susan
    2000 Will corpus linguistics revolutionize grammar teaching in the 21st century?TESOL Quarterly34(3): 548–560. 10.2307/3587743
     https://doi.org/10.2307/3587743 [Google Scholar]
  126. Conrad, Susan
    2004 Corpus variety: Corpus linguistics, language variation, and language teaching. InHow to Use Corpora in Language Teaching [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 12], John McH. Sinclair (ed.), 67–85. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.12.08con
     https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.12.08con [Google Scholar]
  127. Conrad, Susan & Biber, Douglas
    (eds) (2001) 2013 Variation in English: Multi-Dimensional Studies [Studies in Language and Linguistics]. New York, NY: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  128. Conrad, Susan , Biber, Douglas & Leech, Geoffrey N.
    2011 Longman Student Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Workbook. Harlow: Longman.
     [Google Scholar]
  129. Conseil supérieur des programmes
    Conseil supérieur des programmes 2015 Projet de programme de cycle 4. 〈https://www.education.gouv.fr/media/18161/download〉 (1 January 2018).
  130. Consejería de Educación, Juventud y Deporte de Madrid
    Consejería de Educación, Juventud y Deporte de Madrid 2015 Decreto 48/2015 Curriculo de educación secundaria obligatoria. Boletín Oficial de la Comunidad de Madrid. 〈www.bocm.es〉 (12 January 2022).
     [Google Scholar]
  131. Cook, Guy
    2000 Language Play, Language Learning. Oxford: OUP.
     [Google Scholar]
  132. Cook, Vivian
    2002 The functions of invented sentences: A reply to Guy Cook. Applied Linguistics23(2): 262–269. 10.1093/applin/23.2.262
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/23.2.262 [Google Scholar]
  133. Cools, Dorien & Sercu, Lies
    2006 Die Beurteilung von Lehrwerken an Hand des Gemeinsamen Europäischen Referenzrahmens für Sprachen: Eine empirische Untersuchung von zwei kürzlich erschienenen Lehrwerken für Deutsch als Fremdsprache. Zeitschrift für interkulturellen Fremdsprachenunterricht11(3): 1–20.
     [Google Scholar]
  134. Costello, Anna B. & Osborne, Jason
    2005 Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation10(7): 1–9. 10.7275/JYJ1‑4868
     https://doi.org/10.7275/JYJ1-4868 [Google Scholar]
  135. Council of Europe
    Council of Europe (ed.) 2001 Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment (CEFR). Modern Languages Division, Strasbourg. Cambridge: CUP.
     [Google Scholar]
  136. Council of Europe
    Council of Europe (ed.) 2020 Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment. Companion Volume. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing, 〈https://rm.coe.int/common-european-framework-of-reference-for-languages-learning-teaching/16809ea0d4〉 (6 February 2022).
     [Google Scholar]
  137. Cowie, Anthony P.
    (ed.) 1998 Phraseology: Theory, Analysis, and Applications [Oxford Studies in Lexicography and Lexicology]. Oxford: OUP. 10.1093/oso/9780198294252.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198294252.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  138. Crawford, William J. & Zhang, Meixiu
    2021 How can register analysis inform task-based language teaching?Register Studies3(2): 180–206. 10.1075/rs.20021.cra
     https://doi.org/10.1075/rs.20021.cra [Google Scholar]
  139. Croft, William & Cruse, D. Alan
    2004 Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: CUP. 10.1017/CBO9780511803864
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511803864 [Google Scholar]
  140. Crossley, Scott , Allen, Laura & McNamara, Danielle
    2014 A multi-dimensional analysis of essay writing: What linguistic features tell us about situational parameters and the effects of language functions on judgments of quality. InMulti-Dimensional Analysis, 25 Years on: A Tribute to Douglas Biber [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 60], Tony Berber Sardinha & Marcia Veirano Pinto (eds), 197–238. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.60.07cro
     https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.60.07cro [Google Scholar]
  141. Crossley, Scott , Kyle, Kristopher & Römer, Ute
    2019 Examining lexical and cohesion differences in discipline-specific writing using multi-dimensional analysis. InMulti-Dimensional Analysis: Research Methods and Current Issues, Tony Berber Sardinha & Marcia Veirano Pinto (eds), 189–216. Bloomsbury Academic. 10.5040/9781350023857.0019
     https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350023857.0019 [Google Scholar]
  142. Crosthwaite, Peter
    (ed.) 2020 Data-driven Learning for the next Generation: Corpora and DDL for Pre-tertiary Learners. London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  143. Crowley, Tony
    2003 Standard English and the Politics of Language, 2nd edn. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230501935
     https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230501935 [Google Scholar]
  144. Crystal, David
    2018 The Cambridge Encyclopedia of the English Language. Cambridge: CUP. 10.1017/9781108528931
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108528931 [Google Scholar]
  145. Crystal, David & Davy, Derek
    1969 Investigating English Style [English Language Series 1]. Harlow: Longman.
     [Google Scholar]
  146. Cullen, Richard & Kuo, I-Chun (Vicky)
    2007 Spoken grammar and ELT course materials: A missing link?TESOL Quarterly41(2): 361–386. 10.1002/j.1545‑7249.2007.tb00063.x
     https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1545-7249.2007.tb00063.x [Google Scholar]
  147. Curry, Niall , Love, Robbie & Goodman, Olivia
    2022 Adverbs on the move: Investigating publisher application of corpus research on recent language change to ELT coursebook development. Corpora17(1): 1–38. 10.3366/cor.2022.0233
     https://doi.org/10.3366/cor.2022.0233 [Google Scholar]
  148. Dat, Bao
    2008 ELT materials used in Southeast Asia. InEnglish Language Learning Materials: A Critical Review, Brian Tomlinson (ed.), 263–280. London: Continuum.
     [Google Scholar]
  149. 2013 Developing materials for speaking skills. InDeveloping Materials for Language Teaching, 2nd edn, 407–428. London: Bloomsbury.
     [Google Scholar]
  150. Davies, Mark
    2009 The 385+ million word Corpus of Contemporary American English (1990–2008+): Design, architecture, and linguistic insights. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics14(2): 159–190. 10.1075/ijcl.14.2.02dav
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.14.2.02dav [Google Scholar]
  151. 2010 The Corpus of Contemporary American English as the first reliable monitor corpus of English. Literary and Linguistic Computing25(4): 447–464. 10.1093/llc/fqq018
     https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqq018 [Google Scholar]
  152. 2019 The Movie Corpus. 〈https://www.english-corpora.org/movies/〉 (28 February 2022).
  153. Day, Richard R. & Bamford, Julian
    1998 Extensive Reading in the Second Language Classroom. Cambridge: CUP.
     [Google Scholar]
  154. de Bot, Kees , Lowie, Wander & Verspoor, Marjolijn
    2007 A dynamic systems theory approach to second language acquisition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition10(1): 7–21. 10.1017/S1366728906002732
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728906002732 [Google Scholar]
  155. De Knop, Sabine & Gilquin, Gaëtanelle
    2016 Applied Construction Grammar. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110458268
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110458268 [Google Scholar]
  156. Derwing, T.
    2001 What speaking rates do non-native listeners prefer?Applied Linguistics22(3): 324–337. 10.1093/applin/22.3.324
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/22.3.324 [Google Scholar]
  157. Derwing, Tracey M.
    1990 Speech rate is no simple matter: Rate adjustment and NS–NNS communicative success. Studies in Second Language Acquisition12(3): 303–313. 10.1017/S0272263100009189
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100009189 [Google Scholar]
  158. Derwing, Tracey M. , Thomson, Ron I. , Foote, Jennifer A. & Munro, Murray J.
    2012 A longitudinal study of listening perception in adult learners of English: Implications for teachers. The Canadian Modern Language Review68(3): 247–266. 10.3138/cmlr.1215
     https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.1215 [Google Scholar]
  159. Diehr, Bärbel
    (ed.) 2018 Universitäre Englischlehrerbildung: Wege zu mehr Kohärenz im Studium und Korrespondenz mit der Praxis. Berlin: Peter Lang. 10.3726/b14519
     https://doi.org/10.3726/b14519 [Google Scholar]
  160. 2020 Kohärenz und Korrespondenz: Die fachdidaktische Perspektive auf die universitäre Englischlehrerbildung. InDie Stimmen der Fächer hören: Fachprofil und Bildungsanspruch in der Lehrerbildung, Michaela Heer & Ulrich Heinen (eds), 325–342. Paderborn: Ferdinand Schöningh.
     [Google Scholar]
  161. Diepenbroek, Lori G. & Derwing, Tracey M.
    2014 To what extent do popular ESL textbooks incorporate oral fluency and pragmatic development. TESL Canada Journal30(7): 1. 10.18806/tesl.v30i7.1149
     https://doi.org/10.18806/tesl.v30i7.1149 [Google Scholar]
  162. Dinh, Thuy Ngoc & Siregar, Fenty Lidya
    2021 Intercultural competence and parsnip: Voices from teachers of English in Australia. InIntercultural Competence Past, Present and Future: Respecting the Past, Problems in the Present and Forging the Future [Intercultural Communication and Language Education], María Dolores López-Jiménez & Jorge Sánchez-Torres (eds), 255–274. Singapore: Springer. 10.1007/978‑981‑15‑8245‑5_12
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-8245-5_12 [Google Scholar]
  163. Dirven, René
    1990 Pedagogical grammar. Language Teaching23(1): 1. 10.1017/S0261444800005498
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444800005498 [Google Scholar]
  164. Diwersy, Sascha , Evert, Stephanie & Neumann, Stella
    2014 A weakly supervised multivariate approach to the study of language variation. InAggregating Dialectology, Typology, and Register Analysis: Linguistic Variation in Text and Speech, Benedikt Szmrecsanyi & Bernhard Wälchli (eds), 174–204. Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110317558.174
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110317558.174 [Google Scholar]
  165. Diz-Otero, Mario , Portela-Pino, Iago , Domínguez-Lloria, Sara & Pino-Juste, Margarita
    2022 Digital competence in secondary education teachers during the COVID-19-derived pandemic: Comparative analysis. Education + Training65(2): 181–192. 10.1108/ET‑01‑2022‑0001
     https://doi.org/10.1108/ET-01-2022-0001 [Google Scholar]
  166. Dörnyei, Zoltán , Durow, Valerie & Zahran, Khawla
    2004 Individual differences and their effects on formulaic sequence acquisition. InFormulaic Sequences: Acquisition, Processing, and Use [Language Learning and Language Teaching 9], Norbert Schmitt (ed.), 87–106. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/lllt.9.06dor
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.9.06dor [Google Scholar]
  167. Duffley, Patrick J.
    2006 The English Gerund-Participle: A Comparison with the Infinitive [Berkeley Insights in Linguistics and Semiotics 61]. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
     [Google Scholar]
  168. Dumont, Amandine
    2018 Fluency and Disfluency: A Corpus Study of Non-native and Native Cpeaker (dis)Fluency Profiles. PhD dissertation, Université catholique de Louvain. 〈hdl.handle.net/2078.1/198393〉 (12 April 2024).
  169. Eckhardt, Suzanne
    2001 Reported Speech: Empirical Corpus Findings Compared with EFL/ESL Textbook Presentations. MA thesis, Iowa State University, Ames. 10.31274/rtd‑180813‑8333
     https://doi.org/10.31274/rtd-180813-8333 [Google Scholar]
  170. Edwards, Alison
    2016 English in the Netherlands: Functions, Forms and Attitudes [Varieties of English Around the World G56]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/veaw.g56
     https://doi.org/10.1075/veaw.g56 [Google Scholar]
  171. Egbert, Jesse
    2019 Corpus design and representativeness. InMulti-Dimensional Analysis: Research Methods and Current Issues, Tony Berber Sardinha & Marcia Veirano Pinto (eds), 27–42. London: Bloomsbury Academic. 10.5040/9781350023857.0010
     https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350023857.0010 [Google Scholar]
  172. Egbert, Jesse & Biber, Douglas
    2018 Do all roads lead to Rome? Modeling register variation with factor analysis and discriminant analysis. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory14(2): 233–273. 10.1515/cllt‑2016‑0016
     https://doi.org/10.1515/cllt-2016-0016 [Google Scholar]
  173. Egbert, Jesse , Biber, Douglas & Davies, Mark
    2015 Developing a bottom-up, user-based method of web register classification. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology66(9): 1817–1831. 10.1002/asi.23308
     https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23308 [Google Scholar]
  174. Egbert, Jesse , Biber, Douglas & Gray, Bethany
    2022 Designing and Evaluating Language Corpora: A Practical Framework for Corpus Representativeness. Cambridge: CUP. 10.1017/9781316584880
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316584880 [Google Scholar]
  175. Egbert, Jesse , Larsson, Tove & Biber, Douglas
    2020 Doing Linguistics with a Corpus: Methodological Considerations for the Everyday User. Cambridge: CUP. 10.1017/9781108888790
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108888790 [Google Scholar]
  176. Egbert, Jesse & Mahlberg, Michaela
    2020 Fiction – One register or two? Speech and narration in novels. Register Studies2(1): 72–101. 10.1075/rs.19006.egb
     https://doi.org/10.1075/rs.19006.egb [Google Scholar]
  177. Egbert, Jesse & Staples, Shelley
    2019 Doing multi-dimensional analysis in SPSS, SAS, and R. InMulti-Dimensional Analysis: Research Methods and Current Issues, Tony Berber Sardinha & Marcia Veirano Pinto (eds), 125–144. Bloomsbury Academic. 10.5040/9781350023857.0015
     https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350023857.0015 [Google Scholar]
  178. Elio, Renee & Anderson, John R.
    1981 The effects of category generalizations and instance similarity on schema abstraction. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory7(6): 397–417.
     [Google Scholar]
  179. Elio, Renee & Anderson, John R.
    1984 The effects of information order and learning mode on schema abstraction. Memory & Cognition12(1): 20–30. 10.3758/BF03196994
     https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196994 [Google Scholar]
  180. Ellis, Nick C.
    1998 Emergentism, connectionism and language learning. Language Learning48(4): 631–664. 10.1111/0023‑8333.00063
     https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.00063 [Google Scholar]
  181. 2002 Frequency effects in language processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition24(2): 143–188. 10.1017/S0272263102002024
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263102002024 [Google Scholar]
  182. 2006 Language acquisition as rational contingency learning. Applied Linguistics27(1): 1–24. 10.1093/applin/ami038
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/ami038 [Google Scholar]
  183. 2008 Usage-based and form-focused language acquisition: The associative learning of constructions, learned attention, and the limited L2 endstate. InHandbook of Cognitive Linguistics and Second Language Acquisition, Peter Robinson & Nick C. Ellis (eds), 372–405. London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  184. 2019 Essentials of a theory of language cognition. The Modern Language Journal103(S1): 39–60. 10.1111/modl.12532
     https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12532 [Google Scholar]
  185. Ellis, Nick C. & Ferreira-Junior, Fernando
    2009a Constructions and their acquisition: Islands and the distinctiveness of their occupancy. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics7(1): 188–221. 10.1075/arcl.7.08ell
     https://doi.org/10.1075/arcl.7.08ell [Google Scholar]
  186. 2009b Construction learning as a function of frequency, frequency distribution, and function. The Modern Language Journal93(3): 370–385. 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.2009.00896.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00896.x [Google Scholar]
  187. Ellis, Nick C. & Larsen-Freeman, D.
    2006 Language emergence: Implications for applied linguistics--Introduction to the special issue. Applied Linguistics27(4): 558–589. 10.1093/applin/aml028
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/aml028 [Google Scholar]
  188. Ellis, Nick C. & Larsen-Freeman, Diane
    2009 Constructing a second language: Analyses and computational simulations of the emergence of linguistic constructions from usage. Language Learning59: 90–125. 10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2009.00537.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00537.x [Google Scholar]
  189. Ellis, Nick C. , Römer, Ute & O’Donnell, Matthew Brook
    2016 Usage-based Approaches to Language Acquisition and Processing: Cognitive and Corpus Investigations of Construction Grammar [Language Learning Monograph Series]. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  190. Ellis, Rod
    1989 Are classroom and naturalistic acquisition the same? A study of the classroom acquisition of German word order rules. Studies in second language Acquisition11(3): 305–328. 10.1017/S0272263100008159
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100008159 [Google Scholar]
  191. 1997 The empirical evaluation of language teaching materials. ELT Journal51(1): 36–42. 10.1093/elt/51.1.36
     https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/51.1.36 [Google Scholar]
  192. Elman, Jeffrey L. , Bates, Elizabeth A. , Johnson, Mark H. , Karmiloff-Smith, Annette , Parisi, Domenico & Plunkett, Kim
    1996 Rethinking Innateness: A Connectionist Perspective on Development. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  193. European Commission, EACEA, & Eurydice
    European Commission, EACEA, & Eurydice 2017 Key data on teaching languages at school in Europe: Eurydice Report. Luxemburg: Publications Office of the European Union. 〈data.europa.eu/doi/10.2797/839825〉 (15 October 2018).
     [Google Scholar]
  194. Evert, Stephanie
    2018 Statistics for linguists with R – A SIGIL course: Unit 7: A multivariate approach to linguistic variation. FAU Erlangen-Nürnberg, September. 〈www.stephanie-evert.de/SIGIL/sigil_R/〉 (4 November 2021).
     [Google Scholar]
  195. Fankhauser, Anna
    . In preparation. Formulaic language in the EFL classroom: A corpus-based study of phraseological items in British English and American English conversation with implications for EFL teaching. Osnabrück University.
     [Google Scholar]
  196. Fankhauser, Anna
    . Forthcoming. Suggestions for a new model of functional phraseme categorization for applied purposes. InRecent Advances in Multiword Units in Machine Translation and Translation Technology, Johanna Monti , Ruslan Mitkov & Gloria Corpas Pastor eds Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
     [Google Scholar]
  197. Farr, Fiona & Leńko-Szymańska, Agnieszka
    2023 Corpora in English language teacher education: Research, integration, and resources. TESOL Quarterly. 10.1002/tesq.3281
     https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.3281 [Google Scholar]
  198. Feierabend, Sabine , Rathgeb, Thomas , Kheredmand, Hediye & Glöckler, Stephan
    2020 JIM-Studie 2020: Jugend, Information, Medien. Basisuntersuchung zum Medienumgang 12- bis 19-Jähriger. Medienpädagogischer Forschungs- verbund Südwest (mpfs). 〈https://www.mpfs.de/fileadmin/files/Studien/JIM/2020/JIM-Studie-2020_Web_final.pdf〉 (20 January 2022).
  199. Fogal, Gary G. & Verspoor, Marjolijn H.
    (eds) 2020 Complex Dynamic Systems Theory and L2 Writing Development [Language Learning & Language Teaching 54]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/lllt.54
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.54 [Google Scholar]
  200. Fominykh, Mikhail , Shikhova, Elizaveta , Soule, Maria Victoria , Perifanou, Maria & Zhukova, Daria
    2021 Digital competence assessment survey for language teachers. InLearning and Collaboration Technologies: New Challenges and Learning Experiences, Panayiotis Zaphiris & Andri Ioannou (eds), 264–282. Cham: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑030‑77889‑7_18
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77889-7_18 [Google Scholar]
  201. Forsberg, Julia , Mohr, Susanne & Jansen, Sandra
    2019 “The goal is to enable students to communicate”: Communicative competence and target varieties in TEFL practices in Sweden and Germany. European Journal of Applied Linguistics7(1): 31–60. 10.1515/eujal‑2018‑0006
     https://doi.org/10.1515/eujal-2018-0006 [Google Scholar]
  202. forum discussions on neoprofs.org
    forum discussions on neoprofs.org 2016 [Anglais] La question des manuels: Les utilisez-vous? Vous appuyez-vous sur celui de votre établissement? 〈https://www.neoprofs.org/t103210-anglais-la-question-des-manuels-les-utilisez-vous-vous-appuyez-vous-sur-celui-de-votre-etablissement〉 (6 January 2022).
  203. Fournier, Yann , Gaudry-Lachet, Anne & DEPP-MIREI
    2017 L’apprentissage des langues vivantes étrangères dans l’Union européenne: Parcours des élèves. Note d’information N° 17.15. Ministère de l’Education Nationale. 〈https://www.education.gouv.fr/l-apprentissage-des-langues-vivantes-etrangeres-dans-l-union-europeenne-parcours-des-eleves-2588〉 (1 August 2018).
     [Google Scholar]
  204. Frazier, Stefan
    2003 A corpus analysis of would-clauses without adjacent if-clauses. TESOL Quarterly37(3): 443–466. 10.2307/3588399
     https://doi.org/10.2307/3588399 [Google Scholar]
  205. Freeman, David & Holden, Susan
    1986 Authentic listening materials. Techniques of Teaching, 67–69. London: Modern English Publications.
     [Google Scholar]
  206. Freudenstein, Reinhold
    2002 Was morgen geschah... Schulischer Fremdsprachenunterricht gestern, heute – und in Zukunft?InPerspektiven für die zukünftige Fremdsprachendidaktik, Christiane Neveling (ed.), 45–62. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.
     [Google Scholar]
  207. Friederici, Luisa
    2019 Vorschlag für eine pluriperspektivische Analyse der Zielgruppe zur Auswahl eines neuen Lehrwerks oder: Vergesst die Lehrer nicht!Pandaemonium Germanicum22: 281–301. 10.11606/1982‑88372237281
     https://doi.org/10.11606/1982-88372237281 [Google Scholar]
  208. Friginal, Eric
    2018 Corpus Linguistics for English Teachers: New Tools, Online Resources, and Classroom Activities. New York, NY: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315649054
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315649054 [Google Scholar]
  209. Friginal, Eric & Hardy, Jack
    2019 From factors to dimensions: Interpreting linguistic co-occurrence patterns. InMulti-Dimensional Analysis: Research Methods and Current Issues, Tony Berber Sardinha & Marcia Veirano Pinto (eds), 145–64. London: Bloomsbury Academic. 10.5040/9781350023857.0016
     https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350023857.0016 [Google Scholar]
  210. Friginal, Eric & Hardy, Jack A.
    2014 Conducting multi-dimensional analysis using SPSS. InMulti-Dimensional Analysis, 25 Years on: A Tribute to Douglas Biber [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 60], Tony Berber Sardinha & Marcia Veirano Pinto (eds), 297–316. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.60.10fri
     https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.60.10fri [Google Scholar]
  211. Friginal, Eric & Roberts, Jennifer
    2022 Corpora for materials design. InThe Routledge Handbook of Corpora and English Language Teaching and Learning, Reka R. Jablonkai & Eniko Csomay (eds), 131–46. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781003002901‑11
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003002901-11 [Google Scholar]
  212. Friginal, Eric & Weigle, Sara
    2014 Exploring multiple profiles of L2 writing using multi-dimensional analysis. Journal of Second Language Writing26: 80–95. 10.1016/j.jslw.2014.09.007
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2014.09.007 [Google Scholar]
  213. Fujimoto, Kazuko
    2017 Do English textbooks reflect the actual use of English? The present perfect and temporal adverbials. Presented at theThe 9th International Corpus Linguistics Conference, University of Birmingham, July 25. 〈https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/Documents/college-artslaw/corpus/conference-archives/2017/general/paper117.pdf〉 (9 January 2017).
     [Google Scholar]
  214. Gabrielatos, Costas
    1994 Collocations: Pedagogical Implications, and Their Treatment in Pedagogical Materials. PhD dissertation, Research Centre for English and Applied Linguistics, Cambridge University, UK. 〈https://www.researchgate.net/publication/261708736_Collocations_Pedagogical_implications_and_their_treatment_in_pedagogical_materials〉 (12 April 2024).
  215. 2003 Conditional sentences: ELT typology and corpus evidence. Presented at theBAAL 36th Annual Meeting. 〈https://www.researchgate.net/publication/261708834_Conditional_Sentences_ELT_typology_and_corpus_evidence〉 (12 April 2024).
     [Google Scholar]
  216. 2006 Corpus-based analysis of pedagogical materials: If-conditionals in ELT coursebooks and the BNC. Presented at the7th Teaching and Language Corpora Conference. 〈https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228880683_Corpus-based_evaluation_of_pedagogical_materials_If-conditionals_in_ELT_coursebooks_and_the_BNC〉 (6 February 2020).
     [Google Scholar]
  217. 2013  If-conditionals in ICLE and the BNC: A success story for teaching or learning?InTwenty Years of Learner Corpus Research: Looking Back, Moving Ahead, Sylviane Granger , Gaëtanelle Gilquin & Fanny Meunier (eds), 155–166. Louvain-la-Neuve: Presses Universitaires de Louvain.
     [Google Scholar]
  218. 2019  If -Conditionals and modality: Frequency patterns and theoretical explanations. Journal of English Linguistics47(4): 301–334. 10.1177/0075424219875994
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0075424219875994 [Google Scholar]
  219. Gardner, Dee & Davies, Mark
    2007 Pointing out frequent phrasal verbs: A corpus-based analysis. TESOL Quarterly41(2): 339–359. 10.1002/j.1545‑7249.2007.tb00062.x
     https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1545-7249.2007.tb00062.x [Google Scholar]
  220. Gardner, Sheena , Nesi, Hilary & Biber, Douglas
    2019 Discipline, level, genre: Integrating situational perspectives in a new MD analysis of university student writing. Applied Linguistics40(4): 646–674. 10.1093/applin/amy005
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amy005 [Google Scholar]
  221. Garinger, Dawn
    2002 Textbook selection for the ESL classroom. Center for Applied Linguistics Digest. 〈www.mcael.org/uploads/File/provider_library/Textbook_Eval_CAL.pdf〉 (12 January 2017).
     [Google Scholar]
  222. Garton, Sue & Graves, Kathleen
    (eds) 2014 International Perspectives on Materials in ELT. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9781137023315
     https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137023315 [Google Scholar]
  223. Gass, Susan M.
    1997 Input, Interaction, and the Second Language Learner. New York, NY: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  224. Geeraerts, Dirk
    2006 Cognitive Linguistics: Basic Readings. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110199901
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110199901 [Google Scholar]
  225. Geeslin, Kimberly L.
    2014 Sociolinguistics and Second Language Acquisition: Learning to Use Language in Context. New York, NY: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203117835
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203117835 [Google Scholar]
  226. Gehring, Wolfgang
    2013 Can’t judge a book by its cover: An analytical approach to textbook innovations. InBasic Issues in EFL Teaching and Learning, Maria Eisenmann & Theresa Summer (eds), 2nd edn, 357–370. Heidelberg: Winter.
     [Google Scholar]
  227. Ghanbari, Nasim , Esmaili, Fatemeh & Shamsaddini, Mohammad Reza
    2015 The effect of using authentic materials on Iranian EFL learners’ vocabulary learning. Theory and Practice in Language Studies5(12): 2459–2468. 10.17507/tpls.0512.05
     https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0512.05 [Google Scholar]
  228. Ghosn, Irma K.
    2013 Talking like texts and talking about texts: How some primary school coursebook tasks are realized in the classroom. InDeveloping Materials for Language Teaching, 2nd edn, 291–305. London: Bloomsbury.
     [Google Scholar]
  229. Gilmore, Alex
    2004 A comparison of textbook and authentic interactions. ELT Journal58(4): 363–374. 10.1093/elt/58.4.363
     https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/58.4.363 [Google Scholar]
  230. 2007 Authentic materials and authenticity in foreign language learning. Language Teaching40(2): 97. 10.1017/S0261444807004144
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444807004144 [Google Scholar]
  231. 2011 “I prefer not text”: Developing Japanese learners’ communicative competence with authentic materials. Language Learning61(3): 786–819. 10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2011.00634.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2011.00634.x [Google Scholar]
  232. 2019 Materials and authenticity in language teaching. InThe Routledge Handbook of English Language Teacher Education, Steve Walsh & Steve Mann (eds), 1st edn, 299–318. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315659824‑25
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315659824-25 [Google Scholar]
  233. Gilquin, Gaëtanelle
    2016 Discourse markers in L2 English: From classroom to naturalistic input. InNew Approaches to English Linguistics: Building Bridges [Studies in Language Companion Series 177], Olga Timofeeva , Anne-Christine Gardner , Alpo Honkapohja & Sarah Chevalier (eds), 213–249. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.177.09gil
     https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.177.09gil [Google Scholar]
  234. 2018 American and/or British influence on L2 Englishes – Does context tip the scale(s)?InVarieties of English Around the World [Varieties of English Around the World G61], Sandra C. Deshors (ed.), 187–216. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/veaw.g61.08gil
     https://doi.org/10.1075/veaw.g61.08gil [Google Scholar]
  235. Gilquin, Gaëtanelle & Laporte, Samantha
    2021 The use of online writing tools by learners of English: Evidence from a process corpus. International Journal of Lexicography34(4): 472–492. 10.1093/ijl/ecab012
     https://doi.org/10.1093/ijl/ecab012 [Google Scholar]
  236. Gilquin, Gaëtanelle & Paquot, Magali
    2008 Too chatty: Learner academic writing and register variation. English Text Construction1(1): 41–61. 10.1075/etc.1.1.05gil
     https://doi.org/10.1075/etc.1.1.05gil [Google Scholar]
  237. Gnutzmann, Claus & Intemann, Frauke
    (eds) 2008 The Globalisation of English and the English Language Classroom. Tübingen: Narr Francke.
     [Google Scholar]
  238. Goldberg, Adele E.
    1995 Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  239. Goldberg, Adele E.
    2006 Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language. Oxford: OUP.
     [Google Scholar]
  240. Goldberg, Adele E. , Casenhiser, Devin M. & Sethuraman, Nitya
    2004 Learning argument structure generalizations. Cognitive Linguistics15(3): 289–316. 10.1515/cogl.2004.011
     https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.2004.011 [Google Scholar]
  241. Gomes, Dylan G. E. , Pottier, Patrice , Crystal-Ornelas, Robert , Hudgins, Emma J. , Foroughirad, Vivienne , Sánchez-Reyes, Luna L. , Turba, Rachel ,
    2022 Why don’t we share data and code? Perceived barriers and benefits to public archiving practices. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences289(1987): 20221113. 10.1098/rspb.2022.1113
     https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2022.1113 [Google Scholar]
  242. Goretzko, David
    2022 Factor retention in exploratory factor analysis with missing data. Educational and Psychological Measurement82(3): 444–464. 10.1177/00131644211022031
     https://doi.org/10.1177/00131644211022031 [Google Scholar]
  243. Gorsuch, Richard L.
    2014 Factor Analysis, 2nd edn. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 10.4324/9781315735740
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315735740 [Google Scholar]
  244. Götz, Sandra
    2013 Fluency in Native And Nonnative English Speech [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 53]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.53
     https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.53 [Google Scholar]
  245. Goulart, Larissa , Gray, Bethany , Staples, Shelley , Black, Amanda , Shelton, Aisha , Biber, Douglas , Egbert, Jesse & Wizner, Stacey
    2020 Linguistic perspectives on register. Annual Review of Linguistics6(1): 435–455, 10.1146/annurev‑linguistics‑011718‑012644
     https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-linguistics-011718-012644 [Google Scholar]
  246. Goulart, Larissa & Wood, Margaret
    2021 Methodological synthesis of research using multi-dimensional analysis. Journal of Research Design and Statistics in Linguistics and Communication Science6(2): 107–137. 10.1558/jrds.18454
     https://doi.org/10.1558/jrds.18454 [Google Scholar]
  247. Gouverneur, Céline
    2008 The phraseological patterns of high-frequency verbs in advanced English for general purposes: A corpus-driven approach to EFL textbook analysis. InPhraseology in Foreign Language Learning and Teaching, Fanny Meunier & Sylviane Granger (eds), 223–243. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/z.138.17gou
     https://doi.org/10.1075/z.138.17gou [Google Scholar]
  248. Grabowski, Łukasz
    2015 Keywords and lexical bundles within English pharmaceutical discourse: A corpus-driven description. English for Specific Purposes38: 23–33. 10.1016/j.esp.2014.10.004
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2014.10.004 [Google Scholar]
  249. Granger, Sylviane
    1998 The computer learner corpus: A versatile new source of data for SLA research. InLearner English on Computer [Studies in Language and Linguistics], Sylviane Granger (ed.), 3–18. London: Longman.
     [Google Scholar]
  250. 2004 Computer learner corpus research: Current status and future prospects. Language and Computers52(1): 123–145. 10.1163/9789004333772_008
     https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004333772_008 [Google Scholar]
  251. 2015 The contribution of learner corpora to reference and instructional materials design. InThe Cambridge Handbook of Learner Corpus Research, Sylviane Granger , Gaetanelle Gilquin & Fanny Meunier (eds), 485–510. Cambridge: CUP. 10.1017/CBO9781139649414.022
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139649414.022 [Google Scholar]
  252. 2018 Has lexicography reaped the full benefit of the (learner) corpus revolution?InProceedings of the XVIII EURALEX International Congress: Lexicography in Global Contexts, Simon Krek , Jaka Čibej , Vojko Gorjanc & Iztok Kosem (eds), 17–24. Ljubljana: University of Ljubljana. 10.4312/9789610600961
     https://doi.org/10.4312/9789610600961 [Google Scholar]
  253. Granger, Sylviane , Hung, Joseph & Petch-Tyson, Stephanie
    (eds) 2002 Computer Learner Corpora, Second Language Acquisition, and Foreign Language Teaching [Language Learning & Language Teaching 6]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/lllt.6
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.6 [Google Scholar]
  254. Granger, Sylviane & Tyson, Stephanie
    1996 Connector usage in the English essay writing of native and non-native EFL speakers of English. World Englishes15(1): 17–27. 10.1111/j.1467‑971X.1996.tb00089.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-971X.1996.tb00089.x [Google Scholar]
  255. Grau, Maike
    2009 Worlds apart? English in German youth cultures and in educational settings. World Englishes28(2): 160–174. 10.1111/j.1467‑971X.2009.01581.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-971X.2009.01581.x [Google Scholar]
  256. Graves, Kathleen & Garton, Sue
    2019 Materials use and development. InThe Routledge Handbook of English Language Teacher Education, Steve Walsh & Steve Mann (eds), 417–431. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315659824‑33
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315659824-33 [Google Scholar]
  257. Gray, Bethany
    2015 Linguistic Variation in Research Articles: When Discipline Tells Only Part of the Story [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 71]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.71
     https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.71 [Google Scholar]
  258. 2019 Tagging and counting linguistic features for multi-dimensional analysis. InMulti-Dimensional Analysis: Research Methods and Current Issues, Tony Berber Sardinha & Marcia Veirano Pinto (eds), 43–66. London: Bloomsbury Academic. 10.5040/9781350023857.0011
     https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350023857.0011 [Google Scholar]
  259. Gray, Bethany & Egbert, Jesse
    2019 Editorial: Register and register variation. Register Studies1(1): 1–9. 10.1075/rs.00001.edi
     https://doi.org/10.1075/rs.00001.edi [Google Scholar]
  260. 2021 Register in L1 and L2 language development. Register Studies3(2): 177–179. 10.1075/rs.21010.gra
     https://doi.org/10.1075/rs.21010.gra [Google Scholar]
  261. Gray, John
    2000 The ELT coursebook as cultural artefact: How teachers censor and adapt. ELT Journal54(3): 274–283. 10.1093/elt/54.3.274
     https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/54.3.274 [Google Scholar]
  262. 2002 The global coursebook in English language teaching. InGlobalization and Language Teaching, David Block & Deborah Cameron (eds), 151–167. London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  263. 2010 The Construction of English: Culture, Consumerism and Promotion in the Elt Global Coursebook. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230283084
     https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230283084 [Google Scholar]
  264. Gries, Stefan Th
    2005 Null-hypothesis significance testing of word frequencies: A follow-up on Kilgarriff. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory1(2). 10.1515/cllt.2005.1.2.277
     https://doi.org/10.1515/cllt.2005.1.2.277 [Google Scholar]
  265. 2013 Statistical tests for the analysis of learner corpus data. InAutomatic Treatment and Analysis of Learner Corpus Data [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 59], Ana Díaz-Negrillo , Nicolas Ballier & Paul Thompson (eds), 287–310. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.59.17gri
     https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.59.17gri [Google Scholar]
  266. 2015 The most under-used statistical method in corpus linguistics: Multi-level (and mixed-effects) models. Corpora10(1): 95–125. 10.3366/cor.2015.0068
     https://doi.org/10.3366/cor.2015.0068 [Google Scholar]
  267. 2018 On over- and underuse in learner corpus research and multifactoriality in corpus linguistics more generally. Journal of Second Language Studies1(2): 276–308. 10.1075/jsls.00005.gri
     https://doi.org/10.1075/jsls.00005.gri [Google Scholar]
  268. Gries, Stefan Th. & Deshors, Sandra C.
    2020 Statistical analyses of learner corpus data. InRoutledge Handbook of SLA and Corpora, Nancy Tracy-Ventura & Magali Paquot (eds), 119–132. New York, NY: Routledge. 10.4324/9781351137904‑11
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351137904-11 [Google Scholar]
  269. Grieve-Smith, Angus B.
    2007 The envelope of variation in multidimensional register and genre analyses. InCorpus Linguistics Beyond the Word: Corpus Research from Phrase to Discourse, Eileen Fitzpatrick (ed.), 21–42. Amsterdam: Rodopi. 10.1163/9789401203845_003
     https://doi.org/10.1163/9789401203845_003 [Google Scholar]
  270. Griffiths, Roger
    1990 Speech rate and NNS comprehension: A preliminary study in time-benefit analysis. Language Learning40(3): 311–336. 10.1111/j.1467‑1770.1990.tb00666.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1990.tb00666.x [Google Scholar]
  271. 1991 Language classroom speech rates: A descriptive study. TESOL Quarterly25(1): 189. 10.2307/3587050
     https://doi.org/10.2307/3587050 [Google Scholar]
  272. Gurzynski-Weiss, Laura , Geeslin, Kimberly L. , Daidone, Danielle , Linford, Bret , Long, Avizia Yim , Michalski, Ian & Solon, Megan
    2018 Examining multifaceted sources of input. Variationist and usage-based approaches to understanding the L2 classroom. InUsage-Inspired L2 Instruction: Researched Pedagogy [Language Learning & Language Teaching 49], Andrea E. Tyler , Lourdes Ortega , Mariko Uno & Hae In Park , 291–311. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/lllt.49.13gur
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.49.13gur [Google Scholar]
  273. Hair, Joseph F. , Black, William C. , Babin, Barry J. & Anderson, Rolph E.
    2019 Multivariate Data Analysis, 8th edn. Andover, Hampshire: Cengage.
     [Google Scholar]
  274. Hall, Christopher J. , Wicaksono Rachel , Liu Shu , Qian Yuan & Xu Xiaoqing
    2017 Exploring teachers’ ontologies of English: Monolithic conceptions of grammar in a group of Chinese teachers. International Journal of Applied Linguistics27(1): 87–109. 10.1111/ijal.12107
     https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.12107 [Google Scholar]
  275. Hallet, Wolfgang & Legutke, Michael K.
    2013 Task-approaches revisited: New orientations, new perspectives. The European Journal of Applied Linguistics and TEFL2(2): 139–159.
     [Google Scholar]
  276. Halliday, Michael A. K.
    1988 On the language of physical science. InRegisters of written English: Situational Factors and Linguistic Features, Mohsen Ghadessy (ed.), 162–172. London: Pinter.
     [Google Scholar]
  277. Hardie, Andrew
    2014 Modest XML for corpora: Not a standard, but a suggestion. ICAME Journal38(1): 73–103. 10.2478/icame‑2014‑0004
     https://doi.org/10.2478/icame-2014-0004 [Google Scholar]
  278. Harel, Idit & Papert, Seymour
    1991 Constructionism: Research Reports and Essays, 1985–1990. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
     [Google Scholar]
  279. Harwood, Nigel
    2005 What do we want EAP teaching materials for?Journal of English for Academic Purposes4(2): 149–161. 10.1016/j.jeap.2004.07.008
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2004.07.008 [Google Scholar]
  280. Hausmann, Franz Josef
    2005 Isotopie, scénario, collocation et exemple lexicographique. InL’exemple lexicographique dans les dictionnaires français contemporains, Michaela Heinz (ed.), 283–292. Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110924466.283
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110924466.283 [Google Scholar]
  281. Henry, Alastair
    2014 Swedish students’ beliefs about learning English in and outside of school. InMotivation and Foreign Language Learning: From theory to practice [Language Learning & Language Teaching 40], David Lasagabaster , Aintzane Doiz & Juan Manuel Sierra (eds), 93–116. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/lllt.40.05hen
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.40.05hen [Google Scholar]
  282. Henson, Robin K. & Roberts, J. Kyle
    2006 Use of exploratory factor analysis in published research: Common errors and some comment on improved practice. Educational and Psychological Measurement66(3): 393–416. 10.1177/0013164405282485
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164405282485 [Google Scholar]
  283. Herbst, Thomas
    1996 What are collocations: Sandy beaches or false teeth?English Studies77(4): 379–393. 10.1080/00138389608599038
     https://doi.org/10.1080/00138389608599038 [Google Scholar]
  284. 2016 Foreign language learning is construction learning–What else? Moving towards Pedagogical Construction Grammar. InApplied Construction Grammar, Sabine De Knop & Gaëtanelle Gilquin (eds), 32:56–96. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110458268‑003
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110458268-003 [Google Scholar]
  285. Herbst, Thomas , Schmid, Hans-Jörg & Faulhaber, Susen
    (eds) 2014 Constructions Collocations Patterns [Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs 282]. Berlin: Walter De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110356854
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110356854 [Google Scholar]
  286. Hermes, Liesel
    2009 “Reading can be fun if…”: Lektüren in der Sekundarstufe I. InLiteraturdidaktik und Literaturvermittlung im Englischunterricht der Sekundarstufe, I, Jan Hollm (ed.), 7–22. Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Trier.
     [Google Scholar]
  287. Hessisches Kultusministerium
    Hessisches Kultusministerium 2010 Lehrplan Englisch – Gymnasialer Bildungsgang – Jahrgangsstufen 5G bis 9G. 〈https://kultusministerium.hessen.de/sites/kultusministerium.hessen.de/files/2021-06/g8-englisch.pdf〉 (6 February 2022).
  288. Hoey, Michael
    2005 Lexical Priming: A New Theory of Words and Language. London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  289. Holliday, Adrian
    2005 The Struggle to Teach English as an International Language. Oxford: OUP.
     [Google Scholar]
  290. Holmes, Janet
    1988 Doubt and certainty in ESL textbooks. Applied Linguistics9(1): 21–44. 10.1093/applin/9.1.21
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/9.1.21 [Google Scholar]
  291. Hu, Chieh-Fang & Maechtle, Cheyenne
    2021 Construction learning by child learners of foreign language: Input distribution and learner factors. The Modern Language Journal105(1): 335–354. 10.1111/modl.12698
     https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12698 [Google Scholar]
  292. Huang, Pingping
    2019 Textbook interaction: A study of the language and cultural contextualisation of English learning textbooks. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction21: 87–99. 10.1016/j.lcsi.2019.02.006
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2019.02.006 [Google Scholar]
  293. Hughes, Rebecca
    2010 What a corpus tells us about grammar teaching materials. InThe Routledge Handbook of Corpus Linguistics, Anne O’Keeffe & Michael McCarthy (eds), 401–412. New York, NY: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203856949‑35
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203856949-35 [Google Scholar]
  294. Hundt, Marianne , Sand, Andrea & Siemund, Rainer
    1998 Manual of information to accompany the Freiburg-LOB Corpus of British English (‘FLOB’). Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg. 〈korpus.uib.no/icame/frown/〉 (23 January 2022).
     [Google Scholar]
  295. Hundt, Marianne , Sand, Andrea & Skandera, Paul
    1999 Manual of information to accompany the Freiburg-Brown Corpus of American English. Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg. 〈korpus.uib.no/icame/flob/〉 (23 January 2022).
     [Google Scholar]
  296. Hunston, Susan
    2002 Corpora in Applied Linguistics [The Cambridge Applied Linguistics Series]. Cambridge: CUP. 10.1017/CBO9781139524773
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524773 [Google Scholar]
  297. Hunston, Susan & Francis, Gill
    2000 Pattern Grammar: A Corpus-Driven Approach to the Lexical Grammar of English [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 4]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.4
     https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.4 [Google Scholar]
  298. Husson, François , Cornillon, Pierre-André , Guyader, Arnaud , Jégou, Nicolas , Josse, Julie , Klutchnikoff, Nicolas , Le Pennec, Erwan , Matzner-Løber, Eric , Rouvière, Laurent & Thieurmel, Benoît
    2018 R pour la statistique et la science des données. Rennes: Presses universitaires de Rennes.
     [Google Scholar]
  299. Husson, François , Lê, Sébastien & Pagès, Jérôme
    2017 Exploratory Multivariate Analysis by Example Using R, 2nd edn. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman and Hall/CRC Press. 10.1201/b21874
     https://doi.org/10.1201/b21874 [Google Scholar]
  300. Hyland, Ken
    1994 Hedging in academic writing and EAP textbooks. English for Specific Purposes13(3): 239–256. 10.1016/0889‑4906(94)90004‑3
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-4906(94)90004-3 [Google Scholar]
  301. 2013 Materials for developing writing skills. InDeveloping Materials for Language Teaching, Brian Tomlinson (ed.), 2nd edn, 391–406. London: Bloomsbury.
     [Google Scholar]
  302. Hymes, Dell
    1984 Sociolinguistics: Stability and consolidation. International Journal of the Sociology of Language45: 39–45. 10.1515/ijsl.1984.45.39
     https://doi.org/10.1515/ijsl.1984.45.39 [Google Scholar]
  303. Ide, Nancy
    1996 Corpus encoding standard. v. 1.5 (last updatedMarch 2020). Expert Advisory Group on Language Engineering Standards (EAGLES). 〈https://www.cs.vassar.edu/CES/〉 (2 January 2022).
  304. Jablonkai, Reka R. & Csomay, Eniko
    2022 The Routledge Handbook of Corpora and English Language Teaching and Learning. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781003002901
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003002901 [Google Scholar]
  305. Jacobs, George M. & Ball, Jessica
    1996 An investigation of the structure of group activities in ELT coursebooks. ELT Journal50(2): 99–107. 10.1093/elt/50.2.99
     https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/50.2.99 [Google Scholar]
  306. Jansen, Sandra , Mohr, Susanne & Forsberg, Julia
    2021 Standard language ideology in the English language classroom: Suggestions for EIL-informed teacher education. InGlocalising Teaching English as an International Language, Marcus Callies , Stefanie Hehner , Philipp Meer & Micahel Westphal (eds). London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781003090106‑6
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003090106-6 [Google Scholar]
  307. Jenkins, Jennifer
    1998 Which pronunciation norms and models for English as an International Language?ELT Journal52(2): 119–126. 10.1093/elt/52.2.119
     https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/52.2.119 [Google Scholar]
  308. 2000 The Phonology of English as an International Language. Oxford: OUP.
     [Google Scholar]
  309. Jenkins, Jennifer
    2003 World Englishes: A Resource Book for Students [Routledge English Language Introductions]. New York, NY: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  310. Jiang, Xiangying
    2006 Suggestions: What should ESL students know?System34(1): 36–54. 10.1016/j.system.2005.02.003
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2005.02.003 [Google Scholar]
  311. Johns, Tim
    1986 Micro-concord: A language learner’s research tool. System14(2): 151–162. 10.1016/0346‑251X(86)90004‑7
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0346-251X(86)90004-7 [Google Scholar]
  312. 1993 Data-driven learning: An update. TELL & CALL3: 23–32.
     [Google Scholar]
  313. 2002 Data-driven learning: The perpetual challenge. InTeaching and Learning by Doing Corpus Analysis, Bernhard Kettemann & Georg Marko (eds), 105–117. Amsterdam: Rodopi. 10.1163/9789004334236_010
     https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004334236_010 [Google Scholar]
  314. 2014 Contexts: The background, development and trialling of a concordance-based CALL program. InTeaching and Language Corpora, Anne Wichmann & Steven Fligelstone (eds), 100–115. New York, NY: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315842677‑9
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315842677-9 [Google Scholar]
  315. Jolliffe, Ian T.
    2002 Principal Component Analysis [Springer Series in Statistics], 2nd edn. New York, NY: Springer.
     [Google Scholar]
  316. Kachru, Yamuna & Smith, Larry E.
    2008 Cultures, Contexts and World Englishes [ESL & Applied Linguistics Professional Series]. New York, NY: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203891346
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203891346 [Google Scholar]
  317. Kaiser, Henry F. & Rice, John
    1974 Little Jiffy, Mark IV. Educational and Psychological Measurement34(1): 111–117. 10.1177/001316447403400115
     https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447403400115 [Google Scholar]
  318. Karlsen, Petter Hagen & Monsen, Marte
    2020 Corpus literacy and applications in Norwegian upper secondary schools: Teacher and learner perspectives. Nordic Journal of English Studies19(1): 118. 10.35360/njes.500
     https://doi.org/10.35360/njes.500 [Google Scholar]
  319. Kavanagh, Barry
    2021 Norwegian in-service teachers’ perspectives on language corpora in teaching English. Nordic Journal of Language Teaching and Learning9(2): 90–106. 10.46364/njltl.v9i2.933
     https://doi.org/10.46364/njltl.v9i2.933 [Google Scholar]
  320. Kerres, Michael
    2020 Against all odds: Education in Germany coping with Covid-19. Postdigital Science and Education2(3): 690–694, 10.1007/s42438‑020‑00130‑7
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-020-00130-7 [Google Scholar]
  321. Kilgarriff, Adam , Baisa, Vít , Bušta, Jan , Jakubíček, Miloš , Kovář, Vojtěch , Michelfeit, Jan , Rychlý, Pavel & Suchomel, Vít
    2014 The Sketch Engine: Ten years on. Lexicography1(1): 7–36. 10.1007/s40607‑014‑0009‑9
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s40607-014-0009-9 [Google Scholar]
  322. Kim, Daejin & Hall, Joan Kelly
    2002 The role of an interactive book reading program in the development of second language pragmatic competence. The Modern Language Journal86(3): 332–348. 10.1111/1540‑4781.00153
     https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-4781.00153 [Google Scholar]
  323. Koch, Peter & Oesterreicher, Wulf
    1985 Language of immediacy – Language of distance: Orality and literacy from the perspective of language theory and linguistic history. InCommunicative Spaces. Variation, Contact, and Change: Papers in Honour of Ursula Schaefer, Claudia Lange , Beatrix Weber & Göran Wolf (eds), 441–73. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
     [Google Scholar]
  324. 2011 Gesprochene Sprache in der Romania: Französisch, Italienisch, Spanisch [Romanistische Arbeitshefte 31]. Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110252620
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110252620 [Google Scholar]
  325. Koprowski, Mark
    2005 Investigating the usefulness of lexical phrases in contemporary coursebooks. ELT Journal59(4): 322–332, 10.1093/elt/cci061
     https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/cci061 [Google Scholar]
  326. Kosmas, Panagiotis , Parmaxi, Antigoni , Perifanou, Maria & Economides, Anastasios A.
    2021 Open educational resources for language education: Towards the development of an e-toolkit. InLearning and Collaboration Technologies: New Challenges and Learning Experiences. 8th International Conference, LCT 2021, Held as Part of the 23rd HCI International Conference, HCII 2021, Virtual Event, July 24–29, 2021, Proceedings, Part I [Lecture Notes in Computer Science], Panayiotis Zaphiris & Andri Ioannou (eds), 65–79. Cham: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑030‑77889‑7_5
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77889-7_5 [Google Scholar]
  327. Krashen, Stephen
    1982 Principles and Practice in Second Language Acquisition [Language Teaching Methodology Series]. Oxford: Pergamon.
     [Google Scholar]
  328. Krashen, Stephen
    1985 Second Language Acquisition and Second Language Learning [Language Teaching Methodology Series]. Reprinted. Oxford: Pergamon.
     [Google Scholar]
  329. Kruger, Haidee & van Rooy, Bertus
    2018 Register variation in written contact varieties of English: A multidimensional analysis. English World-Wide. A Journal of Varieties of English39(2): 214–242. 10.1075/eww.00011.kru
     https://doi.org/10.1075/eww.00011.kru [Google Scholar]
  330. Kuhl, Patricia K. & Meltzoff, Andrew N.
    1996 Infant vocalizations in response to speech: Vocal imitation and developmental change. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America100(401): 2425–2438. 10.1121/1.417951
     https://doi.org/10.1121/1.417951 [Google Scholar]
  331. Kultusministerkonferenz
    Kultusministerkonferenz 2003 Bildungsstandards für die erste Fremdsprache (Englisch/Französisch) für den Mittleren Schulabschluss. Sekretariat der Ständigen Konferenz der Kultusminister der Länder in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. 〈https://www.kmk.org/fileadmin/veroeffentlichungen_beschluesse/2003/2003_12_04-BS-erste-Fremdsprache.pdf〉 (21 January 2017).
  332. Kultusministerkonferenz
    Kultusministerkonferenz 2012 Bildungsstandards für die fortgeführte Fremdsprache (Englisch/Französisch) für die Allgemeine Hochschulreife. Beschluss der Kultusministerkonferenz vom 18.10.2012. Sekretariat der Ständigen Konferenz der Kultusminister der Länder in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. 〈www.kmk.org/bildung-schule/qualitaetssicherung-in-schulen/bildungsstandards/dokumente.html〉 (26 November 2018).
  333. Kurtz, Jürgen
    2019 Lehrwerkgestütztes Fremdsprachenlernen im digitalen Wandel. InDas Lehren und Lernen von Fremd- und Zweitsprachen im digitalen Wandel: Arbeitspapiere der 39. Frühjahrskonferenz zur Erforschung des Fremdsprachenunterrichts [Gießener Beiträge zur Fremdsprachendidaktik], Eva Burwitz-Melzer , Claudia Riemer & Lars Schmelter (eds), 114–25. Tübingen: Narr Francke Attempto.
     [Google Scholar]
  334. Labov, William
    2004 Quantitative analysis of linguistic variation. InSociolinguistics / Soziolinguistik [Handbücher Zur Sprach- Und Kommunikationswissenschaft / Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science [HSK]], Vol.1, 6–21. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110141894.1.1.6
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110141894.1.1.6 [Google Scholar]
  335. Lakoff, George & Johnson, Mark
    2003 Metaphors We Live By. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226470993.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226470993.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  336. Landesregierung Nordrhein-Westfalen
    Landesregierung Nordrhein-Westfalen 2016 Lernen im digitalen Wandel. Unser Leitbild 2020 für Bildung in Zeiten der Digitalisierung. 〈https://www.land.nrw/sites/default/files/asset/document/leitbild_lernen_im_digitalen_wandel.pdf〉 (22 January 2022).
  337. Langacker, Ronald W.
    1987 Foundations of Cognitive Grammar: Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  338. 2001 Cognitive linguistics, language pedagogy, and the English present tense. InApplied Cognitive Linguistics, Vol.I: Theory and Language Acquisition, Martin Pütz , Susanne Niemeier & René Dirven (eds), 3–39. Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110866247.3
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110866247.3 [Google Scholar]
  339. 2008 Cognitive Grammar: A Basic Introduction. Oxford: OUP. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331967.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331967.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  340. Larsen-Freeman, Diane
    1997 Chaos/complexity science and second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics18(2): 141–165. 10.1093/applin/18.2.141
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/18.2.141 [Google Scholar]
  341. Larsen-Freeman, Diane
    2006 The emergence of complexity, fluency, and accuracy in the oral and written production of five Chinese learners of English. Applied Linguistics27(4): 590–619. 10.1093/applin/aml029
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/aml029 [Google Scholar]
  342. Larsen-Freeman, Diane
    2018 Looking ahead: Future directions in, and future research into, second language acquisition. Foreign Language Annals51(1): 55–72. 10.1111/flan.12314
     https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12314 [Google Scholar]
  343. Lavi-Rotbain, Ori & Arnon, Inbal
    2022 The learnability consequences of Zipfian distributions in language. Cognition223: 105038. 10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105038
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105038 [Google Scholar]
  344. Le Foll, Elen
    2017 Textbook English: A corpus-based analysis of language use in German and French EFL textbooks. Poster presented at theCorpus Linguistics 2017 Conference, University of Birmingham, July. 〈https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/Documents/college-artslaw/corpus/conference-archives/2017/general/paper230.pdf〉 (20 October 2017).
     [Google Scholar]
  345. 2018a “They were walking in a corridor when suddenly the mummy appeared.” A corpus-based study of narrative texts in secondary school EFL textbooks. Presented at the13th Teaching Language and Corpora (TaLC) Conference, Cambridge, UK. 10.13140/RG.2.2.31141.81124
     https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.31141.81124 [Google Scholar]
  346. 2018b Raising, *discovering and *exploiting awareness: Using the Internet as a source of collocational knowledge. Presented at theOLLReN Annual Online Conference: Research into using Technology for Language Learning, October. 〈https://www.researchgate.net/publication/328368290_Raising_discovering_and_exploiting_awareness_Using_the_Internet_as_a_source_of_collocational_knowledge〉 (13 April 2024)
     [Google Scholar]
  347. 2020a Development and evaluation of a corpus linguistics seminar in pre-service teacher training. Presented at theTeaching and Language Corpora Conference (TaLC) 2020, Perpignan, July. 〈https://youtu.be/PtgW5y-xFW8〉 (13 April 2024).
     [Google Scholar]
  348. 2020b Issues in compiling and exploiting textbook corpora. Presented at theJapanese Association for English Corpus Studies 2020, Tokyo, October. 10.13140/RG.2.2.32006.60487
     https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.32006.60487 [Google Scholar]
  349. 2021a A New Tagger for the Multi-Dimensional Analysis of Register Variation in English. M.Sc. thesis, Osnabrück University.
     [Google Scholar]
  350. 2021b About the project. InCreating Corpus-Informed Materials for the English as a Foreign Language Classroom: A Step-by-Step Guide for (Trainee) Teachers Using Online Resources [Open Educational Resource], 3rd edn. 〈https://pressbooks.pub/elenlefoll〉 (30 July 2021).
     [Google Scholar]
  351. 2021c Register variation in school EFL textbooks. Register Studies3(2): 207–246. 10.1075/rs.20009.lef
     https://doi.org/10.1075/rs.20009.lef [Google Scholar]
  352. 2021d Introducing the multi-feature tagger of English (MFTE). Perl. Osnabrück University. 〈https://github.com/elenlefoll/MultiFeatureTaggerEnglish〉 (5 January 2022).
     [Google Scholar]
  353. 2022a “I’m putting some salt in my sandwich.” The use of the progressive in EFL textbook conversation. InBroadening the Spectrum of Corpus Linguistics: New Approaches to Variability and Change [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 105], Susanne Flach & Martin Hilpert (eds), 93–132. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.105.04lef
     https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.105.04lef [Google Scholar]
  354. 2022b  Making tea and mistakes: The functions of make in spoken English and textbook dialogues. InMultifunctionality in English: Corpora, Language and Academic Literacy Pedagogy [Routledge Advances in Corpus Linguistics], Zihan Yin & Elaine Vine (eds), 157–78. New York, NY: Routledge. 10.4324/9781003155072‑12
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003155072-12 [Google Scholar]
  355. 2022c Textbook English: A Corpus-based Analysis of the Language of EFL Textbooks Used in Secondary Schools in France, Germany and Spain. PhD dissertation, Osnabrück University. https://osnadocs.ub.uni-osnabrueck.de/handle/ds-202303138538. 10.48693/278
     https://doi.org/10.48693/278
  356. Le Foll, Elen
    2023a “Opening up” corpus linguistics: An open education approach to developing corpus literacy among pre-service language teachers. Journal of Second Language Teacher Education2(2): 161–86. 10.1558/slte.25371
     https://doi.org/10.1558/slte.25371 [Google Scholar]
  357. Le Foll, Elen
    2023b The potential impact of EFL textbook language on learner English: A triangulated corpus study. InDemystifying Corpus Linguistics for English Language Teaching, Kieran Harrington & Patricia Ronan (eds), 259–287. Cham: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑031‑11220‑1_13
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-11220-1_13 [Google Scholar]
  358. 2023c A conceptual replication of the Multi-dimensional Model of General Spoken and Written English (Biber 1988): Challenges, limitations and potential solutions. Presented at theICAME44, NWU Vanderbijlpark (South Africa), May. 〈https://osf.io/f5496/〉 (13 April 2024).
     [Google Scholar]
  359. 2024a  Schulenglisch: A multi-dimensional model of the variety of English taught in German secondary schools. AAA: Arbeiten aus Anglistik und Amerikanistik / Agenda: Advancing Anglophone Studies49(1): 15–50. 10.24053/AAA‑2024‑0001
     https://doi.org/10.24053/AAA-2024-0001 [Google Scholar]
  360. 2024b Why we need Open Science and Open Education to bridge the corpus research–practice gap. InCorpora for Language Learning: Bridging the Research-Practice Divide, Peter Crosthwaite (ed.), 142–156. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781003413301‑11
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003413301-11 [Google Scholar]
  361. . forthcoming. “To me, authenticity means credibility and correctness”: A data-driven learning approach to encouraging pre-service teachers to re-evaluate their understanding of “authentic English”. InMultiliteracies-aligned Teaching and Learning in Digitally-mediated Second Language Teacher Education, Carolyn Blume ed. London: Routledge. Preprint: https://hal.science/hal-04393791 (5 April 2024)
     [Google Scholar]
  362. Le Foll, Elen & Brezina, Vaclav
    2023 Is multi-dimensional analysis replicable? Variables, parameters and transparency. Presented atCL2023, Lancaster University (UK), July.
     [Google Scholar]
  363. Lê, Sébastien , Josse, Julie & Husson, François
    2008 FactoMineR: An R package for multivariate analysis. Journal of Statistical Software25(1). 10.18637/jss.v025.i01
     https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v025.i01 [Google Scholar]
  364. Leacock, Claudia , Chodorow, Martin , Gamon, Michael & Tetreault, Joel
    2010 Automated Grammatical Error Detection for Language Learners [Synthesis Lectures on Human Language Technologies 10]. San Rafael, CA: Morgan & Claypool. 10.1007/978‑3‑031‑02137‑4
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-02137-4 [Google Scholar]
  365. Lee, David YW.
    2001 Genres, registers, text types, domain, and styles: Clarifying the concepts and navigating a path through the BNC jungle. Language Learning & Technology5(3): 37–72.
     [Google Scholar]
  366. Lee, Hansol , Warschauer, Mark & Lee, Jang Ho
    2019 The effects of corpus use on second language vocabulary learning: A multilevel meta-analysis. Applied Linguistics40(5): 721–753. 10.1093/applin/amy012
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amy012 [Google Scholar]
  367. Lee, Yong Wey David
    2000 Modelling Variation in Spoken and Written Language: TheMmulti-dimensional Approach Revisited. PhD dissertation, Lancaster University.
  368. Leńko-Szymańska, Agnieszka
    2017 Training teachers in data-driven learning: Tackling the challenge. Language Learning & Technology21(3): 217–241.
     [Google Scholar]
  369. Leńko-Szymańska, Agnieszka & Boulton, Alex
    2015 Introduction: Data-driven learning in language pedagogy. InMultiple affordances of Language Corpora for Data-driven Learning [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 69], Agnieszka Leńko-Szymańska & Alex Boulton (eds), 1–14. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.69.01int
     https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.69.01int [Google Scholar]
  370. Lenth, Russell
    2020 emmeans: Estimated marginal means, aka least-squares means. Manual. 〈https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=emmeans〉 (12 July 2020).
  371. Leroy, Michel
    2012 Les manuels scolaires: Situation et perspectives. n° 2012–036. Inspection générale de l’éducation nationale. 〈https://www.education.gouv.fr/les-manuels-scolaires-situation-et-perspectives-6017〉 (1 August 2018).
  372. Levshina, Natalia
    2015 How to Do Linguistics with R: Data Exploration and Statistical Analysis. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/z.195
     https://doi.org/10.1075/z.195 [Google Scholar]
  373. Lewis, Michael
    1993 The Lexical Approach. Hove: Language Teaching Publications.
     [Google Scholar]
  374. 1997 Implementing the Lexical Approach: Putting Theory into Practice. Hove: Language Teaching Publications.
     [Google Scholar]
  375. 2009 The Lexical Approach: The State of ELT and a Way Forward. London: Heinle.
     [Google Scholar]
  376. Liedke, Martina
    2013 Mit Transkripten Deutsch lernen. InGesprochene Sprache im DaF-Unterricht: Grundlagen – Ansätze – Praxis, Sandro M. Moraldo & Federica Missaglia (eds), 243–266. Heidelberg: Winter.
     [Google Scholar]
  377. Limberg, Holger
    2016 “Always remember to say Please and Thank You”: Teaching politeness with German EFL textbooks. InPragmatics & Language Learning, Kathleen Bardovi-Harlig & César Félix-Brasdefer (eds), 265–292. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai‘i, National Foreign Language Resource Center.
     [Google Scholar]
  378. Little, David , Devitt, Sean & Singleton, David
    1989 Learning Foreign Languages from Authentic Texts: Theory and Practice. Dublin: Authentik.
     [Google Scholar]
  379. Little, David , Devitt, Seán & Singleton, David
    2002 The communicative approach and authentic texts. InTeaching Modern Languages, Ann Swarbrick (ed.), 51–55. London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  380. Littlejohn, Andrew
    2011 The analysis of language teaching materials: Inside the Trojan horse. InMaterials Development in Language Teaching, Brian Tomlinson (ed.), 179–211. Cambridge: CUP. 10.1017/9781139042789.011
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9781139042789.011 [Google Scholar]
  381. Liu, Dilin
    2011 The most frequently used English phrasal verbs in American and British English: A multicorpus examination. Tesol Quarterly45(4): 661–688. 10.5054/tq.2011.247707
     https://doi.org/10.5054/tq.2011.247707 [Google Scholar]
  382. Liu, Eric T. K. & Shaw, Philip M.
    2001 Investigating learner vocabulary: A possible approach to looking at EFL/ESL learners’ qualitative knowledge of the word. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching39(3): 171–94. 10.1515/iral.2001.001
     https://doi.org/10.1515/iral.2001.001 [Google Scholar]
  383. Ljung, Magnus
    1990 A Study of TEFL Vocabulary [Stockholm Studies in English 78]. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell International.
     [Google Scholar]
  384. 1991 Swedish TEFL meets reality. InEnglish Computer Corpora: Selected Papers and Research Guide, Stig Johansson & Anna-Brita Stenström (eds), 245–256. Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110865967.245
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110865967.245 [Google Scholar]
  385. Loewen, Shawn & Gonulal, Talip
    2015 Exploratory factor analysis and principal components analysis. InAdvancing Quantitative Methods in Second Language Research [Second Language Acquisition Research Series], Luke Plonsky (ed.), 182–211. New York, NY: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315870908
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315870908 [Google Scholar]
  386. Love, Robbie , Dembry, Claire , Hardie, Andrew , Brezina, Vaclav & McEnery, Tony
    2017 The Spoken BNC2014. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics22(3): 319–344. 10.1075/ijcl.22.3.02lov
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.22.3.02lov [Google Scholar]
  387. Love, Robbie , Hawtin, Abi & Hardie, Andrew
    2018 The British National Corpus 2014: User manual and reference guide. 〈corpora.lancs.ac.uk/bnc2014/doc/BNC2014manual.pdf〉 (15 November 2018).
  388. Lüdecke, Daniel
    2020 sjPlot: Data visualization for statistics in social science. Manual. 〈https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=sjPlot〉 (12 July 2020).
  389. Luke, Steven G.
    2017 Evaluating significance in linear mixed-effects models in R. Behavior Research Methods49(4): 1494–1502. 10.3758/s13428‑016‑0809‑y
     https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-016-0809-y [Google Scholar]
  390. MacWhinney, B.
    2006 Emergentism--Use often and with care. Applied Linguistics27(4): 729–40. 10.1093/applin/aml035
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/aml035 [Google Scholar]
  391. Madlener, Karin
    2018 Do findings from artificial language learning generalize to second language classrooms?InUsage-inspired L2 Instruction: Researched Pedagogy [Language Learning & Language Teaching 49], Andrea Tyler , Lourdes Ortega , Mariko Uno , & Hae In Park (eds), 211–234. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/lllt.49.10mad
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.49.10mad [Google Scholar]
  392. Manning, Christopher D.
    2011 Part-of-speech tagging from 97% to 100%: Is it time for some linguistics?InComputational Linguistics and Intelligent Text Processing [Lecture Notes in Computer Science], Alexander F. Gelbukh (ed.), 171–89. Berlin: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑642‑19400‑9_14
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-19400-9_14 [Google Scholar]
  393. Martin, James R. & Rose, David
    2008 Genre Relations: Mapping Culture [Equinox Textbooks and Surveys in Linguistics]. London: Equinox.
     [Google Scholar]
  394. Martin, James R.
    2009 Genre and language learning: A social semiotic perspective. Linguistics and Education20(1): 10–21. 10.1016/j.linged.2009.01.003
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2009.01.003 [Google Scholar]
  395. Martinez, Ron & Schmitt, Norbert
    2012 A phrasal expressions list. Applied Linguistics33(3): 299–320. 10.1093/applin/ams010
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/ams010 [Google Scholar]
  396. Matthiessen, Christian M. I. M.
    2019 Register in systemic functional linguistics. Register Studies1(1): 10–41. 10.1075/rs.18010.mat
     https://doi.org/10.1075/rs.18010.mat [Google Scholar]
  397. Mauranen, Anna
    2003 The corpus of English as lingua franca in academic settings. TESOL Quarterly37(3): 513–527. 10.2307/3588402
     https://doi.org/10.2307/3588402 [Google Scholar]
  398. 2004a Speech corpora in the classroom. InCorpora and Language Learners [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 17], Guy Aston , Silvia Bernardini & Dominic Stewart (eds), 195–211. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.17.14mau
     https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.17.14mau [Google Scholar]
  399. 2004b Spoken – General. Spoken corpus for an ordinary learner. InHow to Use Corpora in Language Teaching [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 12], John McH. Sinclair (ed.), 89–108. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.12.09mau
     https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.12.09mau [Google Scholar]
  400. Mauranen, Anna , Hynninen, Niina & Ranta, Elina
    2010 English as an academic lingua franca: The ELFA project. English for Specific Purposes29(3): 183–90. 10.1016/j.esp.2009.10.001
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2009.10.001 [Google Scholar]
  401. Mayring, Philipp
    2010 Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse: Grundlagen und Techniken [Beltz Pädagogik]. Weinheim: Beltz.
     [Google Scholar]
  402. McCarthy, Michael
    1998 Spoken Language and Applied Linguistics. Cambridge: CUP.
     [Google Scholar]
  403. McCarthy, Michael & Carter, Ronald
    1995 Spoken grammar: What is it and how can we teach it?ELT journal49(3): 207–218. 10.1093/elt/49.3.207
     https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/49.3.207 [Google Scholar]
  404. 2001 Size isn’t everything: Spoken English, corpus, and the classroom. Tesol Quarterly35(2): 337–340. 10.2307/3587654
     https://doi.org/10.2307/3587654 [Google Scholar]
  405. McCarthy, Michael , McCarten, Jeanne & Sandiford, Helen
    2005 Touchstone. First edition. Cambridge: CUP.
     [Google Scholar]
  406. McEnery, Tony & Hardie, Andrew
    2011 Corpus Linguistics: Method, Theory and Practice. Cambridge: CUP. 10.1017/CBO9780511981395
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511981395 [Google Scholar]
  407. McEnery, Tony & Xiao, Richard
    2011 What corpora can offer in language teaching and learning. InHandbook of Research in Second Language Teaching and Learning [ESL & Applied Linguistics Professional Series], Eli Hinkel (ed.), 364–380. New York, NY: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  408. McManus, Kevin
    . In press. Replication and open science in applied linguistics Research. InOpen Science in Applied Linguistics, Luke Plonsky ed. 〈Preprint: https://osf.io/bqr9w/〉 (29 October 2021). 10.31219/osf.io/bqr9w
     https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/bqr9w [Google Scholar]
  409. Meunier, Fanny & Gouverneur, Céline
    2007 The treatment of phraseology in ELT textbooks. InCorpora in the Foreign Language Classroom, Encarnación Hidalgo , Luis Quereda & Juan Santana (eds), 119–139. Amsterdam: Rodopi. 10.1163/9789401203906_009
     https://doi.org/10.1163/9789401203906_009 [Google Scholar]
  410. 2009 New types of corpora for new educational challenges: Collecting, annotating and exploiting a corpus of textbook material. InCorpora and Language Teaching [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 33], Karin Aijmer (ed.), 179–201. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 10.1075/scl.33.16meu
     https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.33.16meu [Google Scholar]
  411. Meunier, Fanny & Reppen, Randi
    2015 Corpus versus non-corpus-informed pedagogical materials: Grammar as the focus. InThe Cambridge Handbook of English Corpus Linguistics [Cambridge Handbooks in Language and Linguistics], Douglas Biber & Randi Reppen (eds), 498–514. Cambridge: CUP. 10.1017/CBO9781139764377.028
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139764377.028 [Google Scholar]
  412. Meurers, Detmar
    2015 Learner corpora and natural language processing. InThe Cambridge Handbook of Learner Corpus Research, Sylviane Granger , Gaetanelle Gilquin & Fanny Meunier (eds), 537–566. Cambridge: CUP. 10.1017/CBO9781139649414.024
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139649414.024 [Google Scholar]
  413. Meurers, Detmar , De Kuthy, Kordula , Nuxoll, Florian , Rudzewitz, Björn & Ziai, Ramon
    2019 Scaling up intervention studies to investigate real-life foreign language learning in school. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics39: 161–188. 10.1017/S0267190519000126
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190519000126 [Google Scholar]
  414. Meurers, Detmar , Ziai, Ramon , Amaral, Luiz , Boyd, Adriane , Dimitrov, Aleksandar , Metcalf, Vanessa & Ott, Niels
    2010 Enhancing authentic web pages for language learners. InProceedings of the 5th Workshop on Innovative Use of NLP for Building Educational Applications, 9. Los Angeles, CA. 〈www.sfs.uni-tuebingen.de/~dm/papers/meurers-ziai-et-al-10.pdf〉 (21 January 2022).
     [Google Scholar]
  415. Miekley, Joshua
    2005 ESL textbook evaluation checklist. The Reading Matrix5(2).
     [Google Scholar]
  416. Miller, Don
    2011 ESL reading textbooks vs. university textbooks: Are we giving our students the input they may need?Journal of English for Academic Purposes10(1): 32–46. 10.1016/j.jeap.2010.12.002
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2010.12.002 [Google Scholar]
  417. Milroy, James & Milroy, Lesley
    2012 Authority in Language: Investigating Standard English [Routledge Linguistics Classics]. New York, NY: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203124666
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203124666 [Google Scholar]
  418. Mindt, Dieter
    1987 Sprache, Grammatik, Unterrichtsgrammatik: Futurischer Zeitbezug im Englischen [Schule und Forschung]. Frankfurt: Diesterweg.
     [Google Scholar]
  419. 1992 Zeitbezug im Englischen: Eine didaktische Grammatik des Englischen Futurs [Tübinger Beiträge Zur Linguistik]. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.
     [Google Scholar]
  420. 1995a An Empirical Grammar of the English Verb: Modal Verbs. Berlin: Cornelsen.
     [Google Scholar]
  421. 1995b Schulgrammatik vs. Grammatik der englischen Sprache. InPerspektiven des Grammatikunterrichts, Claus Gnutzmann & Frank G. Königs (eds), 47–68. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.
     [Google Scholar]
  422. Mindt, Dieter
    1996 English corpus linguistics and the foreign language teaching syllabus. InUsing Corpora for Language Research, Jenny Thomas & Mick Short (eds), 232–247. Harlow: Longman.
     [Google Scholar]
  423. Mindt, Dieter
    1997 Corpora and the teaching of English in Germany. InTeaching and Language Corpora [Applied Linguistics and Language Study], Anne Wichmann (ed.), 40–50. London: Longman.
     [Google Scholar]
  424. Mishan, F.
    2005 Designing Authenticity into Language Learning Materials [Play Text Series]. Portland, OR: Intellect Books.
     [Google Scholar]
  425. Mishra, Punya & Koehler, Matthew J.
    2006 Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record108(6): 1017–1054. 10.1111/j.1467‑9620.2006.00684.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x [Google Scholar]
  426. Mizumoto, Atsushi & Plonsky, Luke
    2016 R as a lingua franca: Advantages of using R for quantitative research in applied linguistics. Applied Linguistics37(2): 284–291. 10.1093/applin/amv025
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amv025 [Google Scholar]
  427. Mohr, Susanne , Jansen, Sandra & Forsberg, Julia
    2019 European English in the EFL classroom? Teacher attitudes towards target varieties of English in Sweden and Germany. English Today, 37(2): 85–91. 10.1017/S0266078419000403
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266078419000403 [Google Scholar]
  428. Möller, Stefan
    2016 Sourcebook rather than coursebook. Lernerorientiert mit dem Lehrwerk arbeiten. Der fremdsprachliche Unterricht Englisch50(143): 12–18.
     [Google Scholar]
  429. Möller, Verena
    2017 A statistical analysis of learner corpus data, experimental data and individual differences: Monofactorial vs. multifactorial approaches. InLanguage, Learners and Levels: Progression and Variation, Pieter de Haan , Rina de Vries & Sanne van Vuuren (eds), 409–439. Louvain-la-Neuve: Presses Universitaires de Louvain.
     [Google Scholar]
  430. 2020 From pedagogical input to learner output: Conditionals in EFL and CLIL teaching materials and learner language. Pedagogical Linguistics1(2): 95–124, 10.1075/pl.00001.mol
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pl.00001.mol [Google Scholar]
  431. Moreno, Ana I.
    2003 Matching theoretical descriptions of discourse and practical applications to teaching: The case of causal metatext. English for Specific Purposes22(3): 265–295. 10.1016/S0889‑4906(02)00021‑2
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(02)00021-2 [Google Scholar]
  432. Moyer, Alene
    2008 Input as a critical means to an end: Quantity and quality of experience in L2 phonological attainment. InInput Matters in SLA, Thorsten Piske & Martha Young-Scholten (eds), 159–174. Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781847691118‑011
     https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847691118-011 [Google Scholar]
  433. 2013 Foreign Accent: The Phenomenon of Non-Native Speech. Cambridge: CUP. 10.1017/CBO9780511794407
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511794407 [Google Scholar]
  434. Mukherjee, Joybrato
    2004 Bridging the gap between applied corpus linguistics and the reality of English language teaching in Germany. InApplied Corpus Linguistics: A Multidimensional Perspective, Ulla Connor & Thomas Upton (eds), 239–250. Amsterdam: Rodopi. 10.1163/9789004333772_014
     https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004333772_014 [Google Scholar]
  435. Mukundan, Jayakaran
    2010 Retrotext- E 1.0: The beginnings of computer-based ELT textbook evaluation. Advances in Language and Literary Studies1(2): 270–280.
     [Google Scholar]
  436. Mukundan, Jayakaran & Ahour, Touran
    2010 A review of textbook evaluation checklists across four decades (1970–2008). InResearch for Materials Development in Language Learning: Evidence for Best Practice, Brian Tomlinson & Hitomi Masuhara (eds), 336–352. London: Bloomsbury.
     [Google Scholar]
  437. Mukundan, Jayakaran , Leong Chiew Har, Amelia & Nimehchisalem, Vahid
    2012 Distribution of articles in Malaysian secondary school English language textbooks. English Language and Literature Studies2(2): 62–70. 10.5539/ells.v2n2p62
     https://doi.org/10.5539/ells.v2n2p62 [Google Scholar]
  438. Mukundan, Jayakaran & Roslim, Norwati
    2009 Textbook representation of prepositions. English Language Teaching2(4): 13–24. 10.5539/elt.v2n4p13
     https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v2n4p13 [Google Scholar]
  439. Müller, Simone
    2005 Discourse Markers in Native and Non-Native English Discourse [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 138]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.138
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.138 [Google Scholar]
  440. Mundry, Roger & Sommer, Christina
    2007 Discriminant function analysis with nonindependent data: Consequences and an alternative. Animal Behaviour74(4): 965–976. 10.1016/j.anbehav.2006.12.028
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2006.12.028 [Google Scholar]
  441. Munro, Murray J. & Derwing, Tracey M.
    1998 The effects of speaking rate on listener evaluations of native and foreign-accented speech. Language Learning48(2): 159–182. 10.1111/1467‑9922.00038
     https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9922.00038 [Google Scholar]
  442. Murphy, M. Lynne
    2003 Semantic Relations and the Lexicon: Antonymy, Synonymy and Other Paradigms. Cambridge: CUP. 10.1017/CBO9780511486494
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486494 [Google Scholar]
  443. Nakagawa, Shinichi , Johnson, Paul C. D. & Schielzeth, Holger
    2017 The coefficient of determination R 2 and intra-class correlation coefficient from generalized linear mixed-effects models revisited and expanded. Journal of The Royal Society Interface14(134): 20170213. 10.1098/rsif.2017.0213
     https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2017.0213 [Google Scholar]
  444. Nelson, Mike
    2022 Corpora for English Language Learning Textbook Evaluation. InThe Routledge Handbook of Corpora and English Language Teaching and Learning [Routledge Handbooks in Applied Linguistics], Reka R. Jablonkai & Eniko Csomay (eds). London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781003002901‑12
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003002901-12 [Google Scholar]
  445. Nesselhauf, Nadja
    2005 Collocations in a Learner Corpus [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 14]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.14
     https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.14 [Google Scholar]
  446. Neumann, Stella & Evert, Stefan
    2021 A register variation perspective on varieties of English. InCorpus-based Approaches to Register Variation [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 103], Elena Seoane & Douglas Biber (eds), 144–78. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.103.06neu
     https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.103.06neu [Google Scholar]
  447. Nini, Andrea
    2014 Multidimensional Analysis Tagger (MAT), 〈sites.google.com/site/multidimensionaltagger〉 (18 September 2019).
  448. 2019 The multi-dimensional analysis tagger. InMulti-Dimensional Analysis: Research Methods and Current Issues, Tony Berber Sardinha & Marcia Veirano Pinto (eds), 67–96. London: Bloomsbury. 10.5040/9781350023857.0012
     https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350023857.0012 [Google Scholar]
  449. Ninio, Anat
    1999 Pathbreaking verbs in syntactic development and the question of prototypical transitivity. Journal of Child Language26(3): 619–653. 10.1017/S0305000999003931
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000999003931 [Google Scholar]
  450. Nold, Günter
    1998 Die Arbeit mit dem Lehrwerk. InEnglish lernen und lehren – Didaktik des Englischunterrichts, Johannes P. Timm (ed.), 127–36. Berlin: Cornelsen.
     [Google Scholar]
  451. Nordlund, Marie
    2016 EFL textbooks for young learners: A comparative analysis of vocabulary. Education Inquiry7(1): 47–68. 10.3402/edui.v7.27764
     https://doi.org/10.3402/edui.v7.27764 [Google Scholar]
  452. Novakova, Iva & Siepmann, Dirk
    (eds) 2020 Phraseology and Style in Subgenres of the Novel: A Synthesis of Corpus and Literary Perspectives. Cham: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑030‑23744‑8
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23744-8 [Google Scholar]
  453. OECD, European Union, UNESCO Institute for Statistics
    OECD, European Union, UNESCO Institute for Statistics 2015 ISCED 2011 Operational Manua : Guidelines for Classifying National Education Programmes and Related Qualifications. Paris: OECD Publishing. 10.1787/9789264228368‑en
     https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264228368-en [Google Scholar]
  454. Oelkers, Jürgen
    2008 Lehrplanentwicklung, Lehrmittel und Bildungsstandards. presented at theKlausurtagung der Leitungskonferenz des Staatsinstituts für Schulentwicklung und Bildungsforschung, St. Quirin. 〈https://www.ife.uzh.ch/research/emeriti/oelkersjuergen/vortraegeprofoelkers/vortraege2008/339_StQuirin.pdf〉 (8 February 2022).
     [Google Scholar]
  455. O’Keeffe, Anne , McCarthy, Michael & Carter, Ronald
    2007 From Corpus to Classroom: Language Use and Language Teaching. Cambridge: CUP. 10.1017/CBO9780511497650
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511497650 [Google Scholar]
  456. Osborne, Jason W. & Fitzpatrick, David C.
    2005 Replication analysis in exploratory factor analysis: What it is and why it makes your analysis better. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation17(7): 1–9.
     [Google Scholar]
  457. Papert, Seymour A.
    2020 Mindstorms: Children, Computers, and Powerful Ideas. New York, NY: Hachette.
     [Google Scholar]
  458. Paquot, Magali & Plonsky, Luke
    2017 Quantitative research methods and study quality in learner corpus research. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research3(1): 61–94. 10.1075/ijlcr.3.1.03paq
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ijlcr.3.1.03paq [Google Scholar]
  459. Parsons, Sam , Azevedo, Flávio , Elsherif, Mahmoud M. , Guay, Samuel , Shahim, Owen N. , Govaart, Gisela H. , Norris, Emma
    2022 A community-sourced glossary of open scholarship terms. Nature Human Behaviour6(3): 312–318. 10.1038/s41562‑021‑01269‑4
     https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-021-01269-4 [Google Scholar]
  460. Peacock, Matthew
    1997 The effect of authentic materials on the motivation of EFL learners. ELT Journal51(2): 144–156. 10.1093/elt/51.2.144
     https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/51.2.144 [Google Scholar]
  461. Pérez-Paredes, Pascual & Abad, Malena
    . Forthcoming. Integrating language teachers’ voices in the design and exploitation of Spanish corpora in the UK. InApplying Corpora in Teaching and Learning Romance Languages, Henry Tyne & Stefania Spina eds Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
     [Google Scholar]
  462. Pérez-Paredes, Pascual & Mark, Geraldine
    (eds) 2021 Beyond Concordance Lines: Corpora in Language Education [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 102]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.102
     https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.102 [Google Scholar]
  463. Pérez-Paredes, Pascual , Mark, Geraldine & O’Keeffe, Anne
    2020 The impact of usage-based approaches on second language learning and teaching [Cambridge Education Research Reports]. Cambridge: CUP. 〈https://www.cambridge.org/partnership/research/impact-usage-based-approaches-second-language-learning-and-teaching〉 (9 July 2021).
  464. Phakiti, Aek & Plonsky, Luke
    2018 Reconciling beliefs about L2 learning with SLA theory and research. RELC Journal49(2): 217–237. 10.1177/0033688218781970
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688218781970 [Google Scholar]
  465. Piaget, Jean
    2013 The Construction of Reality in the Child. Oxon: Taylor & Francis. 10.4324/9781315009650
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315009650 [Google Scholar]
  466. Picoral, Adriana , Staples, Shelley & Reppen, Randi
    2021 Automated annotation of learner English: An evaluation of software tools. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research7(1): 17–52. 10.1075/ijlcr.20003.pic
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ijlcr.20003.pic [Google Scholar]
  467. Pienemann, Manfred
    1984 Psychological constraints on the teachability of languages. Studies in Second Language Acquisition6(2): 186–214. 10.1017/S0272263100005015
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100005015 [Google Scholar]
  468. Popescu, Marius
    2011 Studying translationese at the character level. InProceedings of Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing, 634–639. Hissar, Bulgaria.
     [Google Scholar]
  469. Porte, Graeme & McManus, Kevin
    2018 Doing Replication Research in Applied Linguistics. Routledge. 10.4324/9781315621395
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315621395 [Google Scholar]
  470. Posner, Michael I. & Keele, Steven W.
    1968 On the genesis of abstract ideas. Journal of Experimental Psychology77(3, Pt.1): 353–363. 10.1037/h0025953
     https://doi.org/10.1037/h0025953 [Google Scholar]
  471. 1970 Retention of abstract ideas. Journal of Experimental Psychology83(2, Pt. 1): 304–308. 10.1037/h0028558
     https://doi.org/10.1037/h0028558 [Google Scholar]
  472. Prabhu, Nagore Seshagiri
    1989 Materials as support; Materials as constraint. Guidelines: A Periodical for Classroom Language Teachers11(1): 66–74.
     [Google Scholar]
  473. Prodromou, Luke
    1992 What culture? Which culture? Cross-cultural factors in language learning. ELT journal46(1): 39–50. 10.1093/elt/46.1.39
     https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/46.1.39 [Google Scholar]
  474. 1996 Correspondence. ELT Journal50(1): 88–89. 10.1093/elt/50.1.88
     https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/50.1.88 [Google Scholar]
  475. Prodromou, Luke
    2003 In search of the successful user of English How a corpus of non-native speaker language could impact on EFL teaching. Modern English Teacher12(2): 5–15.
     [Google Scholar]
  476. Prowse, Philip
    1998 How writers write: Testimony from authors. InMaterials Development in Language Teaching, Brian Tomlinson (ed.), 130–145. Cambridge: CUP.
     [Google Scholar]
  477. Quaglio, Paulo
    2009  Television Dialogue: The Sitcom Friends vs. Natural Conversation [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 36]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.36
     https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.36 [Google Scholar]
  478. Quirk, Randolph
    1995 Grammatical and Lexical Variance in English. London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  479. Quirk, Randolph , Greenbaum, Sidney , Leech, Geoffrey & Svartvik, Jan
    1985 A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.
     [Google Scholar]
  480. R Core Team
    R Core Team 2022 R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Manual. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. 〈https://www.R-project.org/〉 (29 January 2021).
     [Google Scholar]
  481. Ramjattan, Vijay A.
    2019 The white native speaker and inequality regimes in the private English language school. Intercultural Education30(2): 126–140. 10.1080/14675986.2018.1538043
     https://doi.org/10.1080/14675986.2018.1538043 [Google Scholar]
  482. Ranalli, James M.
    2003 The treatment of key vocabulary learning strategies in current ELT course books: Repetition, resource use, recording. MA thesis, University of Birmingham. 〈www.birmingham.ac.uk/documents/college-artslaw/cels/essays/matefltesldissertations/ranallidiss.pdf〉 (10 August 2017).
     [Google Scholar]
  483. Rankin, Tom
    2010 Advanced learner corpus data and grammar teaching: Adverb placement. InCorpus-Based Approaches to English Language Teaching, Mari Carmen Campoy Cubillo , Begoña Bellés-Fortuño & Maria Lluïsa Gea-Valor (eds), 205–2015. London: Continuum.
     [Google Scholar]
  484. Rasch, Björn , Friese, Malte , Hofmann, Wilhelm & Naumann, Ewald
    2014 Einfaktorielle Varianzanalyse. InQuantitative Methoden, 2: Einführung in die Statistik für Psychologen und Sozialwissenschaftler [Springer-Lehrbuch], Björn Rasch , Malte Friese , Wilhelm Hofmann & Ewald Naumann (eds), 1–34. Berlin: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑662‑43548‑9_1
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-43548-9_1 [Google Scholar]
  485. Rautionaho, Paula & Deshors, Sandra C.
    2018 Progressive or not progressive? Modeling the constructional choices of EFL and ESL writers. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research4(2): 225–252. 10.1075/ijlcr.16019.rau
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ijlcr.16019.rau [Google Scholar]
  486. Reda, Ghsoon
    2003 English coursebooks: Prototype texts and basic vocabulary norms. ELT Journal57(3): 260–268. 10.1093/elt/57.3.260
     https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/57.3.260 [Google Scholar]
  487. Reder, Stephen , Harris, Kathryn & Setzler, Kristen
    2003 The multimedia adult ESL learner corpus. TESOL Quarterly37(3): 546–557. 10.2307/3588405
     https://doi.org/10.2307/3588405 [Google Scholar]
  488. Reinders, Hayo & Ellis, Rod
    2009 The effects of two types of input on intake and the acquisition of implicit and explicit knowledge. InImplicit and Explicit Knowledge in Second Language Learning, Testing and Teaching, Rod Ellis , Shawn Loewen , Catherine Elder , Hayo Reinders , Rosemary Erlam & Jenefer Philp (eds), 281–302. Bristol: Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781847691767‑014
     https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847691767-014 [Google Scholar]
  489. Reppen, Randi
    1994 Variation in Elementary Student Writing. PhD dissertation, Northern Arizona University.
  490. (2001) 2013 Register variation in student and adult speech and writing. InVariation in English: Multi-dimensional Studies, Susan Conrad & Douglas Biber (eds), 187–99. New York, NY: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  491. Revelle, William
    2020 psych: Procedures for psychological, psychometric, and personality research. Evanston, IL. 〈https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=psych〉 (20 April 2021).
     [Google Scholar]
  492. Révész, Andrea & Brunfaut, Tineke
    2013 Text characteristics of task input and difficulty in second language listening comprehension. Studies in Second Language Acquisition35(1): 31–65. 10.1017/S0272263112000678
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263112000678 [Google Scholar]
  493. Richards, Jack C.
    2001 Curriculum Development in Language Teaching. Cambridge: CUP. 10.1017/CBO9780511667220
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511667220 [Google Scholar]
  494. 2015 Key Issues in Language Teaching. Cambridge: CUP. 10.1017/9781009024600
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009024600 [Google Scholar]
  495. Richardson, Leonard
    2015 Beautiful Soup 4.4.0 documentation, 2015. 〈https://beautiful-soup-4.readthedocs.io/en/latest/〉 (7 January 2022).
  496. Roberts, Celia & Cooke, Melanie
    2009 Authenticity in the adult ESOL classroom and beyond. TESOL Quarterly43(4): 620–642. 10.1002/j.1545‑7249.2009.tb00189.x
     https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1545-7249.2009.tb00189.x [Google Scholar]
  497. Robinson, Peter J. & Ellis, Nick C.
    (eds) 2008 Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics and Second Language Acquisition. New York, NY: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203938560
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203938560 [Google Scholar]
  498. Rohleder, Bernhard
    2019 Smart school – Auf dem Weg zur digitalen Schule. presented at theBitkom Research GmbH, Berlin, March 12. 〈https://www.bitkom.org/sites/default/files/2019-03/Pr%C3%A4sentation%20Bitkom-PK%20Bildungskonferenz%2012.03.2019_final.pdf〉 (29 September 2020).
     [Google Scholar]
  499. Römer, Ute
    2004a A corpus-driven approach to modal auxiliaries and their didactics. InHow to Use Corpora in Language Teaching [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 12], John McH. Sinclair (ed.), 185–99. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.12.14rom
     https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.12.14rom [Google Scholar]
  500. 2004b Comparing real and ideal language learner input: The use of an EFL textbook corpus in corpus linguistics and language teaching. InCorpora and Language Learners [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 17], Guy Aston , Silvia Bernardini & Dominic Stewart (eds), 151–168. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.17.12rom
     https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.17.12rom [Google Scholar]
  501. 2005 Progressives, Patterns, Pedagogy: A Corpus-Driven Approach to English Progressive Forms, Functions, Contexts, and Didactics [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 18]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.18
     https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.18 [Google Scholar]
  502. 2006 Pedagogical applications of corpora: Some reflections on the current scope and a wish list for future developments. Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik54(2): 121–34. 10.1515/zaa‑2006‑0204
     https://doi.org/10.1515/zaa-2006-0204 [Google Scholar]
  503. 2007 Learner language and the norms in native corpora and EFL teaching materials: A case study of English conditionals. InProceedings of the Anglistentag 2006, Sabine Volk-Birke & Julia Lippert (eds), 355–363. Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Trier.
     [Google Scholar]
  504. 2010 Using general and specialized corpora in English language teaching: Past, present and future. In Mari Carmen Campoy Cubillo , Begoña Bellés Fortuño & Maria Lluïsa Gea-Valor (eds.), Corpus-based approaches to English language teaching, 18–38. London: Continuum.
     [Google Scholar]
  505. Römer, Ute & Berger, Cynthia M.
    2019 Observing the emergence of constructional knowledge: Verb patterns in German and Spanish learners of English at different proficiency levels. Studies in Second Language Acquisition41(5): 1089–1111. 10.1017/S0272263119000202
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263119000202 [Google Scholar]
  506. Rose, David & Martin, James R.
    2012 Learning to Write, Reading to Learn: Genre, Knowledge and Pedagogy in the Sydney School. London: Equinox.
     [Google Scholar]
  507. Rösler, Dietmar & Schart, Michael
    2016 Die Perspektivenvielfalt der Lehrwerkanalyse und ihr weißer Fleck: Einführung in zwei Themenhefte. Info DaF5(43): 483–493. 10.1515/infodaf‑2016‑0502
     https://doi.org/10.1515/infodaf-2016-0502 [Google Scholar]
  508. Rühlemann, Christoph
    2008 A register approach to teaching conversation: Farewell to standard English?Applied Linguistics29(4): 672–693. 10.1093/applin/amn023
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amn023 [Google Scholar]
  509. Rundell, Michael
    2008 The corpus revolution revisited. English Today24(1): 23–27. 10.1017/S0266078408000060
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266078408000060 [Google Scholar]
  510. Runte, Maren
    2015 Lernerlexikographie und Wortschatzerwerb. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110428476
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110428476 [Google Scholar]
  511. Rüschoff, Bernd & Wolff, Dieter
    1999 Fremdsprachenlernen in der Wissensgesellschaft: zum Einsatz der neuen Technologien in Schule und Unterricht. Munich: Hueber Verlag.
     [Google Scholar]
  512. Scales, Julie , Wennerstrom, Ann , Richard, Dara & Wu, Su Hui
    2006 Language learners’ perceptions of accent. TESOL Quarterly40(4): 715. 10.2307/40264305
     https://doi.org/10.2307/40264305 [Google Scholar]
  513. Schaer, Ursula
    2007 Source books rather than course books – Die Bildungsreform im Fremdsprachenunterricht und die neue Rolle für die Lehr-mittel. Beiträge zur Lehrerbildung25(2): 255–267. 10.36950/bzl.25.2.2007.9925
     https://doi.org/10.36950/bzl.25.2.2007.9925 [Google Scholar]
  514. Schäfer, Werner
    2003 Unterrichten ohne Lehrbuch? Einige unzeitgemäße Bemerkungen. Praxis des neusprachlichen Unterrichts50(3): 305–311.
     [Google Scholar]
  515. Schauer, Gila A. & Adolphs, Svenja
    2006 Expressions of gratitude in corpus and DCT data: Vocabulary, formulaic sequences, and pedagogy. System34(1): 119–134. 10.1016/j.system.2005.09.003
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2005.09.003 [Google Scholar]
  516. Schegloff, Emanuel A.
    1993 Reflections on quantification in the study of conversation. Research on Language & Social Interaction26(1): 99–128. 10.1207/s15327973rlsi2601_5
     https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi2601_5 [Google Scholar]
  517. Scheiwe, Lisa
    2022 Evaluating accents of English in ELT textbooks used at German secondary schools. Anglistik33(2): 61–75. 10.33675/ANGL/2022/2/8
     https://doi.org/10.33675/ANGL/2022/2/8 [Google Scholar]
  518. Schildhauer, Peter , Schulte, Marion & Zehne, Carolin
    2020 Global Englishes in the classroom. PFLB. Zeitschrift für Schul- und Professionsentwicklung2(4): 26–40. 10.4119/PFLB‑3435
     https://doi.org/10.4119/PFLB-3435 [Google Scholar]
  519. Schlüter, Norbert
    2002 Present Perfect: Eine Korpuslinguistische Analyse des Englischen Perfekts mit Vermittlungsvorschlägen für den Sprachunterricht [Language in Performance 25]. Tübingen: Narr.
     [Google Scholar]
  520. Schönbrodt, Felix D.
    2016  p-hacker: Train your p-hacking skills! 〈https://shinyapps.org/apps/p-hacker/〉 (28 January 2022).
  521. Schweinberger, Martin
    2020 Best practices in corpus linguistics. Presented at theICAME41, Heidelberg University, May. 〈martinschweinberger.de/docs/ppt/schweinberger-ppt-heidelberg-2020-05-21.pdf〉 (26 July 2021).
     [Google Scholar]
  522. Scott, Mike
    2011 WordSmith Tools. Stroud: Lexical Analysis Software.
     [Google Scholar]
  523. Segermann, Krista
    2000 Eine neue Lehrwerk-Konzeption: Lehrbuch für Lehrer–Lernmaterialien für Schüler. Praxis des neusprachlichen Unterrichts47(4): 339–348.
     [Google Scholar]
  524. Seidlhofer, Barbara
    2001 Closing a conceptual gap: The case for a description of English as a lingua franca. International Journal of Applied Linguistics11(2): 133–158. 10.1111/1473‑4192.00011
     https://doi.org/10.1111/1473-4192.00011 [Google Scholar]
  525. Séré, Alain & Bassy, Alain-Marie
    2010 Le manuel scolaire à l’heure du numérique : Une ‘nouvelle donne’ de la politique de ressources pour l’enseignement. n° 2010–087. Inspection générale de l’éducation nationale. 〈https://www.education.gouv.fr/le-manuel-scolaire-l-heure-du-numerique-1310〉 (6 January 2022).
  526. Siegel, A.
    2014 What should we talk about? The authenticity of textbook topics. ELT Journal68(4): 363–375. 10.1093/elt/ccu012
     https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccu012 [Google Scholar]
  527. Siepmann, Dirk
    2004 Discourse Markers across Languages: A Contrastive Study of Second-Level Discourse Markers in Native and Non-Native Text with Implications for General and Pedagogic Lexicography. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203315262
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203315262 [Google Scholar]
  528. Siepmann, Dirk
    2007 Wortschatz und Grammatik: Zusammenbringen, was zusammengehört. Beiträge zur Fremdsprachenvermittlung46: 59–80.
     [Google Scholar]
  529. Siepmann, Dirk
    2011 Any chance of a bloody drink sometime this century? Generische Strukturen einer Gesprächssituation analysieren. Der fremdsprachliche Unterricht Englisch45(114): 22–26.
     [Google Scholar]
  530. 2014 Zur Repräsentation von Mehrwortausdrücken in deutschen Lehrwerken des Englischen. InSprachwissenschaft und Fremdsprachenunterricht: Spracherwerb und Sprachkompetenzen im Fokus, Dirk Siepmann & Christoph Bürgel (eds). Baltmannsweiler: Schneider Verlag Hohengehren.
     [Google Scholar]
  531. 2018a A Grammar of Spoken and Written French, Vol.5: Prepositions. Leipzig: Independently published.
     [Google Scholar]
  532. 2018b Zum Verhältnis von Fachwissenschaften, Fachdidaktik und Sprachpraxis in der universitären Lehrerausbildung: Theoretische Überlegungen und Anregungen für eine kohärentere Praxis. InUniversitäre Englischlehrerbildung: Wege zu mehr Kohärenz im Studium und Korrespondenz mit der Praxis, Bärbel Diehr (ed.), 103–121. Berlin: Peter Lang.
     [Google Scholar]
  533. 2019 Grammatik des gesprochenen und geschriebenen Französisch, Bd.3: Das Adjektiv. Leipzig: Amazon Distribution.
     [Google Scholar]
  534. Siepmann, Dirk & Bürgel, Christoph
    2022 Band 2: Das Nomen [Grammatik des gesprochenen und geschriebenen Französisch]. Leipzig: Independently published.
     [Google Scholar]
  535. Siepmann, Dirk , Gallagher, John D. , Hannay, Mike & Mackenzie, J. Lachlan
    2011 Writing in English: A Guide for Advanced Learners, 2nd, rev. & ext. edn.Tübingen: Francke. 10.36198/9783838536002
     https://doi.org/10.36198/9783838536002 [Google Scholar]
  536. Sigley, Robert J.
    1997 Text categories and where you can stick them: A crude formality index. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics2(2): 199–237. 10.1075/ijcl.2.2.04sig
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.2.2.04sig [Google Scholar]
  537. Simmons, Joseph P. , Nelson, Leif D. & Simonsohn, Uri
    2011 False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science22(11): 1359–1366. 10.1177/0956797611417632
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611417632 [Google Scholar]
  538. Sinclair, John McH.
    1983 Naturalness in language. InCorpus Linguistics: Recent Developments in the Use of Computer Corpora in English Language Research [Costerus 45], Jan Aarts & Willem Meijs (eds), 203–210. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
     [Google Scholar]
  539. 1991 Corpus, Concordance, Collocation. Oxford: OUP.
     [Google Scholar]
  540. 1992 The automatic analysis of corpora. InDirections in Corpus Linguistics, Jan Svartvik (ed.), 379–400. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110867275.379
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110867275.379 [Google Scholar]
  541. (ed.) 2004 How to Use Corpora in Language Teaching [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 12]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.12
     https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.12 [Google Scholar]
  542. Sinclair, John McH. , Fox, Gwyneth , Bullon, Stephen , Krishnamurthy, Ramesh , Manning, Elisabeth & Todd, John
    (eds) 1990 Collins Cobuild English Grammar: Helping Learners with Real English. Glasgow: Harper Collins.
     [Google Scholar]
  543. Sinclair, John McH. & Renouf, Antoinette
    1988 A lexical syllabus for language learning. InVocabulary and Language Teaching, Ronald Carter & Michael McCarthy (eds), 140–158. Harlow: Longman.
     [Google Scholar]
  544. Singapore Wala, Duriya Aziz
    2013 The instructional design of a coursebook is as it is because of what it has to oo–An application of systemic functional theory. InDeveloping Materials for Language Teaching, Brian Tomlinson (ed), 2nd edn, 119–138. London: Bloomsbury.
     [Google Scholar]
  545. Skehan, Peter
    2014 Individual Differences in Second-Language Learning. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315831664
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315831664 [Google Scholar]
  546. Smith, Christopher Arnold
    2020 A Triangulated Accounting of Top Notch 2: Negotiating Ideologies in the Multimodal Discourse of an EFL Textbook in Korean University Classrooms. PhD dissertation, Carleton University. 〈https://curve.carleton.ca/00125d56-bc4c-4500-ab9a-d1fd4d8ccc02〉 (13 February 2022).
  547. Sommer, Roy
    2020 Lehrerbildung aus fachwissenschaftlicher Perspektive: Beispiel Anglistik. InDie Stimmen der Fächer hören: Fachprofil und Bildungsanspruch in der Lehrerbildung, Michaela Heer & Ulrich Heinen (eds), 307–324. Paderborn: Ferdinand Schöningh.
     [Google Scholar]
  548. Spada, Nina & Lightbown, Patsy M.
    1999 Instruction, first language influence, and developmental readiness in second language acquisition. The Modern Language Journal83(1): 1–22. 10.1111/0026‑7902.00002
     https://doi.org/10.1111/0026-7902.00002 [Google Scholar]
  549. Spoustová, Drahomíra , Hajič, Jan , Raab, Jan & Spousta, Miroslav
    2009 Semi-supervised training for the averaged perceptron POS tagger. InProceedings of the 12th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics on – EACL ’09, 763–771. Athens, Greece: Association for Computational Linguistics. 10.3115/1609067.1609152
     https://doi.org/10.3115/1609067.1609152 [Google Scholar]
  550. Spring, Ryan
    2018 Teaching phrasal verbs more efficiently: Using corpus studies and cognitive linguistics to create a particle list. Advances in Language and Literary Studies9(5): 121–135. 10.7575/aiac.alls.v.9n.5p.121
     https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.9n.5p.121 [Google Scholar]
  551. Starkey, Louise , Shonfeld, Miri , Prestridge, Sarah & Cervera, Mercè Gisbert
    2021 Special issue: Covid-19 and the Role of Technology and Pedagogy on School Education during a Pandemic . Technology, Pedagogy and Education30(1): 1–5. 10.1080/1475939X.2021.1866838
     https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2021.1866838 [Google Scholar]
  552. Stefanowitsch, Anatol
    2020 Corpus Linguistics: A Guide to the Methodology [Textbooks in Language Science 7]. Berlin: Language Science Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  553. Stein, Marcy , Stuen, Carol , Carnine, Douglas & Long, Roger M.
    2001 Textbook evaluation and adoption. Reading & Writing Quarterly17(1): 5–23. 10.1080/105735601455710
     https://doi.org/10.1080/105735601455710 [Google Scholar]
  554. Stranks, Jeff
    2013 Materials for the teaching of grammar. InDeveloping Materials for Language Teaching, 2nd edn, 337–350. London: Bloomsbury.
     [Google Scholar]
  555. Sun, Zhuomin
    2010 Language teaching materials and learner motivation. Journal of Language Teaching and Research1(6): 889–892. 10.4304/jltr.1.6.889‑892
     https://doi.org/10.4304/jltr.1.6.889-892 [Google Scholar]
  556. Swaffar, Janet K.
    1985 Reading authentic texts in a foreign language: A cognitive model. The Modern Language Journal69(1): 15–34. 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.1985.tb02521.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1985.tb02521.x [Google Scholar]
  557. Syndicat national de l’édition
    Syndicat national de l’édition 2021 Chiffres clés de l’édition. Syndicat national de l’édition, 21 July 2021. 〈https://www.sne.fr/economie/chiffres-cles/〉 (2 January 2022).
     [Google Scholar]
  558. Tabachnick, Barbara G. & Fidell, Linda S.
    2014 Using Multivariate Statistics [Always Learning]. 6th edn. Harlow: Pearson.
     [Google Scholar]
  559. Tan, Melinda
    2003 Language corpora for language teachers. Journal of Language and Learning1(2): 98–105.
     [Google Scholar]
  560. Tateyama, Yumiko
    2019 Pragmatics in a language classroom. InThe Routledge Handbook of Second Language Acquisition and Pragmatics, Naoko Taguchi (ed.), 400–413. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781351164085‑26
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351164085-26 [Google Scholar]
  561. Taylor, Charlotte
    2008 What is corpus linguistics? What the data says. ICAME Journal32: 179–200.
     [Google Scholar]
  562. Tesch, Felicitas
    1990 Die Indefinitpronomina Some und Any im Authentischen Englischen Sprachgebrauch und in Lehrwerken: Eine Empirische Untersuchung [Tübinger Beiträge zur Linguistik 345]. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.
     [Google Scholar]
  563. Thompson, Paul , Hunston, Susan , Murakami, Akira & Vajn, Dominik
    2017 Multi-dimensional analysis, text constellations, and interdisciplinary discourse. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics22(2): 153–186. 10.1075/ijcl.22.2.01tho
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.22.2.01tho [Google Scholar]
  564. Thompson, Paul & Sealey, Alison
    2007 Through children’s eyes? Corpus evidence of the features of children’s literature. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics12(1): 1–23. 10.1075/ijcl.12.1.03tho
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.12.1.03tho [Google Scholar]
  565. Thornbury, Scott
    2000 Plenary: Deconstructing grammar. InIATEFL 2000: Dublin Conference Selections, Alan Pulverness (ed.), 59–67. Faversham: IATEFL.
     [Google Scholar]
  566. 2002 Training in instructional conversation. InLanguage in Language Teacher Education [Language Learning & Language Teaching 4], Hugh Trappes-Lomax & Gibson Ferguson (eds), 95–106. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/lllt.4.07tho
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.4.07tho [Google Scholar]
  567. Timmis, Ivor
    2003 Corpora, Classroom and Context: The Place of Spoken Grammar in English Language Teaching. PhD dissertation, University of Nottingham.
  568. 2013 Corpora and materials: Towards a working relationship. InDeveloping Materials for Language Teaching, Brian Tomlinson (ed.), 2nd edn, 461–474. London: Bloomsbury.
     [Google Scholar]
  569. 2015 Corpus Linguistics for ELT: Research and Practice [Routledge Corpus Linguistics Guides]. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315715537
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315715537 [Google Scholar]
  570. 2016 Humanising coursebook dialogues. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching10(2): 144–153. 10.1080/17501229.2015.1090998
     https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2015.1090998 [Google Scholar]
  571. Tognini-Bonelli, Elena
    2001 Corpus Linguistics at Work [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 6]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.6
     https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.6 [Google Scholar]
  572. Tomasello, Michael
    2005 Constructing a Language: A Usage-Based Theory of Language Acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. 10.2307/j.ctv26070v8
     https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv26070v8 [Google Scholar]
  573. Tomlinson, Brian
    2001 Materials development. InThe Cambridge Guide to Teaching English to Speakers of Other Languages, David Nunan & Ronald Carter (eds), 66–71. Cambridge: CUP. 10.1017/CBO9780511667206.010
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511667206.010 [Google Scholar]
  574. (ed.) 2008 English Language Learning Materials: A Critical Review. London: Continuum.
     [Google Scholar]
  575. 2012 Materials development for language learning and teaching. Language Teaching45(2): 143–179. 10.1017/S0261444811000528
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444811000528 [Google Scholar]
  576. (ed.) 2013a Applied Linguistics and Materials Development. London: Bloomsbury.
     [Google Scholar]
  577. (ed.) 2013b Developing Materials for Language Teaching. 2nd edn. London: Bloomsbury.
     [Google Scholar]
  578. Tomlinson, Brian , Dat, Bao , Masuhara, Hitomi & Rugdy, Rani
    2001 Survey review. EFL courses for adults. ELT Journal55(1): 80–101. 10.1093/elt/55.1.80
     https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/55.1.80 [Google Scholar]
  579. Tono, Yukio
    2004 Multiple comparisons of IL, L1 and TL corpora: The case of L2 acquisition of verb subcategorization patterns by Japanese learners of English. InCorpora and Language Learners [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 17], Guy Aston , Silvia Bernardini & Dominic Stewart (eds), 45–66. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 10.1075/scl.17.05ton
     https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.17.05ton [Google Scholar]
  580. Tony, Bex
    1999 Standard English: The Widening Debate. Hove: Psychology Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  581. Torres-Martínez, Sergio
    2019 Applied Cognitive Construction Grammar: A Cognitive Guide to the Teaching of Phrasal Verbs. Medellín: Lulu.com.
     [Google Scholar]
  582. Toutanova, Kristina , Klein, Dan , Manning, Christopher D. & Singer, Yoram
    2003 Feature-rich part-of-speech tagging with a cyclic dependency network. InProceedings of the 2003 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics on Human Language Technology, Vol.1, 173–80. Stroudsburg, PA: Association for Computational Linguistics. 10.3115/1073445.1073478
     https://doi.org/10.3115/1073445.1073478 [Google Scholar]
  583. Toutanova, Kristina & Manning, Christopher D.
    2000 Enriching the knowledge sources used in a maximum entropy part-of-speech tagger. InProceedings of the 2000 Joint SIGDAT Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Very Large Corpora Held in Conjunction with the 38th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Vol.13, 63–70. Hong Kong: Association for Computational Linguistics, 10.3115/1117794.1117802
     https://doi.org/10.3115/1117794.1117802 [Google Scholar]
  584. Trabelsi, Soufiane , Tomlinson, Brian & Masuhara, Hitomi
    2010 Developing and trialling authentic materials for business English students at a Tunisian university. InResearch for Materials Development in Language Learning: Evidence for Best Practice, Brian Tomlinson & Hitomi Masuhara (eds), 103–120. London: Bloomsbury.
     [Google Scholar]
  585. Tracy-Ventura, Nicole & Paquot, Magali
    2020 The Routledge Handbook of Second Language Acquisition and Corpora. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781351137904
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351137904 [Google Scholar]
  586. Tsaroucha, Efthymia
    2018 A Cognitive Linguistics Approach to English Phrasal Verbs. PhD dissertation, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki. 〈ikee.lib.auth.gr/record/299055〉 (14 April 2024).
  587. Tyler, Andrea
    2012 Cognitive Linguistics and Second Language Learning: Theoretical Basics and Experimental Evidence. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203876039
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203876039 [Google Scholar]
  588. Tyler, Andrea E. & Ortega, Lourdes
    2018 Usage-inspired L2 instruction: An emergent, researched pedagogy. InUsage-Inspired L2 Instruction: Researched Pedagogy [Language Learning & Language Teaching 49], Andrea E. Tyler , Lourdes Ortega , Mariko Uno & Hae In Park (eds), 3–26. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 10.1075/lllt.49.01tyl
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.49.01tyl [Google Scholar]
  589. Tyler, Andrea , Ortega, Lourdes , Uno, Mariko & Park, Hae In
    (eds) 2018 Usage-Inspired L2 Instruction: Researched Pedagogy [Language Learning & Language Teaching 49]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/lllt.49
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.49 [Google Scholar]
  590. Ur, Penny
    2011 Research, theory, and practice. InHandbook of Research in Second Language Teaching and Learning [ESL & Applied Linguistics Professional Series], Eli Hinkel (ed.), Vol.2, 507–22. New York, NY: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  591. Usó-Juan, Esther
    2008 A pragmatic-focused evaluation of requests and their modification devices in textbook conversations. InLearning How to Request in an Instructed Language Learning Context, Eva Alcón Soler (ed.), 65–90. Bern: Peter Lang.
     [Google Scholar]
  592. Usó-Juan, Esther & Martínez-Flor, Alicia
    2010 The teaching of speech acts in second and foreign language instructional contexts. InPragmatics across Languages and Cultures, 423–442. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110214444.3.423
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110214444.3.423 [Google Scholar]
  593. Valero Garcés, Carmen
    1998 Some pedagogical and practical implications of contrastive studies in ELT. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada13: 27–36.
     [Google Scholar]
  594. van de Werfhorst, Herman , Kessenich, Emma & Geven, Sara
    2020 The digital divide in online education. Inequality in digital preparedness of students and schools before the start of the COVID-19 pandemic. Pre-print published on OSF. 〈https://osf.io/preprints/socarxiv/58d6p/〉 (1 February 2022).
  595. van Lier, Leo
    2013 Interaction in the Language Curriculum: Awareness, Autonomy and Authenticity. Hoboken, NJ: Taylor and Francis.
     [Google Scholar]
  596. Van Rossum, Guido & Drake, Fred L.
    2009 Python 3 Reference Manual. Python Software Foundation, 〈https://docs.python.org/3/reference/〉 (4 January 2019).
     [Google Scholar]
  597. Varmış Kiliç, Zerhan & Genç İlter, Binnur
    2015 The effect of authentic materials on 12th grade students’ attitudes in EFL Classes. ELT Research Journal4(1): 2–15.
     [Google Scholar]
  598. Veirano Pinto, Marcia
    2019 Using discriminate function analysis in multi-dimensional analysis. InMulti-Dimensional Analysis: Research Methods and Current Issues, Tony Berber Sardinha & Marcia Veirano Pinto (eds), 217–230. London: Bloomsbury Academic. 10.5040/9781350023857.0020
     https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350023857.0020 [Google Scholar]
  599. Velicer, Wayne F. & Jackson, Douglas N.
    1990 Component analysis versus common factor analysis: Some issues in selecting an appropriate procedure. Multivariate Behavioral Research25(1): 1–28. 10.1207/s15327906mbr2501_1
     https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr2501_1 [Google Scholar]
  600. Vellenga, Heidi
    2004 Learning pragmatics from ESL & EFL textbooks: How likely?TESL-EJ Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language8(2).
     [Google Scholar]
  601. Verspoor, Marjolijn
    2017 Complex dynamic systems theory and L2 pedagogy. InComplexity Theory and Language Development: In Celebration of Diane Larsen-Freeman [Language Learnung & Language Teaching 48], Lourdes Ortega & Han ZhaoHong (eds), 143–162. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/lllt.48.08ver
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.48.08ver [Google Scholar]
  602. Verspoor, Marjolijn , Lowie, Wander & van Dijk, Marijn
    2008 Variability in second language development from a dynamic systems perspective. The Modern Language Journal92(2): 214–231. 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.2008.00715.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2008.00715.x [Google Scholar]
  603. Viana, Vander
    (ed.) 2023 Teaching English with Corpora: A Resource Book. New York, NY: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  604. Vielau, Axel
    2005 Lehrwerk, quo vadis? Einflüsse auf die Lehrwerkentwicklung. InNiemals Zu Früh und Selten Zu Spät: Fremdsprachenunterricht in Schule und Erwachsenenbildung. Festschrift für Jürgen Quetz, Eva Burwitz-Melzer & Gert Solmecke (eds), 137–147. Berlin: Cornelsen.
     [Google Scholar]
  605. Vine, Elaine W.
    2013 Corpora and coursebooks compared: Category ambiguous words. InTwenty Years of Learner Corpus Research. Looking Back, Moving Ahead: Proceedings of the First Learner Corpus Research Conference (LCR 2011), Vol.1, 463–78. Louvain-la-Neuve: Presses Universitaires de Louvain.
     [Google Scholar]
  606. Vogt, Karin
    2011 Fremdsprachliche Kompetenzprofile: Entwicklung und Abgleichung von GeR-Deskriptoren für Fremdsprachenlernen mit einer beruflichen Anwendungsorientierung. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.
     [Google Scholar]
  607. Volansky, Vered , Ordan, Noam & Wintner, Shuly
    2015 On the features of translationese. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities30(1): 98–118. 10.1093/llc/fqt031
     https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqt031 [Google Scholar]
  608. Volkmann, Laurenz
    2010 Fachdidaktik Englisch: Kultur und Sprache. Tübingen: Narr.
     [Google Scholar]
  609. Vyatkina, Nina
    2020 Corpora as open educational resources for language teaching. Foreign Language Annals53(2): 359–370, 10.1111/flan.12464
     https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12464 [Google Scholar]
  610. Waibel, Birgit
    2005 Corpus-based approaches to learner interlanguage: Case studies based on the “International Corpus of Learner English”. AAA: Arbeiten aus Anglistik und Amerikanistik30(1–2): 143–176.
     [Google Scholar]
  611. Wallis, Sean
    2020 Statistics in Corpus Linguistics Research: A New Approach. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780429491696
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429491696 [Google Scholar]
  612. Weninger, Csilla & Kiss, Tamas
    2013 Culture in English as a foreign language (EFL) textbooks: A semiotic approach. TESOL Quarterly47(4): 694–716. 10.1002/tesq.87
     https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.87 [Google Scholar]
  613. Werner, Valentin
    2021 Text-linguistic analysis of performed language: Revisiting and re-modeling Koch and Oesterreicher. Linguistics59(3): 541–575. 10.1515/ling‑2021‑0036
     https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2021-0036 [Google Scholar]
  614. Whitelaw, Casey & Argamon, Shlomo
    2004 Systemic functional features in stylistic text classification. AAAI Technical Report (7).
     [Google Scholar]
  615. Widdowson, Henry G.
    1978 Teaching Language as Communication. Oxford: OUP.
     [Google Scholar]
  616. 1984 Explorations in Applied Linguistics, 2nd edn. Oxford: OUP.
     [Google Scholar]
  617. 1989 Knowledge of language and ability for use. Applied Linguistics10(2): 128–137. 10.1093/applin/10.2.128
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/10.2.128 [Google Scholar]
  618. 2003 Defining Issues in English Language Teaching [Oxford Applied Linguistics]. Oxford: OUP.
     [Google Scholar]
  619. Wieling, Martijn , Rawee, Josine & van Noord, Gertjan
    2018 Reproducibility in computational linguistics: Are we willing to share?Computational Linguistics44(4): 641–649. 10.1162/coli_a_00330
     https://doi.org/10.1162/coli_a_00330 [Google Scholar]
  620. Wiese, Heike , Mayr, Katharina , Krämer, Philipp , Seeger, Patrick , Müller, Hans-Georg & Mezger, Verena
    2017 Changing teachers’ attitudes towards linguistic diversity: Effects of an anti-bias programme. International Journal of Applied Linguistics27(1): 198–220. 10.1111/ijal.12121
     https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.12121 [Google Scholar]
  621. Wilkinson, Mark D. , Dumontier, Michel , Aalbersberg, IJsbrand Jan , Appleton, Gabrielle , Axton, Myles , Baak, Arie , Blomberg, Niklas
    2016 The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Scientific Data3(1): 160018. 10.1038/sdata.2016.18
     https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.18 [Google Scholar]
  622. Willis, Dave
    2009 Rules, Patterns and Words: Grammar and Lexis in English Language Teaching [Cambridge Language Teaching Library]. Cambridge: CUP.
     [Google Scholar]
  623. Winter, Bodo
    2019 Statistics for Linguists: An Introduction Using R. New York, NY: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315165547
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315165547 [Google Scholar]
  624. Winter, Tatjana & Le Foll, Elen
    2022 Testing the pedagogical norm: Comparing if-conditionals in EFL textbooks, learner writing and English outside the classroom. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research8(1): 31–66. 10.1075/ijlcr.20021.win
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ijlcr.20021.win [Google Scholar]
  625. Wolff, Dieter
    1984 Lehrbuchtexte und Verstehensprozesse in einer zweiten Sprache. Neusprachliche Mitteilungen aus Wissenschaft und Praxis37(1): 4–11.
     [Google Scholar]
  626. Wolk, Christoph , Götz, Sandra & Jäschke, Katja
    2021 Possibilities and drawbacks of using an online application for semi-automatic corpus analysis to investigate discourse markers and alternative fluency variables. Corpus Pragmatics5: 7–36. 10.1007/s41701‑019‑00072‑x
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s41701-019-00072-x [Google Scholar]
  627. Wood, David
    2010 Lexical clusters in an EAP textbook corpus. InPerspectives on Formulaic Language: Acquisition and Communication, David Wood (ed.), 88–106. London: Continuum.
     [Google Scholar]
  628. Wood, David & Appel, Randy
    2014 Multiword constructions in first year business and engineering university textbooks and EAP textbooks. Journal of English for Academic Purposes15: 1–13. 10.1016/j.jeap.2014.03.002
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2014.03.002 [Google Scholar]
  629. Wulff, Stefanie , Ellis, Nick C. , Römer, Ute , Bardovi-Harlig, Kathleen & Leblanc, Chelsea J.
    2009 The acquisition of tense-aspect: Converging evidence from corpora and telicity ratings. The Modern Language Journal93(3): 354–369. 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.2009.00895.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00895.x [Google Scholar]
  630. Wulff, Stefanie & Gries, Stefan Th
    2021 Exploring individual variation in learner corpus research: Methodological suggestions. InLearner Corpus Research Meets Second Language Acquisition [Cambridge Applied Linguistics], Bert Le Bruyn & Magali Paquot (eds), 191–213. Cambridge: CUP. 10.1017/9781108674577.010
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108674577.010 [Google Scholar]
  631. Xiao, Richard
    2009 Theory-driven corpus research: Using corpora to inform aspect theory. InCorpus Linguistics: An International Handbook [Handbücher Zur Sprach- Und Kommunikationswissenschaft = Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science], Anke Lüdeling & Merja Kytö (eds), Vol.2, 987–1007. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110213881.2.987
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110213881.2.987 [Google Scholar]
  632. Yoo, Isaiah WonHo
    2009 The English definite article: What ESL/EFL grammars say and what corpus findings show. Journal of English for Academic Purposes8(4): 267–278. 10.1016/j.jeap.2009.07.004
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2009.07.004 [Google Scholar]
  633. Yoo, Soyung
    2013 Hypothetical Would-Clauses in Korean EFL Textbooks: An Analysis Based on a Corpus Study and Focus on Form Approach. Portland State University M.A.10.15760/etd.911.
     https://doi.org/10.15760/etd.911 [Google Scholar]
  634. Zarifi, Abdolvahed & Mukundan, Jayakaran
    2012 Phrasal verbs in Malaysian ESL textbooks. English Language Teaching5(5): 9–18. 10.5539/elt.v5n5p9
     https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v5n5p9 [Google Scholar]
  635. Zipf, George Kingsley
    1935 The Psycho-Biology of Language: An Introduction to Dynamic Philology. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  636. 1949 Human Behavior and the Principle of Least Effort: An Introduction to Human Ecology. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/books/9789027246806
Loading

  • From This Site

    /content/books/9789027246806
    dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Chapter
    10
    5
/content/books/9789027246806
dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
-contentType:Journal -contentType:Chapter
10
5
Chapter
content/books/9789027246806
Book
false
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error