1887

The COLT Observation Scheme

Digital versions and updated research applications. Second revised edition

image of The COLT Observation Scheme

This volume presents the second edition of the Communicative Orientation of Language Teaching (COLT) Observation Scheme. Since the book’s original publication, COLT has become well established as a research instrument in L2 teaching and learning. This new edition brings COLT into the 21st century by introducing digital versions of the scheme and describing how advances in technology have made the collection, coding, analysis, and synthesis of classroom data faster and more efficient. Enhancements include the availability of web-based platforms for the coding, sharing and storage of data, the application of artificial intelligence in the coding of classroom observation data, numeric coding systems, and ongoing work in the use of automatic speech recognition for faster transcription. The volume has a similar organizational structure to the original COLT book with the addition of a new chapter on Digital COLT (Part A), a new section on Numeric COLT (Part B), and an expanded final chapter that includes updated summaries reporting on the use of COLT for a wide range of research purposes in diverse L2 contexts. As with the first edition, the material is presented in a user-friendly manner with examples, illustrations and hands-on activities throughout. It is intended for both novice and experienced researchers investigating teaching and learning in L2 classrooms and in teacher education/reflective practice research.

The companion web site with interviews and a video tour can be found at: https://benjamins.com/sites/lllt.60

References

  1. Airey, J.
    (2012) “I don’t teach language” The linguistic attitudes of physics lectures in Sweden. AILA Review, 25 , 64–79. 10.1075/aila.25.05air
    https://doi.org/10.1075/aila.25.05air [Google Scholar]
  2. Allen, P.
    (1983) A three-level curriculum model for second language education. Canadian Modern Language Review, 40 , 23–43. 10.3138/cmlr.40.1.23
    https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.40.1.23 [Google Scholar]
  3. Allen, P. , Bialystok, E. , Cummins, J. , & Mougeon, R.
    (1982) The development of bilingual proficiency (An interim report on the first year of research). Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, University of Toronto.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Allen, P. , & Carroll, S.
    (1987) Evaluation of classroom processes in a Canadian core French programme. Evaluation and Research, 1 , 49–61. 10.1080/09500798709533220
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09500798709533220 [Google Scholar]
  5. (1988) Analytic and experimental dimensions in core French classrooms. Canadian Modern Language Review, 45 , 43–64. 10.3138/cmlr.45.1.43
    https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.45.1.43 [Google Scholar]
  6. Allen, P. , Carroll, S. , Burtis, J. , & Gaudino, V.
    (1987) The core French observation study. In B. Harley , P. Allen , J. Cummins , & M. Swain . (Eds.), The development of bilingual proficiency: Final report. Vol. II: Classroom treatment (Unpublished report). Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, University of Toronto.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Allen, P. , Fröhlich, M. , & Spada, N.
    (1984) The communicative orientation of language teaching: An observation scheme. In J. Handscombe , R. A. Orem , & B. Taylor . (Eds.), On TESOL: ‘83: The question of control (pp.231–251). TESOL. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED275155
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Allen, P. , Swain, M. , Harley, B. , & Cummins, J.
    (1990) Aspects of classroom treatment: Toward a more comprehensive view of second language education. In B. Harley , P. Allen , J. Cummins , & M. Swain . (Eds.), The development of second language proficiency (pp.57–81). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139524568.007
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524568.007 [Google Scholar]
  9. Allwright, R. L.
    (1972) Prescription and description in the training of language teachers. In J. Qvistgaard , H. Schwartz , & H. Spang-Hanssen . (Eds.), Applied linguistics: Problems and solutions (pp.155–166). AILA Proceedings.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Allwright, D.
    (1988) Observation in the language classroom. Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Arias, A. , & Izquierdo, J.
    (2015) Language attention in content-based instruction: The case of language instructors teaching content in a foreign language in Mexican higher education. Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education, 3 , 194–217. 10.1075/jicb.3.2.02ari
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jicb.3.2.02ari [Google Scholar]
  12. Australian Council of Educational Research
    Australian Council of Educational Research (1991) Australian Language Certificates. French.
  13. Bachman, L. , & Palmer, A.
    (1981) A multi-trait-multimethod investigation into the construct validity of six tests of speaking and reading. In A. Palmer . (Ed.), The construct validation of tests of communicative competence (pp.141–163). TESOL. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED223114
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Bell, T. R.
    (2005) Behaviours and attitudes of effective foreign language teachers: Results of a questionnaire study. Foreign Language Annals, 38 , 259–270. 10.1111/j.1944‑9720.2005.tb02490.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2005.tb02490.x [Google Scholar]
  15. Breen, M. , & Candlin, C.
    (1980) The essentials of a communicative curriculum in language teaching. Applied Linguistics, 1 , 1–47. 10.1093/applin/1.2.89
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/1.2.89 [Google Scholar]
  16. Brinton, D. , Snow, M. , & Wesche, M.
    (2003) Content-based second language instruction (2nd ed.). University of Michigan Press. 10.3998/mpub.8754
    https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.8754 [Google Scholar]
  17. Brown, H. D.
    (2001) Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy. Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Brumfit, C.
    (1984) Communicative methodology in language teaching: The roles of fluency and accuracy. Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Canale, M. , & Swain, M.
    (1980) Theoretical bases for communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, 1 , 1–47. 10.1093/applin/1.1.1
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/1.1.1 [Google Scholar]
  20. Celce-Murcia, M.
    (2001) Language teaching approaches: An overview. In M. Celce-Murcia . (Ed.), Teaching English as a second or foreign language (pp.3–11). Heinle & Heinle.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Chacon, T. C.
    (2005) Teachers’ perceived efficacy among English as a foreign language teachers in middle schools in Venezuela. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21 , 257–272. 10.1016/j.tate.2005.01.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2005.01.001 [Google Scholar]
  22. Chastain, K.
    (1969) The audiolingual habit theory versus cognitive code-learning theory: Some theoretical considerations. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 7 , 97–106. 10.1515/iral.1969.7.2.97
    https://doi.org/10.1515/iral.1969.7.2.97 [Google Scholar]
  23. Chaudron, C.
    (1988) Second language classrooms: Research on teaching and learning. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139524469
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524469 [Google Scholar]
  24. (1991) Activities in the classroom: A unit of analysis in classroom interaction for valid observation and analysis. In J. Drury & R. Wijesinha . (Eds.), Aspects of teaching and learning English as a second language (pp.14–33). Sri Lanka National Institute of Education.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Coskun, A.
    (2011) Investigation of the application of communicative language teaching in the English language classroom: A case study on teachers’ attitudes in Turkey. Journal of Linguistics and Language Teaching, 2 , 1–27. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED513910
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Coulthard, M.
    (1977) An introduction to discourse analysis. Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Council of Europe
    Council of Europe (2001) Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Retrieved on2 February 2024fromhttps://rm.coe.int/1680459f97
  28. Crookes, G. , & Chaudron, C.
    (1991) Guidelines for classroom language teaching. In M. Celce-Murcia . (Ed.), Teaching English as a second or foreign language (pp.46–67). Newbury House.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Dendrinou, V. , Vikas, K. , Marmaridou, S. , Ouzounis, A. , & Triandaphylou, T.
    (1987) Taskway English – Vols 1, 2 and 3. Greek Ministry of Education.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Dörnyei, Z.
    (2007) Research methods in applied linguistics. Oxford.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Doughty, C.
    (1994) Finetuning of feedback by competent speakers to language learners. In J. Alatis . (Ed.), GURT 1993 (pp.96–108). Georgetown University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. (2003) Instructed SLA: Constraints, compensation, and enhancement. In C. Doughty & M. Long . (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp.256–310). Blackwell. 10.1002/9780470756492.ch10
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470756492.ch10 [Google Scholar]
  33. Edeihoff, C.
    (1981) Theme-oriented English teaching: Text varieties, media, skills, and project work. In C. Candlin . (Ed.), The communicative teaching of English: Principles and an exercise typology (pp.49–62). Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Ellis, R.
    (2001) Investigating form-focused instruction. Language Learning, 51 , 1–46. 10.1111/j.1467‑1770.2001.tb00013.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.2001.tb00013.x [Google Scholar]
  35. (2012) Language teaching research and language pedagogy. John Wiley & Sons. 10.1002/9781118271643
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118271643 [Google Scholar]
  36. Fanselow, J.
    (1977) Beyond Rashomon – Conceptualizing and describing the teaching act. TESOL Quarterly, 11 , 17–39. 10.2307/3585589
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3585589 [Google Scholar]
  37. Friedenberg, J. , & Schneider, M.
    (2008) An experiment in sheltered sociology at the university level. In R. Wilkinson & V. Zegers . (Eds.), Realizing content and language integration in higher education. (pp.155–168). Maastricht University.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Fröhlich, M. , Spada, N. , & Allen, P.
    (1985) Differences in the communicative orientation of L2 classrooms. TESOL Quarterly, 19 , 27–57. 10.2307/3586771
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3586771 [Google Scholar]
  39. Goo, J. , Granena, G. , Yilmaz, Y. , & Novella, M.
    (2015) Implicit and explicit instruction in L2 learning. In P. Rebuschat . (Ed.), Implicit and explicit learning of languages (pp.443–482). John Benjamins. 10.1075/sibil.48.18goo
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.48.18goo [Google Scholar]
  40. Guilloteaux, M. , & Dörnyei, Z.
    (2008) Motivating language learners: A classroom-oriented investigation of the effects of motivational strategies on student motivation. TESOL Quarterly, 19 , 55–77. 10.1002/j.1545‑7249.2008.tb00207.x
    https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1545-7249.2008.tb00207.x [Google Scholar]
  41. Harley, B. , Allen, P. , Cummins, J. , & Swain, M.
    (Eds.) (1990) The development of second language proficiency. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139524568
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524568 [Google Scholar]
  42. Hatch, E.
    (1978) Discourse analysis and second language acquisition. In E. Hatch . (Ed.), Second language acquisition: A book of readings. Newbury House. https://www.academia.edu/111752968/Second_language_acquisition_A_book_of_readings_Evelyn_Marcussen_Hatch_Ed_Rowley_Mass_Newbury_House_1978_Pp_x_488?uc-g-sw=109991318
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Hincks, R.
    (2010) Speaking rate and information content in English lingua franca oral presentations. English for Specific Purposes, 29 , 4–18. 10.1016/j.esp.2009.05.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2009.05.004 [Google Scholar]
  44. Hollands, S. , Blackburn, D. , & Christensen, H.
    (2022) Evaluating the performance of state-of-the-art ASR systems on non-native English using corpora with extensive language background variation. Interspeech 2022. 10.21437/Interspeech.2022‑10433
    https://doi.org/10.21437/Interspeech.2022-10433 [Google Scholar]
  45. Hymes, D. H.
    (1970) On communicative competence. In J. B. Pride & J. Holmes , (Eds.), Sociolinguistics (pp.269–293). Penguin Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. İnceçay, G. , & İnceçay, V.
    (2009) Turkish university students’ perceptions of communicative and non-communicative activities in EFL classroom. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1 , 618–622. 10.1016/j.sbspro.2009.01.110
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2009.01.110 [Google Scholar]
  47. Ishizuka, H. , & Yorozuya, R.
    (2014) Collaborative VOD platform for classroom observation. In J. Viteli & M. Leikomaa . (Eds.), Proceedings of EdMedia World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications, 2014 (pp.2427–2432).
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Ishizuka, H. , & Kibler, R.
    (2018) Development of automatic language classroom analysis system. InProceedings of EdMedia: World Conference on Educational Media and Technology (pp.626–630). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/184252/
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Ishizuka, H. , & Pellerin, M.
    (2020) Providing quantitative data with AI Mobile COLT to support the reflection process in language teaching and pre-service teacher training: a discussion. In K. M. Frederiksen , S. Larsen , L. Bradley , & S. Thouësny . (Eds.), CALL for widening participation: Short papers from EUROCALL 2020 (pp.125–131). Research-publishing.net. 10.14705/rpnet.2020.48.1176
    https://doi.org/10.14705/rpnet.2020.48.1176 [Google Scholar]
  50. Jarvis, G. A.
    (1968) A behavioural observation system for classroom foreign language skill acquisition. Modern Language Journal, 52 , 335–341. 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.1968.tb01914.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1968.tb01914.x [Google Scholar]
  51. Johnson, K.
    (1982) Communicative syllabus design and methodology. Pergamon Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Kang, E. Y. , Sok, S. , & Han, Z. H.
    (2018) Thirty-five years of ISLA on form-focused instruction: A methodological synthesis. Language Teaching Research, 23, 403–427. 10.1177/1362168818776673
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168818776673 [Google Scholar]
  53. Katagiri, N.
    (2023) Web video text tracks to compile an English classroom transcript with bilingual speech. InProceedings of the 48th JASELE Annual Convention (pp.192–193).
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Katagiri, N. , & Kawai, G.
    (2015) Tabulating transcripts and coding on COLT Part B Scheme to quantify classroom interaction analysis categories. HELES Journal, 14 , 23–41. 10.24675/helesje.14.0_23
    https://doi.org/10.24675/helesje.14.0_23 [Google Scholar]
  55. Katagiri, N. , & Ohashi, Y.
    (2018) Non-native preservice English teachers’ lexical usage and interactional patterns in transcriptions coded on COLT Part B scheme. ACET International Convention Selected Papers, 5 , 80–110. Jacet. Retrieved on2 February 2024fromwww.jacet.org/SelectedPapers/JACET56_2017_SP_5.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Kırkgöz, Y.
    (2008) A case study of teachers’ implementation of curriculum innovation in English language teaching in Turkish primary education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24 , 1859–1875. 10.1016/j.tate.2008.02.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2008.02.007 [Google Scholar]
  57. Krashen, S.
    (1981) Second language acquisition and second language learning. Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. (1982) Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Pergamon Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. (1985) The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Krashen, S. , & Seliger, H.
    (1975) The essential contribution of formal instruction in adult second language learning. TESOL Quarterly, 9 , 173–183. 10.2307/3585484
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3585484 [Google Scholar]
  61. Larsen-Freeman, D.
    (2003) Techniques and principles in language teaching (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Lightbown, P. M. , & Spada, N.
    (1994) An innovative program for primary ESL in Quebec. TESOL Quarterly, 28 , 563–579. 10.2307/3587308
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3587308 [Google Scholar]
  63. Lightbown, P. M. , & Spada, N.
    (1993) How languages are learned. Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  64. [Google Scholar]
  65. Littlewood, W. T.
    (1981) Communicative language teaching: An introduction. Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  66. Long, M. H.
    (1980) Inside the ‘black box’: Methodological issues in classroom research on language learning. Language Learning, 30 , 1–42. 10.1111/j.1467‑1770.1980.tb00149.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1980.tb00149.x [Google Scholar]
  67. (1983) Native speaker/non-native speaker conversation and the negotiation of comprehensible input. Applied Linguistics, 4 , 126–141. 10.1093/applin/4.2.126
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/4.2.126 [Google Scholar]
  68. (1991) Focus on form: A design feature in language teaching methodology. In K. de Bot , D. Coste , R. Ginsberg , & C. Kramsch . (Eds.), Foreign language research in cross-cultural perspective. John Benjamins. 10.1075/sibil.2.07lon
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.2.07lon [Google Scholar]
  69. Lyster, R.
    (1998) Recasts, repetition, and ambiguity in L2 classroom discourse. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20 , 51–81. 10.1017/S027226319800103X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S027226319800103X [Google Scholar]
  70. (2002) Negotiation in immersion teacher-student interaction. International Journal of Educational Research, 37 , 237–253. 10.1016/S0883‑0355(03)00003‑X
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-0355(03)00003-X [Google Scholar]
  71. (2007) Learning and teaching languages through content: A counterbalanced approach. John Benjamins. 10.1075/lllt.18
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.18 [Google Scholar]
  72. Lyster, R. , & Ranta, L.
    (1997) Corrective feedback and learner uptake. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19 , 37–66. 10.1017/S0272263197001034
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263197001034 [Google Scholar]
  73. Lyster, R. , & Mori, H.
    (2006) Interactional feedback and instructional counterbalance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28 , 269–300. 10.1017/S0272263106060128
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263106060128 [Google Scholar]
  74. Mackey, A. , & Gass, S.
    (2005) Second language research methodology and design. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  75. McKay, P.
    (1994) Communicative orientation and language outcomes in Australian junior secondary foreign language classes (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Queensland. 10.14264/366303
    https://doi.org/10.14264/366303
  76. McKay, S.
    (2006) Researching second language classrooms. Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  77. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT), Japan
    Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT), Japan (2017) Heisei 28 nendo eigo kyoiku jisshi jokyo chosa (chugakko) no kekka [Results of English language education progress report on junior high schools]. Retrieved on2 February 2024fromhttps://www.mext.go.jp/component/a_menu/education/detail/icsFiles/afieldfile/2017/04/07/1384236_03.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  78. Mitchell, R.
    (1985) Process research in second language classrooms. Language Teaching, 18 , 330–352. 10.1017/S0261444800011708
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444800011708 [Google Scholar]
  79. Mori, H.
    (2002) Error treatment sequences in Japanese immersion classroom interactions at different grade levels (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of California, Los Angeles.
  80. Moskowitz, G.
    (1970) The foreign language teacher interacts. Minneapolis Association for Productive Teaching.
    [Google Scholar]
  81. Munby, J.
    (1978) Communicative syllabus design. Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  82. Murray, D. E. , & Christison, M.
    (2011) What English language teachers need to know. Vol. 1: Understanding learning. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  83. Myers, M.
    (2008) Code-switching in content learning. In R. Wilkinson & V. Zegers . (Eds.), Realizing content and language integration in higher education (pp.43–52). Maastricht University.
    [Google Scholar]
  84. Nations Unies
    Nations Unies (2020) Note de synthèse: L’éducation en temps de COVID-19 et après. Retrieved on2 February 2024fromhttps://www.un.org/sites/un2.un.org/files/2020/09/policy_brief_-_education_during_covid-19_and_beyond_french.pdf
  85. Newmark, L. , & Riebel, D. A.
    (1968) Necessity and sufficiency in language learning. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 6 , 145–164. 10.1515/iral.1968.6.1‑4.145
    https://doi.org/10.1515/iral.1968.6.1-4.145 [Google Scholar]
  86. Norris, J. , & Ortega, L.
    (2000) Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning, 50 , 417–528. 10.1111/0023‑8333.00136
    https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.00136 [Google Scholar]
  87. O’Keeffe, A. , McCarthy, M. , & Carter, R.
    (2007) From corpus to classroom: Language use and language teaching. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511497650
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511497650 [Google Scholar]
  88. Pellerin, M.
    (2011) The use of the open-source e-portfolio system Mahara to support the notion of digital documentation and the development of electronic-portfolio with pre-service language teachers. In T. Bastiaens & M. Ebner . (Eds.), Proceedings of ED-MEDIA 2011--World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications (pp.523–528). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). https://www.learntechlib.org/p/37916/
    [Google Scholar]
  89. (2018) Affordances of new mobile technologies: Promoting learner agency, autonomy, and self-regulated learning. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 29 , 335–350. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:229293993
    [Google Scholar]
  90. Pellerin, M. , Branch-Mueller, J. , Nicholas, P. , & Wei, W.
    (2018) The integration of e-portfolios in higher education, and students’ perceptions. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 29 , 529–544. https://learntechlib.org/primary/p/181351/
    [Google Scholar]
  91. Pellerin, M. , & Ishizuka, H.
    (2022) Rethinking language teacher supervision and pedagogical coaching for a new digital era with AI COLT system, online platform, and videoconferencing tool. Paper presented atthe 3rd Asia Education Technology Symposium (AETS 2022).
    [Google Scholar]
  92. Pica, T.
    (1987) The selective impact of classroom instruction on second-language acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 6 , 214–222. 10.1093/applin/6.3.214
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/6.3.214 [Google Scholar]
  93. Politzer, R. L.
    (1970) Some reflections on ‘good’ and ‘bad’ language teaching behaviours. Language Learning, 20 , 31–43. 10.1111/j.1467‑1770.1970.tb00043.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1970.tb00043.x [Google Scholar]
  94. Prabhu, N. S.
    (1979) The teaching of English and notions about communication. In J. C. Richards . (Ed.), Applications of linguistics to language teaching – RELC Anthology 6. Singapore University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  95. Richard-Amato, P.
    (2003) Making it happen: From interactive to participatory language teaching. Pearson.
    [Google Scholar]
  96. Richards, J. , & Farrell, T.
    (2005) Professional development for language teachers: Strategies for teacher learning. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511667237
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511667237 [Google Scholar]
  97. Richards, J. , & Rodgers, T. S.
    (2004) Approaches and methods in language teaching (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  98. Rodgers, D.
    (2006) Developing content and form: Encouraging evidence from Italian content-based instruction. The Modern Language Journal, 90 , 373–386. 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.2006.00430.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2006.00430.x [Google Scholar]
  99. Roser, M.
    (2022) The brief history of artificial intelligence: The world has changed fast – What might be next?Our World in Data. https://ourworldindata.org/brief-history-of-ai
    [Google Scholar]
  100. Sano, A. , Katagiri, N. , Sakai, Y. , & Shimura, A.
    (2017) Assessing the effectiveness of the COLT scheme as a reflection tool for high school teachers of English. JACET International Convention Selected Papers, 4 , 85–113. https://www.jacet.org/SelectedPapers/JACET55_2016_SP_4.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  101. Savignon, S.
    (1972) Communicative competence: An experiment in foreign language teaching. Philadelphia Center for Curriculum Development.
    [Google Scholar]
  102. Scherer, G. , & Wertheimer, F.
    (1964) A psycholinguistic experiment in foreign-language teaching. McGraw-Hill.
    [Google Scholar]
  103. Shulman, L. S.
    (1986) Paradigms and research programs in the study of teaching: A contemporary perspective. In M. Wittrock . (Ed.), Third handbook of research on teaching (pp.3–36) Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
  104. Sheen, Y. , & Ellis, R.
    (2011) Corrective feedback in language teaching. In E. Hinkel . (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (Vol.2, pp.593–610). Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9780203836507-41/corrective-feedback-language-teaching-younghee-sheen-rod-ellis
    [Google Scholar]
  105. Smith, P. D.
    (1969) The Pennsylvania foreign language research project: Teaching proficiency and class achievement in two modern languages. Foreign Language Annals, 3 , 194–207. 10.1111/j.1944‑9720.1969.tb01279.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.1969.tb01279.x [Google Scholar]
  106. Spada, N.
    (1987) Relationships between instructional differences and learning outcomes: A process-product study of communicative language teaching. Applied Linguistics, 8 , 137–161. 10.1093/applin/8.2.137
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/8.2.137 [Google Scholar]
  107. (1990a) Observing classroom behaviours and learning outcomes in different second language programs. In J. C. Richards & D. Nunan . (Eds.), Second language teacher education (pp.292–310). Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  108. (1990b) A look at the research process in classroom observation: A case study. In C. Brumfit & R. Mitchell . (Eds.), Research in the language classroom, ELT Documents: 133 (pp.81–93). Modern English Publications in association with the British Council.
    [Google Scholar]
  109. (1997) Form-focused instruction and second language acquisition: A review of classroom and laboratory research. Language Teaching 30 , 73–87. 10.1017/S0261444800012799
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444800012799 [Google Scholar]
  110. (2011) Beyond form-focused instruction: Reflections on past, present, and future research. Language Teaching, 44 , 225–236. 10.1017/S0261444810000224
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444810000224 [Google Scholar]
  111. (2019) Classroom observation research. In J. Schwieter & A. Benati . (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of language learning (pp.186–207). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108333603.009
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108333603.009 [Google Scholar]
  112. Spada, N. , & Frölich, M.
    (1995) The communicative orientation of language teaching observation scheme (COLT): Coding conventions and applications. Macquarie University.
    [Google Scholar]
  113. Spada, N. , & Fröhlich, M.
    (1995) The communicative orientation of language teaching observation scheme (COLT): Coding conventions and applications. MacMillan.
    [Google Scholar]
  114. Spada, N. , & Lyster, R.
    (1997) Macroscopic and microscopic views of L2 classrooms. TESOL Quarterly, 31 , 787–795. 10.2307/3587763
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3587763 [Google Scholar]
  115. Spada, N. , & Tomita, Y.
    (2010) Interactions between type of instruction and type of language feature: A meta-analysis. Language Learning, 60 , 263–308. 10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2010.00562.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00562.x [Google Scholar]
  116. Stern, H.
    (1983) Fundamental concepts of language teaching. Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  117. Strauss, A. , & Corbin, J. M.
    (1997) Grounded theory in practice. Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  118. Swain, M.
    (1985) Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In S. M. Gass & C. G. Madden . (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp.235–253). Newbury House.
    [Google Scholar]
  119. Tatzl, D.
    (2011) English-medium masters’ programmes at an Austrian university of applied sciences: Attitudes, experiences, and challenges. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 10 , 250–270. 10.1016/j.jeap.2011.08.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2011.08.003 [Google Scholar]
  120. Tomlin, R. , & Villa, V.
    (1994) Attention in cognitive science and second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16 , 183–203. 10.1017/S0272263100012870
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100012870 [Google Scholar]
  121. Tschannen-Moran, M. , Woolfolk Hoy, A. , & Hoy, W. K.
    (1998) Teacher efficacy: Its meaning and measurement. Review of Educational Research, 68 , 202–248. 10.3102/00346543068002202
    https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543068002202 [Google Scholar]
  122. Ullman, R. & Geva, E.
    (1984) Approaches to observation in second language classes. In P. Allen & M. Swain . (Eds.), Language issues and education policies: ELT Documents, 119 (pp.113–128). Pergamon.
    [Google Scholar]
  123. UNESCO
    UNESCO (2020) Éducation et COVID-19: Réponse de l’UNESCO. Notes thématiques du Secteur de l’Éducation. Note thématique no 2.2-avril 2020. Retrieved on2 February 2024fromhttps://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000373338_fre
    [Google Scholar]
  124. Unterberger, B.
    (2012) English-medium programmes at Austrian business faculty: A status quo survey on national trends and a case study on programme design and delivery. AILA Review, 25 , 80–100. 10.1075/aila.25.06unt
    https://doi.org/10.1075/aila.25.06unt [Google Scholar]
  125. Valcárcel, M. , Verdú, M. Roca, J. , & Chaudron, C.
    (1991) Classroom activity types, tasks, and sequencing. Paper presented atthe 25th Annual TESOL Convention, New York, 26 March.
    [Google Scholar]
  126. van Lier, L.
    (1988) The classroom and the language learner. Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  127. (1997) Observation from an ecological perspective. TESOL Quarterly, 31 , 783–787. 10.2307/3587762
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3587762 [Google Scholar]
  128. Watson-Gegeo, K. A.
    (1997) Classroom ethnography. In N. Hornberger & D. Corson . (Eds.), Encyclopedia of language and education (Vol.8, pp.135–144). Kluwer. 10.1007/978‑94‑011‑4535‑0_13
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4535-0_13 [Google Scholar]
  129. White, L.
    (1991) Adverb placement in second language acquisition: Some effects of positive and negative evidence in the classroom. Second Language Research, 7 , 133–161. 10.1177/026765839100700205
    https://doi.org/10.1177/026765839100700205 [Google Scholar]
  130. White, L. , Spada, N. , Lightbown, P. M. , & Ranta, L.
    (1991) Input enhancement and L2 question formation. Applied Linguistics, 12 , 416–432. 10.1093/applin/12.4.416
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/12.4.416 [Google Scholar]
  131. Widdowson, H. G.
    (1978) Teaching language as communication. Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  132. Wilkins, D. A.
    (1976) Notional syllabuses. Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  133. Yalden, J.
    (1983) The communicative syllabus: Evolution, design, and implementation. Pergamon.
    [Google Scholar]
  134. Zhu, X. , & Goldberg, A. B.
    (2009) Introduction to semi-supervised learning. Synthesis Lectures on Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning, 3 , 1–130. 10.1007/978‑3‑031‑01548‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-01548-9 [Google Scholar]
  135. Zotou, V.
    (1993) Effective foreign language teaching: A Greek case study (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Southampton.
/content/books/9789027246905
Loading

Supplements

Companion website

/content/books/9789027246905
dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
-contentType:Journal -contentType:Chapter
10
5
Chapter
content/books/9789027246905
Book
false
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error