1887
  1. Home
  2. Books
  3. New Perspectives in Interactional Linguistic Research
  4. Chapter

oa Noticing and assessing nature

A multimodal investigation of the format “perception imperative + exclamative” based on mobile eye-tracking data

image of Noticing and assessing nature

We analyze how walkers employ a verbal format, i.e., the combination of a perception imperative followed by a wie ‘how’-exclamative (e.g., KUCK ma wie TRAUMhaft das is; ‘look PTCL how wonderful that is’), in its multimodal embedding, thus contributing to a multimodal extension of interactional linguistics. The analysis heavily relies on mobile eye-tracking as a method to collect naturally occurring data. It is argued that this kind of analysis would not be possible without the use of this novel technology. We focus on the role of the verbal format in the process of transforming individual perceptions into intersubjective experiences of nature, for which the precise documentation of gaze is essential. It is shown that the interactional function of this combined format is to draw the co-walker’s attention to an object in the surroundings and to express an affective stance towards it, treating the noticed referent as noteworthy and remarkable.

  • Affiliations: 1: University of Freiburg; 2: University of Potsdam; 3: Black Forest National Park

References

  1. Altmann, Hans
    1987 “Zur Problematik der Konstitution von Satzmodi als Formtypen.” InSatzmodus zwischen Grammatik und Pragmatik, ed. by Jörg Meibauer , 22–56. Tübingen: Niemeyer. 10.1515/9783111560588‑003
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783111560588-003 [Google Scholar]
  2. 1993 “Satzmodus.” InSyntax. Ein internationales Handbuch zeitgenössischer Forschung, ed. by Joachim Jacobs , Arnim von Stechow , Wolfgang Sternefeld , and Theo Vennemann , 1006–1029. Berlin: de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110095869.1.15.1006
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110095869.1.15.1006 [Google Scholar]
  3. Anna, Marina , and Martin Pfeiffer
    2021 “Die frühkindliche Verwendung des Exklamativformats ‚oh+X‘: Noticings und Problemmitteilungen.” Gesprächsforschung – Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion22: 1–35. www.gespraechsforschung-online.de/fileadmin/dateien/heft2021/ga-anna.pdf
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Auer, Peter
    1988 “On Deixis and Displacement.” Folia LinguisticaXXII/3–4: 263–292. 10.1515/flin.1988.22.3‑4.263
     https://doi.org/10.1515/flin.1988.22.3-4.263 [Google Scholar]
  5. 2016 “‘Wie geil ist das denn?’ Eine neue Konstruktion im Netzwerk ihrer Nachbarn.” Zeitschrift für Germanistische Linguistik44 (1): 69–92. 10.1515/zgl‑2016‑0003
     https://doi.org/10.1515/zgl-2016-0003 [Google Scholar]
  6. Auer, Peter , and Anja Stukenbrock
    2022 “Deictic Reference in Space.” InPragmatics of Space (=Handbook of Pragmatics, Vol. 14), ed. by Andreas Jucker and Heiko Hausendorf . Berlin: de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110693713‑002
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110693713-002 [Google Scholar]
  7. Auer, Peter , and Barbara Laner
    . Submitted. “Laughter and Gaze among Talkers on a Walk.” InMobile Eyetracking: New Avenues for the Study of Gaze in Social Interaction ed. by Anja Stukenbrock and Elisabeth Zima . Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Batliner, Anton
    1988 “Der Exklamativ: Mehr als Aussage oder doch nur mehr oder weniger Aussage? Experimente zur Rolle von Höhe und Position des F0-Gipfels.” InIntonationsforschungen, ed. by Hans Altmann , 243–271. Tübingen: Niemeyer. 10.1515/9783111358413.243
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783111358413.243 [Google Scholar]
  9. Blythe, Joe , Rod Gardner , Ilana Mushin , and Lesley Sterling
    2018 “Tools of Engagement: Selecting a Next Speaker in Australian Aboriginal Multiparty Conversation.” Research on Language and Social Interaction51 (2): 145–170. 10.1080/08351813.2018.1449441
     https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2018.1449441 [Google Scholar]
  10. Botsch, Kerstin , Peter Auer , Barbara Laner , and Martin Pfeiffer
    , submitted. “Joint Attention Without Language? On Intersubjectivity and the Joint Experience of Nature.” InMobile Eyetracking: New Avenues for the Study of Gaze in Social Interaction ed. by Anja Stukenbrock and Elisabeth Zima . Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Broth, Mathias , and Lorenza Mondada
    2013 “Walking Away: The Embodied Achievement of Activity Closings in Mobile Interaction.” Journal of Pragmatics47: 41–58. 10.1016/j.pragma.2012.11.016
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.11.016 [Google Scholar]
  12. Burckhardt, Lucius
    2006 Warum ist Landschaft schön? Die Spaziergangswissenschaft. 3rd edition. Berlin: Martin Schmitz Verlag.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. D’Avis, Franz
    2001 Über w-Exklamativsätze im Deutschen. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. D’Avis, Franz
    2013 “Exklamativsatz.” InSatztypen des Deutschen, ed. by Jörg Meibauer , Markus Steinbach , and Hans Altmann , 171–201. Berlin/Boston: de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110224832.171
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110224832.171 [Google Scholar]
  15. Deppermann, Arnulf
    2021 “Imperative im Deutschen: Konstruktionen, Praktiken oder social action formats?” InVerfestigungen in der Interaktion, ed. by Beate Weidner , Katharina König , Wolfgang Imo , and Lars Wegner , 195–230. Berlin /Boston: DeGruyter. 10.1515/9783110637502‑009
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110637502-009 [Google Scholar]
  16. De Stefani, Elwys
    2010 “Reference as an Interactively and Multimodally Accomplished Practice. Organizing Spatial Reorientation in Guided Tours.” InSpoken Communication, ed. by Massimo Pettorino , Antonella Giannini , Isabella Chiara , and Francesca Dovetto , 137–170. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. 2013 “Rearranging (in) Space. On Mobility and its Relevance for the Study of Face-to-face Interaction.” InSpace in Language and Linguistics. Geographical, Interactional, and Cognitive Perspectives, ed. by Peter Auer , Martin Hilpert , Benedikt Szmrecsanyi , and Anja Stukenbrock , 434–463. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110312027.434
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110312027.434 [Google Scholar]
  18. Evans, Nicolas
    2007 “Insubordination and its Uses.” InFiniteness. Theoretical and Empirical Foundations, ed. by Irina Nikolaeva , 366–431. New York: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780199213733.003.0011
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199213733.003.0011 [Google Scholar]
  19. Goffman, Erving
    1963 Behavior in Public Places. New York: The Free Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. 1978 “Response Cries.” Language54 (4): 787–815. 10.2307/413235
     https://doi.org/10.2307/413235 [Google Scholar]
  21. 1981 Forms of Talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Golato, Andrea
    2012 German oh: Marking an emotional change of state. InResearch on Language and Social Interaction45: 245–244. 10.1080/08351813.2012.699253
     https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2012.699253 [Google Scholar]
  23. Goodwin, Charles
    1980 “Restarts, Pauses, and the Achievement of a State of Mutual Gaze at Turn-beginning.” Social Inquiry50: 772–302. 10.1111/j.1475‑682X.1980.tb00023.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-682X.1980.tb00023.x [Google Scholar]
  24. Goodwin, Majorie , and Charles Goodwin
    2012 “Car Talk: Integrating Texts, Bodies, and Changing Landscapes.” Semiotica191: 257–286. 10.1515/sem‑2012‑0063
     https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2012-0063 [Google Scholar]
  25. Günthner, Susanne
    2017 “Diskursmarker in der Interaktion – Formen und Funktionen univerbierter guck mal- und weißt du-Konstruktionen.” InDiskursmarker im Deutschen. Reflexionen und Analysen, ed. by Hardarik Blühdorn , Arnulf Deppermann , Henrike Helmer , and Thomas Spranz-Fogasy , 103–130. Göttingen: Verlag für Gesprächsforschung.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Heritage, John
    1984 “A Change-of-state Token and Aspects of its Sequential Placement.” InStructures of Social Action – Studies in Conversation Analysis, ed. by J. Maxwell Atkinson , and John Heritage . Cambridge: CUP. 10.1017/CBO9780511665868
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511665868 [Google Scholar]
  27. Jucker, Andreas H. , Heiko Hausendorf , Christa Dürscheid , Karina Frick , Christoph Hottiger , Wolfgang Kesselheim , Angelika Linke , Nathalie Meyer , and Antonia Steger
    2018 “Doing Space in Face-to-face Interaction and on Interactive Multimodal Platforms.” Journal of Pragmatics134: 85–101. 10.1016/j.pragma.2018.07.001
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.07.001 [Google Scholar]
  28. Kääntä, Leila
    2014 “From Noticing to Initiating Correction: Students’ Epistemic Displays in Instructional Interaction.” Journal of Pragmatics66: 86–105. 10.1016/j.pragma.2014.02.010
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.02.010 [Google Scholar]
  29. Keisanen, Tiina
    2012 “’uh-oh, we were going there’: Environmentally Occasioned Noticings of Trouble in In-car Interaction.” Semiotica191: 197–222. 10.1515/sem‑2012‑0061
     https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2012-0061 [Google Scholar]
  30. Kendon, Adam
    1967 “Some Functions of Gaze Direction in Social Interaction.” Acta Psychologica26: 22–63. 10.1016/0001‑6918(67)90005‑4
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-6918(67)90005-4 [Google Scholar]
  31. Kendon, Adam
    2004 Gesture. Visible Action as Utterance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511807572
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511807572 [Google Scholar]
  32. Laanesoo, Kirsi , and Leelo Keevallik
    2017 “Noticing Breaches with Non-polar Interrogatives: Estonian Kes ‘Who’ Ascribing Responsibility for Problematic Conduct.” Research on Language and Social Interaction50 (3): 286–306. 10.1080/08351813.2017.1340721
     https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2017.1340721 [Google Scholar]
  33. Laner, Barbara
    2022 “‘Guck mal der Baum’ – Zur Verwendung von Wahrnehmungsimperativen mit und ohne mal .” Gesprächsforschung – Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion23: 1–35. www.gespraechsforschung-online.de/fileadmin/dateien/heft2022/ga-laner.pdf
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Maschler, Yael
    2020 “The Insubordinate – Subordinate Continuum. Prosody, Embodied Action, and the Emergence of Hebrew Complex Syntax.” InEmergent Syntax for Conversation: Clausal Patterns and the Organization of Action, ed. by Yael Maschler , Simona Pekarek Doehler , Jan Lindström , and Leelo Keevallik , 87–126. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slsi.32.04mas
     https://doi.org/10.1075/slsi.32.04mas [Google Scholar]
  35. Meibauer, Jörg , Markus Steinbach , and Hans Altmann
    2013 “Kontroversen in der Forschung zu Satztypen und Satzmodus.” InSatztypen des Deutschen, ed. by Jörg Meibauer , Markus Steinbach , and Hans Altmann , 1–19. Berlin/Boston: de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110224832.1
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110224832.1 [Google Scholar]
  36. Merlino, Sara , and Lorenza Mondada
    2019 “Crossing the Street: How Pedestrians Interact with Cars.” Language & Communication65: 131–147. 10.1016/j.langcom.2018.04.004
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2018.04.004 [Google Scholar]
  37. Mondada, Lorenza
    2012 “Organisation multimodale de la parole-en-interaction: pratiques incarnées d’introduction des référants”. Langue française173 (3): 129–147. 10.3917/lf.175.0129
     https://doi.org/10.3917/lf.175.0129 [Google Scholar]
  38. 2014a “The local constitution of multimodal resources for social interaction.” Journal of Pragmatics65: 137–156. 10.1016/j.pragma.2014.04.004
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.04.004 [Google Scholar]
  39. 2014b “Bodies in action: multimodal analysis of walking and talking.” Language and Dialogue4 (3): 357–403. 10.1075/ld.4.3.02mon
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.4.3.02mon [Google Scholar]
  40. 2014c “Pointing, talk and the bodies: Reference and joint attention as embodied interactional achievements.” InFrom Gesture in Conversation to Visible Utterance in Action, edited by Mandana Seyfeddinipur & Marianne Gullberg . Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 95–124. 10.1075/z.188.06mon
     https://doi.org/10.1075/z.188.06mon [Google Scholar]
  41. 2017 “Walking and Talking Together: Questions/Answers and Mobile Participation in Guided Visits.” Social Science Information56 (2): 220–253. 10.1177/0539018417694777
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0539018417694777 [Google Scholar]
  42. Mortensen, Kristian , and Johannes Wagner
    2019 “Inspection Sequences – Multisensorial Inspections of Unfamiliar Objects.” Gesprächsforschung – Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion20: 399–443.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Näf, Anton
    1987 “Gibt es Exklamativsätze?” InSatzmodus zwischen Grammatik und Pragmatik, ed. by Jörg Meibauer , 140–160. Tübingen: Niemeyer. 10.1515/9783111560588‑009
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783111560588-009 [Google Scholar]
  44. 1996 “Die w-Exklamativsätze im Deutschen – zugleich ein Plädoyer für eine Rehabilitierung der Empirie in der Sprachwissenschaft.” Zeitschrift für Germanistische Linguistik24: 135–152. 10.1515/zfgl.1996.24.2.135
     https://doi.org/10.1515/zfgl.1996.24.2.135 [Google Scholar]
  45. 2021 “Zentrum und Peripherie in der deutschen Syntax. Das Beispiel der Satzarten des Deutschen.” Linguistik Online108: 67–114. 10.13092/lo.108.7792
     https://doi.org/10.13092/lo.108.7792 [Google Scholar]
  46. Pfeiffer, Martin
    2016 “The Deictic Dimension of Exclamations: On the Use of wh-Exclamatives in German Face-to-face Interaction.” Revue de Sémantique et Pragmatique40: 35–57. 10.4000/rsp.288
     https://doi.org/10.4000/rsp.288 [Google Scholar]
  47. Pfeiffer, Martin , and Marina Anna
    2021 “Recruiting Assistance in Early Childhood: Longitudinal Changes in the Use of ‘oh+X’ as a Way of Reporting Trouble in German.” Research on Language and Social Interaction54 (2): 142–162. 10.1080/08351813.2021.1899708
     https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2021.1899708 [Google Scholar]
  48. Proske, Nadine
    2017 “Zur Funktion und Klassifikation gesprächsorganisatorischer Imperative.“ InDiskursmarker im Deutschen. Reflexionen und Analysen, ed. by Hardarik Blühdorn , Arnulf Deppermann , Henrike Helmer , and Thomas Spranz-Fogasy , 73–102. Göttingen: Verlag für Gesprächsforschung.
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Rauniomaa, Mirka , Tiina Keisanen , Pauliina Siitonen
    2021 “Shared Understandings of the Human–Nature Relationship in Encounters with Small Wildlife.” InIntersubjectivity in Action: Studies in Language and Social Interaction, ed. by Jan Lindström , Ritva Laury , Anssi Peräkylä , and Marja-Leena Sorjonen , 201–230. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.326.10rau
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.326.10rau [Google Scholar]
  50. Relieu, Marc
    1999 “Parler en marchant. Pour une écologie dynamique des échanges de paroles.” Langage et société89: 37–67.
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Repp, Sophie
    2019 “The Prosody of wh-Exclamatives and wh-Questions in German: Speech Act Differences, Information Structure, and Sex of Speaker.” Language and Speech63 (2): 306–361. 10.1177/0023830919846147
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0023830919846147 [Google Scholar]
  52. Rossano, Federico
    2013 “Gaze in Conversation.” InThe Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ed. by Jack Sidnell and Tanya Stivers , 308–329. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Ryave, Lincoln A. , and James N. Schenkein
    1974 “Notes on the Art of Walking.” InEthnomethodology: Selected Readings, ed. by Roy Turner , 265–274. Harmondsworth: Penguin Education.
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Sacks, Harvey
    1995 Lectures on Conversation, Vol.II, ed. by Gail Jefferson . Oxford: Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Schegloff, Emanuel A.
    1988 “Goffman and the Analysis of Conversation.” InErving Goffman: Exploring the Interaction Order, ed. by Paul Drew , and Anthony J. Wootton , 89–135. Cambridge: Polity Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  56. 1998 “Body torque.” Social Research65 (3): 535–596.
     [Google Scholar]
  57. 2007 Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511791208
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511791208 [Google Scholar]
  58. Schmitt, Reinhold
    2012 “Gehen als situierte Praktik: ‘Gemeinsam gehen’ und ‘hinter jemandem herlaufen’.” Gesprächsforschung – Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion13: 1–44 (www.gespraechsforschung-ozs.de).
     [Google Scholar]
  59. Selting, Margret , Peter Auer , Birgit Barden , Jörg Bergmann , Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen , Susanne Günthner , Christoph Meier , Uta Quasthoff , Peter Schlobinski , and Susanne Uhmann
    2009 “Gesprächsanalytisches Transkriptionssystem 2 (GAT 2).” Gesprächsforschung10: 353–402 (www.gespraechsforschung-ozs.de).
     [Google Scholar]
  60. Siitonen, Pauliina , Mirka Rauniomaa , and Tiina Keisanen
    2021 “Language and the Moving Body: Directive Actions With the Finnish Kato ‘Look’ in Nature-Related Activities.” Frontiers in Psychology12: 66178. 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.661784
     https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.661784 [Google Scholar]
  61. Steger, Antonia
    2019 “Aneinander-Vorbeigehen – Eine Interaktionsanalyse flüchtiger urbaner Begegnungen.” Zeitschrift für Germanistische Linguistik47 (2): 313–336. 10.1515/zgl‑2019‑0014
     https://doi.org/10.1515/zgl-2019-0014 [Google Scholar]
  62. Stivers, Tanja , and Rossano, Federico
    2019 “Mobilizing Response.” Research on Language and Social Interaction54 (1): 1–19. 10.1080/08351813.2020.1864158
     https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2020.1864158 [Google Scholar]
  63. Stukenbrock, Anja
    2009 “Referenz durch Zeigen: Zur Theorie der Deixis.” Deutsche Sprache: Zeitschrift für Theorie, Praxis, Dokumentation37: 289–288. 10.37307/j.1868‑775X.2009.04.02
     https://doi.org/10.37307/j.1868-775X.2009.04.02 [Google Scholar]
  64. 2015 Deixis in der face-to-face-Interaktion. Berlin/München: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110307436
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110307436 [Google Scholar]
  65. Stukenbrock, Anja
    2020 “Deixis, Meta-perceptive Gaze Practices, and the Interactional Achievement of Joint Attention.” Frontiers in Psychology11: 1–23, article 1779. 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01779
     https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01779 [Google Scholar]
  66. Stukenbrock, Anja , and Karin Birkner
    2010 “Multimodale Ressourcen bei Stadtführungen.“ InDeutschland als fremde Kultur: Vermittlungsverfahren in Touristenführungen, ed. by Marcella Costa and Bernd Müller-Jacquier , 214–243. München: Judicium.
     [Google Scholar]
  67. Stukenbrock, Anja , and Anh Nhi Dao
    2019 “Joint Attention in Passing: What Dual Mobile Eye Tracking Reveals about Gaze in Coordinating Embodied Activities at a Market.” InEmbodied Activities in Face-to-Face and Mediated Settings, ed. by Elisabeth Reber and Cornelia Gerhardt , 177–213. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑97325‑8_6
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97325-8_6 [Google Scholar]
  68. Szymanski, Margaret H.
    1999 “Re-engaging and Disengaging Talk in Activity.” Language in Society28 (1): 1–23. 10.1017/S0047404599001013
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404599001013 [Google Scholar]
  69. Tomasello, Michael
    1995 “Joint attention as social cognition.” InJoint attention: Its origins and role in development, ed. by Chris Moore , and Philip J. Dunham , 103–130. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
     [Google Scholar]
  70. van Olmen, Daniel
    2011 The Imperative in English and Dutch: A Functional Analysis in Comparable and Parallel Corpora. Dissertation. Antwerp: University of Antwerp.
  71. vom Lehn, Dirk
    2013 “Withdrawing from Exhibits: The Interactional Organisation of Museum Visits.” InInteraction and Mobility: Language and the Body in Motion, ed. by Pentti Haddington , Lorenza Mondada , and Maurice Nevile , 65–90. Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110291278.65
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110291278.65 [Google Scholar]
  72. Zifonun, Gisela , Ludger Hoffmann , and Bruno Strecker
    1997 Grammatik der deutschen Sprache. 3Bände. Berlin: de Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]

References

  1. Altmann, Hans
    1987 “Zur Problematik der Konstitution von Satzmodi als Formtypen.” InSatzmodus zwischen Grammatik und Pragmatik, ed. by Jörg Meibauer , 22–56. Tübingen: Niemeyer. 10.1515/9783111560588‑003
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783111560588-003 [Google Scholar]
  2. 1993 “Satzmodus.” InSyntax. Ein internationales Handbuch zeitgenössischer Forschung, ed. by Joachim Jacobs , Arnim von Stechow , Wolfgang Sternefeld , and Theo Vennemann , 1006–1029. Berlin: de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110095869.1.15.1006
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110095869.1.15.1006 [Google Scholar]
  3. Anna, Marina , and Martin Pfeiffer
    2021 “Die frühkindliche Verwendung des Exklamativformats ‚oh+X‘: Noticings und Problemmitteilungen.” Gesprächsforschung – Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion22: 1–35. www.gespraechsforschung-online.de/fileadmin/dateien/heft2021/ga-anna.pdf
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Auer, Peter
    1988 “On Deixis and Displacement.” Folia LinguisticaXXII/3–4: 263–292. 10.1515/flin.1988.22.3‑4.263
     https://doi.org/10.1515/flin.1988.22.3-4.263 [Google Scholar]
  5. 2016 “‘Wie geil ist das denn?’ Eine neue Konstruktion im Netzwerk ihrer Nachbarn.” Zeitschrift für Germanistische Linguistik44 (1): 69–92. 10.1515/zgl‑2016‑0003
     https://doi.org/10.1515/zgl-2016-0003 [Google Scholar]
  6. Auer, Peter , and Anja Stukenbrock
    2022 “Deictic Reference in Space.” InPragmatics of Space (=Handbook of Pragmatics, Vol. 14), ed. by Andreas Jucker and Heiko Hausendorf . Berlin: de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110693713‑002
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110693713-002 [Google Scholar]
  7. Auer, Peter , and Barbara Laner
    . Submitted. “Laughter and Gaze among Talkers on a Walk.” InMobile Eyetracking: New Avenues for the Study of Gaze in Social Interaction ed. by Anja Stukenbrock and Elisabeth Zima . Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Batliner, Anton
    1988 “Der Exklamativ: Mehr als Aussage oder doch nur mehr oder weniger Aussage? Experimente zur Rolle von Höhe und Position des F0-Gipfels.” InIntonationsforschungen, ed. by Hans Altmann , 243–271. Tübingen: Niemeyer. 10.1515/9783111358413.243
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783111358413.243 [Google Scholar]
  9. Blythe, Joe , Rod Gardner , Ilana Mushin , and Lesley Sterling
    2018 “Tools of Engagement: Selecting a Next Speaker in Australian Aboriginal Multiparty Conversation.” Research on Language and Social Interaction51 (2): 145–170. 10.1080/08351813.2018.1449441
     https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2018.1449441 [Google Scholar]
  10. Botsch, Kerstin , Peter Auer , Barbara Laner , and Martin Pfeiffer
    , submitted. “Joint Attention Without Language? On Intersubjectivity and the Joint Experience of Nature.” InMobile Eyetracking: New Avenues for the Study of Gaze in Social Interaction ed. by Anja Stukenbrock and Elisabeth Zima . Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Broth, Mathias , and Lorenza Mondada
    2013 “Walking Away: The Embodied Achievement of Activity Closings in Mobile Interaction.” Journal of Pragmatics47: 41–58. 10.1016/j.pragma.2012.11.016
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.11.016 [Google Scholar]
  12. Burckhardt, Lucius
    2006 Warum ist Landschaft schön? Die Spaziergangswissenschaft. 3rd edition. Berlin: Martin Schmitz Verlag.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. D’Avis, Franz
    2001 Über w-Exklamativsätze im Deutschen. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. D’Avis, Franz
    2013 “Exklamativsatz.” InSatztypen des Deutschen, ed. by Jörg Meibauer , Markus Steinbach , and Hans Altmann , 171–201. Berlin/Boston: de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110224832.171
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110224832.171 [Google Scholar]
  15. Deppermann, Arnulf
    2021 “Imperative im Deutschen: Konstruktionen, Praktiken oder social action formats?” InVerfestigungen in der Interaktion, ed. by Beate Weidner , Katharina König , Wolfgang Imo , and Lars Wegner , 195–230. Berlin /Boston: DeGruyter. 10.1515/9783110637502‑009
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110637502-009 [Google Scholar]
  16. De Stefani, Elwys
    2010 “Reference as an Interactively and Multimodally Accomplished Practice. Organizing Spatial Reorientation in Guided Tours.” InSpoken Communication, ed. by Massimo Pettorino , Antonella Giannini , Isabella Chiara , and Francesca Dovetto , 137–170. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. 2013 “Rearranging (in) Space. On Mobility and its Relevance for the Study of Face-to-face Interaction.” InSpace in Language and Linguistics. Geographical, Interactional, and Cognitive Perspectives, ed. by Peter Auer , Martin Hilpert , Benedikt Szmrecsanyi , and Anja Stukenbrock , 434–463. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110312027.434
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110312027.434 [Google Scholar]
  18. Evans, Nicolas
    2007 “Insubordination and its Uses.” InFiniteness. Theoretical and Empirical Foundations, ed. by Irina Nikolaeva , 366–431. New York: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780199213733.003.0011
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199213733.003.0011 [Google Scholar]
  19. Goffman, Erving
    1963 Behavior in Public Places. New York: The Free Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. 1978 “Response Cries.” Language54 (4): 787–815. 10.2307/413235
     https://doi.org/10.2307/413235 [Google Scholar]
  21. 1981 Forms of Talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Golato, Andrea
    2012 German oh: Marking an emotional change of state. InResearch on Language and Social Interaction45: 245–244. 10.1080/08351813.2012.699253
     https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2012.699253 [Google Scholar]
  23. Goodwin, Charles
    1980 “Restarts, Pauses, and the Achievement of a State of Mutual Gaze at Turn-beginning.” Social Inquiry50: 772–302. 10.1111/j.1475‑682X.1980.tb00023.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-682X.1980.tb00023.x [Google Scholar]
  24. Goodwin, Majorie , and Charles Goodwin
    2012 “Car Talk: Integrating Texts, Bodies, and Changing Landscapes.” Semiotica191: 257–286. 10.1515/sem‑2012‑0063
     https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2012-0063 [Google Scholar]
  25. Günthner, Susanne
    2017 “Diskursmarker in der Interaktion – Formen und Funktionen univerbierter guck mal- und weißt du-Konstruktionen.” InDiskursmarker im Deutschen. Reflexionen und Analysen, ed. by Hardarik Blühdorn , Arnulf Deppermann , Henrike Helmer , and Thomas Spranz-Fogasy , 103–130. Göttingen: Verlag für Gesprächsforschung.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Heritage, John
    1984 “A Change-of-state Token and Aspects of its Sequential Placement.” InStructures of Social Action – Studies in Conversation Analysis, ed. by J. Maxwell Atkinson , and John Heritage . Cambridge: CUP. 10.1017/CBO9780511665868
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511665868 [Google Scholar]
  27. Jucker, Andreas H. , Heiko Hausendorf , Christa Dürscheid , Karina Frick , Christoph Hottiger , Wolfgang Kesselheim , Angelika Linke , Nathalie Meyer , and Antonia Steger
    2018 “Doing Space in Face-to-face Interaction and on Interactive Multimodal Platforms.” Journal of Pragmatics134: 85–101. 10.1016/j.pragma.2018.07.001
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.07.001 [Google Scholar]
  28. Kääntä, Leila
    2014 “From Noticing to Initiating Correction: Students’ Epistemic Displays in Instructional Interaction.” Journal of Pragmatics66: 86–105. 10.1016/j.pragma.2014.02.010
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.02.010 [Google Scholar]
  29. Keisanen, Tiina
    2012 “’uh-oh, we were going there’: Environmentally Occasioned Noticings of Trouble in In-car Interaction.” Semiotica191: 197–222. 10.1515/sem‑2012‑0061
     https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2012-0061 [Google Scholar]
  30. Kendon, Adam
    1967 “Some Functions of Gaze Direction in Social Interaction.” Acta Psychologica26: 22–63. 10.1016/0001‑6918(67)90005‑4
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-6918(67)90005-4 [Google Scholar]
  31. Kendon, Adam
    2004 Gesture. Visible Action as Utterance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511807572
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511807572 [Google Scholar]
  32. Laanesoo, Kirsi , and Leelo Keevallik
    2017 “Noticing Breaches with Non-polar Interrogatives: Estonian Kes ‘Who’ Ascribing Responsibility for Problematic Conduct.” Research on Language and Social Interaction50 (3): 286–306. 10.1080/08351813.2017.1340721
     https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2017.1340721 [Google Scholar]
  33. Laner, Barbara
    2022 “‘Guck mal der Baum’ – Zur Verwendung von Wahrnehmungsimperativen mit und ohne mal .” Gesprächsforschung – Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion23: 1–35. www.gespraechsforschung-online.de/fileadmin/dateien/heft2022/ga-laner.pdf
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Maschler, Yael
    2020 “The Insubordinate – Subordinate Continuum. Prosody, Embodied Action, and the Emergence of Hebrew Complex Syntax.” InEmergent Syntax for Conversation: Clausal Patterns and the Organization of Action, ed. by Yael Maschler , Simona Pekarek Doehler , Jan Lindström , and Leelo Keevallik , 87–126. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slsi.32.04mas
     https://doi.org/10.1075/slsi.32.04mas [Google Scholar]
  35. Meibauer, Jörg , Markus Steinbach , and Hans Altmann
    2013 “Kontroversen in der Forschung zu Satztypen und Satzmodus.” InSatztypen des Deutschen, ed. by Jörg Meibauer , Markus Steinbach , and Hans Altmann , 1–19. Berlin/Boston: de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110224832.1
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110224832.1 [Google Scholar]
  36. Merlino, Sara , and Lorenza Mondada
    2019 “Crossing the Street: How Pedestrians Interact with Cars.” Language & Communication65: 131–147. 10.1016/j.langcom.2018.04.004
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2018.04.004 [Google Scholar]
  37. Mondada, Lorenza
    2012 “Organisation multimodale de la parole-en-interaction: pratiques incarnées d’introduction des référants”. Langue française173 (3): 129–147. 10.3917/lf.175.0129
     https://doi.org/10.3917/lf.175.0129 [Google Scholar]
  38. 2014a “The local constitution of multimodal resources for social interaction.” Journal of Pragmatics65: 137–156. 10.1016/j.pragma.2014.04.004
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.04.004 [Google Scholar]
  39. 2014b “Bodies in action: multimodal analysis of walking and talking.” Language and Dialogue4 (3): 357–403. 10.1075/ld.4.3.02mon
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.4.3.02mon [Google Scholar]
  40. 2014c “Pointing, talk and the bodies: Reference and joint attention as embodied interactional achievements.” InFrom Gesture in Conversation to Visible Utterance in Action, edited by Mandana Seyfeddinipur & Marianne Gullberg . Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 95–124. 10.1075/z.188.06mon
     https://doi.org/10.1075/z.188.06mon [Google Scholar]
  41. 2017 “Walking and Talking Together: Questions/Answers and Mobile Participation in Guided Visits.” Social Science Information56 (2): 220–253. 10.1177/0539018417694777
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0539018417694777 [Google Scholar]
  42. Mortensen, Kristian , and Johannes Wagner
    2019 “Inspection Sequences – Multisensorial Inspections of Unfamiliar Objects.” Gesprächsforschung – Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion20: 399–443.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Näf, Anton
    1987 “Gibt es Exklamativsätze?” InSatzmodus zwischen Grammatik und Pragmatik, ed. by Jörg Meibauer , 140–160. Tübingen: Niemeyer. 10.1515/9783111560588‑009
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783111560588-009 [Google Scholar]
  44. 1996 “Die w-Exklamativsätze im Deutschen – zugleich ein Plädoyer für eine Rehabilitierung der Empirie in der Sprachwissenschaft.” Zeitschrift für Germanistische Linguistik24: 135–152. 10.1515/zfgl.1996.24.2.135
     https://doi.org/10.1515/zfgl.1996.24.2.135 [Google Scholar]
  45. 2021 “Zentrum und Peripherie in der deutschen Syntax. Das Beispiel der Satzarten des Deutschen.” Linguistik Online108: 67–114. 10.13092/lo.108.7792
     https://doi.org/10.13092/lo.108.7792 [Google Scholar]
  46. Pfeiffer, Martin
    2016 “The Deictic Dimension of Exclamations: On the Use of wh-Exclamatives in German Face-to-face Interaction.” Revue de Sémantique et Pragmatique40: 35–57. 10.4000/rsp.288
     https://doi.org/10.4000/rsp.288 [Google Scholar]
  47. Pfeiffer, Martin , and Marina Anna
    2021 “Recruiting Assistance in Early Childhood: Longitudinal Changes in the Use of ‘oh+X’ as a Way of Reporting Trouble in German.” Research on Language and Social Interaction54 (2): 142–162. 10.1080/08351813.2021.1899708
     https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2021.1899708 [Google Scholar]
  48. Proske, Nadine
    2017 “Zur Funktion und Klassifikation gesprächsorganisatorischer Imperative.“ InDiskursmarker im Deutschen. Reflexionen und Analysen, ed. by Hardarik Blühdorn , Arnulf Deppermann , Henrike Helmer , and Thomas Spranz-Fogasy , 73–102. Göttingen: Verlag für Gesprächsforschung.
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Rauniomaa, Mirka , Tiina Keisanen , Pauliina Siitonen
    2021 “Shared Understandings of the Human–Nature Relationship in Encounters with Small Wildlife.” InIntersubjectivity in Action: Studies in Language and Social Interaction, ed. by Jan Lindström , Ritva Laury , Anssi Peräkylä , and Marja-Leena Sorjonen , 201–230. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.326.10rau
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.326.10rau [Google Scholar]
  50. Relieu, Marc
    1999 “Parler en marchant. Pour une écologie dynamique des échanges de paroles.” Langage et société89: 37–67.
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Repp, Sophie
    2019 “The Prosody of wh-Exclamatives and wh-Questions in German: Speech Act Differences, Information Structure, and Sex of Speaker.” Language and Speech63 (2): 306–361. 10.1177/0023830919846147
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0023830919846147 [Google Scholar]
  52. Rossano, Federico
    2013 “Gaze in Conversation.” InThe Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ed. by Jack Sidnell and Tanya Stivers , 308–329. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Ryave, Lincoln A. , and James N. Schenkein
    1974 “Notes on the Art of Walking.” InEthnomethodology: Selected Readings, ed. by Roy Turner , 265–274. Harmondsworth: Penguin Education.
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Sacks, Harvey
    1995 Lectures on Conversation, Vol.II, ed. by Gail Jefferson . Oxford: Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Schegloff, Emanuel A.
    1988 “Goffman and the Analysis of Conversation.” InErving Goffman: Exploring the Interaction Order, ed. by Paul Drew , and Anthony J. Wootton , 89–135. Cambridge: Polity Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  56. 1998 “Body torque.” Social Research65 (3): 535–596.
     [Google Scholar]
  57. 2007 Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511791208
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511791208 [Google Scholar]
  58. Schmitt, Reinhold
    2012 “Gehen als situierte Praktik: ‘Gemeinsam gehen’ und ‘hinter jemandem herlaufen’.” Gesprächsforschung – Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion13: 1–44 (www.gespraechsforschung-ozs.de).
     [Google Scholar]
  59. Selting, Margret , Peter Auer , Birgit Barden , Jörg Bergmann , Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen , Susanne Günthner , Christoph Meier , Uta Quasthoff , Peter Schlobinski , and Susanne Uhmann
    2009 “Gesprächsanalytisches Transkriptionssystem 2 (GAT 2).” Gesprächsforschung10: 353–402 (www.gespraechsforschung-ozs.de).
     [Google Scholar]
  60. Siitonen, Pauliina , Mirka Rauniomaa , and Tiina Keisanen
    2021 “Language and the Moving Body: Directive Actions With the Finnish Kato ‘Look’ in Nature-Related Activities.” Frontiers in Psychology12: 66178. 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.661784
     https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.661784 [Google Scholar]
  61. Steger, Antonia
    2019 “Aneinander-Vorbeigehen – Eine Interaktionsanalyse flüchtiger urbaner Begegnungen.” Zeitschrift für Germanistische Linguistik47 (2): 313–336. 10.1515/zgl‑2019‑0014
     https://doi.org/10.1515/zgl-2019-0014 [Google Scholar]
  62. Stivers, Tanja , and Rossano, Federico
    2019 “Mobilizing Response.” Research on Language and Social Interaction54 (1): 1–19. 10.1080/08351813.2020.1864158
     https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2020.1864158 [Google Scholar]
  63. Stukenbrock, Anja
    2009 “Referenz durch Zeigen: Zur Theorie der Deixis.” Deutsche Sprache: Zeitschrift für Theorie, Praxis, Dokumentation37: 289–288. 10.37307/j.1868‑775X.2009.04.02
     https://doi.org/10.37307/j.1868-775X.2009.04.02 [Google Scholar]
  64. 2015 Deixis in der face-to-face-Interaktion. Berlin/München: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110307436
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110307436 [Google Scholar]
  65. Stukenbrock, Anja
    2020 “Deixis, Meta-perceptive Gaze Practices, and the Interactional Achievement of Joint Attention.” Frontiers in Psychology11: 1–23, article 1779. 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01779
     https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01779 [Google Scholar]
  66. Stukenbrock, Anja , and Karin Birkner
    2010 “Multimodale Ressourcen bei Stadtführungen.“ InDeutschland als fremde Kultur: Vermittlungsverfahren in Touristenführungen, ed. by Marcella Costa and Bernd Müller-Jacquier , 214–243. München: Judicium.
     [Google Scholar]
  67. Stukenbrock, Anja , and Anh Nhi Dao
    2019 “Joint Attention in Passing: What Dual Mobile Eye Tracking Reveals about Gaze in Coordinating Embodied Activities at a Market.” InEmbodied Activities in Face-to-Face and Mediated Settings, ed. by Elisabeth Reber and Cornelia Gerhardt , 177–213. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑97325‑8_6
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97325-8_6 [Google Scholar]
  68. Szymanski, Margaret H.
    1999 “Re-engaging and Disengaging Talk in Activity.” Language in Society28 (1): 1–23. 10.1017/S0047404599001013
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404599001013 [Google Scholar]
  69. Tomasello, Michael
    1995 “Joint attention as social cognition.” InJoint attention: Its origins and role in development, ed. by Chris Moore , and Philip J. Dunham , 103–130. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
     [Google Scholar]
  70. van Olmen, Daniel
    2011 The Imperative in English and Dutch: A Functional Analysis in Comparable and Parallel Corpora. Dissertation. Antwerp: University of Antwerp.
  71. vom Lehn, Dirk
    2013 “Withdrawing from Exhibits: The Interactional Organisation of Museum Visits.” InInteraction and Mobility: Language and the Body in Motion, ed. by Pentti Haddington , Lorenza Mondada , and Maurice Nevile , 65–90. Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110291278.65
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110291278.65 [Google Scholar]
  72. Zifonun, Gisela , Ludger Hoffmann , and Bruno Strecker
    1997 Grammatik der deutschen Sprache. 3Bände. Berlin: de Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]

  • From This Site

    /content/books/9789027246912-slsi.36.09aue
    dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal
    10
    5
/content/books/9789027246912-slsi.36.09aue
dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
-contentType:Journal
10
5
Chapter
content/books/9789027246912
Book
false
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error