1887

Chapter 5. Sex and the stability of a legal gender system

Dilemmas of defining intersex in Islamic law

Islamic law’s gender system is based on a conception of humans as sexually dimorphic. The presence of nonbinary bodies, specifically the khunthā, posed a challenge to the gender system. Law practitioners, like ʿAbd al-Raḥīm al-Isnawī (d. 722/1322), attempted to redefine sex and intersexuality to stabilise the legal gender system. In an exploration of al-Isnawī’s writings, I argue that he engages in a form of object translation, following Marais’s typology of translation. Al-Isnawī incorporated the khunthā into the gender system by unravelling the challenge posed by their ambiguity onto Islamic law. This redefinition effectively defines them into impossibility by legal technicalities.

References

  1. Acerbi, A. , and A. Mesoudi
    2015 “If We are all Cultural Darwinians What’s the Fuss About? Clarifying Recent Disagreements in the Field of Cultural Evolution.” Biology and Philosophy30, no.4: 481–503. 10.1007/s10539‑015‑9490‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-015-9490-2 [Google Scholar]
  2. Almarri, S. A.
    2016 “’You Have made her a Man Among Men’”: Translating the khuntha’s Anatomy in Fatimid Jurisprudence.” TSQ: Transgender Studies Quarterly3, no.3–4: 578–86. 10.1215/23289252‑3545251
    https://doi.org/10.1215/23289252-3545251 [Google Scholar]
  3. 2019 “The Khunthā and the Community: A Study in the Medieval Islamic Understanding of the Body and a Critical Edition of ʿAbd Al-Raḥīm Al-Isnawī’sĪḍāḥ Al-Mushkil Fī Aḥkām Al-Khunthā Al-Mushkil.” PhD diss., Binghamton University, State University of New York.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. 2020 “Non-Binary Sexual and Gender Identities in the Community: The Khunthā as an Isolated Being in the Mosque.” Body and Religion3, no.2. 10.1558/bar.15722
    https://doi.org/10.1558/bar.15722 [Google Scholar]
  5. Andersen, N. Å.
    2003Discursive Analytical Strategies: Understanding Foucault, Koselleck, Laclau, Luhmann. Policy Press. 10.2307/j.ctt1t898nd
    https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1t898nd [Google Scholar]
  6. Antrim, Z.
    2020 “ Qamarayn: The Erotics of Sameness in the 1001 Nights .” Al-ʿUṣūr al-Wusṭā28: 1–44. 10.52214/uw.v28i1.8287
    https://doi.org/10.52214/uw.v28i1.8287 [Google Scholar]
  7. Bauer, K.
    2015Gender Hierarchy in the Qur’ān: Medieval Interpretations, Modern Responses. Cambridge University Press. ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nyulibrary-ebooks/detail.action?docID=2034090. 10.1017/CBO9781139649759
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139649759 [Google Scholar]
  8. Borch, C.
    2011Niklas Luhmann. Key Sociologists. Routledge. 10.4324/9780203880524
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203880524 [Google Scholar]
  9. Bucar, E. M.
    2010 “Bodies at the Margins: The Case of Transsexuality in Catholic and Shia Ethics.” Journal of Religious Ethics38, no.4: 601–15. 10.1111/j.1467‑9795.2010.00454.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9795.2010.00454.x [Google Scholar]
  10. Byrne, D. , and G. Callaghan
    2013Complexity Theory and the Social Sciences: The State of the Art. Taylor and Francis Group. ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nyulibrary-ebooks/detail.action?docID=1386433. 10.4324/9780203519585
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203519585 [Google Scholar]
  11. Charbonneau, M. , and P. Bourrat
    2021 “Fidelity and the Grain Problem in Cultural Evolution.” SyntheseJanuary. 10.1007/s11229‑021‑03047‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-021-03047-1 [Google Scholar]
  12. Daftary, F.
    1990The Ismai’ilis: Their History and Doctrines. Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Deacon, T. W.
    2012Incomplete Nature: How Mind Emerged from Matter. W.W. Norton and Co.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. El-Rouayheb, K.
    2005Before Homosexuality in the Arab-Islamic World, 1500–1800. University of Chicago Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226729909.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226729909.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  15. Gadelrab, S. S.
    2011 “Discourses on Sex Differences in Medieval Scholarly Islamic Thought.” Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences66, no.1: 40–81. 10.1093/jhmas/jrq012
    https://doi.org/10.1093/jhmas/jrq012 [Google Scholar]
  16. Geissinger, A.
    2020 “Applying Gender and Queer Theory to Pre-Modern Sources.” InThe Routledge handbook of Islam and Gender, edited by J. Howe , 101–115. Routledge. 10.4324/9781351256568‑6
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351256568-6 [Google Scholar]
  17. Gesink, I. F.
    2018 “Intersex Bodies in Premodern Islamic Discourse: Complicating the Binary.” Journal of Middle East Women’s Studies, 14, no.2: 152–173. 10.1215/15525864‑6680205
    https://doi.org/10.1215/15525864-6680205 [Google Scholar]
  18. 2020 “Intersex in Islamic Medicine, Law, and Activism.” InThe Routledge Handbook of Islam and Gender, edited by J. Howe . Routledge. 10.4324/9781351256568‑7
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351256568-7 [Google Scholar]
  19. Grallert, T.
    2022 “Open Arabic Periodical Editions: A Framework for Bootstrapped Scholarly Editions Outside the Global North.” Digital Humanities Quarterly16, no.2.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Hamza, S.
    2020 “Islamic History and Medicine in Trans Muslim Lives.” JHI Blog. July 1.jhiblog.org/2020/07/01/islamic-history-and-medicine-in-trans-muslim-lives/
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Harding, S.-A.
    2019 Resonances Between Social Narrative Theory and Complexity Theory: A Potentially Rich Methodology for Translation Studies.” Complexity Thinking in Translation Studies: Methodological Considerations, edited by K. Marais , and R. Meylaerts , 33–52. Routledge Advances in Translation and Interpreting Studies 38. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Hitu, M. H.
    (Ed.) 1980 “al-Imam al-Isnawi.” Inal-Tamhid fi Takhrij al-Furu ala al-Usul, edited by A. al-Rahim al-Isnawi , 15–29. Manshurat Mu’assasat al-Risala. shamela.ws/index.php/book/6289
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Lotman, Y. M.
    1990Universe of the Mind: A Semiotic Theory of Culture. Translated by A. Shukman . Indiana University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Luhmann, N.
    1985 “Complexity and Meaning.” InThe Science and Praxis of Complexity, edited by S. Aida , I. Prigogine , M. Zeleny , and E. Morin . Contributions to the symposium held at Montpellier, France, 9–11May. United Nations University.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. 1995aSocial Systems. Translated by J. Bednarz Jr. and D. Baecker . Writing Science. Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. 1995b “The Paradoxy of Observing Systems.” Cultural Critique31: 37–55. 10.2307/1354444
    https://doi.org/10.2307/1354444 [Google Scholar]
  27. Marais, K.
    2019aA (Bio)Semiotic Theory of Translation: The Emergency of Social-Cultural Reality. Routledge Advances in Translation and Interpreting Studies 36. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Marais, K.
    2019b “’Effects Causing Effects’”: Considering Constraints in Translation. InComplexity Thinking in Translation Studies: Methodological Considerations, edited by K. Marais , and R. Meylaerts , 53–72. Routledge Advances in Translation and Interpreting Studies 38. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. 2021 “Tom, Dick and Harry as well as Fido and Puss in Boots are Translators: The Implications of Biosemiotics for Translation Studies.” InBenjamins Translation Library, edited by O. C. i Cortés , and E. Monzó-Nebot , 157: 101–21. John Benjamins. 10.1075/btl.157.05mar
    https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.157.05mar [Google Scholar]
  30. Mitchell, S. M. , J. J. Ring , and M. K. Spellman
    2013 “Domestic Legal Traditions and States’ Human Rights Practices.” Journal of Peace Research50, no.2: 189–202. 10.1177/0022343312466561
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343312466561 [Google Scholar]
  31. Morin, O.
    2018 “Cultural Transmission.” InThe International Encyclopedia of Anthropology, edited by H. Callan . Wiley. 10.1002/9781118924396.wbiea1882
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118924396.wbiea1882 [Google Scholar]
  32. Murata, S.
    1992The Tao of Islam: A Sourcebook on Gender Relationships in Islamic Thought. State University of New York Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Najmabadi, A.
    2016 “What can We Learn from Transsexuality in Iran?”InTranssexualität in Theologie Und Neurowissenschaften [Transsexuality in theology and neuroscience], edited by G. Schreiber , 175–93. De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110434392‑010
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110434392-010 [Google Scholar]
  34. Nigst, L. , M. Romanov , S. Bowen Savant , M. Seydi , and P. Verkinderen
    2023OpenITI: A Machine-Readable Corpus of Islamicate texts. Zenodo. 10.5281/zenodo.7687795
    https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7687795 [Google Scholar]
  35. Poonawala, I. K.
    1996 “Al-Qadi al-un’man and Isma’ili Jurisprudence.” InMediaeval Isma’ili History and Thought, edited by F. Daftary , 117–44. Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Powell, E. J. , and S. M. Mitchell
    2007 “The International Court of Justice and the World’s Three Legal Systems.” The Journal of Politics69, no.2: 397–415. 10.1111/j.1468‑2508.2007.00539.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2508.2007.00539.x [Google Scholar]
  37. Ragab, A.
    2015 “One, Two, or Many Sexes: Sex Differentiation in Medieval Islamicate Medical Thought.” Journal of the History of Sexuality24, no3: 428–54. 10.7560/JHS24304
    https://doi.org/10.7560/JHS24304 [Google Scholar]
  38. Rapoport, Y.
    2007 “Women and Gender in Mamluk Society: An Overview.” Mamluk Studies Review11, no.2: 1–47. 10.6082/M1X34VM5
    https://doi.org/10.6082/M1X34VM5 [Google Scholar]
  39. Rowson, E. K.
    1991a “The Categorization of Gender and Sexual Irregularity in Medieval Arabic Vice Lists.” InBody Guards: The Cultural Politics of Gender Ambiguity, edited by J. Epstein , and K. Straub , 50–79. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. 1991b “The Effeminates of Early Medina.” Journal of the American Oriental Society111, no.4: 671. 10.2307/603399
    https://doi.org/10.2307/603399 [Google Scholar]
  41. 2003 “Gender Irregularity as Entertainment: Institutionalized Transvestism at the Caliphal Court in Medieval Baghdad.” InGender and Difference in the Middle Ages, edited by S. Farmer , and C. Braun Pasternack , 45–72. Medieval Cultures 32. University of Minnesota Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Sadeghi, B.
    2013The Logic of Law-Making in Islam: Women and Prayer in the Legal Tradition. Cambridge Studies in Islamic Civilization. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511920509
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511920509 [Google Scholar]
  43. Said, M.
    2018 “Sagesse et politique à la veille de la période islamique” [Wisdom and politics on the eve of the Islamic period]. Bulletin d’études orientales66, no. April:39–58. 10.4000/beo.5218
    https://doi.org/10.4000/beo.5218 [Google Scholar]
  44. Salaymeh, L.
    2016The Beginnings of Islamic Law: Late Antique Islamicate Legal Traditions. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781316459485
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316459485 [Google Scholar]
  45. Sanders, P.
    1991 “Gendering the Ungendered Body: Hermaphrodites in Medieval Islamic law.” InWomen in Middle Eastern History, edited by N. R. Keddie , and B. Baron , 74–95. Yale University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Selove, E. , and R. Batten
    2014 “Making Men and Women: Arabic Commentaries on the Gynaecological Hippocratic Aphorisms in Context.” Annales Islamologiques48.1, no. August: 239–62. 10.4000/anisl.2670
    https://doi.org/10.4000/anisl.2670 [Google Scholar]
  47. Siever, H.
    2016 “Fractalisation: The Human Condition as a Translational Condition.” InTranslation Studies Beyond the Postcolony, edited by K. Marais , and I. Feinauer , translated by S. O. Signer , 334–57. Cambridge Scholars Publishers. ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nyulibrary-ebooks/detail.action?docID=4778778
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Stanley, E. A.
    2014 “Gender Self-Determination.” TSQ: Transgender Studies Quarterly1, no.1–2: 89–91. 10.1215/23289252‑2399695
    https://doi.org/10.1215/23289252-2399695 [Google Scholar]
  49. Tyulenev, S.
    2012Applying Luhmann to Translation Studies: Translation in Society. Routledge Advances in Translation Studies 1. Routledge. 10.4324/9780203803097
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203803097 [Google Scholar]
  50. Verkinderen, P.
    2020 “Al-Maktaba Al-Shāmila: A Short History.” KITAB. December 3.kitab-project.org/2020/12/03/al-maktaba-al-shamila-a-short-history/
    [Google Scholar]

References

  1. Acerbi, A. , and A. Mesoudi
    2015 “If We are all Cultural Darwinians What’s the Fuss About? Clarifying Recent Disagreements in the Field of Cultural Evolution.” Biology and Philosophy30, no.4: 481–503. 10.1007/s10539‑015‑9490‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-015-9490-2 [Google Scholar]
  2. Almarri, S. A.
    2016 “’You Have made her a Man Among Men’”: Translating the khuntha’s Anatomy in Fatimid Jurisprudence.” TSQ: Transgender Studies Quarterly3, no.3–4: 578–86. 10.1215/23289252‑3545251
    https://doi.org/10.1215/23289252-3545251 [Google Scholar]
  3. 2019 “The Khunthā and the Community: A Study in the Medieval Islamic Understanding of the Body and a Critical Edition of ʿAbd Al-Raḥīm Al-Isnawī’sĪḍāḥ Al-Mushkil Fī Aḥkām Al-Khunthā Al-Mushkil.” PhD diss., Binghamton University, State University of New York.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. 2020 “Non-Binary Sexual and Gender Identities in the Community: The Khunthā as an Isolated Being in the Mosque.” Body and Religion3, no.2. 10.1558/bar.15722
    https://doi.org/10.1558/bar.15722 [Google Scholar]
  5. Andersen, N. Å.
    2003Discursive Analytical Strategies: Understanding Foucault, Koselleck, Laclau, Luhmann. Policy Press. 10.2307/j.ctt1t898nd
    https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1t898nd [Google Scholar]
  6. Antrim, Z.
    2020 “ Qamarayn: The Erotics of Sameness in the 1001 Nights .” Al-ʿUṣūr al-Wusṭā28: 1–44. 10.52214/uw.v28i1.8287
    https://doi.org/10.52214/uw.v28i1.8287 [Google Scholar]
  7. Bauer, K.
    2015Gender Hierarchy in the Qur’ān: Medieval Interpretations, Modern Responses. Cambridge University Press. ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nyulibrary-ebooks/detail.action?docID=2034090. 10.1017/CBO9781139649759
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139649759 [Google Scholar]
  8. Borch, C.
    2011Niklas Luhmann. Key Sociologists. Routledge. 10.4324/9780203880524
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203880524 [Google Scholar]
  9. Bucar, E. M.
    2010 “Bodies at the Margins: The Case of Transsexuality in Catholic and Shia Ethics.” Journal of Religious Ethics38, no.4: 601–15. 10.1111/j.1467‑9795.2010.00454.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9795.2010.00454.x [Google Scholar]
  10. Byrne, D. , and G. Callaghan
    2013Complexity Theory and the Social Sciences: The State of the Art. Taylor and Francis Group. ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nyulibrary-ebooks/detail.action?docID=1386433. 10.4324/9780203519585
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203519585 [Google Scholar]
  11. Charbonneau, M. , and P. Bourrat
    2021 “Fidelity and the Grain Problem in Cultural Evolution.” SyntheseJanuary. 10.1007/s11229‑021‑03047‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-021-03047-1 [Google Scholar]
  12. Daftary, F.
    1990The Ismai’ilis: Their History and Doctrines. Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Deacon, T. W.
    2012Incomplete Nature: How Mind Emerged from Matter. W.W. Norton and Co.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. El-Rouayheb, K.
    2005Before Homosexuality in the Arab-Islamic World, 1500–1800. University of Chicago Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226729909.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226729909.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  15. Gadelrab, S. S.
    2011 “Discourses on Sex Differences in Medieval Scholarly Islamic Thought.” Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences66, no.1: 40–81. 10.1093/jhmas/jrq012
    https://doi.org/10.1093/jhmas/jrq012 [Google Scholar]
  16. Geissinger, A.
    2020 “Applying Gender and Queer Theory to Pre-Modern Sources.” InThe Routledge handbook of Islam and Gender, edited by J. Howe , 101–115. Routledge. 10.4324/9781351256568‑6
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351256568-6 [Google Scholar]
  17. Gesink, I. F.
    2018 “Intersex Bodies in Premodern Islamic Discourse: Complicating the Binary.” Journal of Middle East Women’s Studies, 14, no.2: 152–173. 10.1215/15525864‑6680205
    https://doi.org/10.1215/15525864-6680205 [Google Scholar]
  18. 2020 “Intersex in Islamic Medicine, Law, and Activism.” InThe Routledge Handbook of Islam and Gender, edited by J. Howe . Routledge. 10.4324/9781351256568‑7
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351256568-7 [Google Scholar]
  19. Grallert, T.
    2022 “Open Arabic Periodical Editions: A Framework for Bootstrapped Scholarly Editions Outside the Global North.” Digital Humanities Quarterly16, no.2.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Hamza, S.
    2020 “Islamic History and Medicine in Trans Muslim Lives.” JHI Blog. July 1.jhiblog.org/2020/07/01/islamic-history-and-medicine-in-trans-muslim-lives/
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Harding, S.-A.
    2019 Resonances Between Social Narrative Theory and Complexity Theory: A Potentially Rich Methodology for Translation Studies.” Complexity Thinking in Translation Studies: Methodological Considerations, edited by K. Marais , and R. Meylaerts , 33–52. Routledge Advances in Translation and Interpreting Studies 38. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Hitu, M. H.
    (Ed.) 1980 “al-Imam al-Isnawi.” Inal-Tamhid fi Takhrij al-Furu ala al-Usul, edited by A. al-Rahim al-Isnawi , 15–29. Manshurat Mu’assasat al-Risala. shamela.ws/index.php/book/6289
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Lotman, Y. M.
    1990Universe of the Mind: A Semiotic Theory of Culture. Translated by A. Shukman . Indiana University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Luhmann, N.
    1985 “Complexity and Meaning.” InThe Science and Praxis of Complexity, edited by S. Aida , I. Prigogine , M. Zeleny , and E. Morin . Contributions to the symposium held at Montpellier, France, 9–11May. United Nations University.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. 1995aSocial Systems. Translated by J. Bednarz Jr. and D. Baecker . Writing Science. Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. 1995b “The Paradoxy of Observing Systems.” Cultural Critique31: 37–55. 10.2307/1354444
    https://doi.org/10.2307/1354444 [Google Scholar]
  27. Marais, K.
    2019aA (Bio)Semiotic Theory of Translation: The Emergency of Social-Cultural Reality. Routledge Advances in Translation and Interpreting Studies 36. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Marais, K.
    2019b “’Effects Causing Effects’”: Considering Constraints in Translation. InComplexity Thinking in Translation Studies: Methodological Considerations, edited by K. Marais , and R. Meylaerts , 53–72. Routledge Advances in Translation and Interpreting Studies 38. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. 2021 “Tom, Dick and Harry as well as Fido and Puss in Boots are Translators: The Implications of Biosemiotics for Translation Studies.” InBenjamins Translation Library, edited by O. C. i Cortés , and E. Monzó-Nebot , 157: 101–21. John Benjamins. 10.1075/btl.157.05mar
    https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.157.05mar [Google Scholar]
  30. Mitchell, S. M. , J. J. Ring , and M. K. Spellman
    2013 “Domestic Legal Traditions and States’ Human Rights Practices.” Journal of Peace Research50, no.2: 189–202. 10.1177/0022343312466561
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343312466561 [Google Scholar]
  31. Morin, O.
    2018 “Cultural Transmission.” InThe International Encyclopedia of Anthropology, edited by H. Callan . Wiley. 10.1002/9781118924396.wbiea1882
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118924396.wbiea1882 [Google Scholar]
  32. Murata, S.
    1992The Tao of Islam: A Sourcebook on Gender Relationships in Islamic Thought. State University of New York Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Najmabadi, A.
    2016 “What can We Learn from Transsexuality in Iran?”InTranssexualität in Theologie Und Neurowissenschaften [Transsexuality in theology and neuroscience], edited by G. Schreiber , 175–93. De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110434392‑010
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110434392-010 [Google Scholar]
  34. Nigst, L. , M. Romanov , S. Bowen Savant , M. Seydi , and P. Verkinderen
    2023OpenITI: A Machine-Readable Corpus of Islamicate texts. Zenodo. 10.5281/zenodo.7687795
    https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7687795 [Google Scholar]
  35. Poonawala, I. K.
    1996 “Al-Qadi al-un’man and Isma’ili Jurisprudence.” InMediaeval Isma’ili History and Thought, edited by F. Daftary , 117–44. Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Powell, E. J. , and S. M. Mitchell
    2007 “The International Court of Justice and the World’s Three Legal Systems.” The Journal of Politics69, no.2: 397–415. 10.1111/j.1468‑2508.2007.00539.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2508.2007.00539.x [Google Scholar]
  37. Ragab, A.
    2015 “One, Two, or Many Sexes: Sex Differentiation in Medieval Islamicate Medical Thought.” Journal of the History of Sexuality24, no3: 428–54. 10.7560/JHS24304
    https://doi.org/10.7560/JHS24304 [Google Scholar]
  38. Rapoport, Y.
    2007 “Women and Gender in Mamluk Society: An Overview.” Mamluk Studies Review11, no.2: 1–47. 10.6082/M1X34VM5
    https://doi.org/10.6082/M1X34VM5 [Google Scholar]
  39. Rowson, E. K.
    1991a “The Categorization of Gender and Sexual Irregularity in Medieval Arabic Vice Lists.” InBody Guards: The Cultural Politics of Gender Ambiguity, edited by J. Epstein , and K. Straub , 50–79. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. 1991b “The Effeminates of Early Medina.” Journal of the American Oriental Society111, no.4: 671. 10.2307/603399
    https://doi.org/10.2307/603399 [Google Scholar]
  41. 2003 “Gender Irregularity as Entertainment: Institutionalized Transvestism at the Caliphal Court in Medieval Baghdad.” InGender and Difference in the Middle Ages, edited by S. Farmer , and C. Braun Pasternack , 45–72. Medieval Cultures 32. University of Minnesota Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Sadeghi, B.
    2013The Logic of Law-Making in Islam: Women and Prayer in the Legal Tradition. Cambridge Studies in Islamic Civilization. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511920509
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511920509 [Google Scholar]
  43. Said, M.
    2018 “Sagesse et politique à la veille de la période islamique” [Wisdom and politics on the eve of the Islamic period]. Bulletin d’études orientales66, no. April:39–58. 10.4000/beo.5218
    https://doi.org/10.4000/beo.5218 [Google Scholar]
  44. Salaymeh, L.
    2016The Beginnings of Islamic Law: Late Antique Islamicate Legal Traditions. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781316459485
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316459485 [Google Scholar]
  45. Sanders, P.
    1991 “Gendering the Ungendered Body: Hermaphrodites in Medieval Islamic law.” InWomen in Middle Eastern History, edited by N. R. Keddie , and B. Baron , 74–95. Yale University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Selove, E. , and R. Batten
    2014 “Making Men and Women: Arabic Commentaries on the Gynaecological Hippocratic Aphorisms in Context.” Annales Islamologiques48.1, no. August: 239–62. 10.4000/anisl.2670
    https://doi.org/10.4000/anisl.2670 [Google Scholar]
  47. Siever, H.
    2016 “Fractalisation: The Human Condition as a Translational Condition.” InTranslation Studies Beyond the Postcolony, edited by K. Marais , and I. Feinauer , translated by S. O. Signer , 334–57. Cambridge Scholars Publishers. ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nyulibrary-ebooks/detail.action?docID=4778778
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Stanley, E. A.
    2014 “Gender Self-Determination.” TSQ: Transgender Studies Quarterly1, no.1–2: 89–91. 10.1215/23289252‑2399695
    https://doi.org/10.1215/23289252-2399695 [Google Scholar]
  49. Tyulenev, S.
    2012Applying Luhmann to Translation Studies: Translation in Society. Routledge Advances in Translation Studies 1. Routledge. 10.4324/9780203803097
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203803097 [Google Scholar]
  50. Verkinderen, P.
    2020 “Al-Maktaba Al-Shāmila: A Short History.” KITAB. December 3.kitab-project.org/2020/12/03/al-maktaba-al-shamila-a-short-history/
    [Google Scholar]
/content/books/9789027246943-btl.164.05alm
dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
-contentType:Journal -contentType:Figure -contentType:Table -contentType:SupplementaryData
10
5
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error