1887

Beyond Disfluency

The interplay of speech, gesture, and interaction

image of Beyond Disfluency

This book pioneers a tridimensional approach to (dis)fluency, evaluating fluency across three different dimensions, mainly speech, gesture, and interaction. Drawing from an extensive video dataset covering different languages and speech genres in French and English, the present research goes beyond traditional production-oriented models of so-called ‘disfluency’ phenomena, and aims to unravel the complexities of human multimodal production and interactive processes. Designed for linguists, communication scholars, and researchers, this work resonates with the latest trends in different fields (Second Language Acquisition, Interactional Linguistics, and Gesture studies). It introduces a fresh perspective on disfluency by integrating visual-gestural features, such as hand gestures, gaze, and facial expressions, captured in situated interaction.

References

  1. Abrahamson, D. , & Bakker, A.
    (2016) Making sense of movement in embodied design for mathematics learning. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 1 (1), 1–13. 10.1186/s41235‑016‑0034‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-016-0034-3 [Google Scholar]
  2. Adams, T. W.
    (1998) Gestures in foreigner talk. [Unplublished PhD thesis]. University of Pennsylvania.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Akhavan, N. , Göksun, T. , & Nozari, N.
    (2016) Disfluency production in speech and gesture. CogSci. Cognitive Science Society.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Alibali, M. W. , Kita, S. , & Young, A. J.
    (2000) Gesture and the process of speech production: We think, therefore we gesture. Language and Cognitive Processes, 15 (6), 593–613. 10.1080/016909600750040571
    https://doi.org/10.1080/016909600750040571 [Google Scholar]
  5. Alibali, M. W. , & Nathan, M. J.
    (2007) Teachers’ gestures as a means of scaffolding students’ understanding: Evidence from an early algebra lesson. Video Research in the Learning Sciences, 349–365.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Allwood, J.
    (2017) Fluency or disfluency?Proceedings of DiSS 2017, the 8th Workshop on Disfluency in Spontaneous Speech, 1.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Allwood, J. , Ahlsén, E. , Lund, J. , & Sundqvist, J.
    (2005) Multimodality in own communication management. Proceedings from the Second Nordic Conference on Multimodal Communication.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Allwood, J. , Nivre, J. , & Ahlsén, E.
    (1990) Speech Management – On the Non-written Life of Speech. Nordic Journal of Linguistics, 13 (1), 3–48. 10.1017/S0332586500002092
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0332586500002092 [Google Scholar]
  9. Azaoui, B.
    (2015) Fonctions pédagogiques et implications énonciatives de ressources professorales multimodales. Le cas de la bimanualité et de l’ubiquité coénonciative. Recherches En Didactique Des Langues et Des Cultures. Les Cahiers de l’Acedle, 12 (12–2).
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Azi, Y. A.
    (2018) Fillers, Repairs and Repetitions in the Conversations of Saudi English Speakers: Conversational Device or Disfluency Markers. International Journal of Linguistics, 10 (6), 193–205. 10.5296/ijl.v10i6.14016
    https://doi.org/10.5296/ijl.v10i6.14016 [Google Scholar]
  11. Barlow, M.
    (2013) Individual differences and usage-based grammar. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 18 (4), 443–478. 10.1075/ijcl.18.4.01bar
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.18.4.01bar [Google Scholar]
  12. Bavelas, J. B. , Chovil, N. , Lawrie, D. A. , & Wade, A.
    (1992) Interactive gestures. Discourse Processes, 15 (4), 469–489. 10.1080/01638539209544823
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539209544823 [Google Scholar]
  13. Bavelas, J. B. , Chovil, N. , Coates, L. , & Roe, L.
    (1995) Gestures specialized for dialogue. Personality and social psychology bulletin, 21 (4), 394–405. 10.1177/0146167295214010
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167295214010 [Google Scholar]
  14. Bavelas, J. , & Chovil, N.
    (2018) Some pragmatic functions of conversational facial gestures. Gesture, 17 (1), 98–127. 10.1075/gest.00012.bav
    https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.00012.bav [Google Scholar]
  15. Bavelas, J. , Gerwing, J. , & Healing, S.
    (2014) Effect of dialogue on demonstrations: Direct quotations, facial portrayals, hand gestures, and figurative references. Discourse Processes, 51 (8), 619–655. 10.1080/0163853X.2014.883730
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2014.883730 [Google Scholar]
  16. Bavelas, J. , Gerwing, J. , Sutton, C. , & Prevost, D.
    (2008) Gesturing on the telephone: Independent effects of dialogue and visibility. Journal of Memory and Language, 58 (2), 495–520. 10.1016/j.jml.2007.02.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.02.004 [Google Scholar]
  17. Beattie, G. W. , & Shovelton, H.
    (1999) Do iconic hand gestures really contribute anything to the semantic information conveyed by speech? An experimental investigation. Semiotica, 123 (1/2), 001–030. 10.1515/semi.1999.123.1‑2.1
    https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.1999.123.1-2.1 [Google Scholar]
  18. Beattie, G. W.
    (1979) Planning units in spontaneous speech: Some evidence from hesitation in speech and speaker gaze direction in conversation.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Beattie, G. W. , & Butterworth, B. L.
    (1979) Contextual probability and word frequency as determinants of pauses and errors in spontaneous speech. Language and Speech, 22 (3), 201–211. 10.1177/002383097902200301
    https://doi.org/10.1177/002383097902200301 [Google Scholar]
  20. Belhiah, H.
    (2013) Gesture as a resource for intersubjectivity in second-language learning situations. Classroom Discourse, 4 (2), 111–129. 10.1080/19463014.2012.671273
    https://doi.org/10.1080/19463014.2012.671273 [Google Scholar]
  21. Bell, A.
    (2006) Speech Accommodation Theory and Audience Design. In J. L. Mey & R. E. Asher (Eds.), Concise encyclopaedia of pragmatics (second edition) (pp.992–994). Elsevier Oxford. 10.1016/B0‑08‑044854‑2/01311‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/01311-0 [Google Scholar]
  22. Benus, S. , Enos, F. , Hirschberg, J. B. , & Shriberg, E.
    (2006) Pauses in Deceptive Speech. Proceedings of ISCA, 3rd International Conference on Speech Prosody.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Betz, S.
    (2020) Hesitations in Spoken Dialogue Systems [Unpublished PhD Thesis]. Bielefeld University.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Betz, S. , Carlmeyer, B. , Wagner, P. , & Wrede, B.
    (2018) Interactive Hesitation Synthesis: Modelling and Evaluation. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction, 2 (1), 9. 10.3390/mti2010009
    https://doi.org/10.3390/mti2010009 [Google Scholar]
  25. Betz, S. , & Gambino, S. L.
    (2016) Are we all disfluent in our own special way and should dialogue systems also be?Elektronische Sprachsignalverarbeitung (ESSV) 2016, 81 .
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Betz, S. , & Kosmala, L.
    (2019) Fill the silence! Basics for modeling hesitation. The 9th Workshop on Disfluency in Spontaneous Speech, 11. 10.21862/diss‑09‑004‑betz‑kosm
    https://doi.org/10.21862/diss-09-004-betz-kosm [Google Scholar]
  27. Betz, S. , & Wagner, P.
    (2016) Disfluent Lengthening in Spontaneous Speech. Elektronische Sprachsignalverarbeitung (ESSV) 2016.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Boersma, P.
    (2001) Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer. Glot. Int., 5 (9), 341–345.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Bortfeld, H. , Leon, S. D. , Bloom, J. E. , Schober, M. F. , & Brennan, S. E.
    (2001) Disfluency Rates in Conversation: Effects of Age, Relationship, Topic, Role, and Gender. Language and Speech, 44 (2), 123–147. 10.1177/00238309010440020101
    https://doi.org/10.1177/00238309010440020101 [Google Scholar]
  30. Boulis, C. , Kahn, J. G. , & Ostendorf, M.
    (2005) The role of disfluencies in topic classification of human-human conversations. AAAI Workshop on Spoken Language Understanding.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Boutet, D.
    (2008) Une morphologie de la gestualité: Structuration articulaire. Cahiers de Linguistique Analogique, 5 .
    [Google Scholar]
  32. (2010) Structuration physiologique de la gestuelle: Modèle et tests. Lidil. Revue de Linguistique et de Didactique Des Langues, 42 , 77–96. 10.4000/lidil.3070
    https://doi.org/10.4000/lidil.3070 [Google Scholar]
  33. (2018) Pour une approche kinésiologique de la gestualité [Habilitation à diriger des recherches]. Université de Rouen-Normandie.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Boutet, D. , Morgenstern, A. , & Cienki, A.
    (2016) Grammatical Aspect and Gesture in French : a kinesiological approach. Vestnik RUDN, 20 (3), 131–150.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Brand, C. , & Götz, S.
    (2013) Fluency versus accuracy in advanced spoken learner language. Errors and Disfluencies in Spoken Corpora, 52 , 117–137. 10.1075/bct.52.05bra
    https://doi.org/10.1075/bct.52.05bra [Google Scholar]
  36. Brennan, S. E. , & Schober, M. F.
    (2001) How listeners compensate for disfluencies in spontaneous speech. Journal of Memory and Language, 44 (2), 274–296. 10.1006/jmla.2000.2753
    https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.2000.2753 [Google Scholar]
  37. Bressem, J. , & Müller, C.
    (2014) A repertoire of German recurrent gestures with pragmatic functions. InHandbücher zur Sprach-und Kommunikationswissenschaft/Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science (HSK) 38/2 (Vol.2, pp.1575–1591). De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110302028.1575
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110302028.1575 [Google Scholar]
  38. Broen, P. A. , & Siegel, G. M.
    (1972) Variations in normal speech disfluencies. Language and Speech, 15(3), 219–231.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Brouwer, C. E.
    (2004) Doing pronunciation: A specific type of repair sequence. Second Language Conversations, 93–113.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Butterworth, B. , & Beattie, G.
    (1978) Gesture and silence as indicators of planning in speech. In R. N. Campbell & P. T. Smith (Eds.), Recent advances in the psychology of language (pp.347–360). Springer. 10.1007/978‑1‑4684‑2532‑1_19
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-2532-1_19 [Google Scholar]
  41. Bybee, J.
    (2008) Usage-based grammar and second language acquisition. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. (2010) Language, Usage and Cognition. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511750526
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511750526 [Google Scholar]
  43. Campione, E. , & Véronis, J.
    (2002) A large-scale multilingual study of silent pause duration. Speech Prosody 2002, International Conference.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Candea, M.
    (2000) Contribution à l’étude des pauses silencieuses et des phénomènes dits « d’hésitation » en français oral spontané. Étude sur un corpus de récit en classe de français. [Unpublished PhD Thesis]. Université Sorbonne Nouvelle – Paris III.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. (2017) Pratiques de prononciation et enjeux sociaux. Approches post-variationnistes en sociophonétique du français de France [Habilitation à diriger des recherches]. Université Grenoble Alpes.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Candea, M. , Vasilescu, I. , & Adda-Decker, M.
    (2005) Inter-and intra-language acoustic analysis of autonomous fillers. DISS 05, Disfluency in Spontaneous Speech Workshop, 47–52.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Cenoz, J.
    (1998) Pauses and Communication Strategies in Second Language Speech. (ERIC Document ED 426630).
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Chomsky, N.
    (1965) Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. MIT press.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Christenfeld, N. , & Creager, B.
    (1996) Anxiety, alcohol, aphasia, and ums. Journal of personality and social psychology, 70(3), 451.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Christenfeld, N. , Schachter, S. , & Bilous, F.
    (1991) Filled pauses and gestures: It’s not coincidence. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 20 (1), 1–10. 10.1007/BF01076916
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01076916 [Google Scholar]
  51. Christodoulides, G. , Avanzi, M. , & Goldman, J.-P.
    (2018) DisMo: A morphosyntactic, disfluency and multi-word unit annotator. An evaluation on a corpus of French spontaneous and read speech. ArXiv Preprint
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Chui, K.
    (2005) Temporal patterning of speech and iconic gestures in conversational discourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 37 (6), 871–887. 10.1016/j.pragma.2004.10.016
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2004.10.016 [Google Scholar]
  53. Cienki, A.
    (2004) Bush’s and Gore’s language and gestures in the 2000 US presidential debates: A test case for two models of metaphors. Journal of Language and Politics, 3 (3), 409–440. 10.1075/jlp.3.3.04cie
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.3.3.04cie [Google Scholar]
  54. (2005) Image schemas and gesture. From Perception to Meaning: Image Schemas in Cognitive Linguistics, 29 , 421–442. 10.1515/9783110197532.5.421
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197532.5.421 [Google Scholar]
  55. (2012) Usage events of spoken language and the symbolic units we (may) abstract from them. Cognitive Processes in Language, 149–158.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Cienki, A.
    (2015a) The dynamic scope of relevant behaviors in talk: A perspective from cognitive linguistics. Proceedings of the 2nd European and the 5th Nordic Symposium on Multimodal Communication, August 6–8, 2014, Tartu, Estonia, 110 , 5–7.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Cienki, A.
    (2015b) Spoken language usage events. Language and Cognition, 7 , 499–514. 10.1017/langcog.2015.20
    https://doi.org/10.1017/langcog.2015.20 [Google Scholar]
  58. (2016) Cognitive Linguistics, gesture studies, and multimodal communication. Cognitive Linguistics, 27 (4), 603–618. 10.1515/cog‑2016‑0063
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2016-0063 [Google Scholar]
  59. (2017) Utterance Construction Grammar (UCxG) and the variable multimodality of constructions. Linguistics Vanguard, 3 (s1). 10.1515/lingvan‑2016‑0048
    https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2016-0048 [Google Scholar]
  60. Cienki, A. & Irishkhanova, O. K.
    (2018) Aspectuality across Languages. John Benjamins. 10.1075/hcp.62
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.62 [Google Scholar]
  61. Clark, H. , & Fox Tree, J. E.
    (2002) Using uh and um in spontaneous speaking. Cognition, 84 (1), 73–111. 10.1016/S0010‑0277(02)00017‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(02)00017-3 [Google Scholar]
  62. Clark, H. H.
    (1996) Using language. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511620539
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620539 [Google Scholar]
  63. (2002) Speaking in time. Speech Communication, 36 (1), 5–13. 10.1016/S0167‑6393(01)00022‑X
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6393(01)00022-X [Google Scholar]
  64. (2006) Pauses and hesitations: Psycholinguistic approach. In K. Brown (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics (pp.244–248). Oxford: Elsevier. 10.1016/B0‑08‑044854‑2/00796‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/00796-3 [Google Scholar]
  65. Clark, H. H. , & Wasow, T.
    (1998) Repeating words in spontaneous speech. Cognitive Psychology, 37 (3), 201–242. 10.1006/cogp.1998.0693
    https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1998.0693 [Google Scholar]
  66. Corley, M. , & Stewart, O. W.
    (2008) Hesitation disfluencies in spontaneous speech: The meaning of um. Language and Linguistics Compass, 2 (4), 589–602. 10.1111/j.1749‑818X.2008.00068.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818X.2008.00068.x [Google Scholar]
  67. Couper-Kuhlen, E. , & Selting, M.
    (2001) Introducing interactional linguistics. Studies in Interactional Linguistics, 122 . 10.1075/sidag.10.02cou
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sidag.10.02cou [Google Scholar]
  68. Crible, L.
    (2017) Discourse markers and (dis)fluency across registers: A contrastive usage-based study in English and French [PhD Thesis]. UCL – Université Catholique de Louvain.
    [Google Scholar]
  69. (2018) Discourse Markers and (Dis)fluency: Forms and functions across languages and registers. John Benjamins Publishing. 10.1075/pbns.286
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.286 [Google Scholar]
  70. Crible, L. , Degand, L. , & Gilquin, G.
    (2017) The clustering of discourse markers and filled pauses. Languages in Contrast, 17 (1), 69–95. 10.1075/lic.17.1.04cri
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lic.17.1.04cri [Google Scholar]
  71. Crible, L. , Dumont, A. , Grosman, I. , & Notarrigo, I.
    (2019) (Dis)fluency across spoken and signed languages: Application of an interoperable annotation scheme. In L. Degand , G. Gilquin , & A. C. Simon (Eds.), Fluency and Disfluency across Languages and Language Varieties (Corpora and Language in Use-Proceedings 4). Presses universitaires de Louvain.
    [Google Scholar]
  72. Croft, W.
    (2000) Explaining language change: An evolutionary approach. Pearson Education.
    [Google Scholar]
  73. Cucchiarini, C. , Strik, H. , & Boves, L.
    (2000) Quantitative assessment of second language learners’ fluency by means of automatic speech recognition technology. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 107 (2), 989–999. 10.1121/1.428279
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.428279 [Google Scholar]
  74. Cutting, J.
    (2001) The speech acts of the in-group. Journal of Pragmatics, 33 (8), 1207–1233. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(00)00056‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(00)00056-4 [Google Scholar]
  75. (2002) The in-group code lexis. HERMES-Journal of Language and Communication in Business, 28 , 59–80.
    [Google Scholar]
  76. Danino, C.
    (2018) Les petits corpus – Introduction du numéro thématique. Corpus, 18 .
    [Google Scholar]
  77. De Jaegher, H. , & Di Paolo, E.
    (2007) Participatory sense-making. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 6 (4), 485–507. 10.1007/s11097‑007‑9076‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-007-9076-9 [Google Scholar]
  78. De Jong, N. H.
    (2016a) Fluency in second language assessment. In D. Tsagari & J. Banerjee (Eds.), Handbook of Second Language Assessment. Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9781614513827‑015
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781614513827-015 [Google Scholar]
  79. De Jong, N. H.
    (2016b) Predicting pauses in L1 and L2 speech: The effects of utterance boundaries and word frequency. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 54 (2), 113–132. 10.1515/iral‑2016‑9993
    https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2016-9993 [Google Scholar]
  80. (2018) Fluency in second language testing: Insights from different disciplines. Language Assessment Quarterly, 15 (3), 237–254. 10.1080/15434303.2018.1477780
    https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2018.1477780 [Google Scholar]
  81. De Jong, N. H. , & Bosker, H. R.
    (2013) Choosing a threshold for silent pauses to measure second language fluency. The 6th Workshop on Disfluency in Spontaneous Speech (DiSS), 17–20.
    [Google Scholar]
  82. De Leeuw, E.
    (2007) Hesitation markers in English, German, and Dutch. Journal of Germanic Linguistics, 19 (2), 85–114. 10.1017/S1470542707000049
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1470542707000049 [Google Scholar]
  83. De Ruiter, J. P.
    (2007) Postcards from the mind: The relationship between speech, imagistic gesture, and thought. Gesture, 7 (1), 21–38. 10.1075/gest.7.1.03rui
    https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.7.1.03rui [Google Scholar]
  84. Debras, C.
    (2013) L’expression multimodale du positionnement interactionnel (multimodal stance-taking): Étude d’un corpus oral vidéo de discussions sur l’environnement en anglais britannique [Unpublished PhD Thesis]. Université Sorbonne Nouvelle -Paris III.
    [Google Scholar]
  85. (2017) The shrug: Forms and meanings of a compound enactment. Gesture, 16 (1), 1–34. 10.1075/gest.16.1.01deb
    https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.16.1.01deb [Google Scholar]
  86. (2018) Petits et grands corpus en analyse linguistique des gestes. Corpus, 18 . 10.4000/corpus.3287
    https://doi.org/10.4000/corpus.3287 [Google Scholar]
  87. Debras, C. , & Beaupoil-Hourdel, P.
    (2019) Gestualité et construction des chaînes de référence dans un corpus d’interactions tandem. Cahiers de Praxématique, 72 . 10.4000/praxematique.5576
    https://doi.org/10.4000/praxematique.5576 [Google Scholar]
  88. Debras, C. , Beaupoil-Hourdel, P. , Morgenstern, A. , Horgues, C. , & Scheuer, S.
    (2020) Corrective Feedback Sequences in Tandem Interactions: Multimodal Cues and Speakers’ PositioningsIn S. Raineri , M. Sekali & A. Leroux (Eds.), La correction en langue(s) – Linguistic Correction/Correctness, 91–115.
    [Google Scholar]
  89. Debras, C. , & Cienki, A.
    (2012) Some uses of head tilts and shoulder shrugs during human interaction, and their relation to stancetaking. International Conference on Privacy, Security, Risk and Trust and 2012 International Confernece on Social Computing, 932–937. 10.1109/SocialCom‑PASSAT.2012.136
    https://doi.org/10.1109/SocialCom-PASSAT.2012.136 [Google Scholar]
  90. Debras, C. , Horgues, C. , & Scheuer, S.
    (2015) The multimodality of corrective feedback in tandem interactions. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 212 , 16–22. 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.292
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.292 [Google Scholar]
  91. Debreslioska, S. , Özyürek, A. , Gullberg, M. , & Perniss, P.
    (2013) Gestural viewpoint signals referent accessibility. Discourse Processes, 50 (7), 431–456. 10.1080/0163853X.2013.824286
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2013.824286 [Google Scholar]
  92. Derwing, T. M. , Munro, M. J. , Thomson, R. I. , & Rossiter, M. J.
    (2009) The relationship between L1 fluency and L2 fluency development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 533–557. 10.1017/S0272263109990015
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263109990015 [Google Scholar]
  93. Deschamps, A.
    (1980) The syntactical distribution of pauses in English spoken as a second language by French students. In H. W. Dechert & M. Raupach (Eds.), Temporal variables in speech: Studies in honour of Frieda Goldman-Eisler (pp.255–262). Mouton. 10.1515/9783110816570.255
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110816570.255 [Google Scholar]
  94. Dingemanse, M.
    (2020) Between sound and speech: Liminal signs in interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 53 (1), 188–196. 10.1080/08351813.2020.1712967
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2020.1712967 [Google Scholar]
  95. Dollaghan, C. A. , & Campbell, T. F.
    (1992) A procedure for classifying disruptions in spontaneous language samples. Topics in Language Disorders. 10.1097/00011363‑199202000‑00007
    https://doi.org/10.1097/00011363-199202000-00007 [Google Scholar]
  96. Dörnyei, Z. , & Kormos, J.
    (1998) Problem-solving mechanisms in L2 communication: A Psycholinguistic Perspective. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20 (3), 349–385. 10.1017/S0272263198003039
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263198003039 [Google Scholar]
  97. Duez, D.
    (1982) Silent and non-silent pauses in three speech styles. Language and Speech, 25 (1), 11–28. 10.1177/002383098202500102
    https://doi.org/10.1177/002383098202500102 [Google Scholar]
  98. (1991) La pause dans la parole de l’homme politique. Editions du Centre national de la recherche scientifique.
    [Google Scholar]
  99. (1997) Acoustic markers of political power. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 26 (6), 641–654. 10.1023/A:1025008124631
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025008124631 [Google Scholar]
  100. (2001a) Caractéristiques acoustiques et phonétiques des pauses remplies dans la conversation en français. Travaux Interdisciplinaires Du Laboratoire Parole et Langage d’Aix-En-Provence (TIPA), 20 , 31–48.
    [Google Scholar]
  101. (2001b) Signification des hésitations dans la parole spontanée. Revue Parole, 17–18.
    [Google Scholar]
  102. Dumont, A.
    (2018) Fluency and disfluency: A corpus study of non-native and native speaker (dis) fluency profiles [PhD Thesis]. UCL-Université Catholique de Louvain.
    [Google Scholar]
  103. Dwijayanti, I. , Budayasa, I. K. , & Siswono, T. Y. E.
    (2019) Students’ gestures in understanding algebraic concepts. Beta: Jurnal Tadris Matematika, 12 (2), 133–143. 10.20414/betajtm.v12i2.307
    https://doi.org/10.20414/betajtm.v12i2.307 [Google Scholar]
  104. Edlund, J. , Hirschberg, J. B. , & Heldner, M.
    (2009) Pause and gap length in face-to-face interaction.
    [Google Scholar]
  105. Eguchi, M.
    (2016) Investigating the Relationships Between Vocabulary and Clause-internal Pauses and its Development in L2 Speech. Proceedings of the Pacific Second Language Research Forum (PacSLRF2016). Hiroshima: Japan Second Language Association.
    [Google Scholar]
  106. Eisenbeiss, S.
    (2010) Production methods in language acquisition research. Experimental Methods in Language Acquisition Research, 11–34. 10.1075/lllt.27.03eis
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.27.03eis [Google Scholar]
  107. Eklund, R.
    (2001) Prolongations: A dark horse in the disfluency stable. ISCA Tutorial and Research Workshop (ITRW) on Disfluency in Spontaneous Speech.
    [Google Scholar]
  108. (2004) Disfluency in Swedish human–human and human–machine travel booking dialogues [PhD Thesis]. Linköping University Electronic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  109. Eklund, R. , & Shriberg, E.
    (1998) Crosslinguistic disfluency modelling: A comparative analysis of Swedish and American English human–human and human–machine dialogues. 5th International Conference on Spoken Language Processing, 30th November-4th December, 1998, Sydney, Australia, 6 , 2627–2630. 10.21437/ICSLP.1998‑756
    https://doi.org/10.21437/ICSLP.1998-756 [Google Scholar]
  110. Ekman, P. , & Friesen, W. V.
    (1969) The repertoire of nonverbal behavior: Categories, origins, usage, and coding. Semiotica, 1 . 10.1515/semi.1969.1.1.49
    https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.1969.1.1.49 [Google Scholar]
  111. Enfield, N. J.
    (2005) The body as a cognitive artifact in kinship representations: Hand gesture diagrams by speakers of Lao. Current Anthropology, 46 (1), 51–81. 10.1086/425661
    https://doi.org/10.1086/425661 [Google Scholar]
  112. Esposito, A. , & Marinaro, M.
    (2007) What pauses can tell us about speech and gesture partnership. Nato security through science series human and societal dynamics, 18 , 45.
    [Google Scholar]
  113. Esposito, A. , McCullough, K. E. , & Quek, F.
    (2001) Disfluencies in gesture: Gestural correlates to filled and unfilled speech pauses. Proceedings of IEEE Workshop on Cues in Communication, 1–6.
    [Google Scholar]
  114. Fehringer, C. , & Fry, C.
    (2007) Hesitation phenomena in the language production of bilingual speakers: The role of working memory. Folia Linguistica: Acta Societatis Linguisticae Europaeae, 41 (1–2), 37–72. 10.1515/flin.41.1‑2.37
    https://doi.org/10.1515/flin.41.1-2.37 [Google Scholar]
  115. Ferreira, F. , & Bailey, K. G. D.
    (2004) Disfluencies and human language comprehension. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8 (5), 231–237. 10.1016/j.tics.2004.03.011
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2004.03.011 [Google Scholar]
  116. Fillmore, C. J.
    (1976) Frame semantics and the nature of language. Origins and Evolution of Language and Speech, 280 , 20–32. 10.1111/j.1749‑6632.1976.tb25467.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1976.tb25467.x [Google Scholar]
  117. Finlayson, I. R. , & Corley, M.
    (2012) Disfluency in dialogue: An intentional signal from the speaker?Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19 (5), 921–928. 10.3758/s13423‑012‑0279‑x
    https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-012-0279-x [Google Scholar]
  118. Fischer, K.
    (2000) From Cognitive Semantics to Lexical Pragmatics: The Functional Polysemy of Discourse Markers. Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110828641
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110828641 [Google Scholar]
  119. Foster, P. , Tonkyn, A. , & Wigglesworth, G.
    (2000) Measuring spoken language: A unit for all reasons. Applied Linguistics, 21 (3), 354–375. 10.1093/applin/21.3.354
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/21.3.354 [Google Scholar]
  120. Fox, B. A. , Thompson, S. A. , Ford, C. E. , & Couper-Kuhlen, E.
    (2013) Conversation Analysis and Linguistics. In J. Sidnell & T. Stivers (Eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis (p.726). Blackwell Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  121. Fox Tree, J. E.
    (1995) The effects of false starts and repetitions on the processing of subsequent words in spontaneous speech. Journal of Memory and Language, 34 (6), 709–738. 10.1006/jmla.1995.1032
    https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1995.1032 [Google Scholar]
  122. Fox Tree, J.
    (2007) Folk notions of um and uh, you know, and like. Text & Talk, 27, 297–314.
    [Google Scholar]
  123. Fox Tree, J. E. & Clark, H. H.
    (1997) Pronouncing “the” as “thee” to signal problems in speaking. Cognition, 62 (2), 151–167. 10.1016/S0010‑0277(96)00781‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(96)00781-0 [Google Scholar]
  124. Fraundorf, S. H. , & Watson, D. G.
    (2011) The disfluent discourse: Effects of filled pauses on recall. Journal of Memory and Language, 65 (2), 161–175. 10.1016/j.jml.2011.03.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2011.03.004 [Google Scholar]
  125. (2014) Alice’s adventures in um-derland: Psycholinguistic sources of variation in disfluency production. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 29 (9), 1083–1096. 10.1080/01690965.2013.832785
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01690965.2013.832785 [Google Scholar]
  126. Galaczi, E.
    (2014) Interactional competence across proficiency levels: How do learners manage interaction in paired speaking tests?Applied Linguistics, 35 (5), 553–574. 10.1093/applin/amt017
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amt017 [Google Scholar]
  127. Galaczi, E. , & Taylor, L.
    (2018) Interactional competence: Conceptualisations, operationalisations, and outstanding questions. Language Assessment Quarterly, 15 (3), 219–236. 10.1080/15434303.2018.1453816
    https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2018.1453816 [Google Scholar]
  128. Gawne, L. , & McCulloch, G.
    (2019) Emoji as digital gestures. Language@ Internet, 17 (2).
    [Google Scholar]
  129. Gilquin, G.
    (2008) Hesitation markers among EFL learners: Pragmatic deficiency or difference. In J. Romero-Trillo (Ed.), Pragmatics and Corpus Linguistics: A Mutualistic Entente (pp.119–149). De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110199024.119
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110199024.119 [Google Scholar]
  130. Ginzburg, J. , Fernández, R. , & Schlangen, D.
    (2014) Disfluencies as intra-utterance dialogue moves. Semantics and Pragmatics, 7 , 9–1. 10.3765/sp.7.9
    https://doi.org/10.3765/sp.7.9 [Google Scholar]
  131. Ginzburg, J. , & Poesio, M.
    (2016) Grammar is a system that characterizes talk in interaction. Frontiers in Psychology, 7 1938 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01938
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01938 [Google Scholar]
  132. Goffman, E.
    (1981) Forms of talk. University of Pennsylvania Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  133. Goldberg, A. E.
    (2006) Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  134. Goldin-Meadow, S.
    (1999) The role of gesture in communication and thinking. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3 (11), 419–429. 10.1016/S1364‑6613(99)01397‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(99)01397-2 [Google Scholar]
  135. Goldin-Meadow, S. , Alibali, M. W. , & Church, R. B.
    (1993) Transitions in concept acquisition: Using the hand to read the mind. Psychological Review, 100 (2), 279. 10.1037/0033‑295X.100.2.279
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.100.2.279 [Google Scholar]
  136. Goldman, J.-P. , Avanzi, M. , & Auchlin, A.
    (2010) Hesitations in read vs. Spontaneous French in a multi-genre corpus. DiSS-LPSS Joint Workshop 2010.
    [Google Scholar]
  137. Goldman-Eisler, F.
    (1958) The predictability of words in context and the length of pauses in speech. Language and Speech, 1 (3), 226–231. 10.1177/002383095800100308
    https://doi.org/10.1177/002383095800100308 [Google Scholar]
  138. (1968) Psycholinguistics: Experiments in spontaneous speech. Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  139. Goodwin, C.
    (1981) Conversational Organization: Interaction Between Speakers and Hearers. Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  140. (1987) Forgetfulness as an interactive resource. Social Psychology Quarterly, 115–130. 10.2307/2786746
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2786746 [Google Scholar]
  141. (2000) Action and embodiment within situated human interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 32 (10), 1489–1522. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(99)00096‑X
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00096-X [Google Scholar]
  142. (2003) The body in action. InDiscourse, the body, and identity (pp.19–42). Springer. 10.1057/9781403918543_2
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403918543_2 [Google Scholar]
  143. (2007) Participation, stance and affect in the organization of activities. Discourse & Society, 18 (1), 53–73. 10.1177/0957926507069457
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926507069457 [Google Scholar]
  144. (2010) Multimodality in human interaction. Calidoscopio, 8 (2). 10.4013/cld.2010.82.01
    https://doi.org/10.4013/cld.2010.82.01 [Google Scholar]
  145. (2017) Co-operative action. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781139016735
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781139016735 [Google Scholar]
  146. Goodwin, C. , & Goodwin, M. H.
    (1996) Seeing as a situated activity: Formulating planes. In D. Middleton & Y. Engestrom (Eds.), Cognition and Communication at Work. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139174077.004
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139174077.004 [Google Scholar]
  147. (2004) Participation. A Companion to Linguistic Anthropology, 222–224.
    [Google Scholar]
  148. Goodwin, C. , & Heritage, J.
    (1990) Conversation analysis. Annual Review of Anthropology, 19 (1), 283–307. 10.1146/annurev.an.19.100190.001435
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.an.19.100190.001435 [Google Scholar]
  149. Goodwin, M. H. , & Goodwin, C.
    (1986) Gesture and coparticipation in the activity of searching for a word. Semiotica, 62 (1–2), 51–76.
    [Google Scholar]
  150. Götz, S.
    (2013) Fluency in native and nonnative English speech (John Benjamins Publishing, Vol. 53). John Benjamins Publishing. 10.1075/scl.53
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.53 [Google Scholar]
  151. Graziano, M. , & Gullberg, M.
    (2013) Gesture production and speech fluency in competent speakers and language learners. Presentado En TIGER, Tilburg University, Holanda.
    [Google Scholar]
  152. (2018) When speech stops, gesture stops: Evidence from developmental and crosslinguistic comparisons. Frontiers in Psychology, 9 , 879. 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00879
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00879 [Google Scholar]
  153. Grosjean, F. , & Deschamps, A.
    (1972) Analyse des variables temporelles du français spontané. Phonetica, 26 (3), 129–156. 10.1159/000259407
    https://doi.org/10.1159/000259407 [Google Scholar]
  154. (1975) Analyse contrastive des variables temporelles de l’anglais et du français: Vitesse de parole et variables composantes, phénomènes d’hésitation. Phonetica, 31 (3–4), 144–184. 10.1159/000259667
    https://doi.org/10.1159/000259667 [Google Scholar]
  155. Grosman, I.
    (2018) Évaluation contextuelle de la (dis) fluence en production et perception: Pratiques communicatives et formes prosodico-syntaxiques en français [Unpublished PhD Thesis]. UCL-Université Catholique de Louvain.
    [Google Scholar]
  156. Grosman, I. , Simon, A. C. , & Degand, L.
    (2019) Empathetic hearers perceive repetitions as less disfluent, especially in non-broadcast situations. Proceedings of DiSS, 2019, the 9th Workshop on Disfluency in Spontaneous Speech. 10.21862/diss‑09‑007‑gros‑etal
    https://doi.org/10.21862/diss-09-007-gros-etal [Google Scholar]
  157. Guaïtella, I.
    (1993) Functional, acoustical and perceptual analysis of vocal hesitations in spontaneous speech. ESCA Workshop on Prosody.
    [Google Scholar]
  158. Gullberg, M.
    (1995) Giving language a hand: gesture as a cue based communicative strategy. Working Papers, Lund University, Dept. of Linguistics, 44, 41–60.
    [Google Scholar]
  159. (1998) Gesture as a communication strategy in second language discourse: A study of learners of French and Swedish (Vol.35). Lund University.
    [Google Scholar]
  160. 2006 Some reasons for studying gesture and second language acquisition. Inter-national Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching (IRAL)44.103–24.
    [Google Scholar]
  161. (2011) Multilingual multimodality: Communicative difficulties and their solutions in second-language use. Embodied Interaction: Language and Body in the Material World, 137–151.
    [Google Scholar]
  162. (2014) Gestures and second language acquisition. In C. Müller , A. Cienki , S. H. Ladewig , D. McNeill , & S. Tessendorf (Eds.), Body- Language- Communication: An International Handbook on Multimodsality in Human Interaction. Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110302028.1868
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110302028.1868 [Google Scholar]
  163. Gullberg, M. , & McCafferty, S. G.
    (2008) Introduction to gesture and SLA: Toward an integrated approach. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 30 (2), 133–146. 10.1017/S0272263108080285
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263108080285 [Google Scholar]
  164. Gürbüz, N.
    (2017) Understanding fluency and disfluency in non-native speakers’ conversational English. Kuram ve Uygulamada Egitim Bilimleri, 17 (6), 1853–1874.
    [Google Scholar]
  165. Hai, T.
    (2017) Hesitation phenomena expressed in native Russian and Chinese and accented Russian* spontaneous speech. Phonetics Without Borders, 86–92.
    [Google Scholar]
  166. Harrison, S.
    (2009) Grammar, gesture, and cognition: The case of negation in English. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Bordeaux.
    [Google Scholar]
  167. Hartsuiker, R. J. , & Notebaert, L.
    (2009) Lexical access problems lead to disfluencies in speech. Experimental Psychology.
    [Google Scholar]
  168. Hashemi, M. R. , & Babaii, E.
    (2013) Mixed methods research: Toward new research designs in applied linguistics. The Modern Language Journal, 97 (4), 828–852. 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.2013.12049.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2013.12049.x [Google Scholar]
  169. Hayashi, M.
    (2003) Language and the body as resources for collaborative action: A study of word searches in Japanese conversation. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 36 (2), 109–141. 10.1207/S15327973RLSI3602_2
    https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327973RLSI3602_2 [Google Scholar]
  170. Heath, C. , & Luff, P.
    (2011) Gesture and institutional interaction. Embodied Interaction: Language and Body in the Material World, 276–288.
    [Google Scholar]
  171. Heldner, M. , Hjalmarsson, A. , & Edlund, J.
    (2013) Backchannel relevance spaces. Nordic Prosody XI, Tartu, Estonia, 15–17 August 2012, 137–146.
    [Google Scholar]
  172. Heller, V.
    (2021) Embodied Displays of “Doing Thinking.” Epistemic and Interactive Functions of Thinking Displays in Children’s Argumentative Activities. Frontiers in Psychology, 12 , 369. 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.636671
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.636671 [Google Scholar]
  173. Hieke, A. E.
    (1981) A Content-Processing View of Hesitation Phenomena. Language and Speech, 24 (2), 147–160. 10.1177/002383098102400203
    https://doi.org/10.1177/002383098102400203 [Google Scholar]
  174. Hilton, H.
    (2009) Annotation and analyses of temporal aspects of spoken fluency. Calico Journal, 26 (3), 644–661. 10.1558/cj.v26i3.644‑661
    https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.v26i3.644-661 [Google Scholar]
  175. Hoetjes, M. , & Van Maastricht, L.
    (2020) Using Gesture to Facilitate L2 Phoneme Acquisition: The Importance of Gesture and Phoneme Complexity. Frontiers in Psychology, 11 . 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.575032
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.575032 [Google Scholar]
  176. Hoey, E. M.
    (2015) Lapses: How people arrive at, and deal with, discontinuities in talk. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 48 (4), 430–453. 10.1080/08351813.2015.1090116
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2015.1090116 [Google Scholar]
  177. Hoey, E. M.
    (2020) Waiting to inhale: On sniffing in conversation. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 53 (1), 118–139. 10.1080/08351813.2020.1712962
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2020.1712962 [Google Scholar]
  178. Holmes, V. M.
    (1988) Hesitations and sentence planning. Language and Cognitive Processes, 3 (4), 323–361. 10.1080/01690968808402093
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01690968808402093 [Google Scholar]
  179. Holt, B. , Tellier, M. , & Guichon, N.
    (2015, September). The use of teaching gestures in an online multimodal environment: The case of incomprehension sequences. Gesture and Speech in Interaction 4th Edition. https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01215770
    [Google Scholar]
  180. Horgues, C. , & Scheuer, S.
    (2015) Why some things are better done in tandem. InInvestigating English Pronunciation (pp.47–82). Springer. 10.1057/9781137509437_3
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137509437_3 [Google Scholar]
  181. (2017) Misunderstanding as a two-way street: Communication breakdowns in native/non-native English/French tandem interactions. International Symposium on Monolingual and Bilingual Speech 2017, 148.
    [Google Scholar]
  182. Hough, J. , Tian, Y. , De Ruiter, L. , Betz, S. , Kousidis, S. , Schlangen, D. , & Ginzburg, J.
    (2016) Duel: A multi-lingual multimodal dialogue corpus for disfluency, exclamations and laughter. 10th Edition of the Language Resources and Evaluation Conference.
    [Google Scholar]
  183. Hwang, J. , Brennan, S. E. , & Huffman, M. K.
    (2015) Phonetic adaptation in non-native spoken dialogue: Effects of priming and audience design. Journal of Memory and Language, 81 , 72–90. 10.1016/j.jml.2015.01.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2015.01.001 [Google Scholar]
  184. Ibbotson, P.
    (2013) The scope of usage-based theory. Frontiers in Psychology, 4 , 255. 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00255
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00255 [Google Scholar]
  185. Iverson, J. M. , & Thelen, E.
    (1999) Hand, mouth and brain. The dynamic emergence of speech and gesture. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 6 (11–12), 19–40.
    [Google Scholar]
  186. Jefferson, G.
    (1974) Error correction as an interactional resource. Language in Society, 181–199. 10.1017/S0047404500004334
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500004334 [Google Scholar]
  187. Johnson, R. B. , Onwuegbuzie, A. J. , & Turner, L. A.
    (2007) Toward a definition of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1 (2), 112–133. 10.1177/1558689806298224
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689806298224 [Google Scholar]
  188. Johnson, W.
    (1961) Measurements of oral reading and speaking rate and disfluency of adult male and female stutterers and nonstutterers. Journal of Speech & Hearing Disorders. Monograph Supplement.
    [Google Scholar]
  189. Kahng, J.
    (2014) Exploring utterance and cognitive fluency of L1 and L2 English speakers: Temporal measures and stimulated recall. Language Learning, 64 (4), 809–854. 10.1111/lang.12084
    https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12084 [Google Scholar]
  190. Kärkkäinen, E.
    (2006) Stance taking in conversation: From subjectivity to intersubjectivity. Text & Talk-An Interdisciplinary Journal of Language, Discourse Communication Studies, 26 (6), 699–731. 10.1515/TEXT.2006.029
    https://doi.org/10.1515/TEXT.2006.029 [Google Scholar]
  191. Kasper, G. , & Færch, C.
    (1983) Strategies in interlanguage communication. Longman Publishing Group.
    [Google Scholar]
  192. Keevallik, L. , & Ogden, R.
    (2020) Sounds on the Margins of Language at the Heart of Interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 53 (1), 1–18. 10.1080/08351813.2020.1712961
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2020.1712961 [Google Scholar]
  193. Kelly, S. D. , McDevitt, T. , & Esch, M.
    (2009) Brief training with co-speech gesture lends a hand to word learning in a foreign language. Language and Cognitive Processes, 24 (2), 313–334. 10.1080/01690960802365567
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960802365567 [Google Scholar]
  194. Kendon, A.
    (1967) Some functions of gaze-direction in social interaction. Acta Psychologica, 26 , 22–63. 10.1016/0001‑6918(67)90005‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-6918(67)90005-4 [Google Scholar]
  195. (1972) Some relationships between body motion and speech. In A. W. Siegman & B. Pope (Eds.), Studies in dyadic communication (pp.177–210). Pergamon Press. 10.1016/B978‑0‑08‑015867‑9.50013‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-015867-9.50013-7 [Google Scholar]
  196. Kendon, A.
    (1980) A description of a deaf-mute sign language from the Enga Province of Papua New Guinea with some comparative discussion. Semiotica, 32 (1/2), 81–117.
    [Google Scholar]
  197. Kendon, A.
    (1995) Gestures as illocutionary and discourse structure markers in Southern Italian conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 23 (3), 247–279. 10.1016/0378‑2166(94)00037‑F
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(94)00037-F [Google Scholar]
  198. (2004) Gesture: Visible action as utterance (Cambridge University Press). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511807572
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511807572 [Google Scholar]
  199. (2014) Semiotic diversity in utterance production and the concept of ‘language.’ Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 369 (1651), 2–13. 10.1098/rstb.2013.0293
    https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2013.0293 [Google Scholar]
  200. (2017) Languages as semiotically heterogenous systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 40 . 10.1017/S0140525X15002940
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X15002940 [Google Scholar]
  201. Kendon, A. , & Versante, L.
    (2003) Pointing by hand in Neapolitan. Pointing: Where Language, Culture, and Cognition Meet, 109–137.
    [Google Scholar]
  202. Kita, S.
    (1993) Language and thought interface: A study of spontaneous gestures and Japanese mimetics. University of Chicago.
    [Google Scholar]
  203. (2000) How representational gestures help speaking. Language and Gesture, 1 , 162–185. 10.1017/CBO9780511620850.011
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620850.011 [Google Scholar]
  204. (Ed.) (2003) Pointing: Where language, culture, and cognition meet. Lawrence Erlbaum. 10.4324/9781410607744
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410607744 [Google Scholar]
  205. Kita, S. , & Özyürek, A.
    (2003) What does cross-linguistic variation in semantic coordination of speech and gesture reveal?: Evidence for an interface representation of spatial thinking and speaking. Journal of Memory and Language, 48 (1), 16–32. 10.1016/S0749‑596X(02)00505‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-596X(02)00505-3 [Google Scholar]
  206. Kita, S. , Van Gijn, I. , & Van der Hulst, H.
    (1997) Movement phases in signs and co-speech gestures, and their transcription by human coders. International Gesture Workshop, 23–35.
    [Google Scholar]
  207. Kjellmer, G.
    (2003) Hesitation. In defence of er and erm. English Studies, 84 (2), 170–198. 10.1076/enst.84.2.170.14903
    https://doi.org/10.1076/enst.84.2.170.14903 [Google Scholar]
  208. Koester, A.
    (2010) Building small specialised corpora. The Routledge Handbook of Corpus Linguistics, 1 , 66–79. 10.4324/9780203856949.ch6
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203856949.ch6 [Google Scholar]
  209. Kormos, J. , & Dénes, M.
    (2004) Exploring measures and perceptions of fluency in the speech of second language learners. System, 32 (2), 145–164. 10.1016/j.system.2004.01.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2004.01.001 [Google Scholar]
  210. Kosmala, L.
    (2020a) (Dis)fluencies and their contribution to the co-construction of meaning in native and non-native tandem interactions of French and English. TIPA. Travaux Interdisciplinaires Sur La Parole et Le Langage, 36 , Article 36. 10.4000/tipa.3567
    https://doi.org/10.4000/tipa.3567 [Google Scholar]
  211. (2020b) On the distribution of clicks and inbreaths in class presentations and spontaneous conversations: blending vocal and kinetic activities. Proceedings of Laughter and Other Non-Verbal Vocalisations Workshop.
    [Google Scholar]
  212. (2021) On the Specificities of L1 and L2 (Dis)fluencies and the Interactional Multimodal Strategies of L2 Speakers in Tandem Interactions. Journal of Monolingual and Bilingual Speech. 10.1558/jmbs.15676
    https://doi.org/10.1558/jmbs.15676 [Google Scholar]
  213. Kosmala, L. , & Morgenstern, A.
    (2017) A preliminary study of hesitation phenomena in L1 and L2 productions: A multimodal approach. Proceedings of DiSS 2017, the 8th Workshop on Disfluency in Spontaneous Speech, 37.
    [Google Scholar]
  214. Kowal, S. , Wiese, R. , & O’Connell, D. C.
    (1983) The use of time in storytelling. Language and Speech, 26 (4), 377–392. 10.1177/002383098302600405
    https://doi.org/10.1177/002383098302600405 [Google Scholar]
  215. Krauss, R. M. , Chen, Y. , & Gottesman, R. F.
    (2000) Lexical gestures and lexical access: A process. Language and Gesture, 2 , 261. 10.1017/CBO9780511620850.017
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620850.017 [Google Scholar]
  216. Krauss, R. M. , Dushay, R. A. , Chen, Y. , & Rauscher, F.
    (1995) The communicative value of conversational hand gesture. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31 (6), 533–552. 10.1006/jesp.1995.1024
    https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.1995.1024 [Google Scholar]
  217. Krauss, R. M. , & Hadar, U.
    (1999) The role of speech-related arm/hand gestures in word retrieval. In R. Campbell & L. Messing (Eds.), Gesture, speech, and sign (pp.93–116). Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198524519.003.0006
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198524519.003.0006 [Google Scholar]
  218. Labov, W.
    (1966) The social stratification of English in New York City. Center for Applied Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  219. Ladewig, S. H.
    (2011) Putting the cyclic gesture on a cognitive basis. CogniTextes. Revue de l’Association Française de Linguistique Cognitive, Volume 6. 10.4000/cognitextes.406
    https://doi.org/10.4000/cognitextes.406 [Google Scholar]
  220. (2014) Recurrent gestures. In C. Müller , A. Cienki , S. H. Ladewig , D. McNeill , & S. Tessendorf (Eds.), Body- Language- Communication: An International Handbook on Multimodsality in Human Interaction. Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  221. Ladewig, S. H. , & Bressem, J.
    (2013) New insights into the medium hand: Discovering recurrent structures in gestures. Semiotica 2013(197), 203–231. 10.1515/sem‑2013‑0088
    https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2013-0088 [Google Scholar]
  222. Landis, J. R. , & Koch, G. G.
    (1977a) An application of hierarchical kappa-type statistics in the assessment of majority agreement among multiple observers. Biometrics, 363–374. 10.2307/2529786
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2529786 [Google Scholar]
  223. (1977b) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 159–174. 10.2307/2529310
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310 [Google Scholar]
  224. Langacker, R. W.
    (1987) Foundations of Cognitive grammar, vol. 1 theoretical prerequisites. Stanford University press.
    [Google Scholar]
  225. (1995) Cognitive grammar. InConcise History of the Language Sciences (pp.364–368). Elsevier. 10.1016/B978‑0‑08‑042580‑1.50060‑X
    https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-042580-1.50060-X [Google Scholar]
  226. (1999) Grammar and conceptualization. Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110800524
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110800524 [Google Scholar]
  227. LeBaron, C. D. , Mandelbaum, J. , & Glenn, P. J.
    (2003) An overview of language and social interaction research. Studies in Language and Social Interaction, 12–42.
    [Google Scholar]
  228. Lennon, P.
    (1990) Investigating fluency in EFL: A quantitative approach. Language Learning, 40 (3), 387–417. 10.1111/j.1467‑1770.1990.tb00669.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1990.tb00669.x [Google Scholar]
  229. Lerner, G. H.
    (1992) Assisted storytelling: Deploying shared knowledge as a practical matter. Qualitative Sociology, 15 (3), 247–271. 10.1007/BF00990328
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00990328 [Google Scholar]
  230. Levelt, W. J.
    (1983) Monitoring and self-repair in speech. Cognition, 14 , 41–104. 10.1016/0010‑0277(83)90026‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(83)90026-4 [Google Scholar]
  231. (1989) Speaking. From intention to articulation. MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  232. (1999) Producing spoken language. The Neurocognition of Language, 83–122.
    [Google Scholar]
  233. Levelt, W. J. , & Schriefers, H.
    (1987) Stages of lexical access. InNatural language generation (pp.395–404). Springer. 10.1007/978‑94‑009‑3645‑4_25
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3645-4_25 [Google Scholar]
  234. Levy, E. T. , & McNeill, D.
    (1992) Speech, gesture, and discourse. Discourse Processes, 15 (3), 277–301. 10.1080/01638539209544813
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539209544813 [Google Scholar]
  235. Lickley, R. J.
    (2001) Dialogue moves and disfluency rates. ISCA Tutorial and Research Workshop (ITRW) on Disfluency in Spontaneous Speech.
    [Google Scholar]
  236. (2015) Fluency and Disfluency. In M. A. Redford (Ed.), The Handbook of Speech Production (pp.445–474). John Wiley. 10.1002/9781118584156.ch20
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118584156.ch20 [Google Scholar]
  237. Lopez-Ozieblo, R.
    (2019) Cut-offs and co-occurring gestures: Similarities between speakers’ first and second languages. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 1 (ahead-of-print).
    [Google Scholar]
  238. Lopez-Ozieblo, R.
    (2020) Proposing a revised functional classification of pragmatic gestures. Lingua, 247 , 1–47. 10.1016/j.lingua.2020.102870
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2020.102870 [Google Scholar]
  239. Ma, W. , & Winke, P.
    (2019) Self-assessment: How reliable is it in assessing oral proficiency over time?Foreign Language Annals, 52 (1), 66–86. 10.1111/flan.12379
    https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12379 [Google Scholar]
  240. Maclay, H. , & Osgood, C. E.
    (1959) Hesitation phenomena in spontaneous English speech. Word, 15 (1), 19–44. 10.1080/00437956.1959.11659682
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00437956.1959.11659682 [Google Scholar]
  241. MacWhinney, B.
    (2000) The CHILDES Project: Tools for analyzing talk. transcription format and programs (Vol.1). Psychology Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  242. Matzinger, T. , Ritt, N. , & Fitch, W. T.
    (2020) Non-native speaker pause patterns closely correspond to those of native speakers at different speech rates. PloS One, 15 (4), e0230710. 10.1371/journal.pone.0230710
    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0230710 [Google Scholar]
  243. Mazeland, H.
    (2006) Conversation analysis. Encyclopedia of language and linguistics, 3 , 153–162. 10.1016/B0‑08‑044854‑2/00314‑X
    https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/00314-X [Google Scholar]
  244. McCafferty, S. G.
    (1998) Nonverbal expression and L2 private speech. Applied Linguistics, 19 (1), 73–96. 10.1093/applin/19.1.73
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/19.1.73 [Google Scholar]
  245. (2004) Space for cognition: Gesture and second language learning. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 14 (1), 148–165. 10.1111/j.1473‑4192.2004.0057m.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1473-4192.2004.0057m.x [Google Scholar]
  246. McCarthy, M.
    (2009) Rethinking spoken fluency. ELIA, 9 , 11–29.
    [Google Scholar]
  247. McLaughlin, S. F. , & Cullinan, W. L.
    (1989) Disfluencies, utterance length, and linguistic complexity in nonstuttering children. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 14 (1), 17–36. 10.1016/0094‑730X(89)90021‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0094-730X(89)90021-1 [Google Scholar]
  248. McNeill, D.
    (1985) So you think gestures are nonverbal?Psychological Review, 92 (3), 350. 10.1037/0033‑295X.92.3.350
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.92.3.350 [Google Scholar]
  249. (1992) Hand and mind: What gestures reveal about thought. University of Chicago press.
    [Google Scholar]
  250. Menn, L. , & Dronkers, N. F.
    (2016) Psycholinguistics: Introduction and applications. Plural Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  251. Merlo, S. , & Barbosa, P. A.
    (2010) Hesitation phenomena: A dynamical perspective. Cognitive Processing, 11 (3), 251–261. 10.1007/s10339‑009‑0348‑x
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-009-0348-x [Google Scholar]
  252. Merlo, S. , & Mansur, L. L.
    (2004) Descriptive discourse: Topic familiarity and disfluencies. Journal of Communication Disorders, 37 (6), 489–503. 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2004.03.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcomdis.2004.03.002 [Google Scholar]
  253. Meteer, M. W. , Taylor, A. A. , MacIntyre, R. , & Iyer, R.
    (1995) Dysfluency annotation stylebook for the switchboard corpus. University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia, PA.
    [Google Scholar]
  254. Michel, M. C.
    (2011) Effects of task complexity and interaction on L2 performance. Second Language Task Complexity: Researching the Cognition Hypothesis of Language Learning and Performance, 2 , 141–173. 10.1075/tblt.2.12ch6
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tblt.2.12ch6 [Google Scholar]
  255. Michel, M. C. , Kuiken, F. , & Vedder, I.
    (2007) Effects of task complexity and task condition on Dutch L2. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 45 (3), 241–259.
    [Google Scholar]
  256. Mondada, L.
    (2001) Pour une linguistique interactionnelle. Marges Linguistiques, 1 , 142–162.
    [Google Scholar]
  257. (2007) Multimodal resources for turn-taking: Pointing and the emergence of possible next speakers. Discourse Studies, 9 (2), 194–225. 10.1177/1461445607075346
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445607075346 [Google Scholar]
  258. (2013) Interactional space and the study of embodied talk-in-interaction. Space in Language and Linguistics: Geographical, Interactional and Cognitive Perspectives, 247–275. 10.1515/9783110312027.247
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110312027.247 [Google Scholar]
  259. Mondada, L.
    (2014) Bodies in action: Multimodal analysis of walking and talking. Language and dialogue, 4(3), 357–403.
    [Google Scholar]
  260. Mondada, L.
    (2016) Challenges of multimodality: Language and the body in social interaction. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 20 (3), 336–366. 10.1111/josl.1_12177
    https://doi.org/10.1111/josl.1_12177 [Google Scholar]
  261. (2018) Multiple temporalities of language and body in interaction: Challenges for transcribing multimodality. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 51 (1), 85–106. 10.1080/08351813.2018.1413878
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2018.1413878 [Google Scholar]
  262. Mondada, L. , & Pekarek-Doehler, S.
    (2004) Second language acquisition as situated practice: Task accomplishment in the French second language classroom. Canadian Modern Language Review, 61 (4), 461–490. 10.3138/cmlr.61.4.461
    https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.61.4.461 [Google Scholar]
  263. Mondada, L. , & Traverso, V.
    (2005) (Dés) alignements en clôture. Une étude interactionnelle de corpus de français parlé en interaction. Lidil. Revue de Linguistique et de Didactique Des Langues, 31 , 35–59.
    [Google Scholar]
  264. Moniz, H.
    (2019) Processing disfluencies in distinct speaking styles: Idiosyncrasies and transversality. The 9th Workshop on Disfluency in Spontaneous Speech, 1–2. 10.21862/diss‑09‑001‑moniz
    https://doi.org/10.21862/diss-09-001-moniz [Google Scholar]
  265. Moniz, H. , Batista, F. , Mata, A. I. , & Trancoso, I.
    (2014) Speaking style effects in the production of disfluencies. Speech Communication, 65 , 20–35. 10.1016/j.specom.2014.05.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.specom.2014.05.004 [Google Scholar]
  266. Moniz, H.
    (2013) Processing disfluencies in European Portuguese [Unpublished PhD Thesis] Universidade de Lisboa.
    [Google Scholar]
  267. Moniz, H. , Trancoso, I. , & Mata, A. I.
    (2009) Classification of disfluent phenomena as fluent communicative devices in specific prosodic contexts. Tenth Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association. 10.21437/Interspeech.2009‑518
    https://doi.org/10.21437/Interspeech.2009-518 [Google Scholar]
  268. Morel, M. A. , & Danon-Boileau, L.
    (1998) Grammaire de l’intonation l’exemple du français. Editions OPHRYS.
    [Google Scholar]
  269. Morgenstern, A.
    (2014) Children’s multimodal language development. Manual of Language Acquisition, 123–142. 10.1515/9783110302257.123
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110302257.123 [Google Scholar]
  270. (2020) The Other’s Voice in the Co-Construction of Self-Reference in the Dialogic Child. Bakhtiniana: Revista de Estudos Do Discurso, 16 , 63–87. 10.1590/2176‑457347133
    https://doi.org/10.1590/2176-457347133 [Google Scholar]
  271. Morgenstern, A. , Caët, S. , Debras, C. , Beaupoil-Hourdel, P. , & Le Mené, M.
    (2021) Children’s socialization to multi-party interactive practices: Who talks to whom about what in family dinners. In Letizia Caronia (ed.) Language and Social Interaction at Home and in School. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 46–85. 10.1075/ds.32.01mor
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.32.01mor [Google Scholar]
  272. Mori, J. , & Hayashi, M.
    (2006) The achievement of intersubjectivity through embodied completions: A study of interactions between first and second language speakers. Applied Linguistics, 27 (2), 195–219. 10.1093/applin/aml014
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/aml014 [Google Scholar]
  273. Moro, L. , Mortimer, E. F. , & Tiberghien, A.
    (2020) The use of social semiotic multimodality and joint action theory to describe teaching practices: Two cases studies with experienced teachers. Classroom Discourse, 11 (3), 229–251. 10.1080/19463014.2019.1570528
    https://doi.org/10.1080/19463014.2019.1570528 [Google Scholar]
  274. Müller, C.
    (1998) Redebegleitende Gesten: Kulturgeschichte, Theorie, Sprachvergleich (Vol.1). Spitz.
    [Google Scholar]
  275. (2014) Gesture as ‘deliberate expressive movement.’ From Gesture in Conversation to Visible Action as Utterance: Essays in Honor of Adam Kendon, 127–151. 10.1075/z.188.07mul
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.188.07mul [Google Scholar]
  276. (2017) How recurrent gestures mean: Conventionalized contexts-of-use and embodied motivation. Gesture, 16 (2), 277–304. 10.1075/gest.16.2.05mul
    https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.16.2.05mul [Google Scholar]
  277. Müller, C. , Bressem, J. , & Ladewig, S. H.
    (2013) Towards a grammar of gestures: A form-based view. In C. Müller , A. Cienki , S. H. Ladewig , D. McNeill , & S. Tessendorf (Eds.), Body- Language – Communication. An International Handbook on Multimodality in Human Interaction (Vol.1, pp.707–733). De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110261318.707
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110261318.707 [Google Scholar]
  278. Nicholson, H. B. M.
    (2007) Disfluency in dialogue: Attention, structure and function [Unpublished PhD thesis]. University of Edinburgh.
    [Google Scholar]
  279. Notarrigo, I.
    (2017) Marqueurs de (dis) fluence en langue des signes de Belgique francophone [Unpublished PhD Thesis]. Université de Namur.
    [Google Scholar]
  280. Ogden, R.
    (2013) Clicks and percussives in English conversation. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 43 (3), 299–320. 10.1017/S0025100313000224
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025100313000224 [Google Scholar]
  281. (2020) Audibly not saying something with clicks. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 53 (1), 66–89. 10.1080/08351813.2020.1712960
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2020.1712960 [Google Scholar]
  282. (2018) The actions of peripheral linguistic objects: Clicks. Proceedings of Laughter Workshop 2018, 2–5.
    [Google Scholar]
  283. O’Shaughnessy, D.
    (1992) Analysis of False Starts in Spontaneous Speech. The International Conference on Spoken Language Processing, Banff, Alberta, Canada. 10.21437/ICSLP.1992‑285
    https://doi.org/10.21437/ICSLP.1992-285 [Google Scholar]
  284. Oviatt, S.
    (1995) Predicting spoken disfluencies during human-computer interaction. Computer Speech and Language, 9(1), 19–36.
    [Google Scholar]
  285. Pallaud, B. , Bertrand, R. , Prevot, L. , Blache, P. , & Rauzy, S.
    (2019) Suspensive and Disfluent Self Interruptions in French Language Interactions.
    [Google Scholar]
  286. Pallaud, B. , Rauzy, S. , & Blache, P.
    (2013) Auto-interruptions et disfluences en français parlé dans quatre corpus du CID. TIPA. Travaux interdisciplinaires sur la parole et le langage, 29 . 10.4000/tipa.995
    https://doi.org/10.4000/tipa.995 [Google Scholar]
  287. Papanas, N. , Maltezos, E. , & Lazarides, M. K.
    (2011) Delivering a powerful oral presentation: All the world’s a stage. International Angiology: A Journal of the International Union of Angiology, 30 (2), 185–191.
    [Google Scholar]
  288. Pekarek-Doehler, S.
    (2006) «CA for SLA»: Analyse conversationnelle et recherche sur l’acquisition des langues. Revue Française de Linguistique Appliquée, 11 (2), 123–137. 10.3917/rfla.112.0123
    https://doi.org/10.3917/rfla.112.0123 [Google Scholar]
  289. (2018) Elaborations on L2 interactional competence: The development of L2 grammar-for-interaction. Classroom Discourse, 9 (1), 3–24. 10.1080/19463014.2018.1437759
    https://doi.org/10.1080/19463014.2018.1437759 [Google Scholar]
  290. Pekarek-Doehler, S. , & Pochon-Berger, E.
    (2011) Developing “methods” for interaction: A cross-sectional study of disagreement sequences in French L2. L2 Interactional Competence and Development, 56 , 206. 10.21832/9781847694072‑010
    https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847694072-010 [Google Scholar]
  291. Peltonen, P.
    (2017) L2 fluency in spoken interaction: A case study on the use of other-repetitions and collaborative completions. AFinLA-e: Soveltavan Kielitieteen Tutkimuksia, 10 , 118–138.
    [Google Scholar]
  292. (2019) Gestures as Fluency-enhancing Resources in L2 Interaction: A Case Study on Multimodal Fluency. Fluency in L2 Learning and Use, 138 , 111. 10.21832/9781788926317‑010
    https://doi.org/10.21832/9781788926317-010 [Google Scholar]
  293. (2020) Individual and Interactional Speech Fluency in L2 English from a Problem-solving Perspective: A Mixed-methods Approach [Unpublished PhD Thesis]. University of Turku.
    [Google Scholar]
  294. Peters, A. M.
    (2001) Filler syllables: What is their status in emerging grammar?Journal of Child Language, 28 (1), 229. 10.1017/S0305000900004438
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000900004438 [Google Scholar]
  295. Pinto, D. , & Vigil, D.
    (2019) Searches and clicks in Peninsular Spanish. Pragmatics, 29 (1), 83–106.
    [Google Scholar]
  296. Poggi, I.
    (2001) From a typology of gestures to a procedure for gesture production. International Gesture Workshop, 158–168.
    [Google Scholar]
  297. Pomerantz, A.
    (1984) Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shaped. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of Social Action (pp.57–108). Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  298. Pomerantz, A. , & Fehr, B. J.
    (2011) Conversation analysis: An approach to the analysis of social interaction. Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction, 2 , 165–190.
    [Google Scholar]
  299. Rasier, L. , & Hiligsmann, P.
    (2007) Prosodic transfer from L1 to L2. Theoretical and methodological issues. Nouveaux Cahiers de Linguistique Française, 28 (2007), 41–66.
    [Google Scholar]
  300. Rendle-Short, J.
    (2005) Managing the transitions between talk and silence in the academic monologue. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 38 (2), 179–218. 10.1207/s15327973rlsi3802_3
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi3802_3 [Google Scholar]
  301. Riazantseva, A.
    (2001) Second language proficiency and pausing a study of Russian speakers of English. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 23 (04), 497–526. 10.1017/S027226310100403X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S027226310100403X [Google Scholar]
  302. Riggenbach, H.
    (1991) Toward an understanding of fluency: A microanalysis of nonnative speaker conversations. Discourse Processes, 14 (4), 423–441. 10.1080/01638539109544795
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539109544795 [Google Scholar]
  303. Rohr, J. L.
    (2016) Acoustic and Perceptual Correlates of L2 Fluency: The Role of Prolongations [PhD Thesis].
    [Google Scholar]
  304. Rohrer, P. L. , Vilà-Giménez, I. , Florit-Pons, J. , Esteve-Gibert, N. , Ren, A. , Shattuck-Hufnagel, S. , & Prieto, P.
    (2020) The MultiModal MultiDimensional (M3D) labelling scheme for the annotation of audiovisual corpora. Gesture and Speech in Interaction (GESPIN).
    [Google Scholar]
  305. Rose, R. L.
    (1998) The communicative value of filled pauses in spontaneous speech [M.A Diss.]. University of Birminghman.
  306. Rossano, F.
    (2013) Gaze in Conversation. In J. Sidnell & T. Stivers (Eds.), The handbook of Conversation Analysis. Blackwell Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  307. Rydell, M.
    (2019) Negotiating co-participation: Embodied word searching sequences in paired L2 speaking tests. Journal of Pragmatics, 149 , 60–77. 10.1016/j.pragma.2019.05.027
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.05.027 [Google Scholar]
  308. Sacks, H.
    (1992) Lectures on Conversation (Vol.1–2). Basil Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  309. Sacks, H. , Jefferson, G. , & Schegloff, E. A.
    (1974) A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50 (4), 696–735. 10.1353/lan.1974.0010
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1974.0010 [Google Scholar]
  310. Schachter, S. , Christenfeld, N. , & Bilous, F.
    (1991) Speech Disfluency and the Structure of Knowledge. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60 (3), 362–367. 10.1037/0022‑3514.60.3.362
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.60.3.362 [Google Scholar]
  311. Schegloff, E. A.
    (1991) Conversation analysis and socially shared cognition. In L. B. Resnick , J. Levine , & S. D. Teasley (Eds.), Socially Shared Cognition. American Psychological Association. 10.1037/10096‑007
    https://doi.org/10.1037/10096-007 [Google Scholar]
  312. (1996a) Confirming allusions: Toward an empirical account of action. American Journal of Sociology, 102 (1), 161–216. 10.1086/230911
    https://doi.org/10.1086/230911 [Google Scholar]
  313. (2007) Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis I (Vol.1). Cambridge university press. 10.1017/CBO9780511791208
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511791208 [Google Scholar]
  314. (2010) Some other “uh(m)” s. Discourse Processes, 47 (2), 130–174. 10.1080/01638530903223380
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01638530903223380 [Google Scholar]
  315. Schegloff, E. A. , Sacks, H. , & Jefferson, G.
    (1977) The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language, 53 (2), 361–382. 10.1353/lan.1977.0041
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1977.0041 [Google Scholar]
  316. Schettino, L. , Di Maro, M. , & Cutugno, F.
    (2020) Silent pauses as clarification trigger. Laughter and Other Non-Verbal Vocalisations Workshop: Proceedings (2020).
    [Google Scholar]
  317. Scheuer, S. , & Horgues, C.
    (2020) Potential pitfalls of interpreting data from English-French tandem conversations. Interpreting Languagelearning Data, 197.
    [Google Scholar]
  318. Schnadt, M. J. , & Corley, M.
    (2006) The influence of lexical, conceptual and planning based factors on disfluency production. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, 28 (28).
    [Google Scholar]
  319. Schneider, U.
    (2014) Frequency, Hesitations and Chunks. A Usage-based Study of Chunking in English. Albert-Ludwigs-Universität.
    [Google Scholar]
  320. Segalowitz, N.
    (2016) Second language fluency and its underlying cognitive and social determinants. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 54 (2), 79–95. 10.1515/iral‑2016‑9991
    https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2016-9991 [Google Scholar]
  321. Selting, M. , Barth-Weingarten, D. , Reber, E. , & Selting, M.
    (2010) Prosody in interaction. Prosody in Interaction, Amsterdam/Philadelphia, John Benjamins, 3–40. 10.1075/sidag.23.05sel
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sidag.23.05sel [Google Scholar]
  322. Seo, M.-S. , & Koshik, I.
    (2010) A conversation analytic study of gestures that engender repair in ESL conversational tutoring. Journal of Pragmatics, 42 (8), 2219–2239. 10.1016/j.pragma.2010.01.021
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.01.021 [Google Scholar]
  323. Seyfeddinipur, M.
    (2006) Disfluency: Interrupting speech and gesture [Unpublished PhD Thesis]. Radboud University.
    [Google Scholar]
  324. Seyfeddinipur, M. , & Kita, S.
    (2001) Gesture as an indicator of early error detection in self-monitoring of speech. ISCA Tutorial and Research Workshop (ITRW) on Disfluency in Spontaneous Speech.
    [Google Scholar]
  325. Shames, G. H. , & Sherrick, C. E.
    (1963) A discussion of nonfluency and stuttering as operant behavior. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 28 (1), 3–18. 10.1044/jshd.2801.03
    https://doi.org/10.1044/jshd.2801.03 [Google Scholar]
  326. Shriberg, E.
    (2001) To ‘errrr’is human: Ecology and acoustics of speech disfluencies. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 31 (1), 153–169. 10.1017/S0025100301001128
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025100301001128 [Google Scholar]
  327. (1995) Acoustic properties of disfluent repetitions. Proceedings of the International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, 4 , 384–387.
    [Google Scholar]
  328. (1996) Disfluencies in switchboard. Proceedings of International Conference on Spoken Language Processing, 96 (1), 11–14.
    [Google Scholar]
  329. Shriberg, E. E.
    (1994) Preliminaries to a Theory of Speech Disfiuencies [Unpublished PhD Thesis]. University of California.
    [Google Scholar]
  330. Sidnell, J.
    (2016) Conversation Analysis. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  331. Silverman, K. , Blaauw, E. , Spitz, J. , & Pitrelli, J. F.
    (1992) A prosodic comparison of spontaneous speech and read speech. Second International Conference on Spoken Language Processing. 10.21437/ICSLP.1992‑349
    https://doi.org/10.21437/ICSLP.1992-349 [Google Scholar]
  332. Simpson, R. , Eisenchlas, S. , & Haugh, M.
    (2013) The functions of self-initiated self-repair in the second language Chinese classroom 1. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 23 (2), 144–165. 10.1111/j.1473‑4192.2012.00323.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1473-4192.2012.00323.x [Google Scholar]
  333. Skehan, P.
    (2001) Tasks and language performance assessment. In M. Bygate , P. Skehan , & M. Swain (Eds.), Researching Pedagogic Tasks: Second language learning, teaching, and testing (pp.167–185). Harlow: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  334. (2003) Task-based instruction. Language Teaching, 36 (1), 1–14. 10.1017/S026144480200188X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S026144480200188X [Google Scholar]
  335. Slobin, D. I.
    (1987) Thinking for speaking. Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 13 , 435–445. 10.3765/bls.v13i0.1826
    https://doi.org/10.3765/bls.v13i0.1826 [Google Scholar]
  336. Sloetjes, H. , & Wittenburg, P.
    (2008) Annotation by category-ELAN and ISO DCR. 6th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2008).
    [Google Scholar]
  337. Smith, V. L. , & Clark, H. H.
    (1993) On the course of answering questions. Journal of Memory and Language, 32 , 25–38. 10.1006/jmla.1993.1002
    https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1993.1002 [Google Scholar]
  338. Stam, G.
    (2001) Lexical failure and gesture in second language development. In C. Cavé , I. Guaïtella , & S. Santi (Eds.), Oralité et gestualité: Interactions et comportements multimodaux dans la communication (pp.271–275). L’Harmattan.
    [Google Scholar]
  339. (2006) Thinking for speaking about motion: L1 and L2 speech and gesture. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 143. 10.1515/IRAL.2006.006
    https://doi.org/10.1515/IRAL.2006.006 [Google Scholar]
  340. (2008) What gestures reveal about second language acquisition. Gesture: Second Language Acquistion and Classroom Research, 231 .
    [Google Scholar]
  341. (2018) Gesture and speaking a second language. Speaking in a Second Language, 49 , 67.
    [Google Scholar]
  342. Stam, G. , & Tellier, M.
    (2017) The sound of silence. Why Gesture?: How the Hands Function in Speaking, Thinking and Communicating, 7 , 353. 10.1075/gs.7.17sta
    https://doi.org/10.1075/gs.7.17sta [Google Scholar]
  343. Sterponi, L. , & Fasulo, A.
    (2010) “How to go on”: Intersubjectivity and progressivity in the communication of a child with autism. Ethos, 38 (1), 116–142. 10.1111/j.1548‑1352.2009.01084.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1352.2009.01084.x [Google Scholar]
  344. Stivers, T.
    (2008) Stance, alignment, and affiliation during storytelling: When nodding is a token of affiliation. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 41 (1), 31–57. 10.1080/08351810701691123
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351810701691123 [Google Scholar]
  345. (2015) Coding social interaction: A heretical approach in conversation analysis?Research on Language and Social Interaction, 48 (1), 1–19. 10.1080/08351813.2015.993837
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2015.993837 [Google Scholar]
  346. Stivers, T. , & Robinson, J. D.
    (2006) A preference for progressivity in interaction. Language in Society, 35 (3), 367–392. 10.1017/S0047404506060179
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404506060179 [Google Scholar]
  347. Stivers, T. , & Sidnell, J.
    (2005) Introduction: Multimodal interaction. Semiotica 2005, 1–20. 10.1515/semi.2005.2005.156.1
    https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.2005.2005.156.1 [Google Scholar]
  348. Streeck, J.
    (2008a) Depicting by gesture. Gesture, 8 (3), 285–301. 10.1075/gest.8.3.02str
    https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.8.3.02str [Google Scholar]
  349. (2008b) Gesture in political communication: A case study of the democratic presidential candidates during the 2004 primary campaign. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 41 (2), 154–186. 10.1080/08351810802028662
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351810802028662 [Google Scholar]
  350. (2008c) Metaphor and gesture. A view from the microanalysis of interaction. In C. Müller & A. Cienki (Eds.), Metaphor and gesture (pp.259–264). John Benjamins Publishing. 10.1075/gs.3.16str
    https://doi.org/10.1075/gs.3.16str [Google Scholar]
  351. (2009a) Forward-gesturing. Discourse Processes, 46 (2–3), 161–179. 10.1080/01638530902728793
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01638530902728793 [Google Scholar]
  352. (2009b) Gesturecraft: The manu-facture of meaning (Vol.2). John Benjamins Publishing. 10.1075/gs.2
    https://doi.org/10.1075/gs.2 [Google Scholar]
  353. (2010) Ecologies of gesture. New Adventures in Language and Interaction, 223–242. 10.1075/pbns.196.10str
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.196.10str [Google Scholar]
  354. (2014) Mutual gaze and recognition. In M. Seyfeddinipur & M. Gullberg (Eds.), From Gesture in Conversation to Visible Action as Utterance. Benjamins, Amsterdam (pp.35–55). Benjamins. 10.1075/z.188.03str
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.188.03str [Google Scholar]
  355. (2015) Embodiment in human communication. Annual Review of Anthropology, 44 , 419–438. 10.1146/annurev‑anthro‑102214‑014045
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-102214-014045 [Google Scholar]
  356. (2020) Self-Touch as Sociality. Social Interaction. Video-Based Studies of Human Sociality, 3 (2). 10.7146/si.v3i2.120854
    https://doi.org/10.7146/si.v3i2.120854 [Google Scholar]
  357. (2021) The emancipation of gestures. Interactional Linguistics, 1 (1). 10.1075/il.20013.str
    https://doi.org/10.1075/il.20013.str [Google Scholar]
  358. Streeck, J. , Goodwin, C. , & LeBaron, C.
    (2011) Embodied interaction: Language and body in the material world. Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  359. Streeck, J. , & Hartge, U.
    (1992) Gestures at the transition place. In P. Auer & A. Di Luzio (Eds.), The contextualization of language (pp.135–157). John Benjamins Publishing. 10.1075/pbns.22.10str
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.22.10str [Google Scholar]
  360. Sweetser, E.
    (1998) Regular metaphoricity in gesture: Bodily-based models of speech interaction. InActes du 16e Congrès International des Linguistes. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
    [Google Scholar]
  361. (2007) Looking at space to study mental spaces. Methods in Cognitive Linguistics, 18 , 201–224. 10.1075/hcp.18.15swe
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.18.15swe [Google Scholar]
  362. Sweetser, E. , & Sizemore, M.
    (2008) Personal and interpersonal gesture spaces: Functional contrasts in language and gesture. Language in the Context of Use: Discourse and Cognitive Approaches to Language, 25–51. 10.1515/9783110199123.1.25
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110199123.1.25 [Google Scholar]
  363. Sweetser, E. , & Stec, K.
    (2016) Maintaining multiple viewpoints with gaze. Viewpoint and the Fabric of Meaning: Form and Use of Viewpoint Tools across Languages and Modalities, 237 , 257. 10.1515/9783110365467‑011
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110365467-011 [Google Scholar]
  364. Swerts, M.
    (1998) Filled pauses as markers of discourse structure. Journal of Pragmatics, 30 (4), 485–496. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(98)00014‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(98)00014-9 [Google Scholar]
  365. Szymanski, M. H.
    (1999) Re-engaging and dis-engaging talk in activity. Language in Society, 28 (1), 1–23. 10.1017/S0047404599001013
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404599001013 [Google Scholar]
  366. Tarone, E.
    (1980) Communication strategies, foreigner talk, and repair in interlanguage 1. Language Learning, 30 (2), 417–428. 10.1111/j.1467‑1770.1980.tb00326.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1980.tb00326.x [Google Scholar]
  367. Tashakkori, A. , & Creswell, J. W.
    (2007) The new era of mixed methods. Sage Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  368. Tavakoli, P.
    (2011) Pausing patterns: Differences between L2 learners and native speakers. ELT Journal, 65 (1), 71–79. 10.1093/elt/ccq020
    https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccq020 [Google Scholar]
  369. Tavakoli, P. , & Skehan, P.
    (2005) Strategic planning, task structure and performance testing. InPlanning and task performance in a second language (pp.239–273). John Benjamins. 10.1075/lllt.11.15tav
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.11.15tav [Google Scholar]
  370. Tellier, M.
    (2008a) Dire avec des gestes. Le Français Dans Le Monde. Recherches et Applications, 44 , 40–50.
    [Google Scholar]
  371. (2008b) The effect of gestures on second language memorisation by young children. Gesture, 8 (2), 219–235. 10.1075/gest.8.2.06tel
    https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.8.2.06tel [Google Scholar]
  372. Tellier, M. , & Stam, G.
    (2012) Stratégies verbales et gestuelles dans l’explication lexicale d’un verbe d’action. In Rivière, V. Spécificités et diversité des interactions didactiques. Paris : Riveneuve éditions. 357 – 374.
    [Google Scholar]
  373. Tellier, M. , Stam, G. , & Bigi, B.
    (2013) Gesturing while pausing in conversation: Self-oriented or partner-oriented?”. The Combined Meeting of the 10th International Gesture Workshop and the 3rd Gesture and Speech in Interaction Conference, Tillburg (The Netherlands).
    [Google Scholar]
  374. Tomasello, M.
    (2003) Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Harvard university press.
    [Google Scholar]
  375. Tottie, G.
    (2011) Uh and Um as sociolinguistic markers in British English. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 16 (2), 173–197. 10.1075/ijcl.16.2.02tot
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.16.2.02tot [Google Scholar]
  376. (2014) On the use of uh and um in American English. Functions of Language, 21 (1), 6–29. R. 10.1075/fol.21.1.02tot
    https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.21.1.02tot [Google Scholar]
  377. (2015) Uh and um in British and American English: Are they words? Evidence from co-occurrence with pauses. In N. Dion , A. Lapierre , & R. T. Cacoullos (Eds.), Linguistic Variation: Confronting Fact and Theory (pp.38–55). NY: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  378. Tottie, G.
    (2016) Planning what to say: Uh and um among the pragmatic markers. In G. Kaltenböck , E. Keizer , & A. Lohmann (Eds.), Outside the Clause. Form and function of extra-clausal constituents. (pp.97–122). John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.178.04tot
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.178.04tot [Google Scholar]
  379. Tottie, G.
    (2019) From pause to word: Uh, um and er in written American English. English Language & Linguistics, 23 (1), 105–130. 10.1017/S1360674317000314
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1360674317000314 [Google Scholar]
  380. Vasilescu, I. , & Adda-Decker, M.
    (2007) A cross-language study of acoustic and prosodic characteristics of vocalic hesitations. Fundamentals of Verbal and Nonverbal Communication and the Biometric Issue, 18 , 140.
    [Google Scholar]
  381. Vaughan, E. , & Clancy, B.
    (2013) Small corpora and pragmatics. InYearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics 2013 (pp.53–73). Springer. 10.1007/978‑94‑007‑6250‑3_4
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6250-3_4 [Google Scholar]
  382. Ward, N.
    (2006) Non-lexical conversational sounds in American English. Pragmatics & Cognition, 14 (1), 129–182. 10.1075/pc.14.1.08war
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.14.1.08war [Google Scholar]
  383. Watanabe, M. , & Rose, R.
    (2012) Pausology and hesitation phenomena in second language acquisition. The Routledge Encyclopedia of Second Language Acquisition, 480–483.
    [Google Scholar]
  384. Witton-Davies, G.
    (2014) The study of fluency and its development in monologue and dialogue [PhD Thesis]. Lancaster University.
    [Google Scholar]
  385. Wood, D.
    (2001) In search of fluency: What is it and how can we teach it?Canadian Modern Language Review, 57 (4), 573–589. 10.3138/cmlr.57.4.573
    https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.57.4.573 [Google Scholar]
  386. Wright, M.
    (2005) Studies of the phonetics-interaction interface: Clicks and interactional structures in English conversation [PhD Thesis]. University of York.
    [Google Scholar]
  387. (2011) On clicks in English talk-in-interaction. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 41 (2), 207–229. 10.1017/S0025100311000144
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025100311000144 [Google Scholar]
  388. Wulff, S. , & Ellis, N. C.
    (2018) Usage-based approaches to second language acquisition. Bilingual Cognition and Language: The State of the Science across Its Subfields, 54 , 37. 10.1075/sibil.54.03wul
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.54.03wul [Google Scholar]
  389. Yasinnik, Y. , Shattuck-Hufnagel, S. , & Veilleux, N.
    (2005) Gesture marking of disfluencies in spontaneous speech. Disfluency in Spontaneous Speech.
    [Google Scholar]
  390. Yule, G.
    (1996) Pragmatics. Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  391. Zhang, Y. , Baills, F. , & Prieto, P.
    (2020) Hand-clapping to the rhythm of newly learned words improves L2 pronunciation: Evidence from training Chinese adolescents with French words. Language Teaching Research, 24 (5), 666–689. 10.1177/1362168818806531
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168818806531 [Google Scholar]
  392. Zuniga, M. , & Simard, D.
    (2019) Factors influencing L2 self-repair behavior: The role of L2 proficiency, attentional control and L1 self-repair behavior. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 48 (1), 43–59. 10.1007/s10936‑018‑9587‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-018-9587-2 [Google Scholar]
/content/books/9789027247261
Loading
/content/books/9789027247261
dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
-contentType:Journal -contentType:Chapter
10
5
Chapter
content/books/9789027247261
Book
false
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error