1887
  1. Home
  2. Books
  3. Reference
  4. Chapter

Speakers, addressees and the referential process

A pragmatic approach

image of Speakers, addressees and the referential process
  • Affiliations: 1: Université Grenoble Alpes; 2: Université de Lorraine (Nancy)

References

  1. Abbott, Barbara
    2010 Reference. Oxford: OUP.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Addley, Esther & Connolly, Kate
    2009 Roman Polanski arrested in Switzerland 31 years after fleeing trial. The Guardian, 27 September 2009.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Aguilar-Guevara, Ana , Le Bruyn, Bert & Zwarts, Joost
    (eds) 2014 Weak Referentiality [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 219]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.219
     https://doi.org/10.1075/la.219 [Google Scholar]
  4. Almor, Amit , Kempler, Daniel , MacDonald, Maryellen C. , Andersen, Elaine S. & Tyler, Lorraine K.
    1999 Why do Alzheimer patients have difficulty with pronouns? Working memory, semantics, and reference in comprehension and production in Alzheimer’s disease. Brain and Language67: 202–227. 10.1006/brln.1999.2055
     https://doi.org/10.1006/brln.1999.2055 [Google Scholar]
  5. Ariel, Mira
    1990 Accessing Noun-Phrase Antecedents. New York NY: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Bach, Kent
    2008 On referring and not referring. InReference. Interdisciplinary Perspectives, Jeanette K. Gundel & Nancy Hedberg (eds), 13–59. Oxford: OUP. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331639.003.0002
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331639.003.0002 [Google Scholar]
  7. Baumer, Emmanuel
    2015 Noms propres et anaphores nominales en Anglais et en Français. Étude comparée des chaînes de référence. Paris: L’Harmattan.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Baumer, Emmanuel , Dias, Dominique , Gardelle, Laure & Prak-Derrington, Emmanuelle
    2021 Quelles régularités pour les chaînes de référence dans le genre “nouvelles d’actualité”? Exploration contrastive allemand / anglais / français. Travaux de Linguistique82: 17–43.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Biggs, Stephen & Geirsson, Heimir
    2021 Introduction. InThe Routledge Handbook of Linguistic Reference, Stephen Biggs & Heimir Geirsson (eds), 1–13. New York NY: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Burge, Tyler
    1971 Truth and Some Referential Devices. PhD dissertation, Princeton University.
  11. 1974 Demonstrative constructions, reference, and truth. The Journal of Philosophy71: 205–223. 10.2307/2025348
     https://doi.org/10.2307/2025348 [Google Scholar]
  12. Capin, Daniéla
    2014 Chaînes de référence dans les textes médiévaux non narratifs: Les year books ou l’élaboration d’une écriture juridique. Langages195: 61–78. 10.3917/lang.195.0061
     https://doi.org/10.3917/lang.195.0061 [Google Scholar]
  13. Clark, Andy
    2013 Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences36: 181–204. 10.1017/S0140525X12000477
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X12000477 [Google Scholar]
  14. Condamines, Anne
    2005 Anaphore nominale infidèle et hyperonymie: Le rôle du genre textuel. Revue de Sémantique et Pragmatique18: 33–52.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Combettes, Bernard & Tomassone, Roberte
    1988 Le Texte Informatif: Aspects Linguistiques. Bruxelles: De Boeck.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Consten, Manfred
    2004 Anaphorisch oder Deiktisch? Zu einem Integrativen Modell Domänen-gebundener Referenz. Tübingen: Niemeyer. 10.1515/9783110937190
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110937190 [Google Scholar]
  17. Corblin, Francis
    1995 Les Chaînes de Référence dans le Discours. Rennes: Presses Universitaires de Rennes.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Cornish, Francis
    2000 L’accessibilité cognitive des référents, le centrage d’attention, et la structuration du discours: une vue d’ensemble. Verbum22(1): 7–30.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Delaborde, Marine
    2020 Analyse en corpus de chaînes de coréférence. La coréférence non-stricte à l’épreuve de la linguistique outillée. PhD dissertation, Université Sorbonne Nouvelle.
  20. Emmott, Catherine
    2015 Interpreting antecedentless pronouns in narrative texts: Knowledge types, world building and inference-making. InThe Pragmatics of Personal Pronouns, Laure Gardelle & Sandrine Sorlin (eds), 241–258. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.171.12emm
     https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.171.12emm [Google Scholar]
  21. Erickson, Thomas D. & Mattson, Mark E.
    1981 From words to meaning: A semantic illusion. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior20: 540–551. 10.1016/S0022‑5371(81)90165‑1
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(81)90165-1 [Google Scholar]
  22. Ferreira, Fernanda , Bailey, Karl G. D. & Ferraro, Vittoria
    2002 Good-enough representations in language comprehension. Current Directions in Psychological Science11: 11–15. 10.1111/1467‑8721.00158
     https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.00158 [Google Scholar]
  23. Ferreira, Fernanda & Lowder, Matthew W.
    2016 Prediction, information structure, and good-enough language processing. Psychology of Learning and Motivation65: 217–247. 10.1016/bs.plm.2016.04.002
     https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.plm.2016.04.002 [Google Scholar]
  24. Finegan, Edward
    2015 Language. Its Structure and Use, 7th edn. Stanford CA: Cengage Learning.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Fløttum, Kjersti
    2004 La présence de l’auteur dans les articles scientifiques: Étude des pronoms je, nous et on . InStructures et discours, Antoine Auchlin , Marcel Burger , Laurent Filliettaz , Anne Grobet , Jacques Moeschler , Laurent Perrin , Corinne Rossari & Louis de Saussure (eds), 401–406. Québec: Ed. Nota Bene.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Frege, Gottlob
    1892 Über Sinn und Bedeutung. Zeitschrift für Philosophie Und Philosophische Kritik100(1): 25–50.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Frege, Gottlob
    1948 Sense and reference. The Philosophical Review57(3): 209–230. 10.2307/2181485
     https://doi.org/10.2307/2181485 [Google Scholar]
  28. Garvey, Catherine & Caramazza, Alfonso
    1974 Implicit causality in verbs. Linguistic Inquiry, 5 (1974): 459–464.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Grice, H. Paul
    1975 Logic and conversation. InSyntax and Semantics, Peter Cole & Jerry L. Morgan (eds), 41–58. New York NY: Academic Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Grosz, Barbara J. , Joshi, Aravind K. & Weinstein, Scott
    1995 Centering: A framework for modeling the local coherence of discourse. Computational Linguistics21(2): 203–225.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Gundel, Jeanette & Abbott, Barbara
    (eds) 2019 The Oxford Handbook of Reference. Oxford: OUP. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199687305.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199687305.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  32. Gundel, Jeanette K. , Hedberg, Nancy & Zacharski, Ron
    1993 Cognitive status and the form of referring expressions in discourse. Language69(2): 274–307. 10.2307/416535
     https://doi.org/10.2307/416535 [Google Scholar]
  33. Gunkel, Lutz
    2017 Referenz. InGrammatik des Deutschen im europäischen Vergleich. Das Nominal, unter Mitarbeit von Christine Günther & Ursula Hoberg. Teilband1: Funktionale Domänen, Wort und Wortklassen [Schriften des Instituts für Deutsche Sprache 14], Lutz Gunkel , Adriano Murelli , Susanne Schlotthauer , Bernd Wiese & Gisela Zifonun (eds), 33–62. Berlin: De Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Handel, Stephen
    1989 Listening. An Introduction to the Perception of Auditory Events. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Hanks, Peter
    2019 Reference as a speech act. In Gundel & Abbott (eds), 11–18. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199687305.013.2
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199687305.013.2 [Google Scholar]
  36. Hedberg, Nancy , Gundel, Jeanette & Borthen, Kaja
    2019 Different senses of “referential.” In Gundel & Abbott (eds), 100–116. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199687305.013.6
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199687305.013.6 [Google Scholar]
  37. von Heusinger, Klaus
    2002 Reference and representation of pronouns. InPronouns: Grammar and Representation [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 52] Heike Wiese & Horst J. Simon (eds), 109–135. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.52.09heu
     https://doi.org/10.1075/la.52.09heu [Google Scholar]
  38. Huddleston, Rodney & Pullum, Geoffrey K.
    2002 The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: CUP. 10.1017/9781316423530
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316423530 [Google Scholar]
  39. Johnson-Laird, Philip N.
    1983 Mental Models. Towards a Cognitive Science of Language, Inference and Consciousness. Cambridge: CUP.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Kaiser, Elsi
    2015 Perspective-shifting and free indirect discourse: Experimental investigations. Proceedings of SALT 25 , 346–372. 10.3765/salt.v25i0.3436
     https://doi.org/10.3765/salt.v25i0.3436 [Google Scholar]
  41. Kaiser, Elsi & Fedele, Emily
    2019 Reference resolution: A psycholinguistic perspective. In Gundel & Abbott (eds), 309–336. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199687305.013.15
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199687305.013.15 [Google Scholar]
  42. Karttunen, Lauri
    1976 Discourse referents. Syntax and Semantics40: 363–386.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Kleiber, Georges
    1991 Anaphore-deixis: Où en sommes-nous?L’Information Grammaticale51: 3–18. 10.3406/igram.1991.3231
     https://doi.org/10.3406/igram.1991.3231 [Google Scholar]
  44. 1997 Référents évolutifs et pronoms: Une suite. InLa continuité référentielle, Georges Kleiber , Catherine Schnedecker & Jean-Emmanuel Tyvaert (eds), 115–148. Paris: Klincksieck.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Langacker, Ronald W.
    2008 Cognitive Grammar. An Introduction. Oxford: OUP. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331967.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331967.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  46. Morris, Desmond
    1989 Catlore. London: Cape.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. O’Rourke, Michael
    2019 Referential intentions. In Gundel & Abbott (eds), 19–44. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199687305.013.3
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199687305.013.3 [Google Scholar]
  48. Pickering, Martin J. & Garrod, Simon
    2004 Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue. Behavioral and Brain Sciences27: 169–190. 10.1017/S0140525X04000056
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X04000056 [Google Scholar]
  49. Premack, David & Woodruff, Guy
    1978 Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind?Behavioral and Brain Sciences1: 515–526. 10.1017/S0140525X00076512
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00076512 [Google Scholar]
  50. Ranger, Graham
    2002 Notes sur la traduction de l’anaphore lexicale du français vers l’anglais. InLangues et cultures en contact: Traduire e(s)t commenter, Catherine Paulin (ed.), Philippe Rapatel (collab.), 83–98. Besançon: Presses Universitaires Franc-comtoises.
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Rankin, Ian
    2000 The Hanging Garden. London: Orion.
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Roberts, Craige
    2019 Contextual influences on reference. In Gundel & Abbott (eds), 260–280. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199687305.013.13
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199687305.013.13 [Google Scholar]
  53. Salazar Orvig, Anne
    2019 Reference and referring expressions in first language acquisition. In Gundel & Abbott (eds), 283–308. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199687305.013.14
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199687305.013.14 [Google Scholar]
  54. Salazar Orvig, Anne & Grossen, Michèle
    2010 La co-construction: Une facette dialogale du dialogisme?Talk given at the Colloque International Dialogisme: Langue, Discours , Montpellier. [Online] www.praxiling.fr/IMG/pdf_SalazarGrossen1.pdf (10 November 2022).
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Salazar Orvig, Anne , Marcos, Haydée , Morgenstern, Aliyah , Hassan, Rouba , Leber Marin, Jocelyne & Parès, Jacques
    2010 Dialogic factors in toddlers’ use of clitic pronouns. First Language30(3–4): 375–402. 10.1177/0142723710379957
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0142723710379957 [Google Scholar]
  56. Sandoz, Mélanie , Iglesias, Katia , Achim, Amélie M. , Démonet, Jean-François & Fossard, Marion
    2020 Referential adjustment during discourse production in Alzheimer’s disease. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology42(7): 710–724. 10.1080/13803395.2020.1798883
     https://doi.org/10.1080/13803395.2020.1798883 [Google Scholar]
  57. de Saussure, Ferdinand
    1916 Cours de linguistique générale. Paris: Payot.
     [Google Scholar]
  58. Schnedecker, Catherine
    1995 La distribution du nom propre et son rôle dans la structuration des chaînes de référence. InNom propre et nomination, Michèle Noailly (ed.), 311–329. Paris: Klincksieck.
     [Google Scholar]
  59. 2005 Les chaînes de référence dans les portraits journalistiques: Éléments de description. Travaux de Linguistique51 2005/2: 85–133. 10.3917/tl.051.0085
     https://doi.org/10.3917/tl.051.0085 [Google Scholar]
  60. 2014 Chaînes de référence et variations selon le genre. Langages 2014(3): 23–42. 10.3917/lang.195.0023
     https://doi.org/10.3917/lang.195.0023 [Google Scholar]
  61. 2021 Les chaînes de référence en français. Paris: Ophrys.
     [Google Scholar]
  62. Schnedecker, Catherine & Landragin, Frédéric
    2014 Les chaînes de référence: Présentation. Langages195: 3–22. 10.3917/lang.195.0003
     https://doi.org/10.3917/lang.195.0003 [Google Scholar]
  63. Schnedecker, Catherine & Longo, Laurence
    2013 Impact des genres sur la composition des chaînes de référence: Le cas des faits divers. Proceedings of the 3e Congrès Mondial de Linguistique Française, July 2012, Lyon, France: 1957–1972 <https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00804280 (10 November 2022).
     [Google Scholar]
  64. Schwarz, Monika
    1995 Reference as a process – Towards a theory of cognitive reference. InReference in Multidisciplinary Perspective, Richard Geiger (ed.), 461–470. Hildesheim: Olms.
     [Google Scholar]
  65. 2000 Indirekte Anaphern in Texten: Studien zur Domänengebundenen Referenz und Kohärenz im Deutschen. Tübingen: Niemeyer. 10.1515/9783110912517
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110912517 [Google Scholar]
  66. 2001 Establishing coherence in text. Conceptual continuity and textworld model. Logos and Language2(1): 15–24.
     [Google Scholar]
  67. Schwarz-Friesel, Monika
    2007 Indirect anaphora in text: A cognitive account. InAnaphors in Text. Cognitive, Formal and Applied Approaches to Anaphoric Reference [Studies in Language Companion Series 86], Monika Schwarz-Friesel , Manfred Consten & Mareile Knees (eds), 3–20. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.86.04sch
     https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.86.04sch [Google Scholar]
  68. Searle, John Rogers
    1969 Speech Acts. An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: CUP. 10.1017/CBO9781139173438
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173438 [Google Scholar]
  69. Stewart, Andrew J. , Holler, Judith & Kidd, Evan
    2007 Shallow processing of ambiguous pronouns: Evidence for delay. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology60(12): 1680–1696. 10.1080/17470210601160807
     https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210601160807 [Google Scholar]
  70. Strawson, Peter Frederick
    1950 On referring. Mind59(235): 320–344. 10.1093/mind/LIX.235.320
     https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/LIX.235.320 [Google Scholar]
  71. Strawson, Peter Frederick
    1959 Individuals. An Essay in Descriptive Metaphysics. London: Methuen.
     [Google Scholar]
  72. Strube, Michael & Hahn, Udo
    1996 Functional centering. InProceedings of the 34th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 270–277. https://aclanthology.org/P96-1036.pdf (10 November 2022). 10.3115/981863.981899
     https://doi.org/10.3115/981863.981899 [Google Scholar]
  73. 1999 Functional centering. Grounding referential coherence in information structure. Computational Linguistics25(3): 309–344.
     [Google Scholar]
  74. Thurmair, Maria
    2003 Referenzketten im Text: Pronominalisierungen, Nicht-Pronominalisierungen und Renominalisierungen. InAm Anfang war der Text, Maria Thurmair & Eva-Maria Willkop (eds), 197–219. München: Iudicium Verlag.
     [Google Scholar]
  75. Trask, Robert Lawrence
    2007 Language and Linguistics. The Key Concepts, 2nd edn, edited by Peter Stockwell . Oxon: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203961131
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203961131 [Google Scholar]
  76. Truan, Naomi
    2018 Generisch, unpersönlich, indefinit? Die Pronomina man, on, one und generisches you im politischen Diskurs. InDiskursive Verfestigungen. Schnittstellen zwischen Morphosyntax, Phraseologie und Pragmatik im Deutschen und im Sprachvergleich [Konvergenz und Divergenz 7], Laurent Gautier , Pierre-Yves Modicom & Hélène Vinckel-Roisin (eds), 347–363. Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110585292‑022
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110585292-022 [Google Scholar]
  77. Tomasello, Michael
    1999 The Cultural Origins of Human Cognition. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  78. 2003 Constructing a Language. A Usage-Based Theory of Language Acquisition. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  79. Tutin, Agnès
    2002 A corpus-based study of pronominal anaphoric expressions in French. InProceedings of Discourse Anaphora and Anaphora Resolution – DAARC 2002 (Lisbon, 18–20 September 2002).
     [Google Scholar]
  80. Vinckel-Roisin, Hélène
    2012 Les “centres anticipateurs” dans les théories du Centrage: Modèle grammatical vs. modèle fonctionnel. Verbum34(1): 99–130.
     [Google Scholar]
  81. 2018 La répétition immédiate du nom propre en allemand: Enjeux textuels et argumentatifs [Studien zur Sprachwissenschaft 6]. Hildesheim: Olms.
     [Google Scholar]
  82. Walker, Marilyn A. , Joshi, Aravind K. & Prince, Ellen
    (eds) 1998 Centering Theory in Discourse. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  83. Webber, Bonnie L.
    2016[1979] A Formal Approach to Discourse Anaphora. New York NY: Garland. Re-published in 2016 by Routledge. 10.4324/9781315403342
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315403342 [Google Scholar]

References

  1. Abbott, Barbara
    2010 Reference. Oxford: OUP.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Addley, Esther & Connolly, Kate
    2009 Roman Polanski arrested in Switzerland 31 years after fleeing trial. The Guardian, 27 September 2009.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Aguilar-Guevara, Ana , Le Bruyn, Bert & Zwarts, Joost
    (eds) 2014 Weak Referentiality [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 219]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.219
     https://doi.org/10.1075/la.219 [Google Scholar]
  4. Almor, Amit , Kempler, Daniel , MacDonald, Maryellen C. , Andersen, Elaine S. & Tyler, Lorraine K.
    1999 Why do Alzheimer patients have difficulty with pronouns? Working memory, semantics, and reference in comprehension and production in Alzheimer’s disease. Brain and Language67: 202–227. 10.1006/brln.1999.2055
     https://doi.org/10.1006/brln.1999.2055 [Google Scholar]
  5. Ariel, Mira
    1990 Accessing Noun-Phrase Antecedents. New York NY: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Bach, Kent
    2008 On referring and not referring. InReference. Interdisciplinary Perspectives, Jeanette K. Gundel & Nancy Hedberg (eds), 13–59. Oxford: OUP. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331639.003.0002
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331639.003.0002 [Google Scholar]
  7. Baumer, Emmanuel
    2015 Noms propres et anaphores nominales en Anglais et en Français. Étude comparée des chaînes de référence. Paris: L’Harmattan.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Baumer, Emmanuel , Dias, Dominique , Gardelle, Laure & Prak-Derrington, Emmanuelle
    2021 Quelles régularités pour les chaînes de référence dans le genre “nouvelles d’actualité”? Exploration contrastive allemand / anglais / français. Travaux de Linguistique82: 17–43.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Biggs, Stephen & Geirsson, Heimir
    2021 Introduction. InThe Routledge Handbook of Linguistic Reference, Stephen Biggs & Heimir Geirsson (eds), 1–13. New York NY: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Burge, Tyler
    1971 Truth and Some Referential Devices. PhD dissertation, Princeton University.
  11. 1974 Demonstrative constructions, reference, and truth. The Journal of Philosophy71: 205–223. 10.2307/2025348
     https://doi.org/10.2307/2025348 [Google Scholar]
  12. Capin, Daniéla
    2014 Chaînes de référence dans les textes médiévaux non narratifs: Les year books ou l’élaboration d’une écriture juridique. Langages195: 61–78. 10.3917/lang.195.0061
     https://doi.org/10.3917/lang.195.0061 [Google Scholar]
  13. Clark, Andy
    2013 Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences36: 181–204. 10.1017/S0140525X12000477
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X12000477 [Google Scholar]
  14. Condamines, Anne
    2005 Anaphore nominale infidèle et hyperonymie: Le rôle du genre textuel. Revue de Sémantique et Pragmatique18: 33–52.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Combettes, Bernard & Tomassone, Roberte
    1988 Le Texte Informatif: Aspects Linguistiques. Bruxelles: De Boeck.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Consten, Manfred
    2004 Anaphorisch oder Deiktisch? Zu einem Integrativen Modell Domänen-gebundener Referenz. Tübingen: Niemeyer. 10.1515/9783110937190
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110937190 [Google Scholar]
  17. Corblin, Francis
    1995 Les Chaînes de Référence dans le Discours. Rennes: Presses Universitaires de Rennes.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Cornish, Francis
    2000 L’accessibilité cognitive des référents, le centrage d’attention, et la structuration du discours: une vue d’ensemble. Verbum22(1): 7–30.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Delaborde, Marine
    2020 Analyse en corpus de chaînes de coréférence. La coréférence non-stricte à l’épreuve de la linguistique outillée. PhD dissertation, Université Sorbonne Nouvelle.
  20. Emmott, Catherine
    2015 Interpreting antecedentless pronouns in narrative texts: Knowledge types, world building and inference-making. InThe Pragmatics of Personal Pronouns, Laure Gardelle & Sandrine Sorlin (eds), 241–258. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.171.12emm
     https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.171.12emm [Google Scholar]
  21. Erickson, Thomas D. & Mattson, Mark E.
    1981 From words to meaning: A semantic illusion. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior20: 540–551. 10.1016/S0022‑5371(81)90165‑1
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(81)90165-1 [Google Scholar]
  22. Ferreira, Fernanda , Bailey, Karl G. D. & Ferraro, Vittoria
    2002 Good-enough representations in language comprehension. Current Directions in Psychological Science11: 11–15. 10.1111/1467‑8721.00158
     https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.00158 [Google Scholar]
  23. Ferreira, Fernanda & Lowder, Matthew W.
    2016 Prediction, information structure, and good-enough language processing. Psychology of Learning and Motivation65: 217–247. 10.1016/bs.plm.2016.04.002
     https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.plm.2016.04.002 [Google Scholar]
  24. Finegan, Edward
    2015 Language. Its Structure and Use, 7th edn. Stanford CA: Cengage Learning.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Fløttum, Kjersti
    2004 La présence de l’auteur dans les articles scientifiques: Étude des pronoms je, nous et on . InStructures et discours, Antoine Auchlin , Marcel Burger , Laurent Filliettaz , Anne Grobet , Jacques Moeschler , Laurent Perrin , Corinne Rossari & Louis de Saussure (eds), 401–406. Québec: Ed. Nota Bene.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Frege, Gottlob
    1892 Über Sinn und Bedeutung. Zeitschrift für Philosophie Und Philosophische Kritik100(1): 25–50.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Frege, Gottlob
    1948 Sense and reference. The Philosophical Review57(3): 209–230. 10.2307/2181485
     https://doi.org/10.2307/2181485 [Google Scholar]
  28. Garvey, Catherine & Caramazza, Alfonso
    1974 Implicit causality in verbs. Linguistic Inquiry, 5 (1974): 459–464.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Grice, H. Paul
    1975 Logic and conversation. InSyntax and Semantics, Peter Cole & Jerry L. Morgan (eds), 41–58. New York NY: Academic Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Grosz, Barbara J. , Joshi, Aravind K. & Weinstein, Scott
    1995 Centering: A framework for modeling the local coherence of discourse. Computational Linguistics21(2): 203–225.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Gundel, Jeanette & Abbott, Barbara
    (eds) 2019 The Oxford Handbook of Reference. Oxford: OUP. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199687305.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199687305.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  32. Gundel, Jeanette K. , Hedberg, Nancy & Zacharski, Ron
    1993 Cognitive status and the form of referring expressions in discourse. Language69(2): 274–307. 10.2307/416535
     https://doi.org/10.2307/416535 [Google Scholar]
  33. Gunkel, Lutz
    2017 Referenz. InGrammatik des Deutschen im europäischen Vergleich. Das Nominal, unter Mitarbeit von Christine Günther & Ursula Hoberg. Teilband1: Funktionale Domänen, Wort und Wortklassen [Schriften des Instituts für Deutsche Sprache 14], Lutz Gunkel , Adriano Murelli , Susanne Schlotthauer , Bernd Wiese & Gisela Zifonun (eds), 33–62. Berlin: De Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Handel, Stephen
    1989 Listening. An Introduction to the Perception of Auditory Events. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Hanks, Peter
    2019 Reference as a speech act. In Gundel & Abbott (eds), 11–18. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199687305.013.2
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199687305.013.2 [Google Scholar]
  36. Hedberg, Nancy , Gundel, Jeanette & Borthen, Kaja
    2019 Different senses of “referential.” In Gundel & Abbott (eds), 100–116. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199687305.013.6
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199687305.013.6 [Google Scholar]
  37. von Heusinger, Klaus
    2002 Reference and representation of pronouns. InPronouns: Grammar and Representation [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 52] Heike Wiese & Horst J. Simon (eds), 109–135. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.52.09heu
     https://doi.org/10.1075/la.52.09heu [Google Scholar]
  38. Huddleston, Rodney & Pullum, Geoffrey K.
    2002 The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: CUP. 10.1017/9781316423530
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316423530 [Google Scholar]
  39. Johnson-Laird, Philip N.
    1983 Mental Models. Towards a Cognitive Science of Language, Inference and Consciousness. Cambridge: CUP.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Kaiser, Elsi
    2015 Perspective-shifting and free indirect discourse: Experimental investigations. Proceedings of SALT 25 , 346–372. 10.3765/salt.v25i0.3436
     https://doi.org/10.3765/salt.v25i0.3436 [Google Scholar]
  41. Kaiser, Elsi & Fedele, Emily
    2019 Reference resolution: A psycholinguistic perspective. In Gundel & Abbott (eds), 309–336. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199687305.013.15
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199687305.013.15 [Google Scholar]
  42. Karttunen, Lauri
    1976 Discourse referents. Syntax and Semantics40: 363–386.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Kleiber, Georges
    1991 Anaphore-deixis: Où en sommes-nous?L’Information Grammaticale51: 3–18. 10.3406/igram.1991.3231
     https://doi.org/10.3406/igram.1991.3231 [Google Scholar]
  44. 1997 Référents évolutifs et pronoms: Une suite. InLa continuité référentielle, Georges Kleiber , Catherine Schnedecker & Jean-Emmanuel Tyvaert (eds), 115–148. Paris: Klincksieck.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Langacker, Ronald W.
    2008 Cognitive Grammar. An Introduction. Oxford: OUP. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331967.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331967.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  46. Morris, Desmond
    1989 Catlore. London: Cape.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. O’Rourke, Michael
    2019 Referential intentions. In Gundel & Abbott (eds), 19–44. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199687305.013.3
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199687305.013.3 [Google Scholar]
  48. Pickering, Martin J. & Garrod, Simon
    2004 Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue. Behavioral and Brain Sciences27: 169–190. 10.1017/S0140525X04000056
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X04000056 [Google Scholar]
  49. Premack, David & Woodruff, Guy
    1978 Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind?Behavioral and Brain Sciences1: 515–526. 10.1017/S0140525X00076512
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00076512 [Google Scholar]
  50. Ranger, Graham
    2002 Notes sur la traduction de l’anaphore lexicale du français vers l’anglais. InLangues et cultures en contact: Traduire e(s)t commenter, Catherine Paulin (ed.), Philippe Rapatel (collab.), 83–98. Besançon: Presses Universitaires Franc-comtoises.
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Rankin, Ian
    2000 The Hanging Garden. London: Orion.
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Roberts, Craige
    2019 Contextual influences on reference. In Gundel & Abbott (eds), 260–280. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199687305.013.13
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199687305.013.13 [Google Scholar]
  53. Salazar Orvig, Anne
    2019 Reference and referring expressions in first language acquisition. In Gundel & Abbott (eds), 283–308. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199687305.013.14
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199687305.013.14 [Google Scholar]
  54. Salazar Orvig, Anne & Grossen, Michèle
    2010 La co-construction: Une facette dialogale du dialogisme?Talk given at the Colloque International Dialogisme: Langue, Discours , Montpellier. [Online] www.praxiling.fr/IMG/pdf_SalazarGrossen1.pdf (10 November 2022).
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Salazar Orvig, Anne , Marcos, Haydée , Morgenstern, Aliyah , Hassan, Rouba , Leber Marin, Jocelyne & Parès, Jacques
    2010 Dialogic factors in toddlers’ use of clitic pronouns. First Language30(3–4): 375–402. 10.1177/0142723710379957
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0142723710379957 [Google Scholar]
  56. Sandoz, Mélanie , Iglesias, Katia , Achim, Amélie M. , Démonet, Jean-François & Fossard, Marion
    2020 Referential adjustment during discourse production in Alzheimer’s disease. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology42(7): 710–724. 10.1080/13803395.2020.1798883
     https://doi.org/10.1080/13803395.2020.1798883 [Google Scholar]
  57. de Saussure, Ferdinand
    1916 Cours de linguistique générale. Paris: Payot.
     [Google Scholar]
  58. Schnedecker, Catherine
    1995 La distribution du nom propre et son rôle dans la structuration des chaînes de référence. InNom propre et nomination, Michèle Noailly (ed.), 311–329. Paris: Klincksieck.
     [Google Scholar]
  59. 2005 Les chaînes de référence dans les portraits journalistiques: Éléments de description. Travaux de Linguistique51 2005/2: 85–133. 10.3917/tl.051.0085
     https://doi.org/10.3917/tl.051.0085 [Google Scholar]
  60. 2014 Chaînes de référence et variations selon le genre. Langages 2014(3): 23–42. 10.3917/lang.195.0023
     https://doi.org/10.3917/lang.195.0023 [Google Scholar]
  61. 2021 Les chaînes de référence en français. Paris: Ophrys.
     [Google Scholar]
  62. Schnedecker, Catherine & Landragin, Frédéric
    2014 Les chaînes de référence: Présentation. Langages195: 3–22. 10.3917/lang.195.0003
     https://doi.org/10.3917/lang.195.0003 [Google Scholar]
  63. Schnedecker, Catherine & Longo, Laurence
    2013 Impact des genres sur la composition des chaînes de référence: Le cas des faits divers. Proceedings of the 3e Congrès Mondial de Linguistique Française, July 2012, Lyon, France: 1957–1972 <https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00804280 (10 November 2022).
     [Google Scholar]
  64. Schwarz, Monika
    1995 Reference as a process – Towards a theory of cognitive reference. InReference in Multidisciplinary Perspective, Richard Geiger (ed.), 461–470. Hildesheim: Olms.
     [Google Scholar]
  65. 2000 Indirekte Anaphern in Texten: Studien zur Domänengebundenen Referenz und Kohärenz im Deutschen. Tübingen: Niemeyer. 10.1515/9783110912517
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110912517 [Google Scholar]
  66. 2001 Establishing coherence in text. Conceptual continuity and textworld model. Logos and Language2(1): 15–24.
     [Google Scholar]
  67. Schwarz-Friesel, Monika
    2007 Indirect anaphora in text: A cognitive account. InAnaphors in Text. Cognitive, Formal and Applied Approaches to Anaphoric Reference [Studies in Language Companion Series 86], Monika Schwarz-Friesel , Manfred Consten & Mareile Knees (eds), 3–20. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.86.04sch
     https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.86.04sch [Google Scholar]
  68. Searle, John Rogers
    1969 Speech Acts. An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: CUP. 10.1017/CBO9781139173438
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173438 [Google Scholar]
  69. Stewart, Andrew J. , Holler, Judith & Kidd, Evan
    2007 Shallow processing of ambiguous pronouns: Evidence for delay. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology60(12): 1680–1696. 10.1080/17470210601160807
     https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210601160807 [Google Scholar]
  70. Strawson, Peter Frederick
    1950 On referring. Mind59(235): 320–344. 10.1093/mind/LIX.235.320
     https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/LIX.235.320 [Google Scholar]
  71. Strawson, Peter Frederick
    1959 Individuals. An Essay in Descriptive Metaphysics. London: Methuen.
     [Google Scholar]
  72. Strube, Michael & Hahn, Udo
    1996 Functional centering. InProceedings of the 34th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 270–277. https://aclanthology.org/P96-1036.pdf (10 November 2022). 10.3115/981863.981899
     https://doi.org/10.3115/981863.981899 [Google Scholar]
  73. 1999 Functional centering. Grounding referential coherence in information structure. Computational Linguistics25(3): 309–344.
     [Google Scholar]
  74. Thurmair, Maria
    2003 Referenzketten im Text: Pronominalisierungen, Nicht-Pronominalisierungen und Renominalisierungen. InAm Anfang war der Text, Maria Thurmair & Eva-Maria Willkop (eds), 197–219. München: Iudicium Verlag.
     [Google Scholar]
  75. Trask, Robert Lawrence
    2007 Language and Linguistics. The Key Concepts, 2nd edn, edited by Peter Stockwell . Oxon: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203961131
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203961131 [Google Scholar]
  76. Truan, Naomi
    2018 Generisch, unpersönlich, indefinit? Die Pronomina man, on, one und generisches you im politischen Diskurs. InDiskursive Verfestigungen. Schnittstellen zwischen Morphosyntax, Phraseologie und Pragmatik im Deutschen und im Sprachvergleich [Konvergenz und Divergenz 7], Laurent Gautier , Pierre-Yves Modicom & Hélène Vinckel-Roisin (eds), 347–363. Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110585292‑022
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110585292-022 [Google Scholar]
  77. Tomasello, Michael
    1999 The Cultural Origins of Human Cognition. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  78. 2003 Constructing a Language. A Usage-Based Theory of Language Acquisition. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  79. Tutin, Agnès
    2002 A corpus-based study of pronominal anaphoric expressions in French. InProceedings of Discourse Anaphora and Anaphora Resolution – DAARC 2002 (Lisbon, 18–20 September 2002).
     [Google Scholar]
  80. Vinckel-Roisin, Hélène
    2012 Les “centres anticipateurs” dans les théories du Centrage: Modèle grammatical vs. modèle fonctionnel. Verbum34(1): 99–130.
     [Google Scholar]
  81. 2018 La répétition immédiate du nom propre en allemand: Enjeux textuels et argumentatifs [Studien zur Sprachwissenschaft 6]. Hildesheim: Olms.
     [Google Scholar]
  82. Walker, Marilyn A. , Joshi, Aravind K. & Prince, Ellen
    (eds) 1998 Centering Theory in Discourse. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  83. Webber, Bonnie L.
    2016[1979] A Formal Approach to Discourse Anaphora. New York NY: Garland. Re-published in 2016 by Routledge. 10.4324/9781315403342
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315403342 [Google Scholar]

  • From This Site

    /content/books/9789027254672-slcs.228.01gar
    dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal
    10
    5
/content/books/9789027254672-slcs.228.01gar
dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
-contentType:Journal
10
5
Chapter
content/books/9789027254672
Book
false
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error