Child L2 Writers

References

1. Abe, M.
   (2008) Exploring the role of model essays in the IELTS writing test: A feedback tool (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Queensland, Australia.
2. Adams, A. -M. , & Guillot, K.
   (2008) Working memory and writing in bilingual students. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 156 , 13–28. 10.2143/ITL.156.0.2034417
   https://doi.org/10.2143/ITL.156.0.2034417 [Google Scholar]
3. Adams, R.
   (2003) L2 output, reformulation and noticing: Implications for IL development. Language Teaching Research, 7(3), 347–376. 10.1191/1362168803LR127OA
   https://doi.org/10.1191/1362168803LR127OA [Google Scholar]
4. Adams, R. , & Ross-Feldman, L.
   (2008) Does writing influence learner attention to form? The speaking-writing connection in second language and academic literacy development. In D. Belcher & A. Hirvela . (Eds.), The oral/literate connection: Perspectives on L2 speaking, writing, and other media interactions (pp.210–225). University of Michigan Press.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Ahmadian, M. J.
   (2011) The effect of ‘massed’ task repetitions on complexity, accuracy and fluency: Does it transfer to a new task?The Language Learning Journal, 39 (3), 269–280. 10.1080/09571736.2010.545239
   https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2010.545239 [Google Scholar]
6. Ahmadian, M. J.
   (2012) Task repetition in ELT. ELT journal, 66 (3), 380–382. 10.1093/elt/ccs020
   https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccs020 [Google Scholar]
7. Ahmadian, M. J. , & Tavakoli, M.
   (2010) The effects of simultaneous use of careful online planning and task repetition on accuracy, complexity, and fluency in EFL learners’ oral production. Language Teaching Research, 15 , 35–59. 10.1177/1362168810383329
   https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168810383329 [Google Scholar]
8. Al Khalil, M. K.
   (2011) Second language motivation: Its relationship to noticing, affect, and production in task-based interaction (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Georgetown University, USA.
9. Al Khalil, M. K.
   (2016) Insights from measurement of task-related motivation. In A. Mackey & E. Marsden . (Eds.), Advancing methodology and practice: The IRIS repository of instruments for research into second languages (pp.243–262). Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Albin, M. L. , Benton, S. L. , & Khramtsova, I.
    (1996) Individual differences in interest and narrative writing. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21 (4), 305–324. 10.1006/ceps.1996.0024
    https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1996.0024 [Google Scholar]
11. Alegría de la Colina, A. , & García Mayo, M. P.
    (2009) Oral interaction in task-based EFL learning: The use of the L1 as a cognitive tool. IRAL: International Review of Applied Linguistics, 47 (3–4), 325–345. 10.1515/iral.2009.014
    https://doi.org/10.1515/iral.2009.014 [Google Scholar]
12. Alloway, T. P.
    (2011) Improving working memory: Supporting students’ learning. Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Alloway, T. P. , & Alloway, R. G.
    (2010) Investigating the predictive roles of working memory and IQ in academic attainment. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 106 (1), 20–29. 10.1016/j.jecp.2009.11.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2009.11.003 [Google Scholar]
14. Alloway, T. P. , Gathercole, S. E. , Willis, C. , & Adams, A. M.
    (2004) A structural analysis of working memory and related cognitive skills in early childhood. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 87 (2), 85–106. 10.1016/j.jecp.2003.10.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2003.10.002 [Google Scholar]
15. Alvarez, E.
    (2006) Rate and route of acquisition in EFL narrative development at different ages. In C. Muñoz . (Ed.), Age and the rate of foreign language learning (pp.127–155). Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781853598937‑008
    https://doi.org/10.21832/9781853598937-008 [Google Scholar]
16. Amiryousefi, M.
    (2016) The differential effects of two types of task repetition on the complexity, accuracy, and fluency in computer-mediated L2 written production: A focus on computer anxiety. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29 (5), 1052–1068. 10.1080/09588221.2016.1170040
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2016.1170040 [Google Scholar]
17. Anderman, E. M. , Maehr, M. L. , & Midgley, C.
    (1999) Declining motivation after the transition to middle school: Schools can make a difference. Journal of Research & Development in Education, 32 , 131–147.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Anderson, J. R.
    (1995) Learning and memory: An integrated approach. John Wiley & Sons.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Antón, M. , & DiCamilla, F.
    (1998) Socio-cognitive functions of L1 collaborative interaction in the L2 classroom. Canadian Modern Language Review, 54 (3), 314–342. 10.3138/cmlr.54.3.314
    https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.54.3.314 [Google Scholar]
20. Askew, S. , & Lodge, C.
    (2004) Gifts, ping-pong and loops–linking feedback and learning. In S. Askew . (Ed.). Feedback for learning (pp.13–30). Routledge. 10.4324/9780203017678
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203017678 [Google Scholar]
21. Aula Blasco, J.
    (2016) The relationship between writing anxiety, writing self-efficacy, and Spanish EFL students’ use of metacognitive writing strategies: A case study. Journal of English Studies, 14 , 7–45. 10.18172/jes.3069
    https://doi.org/10.18172/jes.3069 [Google Scholar]
22. Azkarai, A. , & García Mayo, M. P.
    (2016) Task repetition effects on L1 use in EFL child task-based interaction. Language Teaching Research, 21 (4), 480–495. 10.1177/1362168816654169
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168816654169 [Google Scholar]
23. Azkarai, A. , & Kopinska, M.
    (2020) Young EFL learners and collaborative writing: A study on patterns of interaction, engagement in LREs, and task motivation. System, 94 (1). 10.1016/j.system.2020.102338
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102338 [Google Scholar]
24. Azpilicueta-Martinez, R.
    (2020) Verbal evidence of task-related strategies in EFL: Children and adult interactions. International Journal of English Studies, 20 (3), 1–28. 10.6018/ijes.409961
    https://doi.org/10.6018/ijes.409961 [Google Scholar]
25. Baba, K. & Nitta, R.
    (2011) Task repetition and L2 writing development: A longitudinal study from a dynamic systems perspective. In H. Byrnes & R. M. Manchón . (Eds.), Task-based language learning and teaching: Insights from writing (pp.107–136). John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Baba, K. , & Nitta, R.
    (2014) Phase transitions in development of writing fluency from a complex dynamic systems perspective. Language Learning, 64 (1), 1–35. 10.1111/lang.12033
    https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12033 [Google Scholar]
27. Baddeley, A. D.
    (2002) Is working memory still working?European Psychologist, 7 (2), 85. 10.1027//1016‑9040.7.2.85
    https://doi.org/10.1027//1016-9040.7.2.85 [Google Scholar]
28. Baddeley, A. D. , & Hitch, G.
    (1974) Working memory. In G. H. Bower . (Ed.), Recent advances in learning and motivation (pp.47–89). Academic Press. 10.1016/S0079‑7421(08)60452‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-7421(08)60452-1 [Google Scholar]
29. Baddeley, A. D. , & Logie, R. H.
    (1999) Working memory: The multicomponent model. In A. Miyake & P. Shah . (Eds.), Models of working memory (pp.28–61). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139174909.005
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139174909.005 [Google Scholar]
30. Bandura, A.
    (1997) Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. Freeman.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Bennett, N. , & Cass, A.
    (1988) The effects of group composition on group interactive processes and pupil understanding. British Educational Research Journal, 15 , 19–32. 10.1080/0141192890150102
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0141192890150102 [Google Scholar]
32. Becker, C. , & Roos, J.
    (2016) An approach to creative speaking activities in the young learners'classroom. Education Inquiry, 7(1), 9–26. 10.3402/edui.v7.27613
    https://doi.org/10.3402/edui.v7.27613 [Google Scholar]
33. Berk, L.
    (2013) Child development. Pearson Education.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Best, J. R. , Miller, P. H. , & Naglieri, J. A.
    (2011) Relations between executive function and academic achievement from ages 5 to 17 in a large, representative national sample. Learning and Individual Differences, 21 , 327–336. 10.1016/j.lindif.2011.01.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2011.01.007 [Google Scholar]
35. Bilodeau, E. A.
    (1969) Principles of skill acquisition. Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Bitchener, J.
    (2012) A reflection on the language learning potential of written CF. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21 (4), 348–363. 10.1016/j.jslw.2012.09.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2012.09.006 [Google Scholar]
37. Bitchener, J.
    (2016) To what extent has the published written CF research aided our understanding of its potential for L2 development?International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 167 (2), 111–131. 10.1075/itl.167.2.01bit
    https://doi.org/10.1075/itl.167.2.01bit [Google Scholar]
38. Bitchener, J.
    (2019) The intersection between SLA and feedback research. In Hyland, K. , & F. Hyland (Eds.), Feedback in second language writing: Contexts and issues (pp.85–105). 2nd edition. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108635547.007
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108635547.007 [Google Scholar]
39. Bitchener, J. , & Knoch, U.
    (2010) Raising the linguistic accuracy level of advanced L2 writers with written corrective feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing, 19 (4), 207–217. 10.1016/j.jslw.2010.10.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2010.10.002 [Google Scholar]
40. Bitchener, J. , Young, S. , & Cameron, D.
    (2005) The effect of different types of corrective feedback on ESL student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 14, 191–205. 10.1016/j.jslw.2005.08.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2005.08.001 [Google Scholar]
41. Black, P. , Harrison, C. , Lee, C. , Marshal, B. & Wiliam, D.
    (2003) Assessment for learning: Putting it into practice. Open University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Black, P. , & Wiliam, D.
    (1998) Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education, 5 (1), 7–74. 10.1080/0969595980050102
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050102 [Google Scholar]
43. Bley-Vroman, R.
    (1986) Hypothesis testing in second language acquisition. Language Learning, 36 , 353–376. 10.1111/j.1467‑1770.1986.tb00559.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1986.tb00559.x [Google Scholar]
44. Bley-Vroman, R.
    (1989) What is the logical problem of foreign language learning?In S. Gass & J. Schachter . (Eds.), Linguistic perspectives on second language acquisition (pp.41–68). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139524544.005
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524544.005 [Google Scholar]
45. Bloom, B. S.
    (1956) Taxonomy of educational objectives. Vol. 1: Cognitive domain. David McKay.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Bloom, B.
    (1976) Human characteristics and school learning. McGraw–Hill.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Boo, Z. , Dörnyei, Z. , & Ryan, S.
    (2015) L2 motivation research 2005–2014: Understanding a publication surge and a changing landscape. System, 55 , 145–157. 10.1016/j.system.2015.10.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2015.10.006 [Google Scholar]
48. Britton, J. , Burgess, T. , Martin, N. , McLeod, A. , & Rosen, H.
    (1975) The development of writing abilities. Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Britton, J. R.
    (1970) Language and learning. Allen Lane.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Brophy, J.
    (1981) Teacher praise: A functional analysis. Review of Educational Research, 51 , 5–32. 10.3102/00346543051001005
    https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543051001005 [Google Scholar]
51. Brown, A. V.
    (2009) Students’ and teachers’ perceptions of effective foreign language teaching: A comparison of ideals. The Modern Language Journal, 93 , 46–60. 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.2009.00827.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00827.x [Google Scholar]
52. Bruner, J. S.
    (1972) Nature and uses of immaturity. American Psychologist, 27 (8), 687–708. 10.1037/h0033144
    https://doi.org/10.1037/h0033144 [Google Scholar]
53. Bruner, J. S.
    (1996), Culture of education. Harvard University Press. 10.4159/9780674251083
    https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674251083 [Google Scholar]
54. Bruner, R. F.
    (2001, August17). Repetition is the first principle of all learning. SSRN. Retrieved on4 August 2022fromhttps://ssrn.com/abstract=224340
    [Google Scholar]
55. Bruning, R. , & Horn, C.
    (2000) Developing motivation to write. Educational Psychologist, 35 (1), 25–37. 10.1207/S15326985EP3501_4
    https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3501_4 [Google Scholar]
56. Bui, G. , Ahmadian, M. J. , & Hunter, A. -M.
    (2018) Spacing effects on repeated L2 task performance. System, 81 , 1–13. 10.1016/j.system.2018.12.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2018.12.006 [Google Scholar]
57. Bull, R. , & Scerif, G.
    (2001) Executive functioning as a predictor of children’s mathematical ability: Inhibition, switching and working memory. Developmental Neuropsychology, 19 , 273–293. 10.1207/S15326942DN1903_3
    https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326942DN1903_3 [Google Scholar]
58. Busch, D.
    (2010) Pre-service teacher beliefs about language learning: The second language acquisition course as an agent for change. Language Teaching Research, 14 (3), 318–337. 10.1177/1362168810365239
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168810365239 [Google Scholar]
59. Butler, Y. G. , & Zeng, W.
    (2015) Young learners’ interactional development in task-based paired-assessment in their first and foreign languages: A case of English learners in China. Education, 43 (3), 292–321. 10.1080/03004279.2013.813955
    https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2013.813955 [Google Scholar]
60. Bygate, M.
    (1996) Effect of task repetition: Appraising the development of second language learners. In J. Willis & D. Willis . (Eds.), Challenge and change in language teaching (pp.136–146). Heinemann.
    [Google Scholar]
61. Bygate, M.
    (2001) Effects of task repetition on the structure and control of oral language. In M. Bygate , M. Swain , & P. Skehan . (Eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning teaching and testing (pp.23–48). Pearson Education.
    [Google Scholar]
62. Bygate, M.
    (2006) Areas of research that influence L2 speaking instruction. In E. Usó-Juan & A. Martínez-Flor . (Eds.), Current trends in the development and teaching of the four skills (pp.159–186). Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110197778.3.159
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197778.3.159 [Google Scholar]
63. Bygate, M.
    (Ed.) (2018) Learning language through task repetition. John Benjamins. 10.1075/tblt.11
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tblt.11 [Google Scholar]
64. Bygate, M. , & Samuda, V.
    (2005) Integrative planning through the use of task repetition. In R. Ellis . (Ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language (pp.37–74). John Benjamins. 10.1075/lllt.11.05byg
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.11.05byg [Google Scholar]
65. Cain, K. M. , & Dweck, C. S.
    (1995) The relation between motivational patterns and achievement cognitions through the elementary school years. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 41 , 25–52.
    [Google Scholar]
66. Cain, S.
    (2013) Quiet: The power of introverts in a world that can’t stop talking. Broadway Books.
    [Google Scholar]
67. Calzada, A. , & García Mayo, M. P.
    (2020a) Child EFL learners’ attitudes towards a collaborative writing task: An exploratory study. Language Teaching for Young Learners, 2 (1), 52–72. 10.1075/ltyl.19008.cal
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ltyl.19008.cal [Google Scholar]
68. Calzada, A. , & García Mayo, M. P.
    (2020b) Child EFL grammar learning through a collaborative writing task. Languaging in Language Learning and Teaching, 19–40. 10.1075/lllt.55.01cal
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.55.01cal [Google Scholar]
69. Calzada, A. , & García Mayo, M. P.
    (2021a) Child learners’ reflections about EFL grammar in a collaborative writing task: When form is not at odds with communication. Language Awareness, 30 (1), 1–16. 10.1080/09658416.2020.1751178
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2020.1751178 [Google Scholar]
70. Calzada, A. , & García Mayo, M. P.
    (2021b) Effects of proficiency and collaborative work on child EFL individual dictogloss writing. Language Teaching for Young Learners, 3 (2), 246–274. 10.1075/ltyl.20003.cal
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ltyl.20003.cal [Google Scholar]
71. Cánovas Guirao, J. , Roca de Larios, J. , & Coyle, Y.
    (2015) The use of models as a written feedback technique with young EFL learners. System, 52 (1), 63–77. 10.1016/j.system.2015.04.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2015.04.002 [Google Scholar]
72. Chandler, J.
    (2003) The efficacy of various kinds of error feedback for improvement in the accuracy and fluency of L2 student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12 , 267–296. 10.1016/S1060‑3743(03)00038‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(03)00038-9 [Google Scholar]
73. Charness, N. , Tuffiash, M. , Krampe, R. , Reingold, E. , & Vasyukova, E.
    (2005) The role of deliberate practice in chess expertise. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19 , 151–165. 10.1002/acp.1106
    https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1106 [Google Scholar]
74. Chaudron, C.
    (1988) Second language classrooms: Research on teaching and learning. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139524469
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524469 [Google Scholar]
75. Chen, H. , & Myhill, D.
    (2016) Children talking about writing: Investigating metalinguistic understanding. Linguistics and Education, 35, 100e108. 10.1016/j.linged.2016.07.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2016.07.004 [Google Scholar]
76. Chen, S. , Nassaji, H. , & Liu, Q.
    (2016) EFL learners’ perceptions and preferences of written corrective feedback: A case study of university students from Mainland China. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 1 (1), 1–17. 10.1186/s40862‑016‑0010‑y
    https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-016-0010-y [Google Scholar]
77. Chen, W.
    (2017) The effect of conversation engagement on L2 learning opportunities. ELT Journal Volume, 71 (3), 329–340. 10.1093/elt/ccw075
    https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccw075 [Google Scholar]
78. Chen, W.
    (2018) Patterns of pair interaction in communicative tasks: The transition process and effect on L2 teaching and learning. ELT Journal, 72 (4), 425–434. 10.1093/elt/ccy015
    https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccy015 [Google Scholar]
79. Chen, W. , & Yu, S.
    (2019) A longitudinal case study of changes in students’ attitudes, participation, and learning in collaborative writing. System, 82 , 83–96. 10.1016/j.system.2019.03.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2019.03.005 [Google Scholar]
80. Cheung, H.
    (1996) Non-word span as a unique predictor of second language vocabulary learning. Developmental Psychology, 32 , 867–873. 10.1037/0012‑1649.32.5.867
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.32.5.867 [Google Scholar]
81. Chomsky, N.
    (1975) Reflections on language. Pantheon.
    [Google Scholar]
82. Cockcroft, K.
    (2015) The role of working memory in childhood education: Five questions and answers. South African Journal of Childhood Education, 5 (1), 1–20. 10.4102/sajce.v5i1.347
    https://doi.org/10.4102/sajce.v5i1.347 [Google Scholar]
83. Cohen, A. D.
    (1982, May1–6). Writing like a native: The process of reformulation. Paper presented at theAnnual Convention of Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages, Honolulu, HI, United States.
    [Google Scholar]
84. Cohen, A. D.
    (1989) Reformulation: A technique for providing advanced feedback in writing. Guidelines: A Periodical for Classroom Language Teachers, 11 (2), 1–9.
    [Google Scholar]
85. Cook, G.
    (2015) Birds out of dinosaurs: The death and life of applied linguistics. Applied Linguistics, 36 (4), 425–433. 10.1093/applin/amv038
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amv038 [Google Scholar]
86. Cook, V.
    (1999) Using SLA research in language teaching. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 9 (2), 267–284. 10.1111/j.1473‑4192.1999.tb00176.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1473-4192.1999.tb00176.x [Google Scholar]
87. Copland, F. , Garton, S. , & Burns, A.
    (2014) Challenges in teaching English to young learners: Global perspectives and local realities. TESOL Quarterly, 48 (4), 738–762. 10.1002/tesq.148
    https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.148 [Google Scholar]
88. Copley, K.
    (2018) Neoliberalism and ELT coursebook content. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies, 15 (1), 43–62. 10.1080/15427587.2017.1318664
    https://doi.org/10.1080/15427587.2017.1318664 [Google Scholar]
89. Corder, S. P.
    (1967) The significance of learners’ errors. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 5 , 161–167. 10.1515/iral.1967.5.1‑4.161
    https://doi.org/10.1515/iral.1967.5.1-4.161 [Google Scholar]
90. Corder, S. P.
    (1973) Introducing applied linguistics. Penguin
    [Google Scholar]
91. Coulmas, F.
    (2003) Writing systems: An introduction to their linguistic analysis. Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
92. Courtney, L. , Graham, S. , Tonkyn, A. , & Marinis, T.
    (2017) Individual differences in early language learning: A study of English learners of French. Applied Linguistics, 38 (6), 824–847. 10.1093/applin/amv071
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amv071 [Google Scholar]
93. Cowan, N.
    (2010) The magic mystery four: How is working memory capacity limited and why?Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19 , 51–57. 10.1177/0963721409359277
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721409359277 [Google Scholar]
94. Cowan, N.
    (2014) Working memory underpins cognitive development, learning, and education. Educational Psychology Review, 26 (2), 197–223. 10.1007/s10648‑013‑9246‑y
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-013-9246-y [Google Scholar]
95. Coyle, Y. , Cánovas Guirao, J. , & Roca de Larios, J.
    (2018) Identifying the trajectories of young EFL learners across multi-stage writing and feedback processing tasks with model texts. Journal of Second Language Writing, 42 , 25–43. 10.1016/j.jslw.2018.09.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2018.09.002 [Google Scholar]
96. Coyle, Y. , Férez Mora, P. A. , & Solís Becerra, J.
    (2020) Improving reference cohesion in young EFL learners’ collaboratively written narratives: Is there a role for reformulation?System, 94 , 102333. 10.1016/j.system.2020.102333
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102333 [Google Scholar]
97. Coyle, Y. , & Roca de Larios, J.
    (2014) Exploring the role played by error correction and models on children’s reported noticing and output production in a L2 writing task. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 36 (3), 451–485. 10.1017/S0272263113000612
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263113000612 [Google Scholar]
98. Coyle, Y. , & Roca de Larios, J.
    (2020) Exploring young learners’ engagement with models as a written corrective technique in EFL and CLIL settings. System, 95 , 1–14. 10.1016/j.system.2020.102374
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102374 [Google Scholar]
99. Crosthwaite, P.
    (2017) Retesting the limits of data-driven learning: Feedback and error correction. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 30 (6), 447–473. 10.1080/09588221.2017.1312462
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2017.1312462 [Google Scholar]
100. Csizér, K. , & Kormos, J.
     (2009) Learning experiences, selves and motivated learning behavior: A comparative analysis of structural models for Hungarian secondary and university learners of English. In Z. Dörnyei & E. Ushioda . (Eds.), Motivation, language identity and the L2 self (pp.98–119). Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781847691293‑006
     https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847691293-006 [Google Scholar]
101. Cumming, A. H.
     (Ed.) (2006) Goals for academic writing: ESL students and their instructors. John Benjamins. 10.1075/lllt.15
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.15 [Google Scholar]
102. Damon, W.
     (1983) Social and personality development: Infancy through adolescence. Norton.
     [Google Scholar]
103. Damon, W. , & Phelps, E.
     (1989) Critical distinctions among three approaches to peer education. International Journal of Educational Research, 58 (1), 9–19. 10.1016/0883‑0355(89)90013‑X
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-0355(89)90013-X [Google Scholar]
104. DeKeyser, R. M.
     (1998) Beyond focus on form: Cognitive perspectives on learning and practicing second language grammar. In C. Doughty & J. Williams . (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp.42–63). Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
105. DeKeyser, R.
     (2007a) Situating the concept of practice. In R. DeKeyser . (Ed.), Practice in a second language (pp.1–18). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511667275.002
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511667275.002 [Google Scholar]
106. DeKeyser, R. M.
     (2007b) Skill acquisition theory. In B. VanPatten & J. Williams . (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction (pp.97–112). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Associates.
     [Google Scholar]
107. DeKeyser, R.
     (2010) Monitoring processes in Spanish as a second language during a study abroad program. Foreign Language Annals, 43 (1), 80–92. 10.1111/j.1944‑9720.2010.01061.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2010.01061.x [Google Scholar]
108. DeKeyser, R. , & Criado, R.
     (2012) Automatization, skill acquisition, and practice in second language acquisition. In C. A. Chapelle . (Ed.). The encyclopedia of applied linguistics. John Wiley & Sons. 10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal0067
     https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal0067 [Google Scholar]
109. DeKeyser, R. , & Juffs, A.
     (2005) Cognitive considerations in L2 learning. In E. Hinkel . (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp.437–454). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Associates.
     [Google Scholar]
110. DeStefano, D. , & LeFevre, J.
     (2004) The role of working memory in mental arithmetic. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 16 , 353–386. 10.1080/09541440244000328
     https://doi.org/10.1080/09541440244000328 [Google Scholar]
111. Dewaele, J. -M. , Petrides, K. V. , & Furnham, A.
     (2008) Effect of trait emotional intelligence and sociobiographical variables on communicative anxiety and foreign language anxiety among adult multilinguals: A review and empirical investigation. Language Learning, 58 (4), 911–960. 10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2008.00482.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2008.00482.x [Google Scholar]
112. DiCamilla, F. J. , & Antón, M.
     (2004) Private speech: A study of language for thought in the collaborative interaction of language learners. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 14 (1), 36–69. 10.1111/j.1473‑4192.2004.00053.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1473-4192.2004.00053.x [Google Scholar]
113. Dick, W. , Carey, L. , & Carey, J. O.
     (2001) The systematic design of instruction. Longman.
     [Google Scholar]
114. Dixon, L. Q. , Zhao, J. , Shin, J. Y. , Wu, S. , Su, J. H. , Burgess-Brigham, R. , Gezer, M. U. , & Snow, C.
     (2012) What we know about second language acquisition: A synthesis from four perspectives. Review of Educational Research, 82 (1), 5–60. 10.3102/0034654311433587
     https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654311433587 [Google Scholar]
115. Djigunović, J. M.
     (2009) Impact of learning conditions on young FL learners’ motivation. In M. Nikolov . (Ed.), Early learning of modern foreign languages. Processes and outcomes, (pp.75–89). Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781847691477‑008
     https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847691477-008 [Google Scholar]
116. Donato, R.
     (1988) Beyond group: A psycholinguistic rationale for collective activity in second-language learning (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Delaware, Newark.
117. Donato, R.
     (1994) Collective scaffolding in second language learning. In J. P. Lantolf & G. Appel . (Eds.), Vygotskian approaches to second language research (pp.33–56). Ablex.
     [Google Scholar]
118. Dörnyei, Z.
     (2001) New themes and approaches in second language motivation research. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 21 , 43–59. 10.1017/S0267190501000034
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190501000034 [Google Scholar]
119. Dörnyei, Z.
     (2002) The motivational basis of language learning tasks. In P. Robinon . (Ed.), Individual differences and instructed language learning (pp.137–158). John Benjamins. 10.1075/lllt.2.10dor
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.2.10dor [Google Scholar]
120. Dörnyei, Z.
     (2003) Attitudes, orientations and motivations in language learning: Advances in theory, research, and applications. Language Learning, 53 (1), 3–32. 10.1111/1467‑9922.53222
     https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9922.53222 [Google Scholar]
121. Dörnyei, Z.
     (2005) The psychology of the language learner: Individual differences in second language acquisition. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 10.1017/S0272263107310061
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263107310061 [Google Scholar]
122. Dörnyei, Z.
     (2009) The L2 motivational self system. In Z. Dörnyei & E. Ushioda . (Eds), Motivation, language identity and the L2 self (pp.92–142). Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781847691293‑003
     https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847691293-003 [Google Scholar]
123. Dörnyei, Z.
     (2019) Task motivation. What makes an L2 task engaging?Researching L2 Task Performance and Pedagogy, 13 , 53–66. 10.1075/tblt.13.04dor
     https://doi.org/10.1075/tblt.13.04dor [Google Scholar]
124. Dörnyei, Z.
     (2020) From integrative motivation to directed motivational currents: The evolution of the understanding of L2 motivation over three decades. In M. Lamb , K. Csizér , A. Henry , & S. Ryan . (Eds.), Palgrave Macmillan handbook of motivation for language learning (pp.39–69). Palgrave Macmillan.
     [Google Scholar]
125. Dörnyei, Z. , Csizér, K. , & Németh, N.
     (2006) Motivation, language attitudes and globalisation: A Hungarian perspective. Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781853598876
     https://doi.org/10.21832/9781853598876 [Google Scholar]
126. Dörnyei, Z. , & Kormos, J.
     (2000) The role of individual and social variables in oral task performance. Language Teaching Research, 4 (3), 275–300. 10.1177/136216880000400305
     https://doi.org/10.1177/136216880000400305 [Google Scholar]
127. Dörnyei, Z. , & Ryan, S.
     (2015) The psychology of the language learner revisited. Routledge. 10.4324/9781315779553
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315779553 [Google Scholar]
128. Dörnyei, Z. & Skehan, P.
     (2003) Individual differences in second language learning. In C. Doughty & M. Long . (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp.539–587). Blackwell. 10.1002/9780470756492.ch18
     https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470756492.ch18 [Google Scholar]
129. Dörnyei, Z. , & Ushioda, E.
     (2011) Teaching and researching motivation (2nd ed.). Pearson Education.
     [Google Scholar]
130. Doughty, C. , & Long, M. H.
     (Eds.) (2003) Handbook of second language acquisition. Basil Blackwell. 10.1002/9780470756492
     https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470756492 [Google Scholar]
131. Doughty, C. , & Varela, E.
     (1998) Communicative focus on form. In C. Doughty & J. Williams . (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp.114–138). Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
132. Doughty, C. , & Williams, J.
     (Eds.) (1998) Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition. Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
133. Dweck, C. S.
     (1999) Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality and development. Psychology Press.
     [Google Scholar]
134. Dweck, C. S.
     (2002) Messages that motivate: How praise molds students’ beliefs, motivation, and performance (in surprising ways). In J. Aronson . (Ed.), Improving academic achievement: Impact of psychological factors on education (pp.37–60). Academic Press. 10.1016/B978‑012064455‑1/50006‑3
     https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012064455-1/50006-3 [Google Scholar]
135. Ede, L. , & Lunsford, A.
     (1990) Singular texts/plural authors. Southern Illinois University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
136. Edelenbos, P. , Johnstone, R. , & Kubanek, A.
     (2006) The main pedagogical principles underlying the teaching of languages to very young learners. European Commission, Education and Culture, Culture and Communication Multilingualism Policy.
     [Google Scholar]
137. Edstrom, A.
     (2015) Triads in the L2 classroom: Interaction patterns and engagement during a collaborative task. System, 52 , 26–37. 10.1016/j.system.2015.04.014
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2015.04.014 [Google Scholar]
138. Eisenberg, N. , Valiente, C. , Fabes, R. A. , Smith, C. L. , Reiser, M. , Shepard, S. A. , Losoya, A. H. , Guthrie, I. K. , Murphy, B. C. , & Cumberland, A. J.
     (2003) The relations of effortful control and ego control to children’s resiliency and social functioning. Developmental Psychology, 39 , 761–776. 10.1037/0012‑1649.39.4.761
     https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.39.4.761 [Google Scholar]
139. Ellis, R.
     (2005) Planning and task performance in a second language. John Benjamins. 10.1075/lllt.11
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.11 [Google Scholar]
140. Ellis, R.
     (2009) A typology of written corrective feedback types. ELT Journal, 63 , 97–107. 10.1093/elt/ccn023
     https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccn023 [Google Scholar]
141. Ellis, R. , Tanaka, Y. , & Yamazaki, A.
     (1994) Classroom interaction, comprehension, and the acquisition of L2 word meanings. Language learning, 44 (3), 449–491. 10.1111/j.1467‑1770.1994.tb01114.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1994.tb01114.x [Google Scholar]
142. Ellis, S. , & Gauvain, M.
     (1992) Social and cultural influences on children’s collaborative interactions. In L. T. Winegar & J. Valsiner . (Eds.), Children’s development within social context (pp.155–180). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
     [Google Scholar]
143. Elwood, J. A. , & Bode, J.
     (2014) Student preferences vis-à-vis teacher feedback in university EFL writing classes in Japan. System, 42 (1), 333–343. 10.1016/j.system.2013.12.023
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2013.12.023 [Google Scholar]
144. Enever, J.
     (2018) Policy and politics in global primary English. Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
145. Engel de Abreu, P. M. J. , Gathercole, S. E. , & Martin, R.
     (2011) Disentangling the relationship between working memory and language: The roles of short-term storage and cognitive control. Learning and Individual Differences, 21 (5), 569–574. 10.1016/j.lindif.2011.06.002
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2011.06.002 [Google Scholar]
146. Ericsson, K. A. , Krampe, R. T. , & Tesch-Römer, C.
     (1993) The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychological Review, 100 (3), 363–406. 10.1037/0033‑295X.100.3.363
     https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.100.3.363 [Google Scholar]
147. European Commission
     European Commission (2012) First European survey on languages competences. Final report. Retrieved from ec.europa.eu/dgs/education_culture/repository/languages/policy/strategic-framework/documents/language-survey-final-report_en.pdf
     [Google Scholar]
148. Evans, D. W. , Leckman, J. F. , Carter, A. , Reznick, S. , Henshaw, D. , King, R. A. , & Pauls, D.
     (1997) Ritual, habit, and perfectionism: The prevalence and development of compulsive-like behavior in normal young children. Child Development, 68 , 58–68. 10.2307/1131925
     https://doi.org/10.2307/1131925 [Google Scholar]
149. Fazio, L. L.
     (2001) The effect of corrections and commentaries on the journal writing accuracy of minority- and majority-language students. Journal of Second Language Writing, 10 (4), 235–249. 10.1016/S1060‑3743(01)00042‑X
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(01)00042-X [Google Scholar]
150. Ferkany, M.
     (2008) The educational importance of self-esteem. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 42 (1), 119–132. 10.1111/j.1467‑9752.2008.00610.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9752.2008.00610.x [Google Scholar]
151. Fernández Dobao, A.
     (2012) Collaborative writing tasks in the L2 classroom: Comparing group, pair, and individual work. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21 (1), 40–58. 10.1016/j.jslw.2011.12.002
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2011.12.002 [Google Scholar]
152. Ferris, D. R.
     (2003) Response to student writing: Implications for second language students. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 10.4324/9781410607201
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410607201 [Google Scholar]
153. Ferris, D. R.
     (2004) The “grammar correction” debate in L2 writing: Where are we, and where do we go from here? (and what do we do in the meantime…?). Journal of Second Language Writing, 13 (1), 49–62. 10.1016/j.jslw.2004.04.005
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2004.04.005 [Google Scholar]
154. Ferris, D.
     (2006) Does error feedback help student writers? New evidence on the short- and long term effects of written error correction. In Hyland, K. , & F. Hyland (Eds.), Feedback in second language writing: Contexts and issues (pp.81–104). 1st edition. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139524742.007
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524742.007 [Google Scholar]
155. Ferris, D. R.
     (2010) Second language writing research and written corrective feedback in SLA: Intersections and practical applications. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32 (2), 181–201. 10.1017/S0272263109990490
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263109990490 [Google Scholar]
156. Ferris, D. R. , & Roberts, B.
     (2001) Error feedback in L2 writing classes: how explicit does it need to be?Journal of Second Language Writing, 10 , 161–184. 10.1016/S1060‑3743(01)00039‑X
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(01)00039-X [Google Scholar]
157. Finders, J. K. , McClelland, M. M. , Geldhof, G. J. , Rothwell, D. W. , & Hatfield, B. E.
     (2021) Explaining achievement gaps in kindergarten and third grade: The role of self-regulation and executive function skills. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 54 , 72–85. 10.1016/j.ecresq.2020.07.008
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2020.07.008 [Google Scholar]
158. Flowerdew, J.
     (2002) Genre in the classroom: A linguistic approach. In A. M. Johns . (Ed.), Genre in the classroom: Multiple perspectives (pp.91–102). Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
159. Francis, D. J. , Shaywitz, S. E. , Stuebing, K. K. , Shaywitz, B. A. , & Fletcher, J. M.
     (1996) Developmental lag versus deficit models of reading disability: A longitudinal, individual growth curves analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88 , 3–17. 10.1037/0022‑0663.88.1.3
     https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.88.1.3 [Google Scholar]
160. Fukuta, J.
     (2016) Effects of task repetition on learners’ attention orientation in L2 oral production. Language Teaching Research, 20 (3), 321–340. 10.1177/1362168815570142
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168815570142 [Google Scholar]
161. García Hernández, F. J. , Roca de Larios, J. , & Coyle, Y.
     (2017) Reformulation as a problem-solving space for young EFL writers: A longitudinal study of language learning strategies. In M. P. García Mayo . (Ed.), Learning foreign languages in primary school: Research insights (pp.193–222). Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781783098118‑012
     https://doi.org/10.21832/9781783098118-012 [Google Scholar]
162. García Mayo, M. P.
     (Ed.) (2017) Learning foreign languages in primary school: Research insights. Multilingual Matters.
     [Google Scholar]
163. García-Mayo, M. P.
     (2018) Child task-supported interaction in the Spanish EFL setting. Research and challenges. International Journal of English Studies, 18 (2), 119–143. 10.6018/ijes/2018/2/319731
     https://doi.org/10.6018/ijes/2018/2/319731 [Google Scholar]
164. García Mayo, M. P. , & Alcón Soler, E.
     (2013) Negotiated input and output. Interaction. In J. Herschensohn & M. Young-Scholten . (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp.209–229). Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
165. García Mayo, M. P. , & García Lecumberri, M. L.
     (2003) Age and the acquisition of English as a foreign language. Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781853596407
     https://doi.org/10.21832/9781853596407 [Google Scholar]
166. García Mayo, M. P. , & Imaz Agirre, A.
     (2016) Task repetition and its impact on EFL children’s negotiation of meaning strategies and pair dynamics: An exploratory study. The Language Learning Journal, 44 (4), 451–466. 10.1080/09571736.2016.1185799
     https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2016.1185799 [Google Scholar]
167. García Mayo, M. P. , & Imaz Agirre, A.
     (2019) Task modality and pair formation method: Their impact on patterns of interaction and LREs among EFL primary school children. System, 80 , 165–175. 10.1016/j.system.2018.11.011
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2018.11.011 [Google Scholar]
168. García Mayo, M. P. , Imaz Agirre, A. I. , & Azkarai, A.
     (2018) Task repetition effects on CAF in EFL child task-based oral interaction. In M. J. Ahmadian & M. P. García Mayo . (Eds.), Recent perspectives on task-based language learning and teaching (pp.9–27). De Gruyter Mouton.
     [Google Scholar]
169. García Mayo, P. , Lázaro-Ibarrola, A. , & Liceras, J.
     (2005) Placeholders in the English interlanguage of bilingual (Basque/Spanish) children. Language Learning, 55 (3), 445–489. 10.1111/j.0023‑8333.2005.00312.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0023-8333.2005.00312.x [Google Scholar]
170. García Mayo, M. P. , & Loidi Labandibar, U.
     (2017) The use of models as written corrective feedback in English as a Foreign Language (EFL) writing. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 37 , 110–127. 10.1017/S0267190517000071
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190517000071 [Google Scholar]
171. Gardner, R. C.
     (1985), Social psychology and second language learning: The role of attitudes and motivation. Edward Arnold.
     [Google Scholar]
172. Gardner, R. C. , & Lambert, W. E.
     (1959) Motivational variables in second language acquisition. Journal of Psychology, 13 (4), 266–272.
     [Google Scholar]
173. Gass, S. M.
     (1988) Second language vocabulary acquisition. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 9 , 92–106. 10.1017/S0267190500000829
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190500000829 [Google Scholar]
174. Gass, S. M.
     (1990) Second and foreign language learning: Same, different or none of the above?In B. VanPatten & J. Lee . (Eds.), Second language acquisition (pp.34–44). Multilingual Matters.
     [Google Scholar]
175. Gass, S. M. , & Mackey, A.
     (2007) Input, interaction, and output in second language acquisition. In B. VanPatten , & J. Williams . (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition (pp.175–200). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
     [Google Scholar]
176. Gass, S. , Mackey, A. , Alvarez-Torres, M. J. , & Fernández-García, M.
     (1999) The effects of task repetition on linguistic output. Language Learning, 49 (4), 549–581. 10.1111/0023‑8333.00102
     https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.00102 [Google Scholar]
177. Gathercole, S. E. , & Alloway, T. P.
     (2008) Working memory and learning: A practical guide for teachers. Sage.
     [Google Scholar]
178. Gathercole, S. E. , Pickering, S. J. , Ambridge, B. , & Wearing, H.
     (2004) The structure of working memory from 4 to 15 years of age. Developmental Psychology, 40 , 177–190. 10.1037/0012‑1649.40.2.177
     https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.40.2.177 [Google Scholar]
179. Gerber, A. S. , & Malhotra, N.
     (2008) Publication bias in empirical sociological research: Do arbitrary significance levels distort published results?Sociological Methods & Research, 37 (1), 3–30. 10.1177/0049124108318973
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124108318973 [Google Scholar]
180. Gilabert, R. , Manchón, R. , & Vasylets, O.
     (2016) Mode in theoretical and empirical TBLT research: Advancing research agendas. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 36 , 117–135. 10.1017/S0267190515000112
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190515000112 [Google Scholar]
181. Gobet, F. , & Campitelli, G.
     (2007) The role of domain-specific practice, handedness, and starting age in chess. Developmental Psychology, 43 (1), 159–172. 10.1037/0012‑1649.43.1.159
     https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.43.1.159 [Google Scholar]
182. Gokhale, A. A.
     (1995) Collaborative learning enhances critical thinking. Journal of Technology Education, 7 (1). 10.21061/jte.v7i1.a.2
     https://doi.org/10.21061/jte.v7i1.a.2 [Google Scholar]
183. Gorman, M. , & Ellis, R.
     (2019) The relative effects of metalinguistic explanation and direct written corrective feedback on children’s grammatical accuracy in new writing. Language Teaching for Young Learners, 1 (1), 57–81. 10.1075/ltyl.00005.gor
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ltyl.00005.gor [Google Scholar]
184. Gottfried, A. E. , Fleming, J. S. , & Gottfried, A. W.
     (2001) Continuity of academic intrinsic motivation from childhood through late adolescence: A longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93 (1), 3–13. 10.1037/0022‑0663.93.1.3
     https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.93.1.3 [Google Scholar]
185. Graham, S.
     (2020) The sciences of reading and writing must become more fully integrated. Reading Research Quarterly, 55 , 35–44. 10.1002/rrq.332
     https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.332 [Google Scholar]
186. Graham, S. , Harris, K. R. , & Mason, L.
     (2005) Improving the writing performance, knowledge, and self-efficacy of struggling young writers: The effects of self-regulated strategy development. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 30 (2), 207–241. 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2004.08.001
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2004.08.001 [Google Scholar]
187. Graham, S. , & Hebert, M.
     (2011) Writing to read: A meta-analysis of the impact of writing and writing instruction on reading. Harvard Educational Review, 81 , 710–744. 10.17763/haer.81.4.t2k0m13756113566
     https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.81.4.t2k0m13756113566 [Google Scholar]
188. Graham, S. , Kiuhara, S. A. , & MacKay, M.
     (2020) The effects of writing on learning in science, social studies, and mathematics: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 90 (2), 179–226. 10.3102/0034654320914744
     https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654320914744 [Google Scholar]
189. Green, J. , Martin, A. J. , & Marsh, H. W.
     (2007) Motivation and engagement in English, mathematics and science high school subjects: Towards an understanding of multidimensional domain specificity. Learning and Individual Differences, 17 , 269–279. 10.1016/j.lindif.2006.12.003
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2006.12.003 [Google Scholar]
190. Guénette, D.
     (2007) Is feedback pedagogically correct? Research design issues in studies of feedback on writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 16 (1), 40–53. 10.1016/j.jslw.2007.01.001
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2007.01.001 [Google Scholar]
191. Guiora, A. Z.
     (2005) The language sciences: The challenges ahead. A farewell address. Language Learning, 55 , 183–189. 10.1111/j.0023‑8333.2005.00302.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0023-8333.2005.00302.x [Google Scholar]
192. Hakkarainen, K. , Lipponen, L. , Jarvela, S. , & Niemivirta, M.
     (1999) The interaction of motivational orientation and knowledge-seeking inquiry in computer-supported collaborative learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 21 , 263–81. 10.2190/C525‑TDYQ‑WWKY‑87CB
     https://doi.org/10.2190/C525-TDYQ-WWKY-87CB [Google Scholar]
193. Hamburg, D. A.
     (1968) Evolution of emotional responses: Evidence from recent research on non-human primates. Science and Psychoanalysis, 12 , 39–54.
     [Google Scholar]
194. Hamidun, N. , Hizwari, S. , Hashim, M. , & Othman, N.
     (2012) Enhancing students’ motivation by providing feedback on writing: The case of international students from Thailand. International Journal of Social Science and Humanity, 2 (6), 591–594. 10.7763/IJSSH.2012.V2.179
     https://doi.org/10.7763/IJSSH.2012.V2.179 [Google Scholar]
195. Han, J. , & Jung, J. K.
     (2007) Patterns and preferences of corrective feedback and learner repair. Korean Journal of Applied Linguistics, 23 (1), 243–260.
     [Google Scholar]
196. Han, Z. -H.
     (2000, October). Rethinking the role of corrective feedback in Communicative Language Teaching. Paper presented at the27th New York State TESOL Convention, Rochester, NY, United States.
     [Google Scholar]
197. Han, Z. -H.
     (2001) Fine-tuning corrective feedback. Foreign Language Annals, 34 , 582–599. 10.1111/j.1944‑9720.2001.tb02105.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2001.tb02105.x [Google Scholar]
198. Han, Z. -H.
     (2002) A study of the impact of recasts on tense consistency in L2 output. TESOL Quarterly, 36 (4), 543–572. 10.2307/3588240
     https://doi.org/10.2307/3588240 [Google Scholar]
199. Hanaoka, O.
     (2006a) Exploring the role of models in promoting noticing in L2 writing. Jacket Bulletin, 42 , 1–13.
     [Google Scholar]
200. Hanaoka, O.
     (2006b) Noticing from models and reformulations: A case study of two Japanese EFL learners. Sophia Linguistica, 54 , 167–192.
     [Google Scholar]
201. Hanaoka, O.
     (2007) Output, noticing, and learning: An investigation into the role of spontaneous attention to form in a four-stage writing task. Language Teaching Research, 11 (4), 459–479. 10.1177/1362168807080963
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168807080963 [Google Scholar]
202. Hanaoka, O. , & Izumi, S.
     (2012) Noticing and uptake: Addressing pre-articulated covert problems in L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21 (4), 332–347. 10.1016/j.jslw.2012.09.008
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2012.09.008 [Google Scholar]
203. Harter, S.
     (2003) The development of self-representations during childhood and adolescence. In M. R. Leary & J. P. Tangney . (Eds.), Handbook of self and identity (pp.610–642). Guilford.
     [Google Scholar]
204. Harter, S.
     (2006) The self. In N. Eisenberg . (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology (6th ed., Vol.3, pp.505–570). John Wiley & Sons.
     [Google Scholar]
205. Hartup, W. W.
     (1982) Peer relations. In C. B. Kopp & J. B. Krakow . (Eds.), The child: Development in a social context (pp.514–575). Addison-Wesley.
     [Google Scholar]
206. Hashemian, M. , & Heidari, A.
     (2013) The relationship between L2 learners’ motivation/attitude and success in L2 writing. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 70 , 476–489. 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.01.085
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.01.085 [Google Scholar]
207. Hattie, J.
     (2012) Visible learning for teachers: Maximizing impact on learning. Routledge. 10.4324/9780203181522
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203181522 [Google Scholar]
208. Hattie, J. , & Timperley, H.
     (2007) The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77 (1), 81–112. 10.3102/003465430298487
     https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487 [Google Scholar]
209. Hawkes, M.
     (2012) Using task repetition to direct learner attention and focus on form. ELT Journal, 66 (3), 327–336. 10.1093/elt/ccr059
     https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccr059 [Google Scholar]
210. Hedgcock, J. , & Lefkowitz, N.
     (1994) Feedback on feedback: Assessing learner receptivity to teacher response in L2 composing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 3 (2), 141–163. 10.1016/1060‑3743(94)90012‑4
     https://doi.org/10.1016/1060-3743(94)90012-4 [Google Scholar]
211. Henry, A.
     (2009) Gender differences in compulsory school pupils’ L2 self-concepts: A longitudinal study. System, 37 , 177–193. 10.1016/j.system.2008.11.003
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2008.11.003 [Google Scholar]
212. Hidalgo, M. Á. , & Garcia Mayo, M. P.
     (2021) The influence of task repetition type on young EFL learners’ attention to form. Language Teaching Research, 25 (4), 565–586. 10.1177/1362168819865559
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168819865559 [Google Scholar]
213. Hidalgo, M. Á. , & Lázaro-Ibarrola, A.
     (2020) Task repetition and collaborative writing by EFL children: Beyond CAF measures. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 10 (3), 501–522. 10.14746/ssllt.2020.10.3.5
     https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2020.10.3.5 [Google Scholar]
214. Hinde, R. A.
     (1974) Biological bases of human social behaviour. McGraw-Hill.
     [Google Scholar]
215. Hirvela, A. , & Belcher, D.
     (2016) Reading/writing and speaking/writing connections: The advantages of multimodal pedagogy. In R. M. Manchón & P. K. Matsuda . (Eds.), Handbook of second and foreign language writing (pp.587–612). De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9781614511335‑030
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9781614511335-030 [Google Scholar]
216. Hornstra, L. , van der Veen, I. , Peetsma, T. , & Volman, M.
     (2013) Developments in motivation and achievement during primary school: A longitudinal study on group-specific differences. Learning and Individual Differences, 23 , 195–204. 10.1016/j.lindif.2012.09.004
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2012.09.004 [Google Scholar]
217. Housen, A. , & Kuiken, F.
     (2009) Complexity, accuracy and fluency in second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 30 , 461–473. 10.1093/applin/amp048
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amp048 [Google Scholar]
218. Humphrey, N.
     (2004) The death of the feel-good factor? Self-esteem in the educational context. School Psychology International, 25 (3), 347–360. 10.1177/0143034304046906
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0143034304046906 [Google Scholar]
219. Hyde, M.
     (1993) Pair work – A blessing or a curse? An analysis of pair work from pedagogical, cultural, social and psychological perspectives. System, 21 (3), 343–348. 10.1016/0346‑251X(93)90024‑B
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0346-251X(93)90024-B [Google Scholar]
220. Hyland, F.
     (1998) The impact of teacher written feedback on individual writers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 7 (3), 255–286. 10.1016/S1060‑3743(98)90017‑0
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(98)90017-0 [Google Scholar]
221. Hyland, K.
     (2003) Second language writing. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511667251
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511667251 [Google Scholar]
222. Hyland, K. , & Hyland, F.
     (Eds.) (2006) Feedback in second language writing: Contexts and issues. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139524742
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524742 [Google Scholar]
223. Imaz-Agirre, A. , & García-Mayo
     (2020) The impact of agency in pair formation on the degree of participation in young learners’ collaborative dialogue. In C. Lambert & R. Oliver . (Eds.), Using tasks in second language teaching (pp.306–323). Multilingual Matters.
     [Google Scholar]
224. Ives, D.
     (2004) Three NS-NNS upper primary school pairs. A case study. Australian Language and Literacy Matters, 1 , 11–16.
     [Google Scholar]
225. Jacobs, J. E. , Lanza, S. , Osgood, D. W. , Eccles, J. S. , & Wigfield, A.
     (2002) Changes in children’s self-competence and values: Gender and domain differences across grades one through twelve. Child Development, 73 , 509–527. 10.1111/1467‑8624.00421
     https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00421 [Google Scholar]
226. Jang, H. , & Cheung, Y. L.
     (2020) Impacts of dyadic interaction on second language writing: A study with eight bilingual primary school students in Singapore. Education 3–13, 48 (5), 527–540. 10.1080/03004279.2019.1624804
     https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2019.1624804 [Google Scholar]
227. Johnson, D. R. , Alvarez, P. , Longerbeam, S. , Soldner, M. , Inkelas, K. K. , Leonard, J. B. , & Rowan-Kenyon, H.
     (2007) Examining sense of belonging among first-year undergraduates from different racial/ethnic groups. Journal of College Student Development, 48 (5), 525–542. 10.1353/csd.2007.0054
     https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2007.0054 [Google Scholar]
228. Johnson, D. W. , & Johnson, R. T.
     (1999) Making cooperative learning work. Theory into Practice, 38 , 67–73. 10.1080/00405849909543834
     https://doi.org/10.1080/00405849909543834 [Google Scholar]
229. Johnson, K.
     (2008) An introduction to foreign language learning and teaching. Pearson Education.
     [Google Scholar]
230. Johnson, R. T. , & Johnson, D. W.
     (1986) Action research: Cooperative learning in the science classroom. Journal of Science and Children, 24 (2), 31–32.
     [Google Scholar]
231. Jordan, G. , & Gray, H.
     (2019) We need to talk about coursebooks. ELT Journal, 73 (4), 438–446. 10.1093/elt/ccz038
     https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccz038 [Google Scholar]
232. Julkunen, K.
     (2001) Situation- and task-specific motivation in foreign language learning. In Z. Dörnyei & R. Schmidt . (Eds.), Motivation and second language learning (pp.29–42). University of Hawai‘i.
     [Google Scholar]
233. Kalis, T. M. , Vannest, K. J. , & Parker, R.
     (2007) Praise counts: Using self-monitoring to increase effective teaching practices. Preventing School Failure, 51 (3), 20–27. 10.3200/PSFL.51.3.20‑27
     https://doi.org/10.3200/PSFL.51.3.20-27 [Google Scholar]
234. Kang, E. Y.
     (2020) Using model texts as a form of feedback in L2 writing. System, 89 , 102196. 10.1016/j.system.2019.102196
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2019.102196 [Google Scholar]
235. Kang, E. , & Han, Z.
     (2015) The efficacy of written corrective feedback in improving L2 written accuracy: A meta-analysis. Modern Language Journal, 99 (1), 1–18. 10.1111/modl.12189
     https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12189 [Google Scholar]
236. Kear, D. J. , Coffman, G. A. , McKenna, M. C. , & Ambrosio, A. L.
     (2000) Measuring attitude toward writing: A new tool for teachers. The Reading Teacher, 34 , 10–22.
     [Google Scholar]
237. Keith, N. , & Ericsson, K. A.
     (2007) A deliberate practice account of typing proficiency in everyday typists. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 13 (3), 135–145. 10.1037/1076‑898X.13.3.135
     https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-898X.13.3.135 [Google Scholar]
238. Kellogg, R. T. , & Whiteford, A. P.
     (2009) Training advanced writing skills: The case for deliberate practice. Educational Psychologist, 44 (4), 250–266. 10.1080/00461520903213600
     https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520903213600 [Google Scholar]
239. Kim, H. R. , & Bowles, M.
     (2019) How deeply do second language learners process written corrective feedback? Insights gained from think-alouds. TESOL Quarterly, 53 (4), 913–938. 10.1002/tesq.522
     https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.522 [Google Scholar]
240. Kim, J. H.
     (2015) The role of models and error correction in L2 young learners’ noticing and output. English Teaching, 70 (2), 3–26. 10.15858/engtea.70.2.201506.3
     https://doi.org/10.15858/engtea.70.2.201506.3 [Google Scholar]
241. Kim, Y.
     (2013) Promoting attention to form through task repetition in a Korean EFL context. In K. McDonough & A. Mackey . (Eds.), Second language interaction in diverse educational settings (pp.3–24). John Benjamins. 10.1075/lllt.34.04ch1
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.34.04ch1 [Google Scholar]
242. Kim, Y. , Choi, B. , Yun, H. , Kim, B. , & Choi, S.
     (2020) Task repetition, synchronous written corrective feedback and the learning of Korean grammar: A classroom-based study. Language Teaching Research, 1–27. 10.1177/1362168820912354
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168820912354 [Google Scholar]
243. Kim, Y. , Kang, S. , Yun, H. , Kim, B. , & Choi, B.
     (2020) The role of task repetition in a Korean as a foreign language classroom: Writing quality, attention to form, and learning of Korean grammar. Foreign Language Annals, 53 (4), 827–849. 10.1111/flan.12501
     https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12501 [Google Scholar]
244. Kim, Y. , & McDonough, K.
     (2011) Using pretask modelling to encourage collaborative learning opportunities. Language Teaching Research, 15 (2), 183–199. 10.1177/1362168810388711
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168810388711 [Google Scholar]
245. Kim, Y. , & Payant, C.
     (2014) A pedagogical proposal for task sequencing: An exploration of task repetition and task complexity on learning opportunities. In M. Baralt , R. Gilabert , & P. Robinson . (Eds.), Task sequencing and instructed second language learning (pp.151–177). Bloomsbury Academic.
     [Google Scholar]
246. Kim, Y. , & Tracy-Ventura, N.
     (2013) The role of task repetition in L2 performance development: What needs to be repeated during task-based interaction?System, 41, 829–840. 10.1016/j.system.2013.08.005
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2013.08.005 [Google Scholar]
247. King, K. M. , Lengua, L. J. , & Monahan, K. C.
     (2013) Individual differences in the development of self-regulation during pre-adolescence: Connections to context and adjustment. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 41 (1), 57–69. 10.1007/s10802‑012‑9665‑0
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-012-9665-0 [Google Scholar]
248. Kiss, C. , & Nikolov, M.
     (2005) Developing, piloting, and validating an instrument to measure young learners’ aptitude. Language Learning, 55 (1), 99–150. 10.1111/j.0023‑8333.2005.00291.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0023-8333.2005.00291.x [Google Scholar]
249. Klein, P. , Boscolo, P. , Kirkpatrick, L. , & Gelati, C.
     (Eds.) (2014) Writing as a learning activity. Brill. 10.1163/9789004265011
     https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004265011 [Google Scholar]
250. Klein, P. D. , & Boscolo, P.
     (2016) Trends in research on writing as a learning activity. Journal of Writing Research, 7 (3), 311–350. 10.17239/jowr‑2016.07.03.01
     https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2016.07.03.01 [Google Scholar]
251. Kluger, A. N. , & DeNisi, A.
     (1996) The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119 (2), 254–284. 10.1037/0033‑2909.119.2.254
     https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.119.2.254 [Google Scholar]
252. Kopinska, M. , & Azkarai, A.
     (2020) Exploring young EFL learners’ motivation: Individual versus pair work on dictogloss tasks. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 10 (3), 607–630. 10.14746/ssllt.2020.10.3.10
     https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2020.10.3.10 [Google Scholar]
253. Kormos, J.
     (2012) The role of individual differences in L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21 (4), 390–403. 10.1016/j.jslw.2012.09.003
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2012.09.003 [Google Scholar]
254. Kormos, J. , & Dörnyei, Z.
     (2004) The interaction of linguistic and motivational variables in second language task performance. Zeitschrift für interkulturellen Fremdsprachenunterricht, 9 (2), 19. Retrieved on4 August 2022fromciteseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.477.1967&rep=rep1&type=pdf
     [Google Scholar]
255. Kotovsky, K. , Hayes, J. R. , & Simon, H. A.
     (1985) Why are some problems hard? Evidence from Tower of Hanoi. Cognitive Psychology, 17 (2), 248–294. 10.1016/0010‑0285(85)90009‑X
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(85)90009-X [Google Scholar]
256. Krashen, S.
     (1982) Principles and practices of second language acquisition. Pergamon.
     [Google Scholar]
257. Krashen, S.
     (1985) The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. Longman.
     [Google Scholar]
258. Krashen, S.
     (1991) The input hypothesis: An update. In J. Alatis . (Ed.), Georgetown University Round Table on Languages and Linguistics. Linguistics and language pedagogy: The state of the art (pp.409–431). Georgetown University Press
     [Google Scholar]
259. Krueger, R. F. , Hicks, B. M. , Patrick, C. J. , Carlson, S. R. , Iacono, W. G. , & McGue, M.
     (2002) Etiologic connections among substance dependence, antisocial behavior, and personality: Modeling the externalizing spectrum. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 111 , 411–424. 10.1037/0021‑843X.111.3.411
     https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.111.3.411 [Google Scholar]
260. Laal, M. , & Laal, M.
     (2012) Collaborative learning: what is it?Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 31 , 491–495. 10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.12.092
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.12.092 [Google Scholar]
261. Lalande, J. F.
     (1982) Reducing composition errors: An experiment. The Modern Language Journal, 66, 140–149. 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.1982.tb06973.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1982.tb06973.x [Google Scholar]
262. Lamb, M.
     (2016) Motivation. In G. Hall . (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of English language teaching (pp.324–338). Routledge. 10.4324/9781315676203‑28
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315676203-28 [Google Scholar]
263. Lanauze, M. , & Snow, C.
     (1989) The relation between first- and second-language writing skills: Evidence from Puerto Rican elementary school children in bilingual programs. Linguistics and Education, 1 (4), 323–339. 10.1016/S0898‑5898(89)80005‑1
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0898-5898(89)80005-1 [Google Scholar]
264. Lannie, A. L. , & McCurdy, B. L.
     (2007) Preventing disruptive behavior in the urban classroom: Effects of the good behavior game on student and teacher behavior. Education and Treatment of Children, 30 (1), 85–98. Retrieved on4 August 2022from10.1353/etc.2007.0002
     https://doi.org/10.1353/etc.2007.0002 [Google Scholar]
265. Lapkin, S. , Swain, M. , & Smith, M.
     (2002) Reformulation and the learning of French pronominal verbs in a Canadian French immersion context. The Modern Language Journal, 86 (4), 485–507. 10.1111/1540‑4781.00157
     https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-4781.00157 [Google Scholar]
266. Larson, R. W.
     (2000) Toward a psychology of positive youth development. American Psychologist, 55 (1), 170–183. 10.1037/0003‑066X.55.1.170
     https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.170 [Google Scholar]
267. Lasagabaster, D. , & Doiz, A.
     (2003) Maturational constraints on foreign-language written production. In M. P. García Mayo & M. L. García Lecumberri . (Eds.), Age and the acquisition of English as a foreign language: Theoretical issues and fieldwork (pp.136–160). Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781853596407‑008
     https://doi.org/10.21832/9781853596407-008 [Google Scholar]
268. Lázaro-Ibarrola, A.
     (2011) Faster and further morphosyntactic development of CLIL vs EFL Basque-Spanish bilinguals learning English in high school. International Journal of English Studies, 12 (1), 79–96. 10.6018/ijes.12.1.125621
     https://doi.org/10.6018/ijes.12.1.125621 [Google Scholar]
269. Lázaro-Ibarrola, A.
     (2013) Reformulation and self-correction: Insights into correction strategies for EFL writing in a school context. Vigo International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 10 (1), 29–49.
     [Google Scholar]
270. Lázaro-Ibarrola, A.
     (2021) Model texts in collaborative and individual writing among EFL children: noticing, incorporations, and draft quality. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching. 10.1515/iral‑2020‑0160
     https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2020-0160 [Google Scholar]
271. Lázaro-Ibarrola, A. , & Azplicueta-Martínez, R.
     (2019a) Spotting the differences between child–child and child–adult interactions: Evidence from Spanish EFL learners at low levels of proficiency. In J. Rokita-Jaśkow & M. Ellis . (Eds.), Early instructed second language acquisition: Pathways to competence (pp.80–105). Multilingual Matters.
     [Google Scholar]
272. Lázaro-Ibarrola, A. , & Azpilicueta-Martínez, R.
     (2019b) Negotiation of meaning in child-child vs. adult-adult interactions: Evidence from low proficiency EFL learners. IRAL: International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 60(2), 463–489. 10.1515/iral‑2019‑0013
     https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2019-0013 [Google Scholar]
273. Lázaro-Ibarrola, A. , & Azpilicueta-Martínez, R.
     (2021) Motivation towards the foreign language (English) and regional language (Basque) in immersion schools: Does CLIL in the foreign language make a difference? Advance online publication. Language Teaching Research. 10.1177/13621688211031737
     https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688211031737 [Google Scholar]
274. Lázaro-Ibarrola, A. , & Hidalgo, M. Á.
     (2017) Procedural repetition in task-based interaction among young EFL learners: Does it make a difference?International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 168 (2), 183–202. 10.1075/itl.16024.laz
     https://doi.org/10.1075/itl.16024.laz [Google Scholar]
275. Lázaro-Ibarrola, A. , & Hidalgo, M. Á.
     (2021) Give me a second chance: Task repetition and collaborative writing with child EFL learners. Language Teaching for Young Learners, 3 (2), 275–299. 10.1075/ltyl.20009.laz
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ltyl.20009.laz [Google Scholar]
276. Lázaro-Ibarrola, A. , & Villarreal, I.
     (2019) Questioning the effectiveness of procedural repetition: the case of Spanish EFL primary school learners. Porta Linguarum, 31 , 7–20.
     [Google Scholar]
277. Lázaro-Ibarrola, A. , & Villarreal, I.
     (2021) Are EFL writers motivated or demotivated by model texts and task repetition? Evidence from young collaborative writers. International Journal of English Studies, 21 (2), 29–55. 10.6018/ijes.466401
     https://doi.org/10.6018/ijes.466401 [Google Scholar]
278. Lee, E.
     (2013) Corrective feedback preferences and learner repair among advanced ESL students. System, 41 , 217–230. 10.1016/j.system.2013.01.022
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2013.01.022 [Google Scholar]
279. Lee, I.
     (2008) Student reactions to teacher feedback in two Hong Kong secondary classrooms. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17 (3), 144–164. 10.1016/j.jslw.2007.12.001
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2007.12.001 [Google Scholar]
280. Lee, I. , Yu, S. , & Liu, Y.
     (2018) Hong Kong secondary students’ motivation in EFL writing: A survey study. TESOL Quarterly, 52 (1), 176–187. 10.1002/tesq.364
     https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.364 [Google Scholar]
281. Leeser, M. J.
     (2007) Learner-based factors in L2 reading comprehension and processing grammatical form: Topic familiarity and working memory. Language Learning, 57 , 229–270. 10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2007.00408.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2007.00408.x [Google Scholar]
282. Leki, I.
     (1991) The preferences of ESL students for error correction in college-level writing classes. Foreign Language Annals, 24 (3), 203–218. 10.1111/j.1944‑9720.1991.tb00464.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.1991.tb00464.x [Google Scholar]
283. Leow, R. P.
     (Ed.) (2019a) The Routledge handbook of second language research in classroom learning. Routledge. 10.4324/9781315165080
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315165080 [Google Scholar]
284. Leow, R. P.
     (2019b) From SLA > ISLA > ILL: A curricular perspective. In R. P. Leow . (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of second language research in classroom learning (pp.485–493). Routledge. 10.4324/9781315165080‑33
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315165080-33 [Google Scholar]
285. Leow, R.
     (2019c) ISLA: How explicit or how implicit should it be? Theoretical, empirical, and pedagogical/curricular issues. Language Teaching Research, 23 , 476–493. 10.1177/1362168818776674
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168818776674 [Google Scholar]
286. Leow, R. P.
     (2015) Explicit learning in the L2 classroom: A student-centered approach. Routledge. 10.4324/9781315887074
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315887074 [Google Scholar]
287. Leow, R. P.
     (2020) L2 writing-to-learn: Theory, research, and a curricular approach. In Manchón, R. (Ed.), Writing and language learning: Advancing research agendas (pp.95–118). John Benjamins. 10.1075/lllt.56.05leo
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.56.05leo [Google Scholar]
288. Leow, R. P. , & Cerezo, L.
     (2016) Deconstructing the “I” and “SLA” in ISLA: One curricular approach. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 6 , 43–63. 10.14746/ssllt.2016.6.1.3
     https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2016.6.1.3 [Google Scholar]
289. Leow, R. P. , & Suh, B. R.
     (2021) Theoretical perspectives on L2 writing, written corrective feedback, and language learning in individual writing conditions. In R. M. Manchón & C. Polio . (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition and writing (pp.9–21). Routledge. 10.4324/9780429199691‑3
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429199691-3 [Google Scholar]
290. Levelt, W. J. M.
     (1989) Speaking: From intention to articulation. The MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
291. Li, M. , & Kim, D.
     (2016) One wiki, two groups: Dynamic interactions across ESL collaborative writing tasks. Journal of Second Language Writing, 31 , 25–42. 10.1016/j.jslw.2016.01.002
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2016.01.002 [Google Scholar]
292. Lightbown, P. M. , & Spada, N.
     (2020) Teaching and learning L2 in the classroom: It’s about time. Language Teaching, 53 (4), 422–432. 10.1017/S0261444819000454
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444819000454 [Google Scholar]
293. Loewen, S. , & Sato, M.
     (2018) Interaction and instructed second language acquisition. Language teaching, 51 (3), 285–329. 10.1017/S0261444818000125
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444818000125 [Google Scholar]
294. Long, M. H.
     (1996) The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. Ritchie , & T. Bathia . (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp.413–468). Academic Press.
     [Google Scholar]
295. Long, M.
     (2015) Second language acquisition and task-based language teaching. Wiley-Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
296. Long, M. , Inagaki, S. , & Ortega, L.
     (1998) The role of implicit negative evidence in SLA: Models and recasts in Japanese and Spanish. Modern Language Journal, 82 , 357–371. 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.1998.tb01213.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1998.tb01213.x [Google Scholar]
297. Luckasson, R.
     (2006) The human rights basis for personal empowerment in education. In E. B. Keefe , V. M. Moore , & F. R. Duff . (Eds.), Listening to the experts (pp.11–20). Paul H. Brookes.
     [Google Scholar]
298. Luquin, M. , & García Mayo, M. P.
     (2020) Collaborative writing and feedback: An exploratory study of the potential of models in primary EFL students’ writing performance. Language Teaching for Young Learners, 2 (1), 73–100. 10.1075/ltyl.19007.luq
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ltyl.19007.luq [Google Scholar]
299. Luquin, M. , & García Mayo, M. P.
     (2021) Exploring the use of models as a written corrective feedback technique among EFL children. System, 98 , 102465. 10.1016/j.system.2021.102465
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102465 [Google Scholar]
300. Lynch, T. , & Maclean, J.
     (2000) Exploring the benefits of task repetition and recycling for classroom language learning. Language Teaching Research, 4 , 221–250. 10.1177/136216880000400303
     https://doi.org/10.1177/136216880000400303 [Google Scholar]
301. Lynch, T. , & Maclean, J.
     (2001) Effects of immediate task repetition on learners’ performance. In M. Bygate , P. Skehan , & M. Swain . (Eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks, second language learning, teaching and testing (pp.99–118). Longman.
     [Google Scholar]
302. Lyster, R.
     (1998a) Negotiation of form, recasts, and explicit correction in relation to error types and learner repair in immersion classrooms. Language Learning, 48 , 183–218. 10.1111/1467‑9922.00039
     https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9922.00039 [Google Scholar]
303. Lyster, R.
     (1998b) Recasts, repetition, and ambiguity in L2 classroom discourse. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20 , 51–81. 10.1017/S027226319800103X
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S027226319800103X [Google Scholar]
304. Lyster, R.
     (2001) Negotiation of form, recasts, and explicit correction in relation to error types and learner repair in immersion classrooms. Language Learning, 51 , 265–301. 10.1111/j.1467‑1770.2001.tb00019.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.2001.tb00019.x [Google Scholar]
305. Lyster, R. , & Ranta, L.
     (1997) Corrective feedback and learner uptake. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19 , 37–66. 10.1017/S0272263197001034
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263197001034 [Google Scholar]
306. Lyster, R. , & Saito, K.
     (2010) Oral feedback in classroom SLA: A meta-analysis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32 , 265–302. 10.1017/S0272263109990520
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263109990520 [Google Scholar]
307. Lyster, R. , Saito, K. , & Sato, M.
     (2013) Oral corrective feedback in second language classrooms. Language Teaching, 46 , 1–40. 10.1017/S0261444812000365
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444812000365 [Google Scholar]
308. MacIntyre, P. D. , & Serroul, A.
     (2014) Motivation on a per-second timescale: Examining approach-avoidance motivation during L2 task performance. In Z. Dörnyei , P. MacIntyre , & A. Henry . (Eds.), Motivational dynamics in language learning (pp.109–138). Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781783092574‑013
     https://doi.org/10.21832/9781783092574-013 [Google Scholar]
309. Mackey, A.
     (2007) Interaction as practice. In R. DeKeyser . (Ed.), Practice in a second language (pp.85–110). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511667275.006
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511667275.006 [Google Scholar]
310. Mackey, A.
     (2012) Input, interaction and corrective feedback in L2 classrooms. Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
311. Mackey, A. , Gass, S. , & McDonough, K.
     (2000) How do learners perceive interactional feedback?Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22 , 471–497. 10.1017/S0272263100004010
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100004010 [Google Scholar]
312. Mackey, A. , & Goo, J.
     (2007) Interaction research in SLA: A meta-analysis and research synthesis. In A. Mackey . (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A collection of empirical studies (pp.407–451). Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
313. Mackey, A. , Kanganas, A. P. , & Oliver, R.
     (2007) Task familiarity and interactional feedback in child ESL classrooms. TESOL Quarterly, 41 (2), 285–312. 10.1002/j.1545‑7249.2007.tb00060.x
     https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1545-7249.2007.tb00060.x [Google Scholar]
314. Mackey, A. , & Philp, J.
     (1998) Conversational interaction and second language development: Recasts, responses, and red herrings?Modern Language Journal, 82 , 338–356. 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.1998.tb01211.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1998.tb01211.x [Google Scholar]
315. Mackey, A. , Philp, J. , Egi, T. , Fujii, A. , & Tatsumi, T.
     (2002) Individual differences in working memory, noticing of interactional feedback and L2 development. In P. Robinson . (Ed.), Individual differences and instructed language learning (pp.181–209. John Benjamins. 10.1075/lllt.2.12mac
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.2.12mac [Google Scholar]
316. Mahn, H.
     (2013) Vygotsky and second language acquisition. In C. A. Chapelle . (Ed.), The encyclopedia of applied linguistics (pp.1–7). Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
317. Manchón, R.
     (Ed.) (2011) Learning-to-write and writing-to-learn in an additional language. John Benjamins. 10.1075/lllt.31
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.31 [Google Scholar]
318. Manchón, R. M.
     (2014a) The distinctive nature of task repetition in writing. Implications for theory, research, and pedagogy. Estudios de Lingüística Inglesa Aplicada, 14 , 13–41. 10.12795/elia.2014.i14.02
     https://doi.org/10.12795/elia.2014.i14.02 [Google Scholar]
319. Manchón, R. M.
     (2014b) The internal dimension of tasks: The interaction between task factors and learner factors in bringing about learning through writing. In H. Byrnes & R. M. Manchón . (Eds.), Task-based language learning: Insights from and for L2 writing (pp.27–52). John Benjamins. 10.1075/tblt.7.02man
     https://doi.org/10.1075/tblt.7.02man [Google Scholar]
320. Manchón, R. M.
     (Ed.) (2020) Writing and language learning: Advancing research agendas. John Benjamins. 10.1075/lllt.56
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.56 [Google Scholar]
321. Manchón, R. M. , & Leow, R. P.
     (2020) An ISLA perspective on L2 learning through writing. In R. M. Manchón . (Ed.), Writing and Language Learning: Advancing research agendas (pp.335–356). John Benjamins. 10.1075/lllt.56.14man
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.56.14man [Google Scholar]
322. Manchón, R. M. , & Roca de Larios, J.
     (2011) Writing-to-learn in FL contexts. In R. M. Manchón . (Ed.), Learning-to-write and writing-to-learn in an additional language (181–208). John Benjamins. 10.1075/lllt.31.13man
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.31.13man [Google Scholar]
323. Manchón, R. M. & Roca de Larios, J.
     Eds. (Forthcoming). Research methods in the study of writing processes. John Benjamins.
     [Google Scholar]
324. Manchón, R. M. , & Vasylets, O.
     (2019) Language learning through writing: Theoretical perspectives and empirical evidence. In J. W. Schwieter & A. Benati . (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of language learning (pp.341–362). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108333603.015
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108333603.015 [Google Scholar]
325. Manchón, R. M. , & Williams, J.
     (2016) L2 writing and SLA studies. In R. M. Manchón & P. K. Matsuda . (Eds.), The handbook of second and foreign language writing (pp.567–586). De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9781614511335‑029
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9781614511335-029 [Google Scholar]
326. Mann, M. , Hosman, C. , Schaalma, H. , & De Vries, N.
     (2004) Self-esteem in a broad-spectrum approach for mental health promotion. Health Education Research, 19, 357–372. 10.1093/her/cyg041
     https://doi.org/10.1093/her/cyg041 [Google Scholar]
327. Marsden, E.
     (2006) Exploring input processing in the classroom: An experimental comparison of processing instruction and enriched input. Language Learning, 56 (3), 507–566. 10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2006.00375.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2006.00375.x [Google Scholar]
328. Marsden, E. , & Torgerson, C.
     (2012) Single group, pre- and post-test research designs: Some methodological concerns. Oxford Review of Education, 38 (5), 583–616. 10.1080/03054985.2012.731208
     https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2012.731208 [Google Scholar]
329. Martin, A. J.
     (2007) Examining a multidimensional model of student motivation and engagement using a construct validation approach. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77 , 413–440. 10.1348/000709906X118036
     https://doi.org/10.1348/000709906X118036 [Google Scholar]
330. Martin, A. J.
     (2008a) Enhancing student motivation and engagement: The effects of a multidimensional intervention. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33 , 239–269. 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2006.11.003
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2006.11.003 [Google Scholar]
331. Martin, A. J.
     (2008b) Motivation and engagement in music and sport: Testing a multidimensional framework in diverse performance settings. Journal of Personality, 76 , 135–170. 10.1111/j.1467‑6494.2007.00482.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2007.00482.x [Google Scholar]
332. Martin, A. J. , & Dowson, M.
     (2009) Interpersonal relationships, motivation, engagement, and achievement: Yields for theory, current issues, and educational practice. Review of Educational Research, 79 (1), 327–365. 10.3102/0034654308325583
     https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654308325583 [Google Scholar]
333. Martínez-Adrián, M. , Gutiérrez-Mangado, M. J. , Gallardo-del-Puerto, F. , & Basterrechea, M.
     (2021) Language-related episodes by young CLIL learners: A review of task modality effects. Language Teaching for Young Learners, 3 (2), 214–245. 10.1075/ltyl.20005.mar
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ltyl.20005.mar [Google Scholar]
334. Martínez Esteban, N. , & Roca de Larios, J.
     (2010) The use of models as a form of written feedback to secondary school pupils of English. International Journal of English Studies, 10 , 143–170. 10.6018/ijes/2010/2/119241
     https://doi.org/10.6018/ijes/2010/2/119241 [Google Scholar]
335. Masgoret, A. M. , & Gardner, R. C.
     (2003) Attitudes, motivation, and second language learning: A meta-analysis of studies conducted by Gardner and associates. Language Learning, 53 (1), 167–210. 10.1111/1467‑9922.00227
     https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9922.00227 [Google Scholar]
336. McDonough, K.
     (2004) Learner-learner interaction during pair and small group activities in a Thai EFL context. System, 32 (2), 207–224. 10.1016/j.system.2004.01.003
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2004.01.003 [Google Scholar]
337. McDonough, K. , & García Fuentes, C.
     (2015) The effect of writing task and task conditions on Colombian EFL learners’ language use. TESL Canada Journal, 32 (2), 67–67. 10.18806/tesl.v32i2.1208
     https://doi.org/10.18806/tesl.v32i2.1208 [Google Scholar]
338. Meeuwisse, M. , Severiens, S. E. , & Born, M. P.
     (2010) Learning environment, interaction, sense of belonging and study success in ethnically diverse student groups. Research in Higher Education, 51 , 528–545. 10.1007/s11162‑010‑9168‑1
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-010-9168-1 [Google Scholar]
339. Mertens, J.
     (2003) Rhythm, rhymes and rules. Vom Nutzen der Schrift (nicht nur) beim frühen Englischlernen. Fremdsprachenunterricht, 47 (56) 3, 168–173.
     [Google Scholar]
340. Meyer, W. U.
     (1992) Paradoxical effects of praise and criticism on perceived ability. European Review of Social Psychology, 3 , 259–283. 10.1080/14792779243000087
     https://doi.org/10.1080/14792779243000087 [Google Scholar]
341. Mihaljević Djigunović, J.
     (2012) Early EFL learning in context: Evidence from a country case study. The British Council.
     [Google Scholar]
342. Mihaljević Djigunović, J. , & Lopriore, L.
     (2011) The learner: Do individual differences matter?In J. Enever . (Ed.), ELLiE: Early Language Learning in Europe (pp.43–60). British Council.
     [Google Scholar]
343. Miller, A. T. , & Hom, H. L.
     (1997) Conceptions of ability and the interpretation of praise, blame, and material rewards. Journal of Experimental Education, 65 , 163–174. 10.1080/00220973.1997.9943790
     https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.1997.9943790 [Google Scholar]
344. Mischel, W. , Shoda, Y. , & Peake, K.
     (1988) The nature of adolescent competencies predicted by preschool delay of gratification. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 54 , 687–696. 10.1037/0022‑3514.54.4.687
     https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.4.687 [Google Scholar]
345. Möller, J.
     (2005) Paradoxical effects of praise and criticism: Social, dimensional and temporal comparisons. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 75 (2), 275–295. 10.1348/000709904X24744
     https://doi.org/10.1348/000709904X24744 [Google Scholar]
346. Monahan, K. C. , Steinberg, L. , Cauffman, E. , & Mulvey, E. P.
     (2009) Trajectories of antisocial behavior and psychosocial maturity from adolescence to young adulthood. Developmental Psychology, 45 , 1654–1668. 10.1037/a0015862
     https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015862 [Google Scholar]
347. Mosing, M. A. , Madison, G. , Pedersen, N. L. , Kuja-Halkola, R. , & Ullén, F.
     (2014) Practice does not make perfect: No causal effect of music practice on music ability. Psychological science, 25 (9), 1795–1803. 10.1177/0956797614541990
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614541990 [Google Scholar]
348. Mruk, C.
     (2006) Self-esteem research, theory, and practice (3rd ed.). Springer.
     [Google Scholar]
349. Muñoz, C.
     (2017) Tracing trajectories of young learners: Ten years of school English learning. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 37 , 168–184. 10.1017/S0267190517000095
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190517000095 [Google Scholar]
350. Murphy, V. A.
     (2014) Second language learning in the early school years: Trends and contexts. Oxford University Press. 10.1111/ijal.12116
     https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.12116 [Google Scholar]
351. Murtiningsih, S. R.
     (2016) Collaborative writing in an EFL context. Journal of Foreign Languange Teaching and Learning, 1 (1), 82–90. 10.18196/ftl.118
     https://doi.org/10.18196/ftl.118 [Google Scholar]
352. Nassaji, H.
     (2012) The relationship between SLA research and language pedagogy: Teachers’ perspectives. Language Teaching Research, 16 (3), 337–365. 10.1177/1362168812436903
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168812436903 [Google Scholar]
353. Nelson, G. L. , & Murphy, J. M.
     (1993) Peer response groups: Do L2 writers use peer comments in revising their drafts?TESOL Quarterly, 27 (1), 135–141. 10.2307/3586965
     https://doi.org/10.2307/3586965 [Google Scholar]
354. Nicol, D. J. , & Macfarlane-Dick, D.
     (2006) Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31 (2), 199–218. 10.1080/03075070600572090
     https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070600572090 [Google Scholar]
355. Nikolov, M.
     (1999) ‘Why do you learn English?’ ‘Because the teacher is short’. A study of Hungarian children’s foreign language learning motivation. Language Teaching Research, 3 (1), 33–56. 10.1177/136216889900300103
     https://doi.org/10.1177/136216889900300103 [Google Scholar]
356. Nikolov, M.
     (Ed.) (2009) The age factor and early language learning. De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110218282
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110218282 [Google Scholar]
357. Nikolov, M. , & Mihaljević Djigunovic, J.
     (2011) All shades of every color: An overview of early teaching and learning of foreign languages. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 31 , 95–119. 10.1017/S0267190511000183
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190511000183 [Google Scholar]
358. Nitta, R. , & Baba, K.
     (2014) Task repetition and L2 writing development. In H. Byrnes & R. M. Manchón . (Eds.), Task-based language learning: Insights from and for L2 writing (pp.107–136). John Benjamins. 10.1075/tblt.7.05nit
     https://doi.org/10.1075/tblt.7.05nit [Google Scholar]
359. Nitta, R. , & Baba, K.
     (2018) Understanding benefits of repetition from a complex dynamic systems perspective. In M. Bygate . (Ed.), Learning language through task repetition (pp.279–309). John Benjamins. 10.1075/tblt.11.11nit
     https://doi.org/10.1075/tblt.11.11nit [Google Scholar]
360. Norris, J. M. , & Ortega, L.
     (2000) Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning, 50 (3), 417–528. 10.1111/0023‑8333.00136
     https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.00136 [Google Scholar]
361. Nurmi, J. E. , & Aunola, K.
     (2005) Task-motivation during the first school years: A person-oriented approach to longitudinal data. Learning and Instruction, 15 (2), 103–122. 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2005.04.009
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2005.04.009 [Google Scholar]
362. O’Brien, I. , Segalowitz, N. , Collentine, J. , & Freed, B.
     (2006) Phonological memory and lexical narrative, and grammatical skills in second language oral production by adult learners. Applied Psycholinguistics, 27 , 377–402. 10.1017/S0142716406060322
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716406060322 [Google Scholar]
363. Ohta, A. S.
     (2001) Second language acquisition processes in the classroom: Learning Japanese. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 10.4324/9781410604712
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410604712 [Google Scholar]
364. Oliver, R.
     (1995) Negative feedback in child NS–NNS conversation. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 17 , 459–481. 10.1017/S0272263100014418
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100014418 [Google Scholar]
365. Oliver, R.
     (2002) The patterns of negotiation for meaning in child interaction. The Modern Language Journal, 86, 97–111. 10.1111/1540‑4781.00138
     https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-4781.00138 [Google Scholar]
366. Oliver, R.
     (2009) How young is too young? Investigating negotiation of meaning and feedback in children aged five to seven years. In A. Mackey , & C. Polio . (Eds.), Multiple perspectives on interaction (pp.135–156). Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
367. Ortega, L.
     (2007) Meaningful practice in foreign language classrooms: A cognitive-interactionist perspective. In R. DeKeyser . (Ed.), Practice in a second language (pp.180–207). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511667275.011
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511667275.011 [Google Scholar]
368. Pajares, F. , & Valiante, G.
     (1999) Grade level and gender differences in the writing self-beliefs of middle school students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 24 (4), 390–405. 10.1006/ceps.1998.0995
     https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1998.0995 [Google Scholar]
369. Patanasorn, C.
     (2010) Effects of procedural, content, and task repetition on accuracy and fluency in an EFL context (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Northern Arizona University.
370. Paulesu, E. , Demonet, J. F. , Fazio, F. , McCrory, E. , Chanoine, V. , Brunswick, N. , Cappa, S. F. , Cossu, G. , Habib, M. , Frith, C. D. , & Frith, U.
     (2001) Dyslexia – cultural diversity and biological unity. Science, 291 , 2165–2167. 10.1126/science.1057179
     https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1057179 [Google Scholar]
371. Paulesu, E. , McCrory, E. , Fazio, F. , Menoncello, L. , Brunswick, N. , Cappa, S. , Cotelli, M. , Cossu, G. , Corte, F. , Lorusso, M. , Pesenti, S. , Gallagher, A. , Perani, D. , Price, C. , Frith, C. , & Frith, U.
     (2000) A cultural effect on brain function. Nature Neuroscience, 3 , 91–96. 10.1038/71163
     https://doi.org/10.1038/71163 [Google Scholar]
372. Paulston, C. B. , & Bruder, M. N.
     (1976) Teaching English as a second language. Techniques and procedures. Winthrop
     [Google Scholar]
373. Pexman, P. M.
     (2008) It’s fascinating research: The cognition of verbal irony. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17 (4), 286–290. 10.1111/j.1467‑8721.2008.00591.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2008.00591.x [Google Scholar]
374. Philp, J. , Adams, R. , & Iwashita, N.
     (2013) Peer interaction and second language learning. Routledge. 10.4324/9780203551349
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203551349 [Google Scholar]
375. Philp, J. , Oliver, R. , & Mackey, A.
     (Eds.) (2008) Second language acquisition and the younger learner: Child’s play?John Benjamins. 10.1075/lllt.23
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.23 [Google Scholar]
376. Pianta, R. C.
     (1998) Applying the concept of resilience in schools: Cautions from a developmental systems perspective. School Psychology Review, 27 , 407–428. 10.1080/02796015.1998.12085925
     https://doi.org/10.1080/02796015.1998.12085925 [Google Scholar]
377. Pianta, R. C. , Belsky, J. , Vandergrift, N. , Houts, R. , & Morrison, F. J.
     (2008) Classroom effects on children’s achievement trajectories in elementary school. American Journal of Educational Research, 45 , 365–397. 10.3102/0002831207308230
     https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831207308230 [Google Scholar]
378. Pienemann, M. , & Johnston, M.
     (1987) Factors influencing the development of language proficiency. In D. Nunan . (Ed.), Applying second language acquisition research (pp.45–141). University of Sidney, Australia, National Curriculum Resource Center, AMEP.
     [Google Scholar]
379. Pienemann, M. , Johnston, M. , & Brindley, G.
     (1988) Constructing an acquisition-based procedure for second language assessment. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 10 , 217–243. 10.1017/S0272263100007324
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100007324 [Google Scholar]
380. Pinter, A.
     (2006) Verbal evidence of task-related strategies: Child versus adult interactions. System, 34 , 615–63. 10.1016/j.system.2006.09.005
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2006.09.005 [Google Scholar]
381. Pinter, A.
     (2007) Benefits of peer–peer interaction: 10-year-old children practising with a communication task. Language Teaching Research, 11 (2), 1–19. 10.1177/1362168807074604
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168807074604 [Google Scholar]
382. Pinter, A.
     (2011) Children learning second languages. Palgrave McMillan. 10.1057/9780230302297
     https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230302297 [Google Scholar]
383. Pinter, A.
     (2017) Teaching young language learners (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
384. Pinter, A. , Mathew, R. , & Smith, R.
     (2016) Children and teachers as co-researchers in Indian primary English classrooms. British Council.
     [Google Scholar]
385. Pintrich, P. R. , & Schunk, D. H.
     (2007) Motivation in education: Theory, research and applications (3rd ed.). Merrill Prentice Hall.
     [Google Scholar]
386. Pladevall-Ballester, E.
     (2018) A longitudinal study of primary school EFL learning motivation in CLIL and non-CLIL settings. Language Teaching Research, 23 (6), 765–786. 10.1177/1362168818765877
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168818765877 [Google Scholar]
387. Polio, C.
     (2012) The relevance of second language acquisition theory to the written error correction debate. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21 (4), 375–389. 10.1016/j.jslw.2012.09.004
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2012.09.004 [Google Scholar]
388. Poupore, G.
     (2013) Task motivation in process: A complex systems perspective. Canadian Modern Language Review, 69 (1), 91–116. 10.3138/cmlr.1139
     https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.1139 [Google Scholar]
389. Prince, M.
     (2004) Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93 (3), 223–231. 10.1002/j.2168‑9830.2004.tb00809.x
     https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2004.tb00809.x [Google Scholar]
390. Qi, D. S. , & Lapkin, S.
     (2001) Exploring the role of noticing in a three-stage second language writing task. Journal of Second Language Writing, 10 , 277–303. 10.1016/S1060‑3743(01)00046‑7
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(01)00046-7 [Google Scholar]
391. Rai, M. K. , Loschky, L. C. , Harris, R. J. , Peck, N. R. , & Cook, L. G.
     (2011) Effects of stress and working memory capacity on foreign language readers’ inferential processing during comprehension. Language Learning, 61 (1), 187–218. 10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2010.00592.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00592.x [Google Scholar]
392. Robb, T. , Ross, S. , Shortreed, I.
     (1986) Salience of feedback on error and its effect on EFL writing quality. TESOL Quarterly, 20 , 83–93. 10.2307/3586390
     https://doi.org/10.2307/3586390 [Google Scholar]
393. Robinson, P.
     (1995) Attention, memory, and the “noticing” hypothesis. Language Learning, 45 (2), 283–331. 10.1111/j.1467‑1770.1995.tb00441.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1995.tb00441.x [Google Scholar]
394. Robinson, P.
     (2005) Aptitude and second language acquisition. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 25 , 45–73. 10.1017/S0267190505000036
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190505000036 [Google Scholar]
395. Robinson, P.
     (2011) Task-based language learning: A review of issues. Language Learning, 61 , 1–36. 10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2011.00641.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2011.00641.x [Google Scholar]
396. Roca de Larios, J. , García Hernández, F. J. , & Coyle, Y.
     (2021) A theoretically-grounded classification of EFL children’s formulation strategies in collaborative writing. Language Teaching for Young Learners, 3 (2), 300–336. 10.1075/ltyl.20008.roc
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ltyl.20008.roc [Google Scholar]
397. Rokita-Jaśkow, J. , & Ellis, M.
     (Eds.) (2019) Early instructed second language acquisition: Pathways to competence. Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/ROKITA2500
     https://doi.org/10.21832/ROKITA2500 [Google Scholar]
398. Roothooft, H. , Lázaro-Ibarrola, A. , & Bulté, B.
     (2022) Task repetition and corrective feedback via models and direct corrections among young EFL writers: Draft quality and task motivation. Language Teaching Research (ahead of print). 10.1177/13621688221082041
     https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688221082041 [Google Scholar]
399. Rothbart, M. K. , Ahadi, S. A. , & Evans, D. E.
     (2000) Temperament and personality: origins and outcomes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78 , 122–135. 10.1037/0022‑3514.78.1.122
     https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.78.1.122 [Google Scholar]
400. Rothbart, M. K. , Ellis, L. K. , & Posner, M. I.
     (2004) Temperament and self-regulation. In R. F. Baumeister & K. D. Vohs . (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation: Research, theory, and applications (pp.357–370). Guilford Press.
     [Google Scholar]
401. Rouhshad, A. , & Storch, N.
     (2016) A focus on mode. Patterns of interaction in face-to-face and computer-mediated contexts. In M. Sato , & S. Ballinger . (Eds.), Peer interaction and second language learning. Pedagogical potential and research agenda (pp.267–289). John Benjamins. 10.1075/lllt.45.11rou
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.45.11rou [Google Scholar]
402. Ruiz Funes, M.
     (1999) Writing, reading, and reading-to-write in a foreign language: A critical review. Foreign Language Annals, 32 (4), 514–526. 10.1111/j.1944‑9720.1999.tb00880.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.1999.tb00880.x [Google Scholar]
403. Sachs, R. , & Polio, C.
     (2007) Learners’ uses of two types of written feedback on an L2 writing revision task. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 29 (1), 67–100. 10.1017/S0272263107070039
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263107070039 [Google Scholar]
404. Sample, E. , & Michel, M.
     (2014) An exploratory study into trade-off effects of complexity, accuracy and fluency on young learners’ oral task repetition. TESL Canada Journal, 31 (8), 23–47. 10.18806/tesl.v31i0.1185
     https://doi.org/10.18806/tesl.v31i0.1185 [Google Scholar]
405. Samuda, V. , & Bygate, M.
     (2008) Tasks in second language learning. Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230596429
     https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230596429 [Google Scholar]
406. Sánchez, A. J. , Manchón, R. M. , & Gilabert, R.
     (2020) The effects of task repetition across modalities and proficiency levels. In R. M. Manchón . (Ed.), Writing and language learning: Advancing research agendas (pp.121–144). John Benjamins. 10.1075/lllt.56.06san
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.56.06san [Google Scholar]
407. Santos, M. , López Serrano, S. , & Manchón, R. M.
     (2010) The differential effects of two types of direct written corrective feedback on noticing and uptake: Reformulation vs. error correction. International Journal of English Studies, 10 , 131–154. 10.6018/ijes/2010/1/114011
     https://doi.org/10.6018/ijes/2010/1/114011 [Google Scholar]
408. Sato, M. , & Csizér, K.
     (2021) Introduction: Combining learner psychology and ISLA research: Intersections in the classroom. Language Teaching Research, 25(6), 839–855. 10.1177/13621688211044237
     https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688211044237 [Google Scholar]
409. Sato, M. , & Loewen, S.
     (2019) Do teachers care about research? The research–pedagogy dialogue. ELT Journal, 73 , 1–10. 10.1093/elt/ccy048
     https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccy048 [Google Scholar]
410. Schachter, J.
     (1991) Corrective feedback in historical perspective. Second Language Research, 7 (2), 89–102. 10.1177/026765839100700202
     https://doi.org/10.1177/026765839100700202 [Google Scholar]
411. Schmidt, R.
     (1990) The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11 , 129–158. 10.1093/applin/11.2.129
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/11.2.129 [Google Scholar]
412. Schmidt, R. W.
     (1994) Deconstructing consciousness in search of useful definitions for applied linguistics. AILA Review, 11 , 11–26.
     [Google Scholar]
413. Schmidt, R. W.
     (2001) Attention. In P. Robinson . (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp.3–32). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139524780.003
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524780.003 [Google Scholar]
414. Schmidt, R.
     (2012) Attention, awareness, and individual differences in language learning. In W. M. Chan , K. N. Chin , S. Bhatt , & I. Walker . (Eds.), Perspectives on individual characteristics and foreign language education (pp.27–50). Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9781614510932.27
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9781614510932.27 [Google Scholar]
415. Schoonen, R. , Snellings, P. , Stevenson, M. , & van Gelderen, A.
     (2009) Toward a blueprint of the foreign language writer: The linguistic and cognitive demands of foreign language writing. In R. M. Manchón . (Ed.), Writing in foreign language contexts (pp.77–101). Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781847691859‑007
     https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847691859-007 [Google Scholar]
416. Schulz, R. A.
     (1996) Focus on form in the foreign language classroom: Students’ and teachers’ views on error correction and the role of grammar. Foreign Language Annals, 29 , 343–364. 10.1111/j.1944‑9720.1996.tb01247.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.1996.tb01247.x [Google Scholar]
417. Schulz, R. A.
     (2001) Cultural differences in student and teacher perceptions concerning the role of grammar instruction and corrective feedback. The Modern Language Journal, 85 , 244–258. 10.1111/0026‑7902.00107
     https://doi.org/10.1111/0026-7902.00107 [Google Scholar]
418. Schunk, D. H. , & Pajares, F.
     (2002) The development of academic self-efficacy. In A. Wigfield & J. S. Eccles . (Eds.), Development of achievement motivation. A volume in the educational psychology series. (pp.15–31). Academic Press. 10.1016/B978‑012750053‑9/50003‑6
     https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012750053-9/50003-6 [Google Scholar]
419. Schunk, D. H. , & Zimmerman, B. J.
     (2013) Self-regulation and learning. In W. M. Reynolds , G. E. Miller , & I. B. Weiner . (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Educational psychology (pp.45–68). John Wiley & Sons.
     [Google Scholar]
420. Shak, J.
     (2006) Children using dictogloss to focus on form. Reflection on English Language Teaching, 5 , 47–62.
     [Google Scholar]
421. Shak, J. , & Gardner, S.
     (2008) Young learner perspectives on four focus-on-form tasks. Language Teaching Research, 12 (3), 387–408. 10.1177/1362168808089923
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168808089923 [Google Scholar]
422. Sharmat, M. W.
     (1975) Nate the Great and the lost list. Penguin.
     [Google Scholar]
423. Sheppard, C.
     (2006) The effects of instruction directed at the gaps second language learners noticed in their oral production (Unpublished PhD thesis). University of Auckland, New Zealand.
     [Google Scholar]
424. Simard, D. , Guénette, D. , & Bergeron, A.
     (2015) L2 learners’ interpretation and understanding of written corrective feedback: Insights from their metalinguistic reflections. Language Awareness, 24 (3), 233–254. 10.1080/09658416.2015.1076432
     https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2015.1076432 [Google Scholar]
425. Simmering, V. R. , & Perone, S.
     (2013) Working memory capacity as a dynamic process. Frontiers in Psychology, 3 , 1–26. 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00567
     https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00567 [Google Scholar]
426. Skehan, P.
     (1996) A framework for the implementation of task-based instruction. Applied Linguistics, 17 , 38–62. 10.1093/applin/17.1.38
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/17.1.38 [Google Scholar]
427. Skehan, P.
     (1998) A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford University Press
     [Google Scholar]
428. Skehan, P.
     (2007) Task research and language teaching: Reciprocal relationships. In S. Fotos & H. Nassaji . (Eds.), Form focused instruction and teacher education (pp.55–69). Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
429. Skehan, P.
     (2009) Modelling second language performance: Integrating complexity, accuracy, fluency, and lexis. Applied Linguistics, 30 (4), 510–532. 10.1093/applin/amp047
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amp047 [Google Scholar]
430. Snowling, M.
     (2000) Dyslexia. Blackwell
     [Google Scholar]
431. Spada, N. , & Lightbown, P. M.
     (1999) Instruction, first language influence, and developmental readiness in second language acquisition. The Modern Language Journal, 83 (1), 1–22. 10.1111/0026‑7902.00002
     https://doi.org/10.1111/0026-7902.00002 [Google Scholar]
432. Spinath, B. , & Spinath, F. M.
     (2005) Longitudinal analysis of the link between learning motivation and competence beliefs among elementary school children. Learning and Instruction, 15 (2), 87–102. 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2005.04.008
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2005.04.008 [Google Scholar]
433. Steinberg, L. , Albert, D. , Cauffman, E. , Banich, M. , Graham, S. , & Woolard, J.
     (2008) Age differences in sensation seeking and impulsivity as indexed by behavior and self-report: evidence for a dual systems model. Developmental Psychology, 44 , 1764–1778. 10.1037/a0012955
     https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012955 [Google Scholar]
434. Steinmayr, R. , & Spinath, B.
     (2009) The importance of motivation as a predictor of school achievement. Learning and Individual Differences, 19 (1), 80–90. 10.1016/j.lindif.2008.05.004
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2008.05.004 [Google Scholar]
435. Stevenson, C. E. , Bergwerff, C. E. , Heisera, W. J. , & Resinga, W. C. M.
     (2014) Working memory and dynamic measures of analogical reasoning as predictors of children’s math and reading achievement. Infant and Child Development, 23(1), 51–66. 10.1002/icd.1833
     https://doi.org/10.1002/icd.1833 [Google Scholar]
436. Stoel, R. D. , Peetsma, T. T. D. , & Roeleveld, J.
     (2001) Relations between the development of school investment, self-confidence and language achievement in elementary education: A multivariate latent growth curve approach. Learning and Individual Differences, 13 (4), 313–333. 10.1016/S1041‑6080(03)00017‑7
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S1041-6080(03)00017-7 [Google Scholar]
437. Storch, N.
     (1999) Are two heads better than one? Pair work and grammatical accuracy. System, 27(3), 363–374. 10.1016/S0346‑251X(99)00031‑7
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(99)00031-7 [Google Scholar]
438. Storch, N.
     (2001) How collaborative is pair work? ESL tertiary students composing in pairs. Language Teaching Research, 5 (1), 29–53. 10.1177/136216880100500103
     https://doi.org/10.1177/136216880100500103 [Google Scholar]
439. Storch, N.
     (2002) Patterns of interaction in ESL pair work. Language Learning, 52 (1), 119–158. 10.1111/1467‑9922.00179
     https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9922.00179 [Google Scholar]
440. Storch, N.
     (2004) Using activity theory to explain differences in patterns of dyadic interactions in an ESL class. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 60 (4), 457–480. 10.3138/cmlr.60.4.457
     https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.60.4.457 [Google Scholar]
441. Storch, N.
     (2005) Collaborative writing: Product, process, and students’ reflections. Journal of Second Language Writing, 14 (3), 153–173. 10.1016/j.jslw.2005.05.002
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2005.05.002 [Google Scholar]
442. Storch, N.
     (2008) Metatalk in a pair work activity: Level of engagement and implications for language development. Language awareness, 17(2), 95–114. 10.1080/09658410802146644
     https://doi.org/10.1080/09658410802146644 [Google Scholar]
443. Storch, N.
     (2011) Collaborative writing in L2 contexts: Processes, outcomes, and future directions. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 31 , 275–288. 10.1017/S0267190511000079
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190511000079 [Google Scholar]
444. Storch, N.
     (2013) Collaborative writing in L2 classrooms. Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781847699954
     https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847699954 [Google Scholar]
445. Storch, N.
     (2016) Collaborative writing. In R. M. Manchón & P. Matsuda . (Eds.), Handbook of second and foreign language writing (pp.387–406). De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9781614511335‑021
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9781614511335-021 [Google Scholar]
446. Storch, N.
     (2018) Written corrective feedback from sociocultural theoretical perspectives: A research agenda. Language Teaching, 51 (2), 262–277. 10.1017/S0261444818000034
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444818000034 [Google Scholar]
447. Storch, N.
     (2019) Collaborative writing. Language Teaching, 52 , 40–59. 10.1017/S0261444818000320
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444818000320 [Google Scholar]
448. Storch, N.
     (2021a) Collaborative writing: Promoting languaging among language learners. In M. P. García Mayo . (Ed.), Working collaboratively in second/foreign language learning (pp.13–34). De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9781501511318‑002
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501511318-002 [Google Scholar]
449. Storch, N.
     (2021b) Theoretical perspectives on L2 writing and language learning in collaborative writing and the collaborative processing of written corrective feedback. In R. M. Manchón & C. Polio . (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition and writing (pp.22–34). Routledge. 10.4324/9780429199691‑4
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429199691-4 [Google Scholar]
450. Storch, N. , & Wigglesworth, G.
     (2003) Is there a role for the use of the L1 in an L2 setting?TESOL Quarterly, 37 (4), 760–770. 10.2307/3588224
     https://doi.org/10.2307/3588224 [Google Scholar]
451. Sutton, A. J. , Song, F. , Gilbody, S. M. , & Abrams, K. R.
     (2000) Modelling publication bias in meta-analysis: A review. Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 9 (5), p.421–445. 10.1177/096228020000900503
     https://doi.org/10.1177/096228020000900503 [Google Scholar]
452. Swain, M.
     (1993) The output hypothesis: Just speaking and writing aren’t enough. Canadian Modern Language Review, 50 (1), 158–164. 10.3138/cmlr.50.1.158
     https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.50.1.158 [Google Scholar]
453. Swain, M.
     (1995) Three functions of output in second language learning. In G. Cook & B. Seidlhofer . (Eds.), Principles and practice in applied linguistics: Studies in honour of H. G. Widdowson (pp.125–144). Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
454. Swain, M.
     (2000) The output hypothesis and beyond: Mediating acquisition through collaborative dialogue. In J. Lantolf . (Ed.), Sociocultural approaches to second language research (pp.97–115). Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
455. Swain, M.
     (2005) The output hypothesis: Theory and research. In E. Hinkel . (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp.471–483). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
     [Google Scholar]
456. Swain, M.
     (2006) Languaging, agency and collaboration in advanced language proficiency. In H. Byrnes . (Ed.), Advanced language learning: The contribution of Halliday and Vygotsky (pp.95–108). Continuum.
     [Google Scholar]
457. Swain, M. , & Lapkin, S.
     (1995) Problems in output and the cognitive processes they generate: A step towards second language learning. Applied linguistics, 16(3), 371–391. 10.1093/applin/16.3.371
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/16.3.371 [Google Scholar]
458. Swain, M. , & Watanabe, Y.
     (2013) Languaging: Collaborative dialogue as a source of second language learning. The encyclopedia of applied linguistics, 3218–3225.
     [Google Scholar]
459. Swain, M. , Kinnear, P. , & Steinman, L. C.
     (2011) Sociocultural theory in second language acquisition: An introduction through narratives. Multilingual Matters.
     [Google Scholar]
460. Swain, M. , & Lapkin, S.
     (1998) Interaction and second language learning: Two adolescent French immersion students working together. Modern Language Journal, 82 (3), 320–337. 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.1998.tb01209.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1998.tb01209.x [Google Scholar]
461. Swain, M. , & Lapkin, S.
     (2000) Task-based second language learning: The uses of the first language. Language Teaching Research, 4 (3), 251–274. 10.1177/136216880000400304
     https://doi.org/10.1177/136216880000400304 [Google Scholar]
462. Swain, M. , & Lapkin, S.
     (2001) Focus on form through collaborative dialogue: Exploring task effects. Longman.
     [Google Scholar]
463. Swain, M. , & Lapkin, S.
     (2002) Talking it through: Two French immersion learners’ response to reformulation. International Journal of Educational Research, 37 (3–4), 285–304. 10.1016/S0883‑0355(03)00006‑5
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-0355(03)00006-5 [Google Scholar]
464. Swing, S. R. , & Peterson, P. L.
     (1982) The relationship of student ability and small group interaction to student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 19 (2), 259–274. 10.3102/00028312019002259
     https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312019002259 [Google Scholar]
465. Tan, L. , Wigglesworth, G. , & Storch, N.
     (2010) Pair interaction and mode of communication: Comparing face-to-face and computer mediated communication. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 33 , 1–27. 10.2104/aral1027
     https://doi.org/10.2104/aral1027 [Google Scholar]
466. Tang, C. , & Liu, Y.
     (2018) Effects of indirect coded corrective feedback with and without short affective teacher comments on L2 writing performance, learner uptake and motivation. Assessing Writing, 35 , 26–40. 10.1016/j.asw.2017.12.002
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2017.12.002 [Google Scholar]
467. Tavakoli, P.
     (2014) Storyline complexity and syntactic complexity in writing and speaking tasks. In H. Byrnes & R. M. Manchon . (Eds.), Task-based language learning insights from and for L2 writing (pp.217–236). John Benjamins. 10.1075/tblt.7.09tav
     https://doi.org/10.1075/tblt.7.09tav [Google Scholar]
468. Taylor, R.
     (1987) Selecting effective courseware: three fundamental instructional factors. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 12 (3), 231–243. 10.1016/S0361‑476X(87)80028‑0
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-476X(87)80028-0 [Google Scholar]
469. Tennant, J. , & Gardner, R. C.
     (2004) The computerized mini-AMTB. CALICO Journal, 21 (2), 245–263. 10.1558/cj.v21i2.245‑263
     https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.v21i2.245-263 [Google Scholar]
470. Thornbury, S.
     (1997) Reformulation and reconstruction: Tasks that promote ‘noticing’. ELT Journal, 51 , 326–335. 10.1093/elt/51.4.326
     https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/51.4.326 [Google Scholar]
471. Thornbury, S.
     (2013) Resisting coursebooks. In J. Gray . (Ed.), Critical perspectives on language teaching materials. Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9781137384263_10
     https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137384263_10 [Google Scholar]
472. Tin, T. B.
     (2011) Language creativity and co-emergence of form and meaning in creative writing tasks. Applied Linguistics, 32 (2), 215–235. 10.1093/applin/amq050
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amq050 [Google Scholar]
473. Tomasello, M.
     (1999) The cultural origins of human cognition. Harvard University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
474. Totten, S. , Sills, T. , Digby, A. , & Ross, P.
     (Eds.) (1991) Cooperative learning: A guide to research. Garland.
     [Google Scholar]
475. Truscott, J.
     (1996) The case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes. Language Learning, 46 (2), 327–369. 10.1111/j.1467‑1770.1996.tb01238.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1996.tb01238.x [Google Scholar]
476. Twenge, J. M. , & Campbell, W. K.
     (2001) Age and birth cohort differences in self-esteem: A cross-temporal meta-analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5 , 321–344. 10.1207/S15327957PSPR0504_3
     https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327957PSPR0504_3 [Google Scholar]
477. Umbach, P. D. , & Wawrzynski, M. R.
     (2005) Faculty do matter: The role of college faculty in student learning and engagement. Research in Higher Education, 46 (2), 153–184. 10.1007/s11162‑004‑1598‑1
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-004-1598-1 [Google Scholar]
478. UNESCO Institute for Statistics
     UNESCO Institute for Statistics (2008) International literacy statistics: A review of concepts, methodology, and current data. Retrieved on5 August 2022fromuis.unesco.org/sites/default/files/documents/international-literacy-statistics-a-review-of-concepts-methodology-and-current-data-en_0.pdf
479. Ushioda, E.
     (2009) A person-in-context relational view of emergent motivation, self and identity. In Z. Dornyei & E. Ushioda . (Eds.), Motivation, language identity and the L2 self (pp.215–228). Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781847691293‑012
     https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847691293-012 [Google Scholar]
480. Ushioda, E.
     (2017) The impact of global English on motivation to learn other languages: Toward an ideal multilingual self. Modern Language Journal, 101 (3), 469–482. 10.1111/modl.12413
     https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12413 [Google Scholar]
481. Ushioda, E. , & Dörnyei, Z.
     (2017) Beyond global English: Motivation to learn languages in a multicultural world: Introduction to the special issue. The Modern Language Journal, 101 (3), 451–454. 10.1111/modl.12407
     https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12407 [Google Scholar]
482. Van Beuningen, C. G. , De Jong, N. H. , & Kuiken, F.
     (2008) The effect of direct and indirect corrective feedback on L2 learners’ written accuracy. ITL – International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 156, 279–296. 10.2143/ITL.156.0.2034439
     https://doi.org/10.2143/ITL.156.0.2034439 [Google Scholar]
483. Van Beuningen, C. G. , De Jong, N. H. , & Kuiken, F.
     (2012) Evidence on the effectiveness of comprehensive error correction in second language writing. Language Learning, 62, 1–41. 10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2011.00674.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2011.00674.x [Google Scholar]
484. van den Noort, M. W. M. L. , Bosch, P. , & Hugdahl, K.
     (2006) Foreign language proficiency and working memory capacity. European Psychologist, 11 , 289–296. 10.1027/1016‑9040.11.4.289
     https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040.11.4.289 [Google Scholar]
485. van der Veen, I. , & Peetsma, T. T. D.
     (2009) The development in self-regulated learning behaviour of first-year students in the lowest level of secondary school in The Netherlands. Learning and Individual Differences, 19 (1), 34–46. 10.1016/j.lindif.2008.03.001
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2008.03.001 [Google Scholar]
486. Van Lawick-Goodall, J.
     (1968) The behaviour of free-living chimpanzees in the Gombe Stream Reserve. Animal Behaviour Monographs, 1 , 161–311. 10.1016/S0066‑1856(68)80003‑2
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0066-1856(68)80003-2 [Google Scholar]
487. VanPatten, B.
     (1990) Attending to content and form in the input: An experiment in consciousness. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12 , 287–301. 10.1017/S0272263100009177
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100009177 [Google Scholar]
488. VanPatten, B.
     (Ed.) (2003) Processing instruction: Theory, research, and commentary. Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
489. VanPatten, B. , & Williams, J.
     (Eds.) (2007) Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
     [Google Scholar]
490. Vickov, G.
     (2007) Pisanje na engleskom u prvom razredu osnovne skole [Writing skills in English in the first grade of primary school]. Stranijezici.
     [Google Scholar]
491. Villarreal, I. , & Gil-Sarratea, N.
     (2020) The effect of collaborative writing in an EFL secondary setting. Language Teaching Research, 24 (6), 874–897. 10.1177/1362168819829017
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168819829017 [Google Scholar]
492. Villarreal, I. & Lázaro-Ibarrola, A.
     (2022). Models in collaborative writing among CLIL English learners in Primary School: Linguistic outcomes and motivation matters. System, 102922. 10.1016/j.system.2022.102922
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2022.102922 [Google Scholar]
493. Von Der Haar, C. M.
     (2005) Social psychology: A sociological perspective. Pearson Education.
     [Google Scholar]
494. Vygotsky, L. S.
     (1978) Mind in society. The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
495. Vygotsky, L. S.
     (1981) The genesis of higher mental functions. In J. V. Wertsch . (Ed.), The concept of activity in Soviet psychology (pp.144–188). M. E. Sharpe.
     [Google Scholar]
496. Wadsworth, B. J.
     (1989) Piaget’s theory of cognitive and affective development (4th ed.). Longman.
     [Google Scholar]
497. Wajnryb, R.
     (1990) Grammar dictation. Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
498. Walter, C.
     (2006) Transfer of reading comprehension skills to L2 is linked to mental representations of text and to L2 working memory. Applied Linguistics, 25 (3), 315–339. 10.1093/applin/25.3.315
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/25.3.315 [Google Scholar]
499. Watanabe, Y.
     (2008) Peer-peer interaction between L2 learners of different proficiency levels: Their interactions and reflections. Canadian Modern Language Review, 64 , 605–635. 10.3138/cmlr.64.4.605
     https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.64.4.605 [Google Scholar]
500. Watanabe, Y. , & Swain, M.
     (2007) Effects of proficiency differences and patterns of pair interaction on second language learning: Collaborative dialogue between adult ESL learners. Language Teaching Research, 11 (2), 121–142. 10.1177/136216880607074599
     https://doi.org/10.1177/136216880607074599 [Google Scholar]
501. Webb, N. M.
     (1982) Group composition, group interaction, and achievement in small groups. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74 (4), 475–484. 10.1037/0022‑0663.74.4.475
     https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.74.4.475 [Google Scholar]
502. Weigle, S.
     (2002) Assessing Writing. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511732997
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511732997 [Google Scholar]
503. White, L.
     (1988) Implications of learnability theories for second language learning and teaching. McGill Working Papers in Linguistics/Cahiers Linguistiques de McGill, 5 , 148–162.
     [Google Scholar]
504. Wigfield, A. , Eccles, J. S. , Schiefele, U. , Roeser, R. , & Davis-Kean, P.
     (2008) Development of achievement motivation. In W. Damon & R. M. Lerner . (Eds.), Child and adolescent development: An advanced course (pp.406–434). John Wiley & Sons.
     [Google Scholar]
505. Wigglesworth, G. , & Storch, N.
     (2009) Pair versus individual writing: Effects on fluency, complexity and accuracy. Language Testing, 26 (3), 445–466. 10.1177/0265532209104670
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532209104670 [Google Scholar]
506. Wigglesworth, G. , & Storch, N.
     (2012) What role for collaboration in writing and writing feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21 (4), 364–374. 10.1016/j.jslw.2012.09.005
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2012.09.005 [Google Scholar]
507. Williams, J.
     (2012) The potential role(s) of writing in second language development. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21 (4), 321–331. 10.1016/j.jslw.2012.09.007
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2012.09.007 [Google Scholar]
508. Williams, J. N. , & Lovatt, P. P.
     (2003) Phonological memory and rule learning. Language Learning, 53 , 67–121. 10.1111/1467‑9922.00211
     https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9922.00211 [Google Scholar]
509. Williams, M. , & Burden, R.
     (1997) Psychology for language teachers: A social constructivist approach. Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
510. Winne, P. H. , & Marx, R. W.
     (1989) A cognitive-processing analysis of motivation with classroom tasks. In C. Ames & R. Ames . (Eds.), Research on motivation in education (pp.297–327). Academic Press.
     [Google Scholar]
511. Wong, W. , & VanPatten, B.
     (2003) The evidence is in drills are out. Foreign Language Annals, 36 (3), 403–423. 10.1111/j.1944‑9720.2003.tb02123.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2003.tb02123.x [Google Scholar]
512. Wood, D. , Bruner, J. S. , & Ross, G.
     (1976) The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17 (2), 89–100. 10.1111/j.1469‑7610.1976.tb00381.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1976.tb00381.x [Google Scholar]
513. Wydell, T. N.
     (2000) Advances in understanding cross cultural differences in dyslexia through a bilingual individual with monolingual dyslexia. In F. Columbus . (Ed.), Advances in psychology research (Vol.2, pp.141–162). Nova Science Publishers.
     [Google Scholar]
514. Wydell, T. N.
     (2003) Dyslexia in Japanese and the ‘hypothesis of granularity and transparency’. In N. Goulandris . (Ed.), Dyslexia in different languages: Cross-linguistic comparisons (pp.255–276). Whurr Publishers
     [Google Scholar]
515. Yang, L. , Baba, K. , & Cumming, A.
     (2004) Activity systems for ESL writing improvement: Case studies of three Chinese and three Japanese adult learners of English. Angles on the English-Speaking World, 4 , 13–33.
     [Google Scholar]
516. Yang, L. , & Zhang, L.
     (2010) Exploring the role of reformulations and a model text in EFL students’ writing performance. Language Teaching Research, 14 , 464–484. 10.1177/1362168810375369
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168810375369 [Google Scholar]
517. Yu, S. , Jiang, L. , & Zhou, N.
     (2020) Investigating what feedback practices contribute to students’ writing motivation and engagement in Chinese EFL context: A large scale study. Assessing Writing, 44 , 100451. 10.1016/j.asw.2020.100451
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2020.100451 [Google Scholar]
518. Zhang, M.
     (2019) Towards a quantitative model of understanding the dynamics of collaboration in collaborative writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 45 , 16–30. 10.1016/j.jslw.2019.04.001
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2019.04.001 [Google Scholar]
519. Zimmerman, B. J. , & Martinez-Pons, M.
     (1990) Student differences in self-regulated learning: Relating grade, sex, and giftedness to self-efficacy and strategy use. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82 (1), 51–59. 10.1037/0022‑0663.82.1.51
     https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.51 [Google Scholar]