1887
  1. Home
  2. Books
  3. From Pseudo-relatives to Causative Constructions

From Pseudo-relatives to Causative Constructions

Scandinavian languages as a case study

image of From Pseudo-relatives to Causative Constructions
USD
Buy:$135.00 + Taxes

This volume proposes a novel structural analysis for causative constructions, offering a solution for the long-standing mono/bi-clausal dualism. Causatives are claimed to instantiate a ‘complex object’ construction, insofar as the causee is not only the subject of the lexical verb, but also a participant that is related to the whole event. Furthermore, the analysis reveals that the realization of causatives implies a crucial interplay with the pseudo-relative construction, a much-debated structure as well. Data from Scandinavian languages are highlighted, through the results of an experimental test on the scope of negation and adverbs supporting the present analysis. The book offers a cross-linguistic perspective as it discusses the relevant constructions in languages including Italian, English, French, Portuguese and Spanish.

References

  1. Abbagnano, Nicola
    (ed.) 1961 Dizionario di Filosofia. Torino: UTET.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Aikhenvald, Alexandra
    2018 Word-class changing derivations in typological perspective. InLanguage at Large. Essays on Syntax and Semantics, Alexandra Aikhenvald & Robert M. W. Dixon (eds), 221–289. Leiden: Brill.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Aissen, Judith L.
    1974 The Syntax of Causative Construction. PhD dissertation, Harvard University.
  4. Alexiadou, Artemis
    1997 Adverb Placement. A Case Study in Antisymmetric Syntax [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 18]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Alexiadou, Artemis & Elena Anagnostopoulou
    2004 Voice morphology in the causative-inchoative Alternation: Evidence for a non unified structural analysis of unaccusatives. InThe Unaccusativity Puzzle: Explorations of the Syntax-lexicon Interface, Artemis Alexiadou , Elena Anagnostopoulou & Martin Everaert (eds), 115–136. Oxford: OUP. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199257652.003.0005
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199257652.003.0005 [Google Scholar]
  6. Alexiadou, Artemis , Elena Anagnostopoulou & Florian Schäfer
    2006 The properties of anticausatives cross-linguistically. InPhases of Interpretation, Mara Frascarelli (ed.), 187–212. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyer. 10.1515/9783110197723.4.187
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197723.4.187 [Google Scholar]
  7. Alexiadou, Artemis , Anagnostopoulou, Elena & Schäfer, Florian
    2015 External Arguments in Transitivity Alternations: A Layering Approach. Oxford: OUP. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199571949.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199571949.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  8. Alsina, Alex
    1992 On the argument structure of causatives. Linguistic Inquiry23: 517–555.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Arkadiev, Peter M. & Letuchiy, Alexander B.
    2009 The syntax and semantics of event structure and Adyghe causatives. Ms, lingBuzz/000811.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Baker, Carl Leroy
    1970 Double negatives. Linguistic Inquiry1: 169–186.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Baker, Mark
    1988 Incorporation. A Theory of Grammatical Function Changing. Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Bandle, Oskar , Braunmüller, Kurt , Jahr, Ernst Håkon , Karker, Allan , Naumann, Hans-Peter & Teleman, Ulf
    (eds) 2005 The Nordic Languages: An International Handbook of the History of the North Germanic Languages. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Barwise, Jon
    1981 Scenes and other situations. The Journal of Philosophy78: 369–397. 10.2307/2026481
     https://doi.org/10.2307/2026481 [Google Scholar]
  14. Bayer, Josef
    1986 The role of event expression in grammar. Studies in Language10: 1–52. 10.1075/sl.10.1.03bay
     https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.10.1.03bay [Google Scholar]
  15. Belletti, Adriana
    1990 Generalized Verb Movement. Torino: Rosenberg & Sellier.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. 2004 Structures and Beyond: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Vol.3. Oxford: OUP.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Bianchi, Valentina
    1999 Consequences of Antisymmetry: Headed Relative Clauses. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110803372
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110803372 [Google Scholar]
  18. Bianchi, Valentina
    2000 The raising analysis of relative clauses: A reply to Borsley. Linguistic Inquiry31: 123–140. 10.1162/002438900554316
     https://doi.org/10.1162/002438900554316 [Google Scholar]
  19. Bianchi, Valentina
    2002a Headed relative clauses in generative syntax – Part I. Glot International6(7): 197–204.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. 2002b Headed relative clauses in generative syntax – Part II. Glot International6(8): 235–247.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Bianchi, Valentina & Bocci, Giuliano
    2012 Should I stay or should I go? Optional focus movement in Italian. InEmpirical issues in syntax and semantics 9, Christopher Piñon (ed.), 1–16. Paris: EISS.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Brandtler, Johan
    2010 The Evaluability Hypothesis. The Syntax and Semantics of Polarity Item Licensing in Swedish. PhD dissertation, Lund University.
  23. Burzio, Luigi
    1986 Italian Syntax. A Government and Binding Approach. Dordrecht: Reidel.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Buyssens, Eric
    1959 Negative contexts. English Studies40: 163–169. 10.1080/00138385908597040
     https://doi.org/10.1080/00138385908597040 [Google Scholar]
  25. Bybee, Joan L.
    1985 Morphology: A Study of the Relation between Meaning and Form [Typological Studies in Language 9]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.9
     https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.9 [Google Scholar]
  26. Cardinaletti, Anna & Guasti, Maria Teresa
    (eds) 1995 Syntax and Semantics, Vol.XXVIII: Small Clauses. San Diego CA: Academic Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Carnap, Rudolf
    1937 The Logical Syntax of Language. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Carnie, Andrew , Harley, Heidi & Dooley, Sheila Ann
    (eds) 2006 Verb First. On the Syntax of Verb-initial Languages [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 73]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Cerbasi, Donato
    1998a Le costruzioni causative in italiano, spagnolo e portoghese. InSintassi storica. Atti del XXX Congresso SLI, Paolo Ramat & Elisa Roma (eds), 457–468. Roma: Bulzoni.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. 1998b The causee in Romance and Germanic causative constructions. Languages in Contrast2: 161–171. 10.1075/lic.1.2.04cer
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lic.1.2.04cer [Google Scholar]
  31. Chafe, Wallace L.
    1976 Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics and point of view. InSubject and Topic, Charles N. Li (eds), 27–55. New York NY: Academic Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Chierchia, Gennaro
    1997 Semantica. Bologna: Il Mulino.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Chierchia, Gennaro & McConnell-Ginet, Sally
    1990 Meaning and Grammar: An Introduction to Semantics. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Chomsky, Noam
    1970 Remarks on nominalization. InReadings in English Transformational Grammar, Roderick Jacobs & Peter Rosenbaum (eds), 184–221. Waltham MA: Blaisdell.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. 1977 On Wh-movement. InFormal Syntax, Peter W. Culicover , Thomas Wasow & Adrian Akmajian (eds), 71–132. New York NY: Academic Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. 1981 Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. 1986 Barriers. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. 1993 Bare phrase structure. InGovernment and Binding Theory and the Minimalist Program. Principles and Parameters in Syntactic Theory, Gert Webelhuth (ed.), 383–439. Oxford: Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. 1995 The Minimalist Program. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. 2000 Minimalist inquiries: The framework. InStep by Step. Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik, Roger Martin , David Michaels , Juan Uriagereka & Samuel Jay Keyser (eds), 89–155. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. 2001 Derivation by phase. InKen Hale: A Life in Language, Michael Kenstowicz (ed.), 1–52. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Chomsky, Noam
    2004 Beyond explanatory adequacy. InStructures, Vol3, Adriana Belletti (ed.). Oxford: OUP.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Chomsky, Noam
    2005 Three factors in language design. Linguistic Inquiry36: 1–22. 10.1162/0024389052993655
     https://doi.org/10.1162/0024389052993655 [Google Scholar]
  44. 2008 On phases. InFoundational Issues in Linguistic Theory. Essays in Honor of Jean-Roger Vergnaud, Robert Freidin , Carlos Peregrín Otero & Maria Luisa Zubizarreta (eds), 133–166. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/9780262062787.003.0007
     https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262062787.003.0007 [Google Scholar]
  45. Cinque, Guglielmo
    1992 The pseudo-relative and Acc-ing constructions after verbs of perception. Working Papers in Linguistics2: 1–31. Venice: Cafoscarina.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. 1995 The pseudo-relative and ACC-ing constructions after verbs of perception. InItalian Syntax and Universal Grammar, Guglielmo Cinque (ed.), 244–275. Cambridge: CUP.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. 1999 Adverbs and Functional Heads. A Cross-Linguistic Perspective. Oxford: OUP.
     [Google Scholar]
  48. 2001a Restructuring and the order of aspectual and root modal heads. InCurrent studies in Italian syntax. Essays offered to Lorenzo Renzi, Gugliemo Cinque & Giampaolo Salvi (eds), 137–155. Amsterdam: Elsevier. 10.1163/9780585473949_009
     https://doi.org/10.1163/9780585473949_009 [Google Scholar]
  49. 2001b Restructuring and functional structure. Working Papers in Linguistics11: 45–127. Venice: Cafoscarina.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Cole, Peter
    1983 The grammatical role of the causee in the universal grammar. Italian Journal of American Linguistics49: 115–133. 10.1086/465778
     https://doi.org/10.1086/465778 [Google Scholar]
  51. Comrie, Bernard
    1975 Causatives and universal grammar. Transactions of the Philological Society73(1): 1–32.. 10.1111/j.1467‑968X.1974.tb01155.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-968X.1974.tb01155.x [Google Scholar]
  52. 1976 The syntax of causative constructions: Cross-language similarities and divergences. InThe Grammar of Causative Constructions, Masayoshi Shibatani (ed.), 261–312. New York NY: Academic Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  53. 1981 Language Universals and Linguistic Typology. Oxford: Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Cresti, Emanuela
    2000a Corpus di italiano parlato. Firenze: Accademia della Crusca.
     [Google Scholar]
  55. 2000b Enunciato e frase. InEnunciato e frase, illocuzione e modalità. Saggi. Laboratorio Linguistico del Dipartimento di Italianistica (LABLITA), Emanuela Cresti (ed.), 11–28. Florence: University of Florence.
     [Google Scholar]
  56. 2000c Per una nuova definizione di frase. InEnunciato e frase, illocuzione e modalità. Saggi. Laboratorio Linguistico del Dipartimento di Italianistica (LABLITA), Emanuela Cresti (ed.), 29–59. Florence: University of Florence.
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Del Gobbo, Francesca
    2003 Appositives at the Interface. PhD dissertation, University of California at Irvine.
  58. Deutscher, Guy
    2009 Nominalization and the origin of subordination. InSyntactic Complexity. Diachrony, Acquisition, Neurocognition, Evolution [Typological Studies in Language 85], Talmy Givón & Masayoshi Shibatani (eds), 199–214. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.85.08nom
     https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.85.08nom [Google Scholar]
  59. den Dikken, Marcel
    2006 Relators and Linkers: The Syntax of Predication, Predicate Inversion, and Copulas. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/5873.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/5873.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  60. Di Lorenzo, Giorgia
    2011 La subordinata come oggetto complesso: La causative nelle lingue scandinave. PhD dissertation, University of Roma Tre.
  61. Doron, Edit
    1994 The discourse function of appositives. Proceedings of IATL9: 53–62.
     [Google Scholar]
  62. Dowty, David R.
    1972 On the syntax and semantics of the atomic predicate CAUSE. InPapers from the Eighth Regional Meeting, Chicago Linguistic Society, Paul M. Peranteau , Judith N. Levi & Gloria C. Phares (eds), 62–74. Chicago IL: CLS.
     [Google Scholar]
  63. Dowty, David R.
    1979 Word Meaning and Montague Grammar. Dordrecht: Reidel. 10.1007/978‑94‑009‑9473‑7
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9473-7 [Google Scholar]
  64. Egerland, Verner
    1998 The affectdeness constraint and AspP. Studia Linguistica52: 19–47. 10.1111/1467‑9582.00028
     https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9582.00028 [Google Scholar]
  65. Engdahl, Elisabet
    1980 Wh-constructions in Swedish and the relevance of subjacency. Proceedings of NELS 10. Cahiers Linguistiques d’Ottawa9: 98–108.
     [Google Scholar]
  66. Engdahl, Elisabet & Ejerhed Eva
    (eds) 1982 Readings on Unbounded Dependencies in Scandinavian Languages. Stockholm: Almquist & Wiksell International.
     [Google Scholar]
  67. Erteschik-Shir, Nomi
    1973 On the Nature of Island Constraints. PhD dissertation, MIT.
  68. Foley, William A. & Van Valin Jr, Robert D.
    1984 Functional Syntax and Universal Grammar. Cambridge: CUP.
     [Google Scholar]
  69. Folli, Raffaella & Harley, Heidi
    2007 Causation, obligation and argument structure: On the nature of little v. Linguistic Inquiry38(2): 197–238. 10.1162/ling.2007.38.2.197
     https://doi.org/10.1162/ling.2007.38.2.197 [Google Scholar]
  70. Frascarelli, Mara
    2004 L’interpretazione del focus e la portata degli operatori sintattici. InIl Parlato Italiano [Atti del Convegno Nazionale B06], Federico Albano Leoni , Francesco Cutugno , Massimo Pettorino & Renata Savy (eds). Napoli: M. D’Auria–CIRASS.
     [Google Scholar]
  71. (ed.) 2006 Phases of Interpretation. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110197723
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197723 [Google Scholar]
  72. 2007 Subjects, topics and the interpretation of referential pro: An interface approach to the linking of (null) pronouns. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory25: 691–734. 10.1007/s11049‑007‑9025‑x
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-007-9025-x [Google Scholar]
  73. 2010 Narrow focus, clefting and predicate inversion. Lingua120(9): 2121–2147. 10.1016/j.lingua.2010.03.021
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2010.03.021 [Google Scholar]
  74. 2017 Dislocations and framings. InManual of Romance Morphosyntax and Syntax, Elisabeth Star & Andreas Dufter (eds), 472–501. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110377088‑013
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110377088-013 [Google Scholar]
  75. 2018 The interpretation of pro in consistent and partial NS languages: A comparative interface analysis. InNull-Subjects in Generative Grammar. A Synchronic and Diachronic Perspective, Federica Cognola & Jan Casalicchio (eds). Oxford: OUP.
     [Google Scholar]
  76. Frascarelli, Mara , Bonvino, Elisabetta & Pietrandrea, Paola
    2007 Semantica, sintassi e prosodia di alcuni avverbi nel parlato spontaneo. InLa comunicazione parlata. Atti del Convegno Internazionale, TomoI, Massimo Pettorino , Antonella Giannini , Marianna Vallone & Renata Savy (eds), 547–586. Napoli: Liguori Editore.
     [Google Scholar]
  77. Frascarelli, Mara & Carella, Giorgio
    2019 Topic chains and the interpretation of null subjects: The acquisition of discourse-related strategies in Italian. The Linguistic Review36: 637–674. 10.1515/tlr‑2019‑2018
     https://doi.org/10.1515/tlr-2019-2018 [Google Scholar]
  78. Frascarelli, Mara & Stortini, Tania
    2019 Focus constructions, verb types and the SV/VS order in Italian: An acquisitional study from a syntax-prosody perspective. Lingua227: 1–34. 10.1016/j.lingua.2019.04.004
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2019.04.004 [Google Scholar]
  79. Gärtner, Hans Martin
    2002 On the force of V2 declaratives. Theoretical Linguistics28: 33–42. 10.1515/thli.2002.28.1.33
     https://doi.org/10.1515/thli.2002.28.1.33 [Google Scholar]
  80. Gibson, Jeanne & Raposo, Eduardo
    1986 Clause union, the Stratal Uniqueness Law and the chômeur relation. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory4: 295–331.. 10.1007/BF00133372
     https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00133372 [Google Scholar]
  81. Gili-Fivela, Barbara , Avesani, Cinzia , Barone, Marco , Bocci, Giuliano , Crocco, Carla , D’Imperio, Mariapaola , Giordano, Rosa , Marotta, Giovanna , Savio, Michelina & Sorianello, Patrizia
    2015 Varieties of Italian and their intonational phonology. InIntonational Variation in Romance, Sonia Frota & Pilar Prieto (eds), 140–197. Oxford: OUP. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199685332.003.0005
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199685332.003.0005 [Google Scholar]
  82. Giorgi, Alessandra
    1991 La struttura interna dei sintagmi nominali. InGrande grammatica italiana di consultazione, Vol.I: La frase. I sintagmi nominale e preposizionale, Lorenzo Salvi Giampaolo & Anna Cardinaletti (eds), 273–314. Bologna: Il Mulino.
     [Google Scholar]
  83. Givón, Talmy
    1976 Some constraints on Bantu causativization. InSyntax and Semantics, Vol.6: The Grammar of Causative Constructions, Masayoshi Shibatani (ed.), 1–40. New York NY: Academic Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  84. 1980 The binding hierarchy and the typology of omplements. Studies in Language4: 333–377. 10.1075/sl.4.3.03giv
     https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.4.3.03giv [Google Scholar]
  85. 2009 Multiple routs to clause union: The diachrony of complex verbs phrases. InSyntactic Complexity. Diachrony, Acquisition, Neurocognition, Evolution [Typological Studies in Language 85], Talmy Givón & Masayoshi Shibatani (eds), 81–118. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.85.04mul
     https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.85.04mul [Google Scholar]
  86. Graffi, Giorgio
    1980 Su alcune costruzioni pseudo-relative. Rivista di Grammatica Generativa5: 117–139.
     [Google Scholar]
  87. 1994 Sintassi. Bologna: Il Mulino.
     [Google Scholar]
  88. 2019 What are ‘pseudo-relatives’?InDi tutti i colori. Studi linguistici per Maria Grossmann, Roberta D’Alessandro , Gabriele Iannàccaro , Diana Passino & Anna M. Thornton (eds), 115–131. halshs-02060688f.
     [Google Scholar]
  89. Grimshaw, Jane B.
    1979 Complement selection and the Lexicon. Linguistic Inquiry10: 270–326.
     [Google Scholar]
  90. 1990 Argument Structure. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  91. Guasti, Maria Teresa
    1988 La pseudorelative et les phenomenes d’accord. Rivista di Grammatica Generativa13: 35–57.
     [Google Scholar]
  92. 1993 Causative and Perception verbs. A Comparative Study. Turin: Rosenberg & Sellier.
     [Google Scholar]
  93. Haegeman, Liliane
    1991 Introduction to Government and Binding Theory. Oxford: Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  94. 1995 The Syntax of Negation. Cambridge: CUP. 10.1017/CBO9780511519727
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511519727 [Google Scholar]
  95. Haiman, John
    1985 Natural Syntax. Cambridge: CUP.
     [Google Scholar]
  96. Harley, Heidi B.
    2008 On the causative construction. InThe Oxford Handbook of Japanese Linguistics, Shigeru Miyagawa & Mamoru Saito (eds), 20–53. Oxford: OUP.
     [Google Scholar]
  97. Harris, Alice C. , & Campbell, Lyle
    1995 Historical Syntax in Cross-linguistic Perspective. Cambridge: CUP. 10.1017/CBO9780511620553
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620553 [Google Scholar]
  98. Haspelmath, Martin
    1997 Indefinite Pronouns. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  99. Hatcher, Anna G.
    1944 Je le vois sourire; Je le vois qui sourit; Je le vois souriant. Modern Language Quarterly5: 275–301. 10.1215/00267929‑5‑3‑275
     https://doi.org/10.1215/00267929-5-3-275 [Google Scholar]
  100. Haugen, Einar
    1976 The Scandinavian Languages. An Introduction to Their History. London: Faber.
     [Google Scholar]
  101. Heim, Irene
    1982 The Semantics of Definites and Indefinites Noun Phrases. PhD Dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
  102. Heine, Bernd
    2009 From nominals to clausal morphosyntax: Complexity via expansion. InSyntactic Complexity. Diachrony, Acquisition, Neurocognition, Evolution [Typological Studies in Language 85], Talmy Givón & Masayoshi Shibatani (eds), 23–52. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.85.02fro
     https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.85.02fro [Google Scholar]
  103. Heine, Bernd & Kuteva, Tania
    2007 The Genesis of Grammar: A Reconstruction. Oxford: OUP.
     [Google Scholar]
  104. Hellan, Lars & Platzack, Christer
    1999 Pronouns in Scandinavian languages: An overview. InClitics in the Languages of Europe, Henk van Riemsdijk (eds), 123–142. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110804010.123
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110804010.123 [Google Scholar]
  105. Higginbotham, James T.
    1983 The logic of perceptual reports: An extensional alternative to situation semantics. The Journal of PhylosophyLXXX: 100–127. 10.5840/jphil198380289
     https://doi.org/10.5840/jphil198380289 [Google Scholar]
  106. Hinterhölzl, Roland
    2006 Scrambling, Remnant Movement and Restructuring in West Germanic. Oxford: OUP. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195308211.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195308211.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  107. Holmberg, Anders
    1986 Word Order and Syntactic Features in the Scandinavian Languages and English. PhD dissertation, University of Stockholm.
  108. 1999 Remarks on Holmberg’s Generalization. Studia Linguistica5: 1–39. 10.1111/1467‑9582.00038
     https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9582.00038 [Google Scholar]
  109. Holmberg, Anders & Platzack, Christer
    1995 The Role of Inflection in Scandinavian Syntax. Oxford: OUP.
     [Google Scholar]
  110. 2005 The Scandinavian languages. InThe Oxford Handbook of Comparative Syntax, Guglielmo Cinque & Richard S. Kayne (eds), 420–458. Oxford: OUP.
     [Google Scholar]
  111. Hopper, Paul J. & Thompson, Sandra A.
    1985 The iconicity of the universal categories ‘noun’ and ‘verb’. InIconicity in Syntax [Typological Studies in Language 6], John Haiman (ed.), 151–183. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.6.08hop
     https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.6.08hop [Google Scholar]
  112. Hopper, Paul J. & Traugott, Elizabeth C.
    2003 Grammaticalization. Cambridge: CUP. 10.1017/CBO9781139165525
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139165525 [Google Scholar]
  113. Jackendoff, Ray
    1969 An interpretive theory of negation. Foundations of Language5: 218–241.
     [Google Scholar]
  114. Kayne, Richard S.
    1975 French Syntax. The Transformational Cycle. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  115. 1978 Le condizioni sul legamento, il collocamento dei clitici e lo spostamento a sinistra dei quantificatori. Rivista di Grammatica Generativa3: 147–171.
     [Google Scholar]
  116. 1981 Binding quantifiers, clitics and control. InBinding and Filtering, Frank Heny (ed.), 191–211. London: Croom Helm.
     [Google Scholar]
  117. 1984 Connectedness and Binary Branching. Dordrecht: Foris. 10.1515/9783111682228
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783111682228 [Google Scholar]
  118. 1991 Romance clitics, verb movement, and PRO. Linguistic Inquiry22: 647–686.
     [Google Scholar]
  119. 1992 Italian negative infinitival imperatives and clitic climbing. InHommages à Nicolas Ruwet, Liliane Tasmowsky & Anne Zribi-Hertz (eds), 300–312. Ghent: Communication and Cognition.
     [Google Scholar]
  120. 1994 The Antisymmetry of Sintax. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  121. (ed.) 2005 Movement and Silence. Oxford: OUP. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195179163.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195179163.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  122. 2006 On the parameters and on principles of pronunciation. InOrganizing Grammar. Linguistic Studies in Honor of Henk van Riemsdijk, Hans Broekhuis , Norbert Cover , Riny Huybregts , Ursula Kleinhenz & Jay Koster (eds), 289–299. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
  123. Keenan, Edward L. & Comrie, Bernard
    1977 Noun phrase accessibility and universal grammar. Linguistic Inquiry8: 63–99.
     [Google Scholar]
  124. Keenan, Edward L. & Comrie, Bernard
    1979 Data on the noun phrase accessibility hierarchy. Language55: 333–351. 10.2307/412588
     https://doi.org/10.2307/412588 [Google Scholar]
  125. Klima, Edward S.
    1964 Negation in English. InThe Structure of Language, Jerry A. Fodor & Jerrold J. Katz (eds), 246–323. Englewood Cliffs NJ: Prentice Hall.
     [Google Scholar]
  126. Kornfilt, Jaklin
    1997 Turkish. London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  127. Krifka, Manfred
    1995 The semantics and pragmatics of polarity items. Linguistic Analysis25: 209–257.
     [Google Scholar]
  128. 2007 Basic notions of information structure. InInterdisciplinary Studies of Information Structure6, Caroline Féry & Manfred Krifka (eds). Potsdam: University of Potsdam.
     [Google Scholar]
  129. Kuno, Susumu
    1995 Negative polarity items in Japanese and English. Harward Working Papers in Linguistics5: 165–197.
     [Google Scholar]
  130. Kush, Dave & Lindahl, Filippa
    2011 On the escapability of islands in Scandinavian. Paper presented atLinguistic Society of America (LSA)2011, Pittsburgh PA.
     [Google Scholar]
  131. Kush, Dave , Omaki, Akira & Hornstein, Norbert
    2013 Microvariation in islands?InExperimental Syntax and Island Effects, John Sprouse & Norbert Hornstein (eds), 239–264. Cambridge: CUP. 10.1017/CBO9781139035309.013
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139035309.013 [Google Scholar]
  132. Laka, Itziar
    1990 Negation in Syntax: On the Nature of Functional Categories and Projections. PhD dissertation, MIT.
  133. Lambrecht, Knud
    1994 Information Structure and Sentence Form. Topic, Focus and the Mental Representations of Discourse Referents. Cambridge: CUP. 10.1017/CBO9780511620607
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620607 [Google Scholar]
  134. Larson, Richard K.
    1988 On the double object construction. Linguistic Inquiry19: 335–391.
     [Google Scholar]
  135. Levin, Beth & Rappaport Hovav, Malka
    1995 Unaccusativity: At the Syntax-Lexical Semantics Interface. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  136. 1998 Morphology and lexical semantics. In Andrew Spencer & Arnold M. Zwicky (eds), Handbook of Morphology, Andrew Spencer & Arnold M. Zwicky (eds), 248–271. Oxford: Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  137. Lundin, Katarina
    2003 Small Clauses in Swedish. PhD dissertation, University of Lund.
  138. Maling, Joan & Zaenen, Annie
    1982 A phrase structure account of Scandinavian extraction phenomena. InThe Nature of Syntactic Representation, Pauline Jacobson & Geoffrey K. Pullum (ed.), 229–282. Dordrecht: Reidel. 10.1007/978‑94‑009‑7707‑5_7
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-7707-5_7 [Google Scholar]
  139. Marantz, Alec
    1984 On the Nature of Grammatical Relations. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  140. 1995 The minimalist program. InGovernment and Binding Theory and the Minimalist Program, Gert Webelhuth (ed.), 351–382. Oxford: Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  141. Meinunger, André
    2006 On the discourse impact of subordinate clauses. InThe Architecture of Focus, Valéria Molnár & Susanne Winkler (eds), 459–487. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
  142. Moro, Andrea
    1997 The Raising of Predicates. Predicative Noun Phrases and the Theory of Clause Structure. Cambridge: CUP. 10.1017/CBO9780511519956
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511519956 [Google Scholar]
  143. 2000 Dynamic Antisymmetry: Movement as a Symmetry Breaking Phenomenon [Linguistic Inquiry Monograph 38]. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  144. Moulton, Keir & Nino Grillo
    2015 Pseudo-relatives. Big and direct. InProceedings of the Forty-fifth Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society, Thuy Bui & Deniz Özyıldız (eds), 193–202. Amherst MA: GLSA.
     [Google Scholar]
  145. Nedyalkov, Vladimir P. & Silnitsky, Georgij G.
    1973 The typology of morphological and lexical causative. InTrends in Soviet Theoretical Linguistics, Ferenc Kiefer (ed.), 1–32. Dordrecht: Reidel. 10.1007/978‑94‑010‑2536‑2_1
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-2536-2_1 [Google Scholar]
  146. Nespor, Marina & Irene Vogel
    1986 Prosodic Phonology. Dordrecht: Foris.
     [Google Scholar]
  147. Nichols, Johanna
    1992 Language Diversity in Time and Space. Chicago IL: Chicago University Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226580593.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226580593.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  148. Pesetsky, David
    1978 Complementizer-trace phenomena and the Nominative Island Conditions. The Linguistic Review1: 297–344.
     [Google Scholar]
  149. 1982 Paths and Categories. PhD dissertation, MIT.
  150. Pierrehumbert, Janet B.
    1980 The Phonology and Phonetics of English Intonation. PhD dissertation, MIT.
  151. Podlesskaya, Vera I.
    1993 Causatives and causality: Towards a semantic typology of causal relations. InCausatives and Transitivity [Studies in Language Companion Series 23], Bernard Comrie & Maria Polinsky (eds), 165–176. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.23.08pod
     https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.23.08pod [Google Scholar]
  152. Pollock, Jean-Yves
    1989 Verb movement, universal grammar and the structure of IP. Linguistic Inquiry20: 365–424.
     [Google Scholar]
  153. Preminger, Omer
    2009 Breaking agreements: Distinguishing agreement and clitic-doubling by their failures. Linguistic Inquiry40(4): 619–666. 10.1162/ling.2009.40.4.619
     https://doi.org/10.1162/ling.2009.40.4.619 [Google Scholar]
  154. Puglielli, Annarita
    1981 Frase dichiarativa. InStudi Somali, 2: Sintassi della lingua somala, Annarita Puglielli (ed.), 3–44. Roma: Ministero AA EE.
     [Google Scholar]
  155. Puglielli, Annarita & Frascarelli, Mara
    2005 A comparative analysis of restrictive and appositive relative clauses in Cushitic languages. InContributions to the IGG XXX, Laura Brugè , Giuliana Giusti , Nicola Munaro , Walter Schweikert & Giuseppina Turano (eds), 279–303. Venice: Cafoscarina.
     [Google Scholar]
  156. 2011 Linguistic Analysis: From Data to Theory. [Trends in Linguistics, Studies and Monographs 220]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110222517
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110222517 [Google Scholar]
  157. Pylkkänen, Liina
    2008 Introducing Arguments, Ch. III: Causatives. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/9780262162548.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262162548.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  158. Radford, Andrew
    1975 Pseudo-relatives and the unity of Subject Raising. Archivum LinguisticumVI: 32–64.
     [Google Scholar]
  159. Ramat, Paolo & Ricca, Davide
    1998 Sentence adverbs in the languages of Europe. InAdverbial Constructions in the Languages of Europe, Johan van der Auwera (ed.), 187–285. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110802610.187
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110802610.187 [Google Scholar]
  160. Ramchand, Gillian C.
    2003 The first phase syntax. Ms, University of Tromsø.
     [Google Scholar]
  161. 2008 Verb Meaning and the Lexicon. A First-Phase Syntax. Cambridge: CUP. 10.1017/CBO9780511486319
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486319 [Google Scholar]
  162. Raposo, Eduardo
    1989 Prepositional infinitival constructions in European Portuguese. InThe Null Subject Parameter, Osvaldo Jaeggli & Ken Safir (eds), 227–305. Dordrecht: Kluwer. 10.1007/978‑94‑009‑2540‑3_10
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2540-3_10 [Google Scholar]
  163. Rawoens, Gudrun
    2008 Kausativa verbkonstruktioner i svenskan och nederländskan. PhD dissertation, University of Gent.
  164. Rebushi, Georges
    2002 Coordination et subordination. Deuxième partie: Vers la co-jonction généralisée. Bulletin de la Société de Linguistique de ParisXCVII(1): 37–94.
     [Google Scholar]
  165. Rebuschi, Georges
    2003 Generalizing the antisymmetric analysis of coordination to nominal modification. Lingua115: 445–459. 10.1016/j.lingua.2003.09.010
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2003.09.010 [Google Scholar]
  166. Reichenbach, Hans
    1947 Elements of Sumbolic Logic. London: Macmillan.
     [Google Scholar]
  167. Reinhart, Tanya
    1995 Interface strategies. OTS Working Papers in Linguistics. University of Utrecht.
     [Google Scholar]
  168. 2002 The theta system–An overview. Theoretical Linguistics28(3): 229–290.
     [Google Scholar]
  169. Rizzi, Luigi
    1986 Null objects in Italian and the theory of pro. Linguistic Inquiry17: 501–557.
     [Google Scholar]
  170. Rizzi, Luigi
    1990 Relativized Minimality. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  171. 1997 The fine structure of the left periphery. InElements of Grammar. Handbook in Generative Syntax, Liliane Haegeman (ed.), 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer. 10.1007/978‑94‑011‑5420‑8_7
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5420-8_7 [Google Scholar]
  172. 2000 Direct perception, government and thematic sharing. InComparative Syntax and Language Acquisition, Luigi Rizzi (ed.), 203–227. London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  173. 2004 Locality and left periphery. InStructures and Beyond The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Adriana Belletti (ed.). Oxford: OUP.
     [Google Scholar]
  174. Rizzi, Luigi & Roberts, Ian
    1989 Complex inversion in French. Probus1: 1–30. 10.1515/prbs.1989.1.1.1
     https://doi.org/10.1515/prbs.1989.1.1.1 [Google Scholar]
  175. Roberts, Craige
    1996 Information structure: Towards an integrated formal theory of pragmatics. InOSUWPL, Vol.49: Papers in Semantics, Jae Hak Yoon & Andreas Kathol (eds), 91–136. The Ohio State University, Department of Linguistics.
     [Google Scholar]
  176. Roberts, Ian
    1991 Excorporation and minimality. Linguistic Inquiry22: 209–218.
     [Google Scholar]
  177. Rouveret, Alain & Vergnaud, Jean Roger
    1980 Specifying reference to the subject: French causatives and conditions on representations. Linguistic Inquiry11: 97–202.
     [Google Scholar]
  178. Sandfeld, Kristian
    1936 Syntaxe du français contemporain. Les propositions subordonnées. Genève: Droz.
     [Google Scholar]
  179. Scarano, Antonietta
    2002 Frasi relative e pseudorelative in italiano. Sintassi, semantica e articolazione dell’informazione. Roma: Bulzoni.
     [Google Scholar]
  180. Schwarze, Christoph
    1974 Les constructions du type ‘Je le vois qui arrive. InActes du Colloque Franco-Allemand de Grammaire transformationnelle, I: Etudes de syntax, Christian Rohrer & Nicolas Ruwet (eds), 18–30. Tübingen: Niemeyer. 10.1515/9783111611761‑005
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783111611761-005 [Google Scholar]
  181. Shibatani, Masayoshi
    1975 A Linguistic Study of Causative Constructions. Bloomington IN: IULC.
     [Google Scholar]
  182. 1976 The grammar of causative constructions: A conspectus. InSyntax and Semantics, Vol.6: The Grammar of Causative Constructions, Masayoshi Shibatani (ed.), 1–40. New York NY: Academic Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  183. 2002 The Grammar of Causation and Interpersonal Manipulation [Typological Studies in Language 48]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.48
     https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.48 [Google Scholar]
  184. Sigurðsson, Halldór Árman
    1989 Verbal Syntax and Case in Icelandic. Ina comparative GB Approach. PhD dissertation, University of Iceland, Reykjavík.
     [Google Scholar]
  185. 2001 Case: Abstract vs. morphological. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax67: 103–151.
     [Google Scholar]
  186. 2004 Meaningful silence, meaningless sounds. InLinguistic Variation Yearbook, Vol.4, Pierre Pica & Johan Rooryck (eds), 235–259. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
     [Google Scholar]
  187. 2010 Conditions on argument drop. Ms, LingBuzz/000671.
     [Google Scholar]
  188. Sigurðsson, Halldór Árman & Maling, Joan
    2012 Silent heads. InFunctional Heads, Laura Brugé , Anna Cardinaletti , Giuliana Giusti , Nicola Munaro & Cecilia Poletto (eds), 368–378. Oxford: OUP. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199746736.003.0028
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199746736.003.0028 [Google Scholar]
  189. Simone, Raffaele & Cerbasi, Donato
    2001 Types and diachronic evolution of causative constructions in Romance languages. Romanische Forschungen113: 441–473.
     [Google Scholar]
  190. Song, Jae Jung
    1996 Causatives and Causation. A Universal-Typological Perspective. London: Longman.
     [Google Scholar]
  191. Speas, Margaret J.
    1990 Phrase Structure in Natural Language. Dordrecht: Kluwer. 10.1007/978‑94‑009‑2045‑3
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2045-3 [Google Scholar]
  192. Spencer, Andrew
    1991 Morphological Theory. An Introduction to Word Structure in Generative Grammar. Oxford: Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  193. Sportiche, Dominique
    1988 A theory of floating quantifiers and its corollaries for C constituent structure. Linguistic Inquiry19: 425–449.
     [Google Scholar]
  194. Starke, Michal
    1995 On the format for small clauses. InSyntax and Semantics, Vol.XXVIII: Small Clauses, Anna Cardinaletti & Maria T. Guasti (eds), 237–269. San Diego CA:, Academic Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  195. Stowell, Tim A.
    1981 Origins of Phrase Structure. PhD dissertation, MIT.
  196. Strudsholm, Erling
    1999 Relative situazionali in italiano moderno: Una reinterpretazione della cosiddetta pseudorelativa sulla base di un approccio combinato, formale e funzionale [Romanistische Linguistik 3]. Münster: Stollfuß Medien.
     [Google Scholar]
  197. Svenonius, Peter
    2004 On the edge. InPeripheries. Syntactic Edges and Their Effects [SNLT 56], David Adger , Cécile De Cat & George Tsoulas (eds), 259–287. Dordrecht: Kluwer. 10.1007/1‑4020‑1910‑6_11
     https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-1910-6_11 [Google Scholar]
  198. Talmy, Leonard
    1976 Semantic causative types. InThe Grammar of Causative Constructions [Syntax and Semantics 6], Masayoshi Shibatani (ed.), 43–129. New York NY: Academic Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  199. Taraldsen, Knut Tarald
    1981 On the theoretical interpretation of a class of ‘marked’ extractions. InThe Theory of Markedness in Generative Grammar, Adriana Belletti , Luciana Brandi & Luigi Rizzi (eds), 475–516. Pisa: Scuola Normale Superiore.
     [Google Scholar]
  200. Thráinsson, Höskuldur
    1979 On Complementation in Icelandic. New York NY: Garland.
     [Google Scholar]
  201. 2007 The Syntax of Icelandic. Cambridge: CUP. 10.1017/CBO9780511619441
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511619441 [Google Scholar]
  202. Travis, Lisa
    2000 Event structure in syntax. InEvents as Grammatical Objects: The Converging Perspectives of Lexical Semantics and Syntax, Carol Tenny & James Pustejovsky (eds), 145–185. Stanford CA: CSLI.
     [Google Scholar]
  203. Trutkowski, Ewa
    2016 Topic Drop and Null Subjects in German. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110446173
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110446173 [Google Scholar]
  204. Uriagereka, Juan
    1994 Aspects of the syntax of clitic placement in western Romance. Linguistic Inquiry26: 79–123.
     [Google Scholar]
  205. Vergnaud, Jean Roger
    1974 French Relative Clauses. PhD dissertation, MIT.
  206. Viberg, Åke
    2015 Sensation, perception and cognition. Swedsh in a typological-contrastive perspective. Functions of Language22(1): 96–131. 10.1075/fol.22.1.05vib
     https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.22.1.05vib [Google Scholar]
  207. Vikner, Sten
    1994 Scandinavian object shift and West Germanic scrambling. InStudies on Scrambling, Norbert Corver & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds), 487–517. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110857214.487
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110857214.487 [Google Scholar]
  208. 1995 Verb Movement and Expletive Subjects in the Germanic Languages. Oxford: OUP.
     [Google Scholar]
  209. de Vries, Mark
    2002 The Syntax of Relativization. PhD dissertation, Utrecht University.
  210. Wessen, Elias
    1972 Le lingue nordiche. Naples: Istituto Orientale di Napoli.
     [Google Scholar]
  211. Wiklund, Anna-Lena , Hrafnbjargarson, Gunnar Hrafn , Bentzen, Kristine & Hróarsdóttir, Þorbjörg
    2007 Rethinking Scandinavian verb movement. The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics10: 203–233. 10.1007/s10828‑007‑9014‑9
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s10828-007-9014-9 [Google Scholar]
  212. Williams, Edwin
    1980 Predication. Linguistic Inquiry11: 203–238.
     [Google Scholar]
  213. 1994 Thematic Structures [Linquistic Inquiry Monographs 23]. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  214. Zanuttini, Raffaella
    1997a Negation and verb movement. InThe New Comparative Syntax, Liliane Haegeman (ed.), 214–245. London: Longman.
     [Google Scholar]
  215. Zanuttini, Raffaella
    1997b Negation and Clausal Structure: A Comparative Study of Romance Languages. Oxford: OUP.
     [Google Scholar]
  216. Zanuttini, Raffaella
    2001 Sentential negation. InThe Handbook of Contemporary Syntactic Theory, Mark Baltin & Chris Collins (eds), 511–535. Oxford: Basil Blackwell. 10.1002/9780470756416.ch16
     https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470756416.ch16 [Google Scholar]
  217. Zeijstra, Hedde
    2004 Sentential Negation and Negative Concord. PhD dissertation, Utrecht University (LOT Publications).
  218. Zubizarreta, Maria Luisa
    1985 The relation between morphophonology and morphosyntax: The case of Romance causatives. Linguistic Inquiry16: 247–289.
     [Google Scholar]
  219. Zwart, C. Jan-Wouter
    1995 The Morphosyntax of Verb Moment: A Minimalist Approach. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
     [Google Scholar]
  220. 2005 Verb second as a function of Merge. InThe Function of Function Words and Functional Categories [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 78], Marcel den Dikken & Christina Tortora (eds), 11–40. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.78.03zwa
     https://doi.org/10.1075/la.78.03zwa [Google Scholar]
  221. 2011 The Syntax of Dutch. Cambridge: CUP. 10.1017/CBO9780511977763
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511977763 [Google Scholar]
  222. Zwarts, Frans
    1995 Nonveridical contexts. Linguistic Analysis25: 286–312.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/books/9789027257314
Loading

  • From This Site

    /content/books/9789027257314
    dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Chapter
    10
    5
/content/books/9789027257314
dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
-contentType:Journal -contentType:Chapter
10
5
Chapter
content/books/9789027257314
Book
false
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error