1887

Corpus pragmatics

image of Corpus pragmatics

References

  1. Aarts, J.
    2011 “Corpus analysis.” InHandbook of Pragmatics, ed. by J.-O. Östman and J. Verschueren . Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1017/s0047404511000716
    https://doi.org/10.1017/s0047404511000716 [Google Scholar]
  2. Aijmer, K.
    1996Conversational Routines in English. Convention and Creativity. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. 2002English Discourse Particles. Evidence from a Corpus. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.10
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.10 [Google Scholar]
  4. 2008 “At the interface between grammar and discourse: A corpus-based study of some pragmatic markers.” InPragmatics and Corpus Linguistics. A Mutualistic Entente, ed. by J. Romero-Trillo , 11–36. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110199024
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110199024 [Google Scholar]
  5. 2009 “Interjections in the COLT Corpus.” InStudies in Linguistics offered to Anne-Marie Simon-Vandenbergen, ed. by S. Slembrouck , M. Taverniers and M. Herreweghe , 11–19. Gent: Academia Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Andersen, G.
    2001Pragmatic Markers and Sociolinguistic Variation. A Relevance-theoretic Approach to the Language of Adolescents. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.84
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.84 [Google Scholar]
  7. Archer, D. and J. Culpeper
    2003 “Sociopragmatic annotation: New directions and possibilities in historical corpus linguistics.” InCorpus Linguistics by the Lune: A Festschrift for Geoffrey Leech, ed. by A. Wilson , P. Rayson and T. Mcenery , 37–58. Frankfurt a. M.: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. 2009 “Identifying ‘key’ sociophilological usage in plays and trial proceedings (1640–1760): An empirical approach via corpus annotation.” Journal of Historical Pragmatics10 (2): 286–309. 10.1075/jhp.10.2.07arc
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.10.2.07arc [Google Scholar]
  9. Archer, D. , J. Culpeper and M. Davies
    2008 “Pragmatic annotation.” InCorpus Linguistics. An International Handbook. Volume 1 (Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science 29/1), ed. by A. Lüdeling and M. Kytö , 613–642. Berlin: de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Culpeper, J.
    2009Oxford English Corpus” InContemporary Corpus Linguistics, ed. by Paul Baker , 64–86. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. 2011Impoliteness. Using Language to Cause Offence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511975752
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511975752 [Google Scholar]
  12. Culpeper, J. and M. Kytö
    2010Early Modern English Dialogues. Spoken Interaction as Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Deutschmann, M.
    2003Apologising in British English. (Skrifter från moderna språk 10). Umeå: Institutionen för moderna språk, Umeå University.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Jaworski, A. , N. Coupland and D. Galasiński
    2004 “Metalanguage: Why now?” InMetalanguage. Social and Ideological Perspectives, ed. by A. Jaworski , N. Coupland and D. Galasiński , 3–10. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110907377
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110907377 [Google Scholar]
  15. Jucker, A. H.
    2009 “Speech act research between armchair, field and laboratory: The case of compliments.” Journal of Pragmatics41 (8): 1611–1635. 10.1016/j.pragma.2009.02.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2009.02.004 [Google Scholar]
  16. Jucker, A.H ., G. Schneider , I. Taavitsainen and B. Breustedt
    2008 “Fishing for compliments: Precision and recall in corpus-linguistic compliment research.” InSpeech Acts in the History of English, ed. by A. H. Jucker and Irma Taavitsainen , 273–294. Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.176.15juc
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.176.15juc [Google Scholar]
  17. Jucker, A. H. and I. Taavitsainen
    2008 “Apologies in the history of English: Routinized and lexicalized expressions of responsibility and regret.” InSpeech Acts in the History of English, ed. by A. H. Jucker and I. Taavitsainen , 229–244. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.176.12juc
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.176.12juc [Google Scholar]
  18. . (forthc.) “Complimenting in the history of American English: A metacommunicative expression analysis.” InDiachronic Corpus Pragmatics ed. by I. Taavitsainen and A. H. Jucker . Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.243
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.243 [Google Scholar]
  19. Jucker, A. H. , I. Taavitsainen and G. Schneider
    2012 “Semantic corpus trawling: Expressions of ‘courtesy’ and ‘politeness’ in the Helsinki Corpus.” InDeveloping Corpus Methodology for Historical Pragmatics (Studies in Variation, Contacts and Change in English 11), ed. by Carla Suhr and Irma Taavitsainen . Helsinki: Research Unit for Variation, Contacts and Change in English. Available online at〈www.helsinki.fi/varieng/journal/volumes/11/prag/jucker_taavitsainen_schneider/〉. 10.1075/pbns.220.14taa
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.220.14taa [Google Scholar]
  20. Kohnen, T.
    2008 “Tracing directives through text and time: Towards a methodology of a corpus-based diachronic speech-act analysis.” InSpeech Acts in the History of English (Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 176), ed. by A. H. Jucker and I. Taavitsainen , 295–310. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.176.16koh
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.176.16koh [Google Scholar]
  21. Levinson, S. C.
    1983Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge Uni-versity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Manes, J. and N. Wolfson
    1981 “The compliment formula.” InConversational Routine. Explorations in Standardized Communication Situations and Prepatterned Speech, ed. by Florian Coulmas , 115–132. The Hague: Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Mcenery, T. and A. Hardie
    2012Corpus Linguistics. Method, Theory and Practice. (Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199276349.013.0024
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199276349.013.0024 [Google Scholar]
  24. Mcenery, T. , R. Xiao and Y. Tono
    2006Corpus-Based Language Studies. An Advanced Resource Book. (Routledge Applied Linguistics). London: Francis and Taylor.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Nevalainen, T. and H. Tissari
    2010 “Contextualising eighteenth-century politeness: Social distinction and metaphorical levelling.” InEighteenth-Century English: Ideology and Change (Studies in English Language), ed. by R. Hickey , 133–158. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511781643.009
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511781643.009 [Google Scholar]
  26. Partington, A.
    2004 “ Corpora and discourse, a most congruous beast.” InCorpora and Discourse. (Studies in Language and Communication 9). ed. by A. Partington , J. Morley and L. Haarman , 11–20. Bern: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Romero-Trillo, J.
    2008 “Introduction: Pragmatics and corpus linguistics – a mutualistic entente.” InPragmatics and Corpus Linguistics. A Mutualistic Entente, ed. by J. Romero-Trillo , 1–10. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110199024
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110199024 [Google Scholar]
  28. Schiffrin, D.
    1987Discourse Markers. (Studies in Interactional Sociolinguistics, 5). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511611841
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511611841 [Google Scholar]
  29. Tognini-Bonelli, E.
    2001Corpus Linguistics at Work. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.6
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.6 [Google Scholar]
  30. Tottie, G.
    2011Uh and Um as sociolinguistic markers in British English.” The International Journal of Corpus Linguistics16: 173–196. 10.1075/ijcl.16.2.02tot
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.16.2.02tot [Google Scholar]
  31. Valkonen, P.
    2008 “Showing a little promise: Identifying and retrieving explicit illocutionary acts from a corpus of written prose.” InSpeech Acts in the History of English (Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 176), ed. by A. H. Jucker and I. Taavitsainen , 247–272. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.176.14val
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.176.14val [Google Scholar]
  32. Weisser, M.
    2003 “SPAACy: A semi-automated tool for annotating dialogue acts.” International Journal of Corpus Linguistics8 (1): 63–74. 10.1075/ijcl.8.1.03wei
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.8.1.03wei [Google Scholar]
  33. Wierzbicka, A.
    1987English Speech Act Verbs: A Semantic Dictionary. Sydney: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]

References

  1. Aarts, J.
    2011 “Corpus analysis.” InHandbook of Pragmatics, ed. by J.-O. Östman and J. Verschueren . Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1017/s0047404511000716
    https://doi.org/10.1017/s0047404511000716 [Google Scholar]
  2. Aijmer, K.
    1996Conversational Routines in English. Convention and Creativity. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. 2002English Discourse Particles. Evidence from a Corpus. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.10
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.10 [Google Scholar]
  4. 2008 “At the interface between grammar and discourse: A corpus-based study of some pragmatic markers.” InPragmatics and Corpus Linguistics. A Mutualistic Entente, ed. by J. Romero-Trillo , 11–36. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110199024
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110199024 [Google Scholar]
  5. 2009 “Interjections in the COLT Corpus.” InStudies in Linguistics offered to Anne-Marie Simon-Vandenbergen, ed. by S. Slembrouck , M. Taverniers and M. Herreweghe , 11–19. Gent: Academia Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Andersen, G.
    2001Pragmatic Markers and Sociolinguistic Variation. A Relevance-theoretic Approach to the Language of Adolescents. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.84
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.84 [Google Scholar]
  7. Archer, D. and J. Culpeper
    2003 “Sociopragmatic annotation: New directions and possibilities in historical corpus linguistics.” InCorpus Linguistics by the Lune: A Festschrift for Geoffrey Leech, ed. by A. Wilson , P. Rayson and T. Mcenery , 37–58. Frankfurt a. M.: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. 2009 “Identifying ‘key’ sociophilological usage in plays and trial proceedings (1640–1760): An empirical approach via corpus annotation.” Journal of Historical Pragmatics10 (2): 286–309. 10.1075/jhp.10.2.07arc
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.10.2.07arc [Google Scholar]
  9. Archer, D. , J. Culpeper and M. Davies
    2008 “Pragmatic annotation.” InCorpus Linguistics. An International Handbook. Volume 1 (Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science 29/1), ed. by A. Lüdeling and M. Kytö , 613–642. Berlin: de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Culpeper, J.
    2009Oxford English Corpus” InContemporary Corpus Linguistics, ed. by Paul Baker , 64–86. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. 2011Impoliteness. Using Language to Cause Offence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511975752
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511975752 [Google Scholar]
  12. Culpeper, J. and M. Kytö
    2010Early Modern English Dialogues. Spoken Interaction as Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Deutschmann, M.
    2003Apologising in British English. (Skrifter från moderna språk 10). Umeå: Institutionen för moderna språk, Umeå University.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Jaworski, A. , N. Coupland and D. Galasiński
    2004 “Metalanguage: Why now?” InMetalanguage. Social and Ideological Perspectives, ed. by A. Jaworski , N. Coupland and D. Galasiński , 3–10. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110907377
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110907377 [Google Scholar]
  15. Jucker, A. H.
    2009 “Speech act research between armchair, field and laboratory: The case of compliments.” Journal of Pragmatics41 (8): 1611–1635. 10.1016/j.pragma.2009.02.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2009.02.004 [Google Scholar]
  16. Jucker, A.H ., G. Schneider , I. Taavitsainen and B. Breustedt
    2008 “Fishing for compliments: Precision and recall in corpus-linguistic compliment research.” InSpeech Acts in the History of English, ed. by A. H. Jucker and Irma Taavitsainen , 273–294. Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.176.15juc
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.176.15juc [Google Scholar]
  17. Jucker, A. H. and I. Taavitsainen
    2008 “Apologies in the history of English: Routinized and lexicalized expressions of responsibility and regret.” InSpeech Acts in the History of English, ed. by A. H. Jucker and I. Taavitsainen , 229–244. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.176.12juc
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.176.12juc [Google Scholar]
  18. . (forthc.) “Complimenting in the history of American English: A metacommunicative expression analysis.” InDiachronic Corpus Pragmatics ed. by I. Taavitsainen and A. H. Jucker . Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.243
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.243 [Google Scholar]
  19. Jucker, A. H. , I. Taavitsainen and G. Schneider
    2012 “Semantic corpus trawling: Expressions of ‘courtesy’ and ‘politeness’ in the Helsinki Corpus.” InDeveloping Corpus Methodology for Historical Pragmatics (Studies in Variation, Contacts and Change in English 11), ed. by Carla Suhr and Irma Taavitsainen . Helsinki: Research Unit for Variation, Contacts and Change in English. Available online at〈www.helsinki.fi/varieng/journal/volumes/11/prag/jucker_taavitsainen_schneider/〉. 10.1075/pbns.220.14taa
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.220.14taa [Google Scholar]
  20. Kohnen, T.
    2008 “Tracing directives through text and time: Towards a methodology of a corpus-based diachronic speech-act analysis.” InSpeech Acts in the History of English (Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 176), ed. by A. H. Jucker and I. Taavitsainen , 295–310. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.176.16koh
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.176.16koh [Google Scholar]
  21. Levinson, S. C.
    1983Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge Uni-versity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Manes, J. and N. Wolfson
    1981 “The compliment formula.” InConversational Routine. Explorations in Standardized Communication Situations and Prepatterned Speech, ed. by Florian Coulmas , 115–132. The Hague: Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Mcenery, T. and A. Hardie
    2012Corpus Linguistics. Method, Theory and Practice. (Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199276349.013.0024
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199276349.013.0024 [Google Scholar]
  24. Mcenery, T. , R. Xiao and Y. Tono
    2006Corpus-Based Language Studies. An Advanced Resource Book. (Routledge Applied Linguistics). London: Francis and Taylor.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Nevalainen, T. and H. Tissari
    2010 “Contextualising eighteenth-century politeness: Social distinction and metaphorical levelling.” InEighteenth-Century English: Ideology and Change (Studies in English Language), ed. by R. Hickey , 133–158. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511781643.009
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511781643.009 [Google Scholar]
  26. Partington, A.
    2004 “ Corpora and discourse, a most congruous beast.” InCorpora and Discourse. (Studies in Language and Communication 9). ed. by A. Partington , J. Morley and L. Haarman , 11–20. Bern: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Romero-Trillo, J.
    2008 “Introduction: Pragmatics and corpus linguistics – a mutualistic entente.” InPragmatics and Corpus Linguistics. A Mutualistic Entente, ed. by J. Romero-Trillo , 1–10. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110199024
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110199024 [Google Scholar]
  28. Schiffrin, D.
    1987Discourse Markers. (Studies in Interactional Sociolinguistics, 5). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511611841
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511611841 [Google Scholar]
  29. Tognini-Bonelli, E.
    2001Corpus Linguistics at Work. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.6
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.6 [Google Scholar]
  30. Tottie, G.
    2011Uh and Um as sociolinguistic markers in British English.” The International Journal of Corpus Linguistics16: 173–196. 10.1075/ijcl.16.2.02tot
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.16.2.02tot [Google Scholar]
  31. Valkonen, P.
    2008 “Showing a little promise: Identifying and retrieving explicit illocutionary acts from a corpus of written prose.” InSpeech Acts in the History of English (Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 176), ed. by A. H. Jucker and I. Taavitsainen , 247–272. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.176.14val
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.176.14val [Google Scholar]
  32. Weisser, M.
    2003 “SPAACy: A semi-automated tool for annotating dialogue acts.” International Journal of Corpus Linguistics8 (1): 63–74. 10.1075/ijcl.8.1.03wei
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.8.1.03wei [Google Scholar]
  33. Wierzbicka, A.
    1987English Speech Act Verbs: A Semantic Dictionary. Sydney: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/books/9789027257680-hop.m2.cor3
dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
-contentType:Journal
10
5
Chapter
content/books/9789027257680
Book
false
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error