1887
  1. Home
  2. Books
  3. Handbook of Pragmatics
  4. Chapter

Historical pragmatics

image of Historical pragmatics

References

  1. Arnovick, L. K.
    1999 Diachronic pragmatics. Seven case studies in English illocutionary development. John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.68
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.68 [Google Scholar]
  2. Bertuccelli Papi, M.
    2000 Is a diachronic speech act theory possible?Journal of Historical Pragmatics1.1: 57–66. 10.1075/jhp.1.1.06ber
     https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.1.1.06ber [Google Scholar]
  3. Blake, N. F.
    2002 A grammar of Shakespeare's language. Palgrave. 10.1007/978‑1‑4039‑1915‑1
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4039-1915-1 [Google Scholar]
  4. Breuer, H.
    1983 Titel und Anreden bei Shakespeare und in der Shakespearezeit. Anglia101: 49–77.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Brinton, L. J.
    1996 Pragmatic markers in English. Grammaticalization and discourse functions. Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110907582
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110907582 [Google Scholar]
  6. 1998 “The flowers are lovely; only, they have no scent.”: The evolution of a pragmatic marker in English. In R. Borgmeier , H. Grabes & A. H. Jucker (eds.)Anglistentag 1997 Giessen. Proceedings: 9–33. Wissenschaftlicher Verlag.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. 2001a Historical discourse analysis. In D. Schiffrin , D. Tannen & H. E. Hamilton (eds.)The handbook of discourse analysis: 138–160. Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. 2001b From matrix clause to pragmatic marker. The history of look-forms. Journal of Historical Pragmatics2(2): 177–199. 10.1075/jhp.2.2.02bri
     https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.2.2.02bri [Google Scholar]
  9. 2005 Processes underlying the development of pragmatic markers: The case of (I) say . In J. Skaffari , M. Peikola , R. Carroll , R. Hiltunen & B. Wårvik (eds.)Opening windows on texts and discourses of the past: 279–299. John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.134.23bri
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.134.23bri [Google Scholar]
  10. Brown, R. & A. Gilman
    1989 Politeness theory and Shakespeare's four major tragedies. Language in Society18(2): 159–212. 10.1017/S0047404500013464
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500013464 [Google Scholar]
  11. Brown, P. & S. C. Levinson
    1987 Politeness. Some universals in language usage. Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Busse, U.
    2002 Linguistic variation in the Shakespeare Corpus. Morpho-syntactic variability of second person pronouns. John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.106
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.106 [Google Scholar]
  13. 2003 The co-occurrence of nominal and pronominal address forms in the Shakespeare Corpus: Who says thou or you to whom?In I. Taavitsainen & A. H. Jucker (eds.)Diachronic perspectives on address term systems: 193–221. John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.107.10bus
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.107.10bus [Google Scholar]
  14. Collins, D. E.
    2001 Reanimated voices. Speech reporting in a historical-pragmatic perspective. John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.85
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.85 [Google Scholar]
  15. Culpeper, J. & M. Kytö
    2010 Early Modern English dialogues. Spoken interaction as writing. Cambridge University Press. 10.1016/j.pragma.2009.09.004
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2009.09.004 [Google Scholar]
  16. Culpeper, J. & D. Z. Kádár
    (eds.) 2010 Historical (im)politeness. Peter Lang. 10.1016/j.pragma.2009.09.004
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2009.09.004 [Google Scholar]
  17. Deutschmann, M.
    2003 Apologising in British English. Institutionen för moderna språk, Umeå University.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Dossena, M. & I. Tieken-Boon Van Ostade
    (eds.) 2008 Studies in Late Modern English correspondence. Methodology and data. Peter Lang.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Ehrismann, G.
    1901–1904 Duzen und Ihrzen im Mittelalter. Zeitschrift für deutsche Wortforschung1 1901, 117–149; 2, 1902, 118–159; 4, 1903, 210–248; 5, 1904, 127–220.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Finkenstaedt, Th.
    1963 You and thou: Studien zur Anrede im Englischen. Walter de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110822588
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110822588 [Google Scholar]
  21. Fitzmaurice, S. M.
    2002a The familiar letter in Early Modern English. A pragmatic approach. John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.95
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.95 [Google Scholar]
  22. 2002b “Plethoras of witty verbiage” and “heathen Greek”: Ways of reading meaning in English comic drama. Journal of Historical Pragmatics3(1): 31–60. 10.1075/jhp.3.1.03fit
     https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.3.1.03fit [Google Scholar]
  23. Geis,M. & A. M. Zwicky
    1971 On invited inferences. Linguistic Inquiry2: 561–566.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Hickey, R.
    2003 The German address system: Binary and scalar at once. In I. Taavitsainen & A. H. Jucker (eds.)Diachronic perspectives on address term systems: 401–425. John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.107.16hic
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.107.16hic [Google Scholar]
  25. Hope, J.
    1993 Second person singular pronouns in records of Early Modern “spoken” English. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen94: 83–100.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. 1994 The use of thou and you in Early Modern spoken English: Evidence from depositions in the Durham ecclesiastical court records. In D. Kastovsky (ed.)Studies in Early Modern English: 141–152. Mouton de Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Jacobs, A. & A. H. Jucker
    1995 The historical perspective in pragmatics. In A. H. Jucker (ed.)Historical Pragmatics. Pragmatic Developments in the History of English: 3–33. John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.35.04jac
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.35.04jac [Google Scholar]
  28. Jucker, A. H.
    2000a English historical pragmatics: Problems of data and methodology. In G. Di Martino & M. Lima (eds.)English diachronic pragmatics: 17–55. CUEN.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. 2000b “Thou” in the history of English: A case for historical semantics or pragmatics?In Ch Dalton-Puffer & N. Ritt (eds.)Words: Structure, meaning, function. A festschrift for Dieter Kastovsky: 153–163. Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110809169.153
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110809169.153 [Google Scholar]
  30. 2002 Discourse markers in Early Modern English. In R. Watts & P. Trudgill (eds.)Alternative Histories of English: 210–230. Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. 2008 Politeness in the history of English. In R. Dury , M. Gotti & M. Dossena (eds.)English historical linguistics 2006. Volume II: Lexical and semantic change. Selected papers from the Fourteenth International Conference on English Historical Linguistics (ICEHL 14), Bergamo, 21–25 August 2006: 3–29. John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.296
     https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.296 [Google Scholar]
  32. 2010 “In curteisie was set ful muchel hir lest”: Politeness in Middle English. In J. Culpeper & D. Z. Kádár (eds.)Historical (im)politeness: 175–200. Peter Lang.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Jucker, A. H. , G. Fritz & F. Lebsanft
    1999 Historical dialogue analysis: Roots and traditions in the study of the Romance languages, German and English. In A H. Jucker , G. Fritz & F. Lebsanft (eds.)Historical dialogue analysis: 1–33. John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.66.02juc
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.66.02juc [Google Scholar]
  34. Jucker, A. H. , G. Schneider , I. Taavitsainen & B. Breustedt
    2008 Fishing for compliments: Precision and recall in corpus-linguistic compliment research. In A. H. Jucker & I. Taavitsainen (eds.)Speech acts in the history of English: 273–294. John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.176.15juc
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.176.15juc [Google Scholar]
  35. Jucker, A. H. & I. Taavitsainen
    2000 Diachronic speech act analysis: Insults from flyting to flaming. Journal of Historical Pragmatics1(1): 67–95. 10.1075/jhp.1.1.07juc
     https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.1.1.07juc [Google Scholar]
  36. 2003 Diachronic perspectives on address term systems: Introduction. In I. Taavitsainen & A. H. Jucker (eds.)Diachronic perspectives on address term systems: 1–25. John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.107
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.107 [Google Scholar]
  37. 2008 Apologies in the history of English: Routinized and lexicalized expressions of responsibility and regret. In A. H. Jucker & I. Taavitsainen (eds.)Speech acts in the history of English: 229–244. John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.176.12juc
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.176.12juc [Google Scholar]
  38. (eds.) 2010 Handbook of historical pragmatics. Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110214284
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110214284 [Google Scholar]
  39. Koch, P.
    1999 Court records and cartoons: Reflections of spontaneous dialogue in Early Romance texts. In A. H. Jucker , G. Fritz & F. Lebsanft (eds.)Historical dialogue analysis: 399–429. John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.66.16koc
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.66.16koc [Google Scholar]
  40. Koch, P. & W. Oesterreicher
    1985 Sprache der Nähe–Sprache der Distanz: Mündlichkeit und Schriftlichkeit im Spannungsfeld von Sprachtheorie und Sprachgeschichte. Romanistisches Jahrbuch36: 15–43.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Kohnen, Th
    2000a Explicit performatives in Old English: A corpus-based study of directives. Journal of Historical Pragmatics1(2): 301–321. 10.1075/jhp.1.2.07koh
     https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.1.2.07koh [Google Scholar]
  42. Kohnen, Th.
    2000b Corpora and speech acts: The study of performatives. In Ch. Mair & M. Hundt (eds.)Corpus linguistics and linguistic theory. Papers from the twentieth international conference on English language research on computerized corpora (ICAME 20) Freiburg im Breisgau 1999: 177–186. Rodopi.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Kohnen, Th
    2002 Towards a history of English directives. In A. Fischer , G. Tottie & H. M. Lehmann (eds.)Text types and corpora. Studies in honour of Udo Fries: 165–175. Gunter Narr.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Kohnen, Th.
    2008a Linguistic politeness in Anglo-Saxon England? A study of Old English address terms. Journal of Historical Pragmatics9(1): 140–158. 10.1075/jhp.9.1.11koh
     https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.9.1.11koh [Google Scholar]
  45. 2008b Directives in Old English: Beyond politeness?In A. H. Jucker & I. Taavitsainen (eds.)Speech acts in the history of English: 27–44. John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.176.04koh
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.176.04koh [Google Scholar]
  46. Kopytko, R.
    1993 Polite discourse in Shakespeare’s English. Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu im. Adam Mickiewicza w Poznaniu.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. 1995 Linguistic politeness strategies in Shakespeare’s plays. In A. H. Jucker (ed.)Historical pragmatics. Pragmatic developments in the history of English: 515–540. John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.35.27kop
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.35.27kop [Google Scholar]
  48. Kryk-Kastovsky, B.
    2006 Historical courtroom discourse: Introduction. Journal of Historical Pragmatics7(2): 163–179. 10.1075/jhp.7.2.02kry
     https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.7.2.02kry [Google Scholar]
  49. Lebsanft, F.
    1988 Studien zu einer Linguistik des Grußes. Sprache und Funktion der altfranzösischen Grußformeln. Niemeyer. 10.1515/9783110943009
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110943009 [Google Scholar]
  50. Lenker, U.
    2000  Soplice and witodlice. Discourse markers in Old English. In O. Fischer , A. Rosenbach & D. Stein (eds.)Pathways of change. Grammaticalization in English: 229–249. John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.53.12len
     https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.53.12len [Google Scholar]
  51. Listen, P.
    1999 The emergence of German polite. Cognitive and sociolinguistic parameters. Peter Lang.
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Lötscher, A.
    1981 Zur Sprachgeschichte des Fluchens und Beschimpfens im Schweizer deutschen. Zeitschrift für Dialektologie und Linguistik48: 145–160.
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Mazzon, G.
    2003 Pronouns and nominal address in Shakespearean English: A socio-affective marking system in transition. In I. Taavitsainen & A. H. Jucker (eds.)Diachronic perspectives on address term systems: 223–249. John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.107.11maz
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.107.11maz [Google Scholar]
  54. Metcalf, G. J.
    1938 Forms of address in German (1500–1800). Washington University Studies.
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Nevala, M.
    2004 Address in Early English correspondence. Its forms and socio-pragmatic functions. Société Néophilologique.
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Nevalainen, T.
    2004 Letter writing: Introduction. Journal of Historical Pragmatics5(2): 181–191. 10.1075/jhp.5.2.02nev
     https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.5.2.02nev [Google Scholar]
  57. Nevalainen, T. & H. Raumolin-Brunberg
    1995 Constraints on politeness: The pragmatics of address formulae in Early English correspondence. In A. H. Jucker (ed.)Historical pragmatics. Pragmatic developments in the history of English: 541–601. John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.35.28nev
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.35.28nev [Google Scholar]
  58. Onodera, N. O.
    2004 Japanese discourse markers. Synchronic and diachronic discourse analysis. John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.132
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.132 [Google Scholar]
  59. Pakkala-Weckström, M.
    2008 “No botmeles bihestes”: Various ways of making binding promises in Middle English. In A. H. Jucker & I. Taavitsainen (eds.)Speech acts in the history of English: 133–162. John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.176.08pak
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.176.08pak [Google Scholar]
  60. Person, R. R., Jr
    2009 “Oh” in Shakespeare: A conversation analytic approach. Journal of Historical Pragmatics10(1): 84–107. 10.1075/jhp.10.1.05per
     https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.10.1.05per [Google Scholar]
  61. Schlieben-Lange, B.
    1979 Ai las – Que planhs?. Romanistische Zeitschrift für Literaturgeschichte3: 1–30.
     [Google Scholar]
  62. Schrott, A.
    2000 “¿Qu í los podri é contar?” Interrogative acts in the Cantar de mio Cid. Some examples from Old Spanish on asking questions. Journal of Historical Pragmatics1(2): 263–299. 10.1075/jhp.1.2.06sch
     https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.1.2.06sch [Google Scholar]
  63. Schrott, A. & H. Völker
    2005 Historische Pragmatik und historische Varietätenlinguistik. Traditionen, Methoden und Modelle in der Romanistik. In A. Schrott & H. Völker (eds.)Historische Pragmatik und historische Varietätenlinguistik in den romanischen Sprachen: 1–22. Universitätsverlag. 10.17875/gup2005‑423
     https://doi.org/10.17875/gup2005-423 [Google Scholar]
  64. Simon, H. J.
    2003 Für eine grammatische Kategorie “Respekt” im Deutschen. Synchronie, Diachronie und Typologie der deutschen Anredepronomina. Niemeyer. 10.1515/9783110949513
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110949513 [Google Scholar]
  65. Skewis, M.
    2003 Mitigated directness in Honglou meng: Directive speech acts and politeness in eighteenth century Chinese. Journal of Pragmatics35: 161–189. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(02)00084‑X
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00084-X [Google Scholar]
  66. Söll, L.
    1974 Gesprochenes und geschriebenes Französisch. Erich Schmidt [3rd edition 1985, revised and amplified by F.J. Hausmann].
     [Google Scholar]
  67. Somolinos, A. R.
    2005 From certainty to doubt: The evolution of the discourse marker voire in French. In J. Skaffari , M. Peikola , R. Carroll , R. Hiltunen & B. Wårvik (eds.)Opening windows on texts and discourses of the past: 301–317. John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.134.24rod
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.134.24rod [Google Scholar]
  68. Taavitsainen, I.
    1995 Interjections in Early Modern English: From imitation of spoken to conventions of written language. In A. H. Jucker (ed.)Historical pragmatics. Pragmatic developments in the history of English: 439–465. Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.35.23taa
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.35.23taa [Google Scholar]
  69. Taavitsainen, I. & S. M. Fitzmaurice
    2007 Historical pragmatics: What it is and how to do it. In S. M. Fitzmaurice & I, Taavitsainen (eds.)Methodological issues in historical pragmatics: 11–36. Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110197822.11
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197822.11 [Google Scholar]
  70. Taavitsainen, I. & A. H. Jucker
    (eds.) 2003 Diachronic perspectives on address term systems. John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.107
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.107 [Google Scholar]
  71. 2007 Speech acts and speech act verbs in the history of English. In S. Fitzmaurice & I. Taavitsainen (eds.)Methodological issues in historical pragmatics: 107–138. Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110197822.107
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197822.107 [Google Scholar]
  72. 2008a Speech acts now and then: Towards a pragmatic history of English. In A. H. Jucker & I. Taavitsainen (eds.)Speech acts in the history of English: 1–23. John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.176.02taa
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.176.02taa [Google Scholar]
  73. 2008b “Methinks you seem more beautiful than ever”: Compliments and gender in the history of English. In A. H. Jucker & I. Taavitsainen (eds.)Speech acts in the history of English: 195–228. John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.176.11taa
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.176.11taa [Google Scholar]
  74. Traugott, E. C.
    2004 Historical pragmatics. In L. R. Horn & G. Ward (eds.)The handbook of pragmatics: 538–561. Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  75. Valkonen, P.
    2008 Showing a little promise: Identifying and retrieving explicit illocutionary acts from a corpus of written prose. In A. H. Jucker & I. Taavitsainen (eds.)Speech acts in the history of English: 247–272. John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.176.14val
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.176.14val [Google Scholar]
  76. Watts, R. J.
    1992 Linguistic politeness and politic verbal behaviour: Reconsidering claims for universality. In R. J. Watts , S. Ide & K. Ehlich (eds.)Politeness in language. Studies in its history, theory and practice: 43–70. Mouton de Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
  77. 2003 Politeness. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511615184
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511615184 [Google Scholar]

References

  1. Arnovick, L. K.
    1999 Diachronic pragmatics. Seven case studies in English illocutionary development. John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.68
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.68 [Google Scholar]
  2. Bertuccelli Papi, M.
    2000 Is a diachronic speech act theory possible?Journal of Historical Pragmatics1.1: 57–66. 10.1075/jhp.1.1.06ber
     https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.1.1.06ber [Google Scholar]
  3. Blake, N. F.
    2002 A grammar of Shakespeare's language. Palgrave. 10.1007/978‑1‑4039‑1915‑1
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4039-1915-1 [Google Scholar]
  4. Breuer, H.
    1983 Titel und Anreden bei Shakespeare und in der Shakespearezeit. Anglia101: 49–77.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Brinton, L. J.
    1996 Pragmatic markers in English. Grammaticalization and discourse functions. Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110907582
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110907582 [Google Scholar]
  6. 1998 “The flowers are lovely; only, they have no scent.”: The evolution of a pragmatic marker in English. In R. Borgmeier , H. Grabes & A. H. Jucker (eds.)Anglistentag 1997 Giessen. Proceedings: 9–33. Wissenschaftlicher Verlag.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. 2001a Historical discourse analysis. In D. Schiffrin , D. Tannen & H. E. Hamilton (eds.)The handbook of discourse analysis: 138–160. Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. 2001b From matrix clause to pragmatic marker. The history of look-forms. Journal of Historical Pragmatics2(2): 177–199. 10.1075/jhp.2.2.02bri
     https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.2.2.02bri [Google Scholar]
  9. 2005 Processes underlying the development of pragmatic markers: The case of (I) say . In J. Skaffari , M. Peikola , R. Carroll , R. Hiltunen & B. Wårvik (eds.)Opening windows on texts and discourses of the past: 279–299. John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.134.23bri
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.134.23bri [Google Scholar]
  10. Brown, R. & A. Gilman
    1989 Politeness theory and Shakespeare's four major tragedies. Language in Society18(2): 159–212. 10.1017/S0047404500013464
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500013464 [Google Scholar]
  11. Brown, P. & S. C. Levinson
    1987 Politeness. Some universals in language usage. Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Busse, U.
    2002 Linguistic variation in the Shakespeare Corpus. Morpho-syntactic variability of second person pronouns. John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.106
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.106 [Google Scholar]
  13. 2003 The co-occurrence of nominal and pronominal address forms in the Shakespeare Corpus: Who says thou or you to whom?In I. Taavitsainen & A. H. Jucker (eds.)Diachronic perspectives on address term systems: 193–221. John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.107.10bus
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.107.10bus [Google Scholar]
  14. Collins, D. E.
    2001 Reanimated voices. Speech reporting in a historical-pragmatic perspective. John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.85
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.85 [Google Scholar]
  15. Culpeper, J. & M. Kytö
    2010 Early Modern English dialogues. Spoken interaction as writing. Cambridge University Press. 10.1016/j.pragma.2009.09.004
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2009.09.004 [Google Scholar]
  16. Culpeper, J. & D. Z. Kádár
    (eds.) 2010 Historical (im)politeness. Peter Lang. 10.1016/j.pragma.2009.09.004
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2009.09.004 [Google Scholar]
  17. Deutschmann, M.
    2003 Apologising in British English. Institutionen för moderna språk, Umeå University.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Dossena, M. & I. Tieken-Boon Van Ostade
    (eds.) 2008 Studies in Late Modern English correspondence. Methodology and data. Peter Lang.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Ehrismann, G.
    1901–1904 Duzen und Ihrzen im Mittelalter. Zeitschrift für deutsche Wortforschung1 1901, 117–149; 2, 1902, 118–159; 4, 1903, 210–248; 5, 1904, 127–220.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Finkenstaedt, Th.
    1963 You and thou: Studien zur Anrede im Englischen. Walter de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110822588
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110822588 [Google Scholar]
  21. Fitzmaurice, S. M.
    2002a The familiar letter in Early Modern English. A pragmatic approach. John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.95
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.95 [Google Scholar]
  22. 2002b “Plethoras of witty verbiage” and “heathen Greek”: Ways of reading meaning in English comic drama. Journal of Historical Pragmatics3(1): 31–60. 10.1075/jhp.3.1.03fit
     https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.3.1.03fit [Google Scholar]
  23. Geis,M. & A. M. Zwicky
    1971 On invited inferences. Linguistic Inquiry2: 561–566.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Hickey, R.
    2003 The German address system: Binary and scalar at once. In I. Taavitsainen & A. H. Jucker (eds.)Diachronic perspectives on address term systems: 401–425. John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.107.16hic
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.107.16hic [Google Scholar]
  25. Hope, J.
    1993 Second person singular pronouns in records of Early Modern “spoken” English. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen94: 83–100.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. 1994 The use of thou and you in Early Modern spoken English: Evidence from depositions in the Durham ecclesiastical court records. In D. Kastovsky (ed.)Studies in Early Modern English: 141–152. Mouton de Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Jacobs, A. & A. H. Jucker
    1995 The historical perspective in pragmatics. In A. H. Jucker (ed.)Historical Pragmatics. Pragmatic Developments in the History of English: 3–33. John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.35.04jac
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.35.04jac [Google Scholar]
  28. Jucker, A. H.
    2000a English historical pragmatics: Problems of data and methodology. In G. Di Martino & M. Lima (eds.)English diachronic pragmatics: 17–55. CUEN.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. 2000b “Thou” in the history of English: A case for historical semantics or pragmatics?In Ch Dalton-Puffer & N. Ritt (eds.)Words: Structure, meaning, function. A festschrift for Dieter Kastovsky: 153–163. Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110809169.153
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110809169.153 [Google Scholar]
  30. 2002 Discourse markers in Early Modern English. In R. Watts & P. Trudgill (eds.)Alternative Histories of English: 210–230. Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. 2008 Politeness in the history of English. In R. Dury , M. Gotti & M. Dossena (eds.)English historical linguistics 2006. Volume II: Lexical and semantic change. Selected papers from the Fourteenth International Conference on English Historical Linguistics (ICEHL 14), Bergamo, 21–25 August 2006: 3–29. John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.296
     https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.296 [Google Scholar]
  32. 2010 “In curteisie was set ful muchel hir lest”: Politeness in Middle English. In J. Culpeper & D. Z. Kádár (eds.)Historical (im)politeness: 175–200. Peter Lang.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Jucker, A. H. , G. Fritz & F. Lebsanft
    1999 Historical dialogue analysis: Roots and traditions in the study of the Romance languages, German and English. In A H. Jucker , G. Fritz & F. Lebsanft (eds.)Historical dialogue analysis: 1–33. John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.66.02juc
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.66.02juc [Google Scholar]
  34. Jucker, A. H. , G. Schneider , I. Taavitsainen & B. Breustedt
    2008 Fishing for compliments: Precision and recall in corpus-linguistic compliment research. In A. H. Jucker & I. Taavitsainen (eds.)Speech acts in the history of English: 273–294. John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.176.15juc
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.176.15juc [Google Scholar]
  35. Jucker, A. H. & I. Taavitsainen
    2000 Diachronic speech act analysis: Insults from flyting to flaming. Journal of Historical Pragmatics1(1): 67–95. 10.1075/jhp.1.1.07juc
     https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.1.1.07juc [Google Scholar]
  36. 2003 Diachronic perspectives on address term systems: Introduction. In I. Taavitsainen & A. H. Jucker (eds.)Diachronic perspectives on address term systems: 1–25. John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.107
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.107 [Google Scholar]
  37. 2008 Apologies in the history of English: Routinized and lexicalized expressions of responsibility and regret. In A. H. Jucker & I. Taavitsainen (eds.)Speech acts in the history of English: 229–244. John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.176.12juc
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.176.12juc [Google Scholar]
  38. (eds.) 2010 Handbook of historical pragmatics. Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110214284
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110214284 [Google Scholar]
  39. Koch, P.
    1999 Court records and cartoons: Reflections of spontaneous dialogue in Early Romance texts. In A. H. Jucker , G. Fritz & F. Lebsanft (eds.)Historical dialogue analysis: 399–429. John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.66.16koc
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.66.16koc [Google Scholar]
  40. Koch, P. & W. Oesterreicher
    1985 Sprache der Nähe–Sprache der Distanz: Mündlichkeit und Schriftlichkeit im Spannungsfeld von Sprachtheorie und Sprachgeschichte. Romanistisches Jahrbuch36: 15–43.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Kohnen, Th
    2000a Explicit performatives in Old English: A corpus-based study of directives. Journal of Historical Pragmatics1(2): 301–321. 10.1075/jhp.1.2.07koh
     https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.1.2.07koh [Google Scholar]
  42. Kohnen, Th.
    2000b Corpora and speech acts: The study of performatives. In Ch. Mair & M. Hundt (eds.)Corpus linguistics and linguistic theory. Papers from the twentieth international conference on English language research on computerized corpora (ICAME 20) Freiburg im Breisgau 1999: 177–186. Rodopi.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Kohnen, Th
    2002 Towards a history of English directives. In A. Fischer , G. Tottie & H. M. Lehmann (eds.)Text types and corpora. Studies in honour of Udo Fries: 165–175. Gunter Narr.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Kohnen, Th.
    2008a Linguistic politeness in Anglo-Saxon England? A study of Old English address terms. Journal of Historical Pragmatics9(1): 140–158. 10.1075/jhp.9.1.11koh
     https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.9.1.11koh [Google Scholar]
  45. 2008b Directives in Old English: Beyond politeness?In A. H. Jucker & I. Taavitsainen (eds.)Speech acts in the history of English: 27–44. John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.176.04koh
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.176.04koh [Google Scholar]
  46. Kopytko, R.
    1993 Polite discourse in Shakespeare’s English. Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu im. Adam Mickiewicza w Poznaniu.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. 1995 Linguistic politeness strategies in Shakespeare’s plays. In A. H. Jucker (ed.)Historical pragmatics. Pragmatic developments in the history of English: 515–540. John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.35.27kop
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.35.27kop [Google Scholar]
  48. Kryk-Kastovsky, B.
    2006 Historical courtroom discourse: Introduction. Journal of Historical Pragmatics7(2): 163–179. 10.1075/jhp.7.2.02kry
     https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.7.2.02kry [Google Scholar]
  49. Lebsanft, F.
    1988 Studien zu einer Linguistik des Grußes. Sprache und Funktion der altfranzösischen Grußformeln. Niemeyer. 10.1515/9783110943009
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110943009 [Google Scholar]
  50. Lenker, U.
    2000  Soplice and witodlice. Discourse markers in Old English. In O. Fischer , A. Rosenbach & D. Stein (eds.)Pathways of change. Grammaticalization in English: 229–249. John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.53.12len
     https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.53.12len [Google Scholar]
  51. Listen, P.
    1999 The emergence of German polite. Cognitive and sociolinguistic parameters. Peter Lang.
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Lötscher, A.
    1981 Zur Sprachgeschichte des Fluchens und Beschimpfens im Schweizer deutschen. Zeitschrift für Dialektologie und Linguistik48: 145–160.
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Mazzon, G.
    2003 Pronouns and nominal address in Shakespearean English: A socio-affective marking system in transition. In I. Taavitsainen & A. H. Jucker (eds.)Diachronic perspectives on address term systems: 223–249. John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.107.11maz
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.107.11maz [Google Scholar]
  54. Metcalf, G. J.
    1938 Forms of address in German (1500–1800). Washington University Studies.
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Nevala, M.
    2004 Address in Early English correspondence. Its forms and socio-pragmatic functions. Société Néophilologique.
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Nevalainen, T.
    2004 Letter writing: Introduction. Journal of Historical Pragmatics5(2): 181–191. 10.1075/jhp.5.2.02nev
     https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.5.2.02nev [Google Scholar]
  57. Nevalainen, T. & H. Raumolin-Brunberg
    1995 Constraints on politeness: The pragmatics of address formulae in Early English correspondence. In A. H. Jucker (ed.)Historical pragmatics. Pragmatic developments in the history of English: 541–601. John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.35.28nev
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.35.28nev [Google Scholar]
  58. Onodera, N. O.
    2004 Japanese discourse markers. Synchronic and diachronic discourse analysis. John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.132
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.132 [Google Scholar]
  59. Pakkala-Weckström, M.
    2008 “No botmeles bihestes”: Various ways of making binding promises in Middle English. In A. H. Jucker & I. Taavitsainen (eds.)Speech acts in the history of English: 133–162. John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.176.08pak
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.176.08pak [Google Scholar]
  60. Person, R. R., Jr
    2009 “Oh” in Shakespeare: A conversation analytic approach. Journal of Historical Pragmatics10(1): 84–107. 10.1075/jhp.10.1.05per
     https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.10.1.05per [Google Scholar]
  61. Schlieben-Lange, B.
    1979 Ai las – Que planhs?. Romanistische Zeitschrift für Literaturgeschichte3: 1–30.
     [Google Scholar]
  62. Schrott, A.
    2000 “¿Qu í los podri é contar?” Interrogative acts in the Cantar de mio Cid. Some examples from Old Spanish on asking questions. Journal of Historical Pragmatics1(2): 263–299. 10.1075/jhp.1.2.06sch
     https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.1.2.06sch [Google Scholar]
  63. Schrott, A. & H. Völker
    2005 Historische Pragmatik und historische Varietätenlinguistik. Traditionen, Methoden und Modelle in der Romanistik. In A. Schrott & H. Völker (eds.)Historische Pragmatik und historische Varietätenlinguistik in den romanischen Sprachen: 1–22. Universitätsverlag. 10.17875/gup2005‑423
     https://doi.org/10.17875/gup2005-423 [Google Scholar]
  64. Simon, H. J.
    2003 Für eine grammatische Kategorie “Respekt” im Deutschen. Synchronie, Diachronie und Typologie der deutschen Anredepronomina. Niemeyer. 10.1515/9783110949513
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110949513 [Google Scholar]
  65. Skewis, M.
    2003 Mitigated directness in Honglou meng: Directive speech acts and politeness in eighteenth century Chinese. Journal of Pragmatics35: 161–189. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(02)00084‑X
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00084-X [Google Scholar]
  66. Söll, L.
    1974 Gesprochenes und geschriebenes Französisch. Erich Schmidt [3rd edition 1985, revised and amplified by F.J. Hausmann].
     [Google Scholar]
  67. Somolinos, A. R.
    2005 From certainty to doubt: The evolution of the discourse marker voire in French. In J. Skaffari , M. Peikola , R. Carroll , R. Hiltunen & B. Wårvik (eds.)Opening windows on texts and discourses of the past: 301–317. John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.134.24rod
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.134.24rod [Google Scholar]
  68. Taavitsainen, I.
    1995 Interjections in Early Modern English: From imitation of spoken to conventions of written language. In A. H. Jucker (ed.)Historical pragmatics. Pragmatic developments in the history of English: 439–465. Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.35.23taa
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.35.23taa [Google Scholar]
  69. Taavitsainen, I. & S. M. Fitzmaurice
    2007 Historical pragmatics: What it is and how to do it. In S. M. Fitzmaurice & I, Taavitsainen (eds.)Methodological issues in historical pragmatics: 11–36. Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110197822.11
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197822.11 [Google Scholar]
  70. Taavitsainen, I. & A. H. Jucker
    (eds.) 2003 Diachronic perspectives on address term systems. John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.107
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.107 [Google Scholar]
  71. 2007 Speech acts and speech act verbs in the history of English. In S. Fitzmaurice & I. Taavitsainen (eds.)Methodological issues in historical pragmatics: 107–138. Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110197822.107
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197822.107 [Google Scholar]
  72. 2008a Speech acts now and then: Towards a pragmatic history of English. In A. H. Jucker & I. Taavitsainen (eds.)Speech acts in the history of English: 1–23. John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.176.02taa
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.176.02taa [Google Scholar]
  73. 2008b “Methinks you seem more beautiful than ever”: Compliments and gender in the history of English. In A. H. Jucker & I. Taavitsainen (eds.)Speech acts in the history of English: 195–228. John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.176.11taa
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.176.11taa [Google Scholar]
  74. Traugott, E. C.
    2004 Historical pragmatics. In L. R. Horn & G. Ward (eds.)The handbook of pragmatics: 538–561. Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  75. Valkonen, P.
    2008 Showing a little promise: Identifying and retrieving explicit illocutionary acts from a corpus of written prose. In A. H. Jucker & I. Taavitsainen (eds.)Speech acts in the history of English: 247–272. John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.176.14val
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.176.14val [Google Scholar]
  76. Watts, R. J.
    1992 Linguistic politeness and politic verbal behaviour: Reconsidering claims for universality. In R. J. Watts , S. Ide & K. Ehlich (eds.)Politeness in language. Studies in its history, theory and practice: 43–70. Mouton de Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
  77. 2003 Politeness. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511615184
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511615184 [Google Scholar]

  • From This Site

    /content/books/9789027257680-hop.m2.his2
    dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal
    10
    5
/content/books/9789027257680-hop.m2.his2
dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
-contentType:Journal
10
5
Chapter
content/books/9789027257680
Book
false
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error