1887

Intersubjectivity in action

An introduction

image of Intersubjectivity in action
  • Affiliations: 1: University of Helsinki

References

  1. Bercelli, Fabrizio , Federico Rossano , and Maurizio Viaro
    2013 “Supra-Session Courses of Action in Psychotherapy.” Journal of Pragmatics57: 118–137. 10.1016/j.pragma.2013.08.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.08.001 [Google Scholar]
  2. Brems, Lieselotte , Lobke Ghesquière , and Freek Van de Velde
    (eds) 2014Intersubjectivity and Intersubjectification in Grammar and Discourse: Theoretical and Descriptive Advances. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/bct.65
    https://doi.org/10.1075/bct.65 [Google Scholar]
  3. Chafe, Wallace
    1976 “Givenness, Contrastiveness, Definiteness, Subjects, Topics, and Point of View.” InSubject and Topic, ed. by Charles N. Li , 25–55. New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. 1992 “Information Flow in Speaking and Writing.” InThe Linguistics of Literacy, ed. by Pamela A. Downing , Susan D. Lima , and Michael Noonan , 17–29. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.21.05cha
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.21.05cha [Google Scholar]
  5. Darwin, Charles
    1872The Expression of the Emotion in Man and Animals. London: John Murray. 10.1037/10001‑000
    https://doi.org/10.1037/10001-000 [Google Scholar]
  6. Deppermann, Arnulf
    2015 “When Recipient Design Fails: Egocentric Turn-Design of Instructions in Driving School Lessons Leading to Breakdowns of Intersubjectivity.” Gesprächforschung – Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion16: 63–101.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Diessel, Holger
    2006 “Demonstratives, Joint Attention, and the Emergence of Grammar.” Cognitive Linguistics17: 463–489. 10.1515/COG.2006.015
    https://doi.org/10.1515/COG.2006.015 [Google Scholar]
  8. Ekman, Paul
    2007Emotions Revealed. New York: Henry Holt.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Etelämäki, Marja
    2016 “Introduction: Discourse, Grammar and Intersubjectivity.” Nordic Journal of Linguistics39 (2): 101–112. 10.1017/S033258651600007X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S033258651600007X [Google Scholar]
  10. Evans, Nicholas
    2007 “Insubordination and Its Uses.” InFiniteness: Theoretical and Empirical Foundations, ed. by Irina Nikolaeva , 366–431. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Field, Tiffany M.
    2001Touch. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/6845.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/6845.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  12. Garfinkel, Harold
    1967Studies in Ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Goffman, Erving
    1974Frame Analysis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. 1983 “The Interaction Order.” American Sociological Review 48 (1): 1–17. 10.2307/2095141
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2095141 [Google Scholar]
  15. Goodwin, Marjorie Harness
    2017 “Haptic Sociality: The Embodied Interactive Constitution of Intimacy through Touch.” InIntercorporeality: Emerging Socialities in Interaction, ed. by Christian Meyer , Jürgen Streeck , and J. Scott Jordan , 126–155. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Gumperz, John J.
    1982Discourse Strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511611834
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511611834 [Google Scholar]
  17. Heritage, John
    1984 “A Change of State Token and Aspects of Its Sequential Placement.” InStructures of Social Action, ed. by J. Maxwell Atkinson , and John Heritage , 299–345. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Heritage, John , and Steven E. Clayman
    2013 “The Changing Tenor of Questioning over Time: Tracking a Question Form across US Presidential News Conferences, 1953–2000.” Journalism Practice7 (4): 481–501. 10.1080/17512786.2013.802485
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2013.802485 [Google Scholar]
  19. Hopper, Paul
    1987 “Emergent Grammar.” InProceedings of the Thirteenth Annual Meeting of Berkeley Linguistics Society13: 139–157. 10.3765/bls.v13i0.1834
    https://doi.org/10.3765/bls.v13i0.1834 [Google Scholar]
  20. Iacoboni, Marco
    2008Mirroring People. New York: Farrar, Strauss and Giroux.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Jucker, Andreas H.
    1995Historical Pragmatics: Pragmatic Developments in the History of English. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.35
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.35 [Google Scholar]
  22. Levinson, Stephen C.
    2006 “On the Human ‘Interaction Engine’.” InRoots of Human Sociality: Culture, Cognition and Interaction, ed. by N. J. Enfield , and Stephen C. Levinson , 39–69. Oxford: Berg.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Levinson, Stephen C. , and N. J. Enfield
    2006 “Introduction: Human Sociality as a New Interdisciplinary Field.” InRoots of Human Sociality, ed. by N. J. Enfield , and Stephen C. Levinson , 1–39. Oxford: Berg.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Lindström, Anna
    1999 Language as Social Action: Grammar, Prosody and Interaction in Swedish Conversation. Doctoral dissertation. Uppsala: Uppsala University.
  25. Lindström, Jan , Ritva Laury , and Camilla Lindholm
    2019 ”Insubordination and the Contextually Sensitive Emergence of If-Requests in Swedish and Finnish Institutional Talk-in-Interaction.” InInsubordination: Theoretical and Empirical Issues, ed. by Karin Beijering , Gunther Kaltenböck , and María Sol Sansiñena , 55–78. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110638288‑003
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110638288-003 [Google Scholar]
  26. Lindström, Jan , Camilla Lindholm , and Ritva Laury
    2016 ”The Interactional Emergence of Conditional Clauses as Directives: Constructions, Trajectories and Sequences of Action.” Language Sciences58: 8–21. 10.1016/j.langsci.2016.02.008
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2016.02.008 [Google Scholar]
  27. Linell, Per
    2014 “Interactivities, Intersubjectivities and Language: On Dialogism and Phenomenology.” Language and Dialogue4 (2): 165–193. 10.1075/ld.4.2.01lin
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.4.2.01lin [Google Scholar]
  28. 2017 “Intersubjectivity in Dialogue.” InThe Routledge Handbook of Language and Dialogue, ed. by Edda Weigand , 109–126. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Linell, Per , and Jan Lindström
    2016 ”Partial Intersubjectivity and Sufficient Understandings for Current Practical Purposes: On a Specialized Practice in Swedish Conversation.” Nordic Journal of Linguistics39 (2): 113–133. 10.1017/S0332586516000081
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0332586516000081 [Google Scholar]
  30. Merleau-Ponty, Maurice
    1962Phenomenology of Perception. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Meyer, Christian , Streeck, Jürgen , and J. Scott Jordan
    2017 “Introduction.” InIntercorporeality: Emerging Socialities in Interaction, ed. by Christian Meyer , Jürgen Streeck , and J. Scott Jordan , 16–53. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Pekarek Doehler, Simona , Johannes Wagner , and Esther Gonzáles-Martínez
    (eds) 2018Longitudinal Studies on the Organization of Social Interaction. London: Palgrave-Macmillan. 10.1057/978‑1‑137‑57007‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-57007-9 [Google Scholar]
  33. Peräkylä, Anssi , and Johanna Ruusuvuori
    2006 ”Facial Expression in an Assessment.” InVideo Analysis: Methodology and Methods. Qualitative Audiovisual Data Analysis in Sociology, ed. by Hubert Knoblauch , Bernt Schnettler , Jürgen Raab , and Hans-Georg Soeffner , 127–142. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Raymond, Chase
    2019 “Intersubjectivity, Normativity and Grammar.” Social Psychology Quarterly82 (2): 182–204. 10.1177/0190272519850781
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0190272519850781 [Google Scholar]
  35. Robinson, Jeffrey D.
    2013 “Epistemics, Action Formation, and Other-Initiation of Repair: The Case of Partial Questioning Repeats.” InConversational Repair and Human Understanding, ed. by Makoto Hayashi , Geoffrey Raymond , and Jack Sidnell , 261–92. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Rommetveit, Ragnar
    1974On Message Structure. London: Wiley.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Schegloff, Emanuel A.
    1996 “Turn Organization: One Intersection of Grammar and Interaction.” InInteraction and Grammar, ed. by Elinor Ochs , Emanuel A. Schegloff , and Sandra A. Thompson , 52–133. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511620874.002
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620874.002 [Google Scholar]
  38. 2007Sequence Organization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511791208
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511791208 [Google Scholar]
  39. Schuetz, Alfred
    1953 “Common Sense and the Scientific Interpretation of Human Action.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research14 (1): 1–38. 10.2307/2104013
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2104013 [Google Scholar]
  40. Schutz, Alfred , and Thomas Luckmann
    1979Structures of the Life-World. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Selting, Margret
    1994 “Emphatic Speech Style: With Special Focus on the Prosodic Signalling of Heightened Emotive Involvement in Conservation.” Journal of Pragmatics22: 375–408. 10.1016/0378‑2166(94)90116‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(94)90116-3 [Google Scholar]
  42. Stivers Tanya , Tanya Sidnell , and Clara Bergen
    2018 “Children’s Responses to Questions in Peer Interaction: A Window into the Ontogenesis of Interactional Competence.” Journal of Pragmatics124: 14–30. 10.1016/j.pragma.2017.11.013
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2017.11.013 [Google Scholar]
  43. Stevanovic, Melisa , and Anssi Peräkylä
    2015 “Experience Sharing, Emotional Reciprocity, and Turn-Taking.” Frontiers in Psychology. 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00450
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00450 [Google Scholar]
  44. Thompson, Sandra A. , and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen
    2020 “English why don’t you x as a Formulaic Expression.” InFormulaic Expressions: Building Language Structure and Social Action, ed. by Ritva Laury , and Tsuyoshi Ono , 99–132. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.315.05tho
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.315.05tho [Google Scholar]
  45. Tomasello, Michael
    2008Origins of Human Communication. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/7551.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/7551.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  46. Tomasello, Michael , Malinda Carpenter , and R. Peter Hobson
    2005 “The Emergence of Social Cognition in Three Young Chimpanzees.” Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development70 (1): 1–152.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Trevarthen, Colwyn
    1979 “Communication and Cooperation in Early Infancy. A Description of Primary Intersubjectivity.” InBefore Speech: The Beginning of Human Communication, ed. by Margaret Bullowa , 321–347. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Trevarthen, Colwyn , and Kenneth J. Aitken
    2001 “Infant Intersubjectivity: Research, Theory, and Clinical Applications.” The Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry42: 3–48. 10.1111/1469‑7610.00701
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-7610.00701 [Google Scholar]
  49. Verhagen, Arie
    2005Constructions of Intersubjectivity: Discourse, Syntax, and Cognition. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Wootton, Anthony J.
    1997Interaction and The Development of Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511519895
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511519895 [Google Scholar]
  51. Zlatev, Jordan , Timothy P. Racine , Chris Sinha , and Esa Itkonen
    (eds) 2008The Shared Mind: Perspectives on Intersubjectivity. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/celcr.12
    https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.12 [Google Scholar]

References

  1. Bercelli, Fabrizio , Federico Rossano , and Maurizio Viaro
    2013 “Supra-Session Courses of Action in Psychotherapy.” Journal of Pragmatics57: 118–137. 10.1016/j.pragma.2013.08.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.08.001 [Google Scholar]
  2. Brems, Lieselotte , Lobke Ghesquière , and Freek Van de Velde
    (eds) 2014Intersubjectivity and Intersubjectification in Grammar and Discourse: Theoretical and Descriptive Advances. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/bct.65
    https://doi.org/10.1075/bct.65 [Google Scholar]
  3. Chafe, Wallace
    1976 “Givenness, Contrastiveness, Definiteness, Subjects, Topics, and Point of View.” InSubject and Topic, ed. by Charles N. Li , 25–55. New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. 1992 “Information Flow in Speaking and Writing.” InThe Linguistics of Literacy, ed. by Pamela A. Downing , Susan D. Lima , and Michael Noonan , 17–29. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.21.05cha
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.21.05cha [Google Scholar]
  5. Darwin, Charles
    1872The Expression of the Emotion in Man and Animals. London: John Murray. 10.1037/10001‑000
    https://doi.org/10.1037/10001-000 [Google Scholar]
  6. Deppermann, Arnulf
    2015 “When Recipient Design Fails: Egocentric Turn-Design of Instructions in Driving School Lessons Leading to Breakdowns of Intersubjectivity.” Gesprächforschung – Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion16: 63–101.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Diessel, Holger
    2006 “Demonstratives, Joint Attention, and the Emergence of Grammar.” Cognitive Linguistics17: 463–489. 10.1515/COG.2006.015
    https://doi.org/10.1515/COG.2006.015 [Google Scholar]
  8. Ekman, Paul
    2007Emotions Revealed. New York: Henry Holt.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Etelämäki, Marja
    2016 “Introduction: Discourse, Grammar and Intersubjectivity.” Nordic Journal of Linguistics39 (2): 101–112. 10.1017/S033258651600007X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S033258651600007X [Google Scholar]
  10. Evans, Nicholas
    2007 “Insubordination and Its Uses.” InFiniteness: Theoretical and Empirical Foundations, ed. by Irina Nikolaeva , 366–431. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Field, Tiffany M.
    2001Touch. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/6845.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/6845.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  12. Garfinkel, Harold
    1967Studies in Ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Goffman, Erving
    1974Frame Analysis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. 1983 “The Interaction Order.” American Sociological Review 48 (1): 1–17. 10.2307/2095141
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2095141 [Google Scholar]
  15. Goodwin, Marjorie Harness
    2017 “Haptic Sociality: The Embodied Interactive Constitution of Intimacy through Touch.” InIntercorporeality: Emerging Socialities in Interaction, ed. by Christian Meyer , Jürgen Streeck , and J. Scott Jordan , 126–155. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Gumperz, John J.
    1982Discourse Strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511611834
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511611834 [Google Scholar]
  17. Heritage, John
    1984 “A Change of State Token and Aspects of Its Sequential Placement.” InStructures of Social Action, ed. by J. Maxwell Atkinson , and John Heritage , 299–345. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Heritage, John , and Steven E. Clayman
    2013 “The Changing Tenor of Questioning over Time: Tracking a Question Form across US Presidential News Conferences, 1953–2000.” Journalism Practice7 (4): 481–501. 10.1080/17512786.2013.802485
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2013.802485 [Google Scholar]
  19. Hopper, Paul
    1987 “Emergent Grammar.” InProceedings of the Thirteenth Annual Meeting of Berkeley Linguistics Society13: 139–157. 10.3765/bls.v13i0.1834
    https://doi.org/10.3765/bls.v13i0.1834 [Google Scholar]
  20. Iacoboni, Marco
    2008Mirroring People. New York: Farrar, Strauss and Giroux.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Jucker, Andreas H.
    1995Historical Pragmatics: Pragmatic Developments in the History of English. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.35
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.35 [Google Scholar]
  22. Levinson, Stephen C.
    2006 “On the Human ‘Interaction Engine’.” InRoots of Human Sociality: Culture, Cognition and Interaction, ed. by N. J. Enfield , and Stephen C. Levinson , 39–69. Oxford: Berg.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Levinson, Stephen C. , and N. J. Enfield
    2006 “Introduction: Human Sociality as a New Interdisciplinary Field.” InRoots of Human Sociality, ed. by N. J. Enfield , and Stephen C. Levinson , 1–39. Oxford: Berg.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Lindström, Anna
    1999 Language as Social Action: Grammar, Prosody and Interaction in Swedish Conversation. Doctoral dissertation. Uppsala: Uppsala University.
  25. Lindström, Jan , Ritva Laury , and Camilla Lindholm
    2019 ”Insubordination and the Contextually Sensitive Emergence of If-Requests in Swedish and Finnish Institutional Talk-in-Interaction.” InInsubordination: Theoretical and Empirical Issues, ed. by Karin Beijering , Gunther Kaltenböck , and María Sol Sansiñena , 55–78. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110638288‑003
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110638288-003 [Google Scholar]
  26. Lindström, Jan , Camilla Lindholm , and Ritva Laury
    2016 ”The Interactional Emergence of Conditional Clauses as Directives: Constructions, Trajectories and Sequences of Action.” Language Sciences58: 8–21. 10.1016/j.langsci.2016.02.008
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2016.02.008 [Google Scholar]
  27. Linell, Per
    2014 “Interactivities, Intersubjectivities and Language: On Dialogism and Phenomenology.” Language and Dialogue4 (2): 165–193. 10.1075/ld.4.2.01lin
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.4.2.01lin [Google Scholar]
  28. 2017 “Intersubjectivity in Dialogue.” InThe Routledge Handbook of Language and Dialogue, ed. by Edda Weigand , 109–126. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Linell, Per , and Jan Lindström
    2016 ”Partial Intersubjectivity and Sufficient Understandings for Current Practical Purposes: On a Specialized Practice in Swedish Conversation.” Nordic Journal of Linguistics39 (2): 113–133. 10.1017/S0332586516000081
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0332586516000081 [Google Scholar]
  30. Merleau-Ponty, Maurice
    1962Phenomenology of Perception. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Meyer, Christian , Streeck, Jürgen , and J. Scott Jordan
    2017 “Introduction.” InIntercorporeality: Emerging Socialities in Interaction, ed. by Christian Meyer , Jürgen Streeck , and J. Scott Jordan , 16–53. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Pekarek Doehler, Simona , Johannes Wagner , and Esther Gonzáles-Martínez
    (eds) 2018Longitudinal Studies on the Organization of Social Interaction. London: Palgrave-Macmillan. 10.1057/978‑1‑137‑57007‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-57007-9 [Google Scholar]
  33. Peräkylä, Anssi , and Johanna Ruusuvuori
    2006 ”Facial Expression in an Assessment.” InVideo Analysis: Methodology and Methods. Qualitative Audiovisual Data Analysis in Sociology, ed. by Hubert Knoblauch , Bernt Schnettler , Jürgen Raab , and Hans-Georg Soeffner , 127–142. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Raymond, Chase
    2019 “Intersubjectivity, Normativity and Grammar.” Social Psychology Quarterly82 (2): 182–204. 10.1177/0190272519850781
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0190272519850781 [Google Scholar]
  35. Robinson, Jeffrey D.
    2013 “Epistemics, Action Formation, and Other-Initiation of Repair: The Case of Partial Questioning Repeats.” InConversational Repair and Human Understanding, ed. by Makoto Hayashi , Geoffrey Raymond , and Jack Sidnell , 261–92. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Rommetveit, Ragnar
    1974On Message Structure. London: Wiley.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Schegloff, Emanuel A.
    1996 “Turn Organization: One Intersection of Grammar and Interaction.” InInteraction and Grammar, ed. by Elinor Ochs , Emanuel A. Schegloff , and Sandra A. Thompson , 52–133. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511620874.002
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620874.002 [Google Scholar]
  38. 2007Sequence Organization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511791208
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511791208 [Google Scholar]
  39. Schuetz, Alfred
    1953 “Common Sense and the Scientific Interpretation of Human Action.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research14 (1): 1–38. 10.2307/2104013
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2104013 [Google Scholar]
  40. Schutz, Alfred , and Thomas Luckmann
    1979Structures of the Life-World. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Selting, Margret
    1994 “Emphatic Speech Style: With Special Focus on the Prosodic Signalling of Heightened Emotive Involvement in Conservation.” Journal of Pragmatics22: 375–408. 10.1016/0378‑2166(94)90116‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(94)90116-3 [Google Scholar]
  42. Stivers Tanya , Tanya Sidnell , and Clara Bergen
    2018 “Children’s Responses to Questions in Peer Interaction: A Window into the Ontogenesis of Interactional Competence.” Journal of Pragmatics124: 14–30. 10.1016/j.pragma.2017.11.013
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2017.11.013 [Google Scholar]
  43. Stevanovic, Melisa , and Anssi Peräkylä
    2015 “Experience Sharing, Emotional Reciprocity, and Turn-Taking.” Frontiers in Psychology. 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00450
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00450 [Google Scholar]
  44. Thompson, Sandra A. , and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen
    2020 “English why don’t you x as a Formulaic Expression.” InFormulaic Expressions: Building Language Structure and Social Action, ed. by Ritva Laury , and Tsuyoshi Ono , 99–132. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.315.05tho
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.315.05tho [Google Scholar]
  45. Tomasello, Michael
    2008Origins of Human Communication. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/7551.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/7551.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  46. Tomasello, Michael , Malinda Carpenter , and R. Peter Hobson
    2005 “The Emergence of Social Cognition in Three Young Chimpanzees.” Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development70 (1): 1–152.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Trevarthen, Colwyn
    1979 “Communication and Cooperation in Early Infancy. A Description of Primary Intersubjectivity.” InBefore Speech: The Beginning of Human Communication, ed. by Margaret Bullowa , 321–347. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Trevarthen, Colwyn , and Kenneth J. Aitken
    2001 “Infant Intersubjectivity: Research, Theory, and Clinical Applications.” The Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry42: 3–48. 10.1111/1469‑7610.00701
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-7610.00701 [Google Scholar]
  49. Verhagen, Arie
    2005Constructions of Intersubjectivity: Discourse, Syntax, and Cognition. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Wootton, Anthony J.
    1997Interaction and The Development of Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511519895
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511519895 [Google Scholar]
  51. Zlatev, Jordan , Timothy P. Racine , Chris Sinha , and Esa Itkonen
    (eds) 2008The Shared Mind: Perspectives on Intersubjectivity. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/celcr.12
    https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.12 [Google Scholar]
/content/books/9789027259035-pbns.326.01sor
dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
-contentType:Journal
10
5
Chapter
content/books/9789027259035
Book
false
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error