1887

Co-presence during lapses

On “comfortable silences” in Finnish everyday interaction

image of Co-presence during lapses

This study examines video-recorded, naturally occurring Finnish dyads focusing on lapses (inter-sequential silences). During most lapses, participants undertake bodily activities or behaviors (Hoey 2015). Adding to previous work, this study describes “comfortable” silences where participants share the moment with no bodily activities or mutual gaze, inhabiting the silence with simple co-presence. The analysis suggests that instead of the gathering/encounter dualism, participant behavior in social situations is better described as a continuum of orientations. Also during the “comfortable” silences, understanding of behavioral involvements is intersubjectively created and maintained. Thus, even outside of sequences that allegedly create and maintain the “architecture of intersubjectivity” (Heritage 1984), social organization is jointly negotiated and achieved, most importantly by mutual monitoring and reciprocation of (bodily) orientations.

  • Affiliations: 1: University of Oulu

References

  1. Basso, Keith H.
    1970 “‘To Give up on Words’: Silence in Western Apache Culture.” Southwestern Journal of Anthropology26 (3): 213–230. 10.1086/soutjanth.26.3.3629378
    https://doi.org/10.1086/soutjanth.26.3.3629378 [Google Scholar]
  2. Berger, Israel , Rowena Viney , and John P. Rae
    2016 “Do Continuing States of Incipient Talk Exist?” Journal of Pragmatics91: 29–44. 10.1016/j.pragma.2015.10.009
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2015.10.009 [Google Scholar]
  3. Bergmann, Jörg R.
    1990 “On the Local Sensitivity of Conversation.” InThe Dynamics of Dialogue, ed. by I. Markovà , and K. Foppa , 201–226. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Carbaugh, Donal , Michael Berry , and Marjatta Nurmikari-Berry
    2006 “Coding Personhood through Cultural Terms and Practices: Silence and Quietude as a Finnish ‘Natural Way of Being’”. Journal of Language and Social Psychology25: 203–220. 10.1177/0261927X06289422
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X06289422 [Google Scholar]
  5. Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth
    2010 “Commentary on Stivers and Rossano: ‘Mobilizing Response’”. Research on Language and Social Interaction43 (1): 32–37.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Deppermann, Arnulf
    2015 “Retrospection and Understanding in Interaction.” InTemporality in Interaction, ed. by A. Deppermann , and S. Günther , 57–94. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slsi.27.02dep
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slsi.27.02dep [Google Scholar]
  7. De Stefani, Elwys , and Lorenza Mondada.
    2018 “Encounters in Public Space: How Acquainted versus Unacquainted Persons Establish Social and Spatial Arrangements.” Research on Language and Social Interaction51(3): 248–270.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Ford, Cecilia E. , and Barbara A. Fox
    2010 “Multiple Practices for Constructing Laughables.” InProsody in Interaction, ed. by D. Barth-Weingarten , E. Reber , and M. Selting , 339–368. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/sidag.23.27for
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sidag.23.27for [Google Scholar]
  9. Gardner, Rod
    1997 “The Conversation Object mm : A Weak and Variable Acknowledging Token .” Research on Language and Social Interaction30(2): 131–156.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Gardner, Rod , and Ilana Mushin
    2015 “Expanded Transition Spaces: the Case of Garrwa.” Frontiers in Psychology6: 251. 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00251
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00251 [Google Scholar]
  11. Goffman, Erving
    1957 “Alienation from Interaction.” Human Relations10: 47–60.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. 1963Behavior in Public Places. New York: Free Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. 1964 “The Neglected Situation.” American Anthropologist, New Series66 (6): 133–136. 10.1525/aa.1964.66.suppl_3.02a00090
    https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1964.66.suppl_3.02a00090 [Google Scholar]
  14. 1967Interaction Ritual: Essays in Face to Face Behavior. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. 1978 “Response Cries.” Language54 (4): 787–815.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Goodwin, Charles
    1981Conversational Organization: Interaction Between Speakers and Hearers. New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. 1986 “Gesture as a Resource for the Organization of Mutual Orientation.” Semiotica62(1–2): 29–49. 10.1515/semi.1986.62.1‑2.29
    https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.1986.62.1-2.29 [Google Scholar]
  18. Hakulinen, Auli
    2010 “Ingressive Speech in Finnish Interaction.” A presentation at the International Conference on Conversation Analysis, ICCA10, Mannheim. July 4–8.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Heath, Christian
    1988 “Embarrassment and Interactional Organization.” InErving Goffman: Exploring the Interaction Order, ed. by P. Drew , and A. Wootton , 136–160. Cambridge: Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Heritage, John
    1984 “A Change-of-State Token and Aspects of Its Sequential Placement.” InStructures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, ed. by J. M. Atkinson , and J. Heritage , 299–345. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Hoey, Elliott
    2015 “Lapses: How People Arrive at, and Deal with, Discontinuities in Talk.” Research on Language and Social Interaction48(4): 430–453.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. 2017aLapse Organization in Interaction. Doctoral dissertation. Nijmegen: Radboud University Nijmegen.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. 2017b “Sequence Recompletion: A Practice for Managing Lapses in Conversation.” Journal of Pragmatics109: 47–63. 10.1016/j.pragma.2016.12.008
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2016.12.008 [Google Scholar]
  24. Hoey, Elliott M.
    2018 “How Speakers Continue with Talk after a Lapse in Conversation.” Research on Language and Social Interaction51(3): 329–346.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. 2020When Conversation Lapses: The Public Accountability of Silent Copresence. New York: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780190947651.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190947651.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  26. Jefferson, Gail
    1989 “Notes on a Possible Metric Which Provides for a ‘Standard Maximum’ Silence of Approximately One Second in Conversation.” InConversation: An Interdisciplinary Perspective, ed. by D. Roger , and P. Bull , 166–196. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. 2004 “Glossary of Transcript Symbols with an Introduction.” InConversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation, ed. by Gene Lerner , 13–31. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.125.02jef
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.125.02jef [Google Scholar]
  28. Kendrick, Kobin H. , and Francisco Torreira.
    2015 “The Timing and Construction of Preference: A Quantitative Study.” Discourse Processes52(4): 255–289. 10.1080/0163853X.2014.955997
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2014.955997 [Google Scholar]
  29. Luopa, Anna.
    2016”Kiusallinen hiljaisuus” – Keskustelutauot ja puhujien keinot selvitä niistä kasvokkaiskeskustelussa. Master’s thesis. Department of Finnish, Finno-Ugrian and Scandinavian Studies, University of Helsinki.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. McLaughlin, Margaret L. , and Michael J. Cody
    1982 “Awkward Silences: Behavioral Antecedents and Consequences of the Conversational Lapse.” Human Communication Research8(4): 299–316. 10.1111/j.1468‑2958.1982.tb00669.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1982.tb00669.x [Google Scholar]
  31. Mondada, Lorenza.
    2009 “Emergent Focused Interactions in Public Places: A Systematic Analysis of the Multimodal Achievement of a Common Interactional Space.” Journal of Pragmatics41: 1977–1997. 10.1016/j.pragma.2008.09.019
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.09.019 [Google Scholar]
  32. 2012 “Talking and Driving: Multiactivity in the Car.” Semiotica191(1/4): 223–256. 10.1515/sem‑2012‑0062
    https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2012-0062 [Google Scholar]
  33. 2016 “Challenges of Multimodality: Language and the Body in Social interaction.” Journal of Sociolinguistics20: 336–366. 10.1111/josl.1_12177
    https://doi.org/10.1111/josl.1_12177 [Google Scholar]
  34. 2018 “The Multimodal Interactional Organization of Tasting: Practices of Tasting Cheese in Gourmet Shops.” Discourse Studies20(6): 743–769.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. 2019 Conventions for multimodal transcription. https://www.lorenzamondada.net/multimodal-transcription.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Mushin, Ilana , and Rod Gardner
    2009 “Silence Is Talk: Conversational Silence in Australian Aboriginal Talk-in-Interaction.” Journal of Pragmatics41(10): 2033–2052. 10.1016/j.pragma.2008.11.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.11.004 [Google Scholar]
  37. Pietikäinen, Kaisa S.
    2018 “Silence That Speaks: The Local Inferences of Withholding a Response in Intercultural Couples’ Conflicts.” Journal of Pragmatics129: 76–89. 10.1016/j.pragma.2018.03.017
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.03.017 [Google Scholar]
  38. Rossano, Federico
    2012Gaze Behavior in Face-to-Face Interaction. Doctoral dissertation. MPI Series 71. Nijmegen: Radboud University Nijmegen.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Sacks, Harvey
    1992Lectures on Conversation, Volume 2. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Sacks, Harvey , Emanuel Schegloff , and Gail Jefferson
    1974 “A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-Taking for Conversation.” Language50: 696–735.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Schegloff, Emanuel A.
    1992 “Repair after Next Turn: The Last Structurally Provided Defense of Intersubjectivity in Conversation.” American Journal of Sociology97(5): 1295–1345. 10.1086/229903
    https://doi.org/10.1086/229903 [Google Scholar]
  42. Schegloff, Emanuel A. , and Harvey Sacks
    1973 “Opening up Closings.” Semiotica8: 289–327. 10.1515/semi.1973.8.4.289
    https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.1973.8.4.289 [Google Scholar]
  43. Scollon, Ron
    1985 “The Machine stops: Silence in the Metaphor of Malfunction.” InPerspectives on Silence, ed. by D. Tannen , and M. Saville-Troike , 21–30. Norwood: Ablex.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Sidnell, Jack , and Tanya Stivers
    (eds) 2013The Handbook of Conversation Analysis. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Sorjonen, Marja-Leena.
    2001Responding in Conversation. A Study of Response Particles in Finnish. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.70
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.70 [Google Scholar]
  46. Stivers, Tanya , N. J. Enfield , P. Brown , C. Englert , M. Hayashi , T. Heinemann , G. Hoymann , F. Rossano , J. P. De Ruiter , K-E. Yoon , and S. C. Levinson
    2009 “Universals and Cultural Variation in Turn-Taking in Conversation.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America106(26): 10587–10592. 10.1073/pnas.0903616106
    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0903616106 [Google Scholar]
  47. Szymanski, Margaret
    1999 “Re-engaging and Dis-engaging Talk in Activity.” Language in Society28 (1): 1–23. 10.1017/S0047404599001013
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404599001013 [Google Scholar]
  48. Vatanen, Anna.
    2018 “Trajectories of Embodied Activities and the Management of Lapses.” Paper presented at the 5th International Conference on Conversation Analysis (ICCA2018), Loughborough, UK. 11–15 July.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. 2020 “The Interaction Order of Silent Moments in Everyday Life: Lapses as Joint Embodied Achievements.” InSilence and Silencing in Psychoanalysis: Cultural, Clinical, and Research Perspectives, ed. by M. Buchholz , and A. Dimitrijevic , 307–332. Routledge. 10.4324/9780429350900‑22
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429350900-22 [Google Scholar]
  50. Wiggins, Sally
    2002 “Talking with Your Mouth Full: Gustatory mmms and the Embodiment of Pleasure .” Research on Language and Social Interaction35(3): 311–336.
    [Google Scholar]

References

  1. Basso, Keith H.
    1970 “‘To Give up on Words’: Silence in Western Apache Culture.” Southwestern Journal of Anthropology26 (3): 213–230. 10.1086/soutjanth.26.3.3629378
    https://doi.org/10.1086/soutjanth.26.3.3629378 [Google Scholar]
  2. Berger, Israel , Rowena Viney , and John P. Rae
    2016 “Do Continuing States of Incipient Talk Exist?” Journal of Pragmatics91: 29–44. 10.1016/j.pragma.2015.10.009
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2015.10.009 [Google Scholar]
  3. Bergmann, Jörg R.
    1990 “On the Local Sensitivity of Conversation.” InThe Dynamics of Dialogue, ed. by I. Markovà , and K. Foppa , 201–226. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Carbaugh, Donal , Michael Berry , and Marjatta Nurmikari-Berry
    2006 “Coding Personhood through Cultural Terms and Practices: Silence and Quietude as a Finnish ‘Natural Way of Being’”. Journal of Language and Social Psychology25: 203–220. 10.1177/0261927X06289422
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X06289422 [Google Scholar]
  5. Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth
    2010 “Commentary on Stivers and Rossano: ‘Mobilizing Response’”. Research on Language and Social Interaction43 (1): 32–37.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Deppermann, Arnulf
    2015 “Retrospection and Understanding in Interaction.” InTemporality in Interaction, ed. by A. Deppermann , and S. Günther , 57–94. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slsi.27.02dep
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slsi.27.02dep [Google Scholar]
  7. De Stefani, Elwys , and Lorenza Mondada.
    2018 “Encounters in Public Space: How Acquainted versus Unacquainted Persons Establish Social and Spatial Arrangements.” Research on Language and Social Interaction51(3): 248–270.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Ford, Cecilia E. , and Barbara A. Fox
    2010 “Multiple Practices for Constructing Laughables.” InProsody in Interaction, ed. by D. Barth-Weingarten , E. Reber , and M. Selting , 339–368. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/sidag.23.27for
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sidag.23.27for [Google Scholar]
  9. Gardner, Rod
    1997 “The Conversation Object mm : A Weak and Variable Acknowledging Token .” Research on Language and Social Interaction30(2): 131–156.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Gardner, Rod , and Ilana Mushin
    2015 “Expanded Transition Spaces: the Case of Garrwa.” Frontiers in Psychology6: 251. 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00251
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00251 [Google Scholar]
  11. Goffman, Erving
    1957 “Alienation from Interaction.” Human Relations10: 47–60.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. 1963Behavior in Public Places. New York: Free Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. 1964 “The Neglected Situation.” American Anthropologist, New Series66 (6): 133–136. 10.1525/aa.1964.66.suppl_3.02a00090
    https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1964.66.suppl_3.02a00090 [Google Scholar]
  14. 1967Interaction Ritual: Essays in Face to Face Behavior. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. 1978 “Response Cries.” Language54 (4): 787–815.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Goodwin, Charles
    1981Conversational Organization: Interaction Between Speakers and Hearers. New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. 1986 “Gesture as a Resource for the Organization of Mutual Orientation.” Semiotica62(1–2): 29–49. 10.1515/semi.1986.62.1‑2.29
    https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.1986.62.1-2.29 [Google Scholar]
  18. Hakulinen, Auli
    2010 “Ingressive Speech in Finnish Interaction.” A presentation at the International Conference on Conversation Analysis, ICCA10, Mannheim. July 4–8.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Heath, Christian
    1988 “Embarrassment and Interactional Organization.” InErving Goffman: Exploring the Interaction Order, ed. by P. Drew , and A. Wootton , 136–160. Cambridge: Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Heritage, John
    1984 “A Change-of-State Token and Aspects of Its Sequential Placement.” InStructures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, ed. by J. M. Atkinson , and J. Heritage , 299–345. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Hoey, Elliott
    2015 “Lapses: How People Arrive at, and Deal with, Discontinuities in Talk.” Research on Language and Social Interaction48(4): 430–453.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. 2017aLapse Organization in Interaction. Doctoral dissertation. Nijmegen: Radboud University Nijmegen.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. 2017b “Sequence Recompletion: A Practice for Managing Lapses in Conversation.” Journal of Pragmatics109: 47–63. 10.1016/j.pragma.2016.12.008
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2016.12.008 [Google Scholar]
  24. Hoey, Elliott M.
    2018 “How Speakers Continue with Talk after a Lapse in Conversation.” Research on Language and Social Interaction51(3): 329–346.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. 2020When Conversation Lapses: The Public Accountability of Silent Copresence. New York: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780190947651.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190947651.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  26. Jefferson, Gail
    1989 “Notes on a Possible Metric Which Provides for a ‘Standard Maximum’ Silence of Approximately One Second in Conversation.” InConversation: An Interdisciplinary Perspective, ed. by D. Roger , and P. Bull , 166–196. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. 2004 “Glossary of Transcript Symbols with an Introduction.” InConversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation, ed. by Gene Lerner , 13–31. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.125.02jef
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.125.02jef [Google Scholar]
  28. Kendrick, Kobin H. , and Francisco Torreira.
    2015 “The Timing and Construction of Preference: A Quantitative Study.” Discourse Processes52(4): 255–289. 10.1080/0163853X.2014.955997
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2014.955997 [Google Scholar]
  29. Luopa, Anna.
    2016”Kiusallinen hiljaisuus” – Keskustelutauot ja puhujien keinot selvitä niistä kasvokkaiskeskustelussa. Master’s thesis. Department of Finnish, Finno-Ugrian and Scandinavian Studies, University of Helsinki.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. McLaughlin, Margaret L. , and Michael J. Cody
    1982 “Awkward Silences: Behavioral Antecedents and Consequences of the Conversational Lapse.” Human Communication Research8(4): 299–316. 10.1111/j.1468‑2958.1982.tb00669.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1982.tb00669.x [Google Scholar]
  31. Mondada, Lorenza.
    2009 “Emergent Focused Interactions in Public Places: A Systematic Analysis of the Multimodal Achievement of a Common Interactional Space.” Journal of Pragmatics41: 1977–1997. 10.1016/j.pragma.2008.09.019
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.09.019 [Google Scholar]
  32. 2012 “Talking and Driving: Multiactivity in the Car.” Semiotica191(1/4): 223–256. 10.1515/sem‑2012‑0062
    https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2012-0062 [Google Scholar]
  33. 2016 “Challenges of Multimodality: Language and the Body in Social interaction.” Journal of Sociolinguistics20: 336–366. 10.1111/josl.1_12177
    https://doi.org/10.1111/josl.1_12177 [Google Scholar]
  34. 2018 “The Multimodal Interactional Organization of Tasting: Practices of Tasting Cheese in Gourmet Shops.” Discourse Studies20(6): 743–769.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. 2019 Conventions for multimodal transcription. https://www.lorenzamondada.net/multimodal-transcription.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Mushin, Ilana , and Rod Gardner
    2009 “Silence Is Talk: Conversational Silence in Australian Aboriginal Talk-in-Interaction.” Journal of Pragmatics41(10): 2033–2052. 10.1016/j.pragma.2008.11.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.11.004 [Google Scholar]
  37. Pietikäinen, Kaisa S.
    2018 “Silence That Speaks: The Local Inferences of Withholding a Response in Intercultural Couples’ Conflicts.” Journal of Pragmatics129: 76–89. 10.1016/j.pragma.2018.03.017
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.03.017 [Google Scholar]
  38. Rossano, Federico
    2012Gaze Behavior in Face-to-Face Interaction. Doctoral dissertation. MPI Series 71. Nijmegen: Radboud University Nijmegen.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Sacks, Harvey
    1992Lectures on Conversation, Volume 2. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Sacks, Harvey , Emanuel Schegloff , and Gail Jefferson
    1974 “A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-Taking for Conversation.” Language50: 696–735.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Schegloff, Emanuel A.
    1992 “Repair after Next Turn: The Last Structurally Provided Defense of Intersubjectivity in Conversation.” American Journal of Sociology97(5): 1295–1345. 10.1086/229903
    https://doi.org/10.1086/229903 [Google Scholar]
  42. Schegloff, Emanuel A. , and Harvey Sacks
    1973 “Opening up Closings.” Semiotica8: 289–327. 10.1515/semi.1973.8.4.289
    https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.1973.8.4.289 [Google Scholar]
  43. Scollon, Ron
    1985 “The Machine stops: Silence in the Metaphor of Malfunction.” InPerspectives on Silence, ed. by D. Tannen , and M. Saville-Troike , 21–30. Norwood: Ablex.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Sidnell, Jack , and Tanya Stivers
    (eds) 2013The Handbook of Conversation Analysis. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Sorjonen, Marja-Leena.
    2001Responding in Conversation. A Study of Response Particles in Finnish. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.70
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.70 [Google Scholar]
  46. Stivers, Tanya , N. J. Enfield , P. Brown , C. Englert , M. Hayashi , T. Heinemann , G. Hoymann , F. Rossano , J. P. De Ruiter , K-E. Yoon , and S. C. Levinson
    2009 “Universals and Cultural Variation in Turn-Taking in Conversation.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America106(26): 10587–10592. 10.1073/pnas.0903616106
    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0903616106 [Google Scholar]
  47. Szymanski, Margaret
    1999 “Re-engaging and Dis-engaging Talk in Activity.” Language in Society28 (1): 1–23. 10.1017/S0047404599001013
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404599001013 [Google Scholar]
  48. Vatanen, Anna.
    2018 “Trajectories of Embodied Activities and the Management of Lapses.” Paper presented at the 5th International Conference on Conversation Analysis (ICCA2018), Loughborough, UK. 11–15 July.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. 2020 “The Interaction Order of Silent Moments in Everyday Life: Lapses as Joint Embodied Achievements.” InSilence and Silencing in Psychoanalysis: Cultural, Clinical, and Research Perspectives, ed. by M. Buchholz , and A. Dimitrijevic , 307–332. Routledge. 10.4324/9780429350900‑22
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429350900-22 [Google Scholar]
  50. Wiggins, Sally
    2002 “Talking with Your Mouth Full: Gustatory mmms and the Embodiment of Pleasure .” Research on Language and Social Interaction35(3): 311–336.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/books/9789027259035-pbns.326.12vat
dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
-contentType:Journal
10
5
Chapter
content/books/9789027259035
Book
false
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error