Cognitive Aphasiology – A Usage-Based Approach to Language in Aphasia

image of Cognitive Aphasiology – A Usage-Based Approach to Language in Aphasia

Aphasia is the most common acquired language disorder in adults, resulting from brain damage, usually stroke. This book firstly explains how aphasia research and clinical practice remain heavily influenced by rule-based, generative theory, and summarizes key shortcomings with this approach. Crucially, it demonstrates how an alternative — the constructivist, usage-based approach — can provide a more plausible theoretical perspective for characterizing language in aphasia. After detailing rigorous transcription and segmentation methods, it presents constructivist, usage-based analyses of spontaneous speech from people with various aphasia ‘types’, challenging a clear-cut distinction between lexis and grammar, emphasizing the need to consider whole-form storage and frequency effects beyond single words, and indicating that individuals fall along a continuum of spoken language capability rather than differing categorically by aphasia ‘type’. It provides original insight into aphasia — with wide-reaching implications for clinical practice —, while equally highlighting how the study of aphasia is important for the development of Cognitive Linguistics.


  1. Aarts, B.
    (2007) Syntactic gradience: The nature of grammatical indeterminacy. Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Aarts, B. , Chalker, S. , & Weiner, E.
    (2014) Oxford dictionary of English grammar (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Alajouanine, T.
    (1956) Verbal realization in aphasia. Brain, 79(1), 1–28. 10.1093/brain/79.1.1
    https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/79.1.1 [Google Scholar]
  4. Alexander, L. G.
    (1988) Longman English grammar. Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Allan, K.
    (2006) Clause-type, primary illocution, and mood-like operators in English. Language Sciences, 28(1), 1–50. 10.1016/j.langsci.2004.12.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2004.12.001 [Google Scholar]
  6. Allwood, J.
    (2000) An activity-based approach to pragmatics. In H. Bunt , & W. Black (Eds.), Abduction, belief and context in dialogue: Studies in computational pragmatics (pp. 47–80). John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/nlp.1.02all
    https://doi.org/10.1075/nlp.1.02all [Google Scholar]
  7. Ambridge, B.
    (2017) Syntactic categories in child language acquisition: Innate, induced, or illusory?In H. Cohen , & C. Lefebvre (Eds.), Handbook of categorization in cognitive science (2nd ed.) (pp. 567–580). Elsevier. 10.1016/B978‑0‑08‑101107‑2.00023‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-101107-2.00023-3 [Google Scholar]
  8. Ambridge, B. , Kidd, E. , Rowland, C. F. , & Theakston, A. L.
    (2015) The ubiquity of frequency effects in first language acquisition. Journal of Child Language, 42(2), 239–273. 10.1017/S030500091400049X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S030500091400049X [Google Scholar]
  9. Ambridge, B. , & Lieven, E. V. M.
    (2011) Child language acquisition: Contrasting theoretical approaches. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511975073
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511975073 [Google Scholar]
  10. (2015) A Constructivist account of child language acquisition. In B. MacWhinney , & W. O'Grady (Eds.), Handbook of language emergence (pp. 478–510). Wiley Blackwell. 10.1002/9781118346136.ch22
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118346136.ch22 [Google Scholar]
  11. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association
    (n.d.-a) Aphasia. Retrieved January 30, 2021, from https://www.asha.org/practice-portal/clinical-topics/aphasia/
    [Google Scholar]
  12. (n.d.-b) Classification of aphasia. https://www.asha.org/uploadedFiles/ASHA/Practice_Portal/Clinical_Topics/Aphasia/Common-Classifications-of-Aphasia.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  13. (n.d.-c) Glossary. Retrieved January 30, 2021, from https://www.asha.org/practice-portal/glossary/
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Anderson, A.
    (2014) Speech Therapy Aphasia Rehabilitation STAR workbook. Createspace Independent Publishing Platform.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Andreetta, S. , & Marini, A.
    (2015) The effect of lexical deficits on narrative disturbances in fluent aphasia. Aphasiology, 29(6), 705–723. 10.1080/02687038.2014.979394
    https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2014.979394 [Google Scholar]
  16. Anjarningsih, H. Y. , Haryadi-Soebadi, R. D. , Gofir, A. , & Bastiaanse, R.
    (2012) Characterising agrammatism in Standard Indonesian. Aphasiology, 26(6), 757–784. 10.1080/02687038.2011.648370
    https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2011.648370 [Google Scholar]
  17. Aphasia Now
    (n.d.) Living with aphasia. Retrieved December 27, 2019, from http://www.aphasianow.org/About_Us/Living_with_Aphasia/
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Arnon, I. , & Snider, N.
    (2010) More than words: Frequency effects for multi-word phrases. Journal of Memory and Language, 62, 67–82. 10.1016/j.jml.2009.09.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2009.09.005 [Google Scholar]
  19. Auclair-Ouellet, N. , Pythoud, P. , Koenig-Bruhin, M. , & Fossard, M. (2018) Inflectional morphology in fluent aphasia: A case study in a highly inflected language. Language and Speech, 62(2), 250–259. 10.1177/0023830918765897
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0023830918765897 [Google Scholar]
  20. Audacity Team
    (2013–2014) Audacity(R): Free audio editor and recorder (Version 2.0.5) [Computer App]. https://audacityteam.org/
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Australian Aphasia Rehabilitation Pathway
    (n.d.) Types of aphasia therapy: Best practice statements. Retrieved January 30, 2021, from http://www.aphasiapathway.com.au/?name=Types-of-aphasia-therapy
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Babiak, M. C. , Gorno-Tempini, M. L. , & Henry, M. L.
    (2014) Language disorders, overview. In M. J. Aminoff , & R. B. Daroff (Eds.), Encyclopedia of neurological sciences (2nd ed.) (pp. 837–839). Academic Press. 10.1016/B978‑0‑12‑385157‑4.00471‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-385157-4.00471-1 [Google Scholar]
  23. Baker, M.
    (2011) In other words: A coursebook on translation (2nd ed.). Routledge. 10.4324/9780203832929
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203832929 [Google Scholar]
  24. Bannard, C. , & Matthews, D.
    (2008) Stored word sequences in language learning: The effect of familiarity on children's repetition of four-word combinations. Psychological Science, 19(3), 241–248. 10.1111/j.1467‑9280.2008.02075.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02075.x [Google Scholar]
  25. Bastiaanse, R.
    (2011) The retrieval and inflection of verbs in the spontaneous speech of fluent aphasic speakers. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 24(2), 163–172. 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2010.02.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneuroling.2010.02.006 [Google Scholar]
  26. Bastiaanse, R. , Bouma, G. , & Post, W.
    (2009) Linguistic complexity and frequency in agrammatic speech production. Brain and Language, 109(1), 18–28. 10.1016/j.bandl.2008.12.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2008.12.004 [Google Scholar]
  27. Bastiaanse, R. , & Grodzinsky, Y.
    (Eds.) (2000) Grammatical disorders in aphasia. Whurr Publishers Ltd.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Bastiaanse, R. , Rispens, J. E. , & van Zonneveld, R.
    (2000) Verb retrieval, verb inflection and negation. In R. Bastiaanse , & Y. Grodzinsky (Eds.), Grammatical disorders in aphasia (pp. 171–190). Whurr Publishers Ltd.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Bastiaanse, R. , & van Zonneveld, R.
    (2004) Broca’s aphasia, verbs and the mental lexicon. Brain and Language, 90(1–3), 198–202. 10.1016/S0093‑934X(03)00432‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00432-2 [Google Scholar]
  30. Bates, E. A. , Friederici, A. D. , Wulfeck, B. B. , & Juarez, L. A.
    (1988) On the preservation of word order in aphasia: Cross-linguistic evidence. Brain and Language, 33(2), 323–364. 10.1016/0093‑934X(88)90072‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-934X(88)90072-7 [Google Scholar]
  31. Bates, E. , & Goodman, J. C.
    (1997) On the inseparability of grammar and the lexicon: Evidence from acquisition, aphasia and real-time processing. Language and Cognitive Processes, 12(5–6), 507–584. 10.1080/016909697386628
    https://doi.org/10.1080/016909697386628 [Google Scholar]
  32. Bates, E. , Wulfeck, B. , & MacWhinney, B.
    (1991) Crosslinguistic research in aphasia: An overview. Brain and Language, 41(2), 123–148. 10.1016/0093‑934X(91)90149‑U
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-934X(91)90149-U [Google Scholar]
  33. Beeke, S. , Beckley, F. , Johnson, F. , Heilemann, C. , Edwards, S. , Maxim, J. , & Best, W.
    (2015) Conversation focused aphasia therapy: Investigating the adoption of strategies by people with agrammatism. Aphasiology, 29(3), 355–377. 10.1080/02687038.2014.881459
    https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2014.881459 [Google Scholar]
  34. Beeke, S. , Johnson, F. , Beckley, F. , Heilemann, C. , Edwards, S. , Maxim, J. , & Best, W.
    (2014) Enabling better conversations between a man with aphasia and his conversation partner: Incorporating writing into turn taking. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 47(3), 292–305. 10.1080/08351813.2014.925667
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2014.925667 [Google Scholar]
  35. Beeson, P. M. , & Bayles, K. A.
    (1997) Aphasia. In P. D. Nussbaum (Ed.), Handbook of neuropsychology and aging (pp. 298–314). Springer. 10.1007/978‑1‑4899‑1857‑4_20
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-1857-4_20 [Google Scholar]
  36. Benton, A. L. , & Joynt, R. J. (1960) Early descriptions of aphasia. Archives of Neurology, 3, 205–222. 10.1001/archneur.1960.00450020085012
    https://doi.org/10.1001/archneur.1960.00450020085012 [Google Scholar]
  37. Berndt, R. S.
    (2001) Sentence production. In B. Rapp (Ed.), Handbook of cognitive neuropsychology: What deficits reveal about the human mind (pp. 375–396). Psychology Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Berndt, R. S. , Mitchum, C. C. , Haendiges, A. N. , & Sandson, J.
    (1997) Verb retrieval in aphasia. 1. Characterizing single word impairments. Brain and Language, 56(1), 68–106. 10.1006/brln.1997.1727
    https://doi.org/10.1006/brln.1997.1727 [Google Scholar]
  39. Berndt, R. , & Zingeser, L.
    (1991) Grammatical class effects in word production: Finding the locus of the deficit. Brain and Language, 41(4), 597–600. 10.1016/0093‑934X(91)90177‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-934X(91)90177-3 [Google Scholar]
  40. Best, W. , Maxim, J. , Heilemann, C. , Beckley, F. , Johnson, F. , Edwards, S. I. , Howard, D. , & Beeke, S.
    (2016) Conversation therapy with people with aphasia and conversation partners using video feedback: A group and case series investigation of changes in interaction. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 10, 562. 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00562
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2016.00562 [Google Scholar]
  41. Biber, D. , Conrad, S. , & Leech, G.
    (2002) Longman student grammar of spoken and written English. Pearson Education Limited.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Biran, M. , & Friedmann, N.
    (2007) From phonological paraphasias to the structure of the phonological output lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes, 20(4), 589–616. 10.1080/01690960400005813
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960400005813 [Google Scholar]
  43. Bishop, D. , & Byng, S.
    (1984) Assessing semantic comprehension: Methodological considerations, and a new clinical test. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 1(3), 233–244. 10.1080/02643298408252024
    https://doi.org/10.1080/02643298408252024 [Google Scholar]
  44. Blanken, G. , & Marini, V.
    (1997) Where do lexical speech automatisms come from?Journal of Neurolinguistics, 10(1), 19–31. 10.1016/S0911‑6044(97)00001‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0911-6044(97)00001-8 [Google Scholar]
  45. Boye, K. , Bastiaanse, R. , & Harder, P.
    (2017, July10–14). Agrammatic aphasia in a usage-based theory of grammar [Paper presentation]. 14th International Cognitive Linguistics Conference, Tartu, Estonia.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Boye, K. , Bastiaanse, R. , Harder, P. , & Martínez-Ferreiro, S.
    (2018) Agrammatic aphasia in a usage-based theory of grammar [Manuscript submitted for publication]. Department of Nordic Studies and Linguistics, University of Copenhagen.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Boye, K. , & Harder, P.
    (2012) A usage-based theory of grammatical status and grammaticalization. Language, 88(1), 1–44. 10.1353/lan.2012.0020
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2012.0020 [Google Scholar]
  48. Boyle, M.
    (2014) Test-retest stability of word retrieval in aphasic discourse. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 57(3), 966–978. 10.1044/2014_JSLHR‑L‑13‑0171
    https://doi.org/10.1044/2014_JSLHR-L-13-0171 [Google Scholar]
  49. Braine, M. D. S. , & Bowerman, M.
    (1976) Children's first word combinations. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 41(1), 1–104. 10.2307/1165959
    https://doi.org/10.2307/1165959 [Google Scholar]
  50. Broca, P.
    (1861a) Nouvelle observation d’aphémie produite par une lésion de la troisième circonvolution frontale. Bulletins de la Société d’anatomie (Paris), 2nd series, 6, 398–407.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. (1861b) Perte de la parole: Ramollissement chronique et destruction partielle du lobe anterieur gauche du cerveau. Bulletins de la Societe d’anthropologie, 1st series, 2, 235–8.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. (1861c) Remarques sur le siège de la faculté du langage articulé, suivies d’une observation d’aphémie (perte de la parole). Bulletins de la Société d’anatomie (Paris), 2nd series, 6, 330–57.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Brown, R.
    (1973) A first language: The early stages. George Allen & Unwin. 10.4159/harvard.9780674732469
    https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674732469 [Google Scholar]
  54. Brumfitt, S.
    (1993) Losing your sense of self: What aphasia can do. Aphasiology, 7(6), 569–575. 10.1080/02687039308248631
    https://doi.org/10.1080/02687039308248631 [Google Scholar]
  55. Bryant, L. , Ferguson, A. , & Spencer, E. (2016) Linguistic analysis of discourse in aphasia: A review of the literature. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 30(7), 489–518. 10.3109/02699206.2016.1145740
    https://doi.org/10.3109/02699206.2016.1145740 [Google Scholar]
  56. Bunt, H. , & Petukhova, V.
    (2010) On the many benefits of a multidimensional approach to the analysis of spoken dialogue. In P. J. Henrichsen (Ed.), Linguistic theory and raw sound: Copenhagen Studies in Language 40. Samfundslitteratur.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Butterworth, B. , & Howard, D.
    (1987) Paragrammatisms. Cognition, 26(1), 1–37. 10.1016/0010‑0277(87)90012‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(87)90012-6 [Google Scholar]
  58. Bybee, J.
    (1995) Regular morphology and the lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes, 10(5), 425–55. 10.1080/01690969508407111
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01690969508407111 [Google Scholar]
  59. (2011) Usage-based theory and grammaticalization. In H. Narrog , & B. Heine (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of grammaticalization (pp. 69–78). Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Bybee, J. L.
    (2013) Usage-based theory and exemplar representations of constructions. In T. Hoffmann , & G. Trousdale (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of Construction Grammar (pp. 49–69). Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Bybee, J. L. , & Beckner, C.
    (2010) Usage-based theory. In B. Heine , & H. Narrog (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic analysis (pp. 827–856). Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Bybee, J. , & Scheibmann, J.
    (1999) The effect of usage on degrees of constituency: The reduction of don’t in English. Linguistics, 37(4), 575–596. 10.1515/ling.37.4.575
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.37.4.575 [Google Scholar]
  63. Cambridge University Press
    (n.d.-a) Cambridge dictionary. http://dictionary.cambridge.org/
    [Google Scholar]
  64. (n.d.-b) Pay. InCambridge Dictionary. Retrieved May 20, 2014, from http://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/british/pay_1?q=pay
    [Google Scholar]
  65. (n.d.-c) Pay for sth. InCambridge Dictionary. Retrieved May 20, 2014, from http://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/british/pay-for-sth?q=pay+for
    [Google Scholar]
  66. (n.d.-d) Phrasal verb. InCambridge Dictionary. Retrieved May 20, 2014, from http://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/british/phrasal-verb?q=phrasal+verb
    [Google Scholar]
  67. (n.d.-e) Sneeze. InCambridge Dictionary. Retrieved January 30, 2021, from https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/sneeze
    [Google Scholar]
  68. Caplan, D.
    (1987) Neurolinguistics and linguistic aphasiology: An introduction. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511620676
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620676 [Google Scholar]
  69. Caplan, D. , DeDe, G. , & Michaud, J.
    (2006) Task-independent and task-specific syntactic deficits in aphasic comprehension. Aphasiology, 20(9), 893–920. 10.1080/02687030600739273
    https://doi.org/10.1080/02687030600739273 [Google Scholar]
  70. Cappa, S. F. , Moro, A. , Perani, D. , & Piattelli-Palmarini, M.
    (2000) Broca’s aphasia, Broca’s area, and syntax: A complex relationship. Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 23(1), 27. 10.1017/S0140525X00282393
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00282393 [Google Scholar]
  71. Carragher, M. , Sage, K. , & Conroy, P.
    (2013) The effects of verb retrieval therapy for people with non-fluent aphasia: Evidence from assessment tasks and conversation. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 23(6), 846–887. 10.1080/09602011.2013.832335
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09602011.2013.832335 [Google Scholar]
  72. Carter, R. , & McCarthy, M.
    (2006) Cambridge grammar of English: A comprehensive guide. Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  73. Chafe, W. L.
    (1968) Idiomaticity as an anomaly in the Chomskyan paradigm. Foundations of Language, 4(2), 109–127.
    [Google Scholar]
  74. Chen, S. , & Bates, E.
    (1998) The dissociation between nouns and verbs in Broca’s and Wernicke’s aphasia: Findings from Chinese. Aphasiology, 12(1), 5–36. 10.1080/02687039808249441
    https://doi.org/10.1080/02687039808249441 [Google Scholar]
  75. Chomsky, N. (1957) Syntactic structures. Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783112316009
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783112316009 [Google Scholar]
  76. (1965) Aspects of the theory of syntax. MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  77. (1980) Discussion of Putnam’s comments. In M. Piattelli-Palmarini (Ed.), Language and learning: The debate between Jean Piaget and Noam Chomsky (pp. 35–52). Routledge and Kegan Paul.
    [Google Scholar]
  78. (1981) Lectures on government and binding: The Pisa lectures. Foris.
    [Google Scholar]
  79. (1986) Knowledge of language: Its nature, origin and use. Praeger.
    [Google Scholar]
  80. Clausner, T. C. , & Croft, W.
    (1997) Productivity and schematicity in metaphors. Cognitive Science, 21(3), 247–282. 10.1207/s15516709cog2103_1
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog2103_1 [Google Scholar]
  81. Code, C.
    (1982) Neurolinguistic analysis of recurrent utterance in aphasia. Cortex, 18(1), 141–152. 10.1016/S0010‑9452(82)80025‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-9452(82)80025-7 [Google Scholar]
  82. (1989) Speech automatisms and recurring utterances. In C. Code (Ed.), The characteristics of aphasia (pp. 155–177). Taylor Francis. 10.1201/b15069‑16
    https://doi.org/10.1201/b15069-16 [Google Scholar]
  83. (1994) Speech automatism production in aphasia. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 8(2), 135–148. 10.1016/0911‑6044(94)90021‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0911-6044(94)90021-3 [Google Scholar]
  84. Code, C. , Müller, N. , Tree, J. , & Ball, M.
    (2006) Syntactic impairments can emerge later: Progressive agrammatic agraphia and syntactic comprehension impairment. Aphasiology, 20(9), 1035–1058. 10.1080/02687030600739539
    https://doi.org/10.1080/02687030600739539 [Google Scholar]
  85. Cohen, J.
    (1960) A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1), 37–46. 10.1177/001316446002000104
    https://doi.org/10.1177/001316446002000104 [Google Scholar]
  86. Conroy, P. , Sage, K. , & Lambon Ralph, M. A.
    (2009) Errorless and errorful therapy for verb and noun naming in aphasia. Aphasiology, 23(11), 1311–1337. 10.1080/02687030902756439
    https://doi.org/10.1080/02687030902756439 [Google Scholar]
  87. Cowper, S.
    (2002) Finiteness. University of Toronto. Retrieved December 4, 2018, from http://homes.chass.utoronto.ca/~cowper/Cowper.finiteness.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  88. Crawford, J. R.
    (n.d.) Single-case methodology in neuropsychology. University of Aberdeen. Retrieved May 30, 2014, from https://homepages.abdn.ac.uk/j.crawford/pages/dept/SingleCaseMethodology.htm
    [Google Scholar]
  89. Crawford, J. R. , & Garthwaite, P. H.
    (2002) Investigation of the single case in neuropsychology: Confidence limits on the abnormality of test scores and test score differences. Neuropsychologia, 40, 1196–1208. 10.1016/S0028‑3932(01)00224‑X
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0028-3932(01)00224-X [Google Scholar]
  90. Cristofaro, S.
    (2003) Subordination. Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  91. Croft, W.
    (2001) Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198299554.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198299554.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  92. (2005) Logical and typological arguments for Radical Construction Grammar. In M. Fried , & J. Östman (Eds.), Construction grammars: Cognitive grounding and theoretical extensions (Constructional Approaches to Language, 3) (pp. 273–314). John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/cal.3.11cro
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.3.11cro [Google Scholar]
  93. (2007) Construction grammar. In D. Geeraerts , & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 463–508). Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  94. Croft, W. , & Cruse, D. A.
    (2004) Cognitive linguistics. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511803864
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511803864 [Google Scholar]
  95. Crookes, G.
    (1990) The utterance, and other basic units for second language discourse analysis. Applied Linguistics, 11(2), 183–99. 10.1093/applin/11.2.183
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/11.2.183 [Google Scholar]
  96. Crystal, D.
    (1981) Clinical linguistics. Springer Verlag. 10.1007/978‑3‑7091‑4001‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-4001-7 [Google Scholar]
  97. (1988) Linguistic levels in aphasia. In F. C. Rose , R. Whurr , & M. A. Wyke (Eds.), Aphasia (pp. 23–45). Whurr Publishers Ltd.
    [Google Scholar]
  98. Crystal, D. (2003) The Cambridge encyclopedia of the English language (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  99. (2008) Dictionary of linguistics and phonetics (6th ed.). Blackwell Publishing. 10.1002/9781444302776
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444302776 [Google Scholar]
  100. Cummings, L.
    (2008) Clinical linguistics. Edinburgh University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  101. (2014) Communication disorders. Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑1‑137‑40013‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-40013-0 [Google Scholar]
  102. Dąbrowska, E.
    (2004) Language, mind and brain: Some psychological and neurological constraints on theories of grammar. Edinburgh University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  103. (2012) Different speakers, different grammars: Individual differences in native language attainment. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 2(3), 219–253. 10.1075/lab.2.3.01dab
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.2.3.01dab [Google Scholar]
  104. (2014) Recycling utterances: A speaker’s guide to sentence processing. Cognitive Linguistics, 25(4), 617–653. 10.1515/cog‑2014‑0057
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2014-0057 [Google Scholar]
  105. Dąbrowska, E. , & Lieven, E.
    (2005) Towards a lexically specific grammar of children’s question constructions. Cognitive Linguistics, 16(3), 437–474. 10.1515/cogl.2005.16.3.437
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.2005.16.3.437 [Google Scholar]
  106. Dalman, A. J. E. , & Eling, P.
    (2000) In P. J. Koehler , G. W. Bruyn , & J. M. S. Pearce (Eds.), Neurological eponyms (pp. 244–249). Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  107. Damasio, A. R.
    (1998) Signs of aphasia. In M. Taylor Sarno (Ed.), Acquired aphasia (3rd ed.) (pp. 25–41). Academic Press. 10.1016/B978‑012619322‑0/50005‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012619322-0/50005-1 [Google Scholar]
  108. Dancygier, B.
    (2017a) Introduction. In B. Dancygier (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 1–10). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781316339732.001
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316339732.001 [Google Scholar]
  109. (Ed.) (2017b) The Cambridge handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781316339732
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316339732 [Google Scholar]
  110. Davies, M.
    (2004–) BYU-BNC (Based on the British National Corpus from Oxford University Press) [Data set]. Brigham Young University. http://corpus.byu.edu/bnc/
    [Google Scholar]
  111. DeDe, G. , & Caplan, D.
    (2006) Factor analysis of aphasic syntactic comprehension disorders. Aphasiology, 20(2–4), 123–135. 10.1080/02687030500472413
    https://doi.org/10.1080/02687030500472413 [Google Scholar]
  112. Dell, G. S. , Schwartz, M. F. , Martin, N. , Saffran, E. M. , & Gagnon, D. A.
    (1997) Lexical access in aphasic and nonaphasic speakers. Psychological Review, 104(4), 801–838. 10.1037/0033‑295X.104.4.801
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.104.4.801 [Google Scholar]
  113. Dick, F. , & Bates, E.
    (2000) Grodzinsky’s latest stand - or, just how specific are “lesion-specific” deficits?Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 23(1), 29. 10.1017/S0140525X00302394
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00302394 [Google Scholar]
  114. Diessel, H.
    (2015) Usage-based construction grammar. In E. Dąbrowska , & D. Divjak (Eds.), Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 295–321). Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  115. (2017) Usage-based linguistics. In M. Aronoff (Ed.), Oxford research encyclopedia of linguistics. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.013.363
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.013.363 [Google Scholar]
  116. (n.d.) Clause patterns. Friedrich Schiller University Jena. https://holgerdiessel.uni-jena.de/INTRO_Clause_patterns.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  117. Dorgeloh, H.
    (1997) Inversion in Modern English: Form and function. John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/sidag.6
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sidag.6 [Google Scholar]
  118. Druks, J.
    (2002) Verbs and nouns: A review of the literature. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 15(3–5), 289–315. 10.1016/S0911‑6044(01)00029‑X
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0911-6044(01)00029-X [Google Scholar]
  119. Druks, J. , & Marshall, J. C. (1995) When passives are easier than actives: Two case studies of aphasic comprehension. Cognition, 55(3), 311–331. 10.1016/0010‑0277(94)00651‑Z
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(94)00651-Z [Google Scholar]
  120. Duffield, N.
    (2018) Reflections on psycholinguistic theories: Raiding the inarticulate. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108264969
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108264969 [Google Scholar]
  121. Eddington, D.
    (2008) 2008 Presidential address: Linguistics and the scientific method. Southwest Journal of Linguistics, 27(2), 1–16.
    [Google Scholar]
  122. Edwards, S. , & Tucker, K.
    (2006) Verb retrieval in fluent aphasia: A clinical study. Aphasiology, 20(7), 644–675. 10.1080/02687030600631827
    https://doi.org/10.1080/02687030600631827 [Google Scholar]
  123. Efstratiadou, E. A. , Papathanasiou, I. , Holland, R. , Archonti, A. , & Hilari, K.
    (2018) A systematic review of semantic feature analysis therapy studies for aphasia. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 61(5), 1261–1278. 10.1044/2018_JSLHR‑L‑16‑0330
    https://doi.org/10.1044/2018_JSLHR-L-16-0330 [Google Scholar]
  124. Ellis, N. C. , & Wulff, S.
    (2014) Usage-based approaches to SLA. In B. VanPatten , & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction (pp. 75–93). Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  125. Eppler, E. D. , & Ozón, G.
    (2013) English words and sentences: An introduction. Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  126. Evans, N. , & Levinson, S. C.
    (2009) The myth of language universals: Language diversity and its importance for cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 32(5), 429–448. 10.1017/S0140525X0999094X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0999094X [Google Scholar]
  127. Faroqi-Shah, Y. , & Thompson, C. K.
    (2004) Semantic, lexical, and phonological influences on the production of verb inflections in agrammatic aphasia. Brain and Language, 89(3), 484–498. 10.1016/j.bandl.2003.12.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2003.12.006 [Google Scholar]
  128. Fay, D.
    (1982) Substitutions and splices: A study of sentence blends. In A. Cutler (Ed.), Slips of the tongue and language production (pp. 163–195). Mouton. 10.1515/9783110828306.163
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110828306.163 [Google Scholar]
  129. Feenaughty, L. , Basilakos, A. , Bonilha, L. , den Ouden, D. B. , Rorden, C. , Stark, B. , & Fridriksson, J.
    (2017) Non-fluent speech following stroke is caused by impaired efference copy. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 34(6), 333–346. 10.1080/02643294.2017.1394834
    https://doi.org/10.1080/02643294.2017.1394834 [Google Scholar]
  130. Ferguson, A. , & Armstrong, E.
    (2009) Researching communication disorders. Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230594340
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230594340 [Google Scholar]
  131. Fillmore, C. J. , Kay, P. , & O’Connor, M. C.
    (1988) Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: The case of let alone. Language, 64(3), 501–538. 10.2307/414531
    https://doi.org/10.2307/414531 [Google Scholar]
  132. Fink, R. , Brecher, A. , Sobel, P. , & Schwartz, M.
    (2005) Computer-assisted treatment of word retrieval deficits in aphasia. Aphasiology, 19(10–11), 943–954. 10.1080/02687030544000155
    https://doi.org/10.1080/02687030544000155 [Google Scholar]
  133. Foygel, D. , & Dell, G. S.
    (2000) Models of impaired lexical access in speech production. Journal of Memory and Language, 43(2), 182–216. 10.1006/jmla.2000.2716
    https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.2000.2716 [Google Scholar]
  134. Fridriksson, J. , Fillmore, P. , Guo, D. , & Rorden, C.
    (2015) Chronic Broca’s aphasia is caused by damage to Broca’s and Wernicke’s areas. Cerebral Cortex, 25(12), 4689–4696. 10.1093/cercor/bhu152
    https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhu152 [Google Scholar]
  135. Friedmann, N.
    (2002) Question production in agrammatism: The Tree Pruning Hypothesis. Brain and Language, 80(2), 160–187. 10.1006/brln.2001.2587
    https://doi.org/10.1006/brln.2001.2587 [Google Scholar]
  136. (2005) Degrees of severity and recovery in agrammatism: Climbing up the syntactic tree. Aphasiology, 19(10–11), 1037–1051. 10.1080/02687030544000236
    https://doi.org/10.1080/02687030544000236 [Google Scholar]
  137. Friedmann, N. , & Grodzinsky, Y.
    (1997) Tense and agreement in agrammatic production: Pruning the syntactic tree. Brain and Language, 56(3), 397–425. 10.1006/brln.1997.1795
    https://doi.org/10.1006/brln.1997.1795 [Google Scholar]
  138. Gahl, S.
    (2002) Lexical biases in aphasic sentence comprehension: An experimental and corpus linguistic study. Aphasiology, 16(12), 1173–1198. 10.1080/02687030244000428
    https://doi.org/10.1080/02687030244000428 [Google Scholar]
  139. Gahl, S. , & Menn, L. (2016) Usage-based approaches to aphasia. Aphasiology, 30(11), 1361–1377. 10.1080/02687038.2016.1140120
    https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2016.1140120 [Google Scholar]
  140. Gahl, S. , Menn, L. , Ramsberger, G. , Jurafsky, D. S. , Elder, E. , Rewega, M. , & Holland Audrey, L.
    (2003) Syntactic frame and verb bias in aphasia: Plausibility judgments of undergoer-subject sentences. Brain and Cognition, 53(2), 223–228. 10.1016/S0278‑2626(03)00114‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-2626(03)00114-3 [Google Scholar]
  141. Geeraerts, D. , & Cuyckens, H.
    (2007) Introducing Cognitive Linguistics. In D. Geeraerts , & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 1–21). Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  142. Geertzen, J. , Petukhova, V. , & Bunt, H.
    (2007) A multidimensional approach to utterance segmentation and dialogue act classification. In S. Keizer , H. Bunt , & T. Paek (Eds.), Proceedings of the 8th SIGdial Workshop on Discourse and Dialogue (pp. 140–149). https://let.uvt.nl/general/people/bunt/docs/SIGdial_07_Geertzen_Petukhova_Bunt.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  143. Gentner, D.
    (1982) Why nouns are learned before verbs: Linguistic relativity versus natural partitioning. In S. A. KuczajII (Ed.), Language development: Vol. 2. Language, thought and culture (pp. 301–334). Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  144. (2006) Why verbs are hard to learn. In K. Hirsh-Pasek , & R. Golinkoff (Eds.), Action meets word: How children learn verbs (pp. 544–564). Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195170009.003.0022
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195170009.003.0022 [Google Scholar]
  145. Glucksberg, S.
    (1993/2014) Idiom meanings and allusional content. In C. Cacciari , & P. Tabossi (Eds.), Idioms: Processing, structure, and interpretation (pp. 3–26). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    [Google Scholar]
  146. Goldberg, A. E.
    (1995) Constructions: A Construction Grammar approach to argument structure. University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  147. (2003) Constructions: A new theoretical approach to language. TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences, 7(5), 219–224. 10.1016/S1364‑6613(03)00080‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00080-9 [Google Scholar]
  148. (2006) Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  149. (2013) Argument structure constructions versus lexical rules or derivational verb templates. Mind & Language, 28(4), 435–465. 10.1111/mila.12026
    https://doi.org/10.1111/mila.12026 [Google Scholar]
  150. Goldberg, A. E. , & Casenhiser, D.
    (2006) English constructions. In B. Aarts , & A. McMahon (Eds.), The handbook of English linguistics (pp. 343–356). Blackwell Publishing. 10.1002/9780470753002.ch15
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470753002.ch15 [Google Scholar]
  151. Goldberg, A. , & Suttle, L.
    (2010) Construction grammar. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 1(4), 468–477. 10.1002/wcs.22
    https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.22 [Google Scholar]
  152. Green, G. M.
    (1981) Colloquial and literary uses of inversions (No. 217). https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/bitstream/handle/2142/17897/ctrstreadtechrepv01981i00217_opt.pdf?sequence=1
    [Google Scholar]
  153. Grodzinsky, Y.
    (2000) The neurology of syntax: Language use without Broca’s area. Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 23(1), 1–71. 10.1017/S0140525X00002399
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00002399 [Google Scholar]
  154. Groenewold, R. , Bastiaanse, R. , & Huiskes, M.
    (2013) Direct speech constructions in aphasic Dutch narratives. Aphasiology, 27(5), 546–567. 10.1080/02687038.2012.742484
    https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2012.742484 [Google Scholar]
  155. Groenewold, R. , Bastiaanse, R. , Nickels, L. , & Huiskes, M.
    (2014) Perceived liveliness and speech comprehensibility in aphasia: The effects of direct speech in auditory narratives. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 49(4), 486–97. 10.1111/1460‑6984.12080
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1460-6984.12080 [Google Scholar]
  156. Gwet, K. L. (2012) Handbook of inter-rater reliability: The definitive guide to measuring the extent of agreement among multiple raters (3rd ed.). Advanced Analytics LLC.
    [Google Scholar]
  157. Halliday, M. A. K. , & Hasan, R.
    (1976) Cohesion in English. Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  158. Hameister, I. , Nickels, L. , Abel, S. , & Croot, K.
    (2017) “Do you have mowing the lawn?” – improvements in word retrieval and grammar following constraint-induced language therapy in primary progressive aphasia. Aphasiology, 31(3), 308–331. 10.1080/02687038.2016.1197558
    https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2016.1197558 [Google Scholar]
  159. Hatchard, R.
    (2015a) A construction-based approach to spoken language in aphasia [Doctoral dissertation, The University of Sheffield]. White Rose eTheses Online. http://etheses.whiterose.ac.uk/10385/
    [Google Scholar]
  160. (2015b, July20–25). Constructivist theory and methods in aphasia: A usage-based examination of verbs [Paper presentation]. 13th International Cognitive Linguistics Conference, Northumbria, UK.
    [Google Scholar]
  161. (2016, July19–22). Retrieval not rules: A construction-based analysis of spoken errors in aphasia [Paper presentation]. 6th UK Cognitive Linguistics Conference, Bangor, UK.
    [Google Scholar]
  162. (2017, July10–14). Common constructions in aphasia? A usage-based examination of it’s [Paper presentation]. 14th International Cognitive Linguistics Conference, Tartu, Estonia.
    [Google Scholar]
  163. (2019) Usage-based approach to language acquisition. In J. S. Damico , & M. J. Ball (Eds.), The SAGE encyclopedia of human communication sciences and disorders (pp. 2020–2023). Sage Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  164. Hatchard, R. , & Lieven, E.
    (2019) Inflection of nouns for grammatical number in spoken narratives by people with aphasia: How glass slippers challenge the rule-based approach. Language and Cognition, 11(3), 341–372. 10.1017/langcog.2019.21
    https://doi.org/10.1017/langcog.2019.21 [Google Scholar]
  165. Hatchard, R. , Lieven, E. , & Herbert, R.
    (2015, September9–11). Retrieval not rules: A new approach to connected speech in aphasia [Paper presentation]. British Aphasiology Society International Biennial Conference, London, UK.
    [Google Scholar]
  166. Hatchard, R. , Wilkinson, R. , & Herbert, R.
    (2013a, June23–28). The application of Construction Grammar to language in aphasia [Paper presentation]. 12th International Cognitive Linguistics Conference, Edmonton, Canada.
    [Google Scholar]
  167. (2013b, September9–11). The application of Construction Grammar to language in aphasia [Paper presentation]. British Aphasiology Society Biennial Conference, Manchester, UK.
    [Google Scholar]
  168. Harvey, D. Y. , & Schnur, T. T.
    (2015) Distinct loci of lexical and semantic access deficits in aphasia: Evidence from voxel-based lesion-symptom mapping and diffusion tensor imaging. Cortex, 67, 37–58. 10.1016/j.cortex.2015.03.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2015.03.004 [Google Scholar]
  169. Heeschen, C.
    (1985) Agrammatism versus paragrammatism: A fictitious opposition. In M. L. Kean (Ed.), Agrammatism (pp. 207–248). Academic Press. 10.1016/B978‑0‑12‑402830‑2.50012‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-402830-2.50012-2 [Google Scholar]
  170. Hier, D. B. , Gorelick, P. B. , & Gellin Shindler, A.
    (1987) Topics in behavioural neurology and neuropsychology: With key references. Butterworth Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  171. Hilpert, M.
    (2014) Construction Grammar and its application to English. Edinburgh University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  172. Hughlings-Jackson, J.
    (1874) On the nature of the duality of the brain. In J. Taylor (Ed.), Selected writings of John Hughlings Jackson: Vol. 2 (pp. 129–145). Staples Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  173. Hughlings-Jackson, J. (1879) On affections of speech from disease of the brain. Brain, 2, 203–222. 10.1093/brain/2.2.203
    https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/2.2.203 [Google Scholar]
  174. Hung, P. F. , & Ostergren, J.
    (2019) A comparison of drawing and writing on facilitating word retrieval in individuals with aphasia. Aphasiology, 33(12), 1462–1481. 10.1080/02687038.2019.1602861
    https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2019.1602861 [Google Scholar]
  175. Hunt, J.
    (2016) Cuespeak [Mobile App]. http://www.cuespeak.com
    [Google Scholar]
  176. Hunt, K. W.
    (1966) Recent measures in syntactic development. Elementary English, 43(7), 732–39.
    [Google Scholar]
  177. Jefferson, G.
    (2004) Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In G. H. Lerner (Ed.), Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation (pp. 13–31). John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/pbns.125.02jef
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.125.02jef [Google Scholar]
  178. Ibanescu, G. , & Pescariu, S.
    (Eds.) (2010) Aphasia: Symptoms, diagnosis and treatment. Nova Science Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  179. International Phonetic Association
    (2015/2005) The International Phonetic Alphabet. https://www.internationalphoneticassociation.org/sites/default/files/IPA_Kiel_2015.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  180. Ishkhanyan, B.
    (2015, July20–25). Agrammatism, working memory and lexicon-grammar distinction [Paper presentation]. 13th International Cognitive Linguistics Conference, Northumbria, UK.
    [Google Scholar]
  181. Ishkhanyan, B. , Sahraoui, H. , Harder, P. , Mogensen, J. , & Boye, K.
    (2017) Grammatical and lexical pronoun dissociation in French speakers with agrammatic aphasia: A usage-based account and REF-based hypothesis. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 44, 1–16. 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2017.02.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneuroling.2017.02.001 [Google Scholar]
  182. John, A. A. , Javali, M. , Mahale, R. , Mehta, A. , Acharya, P. T. , & Srinivasa, R.
    (2017) Clinical impression and Western Aphasia Battery classification of aphasia in acute ischemic stroke: Is there a discrepancy?Journal of Neurosciences in Rural Practice, 8, 74–8. 10.4103/0976‑3147.193531
    https://doi.org/10.4103/0976-3147.193531 [Google Scholar]
  183. Kasselimis, D. , Potagas, C. , Kourtidou, E. , & Evdokimidis, I.
    (2012) Classification of the aphasias: Maybe it’s time for a change. Academy of Aphasia 2012, Procedia - Social and Behavioural Sciences, 61, 161–162. 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.10.127
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.10.127 [Google Scholar]
  184. Kasselimis, D. S. , Simos, P. G. , Peppas, C. , Evdokimidis, I. , & Potagas, C.
    (2017) The unbridged gap between clinical diagnosis and contemporary research on aphasia: A short discussion on the validity and clinical utility of taxonomic categories. Brain and Language, 164, 63–67. 10.1016/j.bandl.2016.10.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2016.10.005 [Google Scholar]
  185. Kay, P.
    (2000) Comprehension deficits of Broca’s aphasics provide no evidence for traces. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23(1), 37–38. 10.1017/S0140525X00392391
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00392391 [Google Scholar]
  186. Kay, J. , Lesser, R. , & Coltheart, M.
    (1992) Psycholinguistic Assessments of Language Processing in Aphasia. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    [Google Scholar]
  187. (1996) Psycholinguistic assessments of language processing in aphasia (PALPA): An introduction. Aphasiology, 10(2), 159–180. 10.1080/02687039608248403
    https://doi.org/10.1080/02687039608248403 [Google Scholar]
  188. Kent, R. D.
    (2010) Communication disorders. In I. B. Weiner , & W. E. Craighead (Eds.), The Corsini encyclopedia of psychology: Volume 1 (4th ed.) (pp. 358–360). NJ: John Wiley & Sons. 10.1002/9780470479216.corpsy0203
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470479216.corpsy0203 [Google Scholar]
  189. Kertesz, A.
    (1982) Western Aphasia Battery. Grune & Stratton.
    [Google Scholar]
  190. (2006) Western Aphasia Battery - Revised. Harcourt Assessments.
    [Google Scholar]
  191. Kim, M. , & Thompson, C. K.
    (2000) Patterns of comprehension and production of nouns and verbs in agrammatism: Implications for lexical organization. Brain and Language, 74(1), 1–25. 10.1006/brln.2000.2315
    https://doi.org/10.1006/brln.2000.2315 [Google Scholar]
  192. Kinney, J. , Wallace, S. E. , & Schreiber, J. B. (2020) The relationship between word retrieval, drawing, and semantics in people with aphasia. Aphasiology, 34(2), 254–274. 10.1080/02687038.2019.1602862
    https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2019.1602862 [Google Scholar]
  193. Koukoulioti, V. , & Stavrakaki, S.
    (2014) Producing and inflecting verbs with different argument structure: Evidence from Greek aphasic speakers. Aphasiology, 28(11), 1320–1349. 10.1080/02687038.2014.919561
    https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2014.919561 [Google Scholar]
  194. Krámský, J.
    (1969) Verb-form frequency in English. Brno Studies in English, 8, 111–120.
    [Google Scholar]
  195. Kroll, B.
    (1977) Combining ideas in written and spoken English: A look at subordination and coordination. In E. Ochs Keenan , & T. L. Bennett (Eds.), Discourse across time and space. Southern California Occasional Papers in Linguistics 5 (pp. 69–108). University of Southern California.
    [Google Scholar]
  196. Labov, W.
    (1972) Sociolinguistic patterns. University of Pennsylvania Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  197. Lambrecht, K.
    (1994) Information structure and sentence form: Topic, focus, and the mental representations of discourse referents. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511620607
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620607 [Google Scholar]
  198. Langacker, R. W.
    (1987) Foundations of cognitive grammar, volume I: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  199. (2008) Cognitive Grammar: A basic introduction. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331967.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331967.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  200. Le, D. , Licata, K. , & Mower Provost, E.
    (2018) Automatic quantitative analysis of spontaneous aphasic speech. Speech Communication, 100, 1–12. 10.1016/j.specom.2018.04.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.specom.2018.04.001 [Google Scholar]
  201. Lee, J. , & Thompson, C. K.
    (2015) Phonological facilitation effects on naming latencies and viewing times during noun and verb naming in agrammatic and anomic aphasia. Aphasiology, 29(10), 1164–1188. 10.1080/02687038.2015.1035225
    https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2015.1035225 [Google Scholar]
  202. Leech, G. , & Svartvik, J.
    (2002) A communicative grammar of English (3rd ed.). Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  203. Lesser, R. , & Perkins, L.
    (1999) Cognitive neuropsychology and conversation analysis in aphasia: An introductory casebook. Whurr Publishers, Ltd.
    [Google Scholar]
  204. Levelt, W. J. M. , Roelofs, A. , & Meyer, A. S.
    (1999) A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(1), 1–75. 10.1017/S0140525X99001776
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X99001776 [Google Scholar]
  205. Lexico
    (n.d.-a) By and large. InLexico dictionary. Retrieved January 30, 2021, from https://www.lexico.com/definition/by_and_large
    [Google Scholar]
  206. (n.d.-b) Sneeze. InLexico dictionary. Retrieved January 30, 2021, from https://www.lexico.com/definition/sneeze
    [Google Scholar]
  207. Lieven, E.
    (2008) Learning the English auxiliary: A usage-based approach. In H. Behrens (Ed.), Corpora in language acquisition research: History, methods, perspectives (Trends in Acquisition Research, 6) (pp. 61–98). John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/tilar.6.06lie
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tilar.6.06lie [Google Scholar]
  208. (2016) Usage-based approaches to language development: Where do we go from here?Language and Cognition, 8(3), 346–368. 10.1017/langcog.2016.16
    https://doi.org/10.1017/langcog.2016.16 [Google Scholar]
  209. Lieven, E. , Salomo, D. , & Tomasello, M.
    (2009) Two-year-old children’s productions of multiword utterances: A usage-based analysis. Cognitive Linguistics, 20(3), 481–507. 10.1515/COGL.2009.022
    https://doi.org/10.1515/COGL.2009.022 [Google Scholar]
  210. Linebaugh, C. W. , Shisler, R. J. , & Lehner, L.
    (2005) CAC classics. Aphasiology, 19(1), 77–92. 10.1080/02687030444000363
    https://doi.org/10.1080/02687030444000363 [Google Scholar]
  211. Links, P. , Hurkmans, J. , & Bastiaanse, R.
    (2010) Training verb and sentence production in agrammatic Broca’s aphasia. Aphasiology, 24(11), 1303–1325. 10.1080/02687030903437666
    https://doi.org/10.1080/02687030903437666 [Google Scholar]
  212. Lum, C. , Cox, R. , & Kilgour, J. (2012) PATSy: A database of clinical cases for teaching and research [Data set]. Universities of Sussex and Edinburgh. Retrieved January, 2012 – May, 2015, from http://www.patsy.ac.uk
    [Google Scholar]
  213. Luzzatti, C. , Raggi, R. , Zonca, G. , Pistarini, C. , Contardi, A. , & Pinna, G.
    (2002) Verb–noun double dissociation in aphasic lexical impairments: The role of word frequency and imageability. Brain and Language, 81(1), 432–444. 10.1006/brln.2001.2536
    https://doi.org/10.1006/brln.2001.2536 [Google Scholar]
  214. Lyalka, O. , Howard, D. , Morris, J. , & Nickels, L.
    (2020) Does producing semantically related words aid word retrieval in people with aphasia?Aphasiology, 34(2), 158–194. 10.1080/02687038.2018.1562149
    https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2018.1562149 [Google Scholar]
  215. Marcus, G. F.
    (1995) Children’s overregularization of English plurals: A quantitative analysis. Journal of Child Language, 22(2), 447–459. 10.1017/S0305000900009879
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000900009879 [Google Scholar]
  216. Marini, A. , Andreetta, S. , del Tin, S. , & Carlomagno, S.
    (2011) A multi-level approach to the analysis of narrative language in aphasia. Aphasiology, 25(11), 1372–1392. 10.1080/02687038.2011.584690
    https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2011.584690 [Google Scholar]
  217. Marshall, J.
    (2010) Classification of aphasia: Are there benefits for practice?Aphasiology, 24(3), 408–412. 10.1080/02687030802553688
    https://doi.org/10.1080/02687030802553688 [Google Scholar]
  218. Marshall, J. , Devane, N. , Edmonds, L. , Talbot, R. , Wilson, S. , Woolf, C. , & Zwart, N.
    (2018) Delivering word retrieval therapies for people with aphasia in a virtual communication environment. Aphasiology, 32(9), 1054–1074. 10.1080/02687038.2018.1488237
    https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2018.1488237 [Google Scholar]
  219. Martínez Insua, A. E.
    (1998) Existential there-constructions in present day English: A corpus-based study. Atlantis, 20(2), 107–131.
    [Google Scholar]
  220. Matthews, D. , Lieven, E. , Theakston, A. , & Tomasello, M.
    (2005) The role of frequency in the acquisition of English word order. Cognitive Development, 20(1), 121–136. 10.1016/j.cogdev.2004.08.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2004.08.001 [Google Scholar]
  221. Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research
    (n.d.) Aphasia. Mayo Clinic. Retrieved January 30, 2021, from https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/aphasia/symptoms-causes/syc-20369518
    [Google Scholar]
  222. McCann, C. , & Doleman, J.
    (2011) Verb retrieval in nonfluent aphasia: A replication of Edwards & Tucker, 2006. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 24(2), 237–248. 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2010.05.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneuroling.2010.05.001 [Google Scholar]
  223. McNeil, M. R. , Sung, J. E. , Yang, D. , Pratt, S. R. , Fossett, T. R. D. , Doyle, P. J. , & Pavelko, S.
    (2007) Comparing connected language elicitation procedures in persons with aphasia: Concurrent validation of the Story Retell Procedure. Aphasiology, 21(6–8), 775–790. 10.1080/02687030701189980
    https://doi.org/10.1080/02687030701189980 [Google Scholar]
  224. Menn, L.
    (1990) Agrammatism in English: Two case studies. In L. Menn , & L. K. Obler (Eds.), Agrammatic aphasia (pp. 117–178). John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/z.39.11men
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.39.11men [Google Scholar]
  225. (2010) The art and science of transcribing aphasic (and other) speech. In L. Scliar-Cabral (Ed.), Psycholinguistics: Scientific and technological challenges (pp. 24–43). EDIPUCRS.
    [Google Scholar]
  226. Menn, L. , & Duffield, C. J.
    (2013) Aphasias and theories of linguistic representation: Representing frequency, hierarchy, constructions, and sequential structure. WIREs: Cognitive Science, 4(6), 651–663. 10.1002/wcs.1257
    https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1257 [Google Scholar]
  227. Menn, L. , Ramsberger, G. , & Helm-Estabrooks, N.
    (1994) A linguistic communication measure for aphasic narratives. Aphasiology, 8(4), 343–359. 10.1080/02687039408248664
    https://doi.org/10.1080/02687039408248664 [Google Scholar]
  228. Middleton, E. L. , Schwartz, M. F. , Rawson, K. A. , Traut, H. , & Verkuilen, J. (2016) Towards a theory of learning for naming rehabilitation: Retrieval practice and spacing effects. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 59(5), 1111–1122. 10.1044/2016_JSLHR‑L‑15‑0303
    https://doi.org/10.1044/2016_JSLHR-L-15-0303 [Google Scholar]
  229. Moses, M. S. , Nickels, L. A. , & Sheard, C.
    (2004) Disentangling the web: Neologistic perseverative errors in jargon aphasia. Neurocase, 10(6), 452–461. 10.1080/13554790490894057
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13554790490894057 [Google Scholar]
  230. Murdoch, B. E.
    (2010) Acquired speech and language disorders: A neuroanatomical and functional neurological approach (2nd ed.). Wiley Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  231. Murphy, R.
    (2019) English grammar in use (5th ed.). Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  232. Musser, B. , Wilkinson, J. , Gilbert, T. , & Bokhour, B. G.
    (2015) Changes in identity after aphasic stroke: Implications for primary care. International Journal of Family Medicine, 2015, Article ID: 970345. 10.1155/2015/970345
    https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/970345 [Google Scholar]
  233. National Aphasia Association
    (n.d.) Aphasia FAQs. Retrieved January 30, 2021, from https://www.aphasia.org/aphasia-faqs/
    [Google Scholar]
  234. Nelson, G. , & Greenbaum, S.
    (2016) An introduction to English grammar (4th ed.). Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  235. Ochs, E.
    (1979) Transcription as theory. In E. Ochs , & B. Schieffelin (Eds.), Developmental pragmatics (pp. 43–72). Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  236. O’Halloran, R. , Carragher, M. , & Foster, A.
    (2017) The consequences of the consequences: The impact of the environment on people with aphasia over time. Topics in Language Disorders, 37(1), 85–100. 10.1097/TLD.0000000000000109
    https://doi.org/10.1097/TLD.0000000000000109 [Google Scholar]
  237. Olness, G. S. , Matteson, S. E. , & Stewart, C. T.
    (2010) “Let me tell you the point”: How speakers with aphasia assign prominence to information in narratives. Aphasiology, 24(6–8), 697–708. 10.1080/02687030903438524
    https://doi.org/10.1080/02687030903438524 [Google Scholar]
  238. Patterson, K. E. , & Shewell, C.
    (1987) Speak and spell: Dissociations and word-class effects. In M. Coltheart , R. Job , & G. Sartori (Eds.), The cognitive neuropsychology of language. Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  239. Perek, F.
    (2015) Argument structure in usage-based construction grammar: Experimental and corpus-based perspectives. John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/cal.17
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.17 [Google Scholar]
  240. (2016) Using distributional semantics to study syntactic productivity in diachrony: A case study. Linguistics, 54(1), 149–188. 10.1515/ling‑2015‑0043
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2015-0043 [Google Scholar]
  241. Pinker, S. , & Bloom, P.
    (1990) Natural language and natural selection. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 13(4), 707–726. 10.1017/S0140525X00081061
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00081061 [Google Scholar]
  242. Pullum, G. K. , & Scholz, B. C.
    (2002) Empirical assessment of stimulus poverty arguments. The Linguistic Review, 19(1–2), 9–50. 10.1515/tlir.19.1‑2.9
    https://doi.org/10.1515/tlir.19.1-2.9 [Google Scholar]
  243. Richardson, J. T. E.
    (2000) Clinical and neuropsychological aspects of closed head injury (2nd ed.). Psychology Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  244. Riches, N. G.
    (2013) Treating the passive in children with specific language impairment: A usage-based approach. Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 29(2), 155–169. 10.1177/0265659012466667
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0265659012466667 [Google Scholar]
  245. Rispoli, M. , Hadley, P. A. , & Holt, J. K.
    (2009) The growth of tense productivity. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 52(4), 930–944. 10.1044/1092‑4388(2009/08‑0079)
    https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2009/08-0079) [Google Scholar]
  246. Rochon, E. , Saffran, E. M. , Berndt, R. S. , & Schwartz, M. F. (2000) Quantitative analysis of aphasic sentence production: Further development and new data. Brain and Language, 72(3), 193–218. 10.1006/brln.1999.2285
    https://doi.org/10.1006/brln.1999.2285 [Google Scholar]
  247. Routhier, S. , Bier, N. , & Macoir, J.
    (2015) The contrast between cueing and/or observation in therapy for verb retrieval in post-stroke aphasia. Journal of Communication Disorders, 54, 43–55. 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2015.01.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcomdis.2015.01.003 [Google Scholar]
  248. Royal College of Speech and Language Therapists
    (2014) RCSLT resource manual for commissioning and planning services for SLCN: Aphasia. https://docplayer.net/30347044-Rcslt-resource-manual-for-commissioning-and-planning-services-for-slcn.html
    [Google Scholar]
  249. Sacks, H. , Schegloff, E. A. , & Jefferson, G.
    (1974) A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50(4), 696–735. 10.1353/lan.1974.0010
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1974.0010 [Google Scholar]
  250. Saffran, E. M. , Berndt, R. S. , & Schwartz, M. F.
    (1989) The quantitative analysis of agrammatic production: Procedure and data. Brain and Language, 37(3), 440–479. 10.1016/0093‑934X(89)90030‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-934X(89)90030-8 [Google Scholar]
  251. Saffran, E. M. , Schwartz, M. F. , & Marin, O. S. M.
    (1980) The word order problem in agrammatism. II. Production. Brain and Language, 10(2), 263–280. 10.1016/0093‑934X(80)90056‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-934X(80)90056-5 [Google Scholar]
  252. Schmid, H-J.
    (2015) A blueprint of the Entrenchment-and-Conventionalization Model. Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association, 3, 1–27. 10.1515/gcla‑2015‑0002
    https://doi.org/10.1515/gcla-2015-0002 [Google Scholar]
  253. Schuchard, J. , & Middleton, E. L.
    (2018) The roles of retrieval practice versus errorless learning in strengthening lexical access in aphasia. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 61(7), 1700–1717. 10.1044/2018_JSLHR‑L‑17‑0352
    https://doi.org/10.1044/2018_JSLHR-L-17-0352 [Google Scholar]
  254. Siemund, P.
    (2018) Speech acts and clause types: English in a cross-linguistic context. Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  255. Sinclair, J.
    (Ed.) (1990) Collins Cobuild English grammar. Harper Collins.
    [Google Scholar]
  256. Siyambalapitiya, S. , Chenery, H. J. , & Copland, D. A.
    (2013) Lexical-semantic representation in bilingual aphasia: Findings from semantic priming and cognate repetition priming. Aphasiology, 27(11), 1302–1321. 10.1080/02687038.2013.817521
    https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2013.817521 [Google Scholar]
  257. Slobin, D. I.
    (1991) Aphasia in Turkish: Speech production in Broca’s and Wernicke’s patients. Brain and Language, 41(2), 149–164. 10.1016/0093‑934X(91)90150‑Y
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-934X(91)90150-Y [Google Scholar]
  258. Smith, M. C.
    (2015) Word categories. In J. R. Taylor (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of the word (pp. 175–195). Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  259. Sotiropoulou, C. , Conroy, P. , & Lambon-Ralph, M.
    (2015) The impact of accuracy-focused and speed-focused therapy on word retrieval in picture naming and composite picture descriptions in post-stroke aphasia. International Journal of Stroke, 10(5), 65–65.
    [Google Scholar]
  260. Street, J. , & Dąbrowska, E.
    (2014) Lexically specific knowledge and individual differences in adult native speakers’ processing of the English passive. Applied Psycholinguistics, 35(1), 97–118. 10.1017/S0142716412000367
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716412000367 [Google Scholar]
  261. Stroke Association
    (n.d.) Rebuilding lives: Alisha's story. Retrieved January 28, 2021, from https://www.stroke.org.uk/rebuilding-lives/alisha
    [Google Scholar]
  262. Swan, M.
    (1995) Practical English usage (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  263. Swinburn, K. , Porter, G. , & Howard, D.
    (2004) Comprehensive Aphasia Test. Psychology Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  264. Svorou, S.
    (2010) Relational constructions in Cognitive Linguistics. In D. Geeraerts , & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 726–752). Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  265. Tactus Therapy Solutions Ltd (n.d.-a) How to: Verb Network Strengthening Treatment (VNeST). Tactus Therapy. Retrieved January 22, 2021, from https://tactustherapy.com/vnest-verb-network-strengthening-app/
    [Google Scholar]
  266. (n.d.-b) What is Broca’s aphasia?Tactus Therapy. Retrieved January 17, 2021, from https://tactustherapy.com/brocas-aphasia-nonfluent-video/
    [Google Scholar]
  267. (n.d.-c) What is fluent aphasia?Tactus Therapy. Retrieved January 17, 2021, from https://tactustherapy.com/what-is-fluent-aphasia-video/
    [Google Scholar]
  268. Taylor, J. R.
    (2012) The mental corpus: How language is represented in the mind. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199290802.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199290802.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  269. Theakston, A. , & Lieven, E.
    (2017) Multiunit sequences in first language acquisition. Topics in Cognitive Science, 9(2), 588–603. 10.1111/tops.12268
    https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12268 [Google Scholar]
  270. Thompson, C. K. , Lange, K. L. , Schneider, S. L. , & Shapiro, L. P.
    (1997) Agrammatic and non-brain-damaged subjects' verb and verb argument structure production. Aphasiology, 11(4–5), 473–490. 10.1080/02687039708248485
    https://doi.org/10.1080/02687039708248485 [Google Scholar]
  271. Thompson, C. K. , Riley, E. A. , den Ouden, D. , Meltzer-Asscher, A. , & Lukic, S.
    (2013) Training verb argument structure production in agrammatic aphasia: Behavioural and neural recovery patterns. Cortex49(9), 2358–2376. 10.1016/j.cortex.2013.02.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2013.02.003 [Google Scholar]
  272. Thompson, J. , & McKeever, M.
    (2014) The impact of stroke aphasia on health and well-being, and appropriate nursing interventions: An exploration using the Theory of Human Scale Development. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 23(3–4), 410–420. 10.1111/j.1365‑2702.2012.04237.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04237.x [Google Scholar]
  273. Thompson, S. A. , & Hopper, P.
    (2001) Transitivity, clause structure, and argument structure: Evidence from conversation. In J. Bybee , & P. Hopper (Eds.), Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure (pp. 26–60). John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/tsl.45.03tho
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.45.03tho [Google Scholar]
  274. Tomasello, M.
    (1992) First verbs: A case study of early grammatical development. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511527678
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511527678 [Google Scholar]
  275. (1995) Language is not an instinct. Cognitive Development, 10(1), 131–56. 10.1016/0885‑2014(95)90021‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0885-2014(95)90021-7 [Google Scholar]
  276. (2003) Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  277. (2015) The usage-based theory of language acquisition. In E. Bavin (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of child language (2nd ed.) (pp. 89–106). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781316095829.005
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316095829.005 [Google Scholar]
  278. Turkstra, L. S. , Coelho, C. , & Ylvisaker, M.
    (2005) The use of standardized tests for individuals with cognitive-communication disorders. Seminars in Speech and Language, 26(4), 215–222. 10.1055/s‑2005‑922101
    https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2005-922101 [Google Scholar]
  279. Turkstra, L. , & Thompson, C. K.
    (2011) Agrammatism. In J. S. Kreutzer , J. DeLuca , & B. Caplan (Eds.), Encyclopedia of clinical neuropsychology. Springer. 10.1007/978‑0‑387‑79948‑3_849
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-79948-3_849 [Google Scholar]
  280. van Ewijk, L. , & Avrutin, S.
    (2016) Lexical access in nonfluent aphasia: A bit more on reduced processing. Aphasiology, 30(11), 1264–1282. 10.1080/02687038.2015.1135867
    https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2015.1135867 [Google Scholar]
  281. Van Lancker Sidtis, D.
    (2004) When novel sentences spoken or heard for the first time in the history of the universe are not enough: Toward a dual-process of language production. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 39(1), 1–44. 10.1080/13682820310001601080
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13682820310001601080 [Google Scholar]
  282. Van Lancker Sidtis, D. , & Postman, W. A. (2006) Formulaic expressions in spontaneous speech of left- and right-hemisphere-damaged subjects. Aphasiology, 20(5), 411–426. 10.1080/02687030500538148
    https://doi.org/10.1080/02687030500538148 [Google Scholar]
  283. Verspoor, M. , & Sauter, K.
    (2000) English sentence analysis: An introductory course. John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/z.100
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.100 [Google Scholar]
  284. Wallesch, C-W. , & Blanken, G.
    (2000) Recurring utterances: How, where, and why are they generated?Brain and Language, 71(1), 255–257. 10.1006/brln.1999.2263
    https://doi.org/10.1006/brln.1999.2263 [Google Scholar]
  285. Wang, H. , & Thompson, C. K.
    (2016) Assessing syntactic deficits in Chinese Broca’s aphasia using the Northwestern Assessment of Verbs and Sentences-Chinese (NAVS-C). Aphasiology, 30(7), 815–840. 10.1080/02687038.2015.1111995
    https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2015.1111995 [Google Scholar]
  286. Webelhuth, G.
    (2011) Motivating non-canonicality in Construction Grammar: The case of locative inversion. Cognitive Linguistics, 22(1), 81–105. 10.1515/cogl.2011.004
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.2011.004 [Google Scholar]
  287. Webster, J. , Franklin, S. , & Howard, D.
    (2001) An investigation of the interaction between thematic and phrasal structure in nonfluent agrammatic subjects. Brain and Language, 78(2), 197–211. 10.1006/brln.2001.2460
    https://doi.org/10.1006/brln.2001.2460 [Google Scholar]
  288. (2007) An analysis of thematic and phrasal structure in people with aphasia: What more can we learn from the story of Cinderella?Journal of Neurolinguistics, 20(5), 363–394. 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2007.02.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneuroling.2007.02.002 [Google Scholar]
  289. Webster, J. , & Whitworth, A.
    (2012) Treating verbs in aphasia: Exploring the impact of therapy at the single word and sentence levels. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 47(6), 619–636. 10.1111/j.1460‑6984.2012.00174.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-6984.2012.00174.x [Google Scholar]
  290. Wells, B. , & Whiteside, S.
    (2008) Prosodic impairments. In M. J. Ball , M. R. Perkins , N. Müller , & S. Howard (Eds.), The handbook of clinical linguistics (pp. 549–567). Blackwell Publishing Ltd. 10.1002/9781444301007.ch34
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444301007.ch34 [Google Scholar]
  291. Wernicke, C.
    (1874) Der aphasische Symptomencomplex: Eine psychologische Studie auf anatomischer Basis. Cohn and Weigert.
    [Google Scholar]
  292. Whitworth, A. , Webster, J. , & Howard, D.
    (2014) A cognitive neuropsychological approach to assessment and intervention in aphasia: A clinician's guide (2nd ed.). Psychology Press Ltd. 10.4324/9781315852447
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315852447 [Google Scholar]
  293. (2015) Argument structure deficit in aphasia: It’s not all about verbs. Aphasiology, 29(12), 1426–1447. 10.1080/02687038.2015.1037823
    https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2015.1037823 [Google Scholar]
  294. Wieling, M.
    (2012) A quantitative approach to social and geographical dialect variation [Doctoral dissertation, University of Groningen]. University of Groningen Research Database. https://www.rug.nl/research/portal/publications/a-quantitative-approach-to-social-and-geographical-dialect-variation(cd637817-572f-4826-98c1-08272775fb64).html
    [Google Scholar]
  295. Wilkinson, R. , Lock, S. , Bryan, K. , & Sage, K.
    (2011) Interaction-focused intervention for acquired language disorders: Facilitating mutual adaptation in couples where one partner has aphasia. International Journal of Speech and Language Pathology, 13(1), 74–87. 10.3109/17549507.2011.551140
    https://doi.org/10.3109/17549507.2011.551140 [Google Scholar]
  296. Wilson, S. M. , Eriksson, D. K. , Schneck, S. M. , & Lucanie, J. M.
    (2018) A quick aphasia battery for efficient, reliable, and multidimensional assessment of language function. PLOS ONE13(2), e0192773. 10.1371/journal.pone.0192773
    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0192773 [Google Scholar]
  297. Winkler, S.
    (2012) The information structure of English. In M. Krifka , & R. Musan (Eds.), The expression of information structure (pp. 71–94). Mouton De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110261608.71
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110261608.71 [Google Scholar]
  298. Wood, J. M. (2007) Understanding and computing Cohen’s Kappa: A tutorial. WebPsychEmpiricist. http://mywpe.info/vault/wood07/Wood07.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  299. Wray, A.
    (2002) Formulaic language and the lexicon. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511519772
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511519772 [Google Scholar]
  300. Wulff, S. , & Ellis, N. C.
    (2018) Usage-based approaches to second language acquisition. In D. Miller , F. Bayram , J. Rothman , & L. Serratrice (Eds.), Bilingual cognition and language: The state of the science across its subfields (pp. 37–56). John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/sibil.54.03wul
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.54.03wul [Google Scholar]
  301. Zimmerer, V. , Dąbrowska, E. , Romanowski, C. A. J. , Blank, C. , & Varley, R. A.
    (2014) Preservation of passive constructions in a patient with primary progressive aphasia. Cortex, 50, 7–18. 10.1016/j.cortex.2013.09.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2013.09.007 [Google Scholar]
  302. Zimmerer, V. C. , Newman, L. , Thomson, R. , Coleman, M. , & Varley, R. A.
    (2018) Automated analysis of language production in aphasia and right-hemisphere damage: Frequency and collocation strength. Aphasiology, 32(11), 1267–1283. 10.1080/02687038.2018.1497138
    https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2018.1497138 [Google Scholar]
-contentType:Journal -contentType:Chapter
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error