1887

Chapter 6. “Why do you insist that Alana is not real?”

Visitors’ perceptions of the fictionality of Andi and Lance Olsen’s ‘there’s no place like time’ exhibition

image of Chapter 6. “Why do you insist that Alana is not real?”
  • Affiliations: 1: Sheffield Hallam University

References

  1. Abraham, A.
    2013 The world according to me: Personal relevance and the media prefrontal cortext. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience7: 1–4. 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00341
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00341 [Google Scholar]
  2. Abraham, A. & von Cramon, D. Y.
    2009 Reality=relevance? Insights from spontaneous modulations of the brain’s default network when telling apart reality from fiction. PLoS One4(3): 1–9. 10.1371/journal.pone.0004741
    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0004741 [Google Scholar]
  3. Abraham, A. , von Cramon, D. Y. & Schubotz, R. I.
    2008 Meeting George Bush versus meeting Cinderella: The neural response when telling apart what is real from what is fictional in the context of our reality. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience20(6): 965–976. 10.1162/jocn.2008.20059
    https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2008.20059 [Google Scholar]
  4. Altmann, U. , Bohrn, I. C. , Lubrich, O. , Menninghaus, W. & Jacobs, A. M.
    2014 Fact vs fiction – How paratextual information shapes our reading process. SCAN9: 22–29.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bal, M.
    1996Double Exposures: The Subject of Cultural Analysis. New York; London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Bitgood, S. 2011Social Design in Museums: The Psychology of Visitor Studies: Collected Essays Volume One. Edinburgh: MuseumsEtc.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Browse, S. , Gibbons, A. & Hatavara, M.
    2019 Real fictions: Fictionality, factuality, and narrative strategies in contemporary storytelling. Narrative Inquiry29(2): 245–267. 10.1075/ni.19025.bro
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.19025.bro [Google Scholar]
  8. Bunce, L. & Harris, P. L.
    2014 Is it real? The development of judgments about authenticity and ontological status. Cognitive Development32: 110–119. 10.1016/j.cogdev.2014.10.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2014.10.001 [Google Scholar]
  9. Cohn, Dorrit.
    1999The Distinction of Fiction. Baltimore; London: The John Hopkins University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Consoli, G.
    2018 Preliminary steps towards a cognitive theory of fiction and its effects. Journal of Cultural Cognitive Science2: 85–100. 10.1007/s41809‑018‑0019‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s41809-018-0019-5 [Google Scholar]
  11. Cook, C. & Sobel, D. M.
    2011 Children’s beliefs about the fantasy/reality status of hypothesized machines. Developmental Science14:1–8. 10.1111/j.1467‑7687.2009.00949.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2009.00949.x [Google Scholar]
  12. Corriveau, K. H. & Harris, P. L.
    2015 Children’s developing realization that some stories are true: Links to understanding of beliefs and signs. Cognitive Development34: 76–87. 10.1016/j.cogdev.2014.12.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2014.12.005 [Google Scholar]
  13. Corriveau, K. H. , Kim, A. L. , Schwalen, C. E. & Harris, P. L.
    2009 Abraham Lincoln and Harry Potter: Children’s differentiation between historical and fantasy characters. Cognition112: 213–225. 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.08.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2009.08.007 [Google Scholar]
  14. Eakin, P. J.
    1992Touching the World: Reference in Autobiography. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. 10.1515/9781400820641
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400820641 [Google Scholar]
  15. Fludernik, M.
    2018 The fiction of the rise of fictionality. Poetics Today39(1): 67–92. 10.1215/03335372‑4265071
    https://doi.org/10.1215/03335372-4265071 [Google Scholar]
  16. Gavins, J.
    2007Text World Theory: An introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. 10.3366/edinburgh/9780748622993.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9780748622993.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  17. Gibbons, A.
    2012Multimodality, Cognition, and Experimental Literature. London; New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203803219
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203803219 [Google Scholar]
  18. 2019a Entropology and the end of nature in Lance Olsen’s Theories of Forgetting . Textual Practice33(2): 280–299. 10.1080/0950236X.2018.1509271
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0950236X.2018.1509271 [Google Scholar]
  19. 2019bUsing Life and abusing life in the trial of Ahmed Naji: Text World Theory, Adab, and the Ethics of Reading. Journal of Language and Discrimination3(1): 4–31. 10.1558/jld.35809
    https://doi.org/10.1558/jld.35809 [Google Scholar]
  20. 2019c The “dissolving margins” of Elena Ferrante and the Neapolitan Novels: A cognitive approach to fictionality, authorial intentionality, and autofictional reading strategies. Narrative Inquiry29(2): 389–415. 10.1075/ni.19017.gib
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.19017.gib [Google Scholar]
  21. forthcoming 2021 Interpreting fictionality and ontological blurrings in and between Lance Olsen’s Theories of Forgetting and there’s no place like time . Style 55 (2).
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Gilbert, D. T.
    1991 How mental systems believe. American Psychologist46(2): 107–119. 10.1037/0003‑066X.46.2.107
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.46.2.107 [Google Scholar]
  23. Gilbert, D. T. , Malone, P. S. & Krull, D. S.
    1993 Unbelieving the unbelievable: Some problems in the rejection of false information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology59(4): 601–613. 10.1037/0022‑3514.59.4.601
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.59.4.601 [Google Scholar]
  24. Gilbert, D. T. , Tafarodi, R. W. & Malone, P. S.
    1990 You can’t unbelieve everything you read. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology65(2): 221–233. 10.1037/0022‑3514.65.2.221
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.65.2.221 [Google Scholar]
  25. Gorman, D.
    2005 Fiction, Theories of. InRoutledge Encyclopedia of Narrative Theory, D. Herman , M. Jahn & M.-L. Ryan (eds), 163–167. London; New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Green, M.
    2004 Transportation into narrative worlds: The role of prior knowledge and perceived realism. Discourse Processes38(3): 247–266. 10.1207/s15326950dp3802_5
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326950dp3802_5 [Google Scholar]
  27. Green, M. & Brock, T. C.
    2000 The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology79(5): 701–721. 10.1037/0022‑3514.79.5.701
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.79.5.701 [Google Scholar]
  28. Green, M. , Chatham, C. & Sestir, M. A.
    2012 Emotion and transportation into fact and fiction. Scientific Study of Literature2(1): 37–59. 10.1075/ssol.2.1.03gre
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ssol.2.1.03gre [Google Scholar]
  29. Green, M. , Garst, J. , Brock, T. C. & Chung, S. 2006 Fact versus fiction labeling: Persuasion parity despite heightened scrutiny of fact. Media Psychology8: 267–285. 10.1207/s1532785xmep0803_4
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532785xmep0803_4 [Google Scholar]
  30. Hartung, F. , Withers, P. , Hagoort, P. & Willems, R. M.
    2017. When fiction is just as real as fact: No difference in reading behavior between stories believed to be based on true or fictional events. Frontiers in Psychology8 (article 1618):1–14.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Leslie, A. M.
    2001 Theory of Mind. InInternational Encylopedia of the Social & Behavioural Sciences, N. J. Smelser & P. B. Baltes (eds), 15652–15656. Pergamon. Online. 10.1016/B0‑08‑043076‑7/01640‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-043076-7/01640-5 [Google Scholar]
  32. Mar, R. A. & Oatley, K.
    2008 The function of fiction is the abstraction and simulation of social experience. Perspectives on Psychological Science3(3): 173–192. 10.1111/j.1745‑6924.2008.00073.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6924.2008.00073.x [Google Scholar]
  33. Martarelli, C. S. , Mast, F. W. , Läge, D. & Roebers, C. M.
    2015 The distinction between real and fictional worlds: Investigating individual differences in fantasy understanding. Cognitive Development36: 111–126. 10.1016/j.cogdev.2015.10.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2015.10.001 [Google Scholar]
  34. Nielsen, H. S. , Phelan, J. & Walsh, R.
    2015 Ten theses about fictionality. Narrative23(1): 61–73. 10.1353/nar.2015.0005
    https://doi.org/10.1353/nar.2015.0005 [Google Scholar]
  35. Olsen, A. & Olsen, L.
    2018There’s no place like time [exhibition]. Snite Museum of Art , University of Notre Dame, South Bend, IL, 1 September–1 December 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Olsen, L.
    2014Theories of Forgetting. Tuscaloosa, AL: The University of Alabama Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. 2016There’s no place like time. Lake Forest, IL: Now Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Pettersson, T.
    2016 Fictionality and the empirical study of literature. CLCWeb: Comparative Literature and Culture18(2). https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/clcweb/vol18/iss2/3/ (19 November 2019).
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Phelan, J.
    2009 Cognitive narratology, rhetorical narratology, and interpretive disagreement: A response to Alan Palmer’s Analysis of Enduring Love . Style43(3): 309–321.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Prentice, D. A. & Gerrig, R. J.
    1999 Exploring the boundary between fiction and reality. InDual-Process Theories in Social Psychology, S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (eds), 529–546. New York: Guilford Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Samuels, A. & Taylor, M.
    1994 Children’s ability to distinguish fantasy events from real-life events. British Journal of Developmental Psychology12(4): 417–427. 10.1111/j.2044‑835X.1994.tb00644.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-835X.1994.tb00644.x [Google Scholar]
  42. Sayfan, L. & Lagattut, K. H.
    2008 Grownups are not afraid of scary stuff, but kids are: Young children’s and adult’s reasoning about children’s, infant’s, and adult’s fears. Child Development79: 821–835. 10.1111/j.1467‑8624.2008.01161.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01161.x [Google Scholar]
  43. Schaeffer, J-M.
    2012 Fictional vs. factual narration. InThe Living Handbook of Narratology, P. Hühn , J. Pier , W. Schmid & J. Schönert (eds). Hamburg: Hamburg University www.lhn.uni-hamburg.de/article/fictional-vs-factual-narration (19 November 2019).
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Scharine, A. A. & McBeath, M. K.
    2002 Right-handers and Americans favor turning to the right. Human Factors44(1): 248–256. 10.1518/0018720024497916
    https://doi.org/10.1518/0018720024497916 [Google Scholar]
  45. Sharron, T. & Woolley, J. D.
    2004 Do monsters dream? Young children’s understanding of the fantasy/reality distinction. British Journal of Developmental Psychology22: 293–310. 10.1348/026151004323044627
    https://doi.org/10.1348/026151004323044627 [Google Scholar]
  46. Shtulman, A. & Carey, S. A.
    2007 Improbable or impossible: How children reason about the possibility of extraordinary events. Child Development78: 1015–1032. 10.1111/j.1467‑8624.2007.01047.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01047.x [Google Scholar]
  47. Skolnick. D. & Bloom, P.
    2006 What does Batman think about SpongeBob? Children’s understanding of the fantasy/reality distinction. Cognition101(1): B9–B18. 10.1016/j.cognition.2005.10.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2005.10.001 [Google Scholar]
  48. Sperduti, M. , Arcangeli, M. , Makowski, D. , Wantzen, P. , Zalla, T. , Lemaire, S. , Dokic, J. , Pelletier, J. & Piolino, P.
    2016 The paradox of fiction: Emotional response toward fiction and the modulatory role of self-relevance. Acta Psychologica165: 53–59. 10.1016/j.actpsy.2016.02.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2016.02.003 [Google Scholar]
  49. Stockwell, P.
    2009Texture: A Cognitive Aesthetics of Reading. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Stockwell, P. 2016 The texture of authorial invention. InWorld-Building: Discourse in the Mind, J. Gavins & E. Lahey (eds), 147–163. London, New York: Bloomsbury.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Van Reet, J. , Pinkham, A. M. & Lillard, A. S.
    2015 The effect of realistic context on ontological judgments of novel entities. Cognitive Development34: 88–98. 10.1016/j.cogdev.2014.12.010
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2014.12.010 [Google Scholar]
  52. Werth, P.
    1999Text Worlds: Representing Conceptual Space in Discourse. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Whiteley, S. & Canning, P.
    2017 Reader response research in stylistics. Language and Literature26(2): 71–87. 10.1177/0963947017704724
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0963947017704724 [Google Scholar]
  54. Woolley, J. D. , Cornelius, C. A. & Lacy, W.
    2011 Developmental changes in the use of supernatural explanations for unusual events. Journal of Cognition and Culture11: 311–337. 10.1163/156853711X591279
    https://doi.org/10.1163/156853711X591279 [Google Scholar]
  55. Woolley, J. D. & Cox, V.
    2007 Development of beliefs about storybook reality. Developmental Science10: 681–693. 10.1111/j.1467‑7687.2007.00612.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2007.00612.x [Google Scholar]
  56. Woolley, J. D. & Ghossaint, M. E.
    2013 Revisiting the fantasy-reality distinction: Children as naïve skeptics. Child Development84(5): 1495–1510. 10.1111/cdev.12081
    https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12081 [Google Scholar]
  57. Woolley, J. D. , Ma, L. & Lopez-Mobilia, G.
    2011 Development of the use of conversational cues to assess reality status. Journal of Cognition and Development12: 537–555. 10.1080/15248372.2011.554929
    https://doi.org/10.1080/15248372.2011.554929 [Google Scholar]
  58. Woolley J. D. & van Reet, J.
    2006 Effects of context on judgments concerning the reality status of novel entities. Child Development77(6): 1778–1793. 10.1111/j.1467‑8624.2006.00973.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2006.00973.x [Google Scholar]
  59. Wright, J. C. , Huston, A. L. , Reitz, A. L. & Piemyat, S.
    1994 Young children’s perceptions of television reality: Determinants and developmental differences. Developmental Psychology30: 229–239. 10.1037/0012‑1649.30.2.229
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.30.2.229 [Google Scholar]
  60. Yang, J. & Xue, J.
    2014 Distinguishing different fictional worlds during sentence comprehension: ERP evidence. Psychophysiology51: 42–51. 10.1111/psyp.12149
    https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.12149 [Google Scholar]
  61. 2015 Reality/fiction distinction and fiction/fiction distinction during sentence comprehension. Universal Journal of Psychology3(6): 165–175. 10.13189/ujp.2015.030603
    https://doi.org/10.13189/ujp.2015.030603 [Google Scholar]
  62. Zwaan, R. A.
    1994 Effect of genre expectations on text comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition20: 920–933.
    [Google Scholar]

References

  1. Abraham, A.
    2013 The world according to me: Personal relevance and the media prefrontal cortext. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience7: 1–4. 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00341
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00341 [Google Scholar]
  2. Abraham, A. & von Cramon, D. Y.
    2009 Reality=relevance? Insights from spontaneous modulations of the brain’s default network when telling apart reality from fiction. PLoS One4(3): 1–9. 10.1371/journal.pone.0004741
    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0004741 [Google Scholar]
  3. Abraham, A. , von Cramon, D. Y. & Schubotz, R. I.
    2008 Meeting George Bush versus meeting Cinderella: The neural response when telling apart what is real from what is fictional in the context of our reality. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience20(6): 965–976. 10.1162/jocn.2008.20059
    https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2008.20059 [Google Scholar]
  4. Altmann, U. , Bohrn, I. C. , Lubrich, O. , Menninghaus, W. & Jacobs, A. M.
    2014 Fact vs fiction – How paratextual information shapes our reading process. SCAN9: 22–29.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bal, M.
    1996Double Exposures: The Subject of Cultural Analysis. New York; London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Bitgood, S. 2011Social Design in Museums: The Psychology of Visitor Studies: Collected Essays Volume One. Edinburgh: MuseumsEtc.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Browse, S. , Gibbons, A. & Hatavara, M.
    2019 Real fictions: Fictionality, factuality, and narrative strategies in contemporary storytelling. Narrative Inquiry29(2): 245–267. 10.1075/ni.19025.bro
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.19025.bro [Google Scholar]
  8. Bunce, L. & Harris, P. L.
    2014 Is it real? The development of judgments about authenticity and ontological status. Cognitive Development32: 110–119. 10.1016/j.cogdev.2014.10.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2014.10.001 [Google Scholar]
  9. Cohn, Dorrit.
    1999The Distinction of Fiction. Baltimore; London: The John Hopkins University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Consoli, G.
    2018 Preliminary steps towards a cognitive theory of fiction and its effects. Journal of Cultural Cognitive Science2: 85–100. 10.1007/s41809‑018‑0019‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s41809-018-0019-5 [Google Scholar]
  11. Cook, C. & Sobel, D. M.
    2011 Children’s beliefs about the fantasy/reality status of hypothesized machines. Developmental Science14:1–8. 10.1111/j.1467‑7687.2009.00949.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2009.00949.x [Google Scholar]
  12. Corriveau, K. H. & Harris, P. L.
    2015 Children’s developing realization that some stories are true: Links to understanding of beliefs and signs. Cognitive Development34: 76–87. 10.1016/j.cogdev.2014.12.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2014.12.005 [Google Scholar]
  13. Corriveau, K. H. , Kim, A. L. , Schwalen, C. E. & Harris, P. L.
    2009 Abraham Lincoln and Harry Potter: Children’s differentiation between historical and fantasy characters. Cognition112: 213–225. 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.08.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2009.08.007 [Google Scholar]
  14. Eakin, P. J.
    1992Touching the World: Reference in Autobiography. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. 10.1515/9781400820641
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400820641 [Google Scholar]
  15. Fludernik, M.
    2018 The fiction of the rise of fictionality. Poetics Today39(1): 67–92. 10.1215/03335372‑4265071
    https://doi.org/10.1215/03335372-4265071 [Google Scholar]
  16. Gavins, J.
    2007Text World Theory: An introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. 10.3366/edinburgh/9780748622993.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9780748622993.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  17. Gibbons, A.
    2012Multimodality, Cognition, and Experimental Literature. London; New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203803219
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203803219 [Google Scholar]
  18. 2019a Entropology and the end of nature in Lance Olsen’s Theories of Forgetting . Textual Practice33(2): 280–299. 10.1080/0950236X.2018.1509271
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0950236X.2018.1509271 [Google Scholar]
  19. 2019bUsing Life and abusing life in the trial of Ahmed Naji: Text World Theory, Adab, and the Ethics of Reading. Journal of Language and Discrimination3(1): 4–31. 10.1558/jld.35809
    https://doi.org/10.1558/jld.35809 [Google Scholar]
  20. 2019c The “dissolving margins” of Elena Ferrante and the Neapolitan Novels: A cognitive approach to fictionality, authorial intentionality, and autofictional reading strategies. Narrative Inquiry29(2): 389–415. 10.1075/ni.19017.gib
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.19017.gib [Google Scholar]
  21. forthcoming 2021 Interpreting fictionality and ontological blurrings in and between Lance Olsen’s Theories of Forgetting and there’s no place like time . Style 55 (2).
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Gilbert, D. T.
    1991 How mental systems believe. American Psychologist46(2): 107–119. 10.1037/0003‑066X.46.2.107
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.46.2.107 [Google Scholar]
  23. Gilbert, D. T. , Malone, P. S. & Krull, D. S.
    1993 Unbelieving the unbelievable: Some problems in the rejection of false information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology59(4): 601–613. 10.1037/0022‑3514.59.4.601
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.59.4.601 [Google Scholar]
  24. Gilbert, D. T. , Tafarodi, R. W. & Malone, P. S.
    1990 You can’t unbelieve everything you read. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology65(2): 221–233. 10.1037/0022‑3514.65.2.221
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.65.2.221 [Google Scholar]
  25. Gorman, D.
    2005 Fiction, Theories of. InRoutledge Encyclopedia of Narrative Theory, D. Herman , M. Jahn & M.-L. Ryan (eds), 163–167. London; New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Green, M.
    2004 Transportation into narrative worlds: The role of prior knowledge and perceived realism. Discourse Processes38(3): 247–266. 10.1207/s15326950dp3802_5
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326950dp3802_5 [Google Scholar]
  27. Green, M. & Brock, T. C.
    2000 The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology79(5): 701–721. 10.1037/0022‑3514.79.5.701
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.79.5.701 [Google Scholar]
  28. Green, M. , Chatham, C. & Sestir, M. A.
    2012 Emotion and transportation into fact and fiction. Scientific Study of Literature2(1): 37–59. 10.1075/ssol.2.1.03gre
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ssol.2.1.03gre [Google Scholar]
  29. Green, M. , Garst, J. , Brock, T. C. & Chung, S. 2006 Fact versus fiction labeling: Persuasion parity despite heightened scrutiny of fact. Media Psychology8: 267–285. 10.1207/s1532785xmep0803_4
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532785xmep0803_4 [Google Scholar]
  30. Hartung, F. , Withers, P. , Hagoort, P. & Willems, R. M.
    2017. When fiction is just as real as fact: No difference in reading behavior between stories believed to be based on true or fictional events. Frontiers in Psychology8 (article 1618):1–14.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Leslie, A. M.
    2001 Theory of Mind. InInternational Encylopedia of the Social & Behavioural Sciences, N. J. Smelser & P. B. Baltes (eds), 15652–15656. Pergamon. Online. 10.1016/B0‑08‑043076‑7/01640‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-043076-7/01640-5 [Google Scholar]
  32. Mar, R. A. & Oatley, K.
    2008 The function of fiction is the abstraction and simulation of social experience. Perspectives on Psychological Science3(3): 173–192. 10.1111/j.1745‑6924.2008.00073.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6924.2008.00073.x [Google Scholar]
  33. Martarelli, C. S. , Mast, F. W. , Läge, D. & Roebers, C. M.
    2015 The distinction between real and fictional worlds: Investigating individual differences in fantasy understanding. Cognitive Development36: 111–126. 10.1016/j.cogdev.2015.10.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2015.10.001 [Google Scholar]
  34. Nielsen, H. S. , Phelan, J. & Walsh, R.
    2015 Ten theses about fictionality. Narrative23(1): 61–73. 10.1353/nar.2015.0005
    https://doi.org/10.1353/nar.2015.0005 [Google Scholar]
  35. Olsen, A. & Olsen, L.
    2018There’s no place like time [exhibition]. Snite Museum of Art , University of Notre Dame, South Bend, IL, 1 September–1 December 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Olsen, L.
    2014Theories of Forgetting. Tuscaloosa, AL: The University of Alabama Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. 2016There’s no place like time. Lake Forest, IL: Now Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Pettersson, T.
    2016 Fictionality and the empirical study of literature. CLCWeb: Comparative Literature and Culture18(2). https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/clcweb/vol18/iss2/3/ (19 November 2019).
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Phelan, J.
    2009 Cognitive narratology, rhetorical narratology, and interpretive disagreement: A response to Alan Palmer’s Analysis of Enduring Love . Style43(3): 309–321.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Prentice, D. A. & Gerrig, R. J.
    1999 Exploring the boundary between fiction and reality. InDual-Process Theories in Social Psychology, S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (eds), 529–546. New York: Guilford Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Samuels, A. & Taylor, M.
    1994 Children’s ability to distinguish fantasy events from real-life events. British Journal of Developmental Psychology12(4): 417–427. 10.1111/j.2044‑835X.1994.tb00644.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-835X.1994.tb00644.x [Google Scholar]
  42. Sayfan, L. & Lagattut, K. H.
    2008 Grownups are not afraid of scary stuff, but kids are: Young children’s and adult’s reasoning about children’s, infant’s, and adult’s fears. Child Development79: 821–835. 10.1111/j.1467‑8624.2008.01161.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01161.x [Google Scholar]
  43. Schaeffer, J-M.
    2012 Fictional vs. factual narration. InThe Living Handbook of Narratology, P. Hühn , J. Pier , W. Schmid & J. Schönert (eds). Hamburg: Hamburg University www.lhn.uni-hamburg.de/article/fictional-vs-factual-narration (19 November 2019).
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Scharine, A. A. & McBeath, M. K.
    2002 Right-handers and Americans favor turning to the right. Human Factors44(1): 248–256. 10.1518/0018720024497916
    https://doi.org/10.1518/0018720024497916 [Google Scholar]
  45. Sharron, T. & Woolley, J. D.
    2004 Do monsters dream? Young children’s understanding of the fantasy/reality distinction. British Journal of Developmental Psychology22: 293–310. 10.1348/026151004323044627
    https://doi.org/10.1348/026151004323044627 [Google Scholar]
  46. Shtulman, A. & Carey, S. A.
    2007 Improbable or impossible: How children reason about the possibility of extraordinary events. Child Development78: 1015–1032. 10.1111/j.1467‑8624.2007.01047.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01047.x [Google Scholar]
  47. Skolnick. D. & Bloom, P.
    2006 What does Batman think about SpongeBob? Children’s understanding of the fantasy/reality distinction. Cognition101(1): B9–B18. 10.1016/j.cognition.2005.10.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2005.10.001 [Google Scholar]
  48. Sperduti, M. , Arcangeli, M. , Makowski, D. , Wantzen, P. , Zalla, T. , Lemaire, S. , Dokic, J. , Pelletier, J. & Piolino, P.
    2016 The paradox of fiction: Emotional response toward fiction and the modulatory role of self-relevance. Acta Psychologica165: 53–59. 10.1016/j.actpsy.2016.02.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2016.02.003 [Google Scholar]
  49. Stockwell, P.
    2009Texture: A Cognitive Aesthetics of Reading. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Stockwell, P. 2016 The texture of authorial invention. InWorld-Building: Discourse in the Mind, J. Gavins & E. Lahey (eds), 147–163. London, New York: Bloomsbury.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Van Reet, J. , Pinkham, A. M. & Lillard, A. S.
    2015 The effect of realistic context on ontological judgments of novel entities. Cognitive Development34: 88–98. 10.1016/j.cogdev.2014.12.010
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2014.12.010 [Google Scholar]
  52. Werth, P.
    1999Text Worlds: Representing Conceptual Space in Discourse. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Whiteley, S. & Canning, P.
    2017 Reader response research in stylistics. Language and Literature26(2): 71–87. 10.1177/0963947017704724
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0963947017704724 [Google Scholar]
  54. Woolley, J. D. , Cornelius, C. A. & Lacy, W.
    2011 Developmental changes in the use of supernatural explanations for unusual events. Journal of Cognition and Culture11: 311–337. 10.1163/156853711X591279
    https://doi.org/10.1163/156853711X591279 [Google Scholar]
  55. Woolley, J. D. & Cox, V.
    2007 Development of beliefs about storybook reality. Developmental Science10: 681–693. 10.1111/j.1467‑7687.2007.00612.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2007.00612.x [Google Scholar]
  56. Woolley, J. D. & Ghossaint, M. E.
    2013 Revisiting the fantasy-reality distinction: Children as naïve skeptics. Child Development84(5): 1495–1510. 10.1111/cdev.12081
    https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12081 [Google Scholar]
  57. Woolley, J. D. , Ma, L. & Lopez-Mobilia, G.
    2011 Development of the use of conversational cues to assess reality status. Journal of Cognition and Development12: 537–555. 10.1080/15248372.2011.554929
    https://doi.org/10.1080/15248372.2011.554929 [Google Scholar]
  58. Woolley J. D. & van Reet, J.
    2006 Effects of context on judgments concerning the reality status of novel entities. Child Development77(6): 1778–1793. 10.1111/j.1467‑8624.2006.00973.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2006.00973.x [Google Scholar]
  59. Wright, J. C. , Huston, A. L. , Reitz, A. L. & Piemyat, S.
    1994 Young children’s perceptions of television reality: Determinants and developmental differences. Developmental Psychology30: 229–239. 10.1037/0012‑1649.30.2.229
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.30.2.229 [Google Scholar]
  60. Yang, J. & Xue, J.
    2014 Distinguishing different fictional worlds during sentence comprehension: ERP evidence. Psychophysiology51: 42–51. 10.1111/psyp.12149
    https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.12149 [Google Scholar]
  61. 2015 Reality/fiction distinction and fiction/fiction distinction during sentence comprehension. Universal Journal of Psychology3(6): 165–175. 10.13189/ujp.2015.030603
    https://doi.org/10.13189/ujp.2015.030603 [Google Scholar]
  62. Zwaan, R. A.
    1994 Effect of genre expectations on text comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition20: 920–933.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/books/9789027260376-lal.36.06gib
dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
-contentType:Journal
10
5
Chapter
content/books/9789027260376
Book
false
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error