1887
  1. Home
  2. Books
  3. Stative Inquiries

Stative Inquiries

Causes, results, experiences, and locations

image of Stative Inquiries
USD
Buy:$149.00 + Taxes

This monograph studies stative predicates from a neo-constructionist perspective and integrates them in a comprehensive theory of event and argument structure. It focuses on two sets of stative verbs: govern-type verbs and object experiencer psychological verbs. For govern-verbs, it shows how notions such as causativity and resultativity can also be ingredients of stative predicates and be derived syntactically. The consequences of this proposal are further pursued in a crosslinguistic investigation of adjectival passives, which are stative predicates of sorts. For object-experiencer psychological verbs, it is shown that their Experiencer theta-role can and should be derived as an aspectual entailment mediated by prepositional structure. In defending this view, this monograph reveals a syntactic parallelism between location verbs and object-experiencer psychological verbs in many languages that has hitherto gone unnoticed. This book will primarily appeal to researchers interested in lexical aspect and its connection to morphosyntax.

References

  1. Acedo-Matellán, Víctor
    2016 The Morphosyntax of Transitions. Oxford: OUP. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198733287.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198733287.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  2. Aelbrecht, Lobke & Harwood, William
    2015 To be or not to be elided: VP ellipsis revisited. Lingua153: 66–97. 10.1016/j.lingua.2014.10.006
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2014.10.006 [Google Scholar]
  3. Akmajian, Adrian & Wasow, Thomas
    1975 The constituent structure of VP and AUX and the position of the verb be. Linguistic Analysis1: 205–245.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Alexiadou, Artemis
    2001 Functional Structure in Nominals [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 42]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.42
     https://doi.org/10.1075/la.42 [Google Scholar]
  5. 2011 Statives and nominalization. Recherches Linguistiques de Vincennes40: 25–52. 10.4000/rlv.1991
     https://doi.org/10.4000/rlv.1991 [Google Scholar]
  6. 2014 The problem with internally caused change-ofstate verbs. Linguistics52(4): 879–909. 10.1515/ling‑2014‑0011
     https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2014-0011 [Google Scholar]
  7. Alexiadou, Artemis & Anagnostopoulou, Elena
    2008 Structuring participles. InProceedings of the 26th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, Charles B. Chang & Hannah J. Haynie (eds), 33–41. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Alexiadou, Artemis , Anagnostopoulou, Elena & Schäfer, Florian
    2006 The properties of anticausatives crosslinguistically. InPhases of Interpretation, Mara Frascarelli (ed.), 187–211. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110197723.4.187
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197723.4.187 [Google Scholar]
  9. Alexiadou, Artemis , Gehrke, Berit & Schäfer, Florian
    2014 The argument structure of adjectival participles revisited. Lingua149: 118–138. 10.1016/j.lingua.2014.05.018
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2014.05.018 [Google Scholar]
  10. Alexiadou, Artemis , Anagnostopoulou, Elena & Schäfer, Florian
    2015 External Arguments in Transitivity Alternations: A Layering Approach. Oxford: OUP. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199571949.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199571949.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  11. Anagnostopoulou, Elena
    1999 On experiencers. InStudies in Greek Syntax, Artemis Alexiadou , Geoffrey C. Horrocks & Melita Stavrou (eds), 67–93. Dordrecht: Kluwer. 10.1007/978‑94‑015‑9177‑5_4
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9177-5_4 [Google Scholar]
  12. 2003 Participles and voice. InPerfect Explorations, Artemis Alexiadou , Monika Rathert & Arnim von Stechow (eds), 1–36. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110902358.1
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110902358.1 [Google Scholar]
  13. 2017 Voice, manners, and results in adjectival passives. InThe Verbal Domain, Roberta D’Alessandro , Irene Franco & Ángel Gallego (eds), 105–128. Oxford: OUP.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Anagnostopoulou, Elena & Samioti, Yota
    2013 Allosemy, idioms, and their domains: Evidence from adjectival participles. InSyntax and its Limits, Raffaella Folli , Christina Sevdali & Robert Truswell (eds), 218–250. Oxford: OUP. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199683239.003.0012
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199683239.003.0012 [Google Scholar]
  15. Arad, Maya
    1998a Psych notes. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics10: 203–223.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. 1998b VP Structure and the Syntax-Lexicon Interface. PhD dissertation, University College London.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. 1999 What counts as a class? The case of psych verbs. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics35: 1–23.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. 2002 Universal features and language-particular morphemes. InTheoretical Approaches to Universals [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 49], Artemis Alexiadou (ed.), 15–39. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.49.03ara
     https://doi.org/10.1075/la.49.03ara [Google Scholar]
  19. Arche, María Jesús
    2006 Individuals in Time [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 94]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.94
     https://doi.org/10.1075/la.94 [Google Scholar]
  20. 2012 On the aspectuality of the Individual-level/ Stagelevel dichotomy. Borealis: An International Journal of Hispanic Linguistics1(2): 109–132. 10.7557/1.1.2.2385
     https://doi.org/10.7557/1.1.2.2385 [Google Scholar]
  21. Arche, María Jesús , Fábregas, Antonio & Marín, Rafael
    2017 Towards a unified treatment of Spanish copulas. InRomance Languages and Linguistic Theory 11. Selected papers from the 44th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (LSRL), London, Ontario, Silvia Perpiñán , David Heap , Itziri Moreno-Villamar & Adriana Soto-Corominas (eds), 33–52. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/rllt.11.02arc
     https://doi.org/10.1075/rllt.11.02arc [Google Scholar]
  22. Bach, Emmon
    1986 The algebra of events. Linguistics and Philosophy9(1): 5–16.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Baker, Mark , Johnson, Kyle & Roberts, Ian
    1989 Passive arguments raised. Linguistic Inquiry20(2): 219–251.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Baker, Mark C.
    1985 The mirror principle and morphosyntactic explanation. Linguistic Inquiry23(4): 373–415.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. 1988 Incorporation: A Theory of Grammatical Function Changing. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. 1997 Thematic roles and syntactic structure. InElements of Grammar, Lilliane Haegeman (ed.), 73–137. Dordrecht: Springer. 10.1007/978‑94‑011‑5420‑8_2
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5420-8_2 [Google Scholar]
  27. 2003 Lexical Categories: Verbs, Nouns and Adjectives. Cambridge: CUP. 10.1017/CBO9780511615047
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511615047 [Google Scholar]
  28. Belletti, Adriana & Rizzi, Luigi
    1988 Psych-verbs and θ-theory. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory6: 291–352. 10.1007/BF00133902
     https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00133902 [Google Scholar]
  29. Benincà, Paula
    1986 Il lata sinistro della frase Italiana. Association of Teachers of Italian Journal47: 57–85.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Bennett, Michael & Partee, Barbara
    1972 Toward the Logic of Tense and Aspect in English. Santa Monica CA: System Development Corporation. Reprinted with an afterword by Indiana University Linguistics Club, Bloomington 1978.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Bentley, Delia
    2017 Result state adjectives: Valence and voice. Talk given at theCambridge Workshop on Voice, University of Cambridge, 22–24 May.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Boeckx, Cedric
    2014 What principles and parameters got wrong. InLinguistic Variation in the Minimalist Framework, M. Carme Picallo (ed.), 155–178. Oxford: OUP. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198702894.003.0008
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198702894.003.0008 [Google Scholar]
  33. Borer, Hagit
    1994 The projection of arguments. InUniversity of Massachusetts Occasional Papers in Linguistics, Elena Benedicto & Jeff Runner (eds), 19–47. Amherst MA: GLSA.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. 2005a Structuring Sense, Vol. I: In Name Only. Oxford: OUP.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. 2005b Structuring Sense, Vol. II: The Normal Course of Events. Oxford: OUP.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. 2013 Structuring Sense, Vol.III: Taking Form. Oxford: OUP.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Bosque, Ignacio
    1990 Sobre el aspecto en los adjetivos y en los participios. InTiempo y aspecto en español, Ignacio Bosque (ed.), 177–214. Madrid: Cátedra.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. 1999 El sintagma adjetival. Modificadores y complementos del adjetivo. Adjetivo y participio. InGramática descriptiva de la lengua española, Vol1, Ch. 4, Ignacio Bosque & Violeta Demonte (eds), 217–310. Madrid: Espasa Calpe.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. 2014 On resultative past participles in Spanish. Catalan Journal of Linguistics13: 41–77. 10.5565/rev/catjl.155
     https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/catjl.155 [Google Scholar]
  40. Bouchard, Denis
    1995 The Semantics of Syntax: A Minimalist Approach to Grammar. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 10.1075/cilt.91.04bou
     https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.91.04bou [Google Scholar]
  41. Bošković, Željko
    2014 Now I’m a phase, now I’m not a phase: On the variability of phases with extraction and ellipsis. Linguistic Inquiry45(1): 27–89. 10.1162/LING_a_00148
     https://doi.org/10.1162/LING_a_00148 [Google Scholar]
  42. Bresnan, Joan W.
    1982 The passive in lexical theory. InThe Mental Representation of Grammatical Relations, Joan W. Bresnan (ed.), 3–86. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Brody, Michael
    2000 Mirror theory: Syntactic representation in perfect syntax. Linguistic Inquiry31(1): 29–56. 10.1162/002438900554280
     https://doi.org/10.1162/002438900554280 [Google Scholar]
  44. Bruening, Benjamin
    2010 Review of Gillian Catriona Ramchand, Verb Meaning and the Lexion: A First-Phase Syntax. Journal of Linguistics46: 260–270. 10.1017/S0022226709990363
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226709990363 [Google Scholar]
  45. 2014 Word formation is syntactic: Adjectival passives in English. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory32: 363–422. 10.1007/s11049‑014‑9227‑y
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-014-9227-y [Google Scholar]
  46. 2018 The Lexicalist Hypothesis: Both wrong and superfluous. Language49: 1–42. 10.1353/lan.2018.0000
     https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2018.0000 [Google Scholar]
  47. Brugger, Gerhard
    2001 Temporal modification, the 24-hour rule and the location of reference time. InCurrent Issues in Spanish Syntax and Semantics, Javier Gutiérrez-Rexach & Luis Silva-Villar (eds), 243–270. Berlin: Mouton de Gryuter. 10.1515/9783110850536.243
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110850536.243 [Google Scholar]
  48. Bull, William
    1965 Spanish for Teachers. New York NY: Ronald Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Burzio, Luigi
    1986 Italian Syntax: A Government-Binding Approach. Dordrecht: Reidel. 10.1007/978‑94‑009‑4522‑7
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-4522-7 [Google Scholar]
  50. Caha, Pavel
    2009 The Nanosyntax of Case. PhD dissertation, University of Tromsø.
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Carlson, Gregory N.
    1977 Reference to Kinds in English. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst. Published in Outstanding Dissertations in Linguistics series 1980 New York NY: Garland.
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Carrier, Jill & Randall, Janet H.
    1992 The argument structure and syntactic structure of resultatives. Linguistic Inquiry23(2): 173–234.
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Chierchia, Gennaro
    2004 A semantics for unaccusatives and its syntactic consequences. InThe Unaccusativity Puzzle: Explorations of the Syntax-Lexicon Interface, Artemis Alexiadou , Elena Anagnostopoulou & Martin Everaert (eds), 22–59. Oxford: OUP. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199257652.003.0002
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199257652.003.0002 [Google Scholar]
  54. Chomsky, Noam
    1957 Syntactic Structures. The Hague: Mouton. 10.1515/9783112316009
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783112316009 [Google Scholar]
  55. 1981 Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.
     [Google Scholar]
  56. 1986a Barriers. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  57. 1986b Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origin and Use. New York NY: Praeger.
     [Google Scholar]
  58. 1995 The Minimalist Program. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  59. 2001 Derivation by phase. InKen Hale: A Life in Language, Michael Kenstowicz (ed.), 1–52. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  60. 2008 On phases. InFoundational Issues in Linguistic Theory. Essays in Honor of Jean-Roger Vergnaud, Robert Freidin , Carlos P. Otero & María Luisa Zubizarreta (eds), 291–321. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/9780262062787.003.0007
     https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262062787.003.0007 [Google Scholar]
  61. Cinque, Guglielmo
    1999 Adverbs and Functional Heads: A Cross-linguistic Perspective. Oxford: OUP.
     [Google Scholar]
  62. Clark, Eve & Clark, Herbert
    1979 When nouns surface as verbs. Language55(4): 767–811. 10.2307/412745
     https://doi.org/10.2307/412745 [Google Scholar]
  63. Comrie, Bernard
    1976 Aspect. Cambridge: CUP.
     [Google Scholar]
  64. Conti-Jiménez, Carmen
    2004 Construcciones pasivas con estar. ELUA18: 21–44. 10.14198/ELUA2004.18.02
     https://doi.org/10.14198/ELUA2004.18.02 [Google Scholar]
  65. Corver, Norbert
    1997 The internal syntax of the Dutch extended adjectival projection. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory15: 289–368. 10.1023/A:1005846812956
     https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005846812956 [Google Scholar]
  66. Croft, William
    1991 Syntactic Categories and Grammatical Relations: The Cognitive Organization of Information. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  67. Cuervo, María Cristina
    2003 Datives at Large. PhD dissertation, MIT.
     [Google Scholar]
  68. Davidson, Donald
    1967 The logical form of action sentences. InThe Logic of Decision and Action, Nicholas Rescher (ed.), 81–95. Pittsburgh PA: University of Pittsburgh Press. Reprinted in Davidson, Donald 2006 The Essential Davidson, 37–71. Oxford: OUP.
     [Google Scholar]
  69. de Miguel, Elena
    1999 El aspecto léxico. InGramática descriptiva de la lengua española, Vol.2, Ch. 46, Ignacio Bosque & Violeta Demonte (eds), 2977–3060. Madrid: Espasa Calpe.
     [Google Scholar]
  70. Dimitriadis, Alexis
    1999 On clitics, prepositions and case licensing in Standard and Macedonian Greek. InStudies in Greek Syntax, Artemis Alexiadou , Geoffrey C. Horrocks & Melita Stavrou (eds), 95–112. Dordrecht: Kluwer. 10.1007/978‑94‑015‑9177‑5_5
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9177-5_5 [Google Scholar]
  71. Doron, Edit
    2003 Agency and voice: The semantics of the Semitic templates. Natural Language Semantics11: 1–67. 10.1023/A:1023021423453
     https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023021423453 [Google Scholar]
  72. 2013 The interaction of adjectival passive and voice. InThe Roots of Syntax and the Syntax of Roots. Hagit Borer , Artmis Alexiadou & Florian Schäfer (eds), 164–191. Oxford: OUP.
     [Google Scholar]
  73. Dowty, David R.
    1979 Word Meaning and Montague Grammar. Dordrecht: Reidel. 10.1007/978‑94‑009‑9473‑7
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9473-7 [Google Scholar]
  74. 1991 Thematic proto-roles and argument selection. Language67(3): 546–619. 10.1353/lan.1991.0021
     https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1991.0021 [Google Scholar]
  75. Dubinsky, Stanley & Simango, Silvester Ron
    1996 Passive and stative in Chichewa: Evidence for modular distinctions in grammar. Language72(4): 749–781. 10.2307/416101
     https://doi.org/10.2307/416101 [Google Scholar]
  76. Embick, David
    2004 On the structure of resultative participles in English. Linguistic Inquiry35(3): 355–392. 10.1162/0024389041402634
     https://doi.org/10.1162/0024389041402634 [Google Scholar]
  77. Ernst, Thomas
    2016 Modification of stative predicates. Language92(2): 237–274. 10.1353/lan.2016.0042
     https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2016.0042 [Google Scholar]
  78. Espinal, María Teresa
    2010 Bare nominals in Catalan and Spanish. Their structure and meaning. Lingua120: 984–1009. 10.1016/j.lingua.2009.06.002
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2009.06.002 [Google Scholar]
  79. Espinal, María Teresa & McNally, Louise
    2011 Bare singular nominals and incorporating verbs in Spanish and Catalan. Journal of Linguistics47: 87–128. 10.1017/S0022226710000228
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226710000228 [Google Scholar]
  80. Fábregas, Antonio
    2007 The Exhaustive Lexicalization Principle. Nordlyd, Tromsø Working Papers in Language & Lingusitics34(2): 165–199.
     [Google Scholar]
  81. 2014 Un análisis sintáctico de dos tipos de causante. Estudios de Lingüística de la Universidad de Alicante28: 191–214.
     [Google Scholar]
  82. 2016 Las nominalizaciones. Madrid: Visor.
     [Google Scholar]
  83. Fábregas, Antonio & Marín, Rafael
    2012 Syntactic and semantic properties of Davidsonian state verbs. Talk presented at the42 Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages, Southern Utah University, 20–22 April.
     [Google Scholar]
  84. 2015a Deriving individual-level and stage-level psych verbs in Spanish. The Linguistic Review32(2), 227–275. 10.1515/tlr‑2014‑0022
     https://doi.org/10.1515/tlr-2014-0022 [Google Scholar]
  85. 2015b How insertion in non terminal nodes explains two participle puzzles. Talk given atColloquium on Generative Grammar 25, IKER, May 21–23.
     [Google Scholar]
  86. 2017 On non-dynamic eventive verbs in Spanish. Linguistics55(3): 451–488. 10.1515/ling‑2017‑0001
     https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2017-0001 [Google Scholar]
  87. Fernández-Leborans, María Jesús
    1999 La predicación: Las oraciones copulativas. InGramática descriptiva de la lengua española, Vol.2, Ch. 37, Ignacio Bosque & Violeta Demonte (eds), 2357–2460. Madrid: Espasa Calpe.
     [Google Scholar]
  88. Fernández Ordóñez, Inés
    1999 Leísmo, laísmo y loísmo. InGramática descriptiva de la lengua española, Vol.1, Ch. 21, Ignacio Bosque & Violeta Demonte (eds), 1317–1398. Madrid: Espasa Calpe.
     [Google Scholar]
  89. Fernández-Ramírez, Salvador
    1951 Gramática española. El verbo y la oración, Vol.4. Madrid: Arco Libros.
     [Google Scholar]
  90. Fernández-Soriano, Olga & Mendikoetxea, Amaya
    2011 Non-selected dative subjects in anticausative constructions. Archivio Glottologico ItalianoXCVI: 87–128.
     [Google Scholar]
  91. Filip, Hana
    1999 Aspect, Eventuality Types an Nominal Reference. New York NY: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  92. Fodor, Jerry
    1970 Three reasons for not deriving kill’ from cause to die’. Linguistic Inquiry1(4): 429–438.
     [Google Scholar]
  93. Fodor, Jerry & Lepore, Ernest
    1999 Impossible words?Linguistic Inquiry30(3): 445–453. 10.1162/002438999554138
     https://doi.org/10.1162/002438999554138 [Google Scholar]
  94. Folli, Raffaella & Harley, Heidi
    2005 Flavors of v: Consuming results in Italian and English. InAspectual Inquiries, Roumyana Slabakova & Paula Kempchinsky (eds), 95–120. Dordrecht: Kluwer. 10.1007/1‑4020‑3033‑9_5
     https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3033-9_5 [Google Scholar]
  95. 2008 Teleology and animacy in external arguments. Lingua118(2): 190–202. 10.1016/j.lingua.2007.02.004
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2007.02.004 [Google Scholar]
  96. 2016 Against deficiency-based typologies: Manner-alternation parameters in Italian and English. InRomance Languages and Linguistic Theory 10: Selected papers from Going Romance 28, Ernestina Carrilho , Alexandra Fiéis , Maria Lobo & Sandra Pereira (eds), 103–120. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/rllt.10.06fol
     https://doi.org/10.1075/rllt.10.06fol [Google Scholar]
  97. Franco, Jon
    1990 Towards a typology of experiencer verbs: Evidence from Spanish. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics12: 46–62.
     [Google Scholar]
  98. Fukui, Naoki & Speas, Margaret
    1986 Specifiers and projection. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics8: 128–172.
     [Google Scholar]
  99. Fults, Scott
    2006 The Structure of Comparison: An Investigation of Gradable Adjectives. PhD dissertation, University of Maryland.
     [Google Scholar]
  100. García-Pardo, Alfredo
    2015 The aspectual structure of the VP: A case study in adjectival passives. Qualifying Paper, USC.
     [Google Scholar]
  101. 2016a The aspectual composition of adjectival passives. InProceedings of the 50th Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society, 175–89. Chicago IL: University of Chicago.
     [Google Scholar]
  102. 2016b Deriving aspect-alternating verbs without θ-roles. InProceedings of the Forty-Sixth Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society, Vol.1, Christopher Hammerly & Brandon Prickett (eds), 287–300. Amherst MA: GLSA.
     [Google Scholar]
  103. 2017 Aspect and argument structure in adjectival passives. Borealis: An International Journal of Hispanic Linguistics6(1): 21–52. 10.7557/1.6.1.4095
     https://doi.org/10.7557/1.6.1.4095 [Google Scholar]
  104. 2018 El agente implícito en pasivas verbales y adjetivales. Revista de la Sociedad Española de Lingüística48: 199–214. 10.31810/RSEL.48.6
     https://doi.org/10.31810/RSEL.48.6 [Google Scholar]
  105. García-Pardo, Alfredo & Menon, Mythili
    2020 The aspectual structure of the adjective: Spanish ser and estar. InHispanic Linguistics: Current Issues and New Directions [Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 26], Alfonso Morales-Front , Michael J. Ferreira , Ronald P. Leow & Cristina Sanz (eds), 138–159. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/ihll.26.07gar
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ihll.26.07gar [Google Scholar]
  106. Gehrke, Berit
    2011 Stative passives and event kinds. InProceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 15, Ingo Reich , Eva Horch & Dennis Pauly (eds), 241–257. Germany: Universaar – Saarland University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  107. 2012 Passive states. InTelicity, Change and State. A Cross-categorial View of Event Structure, Violeta Demonte & Louise McNally (eds), 185–211. Oxford: OUP. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199693498.003.0008
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199693498.003.0008 [Google Scholar]
  108. 2013 Still puzzled by adjectival passives?InSyntax and its Limits, Raffaella R. Folli , Christina Sevdali & Robert Truswell (eds), 175–191. Oxford: OUP. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199683239.003.0010
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199683239.003.0010 [Google Scholar]
  109. 2015 Adjectival participles, event kind modification and pseudo-incorporation. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory33: 897–938. 10.1007/s11049‑015‑9295‑7
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-015-9295-7 [Google Scholar]
  110. Gehrke, Berit & Sánchez-Marco, Cristina
    2014 Different by-phrases with adjectival and verbal passives: Evidence from Spanish corpus data. Lingua149: 188–214. 10.1016/j.lingua.2014.07.011
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2014.07.011 [Google Scholar]
  111. 2015 Las pasivas psicológicas. InLos predicados psicológicos, Rafael Marín (ed.), 145–184. Madrid: Visor.
     [Google Scholar]
  112. Gese, Helga
    2011 Events in adjectival passives. InProceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 15, Ingo Reich , Eva Horch & Dennis Pauly (eds), 259–273. Germany: Universaar – Saarland University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  113. Gili Gaya, Samuel
    1961 Curso superior de sintaxis española. Barcelona: Bibligraf.
     [Google Scholar]
  114. Giorgi, Alessandra & Pianesi, Fabio
    1997 Tense and Aspect. From Semantics to Morphosyntax. Oxford: OUP.
     [Google Scholar]
  115. Goldberg, Adele E.
    2002 Surface generalizations: An alternative to alternations. Cognitive Linguistics13: 327–356. 10.1515/cogl.2002.022
     https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.2002.022 [Google Scholar]
  116. Gómez-Torrego, Leonardo
    1988 Perífrasis verbales. Madrid: Arco Libros.
     [Google Scholar]
  117. Gómez Vázquez, Diana & García Fernández, Luis
    2013 Estados controlados. InDe la unidad del lenguaje a la diversidad de las lenguas: Actas del X Congreso Internacional de Lingüística General, José Francisco Val Álvaro (ed.), 335–346. Zaragoza: Universidad de Zaragoza.
     [Google Scholar]
  118. Greenberg, Yael
    2006 Structuring aspectual and temporal relations with two Hebrew adverbials and the semantics/pragmatics of still. InProceedings of the 9th Symposium on Logic and Language, Beáta Gyuris , Lászlo Kálmán , Chris Piñón , & Károly Varasdi (eds), 62–69. Budapest: Research Institute for Linguistics, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Theoretical Linguistics Programme, Eotvös Loránd University.
     [Google Scholar]
  119. Grimshaw, Jane
    1990 Argument Structure. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  120. Hale, Kenneth L. & Keyser, Samuel J.
    1993 On argument structure and lexical expression of syntactic relations. InThe View from Building 20. Essays on Linguistics in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger, Kenneth Hale & Samuel J. Keyser (eds), 53–109. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  121. 1997 Adjectives, other stative predicates and the roots of stativity. Ms, MIT.
     [Google Scholar]
  122. 2002 Prolegomenon to a Theory of Argument Structure. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/5634.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/5634.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  123. 2005 Aspect and the syntax of argument structure. InThe Syntax of Aspect, Nomi Erteschik-Shir & Tova Rapoport (eds), 11–41. Oxford: OUP. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199280445.003.0002
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199280445.003.0002 [Google Scholar]
  124. Halle, Morris & Marantz, Alec
    1993 Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. InThe View from Building 20. Essays on Linguistics in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger, Kenneth Hale & Samuel J. Keyser (eds), 111–176. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  125. Hallman, Peter
    2013 Predication and movement in passive. Lingua125: 76–94. 10.1016/j.lingua.2012.09.002
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2012.09.002 [Google Scholar]
  126. 2015 The temporal nature of state/ event distinction. Talk given at theGLOW Workshop on States and Events, Paris (France), 18 April.
     [Google Scholar]
  127. Harley, Heidi
    1995 Subjects, Events and Licensing. PhD dissertation, MIT.
     [Google Scholar]
  128. 2013 External arguments and the Mirror Principle: On the distinctness of Voice and v. Lingua125: 34–57. 10.1016/j.lingua.2012.09.010
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2012.09.010 [Google Scholar]
  129. 2017 The “bundling” hypothesis and the disparate functions of little v. InThe Verbal Domain, Roberta D’Alessandro , Irene Franco & Ángel Gallego (eds), 3–28. Oxford: OUP.
     [Google Scholar]
  130. Harley, Heidi , Tubino-Blanco, Mercedes & Haugen, Jason
    2009 Applicative constructions and suppletive verbs in Hiaki (Yaqui). InRice Working Papers in Linguistics, Vol.1, Linda Lanz , Amy Franklin , Jennifer Hoecker Elizabeth Gentry Brunner Michelle Morrison & Cassandra Pace (eds), 42–51. Houston TX: Rice Linguistics Society, Rice University.
     [Google Scholar]
  131. Harwood, William
    2013 Being Progressive is just a Phase: Dividing the Functional Hierarchy. PhD dissertation, Ghent University.
     [Google Scholar]
  132. 2015 Being progressive is just a phase: Celebrating the uniqueness of progressive aspect under a phase-based analysis. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory33: 523–573. 10.1007/s11049‑014‑9267‑3
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-014-9267-3 [Google Scholar]
  133. 2017 Reduced relatives and extended phases: A phasebased analysis of the inflectional restrictions on English reduced relative clauses. Studia Linguistica1–44. doi:  10.1111/stul.12069
     https://doi.org/10.1111/stul.12069 [Google Scholar]
  134. Hay, Jennifer , Kennedy, Christopher & Levin, Beth
    1999 Scale structure underlies telicity in “degree achievements”. InSemantics and Linguistic Theory 9, Tanya Matthews & Devon Strolovitch (eds), 127–144. Ithaca NY: CLC Publications.
     [Google Scholar]
  135. Hengeveld, Kees
    1986 Copular verbs in a functional grammar of Spanish. Linguistics24: 393–420. 10.1515/ling.1986.24.2.393
     https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1986.24.2.393 [Google Scholar]
  136. Higginbotham, James T.
    1997 Location and causation. Ms, University of Oxford.
     [Google Scholar]
  137. Hoekstra, Teun
    1992 Aspect and theta theory. InThematic Structure: Its Role in Grammar, Iggy M. Roca (ed.), 145–174. Berlin: Foris. 10.1515/9783110872613.145
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110872613.145 [Google Scholar]
  138. Horvath, Julia & Siloni, Tal
    2008 Active lexicon: Adjectival and verbal passives. InGenerative Approaches to Hebrew Linguistics [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 134], Sharon Armon-Lotem , Gabi Danon & Susan Rothstein (eds), 105–136. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.134.05act
     https://doi.org/10.1075/la.134.05act [Google Scholar]
  139. van Hout, Angeliek
    2004 Unaccusativity as telicity checking. InThe Unaccusativity Puzzle: Explorations of the Syntax-Lexicon Interface, Artemis Alexiadou , Elena Anagnostopoulou & Martin Everaert (eds), 60–83. Oxford: OUP. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199257652.003.0003
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199257652.003.0003 [Google Scholar]
  140. Husband, Matthew E.
    2012 On the Compositional Nature of States [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 188]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.188
     https://doi.org/10.1075/la.188 [Google Scholar]
  141. Iatridou, Sabine , Anagnostopoulou, Elena & Izvorsky, Roumyana
    2001 Observations about the form and meaning of the perfect. InKen Hale: A Life in Language, Michael J. Kenstowicz (ed.), 189–238. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  142. Ippolito, Michaela
    2004 An analysis of still. InProceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory 14, Robert B. Young (ed.), 127–144. Ithaca NY: CLC Publications.
     [Google Scholar]
  143. Jaque, Matías
    2013 La expresión de la estatividad en español: Niveles de representación y grados de dinamicidad. PhD dissertation, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid.
     [Google Scholar]
  144. Kallulli, Dalina
    2006a Argument demotion as feature suppression. InDemoting the Agent. Passive, Middle and Other Voice Phenomena [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 96], Benjamin Lyngfeldt & Torgrim Solstad (eds), 143–166. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.96.08kal
     https://doi.org/10.1075/la.96.08kal [Google Scholar]
  145. 2006b Unaccusatives with dative causers and experiencers: A unified account. InDatives and Other Cases [Studies in Language Companion Series 75], Daniel Hole , André Meinunger & Werner Abraham (eds), 271–301. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.75.13kal
     https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.75.13kal [Google Scholar]
  146. Kamp, Hans & Reyle, Uwe
    1993 From Discourse to Logic: Introduction to Model-theoretic Semantics of Natural Language, Formal Logic and Discourse Representation Theory. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
     [Google Scholar]
  147. Kamp, Hans , Reyle, Uwe & Rossdeutscher, Antje
    2015 Perfects as feature shifting operators. Ms, Universität Stuttgart.
     [Google Scholar]
  148. Kayne, Richard
    1975 French Syntax: The Transformational Cycle. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  149. Kearns, Kate
    2000 Semantics. New York: St. Martin’s.
     [Google Scholar]
  150. Kennedy, Christopher
    1997 Projecting the Adjective: The Syntax and Semantics of Gradability and Comparison. PhD dissertation, University of California, Santa Cruz.
     [Google Scholar]
  151. Kenny, Anthony
    1963 Action, Emotion and Will. London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  152. Kiparsky, Paul
    1973 Elsewhere in phonology. InA Festschrift for Morris Halle, Stephen R. Anderson & Paul Kiparsky (eds), 93–106. New York NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
     [Google Scholar]
  153. Koenig, Jean-Pierre & Davis, Anthony R.
    2006 The KEY to lexical semantic representations. Journal of Linguistics42: 71–108. 10.1017/S0022226705003695
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226705003695 [Google Scholar]
  154. Koopman, Hilda & Sportiche, Dominique
    1985 Theta theory and extraction. GLOW Newsletter14: 57–88.
     [Google Scholar]
  155. 1988 Subjects. Ms, University of CaliforniaatLos Angeles.
     [Google Scholar]
  156. 1991 The position of subjects. Lingua: 211–258. 10.1016/0024‑3841(91)90022‑W
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3841(91)90022-W [Google Scholar]
  157. Kramer, Ruth
    2014 Clitic doubling or object agreement: The view from Amharic. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory32: 593–634. 10.1007/s11049‑014‑9233‑0
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-014-9233-0 [Google Scholar]
  158. Krapova, Iliyana & Cinque, Guglielmo
    2008 Clitic reduplication constructionsin Bulgarian. InClitic Doubling in the Balkan Languages [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 130], Dalina Kalluli & Liliane Tasmowski (eds), 257–286. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.130.15kra
     https://doi.org/10.1075/la.130.15kra [Google Scholar]
  159. Kratzer, Angelika
    1995 Stage-level and individual-level predicates. InThe Generic Book, Gregory N. Carlson & Francis Jeffry Pelletier (eds), 125–175. Chicago IL: Chicago University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  160. 1996 Severing the external argument from the verb. InPhrase Structure and the Lexicon, Johan Rooryck & Laurie Zaring (eds), 109–137. Dordrecht: Kluwer. 10.1007/978‑94‑015‑8617‑7_5
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8617-7_5 [Google Scholar]
  161. 2000 Building statives. InProceedings of the 26th Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, Lisa J. Conathan , Jeff Good , Darya Kavitskaya , Alyssa B. Wulf & Alan C. L. Yu (eds), 385–399. Berkeley CA: BLS.
     [Google Scholar]
  162. 2002 The event argument. Ms, University of Massachusetts.
     [Google Scholar]
  163. 2005 Building resultatives. InEvent Arguments in Syntax, Semantics and Discourse, Claudia Maienbaum & Angelke Wöllstein-Leisen (eds), 178–212. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
     [Google Scholar]
  164. Krifka, Manfred
    1989 Nominal reference, temporal constitution and quantification in event semantics. InSemantics and Contextual Expression, Renate Bartsch , Johan van Benthem & Peter van Emde Boas (eds), 75–115. Stanford CA: CSLI. 10.1515/9783110877335‑005
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110877335-005 [Google Scholar]
  165. 1992 Thematic relations as links between nominal reference and temporal constitution. InLexical Matters, Ivan A. Sag & Anna Szablocsi (eds), 29–53. Stanford CA: CSLI.
     [Google Scholar]
  166. 2000 Alternatives for aspectual particles: Semantics of still and already. InProceedings of the 26th Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, Lisa J. Conathan , Jeff Good , Darya Kavitskaya , Alyssa B. Wulf & Alan C. L. Yu (eds), 401–412. Berkeley CA: BLS.
     [Google Scholar]
  167. Kuroda, Sige-Yuki
    1988 Whether we agree or not: A comparative syntax of English and Japanese. Lingvisticae Investigationes12(1): 1–47. 10.1075/li.12.1.02kur
     https://doi.org/10.1075/li.12.1.02kur [Google Scholar]
  168. Laka, Itziar
    1990 Negation in Syntax: On the Nature of Functional Categories and Projections. PhD dissertation, MIT.
     [Google Scholar]
  169. Lakoff, George
    1970 Irregularity in Syntax. New York NY: Holt, Rinehart and Wilson.
     [Google Scholar]
  170. Landau, Idan
    2010 The Locative Syntax of Experiencers [Linguistic InquiryMonograph 53]. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  171. Larsson, Ida
    2009 Participles in Time: The Development of the Perfect Tense in Swedish. PhD dissertation, Göteborg University.
     [Google Scholar]
  172. Larsson, Ida & Svenonius, Peter
    2013 Phases and categories in passive and perfect participles. Talk presented at theComparative Germanic Syntax Workshop 28, University of Leipzig, 4 October.
     [Google Scholar]
  173. Leech, Geoffrey N.
    1970 Towards a Semantic Description of English. Bloomington IN: Indiana University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  174. Legate, Julie Anne
    2014 Voice and v: Lessons from Acehnese [Linguistic Inquiry Monograph 69]. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/9780262028141.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262028141.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  175. Legendre, Géraldine
    1989 Inversion with certain French experiencer verbs. Language65(4): 752–782. 10.2307/414933
     https://doi.org/10.2307/414933 [Google Scholar]
  176. 1993 Antipassive with French psych-verbs. InProceedings of WCCFL 12, Erin Dunca , Donka Farkas & Philip Spaelti (eds), 373–388. Stanford CA: CSLI.
     [Google Scholar]
  177. Legendre, Géraldine & Akimova, Tanya
    1993 Inversion and antipassive in Russian. InThe Second Annual Workshop on Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics, Sergey Avrutin , Steven Franks & Ljiljana Progovac (eds), 286–318. Ann Arbor MI: Michigan Slavic Publications.
     [Google Scholar]
  178. Levin, Beth
    1993 English Verb Classes and Alternations: A Preliminary Investigation. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  179. Levin, Beth & Rappaport, Malka
    1986 The formation of adjectival passives. Linguistic Inquiry17(4): 623–261.
     [Google Scholar]
  180. Levin, Beth & Rappaport-Hovav, Malka
    1995 Unaccusativity: At the Syntax-Lexical Semantics Interface [Linguistic Inquiry Monograph 26]. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  181. 2005 Argument Realization. Cambridge: CUP. 10.1017/CBO9780511610479
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511610479 [Google Scholar]
  182. Lewis, David
    1973 Causation. The Journal of Philosophy70(17): 556–567. 10.2307/2025310
     https://doi.org/10.2307/2025310 [Google Scholar]
  183. Lieber, Rochelle
    1980 On the Organization of the Lexicon. PhD dissertation, MIT.
     [Google Scholar]
  184. Lin, Jimmy
    2004 Event Structure and the Encoding of Arguments: The Syntax of the Mandarin and English Verb Phrase. PhD dissertation, MIT.
     [Google Scholar]
  185. Löbner, Sebastian
    1989 German schön – erst – noch: An integrated analysis. Linguistics and Philosophy12: 167–212. 10.1007/BF00627659
     https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00627659 [Google Scholar]
  186. Lohndal, Terje
    2014 Phrase Structure and Argument Structure. A Case Study of the Syntax-Semantics Interface. Oxford: OUP. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199677115.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199677115.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  187. Maienborn, Claudia
    2005 On the limits of the Davidsonian approach: The case of copula sentences. Theoretical Linguistics31: 275–316. 10.1515/thli.2005.31.3.275
     https://doi.org/10.1515/thli.2005.31.3.275 [Google Scholar]
  188. 2007 On Davidsonian and Kimian states. InExistence: Semantics and Syntax, Ileana Comorovski & Klaus von Heusinger (eds), 107–130. Dordrecht: Springer.
     [Google Scholar]
  189. 2009 Building event-based ad hoc properties: On the interpretation of adjectival passives. InProceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 13, Arndt Riester & Torgrim Solstad (eds), 31–46. https://ojs.ub.uni-konstanz.de/sub/index.php/sub/issue/view/15 (4 June 2020).
     [Google Scholar]
  190. Marantz, Alec
    1984 On the Nature of Grammatical Relations. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  191. 1997 No escape from syntax: Don’t try morphological analysis in the privacy of your own lexicon. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics4: 200–225.
     [Google Scholar]
  192. 1999 Creating words above and below little v. Ms, MIT.
     [Google Scholar]
  193. 2013 Verbal argument structure: Events and participants. Lingua130: 152–168. 10.1016/j.lingua.2012.10.012
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2012.10.012 [Google Scholar]
  194. Marín, Rafael
    2000 El componente aspectual de la predicación. PhD dissertation, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.
     [Google Scholar]
  195. 2004 Entre ser y estar. Madrid: Arco Libros.
     [Google Scholar]
  196. 2011 Casi todos los predicados psicológicos son estativos. InSobre estados y estatividad, Ángeles Carrasco Gutiérrez (ed), 26–44. Munich: Lincom.
     [Google Scholar]
  197. 2015 Los predicados psicológicos: Debate sobre el estado de la cuestión. InLos predicados psicológicos, Rafael Marín (ed), 11–50. Madrid: Visor.
     [Google Scholar]
  198. Marín, Rafael & McNally, Louise
    2005 The Aktionsart of Spanish reflexive psychological verbs. InProceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 9, 212–225. Ithaca NY: CLC Publications.
     [Google Scholar]
  199. 2011 Inchoativity, change of state and telicity: Evidence from Spanish reflexive psychological verbs. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory29(2): 467–502. 10.1007/s11049‑011‑9127‑3
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-011-9127-3 [Google Scholar]
  200. Marín, Rafael & Sánchez-Marco, Cristina
    2012 Verbos y nombres psicológicos: Juntos y revueltos. Borealis: An International Journal of Hispanic Linguistics2: 91–108. 10.7557/1.1.2.2379
     https://doi.org/10.7557/1.1.2.2379 [Google Scholar]
  201. Martin, Fabienne
    2006 Prédicats statifs, causatifs et résultatifs en discours. PhD dissertation, Université Libre de Bruxelles.
     [Google Scholar]
  202. Martin, Fabienne & Schäfer, Florian
    2014 Causation at the syntax-semantics interface. InCausation in Grammatical Structures, Bridget Copley & Fabienne Martin (eds), 209–244. Oxford: OUP. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199672073.003.0009
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199672073.003.0009 [Google Scholar]
  203. Massam, Diane
    2001 Pseudo noun incorporation in Niuean. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory19: 153–197. 10.1023/A:1006465130442
     https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006465130442 [Google Scholar]
  204. Mateu, Jaume
    2002 Argument Structure: Relational Construal at the Syntax-Semantics Interface. PhD dissertation, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.
     [Google Scholar]
  205. MacDonald, Jonathan
    2008 The Syntactic Nature of Inner Aspect [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 133] Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.133
     https://doi.org/10.1075/la.133 [Google Scholar]
  206. McCawley, James D.
    1971 Tense and time reference in English. InStudies in Linguistic Semantics, Charles J. Fillmore & D. Terence Langendoen (eds), 97–113. New York NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
     [Google Scholar]
  207. 1973 Pre-lexical syntax. InGrammar and Meaning: Papers on Syntactic and Semantic Topics, 343–356. New York NY: Academic Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  208. 1981 Notes on the English perfect. Australian Journal of Linguistics1: 81–90. 10.1080/07268608108599267
     https://doi.org/10.1080/07268608108599267 [Google Scholar]
  209. Mchombo, Sam
    1993 A formal analysis of the stative construction in Bantu. Journal of African Languages and Linguistics14: 5–28. 10.1515/jall.1993.14.1.5
     https://doi.org/10.1515/jall.1993.14.1.5 [Google Scholar]
  210. McIntyre, Andrew
    2013 Adjectival passives and adjectival participles in English. InNon-Canonical Passives [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 205], Artemis Alexiadou & Florian Schäfer (eds), 21–42. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.205.02mci
     https://doi.org/10.1075/la.205.02mci [Google Scholar]
  211. 2015 Event modifiers in (German) adjectival participles: Remarks on Gehrke (this issue). Natural Language and Linguistic Theory33: 939–953. 10.1007/s11049‑015‑9285‑9
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-015-9285-9 [Google Scholar]
  212. Meltzer, Aya
    2005 Adjectival Passives and Adjectival Decausatives in Hebrew. M.Phil thesis, Tel Aviv University.
     [Google Scholar]
  213. Meltzer-Asscher, Aya
    2011 Adjectival passives in Hebrew: Evidence for parallelism between the adjectival and verbal systems. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory29: 815–855. 10.1007/s11049‑011‑9138‑0
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-011-9138-0 [Google Scholar]
  214. Michaelis, Laura A.
    1993 “Continuity” within three scalar models: The polysemy of adverbial still. Journal of Semantics10: 193–237. 10.1093/jos/10.3.193
     https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/10.3.193 [Google Scholar]
  215. 1994 The ambiguity of the English present perfect. Journal of Linguistics30: 111–157. 10.1017/S0022226700016200
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226700016200 [Google Scholar]
  216. Mithun, Marianne
    1984 The evolution of noun incorporation. Language60: 847–894. 10.1353/lan.1984.0038
     https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1984.0038 [Google Scholar]
  217. Mittwoch, Anita
    1988 Aspects of English aspect: on the interaction of perfect, progressive and durational phrases. Linguistics and Philosophy11: 203–254. 10.1007/BF00632461
     https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00632461 [Google Scholar]
  218. 1991 In defense of Vendler’s achievements. Belgian Journal of Linguistics6: 71–84. 10.1075/bjl.6.05mit
     https://doi.org/10.1075/bjl.6.05mit [Google Scholar]
  219. Moens, Marc
    1987 Tense, Aspect and Temporal Reference. PhD dissertation, University of Edinburgh.
     [Google Scholar]
  220. Moens, Marc & Steedman, Mark
    1988 Temporal ontology and temporal reference. Computational Linguistics14(2): 15–28.
     [Google Scholar]
  221. Morgan, Jerry
    1969 On arguing about semantics. Papers in Linguistics1: 49–70. 10.1080/08351816909389106
     https://doi.org/10.1080/08351816909389106 [Google Scholar]
  222. Mourelatos, Alexander P. D.
    1978 Events, states and processes. Linguistics and Philosophy2: 415–434. 10.1007/BF00149015
     https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00149015 [Google Scholar]
  223. Navas-Ruiz, Ricardo
    1987 Usos de “ser” y “estar”. Madrid: Sociedad Española de Librería.
     [Google Scholar]
  224. Neeleman, Ad & van de Koot, Hans
    2012 The linguistic expression of causation. InThe Theta System: Argument Structure at the Interface, Martin Everaert , Marijana Marelj & Tal Siloni (eds), 20–51. Oxford: OUP. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199602513.003.0002
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199602513.003.0002 [Google Scholar]
  225. Nishiyama, Atsuko & Koenig, Jean-Pierre
    2010 What is a perfect state?Language86: 611–646. 10.1353/lan.2010.0014
     https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2010.0014 [Google Scholar]
  226. Olsen, Mari Broman
    1994 The semantics and pragmatics of lexical aspect features. Studies in the Linguistics Sciences24: 361–375.
     [Google Scholar]
  227. 1997 A Semantic and Pragmatic Model of Lexical and Grammatical Aspect. New York NY: Garland.
     [Google Scholar]
  228. Pancheva, Roumyana
    2003 The aspectual makeup of the Perfect participle. InPerfect Explorations, Artemis Alexiadou , Monika Rathert & Arnim von Stechow (eds), 277–306. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110902358.277
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110902358.277 [Google Scholar]
  229. Parsons, Terence
    1990 Events in the Semantics of English. A Study in Subatomic Semantics. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  230. Paslawska, Alla & von Stechow, Arnim
    2003 Perfect readings in Russian. InPerfect Explorations, Artemis Alexiadou , Monika Rathert & Arnim von Stechow (eds), 307–362. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110902358.307
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110902358.307 [Google Scholar]
  231. Pereltsvaig, Asya
    1997 The genitive of negation. InProceedings of the Fifth Meeting of the Israeli Association of Theoretical Linguistics, Adam Z. Weiner (ed.), 167–190. Jerusalem: The Hebrew University of Jerusalem Akademon.
     [Google Scholar]
  232. Perlmutter, David M.
    1978 Impersonal Passives and the Unaccusative Hypothesis. InProceedings of the 4th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, Jeri Jaeger (ed.), 157–190. Berkeley CA: BLS.
     [Google Scholar]
  233. Pesetsky, David
    1995 Zero Syntax: Experiencers and Cascades. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  234. Picallo, M. Carme
    1991 Nominals and nominalizations in Catalan. Probus3: 279–316. 10.1515/prbs.1991.3.3.279
     https://doi.org/10.1515/prbs.1991.3.3.279 [Google Scholar]
  235. Portner, Paul
    2003 The (temporal) semantics and (modal) pragmatics of the perfect. Linguistics and Philosophy26: 459–510. 10.1023/A:1024697112760
     https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024697112760 [Google Scholar]
  236. Pustejovsky, James
    1991 The syntax of event structure. Cognition41: 47–81. 10.1016/0010‑0277(91)90032‑Y
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(91)90032-Y [Google Scholar]
  237. Pylkkänen, Liina
    2000 On stativity and causation. InEvents as Grammatical Objects: The Converging Perspectives of Lexical Semantics and Syntax, Carol Tenny & James Pustejovsky (eds), 417–445. Chicago IL: CSLI.
     [Google Scholar]
  238. 2002 Introducing Arguments. PhD dissertation, MIT.
     [Google Scholar]
  239. Ramchand, Gillian
    2014 Causal chains and instrumental case in Hindi/Urdu. InCausation in Grammatical Structures, Bridget Copley & Fabienne Martin (eds), 245–278. Oxford: OUP. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199672073.003.0010
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199672073.003.0010 [Google Scholar]
  240. Ramchand, Gillian & Svenonius, Peter
    2014 Deriving the functional hierarchy. Language Sciences46: 152–174. 10.1016/j.langsci.2014.06.013
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2014.06.013 [Google Scholar]
  241. Ramchand, Gillian C.
    2005 Post-Davidsonianism. Theoretical Linguistics31(3): 359–373. 10.1515/thli.2005.31.3.359
     https://doi.org/10.1515/thli.2005.31.3.359 [Google Scholar]
  242. 2008 Verb Meaning and the Lexicon: A First Phase Syntax. Cambridge: CUP. 10.1017/CBO9780511486319
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486319 [Google Scholar]
  243. 2011 Minimalist semantics. InOxford Handbook of Linguistic Minimalism, Cedric Boeckx (ed.), 449–471. Oxford: OUP.
     [Google Scholar]
  244. 2018 Situations and Syntactic Structures [Linguistic Inquiry Monograph 77]. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/10911.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/10911.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  245. 2019 Verbal symbols and demonstrations across modalities. Open Linguistics5(1): 94–108. 10.1515/opli‑2019‑0006
     https://doi.org/10.1515/opli-2019-0006 [Google Scholar]
  246. Rapp, Irene
    1996 Zustand? Passiv? Überlegungen zum sogenannten “Zustandspassiv”. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft15(2): 231–265. 10.1515/zfsw.1996.15.2.231
     https://doi.org/10.1515/zfsw.1996.15.2.231 [Google Scholar]
  247. 1997 Partizipen und semantische Struktur. Zu passivischen Konstruktionen des 3. Status. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.
     [Google Scholar]
  248. 2011 The attributive past participle: Structure and temporal interpretation. InAudiatur Vox Sapientiae: A Festschrift for Arnim von Stechow, Caroline Féry & Wolfgang Sternefeld (eds), 392–409. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.
     [Google Scholar]
  249. Rappaport-Hovav, Malka & Levin, Beth
    1998 Building verb meanings. InThe Projection of Arguments: Lexical and Syntactic Constraints, Miriam Butt & Wilhelm Geuder (eds), 97–134. Stanford CA: CSLI.
     [Google Scholar]
  250. 2010 Reflections on manner/result complementarity. InSyntax, Lexical Semantics and Event Structure, Malka Rappaport-Hovav , Edit Doron & Ivy Sichel (eds), 21–38. Oxford: OUP. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199544325.003.0002
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199544325.003.0002 [Google Scholar]
  251. Reinhart, Tanya
    1997 Syntactic effects of lexical operations: Reflexives and unaccusatives. Ms, Utrecht University.
     [Google Scholar]
  252. 2000 The theta system: Syntactic realization of verbal concepts. UiL-OTS Working Papers in Linguistics 00/01/TL. Utrecht: Utrecht University.
     [Google Scholar]
  253. 2001 Experiencing deviations. InProceedings of SALT 11, Rachel Hastings , Brendan Jackson & Zsofia Zvolensky (eds), 127–144. Ithaca NY: CLC Publications.
     [Google Scholar]
  254. 2002 The theta system – An overview. Theoretical Linguistics28: 229–290.
     [Google Scholar]
  255. Reinhart, Tanya & Siloni, Tal
    2004 Against the unaccusative analysis of reflexives. InThe Unaccusativity Puzzle: Explorations of the Syntax-Lexicon Interface, Artemis Alexiadou , Elena Anagnostopoulou & Martin Everaert (eds), 288–331. Oxford: OUP. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199257652.003.0007
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199257652.003.0007 [Google Scholar]
  256. 2005 The lexicon-syntax parameter: Reflexivization and other arity operations. Linguistic Inquiry36(3): 389–436. 10.1162/0024389054396881
     https://doi.org/10.1162/0024389054396881 [Google Scholar]
  257. Rizzi, Luigi
    1997 The fine structure of the left periphery. InElements of Grammar, Lilliane Haegeman (ed.), 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer. 10.1007/978‑94‑011‑5420‑8_7
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5420-8_7 [Google Scholar]
  258. Roberts, Ian
    1991 NP-movement, crossover and chain formation. InRepresentation and Derivation in the Theory of Grammar, Hubert Haider & Klaus Netter (eds), 17–52. Dordrecht: Kluwer. 10.1007/978‑94‑011‑3446‑0_2
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3446-0_2 [Google Scholar]
  259. Ross, John R.
    1967 Constraints on Variables in Syntax. PhD dissertation, MIT.
     [Google Scholar]
  260. 1972 Doubling. Linguistic Inquiry3(1): 61–86.
     [Google Scholar]
  261. Rothmayr, Antonia
    2009 The Structure of Stative Verbs. [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 143] Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.143
     https://doi.org/10.1075/la.143 [Google Scholar]
  262. Rothstein, Susan
    2004 Structuring Events: A Study in the Semantics of Lexical Aspect. Blackwell: Oxford. 10.1002/9780470759127
     https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470759127 [Google Scholar]
  263. 2012 Another look at accomplishments and incrementality. InTelicity, Change and State. A Cross-Categorial View of Event Structure, Violeta Demonte & Louise McNally (eds), 60–102. Oxford: OUP. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199693498.003.0003
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199693498.003.0003 [Google Scholar]
  264. Roy, Isabelle
    2013 Non-Verbal Predication: Copular Sentences at the Syntax-Semantics Interface. Oxford: OUP. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199543540.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199543540.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  265. Ryle, Gilbert
    1949 The Concept of Mind. London: Barnes and Noble.
     [Google Scholar]
  266. Sánchez López, Cristina
    1999 La negación. InGramática descriptiva de la lengua española, Vol.2, Ch. 40, Ignacio Bosque & Violeta Demonte (eds), 2561–2634. Madrid: Espasa Calpe.
     [Google Scholar]
  267. Schäfer, Florian
    2008 The Syntax of (Anti-)Causatives: External Arguments in Change-of-State Contexts [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 126]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.126
     https://doi.org/10.1075/la.126 [Google Scholar]
  268. 2009 The causative alternation. Language and Linguistics Compass3(2): 641–681. 10.1111/j.1749‑818X.2009.00127.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818X.2009.00127.x [Google Scholar]
  269. Schlücker, Barbara
    2005 Event-related modifiers in German adjectival passives. InProceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 9, Emar Maier , Corien Bary & Janneke Huitink (eds), 415–430. Nijmegen: Nijmegen Centre of Semantics.
     [Google Scholar]
  270. Schwarzschild, Roger
    2002 The grammar of measurement. InSemantics and Linguistic Theory 12, Brendan Jackson (ed.), 225–245. Ithaca NY: CLC Publications.
     [Google Scholar]
  271. Schwenter, Scott A.
    1994 The grammaticalization of anterior in progress: Evidence from a Peninsular Spanish dialect. Studies in Language18(1): 71–111. 10.1075/sl.18.1.05sch
     https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.18.1.05sch [Google Scholar]
  272. Shibatani, Masayoshi
    1976 The grammar of causative constructions: A conspectus. InSyntax and Semantics 6: The Grammar of Causative Constructions, Masayoshi Shibatani (ed.), 1–40. New York NY: Academic Press. 10.1163/9789004368842_002
     https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004368842_002 [Google Scholar]
  273. Simpson, Jane
    1983 Resultatives. InPapers in Lexical-Functional Grammar, Lori Levin , Malka Rappaport Hovav & Annie Else Zaenen (eds), 143–158. Bloomington IN: Indiana University Linguistics Club.
     [Google Scholar]
  274. Smith, Carlota S.
    1961 A class of complex modifiers in English. Language37: 342–365. 10.2307/411077
     https://doi.org/10.2307/411077 [Google Scholar]
  275. Smith, Carlota
    1983 A theory of aspectual choice. Language59: 479–501. 10.2307/413899
     https://doi.org/10.2307/413899 [Google Scholar]
  276. 1991 The Parameter of Aspect. Dordrecht: Kluwer. 10.1007/978‑94‑015‑7911‑7
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-7911-7 [Google Scholar]
  277. Sorace, Antonella
    2004 Gradience at the lexicon-syntax interface: Evidence from auxiliary selection and implications for unaccusativity. InThe Unaccusativity Puzzle: Explorations of the Syntax-Lexicon Interface, Artemis Alexiadou , Elena Anagnostopoulou & Martin Everaert (eds), 243–268. Oxford: OUP. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199257652.003.0010
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199257652.003.0010 [Google Scholar]
  278. Spathas, Giorgos , Alexiadou, Artemis & Schäfer, Florian
    2015 Middle voice and reflexive interpretations: Afto-prefixation in Greek. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory33(4): 1293–1350. 10.1007/s11049‑014‑9279‑z
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-014-9279-z [Google Scholar]
  279. Starke, Michal
    2009 Nanosyntax – A short primer to a new approach to language. Special Issue on Nanosyntax , Peter Svenonius , Gillian Ramchand , Michal Starke & Tarald Taraldsen (eds). Tromsø: CASTL, University of Tromsø. Nordlyd36: 1–6.
     [Google Scholar]
  280. Stowell, Tim
    1981 Origins of Phrase Structure. PhD dissertation, MIT.
     [Google Scholar]
  281. Svenonius, Peter
    2006 The emergence of axial parts. Special issue on Adpositions , Peter Svenonius & Marina Pantcheva (eds). Tromsø: CASTL, University of Tromsø. Nordlyd33: 49–77.
     [Google Scholar]
  282. 2008 Projections of P. InSyntax and Semantics of Spatial P [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 120], Anna Asbury , Jakub Dotlacil , Berit Gehrke & Rick Nouwen (eds), 63–84. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.120.04sve
     https://doi.org/10.1075/la.120.04sve [Google Scholar]
  283. 2010 Spatial P in English. InCartography of Syntactic Structures, Guglielmo Cinque & Luigi Rizzi (eds), 127–160. Oxford: OUP.
     [Google Scholar]
  284. 2012a Spanning. Ms, University of Tromsø.
     [Google Scholar]
  285. 2012b Structural decomposition of spatial adpositions. Talk presented at TheMeaning of P workshop, Ruhr Universität Bochum, 24 November.
     [Google Scholar]
  286. 2016 Spans and words. InMorphological Metatheory, [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 229], Daniel Siddiqi & Heidi Harley (eds), 201–222. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.229.07sve
     https://doi.org/10.1075/la.229.07sve [Google Scholar]
  287. Talmy, Leonard
    1975 Figure and ground in complex sentences. InProceedings of the First Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, Cathy Cogen (ed.), 419–430. Berkeley CA: BLS.
     [Google Scholar]
  288. 1976 Semantic causative types. InSyntax and Semantics, 6: The Grammar of Causative Constructions, Masayoshi Shibatani (ed.), 43–116. New York NY: Academic Press. 10.1163/9789004368842_003
     https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004368842_003 [Google Scholar]
  289. 1985 Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms. InLanguage Typology and Syntactic Description, I: Clause Structure, Timothy Shopen (ed), 57–149. Cambridge: CUP.
     [Google Scholar]
  290. Taylor, Barry
    1977 Tense and continuity. Linguistics and Philosophy1: 199–220.
     [Google Scholar]
  291. Tenny, Carol
    1987 Grammaticalizing Aspect and Affectedness. PhD dissertation, MIT.
     [Google Scholar]
  292. 1992 The aspectual interface hypothesis. InLexical Matters, Ivan A. Sag & Anna Szablocsi (eds), 1–28. Stanford CA: CSLI.
     [Google Scholar]
  293. 1994 Aspectual Roles and the Syntax-Semantics Interface. Dordrecht: Kluwer. 10.1007/978‑94‑011‑1150‑8
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-1150-8 [Google Scholar]
  294. Tikagawa, Yoshihisa
    1986 Subjects in Japanese and English. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
     [Google Scholar]
  295. Travis, Lisa
    2000 Event Structure in Syntax. InEvents as Grammatical Objects: The Converging Perspectives of Lexical Semantics and Syntax, Carol Tenny & James Pustejovsky (eds), 145–185. Stanford CA: CSLI.
     [Google Scholar]
  296. 2010 Inner Aspect. The Articulation of the VP. Dordrecht: Springer. 10.1007/978‑90‑481‑8550‑4
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-8550-4 [Google Scholar]
  297. Van Valin Jr., Robert D.
    1990 Semantic parameters of split transitivity. Language66: 221–260. 10.2307/414886
     https://doi.org/10.2307/414886 [Google Scholar]
  298. Van Valin Jr., Robert D. & LaPolla, Randy
    1997 Syntax: Structure, Meaning and Function. Cambridge: CUP. 10.1017/CBO9781139166799
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139166799 [Google Scholar]
  299. Vanhoe, Henk
    2004 Aspectos de la sintaxis de los verbos psicológicos en español. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
     [Google Scholar]
  300. Vendler, Zeno
    1957 Verbs and Times. The Philosophical Review66(2): 143–160. 10.2307/2182371
     https://doi.org/10.2307/2182371 [Google Scholar]
  301. Verkuyl, Henk J.
    1972 On the Compositional Nature of the Aspects. Dordrecht: Reidel. 10.1007/978‑94‑017‑2478‑4
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2478-4 [Google Scholar]
  302. 1989 Aspectual classes and aspectual composition. Linguistics and Philosophy12(1): 39–94. 10.1007/BF00627398
     https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00627398 [Google Scholar]
  303. Vivanco, Margot
    2015 Causatividad y cambio de estado en español: La alternancia causativo-inacusativa. PhD dissertation, Universidad Complutense de Madrid.
     [Google Scholar]
  304. Vlach, Frank
    1981 The semantics of the progressive. InSyntax and Semantics, 14: Tense and Aspect, Philip J. Tedeschi & Annie Zaenen (eds), 271–292. New York NY: Academic Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  305. von Stechow, Arnim
    1995 Lexical decomposition in syntax. InLexical Knowledge in the Organization of Language [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 114], Urs Egli , Peter Pause , Christoph Schwarze , Arnim von Stechov & Götz Wienold (eds), 81–177. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.114.05ste
     https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.114.05ste [Google Scholar]
  306. 1996 The different readings of wieder again: A structural account. Journal of Semantics13: 87–138. 10.1093/jos/13.2.87
     https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/13.2.87 [Google Scholar]
  307. 1998 German participles II in Distributed Morphology. Ms, University of Tübingen.
     [Google Scholar]
  308. Wasow, Thomas
    1977 Transformations and the lexicon. InFormal Syntax, Peter W. Culicover , Thomas Wasow & Adrian Akmajian (eds), 327–360. New York NY: Academic Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  309. Wechsler, Stephen
    2005 Resultatives under the ‘event-argument homomorphism’ model of telicity. InThe Syntax of Aspect, Nomi Erteschik-Shir & Tova Rappoport (eds), 255–273. Oxford: OUP. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199280445.003.0012
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199280445.003.0012 [Google Scholar]
  310. Williams, Edwin
    1981 Argument structure and morphology. The Linguistic Review1: 81–114. 10.1515/tlir.1981.1.1.81
     https://doi.org/10.1515/tlir.1981.1.1.81 [Google Scholar]
  311. Wurmbrand, Susi
    2013 QR and selection: Covert evidence for phasehood. InProceedings of NELS 42, Stephan Keine & Shayne Slogget (eds), 277–290. Amherst MA: GLSA.
     [Google Scholar]
  312. 2014 Tense and aspect in English infinitives. Linguistic Inquiry45(3): 403–447. 10.1162/LING_a_00161
     https://doi.org/10.1162/LING_a_00161 [Google Scholar]
  313. Xiqués, Teresa Maria
    2012 Re-examining the hodiernal present perfect: Towards a unified account. InProceedings of ConSOLE XX, Enrico Boone , Marin Kohlberger & Maartje Schulpen (eds). Leiden: SOLE.
     [Google Scholar]
  314. Zubizarreta, María Luisa & Oh, Eunjeong
    2007 On the Syntactic Composition of Manner and Motion. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/5132.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/5132.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
/content/books/9789027260512
Loading

  • From This Site

    /content/books/9789027260512
    dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Chapter
    10
    5
/content/books/9789027260512
dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
-contentType:Journal -contentType:Chapter
10
5
Chapter
content/books/9789027260512
Book
false
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error