oa Patterns of Change in 18th-century English

A sociolinguistic approach

image of Patterns of Change in 18th-century English

Eighteenth-century English is often associated with normative grammar. But to what extent did prescriptivism impact ongoing processes of linguistic change? The authors of this volume examine a variety of linguistic changes in a corpus of personal correspondence, including the auxiliary do, verbal -s and the progressive aspect, and they conclude that direct normative influence on them must have been minimal.

The studies are contextualized by discussions of the normative tradition and the correspondence corpus, and of eighteenth-century English society and culture. Basing their work on a variationist sociolinguistic approach, the authors introduce the models and methods they have used to trace the progress of linguistic changes in the “long” eighteenth century, 1680–1800. Aggregate findings are balanced by analysing individuals and their varying participation in these processes. The final chapter places these results in a wider context and considers them in relation to past sociolinguistic work.

One of the major findings of the studies is that in most cases the overall pace of change was slow. Factors retarding change include speaker evaluation and repurposing outgoing features, in particular, for certain styles and registers.


  1. Aarts, Bas , Joanne Close & Sean Wallis
    2010 Recent changes in the use of the progressive construction in English. In Bert Cappelle & Naoaki Wada (eds.), Distinctions in English grammar: Offered to Renaat Declerck, 48–167. Tokyo: Kaitakusha.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Aarts, Bas , Maria José López-Couso & Belén Méndez-Naya
    2012 Late Modern English syntax. In Alexander Bergs & Laurel Brinton (eds.), Historical linguistics of English, vol.2, 869–887. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Adamson, Sylvia
    1989 With double tongue: Diglossia, stylistics and the teaching of English. In Michael Short (ed.), Reading, analysing and teaching literature, 204–240. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. 1999 Literary language. In Roger Lass (ed.), The Cambridge history of the English language, vol.III: 1476–1776, 539–653. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CHOL9780521264778.008
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521264778.008 [Google Scholar]
  5. 2007 Prescribed reading: Pronouns and gender in the eighteenth century. Historical Sociolinguistics and Sociohistorical Linguistics7. www.hum2.leidenuniv.nl/hsl_shl/Adamson.htm.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Agha, Asif
    2007Language and social relations. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Anderson, Karen
    2000Productivity in English nominal and adjectival derivation, 1100–2000. Perth: University of Western Australia PhD dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Anderwald, Lieselotte
    2012 Clumsy, awkward or having a peculiar propriety? Prescriptive judgements and language change in the 19th century. Language Sciences34(1). 28–53. doi: 10.1016/j.langsci.2011.06.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2011.06.002 [Google Scholar]
  9. 2016Language between description and prescription: Verb categories in nineteenth-century grammars of English. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190270674.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190270674.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  10. Ando, Sadao
    1976A descriptive syntax of Christopher Marlowe’s language. Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Apcar, Amy
    (ed.) 1918Life and adventures of Emin Joseph Emin, 1726–1809. Calcutta: The Baptist Mission Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Ard, Josh
    1982 Auxiliary do: Support or emphasis?Linguistics20. 445–466. doi: 10.1515/ling.1982.20.5‑6.445
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1982.20.5-6.445 [Google Scholar]
  13. Argamon, Shlomo , Moshe Koppel , Jonathan Fine & Anat Rachel Shimoni
    2003 Gender, genre, and writing style in formal written texts. Text23(3). 321–346. doi: 10.1515/text.2003.014
    https://doi.org/10.1515/text.2003.014 [Google Scholar]
  14. Arkell, Tom
    2006 Illuminations and distortions: Gregory King’s scheme calculated for the year 1688 and the social structure of later Stuart England. The Economic History ReviewN.S.59. 32–69. doi: 10.1111/j.1468‑0289.2005.00330.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0289.2005.00330.x [Google Scholar]
  15. Arnaud, René
    1973La forme progressive en Anglais du XIXe siècle. Lille: Service de Reproduction de Thèses Université Lille III.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. 1998 The development of the progressive in 19th century English: A quantitative study. Language Variation and Change10(2). 123–152. doi: 10.1017/S0954394500001265
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394500001265 [Google Scholar]
  17. 2002Letter-writers of the Romantic Age and the modernization of English: A quantitative historical survey of the progressive. web.univ-pau.fr/saes/pb/bibliographies/A/arnaud/romanticletterwriters.pdf (2007.)
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Auer, Anita
    2008 The letter which that I wrote: Self-corrections in Late Modern English letters. In Marina Dossena & Ingrid Tieken-Boon van Ostade (eds.), Studies in Late Modern English correspondence: Methodology and data (Linguistic Insights Studies in Language and Communication76), 213–234. Bern: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Auer, Anita & Victorina González-Díaz
    2005 Eighteenth-century prescriptivism in English: A re-evaluation of its effects on actual language usage. Multilingua24(4). 317–341. doi: 10.1515/mult.2005.24.4.317
    https://doi.org/10.1515/mult.2005.24.4.317 [Google Scholar]
  20. Austin, Frances
    1973 Epistolary conventions in the Clift family correspondence. English Studies54. 9–22, 129–140. doi: 10.1080/00138387308597547
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00138387308597547 [Google Scholar]
  21. 1991The Clift family correspondence 1792–1846. Sheffield: CECTAL.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. 1994 The effect of exposure to Standard English: The language of William Clift. In Dieter Stein & Ingrid Tieken-Boon van Ostade (eds.), Towards a Standard English, 1600–1800, 285–313. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. 2000 Letter writing in a Cornish community in the 1790s. In David Barton & Nigel Hall (eds.), Letter writing as a social practice, 43–61. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/swll.9.04aus
    https://doi.org/10.1075/swll.9.04aus [Google Scholar]
  24. Authorized Version = The Holy Bible, containing the Old and New Testaments, translated out of the original tongues: And with the former translations diligently compared and revised by His Majesty’s special command. Authorized King James version. Oxford: Oxford University Press. quod.lib.umich.edu/k/kjv/. (15June 2013.)
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Baayen, R. H.
    2009 Corpus linguistics in morphology: Morphological productivity. In Anke Lüdeling & Merja Kytö (eds.), Corpus linguistics: An international handbook, 899–919. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110213881.2.899
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110213881.2.899 [Google Scholar]
  26. Bækken, Bjørg
    1998Word order patterns in Early Modern English with special reference to the position of the subject and the finite verb (Studia Anglistica Norvegica9). Oslo: Novus Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. 1999 Periphrastic do in Early Modern English. Folia Linguistica HistoricaXX. 107–128.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. 2002Yet this follie doth many times assault the brauest minds: Affirmative declarative do in 17th-century English. Nordic Journal of English Studies1. 317–337.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. 2003Word order in 17th century English. A study of the stabilisation of the XSV pattern (Studia Anglistica Norvegica12). Oslo: Novus Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Baeskow, Heike
    2012 -Ness and ‑ity: Phonological exponents of n or meaningful nominalizers of different adjectival domains?Journal of English Linguistics40(1). 6–40. doi: 10.1177/0075424211405156
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0075424211405156 [Google Scholar]
  31. Bailey, Richard W.
    2010 Variation and change in eighteenth-century English. In Raymond Hickey (ed.), Eighteenth-century English: Ideology and change, 182–199. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511781643.011
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511781643.011 [Google Scholar]
  32. Baines, Paul
    2004The long 18th century. London: Hodder Arnold.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Baker, Robert
    1770Remarks on the English language, in the nature of Vaugelas’s remarks on the French. London.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Barber, Charles
    1976Early Modern English. London: André Deutch.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Bauer, Laurie
    2001Morphological productivity (Cambridge Studies in Linguistics95). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511486210
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486210 [Google Scholar]
  36. Bax, Randy C.
    2005 Traces of Johnson in the language of Fanny Burney. International Journal of English Studies5(1). 159–181.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Bax, Randy C.
    2008Foolish, foolisher, foolishest: Eighteenth-century English grammars and the comparison of adjectives. In Ingrid Tieken-Boon van Ostade (ed.), Grammars, grammarians and grammar-writing in eighteenth-century England, 279–288. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Baxter, Gareth & William Croft
    2016 Modeling language change across the lifespan: Individual trajectories in community change. Language Variation and Change28(2). 129–173. doi: 10.1017/S0954394516000077
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394516000077 [Google Scholar]
  39. Bayly, Anselm
    1758An introduction to languages, literary and philosophical. London.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Bayly, Anselm
    1772A plain and complete grammar of the English language. London.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Beal, Joan C.
    2004English in modern times 1700–1945. London: Arnold.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Beal, Joan C. , Carmela Nocera & Massimo Sturiale
    (eds.) 2008Perspectives on prescriptivism. Bern: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Bell, Allan
    1984 Language style as audience design. Language in Society13(2). 145–204. doi: 10.1017/S004740450001037X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S004740450001037X [Google Scholar]
  44. Benjamini, Yoav & Yosef Hochberg
    1995 Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological)57(1). 289–300.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Bergs, Alexander
    2004 Address pronouns in Late Middle English. In Alicia Rodríguez-Alvarez & Francisco Alonso-Almeida (eds.), Voices on the past: Studies in Old and Middle English language and literature, 127–138. Coruna: Netbiblo.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. 2005Social networks and historical sociolinguistics: Studies in morphosyntactic variation in the Paston Letters (1421–1503). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110923223
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110923223 [Google Scholar]
  47. 2012 The Uniformitarian Principle and the risk of anachronisms in language and social history. In Juan Manuel Hernández-Campoy & Juan Camilo Conde-Silvestre (eds.), The handbook of historical sociolinguistics, 80–98. Malden, MA: Blackwell. doi: 10.1002/9781118257227.ch5
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118257227.ch5 [Google Scholar]
  48. Bestgen, Yves
    2014 Inadequacy of the chi-squared test to examine vocabulary differences between corpora. Literary and Linguistic Computing29(2). 164–170. doi: 10.1093/llc/fqt020
    https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqt020 [Google Scholar]
  49. Biber, Douglas
    1988Variation across speech and writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511621024
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511621024 [Google Scholar]
  50. 1995Dimensions of register variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511519871
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511519871 [Google Scholar]
  51. 2001 Dimensions of variation among 18th-century speech-based and written registers. In Hans-Jürgen Diller & Manfred Görlach (eds.), Towards a history of English as a history of genres (Anglistische Forschungen298), 89–109. Heidelberg: C. Winter.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. 2010 What can a corpus tell us about registers and genres?In Anne O’Keeffe & Michael McCarthy (eds.), The Routledge handbook of corpus linguistics, 241–254. New York: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9780203856949.ch18
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203856949.ch18 [Google Scholar]
  53. Biber, Douglas & Edward Finegan
    1997 Diachronic relations among speech-based and written registers in English. In Terttu Nevalainen & Leena Kahlas-Tarkka (eds.), To explain the present: Studies in the changing English language in honour of Matti Rissanen (Mémoires de la Société Néophilologique de Helsinki52), 253–275. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Biber, Douglas , Stig Johansson , Geoffrey Leech , Susan Conrad & Edward Finegan
    1999Longman grammar of spoken and written English. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Bingham, William
    1867A grammar of the English language: For the use of schools and academies. Philadelphia.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Black, Jeremy
    2008Eighteenth-century Britain, 1688–1783, 2nd edn.Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave.10.1007/978‑1‑137‑06140‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-06140-9 [Google Scholar]
  57. Black, Joseph
    (eds.) 2006The broadview anthology of British literature: The restoration and the eighteenth century. Peterborough, ON: Broadview Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Blake, Norman F.
    1992 The literary language. In Norman F. Blake (ed.), The Cambridge history of the English language, vol. II: 1066–1476, 500–541. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CHOL9780521264754.007
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521264754.007 [Google Scholar]
  59. Bolinger, Dwight L.
    1948 On defining the morpheme. Word4. 18–23. doi: 10.1080/00437956.1948.11659323
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00437956.1948.11659323 [Google Scholar]
  60. Bolinger, Dwight
    1976 The in-group: One and its compounds. In P. A. Reich (ed.), The second LACUS forum 1975, 229–237. Columbia, SC: Hornbeam Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Bonnell, Thomas F.
    2009 The reprint trade. In Michael F. Suarez & Michael L. Turner (eds.), The Cambridge history of the book in Britain, vol. 5, 1695–1830, 699–709. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CHOL9780521810173.039
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521810173.039 [Google Scholar]
  62. Boulton, Jeremy
    2000 London 1540–1700. In Peter Clark (ed.), The Cambridge history of urban Britain, vol. 2, 1540–1840, 315–346. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CHOL9780521431415.016
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521431415.016 [Google Scholar]
  63. Braaten, Björn
    1967 Notes on continuous tenses in English. Norsk Tidskrift for Sprogvidenskap21. 167–180.
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Brant, Clare
    2006Eighteenth-century letters and British culture. London & New York: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1007/978‑1‑349‑74050‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-74050-5 [Google Scholar]
  65. Brezina, Vaclav & Miriam Meyerhoff
    2014 Significant or random? A critical review of sociolinguistic generalisations based on large corpora. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics19(1). 1–28. doi: 10.1075/ijcl.19.1.01bre
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.19.1.01bre [Google Scholar]
  66. Brightland, John & Charles Gildon
    1711A grammar of the English tongue. London.
    [Google Scholar]
  67. Brittain, Lewis
    1788Rudiments of English grammar. Louvain.
    [Google Scholar]
  68. Brown, Roger & Albert Gilman
    1960 The pronouns of power and solidarity. In Thomas A. Sebeok (ed.), Style in language, 253–276. Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  69. Brysbaert, Marc , Emmanuel Keuleers & Boris New
    2011 Assessing the usefulness of Google Books’ word frequencies for psycholinguistic research on word processing. Frontiers in Psychology2, 27. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00027
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00027 [Google Scholar]
  70. Buchanan, James
    1770A plan of an English grammar-school education. Edinburgh.
    [Google Scholar]
  71. Burke, Peter
    2000 A civil tongue: Language and politeness in Early Modern Europe. In Peter Burke , Brian Harrison & Paul Slack (eds.), Civil histories: Essays presented to Sir Keith Thomas, 31–48. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198207108.003.0002
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198207108.003.0002 [Google Scholar]
  72. Burles, Edward
    1652Grammatica Burlesa, or a new English grammar. (Facsimileedition, R. C. Alston (ed.) English linguistics1500–1800. Menston: Scolar Press 1971.)
    [Google Scholar]
  73. Burn, John
    1766A practical grammar of the English language. Glasgow.
    [Google Scholar]
  74. Burnley, David
    2003 The T/V pronouns in later Middle English literature. In Irma Taavitsainen & Andreas H. Jucker (eds.), Diachronic perspectives on address term systems (Pragmatics & Beyond New Series107), 27–45. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/pbns.107.03bur
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.107.03bur [Google Scholar]
  75. Bybee, Joan
    2010Language, usage and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511750526
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511750526 [Google Scholar]
  76. Byrne, Muriel St Clare
    1964 The foundations of Elizabethan language. In Allardyce Nicoll (ed.), Shakespeare in his own age (Shakespeare Survey17), 223–239. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  77. Campbell, George
    1776The philosophy of rhetoric […]. Volume1. London: printed for W. Strahan; and T. Cadell, in the Strand; and W. Creech at Edinburgh.
    [Google Scholar]
  78. Cannadine, David
    2000Class in Britain. London: Penguin Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  79. Card, William , Raven I. McDavid Jr. , & Virginia McDavid
    1984 Dimensions of usage and dictionary labelling. Journal of English Linguistics17. 57–74. doi: 10.1177/007542428401700105
    https://doi.org/10.1177/007542428401700105 [Google Scholar]
  80. Carretta, Vincent
    2004 Sancho, (Charles) Ignatius (1729?–1780). Oxford dictionary of national biography. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/ref:odnb/24609
    https://doi.org/10.1093/ref:odnb/24609 [Google Scholar]
  81. Carter, Philip
    2001Men and the emergence of polite society, 1660–1800. London: Pearson Education.
    [Google Scholar]
  82. CEEC = Corpora of Early English Correspondence Compiled by Terttu Nevalainen , Helena Raumolin-Brunberg at theDepartment of Modern Languages, University of Helsinki. www.helsinki.fi/varieng/CoRD/corpora/CEEC/. (5May 2014.)
    [Google Scholar]
  83. CEECE = Corpus of Early English Correspondence Extension Compiled by Terttu Nevalainen , Helena Raumolin-Brunberg , Samuli Kaislaniemi , Mikko Laitinen , Minna Nevala , Arja Nurmi , Minna Palander-Collin , Tanja Säily and Anni Sairio at theDepartment of Modern Languages, University of Helsinki.
    [Google Scholar]
  84. Chambers, J. K.
    2009Sociolinguistic theory: Linguistic variation and its social significance. Revised edition. Chichester & Malden, MA: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  85. Cheshire, Jenny
    2013 Grammaticalisation in social context: The emergence of a new English pronoun. Journal of Sociolinguistics17(5). 608–633. doi: 10.1111/josl.12053
    https://doi.org/10.1111/josl.12053 [Google Scholar]
  86. Claridge, Claudia & Merja Kytö
    2014I had lost sight of them then for a bit, but I went on pretty fast: Two degree modifiers in the Old Bailey Corpus. In Irma Taavitsainen , Andreas H. Jucker & Jukka Tuominen (eds.), Diachronic corpus pragmatics, 29–52. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/pbns.243.05cla
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.243.05cla [Google Scholar]
  87. Coates, Jennifer
    2004Women, men, and language: A sociolinguistic account of gender differences in language, 3rd edn.London: Pearson Education.
    [Google Scholar]
  88. COCA = Davies, Mark (2008–) The Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA): 400+ million words, 1990–present. Available online atwww.americancorpus.org/.
  89. Cohen, Michèle
    2006 ‘A little learning’: The curriculum and the construction of gender difference in the long eighteenth century. British Journal for Eighteenth-Century Studies29(3). 321–335. doi: 10.1111/j.1754‑0208.2006.tb00651.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1754-0208.2006.tb00651.x [Google Scholar]
  90. Conde-Silvestre, Juan Camilo
    2012 The role of social networks and mobility in diachronic sociolinguistics. In Juan Manuel Hernández-Campoy & Juan Camilo Conde-Silvestre (eds.), The handbook of historical sociolinguistics, 332–352. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell. doi: 10.1002/9781118257227.ch18
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118257227.ch18 [Google Scholar]
  91. CoRD = Corpus Resource Database. Compiled bythe Research Unit for Variation, Contacts and Change in English (VARIENG), University of Helsinki. www.helsinki.fi/varieng/CoRD/.
    [Google Scholar]
  92. Coote, Charles
    1788Elements of the grammar of the English language. London.
    [Google Scholar]
  93. Corfield, Penelope J.
    1991 Class by name and number in eighteenth-century Britain. In Penelope J. Corfield (ed.), Language, history and class, 101–130. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  94. Cowie, Claire
    1999Diachronic word-formation: A corpus-based study of derived nominalizations in the history of English. Cambridge: University of Cambridge PhD dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  95. 2003 “Uncommon terminations”: Proscription and morphological productivity. Italian Journal of Linguistics15(1). 17–30.
    [Google Scholar]
  96. Cressy, David
    1980 Literacy and society in England and beyond. In David Cressy (ed.), Literacy and the social order. Reading and writing in Tudor and Stuart England, 175–189. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511560484.009
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511560484.009 [Google Scholar]
  97. Culpeper, Jonathan & Merja Kytö
    2010Early Modern English dialogues: Spoken interaction as writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  98. Culpeper, Jonathan & Minna Nevala
    2012 Sociocultural processes and the history of English. In Terttu Nevalainen & Elizabeth Closs Traugott (eds.), The Oxford handbook of the history of English (Oxford Handbooks in Linguistics), 365–391. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  99. D’Arcy, Alexandra , Bill Haddican , Hazel Richards , Sali A. Tagliamonte & Ann Taylor
    2013 Asymmetrical trajectories: The past and present of ‑body/‑one . Language Variation and Change25(3). 287–310. doi: 10.1017/S0954394513000148
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394513000148 [Google Scholar]
  100. Dahl, Torsten
    1956 Linguistic studies in some Elizabethan writings. II The auxiliary do. Acta JutlandicaXXVIII. 3–104.
    [Google Scholar]
  101. Dalton-Puffer, Christiane
    1994 Productive or not productive? The Romance element in Middle English derivation. In Francisco Fernández , Miguel Fuster & Juan José Calvo (eds.), English Historical Linguistics 1992: Papers from the 7th International Conference on English Historical Linguistics, Valencia, 22–26 September 1992 (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory113), 247–260. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.113.25dal
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.113.25dal [Google Scholar]
  102. 1996The French influence on Middle English morphology: A corpus-based study of derivation (Topics in English Linguistics20). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110822113
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110822113 [Google Scholar]
  103. Danchev, Andrej
    1992 The evidence for analytic and synthetic developments in English. In Matti Rissanen , Ossi Ihalainen , Terttu Nevalainen & Irma Taavitsainen (eds.), History of Englishes: New methods and interpretations in historical linguistics, 25–41. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110877007.25
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110877007.25 [Google Scholar]
  104. Daunton, M. S.
    1995Progress and poverty: An economic and social history of Britain 1700–1850. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  105. Davies, Mark
    2011– Google Books Corpus. Based on Google Books n-grams ( Michel 2011) googlebooks.byu.edu.
    [Google Scholar]
  106. 2012 Some methodological issues related to corpus-based investigations of recent syntactic changes in English. In Terttu Nevalainen & Elizabeth Closs Traugott (eds.), The Oxford handbook of the history of English, 157–174. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  107. 2014 Making Google Books n-grams useful for a wide range of research on language change. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics19(3). 401–416. doi: 10.1075/ijcl.19.3.04dav
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.19.3.04dav [Google Scholar]
  108. Daybell, James
    (ed.) 2001Early modern women’s letter writing, 1450–1700. Basingstoke: Palgrave.10.1057/9780230598669
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230598669 [Google Scholar]
  109. 2006Women letter-writers in Tudor England. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199259915.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199259915.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  110. De Smet, Hendrik
    2013Spreading patterns: Diffusional change in the English system of complementation. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  111. Denison, David
    1985 The origins of periphrastic do: Ellegård and Visser reconsidered. In Roger Eaton , Olga Fischer , Willem Koopman & Frederike van der Leek (eds.), Papers from the 4th International Conference on English Historical Linguistics, 45–60. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
  112. 1993English historical syntax: Verbal constructions (Longman Linguistics Library). London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  113. 1998 Syntax. In Suzanne Romaine (ed.), The Cambridge history of the English language, IV: 1776–1997, 92–329. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  114. Denison, David
    2003 Log(ist)ic and simplistic S-curves. In Raymond Hickey (ed.), Motives for language change, 54–70. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511486937.005
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486937.005 [Google Scholar]
  115. Deumert, Ana & Wim Vandenbussche
    (eds.) 2003Germanic standardizations: Past to present (Impact: Studies in Language and Society18). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/impact.18
    https://doi.org/10.1075/impact.18 [Google Scholar]
  116. Dickens, Charles
    1859A tale of two cities. London: Chapman & Hall.
    [Google Scholar]
  117. Diller, Hans-Jürgen , Hendrik De Smet & Jukka Tyrkkö
    2011 A European database of descriptors of English electronic texts. The European English Messenger19. 21–35.
    [Google Scholar]
  118. Dilworth, Thomas
    1751A new guide to the English tongue. 13th edn. London.
    [Google Scholar]
  119. Dossena, Marina
    (ed.) 2014Transatlantic perspectives on Late Modern English. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
  120. Dossena, Marina , John G. Newman & Sylwester Łodej
    (eds.) 2014Token: A Journal of English Linguistics (Volume3): Special issue on Late Modern English.
    [Google Scholar]
  121. Dryden, John
    1672aThe conquest of Granada by the Spaniards in two parts. London: T. N. for Henry Herringman.
    [Google Scholar]
  122. 1672bDefence of the Epilogue to ‘The conquest of Granada’. London.
    [Google Scholar]
  123. Duncan, D.
    1731A new English grammar. London.
    [Google Scholar]
  124. ECEG = Eighteenth-Century English Grammars database 2010 Compiledby Nuria Yáñez-Bouza (Manchester) and María E. Rodríguez-Gil (Las Palmas de Gran Canaria). www.manchester.ac.uk/ECEG. (September 2012.)
    [Google Scholar]
  125. Eckert, Penelope
    2000Linguistic variation as social practice. Malden, MA & Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  126. 2012 Three waves of variation study: The emergence of meaning in the study of sociolinguistic variation. Annual Review of Anthropology41. 87–100. doi: 10.1146/annurev‑anthro‑092611‑145828
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-092611-145828 [Google Scholar]
  127. Edwards, Paul & Polly Rewt
    (eds.) 1994The letters of Ignatius Sancho. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  128. Ellegård, Alvar
    1953The auxiliary do, the establishment and regulation of its use in English (Gothenburg Studies in English2). Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.
    [Google Scholar]
  129. Elphinson, James
    1765The principles of the English language digested. London.
    [Google Scholar]
  130. Elspaß, Stephan
    2012 Between linguistic creativity and formulaic restriction: Cross-linguistic perspectives on nineteenth-century lower class writers’ private letters. In Marina Dossena & Gabriella Del Lungo Camiciotti (eds.), Letter writing in Late Modern Europe, 45–64. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/pbns.218.04els
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.218.04els [Google Scholar]
  131. Elspaß, Stephan , Nils Langer , Joachim Scharloth & Wim Vandenbussche
    (eds.) 2007Germanic language histories ‘from below’ (1700–2000) (Studia Linguistica Germanica86). Berlin & New York: De Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110925463
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110925463 [Google Scholar]
  132. Emsley, Clive , Tim Hitchcock & Robert Shoemaker
    2013 London history: A population history of London. Old Bailey proceedings online. www.oldbaileyonline.org, version 7.0. (13May 2013.)
    [Google Scholar]
  133. Fairman, Tony
    2012 Letters in mechanically-schooled language. Theories and ideologies. In Marina Dossena & Gabriella Del Lungo Camiciotti (eds.), Letter writing in Late Modern Europe, 205–227. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/pbns.218.12fai
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.218.12fai [Google Scholar]
  134. 2015 Language in print and handwriting. In Anita Auer , Daniel Schreier & Richard J. Watts (eds.), Letter writing and language change, 53–71. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139088275.005
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139088275.005 [Google Scholar]
  135. Farnworth, Richard
    1655The pure language of the spirit of truth set forth for the confounding false languages; acted out of pride, ambition and deceit, or, thee and thou in its place is the proper language to any single person whatsoever: Proved by severall examples, etc. London.
    [Google Scholar]
  136. Farro, Daniel
    1754The royal universal British grammar and vocabulary. London.
    [Google Scholar]
  137. Feather, John
    1985The provincial book trade in eighteenth-century England. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511552892
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511552892 [Google Scholar]
  138. Fell, John
    1784An essay towards an English grammar. London.
    [Google Scholar]
  139. Fenning, Daniel
    1771A new grammar of the English language; or an easy introduction to the art of speaking and writing English with propriety and correctness: […]. London: printed for S. Crowder .
    [Google Scholar]
  140. Ferguson, Charles
    1996 Variation and drift: Loss of agreement in Germanic. In T. Huebner (ed.), Sociolinguistic perspectives: Papers on language in society, 1959–1994, 241–260. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  141. Filppula, Markku
    2003 More on the English progressive and the Celtic connection. In Hildegard Tristram (ed.), The Celtic EnglishesIII, 150–168. Heidelberg: Winter.
    [Google Scholar]
  142. Filppula, Markku & Juhani Klemola
    2012 English in contact: Celtic and Celtic Englishes. In Alexander Bergs & Laurel Brinton (eds.), English historical linguistics, vol. 2, 1687–1703. Berlin & Boston: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  143. Finegan, Edward
    1998 English grammar and usage. In Suzanne Romaine (ed.), The Cambridge history of the English language, 1776–1997, vol.IV, 536–588. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  144. Finegan, Edward & Douglas Biber
    2001 Register variation and social dialect variation: The Register Axiom. In Penelope Eckert & John R. Rickford (eds.), Style and sociolinguistic variation, 235–267. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  145. Finkenstaedt, Thomas
    1963You und thou: Studien zur Anrede im Englischen . Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110822588
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110822588 [Google Scholar]
  146. Fisher, Michael
    2004Counterflows to colonialism: Indian travellers and settlers in Britain, 1600–1857. Ohio: Oberlin College.
    [Google Scholar]
  147. Fitzmaurice, Susan
    1998 The commerce of language in the pursuit of politeness in eighteenth-century England. English Studies79. 309–328. doi: 10.1080/00138389808599136
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00138389808599136 [Google Scholar]
  148. 2000 The Spectator, the politics of social networks, and language standardisation in eighteenth-century England. In Laura Wright (ed.), The development of Standard English, 1300–1800: Theories, descriptions, conflicts, 195–218. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511551758.012
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511551758.012 [Google Scholar]
  149. 2004 The meanings and uses of the progressive construction in an early eighteenth-century English network. In Anne Curzan & Kimberly Emmons (eds.), Studies in the History of the English LanguageII, 131–173. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110897661.131
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110897661.131 [Google Scholar]
  150. 2012 Social factors and language change in eighteenth-century England: The case of negative concord. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen113. 293–321.
    [Google Scholar]
  151. Fogg, Peter W.
    1792–96 Elementa Anglicana; or, the principles of English grammar displayed and exemplified. 2vols.London.
    [Google Scholar]
  152. Fogg, Peter Walkden
    1796Elementa Anglicana. Stockport.
    [Google Scholar]
  153. Forgeng, Jeffrey L.
    2007Daily life in Stuart England. Westwood, CT: Greenwood Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  154. Fox, George , John Stubs & Benjamin Furley
    1660A battle-door for teachers & professors to learn singular & plural; you to many, and thou to one. London.
    [Google Scholar]
  155. Frank, Thomas
    1985 The rise of do-support in Early Modern English: A reappraisal. Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses10. 1–29.
    [Google Scholar]
  156. Friginal, Eric & Jack A. Hardy
    2014Corpus-based sociolinguistics: A guide for students. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  157. Friginal, Eric , Marsha Walker & Janet Beth Randall
    2014 Exploring mega-corpora: Google Ngram Viewer and the Corpus of Historical American English. EuroAmerican Journal of Applied Linguistics and Languages1(1). 48–68. doi: 10.21283/2376905X.1.4
    https://doi.org/10.21283/2376905X.1.4 [Google Scholar]
  158. Gachelin, Jean-Marc
    1997 The progressive and habitual aspects in non-standard Englishes. In Edgar Werner Schneider (ed.), Englishes Around the World, vol.1, 33–46. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/veaw.g18.07gac
    https://doi.org/10.1075/veaw.g18.07gac [Google Scholar]
  159. Gardner, Anne
    2013Derivation in Middle English: Regional and text type variation. Zurich: University of Zurich PhD dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  160. Gerner, Jürgen
    1996 Untersuchungen zur Funktion des emphatischen do im Englischen . Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  161. Gil, Alexander
    1619Logonomia Anglica. London: J. Beale.
    [Google Scholar]
  162. González-Díaz, Victorina
    2008 On normative grammarians and the double marking of degree. In Ingrid Tieken-Boon van Ostade (ed.), Grammars, grammarians and grammar-writing in eighteenth-century England, 289–310. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  163. Google
    2013a Google Books Ngram Viewer. https://books.google.com/ngrams/.
  164. 2013b About Ngram Viewer. https://books.google.com/ngrams/info.
  165. Görlach, Manfred
    1988 The study of Early Modern English variation – the Cinderella of English historical linguistics?In Jacek Fisiak (ed.), Historical dialectology, regional and social, 211–228. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110848137.211
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110848137.211 [Google Scholar]
  166. Görlach, Manfred
    1991Introduction to Early Modern English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139166010
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139166010 [Google Scholar]
  167. 2001Eighteenth-century English (Sprachwissenschaftliche Studienbücher). Heidelberg: Winter.
    [Google Scholar]
  168. Greaves, Paul
    1594Grammatica Anglicana. London. (Facsimileedition, R. C. Alston (ed.) English linguistics 1500–1800. Menston: Scolar Press 1969.)
    [Google Scholar]
  169. Greenwood, James
    1722 [1711] An essay towards a practical English grammar, […], 2nd edn.London: printed forJohn Clark.
    [Google Scholar]
  170. Gries, Stefan Th. & Martin Hilpert
    2010 Modeling diachronic change in the third person singular: A multifactorial, verb- and author-specific exploratory approach. English Language and Linguistics14(3). 293–320. doi: 10.1017/S1360674310000092
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1360674310000092 [Google Scholar]
  171. Grund, Peter
    2011 The science of pronominal usage: He and it in conference to inanimate entities in Late Middle English texts on alchemy. Journal of English Linguistics39(4). 335–358.
    [Google Scholar]
  172. Hammond, Samuel
    1750A new introduction to learning; or, a sure guide to the English pronunciation and orthography. Nottingham: Creswell.
    [Google Scholar]
  173. Hay, Douglas & Nicholas Rogers
    1997Eighteenth-century English society: Shuttles and swords. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  174. Helsinki Corpus = The Helsinki Corpus of English Texts (1991) Department of Modern Languages, University of Helsinki. Compiledby Matti Rissanen (Project leader), Merja Kytö (Project secretary); Leena Kahlas-Tarkka , Matti Kilpiö (Old English); Saara Nevanlinna , Irma Taavitsainen (Middle English); Terttu Nevalainen , Helena Raumolin-Brunberg (Early Modern English) .
    [Google Scholar]
  175. Hickey, Raymond
    2010a Timeline for the eighteenth century. In Raymond Hickey (ed.), Eighteenth-century English: Ideology and change, 139–159. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  176. (ed.) 2010bEighteenth-century English: Ideology and change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511781643
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511781643 [Google Scholar]
  177. 2012 Early English and the Celtic hypothesis. In Terttu Nevalainen & Elizabeth Closs Traugott (eds.), The Oxford handbook of the history of English. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199922765.013.0042
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199922765.013.0042 [Google Scholar]
  178. Hinneburg, Alexander , Heikki Mannila , Samuli Kaislaniemi , Terttu Nevalainen & HelenaRaumolin-Brunberg
    2007 How to handle small samples: Bootstrap and Bayesian methods in the analysis of linguistic change. Literary and Linguistic Computing22. 137–150. doi: 10.1093/llc/fqm006
    https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqm006 [Google Scholar]
  179. Hodson, Jane
    2008 Joseph Priestley’s two Rudiments of English grammar: 1761 and 1768. In Ingrid Tieken-Boon van Ostade (ed.), Grammars, grammarians and grammar-writing in eighteenth-century England, 177–190. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  180. Holmes, George & Daniel Szechi
    1993The age of oligarchy. Pre-industrial Britain 1722–1783. London & New York: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  181. Holmes, Janet & Miriam Meyerhoff
    2005 Different voices, different views: An introduction to current research in language and gender. In Janet Holmes & Miriam Meyerhoff (eds.), The handbook of language and gender, 1–17. Malden, MA & Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  182. Holmqvist, Erik
    1922On the history of the English present inflections, particularly -th and -s. Heidelberg: Carl Winters Universitätsbuchhandlung.
    [Google Scholar]
  183. Honegger, Thomas
    2003 ‘And if ye wol nat so, my lady sweete, thanne preye I thee, […].’: Forms of address in Chaucer’s Knight’s Tale . In Irma Taavitsainen & Andreas H. Jucker (eds.), Diachronic perspectives on address term systems (Pragmatics & Beyond New Series107), 61–84. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/pbns.107.05hon
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.107.05hon [Google Scholar]
  184. Hope, Jonathan
    1993 Second person singular pronouns in records of early modern ‘spoken’ English. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen94(1). 83–100.
    [Google Scholar]
  185. Horne Tooke, John
    1798The diversions of Purley, vol.1. 2nd edn.London.
    [Google Scholar]
  186. Hornsey, John
    1793A short English grammar in two parts: Simplified to the capacities of children. York.
    [Google Scholar]
  187. Huber, Magnus
    2007 The Old Bailey Proceedings, 1674–1834: Evaluating and annotating a corpus of 18th- and 19th-century spoken English. In Anneli Meurman-Solin & Arja Nurmi (eds.), Annotating variation and change (Studies in Variation, Contacts and Change in English 1). Helsinki: VARIENG. www.helsinki.fi/varieng/series/volumes/01/huber/.
    [Google Scholar]
  188. Huddleston, Rodney & Geoffrey K. Pullum
    2002The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781316423530
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316423530 [Google Scholar]
  189. Hudson, Richard A.
    1996Sociolinguistics, 2nd edn.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139166843
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139166843 [Google Scholar]
  190. Hundt, Marianne
    2004 Animacy, agentivity and the spread of the progressive in Modern English. English Language and Linguistics8(1). 47–69. doi: 10.1017/S1360674304001248
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1360674304001248 [Google Scholar]
  191. Hundt, Marianne & Geoffrey Leech
    2012 “Small is beautiful”: On the value of standard reference corpora for observing recent grammatical change. In Terttu Nevalainen & Elizabeth Closs Traugott (eds.), The Oxford handbook of the history of English, 175–188. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  192. Hundt, Marianne & Christian Mair
    1999 ‘Agile’ and ‘uptight’ genres: The corpus-based approach to language change in progress. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics4(2). 221–242. doi: 10.1075/ijcl.4.2.02hun
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.4.2.02hun [Google Scholar]
  193. Ihalainen, Ossi
    1976 Periphrastic do in affirmative sentences in the dialect of East Somerset. Neuphilologische MitteilungenLXXVII. 608–622.
    [Google Scholar]
  194. Ihalainen, Ossi
    1982 On the notion “possible grammatical change”: A look at a perfectly good change that did not quite make it. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia15. 3–11.
    [Google Scholar]
  195. 1994 The dialects of England since 1776. In Robert Burchfield (ed.), The Cambridge history of the English language, vol.V: English in Britain and overseas: Origins and developments, 197–274. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  196. Immel, Andrea
    2009 Children’s books and school books. In Michael F. Suarez & Michael L. Turner (eds.), The Cambridge history of the book in Britain, vol. 5, 1695–1830, 736–749. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CHOL9780521810173.042
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521810173.042 [Google Scholar]
  197. Joby, Chris
    2014 Third-person singular zero in the Norfolk dialect: A re-assessment. Folia Linguistica Historica35. 135–172.
    [Google Scholar]
  198. Johnson, Samuel
    1755A Dictionary of the English Language, vol.2. London.
    [Google Scholar]
  199. Johnstone, Barbara
    2016 Enregisterment: How linguistic items become linked with ways of speaking. Language and Linguistics Compass10. 632–643. doi: 10.1111/lnc3.12210
    https://doi.org/10.1111/lnc3.12210 [Google Scholar]
  200. Jones, Hugh
    1724An accidence to the English tongue. London.
    [Google Scholar]
  201. Jucker, Andreas H.
    2000aHistory of English and English historical linguistics. Stuttgart: Ernst Klett.
    [Google Scholar]
  202. 2000bThou in the history of English: A case for historical semantics or pragmatics?In Christiane Dalton-Puffer & Nikolaus Ritt (eds.), Words: Structure, meaning, function: A festschrift for Dieter Kastovsky, 153–163. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110809169.153
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110809169.153 [Google Scholar]
  203. Jucker, Andreas H. , Irma Taavitsainen & Gerold Schneider
    2012 Semantic corpus trawling: Expressions of “courtesy” and “politeness” in the Helsinki Corpus. In Carla Suhr & Irma Taavitsainen (eds.), Developing corpus methodology for historical pragmatics (Studies in Variation, Contacts and Change in English11). Helsinki: VARIENG. www.helsinki.fi/varieng/series/volumes/11/jucker_taavitsainen_schneider/.
    [Google Scholar]
  204. Kaislaniemi, Samuli
    2006 The Corpus of Early English Correspondence Extension and Supplement. Poster presented at ICAME 27 (the 27th conference of the International Computer Archive for Medieval and Modern English), 24–28 May, Espoo, Finland. Available on CoRD: www.helsinki.fi/varieng/CoRD/corpora/CEEC/Kaislaniemi_posteri_96dpi.pdf.
    [Google Scholar]
  205. Kampstra, Peter
    2008 Beanplot: A boxplot alternative for visual comparison of distributions. Journal of Statistical Software28. Code Snippet 1, www.jstatsoft.org/v28/c01/. doi: 10.18637/jss.v028.c01
    https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v028.c01 [Google Scholar]
  206. Kekäläinen, Kirsti
    1971Aspects of style and language in the English and Scottish popular ballads. Helsinki: University of Helsinki licentiate thesis.
    [Google Scholar]
  207. Kerswill, Paul
    1996 Children, adolescents, and language change. Language Variation and Change8. 177–202. doi: 10.1017/S0954394500001137
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394500001137 [Google Scholar]
  208. Kilgarriff, Adam
    2001 Comparing corpora. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics6(1). 97–133. doi: 10.1075/ijcl.6.1.05kil
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.6.1.05kil [Google Scholar]
  209. Killie, Kristin
    2004 Subjectivity and the English progressive. English Language and Linguistics8(1). 25–46. doi: 10.1017/S1360674304001236
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1360674304001236 [Google Scholar]
  210. Kirkby, John
    1746A new English grammar, or, guide to the English tongue, with notes. London: for R. Manby & H. S. Coy (Facs. ed.Menston: Scolar 1971, EL 297).
    [Google Scholar]
  211. Klein, Lawrence E.
    1994 “Politeness” as linguistic ideology in late seventeenth- and eighteenth-century England. In Dieter Stein & Ingrid Tieken-Boon van Ostade (eds.), Towards a Standard English, 1600–1800, 31–50. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  212. Klein, Lawrence E.
    2002 Politeness and the interpretation of the British eighteenth century. The Historical Journal45. 869–898. doi: 10.1017/S0018246X02002716
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0018246X02002716 [Google Scholar]
  213. Kleiner, Brian & Dennis R. Preston
    1997 Discourse disputes: How come you do do like you do. Folia Linguistica31. 105–131. doi: 10.1515/flin.1997.31.1‑2.105
    https://doi.org/10.1515/flin.1997.31.1-2.105 [Google Scholar]
  214. Knox, Vicesimus
    1789Liberal education, 10th edn., 2 vols. London.
    [Google Scholar]
  215. Koch, Peter & Wulf Oesterreicher
    1985 Sprache der Nähe – Sprache der Distanz: Mündlichkeit und Schriftlichkeit im Spannungsfeld von Sprachtheorie und Sprachgeschichte. Romanistisches Jahrbuch36. 15–46.
    [Google Scholar]
  216. Koplenig, Alexander
    2017 The impact of lacking metadata for the measurement of cultural and linguistic change using the Google Ngram data sets: Reconstructing the composition of the German corpus in times of WWII. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities32(1). 169–188.
    [Google Scholar]
  217. Kranich, Svenja
    2008 Subjective progressives in seventeenth- and eighteenth-century English. Secondary grammaticalization as a process of objectification. In Marina Dossena , Richard Dury & Maurizio Gotti (eds.), English Historical Linguistics 2006. Selected Papers from the Fourteenth International Conference on English Historical Linguistics (ICEHL 14), vol.1, 241–256. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
  218. 2010The progressive in Modern English: A corpus-based study of grammaticalization and related changes (Language and Computers: Studies in Practical Linguistics72). Amsterdam: Rodopi. doi: 10.1163/9789042031449
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789042031449 [Google Scholar]
  219. Kurki, Tommi
    2005Yksilön ja ryhmän kielen reaaliaikainen muuttuminen: Kielenmuutosten seuraamisesta ja niiden tarkastelussa käytettävistä menetelmistä [Real-time language change of group and individual: On following linguistic changes in apparent time and real time, and on the methods used in the study of language change]. Helsinki: Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seura.
    [Google Scholar]
  220. Kytö, Merja
    1993 Third-person present singular verb inflection in early British and American English. Language Variation and Change5. 113–139. doi: 10.1017/S0954394500001447
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394500001447 [Google Scholar]
  221. (comp) 1996Manual to the diachronic part of the Helsinki Corpus of English Texts. Coding conventions and lists of source texts, 3rd edn.Helsinki: Department of English, University of Helsinki.
    [Google Scholar]
  222. Kytö, Merja & Matti Rissanen
    1997 Introduction: Language analysis and diachronic corpora. In Raymond Hickey , Merja Kytö , Ian Lancashire & Matti Rissanen (eds.), Tracing the trail of time: Proceedings from the second Diachronic Corpora workshop, 9–22. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
    [Google Scholar]
  223. Labov, William
    1978 [1972] Sociolinguistic patterns. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  224. 1994Principles of linguistic change, vol.1: Internal factors (Language in Society20). Oxford, UK & Cambridge, USA: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  225. 2001Principles of linguistic change, vol.2: Social factors (Language in Society29). Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  226. 2010Principles of linguistic change, vol.3: Cognitive and cultural factors (Language in Society39). Malden, MA & Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. doi: 10.1002/9781444327496
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444327496 [Google Scholar]
  227. Laitinen, Lea & Taru Nordlund
    2012 Performing identities and interaction through epistolary formulae. In Marina Dossena & Gabriella Del Lungo Camiciotti (eds.), Letter writing in Late Modern Europe, 65–88. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/pbns.218.05lai
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.218.05lai [Google Scholar]
  228. Laitinen, Mikko
    2002 Extending the Corpus of Early English Correspondence to the 18th century. Helsinki English Studies2. blogs.helsinki.fi/hes-eng/volumes/volume-2-corpora-in-todays-english-studies.
    [Google Scholar]
  229. Laitinen, Mikko
    2007a Explaining present-day variation: Agreement patterns of he and they with singular antecedents. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen108(4). 537–562.
    [Google Scholar]
  230. Laitinen, Mikko
    2007bAgreement patterns in English. Diachronic corpus studies on common-number pronouns. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.
    [Google Scholar]
  231. 2009 Singular you was/you were variation and English normative grammars in the eighteenth century. In Arja Nurmi , Minna Nevala & Minna Palander-Collin (eds.), The language of daily life in England (1400–1800), 199–217. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/pbns.183.12lai
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.183.12lai [Google Scholar]
  232. Langford, Paul
    1998 [1989] A polite and commercial people: England, 1727–1783. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  233. 2002 The uses of eighteenth-century politeness. Transactions of the Royal Historical Society12. 311–331. doi: 10.1017/S0080440102000129
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0080440102000129 [Google Scholar]
  234. Lass, Roger
    (ed.) 1999aThe Cambridge history of the English language, vol. III: 1476–1776. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  235. 1999b Phonology and morphology. In Roger Lass (ed.), The Cambridge history of the English language, vol. III: 1476–1776, 56–186. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  236. Leech, Geoffrey
    1993 100 million words of English. English Today9(1). 9–15. doi: 10.1017/S0266078400006854
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266078400006854 [Google Scholar]
  237. Leech, Geoffrey & Nicholas Smith
    2005 Extending the possibilities of corpus-based research on English in the twentieth century: A prequel to LOB and FLOB. ICAME Journal29. 83–98.
    [Google Scholar]
  238. Lijffijt, Jefrey
    2013Computational methods for comparison and exploration of event sequences. Helsinki: Aalto University PhD dissertation. urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-60-5475-9.
    [Google Scholar]
  239. Lijffijt, Jefrey , Terttu Nevalainen , Tanja Säily , Panagiotis Papapetrou , Kai Puolamäki & Heikki Mannila
    2016 Significance testing of word frequencies in corpora. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities31(2). 374–397.10.1093/llc/fqu064
    https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqu064 [Google Scholar]
  240. Lijffijt, Jefrey , Tanja Säily & Terttu Nevalainen
    2012 CEECing the baseline: Lexical stability and significant change in a historical corpus. In Jukka Tyrkkö , Matti Kilpiö , Terttu Nevalainen & Matti Rissanen (eds.), Outposts of historical corpus linguistics: From the Helsinki Corpus to a proliferation of resources (Studies in Variation, Contacts and Change in English10). Helsinki: VARIENG. www.helsinki.fi/varieng/series/volumes/10/lijffijt_saily_nevalainen/.
    [Google Scholar]
  241. Lin, Yuri , Jean-Baptiste Michel , Erez Lieberman Aiden , Jon Orwant , Will Brockman & Slav Petrov
    2012 Syntactic annotations for the Google Books Ngram Corpus. InProceedings of the ACL 2012 system demonstrations, 169–174. Stroudsburg, PA: Association for Computational Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  242. Lindert, Peter H. & Jeffrey G. Williamson
    1982 Revising England’s social tables 1688–1812. Explorations in Economic History19. 385–408. doi: 10.1016/0014‑4983(82)90009‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-4983(82)90009-2 [Google Scholar]
  243. Lindsay, Mark & Mark Aronoff
    2013 Natural selection in self-organizing morphological systems. In Nabil Hathout , Fabio Montermini & Jesse Tseng (eds.), Morphology in Toulouse: Selected proceedings of Décembrettes 7 (LINCOM Studies in Theoretical Linguistics51). Munich: Lincom.
    [Google Scholar]
  244. Lodge, R. Anthony
    2004A sociolinguistic history of Parisian French. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511486685
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486685 [Google Scholar]
  245. Los, Bettelou
    2002 The loss of the indefinite pronoun man. Syntactic change and information structure. In Teresa Fanego , María José López-Couso & Javier Perez-Guerra (eds.), English historical syntax and morphology. Selected Papers from 11 ICEHL, Santiago de Compostela, 7–11 September 2000, 181–202. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
  246. Loughton, William
    1734A practical grammar of the English tongue. London.
    [Google Scholar]
  247. Loughton, William
    1744A practical grammar of the English tongue, 4th edn. London.
    [Google Scholar]
  248. Lowe, Solomon
    1737English grammar reformd into a small compass and easy method for the readier learning and better understanding of the English tongue. London.
    [Google Scholar]
  249. Lowth, Robert
    1762A short introduction to English grammar: With critical notes. London.
    [Google Scholar]
  250. 1763A short introduction to English grammar: With critical notes, 2nd edn. Dublin: Saunders.
    [Google Scholar]
  251. Lutz, Angelika
    1998 The interplay of external and internal factors in morphological restructuring: The case of you . In Jacek Fisiak & Marcin Krygier (eds.), Advances in English historical linguistics (1996), 189–210. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110804072.189
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110804072.189 [Google Scholar]
  252. Mair, Christian
    2006Twentieth-century English: History, variation and standardization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511486951
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486951 [Google Scholar]
  253. Mann, H. B. & D. R. Whitney
    1947 On a test of whether one of two random variables is stochastically larger than the other. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics18(1). 50–60. doi: 10.1214/aoms/1177730491
    https://doi.org/10.1214/aoms/1177730491 [Google Scholar]
  254. Mannila, Heikki , Terttu Nevalainen & Helena Raumolin-Brunberg
    2013 Quantifying variation and estimating the effects of sample size on the frequencies of linguistic variables. In Manfred Krug & Julia Schlüter (eds.), Research methods in language variation and change, 337–360. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511792519.023
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511792519.023 [Google Scholar]
  255. Marchand, Hans
    1969The categories and types of present-day English word-formation: A synchronic-diachronic approach, 2nd edn. Munich: C.H. Beck’sche Verlagsbuchhandlung.
    [Google Scholar]
  256. Martin, Benjamin
    1754An introduction to the English language and learning in three parts. London.
    [Google Scholar]
  257. Martinet, André
    1964Elements of general linguistics. London: Faber.
    [Google Scholar]
  258. Martínez-Insua, Ana E. & Javier Pérez-Guerra
    2006 ‘There’s Bjørg’: On there-sentences in the recent history of English. In Leiv Egil Breivik , Sandra Halverson & Kari E. Haugland (eds.), ‘These things I write vnto thee …’ Essays in honour of Bjørg Bækken, 189–211. Oslo: Novus Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  259. McIntosh, Angus , M. L. Samuels & Michael Benskin
    1986A linguistic atlas of Late Mediaeval English, vol.I. Aberdeen: Aberdeen University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  260. McIntosh, Carey
    1986Common and courtly language: The stylistics of social class in 18th-century British literature. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  261. 1998The evolution of English prose 1700–1800: Style, politeness, and print culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511582790
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511582790 [Google Scholar]
  262. 2008 British English in the long eighteenth century (1660–1830). In Haruko Momma & Michael Matto (eds.), Blackwell companion to the history of the English language, 228–234. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  263. Metcalfe, Lister
    1771The rudiments of the English tongue; or, the principles of English grammar, […], 2nd edn.Newcastle: printed by T. Saint , for J. Wilkie , London.
    [Google Scholar]
  264. Michael, Ian
    1970English grammatical categories and the tradition to 1800. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  265. 1987The teaching of English from the sixteenth century to 1870. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139165853
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139165853 [Google Scholar]
  266. 1997 The hyperactive production of English grammars in the nineteenth century: A speculative bibliography. Publishing History41. 23–61.
    [Google Scholar]
  267. Michel, Jean-Baptiste , Yuan Kui Shen , Aviva Presser Aiden , Adrian Veres , Matthew K. Gray , The Google Books Team , Joseph P. Pickett ,
    2011 Quantitative analysis of culture using millions of digitized books. Science331(6014). 176–182. doi: 10.1126/science.1199644
    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1199644 [Google Scholar]
  268. Milroy, James
    1992Linguistic variation and change: On the historical sociolinguistics of English (Language in Society19). Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  269. Milroy, James & Lesley Milroy
    2012 [1985] Authority in language: Investigating language prescription and standardisation, 4th edn.London & New York: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
    [Google Scholar]
  270. Minugh, David
    1999 What aileth thee, to print so curiously? Archaic forms and contemporary newspaper language. In Irma Taavitsainen , Gunnel Melchers & Päivi Pahta (eds.), Writing in non-standard English, 47–54. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
  271. Moore, Colette
    2002 Writing good Southerne: Local and supralocal norms in the Plumpton letter collection. Language Variation and Change14. 1–17. doi: 10.1017/S0954394502141019
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394502141019 [Google Scholar]
  272. Mossé, Fernand
    1938Histoire de la forme périphrastique être + participe présent en germanique. Paris: Klincksieck.
    [Google Scholar]
  273. Mugglestone, Lynda
    2003 [1995] ‘Talking proper’: The rise of accent as social symbol, 2nd edn.Oxford: Clarendon Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  274. Munck, Thomas
    2000The enlightenment: A comparative social history 1721–1794. London: Arnold.
    [Google Scholar]
  275. Murray, Lindley
    1795English grammar: Adapted to the different classes of learners. London.
    [Google Scholar]
  276. Mustanoja, Tauno F.
    1960A Middle English syntax. 1: Parts of speech. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.
    [Google Scholar]
  277. Nevala, Minna
    2002Your moder sent a letter to the: Pronouns of address in private correspondence from Late Middle to Late Modern English. In Helena Raumolin-Brunberg , Minna Nevala , Arja Nurmi & Matti Rissanen (eds.), Variation past and present: VARIENG studies on English for Terttu Nevalainen (Mémoires de la Société Néophilologique de Helsinki61), 135–159. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.
    [Google Scholar]
  278. 2004a Accessing politeness axes: On forms of address and terms of reference in early English correspondence. Journal of Pragmatics36(12). 2125–2160. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2004.02.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2004.02.001 [Google Scholar]
  279. 2004bAddress in early English correspondence: Its forms and socio-pragmatic functions (Mémoires de la Société Néophilologique de Helsinki64). Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.
    [Google Scholar]
  280. 2009Friends will be friends? The sociopragmatics of referential terms in early English letters. In Andreas H. Jucker , Daniel Schreier & Marianne Hundt (eds.), Corpora: Pragmatics and discourse. Papers from the 29th international conference on English language research on computerized corpora, 81–101. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
    [Google Scholar]
  281. Nevala, Minna & Arja Nurmi
    2013The Corpora of Early English Correspondence (CEEC400). In Anneli Meurman-Solin & Jukka Tyrkkö (eds.), Principles and practices for the digital editing and annotation of diachronic data (Studies in Variation, Contacts and Change in English14). Helsinki: VARIENG. www.helsinki.fi/varieng/series/volumes/14/nevala_nurmi/.
    [Google Scholar]
  282. Nevalainen, Terttu
    1996 Gender difference. In Terttu Nevalainen & Helena Raumolin-Brunberg (eds.), Sociolinguistics and language history: Studies based on the Corpus of Early English Correspondence, 77–91. Amsterdam & Atlanta: Rodopi.
    [Google Scholar]
  283. 2000 Processes of supralocalisation and the rise of Standard English in the Early Modern period. In Ricardo Bermúdez-Otero , David Denison , Richard M. Hogg & C. B. McCully (eds.), Generative theory and corpus studies: A dialogue from 10 ICEHL, 329–372. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110814699.329
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110814699.329 [Google Scholar]
  284. 2006 Negative concord as an English “vernacular universal”: Social history and linguistic typology. Journal of English Linguistics34(3). 257–278. doi: 10.1177/0075424206293144
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0075424206293144 [Google Scholar]
  285. Nevalainen, Terttu
    2008 Variation in written English: Grammar change or a shift in style?In Susan Kermas & Maurizio Gotti (eds.), Socially-conditioned language change: Diachronic and synchronic insights, 31–51. Lecce: Edizioni del Grifo.
    [Google Scholar]
  286. Nevalainen, Terttu
    2009 Number agreement in existential constructions: A sociolinguistic study of 18th-century English. In Markku Filppula , Juhani Klemola & Heli Paulasto (eds.), Vernacular universals and language contact, 80–102. New York & London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  287. 2013 English historical corpora in transition: From new tools to legacy corpora?In Paul Bennett , Martin Durrell , Silke Scheible & Richard J. Whitt (eds.), New methods in historical corpora (Korpuslinguistik und interdisziplinäre Perspektiven auf Sprache3), 37–53. Tübingen: Narr.
    [Google Scholar]
  288. 2014a Sociohistorical analysis. In Janet Holmes & Kirk Hazen (eds.), Research methods in sociolinguistics: A practical guide, 93–106. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  289. 2014b What are historical sociolinguistics?Journal of Historical Sociolinguistics1(2). 243–269. doi: 10.1515/jhsl‑2015‑0014
    https://doi.org/10.1515/jhsl-2015-0014 [Google Scholar]
  290. 2015 Descriptive adequacy of the S-curve model in diachronic studies of language change. In Christina Sanchez-Stockhammer (ed.), Can we predict linguistic change? (Studies in Variation, Contacts and Change in English16). Helsinki: VARIENG. www.helsinki.fi/varieng/series/volumes/16/nevalainen/.
    [Google Scholar]
  291. Nevalainen, Terttu & Elizabeth Closs Traugott
    (eds.) 2012The Oxford handbook of the history of English. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199922765.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199922765.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  292. Nevalainen, Terttu & Helena Raumolin-Brunberg
    1994a Sociolinguistics and language history: The Helsinki Corpus of Early English Correspondence. Hermes: Journal of Linguistics13. 135–143.
    [Google Scholar]
  293. 1994bIts strength and the beauty of it: The standardization of the third person neuter possessive in Early Modern English. In Dieter Stein & Ingrid Tieken-Boon van Ostade (eds.), Towards a Standard English, 1600–1800, 171–183. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  294. (eds.) 1996aSociolinguistics and language history: Studies based on the Corpus of Early English Correspondence. Amsterdam & Atlanta: Rodopi.
    [Google Scholar]
  295. 1996b The Corpus of Early English Correspondence. In Terttu Nevalainen & Helena Raumolin-Brunberg (eds.), Sociolinguistics and language history: Studies based on the Corpus of Early English Correspondence, 39–54. Amsterdam & Atlanta: Rodopi.
    [Google Scholar]
  296. 2000a The changing role of London on the linguistic map of Tudor and Stuart England. In Dieter Kastovsky & Arthur Mettinger (eds.), The history of English in a social context: A contribution to historical sociolinguistics, 279–337. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110810301.279
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110810301.279 [Google Scholar]
  297. 2000b The third-person singular -(e)s and -(e)th revisited: The morphophonemic hypothesis. In Christiane Dalton-Puffer & Nikolaus Ritt (eds.), Words: Structure, meaning, function; A festschrift for Dieter Kastovsky (Trends in Linguistics130), 235–248. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110809169.235
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110809169.235 [Google Scholar]
  298. 2003Historical sociolinguistics: Language change in Tudor and Stuart England (Longman Linguistics Library). London: Pearson Education.
    [Google Scholar]
  299. Nevalainen, Terttu , Helena Raumolin-Brunberg & Heikki Mannila
    2011 The diffusion of language change in real time: Progressive and conservative individuals and the time-depth of change. Language Variation and Change23(1). 1–43. doi: 10.1017/S0954394510000207
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394510000207 [Google Scholar]
  300. Nevalainen, Terttu , Helena Raumolin-Brunberg & Peter Trudgill
    2001 Chapters in the social history of East Anglian English: The case of the third-person singular. In Jacek Fisiak & Peter Trudgill (eds.), East Anglian English, 187–204. Cambridge: Boydell & Brewer.
    [Google Scholar]
  301. Nevalainen, Terttu & Matti Rissanen
    1986 Do you support the do-support? Emphatic and non-emphatic do in affirmative statements in present-day spoken English. In Sven Jacobson (ed.), Papers from the Third Scandinavian Symposium on Syntactic Variation. Stockholm, May 11–12, 1985, 35–50. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell International.
    [Google Scholar]
  302. 2002Fairly pretty or pretty fair? On the development and grammaticalization of English downtoners. Language Sciences24. 359–380. doi: 10.1016/S0388‑0001(01)00038‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0388-0001(01)00038-9 [Google Scholar]
  303. Nevalainen, Terttu & Gijsbert Rutten
    (eds.) 2012Neuphilologische MitteilungenCXIII(3). Special issue on comparative historical sociolinguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  304. Nevalainen, Terttu & Ingrid Tieken-Boon van Ostade
    2006 Standardisation. In Richard M. Hogg & David Denison (eds.), A history of the English language, 271–311. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511791154.006
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511791154.006 [Google Scholar]
  305. Nevalainen, Terttu & Heli Tissari
    2010 Contextualising eighteenth-century politeness: Social distinction and metaphorical levelling. In Raymond Hickey (ed.), Eighteenth-century English: Ideology and change (Studies in English Language), 133–158. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511781643.009
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511781643.009 [Google Scholar]
  306. Nicholson, James
    1793The rudiments or first principles of English grammar. Newcastle: M. Angus.
    [Google Scholar]
  307. Núñez-Pertejo, Paloma
    2004The progressive in the history of English (LINCOM Studies in English Linguistics06). Munchen: Lincom.
    [Google Scholar]
  308. Nurmi, Arja
    1996 Periphrastic do and be + ing: Interconnected developments?In Terttu Nevalainen & Helena Raumolin-Brunberg (eds.), Sociolinguistics and language history: Studies based on the Corpus of Early English Correspondence (Language and Computers: Studies in Practical Linguistics15), 151–165. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
    [Google Scholar]
  309. 1998Manual for the Corpus of Early English Correspondence Sampler CEECS. Department of English. University of Helsinki. clu.uni.no/icame/manuals/
    [Google Scholar]
  310. 1999A social history of periphrastic do (Mémoires de la Société Néophilologique de Helsinki56). Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.
    [Google Scholar]
  311. Nurmi, Arja , Minna Nevala & Minna Palander-Collin
    (eds.) 2009The language of daily life in England (1400–1800). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/pbns.183
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.183 [Google Scholar]
  312. Nurmi, Arja & Päivi Pahta
    2010 Preacher, scholar, brother, friend: Social roles and code-switching in the writings of Thomas Twining. In Päivi Pahta , Minna Nevala , Arja Nurmi & Minna Palander-Collin (eds.), Social roles and language practices in Late Modern English (Pragmatics & Beyond NS195), 135–162. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.195.07nur
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.195.07nur [Google Scholar]
  313. Nurmi, Arja & Minna Palander-Collin
    2008 Letters as a text type: Interaction in writing. In Marina Dossena & Ingrid Tieken-boon van Ostade (eds.), Studies in Late Modern English correspondence: Methodology and data (Linguistic Insights Studies in Language and Communication76), 21–49. Bern: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  314. OED = Oxford English Dictionary, 2nd edn. 1989 OED Online. Oxford University Press. www.oed.com/. (5May 2014.)
    [Google Scholar]
  315. Oeppen, Jim
    1993 Back projection and inverse projection: Members of a wider class of constrained projection models. Population Studies47(2). 245–267. doi: 10.1080/0032472031000146996
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0032472031000146996 [Google Scholar]
  316. Ogura, Mieko & William S -Y. Wang
    1996 Snowball effect in lexical diffusion: The development of ‑s in the third-person singular present indicative in English. In Derek Britton (ed.), English Historical Linguistics 1994: Papers from the 8th International Conference on English Historical Linguistics, 119–141. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.135.10ogu
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.135.10ogu [Google Scholar]
  317. Oldireva-Gustafsson, Larisa
    2002 Variation in usage and grammars: The past participle forms of write in English 1680–1790. Historical Sociolinguistics and Sociohistorical Linguistics2. www.hum2.leidenuniv.nl/hsl_shl/Oldireva%20G.htm. (July 2012.)
    [Google Scholar]
  318. Olsen, Kirstin
    1999Daily life in eighteenth-century England. Westwood, CT: Greenwood Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  319. OTA = University of Oxford Text Archive. University of Oxford. ota.ahds.ac.uk.
  320. Pahta, Päivi , Minna Nevala , Arja Nurmi & Minna Palander-Collin
    (eds.) 2010Social roles and language practices in Late Modern English (Pragmatics & Beyond NS195). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/pbns.195
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.195 [Google Scholar]
  321. Palander-Collin, Minna & Mikko Hakala
    2011 Standardizing the Corpus of Early English Correspondence (CEEC). Poster presented at ICAME 32 (32nd conference of the International Computer Archive of Modern and Medieval English), 1–5 June 2011, Oslo, Norway. Available on CoRD: www.helsinki.fi/varieng/CoRD/corpora/CEEC/standardized.html.
    [Google Scholar]
  322. Palander-Collin, Minna & Minna Nevala
    2010 Reporting and social role construction in eighteenth-century personal correspondence. In Päivi Pahta , Minna Nevala , Arja Nurmi & Minna Palander-Collin (eds.), Social roles and language practices in Late Modern English (Pragmatics & Beyond NS195), 111–133. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/pbns.195.06pal
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.195.06pal [Google Scholar]
  323. Palander-Collin, Minna , Minna Nevala & Anni Sairio
    2013 Language and identity in letters. In Jukka Tyrkkö , Olga Timofeeva & Maria Salenius (eds.), Ex philologia lux. Essays in honour of Leena Kahlas-Tarkka (Mémoires de la Société Néophilologique de Helsinki90), 291–311. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.
    [Google Scholar]
  324. Palmer, Chris C.
    2009Borrowings, derivational morphology, and perceived productivity in English, 1300–1600. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan PhD dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  325. Parker, Richard G. & Charles Fox
    1835 [1834]. Progressive exercises in English grammar, 3rd edn.Boston/New York.
    [Google Scholar]
  326. Pechenick, Eitan Adam , Christopher M. Danforth & Peter Sheridan Dodds
    2015 Characterizing the Google Books corpus: Strong limits to inferences of socio-cultural and linguistic evolution. PLOS ONE10(10). e0137041. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0137041
    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0137041 [Google Scholar]
  327. Percy, Carol
    2008 Mid-century grammars and their reception in the Monthly Review and the Critical Review . In Ingrid Tieken-Boon van Ostade (ed.), Grammars, grammarians and grammar-writing in eighteenth-century England, 125–142. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  328. 2009a Periodical reviews and the rise of prescriptivism: The Monthly (1749–1844) and Critical Review (1756–1817) in the eighteenth century. In Ingrid Tieken-Boon van Ostade & Wim van der Wurff (eds.), Current issues in Late Modern English, 117–150. Bern: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  329. 2009b Learning and virtue: English grammar and the eighteenth-century girls’ school. In Mary Hilton & Jill Shefrin (eds.), Educating the child in Enlightenment Britain: Beliefs, cultures, practices, 77–98. Surrey: Ashgate.
    [Google Scholar]
  330. Poplack, Shana , Gerard, Van Herk & Dawn Harvie
    2002 ‘Deformed in the dialects’: An alternative history of non-standard English. In Richard Watts & Peter Trudgill (eds.), Alternative histories of English, 87–110. London & New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  331. Porter, Roy
    2000Enlightenment: Britain and the creation of the modern world. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
  332. Pratt, Linda & David Denison
    2000 The language of the Southey-Coleridge circle. Language Sciences22. 401–422. doi: 10.1016/S0388‑0001(00)00013‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0388-0001(00)00013-9 [Google Scholar]
  333. Prest, Wilfrid
    (ed.) 1987The professions in early modern England. London: Croom Helm.
    [Google Scholar]
  334. Quackenbos, George P.
    1868 [1862] An English grammar. New York.
    [Google Scholar]
  335. Quirk, Randolph
    1971 Shakespeare and the English language. In Kenneth Muir & Samuel Schoenbaum (eds.), A new companion to Shakespeare studies, 67–83. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  336. Quirk, Randolph , Sidney Greenbaum , Geoffrey Leech & Jan Svartvik
    1985A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  337. Raumolin-Brunberg, Helena
    1994 The development of the compound pronouns in ‑body and ‑one in Early Modern English. In Dieter Kastovsky (ed.), Studies in Early Modern English (Topics in English Linguistics13), 301–324. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110879599.301
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110879599.301 [Google Scholar]
  338. 1998 Social factors and pronominal change in the seventeenth century: The Civil War effect. In Jacek Fisiak & Marcin Krygier (eds.), Advances in English historical linguistics, 361–388. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  339. 2009 Lifespan changes in the language of three early modern gentlemen. In Arja Nurmi , Minna Nevala & Minna Palander-Collin (eds.), The language of daily life in England (1400–1800), 165–196. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/pbns.183.10rau
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.183.10rau [Google Scholar]
  340. Raumolin-Brunberg, Helena & Leena Kahlas-Tarkka
    1997 Indefinite pronouns with singular human reference. In Matti Rissanen , Merja Kytö & Kirsi Heikkonen (eds.), Grammaticalization at work: Studies of long-term developments in English (Topics in English Linguistics24), 17–86. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110810745.17
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110810745.17 [Google Scholar]
  341. Raumolin-Brunberg, Helena & Terttu Nevalainen
    2007 Historical sociolinguistics: The Corpus of Early English Correspondence . In Joan C. Beal , Karen P. Corrigan & Hermann L. Moisl (eds.), Creating and digitizing language corpora, vol.2, Diachronic databases, 148–171. Houndsmills: Palgrave-Macmillan. A pre-print version is available atwww.helsinki.fi/varieng/CoRD/corpora/CEEC/generalintro.html.10.1057/9780230223202_7
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230223202_7 [Google Scholar]
  342. Raven, James
    2009 The book as a commodity. In Michael F. Suarez & Michael L. Turner (eds.), The Cambridge history of the book in Britain, vol. 5, 1695–1830, 85–117. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CHOL9780521810173.005
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521810173.005 [Google Scholar]
  343. Rayson, Paul , Geoffrey Leech & Mary Hodges
    1997 Social differentiation in the use of English vocabulary: Some analyses of the conversational component of the British National Corpus. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics2(1). 133–152. doi: 10.1075/ijcl.2.1.07ray
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.2.1.07ray [Google Scholar]
  344. Renouf, Antoinette
    2012 A finer definition of neology in English: The life-cycle of a word. In Hilde Hasselgård , Jarle Ebeling & Signe Oksefjell Ebeling (eds.), Corpus perspectives on patterns of lexis (Studies in Corpus Linguistics57), 177–208. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
  345. Riddle, Elizabeth M.
    1985 A historical perspective on the productivity of the suffixes ‑ness and ‑ity . In Jacek Fisiak (ed.), Historical semantics; historical word-formation (Trends in Linguistics: Studies and Monographs29), 435–461. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110850178.435
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110850178.435 [Google Scholar]
  346. Rissanen, Matti
    1985 Periphrastic do in affirmative statements in Early American English. Journal of English Linguistics18(2). 163–183. doi: 10.1177/007542428501800205
    https://doi.org/10.1177/007542428501800205 [Google Scholar]
  347. 1989 Three problems connected with the use of diachronic corpora. ICAME Journal13. 16–19.
    [Google Scholar]
  348. Rissanen, Matti
    1997 Whatever happened to the Middle English indefinite pronouns?In Jacek Fisiak (ed.), Studies in Middle English linguistics, 513–529. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110814194.513
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110814194.513 [Google Scholar]
  349. Rissanen, Matti
    1999 Syntax. In Roger Lass (ed.), The Cambridge history of the English language, vol. III: 1476–1776, 187–331. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  350. Robins, Robert H.
    1986 The evolution of English grammar books since the Renaissance. In Gerhard Leitner (ed.), English reference grammar. Languages and linguistics writers and readers, 292–306. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
    [Google Scholar]
  351. Rohrdantz, Christian , Andreas Niekler , Annette Hautli , Miriam Butt & Daniel A. Keim
    2012 Lexical semantics and distribution of suffixes: A visual analysis. In Miriam Butt , Sheelagh Carpendale , Gerald Penn , Jelena Prokić & Michael Cysouw (eds.), Proceedings of the EACL 2012 joint workshop of LINGVIS & UNCLH, 7–15. Stroudsburg, PA: Association for Computational Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  352. Romaine, Suzanne
    1985 Variability in word formation patterns and productivity in the history of English. In Jacek Fisiak (ed.), Papers from the 6th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Poznań, 22–26 August 1983 (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory34), 451–465. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
  353. (ed.) 1998The Cambridge history of the English language, vol. IV, 1776–1997. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  354. 2005 Variation in language and gender. In Janet Holmes & Miriam Meyerhoff (eds.), The handbook of language and gender, 98–118. Malden, MA & Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  355. Rowlands, Ian , David Nicholas , Peter Williams , Paul Huntington , Maggie Fieldhouse , Barrie Gunter , Richard Withey , Hamid R. Jamali , Tom Dobrowolski & Carol Tenopir
    2008 The Google generation: The information behaviour of the researcher of the future. Aslib Proceedings60(4). 290–310. doi: 10.1108/00012530810887953
    https://doi.org/10.1108/00012530810887953 [Google Scholar]
  356. Rutten, Gijsbert
    2009 Grammar to the people. The Dutch language and the public sphere in the 18th century. With special reference to Kornelis van der Palm. Beiträge zur Geschichte der Sprachwissenschaft19. 55–86.
    [Google Scholar]
  357. Rutten, Gijsbert & Marijke J. van der Wal
    2014Letters as loot: A Sociolinguistic approach to seventeenth- and eighteenth-century Dutch. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/ahs.2
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ahs.2 [Google Scholar]
  358. Rutten, Gijsbert , Rik Vosters & Wim Vandenbussche
    (eds.) 2014Norms and usage in language history, 1600–1900: A sociolinguistic and comparative perspective. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/ahs.3
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ahs.3 [Google Scholar]
  359. Rydén, Mats & Sverker Brorström
    1987 The be/have variation with intransitives in English: With special reference to the Late Modern period . Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell International.
    [Google Scholar]
  360. Saeed, John I.
    1997Semantics (Introducing Linguistics2). Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  361. Säily, Tanja
    2011 Variation in morphological productivity in the BNC: Sociolinguistic and methodological considerations. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory7(1). 119–141. doi: 10.1515/cllt.2011.006
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cllt.2011.006 [Google Scholar]
  362. 2014Sociolinguistic variation in English derivational productivity: Studies and methods in diachronic corpus linguistics (Mémoires de la Société Néophilologique de Helsinki XCIV). Helsinki: Société Néophilologique. urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-951-9040-50-9.
    [Google Scholar]
  363. 2016 Sociolinguistic variation in morphological productivity in eighteenth-century English. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory12(1). 129–151.10.1515/cllt‑2015‑0064
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cllt-2015-0064 [Google Scholar]
  364. Säily, Tanja , Terttu Nevalainen & Harri Siirtola
    2011 Variation in noun and pronoun frequencies in a sociohistorical corpus of English. Literary and Linguistic Computing26(2). 167–188. doi: 10.1093/llc/fqr004
    https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqr004 [Google Scholar]
  365. Säily, Tanja & Jukka Suomela
    2009 Comparing type counts: The case of women, men and ‑ity in early English letters. In Antoinette Renouf & Andrew Kehoe (eds.), Corpus linguistics: Refinements and reassessments (Language and Computers: Studies in Practical Linguistics69), 87–109. Amsterdam: Rodopi. doi: 10.1163/9789042025981_007
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789042025981_007 [Google Scholar]
  366. Sairio, Anni
    2009Language and letters of the Bluestocking network: Sociolinguistic issues in eighteenth-century epistolary English (Mémoires de la Société Néophilologique de Helsinki75). Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.
    [Google Scholar]
  367. Sairio, Anni & Minna Nevala
    2013 Social dimensions of layout in eighteenth-century letters and letter-writing manuals. In Anneli Meurman-Solin & Jukka Tyrkkö (eds.), Principles and practices for the digital editing and annotation of diachronic data (Studies in Variation, Contacts and Change in English14). Helsinki: VARIENG. www.helsinki.fi/varieng/series/volumes/14/sairio_nevala/. (26June 2015.)
    [Google Scholar]
  368. Sandhu, Sukhdev S.
    1998 Ignatius Sancho and Laurence Sterne. Research in African Literature29(4). 88–105.
    [Google Scholar]
  369. Schütze, Carson T.
    2004 Synchronic and diachronic microvariation in English do . Lingua114. 495–516. doi: 10.1016/S0024‑3841(03)00070‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-3841(03)00070-6 [Google Scholar]
  370. Schwartz, Leonard
    2000 London 1700–1840. In Peter Clark (ed.), The Cambridge history of urban Britain, vol. 2, 1540–1840, 641–672. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CHOL9780521431415.025
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521431415.025 [Google Scholar]
  371. Shoemaker, Robert
    2004The London mob: Violence and disorder in eighteenth-century England. London: Hambledon and London.
    [Google Scholar]
  372. Skedd, Susan
    1997 Women teachers and the expansion of girl’s schooling in England, c.1760–1820. In Hannah Barker & Elaine Chalus (eds.), Gender in eighteenth-century England, 101–125. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  373. Smith, Adam
    (1762) [1983] Lectures on rhetoric and belles lettres. The Glasgow edition of the works and correspondence of Adam Smith. Vol.4. Ed.by J. C. Bryce . Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  374. Smitterberg, Erik
    2002The progressive in 19th-century English: A process of integration. Uppsala, Sweden: Uppsala UniversityPhD thesis.
    [Google Scholar]
  375. 2005The progressive in 19th-century English: A process of integration (Language and Computers: Studies in Practical Linguistics54). Amsterdam & New York: Rodopi.10.1163/9789004333086
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004333086 [Google Scholar]
  376. Stein, Dieter
    1990 The semantics of syntactic change: Aspects of the evolution of do in English . Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110846829
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110846829 [Google Scholar]
  377. Steinbach, Susie
    2005Women in England 1750–1914: A social history. London: Phoenix.
    [Google Scholar]
  378. Stone, Lawrence
    1969 Literacy and education in England, 1640–1900. Past and Present42. 69–139. doi: 10.1093/past/42.1.69
    https://doi.org/10.1093/past/42.1.69 [Google Scholar]
  379. Straaijer, Robin
    2010 Prescription or practice? Be/have variation with past participles of mutative intransitive verbs in the letters of Joseph Priestley. In Ursula Lenker , Judith Huber & Robert Mailhammer (eds.), English historical linguistics 2008. Selected papers from the fifteenth International Conference on English Historical Linguistics (ICEHL 15), Munich, 24–30 August 2008, 63–78. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
  380. Strang, Barbara M. H.
    1970A history of English. London: Methuen.
    [Google Scholar]
  381. Strang, Barbara
    1982 Some aspects of the history of the be+ing construction. In John Anderson (ed.), Language form and linguistic variation, 427–474. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/cilt.15.22str
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.15.22str [Google Scholar]
  382. Suarez, Michael F.
    2009 Toward a bibliometric analysis of the surviving record, 1701–1800. In Michael F. Suarez & Michael L. Turner (eds.), The Cambridge history of the book in Britain, vol. 5, 1695–1830, 39–65. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CHOL9780521810173.003
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521810173.003 [Google Scholar]
  383. Sundby, Bertil , Anne Kari Bjørge & Kari E. Haugland
    1991A dictionary of English normative grammar 1700–1800. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/sihols.63
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sihols.63 [Google Scholar]
  384. Suomela, Jukka
    2014types2: Type and hapax accumulation curves. Computer program. Zenodo. Cite to nonCR doi: 10.5281/zenodo.9868, users.ics.aalto.fi/suomela/types2/.
  385. Svartvik, Jan & Hans Lindquist
    1997 One and body language. In Udo Fries , Viviane Müller & Peter Schneider (eds.), From Ælfric to the New York Times: Studies in English corpus linguistics, 11–20. Amsterdam & Atlanta: Rodopi.
    [Google Scholar]
  386. Sweet, Henry
    1903A new English grammarII. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  387. Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt
    2009 Typological parameters of intralingual variability: Grammatical analyticity versus syntheticity in varieties of English. Language Variation and Change21. 319–353. doi: 10.1017/S0954394509990123
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394509990123 [Google Scholar]
  388. 2012 Analyticity and syntheticity in the history of English. In Terttu Nevalainen & Elizabeth Closs Traugott (eds.), The Oxford handbook of the history of English, 654–665. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  389. 2016 About text frequencies in historical linguistics: Disentangling environmental and grammatical change. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory12(1). 153–171.10.1515/cllt‑2015‑0068
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cllt-2015-0068 [Google Scholar]
  390. Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt , Douglas Biber , Jesse Egbert & Karlien Franco
    2016 Toward more accountability: Modeling ternary genitive variation in Late Modern English. Language Variation and Change28(1). 1–29. doi: 10.1017/S0954394515000198
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394515000198 [Google Scholar]
  391. Tagliamonte, Sali A.
    2012Variationist sociolinguistics: Change, observation, interpretation. Malden, MA & Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  392. 2016Teen talk: The language of adolescents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139583800
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139583800 [Google Scholar]
  393. The Art of Letter-Writing, divided into two parts. The first, containing rules and directions for writing letters on all sorts of subjects: with a variety of examples, Equally elegant and instructive. The second, a collection of letters on the most interesting occasions in life, etc (1762) London: T. Osborne.
    [Google Scholar]
  394. Tieken-Boon van Ostade , Ingrid
    1985Do-support in the writings of Lady Mary Wortley Montagu: A change in progress. Folia Linguistica HistoricaVI. 127–151.
    [Google Scholar]
  395. 1987The auxiliary do in eighteenth-century English . A Sociohistorical-linguistic Approach. Dordrecht: Foris.
    [Google Scholar]
  396. 2000 Normative studies in England. In Sylvain Auroux , E. F. Konrad Koerner , Hans-Josef Niederehe & Kees Versteegh (eds.), History of the language sciences, vol.I, 876–887. Berlin & New York: Walter de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  397. 2005 Of social networks and linguistic influence: The language of Robert Lowth and his correspondents. In Juan Camilo Conde-Silvestre (ed.), Sociolinguistics and the history of English. Special issue of International Journal of English Studies 5. 135–157.
    [Google Scholar]
  398. 2006 Eighteenth-century prescriptivism and the norm of correctness. In Ans van Kemenade & Bettelou Los (eds.), The handbook of the history of English, 539–557. London: Blackwell. doi: 10.1002/9780470757048.ch21
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470757048.ch21 [Google Scholar]
  399. Tieken-Boon van Ostade , Ingrid
    (ed.) 2008Grammars, grammarians and grammar-writing in eighteenth-century England. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  400. Tieken-Boon van Ostade , Ingrid
    2008a Grammars, grammarians and grammar-writing: An introduction. In Ingrid Tieken-Boon van Ostade (ed.), Grammars, grammarians and grammar-writing in eighteenth-century England, 1–14. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  401. 2008b The 1760s: Grammars, grammarians and the booksellers. In Ingrid Tieken-Boon van Ostade (ed.), Grammars, grammarians and grammar-writing in eighteenth-century England, 101–124. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  402. 2008c Reception and the market for grammars: Introduction. In Ingrid Tieken-Boon van Ostade (ed.), Grammars, grammarians and grammar-writing in eighteenth-century England, 79–80. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  403. 2009An introduction to Late Modern English. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  404. 2010 Eighteenth-century women and their norms of correctness. In Raymond Hickey (ed.), Eighteenth-century English: Ideology and change (Studies in English Language), 59–72. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511781643.005
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511781643.005 [Google Scholar]
  405. 2014In search of Jane Austen. The language of the letters. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199945115.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199945115.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  406. Trudgill, Peter
    1999The dialects of England, 2nd edn.Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  407. 2011Sociolinguistic typology: Social determinants of linguistic complexity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  408. Tyrkkö, Jukka
    2013 Notes on eighteenth-century dictionary grammars. Transactions of the Philological Society111(2). 179–201. doi: 10.1111/1467‑968X.12031
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-968X.12031 [Google Scholar]
  409. Vartiainen, Turo , Tanja Säily & Mikko Hakala
    2013 Variation in pronoun frequencies in early English letters: Gender-based or relationship-based?In Jukka Tyrkkö , Olga Timofeeva & Maria Salenius (eds.), Ex philologia lux: Essays in honour of Leena Kahlas-Tarkka (Mémoires de la Société Néophilologique de HelsinkiXC), 233–255. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.
    [Google Scholar]
  410. Visser, F.
    1969An historical syntax of the English language. III Part I. Leiden: E.J. Brill.
    [Google Scholar]
  411. Visser, Federicus Th
    1963–73 An historical syntax of the English Language. 4vols.Leiden: E.J. Brill.
    [Google Scholar]
  412. Vorlat, Emma
    1996 Lindley Murray’s prescriptive canon. In Ingrid Tieken-Boon van Ostade (ed.), Two hundred years of Lindley Murray, 163–182. Münster: Nodus Publikationen.
    [Google Scholar]
  413. Wagner, Suzanne Evans & Isabelle Buchstaller
    2017Panel studies of variation and change. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  414. Wagner, Suzanne Evans & Gillian Sankoff
    2011 Age grading in the Montréal French inflected future. Language Variation and Change23(3). 275–313. doi: 10.1017/S0954394511000111
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394511000111 [Google Scholar]
  415. Wales, Kathleen M.
    1983Thou and you in Early Modern English: Brown and Gilman re-appraised. Studia Linguistica37(2). 107–125. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑9582.1983.tb00316.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9582.1983.tb00316.x [Google Scholar]
  416. Walker, Terry
    2007Thou and you in Early Modern English dialogues. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/pbns.158
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.158 [Google Scholar]
  417. Wallis, John
    1653Grammatica linguae Anglicanae. Oxford.
    [Google Scholar]
  418. Watts, Richard J.
    1999 Language and politeness in early eighteenth century Britain. Pragmatics9(1). 9–20. doi: 10.1075/prag.9.1.02wat
    https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.9.1.02wat [Google Scholar]
  419. Watts, Richard J.
    2002 From polite language to educated language: The re-emergence of an ideology. In Richard Watts & Peter Trudgill (eds.), Alternative histories of English, 155–172. London & New York: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9780203468005
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203468005 [Google Scholar]
  420. Watts, Richard J.
    2008 Grammar writers in eighteenth-century Britain: A community of practice or a discourse community?In Tieken-Boon van Ostade (ed.), 37–56.
    [Google Scholar]
  421. Webster, Noah
    1789Dissertations on the English language. Boston.
    [Google Scholar]
  422. White, James
    1761The English verb. London.
    [Google Scholar]
  423. Whyman, Susan
    2009The Pen and the people: English letter writers 1660–1800. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199532445.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199532445.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  424. Wilcoxon, Frank
    1945 Individual comparisons by ranking methods. Biometrics Bulletin1(6). 80–83. doi: 10.2307/3001968
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3001968 [Google Scholar]
  425. Wolfson, Nessa
    1990 The bulge: A theory of speech behavior and social distance. Penn Working Papers in Educational Linguistics2(1). 55–83.
    [Google Scholar]
  426. Wood, Johanna L.
    2004 Text in context: A critical discourse analysis approach to Margaret Paston. In Terttu Nevalainen & Sanna-Kaisa Tanskanen (eds.), Letter writing. Special issue of Journal of Historical Pragmatics5(2). 229–254.
    [Google Scholar]
  427. Wright, Susan
    1994 The mystery of the modal progressive. In Dieter Kastovsky (ed.), Studies in Early Modern English, 467–485. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110879599.467
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110879599.467 [Google Scholar]
  428. Wrightson, Keith
    2002Earthly necessities: Economic lives in Early Modern Britain 1470–1750. London: Penguin Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  429. Wrigley, Edward A.
    1987People, cities and wealth: The transformation of traditional society. Oxford. Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  430. 2004Poverty, progress, and population. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511616365
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511616365 [Google Scholar]
  431. 2010Energy and the English industrial revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511779619
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511779619 [Google Scholar]
  432. Wrigley, Edward A. & Roger C. Schofield
    1981The population history of England 1541–1871: A reconstruction. London: Edward Arnold.
    [Google Scholar]
  433. Yáñez-Bouza, Nuria
    2016 Early and Late Modern English grammars as evidence in English historical linguistics. In Merja Kytö & Päivi Pahta (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of English historical linguistics, 164–180. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139600231.011
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139600231.011 [Google Scholar]
  434. Yáñez-Bouza, Nuria & David Denison
    2015 Which comes first in the double object construction?English Language and Linguistics19(2). 247–268. doi: 10.1017/S136067431500012X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S136067431500012X [Google Scholar]
  435. Yáñez-Bouza, Nuria & María E. Rodríguez-Gil
    2013 Special volume on English Grammar Writing in the Eighteenth Century . Transactions of the Philological Society111(2). 141–258. doi: 10.1111/1467‑968X.12027
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-968X.12027 [Google Scholar]
  436. Ziegeler, Debra
    2004 Reanalysis in the history of do: A view from construction grammar. Cognitive Linguistics15. 529–574. doi: 10.1515/cogl.2004.15.4.529
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.2004.15.4.529 [Google Scholar]
-contentType:Journal -contentType:Chapter
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error