1887

Language Ideology and Semiotic Negotiation in Mongolian Use

image of Language Ideology and Semiotic Negotiation in Mongolian Use

As Owen Lattimore points out, the right to move and the right to settle mark anecological-cum-ideological division between nomadism and agriculturalism inInner Asia. Though marketization has brought the Chinese Mongols and the Hanever closer, the need for ideological negotiation remains, which is best reflected inthe discourse of Mongolian language use in Inner Mongolia and beyond.Language ideology is more about “reason” while semiotic negotiation takesplace along the three dimensions of sign (representaman), object, and interpretant,a Peircean triadic division I adopt in this chapter. Language use involvesreasoning as much as materiality.

References

References

/content/books/9789027268112-06bil
dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
10
5
Chapter
content/books/9789027268112
Book
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error