The Lexis and Lexicogrammar of Sri Lankan English

image of The Lexis and Lexicogrammar of Sri Lankan English

This book offers the first in-depth corpus-based description of written Sri Lankan English. In comparison to British and Indian English, lexical and lexicogrammatical features of Sri Lankan English are analysed in a complex corpus environment comprising data from the respective components of the International Corpus of English, newspapers and online sources to explore the status of Sri Lankan English as a variety in its own right. The evolution of Sri Lankan English is depicted against the background of historical as well as sociolinguistic considerations and allows deriving a fine-grained model of the emergence of distinctive structural profiles of postcolonial Englishes developing in a multitude of norm orientations. This book is highly relevant to readers interested in Sri Lankan English and South Asian Englishes. It also offers more general sociolinguistic perspectives on the dynamics of postcolonial Englishes world-wide and on the inextricable link between language and identity.


  1. Ahulu, S
    1995 Variation in the use of complex verbs in international English. English Today11(2): 28–34. doi: 10.1017/S0266078400008233
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266078400008233 [Google Scholar]
  2. Algama, D
    2008 Who’s collecting ‘bits and bobs’: Meyler or Dylan?Sunday Times, 23March 2008 <mirisgala.net/Dilini_Algama_review.html (17 October 2014).
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Algeo, J
    2006British or American English? A Handbook of Word and Grammar Patterns. Cambridge: CUP. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511607240
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511607240 [Google Scholar]
  4. Ansaldo, U
    2008 Sri Lanka Malay revisited: Genesis and classification. InLessons from Documented Endangered Languages [Studies in Language Companion Series 78], K.D. Harrison , D.S. Rood & A. Dwyer (eds), 13–42. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/tsl.78.02ans
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.78.02ans [Google Scholar]
  5. Balasubramanian, C
    2009Register Variation in Indian English [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 37]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/scl.37
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.37 [Google Scholar]
  6. Bauer, L
    2002 Globality and locality in New Zealand. InFrom Local to Global English: Proceedings of Style Council 2001/2002, P. Peters (ed.), 54–67. Sydney: Macquarie University, Dictionary Research Centre.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Bernaisch, T
    2012 Attitudes towards Englishes in Sri Lanka. World Englishes31(3): 279–291. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑971X.2012.01753.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-971X.2012.01753.x [Google Scholar]
  8. 2013 The verb-complementational profile of OFFER in Sri Lankan English. InCorpus Linguistics and Variation in English: Focus on Non-native Englishes, M. Huber & J. Mukherjee (eds), www.helsinki.fi/varieng/series/volumes/13/bernaisch/ (17 October 2014). Helsinki: Research Unit for Variation, Contacts and Change in English.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Bernaisch, T. & Lange
    C 2012 The typology of focus marking in South Asian Englishes. Indian Linguistics73(1–4): 1–18.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Bernaisch, T. , Koch, C. , Mukherjee, J. & Schilk, M
    2011Manual for the South Asian Varieties of English (SAVE) Corpus: Compilation, Cleanup Process, and Details on the Individual Components. Giessen: Justus Liebig University.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Biber, D
    1988Variation across Speech and Writing. Cambridge: CUP. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511621024
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511621024 [Google Scholar]
  12. Biewer, C. , Hundt, M. & Zipp, L
    2010 ‘How’ a Fiji corpus? Challenges in the compilation of an ESL ICE component. ICAME Journal34: 5–23.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Bladon, R
    1968 Selecting the to- or -ing nominal after like, love, hate, dislike and prefer . English Studies49(1–6): 203–214. doi: 10.1080/00138386808597300
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00138386808597300 [Google Scholar]
  14. Boange, D
    2010 The bowl-or-ball dilemma of rubbishing English standards. Sunday Observer, 6June 2010 <www.sundayobserver.lk/2010/06/06/mon08.asp (17 October 2014).
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Bolinger, D.L
    1971The Phrasal Verb in English. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Bolton, K
    (ed.) 2002Hong Kong English: Autonomy and Creativity. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Bresnan, J. & Ford, M
    2010 Predicting syntax: Processing dative constructions in American and Australian varieties of English. Language86(1): 186–213.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Bresnan, J. & Hay, J
    2008 Gradient grammar: An effect of animacy on the syntax of give in New Zealand and American English. Lingua118(2): 245–259. doi: 10.1016/j.lingua.2007.02.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2007.02.007 [Google Scholar]
  19. Brinton, L.J
    1996 Attitudes towards increasing segmentalization: Complex and phrasal verbs in English. Journal of English Linguistics24(3): 186–205. doi: 10.1177/007542429602400304
    https://doi.org/10.1177/007542429602400304 [Google Scholar]
  20. Brugmann, K
    1909 Das Wesen der lautlichen Dissimilationen. Abhandlungen der philologisch-historischen Klasse der königlich-sächsischen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften27: 141–178.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Coperahewa, S
    2009 The language planning situation in Sri Lanka. Current Issues in Language Planning10(1): 69–150. doi: 10.1080/14664200902894660
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14664200902894660 [Google Scholar]
  22. Davies, M
    2013Corpus of Global Web-based English: 1.9 Billion Words from Speakers in 20 Countries. corpus2.byu.edu/glowbe/ (17 October 2014).
    [Google Scholar]
  23. de Silva, K.M
    1981A History of Sri Lanka. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Dempsey, K.B. , McCarthy, P.M. & McNamara, D.S
    2007 Using phrasal verbs as an index to distinguish text genres. InProceedings of the Twentieth International Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society Conference, D. Wilson & G. Sutcliffe (eds), 217–222. Menlo Park CA: AAAI Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Dixon, R.M.W
    2005A Semantic Approach to English Grammar. Oxford: OUP.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Fanego, T
    1996 The development of gerunds as objects of subject-control verbs in English (1400–1760). Diachronica13(1): 29–62. doi: 10.1075/dia.13.1.03fan
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.13.1.03fan [Google Scholar]
  27. Fernando, C
    1977 English and Sinhala bilingualism in Sri Lanka. Language in Society6(3): 341–360. doi: 10.1017/S0047404500005054
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500005054 [Google Scholar]
  28. Fernando, S
    1985 Changes in Sri Lankan English as reflected in phonology. University of Colombo Review5: 41–53.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. 2003 The vocabulary of Sri Lankan English: Words and phrases that transform a foreign language into their own. Paper presented at the9th International Conference on Sri Lankan Studies, Matara, Sri Lanka, 28–30 November 2003.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Field, A. , Miles, J. & Field, Z
    2012Discovering Statistics Using R. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Fisher, R.A
    1922 On the interpretation of χ² from contingency tables, and the calculation of P. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society85(1): 87–94. doi: 10.2307/2340521
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2340521 [Google Scholar]
  32. Fletcher, W.H
    2007 Concordancing the web: Promise and problems, tools and techniques. InCorpus Linguistics and the Web, M. Hundt , N. Nesselhauf & C. Biewer (eds), 25–45. Amsterdam: Rodopi. doi: 10.1163/9789401203791_004
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789401203791_004 [Google Scholar]
  33. Fonseka, E.A.G
    2003 Sri Lankan English: Exploding the falacy. Paper presented at the9th International Conference on Sri Lankan Studies, Matara, Sri Lanka, 28–30 November 2003.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Gadsby, A
    (ed.) 2000Longman Phrasal Verbs Dictionary. Harlow: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Goonetilleke, D
    2005Sri Lankan English Literature and the Sri Lankan People 1917–2003. Colombo: Vijitha Yapa Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Greenbaum, S
    1988 Language spread and the writing of grammars. InLanguage Spread and Language Policy: Issues, Implications and Case Studies, P.H. Lowenberg (ed.), 133–139. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. 1996 Introducing ICE. InComparing English Worldwide: The International Corpus of English, S. Greenbaum (ed.), 3–12. Oxford: Clarendon.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Greenbaum, S. & Nelson, G
    1996 The International Corpus of English (ICE) Project. World Englishes15(1): 3–15. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑971X.1996.tb00088.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-971X.1996.tb00088.x [Google Scholar]
  39. Grefenstette, G. & Nioche, J
    2000 Estimation of English and non-English language use on the www. In Computer-Assisted Information Retrieval (Recherche d’Information et ses Applications) – RIAO 2000, 6th International Conference, College de France, France, April 12–14, 2000. Proceedings , J.-J. Mariani & D. Harman (eds), 237–246. CID.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Gries, S.Th
    2008 Dispersion and adjusted frequencies in corpora. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics13(4): 403–437. doi: 10.1075/ijcl.13.4.02gri
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.13.4.02gri [Google Scholar]
  41. 2009Quantitative Corpus Linguistics with R. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Gries, S.Th. & Bernaisch, T
    . Forthcoming. Exploring epicentres empirically: Focus on South Asian Englishes. English World-Wide37(1). doi: 10.1075/eww.37.1.01gri
    https://doi.org/10.1075/eww.37.1.01gri [Google Scholar]
  43. Gunesekera, M
    2000 Morphosyntactic errors of fluent speakers of English in Sri Lanka. Vaag Vidya7: 112–133.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. 2005The Postcolonial Identity of Sri Lankan English. Colombo: Katha Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. 2006 Why teach Sri Lankan English in a multilingual environment?InEnglish in the Multilingual Environment: Selected Papers from the 3rd International Conference of the Sri Lanka English Language Teachers’ Association, H. Ratwatte & S. Herath (eds), 29–45. Colombo: SLELTA.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Hartford, B.S
    1989 Prototype effects in non-native English: Object-coding in verbs of saying. World Englishes8(2): 97–117. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑971X.1989.tb00647.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-971X.1989.tb00647.x [Google Scholar]
  47. Herat, M
    2001 Speaking and writing in Lankan English: A study of native and non-native users of English. California Linguistic Notes26(1), hss.fullerton.edu/linguistics/CLN/spring01_articles/herat.pdf (17 September 2010).
    [Google Scholar]
  48. 2005 BE variation in Sri Lankan English. Language Variation and Change17(2): 181–208. doi: 10.1017/S0954394505050088
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394505050088 [Google Scholar]
  49. 2006 Substitute one in Sri Lankan English. Leeds Working Papers in Linguistics11, www.leeds.ac.uk/linguistics/WPL/WPL11.html (11 February 2014).
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Hilbert, M. & Krug, M
    2010 The compilation of ICE Malta: State of the art and challenges along the way. ICAME Journal34: 54–63.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Hoffmann, S
    2007 From web page to mega-corpus: The CNN transcripts. InCorpus Linguistics and the Web, M. Hundt , N. Nesselhauf & C. Biewer (eds), 69–85. Amsterdam: Rodopi. doi: 10.1163/9789401203791_006
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789401203791_006 [Google Scholar]
  52. Hoffmann, S. , Hundt, M. & Mukherjee, J
    2011 Indian English – An emerging epicentre? A pilot study on light verbs in web-derived corpora of South Asian Englishes. Anglia129(3–4): 258–280. doi: 10.1515/angl.2011.083
    https://doi.org/10.1515/angl.2011.083 [Google Scholar]
  53. Hohenthal, A
    2003 English in India: Loyalty and attitudes. Language in India3(5), www.languageinindia.com/may2003/annika.html (17 October 2014).
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Hornby, A.S
    2008Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary of Current English. Oxford: OUP.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Huddleston, R. & Pullum, G.K
    2002The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: CUP.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Hundt, M
    1998New Zealand English Grammar, Fact or Fiction? A Corpus-Based Study in Morphosyntactic Variation [Varieties of English Around the World G23]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/veaw.g23
    https://doi.org/10.1075/veaw.g23 [Google Scholar]
  57. Hundt, M. , Hoffmann, S. & Mukherjee, J
    2012 The hypothetical subjunctive in South Asian Englishes: Local developments in the use of a global construction. English World-Wide33(2): 147–164. doi: 10.1075/eww.33.2.02hun
    https://doi.org/10.1075/eww.33.2.02hun [Google Scholar]
  58. Hundt, M. , Nesselhauf, N. & Biewer, C
    2007 Corpus linguistics and the web. InCorpus Linguistics and the Web, M. Hundt , N. Nesselhauf & C. Biewer (eds), 1–5. Amsterdam: Rodopi. doi: 10.1163/9789401203791_002
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789401203791_002 [Google Scholar]
  59. Jayawardena, K
    2003Nobodies to Somebodies: The Rise of the Colonial Bourgeoisie in Sri Lanka. Colombo: Social Scientists’ Association & Sanjiva Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Johansson, S. , Leech, G. & Goodluck, H
    1978Manual of Information to Accompany the Lancaster-Oslo/Bergen Corpus of British English, for Use with Digital Computers. Oslo: Department of English, University of Oslo.
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Joseph, B.D
    2004 On change in Language and change in language. Language80(3): 381–383. doi: 10.1353/lan.2004.0132
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2004.0132 [Google Scholar]
  62. Kachru, B.B
    1982 South Asian English. InEnglish as a World Language, R.W. Bailey & M. Görlach (eds), 353–383. Ann Arbor MI: University of Michigan Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  63. 1992 Models for non-native Englishes. InThe Other Tongue: English across Cultures, B.B. Kachru (ed.), 48–74. Urbana IL: University of Illinois Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Kandiah, T
    1981a Disinherited Englishes: The case of Lankan English (Part II). Navasilu4: 92–113.
    [Google Scholar]
  65. 1981b Lankan English schizoglossia. English World-Wide2(1): 63–81. doi: 10.1075/eww.2.1.05kan
    https://doi.org/10.1075/eww.2.1.05kan [Google Scholar]
  66. 1984Kaduva: Power and the English language weapon in Sri Lanka. InHonouring E.F.C. Ludowyk, P. Colin-Thomé & A. Halpé (eds), 117–154. Colombo: Tisara Prakasakayo.
    [Google Scholar]
  67. Koch, C. & Bernaisch, T
    2013 Verb complementation in South Asian English(es): The range and frequency of ‘new’ ditransitives. InEnglish Corpus Linguistics: Variation in Time, Space and Genre – Selected Papers from ICAME 32, G. Andersen & K. Bech (eds), 69–89. Amsterdam: Rodopi. doi: 10.1163/9789401209403_006
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789401209403_006 [Google Scholar]
  68. Kortmann, B
    2005English Linguistics: Essentials. Berlin: Cornelsen.
    [Google Scholar]
  69. Kortmann, B. & Schneider, E.W
    2008 General introduction. InVarieties of English: Africa, South and Southeast Asia, R. Mesthrie (ed.), 1–7. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110208429
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110208429 [Google Scholar]
  70. Körtvelyessy, M. , Bernaisch, T. , Mukherjee, J. & Mendis, D
    2012Manual to the Written Component of the International Corpus of English – Sri Lanka ICE-SL [W200]. Giessen: Justus Liebig University.
    [Google Scholar]
  71. Kumara, S.M.D.S. & Mendis, D
    2010 Making out SLE: A corpus based study of Sri Lankan English phrasal verbs. Paper presented at the6th International SLELTA Conference, Colombo, Sri Lanka, 15–17 October 2010.
    [Google Scholar]
  72. Kumarasamy, S
    2007 Understanding Language Policy and Planning in Sri Lanka. MA thesis, University of Duisburg-Essen.
    [Google Scholar]
  73. Künstler, V. , Mendis, D. & Mukherjee, J
    2009 English in Sri Lanka: Language functions and speaker attitudes. Anglistik: International Journal of English Studies20(2): 57–74.
    [Google Scholar]
  74. Labuhn, U
    2001Von Give a Laugh bis Have a Cry. Zu Aspektualität und Transitivität der V + N-Konstruktionen im Englischen. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  75. Lange, C
    2007 Focus marking in Indian English. English World-Wide28(1): 89–118. doi: 10.1075/eww.28.1.05lan
    https://doi.org/10.1075/eww.28.1.05lan [Google Scholar]
  76. 2012The Syntax of Spoken Indian English [Varieties of English Around the World G45]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/veaw.g45
    https://doi.org/10.1075/veaw.g45 [Google Scholar]
  77. Leech, G
    2007 New resources, or just better old ones? The Holy Grail of representativeness. InCorpus Linguistics and the Web, M. Hundt , N. Nesselhauf & C. Biewer (eds), 133–149. Amsterdam: Rodopi. doi: 10.1163/9789401203791_009
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789401203791_009 [Google Scholar]
  78. Leech, G. , Hundt, M. , Mair, C. & Smith, N
    2009Change in Contemporary English: A Grammatical Study. Cambridge: CUP. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511642210
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511642210 [Google Scholar]
  79. Leisi, E. & Mair, C
    1999Das heutige Englisch: Wesenszüge und Probleme. Heidelberg: Winter.
    [Google Scholar]
  80. Leitner, G
    1992 English as a pluricentric language. InPluricentric Languages: Differing Norms in Different Nations, M. Clyne (ed.), 179–237. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  81. Lim, L
    (ed) 2004Singapore English: A Grammatical Description [Varieties of English Around the World G33]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/veaw.g33
    https://doi.org/10.1075/veaw.g33 [Google Scholar]
  82. Live, A.H
    1973 The TAKE-HAVE phrasal in English. Linguistics95: 31–50.
    [Google Scholar]
  83. Lüdeling, A. , Evert, S. & Baroni, M
    2007 Using web data for linguistic purposes. InCorpus Linguistics and the Web, M. Hundt , N. Nesselhauf & C. Biewer (eds), 7–24. Amsterdam: Rodopi. doi: 10.1163/9789401203791_003
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789401203791_003 [Google Scholar]
  84. Mair, C
    2002 Three changing patterns of verb complementation in Late Modern English: A real-time study based on matching text corpora. English Language and Linguistics6(1): 105–131. doi: 10.1017/S1360674302001065
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1360674302001065 [Google Scholar]
  85. 2007 Change and variation in present-day English: Integrating the analysis of closed corpora and web-based monitoring. InCorpus Linguistics and the Web, M. Hundt , N. Nesselhauf & C. Biewer (eds), 233–247. Amsterdam: Rodopi. doi: 10.1163/9789401203791_014
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789401203791_014 [Google Scholar]
  86. Mair, C. & Winkle, C
    2012 Change from to-infinitive to bare infinitive in specificational cleft sentences: Data from World Englishes. InMapping Unity and Diversity World-Wide: Corpus-Based Studies of New Englishes [Varieties of English Around the World G43], M. Hundt & U. Gut (eds), 243–262. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/veaw.g43.10mai
    https://doi.org/10.1075/veaw.g43.10mai [Google Scholar]
  87. McArthur, T
    1998Concise Oxford Companion to the English Language. Oxford: OUP.
    [Google Scholar]
  88. 2001 World English and world Englishes: Trends, tensions, varieties, and standards. Language Teaching34(1): 1–20. doi: 10.1017/S0261444800016062
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444800016062 [Google Scholar]
  89. 2002The Oxford Guide to World English. Oxford: OUP.
    [Google Scholar]
  90. Mendis, D
    2002 Language planning and ethnicity: Attitudes and perceptions from the education sector. The Sri Lanka Journal of the Humanities17–18: 161–184.
    [Google Scholar]
  91. 2010 Formality in academic writing: The use/non-use of phrasal verbs in two varieties of English. InEnglish for Professional and Academic Purposes, M.F. Ruiz-Garrido , J.C. Palmer-Silveira & I. Fortanet-Gomez (eds), 11–24. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
    [Google Scholar]
  92. Mendis, D. & Rambukwella, H
    2010 Sri Lankan Englishes. InThe Routledge Handbook of World Englishes, A. Kirkpatrick (ed.), 181–196. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  93. Mesthrie, R
    2006 Anti-deletions in an L2 grammar: A study of Black South African English mesolect. English World-Wide27(2): 111–145. doi: 10.1075/eww.27.2.02mes
    https://doi.org/10.1075/eww.27.2.02mes [Google Scholar]
  94. Mesthrie, R. & Bhatt, R.M
    2008World Englishes: The Study of New Linguistic Varieties. Cambridge: CUP. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511791321
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511791321 [Google Scholar]
  95. Meyler, M
    2007A Dictionary of Sri Lankan English. Colombo: Mirisgala.
    [Google Scholar]
  96. 2009 Sri Lankan English: A distinct South Asian variety. English Today25(4): 55–60. doi: 10.1017/S0266078409990447
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266078409990447 [Google Scholar]
  97. 2010 A snooty English speaker’s reply. Groundviews, 3June 2010 <www.groundviews.org/2010/06/03/a-snooty-english-speaker%E2%80%99s-reply/#more-3538 (17 October 2014).
    [Google Scholar]
  98. Mukherjee, J
    2007 Steady states in the evolution of New Englishes: Present-day Indian English as an equilibrium. Journal of English Linguistics35(2): 157–187. doi: 10.1177/0075424207301888
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0075424207301888 [Google Scholar]
  99. 2008 Sri Lankan English: Evolutionary status and epicentral influence from Indian English. InAnglistentag 2007 Münster: Proceedings, K. Stierstorfer (ed.), 359–368. Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Trier.
    [Google Scholar]
  100. 2009 The lexicogrammar of present-day Indian English: Corpus-based perspectives on structural nativisation. InExploring the Lexis-Grammar Interface [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 35], U. Römer & R. Schulze (eds), 117–135. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/scl.35.9muk
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.35.9muk [Google Scholar]
  101. 2010 Corpus-based insights into verb-complementational innovations in Indian English: Cases of nativised semantico-structural analogy. InGrammar between Norm and Variation, A.N. Lenz & A. Plewnia (eds), 219–241. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  102. 2012 English in South Asia – Ambinormative orientations and the role of corpora: The state of the debate in Sri Lanka. InEnglish as an International Language in Asia: Implications for Language Education, A. Kirkpatrick & R. Sussex (eds), 191–208. Heidelberg: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978‑94‑007‑4578‑0_12
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4578-0_12 [Google Scholar]
  103. Mukherjee, J. & Gries, S.Th
    2009 Collostructional nativisation in New Englishes: Verb-construction associations in the International Corpus of English. English World-Wide30(1): 27–51. doi: 10.1075/eww.30.1.03muk
    https://doi.org/10.1075/eww.30.1.03muk [Google Scholar]
  104. Mukherjee, J. & Hoffmann, S
    2006 Describing verb-complementational profiles of New Englishes: A pilot study of Indian English. English World-Wide27(2): 147–173. doi: 10.1075/eww.27.2.03muk
    https://doi.org/10.1075/eww.27.2.03muk [Google Scholar]
  105. Mukherjee, J. & Schilk, M
    2008 Verb-complementational profiles across varieties of English: Comparing verb classes in Indian English and British English. InThe Dynamics of Linguistic Variation: Corpus Evidence on English Past and Present [Studies in Language Variation 2], T. Nevalainen , I. Taavitsainen , P. Pahta & M. Korhonen (eds), 163–181. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/silv.2.14muk
    https://doi.org/10.1075/silv.2.14muk [Google Scholar]
  106. 2012 Exploring variation and change in New Englishes: Looking into the International Corpus of English (ICE) and beyond. InThe Oxford Handbook of the History of English, T. Nevalainen & E.C. Traugott (eds), 189–199. Oxford: OUP.
    [Google Scholar]
  107. Mukherjee, J. , Schilk, M. & Bernaisch, T
    2010 Compiling the Sri Lankan component of ICE: Principles, problems, prospects. ICAME Journal34: 64–77.
    [Google Scholar]
  108. Nelson, G
    1996 The design of the corpus. InComparing English Worldwide: The International Corpus of English, S. Greenbaum (ed.), 27–35. Oxford: Clarendon.
    [Google Scholar]
  109. Nelson, G. & Hongtao, R
    2012 Particle verbs in African Englishes: Nativization and innovation. InMapping Unity and Diversity World-Wide: Corpus-Based Studies of New Englishes [Varieties of English Around the World G43], M. Hundt & U. Gut (eds), 197–213. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/veaw.g43.08nel
    https://doi.org/10.1075/veaw.g43.08nel [Google Scholar]
  110. Nesselhauf, N
    2009 Co-selection phenomena across New Englishes: Parallels (and differences) to foreign learner varieties. English World-Wide30(1): 1–26. doi: 10.1075/eww.30.1.02nes
    https://doi.org/10.1075/eww.30.1.02nes [Google Scholar]
  111. Nihalani, P. , Tongue, R.K. , Hosalim, P. & Crowther, J
    2004Indian and British English: A Handbook of Usage and Pronunciation. New Dehli: OUP.
    [Google Scholar]
  112. Olavarría de Ersson, E. & Shaw, P
    2003 Verb complementation patterns in Indian Standard English. English World-Wide24(2): 137–161. doi: 10.1075/eww.24.2.02ers
    https://doi.org/10.1075/eww.24.2.02ers [Google Scholar]
  113. Parakrama, A
    1995De-Hegemonizing Language Standards: Learning from (Post) Colonial Englishes about ‘English’. London: Macmillan. doi: 10.1057/9780230371309
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230371309 [Google Scholar]
  114. Passé, H.A
    1943 The English language in Ceylon. University of Ceylon Review1(2): 50–65.
    [Google Scholar]
  115. 1950 Common errors in Ceylon English. University of Ceylon Review8(3): 133–160.
    [Google Scholar]
  116. Pearson, K
    1900 X. On the criterion that a given system of deviations from the probable in the case of a correlated system of variables is such that it can be reasonably supposed to have arisen from random sampling. Philosophical Magazine50(5): 157–175. doi: 10.1080/14786440009463897
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14786440009463897 [Google Scholar]
  117. Peters, P
    2009 Australian English as a regional epicentre. InWorld Englishes – Problems, Properties and Prospects [Varieties of English Around the World G40], T. Hoffmann & L. Siebers (eds), 107–124. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/veaw.g40.09pet
    https://doi.org/10.1075/veaw.g40.09pet [Google Scholar]
  118. Poutsma, H
    1904A Grammar of Late Modern English: For the Use of Continental, Especially Dutch, Students, Part I: The Sentence. Groningen: Noordhoff.
    [Google Scholar]
  119. Quirk, R. , Greenbaum, S. , Leech, G. & Svartvik, J
    1985A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  120. Raheem, R
    2006 Configuring the mosaic: Investigating language use and attitude in Sri Lanka. InEnglish in the Multilingual Environment: Selected Papers from the 3rd International Conference of the Sri Lanka English Language Teachers’ Association, H. Ratwatte & S. Herath (eds), 13–27. Colombo: SLELTA.
    [Google Scholar]
  121. Renouf, A. , Kehoe, A. & Banerjee, J
    2005The WebCorp Search Engine: A Holistic Approach to Web Text Search. Birmingham: University of Birmingham.
    [Google Scholar]
  122. 2007 WebCorp: An integrated system for web text search. InCorpus Linguistics and the Web, M. Hundt , N. Nesselhauf & C. Biewer (eds), 47–67. Amsterdam: Rodopi. doi: 10.1163/9789401203791_005
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789401203791_005 [Google Scholar]
  123. Renský, M
    1966 English verbo-nominal phrases: Some structural and stylistic aspects. Travaux Linguistique de Prague1: 289–299.
    [Google Scholar]
  124. Rohdenburg, G
    2003 Cognitive complexity and horror aequi as factors determining the use of interrogative clause linkers in English. InDeterminants of Grammatical Variation in English, G. Rohdenburg & B. Mondorf (eds), 205–249. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110900019
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110900019 [Google Scholar]
  125. 2006 The role of functional constraints in the evolution of the English complementation system. InSyntax, Style and Grammatical Norms: English from 1500–2000, C. Dalton-Puffer , D. Kastovsky & H. Schendl (eds), 143–166. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  126. Samarakkody, M. & Braine, G
    2005 Teaching English in Sri Lanka: From colonial roots to Lankan English. InTeaching English to the World: History, Curriculum, and Practice, G. Braine (ed.), 147–157. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    [Google Scholar]
  127. Schilk, M
    2011Structural Nativization in Indian English Lexicogrammar [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 46]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/scl.46
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.46 [Google Scholar]
  128. Schilk, M. , Bernaisch, T. & Mukherjee, J
    2012 Mapping unity and diversity in South Asian English lexicogrammar: Verb-complementational preferences across varieties. InMapping Unity and Diversity World-Wide: Corpus-Based Studies of New Englishes [Varieties of English Around the World G43], M. Hundt & U. Gut (eds), 137–165. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/veaw.g43.06sch
    https://doi.org/10.1075/veaw.g43.06sch [Google Scholar]
  129. Schneider, E.W
    2003 The dynamics of New Englishes: From identity construction to dialect birth. Language79(2): 233–281. doi: 10.1353/lan.2003.0136
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2003.0136 [Google Scholar]
  130. 2004 How to trace structural nativization: Particle verbs in world Englishes. World Englishes23(2): 227–249. doi: 10.1111/j.0883‑2919.2004.00348.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0883-2919.2004.00348.x [Google Scholar]
  131. 2007Postcolonial English: Varieties Around the World. Cambridge: CUP. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511618901
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511618901 [Google Scholar]
  132. Sedlatschek, A
    2009Contemporary Indian English: Variation and Change [Varieties of English Around the World G38]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/veaw.g38
    https://doi.org/10.1075/veaw.g38 [Google Scholar]
  133. Selvadurai, S
    1994Funny Boy. Toronto: McClelland and Stewart.
    [Google Scholar]
  134. Senaratne, C.D
    2009Sinhala-English Code-Mixing in Sri Lanka: A Sociolinguistic Study. Utrecht: LOT.
    [Google Scholar]
  135. Seneviratne, M
    2010 The waylaying ways of ‘English Our Way’. Daily Mirror, 7August 2010 <print2.dailymirror.lk/opinion1/17853.html (11 February 2014).
    [Google Scholar]
  136. Shastri, S.V
    1988 The Kolhapur Corpus of Indian English and work done on its basis so far. ICAME Journal12: 15–26.
    [Google Scholar]
  137. Shastri, S.V. , Patilkulkarni, C.T. & Shastri, G.S
    1986Manual of Information to Accompany the Kolhapur Corpus of Indian English, for Use with Digital Computers. Kolhapur: Shivaji University.
    [Google Scholar]
  138. Sinclair, J
    (ed) 2002Collins COBUILD Phrasal Verbs Dictionary. Glasgow: HarperCollins.
    [Google Scholar]
  139. Sivanandan, A
    1997When Memory Dies. London: Arcadia Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  140. Smith, A
    2009 Light verbs in Australian, New Zealand and British English. InComparative Studies in Australian and New Zealand English: Grammar and Beyond [Varieties of English Around the World G39], P. Peters , P. Collins & A. Smith (eds), 139–155. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/veaw.g39.09smi
    https://doi.org/10.1075/veaw.g39.09smi [Google Scholar]
  141. Stein, G
    1991 The phrasal verb type ‘to have a look’ in Modern English. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching29(1): 1–29. doi: 10.1515/iral.1991.29.1.1
    https://doi.org/10.1515/iral.1991.29.1.1 [Google Scholar]
  142. Strevens, P
    1980Teaching English as an International Language: From Practice to Principle. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  143. Stubbs, M
    2001Words and Phrases: Corpus Studies of Lexical Semantics. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  144. Swales, J.M. & Feak, C.B
    2004Academic Writing for Graduate Students. Ann Arbor MI: University of Michigan Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  145. Thirumalai, M.S
    2002 Sri Lanka’s language policy: A brief introduction. Language in India1(9), www.languageinindia.com/jan2002/srilanka1.html (17 October 2014).
    [Google Scholar]
  146. Trudgill, P
    2003A Glossary of Sociolinguistics. Edinburgh: EUP.
    [Google Scholar]
  147. Vosberg, U
    2006Die Große Komplementverschiebung: Außersemantische Einflüsse auf die Entwicklung satzwertiger Ergänzungen im Neuenglischen. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.
    [Google Scholar]
  148. Werner, J. & Mukherjee, J
    2012 Highly polysemous verbs in New Englishes: A corpus-based study of Sri Lankan and Indian English. InCorpus Linguistics: Looking back, Moving forward, S. Hoffmann , P. Rayson & G. Leech (eds), 249–266. Amsterdam: Rodopi. doi: 10.1163/9789401207478_018
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789401207478_018 [Google Scholar]
  149. Wickramasinghe, W
    1999British English, American English and Sri Lankan English, Vol. 3. Nugegoda: Wimal Wickramasinghe.
    [Google Scholar]
  150. Wickramasuriya, C
    1961 Some common mistakes in written English. Journal of the National Education Society of Ceylon10(1): 34–54.
    [Google Scholar]
  151. 1962 Mistakes in vocabulary and grammar resulting from difficulties with phonemes of English. Journal of the National Education Society of Ceylon11(2): 32–39.
    [Google Scholar]
  152. Wierzbicka, A
    1982 Why can you Have a Drink when you can’t *Have an Eat . Language58(4): 753–799. doi: 10.2307/413956
    https://doi.org/10.2307/413956 [Google Scholar]
  153. Williams, J
    1987 Non-native varieties of English: A special case of language acquisition. English World-Wide8(2): 161–199. doi: 10.1075/eww.8.2.02wil
    https://doi.org/10.1075/eww.8.2.02wil [Google Scholar]
  154. Wright, L
    2000 Introduction. InThe Development of Standard English, 1300–1800: Theories, Descriptions, Conflicts, L. Wright (ed.), 1–8. Cambridge: CUP. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511551758.001
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511551758.001 [Google Scholar]
  155. Xiao, R
    2009 Multidimensional analysis and the study of world Englishes. World Englishes28(4): 421–450. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑971X.2009.01606.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-971X.2009.01606.x [Google Scholar]
  156. Yogasundram, N
    2008A Comprehensive History of Sri Lanka: From Prehistory to Tsunami. Colombo: Vijitha Yapa Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  157. Zandvoort, R.W
    1965A Handbook of English Grammar. London: Longmans.
    [Google Scholar]
  158. Zipp, L
    2014Educated Fiji English: Lexico-Grammar and Variety Status [Varieties of English Around the World G47]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/veaw.g47
    https://doi.org/10.1075/veaw.g47 [Google Scholar]
  159. Zipp, L. & Bernaisch, T
    2012 Particle verbs across first and second language varieties of English. InMapping Unity and Diversity World-Wide: Corpus-Based Studies of New Englishes [Varieties of English Around the World G43], M. Hundt & U. Gut (eds), 167–196. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/veaw.g43.07zip
    https://doi.org/10.1075/veaw.g43.07zip [Google Scholar]
-contentType:Journal -contentType:Chapter
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error