1887

Demonstratives and Possessives with Attitude

An intersubjectively-oriented empirical study

image of Demonstratives and Possessives with Attitude

Linking grammatical analyses with ideas about a shareable reality, this book investigates some fascinating ways in which nominal reference is exploited to meet interpersonal and rhetorical goals. It focuses on the use of demonstrative and possessive determiners in Polish discourse and proposes that the phenomenon of deixis be reexamined in the light of linguistic variation. The book illustrates a growing concern with the application of cognitive grammar to the study of situated language use and its social outcomes. What emerges is a new understanding of the role of deictic elements as tools for establishing intersubjective coordination and expressing attitudes.

This book is for anyone actively seeking to understand how linguistic systems reflect human socio-cognitive abilities and in what ways reality is mediated through language.

References

  1. Ariel, Mira
    1988 Referring and accessibility. Journal of Linguistics, 24(1), 65–87. doi: 10.1017/S0022226700011567
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226700011567 [Google Scholar]
  2. 1990Accessing noun-phrase antecedents. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bach, Emmon
    1967Have and be in English syntax. Language, 43(2), 462–85. doi: 10.2307/411547
    https://doi.org/10.2307/411547 [Google Scholar]
  4. Bach, Kent
    2008 On referring and not referring. In Jeanette K. Gundel , & Nancy Hedberg (Eds.), Reference: Interdisciplinary perspectives (pp. 13–58). Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331639.003.0002
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331639.003.0002 [Google Scholar]
  5. Bar-Anan, Yoav , Trope, Yaacov , Liberman, Nira , & Algom, Daniel
    2007 Automatic processing of psychological distance: Evidence from a Stroop task. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 136(4), 610–622. doi: 10.1037/0096‑3445.136.4.610
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.136.4.610 [Google Scholar]
  6. Barlow, Michael , & Kemmer, Suzanne
    (Eds.) 2000Usage-based models of language. Stanford, California: CSLI Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Barsalou, Lawrence W
    2008 Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 617–645. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093639
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093639 [Google Scholar]
  8. Bednarek, Monika
    2008Emotion talk across corpora. Houndmills / New York: Palgrave Macmillan. doi: 10.1057/9780230285712
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230285712 [Google Scholar]
  9. Beebe, Beatrice
    2005Forms of intersubjectivity in infant research and adult treatment. New York: Other Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Bendix, Edward H
    1966 Componential analysis of general vocabulary: The semantic structure of a set of verbs in English, Hindi, and Japanese. International Journal of American Linguistics, 32(2).
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Bratman, Michael
    1992 Shared cooperative activity. The Philosophical Review, 101, 327–341. doi: 10.2307/2185537
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2185537 [Google Scholar]
  12. Butterworth, George , & Jarrett, Nick
    1991 What minds have in common is space: Spatial mechanisms serving joint visual attention in infancy. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9, 55–72. doi: 10.1111/j.2044‑835X.1991.tb00862.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-835X.1991.tb00862.x [Google Scholar]
  13. Chafe, Wallace L
    1976 Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics and point of view. In Charles N. Li (Ed.), Subject and topic (pp. 27–55). New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. (Ed.). 1980The pear stories: Cognitive, cultural, and linguistic aspects of narrative production. Norwood (NJ): Ablex.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Cienki, Alan
    1993 Experiencers, possessors, and overlap between Russian dative and u + genitive. Berkeley Linguistic Society, 19, 76–89. doi: 10.3765/bls.v19i1.1504
    https://doi.org/10.3765/bls.v19i1.1504 [Google Scholar]
  16. 1995 The semantics of possessive and spatial constructions in Russian and Bulgarian: A comparative analysis in cognitive grammar. Slavic and East European Journal, 39(1), 73–114. doi: 10.2307/308693
    https://doi.org/10.2307/308693 [Google Scholar]
  17. Clancy, Steven J
    2010The chain of being and having in Slavic. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. doi: 10.1075/slcs.122
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.122 [Google Scholar]
  18. Clark, Herbert H
    1997 Dogmas of understanding. Discourse Processes, 23, 567–598. doi: 10.1080/01638539709545003
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539709545003 [Google Scholar]
  19. Croft, William
    2009 Toward a social cognitive linguistics. In Vyvyan Evans , & Stéphanie Pourcel (Eds.), New directions in cognitive linguistics (pp. 396–420). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. doi: 10.1017/s186698080000017x
    https://doi.org/10.1017/s186698080000017x [Google Scholar]
  20. Croft, William , & Cruse, D. Alan
    2004Cognitive linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511803864
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511803864 [Google Scholar]
  21. Crowley, Terry
    1996 Inalienable possession in Paamese grammar. In Hilary Chappell , & William McGregor (Eds.), The grammar of inalienability: A typological perspective on body part terms and the part-whole relation (pp. 383–432). Berlin / New York: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110822137.383
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110822137.383 [Google Scholar]
  22. Dancygier, Barbara
    1999 How Polish structures space: Prepositions, direction nouns, case and metaphor. In Frederike van der Leek , & Ad Foolen (Eds.), Constructions in cognitive linguistics (pp. 27–45). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. doi: 10.1075/cilt.178.04dan
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.178.04dan [Google Scholar]
  23. 2012The language of stories: A cognitive approach. Cambridge / New York: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Dancygier, Barbara , & Sweetser, Eve
    2005Mental spaces in grammar: Conditional constructions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511486760
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486760 [Google Scholar]
  25. 2012Viewpoint in language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139084727
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139084727 [Google Scholar]
  26. Dancygier, Barbara , & Vandelanotte, Lieven
    2009 Judging distances: Mental spaces, distance, and viewpoint in literary discourse. In Geert Brône , & Jeroen Vandaele (Eds.), Cognitive poetics: Goals, gains and gaps (Applications of Cognitive Linguistics 10) (pp. 319–369). Berlin / New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Dąbrowska, Ewa
    1997Cognitive semantics and the Polish dative. Berlin / New York: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110814781
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110814781 [Google Scholar]
  28. 2012 Different speakers, different grammars: Individual differences in native language attainment. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 2, 219–253. doi: 10.1075/lab.2.3.01dab
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.2.3.01dab [Google Scholar]
  29. Deane, Paul D
    1987 English possessives, topicality, and the Silverstein Hierarchy. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 13 (pp. 65–76). California: Berkeley Linguistics Society.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. 1992Grammar in mind and brain: Explorations in cognitive syntax. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110886535
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110886535 [Google Scholar]
  31. DeLancey, Scott
    1981 An interpretation of split ergativity and related patterns. Language, 57, 626–657. doi: 10.2307/414343
    https://doi.org/10.2307/414343 [Google Scholar]
  32. Diessel, Holger
    1999Demonstratives: Form, function, and grammaticalization (Typological studies in language, 42). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. doi: 10.1075/tsl.42
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.42 [Google Scholar]
  33. 2006 Demonstratives, joint attention, and the emergence of grammar. Cognitive Linguistics, 17(4), 463–489. doi: 10.1515/COG.2006.015
    https://doi.org/10.1515/COG.2006.015 [Google Scholar]
  34. 2013 Distance contrasts in demonstratives. In Matthew S. Dryer , & Martin Haspelmath (Eds.), The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. (Available online atwals.info/chapter/41, accessed on2014-07-02.)
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Dirven, René , Wolf, Hans-Georg, & Polzenhagen, Frank
    2007 Cognitive linguistics and cultural studies. In Dirk Geeraerts , & Hubert Cuyckens (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of cognitive linguistics (pp. 1203–1240). New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Epstein, Richard
    1999 Roles, frames and definitness. In Karen van Hoek , Andrej A. Kibrik , & Leo Noordman (Eds.), Discourse studies in cognitive linguistics. Selected papers from the fifth international cognitive linguistics conference, Amsterdam, July 1997 (pp. 53–74). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. doi: 10.1075/cilt.176.05eps
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.176.05eps [Google Scholar]
  37. Evans, Nicholas , & Wilkins, David
    2000 In the mind’s ear: The semantic extensions of perception verbs in Australian languages. Language, 76(3), 546–592. doi: 10.2307/417135
    https://doi.org/10.2307/417135 [Google Scholar]
  38. Evans, Vyvyan
    2006 Lexical concepts, cognitive models and meaning-construction. Cognitive Linguistics, 17(4), 491–534. doi: 10.1515/COG.2006.016
    https://doi.org/10.1515/COG.2006.016 [Google Scholar]
  39. 2007A glossary of cognitive linguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Evans, Vyvyan , & Green, Melanie
    2006Cognitive linguistics: An introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Fauconnier, Gilles
    (1994 [1985]) Mental spaces: Aspects of meaning construction in natural language (2nd edition). Cambridge / New York: Cambridge University Press [first published by MIT Press]. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511624582
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511624582 [Google Scholar]
  42. 1997Mappings in thought and language. Cambridge / New York: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139174220
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139174220 [Google Scholar]
  43. 1999 Methods and generalizations. In Theo Janssen , & Gisela Redeker (Eds.), Cognitive linguistics: Foundations, scope, and methodology (pp. 95–127). Berlin / New York: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110803464.95
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110803464.95 [Google Scholar]
  44. Fauconnier, Gilles , & Turner, Mark
    2002The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities. New York: Basic Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Fillmore, Charles
    1975Santa Cruz lectures on deixis 1971. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Linguistics Club.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. 1990 Epistemic stance and grammatical form in English conditional sentences. Papers from the Twenty-Sixth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society (pp. 137–162).
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Geeraerts, Dirk , Kristiansen, Gitte , & Peirsman, Yves
    (Eds.) 2010Advances in cognitive sociolinguistics. Berlin / New York: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110226461
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110226461 [Google Scholar]
  48. Gibbs, Raymond W
    1994The poetics of mind: Figurative thought, language, and understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. (Ed.) 2008The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought. Cambridge / New York: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511816802
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816802 [Google Scholar]
  50. 2012 Walking the walk while thinking about the talk: Embodied interpretation of metaphorical narratives. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 42, 1–16.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Givón, Talmy
    1985 Iconicity, isomorphism and non-arbitrary coding in syntax. In John Haiman (Ed.), Iconicity in syntax (pp. 187–219). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. doi: 10.1075/tsl.6.10giv
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.6.10giv [Google Scholar]
  52. 1995Functionalism and grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. doi: 10.1075/z.74
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.74 [Google Scholar]
  53. Gonzalez-Marquez, Monica , Mittelberg, Irene , Coulson, Seana , & Spivey, Michael J
    (Eds.) 2007Methods in cognitive linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. doi: 10.1075/hcp.18
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.18 [Google Scholar]
  54. Górska, Elżbieta
    1999On parts and wholes: A cognitive study of English schematic part terms. Warsaw: University of Warsaw.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. 2008 Four arguments for patterns of metaphorical thought. Acta Philologica, 35, 15–31.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. 2010 life is music: A case study of a novel metaphor and its use in discourse. In Barbara Dancygier , & José Sanders (Eds.), English text construction 3/2 (Special issue: Textual choices and discourse genres: Creating meaning through form) (pp. 275–293). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. doi: 10.1075/etc.3.2.08gor
    https://doi.org/10.1075/etc.3.2.08gor [Google Scholar]
  57. Grady, Joseph
    1997Foundations of meaning: Primary metaphors and primary scenes. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Gries, Stefan Th. , & Stefanowitsch, Anatol
    2006Corpora in cognitive linguistics: Corpus-based approaches to syntax and lexis. Berlin / New York: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110197709
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197709 [Google Scholar]
  59. Grondelaers, Stefan , Geeraerts, Dirk , & Speelman, Dirk
    2007 A case for a cognitive corpus linguistics. In Monica Gonzalez-Marquez , Irene Mittelberg , Seana Coulson , & Michael J. Spivey (Eds.), Methods in cognitive linguistics (pp. 149–169). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing House. doi: 10.1075/hcp.18.12gro
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.18.12gro [Google Scholar]
  60. Grzegorczykowa, Renata
    2002Wprowadzenie do semantyki językoznawczej [An introduction to linguistic semantics]. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Haiman, John
    1980 The iconicity of grammar: Isomorphism and motivation. Language, 56, 514–540. doi: 10.2307/414448
    https://doi.org/10.2307/414448 [Google Scholar]
  62. Halliday, Michael A.K. , & Hasan, Ruqaiya
    1976Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Hampe, Beate
    2005 When down is not bad, and up not good enough: A usage-based assessment of the plus-minus parameter in image-schema theory. Cognitive Linguistics, 16(1), 115–146. doi: 10.1515/cogl.2005.16.1.81
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.2005.16.1.81 [Google Scholar]
  64. Harder, Peter
    2009 Meaning as input: The instructional perspective. In Vyvyan Evans , & Stéphanie Pourcel (Eds.), New directions in cognitive linguistics (pp. 15–26). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. doi: 10.1075/hcp.24.05har
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.24.05har [Google Scholar]
  65. 2010Meaning in mind and society: A functional contribution to the social turn in cognitive linguistics. Berlin / New York: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110216059
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110216059 [Google Scholar]
  66. Hart, Christopher
    2010Critical discourse analysis and cognitive science: New perspectives on immigration discourse. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. doi: 10.1057/9780230299009
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230299009 [Google Scholar]
  67. Hawkins, John A
    1978Definiteness and indefiniteness: A study in reference and grammaticality prediction. London: Croon Helm.
    [Google Scholar]
  68. 1991 On (in)definite articles: Implicatures and (un)grammaticality prediction. Journal of Linguistics, 27, 405–442. doi: 10.1017/S0022226700012731
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226700012731 [Google Scholar]
  69. 2004Efficiency and complexity in grammars. Oxford / New York: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199252695.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199252695.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  70. Heine, Bernd
    1997aCognitive foundations of grammar. Oxford / New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  71. 1997bPossession: Cognitive sources, forces, and grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511581908
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511581908 [Google Scholar]
  72. Heine, Bernd , & Song, Kyung-An
    2010 On the genesis of personal pronouns: Some conceptual sources. Language and Cognition, 2(1), 117–147. doi: 10.1515/langcog.2010.005
    https://doi.org/10.1515/langcog.2010.005 [Google Scholar]
  73. Holland, Dorothy , & Quinn, Naomi
    (Eds.) 1987Cultural models in language and thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511607660
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511607660 [Google Scholar]
  74. Hopper, Paul , & Traugott, Elizabeth C
    1993Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  75. Itkonen, Esa
    2008 The central role of normativity in language and linguistics. In Jordan Zlatev , Timothy P. Racine , Chris Sinha , & Esa Itkonen (Eds.), The shared mind: Perspectives on intersubjectivity (pp. 279–305). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. doi: 10.1075/celcr.12.16itk
    https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.12.16itk [Google Scholar]
  76. Janda, Laura A
    1993A geography of case semantics: The Czech dative and the Russian instrumental. Berlin / New York: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110867930
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110867930 [Google Scholar]
  77. 1996 Unpacking markedness. In Eugene H. Casad (Ed.), Cognitive linguistics in the Redwoods: The expansion of a new paradigm in linguistics (pp. 207–233). Berlin / New York: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110811421.207
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110811421.207 [Google Scholar]
  78. Janssen, Theo A.J.M
    2002 Deictic principles of pronominals, demonstratives and tenses. In Frank Brisard (Ed.), Grounding: The epistemic footing of deixis and reference (151–193). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110899801.151
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110899801.151 [Google Scholar]
  79. Johnson, Mark
    1987The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  80. Knight, Dawn
    2010 Language, corpora and context: A ‘thrilling’ case study. Presentation atThe 5th Inter-Varietal Applied Corpus Studies (IVACS 2010), [www.slideshare.net/nottyknight/ivacs-symposium-2010].
    [Google Scholar]
  81. 2011 The future of multimodal corpora. RBLA, 11(2), 391–415.
    [Google Scholar]
  82. Kochańska, Agata
    2007 A note on the ‘hidden’ interpersonal semantics of referring to third person humans in Polish: A cognitive grammar analysis. Studies in Polish Linguistics, 4, 109–123.
    [Google Scholar]
  83. Kövecses, Zoltán
    2000Metaphor and emotion: Language, culture, and body in human feeling. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  84. 2005Metaphor in culture: Universality and variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511614408
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511614408 [Google Scholar]
  85. 2010Metaphor: A practical introduction (2nd edition). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  86. Kövecses, Zoltán , & Radden, Günter
    1998 Metonymy: Developing a cognitive linguistic view. Cognitive Linguistics, 9(1), 37–77. doi: 10.1515/cogl.1998.9.1.37
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1998.9.1.37 [Google Scholar]
  87. Krzeszowski, Tomasz P
    1997Angels and devils in hell. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Energeia.
    [Google Scholar]
  88. Kubiński, Wojciech
    1999Word order in English and Polish: On the statement of linearization patterns in cognitive grammar. Gdańsk: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Gdańskiego.
    [Google Scholar]
  89. Kuno, Susumu , & Kaburaki, Etsuko
    1977 Empathy and syntax. Linguistic Inquiry, 8(4), 627–672.
    [Google Scholar]
  90. Labov, William
    1972Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  91. Lakoff, George
    1987Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. doi: 10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  92. Lakoff, George , & Johnson, Mark
    1980Metaphors we live by. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  93. 1999Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. New York: Basic Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  94. Lakoff, Robin
    1974 Remarks on this and that . In Charles Fillmore , George Lakoff , & Robin Lakoff (Eds.), Berkeley Studies in Syntax and Semantics 1: XVII, 1–12.
    [Google Scholar]
  95. Langacker, Ronald W
    1985 Observations and speculations on subjectivity. In John Haiman (Ed.), Iconicity in syntax (pp. 109–150). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. doi: 10.1075/tsl.6.07lan
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.6.07lan [Google Scholar]
  96. 1987Foundations of cognitive grammar. Volume 1: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  97. 1988 A usage-based model. In Brygida Rudzka-Ostyn (Ed.), Topics in cognitive linguistics (pp. 127–161). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. doi: 10.1075/cilt.50.06lan
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.50.06lan [Google Scholar]
  98. 1991Foundations of cognitive grammar. Volume 2: Descriptive application. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  99. 1993 Reference-point constructions. Cognitive Linguistics, 4(1), 1–38. doi: 10.1515/cogl.1993.4.1.1
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1993.4.1.1 [Google Scholar]
  100. 1995a Viewing in cognition and grammar. In Philip W. Davis (Ed.), Alternative linguistics: Descriptive and theoretical modes (pp. 153–212). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. doi: 10.1075/cilt.102.06lan
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.102.06lan [Google Scholar]
  101. 1995b Possession and possessive constructions. In John R. Taylor , & Robert E. MacLaury (Eds.), Language and the cognitive construal of the world (pp. 51–79). Berlin / New York: Mouton de Gruyte. doi: 10.1515/9783110809305.51
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110809305.51 [Google Scholar]
  102. 1999a Assessing the cognitive linguistic enterprise. In Theo Janssen , & Gisela Redeker (Eds.), Cognitive linguistics: Foundations, scope, and methodology (pp. 13–59). Berlin / New York: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110803464.13
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110803464.13 [Google Scholar]
  103. 1999bGrammar and conceptualization. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110800524
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110800524 [Google Scholar]
  104. 1999c Losing control: Grammaticization, subjectification, and transparency. In Andreas Blank , & Peter Koch (Eds.), Historical semantics and cognition (pp. 147–175). Berlin / New York: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110804195.147
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110804195.147 [Google Scholar]
  105. 2000 A dynamic usage-based model. In Michael Barlow , & Suzanne Kemmer (Eds.), Usage-based models of language (pp. 1–63). Stanford, California: CSLI Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  106. 2001a Discourse in cognitive grammar. Cognitive Linguistics, 12(2), 143–188. doi: 10.1515/cogl.12.2.143
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.12.2.143 [Google Scholar]
  107. 2001b Dynamicity in grammar. Axiomathes, 12, 7–33. doi: 10.1023/A:1012701031022
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012701031022 [Google Scholar]
  108. 2002a Deixis and subjectivity. In Frank Brisard (Ed.), Grounding: The epistemic footing of deixis and reference (pp. 1–28). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110899801.1
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110899801.1 [Google Scholar]
  109. 2002b Remarks on the English grounding system. In Frank Brisard (Ed.), Grounding: The epistemic footing of deixis and reference (pp. 28–38). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110899801.29
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110899801.29 [Google Scholar]
  110. 2003 Conceptual overlap in reference point constructions. In Masatomo Ukaji , Masayuki Ike-Uchi , & Yoshiki Nishimura (Eds.), Current issues in English linguistics (pp.87–117). Special Publications of the English Linguistic Society of Japan 2. Tokyo: Kaitakusha.
    [Google Scholar]
  111. 2004 Grammar as image: The case of voice. In Barbara Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk , & Alina Kwiatkowska (Eds.), Imagery in language: Festschrift in honour of professor Ronald W. Langacker (pp. 63–114). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  112. 2007 Constructing the meanings of personal pronouns. In Günter Radden , Klaus-Michael Köpcke , Thomas Berg , & Peter Siemund (Eds.), Aspects of meaning construction (pp. 171–187). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. doi: 10.1075/z.136.12lan
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.136.12lan [Google Scholar]
  113. 2008Cognitive grammar: A basic introduction. New York: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331967.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331967.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  114. 2009Investigations in cognitive grammar. Berlin / New York: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110214369
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110214369 [Google Scholar]
  115. . (ms). The English auxiliary: A functional approach. Workshop held at the University of Tartu, 1st–3rd June 2008.
    [Google Scholar]
  116. Levine, James S
    1980 Observations on inalienable possession in Russian. Folia Slavica, 4(1), 7–24.
    [Google Scholar]
  117. Levinson, Stephen
    1983Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University.
    [Google Scholar]
  118. Likert, Rensis
    1932 A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of Psychology, 22(140), 1–55.
    [Google Scholar]
  119. Lyons, Christopher
    1999Definiteness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511605789
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511605789 [Google Scholar]
  120. Lyons, John
    1977aSemantics. Volume 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  121. 1977bSemantics. Volume 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  122. Majewska, Małgorzata
    2005Akty deprecjonujące siebie i innych [‘Acts of belittling oneself and others’]. Kraków: Universitas.
    [Google Scholar]
  123. Maldonado, Ricardo
    2002 Objective and subjective datives. Cognitive Linguistics, 13 (1), 1–65. doi: 10.1515/cogl.2002.010
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.2002.010 [Google Scholar]
  124. Mandler, Jean M
    2010 The spatial foundation of the conceptual system. Language and Cognition, 2(1), 21–44. doi: 10.1515/langcog.2010.002
    https://doi.org/10.1515/langcog.2010.002 [Google Scholar]
  125. Matlock, Teenie , & Winter, Bodo
    2013 Experimental semantics. In Bernd Heine , & Heiko Narrog (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of linguistics analysis. Oxford / New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  126. Matthews, Justin L. , & Matlock, Teenie
    2010 The spatial and temporal underpinnings of social distance. Proceedings of Spatial CognitionVII, 19–31.
    [Google Scholar]
  127. Matthews, Justin L. , & Matlock Teenie
    2011 Understanding the link between spatial distance and social distance. Social Psychology, 42, 185–192. doi: 10.1027/1864‑9335/a000062
    https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000062 [Google Scholar]
  128. Meier, Brian P. , & Robinson, Michael D
    2004 Why the sunny side is up: Associations between affect and vertical position. Psychological Science, 15, 243–247. doi: 10.1111/j.0956‑7976.2004.00659.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00659.x [Google Scholar]
  129. Miodunka, Władysław
    1974Funkcje zaimków w grupach nominalnych współczesnej polszczyzny mówionej [‘Determiner functions in nominal groups in contemporary spoken Polish’]. Warszawa / Kraków: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.
    [Google Scholar]
  130. Morganti, Francesca , Carassa, Antonella , & Riva, Giuseppe
    (Eds.) 2008Enacting intersubjectivity: A cognitive and social perspective on the study of interactions. Amsterdam: IOS Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  131. Overgaard, Soren
    2009Wittgenstein and other minds: Rethinking subjectivity and intersubjectivity with Wittgenstein, Levinas, and Husserl (Routledge Studies in Twentieth Century Philosophy). New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  132. Papafragou, Anna , Massey, Christine , & Gleitman, Lila
    2006 When English proposes what Greek presupposes: The cross-linguistic encoding of motion events. Cognition, 98, B75–87. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2005.05.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2005.05.005 [Google Scholar]
  133. Paykin, Katia , & Van Peteghem, Marleen
    2003 External vs. internal possessor structures and inalienability in Russian. Russian Linguistics, 27, 329–348. doi: 10.1023/A:1027373010332
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1027373010332 [Google Scholar]
  134. Quirk, Randolph , Greenbaum, Sidney , Leech, Geoffrey , & Svartvik, Jan
    1985A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London / New York : Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  135. Radden, Günter , & Panther, Klaus-Uwe
    (Eds.) 2004Studies in linguistic motivation. Berlin / New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  136. Rosch, Eleanor
    1973 Natural categories. Cognitive Psychology, 4(3), 328–350. doi: 10.1016/0010‑0285(73)90017‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(73)90017-0 [Google Scholar]
  137. 1978 Principles of categorization. In Eleanor Rosch , & Barbara B. Lloyd (Eds.), Cognition and categorization (pp. 27–48). Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  138. Rudzka-Ostyn, Brygida
    1992 Case relations in cognitive grammar: Some reflexive uses of the Polish dative. Leuvense Bijdragen, 81, 327–373.
    [Google Scholar]
  139. Rybarczyk, Magdalena
    2006Subjectively construed means of negotiating the speaker-hearer relation in discourse: A cognitive grammar analysis of selected examples. Unpublished MA thesis, University of Warsaw.
    [Google Scholar]
  140. 2011My sister vs. your daughter: Perspective changes and their implicit impact on communication. Anglica, 20, 121–136.
    [Google Scholar]
  141. Sambre, Paul
    2012 Fleshing out language and intersubjectivity: An exploration of Merleau-Ponty’s legacy to cognitive linguistics. Cognitive Semiotics, 4(1), 189–224.
    [Google Scholar]
  142. Sammut, Gordon , Daanen, Paul , & Moghaddam, Fathali M
    (Eds.) 2013Understanding the self and others: Explorations in intersubjectivity and interobjectivity. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  143. Sandra, Dominiek
    2009 Experimentation. In Dominiek Sandra , Jan-Ola Östman , & Jef Verschueren (Eds.), Cognition and pragmatics (pp. 157–198). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing House. doi: 10.1075/hoph.3.11san
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hoph.3.11san [Google Scholar]
  144. Schulze, Brigitte , & Tabakowska, Elżbieta
    1992The Polish discourse marker TO in Gombrowicz’s “Ślub” (“The Marriage”) and in its English, German, French and Czech translations. Mainz: Liber Verlag.
    [Google Scholar]
  145. Searle, John R
    1969Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. New York: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139173438
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173438 [Google Scholar]
  146. Silverstein, Michael
    1976 Hierarchy of features and ergativity. In R.M.W. Dixon (Ed.), Grammatical categories in Australian languages (pp. 112–171). Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.
    [Google Scholar]
  147. 1981 Case-marking and the nature of language. Australian Journal of Linguistics, 1(2), 227–244. doi: 10.1080/07268608108599275
    https://doi.org/10.1080/07268608108599275 [Google Scholar]
  148. Sinha, Chris
    1999 Grounding, mapping and acts of meaning. In Theo Janssen , & Gisela Redeker (Eds.), Cognitive linguistics: Foundation, scope, and methodology (pp. 223–255). Berlin / New York: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110803464.223
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110803464.223 [Google Scholar]
  149. Sinha, Chris , & Rodríguez, Cintia
    2008 Language and the signifying object: From convention to imagination. In Jordan Zlatev , Timothy P. Racine , Chris Sinha , & Esa Itkonen (Eds.), The shared mind: Perspectives on intersubjectivity (pp. 357–378). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. doi: 10.1075/celcr.12.19sin
    https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.12.19sin [Google Scholar]
  150. Stephan, Elena , Liberman, Nira , & Trope, Yaacov
    2010 Politeness and psychological distance: A construal level perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(2), 268–280. doi: 10.1037/a0016960
    https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016960 [Google Scholar]
  151. Stolz, Thomas , Kettler, Sonja , Stroh, Cornelia , & Urdze, Aina
    2008Split possession: An areal-linguistic study of the alienability correlation and related phenomena in languages of Europe. (Studies in Language Companion Series 101.) Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. doi: 10.1075/slcs.101
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.101 [Google Scholar]
  152. Sumner, William Graham
    1906Folkways: A study of the sociological importance of usages, manners, customs, mores and morals. Boston: Ginn and Company.
    [Google Scholar]
  153. Sweetser, Eve
    1990From etymology to pragmatics: Metaphorical and cultural aspects of semantic structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511620904
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620904 [Google Scholar]
  154. 1999 Compositionality and blending: Semantic composition in a cognitively realistic framework. In Gisela Redeker , & Theo Janssen (Eds.), Cognitive linguistics: Foundations, scope and methodology (pp. 129–162). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110803464.129
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110803464.129 [Google Scholar]
  155. Szupryczyńska, Maria
    1994 Tzw. dativus possessivus we współczesnym języku polskim [‘Dativus possessivus in contemporary Polish’]. BPTJ, 50, 49–69.
    [Google Scholar]
  156. Szwedek, Aleksander
    1973 A note on the relation between the article in English and the word order in Polish. Papers and Studies in Contrastive Linguistics, 2, part I, 213–220; part II, 221–225.
    [Google Scholar]
  157. Tabakowska, Elżbieta
    1995 The concept of radial category and polysemy: A study of the Polish lexical item TO. In Wojciech Smoczyński (Ed.), Analecta Indoeuropea Safarewicz Dictata (pp. 429–441). Kraków: Universitas.
    [Google Scholar]
  158. Talmy, Leonard
    1978 Figure and ground in complex sentences. In Joseph Greenberg (Ed.), Universals of human language. Volume 4: Syntax (pp. 625–649). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  159. 1983 How language structures space. In Herbert L. Pick , & Linda P. Acredolo (Eds.), Spatial orientation: Theory, research, and application (pp. 225–282). New York: Plenum Press. doi: 10.1007/978‑1‑4615‑9325‑6_11
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-9325-6_11 [Google Scholar]
  160. 2000Toward a cognitive semantics (2 volumes). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  161. 2005 Leonard Talmy: A windowing to conceptual structure and language. Part 1: Lexicalisation and typology. Interview by Ibraide Ibarretxe Antunano. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 3(1), 325–347. doi: 10.1075/arcl.3.17iba
    https://doi.org/10.1075/arcl.3.17iba [Google Scholar]
  162. 2006 Leonard Talmy: A windowing onto conceptual structure and language. Part 2: Language and cognition: Past and future. Interview by Ibraide Ibarretxe Antunano. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 4, 253–267. doi: 10.1075/arcl.4.11iba
    https://doi.org/10.1075/arcl.4.11iba [Google Scholar]
  163. 2007a Attention phenomena. In Dirk Geeraerts , & Hubert Cuyckens (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of cognitive linguistics (pp. 264–293). New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  164. 2007b Foreword. In Monica Gonzalez-Marquez , Irene Mittelberg , Seana Coulson , & Michael J. Spivey (Eds.), Methods in cognitive linguistics (pp.xi–xxi). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing House. doi: 10.1075/hcp.18.03tal
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.18.03tal [Google Scholar]
  165. Taylor, John R
    1992 Old problems: Adjectives in cognitive grammar. Cognitive Linguistics, 3(1), 1–35. doi: 10.1515/cogl.1992.3.1.1
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1992.3.1.1 [Google Scholar]
  166. (1995 [1989]) Linguistic categorization: Prototypes in linguistic theory. Oxford / New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  167. 1996Possessives in English: An exploration in cognitive grammar. Oxford / New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  168. Thornbury, Scott
    2005Beyond the sentence: Introducing discourse analysis. Oxford: Macmillan Education.
    [Google Scholar]
  169. Tirassa, Maurizio , & Bosco, Francesca M
    2008 On the nature and role of intersubjectivity in human communication. In Francesca Morganti , Antonella Carassa , & Giuseppe Riva (Eds.), Enacting intersubjectivity: A cognitive and social perspective on the study of interactions. Amsterdam: IOS Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  170. Tomasello, Michael
    1996 The child’s contribution to culture: A commentary on Toomela. Culture and Psychology, 2, 307–318. doi: 10.1177/1354067X9600200306
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X9600200306 [Google Scholar]
  171. 1999The cultural origins of human cognition. Cambridge, MA / London: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  172. 2000 First steps toward a usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cognitive Linguistics, 11(1–2), 61–82.
    [Google Scholar]
  173. 2003Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  174. 2008 Interview by Gert Scobel. German channel 3Sat. video.google.com/videoplay?docid=8933367116959974563&hl=pl
  175. Tomasello, Michael , Kruger, Ann C. , & Ratner, Hilary H
    1993 Cultural learning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 16, 495–552. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X0003123X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0003123X [Google Scholar]
  176. Traugott, Elizabeth C
    1989 On the rise of epistemic meanings in English: An example of subjectification in semantic change. Language, 57, 33–65.
    [Google Scholar]
  177. Traugott, Elizabeth C. , & Heine, Bernd
    (Eds.) 1991aApproaches to grammaticalizalion. Volume 1. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. doi: 10.1075/tsl.19.1
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.19.1 [Google Scholar]
  178. (Eds.) 1991bApproaches to grammaticalization. Volume 2. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. doi: 10.1017/s0022226700000116
    https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022226700000116 [Google Scholar]
  179. Trope, Yaacov , & Liberman, Nira
    2003 Temporal construal. Psychological Review, 110, 403–421. doi: 10.1037/0033‑295X.110.3.403
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.110.3.403 [Google Scholar]
  180. Tuggy, David H
    1980 Ethical dative and possessor omission sì, possessor ascension no!Work Papers of the Summer Institute of Linguistics24 (pp.97–141). University of North Dakota.
    [Google Scholar]
  181. 1981 [revised electronic edition 2008]. The transitivity-related morphology of tetelcingo nahuatl: An exploration in cognitive grammar. Ph. D. dissertation, University of California, San Diego. [www.sil.org/~tuggyd/Dissert/DTuggy-Dissertation-CG-nhg.pdf].
    [Google Scholar]
  182. Twardzisz, Piotr
    2012To be and not to have in Polish locationals. Rice Working Papers in Linguistics, 3, 1–23.
    [Google Scholar]
  183. Tyler, Andrea , & Evans, Vyvyan
    2003The semantics of English prepositions: Spatial scenes, embodied meaning and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511486517
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486517 [Google Scholar]
  184. Van Belle, William , & Van Hoecke, Willy
    (Eds.) 1996The dative. Volume 1: Descriptive studies. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. doi: 10.1075/cagral.2
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cagral.2 [Google Scholar]
  185. Van Dijk, Teun A
    1987Communicating racism: Ethnic prejudice in thought and talk. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  186. 1991Racism and the press: Critical studies in racism and migration. London / New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  187. 1995 Elite discourse and the reproduction of racism. In Rita Kirk Whillock , & David Slayden (Eds.), Hate speech (pp. 1–27). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  188. Van Hoek, Karen
    1992Paths through conceptual structure: Constrains on pronominal anaphora. Unpublished Ph. D. dissertation, University of California, San Diego.
    [Google Scholar]
  189. 1995 Conceptual reference points: A cognitive grammar account of pronominal anaphora constraints. Language, 71(2), 310–340. doi: 10.2307/416165
    https://doi.org/10.2307/416165 [Google Scholar]
  190. Van Langendonck, Willy
    2007 Iconicity. In Dirk Geeraerts , & Hubert Cuyckens (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of cognitive linguistics (pp. 394–418). New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  191. Verhagen, Arie
    2005Constructions of intersubjectivity: Discourse, syntax, and cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  192. 2007 Construal and perspectivization. In Dirk Geeraerts , & Hubert Cuyckens (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of cognitive linguistics (pp. 48–81). New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  193. 2008 Intersubjectivity and the architecture of the language system. In Jordan Zlatev , Timothy P. Racine , Chris Sinha , & Esa Itkonen (Eds.), The shared mind: Perspectives on intersubjectivity (pp. 307–331). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. doi: 10.1075/celcr.12.17ver
    https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.12.17ver [Google Scholar]
  194. Vygotsky, Lev S
    1978Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  195. Waugh, Linda R. , Fonseca-Greber, Bonnie , Vickers, Caroline , & Eröz, Betil
    2007 Multiple empirical approaches to a complex analysis of discourse. In Monica Gonzalez-Marquez , Irene Mittelberg , Seana Coulson , & Michael J. Spivey (Eds.), Methods in cognitive linguistics (pp. 120–148). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing House. doi: 10.1075/hcp.18.11wau
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.18.11wau [Google Scholar]
  196. Wierzbicka, Anna
    1986 The meaning of a case: A study of the Polish dative. In Richard D. Brecht , & James S. Levine (Eds.), Case in Slavic (pp. 386–426). Columbus: Slavica.
    [Google Scholar]
  197. 1988The semantics of grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. doi: 10.1075/slcs.18
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.18 [Google Scholar]
  198. 1992Semantics, culture, and cognition: Universal human concepts in culture-specific configurations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  199. 1997Understanding cultures through their key words: English, Russian, Polish, German, and Japanese. New York / Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  200. Willemse, Peter
    2010 A discourse perspective to nominal reference-point constructions. In Elżbieta Tabakowska , Michał Choiński , & Łukasz Wiraszka (Eds.), Cognitive linguistics in action: From theory to application and back (pp. 209–240). Berlin / New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  201. Winter, Bodo , & Matlock, Teenie
    2013 Reasoning about similarity and proximity. Metaphor & Symbol, 28, 1–14. doi: 10.1080/10926488.2013.826529
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2013.826529 [Google Scholar]
  202. Wodak, Ruth
    1996 The genesis of racist discourse in Austria since 1989. In Carmen R. Caldas-Coulthard , & Malcolm Coulthard (Eds.), Texts and practices (pp.107–128). London / New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  203. Zahavi, Dan
    2001 Beyond empathy: Phenomenological approaches to intersubjectivity. Journal of Consciousness Studies,8(5–7), 151–167.
    [Google Scholar]
  204. 2003Husserl’s phenomenology. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  205. Zhong, Chen-Bo , & Leonardelli, Geoffrey J
    2008 Cold and lonely: Does social exclusion literally feel cold?Psychological Science, 19, 838–842. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑9280.2008.02165.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02165.x [Google Scholar]
  206. Zlatev, Jordan , Racine, Timothy P. , Sinha, Chris , & Itkonen, Esa
    (Eds.) 2008The shared mind: perspectives on intersubjectivity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. doi: 10.1075/celcr.12
    https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.12 [Google Scholar]
  207. “Solidarni 2010” by Ewa Stankiewicz 2010 Film Open Group.
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/books/9789027268822
Loading
/content/books/9789027268822
dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
-contentType:Journal -contentType:Chapter
10
5
Chapter
content/books/9789027268822
Book
false
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error