The Semantics of German Verb Prefixes

image of The Semantics of German Verb Prefixes

The Semantics of German Verb Prefixes is the most comprehensive study ever undertaken in this area of German grammar. Using an extensive collection of naturally occurring data, the author proposes an image-schematic interpretation for each of the productive prefixes be-, ver-, er-, ent-, zer-, um-, über-, unter-, and durch-. These abstract semantic patterns underlie a remarkable range of particular meanings, and they consistently account for subtle contrasts between prefixed verbs and alternative constructions such as simple verbs, particle verbs, and verbs with other prefixes. Furthermore, the author develops a schematic meaning for the prefixed verb construction itself. This grammatical meaning reflects the interpreter’s perspective and attentional focus as the objective event is imagined to unfold. Underlying all of these proposals is a novel conception of meaning as a dynamic and flexible process with a constantly active role for the interpreter. This volume will be of great value to cognitive linguists as well as scholars and students of German who want to gain insights into a central and puzzling part of the morphosyntax and semantics of the German language.


  1. Beaton, K.B
    (1996) A practical dictionary of German usage. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [Cited in text as “Beaton” with page number.]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Becker, Donald A
    (1971) Case grammar and German be . Glossa, 5, 125–145.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bellavia, Elena
    (1996) The German über . In M. Pütz , & R. Dirven (Eds.), The construal of space in language and thought[Cognitive Linguistics Research 8] (pp. 73–107). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Belz, Julie Anne
    (1997) Mind, metaphor, and prefix: Evidence for prototype category structure in NHG ver-. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bister-Broosen, H. , Genzmer, H. , & Pynes, P
    (1992) Spektrum: Grammatik im Kontext. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Bloch, Ernst , Halley, Anne , & Suvin, Darko
    (1970) ‘Entfremdung, Verfremdung’: Alienation, Estrangement. The Drama Review, 15(1), 120–125. www.jstor.org/stable/1144598 doi: 10.2307/1144598
    https://doi.org/10.2307/1144598 [Google Scholar]
  7. Bouillon, Henri
    (1978) Kontrastive Syntagmatik der deutschen Präpositionen auf und über . In J. Lerot , & R. Kern (Eds.), Mélanges de linguistique et de littérature offerts au professeur Henri Draye à l’occasion de son éméritat (pp. 3–13). Louvain: Bibliothèque de l’Université, Bureau de recueil.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Brinkmann, Hennig
    (1962) Die deutsche Sprache: Gestalt und Leistung. Düsseldorf: Schwann.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Brinkmann, Ursula
    (1997) The locative alternation in German: Its structure and acquisition[Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 15]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/lald.15
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.15 [Google Scholar]
  10. Brugman, Claudia
    (1981). The story of over. Master’s thesis, University of California, Berkeley. Reproduced by Indiana University Linguistics Club (1983).
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Buzsáki, György
    (2006) Rhythms of the brain. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195301069.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195301069.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  12. COSMAS IIweb
    . Version 1.6.3 (March2011) Institut für deutsche Sprache Mannheim. cosmas2.ids-mannheim.de/cosmas2-web/menu.home.do.
  13. Croft, William
    (1998) The structure of events and the structure of language. In Michael Tomasello (Ed.), The new psychology of language: cognitive and functional approaches to language structure (67–92). Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Curme, George O
    (1922) A grammar of the German language. 2nd ed.New York: Frederick Ungar.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Deane, Paul
    (1993) Multimodal spatial representation: On the semantic unity of over and other polysemous prepositions. Duisburg: L.A.U.D. Series A, paper no. 332.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Dewell, Robert B
    (1994)  Over again: Image-schema transformations in semantic analysis. Cognitive Linguistics, 5, 351–380. doi: 10.1515/cogl.1994.5.4.351
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1994.5.4.351 [Google Scholar]
  17. (2000) Case meaning and sequence of attention: Source landmarks as accusative and dative objects of the verb. In A. Foolen , & F. van der Leek (Eds.), Constructions in cognitive linguistics (pp. 47–65). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/cilt.178.05dew
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.178.05dew [Google Scholar]
  18. (2004) The semantics of be-verb constructions and the German locative alternation. Leuvense Bijdragen, 93, 15–59.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. (2007a) Moving around: The role of the conceptualizer in semantic interpretation. Cognitive Linguistics, 18, 383–415. doi: 10.1515/COG.2007.022
    https://doi.org/10.1515/COG.2007.022 [Google Scholar]
  20. (2007b) Why Monday comes before Tuesday: The role of a non-deictic conceptualiser. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies, 25, 291–301. doi: 10.2989/16073610709486464
    https://doi.org/10.2989/16073610709486464 [Google Scholar]
  21. (2008) Moving over: The role of systematic semantic processes in defining individual lexemes. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 5, 271–288. doi: 10.1075/arcl.5.11dew
    https://doi.org/10.1075/arcl.5.11dew [Google Scholar]
  22. (2011) The meaning of particle/prefix constructions in German [Human Cognitive Processing 34]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/hcp.34
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.34 [Google Scholar]
  23. Dowty, David
    (1991) Thematic proto-roles and argument selection. Language, 67, 547–619. doi: 10.1353/lan.1991.0021
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1991.0021 [Google Scholar]
  24. Duden Deutsches Universalwörterbuch (1996) Mannheim, Leipzig, Wien, & Zürich: Dudenverlag.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Duden Die Grammatik[Duden Band 4] (2006) Mannheim, Leipzig, Wien, & Zürich: Dudenverlag.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Duden Richtiges und gutes Deutsch: Wörterbuch der sprachlichen Zweifelsfälle [Duden Band 9] (2007) Mannheim, Leipzig, Wien, & Zürich: Dudenverlag.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Eberhard, Johann August , Lyon, Otto , & Rückert, Friedrich
    (1802/1910) Synonymisches Handwörterbuch der deutschen Sprache. 17th ed.Available online atwww.textlog.de/synonym.html. [Cited in text as “Eberhard” with article number.]
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Eroms, Hans-Werner
    (1980) Be-Verb und Präpositionalphrase[Monographien zur Sprachwissenschaft 9]. Heidelberg: Winter.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Farrell, R.B
    (1977) Dictionary of German synonyms. 3rd ed.Cambridge: University Press. [Cited in text as “Farrell” with page number.]
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Fleischer, Wolfgang
    (1971) Wortbildung der deutschen Gegenwartssprache. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Geiger, Gad , & Lettvin, Jerome
    (1997) A view on Dyslexia. CBCL Paper #148/AI Memo #1608, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA. cbcl.mit.edu/people/geiger/geiger-new.html.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Goldberg, Adele E
    (1995) Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. (2006) Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Google
  35. Günther, Hartmut
    (1974) Das System der Verben mit be- in der deutschen Sprache der Gegenwart. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. (1987) Wortbildung, Syntax, be-Verben und das Lexikon. Beiträge zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache und Literatur (PBB), 109, 179–201.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Hallwass, Edith
    (1991) Mehr Erfolg mit gutem Deutsch. Munich: Mosaik.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Hawkins, Bruce Wayne
    (1984) The semantics of English spatial prepositions. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, San Diego. Reproduced by University Microfilms International, Ann Arbor (1986).
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Heidegger, Martin
    (2006) Mindfulness (Besinnung). Translation by Parvis Emad , & Thomas Kalary . Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Hopper, Paul , & Thompson, Sandra
    (1980) Transitivity in grammar and discourse. Language, 56, 251–299. doi: 10.1353/lan.1980.0017
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1980.0017 [Google Scholar]
  41. Jackendoff, Ray
    (1983) Semantics and cognition. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. (1986) Distributive location. Sophia Linguistica, 20/21, 15–24.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Janda, Laura A
    (1986) A semantic analysis of the Russian verbal prefixes: Za-, pere-, do-, and ot-. Munich: O. Sagner (Slawistische Beiträge).
    [Google Scholar]
  44. von Károlyi, Catya , Winner, Ellen , Gray, Wendy , & Sherman, Gordon F
    (2003) Dyslexia linked to talent: Global visual-spatial ability. Brain and Language, 85(3), 427–431. doi: 10.1016/S0093‑934X(03)00052‑X
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00052-X [Google Scholar]
  45. Kühnhold, Ingeburg
    (1973) Präfixverben. In I. Kühnhold , & H. Wellmann (Eds.), Das Verb (Deutsche Wortbildung: Typen und Tendenzen in der Gegenwartssprache, Erster Hauptteil)[Sprache der Gegenwart 29] (pp. 141–362). Düsseldorf: Schwann.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Lakoff, George
    (1987) Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. doi: 10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  47. Langacker, Ronald W
    (1987) Foundations of cognitive Grammar I: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford: University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. (1991) Foundations of cognitive Grammar II: Descriptive application. Stanford: University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. (2013) Essentials of cognitive Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Leopold, Max
    (1907) Die Vorsilbe VER- und ihre Geschichte [Germanistische Abhandlungen 27]. Breslau: Marcus. openlibrary.org:archive.org/stream/dievorsilbeveru00leopgoog#page/n3/mode/2up
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Levin, Beth
    (1993) English verb classes and alternations: A preliminary investigation. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Lindner, Susan Jean
    (1983) A Lexico-Semantic Analysis of English Verb Particle Constructions with out and up . Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, San Diego. Reproduced by Indiana University Linguistics Club.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. LEO GmbH
  54. Matlock, Teenie
    (2010) Abstract motion is no longer abstract. Language and Cognition, 2(2), 243–260. doi: 10.1515/langcog.2010.010
    https://doi.org/10.1515/langcog.2010.010 [Google Scholar]
  55. Michaelis, Laura A. , & Ruppenhofer, Josef
    (2001) Beyond alternations: A constructional model of the German applicative pattern. Stanford: CSLI.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Olsen, Susan
    (1994) Lokativalternation im Deutschen und Englischen. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft, 13, 201–235. doi: 10.1515/zfsw.1994.13.2.201
    https://doi.org/10.1515/zfsw.1994.13.2.201 [Google Scholar]
  57. (1996) Pleonastische Direktionale. In G. Harras , & M. Bierwisch (Eds.), Wenn die Semantik arbeitet: Festschrift für Klaus Baumgärtner zum 65. Geburtstag (pp. 303–330). Tübingen: Niemeyer.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Risch, Gabriela
    (1995) Verbpräfigierung des Deutschen: Skalierungsverben mit über- und unter- . Ph.D. dissertation, Stuttgart.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Schmitz, Werner
    (1964) Der Gebrauch der deutschen Präpositionen. Ismaning: Max Hueber.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Schröder, Jochen
    (1986) Lexikon deutscher Präpositionen. Leipzig: Verlag Enzyklopädie Leipzig.
    [Google Scholar]
  61. (1992) Lexikon deutscher Präfixverben. Berlin & Leipzig: Langenscheidt Verlag Enzyklopädie Leipzig.
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Schulz, Dora , & Griesbach, Heinz
    (1960) Grammatik der deutschen Sprache. München: Max Hueber.
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Schulze, Rainer
    (1991) Getting round to (a)round: Towards a description and analysis of a spatial predicate. In G. Rauh (Ed.), Approaches to prepositions (pp. 251–274). Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag.
    [Google Scholar]
  64. (1993) The meaning of (a)round: A study of an English preposition. In R.A. Geiger , & B. Rudzka-Ostyn (Eds.), Conceptualizations and mental processing in language (pp. 399–431). Berlin / New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  65. Stiebels, Barbara
    (1996) Lexikalische Argumente und Adjunkte[studia grammatica 39]. Berlin: Akademie. doi: 10.1515/9783050072319
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783050072319 [Google Scholar]
  66. Stiebels, Barbara , & Wunderlich, Dieter
    (1994) Morphology feeds syntax: The case of particle verbs. Linguistics, 32, 913–968. doi: 10.1515/ling.1994.32.6.913
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1994.32.6.913 [Google Scholar]
  67. Talmy, Leonard
    (2000a) Toward a cognitive semantics I: Concept structuring systems. Cambridge / London: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  68. (2000b) Toward a cognitive semantics II: Typology and process in concept structuring. Cambridge / London: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  69. Taylor, Holly A. , & Tversky, Barbara
    (1996) Perspective in spatial descriptions. Journal of Memory and Language, 35, 371–391. doi: 10.1006/jmla.1996.0021
    https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1996.0021 [Google Scholar]
  70. Tyler, Andrea , & Evans, Vyvyan
    (2003) The semantics of English prepositions: Spatial scenes, embodied meaning and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511486517
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486517 [Google Scholar]
  71. Weinrich, Harald
    (1993) Textgrammatik der deutschen Sprache. Mannheim, Leipzig, Wien, & Zürich: Dudenverlag.
    [Google Scholar]
  72. Wunderlich, Dieter
    (1983) On the compositionality of German prefix verbs. In R. Bäuerle , C. Schwarze , & A. von Stechow (Eds.), Meaning, use and interpretation of language (pp. 452–465). Berlin: de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  73. (1987) An investigation of lexical composition: the case of German be- verbs. Linguistics, 25, 283–331. doi: 10.1515/ling.1987.25.2.283
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1987.25.2.283 [Google Scholar]
  74. (1993) On German um: semantic and conceptual aspects. Linguistics, 31, 111–133. doi: 10.1515/ling.1993.31.1.111
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1993.31.1.111 [Google Scholar]
  75. Zifonun, Gisela et al.
    (1997) Grammatik der deutschen Sprache[Schriften des Instituts für deutsche Sprache 7]. Berlin: de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
-contentType:Journal -contentType:Chapter
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error