1887
  1. Home
  2. Books
  3. Endocentric Structuring of Projection-free Syntax

Endocentric Structuring of Projection-free Syntax

image of Endocentric Structuring of Projection-free Syntax
GBP
Buy:£83.00 + Taxes

Endocentric Structuring of Projection-free Syntax puts forward a novel theory of syntax that rigidly adheres to the principle of Minimal Computation, in which a number of traditional but extraneous stipulations such as referential indices and representational labels/projections are eliminated. It specifically articulates the overarching hypothesis that every syntactic object is composed by recursive, phase-by-phase embedding of the endocentric structure {H, α}, where H is a head lexical item and α is another syntactic object (order irrelevant). The proposed mechanism achieves both theory-internal simplicity and broad empirical coverage at the same time, advancing a radically reduced conception of endocentricty/headedness while deriving a number of empirically grounded constraints on human language.

References

  1. Abels, Klaus
    2001 Successive cyclicity, anti-locality, and adposition-stranding. PhD dissertation, University of Connecticut, Storrs.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Abels, Klaus & Neeleman, Ad
    2009 Universal 20 without the LCA. InMerging Features: Computation, Interpretation and Acquisition, Josep M. Brucart , Anna Gavarró , & Jaume Solà (eds), 60–80. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199553266.003.0004
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199553266.003.0004 [Google Scholar]
  3. Abney, Steven Paul
    1987 The noun phrase in its sentential aspect. PhD dissertation, MIT.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Ackema, Peter & Neeleman, Ad
    2002 Effects of short-term storage in processing rightward movement. InStorage and Computation in the Langauge Faculty: Studies in Theoretical Psycholinguistics, Sieb Nooteboom , Fred Weerman , & Frank Wijnen (eds), 219–256. Kluwer. doi: 10.1007/978‑94‑010‑0355‑1_8
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0355-1_8 [Google Scholar]
  5. Agbayani, Brian , Golston, Chris , & Ishii, Toru
    2012 Prosodic scrambling. InProceedings of the 5th Formal Approaches to Japanese Linguistics Conference (FAJL5), Matthew A. Tucker , Anie Thompson , Oliver Northrup , & Ryan Benett (eds), 15–24. MITWPL.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Alexiadou, Artemis & Anagnostopoulou, Elena
    2001 The subject-in-situ generalization and the role of case in driving computations. Linguistic Inquiry32(2): 193–231. doi: 10.1162/00243890152001753
     https://doi.org/10.1162/00243890152001753 [Google Scholar]
  7. Alrenga, Peter
    2005 A sentential subject asymmetry in English and its implications for complement selection. Syntax8: 175–207. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑9612.2005.00078.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9612.2005.00078.x [Google Scholar]
  8. Asbury, Anna
    2008 The Morphosyntax of Case and Adpositions. Utrecht: LOT.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Baker, Mark C
    1988 Incorporation: A Theory of Grammatical Function Changing. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. 1996 The Polysynthesis Parameter. New York: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. 2003 Lexical Categories: Verbs Nouns and Adjectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511615047
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511615047 [Google Scholar]
  12. Barwise, Jon & Cooper, Robin
    1981 Generalized quantifiers and natural language. Linguistics and Philosophy4: 159–209. doi: 10.1007/BF00350139
     https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00350139 [Google Scholar]
  13. Belletti, Adriana
    2001 ‘Inversion’ as focalization. InSubject Inversion in Romance and the Theory of Universal Grammar, Aafke Hulk & Jean-Yves Pollock (eds), 60–90. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Berwick, Robert C. , Pietroski, Paul , Yankama, Beracah , & Chomsky, Noam
    2011 Poverty of the stimulus revisited. Cognitive Science35: 1207–1242. doi: 10.1111/j.1551‑6709.2011.01189.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-6709.2011.01189.x [Google Scholar]
  15. den Besten, Hans & Webelhuth, Gert
    1990 Stranding. InScrambling and Barriers, Günther Grewendorfand & Wolfgang Sternefeld (eds), 77–92. New York: Academic Press. doi: 10.1075/la.5.05bes
     https://doi.org/10.1075/la.5.05bes [Google Scholar]
  16. Bever, Thomas G. & Poeppel, David
    2010 Analysis by synthesis: A (re-)emerging program of research for language and vision. Biolinguistics4(2–3): 174–200.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Biberauer, Theresa , Holmberg, Anders , & Roberts, Ian
    2008 Structure and linearization in disharmonic word orders. InProceedings of WCCFL26, Somerville, MA., 96–104. Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Bittner, Maria & Hale, Ken
    1996a The structural determination of Case and agreement. Linguistic Inquiry27: 1–68.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. 1996b Ergativity: Toward a theory of a heterogeneous class. Linguistic Inquiry27: 531–604.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Bloomfield, Leonard
    1933 Language. New York: Henry Holt.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Bobaljik, Jonathan David
    1995 Morphosyntax: The syntax of verbal inflection. PhD dissertation, MIT.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Bobaljik, Jonathan David & Brown, S
    1997 Inter-arboreal operations: Head-movement and the extension requirement. Linguistic Inquiry28: 345–356.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Boeckx, Cedric
    2003 Islands and Chains. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/la.63
     https://doi.org/10.1075/la.63 [Google Scholar]
  24. 2008a Bare Syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. 2008b A note on object EPP. ms. Harvard University.
  26. 2008c Understanding Minimalist Syntax. Oxford: Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. 2009 On the locus of asymmetry in UG. Catalan Journal of Linguistics8: 41–53.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. 2010a Defeating lexicocentrism. ms. ICREA/UAB. ling.auf.net/lingBuzz/ 001130.
  29. 2010b A tale of two minimalisms: Reflections on the plausibility of crash-proof syntax, and its free-merge alternative. InExploring Crash-proof Grammars, Michael Putnam (ed), 105–124. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/lfab.3.06boe
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lfab.3.06boe [Google Scholar]
  30. 2011 Approaching parameters from below. InThe Biolinguistic Enterprise: New Perspectives on the Evolution and Nature of the Human Language Faculty, Anna Maria Di Sciullo & Cedric Boeckx (eds), 205–221. Cambridge, MA: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. 2012 Phases beyond explanatory adequacy. InPhases: Developing the Framework, Ángel J. Gallego (ed), 45–66. Mouton de Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. 2014 Elementary Syntactic Structures: Prospects of a Feature-free Syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139524391
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524391 [Google Scholar]
  33. Boeckx, Cedric & Grohmann, Kleanthes K
    2007 Putting phases into perspective. Syntax10: 204–222. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑9612.2007.00098.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9612.2007.00098.x [Google Scholar]
  34. Boeckx, Cedric & Stjepanović, Sandra
    2001 Head-ing toward PF. Linguistic Inquiry32: 345–355. doi: 10.1162/00243890152001799
     https://doi.org/10.1162/00243890152001799 [Google Scholar]
  35. Boeckx, Cedric & Uriagereka, Juan
    2007 Minimalism. InThe Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Interfaces, Gillian Ramchand & Charles Reiss (eds), 541–573. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Borer, Hagit
    2005 Structuring Sense, Volume I: In Name Only. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199263905.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199263905.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  37. Borgonovo, Claudia & Neeleman, Ad
    2000 Transparent Adjuncts. Canadian Journal of Linguistics45: 199–224.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Bošković, Željko
    1997 The Syntax of Nonfinite Complementation: An Economy Approach. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. 2002a A-movement and the EPP. Syntax5: 167–218. doi: 10.1111/1467‑9612.00051
     https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9612.00051 [Google Scholar]
  40. 2002b On multiple wh-fronting. Linguistic Inquiry33: 351–383. doi: 10.1162/002438902760168536
     https://doi.org/10.1162/002438902760168536 [Google Scholar]
  41. 2005 On the locality of left branch extraction and the structure of np. Studia Linguistica59: 1–45. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑9582.2005.00118.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9582.2005.00118.x [Google Scholar]
  42. 2007 On the locality and motivation of Move and Agree: An even more minimal theory. Linguistic Inquiry38: 589–644. doi: 10.1162/ling.2007.38.4.589
     https://doi.org/10.1162/ling.2007.38.4.589 [Google Scholar]
  43. 2008 What will you have, DP or NP?InProceedings of NELS37, Emily Elfner & Martin Walkow (eds). Amherst, MA.: GLSA.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Brame, Michael
    1981 The general theory of binding and fusion. Linguistic Analysis7.3: 277–325.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. 1982 The head-selector theory of lexical specifications and the nonexistence of coarse categories. Linguistic Analysis10.4: 321–325.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Bresnan, John W
    1970 On complementizers: Toward a syntactic theory of complement types. Foundations of Language6: 297–321.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. 1972 Theory of complementation in English syntax. PhD dissertation, MIT.
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Brody, Michael
    2000 Mirror theory: Syntactic representation in perfect syntax. Linguistic Inquiry31: 29–56. doi: 10.1162/002438900554280
     https://doi.org/10.1162/002438900554280 [Google Scholar]
  49. Cable, Seth
    2007 The grammar of Q. PhD dissertation, MIT.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. 2010 The Grammar of Q: Q-Particles, Wh-Movement, and PiedPiping. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195392265.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195392265.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  51. Caha, Pavel
    2009 The nanosyntax of case. PhD dissertation, University of Toromsø.
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Carnie, Andrew
    2002 Syntax: A Generative Introduciton. Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  53. 2008 Constituent Structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Carstens, Vicki
    2000 Concord in minimalist theory. Linguistic Inquiry31: 319–355. doi: 10.1162/002438900554370
     https://doi.org/10.1162/002438900554370 [Google Scholar]
  55. 2003 Rethinking complementizer agreement: Agree with a Case checked goal. Linguistic Inquiry34: 393–412. doi: 10.1162/002438903322247533
     https://doi.org/10.1162/002438903322247533 [Google Scholar]
  56. Cattell, Ray
    1976 Constraints on movement rules. Language52: 18–50. doi: 10.2307/413206
     https://doi.org/10.2307/413206 [Google Scholar]
  57. Cecchetto, Carlo
    2007 Some preliminary remarks on a ‘weak’ theory of linearization. Annali Online di Ferrara Lettere1: 1–13. eprints.unife.it/annali/lettere/2007vol1/indice.htm.
     [Google Scholar]
  58. 2013 Backward dependencies must be short: A unified account of the Final-over-Final and the Right Roof Constraints and its consequences for the syntax/morphology interface. InChallenges to Linearization, Theresa Biberauer & Ian Roberts (eds), 57–92. Berlin: Mouton.
     [Google Scholar]
  59. Cecchetto, Carlo & Donati, Caterina
    2010a A head is a head is a head. ms. University of Milan-Bicocca and University of Rome-La Sapienza.
  60. 2010b Relabeling heads: A unified accout for relativization structures. ms. University of Milan-Bicocca and University of Rome-La Sapienza. ling.auf.net/lingBuzz/001014.
  61. Ceplová, Markéta
    2001 Minimalist islands: Restricting P-features. ms. MIT.
  62. Chametzky, Robert A
    2000 Phrase Structure: From GB to Minimalism. Oxford: Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  63. Chierchia, Gennaro
    1998 Reference to kinds across languages. Natural Language Semantics6: 339–405. doi: 10.1023/A:1008324218506
     https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008324218506 [Google Scholar]
  64. Chomsky, Noam
    1955/1975b The Logical Structure of Linguistic Theory. ms. Harvard University, 1955. Published in part in 1975, New York: Plenum.
     [Google Scholar]
  65. 1957 Syntactic Structures. The Hague: Mouton. 2nd edition (2002).
     [Google Scholar]
  66. 1959 On certain formal properties of grammars. Information and Control2: 137–167. Reprinted in R. Duncan Luce, Robert R. Bush, and Eugene Galanter, eds. (1965), Readings in Mathematical Psychology, Volume II, 125–155, New York: John Wiley and Sons. doi: 10.1016/S0019‑9958(59)90362‑6
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(59)90362-6 [Google Scholar]
  67. 1965 Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  68. 1966/2002/2009a Cartesian Linguistics: A Chapter in the History of Rationalist Thought. New York: Harper & Row. 2nd edition with new introduction by James McGilvray, Christchurch NZ: Cybereditions; 3rd edition supplemented with new introduction by James McGilvray, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  69. 1968 Language and Mind. New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovitch. doi: 10.1037/e400082009‑004
     https://doi.org/10.1037/e400082009-004 [Google Scholar]
  70. 1970 Remarks on nominalization. InReadings in English Transformational Grammar, Roderick A. Jacobs & Peter S. Rosenbaum (eds), 184–221. Waltham, MA: Ginn.
     [Google Scholar]
  71. 1973 Conditions on transformations. InA Festschrift for Morris Halle, Stephen Anderson & Paul Kiparsky (eds), 232–286. New York: Rinehart and Winston.
     [Google Scholar]
  72. 1975a Reflections on Language. New York: Pantheon.
     [Google Scholar]
  73. 1977 Essays on Form and Interpretation. New York: North-Holland.
     [Google Scholar]
  74. 1980a On binding. Linguistic Inquiry11: 1–46.
     [Google Scholar]
  75. 1980b On cognitive structures and their development. InLanguage and Learning: The Debate between Jean Piaget and Noam Chomsky, Massimo Piattelli-Palmarini (ed), 35–52. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  76. 1981 Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.
     [Google Scholar]
  77. 1982 Some Concepts and Consequences of the Government and Binding Theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  78. 1986a Barriers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  79. 1986b Knowledge of Language. New York: Praeger.
     [Google Scholar]
  80. 1987 Generative Grammar: Its Basis, Development and Prospects. Studies in English Linguistics and Literature. Kyoto: Kyoto University of Foreign Studies.
     [Google Scholar]
  81. 1993 A minimalist program for linguistic theory. InThe View from Building 20: Essays in Linguistics in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger, Ken Hale & Samuel J. Keyser (eds), 1–52. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  82. 1994 Bare phrase structure. MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics5: Department of Linguistics and Philosophy, MIT. Reprinted in G. Webelhuth, ed. (1995), Malden: Blackwell, Government and Binding Theory and the Minimalist Program, 383–439.
     [Google Scholar]
  83. 1995a Language and nature. Mind104. 413: 1–61. doi: 10.1093/mind/104.413.1
     https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/104.413.1 [Google Scholar]
  84. 1995b The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  85. 2000a Minimalist inquiries: The framework. InStep by Step: Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik, Roger Martin , David Michaels , & Juan Uriagereka (eds), 89–155. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  86. 2000b New Horizons in the Study of Language and Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511811937
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511811937 [Google Scholar]
  87. 2001 Derivation by phase. InKen Hale: A Life in Language, Michael Kenstowicz (ed), 1–52. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  88. 2004 Beyond explanatory adequacy. InStructures and Beyond: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Adriana Belletti (ed), 104–131. New York: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  89. 2005 Three factors in the language design. Linguistic Inquiry36: 1–22. doi: 10.1162/0024389052993655
     https://doi.org/10.1162/0024389052993655 [Google Scholar]
  90. 2007a Approaching UG from below. InInterfaces + Recursion = Language?: Chomsky’s Minimalism and the View from Semantics, Uli Sauerland & Hans-Martin Gärtner (eds), 1–29. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
  91. 2007b Biolinguistic explorations: Design, development, evolution. International Journal of Philosophical Studies15(1): 1–21. doi: 10.1080/09672550601143078
     https://doi.org/10.1080/09672550601143078 [Google Scholar]
  92. 2007c Of minds and language. Biolinguistics1: 9–27.
     [Google Scholar]
  93. 2008 On phases. InFoundational Issues in Linguistic Theory: Essays in Honor of Jean-Roger Vergnaud, Robert Freidin , Carlos Otero , & Maria Luisa Zubizarreta (eds), 133–166. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  94. 2009b The mysteries of nature: How deeply hidden?The Journal of Philosophy16(4): 167–200. doi: 10.5840/jphil2009106416
     https://doi.org/10.5840/jphil2009106416 [Google Scholar]
  95. 2012 Introduction. InGengokisoronshu [Foundations of Biolinguistics: Selected Writings], Naoki Fukui (ed), 17–26. Iwanami Shoten.
     [Google Scholar]
  96. 2013 Problems of projection. Lingua130: 33–49. doi: 10.1016/j.lingua.2012.12.003
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2012.12.003 [Google Scholar]
  97. Chomsky, Noam & Lasnik, Howard
    1977 Filters and control. Linguistic Inquiry8(3): 425–504.
     [Google Scholar]
  98. 1993 The theory of principles and parameters. InSyntax: An International Handbook of Contemporary Research, Vol. 1, Joachim Jacobs , Arnim von Stechow , Wolfgang Sternefeld , & Theo Vennemann (eds), 506–569. Walter de Gruyter. Reprinted in Chomsky (1995b).
     [Google Scholar]
  99. Cinque, Guglielmo
    1993 A null theory of phrase and compound stress. Linguistic Inquiry24: 239–298.
     [Google Scholar]
  100. 1999 Adverbs and Functional Heads: A Cross-linguistic Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  101. 2002 Functional Structure in DP and IP: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Vol. 1. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  102. 2005 Deriving Greenberg’s universal 20 and its exceptions. Linguistic Inquiry36: 315–332. doi: 10.1162/0024389054396917
     https://doi.org/10.1162/0024389054396917 [Google Scholar]
  103. Cinque, Guglielmo & Rizzi, Luigi
    (eds) 2010 Mapping Spatial PPs: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Vol. 6. New York: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195393675.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195393675.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  104. Collins, Chris
    2002 Eliminating labels. InDerivation and Explanation in the Minimalist Program, Samuel David Epstein & T. Daniel Seely (eds), 42–64. Oxford: Blackwell. doi: 10.1002/9780470755662.ch3
     https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470755662.ch3 [Google Scholar]
  105. Corver, Norbert
    2006 Freezing effects. InThe Blackwell Companion to Syntax II, Martin Everaert & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds), 383–406. Oxford: Blackwell. doi: 10.1002/9780470996591.ch28
     https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470996591.ch28 [Google Scholar]
  106. Crain, Stephen & Nakayama, Mineharu
    1987 Structure dependence in grammar formation. Language63: 522–543. doi: 10.2307/415004
     https://doi.org/10.2307/415004 [Google Scholar]
  107. Culicover, Peter W
    1982 Syntax. New York/London: Academic Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  108. den Dikken, Marcel
    1995 Binding, expletives and levels. Linguistic Inquiry26: 347–354.
     [Google Scholar]
  109. Donati, Caterina
    2006 On wh-head-movement. InWh-movement: Moving on, Lisa L.-S. Cheng & N. Corver (eds), 21–46. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  110. Embick, David & Marantz, Alec
    2008 Architecture and blocking. Linguistic Inquiry39: 1–53. doi: 10.1162/ling.2008.39.1.1
     https://doi.org/10.1162/ling.2008.39.1.1 [Google Scholar]
  111. Emonds, Joseph
    2009 Valuing V features and N features: What adjuncts tell us about case, agreement, and syntax in general. InMerging Features: Computation, Interpretation and Acquisition, Josep M. Brucart , Anna Gavarró , & Jaume Solà (eds), 194–214. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199553266.003.0011
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199553266.003.0011 [Google Scholar]
  112. Emonds, Joseph E
    1970 Root and structure-preserving transformations. PhD dissertation, MIT.
     [Google Scholar]
  113. 1976 A Transformational Approach to English Syntax: Root, Structure-preserving, and Local Transformations. New York, NY: Academic Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  114. Endo, Yoshio
    1996 Right dislocation. InMIT Working Papers in Linguistics 29: Formal Approaches to Japanese Linguistics2, 1–20. MITWPL.
     [Google Scholar]
  115. Epstein, Samuel David
    1999 Un-principled syntax: The derivation of syntactic relations. InWorking Minimalism, Samuel David Epstein & Norbert Hornstein (eds), 317–345. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  116. 2009. The unification of theta relations: How TRANSFER renders SpecvP a theta marked complement. ms. University of Michigan.
  117. Epstein, Samuel David , Groat, Erich M. , Kawashima, Ruriko , & Kitahara, Hisatsugu
    1998 A Derivational Approach to Syntactic Relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  118. Epstein, Samuel David , Kitahara, Hisatsugu , & Seely, T. Daniel
    2010 Uninterpretable features; what are they and what do they do?InExploring Crash-proof Grammars, Michael Putnam (ed), 124–142. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/lfab.3.07eps
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lfab.3.07eps [Google Scholar]
  119. 2012 Structure building that can’t be!InWays of Structure Building, Myriam UribeEtxebarria & Vidal Valmala (eds), 253–270. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199644933.003.0011
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199644933.003.0011 [Google Scholar]
  120. Epstein, Samuel David & Seely, T. Daniel
    2002 Rule applications as cycles in a level-free syntax. InDerivation and Explanation in the Minimalist Program, Samuel David Epstein & T. Daniel Seely (eds), 65–89. Oxford: Blackwell. doi: 10.1002/9780470755662.ch4
     https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470755662.ch4 [Google Scholar]
  121. 2005 Transformations and Derivations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  122. Fiengo, Robert & May, Robert
    1994 Indices and Identity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  123. Fitch, W. Tecumseh , Hauser, Marc D. , & Chomsky, Noam
    2005 The evolution of the language faculty: Clarifications and implications. Cognition97: 179–210. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2005.02.005
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2005.02.005 [Google Scholar]
  124. Fodor, Jerry A
    1975 The Language of Thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  125. 2008 LOT2: The Language of Thought Revisited. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  126. Fox, Danny & Nissenbaum, Jon
    1999 Extraposition and scope: A case for overt QR. InProceedings of WCCFL 18, Sonya Bird , Andrew Carnie , Jason D. Haugen , & Peter Norquest (eds), 132–144. Somerville, MA.: Cascadilla Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  127. Fox, Danny & Pesetsky, David
    2005 Cyclic linearization of syntactic structure. Theoretical Linguistics31: 1–45. doi: 10.1515/thli.2005.31.1‑2.1
     https://doi.org/10.1515/thli.2005.31.1-2.1 [Google Scholar]
  128. Frampton, John & Gutmann, Sam
    2000 Agreement is feature sharing. ms. Northeastern University.
  129. Freidin, Robert & Lasnik, Howard
    1981 Disjoint refernece and wh-trace. Linguistic Inquiry12: 39–53.
     [Google Scholar]
  130. Fujita, Koji
    2007 Facing the logical problem of language evolution. English Linguistics24(1): 78–108. doi: 10.9793/elsj1984.24.78
     https://doi.org/10.9793/elsj1984.24.78 [Google Scholar]
  131. 2009 A prospect for evolutionary adequacy: Merge and the evolution and development of human language. Biolinguistics3(2–3): 128–153.
     [Google Scholar]
  132. Fukui, Naoki
    1986/1995b A theory of category projection and its applications. PhD dissertation, MIT. Published in 1995 with revisions as Theory of Projection in Syntax, Kurosio Publishers and CSLI publications.
     [Google Scholar]
  133. 1988 Deriving the differences between English and Japanese: A case study in parametric syntax. English Linguistics5: 249–270. doi: 10.9793/elsj1984.5.249
     https://doi.org/10.9793/elsj1984.5.249 [Google Scholar]
  134. 1993 Parameters and optionality. Linguistic Inquiry24: 399–420. Reprinted in Fukui (2006).
     [Google Scholar]
  135. 1995a The principles-and-parameters approach: A comparative syntax of English and Japanese. InApproaches to Language Typology, Masayoshi Shibatani & Theodora Bynon (eds), 327–371. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Reprinted in Fukui (2006).
     [Google Scholar]
  136. 1996 On the nature of economy in language. Cognitive Studies (Bulletin of the Japanese Cognitive Science Society), 3: 51–71. Reprinted in Fukui (2006).
     [Google Scholar]
  137. 1999 An A-over-A perspective on locality. InLinguistics: In Search of the Human Mind: A Festschrift for Kazuko Inoue, Masatake Muraki & Enoch Iwamoto (eds), 109–127. Tokyo: Kaitakusha. Reprinted in Fukui (2006).
     [Google Scholar]
  138. 2001 Phrase structure. InThe Handbook of Contemporary Syntactic Theory, Mark Baltin & Chris Collins (eds), 374–406. Oxford: Blackwell. Reprinted in Fukui (2006). doi: 10.1002/9780470756416.ch12
     https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470756416.ch12 [Google Scholar]
  139. 2006 Theoretical Comparative Syntax: Studies in Macroparameters. London/New York: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  140. 2008 Gengo-no kihonenzan-o meguru oboegaki [A note concerning basic operations in language]. InGengokenkyuu-no Genzai: Keishiki-to Imi-no Intaafeisu [The State of the Art in Linguistic Research: The Syntax-Semantics Interface], Yoshiaki Kaneko , Akira Kikuchi , & Daiko Takahashi (eds), 1–21. Tokyo: Kaitakusha.
     [Google Scholar]
  141. 2011 Merge and bare phrase structure. InThe Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Minimalism, Cedric Boeckx (ed), 73–95. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  142. Fukui, Naoki & Kasai, Hironobu
    2004 Spelling-Out scrambling. Linguistic Variation Yearbook4.1: 109–141. doi: 10.1075/livy.4.04fuk
     https://doi.org/10.1075/livy.4.04fuk [Google Scholar]
  143. Fukui, Naoki & Sakai, Hiromu
    2003 The visibility guideline for functional categories: Verb raising in Japanese and related issues. Lingua113: 321–375. Reprinted in Fukui (2006). doi: 10.1016/S0024‑3841(02)00080‑3
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-3841(02)00080-3 [Google Scholar]
  144. Fukui, Naoki & Speas, Margaret
    1986 Specifiers and projection. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics8: 128–172. Reprinted in Fukui (2006).
     [Google Scholar]
  145. Fukui, Naoki & Takano, Yuji
    1998 Symmetry in syntax: Merge and Demerge. Journal of East Asian Linguistics7: 27–86. Reprinted in Fukui (2006). doi: 10.1023/A:1008240710949
     https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008240710949 [Google Scholar]
  146. 2000 Nominal structure: An extension of the Symmetry Principle. InThe Derivation of VO and OV, Peter Svenonius (ed), 219–254. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Reprinted in Fukui (2006). doi: 10.1075/la.31.09fuk
     https://doi.org/10.1075/la.31.09fuk [Google Scholar]
  147. Fukui, Naoki & Zushi, Mihoko
    2008 On certain differences between noun phrases and clauses. InEssays on Nominal Determination, Henrik Høeg Müller & Alex Klinge (eds), 265–285. John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/slcs.99.14fuk
     https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.99.14fuk [Google Scholar]
  148. Gallego, Ángel J
    2007 Phase theory and parametric variation. PhD dissertation, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.
     [Google Scholar]
  149. 2010 Phase Theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/la.152
     https://doi.org/10.1075/la.152 [Google Scholar]
  150. Gambell, Timothy & Yang, Charles D
    2003 Scope and limits of statistical learning in word segmentation. InProceedings of NELS34, 29–30.
     [Google Scholar]
  151. Georgopoulos, Carol Perkins
    1991 Syntactic Variables: Resumptive Pronouns and Binding in Palauan. Dordrecht: Kluwer. doi: 10.1007/978‑94‑011‑3202‑2
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3202-2 [Google Scholar]
  152. Goto, Nobu
    2010 Some consequences of feature inheritance. InEnglish Literature, Regional Branches Combined Issue III, 113–136. The Tohoku Branch of the English Literary Society of Japan.
     [Google Scholar]
  153. 2011 Feature-inheritance: Its effects on Agree, Move, and Delete. PhD dissertation, Tohoku Gakuin University.
     [Google Scholar]
  154. Graffi, Giorgio
    2001 200 Years of Syntax: A Critical Survey. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/sihols.98
     https://doi.org/10.1075/sihols.98 [Google Scholar]
  155. Grimshaw, Jane B
    1982 Subcategorization and grammatical relations. InSubjects and Other Subjects: Proceedings of the Harvard Conference on the Representation of Grammatical Relations, Annie Zaenen (ed), 35–55. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.
     [Google Scholar]
  156. 1991/2005 Extended projection. InWords and Structure, 1–73 (final version of the manuscript written in 1991). CSLI Publications.
     [Google Scholar]
  157. Groat, Erich
    1997 A derivational program for syntactic theory. PhD dissertation, Harvard University.
     [Google Scholar]
  158. 1999 Raising the case of expletives. InWorking Minimalism, Samuel David Epstein & Norbert Hornstein (eds), 27–44. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  159. Groat, Erich & O’Neil, John
    1996 Spell-Out at the LF interface: Achieving a unified syntactic computational system in the minimalist framework. InMinimal Ideas: Syntactic Studies in the Minimalist Framework, Werner Abraham , Samuel David Epstein , Höskuldur Thráinsson , & Jan-Wouter Zwart (eds), 113–139. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/la.12.07gro
     https://doi.org/10.1075/la.12.07gro [Google Scholar]
  160. Guimarães, Maximiliano
    2000 In defense of vacuous projections in bare phrase structure. University Of Maryland Working Papes In Linguistics9: 90–115.
     [Google Scholar]
  161. Hagstrom, Paul
    1998 Decomposing questions. PhD dissertation, MIT.
     [Google Scholar]
  162. Haider, Hubert
    1990 Topicalization and other puzzles of German syntax. InScrambling and Barriers, Gunther Grewendorf & Wolfgang Sternefeld (eds), 93–111. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/la.5.06hai
     https://doi.org/10.1075/la.5.06hai [Google Scholar]
  163. Hale, Ken & Keyser, Samuel J
    1993 On argument structure and the lexical expression of grammatical relations. InThe View from Building 20: Essays in Linguistics in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger, Ken Hale & Samuel J. Keyser (eds), 53–110. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  164. 2002 Prolegomenon to a Theory of Argument Structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  165. Halle, Morris & Marantz, Alec
    1993 Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. InThe View from Building 20: Essays in Linguistics in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger, Ken Hale & Samuel J. Keyser (eds), 111–176. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  166. 1994 Some key features of Distributed Morphology. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics21: 275–288.
     [Google Scholar]
  167. Halle, Morris & Stevens, Kenneth
    1959 Analysis by synthesis. InProceedings of Seminar on Speech Compression and Processing, Vol. 2, paper D7.
     [Google Scholar]
  168. 1963 Speech recognition: A model and a program for research. IRE Transactions on Information Theory8: 155–159. [Reprinted in Morris Halle. 2002. From Memory to Speech and Back. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.]. doi: 10.1109/TIT.1962.1057686
     https://doi.org/10.1109/TIT.1962.1057686 [Google Scholar]
  169. Hankamer, Jorge & Knecht, Laura
    1976 The role of the subject/non-subject distinction in determining the choice of relative clause participle in Turkish. Proceedings of the North Eastern Linguistic Society 6Montréal WPL: 123–135.
     [Google Scholar]
  170. Hauser, Marc D. , Chomsky, Noam , & Fitch, W. Tecumseh
    2002 The Faculty of Language: What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve?Science298(5598): 1569–1579. doi: 10.1126/science.298.5598.1569
     https://doi.org/10.1126/science.298.5598.1569 [Google Scholar]
  171. Heck, Fabian
    2008 On Pied-piping: Wh-movement and beyond. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110211467
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110211467 [Google Scholar]
  172. 2009 On certain properties of pied-piping. Linguistic Inquiry40: 75–111. doi: 10.1162/ling.2009.40.1.75
     https://doi.org/10.1162/ling.2009.40.1.75 [Google Scholar]
  173. Heim, Irene & Kratzer, Angelika
    1998 Semantics in Generative Grammar. Oxford: Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  174. Heycock, Caroline
    1995 Asymmetries in reconstruction. Linguistic Inquiry26: 547–570.
     [Google Scholar]
  175. Higginbotham, James
    1985 On semantics. Linguistic Inquiry16: 547–594.
     [Google Scholar]
  176. Hinzen, Wolfram
    2006 Mind Design and Minimal Syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199289257.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199289257.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  177. 2007 An Essay on Names and Truth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  178. Hiraiwa, Ken
    2005 Dimensions of symmetry in syntax: Agreement and clausal architecture. PhD dissertation, MIT.
     [Google Scholar]
  179. Hiraiwa, Ken & Ishihara, Shinichiro
    2002 Missing links: Cleft, sluicing and ‘no da’ construction in Japanese. InProceedings of HUMIT 2001. MITWPL #43, 35–54. Cambridge, MA: MITWPL.
     [Google Scholar]
  180. 2012 Syntactic metamorphosis: Clefts, sluicing, and in-situ focus in Japanese. Syntax15(2): 142–180. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑9612.2011.00164.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9612.2011.00164.x [Google Scholar]
  181. Hoekstra, Eric
    1991 Licensing conditions on phrase structure. PhD dissertation, University of Groningen.
     [Google Scholar]
  182. Hoekstra, Jarich & Marácz, Laszlo
    1989 On the position of inflection in West-Germanic. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax44: 75–88.
     [Google Scholar]
  183. Hoekstra, Teun & Mulder, René
    1990 Unergatives as copular verbs: Locational and existential predication. The Linguistic Review7: 1–79. doi: 10.1515/tlir.1990.7.1.1
     https://doi.org/10.1515/tlir.1990.7.1.1 [Google Scholar]
  184. Hoji, Hajime
    1990 Theories of anaphora and aspects of Japanese syntax. ms. University of Southern California.
  185. 2003 Falsifiability and repeatability in generative grammar: A case study of anaphora and scope dependency in Japanese. Lingua113: 377–446. doi: 10.1016/S0024‑3841(02)00081‑5
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-3841(02)00081-5 [Google Scholar]
  186. Holmberg, Anders
    2000 Deriving OV order in Finnish. InThe Derivation of VO and OV, Peter Svenonius (ed), 123–152. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/la.31.06hol
     https://doi.org/10.1075/la.31.06hol [Google Scholar]
  187. Holmberg, Anders & Hróarsdóttir, Throbjörg
    2003 Agreement and movement in Icelandic raising constructions. Lingua113: 997–1019. doi: 10.1016/S0024‑3841(02)00162‑6
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-3841(02)00162-6 [Google Scholar]
  188. 2004 Agreement and movement in Icelandic raising constructions. Lingua114: 651–673. doi: 10.1016/j.lingua.2004.01.002
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2004.01.002 [Google Scholar]
  189. Hornstein, Norbert
    2009 A Theory of Syntax: Minimal Operations and Universal Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  190. Hornstein, Norbert & Pietroski, Paul M
    2009 Basic operations: Minimal syntax-semantics. Catalan Journal of Linguistics8: 113–139.
     [Google Scholar]
  191. Hornstein, Norbert & Uriagereka, Juan
    1999 Labels and projections: a note on the syntax of quantifiers. University of Maryland Working Papers in Linguistics8: 249–270.
     [Google Scholar]
  192. 2002 Reprojections. InDerivation and Explanation in the Minimalist Program, Samuel David Epstein & T. Daniel Seely (eds), 106–132. Oxford: Blackwell. doi: 10.1002/9780470755662.ch6
     https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470755662.ch6 [Google Scholar]
  193. Huang, C.-T. James
    1982 Logical relations in Chinese and the theory of grammar. PhD dissertation, MIT. Edited and published by Garland Publishing, New York (1998).
     [Google Scholar]
  194. Iatridou, Sabine
    1993 On nominative case assignment and a few related things. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics19: 175–196.
     [Google Scholar]
  195. Irurtzun, Aritz
    2006 Focus and clause structuration in the minimalist program. InMinimalist Essays, Cedric Boeckx (ed), 68–96. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/la.91.09iru
     https://doi.org/10.1075/la.91.09iru [Google Scholar]
  196. 2007 The grammar of focus at the interfaces. PhD dissertation, University of the Basque Country.
     [Google Scholar]
  197. Ishii, Toru
    1997 An asymmetry in the composition of phrase structure and its consequences. PhD dissertation, University of California, Irvine.
     [Google Scholar]
  198. Jackendoff, Ray
    1977 X'-syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  199. Jayaseelan, Karattuparambil
    2008 Bare phrase structure and specifier-less syntax. Biolinguistics2: 87–106.
     [Google Scholar]
  200. Kato, Takaomi
    2004 Not so overt movement. InProceedings of WCCFL23, 436–449.
     [Google Scholar]
  201. 2006 Symmetries in coordination. PhD dissertation, Harvard University.
     [Google Scholar]
  202. 2007 On the nature of the left branch condition: Syntactic or phonological?InProceedings of the 9th Seoul International Conference on Generative Grammar.
     [Google Scholar]
  203. Kato, Takaomi , Kuno, Masakazu , Narita, Hiroki , Zushi, Mihoko , & Fukui, Naoki
    2014 Generalized search and cyclic derivation by phase: A preliminary study. Sophia Linguistica61: 203–222.
     [Google Scholar]
  204. Kawasaki, Noriko
    1989 Jibun-tachi and non-coreferential anaphora. InPapers in Quantification, NFS Grant BNS 8719999, Principal investigators: Emmon Bach, Angelika Kratzer and Barbara Partee, Department of Linguistics, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
     [Google Scholar]
  205. Kayne, Richard S
    1981a ECP extensions. Linguistic Inquiry12: 93–133.
     [Google Scholar]
  206. 1981b Unambiguous paths. InLevels of Syntactic Representation, R. May & J. Koster (eds), 143–183. Reidel.
     [Google Scholar]
  207. 1983 Connectedness. Linguistic Inquiry14: 223–249.
     [Google Scholar]
  208. 1984 Connectedness and Binary Branching. Dordrecht: Foris. doi: 10.1515/9783111682228
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783111682228 [Google Scholar]
  209. 1994 The Antisymmetry of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  210. 2004a Antisymmetry and Japanese. InVariation and Universals in Biolinguistics, L. Jenkins (ed), 3–35. Elsevier B. V.
     [Google Scholar]
  211. 2004b Prepositions as probes. InStructures and Beyond: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Adriana Belletti (ed), 192–212. Reprinted in Richard S. Kayne, Movement and silence, 2005, pp. 85–105. New York: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  212. 2009 Antisymmetry and the lexicon. Linguistic Variation Yearbook8(1): 1–31. Reprinted in Di Sciullo and Boeckx (2011). doi: 10.1075/livy.8.01kay
     https://doi.org/10.1075/livy.8.01kay [Google Scholar]
  213. 2011 Why are there no directionality parameters?InProceedings of WCCFL 28, Mary Byram Washburn , Katherine McKinney-Bock , Erika Varis , Ann Sawyer , & Barbara Tomaszewicz (eds), Somerville, MA., 1–23. Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
     [Google Scholar]
  214. Kishimoto, Hideki
    2005 Wh-in-situ and movement in Sinhala questions. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory23: 1–51. doi: 10.1007/s11049‑004‑6574‑0
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-004-6574-0 [Google Scholar]
  215. É. Kiss, Katalin
    1987 Configurationality in Hungarian. Dordrecht: D. Reidel. doi: 10.1007/978‑94‑009‑3703‑1
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3703-1 [Google Scholar]
  216. Kitahara, Hisatsugu
    1997 Elementary Operations and Optimal Derivations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  217. Koopman, Hilda & Sportiche, Dominique
    1983 Variables and the bijection principle. The Linguistic Review2: 139–160. doi: 10.1515/tlir.1983.2.4.365
     https://doi.org/10.1515/tlir.1983.2.4.365 [Google Scholar]
  218. Kratzer, Angelika
    1996 Severing the external argument from its verb. InPhrase Structure and the Lexicon, Johan Rooryck & Laurie Zaring (eds), 109–137. Dordrecht: Kluwer. doi: 10.1007/978‑94‑015‑8617‑7_5
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8617-7_5 [Google Scholar]
  219. 2000 The event argument and the semantics of verbs. ms. University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
  220. Kuno, Masakazu
    2003 Scrambling in Japanese as pure Merge. Linguistic Research: Working Papers in English Linguistics (Tokyo University English Linguistics Association): 45–78.
     [Google Scholar]
  221. Kuno, Susumu
    1973 The Structure of the Japanese Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  222. 1978 Danwa-no Bunpo [The Grammar of Discourse]. Tokyo: Taishukan Shoten.
     [Google Scholar]
  223. Kurafuji, Takeo
    1999 Japanese pronouns in dynamic semantics: The null/overt contrast. PhD dissertation, Rutgers University.
     [Google Scholar]
  224. Kural, Murat
    1993 V-to (I-to) -C in Turkish. InUCLA Occasional Papers in Linguistics 11, Filippo Beghelli & Murat Kural (eds), 17–54.
     [Google Scholar]
  225. Kuroda, S.-Y
    1965 Generative grammatical studies in the Japanese language. PhD dissertation, MIT.
     [Google Scholar]
  226. 1971 Remarks on the notion of subject. Journal of Japanese Linguistics11: 98–156.
     [Google Scholar]
  227. 1972 Categorical and thetic judgments: Evidence from Japanese syntax. Foundations of Language9: 1–37.
     [Google Scholar]
  228. 1976 Subject. InJapanese Generative Grammar, Masayoshi Shibatani (ed), 1–16. New York: Academic Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  229. 1988 Whether we agree or not: A comparative syntax of English and Japanese. InPapers from the Second International Workshop on Japanese Syntax, W.J. Poser (ed), 103–143. Stanford, Calif.: CSLI Publications. Reprinted in S.-Y. Kuroda (1992).
     [Google Scholar]
  230. 1992 Japanese Syntax and Semantics: Collected Papers. Dordrecht: Kluwer. doi: 10.1007/978‑94‑011‑2789‑9
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-2789-9 [Google Scholar]
  231. 1999 Bunpo riron to tetsugakuteki shizenshugi [Grammatical theory and philosophical naturalism]. InGengo to Shiko [Language and Thought], Noam Chomsky & Masayuki Oishi (eds), 95–134. Tokyo: Shohakusha.
     [Google Scholar]
  232. 2005 Focusing on the matter of topic: A study of wa and ga in Japanese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics14: 1–58. doi: 10.1007/s10831‑004‑2701‑5
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s10831-004-2701-5 [Google Scholar]
  233. Lamontagne, Greg & Travis, Lisa deMena
    1986 The Case Filter and the ECP. McGill Working Papers in Linguistics3: 51–75.
     [Google Scholar]
  234. Lasnik, Howard
    1990 Essays on Restrictiveness and Learnability. Dordrecht: Kluwer. doi: 10.1007/978‑94‑015‑6859‑3
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-6859-3 [Google Scholar]
  235. 1999 Chains of arguments. InWorking Minimalism, Samuel David Epstein & Norbert Hornstein (eds), 189–215. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  236. 2003 Minimalist Investigations in Linguistic Theory. London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  237. Lasnik, Howard , Depiante, Marcela , & Stepanov, Arthur
    2000 Syntactic Structures Revisited: Contemporary Lectures on Classic Transformational Theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  238. Lasnik, Howard & Park, Myung-Kwan
    2003 The EPP and the Subject Condition under Sluicing. Linguistic Inquiry34: 649–660. doi: 10.1162/ling.2003.34.4.649
     https://doi.org/10.1162/ling.2003.34.4.649 [Google Scholar]
  239. Lasnik, Howard & Saito, Mamoru
    1991 On the subject of infinitives. InPapers from the 27th Regional Meeting of Chicago Linguistic Society 1991. Part 1: The General Session, Lise M. Dobrin , Lynn Nichols , & Rosa M. Rodriguez (eds), 324–343. Chicago, IL: Chicago Linguistics Society. Reprinted in H. Lasnik (1999), Minimalist Analysis, Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  240. 1992 Move α: Conditions on its Applications and Outputs. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  241. Lasnik, Howard , Uriagereka, Juan , & Boeckx, Cedric
    2005 A Course in Minimalist Syntax: Foundations and Prospects. Oxford: Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  242. Lohndal, Terje
    2012 Without specifiers: Phrase structure and events. PhD dissertation, University of Maryland, College Park.
     [Google Scholar]
  243. Longobardi, Giuseppe
    2003 Methods in parametric linguistics and cognitive history. Linguistic Variation Yearbook3: 101–138. doi: 10.1075/livy.3.06lon
     https://doi.org/10.1075/livy.3.06lon [Google Scholar]
  244. Lyons, John
    1968 Introduction to Theoretical Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139165570
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139165570 [Google Scholar]
  245. Marantz, Alec
    1984 On the Nature of Grammatical Relations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  246. 1996 ‘Cat’ as a phrasal idiom: Consequences of late insertion in Distributed Morphology. ms., MIT.
  247. 1997 No escape from syntax: Don’t try morphological analysis in the privacy of your own lexicon. InProceedings of the 21st Annual Penn Linguistics Colloquium, 201–225. University of Pennsylvania Working Papersin Linguistics, Vol. 4.2.
     [Google Scholar]
  248. 2007 Phases and words. InPhases in the Theory of Grammar, S.-H. Choe (ed), 191–222. Seoul: Dong In.
     [Google Scholar]
  249. Martin, Roger
    2001 Null Case and the distribution of PRO. Linguistic Inquiry32: 141–166. doi: 10.1162/002438901554612
     https://doi.org/10.1162/002438901554612 [Google Scholar]
  250. Marušič, Franc
    2009 If non-simultaneous spell-out exists, this is what it can explain. InMerging Features: Computation, Interpretation and Acquisition, Josep M. Brucart , Anna Gavarró , & Jaume Solà (eds), 175–193. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199553266.003.0010
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199553266.003.0010 [Google Scholar]
  251. Matushansky, Ora
    2006 Head movement in linguistic theory. Linguistic Inquiry37: 69–109. doi: 10.1162/002438906775321184
     https://doi.org/10.1162/002438906775321184 [Google Scholar]
  252. May, Robert
    1985 Logical Form: Its Structure and Derivation. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
     [Google Scholar]
  253. McCawley, James
    1968 Concerning the base component of a transformational grammar. Foundations of Language4: 243–269.
     [Google Scholar]
  254. McGilvray, James
    1998 Meanings are syntactically individuated and found in the head. Mind and Language13: 225–280. doi: 10.1111/1468‑0017.00076
     https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0017.00076 [Google Scholar]
  255. 2002 MOPs: The science of concepts. InBelief and Meaning: Essays at the Interface, Wolfram Hinzen & Hans Rott (eds), 73–103. Frankfurt: Ontos.
     [Google Scholar]
  256. 2009 Introduction to the third edition. Noam Chomsky (2009)Cartesian Linguistics: A Chapter in the History of Rationalist Thought, Third Edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1–52. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511803116.001
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511803116.001 [Google Scholar]
  257. McGinn, Colin
    1991 The Problem of Consciousness. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  258. 1993 Problems in Philosophy. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  259. Miyagawa, Shigeru
    1997 Against optional scrambling. Linguistic Inquiry28: 1–25.
     [Google Scholar]
  260. 2003 A-movement scrambling and options without optionality. InWord Order and Scrambling, S. Karimi (ed). Oxford: Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  261. 2010 Why Agree? Why Move?: Unifying Agreement-based and Discourse Configurational Languages. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  262. Mori, Nobue
    2005 A syntactic structure of lexical verbs. PhD dissertation, University of Maryland, College Park.
     [Google Scholar]
  263. Moro, Andrea
    1997a Dynamic antisymmetry: Movement as a symmetry-breaking phenomenon. Studia Linguistica51: 50–76. doi: 10.1111/1467‑9582.00017
     https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9582.00017 [Google Scholar]
  264. 1997b The Raising of Predicates. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511519956
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511519956 [Google Scholar]
  265. 2000 Dynamic Antisymmetry. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  266. 2007 Some notes on unstable structures. ms. Universita San Raffaele, Milano.
  267. Motomura, Mitsue
    2003 The thematic roles of sentential to/ko complements in Japanese/Korean. InJapanese Korean Linguistics 11, Patricia M. Clency (ed), 439–454. CSLI/Stanford University.
     [Google Scholar]
  268. Narita, Hiroki
    2007a Project Both in Japanese, with a case study of head-internal relative clauses. InProceedings of the 8th Tokyo Conference on Psycholinguistics, Yukio Otsu (ed), 213–237. Tokyo: Hituzi Syobo.
     [Google Scholar]
  269. 2007b A “Project Both” perspective on covert movement in Japanese head-internal relative clauses. Master’s thesis, Sophia University.
  270. 2008 Two ways of pronouncing “unpronounceable” QR. InProceedings of TCP2008, Yukio Otsu (ed), 151–175. Tokyo: Hituzi Syobo.
     [Google Scholar]
  271. 2009a Full interpretation of optimal labeling. Biolinguistics3(2–3): 213–254.
     [Google Scholar]
  272. 2009b How syntax naturalizes semantics: A review of Uriagereka (2008). Lingua119(11): 1767–1775. doi: 10.1016/j.lingua.2009.03.005
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2009.03.005 [Google Scholar]
  273. 2009c, 4 Multiple Transfer in service of recursive Merge. Paper presented atThe 32nd GLOW ColloquiumatNantes University, April 15th–18th, 2009. Abstract published in GLOW Newsletter #62, 89–91.
     [Google Scholar]
  274. 2009d The naturalist program for neo-Cartesian biolinguistics. InProceedings of Sophia University Linguistic Society 24, Takahito Shinya & Ako Imaoka (eds), 55–91.
     [Google Scholar]
  275. 2010 The tension between explanatory and biological adequacy: Review of Fukui (2006). Lingua120(5): 1313–1323. doi: 10.1016/j.lingua.2009.09.004
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2009.09.004 [Google Scholar]
  276. 2011 Phasing in Full Interpretation. PhD dissertation, Harvard University. ling.auf.net/lingBuzz/001304.
     [Google Scholar]
  277. 2012a Head-detection, phases, and the complementarity of XP- v.s. X0-movement. InOnline Proceedings of GLOW in Asia Workshop for Young Scholars 2011, Koichi Otaki , Hajime Takeyasu , & Shin-ichi Tanigawa (eds), 232–246. faculty.human.mieu.ac.jp/ glow mie/Workshop Proceedings/18Narita.pdf.
     [Google Scholar]
  278. 2012b Phase cycles in service of projection-free syntax. InPhases: Developing the Framework, Ángel J. Gallego (ed), 125–172. Mouton de Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
  279. 2012c Remarks on the nature of headedness and compositionality in bare phrase structure. InProceedings of Sophia University Linguistic Society 26, Haruka Toyoda (ed), 81–126.
     [Google Scholar]
  280. 2012d *{XP, YP}, the independence of the LCA and antisymmetry, and the LCA-free phase-based account of the CED effect. ms. Waseda Institute for Advanced Study. To appear in Balazs Suranyi , ed., Minimalist Approaches to Syntactic Locality, Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  281. . forthcoming. *{t, t}. To appear inWCCFL 32 Proceedings.
     [Google Scholar]
  282. Narita, Hiroki & Fujita, Koji
    2010 A naturalist reconstruction of minimalist and evolutionary biolinguistics. Biolinguistics4(4): 356–376.
     [Google Scholar]
  283. Narita, Hiroki & Fukui, Naoki
    2012 Merge and (a)symmetry. ms. Waseda Institute for Advanced Study and Sophia University. Paper presented bythe second author at the Kyoto Conference on Biolinguistics, Kyoto University, March 12, 2012.
     [Google Scholar]
  284. Narita, Hiroki , Kato, Takaomi , & Zushi, Mihoko
    2013 Review of Di Sciullo and Boeckx (2011). English Linguistics30: 780–791.
     [Google Scholar]
  285. Neeleman, Ad & Weerman, Fred
    1999 Flexible Syntax: A Theory of Case and Arguments. Dordrecht: Kluwer. doi: 10.1007/978‑94‑011‑4289‑2
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4289-2 [Google Scholar]
  286. Newmeyer, Frederick J
    2005 Possible and Probable Languages: A Generative Perspective on Linguistic Typology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199274338.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199274338.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  287. 2006 Newmeyer’s rejoinder to Roberts and Holmberg on parameters. ms. University of Washington. lingBuzz/000248.
  288. 2010 Three approaches to exceptionality in syntactic typology. InExpecting the Unexpected: Exceptions in Grammar, Horst Simon & Heike Wiese (eds). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
  289. Nishigauchi, Taisuke
    1990a Quantification in syntax. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
     [Google Scholar]
  290. 1990b Quantification in the Theory of Grammar. Dordrecht: Kluwer. doi: 10.1007/978‑94‑009‑1972‑3
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1972-3 [Google Scholar]
  291. 1991 Construing wh. InLogical Structure and Linguistic Structure: Cross-linguistic Perspectives, C.-T. James Huang & Robert May (eds), 197–231. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
     [Google Scholar]
  292. Nissenbaum, Jon
    2000 Investigations of covert phrase movement. PhD dissertation, MIT.
     [Google Scholar]
  293. Nunes, Jairo
    2004 Linearization of Chains and Sideward Movement. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  294. Nunes, Jairo & Uriagereka, Juan
    2000 Cyclicity and extraction domains. Syntax3: 20–43. doi: 10.1111/1467‑9612.00023
     https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9612.00023 [Google Scholar]
  295. Obata, Miki
    2010 Root, successive-cyclic and feature-splitting Internal Merge: Implications for feature-inheritance and Transfer. PhD dissertation, University of Michigan.
     [Google Scholar]
  296. Ott, Dennis
    2009 The conceptual necessity of phases: Some remarks on the minimalist enterprise. InExplorations of phase theory: Interpretation at the interfaces, K.K. Grohmann (ed). Mouton de Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
  297. 2010 Grammaticality, interfaces, and UG. InExploring Crash-proof Grammars, Michael Putnam (ed), 89–104. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/lfab.3.05ott
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lfab.3.05ott [Google Scholar]
  298. 2011a Local instability. PhD dissertation, Harvard University. Published online at irs.ub.rug.nl/dbi/4e8027471fa04, GAGL (Groninger Arbeiten zur germanistischen Linguistik).
     [Google Scholar]
  299. 2011b A note on free relative clauses in the theory of phases. Linguistic Inquiry42: 183–192. doi: 10.1162/LING_a_00036
     https://doi.org/10.1162/LING_a_00036 [Google Scholar]
  300. 2012 Local Instability: Split Topicalization and Quantifier Float in German. Berlin/New York: Walter De Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110290950
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110290950 [Google Scholar]
  301. in press. Symmetric merge and local instability: Evidence from split topics. Syntax.
     [Google Scholar]
  302. Pesetsky, David
    1982 Paths and categories. PhD dissertation, MIT.
     [Google Scholar]
  303. Pesetsky, David & Torrego, Esther
    2001 T-to-C movement: Causes and consequences. InKen Hale: A Life in Language, Michael Kenstowicz (ed), 355–426. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  304. 2004 Tense, case, and the nature of syntactic categories. InThe Syntax of Time, Jacqueline Guéron & Alexander Lecarme (eds), 495–537. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  305. 2006 Probes, goals, and the nature of syntactic categories. InProceedings of the 7th Tokyo Conference on Psycholinguistics, Yukio Otsu (ed), 25–60. Tokyo: Hituzi Syobo.
     [Google Scholar]
  306. 2007 The syntax of valuation and the interpretability of features. InPhrasal and Clausal Architecture: Syntactic Derivation and Interpretation. In Honor of Joseph E. Emonds, Simin Karimi , Vida Samiian , & Wendy Wilkins (eds), 262–294. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/la.101.14pes
     https://doi.org/10.1075/la.101.14pes [Google Scholar]
  307. Peters, Stanley P. & Ritchie, Robert W
    1973 On the generative power of transformational grammars. Science6: 49–83.
     [Google Scholar]
  308. Petitto, Laura-Ann
    2005 How the brain begets language. InThe Cambridge Companion to Chomsky, James McGilvray (ed), 84–101. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CCOL0521780136.005
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL0521780136.005 [Google Scholar]
  309. Piattelli-Palmarini, Massimo , Uriagereka, Juan , & Salaburu, Pello
    (eds) 2009 Of Minds and Language: A Dialogue with Noam Chomsky in the Basque Country. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  310. Pietroski, Paul M
    2000 On explaining that. Journal of Philosophy97: 655–662. doi: 10.2307/2678461
     https://doi.org/10.2307/2678461 [Google Scholar]
  311. 2005 Events and Semantic Architecture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  312. 2008 Minimalist meaning, internalist interpretation. Biolinguistics2(4): 317–341.
     [Google Scholar]
  313. Poeppel, David , Idsardi, William J. , & van Wassenhove, Virginie
    2008 Speech perception at the interface of neurobiology and linguistics. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal SocietyB 363: P1071–1086. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2007.2160
     https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2007.2160 [Google Scholar]
  314. Pollock, Jean-Yves
    1989 Verb movement, universal grammar and the structure of IP. Linguistic Inquiry20: 365–424.
     [Google Scholar]
  315. Postal, Paul M
    1974 On Raising: One Rule of English Grammar and its Theoretical Implications. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  316. Ramchand, Gillan & Svenonius, Peter
    2009 Mapping a parochial lexicon onto a universal semantics. InThe Limits of Syntactic Variation, Theresa Biberauer (ed), 219–244. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/la.132.08ram
     https://doi.org/10.1075/la.132.08ram [Google Scholar]
  317. Raposo, Eduardo & Uriagereka, Juan
    1995 Two types of small clauses: Toward a syntax of theme/rheme relations. InSmall Clauses, Anna Cardinaletti & Maria Teresa Guasti (eds), 179–206. New York: Academic Press. Reprinted in Uriagereka (2002).
     [Google Scholar]
  318. 1996 Indefinite SE. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory14: 749–810. doi: 10.1007/BF00133363
     https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00133363 [Google Scholar]
  319. Reinhart, Tanya
    1976 Syntacic domain of anaphora. PhD dissertation, MIT.
     [Google Scholar]
  320. 1981 Definite NP anaphora and c-command domains. Linguistic Inquiry12: 605–635.
     [Google Scholar]
  321. 1983 Anaphora and Semantic Interpretation. London: Croom Helm.
     [Google Scholar]
  322. Richards, Marc D
    2004 Object shift, scrambling, and symmetrical syntax. PhD dissertation, University of Cambridge.
     [Google Scholar]
  323. 2007a Dynamic linearization and the shape of phases. Linguistic Analysis33: 209–237.
     [Google Scholar]
  324. 2007b On feature inheritance: An argument from the phase impenetrability condition. Linguistic Inquiry38: 563–572. doi: 10.1162/ling.2007.38.3.563
     https://doi.org/10.1162/ling.2007.38.3.563 [Google Scholar]
  325. Richards, Norvin
    1997 What moves where when in which language?PhD dissertation, MIT.
     [Google Scholar]
  326. 1999 Featural cyclicity and the ordering of multiple specifiers. InWorking Minimalism, Samuel David Epstein & Nobert Hornstein (eds), 127–158. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  327. 2001 Movement in Language: Interactions and Architectures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  328. van Riemsdijk, Henk
    1978 A Case Study in Syntactic Markedness: The Binding Nature of Prepositional Phrases. Dordrecht: Foris.
     [Google Scholar]
  329. van Riemsdijk, Henk & Williams, Edwin
    1986 Introduction to the Theory of Grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  330. Rizzi, Luigi
    1978 Violations of the wh-island constraint in Italian and the subjacency condition. InMontreal Working Papers in Linguistics11, 155–190. Reprinted in Rizzi (1982), 49–76. doi: 10.1080/08351817809389169
     https://doi.org/10.1080/08351817809389169 [Google Scholar]
  331. 1982 Issues in Italian Syntax. Dordrecht: Foris. doi: 10.1515/9783110883718
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110883718 [Google Scholar]
  332. 1990 Relativized Minimality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  333. 1997 The fine structure of the left periphery. InElements of Grammar: Handbook of Generative Syntax, Liliane Haegeman (ed), 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer. doi: 10.1007/978‑94‑011‑5420‑8_7
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5420-8_7 [Google Scholar]
  334. 2004 The Structure of CP and IP: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Vol. 2. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  335. 2006 On the form of chains: Criterial positions and ECP effects. InWh-movement: Moving on, Lisa Lai-Shen Cheng & Norbert Corver (eds), 97–133. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  336. Roberts, Ian
    2010 Agreement and Head Movement: Clitics, Incorporation, and Defective Goals. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. doi: 10.7551/mitpress/9780262014304.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262014304.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  337. Rosenbaum, Peter S
    1970 A principle governing deletion in English sentential complementation. InReadings in English Transformational Grammar, Roderick A. Jacobs & Peter S. Rosenbaum (eds), 220–9. Waltham, MA: Ginn.
     [Google Scholar]
  338. Ross, J.R
    1967 Constraints on variables in syntax. PhD dissertation, MIT.
     [Google Scholar]
  339. Ross, John Robert
    1974 Three batons for cognitive psychology. InCognition and the Symbolic Processes, Walter B. Weimer & David Palermo (eds). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
     [Google Scholar]
  340. 1986 Infinite Syntax! (Language and Being). New Jersey: Ablex Publishing Incorporation.
     [Google Scholar]
  341. Saito, Mamoru
    1985 Some asymmetries in Japanese and their theoretical implications. PhD dissertation, MIT.
     [Google Scholar]
  342. 1989 Scrambling as semantically vacuous A'-movement. InAlternative Conceptions of Phrase Structure, Mark R. Baltin & Anthony S. Kroch (eds), 182–200. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  343. 1992 Long distance scrambling in Japanese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics1: 69–118. doi: 10.1007/BF00129574
     https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00129574 [Google Scholar]
  344. 2003 A derivational approach to the interpretation of scrambling chains. Lingua113: 481–558. doi: 10.1016/S0024‑3841(02)00083‑9
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-3841(02)00083-9 [Google Scholar]
  345. 2005 On Miyagawa’s analysis of A-scrambling. Paper presented atKeio University Linguistics Colloquium, November 25th, 2005.
     [Google Scholar]
  346. Saito, Mamoru & Fukui, Naoki
    1998 Order in phrase structure and movement. Linguistic Inquiry29: 439–474. Reprinted in Fukui (2006). doi: 10.1162/002438998553815
     https://doi.org/10.1162/002438998553815 [Google Scholar]
  347. Sakai, Hiromu
    2000 Predicate ellipsis and nominalization. InProceedings of the 2000 Seoul International Conference on Language and Computation, 85–113. Seoul, Korea: The Linguistic Society of Korea.
     [Google Scholar]
  348. Samuels, Bridget & Narita, Hiroki
    2013 Phasing out projection: Considerations from the syntax-phonology interface. Linguistic Analysis38(3–4): 357–391.
     [Google Scholar]
  349. Sauerland, Uli
    1998 The meaning of chains. PhD dissertation, MIT.
     [Google Scholar]
  350. Sciullo, Anna Maria Di & Boeckx, Cedric
    (eds) 2011 The Biolinguistic Enterprise: New Perspectives on the Evolution and Nature of the Human Language Faculty. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  351. Seely, T. Daniel
    2006 Merge, derivational c-command, and subcategorization in a label-free syntax. InMinimalist Essays, Cedric Boeckx (ed), 182–217. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/la.91.13see
     https://doi.org/10.1075/la.91.13see [Google Scholar]
  352. Selkirk, Elisabeth O
    1995 Sentence prosody: Intonation, stress, and phrasing. InThe Handbook of Phonological Theory, John A. Goldsmith (ed), 550–569. London: Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  353. Sheehan, Michelle
    2009 The final-over-final constraint as an effect of complement stranding. Newcastle Working Papers in Linguistics15: 104–125.
     [Google Scholar]
  354. 2010 Labelling, multiple spell-out and the final-over-final constraint. InIncontro di Grammatica Generativa XXXV 2010, Vincenzo Moscati & Emilio Servidio (eds), Siena.
     [Google Scholar]
  355. 2013a Some implications of a copy theory of labeling. Syntax16(4): 362–396. doi: 10.1111/synt.12010
     https://doi.org/10.1111/synt.12010 [Google Scholar]
  356. 2013b The resuscitation of CED. InProceedings of the 40th Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society (NELS 40), Seda Kan , Claire Moore-Cantwell & Robert Staubs (eds), 135–150. Amherst, MA: GLSA.
     [Google Scholar]
  357. Simon, Mutsuko Endo
    1989 An analysis of the postposing construction in Japanese. PhD dissertation, University of Michigan.
     [Google Scholar]
  358. Sorida, Masanobu
    2011 Cyclic Transfer, chains, and the A/A' problem of Japanese scrambling. Paper presented atthe Chains in Minimalism conference, Yokohama National University, February 12–13, 2011.
     [Google Scholar]
  359. 2012 Unweaving chains. PhD dissertation, Sophia University, Tokyo.
     [Google Scholar]
  360. Sportiche, Dominique
    1988 A theory of floating quantifiers and its corollaries for constituent structure. Linguistic Inquiry19: 425–449.
     [Google Scholar]
  361. Starke, Michal
    2004 On the inexistence of specifiers and the nature of heads. InStructures and Beyond: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Adriana Belletti (ed), 252–268. New York: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  362. Stepanov, Arthur
    2007 The end of CED? minimalism and extraction domains. Syntax10(1): 80–126. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑9612.2007.00094.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9612.2007.00094.x [Google Scholar]
  363. Stowell, Tim
    1981 Origins of phrase structure. PhD dissertation, MIT.
     [Google Scholar]
  364. Suñer, Margarita
    1994 V-movement and the licensing of argumental Wh-phrases in Spanish. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory12(2): 335–372. doi: 10.1007/BF00993148
     https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00993148 [Google Scholar]
  365. Svenonius, Peter
    1994 C-selection as feature-checking. Studia Linguistica58: 133–155. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑9582.1994.tb00853.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9582.1994.tb00853.x [Google Scholar]
  366. 2003 Limits on P: Filling in holes vs. falling in holes. Nordlyd. Proceedings of the 19th Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics31: 431–445.
     [Google Scholar]
  367. 2004 On the edge. InPeripheries: Syntactic Edges and their Effects, David Adger , Cécile de Cat , & George Tsulas (eds), 261–287. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
     [Google Scholar]
  368. 2010 Spatial P in English. InMapping Spatial PPs: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Vol. 6, Guglielmo Cinque & Luigi Rizzi (eds), 127–161. New York: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195393675.003.0004
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195393675.003.0004 [Google Scholar]
  369. Takahashi, Daiko
    1994 Minimality of movement. PhD dissertation, University of Connecticut, Storrs.
     [Google Scholar]
  370. Takahashi, Shoichi
    2010 The hidden side of clausal complements. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory28: 343–380. doi: 10.1007/s11049‑010‑9091‑3
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-010-9091-3 [Google Scholar]
  371. Takano, Yuji
    1995 Predicate fronting and internal subjects. Linguistic Inquiry26: 327–340.
     [Google Scholar]
  372. 1996 Movement and parametric variation in syntax. PhD dissertation, University of California, Irvine.
     [Google Scholar]
  373. 2000 Illicit remnant movement. Linguistic Inquiry31: 141–156. doi: 10.1162/002438900554325
     https://doi.org/10.1162/002438900554325 [Google Scholar]
  374. Tanaka, Hidekazu
    2001 Right-dislocation as scrambling. Journal of Linguistics37: 551–579. doi: 10.1017/S0022226701001049
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226701001049 [Google Scholar]
  375. Tenny, Carol Lee
    1987 Grammaticalizing aspect and affectedness. PhD dissertation, MIT.
     [Google Scholar]
  376. 1994 Aspectual Roles and the Syntax-Semantics Interface. Boston: Kluwer. doi: 10.1007/978‑94‑011‑1150‑8
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-1150-8 [Google Scholar]
  377. Thráinsson, Höskuldur
    1996 On the (non-)universality of functional categories. InMinimal Ideas: Syntactic Studies in the Minimalist Framework, Werner Abraham , Samuel David Epstein , Höskuldur Thráinsson , & JanWouter Zwart (eds), 253–281. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/la.12.13thr
     https://doi.org/10.1075/la.12.13thr [Google Scholar]
  378. Toyoshima, Takashi
    1997 Derivational CED: A consequence of the bottom-up parallel-process of Merge and Attract. InWCCFL 17 Proceedings, 505–519.
     [Google Scholar]
  379. Truswell, Robert
    2007a Extraction from adjuncts and the structure of events. Lingua117: 1355–1377. doi: 10.1016/j.lingua.2006.06.003
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2006.06.003 [Google Scholar]
  380. 2007b Locality of wh-movement and the individuation of events. PhD dissertation, University College London.
     [Google Scholar]
  381. 2008 Preposition stranding, passvisation, and extraction from adjuncts in Germanic. ms. Tufts University.
  382. 2011 Events, Phrases, and Questions. Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199577774.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199577774.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  383. Ueyama, Ayumi
    1998 Two types of dependency. PhD dissertation, University of South California.
     [Google Scholar]
  384. Uriagereka, Juan
    1988 On government. PhD dissertation, University of Connecticut, Storrs.
     [Google Scholar]
  385. 1997 Formal and substantive elegance in the minimalist program (on the emergence of some linguistic forms). InThe Role of Economy Principles in Linguistic Theory, C. Wilder , H.-M. Gartner , & M. Bierwisch (eds), 170–204. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.
     [Google Scholar]
  386. 1999 Multiple Spell-Out. InWorking Minimalism, Samuel David Epstein & Norbert Hornstein (eds), 251–282. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  387. 2002 Derivations: Exploring the Dynamics of Syntax. London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  388. 2008 Syntactic Anchors: On Semantic Structuring. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511481482
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511481482 [Google Scholar]
  389. 2012 Spell-Out and the Minimalist Program. New York: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  390. Watanabe, Akira
    1992a Subjacency and S-structure movement of wh-in-situ. Journal of East Asian Linguistics1: 255–291. doi: 10.1007/BF00130554
     https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00130554 [Google Scholar]
  391. 1992b Wh-in-situ, Subjacency, and Chain Formation, Volume 2 of MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics. MITWPL.
     [Google Scholar]
  392. 1996 Case Absorption and Wh-Agreement. Dordrecht: Kluwer. doi: 10.1007/978‑94‑015‑8615‑3
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8615-3 [Google Scholar]
  393. 2000 Feature copying and binding. Syntax3: 159–181. doi: 10.1111/1467‑9612.00031
     https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9612.00031 [Google Scholar]
  394. 2006 Functional projections of nominals in Japanese: Syntax of classifiers. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory24: 241–306. doi: 10.1007/s11049‑005‑3042‑4
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-005-3042-4 [Google Scholar]
  395. 2008 The structure of DP. InThe Oxford Handbook of Japanese Linguistics, Shigeru Miyagawa & Mamoru Saito (eds). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  396. Webelhuth, Gert
    1992 Principles and Parameters of Syntactic Saturation. New York: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  397. Wexler, Kenneth & Culicover, Peter W
    1980 Formal Principles of Language Acquisition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  398. Williams, Edwin
    1981 Argument structure and morphology. The Linguistic Review1: 81–114. doi: 10.1515/tlir.1981.1.1.81
     https://doi.org/10.1515/tlir.1981.1.1.81 [Google Scholar]
  399. Wujastyk, Dominik
    1982 Bloomfield and the Sanskrit origin of the terms ‘exocentric’ and ‘endocentric’. Historiographia Linguistica9(1/2): 179–184. doi: 10.1075/hl.9.1‑2.19wuj
     https://doi.org/10.1075/hl.9.1-2.19wuj [Google Scholar]
  400. Yang, Charles D
    2002 Knowledge and Learning in Natural Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  401. 2004 Universal grammar, statistics or both?Trends in Cognitive Sciences8(10): 451–456. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2004.08.006
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2004.08.006 [Google Scholar]
  402. Zwart, Jan-Wouter
    1993 Dutch syntax: a minimalist approach. PhD dissertation, University of Groningen.
     [Google Scholar]
  403. 2011 Structure and order: asymmetric merge. InThe Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Minimalism, Cedric Boeckx (ed), 96–118. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/books/9789027269621
Loading

  • From This Site

    /content/books/9789027269621
    dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Chapter
    10
    5
/content/books/9789027269621
dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
-contentType:Journal -contentType:Chapter
10
5
Chapter
content/books/9789027269621
Book
false
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error