1887
  1. Home
  2. Books
  3. Pragmatic Competence and Relevance

Pragmatic Competence and Relevance

image of Pragmatic Competence and Relevance
GBP
Buy:£76.00 + Taxes

This book probes into under-researched issues in L2 pragmatics. Firstly, pragmatic competence, pragmatic awareness and metapragmatic awareness are re-defined and clearly distinguished on theoretical grounds. Secondly, pragmatic competence and its manifestations are evaluated on empirical grounds by distinct criteria and validated testing measures. More importantly, genuine pragmatic inference is elicited in contexts of online interpretation where figurative speech plays a central role. Genre-specific discourse which occurs in editorials and news reports serves as a natural testbed for examining the role of advanced mind-reading abilities in developing pragmatic competence. Sperber and Wilson’s relevance theory accommodates the findings of empirical assessment and yields new insights in the cognitive procedures activated during interpretation. The comprehensive theoretical and methodological treatment of pragmatic competence makes this book of interest to researchers and students in pragmatics, L2 theory and applications, genre studies, and to those concerned with the cognitive underpinnings of communication in L2.

References

  1. Al-Gahtani, Saad , and Carsten Roever
    2012 “Proficiency and Sequential Organization of L2 Requests.” Applied Linguistics 33 (1): 42–65. 10.1093/applin/amr031
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amr031 [Google Scholar]
  2. Alberts, Bruce , Dennis Bray , Karen Hopkin , Alexander Johnson , Julian Lewis , Martin Raff , Keith Roberts , and Peter Walter
    2003  Essential Cell Biology (second edition). New York: Garland Science.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Alcón Soler, Eva , and María Pilar Safont Jordà
    2008 “Pragmatic Awareness in Second Language Acquisition.” In Encyclopedia of Language and Education , ed. by Jasone Cenoz , and Nancy Hornberger , 193–204. (2nd ed. Vol.6, Knowledge about Language.) Berlin: Springer.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Alcón Soler, Eva , and Alicia Martínez-Flor
    (eds) 2008  Investigating Pragmatics in Foreign Language Learning, Teaching and Testing . Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Alcón Soler, Eva , and Josep R. Guzmán Pitarch
    2010 “The Effect of Instruction on Learners’ Pragmatic Awareness: A Focus on Refusals.” International Journal of English Studies 10 (1): 65–80.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Ansary, Hasan , and Esmat Babaii
    2009 “A Cross-Cultural Analysis of English Newspaper Editorials: A Systemic-Functional View of Text for Contrastive Rhetoric Research.” RELC Journal 40 (2), 211–249. 10.1177/0033688209105867
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688209105867 [Google Scholar]
  7. Antonopoulou, Eleni , and Kiki Nikiforidou
    2011 “Construction Grammar and Conventional Discourse: A Construction-Based Approach to Discoursal Incongruity.” Journal of Pragmatics 43: 2594–2609. 10.1016/j.pragma.2011.01.013
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2011.01.013 [Google Scholar]
  8. Askehave, Inger , and John M. Swales
    2001 “Genre Identification and Communicative Purpose: A Problem and a Possible Solution.” Applied Linguistics 23 (2): 195–212. 10.1093/applin/22.2.195
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/22.2.195 [Google Scholar]
  9. Askenhave, Inger , and Anne Ellerup Nielsen
    2005 “Digital Genres: A Challenge to Traditional Theory.” Information Technology and People 18 (2): 120–141. 10.1108/09593840510601504
     https://doi.org/10.1108/09593840510601504 [Google Scholar]
  10. Averbeck, Joshua M
    2010 “Irony and Language Expectancy Theory: Evaluations of Expectancy Violation Outcomes.” Communication Studies 61: 356–372. 10.1080/10510971003776147
     https://doi.org/10.1080/10510971003776147 [Google Scholar]
  11. Averbeck, Joshua M. , and Dale Hample
    2008 “Ironic Message Production: How and Why We Produce Ironic Messages.” Communication Monographs 75: 396–410. 10.1080/03637750802512389
     https://doi.org/10.1080/03637750802512389 [Google Scholar]
  12. Baars, Bernard
    1988  A Cognitive Theory of Consciousness . New York: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Bach, Kent
    1994 “Conversational Implicature.” Mind and Language 9 (2): 124–162. 10.1111/j.1468‑0017.1994.tb00220.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0017.1994.tb00220.x [Google Scholar]
  14. 2006 “The Excluded Middle: Semantic Minimalism without Minimal Propositions.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 73 (2): 435–442. 10.1111/j.1933‑1592.2006.tb00626.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1933-1592.2006.tb00626.x [Google Scholar]
  15. Barraja-Rohan, Anne-Marie
    2011 “Using Conversation Analysis in the Second Language Classroom to Teach Interactional Competence.” Language Teaching Research 15 (4): 479–507. 10.1177/1362168811412878
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168811412878 [Google Scholar]
  16. Bardovi-Harlig, Kathleen
    2003 “Understanding the Role of Grammar in the Acquisition of L2 Pragmatics.” In Pragmatic Competence and Foreign Language Teaching , ed. by Alicia Martínez Floor , Esther Usó Juan , and Ana Fernandez Guerra , 25–44. Castello de la Plana, Spain: Publications de la Universitat Jaume I.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Bardovi-Harlig, Kathleen , Beverly A.S. Hartford , Rebecca Mahan-Taylor , Marley J. Morgan , and Dudley W. Reynolds
    1991 “Developing Pragmatic Awareness: Closing the Conversation.” ELT Journal 45: 4–15. 10.1093/elt/45.1.4
     https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/45.1.4 [Google Scholar]
  18. Bardovi-Harlig, Kathleen , and Zoltan Dörnyei
    1998 “Do Language Learners Recognize Pragmatic Violations? Pragmatic vs. Grammatical Awareness in Instructed L2 Learning.” TESOL Quarterly 32: 233–259. 10.2307/3587583
     https://doi.org/10.2307/3587583 [Google Scholar]
  19. Bardovi-Harlig, Kathleen , and Rebecca Mahan-Taylor
    (eds) 2003 “Teaching Pragmatics.” Washington, DC: US Department of State Office of English Language Programs.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Bardovi-Harlig, Kathleen , and Robert Griffin
    2005 “L2 Pragmatic Awareness: Evidence from the ESL Classroom.” System 33: 401–415. 10.1016/j.system.2005.06.004
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2005.06.004 [Google Scholar]
  21. Bardovi-Harlig, Kathleen , and Beverly S. Hartford
    (eds) 2005  Interlanguage Pragmatics: Exploring Institutional Talk . Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Barron, Anne
    2003  Acquisition in Interlanguage Pragmatics. Learning How to Do Things with Words in a Study Abroad Context . Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Barthes, Ronald
    1967/1977  Image-Music-Text . London: Fontana Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Bawarshi, Anis S. , and Mary-Jo Reiff
    2010  Genre. An Introduction to History, Theory, Research, and Pedagogy . West Lafayette: Parlor Press and the WAC Clearinghouse.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Bazerman, Charles
    1994 “Systems of Genre and the Enactment of Social Intentions.” In Genre and the New Rhetoric , ed. by Aviva Freedman , and Peter Medway , 79–101. London/Bristol: Taylor and Francis.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. 2009 “Genre and Cognitive Development: Beyond Writing to Learn.” In Genre in a Changing World , ed. by Charles Bazerman , Adair Bonini , and Débora Figueiredo , 279–294. Fort Collins, Colorado: The WAC Clearinghouse and Parlor Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Beebe, Leslie M. , and Martha C. Cummings
    1996 “Natural Speech Act Data versus Written Questionnaire Data: How Data Collection Method Affects Speech Act Performance.” In Speech Acts across Cultures , ed. by Susan M. Gass , and Joyce Neu , 65–86. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Bergs, Alexander T. , and Gabriele Diewald
    2009 “Contexts and Constructions.” In Contexts and Constructions , ed. by Alexander Bergs , and Gabriele Diewald , 1–14. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Berry, Dianne C
    1994 “Implicit and Explicit Learning of Complex Tasks.” In Implicit and Explicit Learning of Languages , ed. by Nick C. Ellis , 147–164. London: Academic Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Bezuidenhout, Anne
    2004 “Procedural Meaning and the Semantics/Pragmatics Interface.” In The Semantics/Pragmatics Distinction , ed. by Claudia Bianchi, 101–131. Stanford, CA: CSLI.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Bhatia, Vijay K
    1993  Analysing Genre: Language Use in Professional Settings . London: Longman.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. 1995 “Genre-Mixing in Professional Communication: The Case of ‘Private Intentions’ v. ‘Socially Recognised Purposes’.” In Explorations in English for Professional Communication , ed. by Paul Bruthiaux , Tim Boswood , and Bertha Du-Babcock , 1–19. Hong Kong: City University of Hong Kong.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. 1997 “Genre-Mixing in Academic Introductions.” English for Specific Purposes 16 (3): 181–196. 10.1016/S0889‑4906(96)00039‑7
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(96)00039-7 [Google Scholar]
  34. 2000 “Genres in Conflict.” In Analysing Professional Genres , ed. by Anna Trosborg , 147–162. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Bhatia, Vijay
    Κ 2005 “Generic Patterns in Promotional Discourse.” In Persuasion across Genres: A Linguistic Approach , ed. by Helena Halmari , and Tuija Virtanen , 213–225. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Bianchi, Claudia
    2011 “Contextualism.” In Philosophical Perspectives for Pragmatics , ed. by Marina Sbisà , Jan-Ola Östman , and Jef Verschueren , 53–70. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Bialystok, Ellen
    1993 “Symbolic Representation and Attentional Control in Pragmatic Competence.” In Interlanguage Pragmatics , ed. by Shoshana S. Blum-Kulka , and Gabriele Kasper , 43–57. New York: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. 1994a “Representation and Ways of Knowing: Three Issues in Second Language Acquisition.” In Implicit and Explicit Learning of Languages , ed. by Nick C. Ellis , 549–569. London: Academic Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. 1994b “Analysis and Control in the Development of Second Language Proficiency.” Studies in Second Language Acquisition 16: 157–168. 10.1017/S0272263100012857
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100012857 [Google Scholar]
  40. Biber, Douglas
    1988  Variation across Speech and Writing . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511621024
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511621024 [Google Scholar]
  41. Billmyer, Kristine
    1990 “ ‘I Really Like Your Lifestyle’: ESL Learners Learning How to Compliment.” Penn Working Papers in Educational Linguistics 6 (2): 31–48.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Blakemore, Diane
    1987  Semantic Constraints on Relevance . Oxford: Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. 1992  Understanding Utterances . Oxford: Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. 2002  Relevance and Linguistic Meaning: The Semantics and Pragmatics of Discourse Markers . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511486456
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486456 [Google Scholar]
  45. Blass, Regina
    1990  Relevance Relations in Discourse . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511586293
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511586293 [Google Scholar]
  46. Blum-Kulka, Shoshana , Juliane House , and Gabriele Kasper
    1989  Cross-Cultural Pragmatics: Requests and Apologies . Norwood, New Jersey: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Borg, Emma
    2004  Minimal Semantics . Oxford: Clarendon Press. 10.1093/0199270252.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/0199270252.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  48. 2007 “Minimalism versus Contextualism in Semantics.” In Context Sensitivity and Semantic Minimalism: Essays on Semantics and Pragmatics , ed. by Gerhard Preyer , and Georg Peter , 546–571. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Bou Franch, Patricia
    2012 “Pragmatic Transfer.” In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics , Vol. 8, ed. by Carol A. Chapelle , 4622–4626. Oxford: Wiley- Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Bouton, Lawrence F
    1988 “A Cross-Cultural Study of Ability to Interpret Implicatures in English.” World Englishes 7: 183–196. 10.1111/j.1467‑971X.1988.tb00230.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-971X.1988.tb00230.x [Google Scholar]
  51. 1990 “The Effective Use of Implicature in English: Why and How it Should Be Taught in the ESL Classroom.” In Pragmatics and Language Learning, Monograph Series, Vol. 1, ed. by Lawrence F. Bouton , and Yamuna Kachru , 43–52. Urbana IL: University of Illinois.
     [Google Scholar]
  52. 1994a “Can NNS Skill in Interpreting Implicature in American English Be Improved through Explicit Instruction?—A Pilot Study.” In Pragmatics and Language Learning . Monograph Series, Vol. 5, ed. by Lawrence F. Bouton , and Yamuna Kachru , 88–109. Urbana IL: University of Illinois.
     [Google Scholar]
  53. 1994b “Conversational Implicature in the Second Language: Learned Slowly When Not Deliberately Taught.” Journal of Pragmatics 22: 157–167. 10.1016/0378‑2166(94)90065‑5
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(94)90065-5 [Google Scholar]
  54. 1996 “Pragmatics and Language Learning.” In Pragmatics and Language Learning, Monograph Series, Vol. 7, ed. by Lawrence F. Bouton , 1–20. Urbana IL: University of Illinois.
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Boxer, Diane
    2010 “Complaints. How to Gripe and Establish Rapport.” In Speech Act Performance. Theoretical, Empirical and Methodological Issues , ed. by Alicia Martínez-Flor , and Esther Usó-Juan , 163–178. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Bromberek-Dyzman Katarzyna, Karolina Ratah , and Jacek Dylak
    2010 “Mentalizing in the Second Language: Is Irony Online Inferencing Any Different in L1 and L2?” In Pragmatic Perspectives on Language and Linguistics, Vol. 1: Speech Actions in Theory and Applied Studies , ed. by Iwona Witczak-Plisiecka , 197–216. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Bromberek-Dyzman, Katarzyna , and Anna Ewert
    2010 “Figurative Competence is Better Developed in L1 than in L2, or Is It? Understanding Conversational Implicatures in L1 and L2.” In Cognitive Processing in Second Language Acquisition: Inside the Learner’s Mind , ed. by Martin Pütz , and Laura Sicola , 317–334. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
     [Google Scholar]
  58. Butler, Christopher S
    1988a “Meeting the Challenge of ‘Pragmatics’.” In Pragmatics, Discourse and Text , ed. by Erich H. Steiner , and Robert Veltman , 3–27. London: Pinter Publishers.
     [Google Scholar]
  59. 1988b “Pragmatics and Systematic Linguistics.” Journal of Pragmatics 12 (1): 83–102. 10.1016/0378‑2166(88)90021‑5
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(88)90021-5 [Google Scholar]
  60. 1996 “On the Concept of an Interpersonal Metafunction in English.” In Meaning and Form: Systemic Functional Metafunction of English , ed. by Margaret Berry , Christopher Butler , Robin Fawcett , and Guowen Huang , 151–181. Norwood: Ablex.
     [Google Scholar]
  61. Byon, Andrew Sangpil
    2006 “Developing KFL Students’ Pragmatic Awareness of Korean Speech Acts: The Use of Discourse Completion Tasks.” Language Awareness 15 (4): 244–263. 10.2167/la410.0
     https://doi.org/10.2167/la410.0 [Google Scholar]
  62. Canale, Michael
    1983 “From Communicative Competence to Communicative Language Pedagogy.” In Language and Communication , ed. by Jack C. Richards , and Richard W. Schmidt , 2–27. London: Longman.
     [Google Scholar]
  63. Canale, Michael , and Merrill Swain
    1980 “Theoretical Bases of Communicative Approaches to Second Language Teaching and Testing.” Applied Linguistics 1 (1): 1–48. 10.1093/applin/1.1.1
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/1.1.1 [Google Scholar]
  64. Cappelen, Herman , and Ernie Lepore
    2005  Insensitive Semantics: A Defense of Semantic Minimalism and Speech Act Pluralism . Oxford: Blackwell. 10.1002/9780470755792
     https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470755792 [Google Scholar]
  65. Carston, Robyn
    1999 “The Semantics/Pragmatics Distinction: A View from Relevance Theory.” In The Semantics/Pragmatics Interface from Different Points of View , ed. by Ken Turner , 85–125. Oxford: Elsevier.
     [Google Scholar]
  66. 2002  Thoughts and Utterances . Oxford: Blackwell. 10.1002/9780470754603
     https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470754603 [Google Scholar]
  67. 2009 “The Explicit/Implicit Distinction in Pragmatics and the Limits of Explicit Communication.” International Review of Pragmatics 1 (1): 35–62. 10.1163/187731009X455839
     https://doi.org/10.1163/187731009X455839 [Google Scholar]
  68. 2012 “Relevance Theory.” In Routledge Companion to the Philosophy of Language , ed. by Gillian Russell , and Delia Graff Fara , 163–176. London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  69. Carston, Robyn , and Alison Hall
    2012 “Implicature and Explicature.” In Cognitive Pragmatics , ed. by Hans-Jörg Schmid , 47–84. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110214215.47
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110214215.47 [Google Scholar]
  70. Charteris-Black, Jonathan
    2005  Politicians and Rhetoric: The Persuasive Power of Metaphor . Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
     [Google Scholar]
  71. Chomsky, Noam
    1965  Aspects of the Theory of Syntax . Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  72. 1966  Cartesian Linguistics . New York: Harper and Row.
     [Google Scholar]
  73. 1967/2006 “The Formal Nature of Language.” In Language and Mind 3rd ed., 102–142. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  74. 1979 “Linguistics and the Human Sciences.” In Language and Responsibility . Reprinted in On Language , 43–62. New York: The New Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  75. 1979 “Universal Grammar and Unresolved Questions.” In Language and Responsibility . Reprinted in On Language , 180–194. New York: The New Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  76. 1980  Rules and Representations . Oxford: Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  77. 2010 “Some Simple Evo-Devo Theses: How True Might They Be for Language?” In Approaches to the Evolution of Language , ed. by Richard K. Larson , Viviane M. Deprez , and Hiroko Yamakido , 45–62. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  78. Christie, Frances
    1999 “Genre Theory and ESL Teaching: A Systemic Functional Perspective.” TESOL Quarterly 33 (4): 759–763. 10.2307/3587889
     https://doi.org/10.2307/3587889 [Google Scholar]
  79. Colebrook, Claire
    2002  Irony in the Work of Philosophy . Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  80. Cook, Misty , and Anthony J. Liddicoat
    2002 “The Development of Comprehension in Interlanguage Pragmatics: The Case of Request Strategies in English.” Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 25 (1): 19–40.
     [Google Scholar]
  81. Council of Europe
    2001  Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  82. Crystal, David
    1997  Cambridge Encyclopedia of the English language , 2nd ed. New York: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  83. Cummings, Louise
    2009  Clinical Pragmatics . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  84. de Paiva, Beatriz M. M
    2003 “Pragmatic Interactions in a Second Language.” In Rethinking Communicative Interaction: New Interdisciplinary Horizons , ed. by Collin B. Grant , 187–206. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
     [Google Scholar]
  85. de Paiva, Beatriz M. M. , and Susan H. Foster-Cohen
    2004 “Exploring the Relationships between Theories of Second Language Acquisition and Relevance Theory.” Second Language Research 20 (3): 281–288. 10.1191/0267658304sr241oa
     https://doi.org/10.1191/0267658304sr241oa [Google Scholar]
  86. Degand, Liesbeth
    1994 “Towards an Account of Causation in a Multilingual Text Generation System.” In INLG ‘94 Proceedings of the Seventh International Workshop on Natural Language Generation , 108–116. New Mexico, USA: Association for Computational Linguistics.
     [Google Scholar]
  87. Dekeyser, Robert
    2003 “Implicit and Explicit Learning.” In The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition , ed. by Catherine J. Doughty , and Michael H. Long , 313–348. Oxford: Blackwell. 10.1002/9780470756492.ch11
     https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470756492.ch11 [Google Scholar]
  88. Dendrinos, Bessie
    2006 “Mediation in Communication, Language Teaching and Testing.” Journal of Applied Linguistics 22: 9–35.
     [Google Scholar]
  89. Devitt, Amy J
    2004  Writing Genres . Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  90. Doughty, Catherine
    2003 “Instructed SLA: Constraints, Compensation, and Enhancement.” In The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition , ed. by Catherine J. Doughty , and Michael H. Long , 256–310. Malden, MA: Blackwell. 10.1002/9780470756492.ch10
     https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470756492.ch10 [Google Scholar]
  91. Ehlich, Konrrad , and Jochen Rehbein
    1986  Muster und Institution. Untersuchungen zur schulischen Kommunikation . Tübingen: Narr.
     [Google Scholar]
  92. Ellis, Barbara G
    2001  The Copy-Editing and Headline Handbook . Cambridge, Mass.: Perseus Publishing.
     [Google Scholar]
  93. Ellis, Nick C
    (ed) 1994  Implicit and Explicit Learning of Languages . London: Academic Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  94. 2001 “Memory for Language.” In Cognition and Second Language Instruction , ed. by Peter Robinson , 33–68. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139524780.004
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524780.004 [Google Scholar]
  95. 2005 “At the Interface: Dynamic Interactions of Explicit and Implicit Language Knowledge.” Studies in Second Language Acquisition 27 (2): 305–352. 10.1017/S027226310505014X
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S027226310505014X [Google Scholar]
  96. Ellis, Rod
    2003  Task-Based Language Learning and Teaching . Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  97. Ellis, Rod , Shawn Loewen , Catherine Elder , Rosemary Erlam , Jenefer Philip , and Hayo Reinders
    2009  Implicit and Explicit Knowledge in Second Language Learning, Testing and Teaching . Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
     [Google Scholar]
  98. Enright, Dennis Joseph
    1986  The Alluring Problem: An Essay on Irony . Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  99. Fairclough, Norman
    1989  Language and Power . London: Longman.
     [Google Scholar]
  100. 1993 “Critical Discourse Analysis and the Marketisation of Public Discourse: The Universities.” Discourse and Society 4 (2): 133–168. 10.1177/0957926593004002002
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926593004002002 [Google Scholar]
  101. 1995  Critical Discourse Analysis . Boston: Addison Wesley.
     [Google Scholar]
  102. Feyaerts, Kurt
    2006 “Towards a Dynamic Account of Phraseological Meaning: Creative Variation in Headlines and Conversational Humor.” International Journal of English Studies 6 (1): 57–84.
     [Google Scholar]
  103. Fillmore, Charles , Paul Kay , and Mary Catherine O’Connor
    1988 “Regularity and Idiomaticity in Grammatical Constructions: The Case of Let Alone.” Language 64 (3): 501–538. 10.2307/414531
     https://doi.org/10.2307/414531 [Google Scholar]
  104. Flowerdew, Lynne
    2003 “A Combined Corpus and Systemic-Functional Analysis of the Problem-Solution Pattern in a Student and Professional Corpus of Technical Writing.” TESOL Quarterly 37 (3): 489–511. 10.2307/3588401
     https://doi.org/10.2307/3588401 [Google Scholar]
  105. Foster-Cohen, Susan
    2000 “Review Article: D. Sperber and D. Wilson (1986, 1995) Relevance: Communication and Cognition.” Second Language Research 16 (1): 72–92.
     [Google Scholar]
  106. 2002 “The Relevance of Relevance Theory to First and Second Language Acquisition.” In Selected Papers on Theoretical and Applied Linguistics from the 14th International Symposium, ed. by Marianthi Makri- Tsilipakou , 9–23. Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece: Department of Theoretical and Applied Linguistics.
     [Google Scholar]
  107. Francis, Hazel , and Susan Hallam
    2000 “Genre Effects on Higher Education Students’ Text Reading for Understanding.” Higher Education 39 (3): 279–296. 10.1023/A:1003993801796
     https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003993801796 [Google Scholar]
  108. Fried, Mirjam , and Jan-Ola Östman
    2005 “Construction Grammar and Spoken Language: The Case of Pragmatic Particles.” Journal of Pragmatics 37 (11): 1752–1778. 10.1016/j.pragma.2005.03.013
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2005.03.013 [Google Scholar]
  109. Garcia, Paula
    2004a “Pragmatic Comprehension of High and Low Level Language Learners.” Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language 8 (2): A-1. tesl-ej.org/ej30/a1.html (accessed17September 2011).
     [Google Scholar]
  110. 2004b “Developmental Differences in Speech Act Recognition: A Pragmatic Awareness Study.” Language Awareness 13 (2): 96–115. 10.1080/09658410408667089
     https://doi.org/10.1080/09658410408667089 [Google Scholar]
  111. Gibbs, Raymond W
    1994  The Poetics of Mind . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  112. Gibbs, Raymond W. , and Christin Izett
    2005 “Irony as Persuasive Communication.” In Figurative Language Comprehension: Social and Cultural Influences, ed. by Herbert L. Colston , and Albert N. Katz , 131–152. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
     [Google Scholar]
  113. Grabowski, Kirby , Cook
    2008 “Investigating the Construct Validity of a Performance Test Designed to Measure Grammatical and Pragmatic Knowledge.” Spann Fellow Working Papers in Second or Foreign Language Assessment 6: 131–179.
     [Google Scholar]
  114. Grice, Paul H
    1989  Studies in the Way of Words . Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  115. Grossi, Vittoria
    2009 “Teaching Pragmatic Competence: Compliments and Compliment Responses in the ESL Classroom.” Prospect Journal (Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia) 24 (2): 53–62. www.ameprc.mq.edu.au/docs/prospect_journal/volume24_no_2/Vittoria_Grossi.pdf (accessed19September 2011)
     [Google Scholar]
  116. Hall, Alison
    2008 “Free Enrichment or Hidden Indexicals?” Mind and Language 23 (4): 426–456. 10.1111/j.1468‑0017.2008.00350.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0017.2008.00350.x [Google Scholar]
  117. Hall, Joan Kelly
    1993 “The Role of Oral Practices in the Accomplishment of Our Everyday Lives: The Sociocultural Dimensions of Interaction with Implications for the Learning of another Language.” Applied Linguistics 14: 145–166. 10.1093/applin/14.2.145
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/14.2.145 [Google Scholar]
  118. Hall, Joan Kelly , Hellermann, John , and Simona Pekarek Doehler
    (eds) 2011  L2 Interactional Competence and Development . Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.
     [Google Scholar]
  119. Halliday, Michael Alexander Kirkwood
    1978  Language as Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning . Baltimore: University Park Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  120. 2007  Language and Education . The Collected Works of M. A. K. Halliday, Vol. 9, ed. by Jonathan J. Webster . London/New York: Continuum.
     [Google Scholar]
  121. Halliday, Michael Alexander Kirkwood , and Christian M. Matthiessen
    2004  An Introduction to Functional Grammar . London: Arnold.
     [Google Scholar]
  122. Halmari, Helena , and Jan-Ola Östman
    2001 “The Soft-Spoken, Angelix Pickax Killer: The Notion of Discourse Pattern in Controversial News Reporting.” Journal of Pragmatics 33: 805–823. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(01)80030‑8
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(01)80030-8 [Google Scholar]
  123. Harley, Birgit , Jim Cummins , Merrill Swain , and Patrick Allen
    1990 “The Nature of Language Proficiency.” In The Development of Second Language Proficiency , ed. by Birgit Harley , Patrick Allen , Jim Cummins , and Merrill Swain , 7–25. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139524568.003
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524568.003 [Google Scholar]
  124. Harmer, Jeremy
    2001  The Practice of English Language Teaching , 3rd ed. London: Longman.
     [Google Scholar]
  125. Harris, Sandra
    1995 “Pragmatics and Power.” Journal of Pragmatics 23: 117–135. 10.1016/0378‑2166(94)00008‑3
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(94)00008-3 [Google Scholar]
  126. Hedge, Tricia
    2000  Teaching and Learning in the Language Classroom . Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  127. Hoffman-Hicks, Sheila
    1992 “Linguistic and Pragmatic Competence: Their Relationship in the Overall Competence of the Language Learner.” In Pragmatics and Language Learning Monograph Series, Vol. 3, ed. by Lawrence F. Bouton , and Yamuna Kachru , 66–80. Urbana IL: University of Illinois.
     [Google Scholar]
  128. Holdcroft, David
    1979 “Speech Acts and Conversation—I.” Philosophical Quarterly 29: 125–141. 10.2307/2219485
     https://doi.org/10.2307/2219485 [Google Scholar]
  129. House, Juliane
    1996 “Developing Pragmatic Fluency in English as a Foreign Language: Routines and Metapragmatic Awareness.” Studies in Second Language Acquisition 18: 225–252. 10.1017/S0272263100014893
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100014893 [Google Scholar]
  130. 1977 “A Model for Assessing Translation Quality.” Meta 22 (2): 103–109. 10.7202/003140ar
     https://doi.org/10.7202/003140ar [Google Scholar]
  131. House, Juliane , and Gabriele Kasper
    1981 “Zur Rolle der Kognition in Kommunikationskursen.” Die Neueren Sprachen 80: 42–55.
     [Google Scholar]
  132. House, Juliane
    1998 “Quality of Translation.” In Encyclopaedia of Translation Studies , ed. by Mona Baker , 197–200. London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  133. House, Juliane , and Gabriele Kasper
    2000 “How to Remain a Non-Native Speaker.” In Kognitive Aspekte des Lehrens und Lernens von Fremdsprachen. Cognitive Aspects of Foreign Language Learning and Teaching. Festschrift für Willis j. Edmondson zum 60 . Geburstag , ed. by Claudia Riemer , 101–118. Tübingen: Narr.
     [Google Scholar]
  134. House, Juliane
    2008 “Towards a Linguistic Theory of Translation as Re- contextualisation and a Third Space Phenomenon.” Linguistica Antverpiensia 7: 149–176.
     [Google Scholar]
  135. 2013 “Developing Pragmatic Competence in English as a Lingua Franca: Using Discourse Markers to Express (Inter) Subjectivity and Connectivity.” In Pragmatic Development in L1, L2, L3: Its Biological and Cultural Foundations , ed. by Elly Ifantidou , and Tomoko Matsui . Journal of Pragmatics Special Issue 59 (Part A): 57–67.
     [Google Scholar]
  136. Howe, Nicholas
    1988 “Metaphor in Contemporary American Political Discourse.” Metaphor and Symbolic Activity 3 (2): 87–104. 10.1207/s15327868ms0302_2
     https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327868ms0302_2 [Google Scholar]
  137. Hutchinson, Tom , and Allan Waters
    1987  English for Specific Purposes . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511733031
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511733031 [Google Scholar]
  138. Hymes, Dell H
    1972 “On Communicative Competence.” In Sociolinguistics , ed. by John B. Pride , and Janet Holmes , 269–293. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
     [Google Scholar]
  139. Ifantidou, Elly
    2001  Evidentials and Relevance . Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
     [Google Scholar]
  140. 2009 “Newspaper Headlines and Relevance: Ad Hoc Concepts in Ad Hoc Contexts.” Journal of Pragmatics 41 (4): 699–720. 10.1016/j.pragma.2008.10.016
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.10.016 [Google Scholar]
  141. 2011a “Genres and Pragmatic Competence.” Journal of Pragmatics 43: 327–346. 10.1016/j.pragma.2010.07.016
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.07.016 [Google Scholar]
  142. 2011b  Genres and Pragmatic Understanding . Athens: Patakis Publications.
     [Google Scholar]
  143. 2013a “Pragmatic Awareness: An Index of Linguistic Competence.” In Research Trends in Intercultural Pragmatics , ed. by Istvan Kecskes , and Jesús Romero-Trillo , 105–144. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9781614513735.105
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9781614513735.105 [Google Scholar]
  144. 2013b “Pragmatic Competence and Explicit Instruction.” In Pragmatic Development in L1, L2, L3: Its Biological and Cultural Foundations , ed. by Elly Ifantidou , and Tomoko Matsui . Journal of Pragmatics Special Issue 59 (Part A): 93–116.
     [Google Scholar]
  145. . Submitted. “Relevance Theory, Epistemic Vigilance and Pragmatic Competence.” In Relevance Theory: Recent Developments, Current Challenges and Future Directions (volume based on the EPICS V conference, Seville 2012), ed. by Manuel Padilla-Cruz .
     [Google Scholar]
  146. Ifantidou, Elly , and Angeliki Tzanne
    2012 “Levels of Pragmatic Competence in an EFL Academic Context: A Tool for Assessment.” Intercultural Pragmatics 9 (1): 47–70. 10.1515/ip‑2012‑0003
     https://doi.org/10.1515/ip-2012-0003 [Google Scholar]
  147. Ishida, Kazuto
    2009 “Indexing Stance in Interaction with the Japanese Desu/Masu and Plain Forms.” In Pragmatic Competence , ed. by Naoko Taguchi , 41–68. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
  148. Ishihara, Noriko
    2007 “Compliments and Responses to Compliments: Learning Communication in Context.” In Speech Act Performance. Theoretical, Empirical and Methodological Issues , ed. by Alicia Martínez-Flor , and Esther Usó-Juan , 179–198. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
     [Google Scholar]
  149. Jeon, Eun Hee , and Tadayoshi Kaya
    2006 “Effects of L2 Instruction on Interlanguage Pragmatic Development.” In Synthesizing Research on Language Learning and Teaching , ed. by John M. Norris , and Lourdes Ortega , 165–211. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
     [Google Scholar]
  150. Jodłowiec, Maria
    2010 “The Role of Relevance Theory in SLA Studies.” In Cognitive Processing in Second Language Acquisition: Inside the Learner’s Mind , ed. by Martin Pütz , and Laura Sicola , 49–66. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
     [Google Scholar]
  151. Johns, Ann M.
    ed 2002  Genre in the Classroom: Multiple Perspectives . Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
     [Google Scholar]
  152. Kasper, Gabriele
    1984 “Pragmatic Comprehension in Leamer-Native Speaker Discourse.” Language Learning 34: 1–20. 10.1111/j.1467‑1770.1984.tb00349.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1984.tb00349.x [Google Scholar]
  153. 1992 “Pragmatic Transfer”. Second Language Research 8: 203–231. 10.1177/026765839200800303
     https://doi.org/10.1177/026765839200800303 [Google Scholar]
  154. 1997 “Can Pragmatic Competence Be Taught?” (Net Work #6) [HTML document]. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i, Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center. nflrc.hawaii.edu/NetWorks/NW06/ (accessed17September 2011).
  155. 2001a “Four Perspectives on L2 Pragmatic Development.” Applied Linguistics 22 (4): 502–530. 10.1093/applin/22.4.502
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/22.4.502 [Google Scholar]
  156. 2001b “Classroom Research on Interlanguage Pragmatics.” In Pragmatics in Language Teaching , ed. by Kenneth R. Rose , and Gabriele Kasper , 33–60. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139524797.006
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524797.006 [Google Scholar]
  157. 2006a “Speech Acts in Interaction: Towards Discursive Pragmatics.” In Pragmatics and Language Learning , Vol. 11, ed. by Kathleen Bardovi-Harlig , César J. Félix-Brasdefer , and Alwiya S. Omar , 281–314. National University of Hawai’i at Manoa: Foreign Language Resource Center.
     [Google Scholar]
  158. 2006b “Beyond Repair: Conversation Analysis as an Approach to SLA.” AILA Review 19: 83–99. 10.1075/aila.19.07kas
     https://doi.org/10.1075/aila.19.07kas [Google Scholar]
  159. Kasper, Gabriele , and Shoshana Blum-Kulka
    (eds) 1993  Interlanguage Pragmatics . New York: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  160. Kasper, Gabriele , and Richard Schmidt
    1996 “Developmental Issues in Interlanguage Pragmatics.” Studies in Second Language Acquisition 18: 149–169. 10.1017/S0272263100014868
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100014868 [Google Scholar]
  161. Kasper, Gabriele , and Kenneth R. Rose
    1999 “Pragmatics and SLA”. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 19: 81–104. 10.1017/S0267190599190056
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190599190056 [Google Scholar]
  162. 2002  Pragmatic Development in a Second Language . Oxford: Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  163. Kaufman, Sheri , Patricia Prelock , Ernest Weiler , Nancy Creaghead , and Carole Donnelly
    1994 “Metapragmatic Awareness of Explanation Adequacy: Developing Skills for Academic Success from a Collaborative Communication Skills Unit.” Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in the Schools 25: 174–180.
     [Google Scholar]
  164. Kay, Paul
    1995 “Construction Grammar.” In Handbook of Pragmatics , ed. by Jef Verschueren , Jan-Ola Östman , and Jan Blommaert , 171–177. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
     [Google Scholar]
  165. Kerekes, Julie A.
    1992  Development in Nonnative Speakers’ Use and Perceptions of Assertiveness and Supportiveness in Mixed-Sex Conversations (Occasional Paper Series, Vol. 21). Honolulu: University of Hawai’I, Department of English as a Second Language.
     [Google Scholar]
  166. Kern, Richard
    2000  Literacy and Language Teaching . Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  167. Kinginger, Celeste , and Kathleen Farrell
    2004 “Assessing Development of Metapragmatic Awareness in Study Abroad.” Frontiers: The Interdisciplinary Journal of Study Abroad 10: 19–42.
     [Google Scholar]
  168. Kitis, Eliza
    1999 “On Relevance Again: From Philosophy of Language across ‘Pragmatics and power’ to Global Relevance.” Journal of Pragmatics 31 (5): 643–667. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(98)00090‑3
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(98)00090-3 [Google Scholar]
  169. Knapp, Peter , and Megan Watkins
    2005  Genre, Text, Grammar . Sydney: UNSW Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  170. Koike, Dale A
    1996 “Transfer of Pragmatic Competence and Suggestions in Spanish Foreign Language Learning.” In Speech Acts across Cultures: Challenges to Communication in a Second Language , ed. by Susan M. Gass , and Joyce Neu , 257–281. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
  171. Kondo, Sachiko
    2010 “Apologies. Raising Learners’ Cross-Cultural Awareness.” In Speech Act Performance. Theoretical, Empirical and Methodological Issues , Alicia Martínez-Flor , and Esther Usó-Juan , 145–162. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
     [Google Scholar]
  172. Kozima, Hideki , and Teiji Furugori
    1994 “Segmenting Narrative Text into Coherent Scenes.” Literary and Linguistic Computing 9 (1): 13–19. 10.1093/llc/9.1.13
     https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/9.1.13 [Google Scholar]
  173. Kubota, Mikio
    1995 “Teachability of Conversational Implicature to Japanese EFL Learners.” IRLT(Institute for Research in Language Teaching) Bulletin 9: 35–67.
     [Google Scholar]
  174. Lakoff, Robin T
    2009 “Conversational Logic”. In Key Notions for Pragmatics , ed. by Jef Verschueren , and Jan-Ola Östman , 102–113. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
     [Google Scholar]
  175. Langacker, Ronald W
    1987  Foundations of Cognitive Grammar: Theoretical Prerequisites . Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  176. 1993 “Universals of Construal.” Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 19: 447–463.
     [Google Scholar]
  177. 1999  Grammar and Conceptualization . Cognitive Linguistics Research 14. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
  178. 2003 “Constructional Integration, Grammaticalization, and Serial Verb Constructions.” Language and Linguistics 4 (2): 251–278.
     [Google Scholar]
  179. Le, Elizabeth
    2004 “Active Participation within Written Argumentation: Metadiscourse and Editorialist’s Authority.” Journal of Pragmatics 36 (4): 687–714. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(03)00032‑8
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(03)00032-8 [Google Scholar]
  180. 2010  Editorials and the Power of Media . Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
     [Google Scholar]
  181. Leech, Geoffrey
    1983  Principles of Pragmatics . London: Longman.
     [Google Scholar]
  182. Levinson, Stephen
    1983  Pragmatics . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  183. 2000  Presumptive Meanings: The Theory of Generalized Conversational Implicature . Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  184. Li, Jie , and Norbert Schmitt
    2009 “The Acquisition of Lexical Phrases in Academic Writing: A Longitudinal Case Study.” Journal of Second Language Writing 18 (2): 85–102. 10.1016/j.jslw.2009.02.001
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2009.02.001 [Google Scholar]
  185. 2010 “The Development of Collocation Use in Academic Texts by Advanced L2 Learners: A Multiple Case Study Approach.” In Perspectives on Formulaic Language , ed. by David Wood, 23–46. London, New York: Continuum.
     [Google Scholar]
  186. Littlemore, Jeannette
    2010 “Metaphoric Competence in the First and Second Language: Similarities and Differences.” In Cognitive Processing in Second Language Acquisition: Inside the Learner’s Mind , ed. by Martin Pütz , and Laura Sicola , 269–292. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
     [Google Scholar]
  187. Marmaridou, Sophia
    2011 “Pragmalinguistics and Sociopragmatics.” In Foundations of Pragmatics , ed. by Bublitz Wolfram , and Neal R. Norrick , 77–106. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110214260.77
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110214260.77 [Google Scholar]
  188. Martin, James R
    1984 “Language, Register and Genre.” In Language Studies: Children Writing: A Reader , ed. by Frances Christie, 21–29. Geelong, Victoria: Deakin University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  189. 1992  English Text: System and Structure . Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
     [Google Scholar]
  190. Martínez Floor, Alicia , Esther Usó Juan , and Ana Fernandez Guerra
    (eds) 2003  Pragmatic Competence and Foreign Language Teaching . Castello de la Plana, Spain: Publications de la Universitat Jaume I.
     [Google Scholar]
  191. Martínez-Flor, Alicia , and Eva Alcón Soler
    2007 “Developing Pragmatic Awareness of Suggestions in the EFL Classroom: A Focus on Instructional Effects.” Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics 10 (1): 47–76.
     [Google Scholar]
  192. Martínez-Flor, Alicia , and Esther Usó-Juan
    2010  Speech Act Performance. Theoretical, Empirical and Methodological Issues . Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
     [Google Scholar]
  193. Masahiro, Takimoto
    2009 “The Effects of Input-Based Tasks on the Development of Learners’ Pragmatic Proficiency”. Applied Linguistics 30 (1): 1–25. 10.1093/applin/amm049
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amm049 [Google Scholar]
  194. Matsumura, Shoichi
    2003 “Modelling the Relationships among Interlanguage Pragmatic Development, L2 Proficiency, and Exposure to L2.” Applied Linguistics 24 (4): 465–491. 10.1093/applin/24.4.465
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/24.4.465 [Google Scholar]
  195. McNamara, Tim , and Carsten Roever
    2006  Language Testing: The Social Dimension . Malden, MA and Oxford: Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  196. Miller, Carolyn R
    1984 “Genre as Social Action.” Quarterly Journal of Speech 70: 151–167. 10.1080/00335638409383686
     https://doi.org/10.1080/00335638409383686 [Google Scholar]
  197. Morrow, Keith
    1977 “Authentic Texts in ESP.” In English for Specific Purposes , ed. by Susan Holden , 13–17. London: Modern English Publications.
     [Google Scholar]
  198. Motta-Roth, Désirée
    1998 “Discourse Analysis and Academic Book Reviews: A Study of Text and Disciplinary Cultures.” In Genre Studies in English for Academic Purposes , ed. by Fortanet Immaculada , Santiago Posteguillo , Juan C. Palmer , and Juan F. Coll , 29–58. Castelló: Universitat Jaume I.
     [Google Scholar]
  199. Nikiforidou, Kiki , and Rena Torres Cacoullos
    2010 “Variably Future-Marked Conditionals in Greek: Integrating Discourse and Grammar.” Constructions and Frames 2 (1): 90–123. 10.1075/cf.2.1.04nik
     https://doi.org/10.1075/cf.2.1.04nik [Google Scholar]
  200. Nizegorodcew, Anna
    2007  Input for Instructed L2 Learners: The Relevance of Relevance . Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
     [Google Scholar]
  201. Norris, John M. , and Lourdes Ortega
    2000 “Effectiveness of L2 Instruction: A Research Synthesis and Quantitative Meta-Analysis.” Language Learning 50 (3): 417–528. 10.1111/0023‑8333.00136
     https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.00136 [Google Scholar]
  202. North, Brian
    2000  The Development of a Common Framework Scale of Language Proficiency . New York: Peter Lang.
     [Google Scholar]
  203. Nunan, David
    1989  Designing Tasks for the Communicative Classroom . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  204. Olshtain, Elite , and Andrew D. Cohen
    1990 “The Learning of Complex Speech Act Behavior.” TESL Canada Journal 7: 45–65.
     [Google Scholar]
  205. Origgi, Gloria , and Dan Sperber
    2000 “Evolution, Communication, and the Proper Function of Language.” In Evolution and the Human Mind: Modularity, Language, and Meta-Cognition , ed. by Peter Carruthers , and Andrew Chamberlain , 140–169. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511611926.008
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511611926.008 [Google Scholar]
  206. Östman, Jan-Ola
    1995 “Explicating Implicitness.” Pragmatics, Ideology and Contacts Bulletin 2: 4–7. [Department of English, University of Helsinki]
     [Google Scholar]
  207. 1999 “Coherence through Understanding through Discourse Patterns. Focus on News Reports.” In Coherence in Spoken and Written Discourse: How to Create and How to Describe It , ed. by Wolfram Bublitz , Uta Lenk , and Eija Ventola , 77–100. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
     [Google Scholar]
  208. 2004 “Construction Discourse: A Prolegomenon.” In Construction Grammars: Cognitive Grounding and Theoretical Extensions , ed. by Jan-Ola Östman , and Mirjam Fried , 121–144. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
     [Google Scholar]
  209. 2005 “Persuasion as Implicit Anchoring. The Case of Collocations.” In Persuasion across Genres. A Linguistic Approach , ed. by Elena Halmari, and Tuija Virtanen, 183–212. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
     [Google Scholar]
  210. Östman, Jan-Ola , and Mirjam Fried
    2005 “The Cognitive Grounding of Construction Grammar.” In Construction Grammars , ed. by Jan-Ola Östman , and Mirjam Fried , 1–13. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
     [Google Scholar]
  211. Ottati, Victor C. , and Randall A. Renstrom
    2010 “Metaphor and Persuasive Communication: A Multifunctional Approach.” Social and Personality Psychology Compass 4 (9): 783–794. 10.1111/j.1751‑9004.2010.00292.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2010.00292.x [Google Scholar]
  212. Paltridge, Brian
    1995a “Analyzing Genre: A Relational Perspective.” System 23 (4): 503–511. 10.1016/0346‑251X(95)00036‑J
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0346-251X(95)00036-J [Google Scholar]
  213. 1995b “Working with Genre: A Pragmatic Perspective.” Journal of Pragmatics 24: 393–406. 10.1016/0378‑2166(94)00058‑M
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(94)00058-M [Google Scholar]
  214. Papafragou, Anna , Peggy Li , Youngon Choi , and Chung-Hye Han
    2007 “Evidentiality in Language and Cognition.” Cognition 103: 253–299. 10.1016/j.cognition.2006.04.001
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2006.04.001 [Google Scholar]
  215. Pedersen, Johan , and Teresa Cadierno
    2004 “Construction Grammar and Second Language Acquisition: A Cognitive Understanding of Language in a Contrastive Perspective.” In Disciplines and Interdisciplinarity in Foreign Language Studies , ed. by Hans Lauge Hansen , 151–167. Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum.
     [Google Scholar]
  216. Perkins, Michael
    2007  Pragmatic Impairment . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511486555
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486555 [Google Scholar]
  217. Popper, Karl
    1972/1979  Objective Knowledge . Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  218. Purpura, James E
    2004  Assessing Grammar . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511733086
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511733086 [Google Scholar]
  219. Reah, Danuta
    1998  The Language of Newspapers . London/New York: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  220. Recanati, François
    1993  Direct Reference: From Language to Thought . Oxford: Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  221. 2001 “What Is Said.” Synthese 128: 75–91. 10.1023/A:1010383405105
     https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010383405105 [Google Scholar]
  222. 2004  Literal Meaning . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  223. 2010  Truth-Conditional Pragmatics . Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199226993.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199226993.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  224. Roever, Carsten
    2006 “Validation of a Web-Based Test of ESL Pragmalinguistics.” Language Testing 23 (2): 229–256. 10.1191/0265532206lt329oa
     https://doi.org/10.1191/0265532206lt329oa [Google Scholar]
  225. 2007 “DIF in the Assessment of Second Language Pragmatics.” Language Assessment Quarterly 4 (2): 165–189. 10.1080/15434300701375733
     https://doi.org/10.1080/15434300701375733 [Google Scholar]
  226. 2011 “Testing of Second Language Pragmatics: Past and Future.” Language Testing 28 (4): 463–481. 10.1177/0265532210394633
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532210394633 [Google Scholar]
  227. Rose, Kenneth , and Gabriele Kasper
    (eds) 2001  Pragmatics in Language Teaching . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139524797
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524797 [Google Scholar]
  228. Safont Jordà , Maria Pilar
    2003 “Metapragmatic Awareness and Pragmatic Production of Third Language Learners of English: A Focus on Request Acts Realizations.” The International Journal of Bilingualism 7 (1): 43–69. 10.1177/13670069030070010401
     https://doi.org/10.1177/13670069030070010401 [Google Scholar]
  229. Samet, Jerry , and Roger Schank
    1984 “Coherence and Connectivity.” Linguistics and Philosophy 7: 57–82. 10.1007/BF00627475
     https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00627475 [Google Scholar]
  230. Sanz, Cristina , and Ronald P. Leow
    2011  Implicit and Explicit Conditions, Processes and Knowledge in SLA and Bilingualism . Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  231. Sauer, Christoph
    2002 “Ceremonial Text and Talk: A Functional-Pragmatic Approach.” In Politics as Text and Talk: Analytic Approaches to Political Discourse , ed. by Paul A. Chilton , and Christina Schäffner , 111–142. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
     [Google Scholar]
  232. Schauer, Gila
    2006 “Pragmatic Awareness in ESL and EFL Contexts: Contrast and Development.” Language Learning 56 (2): 269–318. 10.1111/j.0023‑8333.2006.00348.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0023-8333.2006.00348.x [Google Scholar]
  233. Schauer, Gila A
    2009  Interlanguage Pragmatic Development: The Study Abroad Context . London: Continuum.
     [Google Scholar]
  234. Schmidt, Richard
    1990 “The Role of Consciousness in Second Language Learning.” Applied Linguistics 11 (2): 129–158. 10.1093/applin/11.2.129
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/11.2.129 [Google Scholar]
  235. 1995 “Consciousness and Foreign Language Learning: A Tutorial on the Role of Attention and Awareness.” In Attention and Awareness in Foreign Language Teaching and Learning (Technical Report No. 9.), ed. by Richard Schmidt , 1–64, Honolulu: University of Hawai’i.
     [Google Scholar]
  236. 2001 “Attention.” In Cognition and Second Language Instruction , ed. by Peter Robinson , 3–32. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139524780.003
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524780.003 [Google Scholar]
  237. Scollon, Ron
    1998  Mediated Discourse as Social Interaction. A Study of News Discourse . London/New York: Longman.
     [Google Scholar]
  238. Shine, Stephanie , and Nancy L. Roser
    1999 “The Role of Genre in Preschoolers’ Response to Picture Books.” Research in the Teaching of English 34 (2): 197–255.
     [Google Scholar]
  239. Siewierska, Anna
    1991  Functional Grammar . London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  240. Skehan, Peter
    1998  A Cognitive Approach to Language Learning . Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  241. Slembrouck, Stef
    2009 “Channel.” In Key Notions for Pragmatics , ed. by Jef Verschueren , and Jan-Ola Östman , 48–61. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
     [Google Scholar]
  242. Sopory, Pradeep , and James Price Dillard
    2002 “The Persuasive Effects of Metaphor: A Meta-Analysis.” Human Communication Research 28 (3): 382–419. 10.1111/j.1468‑2958.2002.tb00813.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2002.tb00813.x [Google Scholar]
  243. Sperber, Dan
    2000 “Metarepresentations in an Evolutionary Perspective.” In Metarepresentation, ed. by Dan Sperber, 117–137. NY: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  244. Sperber, Dan , and Deirdre Wilson
    1986/1995  Relevance: Communication and Cognition . Oxford: Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  245. 1998 “The Mapping between the Mental and the Public Lexicon.” In Language and Thought , ed. by Peter Carruthers , and Jill Boucher , 184–200. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  246. 2005 “Pragmatics.” In Oxford Handbook of Contemporary Philosophy , ed. by Frank Jackson , and Michael Smith , 468–501. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Earlier version published in 2003 UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 17, 353–388.
     [Google Scholar]
  247. Sperber, Dan , Fabrice Clément , Christophe Heintz , Olivier Mascaro , Hugo Mercier , Gloria Origgi , and Deirdre Wilson
    2010 “Epistemic Vigilance.” Mind and Language 25 (4): 359–393. 10.1111/j.1468‑0017.2010.01394.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0017.2010.01394.x [Google Scholar]
  248. Spooren, Wilbert , and Ted Sanders
    2008 “The Acquisition Order of Coherence Relations: On Cognitive Complexity in Discourse. Journal of Pragmatics 40 (12): 2003–2026. 10.1016/j.pragma.2008.04.021
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.04.021 [Google Scholar]
  249. Stern, Hans Heinrich
    1992  Issues and Options in Language Teaching : Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  250. Swales, John M
    1990  Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  251. 2004  Research Genres: Explorations and Applications . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139524827
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524827 [Google Scholar]
  252. Swales, John M. , and Christine B. Feak
    2000  English in Today’s Research World: A Writing Guide . Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  253. 2004  Academic Writing for Graduate Students: Essential Tasks and Skills . Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  254. Taguchi, Naoko
    2002 “An Application of Relevance Theory to the Analysis of L2 Interpretation Processes: The Comprehension of Indirect Replies.” International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching IRAL 40 (2): 151–176.
     [Google Scholar]
  255. 2007 “Task Difficulty in Oral Speech Production.” Applied Linguistics 28 (1): 113–135. 10.1093/applin/aml051
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/aml051 [Google Scholar]
  256. (ed) 2009  Pragmatic Competence (Mouton Series in Pragmatics). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110218558
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110218558 [Google Scholar]
  257. 2012  Context, Individual Differences and Pragmatic Competence . Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
     [Google Scholar]
  258. Takahashi, Satomi
    2005 “Pragmalinguistic Awareness: Is it Related to Motivation and Proficiency?” Applied Linguistics 26: 90–120. 10.1093/applin/amh040
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amh040 [Google Scholar]
  259. 2010 “The Effect of Pragmatic Instruction on Speech Act Performance.” In Speech Act Performance: Theoretical, Empirical and Methodological Issues , ed. by Alicia Martínez-Flor , and Esther Usó-Juan , 127–142. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
     [Google Scholar]
  260. Takimoto, Masahiro
    2009 “The Effects of Input-Based Tasks on the Development of Learners’ Pragmatic Proficiency.” Applied Linguistics 30 (1): 1–25. 10.1093/applin/amm049
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amm049 [Google Scholar]
  261. Tardy, Christine
    2003 “A Genre System View of the Funding of Academic Research.” Written Communication 20 (1): 7–36. 10.1177/0741088303253569
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088303253569 [Google Scholar]
  262. Tateyama, Yumiko
    2001 “Explicit and Implicit Teaching of Pragmatic Routines: Japanese Sumimasen.” In Pragmatics in Language Teaching , ed. by Kenneth R. Rose , and Gabriele Kasper , 200–222. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139524797.015
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524797.015 [Google Scholar]
  263. Tateyama, Yumiko , Gabriele Kasper , Laura Mui , Hui-Mian Tay , and Ong-On Thananart
    1997 “Explicit and Implicit Teaching of Pragmatic Routines.” In Pragmatics and Language Learning , Vol.8, ed. by Lawrence Bouton, 163–177. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
     [Google Scholar]
  264. Taylor, David
    1994 “Inauthentic Authenticity or Authentic Inauthenticity?” TESL- EJ Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language 1 (2): 1–11.
     [Google Scholar]
  265. Thibault, Paul J
    1999 “Communicating and Interpreting Relevance through Discourse Negotiation: An Alternative to Relevance Theory—A Reply to Franken.” Journal of Pragmatics 31 (4): 557–594. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(98)00081‑2
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(98)00081-2 [Google Scholar]
  266. Thibault, Paul J. , and Theo Van Leeuwen
    1996 “Grammar, Society, and the Speech Act: Renewing the Connections.” Journal of Pragmatics 25: 561–585. 10.1016/0378‑2166(95)00058‑5
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(95)00058-5 [Google Scholar]
  267. Thomas, Jenny
    1983 “Cross-Cultural Pragmatic Failure.” Applied Linguistics 4: 91–112. 10.1093/applin/4.2.91
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/4.2.91 [Google Scholar]
  268. Tindale, Christopher W. , and James Gough
    1987 “The Use of Irony in Argumentation.” Philosophy and Rhetoric 20 (1): 1–17.
     [Google Scholar]
  269. Titscher, Stefan , Michael Meyer , Ruth Wodak , and Eva Vetter
    2000  Methods of Text and Discourse Analysis . London: Sage Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  270. Trosborg, Anna
    1995  Interlanguage Pragmatics: Requests, Complaints and Apologies . Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110885286
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110885286 [Google Scholar]
  271. Tzanne, Angeliki , Elly Ifantidou , and Bessie Mitsikopoulou
    2009 “Raising and Assessing Pragmatic Awareness in L2 Academic Language Learning.” The International Journal of Learning 16 (9): 297–309.
     [Google Scholar]
  272. Unger, Christoph
    2006  Genre, Relevance and Global Coherence . Basingstoke: Palgrave. 10.1057/9780230288201
     https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230288201 [Google Scholar]
  273. van Compernolle, Rémi A. , and Lawrence Williams
    2012 “Teaching, Learning, and Developing L2 French Sociolinguistic Competence: A Sociocultural Perspective”. Applied Linguistics 33 (2): 184–205. 10.1093/applin/amr048
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amr048 [Google Scholar]
  274. van Dijk, Teun Adrianus , and Walter Kintsch
    1983  Strategies of Discourse Comprehension . Orlando, Florida: Academic Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  275. Verschueren, Jef
    2000 “Notes on the Role of Metapragmatic Awareness in Language Use.” Pragmatics 10 (4): 439–456.
     [Google Scholar]
  276. Walters, Scott F
    2007 “A Conversation-Analytic Hermeneutic Rating Protocol to Assess L2 Oral Pragmatic Competence.” Language Testing 24 (2): 155–183. 10.1177/0265532207076362
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532207076362 [Google Scholar]
  277. Wang, Vincent X
    2011  Making Requests by Chinese EFL Learners . Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
     [Google Scholar]
  278. Weinert, Regina
    2010 “Formulaicity and Usage-Based Language: Linguistic, Psycholinguistic and Acquisitional Manifestations.” In Perspectives on Formulaic Language , ed. by David Wood , 1–20. London/New York: Continuum.
     [Google Scholar]
  279. Weizman, Elda
    1989 “Requestive Hints.” In Cross-Cultural Pragmatics: Requests and Apologies , ed. by Shoshana Blum-Kulka , Juliane House , and Gabriele Kasper , 71–95. Norwood, New Jersey: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
     [Google Scholar]
  280. Wharton, Tim
    2009  Pragmatics and Non-Verbal Communication . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511635649
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511635649 [Google Scholar]
  281. Widdowson, Henry G
    1979  Explorations in Applied Linguistics . Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  282. Wierzbicka, Anna
    1985 “Different Cultures, Different Languages, Different Speech Acts: Polish vs. English”. Journal of Pragmatics 9 (2-3): 145–178. 10.1016/0378‑2166(85)90023‑2
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(85)90023-2 [Google Scholar]
  283. Wilawan, Sujunya
    2011 “Effects of Lexical Cohesion and Macrorules on EFL Students’ Main Idea Comprehension.” Reading Improvement 48 (2): 71–87.
     [Google Scholar]
  284. Wildner-Bassett, Mary
    1984  Improving Pragmatic Aspects of Learners’ Interlanguage . Tübingen: Narr.
     [Google Scholar]
  285. 1986 “Teaching and Learning ‘Polite Noises’: Improving Pragmatic Aspects of Advanced Adult Learners’ Interlanguage.” In Learning, Teaching and Communication in the Foreign Language Classroom , ed. by Gabriele Kasper , 163–178. Aarhus, Copenhagen: Aarhus University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  286. 1994 “Intercultural Pragmatics and Proficiency: ‘Polite’ Noises for Cultural Appropriateness.” International Review of Applied Linguistics 32: 3–17.
     [Google Scholar]
  287. Wilkins, David , Arthur
    1976  Notional Syllabuses . Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  288. Williams, Tennessee
    1947/1984  Sweet Bird of Youth, a Streetcar Named Desire, the Glass Menagerie, ed. by E. Martin Brownie , 113–226. Middlesex: Penguin Books.
     [Google Scholar]
  289. Wilson, Deirdre
    1999 “Relevance and Relevance Theory.” In MIT Encyclopedia of the Cognitive Sciences , ed. by Robert A. Wilson , and Frank C. Keil , 719–722. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  290. 2011 “The Conceptual-Procedural Distinction: Past, Present and Future.” In Procedural Meaning: Problems and Perspectives , ed. by Victoria Escandell-Vidal , Manuel Leonetti , and Aoife Ahern , 3–31. Bingley: Emerald.
     [Google Scholar]
  291. Wilson, Deirdre , and Dan Sperber
    1993 “Linguistic Form and Relevance.” Lingua 90 / Special Issue on Relevance Theory, 1/2 (2): 1–25.
     [Google Scholar]
  292. 2004 “Relevance Theory.” In The Handbook of Pragmatics , ed. by Laurence Horn , and Gregory Ward , 607–632. Oxford: Blackwell. Longer earlier version published in 2002 UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 14, 249–287.
     [Google Scholar]
  293. Wilson, Deirdre , and Tim Wharton
    2006 “Relevance and Prosody.” Journal of Pragmatics 38 (10): 1559–1579. 10.1016/j.pragma.2005.04.012
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2005.04.012 [Google Scholar]
  294. Wilson, Deirdre , and Robyn Carston
    2007 “A Unitary Approach to Lexical Pragmatics: Relevance, Inference and Ad Hoc Concepts.” In Pragmatics , ed. by Noel Burton-Roberts , 230–259. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
     [Google Scholar]
  295. Wilson, Deirdre , and Dan Sperber
    2013 Meaning and Relevance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  296. Wimsatt, William K. , and Monroe C. Beardsley
    1946/1954 “The Intentional Fallacy.” Sewanee Review 54: 468-488. Revised and republished in The Verbal Icon: Studies in the Meaning of Poetry, William K. Wimsatt , and Monroe C. Beardsley , 3–18. Lexington, KY: University of Kentucky Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  297. Wolf, Alain J. E
    1998 “Une étude des capacités inférentielles des élèves en apprentissage d’une langue seconde dans la perspective de la théorie de la pertinence.” [A study of L2 learners’ inferential abilities from a relevance- theoretic perspective.] Cahiers/Langues 1 (1): 70–81.
     [Google Scholar]
  298. 1999 “Context and Relevance Theory in Language Teaching: An Exploratory Approach.” International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching/IRAL XXXVII (2): 95–110.
     [Google Scholar]
  299. Woodfield, Helen , and Maria Economidou-Kogetsidis
    2010 “ ‘I Just Need More Time’: A Study of Native and Non-Native Students’ Requests to Faculty for an Extension.” Multilingua Journal of Cross-Cultural and Interlanguage Communication 29: 77–118. 10.1515/mult.2010.004
     https://doi.org/10.1515/mult.2010.004 [Google Scholar]
  300. Yeh, Hui-Chin , Yu-Fen Yang , and Wing-Kwong Wong
    2010 “Interaction Chain Patterns of Online Text Construction with Lexical Cohesion.” Educational Technology and Society 13 (1): 55–68.
     [Google Scholar]
  301. Yoshimi, Dina Rudolph
    2001 “Explicit Instruction and JFL Learner’s Use of Interactional Discourse Markers.” In Pragmatics in Language Teaching , ed. by Kenneth R. Rose , and Gabriele Kasper , 223–244. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139524797.016
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524797.016 [Google Scholar]
  302. Young, Richard F. , and Elizabeth R. Miller
    2004 “Learning as Changing Participation: Discourse Roles in ESL Writing Conferences.” The Modern Language Journal 88: 519–535. 10.1111/j.0026‑7902.2004.t01‑16‑.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0026-7902.2004.t01-16-.x [Google Scholar]
  303. Žegarac, Vlad
    2004 “Relevance Theory and the in Second Language Acquisition.” Second Language Research 20 (3): 193–211. 10.1191/0267658304sr237oa
     https://doi.org/10.1191/0267658304sr237oa [Google Scholar]
  304. Zufferey, Sandrine
    2010  Lexical Pragmatics and Theory of Mind . The Acquisition of Connectives . Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/books/9789027270375
Loading

  • From This Site

    /content/books/9789027270375
    dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Chapter
    10
    5
/content/books/9789027270375
dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
-contentType:Journal -contentType:Chapter
10
5
Chapter
content/books/9789027270375
Book
false
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error