Multimodality, Interaction and Turn-taking in Mandarin Conversation

image of Multimodality, Interaction and Turn-taking in Mandarin Conversation

One major feature of conversation is that people take turns to speak. Based on audio and video recordings of naturally-occurring Mandarin conversation, this book explores the role of syntax, prosody, body movements as well as their interplay in turn organization in the temporal unfolding of action and interaction. Adopting the methodology of interactional linguistics, this book offers a fine-grained analysis of the three multimodal resources and the sequential environments in which they appear. It demonstrates that syntax, prosody and body movements not only converge but also diverge in projecting possible turn completion. As one of the few systematic studies of multimodality in Mandarin interaction, this book will be of interest to researchers in Chinese linguistics, interactional linguistics, conversation analysis, and multimodal analysis.


  1. Atkinson, Maxwell & John Heritage
    , eds. 1984Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Auer, Peter
    1991 Vom Ende deutscher Sätze. Zeitschrift für germanistische Linguistik19. 139-157. doi: 10.1515/zfgl.1991.19.2.141
    https://doi.org/10.1515/zfgl.1991.19.2.141 [Google Scholar]
  3. 1992 “The Neverending Sentence: Rightward Expansion in Spoken Language”. Studies in Spoken Languages: English, German, Finno-Ugric, ed. by Miklós Kontra & Tibor Váradi , 41-60. Budapest: Linguistics Institute, Hungarian Academy of Sciences.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. 1996 “On the Prosody and Syntax of Turn-continuations”. Couper-Kuhlen & Selting 1996 57-100.
  5. 2000 “On line-Syntax-oder: was es bedeuten könnte, die Zeitlichkeit der mündlichen Sprache ernst zu nehmen”. Sprache und Literatur85, 31:1. 43-56.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. 2005 “Projection in Interaction and Projection in Grammar”. Text25. 7–36.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. 2009a “On-line Syntax: Thoughts on the Temporality of Spoken Language”. Language Sciences31. 1-13. doi: 10.1016/j.langsci.2007.10.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2007.10.004 [Google Scholar]
  8. 2009b “Projection and Minimalistic Syntax in Interaction”. Discourse Processes46:2. 180-205. doi: 10.1080/01638530902728934
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01638530902728934 [Google Scholar]
  9. Auer, Peter & Aldo di Luzio
    , eds. 1992The Contextualization of Language. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/pbns.22
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.22 [Google Scholar]
  10. Auer, Peter , Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen & Frank Müller
    1999Language in Time: The rhythm and tempo of spoken interaction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Austin, Gilbert
    1969 [1818] Die Kunst der rednerischen und theatralischen Deklamation. Leipzig: Edition Leipzig.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Austin, John L
    1962How to Do Things with Words. London: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Barth-Weingarten, Dagmar , Elisabeth Reber & Margret Selting
    , eds. 2010Prosody in Interaction. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/sidag.23
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sidag.23 [Google Scholar]
  14. Bateson, Gregory
    1956 “The message ‘This is play’”. Group Processes: Transactions of the second conference, ed. by Bertram Schaffner , 145-242. New York: Josiah Macy, Jr. Foundation.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Biq, Yung-O
    1998 “Overlap in Mandarin conversation”. NACCL 9 (Proceedings of the Ninth North American Conference of Chinese Linguistics ), vol. II, 1-18. Los Angeles: University of Southern California, GSIL Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. 2000 “Recent Developments in Discourse-and-Grammar”. Chinese Studies18. 357-394.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Bloomfield, Leonard
    1933Language. New York: Holt.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Bohle, Ulrike
    2007Das Wort ergreifen — das Wort übergeben. Explorative Studie zur Rolle redebegleitender Gesten in der Organisation des Sprecherwechsels. Berlin: Weidler Verlag.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Bolinger, Dwight L
    1957Interrogative Structures of American English. Tuscaloosa AL: University of Alabama Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. 1989Intonation and its Uses – Melody in Grammar and Discourse. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Brown, Gillian , Karen L. Currie & Joanne Kenworthy
    1980Questions of Intonation. London: Croom Helm.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Brown, Penelope & Stephen C. Levinson
    1987Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Cao, Jianfen
    1998 “Some Aspects on Chinese Intonation”. Proceedings of the Conference on Phonetics of the Language in China, Hong Kong, 1998ed. by Eric Zee & Maocan Lin . 28-30. Hong Kong: City University of Hong Kong.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. 2002 “Hanyu Shengdiao yu Yudiao de Guanxi” [The Relationship between Tone and Intonation in Chinese]. Zhongguo Yuwen2002:3. 195-202.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. 2004 “Hanyu Kouyu Yudiao Jiegou” [The Intonation Structure of Spoken Chinese]. Xiandai Yuyin Yanjiu yu Tansuo [ Modern Phonetics Study and Exploration ], ed. by Jianfen Cao , 355-388. Beijing: Shangwu Yinshuguan.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Cao, Wen
    2007 “Zhao Yuanren Xiansheng dui Hanyu Yudiao Yanjiu de Gongxian” [Yuen-Ren Chao’s Contribution to the Research of Chinese Tone]. Shijie Hanyu Jiaoxue82. 75-85.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Chafe, Wallace
    1980 “The Deployment of Consciousness in the Production of a Narrative”. The Pear Stories: Cognitive, Cultural and Linguistic Aspects of Narrative Productioned. by Wallace Chafe , 9-50. Norwood, NJ.: Ablex.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. 1987 “Cognitive Constraints on Information Flow”. Coherence and Grounding in Discourse, ed. by Russell Tomlin , 21-51. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/tsl.11.03cha
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.11.03cha [Google Scholar]
  29. 1993 “Prosodic and Functional Units of Language”. Talking Data: Transcription and Coding in Discourse Research, ed. by Jane A. Edwards & Martin D. Lampert , 33-43. London: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Chang, Hsiang Chang
    2009 “Stance Uses of the Mandarin LE Constructions in Conversational Discourse”. Journal of Pragmatics41. 2240-2256. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2008.06.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.06.003 [Google Scholar]
  31. Chao, Yuen-Ren
    1948Mandarin Primer: An Intensive Course in Spoken Chinese. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. doi: 10.4159/harvard.9780674732889
    https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674732889 [Google Scholar]
  32. 1968A Grammar of Spoken Chinese. Berkeley: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. 2006[1932] “A Preliminary Study of English Intonation (with American Variants) and Its Chinese Equivalents”. Chaoyuanren Yuyanxue Lunwenji[ Collections of Chao Y.-R.’s Linguistic Papers ], ed. by Zongji Wu & Xinna Zhao , 110-197. Beijing: Shangwu Yinshuguan.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. 2006[1933] Tone and Intonation in Chinese. Chaoyuanren Yuyanxue Lunwenji[ Collections of Chao Y.-R.’s Linguistic Papers ], ed. by Zongji Wu & Xinna Zhao , 198-220. Beijing: Shangwu Yinshuguan.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Chao, Yuen-ren
    2007[1922] “Zhongguo Yanyu Zidiao di Shiyan Yanjiu Fangfa” [Experimental Study of Chinese Word Tones]. Chaoyuanren Yuyanxue Lunwenji[ Collections of Chao Y.-R.’s Linguistic Papers ], ed. by Zongji Wu & Xinna Zhao , 27-36. Beijing: Shangwu Yinshuguan.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Chu, Chauncey C
    1984 “Hanyu de Cixu jiqi Bianqian” [Chinese Word Order and Word Order Change]. Yuyan Yanjiu1. 127-151.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. 2002 “Relevance Theory, Discourse Markers and the Mandarin Utterance-Final Particle a/ya”. Journal of the Chinese Language Teachers Association37:1. 1-42.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Chui, Kawai
    1996 “Organization of Repair in Chinese conversation”. Text16:3. 343-372.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. 2004 “Overlapping Speech in Chinese Conversation”. Journal of Chinese Language and Computing14:2. 139-156.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. 2005 “Temporal Patterning of Speech and Iconic Gestures in Conversational Discourse”. Journal of Pragmatics37. 871-887. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2004.10.016
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2004.10.016 [Google Scholar]
  41. 2009 “Linguistic and Imagistic Representations of Motion Events”. Journal of Pragmatics41. 1767-1777. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2009.04.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2009.04.006 [Google Scholar]
  42. Cohen, Antonie , Rene Collier & Johan ’t Hart
    1982 “Declination: Construct or Intrinsic Feature of Speech Pitch”?Phonetica39. 254-273. doi: 10.1159/000261666
    https://doi.org/10.1159/000261666 [Google Scholar]
  43. Cohen, Antonie & Johan ’t Hart
    1965 Perceptual Analysis of Intonation Patterns. Proceedings of the 5th International Congress on Acoustics , 1-4. Liege.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Condon, William S . & William D. Ogston
    1966 “Sound Film Analysis of Normal and Pathological Behaviour Patterns”. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease143:4. 338-347. doi: 10.1097/00005053‑196610000‑00005
    https://doi.org/10.1097/00005053-196610000-00005 [Google Scholar]
  45. 1967 “A Segmentation of Behavior”. Journal of Psychiatric Research5. 221-235. doi: 10.1016/0022‑3956(67)90004‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3956(67)90004-0 [Google Scholar]
  46. Cooper, William E . & John M. Sorensen
    1981Fundamental Frequency in Sentence Production. New York, NY.: Springer-Verlag. doi: 10.1007/978‑1‑4613‑8093‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-8093-1 [Google Scholar]
  47. Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth
    1992 “Contextualizing Discourse: The Prosody of Interactive Repair”. Auer & Di Luzio 1992 337–364.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. 1993English Speech Rhythm: Form and Function in Everyday Verbal Interaction. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/pbns.25
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.25 [Google Scholar]
  49. 1996 “Intonation and Clause Combining in Discourse: The Case of Because”. Pragmatics6:3. 389-426.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. 2001a “Interactional Prosody: High Onsets in Reasonfor-the-Call Turns”Language in Society30. 29–53. doi: 10.1017/S0047404501001026
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404501001026 [Google Scholar]
  51. 2001b “Intonation and Discourse: Current Views from within”. The Handbook of Discourse Analysis, ed. by Deborah Schiffrin , Deborah Tannen & Heidi Hamilton , 13-34. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. 2004 “Prosody and Sequence Organization in English Conversation: The Case of New Beginnings”. Couper-Kuhlen & Ford 2004 335-376.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. 2007 “Prosodische Prospektion und Retrospektion im Gespräch”. Gespräch als Prozess: Linguistische Aspekte der Zeitlichkeit verbaler Interaktion, ed. by Heiko Hausendorf , 69-94. Tübingen: Narr.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. 2012 “Some Truths and Unthruths about Final Intonation in Conversational Questions”. Questions: Formal, Functional and Interactional Perspectives, ed. by Jan P. de Ruiter , 123-145. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139045414.009
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139045414.009 [Google Scholar]
  55. Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth & Cecilia E. Ford
    2004Sound Patterns in Interaction— Cross-linguistic Studies from Conversation. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/tsl.62
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.62 [Google Scholar]
  56. Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth & Margret Selting
    , eds. 1996aProsody in Conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511597862
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511597862 [Google Scholar]
  57. 1996b “Towards an Interactional Perspective on Prosody and a Prosodic Perspective on Interaction”. Couper-Kuhlen & Selting 1996a 11-56.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. 2001 “Introducing Interactional Linguistics”. Selting & Couper-Kuhlen 2001 1-24. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth & Sandra A. Thompson
    2001 “Concessive Patterns in Conversation”. Cause, Condition, Concession, Contrast: Cognitive and Discourse Perspectives, ed. by Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen & Bernd-Dieter Kortmann , 381-410. Berlin: Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. 2008 “On Assessing Situations and Events in Conversation: ‘Extraposition’ and Its Relatives”. Discourse Studies10:4. 443-467. doi: 10.1177/1461445608091882
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445608091882 [Google Scholar]
  61. Cruttenden, Allen
    1986Intonation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Crystal, David
    1969Prosodic Systems and Intonation in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  63. 1975The English Tone of Voice. London: Arnold.
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Curl, Traci & Paul Drew
    2008 “Contingency and Action: A Comparison of Two Forms of Requesting”. Research on Language and Social Interaction41:2. 129-153. doi: 10.1080/08351810802028613
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351810802028613 [Google Scholar]
  65. De Long, Alton
    1974 “Kinesic Signals at Utterance Boundaries in Preschool Children”. Semiotica11:1. 43-73. doi: 10.1515/semi.1974.11.1.43
    https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.1974.11.1.43 [Google Scholar]
  66. Drew, Paul
    2004 “Conversation Analysis”. Handbook of Language and Social Interaction, ed. by Kristine L. Fitch & Robert E. Sanders , 71-102. Mahwah, NJ.: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  67. 2009 “‘Quit Talking While I’m Interrupting’: A Comparison between Positions of Overlap Onset in Conversation”. Talk in Interaction: Comparative Dimensions, ed. by Markku Haakana , Minna Laakso & Jan Lindström , 70-93. Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society.
    [Google Scholar]
  68. 2010 “On the Micro-Politics of Social Action in Interaction”. Paper presented at2010 International Conference of Conversation Analysis (ICCA), Mannheim, July 2010.
    [Google Scholar]
  69. Drew, Paul & Elizabeth Holt
    1998 “Figures of Speech: Figurative Expressions and the Management of Topic Transition in Conversation”. Language in Society27. 495–522. doi: 10.1017/S0047404500020200
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500020200 [Google Scholar]
  70. Du Bois , John W ., Stephen Schuetze-Coburn , Susanna Cumming & Danae Paolino
    1993 “An Outline of Discourse Transcription”. Talking Data: Transcription and Coding in Discourse Research, ed. by Jane A. Edwards & Martin D. Lampert , 45-89. Hillsdale, NJ.: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  71. Duncan, Starkey Jr
    1972 “Some Signals and Rules for Talking Speaking Turns in Conversation”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology23:2. 283-292. doi: 10.1037/h0033031
    https://doi.org/10.1037/h0033031 [Google Scholar]
  72. 1974 “On the Structure of Speaker-Auditor Interaction during Speaking Turns”. Language in Society3:2.161-180. doi: 10.1017/S0047404500004322
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500004322 [Google Scholar]
  73. Duncan, Starkey Jr . & Donald W. Fiske
    1977Face-To-Face Interaction: Research, Methods, and Theory. New York, NY.: Wiley.
    [Google Scholar]
  74. Duncan, Starkey Jr . & George Niederehe
    1974 “On Signalling That it’s Your Turn to Speak”. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology10. 234-247. doi: 10.1016/0022‑1031(74)90070‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(74)90070-5 [Google Scholar]
  75. Ekman, Paul & Wallace Friesen
    1969 “The Repertorie of Nonverbal Behavior: Categories, Origins, Usage and Coding”. Semiotica1. 49-90.
    [Google Scholar]
  76. Erickson, Frederick
    1975 “One Function of Proxemic Shifts in Face-to-Face Interaction”. Organization of Behavior in Face-to-Face Interaction, ed. by Adam Kendon , Richard M. Harris , & Mary R. Key , 175-188. The Hague: Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
  77. Erickson, Frederick & Jeffrey Schultz
    1982The Counselor as Gatekeeper: Social interaction in interviews. New York, NY.: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  78. Fang, Mei
    1994 “Beijinghua Juzhong Yuqici de Gongneng Yanjiu [A Functional Study of the of the particles used as a thematic marker in Mandarin]”. Zhongguo Yuwen2. 129-138.
    [Google Scholar]
  79. Ferrara, Kathleen
    1992 “The Interactive Achievement of a Sentence: Joint Productions in Therapeutic Discourse”. Discouse Processes15. 207-228. doi: 10.1080/01638539209544809
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539209544809 [Google Scholar]
  80. Firth, John R
    1930Speech. London: Ernest Benn.
    [Google Scholar]
  81. 1957 “A Synopsis of Linguistic Theory”. Studies in Linguistic Analysis (special volume of the Philological Society). 1-32. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  82. Flowe, William C
    2002The Form and Function of Prosodic Stylization in Spoken Discourse. PhD Dissertation. Universität Konstanz.
    [Google Scholar]
  83. Ford, Cecilia E
    1993Grammar in Interaction: Adverbial Clauses in American English Conversations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511554278
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511554278 [Google Scholar]
  84. 2004 “Contingency and Units in Interaction”. Discourse Studies6. 27–52. doi: 10.1177/1461445604039438
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445604039438 [Google Scholar]
  85. Ford, Cecilia E ., Barbara Fox & Sandra A. Thompson
    1996 “Practices in the Construction of Turns: The ‘TCU’ revisited”. Pragmatics6. 427–454.
    [Google Scholar]
  86. . eds. 2002aThe Language of Turn and Sequence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  87. 2002b Introduction. Ford , Fox & Thompson 2002a 3-13.
  88. 2003 “Social Interaction and Grammar”. The New Psychology of Language: Cognitive and Functional Approaches to Langauge Structure, ed. by Michael Tomasello , Vol. 2, 119-144. London: Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  89. Ford, Cecilia E . & Sandra. A. Thompson
    1996 “Interactional Units in Conversation: Syntactic, Intonational, and Pragmatic Resources for the Projection of Turn Completion”. Ochs , Schegloff & Thompson 1996 134–184.
    [Google Scholar]
  90. Fox, Barbara A
    1986 “Local Patterns and General Principles in Cognitive Processes”. Text16:1. 25-51.
    [Google Scholar]
  91. 1987Discourse Structure and Anaphora. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511627767
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511627767 [Google Scholar]
  92. 1999 Directions in Research: Language and the Body. Research on Language and Social Interaction32:2. 51-59. doi: 10.1080/08351813.1999.9683607
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.1999.9683607 [Google Scholar]
  93. 2001 “An Exploration of Prosody and Turn Projection in English Conversation”. Selting & Couper-Kuhlen 2001 287–316.
    [Google Scholar]
  94. 2002 “On the Embodied Nature of Grammar: Embodied Being-in-the-World”. Complex Sentences in Grammar and Discourse, ed. by Joan Bybee & Michael Noonan , 79-99. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
  95. Fox, Barbara A ., Makoto Hayashi & Robert Jasperson
    1996 “Resources and Repair: A Cross-Linguistic Study of Syntax and Repair”. Ochs , Schegloff & Thompson 1996 185–237.
    [Google Scholar]
  96. Fox, Barbara A . & Robert Jasperson
    1995 “A Syntactic Exploration of Repair in English Conversation”. Alternative Linguistics, ed. by Phillip W. Davis , 77-134. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
  97. Fox, Barbara A . & Sandra A. Thompson
    2010 “Responses to Wh-Questions in English Conversation”. Research on Language and Social Interaction43:2. 133–156.
    [Google Scholar]
  98. French, Peter & John Local
    1983 “Turn Competitive Incomings”. Journal of Pragmatics7. 701–715. doi: 10.1016/0378‑2166(83)90147‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(83)90147-9 [Google Scholar]
  99. 1986 “Prosodic Features and the Management of Turn Interruptions”. Intonation in Discourse, ed. by Catherine Johns-Lewis , 157–180. London: Croom Helm.
    [Google Scholar]
  100. Gao, Mingkai
    1995Yuyan lun [On Language]. Beijing: Shuangwu Yinshuguan.
    [Google Scholar]
  101. Geluykens, Ronald
    1987 “Tails (Right-Dislocations) as a Repair Mechanism in English Conversation”. Getting One’s Words into Line: On Word Order and Functional Grammar, ed. by Jan Nuyts , 119-129. Dordrecht: Feris.
    [Google Scholar]
  102. 1992From Discouse Process to Grammatical Construction: On Left-Dislocation in English. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/sidag.1
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sidag.1 [Google Scholar]
  103. 1994The Pragmatics of Discourse Anaphora in English: Evidence from Conversational Repair. Berlin: Mouton. doi: 10.1515/9783110846171
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110846171 [Google Scholar]
  104. Geng, Renling
    1988Titaiyu Gaishuo [A Introduction to Body Language]. Beijing: Beijing Language and Culture University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  105. Goffman, Ervin
    1963Behavior in Public Places. New York, NY.: The Free Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  106. 1974Frame Analysis. New York, NY.: Harper and Row.
    [Google Scholar]
  107. Goodwin, Charles
    1979 “The Interactive Construction of a Sentence in Natural Conversation”. Everyday Language: Studies in ethnomethodology, ed. by George Psathas , 97-121. New York, NY.: Irvington Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  108. 1980 “Restarts, Pauses, and the Achievement of Mutual Gaze at Turn-Beginning”. Sociological Inquiry50:3-4. 272-302. doi: 10.1111/j.1475‑682X.1980.tb00023.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-682X.1980.tb00023.x [Google Scholar]
  109. 1981Conversational Organization: Interaction between Speakers and Hearers. New York, NY.: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  110. 1986 “Gesture as a Resource for the Organization of Mutual Orientation”. Semiotica62:1-2. 29-49. doi: 10.1515/semi.1986.62.1‑2.29
    https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.1986.62.1-2.29 [Google Scholar]
  111. 1995 “Co-Constructing Meaning in Conversations with an Aphasic Man”. Research on Language and Social Interaction28:3. 233-260. doi: 10.1207/s15327973rlsi2803_4
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi2803_4 [Google Scholar]
  112. 2000a “Action and Embodiment Within Situated Human Interaction”. Journal of Pragmatics32. 1489-1522. doi: 10.1016/S0378‑2166(99)00096‑X
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00096-X [Google Scholar]
  113. 2000b “Gesture, Aphasia and Interaction”. Language and Gesture: Window into Thought and Action,ed. by David McNeill , 84-98. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  114. 2002 “Time in Action”. Current Anthropology, 43 (Supplement August - October 2002. Special issue Repertoires of Timekeeping in Anthropology). 19-35. doi: 10.1086/339566
    https://doi.org/10.1086/339566 [Google Scholar]
  115. 2003 “Pointing as Situated Practice”. Pointing: Where language, Culture and Cognition Meet, ed. by Sotaro Kita , 217-41. Mahwah, NJ.: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  116. Goodwin, Charles & Marjorie H. Goodwin
    1987 “Concurrent Operations on Talk: Notes on the Interactive Organization of Assessments”. Pragmatics1(1). 1-54.
    [Google Scholar]
  117. 1992 “Assessments and the Construction of Context”. Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon, ed. by Alessandro Duranti & Charles Goodwin , 147-190. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  118. Goodwin, Marjorie H
    1980 “Processes of Mutual Monitoring Implicated in the Production of Description Sequences”. Sociological Inquiry50. 303-317. doi: 10.1111/j.1475‑682X.1980.tb00024.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-682X.1980.tb00024.x [Google Scholar]
  119. 1983 “Searching for a Word as an Interactive Activity”. Semiotics, ed. by John N. Deely & Margot D. Lenhart , 129-38. New York, NY.: Plenum.
    [Google Scholar]
  120. Goodwin, Marjorie H . & Charles Goodwin
    1986 “Gesture and Coparticipation in the Activity of Searching for a Word”. Semiotica62:1-2. 51-75. doi: 10.1515/semi.1986.62.1‑2.29
    https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.1986.62.1-2.29 [Google Scholar]
  121. Greenberg, Joseph H
    1963 “Some Universals of Grammar with Particular Reference to the Order of Meaningful Elements”. Universals of Language, ed. by Joseph H. Greenberg , 110-113. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  122. Griffitt, Kira L
    2008 Functions of Leaning in Episodes of Laughter: Laughter as a Visual Phenomenon. MA Thesis, University of California, Santa Barbara.
    [Google Scholar]
  123. Grosjean, Francois
    1983 “How Long is the Sentence? Prediction and Prosody in the On-line Processing of Language”. Linguistics21. 501–529. doi: 10.1515/ling.1983.21.3.501
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1983.21.3.501 [Google Scholar]
  124. Gumperz, John J
    1982.Discourse Strategies. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511611834
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511611834 [Google Scholar]
  125. 1992a Contextualization and Understanding. Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon, ed. by Alessandro Duranti & CharlesGoodwin , 229-252. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  126. 1992b “Contextualization Revisited”. Auer & Di Luzio 1992 39-45.
    [Google Scholar]
  127. Haiman, John
    1994 “Ritualization and the Development of Language”. Perspectives on Grammaticalization, ed. by William Pagliuca , 3-28. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
  128. Hakulinen, Auli & Margret Selting
    , eds. 2005aSyntax and Lexis in Conversation: Studies on the Use of Linguistic Resources in Talk-in-Interaction. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/sidag.17
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sidag.17 [Google Scholar]
  129. 2005b Introduction. Hakulinen & Selting 2005a 1-14. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
  130. Halliday, Michael A. K
    1967Intonation and Grammar in British English. The Hague: Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
  131. Hayashi, Mokoto
    1999 “Where Grammar and Interaction Meet: A Study of Co-Participant Completion in Japanese Conversation”. Human Studies22:2-4. 475-499. doi: 10.1023/A:1005492027060
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005492027060 [Google Scholar]
  132. 2001 “Postposition-Initiated Utterances in Japanese Conversation: An Interactional Account of a Grammatical Practice”. Selting & Couper-Kuhlen 2001 317-343.
    [Google Scholar]
  133. 2003a. “Language and the Body as Resources for Collaborative Action: A Study of Word Searches in Japanese Conversation”. Research on Language and Social Interaction36:2. 109-141. doi: 10.1207/S15327973RLSI3602_2
    https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327973RLSI3602_2 [Google Scholar]
  134. 2003bJoint Utterance Construction in Japanese Conversation. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/sidag.12
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sidag.12 [Google Scholar]
  135. 2004 Discourse within a Sentence: An Exploration of Postpositions in Japanese as an Interactional Resource”. Language in Society33:3. 343-376. doi: 10.1017/S0047404504043027
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404504043027 [Google Scholar]
  136. 2005 “Joint Turn Construction through Language and the Body: Notes on Embodiment in Coordinated Participation in Situated Activities”. Semiotica156:1/4. 21–53.
    [Google Scholar]
  137. 2009 “Marking a ‘Noticing of Departure’ in Talk: Eh-Prefaced Turns in Japanese Conversation”. Journal of Pragmatics41:10. 2100-2129. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2008.12.008
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.12.008 [Google Scholar]
  138. He, Yang
    1994 “Hanyu Wanju Chengfeng Shitan” [An Exploration of Sentence-Final Elements] Yuyan Jiaoxue yu Yanjiu1994:4. 26-38.
    [Google Scholar]
  139. Heath, Christian C
    1984 “Talk and Recipiency: Sequential Organization in Speech and Body Movement”. Atkinson & Heritage 1984 247-265.
    [Google Scholar]
  140. 1986Body Movement and Speech in Medical Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511628221
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511628221 [Google Scholar]
  141. Helasvuo, Marja-Liisa
    2001aSyntax in the Making: The Emergence of Syntactic Units in Finnish Conversation. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/sidag.9
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sidag.9 [Google Scholar]
  142. 2001b “Emerging Syntax for Interaction Noun Phrases and Clauses as a Syntactic Resource for Interaction”. Selting & Couper-Kuhlen 2001 25-50.
    [Google Scholar]
  143. Heritage, John
    1984aGarfinkel and Ethnomethodology. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
    [Google Scholar]
  144. 1984b “A Change-of-State-Token and Aspects of Its Sequential Placement”. Atkinson & Heritage 1984 299-345. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  145. 2001 “Goffman, Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology”. Discourse Theory and Practice: A Reader for Researchers, ed. by MargaretWetherall , Stephnie J. Taylor & Simon J. Yates , 47-56. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  146. 2004 “Conversation Analysis and Institutional Talk”. Handbook of Language and Social Interaction, ed. by Robert Sanders & Kristine Fitch , 103-147. Mahwah, NJ.: Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  147. Hewes, Gordon H
    1957 “The Anthropology of Posture”. Scientific American196. 122-132. doi: 10.1038/scientificamerican0257‑122
    https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican0257-122 [Google Scholar]
  148. Holt, Elizabeth & Paul Drew
    2005 “Figurative Pivots: The Use of Figurative Expressions in Pivotal Topic Transitions”. Research on Language and Social Interaction38. 235-261. doi: 10.1207/s15327973rlsi3801_2
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi3801_2 [Google Scholar]
  149. Hopper, Paul
    1987 “Emergent Grammar”. Berkeley Linguistic Society13. 139-157.
    [Google Scholar]
  150. 1998 “Emergent Grammar”. The New Psychology of Language: Cognitive and Functional Approaches to Language Structure, ed. by Michael Tomasello , 155-175. Mahwah, NJ.: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  151. Hu, Fu & Wen, Lian
    1984 “Hanyu Yuxu Yanjiu zhong de ji ge Wenti” [A Few Thoughts on the Word Order in Chinese]. Zhonguo Yuwen3. 161-165.
    [Google Scholar]
  152. Hu, Mingyang
    1981 “Beijinghua de Yuci Zhuci he Tanci II” [Mood Particles and Interjections in Beijing Mandarin]. Zhongguo Yuwen6. 416-423.
    [Google Scholar]
  153. 1987 “Guanyu Beijinghua de Yudiao Wenti” [On the Intonation of Beijing Mandarin], Beijinghua Chutan [A Preliminary Study on Beijing Mandarin] ed. by Mingyang Hu , 146-164. Beijing: Shuangwu Yinshuguan.
    [Google Scholar]
  154. Huang, C.-T. James
    1982Logical Relations in Chinese and the Theory of Grammar.PhD Dissertation. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT press.
    [Google Scholar]
  155. Hutchby, Ian . & Robbin Wooffitt
    1998Conversation Analysis: Principles, Practices and Applications. Cambridge: Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  156. Jackson, Sally & Scott Jacobs
    1980 “Structure of Conversational Argument: Pragmatic Bases for the Enthymeme”. Quarterly Journal of Speech66. 251-265. doi: 10.1080/00335638009383524
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00335638009383524 [Google Scholar]
  157. Jasperson, Robert
    2002 “Some Linguistic Aspects of Closure Cut-off”. Ford , Fox & Thompson 2002a 257–286.
  158. Jefferson, Gail
    1978 “Sequential Aspects of Storytelling in Conversation”. Studies in the Organization of Conversational Interaction, ed. by Jim Schenkein , 219-248. New York, NY.: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  159. 1979 “A Technique for Inviting Laughter and Its Subsequent Acceptance Declination”. Everyday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology, ed. by George Psathas , 79-96. New York, NY.: Irvington.
    [Google Scholar]
  160. 1983a “Two Explorations of the Organization of Overlapping Talk in Conversation 1: Notes on Some Orderlinesses of Overlap Onset”. Tilburg Papers in Language and Literature28. 1-28.
    [Google Scholar]
  161. 1983b “Caveat Speaker: Preliminary Notes on Recipient Topic-Shift Implicature”. Tilburg Papers in Language and Literature30. 1-25.
    [Google Scholar]
  162. 1984 “On Stepwise Transition from Talk about a Trouble to Inappropriately Next-positioned Matters”. Atkinson & Heritage 1984 191-222.
    [Google Scholar]
  163. 1986 “Notes on ‘Latency’ in Overlap Onset”. Human Studies9. 153-183. doi: 10.1007/BF00148125
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00148125 [Google Scholar]
  164. 1988 “On the Sequential Organization of Troubles Talk in Ordinary Conversation”. Social Problems35:4. 418-442. doi: 10.2307/800595
    https://doi.org/10.2307/800595 [Google Scholar]
  165. 2004 “Glossary of Transcript Symbols with an Introduction”. Conversation Analysis: Studies from the first generation, ed. by Gene H. Lerner , 13-31. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins doi: 10.1075/pbns.125.02jef
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.125.02jef [Google Scholar]
  166. Jespersen, Otto
    1924The Philosophy of Grammar. London: Allen and Unwin.
    [Google Scholar]
  167. Jiang, Wangqi
    2003Dangdai Yuyongxue [Pragmatics]. Beijing: Peking University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  168. 2005 “Hanyu de ‘Juzi’ yu Yingyu de Sentence” [Chinese Juzi and English Sentence]. Jiefangjun Waiguoyuxueyuan Xuebao1. 10-15.
    [Google Scholar]
  169. Jin, Song
    1992 “Beijinghua de Yuqi he Yudiao” [On the Mood and Intonation of Beijing Mandarin]. Zhongguo Yuwen2. 113-123.
    [Google Scholar]
  170. Kärkkäinen, Elise
    2003Epistemic Stance in English Conversation: A Description of Its Interactional Functions, with a Focus on I Think. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins doi: 10.1075/pbns.115
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.115 [Google Scholar]
  171. Kelly, John & John Local
    1989 “On the Use of General Phonetic Techniques in Handling Conversational Material”. Conversation: An Interdisciplinary Perspective, ed. by Derek Roger & Peter Bull , 197–212. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
  172. Kendon, Adam
    1972 “Some Relationships Between Body Motion and Speech”. Studies in Dyadic Communication, ed. by Wolfe A. Seigman & Benjamin Pope , 177-216. Elmsford, New York, NY.: Pergamon Press. doi: 10.1016/B978‑0‑08‑015867‑9.50013‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-015867-9.50013-7 [Google Scholar]
  173. 1973 “The Role of Visible Behaviour in the Organization of Social Interaction”. Social Communication and Movement: Studies of Interaction and Expression in Man and Chimpanzee, ed. by Mario Von Cranach & Jan Vine , 29-74. London: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  174. 1975 “Gesticulation, Speech and the Gesture Theory of Language Origins”. Sign Language Studies9. 349-373. doi: 10.1353/sls.1975.0016
    https://doi.org/10.1353/sls.1975.0016 [Google Scholar]
  175. 1977Studies in the Behavior of Face-to-Face Interaction. Lisse, Netherlands: Peter De Ridder Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  176. 1980 “Gesture and Speech: Two aspects of the process of utterance”. Nonverbal Communication and Language, ed. by Mary R. Key , 207-227. The Hague: Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
  177. 1985 “Some Uses of Gesture”. Perspectives on Silence, ed. by Deborah Tannen & Muriel Saville-Troike , 215-234. Norwood, N.J.:Ablex Publishing Corporation.
    [Google Scholar]
  178. 1990Conducting Interaction: Patterns of behavior in focused encounters. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  179. 1995 “Gestures as Illocutionary and Discourse Structure Markers in Southern Italian Conversation”. Journal of Pragmatics23:3. 247-279. doi: 10.1016/0378‑2166(94)00037‑F
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(94)00037-F [Google Scholar]
  180. 1997 “Gesture”. Annual Review of Anthropology26. 109-128. doi: 10.1146/annurev.anthro.26.1.109
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.26.1.109 [Google Scholar]
  181. 2004Gesture: Visible Action as Utterance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  182. Kim, Kyu-hyun
    1999 “Phrasal Unit Boundaries and Organization of Turns and Sequences in Korean Conversation”, Human Studies22. 425-46. doi: 10.1023/A:1005431826151
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005431826151 [Google Scholar]
  183. Kingdon, Roger
    1958The Groundwork of English Intonation. London: Longmans.
    [Google Scholar]
  184. Kita, Sotaro
    1990The Temporal Relationship between Gesture and Speech: A Study of Japanese-English Bilinguals. MA thesis, University of Chicago.
    [Google Scholar]
  185. 1993Language and Thought Interface: A Study of Spontaneous Gestures and Japanese Mimetics. PhD Dissertation, University of Chicago.
    [Google Scholar]
  186. Klinghardt, Hermann & Gertrude Klemm
    1920Übungen im englischen Tonfall. Cöthen: O. Schulze.
    [Google Scholar]
  187. Ladd, D. Robert
    1988 “Declination “Reset” and the Hierarchical Organization of Utterances”. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America84. 530-544. doi: 10.1121/1.396830
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.396830 [Google Scholar]
  188. Langacker, Ronald. W
    1987Foundations of Cognitive Grammar: Vol 1. Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  189. LeBaron, Christian. D . & Jürgen Streeck
    2000 “Gestures, Knowledge, and the World”. Gestures in Action, Language, and Culture, ed. by McNeill David , 118-138. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511620850.008
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620850.008 [Google Scholar]
  190. Lerner, Gene H
    1991 “On the Syntax of Sentence-in-Progress”. Langauge in Society20. 441-458. doi: 10.1017/S0047404500016572
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500016572 [Google Scholar]
  191. 1996 “On the ‘Semi-Permeable’ Character of Grammatical Units in Conversation: Conditional Entry into the Turn Space of Another Speaker”. Ochs , Schegloff & Thompson 1996 238–276.
    [Google Scholar]
  192. 2004 “Collaborative Turn Sequences”. Conversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation, ed. by Gene H. Lerner , 225-256. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins doi: 10.1075/pbns.125.12ler
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.125.12ler [Google Scholar]
  193. Lerner, Gene H . & Tomoyo Takagi
    1999 “On the Place of Linguistic Resources in the Organization of Talk-in-Interaction: A Co-investigation of English and Japanese Grammatical Practices”. Journal of Pragmatics31. 49-75. doi: 10.1016/S0378‑2166(98)00051‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(98)00051-4 [Google Scholar]
  194. Levelt, William J. M
    1989Speaking: From Intention to Articulation. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  195. Li, Aijun
    2002 “Putonghua Duihua zhong Yunlv Tezheng de Shengxue Biaoxian” [Prosodic Analysis on Conversations in Standard Chinese]. Zhongguo Yuwen6. 525-535.
    [Google Scholar]
  196. Li, Charles N . & Sandra A. Thompson
    1974 “An Explanation of Word Order Change from SVO to SOV”. Foundations of Language12. 201-214.
    [Google Scholar]
  197. 1975 “The Semantic Function of Word Order: A Case Study in Mandarin”. Word Order and Word Order Change, ed. by Charles N. Li , 163-195. Austin, Tex.: University of Texas Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  198. 1976 “Subject and Topic: A New Typology of Language”. Subject and Topic, ed. by Charles N. Li , 457-489. New York, NY.: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  199. 1981Mandarin Chinese: A Functional Reference Grammar. Berkeley, Calif.: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  200. Li, Charles N ., Sandra A. Thompson & Bojiang Zhang
    1998 “Cong Huayu Jiaodu Lunzheng Yuqici ‘de’” [An Account of Particle de from a Discourse Perspective]. Zhongguo Yuwen2. 93-102.
    [Google Scholar]
  201. Li, Jiequn
    2002Feiyanyu Jiaoji Gailun [ Nonverbal Communication ]. Beijing: Peking University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  202. Li, Jinxi
    2007[1924] Xinzhu Guoyu Wenfa [ New Grammar of Chinese ]. Beijing: Shangwu Yinshuguan.
    [Google Scholar]
  203. Li, Xiaoting
    2013 "Language and the Body in the Construction of Units in Mandarin Face-to-Face Interaction". Units of Talk–Units of Action, ed. by Beatrice Szczepek Reed & Geoffrey Raymond , 343-375. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/slsi.25.11li
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slsi.25.11li [Google Scholar]
  204. 2014 "Leaning and Recipient Intervening Questions in Mandarin Conversation". Journal of Pragmatics 67. 34-60. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2014.03.011
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.03.011 [Google Scholar]
  205. Lieberman, Phillip
    1967Intonation, Perception and Language. Cambridge: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  206. Lin, Dajin & Chaoqun Xie
    2003 “Hudong Yuyanxue de Fazhan Licheng jiqi Qianjing” [The Development and Outlook of Interactional Linguistics] Xiandai Waiyu4. 411-428.
    [Google Scholar]
  207. Lin, Tao
    1983 “Tantao Beijinghua Qinyin Xinzhi de Chubu Shiyan” [Preliminary experiments in the exploration of the nature of Mandarin neutraltone] Yuyanxue Luncong [Essays on Linguistics] 16-37. Beijing: Shangwu Yinshuguan.
    [Google Scholar]
  208. Liu, Danqing
    2003 “Yuyan Leixingxue yu Hanyu Yanjiu” [Linguistic Typology and the Study of Chinese] Shijie Hanyu Jiaoxue4. 5-12.
    [Google Scholar]
  209. Liu, Hong
    2004Huihua Jiegou Fenxi. [ Analysis of Conversational Structure ]. Beijing: Peking University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  210. Liu, Yabin & Aijun Li
    2002 “Langdu Yuliao yu Ziran Kouyu de Chayi Fenxi” [Comparative Analysis Between Read and Spontaneous Speech]. Zhongwen Xinxi Xuebao1. 13-53.
    [Google Scholar]
  211. Local, John
    1986 “Patterns and Problems in a Study of Tyneside Intonation”. Intonation in Discourse, ed. by Johns-Lewis, Sinclair , 181–198. London: Croom Helm.
    [Google Scholar]
  212. 1992 “Continuing and Restarting”. Auer & Di Luzio 1992 273–296.
  213. Local, John & John Kelly
    1986 “Projection and ‘Silences’: Notes on Phonetic and Conversational Structure”. Human Studies9. 185–204. doi: 10.1007/BF00148126
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00148126 [Google Scholar]
  214. Local, John , John Kelly & William H. G. Wells
    1986 “Towards a Phonology of Conversation: Turn-taking in Tyneside English”. Journal of Pragmatics22:2. 411-437.
    [Google Scholar]
  215. Local, John & Gareth Walker
    2004 “Abrupt-Joins as a Resource for the Production of Multi-TCU, Multi-Action Turns”. Journal of Pragmatics36. 1375–1403. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2004.04.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2004.04.006 [Google Scholar]
  216. 2005 “Methodological Imperatives for Investigating the Phonetic Organization and Phonological Structures of Spontaneous Speech”, Phonetica62. 120-130. doi: 10.1159/000090093
    https://doi.org/10.1159/000090093 [Google Scholar]
  217. Local, John & Bill Wells & Mark Sebba
    1985 “Phonology for Conversation: Phonetic Aspects of Turn-Delimitation in London Jamaican”. Journal of Pragmatics9. 309–330. doi: 10.1016/0378‑2166(85)90029‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(85)90029-3 [Google Scholar]
  218. Local, John & Anthony Wootton
    1995 “Interactional and Phonetic Aspects of Immediate Echolalia in Autism: A Case Study”. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics9. 155–194. doi: 10.3109/02699209508985330
    https://doi.org/10.3109/02699209508985330 [Google Scholar]
  219. Lu, Jianmin
    1980 “Hanyu kouyu jufa li de yiwei xianxiang” [Transposition in the grammar of spoken Chinese]. Zhongguo Yuwen1. 28-41.
    [Google Scholar]
  220. 1984 “Guanyu Xiandai Hanyu li de Yiwen Yuqici” [On Interrogative Particles in Modern Chinese]. Zhongguo Yuwen5. 330-337.
    [Google Scholar]
  221. Luke, Kang-Kwong
    1990Utterance Particles in Cantonese Conversation. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/pbns.9
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.9 [Google Scholar]
  222. 2000 “Juzi Chengfen de Houzhi yu Hualun Jiaoti zhong de Hualun Houxu Shouduan” [Postposed Sentential Constituents as Post-Completion Devices in Conversational Turn-Taking]. Zhongguo Yuwen4. 303-310.
    [Google Scholar]
  223. 2002 “Zai Jinxing zhong de Juzi li Banshi Jumo” [Recognizing the End of a Sentence-in Progress]. Hanyu yufa yanjiu de xin tuozhan [New development in Chinese grammar (1): Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Modern Chinese Grammar for the New Millennium] ed. by Xu Liejiong & Shao Jingmin , 356-374. Hangzhou: Zhejiang Education Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  224. 2004 “Yanshenju de kua Yuyan Duibi” [A Cross-Linguistic Study of Incremental Sentences] Yuyan Jiaoxue yu Yanjiu6. 1-9.
    [Google Scholar]
  225. Luke, Kang-kwong
    2005 “Shuo Yanshenju” [On Incremental Sentences]. Papers in Commemoration of the 50th Anniversity of Zhongguo Yuwen, 39-48. Beijing: Shangwu Yinshuguan.
    [Google Scholar]
  226. Lü, Shuxiang
    1951Zhongguo Wenfa Yaolue [An Outline of Chinese Grammar]. Beijing: Shangwu Yinshuguan.
    [Google Scholar]
  227. 1979Hanyu Yufa Fenxi Wenti [Issues in Analyzing Chinese Grammar]. Beijing: Shangwu Yinshuguan.
    [Google Scholar]
  228. 1980aYuwen Changtan [Fundamentals of Chinese Grammar]. Beijing: Sanlian Shudian.
    [Google Scholar]
  229. 1980bXiandai Hanyu Babai Ci [800 Major Words in Contemporary Chinese]. Beijing: Shangwu Yinshuguan.
    [Google Scholar]
  230. Lü, Shuxiang & Dexi Zhu
    1951Yufa Xiuci Jianghua [Grammar of Speech]. Beijing: Kaiming Shudian.
    [Google Scholar]
  231. Ma, Zhen
    1997Jianming Shiyong Hanyu Yufa Jiaocheng [A Concise and Practical Texbook on Chinese Grammar]. Beijing: Peking University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  232. Malinowski, Bronislaw
    1923 “The Problem of Meaning in Primitive Languages”. The Meaning of Meaning, ed. by Charles K. Ogden & Ian A. Richards , 146-152. New York, NY.: Harcourt, Brace and World.
    [Google Scholar]
  233. Maynard, Douglas
    1997 The News Delivery Sequence: Bad News and Good News in Conversational Interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction30:2. 93-130. doi: 10.1207/s15327973rlsi3002_1
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi3002_1 [Google Scholar]
  234. 2003Bad News, Good News: Conversational Order in Everyday Talk and Clinical Settings. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  235. McNeill, David
    1985 So You Think Gestures are Nonverbal? Psychological Review92:3. 350-371. doi: 10.1037/0033‑295X.92.3.350
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.92.3.350 [Google Scholar]
  236. 1992Hand and Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  237. Müller, Cornelia
    1998Redebegleitende Gesten. Kulturgeschichte-Theorie-Sprachvergleich. Berlin: Berlin Verlag.
    [Google Scholar]
  238. 2004 “Forms and Uses of the Palm-Up Open Hand: A Case of a Gesture Family?” The Semantics and Pragmatics of Everyday Gestures, ed. by Cornalia Müller & Roland Posner , 234–256. Berlin: Weidler.
    [Google Scholar]
  239. Ochs, Elinor
    1979 “Transcription as Theory”. Developmental Pragmatics, ed. by Elinor Ochs & Bambi Schieffelin , 43-72. New York, NY.: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  240. Ochs, Elinor , Emaneul A. Schegloff & Sandra A. Thompson
    , eds. 1996Interaction and Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511620874
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620874 [Google Scholar]
  241. O’Connor, Joseph & Gordon Arnold
    1961Intonation of Colloquial English. London: Longmans.
    [Google Scholar]
  242. Ogden, Richard
    2001 “Turn Transition, Creak and Glottal Stop in Finnish Talk-in-Interaction”. Journal of the International Phonetic Association31. 139–152. doi: 10.1017/S0025100301001116
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025100301001116 [Google Scholar]
  243. 2003 “Voice Quality as a Resource for the Management of Turn-taking in Finnish Talk-in-Interaction”. Proceedings of the 15th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences , 123–126.
    [Google Scholar]
  244. 2004 “Non-Modal Voice Quality and Turn-taking in Finnish”. Couper-Kuhlen , & Ford 2004 29–62.
  245. 2009An Introduction to English Phonetics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  246. Ono, Tsuyoshi & Sandra A. Thompson
    1994 “Unattached NPs in English Conversation”. Berkeley Linguistics Society20. 402-419.
    [Google Scholar]
  247. 1995 “What Can Conversation Tell Us about Syntax?” Alternative Linguistics: Descriptive and Theoretical Modes, ed. by Phillip W. Davis , 213-271. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
  248. Palmer, Harold E
    1922English Intonation with Systematic Exercises. Cambridge: Heffer.
    [Google Scholar]
  249. Pierrehumbert, Janet
    1980 The Phonology and Phonetics of English Intonation. Ph.D. Dissertation, MIT.
    [Google Scholar]
  250. Pike, Kenneth L
    1945The Intonation of American English. Ann Arbor, Mich.: University of Michigan Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  251. Pomerantz, Anita M
    1984 “Agreeing and Disagreeing with Assessment: Some Features of Preferred/Dispreferred Turn Shapes”. Atkinson & Heritage 1984 57-101.
    [Google Scholar]
  252. Quirk, Randolph , Sidney Greenbaum , Geoffrey Leech & Jan Svartvik
    1985A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  253. Richards, Jack C ., John Platt & Heidi Platt
    1992Longman Dictionary of Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  254. Sacks, Harvey
    1984 “On Doing ‘Being Ordinary’”. Atkinson & Heritage 1984 413-429.
    [Google Scholar]
  255. 1992aLectures on Conversation, vol. I. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  256. 1992bLectures on Conversation, vol. II. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  257. Sacks, Harvey & Emaneul A. Schegloff
    2002 [1975]. “Home Position”. Gesture2:2. 133–146. doi: 10.1075/gest.2.2.02sac
    https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.2.2.02sac [Google Scholar]
  258. Sacks, Harvey , Emanuel A. Schegloff & Gail Jefferson
    1974 “A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-taking for Conversation”. Language50. 696–735. doi: 10.2307/412243
    https://doi.org/10.2307/412243 [Google Scholar]
  259. Scheflen, Albert E
    1964 “The Significance of Posture in Communication Systems”. Psychiatry27:4. 316-331.
    [Google Scholar]
  260. 1973Communicational Structure: Analysis of a Psychotherapy Transaction. Bloomington, Ind.: Indiana University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  261. Schegloff, Emanuel A
    1968 “Sequencing in Conversational Openings”. American Anthropologist70. 1075–1095. doi: 10.1525/aa.1968.70.6.02a00030
    https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1968.70.6.02a00030 [Google Scholar]
  262. 1979 “The Relevance of Repair for Syntax-for-Conversation”. Syntax and Semantics 12: Discourse and Syntax, ed. by Talmy Givón , 261–88. New York, NY.: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  263. 1980 “Preliminaries to Preliminaries: ‘Can I Ask You a Question?’”. Special double issue “Language and Social Interaction”, Sociological Inquiry50. 104–52. doi: 10.1111/j.1475‑682X.1980.tb00018.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-682X.1980.tb00018.x [Google Scholar]
  264. 1982 “Discourse as an Interactional Achievement: Some Uses of ‘Uh Huh’ and Other Things That Come between Sentences”. Analyzing Discourse: Text and Talk. Georgetown University Round Table on Languages and Linguistics, ed. by Deborah Tannen , 71-93. Washingtong, DC: Georgetown University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  265. 1984 “On Some Gestures’ Relation to Talk”. Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, ed. by Atkinson & Heritage 1984 266-296.
    [Google Scholar]
  266. 1987a “Analyzing Single Episodes of Conversation: An Exercise in Conversation Analysis”. Social Psychology Quarterly50. 101–114. doi: 10.2307/2786745
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2786745 [Google Scholar]
  267. 1987b “Recycled Turn Beginnings: A Precise Repair Mechanism in Conversation’s Turntaking Organisation”. Talk and Social Organisation, ed. by Button Graham & John Lee , 70–85. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
  268. 1988 “Goffman and the Analysis of Conversation”. Erving Goffman: Exploring the Interaction Order, ed. by Paul Drew & Anthony Wootton , 89–135. London: Polity.
    [Google Scholar]
  269. 1992 “Introduction”. Sacks 1992b ix-lxii.
  270. 1996a “Confirming Allusions: Toward an Empirical Account of Action”. Journal of Sociology102:1. 161-216.
    [Google Scholar]
  271. 1996b “Turn Organization: One Intersection of Grammar and Interaction”. Ochs, Schegloff & Thompson 1996 52–133.
    [Google Scholar]
  272. 1998a “Body Torque”. Social Research65:3. 535-596.
    [Google Scholar]
  273. 1998b “Reflections on Studying Prosody in Talk-in-Interaction”. Language and Speech41. 235–263.
    [Google Scholar]
  274. 1999 “Discourse, Pragmatics, Conversation, Analysis”. Discourse Studies1:4. 405–435. doi: 10.1177/1461445699001004002
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445699001004002 [Google Scholar]
  275. 2007Sequence Organization in Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511791208
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511791208 [Google Scholar]
  276. 2011 “Word Repeats as Unit Ends”. Discourse Studies13:3. 367-380. doi: 10.1177/1461445611402749
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445611402749 [Google Scholar]
  277. Schegloff, Emanuel A ., Gail Jefferson & Harvey Sacks
    1977 “The Peference for Self-Correction in the Organization of Repair in Conversation”. Language53:2. 361-382. doi: 10.1353/lan.1977.0041
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1977.0041 [Google Scholar]
  278. Schegloff, Emanuel A . & Harvey Sacks
    1973 “Opening Up Closings”. Semiotica8. 289-327. doi: 10.1515/semi.1973.8.4.289
    https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.1973.8.4.289 [Google Scholar]
  279. Schiffrin, Deborah
    1994Approaches to Discourse. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  280. Schmitt, Reinhold
    2005 “Zur multimodalen Struktur von Turn-Taking”. Geprächsforschung-Online Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion6. 17-61.
    [Google Scholar]
  281. Schönherr, Beatrix
    1997Syntax-Prosodie-nonverbale Kommunikation. Empirische Untersuchungen zur Interaktion sprachlicher und parasprachlicher Ausdrucksmittel im Gespräch. Tübingen:Niemeyer. doi: 10.1515/9783110926156
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110926156 [Google Scholar]
  282. Schwitalla, Johannes
    1979Dialogsteuerung in Interviews. Ansätze zu einer Theorie der Dialogsteuerung mit empirischen Untersuchungen von Politiker-, Experten- und Star-interviews in Rundfunk und Fernsehen. München: Hüber.
    [Google Scholar]
  283. Searle, John
    1969Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambrige University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139173438
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173438 [Google Scholar]
  284. 1975 “Indirect Speech Acts”. Syntax and Semantics, 3: Speech Acts, ed. by Peter Cole & Jerry L. Morgan , 59–82. New York, NY.: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  285. Selkirk, Elisabeth
    1984Phonology and Syntax: The Relation between Sound and Structure. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  286. Selting, Margret
    1992a “Prosody in Conversational Questions”. Journal of Pragmatics17. 315-345. doi: 10.1016/0378‑2166(92)90014‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(92)90014-3 [Google Scholar]
  287. 1992b “Intonation as a Contextualization Device: Case Studies on the Role of Prosody, Especially Intonation, in Contextualizing Story Telling in Conversation”. Auer & Di Luzio 1992 233–258.
    [Google Scholar]
  288. 1995aProsodie im Gespräch: Aspekte einer interaktionalen Phonologie der Konversation. Tübingen: Niemeyer. doi: 10.1515/9783110934717
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110934717 [Google Scholar]
  289. 1995b “Der ‘mögliche Satz’ als interaktiv relevante syntaktische Kategorie”. Linguistische Berichte158. 198-352.
    [Google Scholar]
  290. 1996 On the Interplay of Syntax and Prosody in the Constitution of Turn-Constructional Units and Turns in Conversation. Pragmatics6. 357–388.
    [Google Scholar]
  291. 2000 The Construction of Units in Conversational Talk. Language in Society29. 477-517. doi: 10.1017/S0047404500004012
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500004012 [Google Scholar]
  292. 2001 Fragments of Units as Deviant Cases of Unit-Production in Conversational Talk. Studies in Interactional Linguistics, ed. by Margret Selting & Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen , 229-258. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/sidag.10.12sel
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sidag.10.12sel [Google Scholar]
  293. 2005 Syntax and Prosody as Methods for the Construction and Identification of Turn-Constructional Units in Conversation. Syntax and Lexis in Conversation, ed. by Auli Hakulinen & Margret Selting , 17-44. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/sidag.17.04sel
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sidag.17.04sel [Google Scholar]
  294. 2010 “Prosody in Interaction: State of the Art”. Barth-Weingarten , Reber & Selting 2010 3-40.
    [Google Scholar]
  295. Selting, Margret , Peter Auer , Dagmar Barth-Weingarten , Jörg Bergmann , Pia Bergmann , Karin Birkner , Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen , Arnulf Deppermann , Peter Gilles , Susanne Günthner , Martin Hartung , Friederike Kern , Christine Mertzlufft , Christian Meyer , Miriam Morek , Frank Oberzaucher , Jörg Peters , Uta Quasthoff , Wilfried Schütte , Anja Stukenbrock , Susanne Uhmann1
    2009 “Gesprächsanalytisches Transkriptionssystem 2 (GAT 2) ”. Gesprächsforschung-Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion10. 353-402.
    [Google Scholar]
  296. Selting, Margret & Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen
    . eds. 2001Studies in Interactional Linguistics. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/sidag.10
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sidag.10 [Google Scholar]
  297. Shen, Jiong
    1985 “Beijinghua Shengdiao de Yinyu he Yudiao” [The Range of Tones and Intonation in Beijing Mandarin]. Beijing Yuyin Shiyanlu [Experimental Analyses on Beijing Mandarin] ed. by Tao Lin and Lijia Wang , 73-125. Beijing: Beijing University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  298. 1992 “Hanyu Yudiao Moxing Chuyi” [On the Pattern of Chinese Intonation]. Yuwen Yanjiu4. 16-24.
    [Google Scholar]
  299. 1994 “Hanyu Yudiao Gouzao he Yudiao Leixing” [Chinese Intonation Structure and Intonation Types]. Fangyan4. 221-229.
    [Google Scholar]
  300. Shen, Xiaonan Susan
    1990The Prosody of Mandarin Chinese. Berkeley, Calif.: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  301. Shi, Youwei
    1997Hanyu Rushiguan [Aspects of Chinese]. Beijing: Beijing Language and Culture University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  302. Shi, Yuzhi
    2001 “Hanyu de Zhuyu yu Huati zhi bian” [The Distinction between Subject and Topic in Chinese]. Yuyan Yanjiu2. 82-91.
    [Google Scholar]
  303. Shih, Chilin
    1997 “Declination in Mandarin Intonation: Theory, Models and Applications”. Proceedings of an ESCA Workshop, Athens, 18-20 September 1997ed. by Antonis Botinis , Georgios Kouroupetroglou & George Carayiannis , 293-296. Athens: ESCA and the University of Athens Department of Informatics.
    [Google Scholar]
  304. Sorjonen, Marja-Leena
    1996 “On Repeats and Responses in Finnish Conversation”. Ochs , Schegloff & Thompson 1996. 277-327.
    [Google Scholar]
  305. 2001aResponding in Conversation: A study of response particles in Finnish. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/pbns.70
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.70 [Google Scholar]
  306. 2001b “Simple Answers to Polar Questions: The Case of Finnish”. Selting & Couper-Kuhlen 2001 405-431.
  307. Spekman, Marloes
    2009Co-verbal Behavior in Turn-Taking: An Explorative Study into the Role of Co-Verbal Behavior in Turn-Taking in Conversations between Dutch Children between the ages of nine and twelve. MA thesis, VU University Amsterdam.
    [Google Scholar]
  308. Stivers, Tanya
    2008 “Stance, Alignment and Affiliation during Story Telling: When Nodding is a Token of Preliminary Affiliation”. Research on Language in Social Interaction41. 29-55. doi: 10.1080/08351810701691123
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351810701691123 [Google Scholar]
  309. Stivers, Tanya & Jack Sidnell
    2005 Introduction: Multimodal interaction. Semiotica156:1/4. 1-20. doi: 10.1515/semi.2005.2005.156.1
    https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.2005.2005.156.1 [Google Scholar]
  310. Streeck, Jürgen
    1984 “Embodied Contexts, Transcontextuals and the Timing of Speech Acts”. Journal of Pragmatics8. 113-137. doi: 10.1016/0378‑2166(84)90067‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(84)90067-5 [Google Scholar]
  311. 1993 “Gesture as Communication I: Its Coordination with Gaze and Speech”. Communication Monographs60. 275–299. doi: 10.1080/03637759309376314
    https://doi.org/10.1080/03637759309376314 [Google Scholar]
  312. 1994 “Gestures as Communication II: The Audience as Co-Author”. Research on Langauge and Social Interaction27:3. 223-238.
    [Google Scholar]
  313. 1995 “On Projection”. Social Intelligence and Interaction, ed. by Esther Goody , 87-110. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511621710.007
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511621710.007 [Google Scholar]
  314. 2007 “Geste und verstreichende Zeit. Innehalten und Bedeu- tungswandel der 'bietenden Hand'”. Gespräch als Prozess, ed. by Heiko Hausendorf , 157-180. Tübingen: Narr.
    [Google Scholar]
  315. 2008 Depicting by Gestures. Gesture8:3. 285–301. doi: 10.1075/gest.8.3.02str
    https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.8.3.02str [Google Scholar]
  316. 2009aGesturecraft: The Manu-Facture of Meaning. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/gs.2
    https://doi.org/10.1075/gs.2 [Google Scholar]
  317. 2009b Forward-Gesturing. Discourse Processes46:2. 161–179. doi: 10.1080/01638530902728793
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01638530902728793 [Google Scholar]
  318. Streeck, Jürgen , Charles Goodwin & Curtis D. LeBaron
    2011Embodied Interaction: Language and Body in the Material World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  319. Streeck, Jürgen & Ulrike Hartge
    1992 “Previews: Gestures at the Transition Place”. Auer & Di Luzio1992. 135-158.
    [Google Scholar]
  320. Sun, Chao-Fen & Talmy Givón
    1985 “On the So-Called SOV Word Order in Mandarin Chinese: A Quantified Text Study and Its Implications”. Language61. 329-351. doi: 10.2307/414148
    https://doi.org/10.2307/414148 [Google Scholar]
  321. Sweet, Henry
    1906A Primer of Phonetics. 2nd edition. Oxford: Claredon Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  322. Szczepek, Beatrice
    2000a “Formal Aspects of Collaborative Productions in English Conversation”. Interaction and Linguistic Structures (InLiSt)17. 1-34.
    [Google Scholar]
  323. 2000b “Functional Aspects of Collaborative Productions in English Conversation”. Interaction and Linguistic Structures (InLiSt)21. 1-36.
    [Google Scholar]
  324. Szczepek Reed, Beatrice
    2004 “Turn-final Intonation in English”. Couper-Kuhlen & Ford 2004 97-118.
  325. 2006Prosodic Orientation in English Conversation. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. doi: 10.1057/9780230625273
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230625273 [Google Scholar]
  326. 't Hart, Johan , Rene Collier & Antonie Cohen
    1990A Perceptual Study of Intonation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511627743
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511627743 [Google Scholar]
  327. Tai, H.-Y. James
    1976 “On the Change from SVO to SOV in Chinese”. Papers from the Parasession on Diachronic Syntax, Chicago Linguistic Society291-304. Chicago, Ill.: Chicago University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  328. Tan, Chunjian
    2004 “Juwei ‘le’ Goucheng de Juzhi Yuyi ji Yuyong Gongneng” [The Syntax, Semantics and Pragmatics of Sentence Ended on ‘le’]. Hanyu Xuexi2. 26-31.
    [Google Scholar]
  329. Tanaka, Hiroko
    1999Turn-Taking in Japanese Conversation: A Study in Grammar and Interaction. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
  330. 2000 “Turn-Projection in Japanese Talk-in-Interaction”. Research on Language and Social Interaction33:1. 1-38. doi: 10.1207/S15327973RLSI3301_1
    https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327973RLSI3301_1 [Google Scholar]
  331. Tao, Hongyin
    1996Units in Mandarin Conversation: Prosody, Discourse, and Grammar. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/sidag.5
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sidag.5 [Google Scholar]
  332. 1999 “Body Movement and Participant Alignment in Mandarin Conversational Interactions”. Papers from the 35th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, Vol. II: The Panels125-139. Chicago: The Chicago Linguistic Society.
    [Google Scholar]
  333. Tao, Liang , Barbara A. Fox & Jule Gómez de García
    1999 “Tone-Choice Repair in Conversational Mandarin Chinese”. Cognition and Function in Language, ed. by Barbara Fox , Dan Jurafsky & Laura A. Michaelis , 268-281. Stanford, Calif.: CSLI Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  334. Tarplee, Clare
    1989 “Confirmation and Repair: An Interactional Analysis of Redoing Sequences in Child-Adult Talk”. York Papers in Linguistics14. 279–296.
    [Google Scholar]
  335. Thompson, Sandra A . & Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen
    2005 “The Clause as a Locus of Grammar and Interaction”. Discourse Studies7. 481-505. doi: 10.1177/1461445605054403
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605054403 [Google Scholar]
  336. Thompson, Sandra A . & Barbara A Fox
    2010 “Responses to Wh-Questions in English Conversation”. Research on Language and Social Interaction43:2. 133-156. doi: 10.1080/08351811003751680
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351811003751680 [Google Scholar]
  337. Trager, George L . & Henry L. Smith
    1951An Outline of English Structure. New York: Johnson.
    [Google Scholar]
  338. Tsao, Feng-Fu
    1979A Functional Study of Topic: The First Step towards Discourse Analysis. Taipei: Student Book.
    [Google Scholar]
  339. Tsao, Wen-Yen
    1967 Question in Chinese. Journal of the Chinese Language Teachers Association2. 15-26.
    [Google Scholar]
  340. Tseng, Chiu-Yu
    2006 “Higher Level Organization and Discourse Prosody”. Paper presented at theSecond International Symposium on Tonal Aspects of Languages, La Rochelle, April 2006.
    [Google Scholar]
  341. Tseng, Chiu-Yu & Chun-Hsiang Chang
    2008 Pause or No Pause? – Prosodic Phrase Boundaries Revisited. Tsinghua Science and Technology13:4. 500-509. doi: 10.1016/S1007‑0214(08)70080‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S1007-0214(08)70080-4 [Google Scholar]
  342. Walker, Gareth
    2004a “On Some Interactional and Phonetic Properties of Increments to Turns in Talk-in-Interactio”. Couper-Kuhlen & Ford 2004 147–169
  343. 2004bThe Phonetic Design of Turn Endings, Beginnings, and Continuations in Conversation. PhD Dissertation, University of York.
    [Google Scholar]
  344. 2010 “The Phonetic Constitution of a Turn-Holding Practice: Rush-Rhroughs in English Talk-in-Interaction”. Barth-Weingarten , Reber & Selting 2010 51-72.
  345. Wang, Li
    1954[1947] Zhongguo Xiandai Yufa [Chinese Modern Grammar]. Beijing: Zhongguo Shuju.
    [Google Scholar]
  346. Wang, Maolin , Maocan Lin & Aijun Li
    2008 “Hanyu Ziran Duihua Yingao Yanjiu” [Pitch in Chinese Natural Conversation]. Shengxue Xuebao2. 97-101.
    [Google Scholar]
  347. Wang, Yin
    1999 “Zhuwei Zhuyu he Huati de Sibian” [Theme, Subject and Topic]. Waiyu Yanjiu3. 15-19.
    [Google Scholar]
  348. Wang, Yunjia
    2004 “Yingao he Shichang zai Hanyu Putonghua Qinsheng Zhijue zhong de Zuoyong” [The Effect of Pitch and Duration on the Perception of the Neutral Tone in Standard Chinese]. Shengxue Xuebao5. 453-461.
    [Google Scholar]
  349. Wells, Bill & John Local
    1993 “The Sense of an Ending: A Case of Prosodic Delay”. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics7. 59–73. doi: 10.3109/02699209308985544
    https://doi.org/10.3109/02699209308985544 [Google Scholar]
  350. Wells, Bill , John Local & Sarah Macfarlane
    1998 “Prosody as an Interactional Resource: Turn-Projection and Overlap”. Language and Speech41. 265–294.
    [Google Scholar]
  351. Wells, Bill , John Local & Sue Peppé
    1996 “Ending up in Ulster: Prosody and Turn-Taking in English Dialects”. Couper-Kuhlen & Selting 1996a 101–130.
  352. Wen, Lian
    1992 “Juzi de Lijie Celue” [Chinese Sentence Comprehension]. Zhongguo Yuwen4. 260-264.
    [Google Scholar]
  353. Wittgenstein, Ludwig
    1958Philosophical Investigations. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  354. Wu, Ruey-Jiuan, Regina
    1997 “Transforming Participation Frameworks in Multi-Party Mandarin Conversation: The Use of Discourse Particles and Body Behavior”. Issues in Applied Linguistics8:2. 97-117.
    [Google Scholar]
  355. 2004Stance in Talk: A Conversation Analysis of Mandarin Final Particles. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
  356. 2005 “‘There is More here than Meets the Eye!’: The Use of Final ou in Two Sequential Positions in Mandarin Chinese Conversation”. Journal of Pragmatics37:7. 967-995. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2004.12.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2004.12.006 [Google Scholar]
  357. 2006 “Initiating Repair and Beyond: The Use of Two Repeat-Formatted Repair Initiations in Mandarin Conversation”. Discourse Processes41:1. 67-109. doi: 10.1207/s15326950dp4101_5
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326950dp4101_5 [Google Scholar]
  358. Wu, Zongji
    1982 “Putonghua Yuju zhong de Shengdiao Bianhua” [Tonal Changes in Sentences in Standard Chinese]. Zhongguo Yuwen6. 439-449.
    [Google Scholar]
  359. 1990 “Hanyu Putonghua Yudiao de Jiben Diaoxing” [Basic Patterns of Intonation in Standard Chinese]. Wang Li Xiansheng Jinian Lunwenji. Beijing: Shangwu Yinshuguan.
    [Google Scholar]
  360. 1997 “Cong Shengdiao yu Yuelü de Guanxi Tichu Putonghua Yudiao Chuli de xin Fangfa” [A New Method of Mandarin Intoantion Processing]. Papers in Commemoration of the 45th Anniversity of Linguistics Institute of CASS243-258. Beijing: Shangwu Yinshuguan.
    [Google Scholar]
  361. Xiong, Ziyu & Maocan Lin
    2004 “‘A’ de Yunlv Tezheng jiqi Huayu Jiaoji Gongneng” [Prosodic Features of “a” and Their Conversational Communicative Functions] Dandai Yuyanxue2. 116-127.
    [Google Scholar]
  362. Xu, Liejiong & Danqing Liu
    1998Huati de Jiegou yu Gongneng [Structure and Function of Topic]. Shanghai: Shanghai Jiaoyu Chubanshe.
    [Google Scholar]
  363. Xu, Yulong
    1995Resolving Third-Person Anaphora in Chinese Texts: Towards a Functional-Pragmatic Model. PhD Dissertation. Hong Kong Polytechnic University.
    [Google Scholar]
  364. Zhang, Bojiang & Mei Fang
    1996Hanyu Gongneng Yufa Yanjiu [Functional Studies of Chinese Grammar]. Nanchang: Jiangxi Jiaoyu Chubanshe.
    [Google Scholar]
  365. Zhang, Wei
    1998Repair in Chinese Conversation. PhD Dissertation. University of Hong Kong.
    [Google Scholar]
  366. Zhu, Dexi
    1961 “Shuo ‘de’” [On de ]. Zhongguo Yuwen12. 1-15.
    [Google Scholar]
  367. 1978 “‘De’ zi Jiegou he Panduanju’ [The De-Construction and Assertives]. Zhongguo Yuwen2. 23-27.
    [Google Scholar]
  368. 1982Yufa Jiangyi [Lectures on Chinese grammar]. Beijing: Shangwu Yinshuguan.
    [Google Scholar]
  369. 1985Yufa Dawen [Grammar: Questions and answers]. Beijing: Shangwu Yinshuguan.
    [Google Scholar]
  370. 1999Zhu Dexi Wenji Dier Juan [Essays of Zhu Dexi] Vol. 2. Beijing: Shangwu Yinshuguan.
    [Google Scholar]
-contentType:Journal -contentType:Chapter
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error