Cognitive Grammar in Literature

image of Cognitive Grammar in Literature

This is the first book to present an account of literary meaning and effects drawing on our best understanding of mind and language in the form of a Cognitive Grammar. The contributors provide exemplary analyses of a range of literature from science fiction, dystopia, absurdism and graphic novels to the poetry of Wordsworth, Hopkins, Sassoon, Balassi, and Dylan Thomas, as well as Shakespeare, Chaucer, Barrett Browning, Whitman, Owen and others. The application of Cognitive Grammar allows the discussion of meaning, translation, ambience, action, reflection, multimodality, empathy, experience and literariness itself to be conducted in newly valid ways. With a Foreword by the creator of Cognitive Grammar, Ronald Langacker, and an Afterword by the cognitive scientist Todd Oakley, the book represents the latest advance in literary linguistics, cognitive poetics and literary critical practice.


  1. Ariel, M
    (1990)  Accessing Noun Phrase Antecedents . London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Atwood, M
    (1966)  The Circle Game . Toronto: Anansi Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. (1996)  The Handmaid’s Tale [original 1985]. London: Vintage.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Badran, D
    (2012) ‘Metaphor as argument: a stylistic genre-based approach’, Language and Literature 21 (2): 119–35. doi: 10.1177/0963947011435858
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0963947011435858 [Google Scholar]
  5. Balassi, B
    (1986)  Gyarmati Balassi Bálint Énekei [The songs of Bálint Balassi of Gyarmat] (eds P. Kőszeghy and G. Szabó ). Budapest: Szépirodalmi Könyvkiadó.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Bánhidi, Z. , Jókay, Z. and Szabó, D
    (1965)  Learn Hungarian . Budapest: Tankönyvkiadó.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Baldick, C
    (2004)  The Oxford Concise Dictionary of Literary Terms . Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Barańczak, S
    (2004)  Ocalone w tłumaczeniu: szkice o warsztacie tłumacza poezji z dodatkiem małej antologii przekładów problemów. Wydanie trzecie, poprawione i znacznie rozszerzone [Saved in Translation: Sketches from a Poetry Translator’s Workshop, with a Supplement]. Kraków: Wydawnictwo.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Barsalou, L
    (2008) ‘Grounded cognition’, Annual Review of Psychology 59: 617–65. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093639
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093639 [Google Scholar]
  10. (2009) ‘Simulation, situated conceptualization, and prediction’, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society 364: 1281–9. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2008.0319
    https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2008.0319 [Google Scholar]
  11. Barth, J.R
    (2003)  Romanticism and Transcendence: Wordsworth, Coleridge, and the Religious Imagination . Columbia: University of Missouri Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Barthes, R
    (1974) S/Z (trans. R. Miller ). New York: Hill and Wang.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. (1977) ‘The death of the author’, in Image–Music–Text (ed. and trans. S. Heath ). New York: Hill and Wang, pp. 142–8.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Bechdel, A
    (2006)  Fun Home: A Family Tragicomic . Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Bennett, E
    (2012) ‘Vincent’s bedroom in Arles’, Quill & Parchment 127 (January 2012) Online atwww.quillandparchment.com/archives/vol127.html
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Bergen, B. and Chang, N
    (2005) ‘Embodied construction grammar in simulation–based language understanding’, in J. östman and M. Fried (eds) Construction Grammars: Cognitive Grounding and Theoretical Extensions , Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp.147–90. doi: 10.1075/cal.3.08ber
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.3.08ber [Google Scholar]
  17. Blackhall, S
    (1989) ‘Vincent’s Bedroom in Arles, Painted 1888’, in Fite Doo/ Black Crow . Aberdeen: Keith Murray Publications 1989 Online atwww.poemhunter.com/poem/vincent-s-bedroom-in-arles-painted-1888/
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Boot, I. and Pecher, D
    (2010) ‘Similarity is closeness: metaphorical mapping in a conceptual task’, Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 63 (5): 942–54. doi: 10.1080/17470210903134351
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210903134351 [Google Scholar]
  19. (2011) ‘Representation of categories: metaphorical use of the container schema’, Experimental Psychology 58 (2): 162–70. doi: 10.1027/1618‑3169/a000082
    https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000082 [Google Scholar]
  20. Botting, F
    (1996)  Gothic . London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Bouson, J.B
    (1993)  Brutal Choreographies: Oppositional Strategies and Narrative Design in the Novels of Margaret Atwood . Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Bowdle, B. and Gentner, D
    (2005) ‘The career of metaphor’, Psychological Review 112 (1): 193–216. doi: 10.1037/0033‑295X.112.1.193
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.112.1.193 [Google Scholar]
  23. Bruhn, M.J
    (2008) ‘Fictive motion from Maine to Milton’, Paper presented at the9th Conference on Conceptual Structure, Discourse, and Language . Case Western University, Cleveland, October 2008.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Butler, C.S. and Gonzálvez-García, F
    (2005) ‘Situating FDG in functional-cognitive space: an initial study’, in J.L. Mackenzie and M. de los Ángeles Gómez-González (eds) Studies in Functional Discourse Grammar , Bern: Peter Lang, pp.109–58.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Byrne, R. and Johnson-Laird. P
    (2009) ‘“If” and the problems of conditional reasoning’, Trends in Cognitive Sciences 13 (7): 282–7. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2009.04.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2009.04.003 [Google Scholar]
  26. Cage, J
    (2011) ‘Vincent Van Gogh’s “Bedroom in the Yellow House At Arles”. Blue Door, Stage Left’. Online atjrc-sourwoodmountain.blogspot.com/2011/09/vincent-van-goghs-bedroom-in-yellow.html.
  27. Caesar, A
    (1993)  Taking it Like a Man: Suffering, Sexuality and the War Poets: Brooke, Sassoon, Owen, Graves . Manchester: Manchester University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Caink, A.D
    (2013) ‘Generative grammar and stylistics’, in V. Sotirova (ed.) Companion to Stylistics , London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Cameron, L
    (2007) ‘Patterns of metaphor in reconciliation talk’, Discourse and Society 18 (2): 197–224. doi: 10.1177/0957926507073376
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926507073376 [Google Scholar]
  30. Campbell, P
    (1999)  Siegfried Sassoon: A Study of the War Poetry . Jefferson: McFarland.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Carter, R. , Hughes, R. and McCarthy, M
    (2000)  Exploring Grammar in Context . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Casasanto, D. and Dijkstra, K
    (2010) ‘Motor action and emotional memory’, Cognition 115 (1): 179–85. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.11.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2009.11.002 [Google Scholar]
  33. Cervo, N
    (1981) ‘Catholic humanism in “The Windhover” and “God’s Grandeur”’, The Hopkins Quarterly 8 (1): 33–40.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Chafe, W
    (1994)  Discourse, Consciousness and Time: The Flow and Displacement of Conscious Experience in Speaking and Writing . Chicago: Chicago University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Chandler, J.K
    (1982) ‘Romantic allusiveness’, Critical Inquiry 8 (3): 461–87. doi: 10.1086/448165
    https://doi.org/10.1086/448165 [Google Scholar]
  36. Chaparro, A
    (2000) ‘Translating the untranslatable: Carroll, Carner and Alicia en Terra Catalana? Journal of Iberian and Latin American Studies 6 (1): 19–28. doi: 10.1080/13507490050020923
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13507490050020923 [Google Scholar]
  37. Charteris-Black, J
    (2004)  Corpus Approaches to Critical Metaphor Analysis . New York: Palgrave Macmillan. doi: 10.1057/9780230000612
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230000612 [Google Scholar]
  38. Clark, A
    (2011)  Supersizing the Mind: Embodiment, Action, and Cognitive Extension . Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. (2013) ‘Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of Cognitive Science’, Behavioural and Brain Sciences 36.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Cosgrove, P
    (2004) ‘Hopkins’s “The Windhover”: not ideas about the thing but the thing itself’, Poetics Today 25 (3): 437–64. doi: 10.1215/03335372‑25‑3‑437
    https://doi.org/10.1215/03335372-25-3-437 [Google Scholar]
  41. Crisp, P
    (1996) ‘Imagism’s metaphors – a test case’, Language and Literature 5 (2): 79–92. doi: 10.1177/096394709600500201
    https://doi.org/10.1177/096394709600500201 [Google Scholar]
  42. Croft, W
    (2001)  Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic Theory in Typological Perspective . Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198299554.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198299554.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  43. Croft, W. and Cruse, D.A
    ( 2004)  Cognitive Linguistics . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511803864
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511803864 [Google Scholar]
  44. Culler, J
    (1997)  Literary Theory: A Very Short Introduction . Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. (2002)  Structuralist Poetics: Structuralism, Linguistics, and the Study of Literature (2nd edn). London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Cupchik, G. , Oatley, K. and Vorderer, P
    (1998) ‘Emotional effects of reading excerpts from short stories by James Joyce’, Poetics 25 (6): 363–77. doi: 10.1016/S0304‑422X(98)90007‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-422X(98)90007-9 [Google Scholar]
  47. Croft, W
    (2001)  Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic Theory in Typological Perspective . Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198299554.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198299554.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  48. Dancygier, B
    (2012)  The Language of Stories: A Cognitive Approach . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Dancygier, B. and Sweetser, E
    (2005)  Mental Spaces in Grammar . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511486760
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486760 [Google Scholar]
  50. Das, S
    (2005)  Touch and Intimacy in First World War Literature . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. (2007) ‘War poetry and the realm of the senses: Owen and Rosenberg’, in T. Kendall (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of British and Irish War Poetry , Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Davidson, A
    (1988) ‘Future tense: making history in The Handmaid’s Tale’, in K. van Spanckeren and J. Garden Castro (eds) Margaret Atwood: Vision and Forms, Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, pp. 113–21.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Davis, S
    (1984)  Wordsworth and the Picturesque (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Florida.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Davies, M
    (2004)  British National Corpus . Provo: Bingham Young University.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Declerck, R. and Reed, S
    (2001)  Conditionals: A Comprehensive Empirical Analysis . Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110851748
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110851748 [Google Scholar]
  56. de Jong, J
    (2003) ‘Word processing in the Italian Renaissance: action and reaction with pen and paintbrush’, Visual Resources 19 (4): 259–81. doi: 10.1080/0197376032000143158
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0197376032000143158 [Google Scholar]
  57. Dempsey, D
    (2013) ‘Little Girl Lost in Vincent’s Bedroom’. Online atwww.poemhunter.com/poem/little-girl-lost-in-vincent-s-bedroom/.
  58. DeNicola, D
    (2004) ‘Van Gogh’s Room’, Ekphrasis 3 (4): 17–18. Online atwww.poemhunter.com/poem/van-gogh-s-room/
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Dennett, D
    (1981) ‘Three kinds of intentional psychology’, in R. Healy (ed.) Reduction, Time, and Reality, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.37–61.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Diller, H.-J
    (2012) ‘Historical semantics, corpora and the unity of English studies’, in M. Fludernnik and B. Kohlmann (eds) Anglistentag 2001 Freiburg. Proceedings, Trier: Wissenschaftlige Verlag, pp.321–37.
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Dollar, M
    (2004) ‘Ghost imagery in the war poems of Siegfried Sassoon’, War, Literature and the Arts 16 (1/2): 235–45.
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Doloughan, F
    (2011)  Contemporary Narrative: Textual Production, Multimodality and Multiliteracies . London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Downes, A.D
    (1993) ‘Hopkins’s epiphanic imagination’, in E. Hollahan (ed.) Gerard Manley Hopkins and Critical Discourse , New York: AMS, pp.117–36.
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Downes, W
    (2000) ‘The language of felt experience: emotional, evaluative and intuitive’, Language and Literature 9 (2): 99–121. doi: 10.1177/096394700000900201
    https://doi.org/10.1177/096394700000900201 [Google Scholar]
  65. Dowty, D
    (1991) ‘Thematic proto-roles and argument selection’, Language 67: 574–619. doi: 10.1353/lan.1991.0021
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1991.0021 [Google Scholar]
  66. Dvorak, M
    (1998) ‘What is real/reel? Margaret Atwood’s “Rearrangement of shapes on a flat surface” or narrative as collage’, Etudes Anglaises 51 (4): 448–60.
    [Google Scholar]
  67. Dworak, K. /[ Carroll, L. ]
    (2010)  Lewis Carroll Alicja w Krainie Czarów . Warszawa: Buchmann.
    [Google Scholar]
  68. Eagleton, T
    (2007)  How to Read a Poem . Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  69. Easthope, A
    (1985) ‘The problem of polysemy and identity in the literary text’, British Journal of Aesthetics 25 (4): 326–39. doi: 10.1093/bjaesthetics/25.4.326
    https://doi.org/10.1093/bjaesthetics/25.4.326 [Google Scholar]
  70. Edgecombe, R.S
    (1994) ‘The bow-bend in Hopkins’s “Windhover”’, Notes and Queries 41 (3): 357–8.
    [Google Scholar]
  71. Ehrlich, S
    (1990)  Point of View. A Linguistic Analysis of Literary Style . New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  72. Eilenberg, S
    (1992)  Strange Power of Speech: Wordsworth, Coleridge, and Literary Possession . Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  73. Emmott, C
    (1997)  Narrative Comprehension: A Discourse Perspective . Oxford: Clarendon Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  74. Enkvist, N.E
    (1981) ‘Experiential iconicism in text strategy’, Text 1: 77–111. doi: 10.1515/text.1.1981.1.1.97
    https://doi.org/10.1515/text.1.1981.1.1.97 [Google Scholar]
  75. Evans, V
    (2004)  The Structure of Time: Language, Meaning and Temporal Cognition . Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1515/COG.2006.016
    https://doi.org/10.1515/COG.2006.016 [Google Scholar]
  76. (2006) ‘Lexical concepts, cognitive models and meaning-construction’, Cognitive Linguistics 17 (4): 491–534. doi: 10.1515/COG.2006.016
    https://doi.org/10.1515/COG.2006.016 [Google Scholar]
  77. (2009)  How Words Mean: Lexical Concepts, Cognitive Models and Meaning Construction . Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  78. (2010) ‘Figurative language understanding in LCCM theory’, Cognitive Linguistics 24 (4): 601–62.
    [Google Scholar]
  79. Evans, V. and Green, M
    (2006)  Cognitive Linguistics: An Introduction . Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  80. Evans, V. and Tyler, A
    (2004) ‘Rethinking English “prepositions of movement”: the case of to and through’, Belgium Journal of Linguistics 18: 247–70. doi: 10.1075/bjl.18.13eva
    https://doi.org/10.1075/bjl.18.13eva [Google Scholar]
  81. Fauconnier, G
    (1994)  Mental Spaces: Aspects of Meaning Construction in Natural Language [original Espaces Mentaux, 1985] New York: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511624582
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511624582 [Google Scholar]
  82. (1997)  Mappings in Thought and Language . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139174220
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139174220 [Google Scholar]
  83. Fauconnier, G. and Sweetser, E
    (eds) (1996)  Spaces, Worlds, and Grammar . Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  84. Fauconnier, G. and Turner, M
    (2002)  The Way We Think. Conceptual Blending and the Mind’s Hidden Complexities . New York: Basic Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  85. Fillmore, C.J. and Kay, P
    (1995)  Construction Grammar . Manuscript: University of California, Berkeley.
    [Google Scholar]
  86. Fillmore, C.J. , Kay, P. and O’Connor, M.K
    (1988) ‘Regularity and idiomacity in grammatical constructions: the case of let alone’, Language 64: 501–38. doi: 10.2307/414531
    https://doi.org/10.2307/414531 [Google Scholar]
  87. Fludernik, M
    (1996)  Towards a ‘Natural’ Narratology . London: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9780203432501
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203432501 [Google Scholar]
  88. Forceville, C
    (2009) ‘Non-verbal and multimodal metaphor in a cognitivist framework: agendas for research’, in C. Forceville and E. Urios-Aparisi (eds) Multimodal Metaphor , Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp.19–42. doi: 10.4324/9780203432501
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203432501 [Google Scholar]
  89. Fowler, R
    (1977)  Linguistics and the Novel . London: Methuen.
    [Google Scholar]
  90. Freedman, A
    (2009) ‘Drawing on Modernism in Alison Bechdel’s Fun Home’ , Journal of Modern Literature 32: 125–40. doi: 10.2979/JML.2009.32.4.125
    https://doi.org/10.2979/JML.2009.32.4.125 [Google Scholar]
  91. Freeman, M
    (2006) ‘The fall of the wall between literary studies and linguistics: cognitive poetics’, in G. Kristiansen , M. Achard , R. Dirven , F.J. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibanez (eds) Cognitive Linguistics: Current Applications and Future Perspectives , Berlin: Mouton de Gryuter, pp.403–28.
    [Google Scholar]
  92. Frosch, C. and Byrne, R
    (2012) ‘Causal conditionals and counterfactuals’, Acta Psychologica 141: 54–66. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2012.07.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2012.07.001 [Google Scholar]
  93. Fussell, P
    (1975)  The Great War and Modern Memory . New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  94. Gallet, R
    (1991) ‘“The Windhover” and God’s first intention ad extra’, in P. Bottalla , G. Marra and F. Marucci (eds) Gerard Manley Hopkins: Tradition and Innovation , Ravenna: Longo Editore, pp.55–68.
    [Google Scholar]
  95. Gardner, M
    (ed.) (1960)  The Annotated Alice: Alice’s Adventures in the Wonderland and Through the Looking Glass . London: Penguin.
    [Google Scholar]
  96. (2000) ‘Introduction’, in Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland and Through the Looking Glass , New York: Signet, pp.v–x.
    [Google Scholar]
  97. Gardner, W.H
    (2008) ‘Introduction’, Poems and Prose by Gerard Manley Hopkins . London: Penguin.
    [Google Scholar]
  98. Gardner, W.H. and Mackenzie, N.H
    (eds) (1967)  The Poems of Gerard Manley Hopkins (4th edn). London: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  99. Gavins, J
    (2005) ‘(Re)thinking modality: a text-world perspective’, Journal of Literary Semantics 34 (2): 79–93. doi: 10.1515/jlse.2005.34.2.79
    https://doi.org/10.1515/jlse.2005.34.2.79 [Google Scholar]
  100. (2007)  Text World Theory: An Introduction . Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. doi: 10.3366/edinburgh/9780748622993.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9780748622993.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  101. Gavins, J. and Stockwell, P
    (2012) ‘About the heart, where it hurt exactly, and how often’, Language and Literature 21 (3): 33–50. doi: 10.1177/0963947011432052
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0963947011432052 [Google Scholar]
  102. Genette, G
    (1972)  Figures III . Paris: Editions du Seuil.
    [Google Scholar]
  103. (1980)  Narrative Discourse: An Essay in Method . Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  104. (1988)  Narrative Discourse Revisited . Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  105. (2002) ‘Order, duration and frequency’in B. Richardson (ed.) Narrative Dynamics: Essays on Time, Plot, Closure and Frame, Columbus: Ohio State University Press, pp.25–34.
    [Google Scholar]
  106. Gentner, D
    (1983) ‘Structure mapping: a theoretical framework for analogy’, Cognitive Science 7: 155–70. doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog0702_3
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog0702_3 [Google Scholar]
  107. Gentner, D. and Markman, A
    (1997) ‘Structure mapping in analogy and similarity’, American Psychologist 52 (3): 45–56. doi: 10.1037/0003‑066X.52.1.45
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.52.1.45 [Google Scholar]
  108. Gibbons, A
    (2012)  Multimodality, Cognition, and Experimental Literature . New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  109. Gibbs, R
    (1994)  The Poetics of Mind: Figurative Thought, Language and Understanding . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  110. (2002a) ‘Feeling moved by metaphor’in S. Csabi and J. Zerkowitz (eds) Textual Secrets: The Message of the Medium , Budapest, ELTE, pp.13–28.
    [Google Scholar]
  111. (2002b) ‘A new look at literal meaning in understanding what is said and implicated’, Journal of Pragmatics 34: 457–86. doi: 10.1016/S0378‑2166(01)00046‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(01)00046-7 [Google Scholar]
  112. (2006) ‘Metaphor interpretation as embodied simulation’, Mind and Language 21: 434–58. doi: 10.1111/j.1468‑0017.2006.00285.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0017.2006.00285.x [Google Scholar]
  113. (2011a) ‘Are “deliberate” metaphors really deliberate?: a question of human consciousness and action’, Metaphor and the Social World 1 (1): 26–52. doi: 10.1075/msw.1.1.03gib
    https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.1.1.03gib [Google Scholar]
  114. (2011b) ‘Advancing the debate on deliberate metaphor’, Metaphor and the Social World 1 (1): 67–9. doi: 10.1075/msw.1.1.07gib
    https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.1.1.07gib [Google Scholar]
  115. Gilpin, W
    (1802)  An Essay on Prints . London: Cadell & Davies.
    [Google Scholar]
  116. Glucksberg, S
    (2003) ‘The psycholinguistics of metaphor’, Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7 (2): 92–6. doi: 10.1016/S1364‑6613(02)00040‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(02)00040-2 [Google Scholar]
  117. Glucksberg, S. and Haught, C
    (2006) ‘On the relation between metaphor and simile: when comparison fails’, Mind and Language 21 (3): 360–78. doi: 10.1111/j.1468‑0017.2006.00282.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0017.2006.00282.x [Google Scholar]
  118. Glucksberg, S. and Keysar, B
    (1990) ‘Understanding metaphor comparisons: beyond similarity’, Psychological Review 97 (1): 3–18. doi: 10.1037/0033‑295X.97.1.3
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.97.1.3 [Google Scholar]
  119. Goatly, A
    (2007)  Washing the Brain: Metaphor and Hidden Ideology . Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/dapsac.23
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.23 [Google Scholar]
  120. Goldberg, A.E
    (1995)  Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure . Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  121. Goldberg, A
    (1996)  Conceptual Structure, Discourse and Language . Stanford: CSLI Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  122. Gomes, G
    (2008) ‘Three types of conditionals and their verb forms in English and Portuguese’, Cognitive Linguistics 19 (2): 219–40. doi: 10.1515/COG.2008.009
    https://doi.org/10.1515/COG.2008.009 [Google Scholar]
  123. Gonzálvez-García, F. and Butler, C.S
    (2006) ‘Mapping functional-cognitive space’, Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics 4: 39–96. doi: 10.1075/arcl.4.04gon
    https://doi.org/10.1075/arcl.4.04gon [Google Scholar]
  124. Grady, J
    (1997)  Foundations of Meaning: Primary Metaphors and Primary Scenes . (Unpublished doctoral thesis). University of California, Berkeley.
    [Google Scholar]
  125. (2004) ‘Primary metaphors as inputs to conceptual integration’, Journal of Pragmatics 37 (10): 1595–614. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2004.03.012
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2004.03.012 [Google Scholar]
  126. Grayson, S.A
    (2010) ‘Core texts and context: reading poems of World War 1 in 2005–2006’, in P.T. Flynn , J-M. Kauth , J.K. Doyle and J. Scott Lee (eds) Substance, Judgment and Evaluation: Seeking the Value of a Liberal Arts, Core Text Education. Selected Papers from the Twelfth Annual Conference of the Association for Core Texts and Courses , Lanham: University Press of America.
    [Google Scholar]
  127. Green, K
    (ed.) (1995)  New Essays in Deixis . Amsterdam: Rodopi.
    [Google Scholar]
  128. Greimas, A.-J
    (1971) ‘Narrative grammar: units and levels’, Modern Language Notes 86: 793–806. doi: 10.2307/2907443
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2907443 [Google Scholar]
  129. (1976)  Maupassant: La sémiotique du texte: Exercises pratiques . Paris: Seuil.
    [Google Scholar]
  130. Greimas, A.-J. and Courtés, J
    (1993)  Sémiotique: Dictionnaire raisonné de la théorie du langage [original 1979]. Paris: Hachette.
    [Google Scholar]
  131. Haiman, J
    (1978) ‘Conditionals are topics’, Language 54: 512–40. doi: 10.1353/lan.1978.0009
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1978.0009 [Google Scholar]
  132. Hakemulder, J
    (2004) ‘Foregrounding and its effects on readers’ perception’, Discourse Processes 38: 193–208. doi: 10.1207/s15326950dp3802_3
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326950dp3802_3 [Google Scholar]
  133. Halliday, M.A.K.
    (1971) ‘Linguistic function and literary style: an inquiry into the language of William Golding’s The Inheritors’, in S. Chatman (ed.) Literary Style: A Symposium , Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.330–68.
    [Google Scholar]
  134. Halliday, M.A.K. and Matthiessen, C.M.I.M
    (2004)  An Introduction to Functional Grammar (3rd edn). London: Arnold.
    [Google Scholar]
  135. Hamilton, C
    (2003) ‘A Cognitive Grammar of “Hospital Barge” by Wilfred Owen’, in J. Gavins and G. Steen (eds) Cognitive Poetics in Practice , London: Routledge, pp.55–65.
    [Google Scholar]
  136. Harbus, A
    (2012)  Cognitive Approaches to Old English Poetry . Cambridge: D.S Brewer.
    [Google Scholar]
  137. Harding, J.R
    (2011) ‘“He had never written a word of that”: regret and counterfactuals in Hemingway’s “The Snows of Kilimanjaro”’, Hemingway Review 30 (2): 21–35. doi: 10.1353/hem.2011.0024
    https://doi.org/10.1353/hem.2011.0024 [Google Scholar]
  138. Harrison, C
    (2013)  Cognitive Discourse Grammar in Contemporary Literature (Unpublished doctoral thesis). University of Nottingham.
    [Google Scholar]
  139. Harrison, C. and Stockwell, P
    (2013) ‘Cognitive poetics’, in J. Littlemore and J. Taylor (eds) Companion to Cognitive Linguistics . London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  140. Hart, C
    (2010)  Critical Discourse Analysis and Cognitive Science . Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. doi: 10.1057/9780230299009
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230299009 [Google Scholar]
  141. Hatlen, B
    (1989) ‘Kinesis and meaning: Charles Olson’s “The Kingfishers” and the critics’, Contemporary Literature 30: 546–72. doi: 10.2307/1208615
    https://doi.org/10.2307/1208615 [Google Scholar]
  142. Heffernan, J
    (1993)  Museum of Words: The Poetics of Ekphrasis from Homer to Ashbery . Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  143. Hejwowski, K
    (2007)  Kognitywno- komunikacyjna teoria przekładu . Warszawa: PWN.
    [Google Scholar]
  144. Herman, D
    (2002)  Story Logic . Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  145. (2009a) ‘Beyond voice and vision: Cognitive Grammar and focalization theory’, in P. Hühn , W. Schmid and J. Schönert (eds) Point of View, Perspective, and Focalization: Modeling Mediation in Narrative , Berlin: de Gruyter, pp.119–42.
    [Google Scholar]
  146. (2009b) ‘Cognitive approaches to narrative analysis’, in G. Brône and J. Vandaele (eds) Cognitive Poetics: Goals, Gains and Gaps . Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp.79–118.
    [Google Scholar]
  147. Hirata, T
    (2011) ‘Van Gogh’s Bedroom as I See It’ (transl. Jeffrey Angles ), Action Yes 1 (15) (Winter 2011) Online atactionyes.org/issue15/hirata/
    [Google Scholar]
  148. Hobbs, J.R
    (1990)  Literature and Cognition . Stanford: CSLI Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  149. Hoeken, H. and van Vliet, M
    (2000) ‘Suspense, curiosity and surprise: how discourse structure influences the affective and cognitive processing of a story’, Poetics 27 (4): 277–86. doi: 10.1016/S0304‑422X(99)00021‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-422X(99)00021-2 [Google Scholar]
  150. Hoey, M
    (2005)  Lexical Priming: A New Theory of Words and Language . London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  151. (2013) ‘Lexical priming’, in C.A. Chapelle (ed.) The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics , Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  152. Holloway, M.M
    (1993) ‘An approach to Hopkins through the game motif’, in E. Hollahan (ed.) Gerard Manley Hopkins and Critical Discourse , New York: AMS, pp.197–210.
    [Google Scholar]
  153. Hopkins, G.M
    (1918)  Poems (ed. R. Bridges ). London: Humphrey Milford.
    [Google Scholar]
  154. Horn, L
    (2000) ‘From if to iff: conditional perfection as pragmatic strengthening’, Journal of Pragmatics 32: 289–326. doi: 10.1016/S0378‑2166(99)00053‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00053-3 [Google Scholar]
  155. House, H. and Storey, G
    (eds) (1959)  The Journals and Papers of Gerard Manley Hopkins . London: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  156. Howells, C.A
    (2005)  Margaret Atwood (2nd edn). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
  157. Hugh-Moore, L
    (1969) ‘Siegfried Sassoon and Georgian Realism’ Twentieth Century Literature 14 (4): 199–209. doi: 10.2307/440596
    https://doi.org/10.2307/440596 [Google Scholar]
  158. IFLA
    (1998)  Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records – Final Report . International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions. Available: archive.ifla.org/VII/s13/frbr/frbr1.htm
    [Google Scholar]
  159. Ingpen, R
    (2009) ‘Od ilustratora’, in L. l , Alicja w Krainie Czarów . Warszawa: Buchmann.
    [Google Scholar]
  160. Ishiguro, K
    (2005)  Never Let Me Go . London: Faber and Faber.
    [Google Scholar]
  161. Jansen, L. , Luijten, H. and Bakker, N
    (eds) (2009)  Vincent Van Gogh – The Letters . Vol. 4: Arles 1888–1889. New York and London: Thames and Hudson, in conjunction with Van Gogh Museum and the Huygens Institute.
    [Google Scholar]
  162. Jaworski, S
    (2000)  Podręczny słownik terminów literackich . Kraków: Universitas.
    [Google Scholar]
  163. Jeffries, L
    (2000) ‘Don’t throw out the baby with the bathwater: in defence of theoretical eclecticism in stylistics’, PALA Occasional Papers 12.
    [Google Scholar]
  164. Jibson, D
    (2012) ‘Vincent’. Online atekphrasispoems.tumblr.com/vincent
  165. Johnson-Laird, P
    (1983)  Mental Models: Towards a Cognitive Science of Language, Inference and Consciousness . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  166. Johnson, M
    (1987)  The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason . Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  167. Johnson, S
    (1990) ‘The life of Cowley’, in D. Greene (ed.) Samuel Johnson , Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 677–97.
    [Google Scholar]
  168. Jones, J
    (1954)  The Egotistical Sublime: A History of Wordsworth’s Imagination . London: Chatto and Windus.
    [Google Scholar]
  169. Kaiser, R
    (2007) ‘Unity in the valley: transcendence and contiguity in Wordsworth’s “Tintern Abbey”’, Limina 13: 45–53.
    [Google Scholar]
  170. Kames, H.H
    (2005)  Elements of Criticism (ed. P. Jones , 6th edn) [original 1762]. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.
    [Google Scholar]
  171. Kant, B. /[ Carroll, L. ]
    (2010) Lewis Carroll Alicja w Krainie Czarów . Poznań: Vesper.
    [Google Scholar]
  172. Kant, I
    (2007)  Critique of Judgement (trans. J.C. Meredith ) [original 1790]. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  173. Kaufman, G
    (1972)  God, the Problem . Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  174. Kaufmann, S
    (2006) ‘Conditionals’, in K. Brown (ed.) Elsevier Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics (2nd edn), Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp.6–10.
    [Google Scholar]
  175. Kay, P. and Fillmore, C
    (1999) ‘Grammatical constructions and linguistic generalisations: the what’s doing X to Y? construction’, Language 75 (1): 1–33. doi: 10.2307/417472
    https://doi.org/10.2307/417472 [Google Scholar]
  176. Kenesei, I. , Vago, R.M. and Fenyvesi, A
    (1998)  Hungarian . London: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9780203192238
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203192238 [Google Scholar]
  177. Kenner, H
    (1967) ‘Artemis and Harlequin: review of The Complete Poems of Marianne Moore, The National Review 19, December26th 1967, p.1432–3.
    [Google Scholar]
  178. Kirk, D.F
    (1962)  Charles Dodgson Semeiotician (University of Florida Monographs, No. 11). Gainesville: University of Florida.
    [Google Scholar]
  179. Klaniczay, T
    (ed.) (1985)  Pallas Magyar ivadékai Budapest: Szépirodalmi Könyvkiadó.
    [Google Scholar]
  180. Koller, V
    (2005) ‘Critical Discourse Analysis and social cognition: evidence from business media discourse’, Discourse and Society 16 (2): 199–224. doi: 10.1177/0957926505049621
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926505049621 [Google Scholar]
  181. Koller, V. and Davidson, P
    (2008) ‘Social exclusion as conceptual and grammatical metaphor: a cross-genre study of British policy making’, Discourse and Society 19 (3): 307–31. doi: 10.1177/0957926508088963
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926508088963 [Google Scholar]
  182. Kőszeghy, P
    (2008)  Balassi Bálint: Magyar Alkibiadész . Budapest: Balassi Kiadó.
    [Google Scholar]
  183. Kozak, J. /[ Carroll, L. ]
    (1997) Lewis Carroll Przygody Alicji w Krainie Czarów . Warszawa: Czytelnik.
    [Google Scholar]
  184. Kuiken, D. and Miall, D.S
    (1994) ‘Foregrounding, defamiliarisation and affect: response to literary stories’, Poetics 22: 389–407. doi: 10.1016/0304‑422X(94)00011‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-422X(94)00011-5 [Google Scholar]
  185. Kuiken, D. , Miall, D.S. and Sikora, S
    (2004) ‘Forms of self implication in literary reading,’ Poetics Today , 25 (2): 171–203. doi: 10.1215/0333537225‑2‑171
    https://doi.org/10.1215/0333537225-2-171 [Google Scholar]
  186. Labov, W
    (1972)  Language in the Inner City . Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  187. Lacayo, R. and Grossman, L
    (2006) ‘10 Best Books’, Time [Online]. Available: www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1570801,00.html
    [Google Scholar]
  188. Lakoff, G
    (1987)  Women, Fire and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal About the Mind . Chicago: University of Chicago Press. doi: 10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  189. (1993) ‘The contemporary theory of metaphor.’, in A. Ortony (ed.) Metaphor and Thought (2nd edn), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 202–51. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139173865.013
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173865.013 [Google Scholar]
  190. Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M
    (1980)  Metaphors We Live By . Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  191. (1999)  Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and its Challenge to Western Thought . Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  192. Lakoff, G. and Turner, M
    (1989)  More Than Cool Reason: A Field Guide to Poetic Metaphor . Chicago: University of Chicago Press. doi: 10.7208/chicago/9780226470986.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226470986.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  193. Langacker, R.W
    (1987)  Foundations of Cognitive Grammar Vol. 1: Theoretical Prerequisites . Stanford: Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  194. (1991a)  Concept, Image, Symbol: The Cognitive Basis of Grammar . New York: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110857733
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110857733 [Google Scholar]
  195. (1991b)  Foundations of Cognitive Grammar , vol. II: Descriptive Application. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  196. (1993) ‘Grammatical traces of some “invisible” semantic constructs’, Language Sciences 15: 323–55. doi: 10.1016/0388‑0001(93)90008‑G
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0388-0001(93)90008-G [Google Scholar]
  197. (1994) ‘The limits of continuity: discreteness in cognitive semantics’, in C. Fuchs and B. Victorri (eds) Continuity in Linguistic Semantics , Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 9–20. doi: 10.1075/lis.19.03lan
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lis.19.03lan [Google Scholar]
  198. (1995) ‘Viewing and cognition in grammar’, in P.W. Davis (ed.) Alternative Linguistics: Descriptive and Theoretical Modes , Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 153–212.
    [Google Scholar]
  199. (1999)  Grammar and Conceptualization . Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110800524
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110800524 [Google Scholar]
  200. (2000) ‘A dynamic usage-based model’, in M. Barlow and S. Kemmer (eds) Usage-Based Models of Language , Stanford: CSLI, pp. 1–64.
    [Google Scholar]
  201. (2001) ‘Discourse in Cognitive Grammar’, Cognitive Linguistics 12 (2): 143–88. doi: 10.1515/cogl.12.2.143
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.12.2.143 [Google Scholar]
  202. (2002)  Concept, Image and Symbol: The Cognitive Basis of Grammar (2nd edn). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  203. (2005) ‘Construction Grammars: Cognitive, Radical, and less so’, in M. Ibáñez , F.J. Ruiz and S. Peña Cervel (eds) Cognitive Linguistics: Internal Dynamics and Interdisciplinary Interaction , Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 101–59.
    [Google Scholar]
  204. (2007a) ‘Cognitive Grammar’, in D. Geeraerts and H. Cuyckens (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics . Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 421–62.
    [Google Scholar]
  205. (2007b) ‘Constructing the meaning of personal pronouns’in G. Radden , K-M. Kopcke , T. Berg and P. Siemund (eds) Aspects of Meaning Construction , Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 171–88.
    [Google Scholar]
  206. (2008a)  Cognitive Grammar: A Basic Introduction . New York: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331967.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331967.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  207. (2008b) ‘Sequential and summary scanning: a reply’, Cognitive Linguistics 19 (4): 571–84. doi: 10.1515/COGL.2008.022
    https://doi.org/10.1515/COGL.2008.022 [Google Scholar]
  208. (2009)  Investigations in Cognitive Grammar . Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110214369
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110214369 [Google Scholar]
  209. (2010) ‘Control and the mind/body duality: knowing vs. effecting’, in E. Tabakowska , M. Choiński and Ł. Wiraszka (eds) Cognitive Linguistics in Action. From Theory to Application and Back , Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 163–208.
    [Google Scholar]
  210. Larsson, S
    (2009) ‘Review of Conditionals in Context by Christopher Gauker (MIT Press, 2005)’, Language 85 (1): 201–203. doi: 10.1353/lan.0.0089
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.0.0089 [Google Scholar]
  211. Lausberg, H
    (1998)  Handbook of Literary Rhetoric: A Foundation for Literary Study (trans. M.T. Bliss , A. Jansen and D.E. Orton , eds D.E. Orton and R.D. Anderson ). Leiden: Brill.
    [Google Scholar]
  212. Leech, G. , Rayson, P. and Wilson. A
    (2001)  Word Frequencies in Written and Spoken English . London: Longman [see alsoucrel.lancs.ac.uk/bncfreq/]
    [Google Scholar]
  213. Leech, G. and Short, M
    (2007)  Style in Fiction: a Linguistic Introduction to English Fictional Prose (2nd edn). Harlow: Pearson Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  214. Lees, F.N
    (1950) ‘The Windhover’, Scrutiny 16 (1): 36.
    [Google Scholar]
  215. Levenston, E.A. and Sonnenshein, G
    (1986) ‘The translation of point of view in fictional narrative’, in J. House and S. Blum-Kulka (eds) Interlingual and Intercultural Communication , Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag, pp. 49–59.
    [Google Scholar]
  216. Levy, L.B
    (1966) ‘Hawthorne and the sublime’, American Literature 37 (4): 391–402. doi: 10.2307/2923134
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2923134 [Google Scholar]
  217. Liu, A
    (1984) ‘Wordsworth: the history in “imagination”’, ELH41 (3): 505–48. doi: 10.2307/2872936
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2872936 [Google Scholar]
  218. Longman
    (1998)  An Introduction to Poetry (9th edn, ed. M. Panero . New York: Addison-Wesley-Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  219. Louw, B. and Milojkovic, M
    (2013) ‘Semantic prosody’, in P. Stockwell and S. Whiteley (eds) The Handbook of Stylistics , Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  220. Low, G. , Littlemore, J. and Koester, A
    (2008) ‘Metaphor use in three UK university lectures’, Applied Linguistics 29 (3): 428–55. doi: 10.1093/applin/amn008
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amn008 [Google Scholar]
  221. Lucas, J
    (1988) ‘Places and dwellings: Wordsworth, Clare and the anti-picturesque’, in D. Cosgrove and S. Daniels (eds) The Iconography of Landscape: Essays on the Symbolic Representation, Design and Use of Past Environments , Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 83–97.
    [Google Scholar]
  222. McCallum, E
    (2009) ‘Lost in the Fun Home: Alison Bechdel’s Gothic queers’, in M. Duperray (ed.) Gothic N.E.W.S.: Exploring the Gothic in Relation to New Critical Perspectives and the Geographical Polarities of North, East, West and South . Paris: M. Houdiard.
    [Google Scholar]
  223. McFarland, T
    (1992)  William Wordsworth: Intensity and Achievement . Oxford: Clarendon Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198112532.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198112532.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  224. McGann, J
    (1992)  A Critique of Modern Textual Criticism . Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  225. McHale, B
    (1989)  Postmodernist Fiction . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  226. (1992)  Constructing Postmodernism . London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  227. Mack, M
    (1982)  Collected in Himself: Essays Critical, Biographical, and Bibliographical on Pope and some of his Contemporaries . London: Associated University Presses.
    [Google Scholar]
  228. McLaughlin, R
    (2012) ‘Post-postmodernism’in J. Bray , A. Gibbons and B. McHale (eds) The Routledge Companion to Experimental Literature , London: Routledge, pp. 212–23.
    [Google Scholar]
  229. McLellan, J
    (1984) ‘Did Queen Victoria write Alice in Wonderland?’, The Gazette , Montreal, February11 1984.
    [Google Scholar]
  230. McRae, K. and Boisvert, S
    (1998) ‘Automatic semantic similarity priming’, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 24: 558–72. doi: 10.1037/0278‑7393.24.3.558
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.24.3.558 [Google Scholar]
  231. Maldonado, R
    (2010) ‘Grammatical voice in Cognitive Grammar’, in D. Geeraerts , Herbert Cuyckens and Hubert Cuyckens (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics , Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.829–68.
    [Google Scholar]
  232. Mariani, P.L
    (1970)  A Commentary on the Complete Poems of Gerard Manley Hopkins . Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  233. Marianowicz, A. /[ Carroll, L
    ] (1955) Lewis Carroll. Alicja w Krainie Czarów . Warszawa: nasza Księgarnia.
    [Google Scholar]
  234. Mason, W
    (2004) ‘Don’t like it? You don’t have to play’, London Review of Books 26 (22), pp. 17–19.
    [Google Scholar]
  235. Matlock, T
    (2004a) ‘Fictive motion as cognitive simulation’, Memory & Cognition 32 (8): 1389–400. doi: 10.3758/BF03206329
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206329 [Google Scholar]
  236. (2004b) ‘The conceptual motivation of fictive motion’, in G. Radden and K.U. Panther (eds), Studies in Linguistic Motivation , Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 221–48.
    [Google Scholar]
  237. (2010) ‘Abstract motion is no longer abstract’, Language and Cognition 2 (2): 243–60. doi: 10.1515/langcog.2010.010
    https://doi.org/10.1515/langcog.2010.010 [Google Scholar]
  238. Matsumoto, Y
    (1996) ‘How abstract is subjective motion? A comparison of coverage path expressions and access path expressions’, in A.E. Goldberg (ed.) Conceptual Structure, Discourse and Language , Stanford: CSLI Publications, pp. 359–73.
    [Google Scholar]
  239. Miall, D.S
    (1998) ‘The Alps deferred: Wordsworth at the Simplon Pass’, European Romantic Review 9: 84–102. doi: 10.1080/10509589808570040
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10509589808570040 [Google Scholar]
  240. (2000) ‘Locating Wordsworth: “Tintern Abbey” and the community with nature’, Romanticism on the Net 20. [id.erudit.org/iderudit/005949ar]
    [Google Scholar]
  241. Moeyes, P
    (1997)  Siegfried Sassoon, Scorched Glory: A Critical Study . Macmillan: Basingstoke. doi: 10.1057/9780230374560
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230374560 [Google Scholar]
  242. Müller, K
    (2000) ‘Re-constructions of reality in Margaret Atwood’s literature: a constructionist approach’,in R.M. Nischik (ed.) Margaret Atwood: Works and Impact, Woodbridge: Boydell & Brewer, pp. 229–57.
    [Google Scholar]
  243. Nabholtz, J.R
    (1964) ‘Wordsworth’s guide to the Lakes and the picturesque tradition’, Modern Philology 61: 288–94. doi: 10.1086/389627
    https://doi.org/10.1086/389627 [Google Scholar]
  244. Naifeh, S. and White Smith, G
    (2011)  Van Gogh: The Life . New York: Random House.
    [Google Scholar]
  245. Nesset, T
    (2009) ‘Review of Cognitive Grammar: A Basic Introduction (2008), R. Langacker’, Journal of Linguistics 45 (2): 477–80. doi: 10.1017/S0022226709005799
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226709005799 [Google Scholar]
  246. Nikiforidou, K
    (2012) ‘The constructional underpinnings of viewpoint blends: the Past + now in language and literature’, in B. Dancygier and E. Sweetser (eds), Viewpoint in Language . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 177–97. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139084727.014
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139084727.014 [Google Scholar]
  247. Nischik, R.M
    (1991)  Mentalstilistik: Ein Beitrag zu Stiltheorie und Narrativik, dargestellt am Erzählwerk Margaret Atwoods . Tübingen: Narr Verlag.
    [Google Scholar]
  248. Norton
    (1983)  The Norton Anthology of Poetry (3rd edn, ed. A.W. Allison ). New York: Norton.
    [Google Scholar]
  249. (1999)  The Norton Introduction to Poetry (7th edn, ed. J.P. Hunter ). New York: Norton.
    [Google Scholar]
  250. Noyes, R
    (1968)  Wordsworth and the Art of Landscape . Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  251. Nuyts, J
    (2001)  Epistemic Modality, Language, and Conceptualization: A Cognitive-Pragmatic Perspective . Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/hcp.5
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.5 [Google Scholar]
  252. (2005) ‘Brothers in arms? On the relations between cognitive and functional linguistics’, in F.J. Ruiz de Mendoza and S. Peña (eds) Cognitive Linguistics: Internal Dynamics and Interdisciplinary Interaction . Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp.69–100.
    [Google Scholar]
  253. (2006) ‘Modality: overview and linguistic issues’, in W. Frawley , E. Eschenroeder , S. Mills and T. Nguyen (eds) The Expression of Modality , Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 1–26.
    [Google Scholar]
  254. (2007) ‘Cognitive linguistics and functional linguistics’, in D. Geeraerts and H. Cuyckens (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics . Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  255. Oakley, T. and Tobin, V
    . (in press) ‘Sometimes the whole is less than the sum of its parts: toward a theory of document acts’, Language and Cognition 6.1.
    [Google Scholar]
  256. Oatley, K
    (1994) ‘A taxonomy of the emotions of literary response and a theory of identification in fictional narrative,’ Poetics 23 (1–2): 53–74. doi: 10.1016/0304‑422X(94)P4296‑S
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-422X(94)P4296-S [Google Scholar]
  257. Oberauer, K
    (2006) ‘Reasoning with conditionals: a test of formal models of four theories’, Cognitive Psychology 53: 238–83. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2006.04.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2006.04.001 [Google Scholar]
  258. Ogden, J.T
    (1973)  The Power of Distance in Wordsworth’s Prelude . PMLA88 (2): 246–9. doi: 10.2307/461490
    https://doi.org/10.2307/461490 [Google Scholar]
  259. Ohmann, R
    (1964) ‘Generative grammars and the concept of literary style’, Word 20: 423–39.
    [Google Scholar]
  260. Olney, J
    (1993)  The Language(s) of Poetry: Walt Whitman, Emily Dickinson and Gerard Manley Hopkins . Athens: University of Georgia Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  261. Olson, C
    (1997)  Collected Prose (eds D. Allen and B. Friedlander ). Berkeley: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  262. Ortony, A
    (ed.) (1979)  Metaphor and Thought . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  263. Palmer, F
    (1986)  Mood and Modality . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  264. Parrinder, P
    (ed.) (2012)  H.G. Wells: The Critical Heritage . London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  265. Perkins, M
    (1983)  Modal Expressions in English . London: Francis Pinter.
    [Google Scholar]
  266. Phelan, J
    (1996)  Narrative as Rhetoric: Technique, Audiences, Ethics, Ideology . Ohio: Ohio State University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  267. (2005)  Living to Tell About It: A Rhetoric and Ethics of Character Narration . New York: Cornell University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  268. Phillips, B
    (2005) ‘The negative style of David Foster Wallace’, The Hudson Review 57 (4): 675–82.
    [Google Scholar]
  269. Pinker, S
    (2007)  The Stuff of Thought: Language as a Window into Human Nature . New York: Viking.
    [Google Scholar]
  270. Pragglejaz group
    (2007) ‘A practical and flexible method for identifying metaphorically-used words in discourse.’ Metaphor & Symbol 22: 1–39. doi: 10.1080/10926480709336752
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10926480709336752 [Google Scholar]
  271. Price, U
    (1810)  Essays on the Picturesque, as Compared with the Sublime and the Beautiful [original 1794] London: J. Robson.
    [Google Scholar]
  272. Propp, V
    (1968)  Morphology of the Folktale . Austin: University of Texas Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  273. Quintilian
    (2001)  The Orator’s Education (trans. and ed. D.A. Russell ). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  274. Radden, G. and Dirven, R
    (2007)  Cognitive English Grammar . Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/clip.2
    https://doi.org/10.1075/clip.2 [Google Scholar]
  275. Rehder, R
    (1992) ‘Inside out: omnipotence and the hidden heart in “The Windhover”’, in A. Mortimer (ed.) The Authentic Cadence: Centennial Essays on Gerard Manley Hopkins, Fribourg: University Press of Fribourg, pp. 169–99.
    [Google Scholar]
  276. Rescher, N
    (1968)  Topics in Philosophical Logic . Dordrecht: Reidel. doi: 10.1007/978‑94‑017‑3546‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3546-9 [Google Scholar]
  277. Rhode, H
    (2006) ‘Rhetorical questions as redundant interrogatives’, San Diego Linguistics Papers 2 (1): 134–68.
    [Google Scholar]
  278. Rice, C
    (2012) ‘Fictive motion and perspectival construal in the Lyric’, in I. Jaén and J.J. Simon (eds) Cognitive Literary Studies: Current Themes and New Directions , Austin: University of Texas Press, pp. 183–98.
    [Google Scholar]
  279. Richardson, A
    (2010)  The Neural Sublime: Cognitive Theories and Romantic Texts . Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  280. Rivinoja, A
    (2004) ‘Free Indirect Discourse and third-person pronouns in translation – possible changes in point of view’, in T. Puutrinen and R. Jäskelääinen (eds) Points of View: Papers on Teaching and Research in the English Department, Savonlinna: Savonlinna School of Translation Studies4: 75–85.
    [Google Scholar]
  281. Rodaway, P
    (1994)  Sensuous Geographies: Body, Sense and Space . London: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9780203306864
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203306864 [Google Scholar]
  282. Rojo, A. and Valenzuela, J
    (2003) ‘Fictive motion in English and Spanish’, International Journal of English Studies 3 (2): 123–49.
    [Google Scholar]
  283. Rudanko, J
    (1982) ‘On one NP of “The Windhover”: a phonological approach’, Language and Style 15 (4): 277–82.
    [Google Scholar]
  284. Rumelhart, D.E
    (1975) ‘Notes on a schema for stories’, in D.G. Bobrow and A.M. Collins (eds) Representation and Understanding: Studies on Cognitive Science , New York: Academic Press, pp. 211–36. doi: 10.1016/B978‑0‑12‑108550‑6.50013‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-108550-6.50013-6 [Google Scholar]
  285. Ruoff, G.W
    (1973) ‘Religious implications of Wordsworth’s imagination’, Studies in Romanticism 12 (3): 607–92. doi: 10.2307/25599893
    https://doi.org/10.2307/25599893 [Google Scholar]
  286. Ryan, M-L
    (1991)  Possible Worlds, Artificial Intelligence and Narrative Theory . Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  287. Salvesen, C
    (1965)  The Landscape of Memory: A Study of Wordsworth’s Poetry . Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  288. Sartre, J.-P
    (1984)  Being and Nothingness (trans. H.E. Barnes ). New York: Washington Square Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  289. Sassoon, S
    (1946)  Siegfried’s Journey 1916–1920 . London: Faber and Faber.
    [Google Scholar]
  290. (1983)  Siegfried Sassoon Diaries 1915–1918 (ed. Rupert Hart-Davis ). London: Faber and Faber.
    [Google Scholar]
  291. (1984)  Collected Poems 1908–1956 . London: Faber and Faber.
    [Google Scholar]
  292. (2000)  Memoirs of an Infantry Officer . London: Faber and Faber.
    [Google Scholar]
  293. Scheffer, L
    (2012) ‘Bedroom in Arles’, Quill & Parchment 127 (January 2012) Online atwww.quillandparchment.com/archives/vol127.html
    [Google Scholar]
  294. Schiffrin, D
    (1992) ‘Conditionals as topics in discourse’, Linguistics 30: 165–97. doi: 10.1515/ling.1992.30.1.165
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1992.30.1.165 [Google Scholar]
  295. Schneider, C.W
    (2010) ‘Young daughter, old artificer: constructing the Gothic Fun Home’, Studies in Comics 1: 337–58. doi: 10.1386/stic.1.2.337_1
    https://doi.org/10.1386/stic.1.2.337_1 [Google Scholar]
  296. Schubert, T.W
    (2005) ‘Your highness: vertical positions as perceptual symbols of power’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 89: 1–21. doi: 10.1037/0022‑3514.89.1.1
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.89.1.1 [Google Scholar]
  297. Scott, C.T
    (1974) ‘Towards a formal poetics: metrical patterning in “The Windhover”’, Language and Style 7: 91–107.
    [Google Scholar]
  298. Scott, N
    (2012) ‘Bedroom in Arles’, Quill & Parchment 127 (January 2012). Online atwww.quillandparchment.com/archives/vol127.html
    [Google Scholar]
  299. Semino, E
    (2008) ‘A cognitive stylistic approach to mind style in narrative fiction’in R. Carter and P. Stockwell (eds) The Language and Literature Reader , London: Routledge, pp. 268–77.
    [Google Scholar]
  300. (2009) ‘Text worlds’in G. Brône and J. Vandaele (eds) Cognitive Poetics: Goals, Gains and Gaps , Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 33–71.
    [Google Scholar]
  301. Short, M
    (1996)  Exploring the Language of Poems, Plays and Prose . Harlow: Pearson Education.
    [Google Scholar]
  302. Sienkiewicz, B
    (1992)  Literackie ‘teorie widzenia’ . Poznań: Obserwator.
    [Google Scholar]
  303. Silkin, J
    (ed.) (1979)  The Penguin Book of First World War Poetry . Harmondsworth: Penguin.
    [Google Scholar]
  304. Simpson, P
    (1993)  Language, Ideology and Point of View . London: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9780203312612
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203312612 [Google Scholar]
  305. Słomczyński, M. /[ Carroll, L
    ] (1972) Lewis Carroll Przygody Alicji w Krainie Czarów . Warszawa: Czytelnik.
    [Google Scholar]
  306. Smith, B
    (2012) ‘How to do things with documents’, Rivisti di Estetica 50: 179–98.
    [Google Scholar]
  307. (2014) ‘Document acts’, in A. Konzelmann-Ziv and H.B Schmid (eds) Institutions, Emotions, and Group Agents. Contributions to Social Ontology . Heidelberg: Springer.
    [Google Scholar]
  308. Spector, S.J
    (1977) ‘Wordsworth’s mirror imagery and the picturesque tradition’, ELH44 (1): 85–107. doi: 10.2307/2872528
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2872528 [Google Scholar]
  309. Spiers, M.B
    (2010) ‘Daddy’s little girl: multigenerational queer relationships in Bechdel’s Fun Home’ , Studies in Comics 1: 315–35. doi: 10.1386/stic.1.2.315_1
    https://doi.org/10.1386/stic.1.2.315_1 [Google Scholar]
  310. Spooner, C
    (2006)  Contemporary Gothic . London: Reaktion Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  311. Staels, H
    (1995)  Margaret Atwood’s Novels: A Study of Narrative Discourse . Tübingen: Francke.
    [Google Scholar]
  312. Staes, T
    (2010) ‘“Only artists can transfigure”: Kafka’s artists and the possibility of redemption in the novellas of David Foster Wallace’, Language and Literature 65 (6): 459–80.
    [Google Scholar]
  313. Steen, F. and Turner, M
    (2013) ‘Multimodal Construction Grammar’, in M. Borkent , B. Dancygier , and J. Hinnell (eds) Language and the Creative Mind . Stanford: CSLI Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  314. Steen, G
    (1999) ‘From linguistic to conceptual metaphor in five steps’, in R. Gibbs and G. Steen (eds) Metaphor in Cognitive Linguistics: Selected Papers from the Fifth International Cognitive Linguistics Conference, Amsterdam , July 1997, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 197–226. doi: 10.1075/cilt.175
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.175 [Google Scholar]
  315. (2004) ‘Can discourse properties of metaphor effect metaphor recognition?’ Journal of Pragmatics 36: 1295–1313. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2003.10.014
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2003.10.014 [Google Scholar]
  316. (2008) ‘The paradox of metaphor: why we need a three-dimensional model of metaphor’, Metaphor and Symbol 23 (4): 213–41. doi: 10.1080/10926480802426753
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10926480802426753 [Google Scholar]
  317. (2009) ‘From linguistic form to conceptual structure in five easy steps: analyzing metaphor in poetry’, in F. Brône and J. Vandaele (eds) Cognitive Poetics, Goals, Gains and Gaps , Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 197–226.
    [Google Scholar]
  318. (2011a) ‘From three dimensions to five steps: the value of deliberate metaphor’, Metaphorik.de 21: 83–110.
    [Google Scholar]
  319. (2011b) ‘The Contemporary Theory of Metaphor – now new and improved!’ The Review of Cognitive Linguistics 9 (1): 26–64. doi: 10.1075/rcl.9.1.03ste
    https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.9.1.03ste [Google Scholar]
  320. (2011c) ‘What does “really deliberate” really mean? More thoughts on metaphor and consciousness’, Metaphor and the Social World 1 (1): 53–6. doi: 10.1075/msw.1.1.04ste
    https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.1.1.04ste [Google Scholar]
  321. Steen, G. , Dorst, A. , Hermann, B. , Kaal, A , and Krenmayr, T
    (2011) ‘Metaphor in usage’, Cognitive Linguistics 21 (4): 765–96.
    [Google Scholar]
  322. Sternberg, R. and Sternberg, K
    (2011)  Cognitive Psychology (6th edition). New York: Wadsworth.
    [Google Scholar]
  323. Stewart, D
    (2010)  Semantic Prosody: A Critical Evaluation . London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  324. Stiller, R. /[ Carroll, L
    ] (1990) Lewis Carroll Przygody Alicji w Krainie Czarów . Warszawa: Lettrex.
    [Google Scholar]
  325. Stockwell, P
    (2002a)  Cognitive Poetics: An Introduction . London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  326. (2002b) ‘Miltonic texture and the feeling of reading’, in J. Culpeper and E. Semino (eds) Cognitive Stylistics: Language and Cognition in Text Analysis , Amsterdam: Benjamins, pp.73–94. doi: 10.1075/lal.1.06sto
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lal.1.06sto [Google Scholar]
  327. (2003) ‘Surreal figures’, in J. Gavins and G. Steen (eds) Cognitive Poetics In Practice, London: Routledge, pp. 13–25.
    [Google Scholar]
  328. (2005) ‘Texture and identification’, European Journal of English Studies 9 (2): 143–53. doi: 10.1080/13825570500171937
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13825570500171937 [Google Scholar]
  329. (2009a)  Texture: A Cognitive Aesthetics of Reading . Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  330. (2009b) ‘The cognitive poetics of literary resonance’, Language and Cognition 1 (1): 25–44. doi: 10.1515/LANGCOG.2009.002
    https://doi.org/10.1515/LANGCOG.2009.002 [Google Scholar]
  331. (2010) ‘The eleventh checksheet of the apocalypse’, in B. Busse and D. McIntyre (eds) Language and Style , London: Palgrave, pp. 419–32.
    [Google Scholar]
  332. (2013) ‘Atmosphere and tone’, in P. Stockwell and S. Whiteley (eds) The Handbook of Stylistics , Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  333. Strickson, A
    (2004) ‘Vincent and I discuss “Bedroom at Arles” (Version 3)’, Staple 59 (Spring 2004) Online atwww.poetrymagazines.org.uk/magazine/record.asp?id=13669
    [Google Scholar]
  334. Suvin, D
    (1979)  Metamorphoses of Science Fiction: On the Poetics and History of a Literary Genre . New Haven: Yale University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  335. Swan, M
    (2005)  Practical English Usage (3rd edn). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  336. Szentmártoni Szabó, G
    (2004) ‘Balassi Bálint poézisáról’, in Balassi Bálint és kora , Budapest: Balassi Kiadó, pp. 43–64.
    [Google Scholar]
  337. Tabakowska, E
    (1993)  Cognitive Linguistics and Poetics of Translation . Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag.
    [Google Scholar]
  338. (2007) ‘Point of view in translation’, in R. Jääskeläinen , T. Puurtinen and H. Stostesbury (eds) Text, Processes and Corpora: Research Inspired by Sonja Tirkkonen--Condit, Savonlinna: Savonlinna School of Translation Studies5: 69–81.
    [Google Scholar]
  339. Tabakowska, E. /[ Carroll, L
    ] (2012)  Alicja w Krainie czarów . Kraków: Bona.
    [Google Scholar]
  340. Talmy, L
    (1988) ‘Force dynamics in language and cognition’, Cognitive Science 12: 49–100. doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog1201_2
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1201_2 [Google Scholar]
  341. (2000)  Toward a Cognitive Semantics,Vol. 1: Concept Structuring Systems. Cambridge: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  342. (2007) ‘Attention phenomena’, in D. Geeraerts and H. Cuyckens (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics , Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 264–93.
    [Google Scholar]
  343. (2008) ‘Aspects of attention in language’in P. Robinson (ed.) Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics , London: Routledge, pp. 27–38.
    [Google Scholar]
  344. Tanselle, G.T
    (1989)  A Rationale of Textual Criticism . Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  345. Taylor, J.R
    (2002)  Cognitive Grammar . Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  346. Thomas, D
    (2000)  Collected Poems 1934–1953 (eds W. Davies and R. Maud ). London: Phoenix.
    [Google Scholar]
  347. Thomas, W.K. and Ober, W.U
    (1989)  A Mind Forever Voyaging: Wordsworth at Work Portraying Newton and Science . Edmonton: University of Alberta Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  348. Thompson, V. , Evans, J.St.B.T. , and Handley, S
    (2005) ‘Persuading and dissuading by conditional argument’, Journal of Memory and Language 53: 238–57. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2005.03.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2005.03.001 [Google Scholar]
  349. Tobin, V. and Oakley, T
    . (in preparation) ‘Shrinking poems and truncated authors: identity compressions and the ontology of the “Work”. Unpublished manuscript.
    [Google Scholar]
  350. Todorov, T
    (1975)  The Fantastic: A Structural Approach to a Literary Genre (trans. R. Howard ). Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  351. Todorov, T. , Ducrot, O. and Porter, C
    (1983)  Encyclopedic Dictionary of the Sciences of Language [original 1979]. Baltomore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  352. Todorov, T
    (1977)  The Poetics of Prose . Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  353. Traugott, E.C
    (1978) ‘On the expression of spatio-temporal relations in language’, in J.H. Greenberg (ed.) Universals of Human Language , vol. 3: Word Structure , Stanford: Stanford University Press, pp. 369–400.
    [Google Scholar]
  354. (1985) ‘Conditional markers’, in J. Haiman (ed.) Iconicity in Syntax , Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 289–307. doi: 10.1075/tsl.6.14clo
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.6.14clo [Google Scholar]
  355. Traugott, E.C. and Pratt, M.L
    (1980)  Linguistics for Students of Literature . New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
    [Google Scholar]
  356. Tsur, R
    (2003)  On the Shore of Nothingness: A Study in Cognitive Poetics . Exeter: Imprint Academic.
    [Google Scholar]
  357. (2010) ‘Linguistic devices and ecstatic poetry: “The Windhover” – tongue-twisters and cognitive processes’, Journal of Literary Theory 4 (1): 121–39. doi: 10.1515/jlt.2010.008
    https://doi.org/10.1515/jlt.2010.008 [Google Scholar]
  358. Turner, M
    (2006)  The Artful Mind: Cognitive Science and the Riddle of Human Creativity . Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  359. Tyler, A. and Evans, V
    (2003)  The Semantics of English Prepositions: Spatial Scenes, Embodied Meaning and Cognition . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511486517
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486517 [Google Scholar]
  360. Ungerer, F. and Schmid, H.J
    (2006)  An Introduction to Cognitive Linguistics . Harlow: Pearson/Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  361. van Canegem-Ardijns, I. and van Belle, W
    (2008) ‘Conditionals and types of conditional perfection’, Journal of Pragmatics 40: 349–76. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2006.11.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2006.11.007 [Google Scholar]
  362. van Hoek, K
    (2003) ‘Pronouns and point of view: cognitive principles of co-reference’in M. Tomasello (ed.) The New Psychology of Language: Cognitive and Functional Approaches to Language Structure Volume2, Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 169–94.
    [Google Scholar]
  363. van Peer, W
    (ed.) (1986) ‘The theory of foregrounding: the state of the art’, Stylistics and Psychology: Investigations of Foregrounding , London: Croom Helm, pp. 1–25.
    [Google Scholar]
  364. van Peer. W. , Hakemulder, J. and Zyngier, S
    (2007) ‘Lines on feeling: foregrounding, aesthetics and meaning’, Language and Literature 16 (2): 197–293. doi: 10.1177/0963947007075985
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0963947007075985 [Google Scholar]
  365. Verhagen, A
    (2005)  Constructions of Intersubjectivity: Discourse, Syntax, and Cognition . Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  366. (2007) ‘Construal and perspectivization’in D. Geeraerts and H. Cuyckens (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics , Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 48–81.
    [Google Scholar]
  367. Verspoor, M
    (1996) ‘The story of -ing: a subjective perspective’in M. Putz and R. Dirven (eds) The Construal of Space in Language and Thought , Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, pp. 417–54. doi: 10.1515/9783110821611.417
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110821611.417 [Google Scholar]
  368. Wallace, D
    (1989)  Girl with Curious Hair . New York: Norton.
    [Google Scholar]
  369. (1997)  A Supposedly Fun Thing I’ll Never Do Again . Boston: Little, Brown.
    [Google Scholar]
  370. Wallace, D.F
    (2004) ‘The Soul Is Not a Smithy’in Oblivion , London: Little, Brown, pp. 67–113.
    [Google Scholar]
  371. Wallhead
    (2003) ‘Metaphors for the self in A.S. Byatt’s The Biographer’s Tale’, Language and Literature 12 (4): 291–308. doi: 10.1177/09639470030124001
    https://doi.org/10.1177/09639470030124001 [Google Scholar]
  372. Watson, J.R
    (1970)  Picturesque Landscape and English Romantic Poetry . London: Hutchinson.
    [Google Scholar]
  373. Weber, J.J
    (ed.) (1996)  The Stylistics Reader . London: Arnold.
    [Google Scholar]
  374. Wells, H.G
    (1898)  The War of the Worlds . London: William Heinemann.
    [Google Scholar]
  375. Welch, M.D
    (2012) ‘Bedroom in Arles’, Quill & Parchment 127 (January 2012) Online atwww.quillandparchment.com/archives/vol127.html
    [Google Scholar]
  376. Werth, P
    (1999)  Text Worlds: Representing Conceptual Space in Discourse . London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  377. Whiteford, P
    (2001) ‘A note on Hopkins’ plough in “The Windhover”’, Victorian Poetry 39 (4): 617–20. doi: 10.1353/vp.2001.0045
    https://doi.org/10.1353/vp.2001.0045 [Google Scholar]
  378. Whiteley, S
    (2010)  Text World Theory and the Emotional Experience of Literary Discourse (Unpublished doctoral thesis). University of Sheffield.
    [Google Scholar]
  379. Wilson, S.R
    (1993)  Margaret Atwood’s Fairy-Tale Sexual Politics . Jackson: University Press of Mississippi.
    [Google Scholar]
  380. Wisker, G
    (2010)  Reader’s Guides: Atwood’s The Handmaid’s Tale . London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  381. Wójcik-Leese, E
    (2000) ‘Salient ordering of free verse and its translation’, Language and Literature 9 (2): 170–81. doi: 10.1177/096394700000900205
    https://doi.org/10.1177/096394700000900205 [Google Scholar]
  382. Wölfflin, H
    (1950)  Principles of Art History: The Problem of the Development of Style in Later Art . New York: Dover Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  383. Wordsworth, W
    (1837)  The Poetic Works of William Wordsworth . London: Edward Moxon.
    [Google Scholar]
  384. (2004)  Guide to the Lakes (ed. E.D. Selincourt ). Berkeley: Publishers Group West.
    [Google Scholar]
  385. Zaicz, G
    (ed.) (2006)  Etimológiai szótár: Magyar szavakés toldalékok eredete [Etymological dictionary: The origin of Hungarian word-extensions]. Budapest: Tinta Könyvkiadó.
    [Google Scholar]
  386. Zanolie, K. , van Dantzig, S. , Boot, I. , Wijnen, J. , Schubert, T.W. , Giessner, S.R. , and Pecher, D
    (2012) ‘Mighty metaphors: behavioral and ERP evidence that power shifts attention on a vertical dimension’, Brain and Cognition 78: 50–8. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2011.10.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2011.10.006 [Google Scholar]
  387. Zunshine, L
    (2006)  Why We Read Fiction: Theory of Mind and the Novel . Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  388. (ed.) (2010)  Introduction to Cognitive Cultural Studies . Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
-contentType:Journal -contentType:Chapter
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error