1887

Substrata versus Universals in Creole Genesis

Papers from the Amsterdam Creole Workshop, April 1985

image of Substrata versus Universals in Creole Genesis
GBP
Buy:£101.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Two of the most prominent hypotheses about why the structures of the Creole languages of the Atlantic and the Pacific differ are the universalist and he substrate hypotheses. The universalist hypothesis claims, essentially, that the particular grammatical properties of Creole languages directly reflect universal aspects of the human language capacity, and thus Creole genesis involves, then, the stripping away of the accretions of language history. The substrate hypothesis claims, on the other hand, that creole genesis results from the confrontation of two systems, the native languages of the colonized groups, and the dominant colonial language, and that the native language leaves strong traces in the resulting Creole. The contributions of this ground breaking collection present new and historical research on the old debate of substrata versus universals in Creole languages.

Subjects: Contact Linguistics; Creole studies; Theoretical linguistics

References

References

http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/books/9789027279415
Loading
/content/books/9789027279415
dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
10
5
Chapter
content/books/9789027279415
Book
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error