Browse Books

Francisco Suárez (1548–1617) sieht es als Problem an dass nach dem traditionellen Modell der Kunstproduktion der Gedanke immer nur als Vorkonzeption und damit auf sehr vermittelte Weise in das Kunstwerk eingeht. Entsprechend wäre auch die Analyse von geistigen Hervorbringungen immer ein Prozess bei dem die Gedanken als etwas hinter dem Gesagten Liegendes rekonstruiert werden müssten. Suárez verwirft dieses auf Nachahmung beruhende Modell und verwendet die Unterscheidung zwischen dem Denkakt – verstanden als "Blick des Geistes" – und dem gedachten Inhalt um ein ganz neues Modell zu entwickeln. Für ihn ist es die Aufmerksamkeit des Malers die den Pinsel führt und die so dafür sorgt dass eine anfangs noch leere formale Repräsentation sich anfüllt. <br xmlns="http://pub2web.metastore.ingenta.com/ns/"/>Während die Innovation von Suárez zunächst keinen Widerhall findet könnte sie ein Fundament sein für viel spätere Weisen die Kunst aufzufassen z. B. für die formalistische Schule der Kunstgeschichte oder für einen Künstler wie Paul Klee der sagt: "Kunst gibt nicht das Sichtbare wieder sondern macht sichtbar." <br/> Francisco Suárez (1548–1617) considers it to be problematic that according to the traditional model of art production thought only enters a piece of art obliquely as preconception. Consequently any analysis of mental creations would have to be a process whereby thoughts are reconstructed as something that lies behind that which is being said. Suárez rejects this imitation-based model and uses the distinction between act of thought – considered as "focus of the mind" – and the cognized content to develop a completely new model. For him it is the artist's attention which guides the brush and which thus causes the initially empty representation to be filled.<br/>While Suárez's innovation hardly received any immediate reaction it can be considered as a foundation for later approaches to art e.g. for the formalistic school of art history or for an artist like Paul Klee who says: "Art does not reproduce what is visible but rather produces visibility".

This book connects two linguistic phenomena modality and subordinators so that both are seen in a new light each adding to the understanding of the other. It argues that general subordinators (or complementizers) denote propositional modality (otherwise expressed by moods such as the indicative-subjunctive and epistemic-evidential modal markers). The book explores the hypothesis both on a cross-linguistic and on a language-branch specific level (the Germanic languages). One obvious connection between the indicative-subjunctive distinction and subordinators is that the former is typically manifested in subordinate clauses. Furthermore both the indicative-subjunctive and subordinators determine clause types. More importantly however it is shown through data from various languages that subordinators themselves often denote the indicative-subjunctive distinction. In the Germanic languages there is variation in many clause types between both the indicative and the subjunctive and that and if depending on the speaker’s and/or the subject’s certainty of the truth of the proposition.

Beyond Narrative Coherence reconsiders the way we understand and work with narratives. Even though narrators tend to strive for coherence they also add complexity challenge canonical scripts and survey lives by telling highly perplexing and contradictory stories. Many narratives remain incomplete ambiguous and contradictory. Obvious coherence cannot be the sole moral standard the only perspective of reading or the criterion for selecting and discarding research material. Beyond Narrative Coherence addresses the limits and aspects of narrative (dis)cohering by offering a rich theoretical and historical background to the debate. Limits of narrative coherence are discussed from the perspective of three fields of life that often threaten the coherence of narrative: illness arts and traumatic political experience. The authors of the book cover a wide range of disciplines such as psychology sociology arts studies political science and philosophy.

The central concern in this book is the relationship between language and group identity a relationship that is thrown into greatest relief in ‘minority’ settings. Since much of the current interest in minority languages revolves around issues of identity politics language rights and the plight of ‘endangered’ languages one aim of the book is to summarise and analyse these and other pivotal themes. Furthermore since the uniqueness of every language-contact situation does not rest upon unique elements or features – but rather upon the particular weightings and combinations of features that recur across settings – the second aim here is to provide a general descriptive framework within which a wide range of contact settings may be more easily understood. The book thus begins with a discussion of such matters as language decline maintenance and revival the dynamics of minority languages and the ecology of language. It then offers a typological framework that draws and expands upon previous categorising efforts. Finally the book presents four case studies that are both intrinsically interesting and – more importantly – provide specific illustrations of the generalities discussed earlier.

It has been eight years since An Introduction to the Grammar of English was first published. The second edition is completely revised and greatly expanded especially where texts example sentences exercises and cartoons are concerned. It continues to provide a very lively and clearly written textbook. The book introduces basic concepts of grammar in a format which inspires the reader to use linguistic arguments. The style of the book is engaging and examples from poetry jokes and puns illustrate grammatical concepts. The focus is on syntactic analysis and evidence. However special topic sections contribute sociolinguistic and historical reasons behind prescriptive rules such as the bans on split infinitives dangling participles and preposition stranding. The book is written for undergraduate students and structured for a semester-long course. It provides exercises keys to those exercises and sample exams. It also includes a comprehensive glossary. A basic website will be kept up at http://www.public.asu.edu/~gelderen/grammar.htm.